Short Communication
Print
Short Communication
Fish rubbings, ‘gyotaku’, as a source of historical biodiversity data
expand article infoYusuke Miyazaki, Atsunobu Murase§§
‡ Shiraume Gakuen College, Tokyo, Japan
§ University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
Open Access

Abstract

Methods for obtaining historical biodiversity information are mostly limited to examining museum specimens or surveying past literature. Such materials are sometimes time limited due to degradation, discarding, or other loss. The Japanese cultural art of ‘gyotaku’, which means “fish impression” or “fish rubbing” in English, captures accurate images of fish specimens, and has been used by recreational fishermen and artists since the Edo Period (the oldest known ‘gyotaku’ was made in 1839). ‘Gyotaku’ images often include distributional information, i.e., locality and sampling date. To determine the extent and usefulness of these data, field and questionnaire surveys targeting leisure fishing and boating stores were conducted in the following regions where threatened or extinct fishing targets exist (four regions including the northernmost to the southernmost regions). As a result, 261 ‘gyotaku’ rubbings were digitally copied with their owners’ consents. From these, distributional data were extracted for 218 individuals, which roughly represented regional fish faunas and common fishing targets. The peak number of ‘gyotaku’ stocked at the surveyed shops was made in 2002, while ones made before 1985 were much fewer. The number of ‘gyotaku’ rubbings made in recent years shows a recovery trend after 2011–2012. The present study demonstrates the validity of examining ‘gyotaku’ for historical biodiversity information.

Keywords

biogeography, citizen science, data mining, fish rubbing, red list

Introduction

Access to historical biodiversity information is limited, being mainly obtained via museum specimens, past literature, movies, photographs/images and/or other historical materials such as classic monographs (e.g., Hayashi 2014; Rocha et al. 2014; Schilthuizen et al. 2015). These potential data sources, in particular historical materials, are sometimes lost by deliberate or accidental disposal or, for example, by fire or an estate liquidation where materials are scattered far from their origin. There are other similar examples where biodiversity information can be lost over time: seeds in seed banks can die within decades of their collection (e.g., Telewski and Zeevaart 2002; Nishihiro et al. 2016), and environmental DNA cannot be detected several hours or days after sampling (e.g., Thomsen et al. 2012; Bohmann et al. 2014). Thus, it is important for historical biodiversity information to be accessed and recorded as a matter of urgency. Copying or extracting information from privately owned materials is of highest priority.

Biodiversity observations have been made not only by researchers but also by citizens, even prior to the recent rise of citizen science projects (Miller-Rushing et al. 2012; Kobori et al. 2016). Although data mining from citizens’ observation records is a legitimate method of citizen science (Fink and Hochachka 2012), limitations on data availability have not been well documented except for online data (e.g., Miyazaki et al. 2015).

In Japan, many recreational fishers have recorded their memorable catches as ‘gyotaku’ (魚拓), which means fish impression or fish rubbing in English (Fig. 1), since the last Edo Period (the current oldest known ‘gyotaku’ dates back to late February 1839) (Hiyama 1964a, b; Shimizu 1975; Nakajima 2005). ‘Gyotaku’ is made directly from fish specimen(s), and usually includes information such as sampling date and locality, the name(s) of the fisher(s), its witness(es), the fish species (frequently its local name), and fishing tackle used. In recent decades, color versions of ‘gyotaku’ have become well developed, and used for art and educational purposes (Hiyama 1964a, b; Shimizu 1972, 1975; Yamamoto 1998; Stokes 2001; Baggett and Shaw 2008). In contrast, the traditional method is printed by using black writing ink. Generally, color prints for art rarely include specimen data including sampling locality and date (e.g., Hiyama 1964a, b; Shimizu 1975; Yamamoto 1998).

Figure 1. 

An explanation of fish rubbing (‘gyotaku’, in Japanese). A 1st step – the fish specimen is painted using ink B 2nd step – the specimen is covered with a sheet of paper C the finished image of the fish specimen on the paper. This is known as the direct method of ‘gyotaku’; there is also an indirect method whereby a sheet of paper is placed on the fish specimen, then the sheet is painted by hand using ink. See also Hiyama (1964a, b) and Shimizu (1972, 1975).

We hypothesized that historical biodiversity data attached to ‘gyotaku’ prints are at risk of being lost, and that the number of ‘gyotaku’ prints is generally declining, being replaced with photographs from digital cameras and/or smart phones. The number of fishing-related shops that are personally managed (rather than the large chain stores) and therefore likely to stock original ‘gyotaku’ prints may be decreasing in recent years due to their owners retiring, an increase in chain store numbers, and/or a decrease in recreational fishers (Miyazaki in press).

In the present study, we attempt to validate these hypotheses by collecting data of ‘gyotaku’ from recreational fishing shops where threatened fish species are distributed according to both the national and regional Red Lists. The potential use of ‘gyotaku’ for historical biodiversity information (Miyazaki and Fukui 2018; Miyazaki in press) is discussed.

