Research Article |
Corresponding author: Josh Jenkins Shaw ( joshjenkins@btinternet.com ) Academic editor: Jan Klimaszewski
© 2020 Josh Jenkins Shaw, Igor Orlov, Alexey Solodovnikov.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Jenkins Shaw J, Orlov I, Solodovnikov A (2020) A new genus and species of Staphylininae rove beetle from the Peruvian Amazon (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). ZooKeys 904: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.904.48592
|
A new monotypic genus of Staphylininae Latreille, 1802 tribe incertae sedis is proposed based on Amazonothops aslaki gen. et sp. nov. from the Peruvian Amazon. Descriptions and illustrations of the new genus and species are provided. Its systematic placement and phylogenetic significance are discussed.
Hyptiomini, Neotropical Region, Peru, South America, Tanygnathinini, taxonomy
During a field trip to the Amazonian region of Peru, members of the Natural History Museum of Denmark Coleoptera section collected several conspecific specimens of a small rove beetle which strongly resembled the widespread, polyphyletic genus Heterothops Stephens, 1829 from the tribe Amblyopinini (
Specimens studied are deposited in the following institutions:
One specimen was prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) by initial immersion in soapy water, followed by 1 hour in 10% KOH, resting overnight in 70% alcohol, then successive immersion in 96% alcohol for 15 minutes, in 99.9% alcohol for 15 minutes and in acetone for 15 minutes. SEM photographs were taken using a JEOL JSM-6335F SEM at the
The following measurements were taken (all in mm):
HW Head width, at widest point
PL Pronotum length, at middle
PW Pronotum width, at widest point
FB Forebody length, from anterior edge of frons to posterior end of elytral suture
EW Elytral width, at widest point
TL Total length, from anterior edge of frons to apex of abdominal segment IX
Tribe incertae sedis
Amazonothops aslaki gen. et sp. nov.
From all other genera of Staphylininae the new genus can be recognized based on the following characters: antennomere 2 1.6× wider than antennomere 3; antennomere 11 3× longer than antennomere 10; penultimate segment of maxillary palpi large, covered in short setae, approximately 2× the length of apical segment; apical segment of maxillary and labial palpi aciculate. Head with ‘infraorbital ridges’ straight, extended to base of mandibles; postgenal ridge absent; frontoclypeal suture present; mesoventrite with transverse ridge present (incomplete medially); mesotrochanter and first mesotarsomere of males with black combs; tarsal formula 5-5-5; empodial setae long and parallel-sided; apical edge of sternites III to VI with randomly distributed acute projections; tergites VII and VIII with broader, foliose setae in addition to the usual acuminate, simple setae; apparent fusion of tergite X to lateral tergal sclerites in males.
The differential diagnosis is based on the recovered phylogenetic position of Amazonothops and its strong resemblance to the Amblyopinini genus Heterothops. Amazonothops differs from Atanygnathus Jacobson, 1909 (Tanygnathinini) in the number of tarsal segments (5-4-4 in Atanygnathus); short genae and normal shape of the apical labial and maxillary palpomere (extremely elongate and distinctly converging to apex in Atanygnathus); absence of dorsal setae on the apical tarsomere (present in Atanygnathus). It should be noted that some species of Atanygnathus have combs on the profemora (Adam Brunke, personal communication). Amazonothops differs from species of Holisus Erichson, 1839 (Hyptiomini) in the pronotal hypomeron strongly inflexed, not visible in lateral view and without longitudinal middle carina (visible in lateral view and with middle carina in Holisus), presence of empodial setae (absent in Holisus) and general appearance and habitus (Holisus is distinctly dorso-ventrally flattened with coarse punctation). Amazonothops differs from the genus Natalignathus Solodovnikov, 2005, a hitherto unrecognized possible member of the same clade (see Discussion below) in the smaller body, short genae and much lesser elongate mouthparts, absence of dorsal setae on the apical tarsomere (present in Natalignathus) and presence of the combs. Amazonothops differs from Heterothops and other genera of Amblyopinini in presence of the frontoclypeal suture; antennomere 3 distinctly smaller than antennomeres 2 and 4; mesosternum with transverse ridge present (incomplete medially); apical edge of sternites III to VI with randomly distributed acute projections; tergites VII and VIII with broader, foliose setae in addition to the usual acuminate, simple setae; and apparent fusion of tergite X to lateral sclerites in males.
Habitus as in Fig.
Head.
Dorsal surface with weak transverse microsculpture. Neck indistinct; nuchal ridge absent dorsally, present laterally, extended as ‘infraorbital ridge’ towards base of mandibles. Frontoclypeal suture present. Frontoclypeal puncture present (
Prothorax. Pronotum widest in posterior third. Dorsal surface with weak transverse microsculpture and two pairs of punctures in dorsal series (one puncture near posterior margin and one distad of that); hypomeron strongly inflexed (not visible in lateral view). Basisternum with weak longitudinal ridge in posterior half, without punctures or setae. Post-coxal process absent.
Scutellum with anterior transverse ridge only, impunctate, glabrous. Elytra widest posteriorly. Hind wings fully developed, posterior edge with fringe of setae; veins CuA and MP4 fused; vein MP3 present. Mesoventrite (Fig.
Abdomen.
Protergal glands elongate, fringed by setae (Fig.
Legs.
Tarsal formula 5-5-5. Both sexes with protarsomeres 1 to 4 transverse. All tarsal empodia with long, parallel-sided setae (Fig.
Male.
Protarsomeres 1 to 4 with white adhesive setae ventrally. First mesotarsomere with black comb comprising 11–14 articles (Fig.
Female. Protarsomeres 1 to 4 only with usual setae ventrally, white adhesive setae absent. No combs.
Morphology of Amazonothops aslaki gen. et sp. nov. A tergite VII B tergite VII C abdominal apex (tergites VII and VIII) D empodium of mesotarsi E empodium of metatarsi F mesotarsi (male) G mesotrochanter (male) H mesoleg (male). ES, Empodial setae; FS, Foliose setae; MS, Mesotarsomere; MSTr, Mesotrochanter; SS, Simple setae.
Based on the specimens studied here, the new genus is restricted to the lowland areas of the Amazonian basin of Peru.
Based on the available label data, the genus occurs in forested areas (100–420 m elevation) and has so far only been collected by flight intercept traps.
The genus name is a combination of ‘Amazon’ and the genus name Heterothops, which the new genus strongly resembles superficially.
The new genus is certainly morphologically distinct among other members of the subfamily Staphylininae and family Staphylinidae. Noteworthy is the secondary sexual dimorphism exhibited by Amazonothops. In males, the mesotrochanter and first mesotarsomere have distinct black combs which are completely lacking in females (Fig.
Holotype.
Male ‘PERU: Amazonia, Loreto region, Requena Province, 3km E of Jenaro Herrera, 100–200 m, 4°53.914'S, 73°38.689'W, 24–28.VIII.2017, rainforest, FIT close to logs, A. Hansen, D. Zyla, M. Chani-Posse PER17-11i’ (
In addition to characters in the genus description, the species is characterized by the following primary and secondary male sexual characters. Sternite VIII without apical incision. Tergite X apparently fused to internal face of lateral sclerites (Fig.
Based on the specimens studied here, the new genus is restricted to the lowland areas of the Amazonian basin of Peru (Fig.
Same as above.
The species is named in honour of Aslak Kappel Hansen (
It is notable that a species of Heterothops (Amblyopinini) was obtained during the same collecting event as one of the Amazonothops specimens. This shows that these two similar looking, yet phylogenetically distant (Fig.
The molecular phylogeny of
With the recently updated classification of the subfamily Staphylininae (
We are much obliged to all collectors of the new genus and to Zack Falin for the loan of the