Materials and methods

First, preliminary field surveys were conducted at three fishing shops in Miyazaki Prefecture, and one recreational boating shop in Chiba Prefecture where we found ‘gyotaku’ of threatened species were stocked via a reference (Onoue 2004) and by chance during in August 2016 (Miyazaki Pref.), and in March 2017 (Chiba Pref.). Second, we also conducted preliminary surveys of recreational fishing shops at the northernmost and southernmost regions of Japan in order to understand the ‘gyotaku’ information available at the latitudinal limits of Japan (from the subarctic to the tropics). Referencing the Town Page (yellow pages by the Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation) of the Souya (northernmost) and the Yaeyama (southernmost) regions, we identified relevant shops (six for Souya in November 2017, and ten for Yaeyama in May 2017). In these surveys, we asked for information on the presence/absence of ‘gyotaku’ and the possibility of photographing them, and other relevant data. Where possible, we photographed ‘gyotaku’ stocks, and sought permission to use the images for research.

Our questionnaires mainly surveyed three regions of Japan where threatened fish species are distributed according to the national Red List (Ministry of the Environment, Japan 2017): the Sakhalin taimen, Hucho perryi (Brevoort, 1856) for Hokkaido (234 shops and stores); the small-scale sillago, Sillago parvisquamis Gill, 1861 for Tokyo Bay (274 shops and stores); and the Japanese lates, Lates japonicus Katayama & Taki, 1984 for Miyazaki Prefecture (80 shops and stores). The Souya region, which had been previously surveyed and no ‘gyotaku’ with distributional data were recorded from there, was excluded from this.

An explanation of the aim of our research and an answer sheet, which covered fifteen items for informed consent based on a research ethics review at the first author’s institution, were attached to the questionnaire. In the surveys conducted during July–September 2018, we asked for information on the presence/absence of ‘gyotaku’, and the possibility of copying relevant data. When possible, we conducted field surveys to photograph ‘gyotaku’ in March 2019.

We pooled the collected ‘gyotaku’ data, and statistically analyzed the dataset by a state space model using R v. 3.6.0 (R Core Team 2019) and the dlm package (Petris 2010) that applies a local level model with filtering and smoothing.

Results and discussion

Of the stores and shops targeted by our second preliminary surveys, none (of six) in the northernmost (Souya) region and three (of ten) in the southernmost (Yaeyama) region stocked ‘gyotaku’ rubbings with distributional information.

Regarding the questionnaires, fourteen surveys were returned unopened due to stores being closed down, and 56 responses were received from others, indicating that the questionnaire response rate was 9.5%. Our field surveys were permitted by nine stores and shops that stocked ‘gyotaku’ rubbings, based on the questionnaire surveys, while 82% of the responses recorded no stock of ‘gyotaku’. This low response rate was possibly caused by us not paying to have the surveys completed and by a high perceived workload to complete the answers.

In total, 261 ‘gyotaku’ rubbings, with 325 printed individual specimens (i.e., a part of ‘gyotaku’ has multiple individuals on a single sheet), were found among the targeted shops (Table 1; Suppl. material 1). All data recorded were integrated to the ‘gyotaku’ database (https://zukan.com/gyotaku/) using the same system as WEB sakana-zukan (see Miyazaki et al. 2014). Among the data obtained in the present study, we extracted distributional data for 221 individuals. Distributional data for an additional 14 individuals were obtained through interviewing the holders of the ‘gyotaku’ regarding date and/or locality information, resulting in a total of 235 individuals with distributional data (Table 1). Among the prints, 68 Japanese fish and three cephalopod species were represented, but 65 of these (14.9%) did not include a fish name (Tables 1, 2; Suppl. material 1). In general, a limited number of species are targeted by recreational fishers. Anglers and shop staff accurately identify the main fishing targets, and misidentifications are quickly corrected by other fishers in the local community. A pertinent example is the common octopus, Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797, which is identified as a main fishing target by one fishing shop in Yokohama City, Tokyo Bay. ‘Gyotaku’ images of an octopus from this shop is likely to be O. vulgaris even if there is no name on the specific ‘gyotaku’. However, this study did not validate such identifications based on external morphology and/or molecular analyses.

Table 1.

Details of ‘gyotaku’ rubbings surveyed from the shops in the present study.

Shops surveyed Region Shop style The number of
gyotaku individuals printed distributional data1 species (potential)2
A Hokkaido Tackles and bait shops 23 23 20 4
B Hokkaido Tackles and bait shops 11 11 11 9
C Hokkaido Tackles and bait shops 44 53 37 + 8 8
D Hokkaido Tackles and bait shops 4 4 3 + 1 4
E Hokkaido Tackles and bait shops 1 1 0 1
Sub-total in the Hokkaido area 83 92 71 + 9 18
F Tokyo Bay Tackles and bait shops 27 31 31 17
G Tokyo Bay Tackles and bait shops 22 23 16 + 3 8
H Tokyo Bay Tackles and bait shops 9 9 7 + 1 8
I Tokyo Bay Ship shops 39 41 32 7
J Tokyo Bay Ship shops 9 15 4 6
Sub-total around the Tokyo Bay area 106 119 90 + 4 32
K Miyazaki Tackles and bait shops 12 12 10 4
L Miyazaki Tackles and bait shops 8 8 6 + 1 3
M Miyazaki Tackles and bait shops 6 6 5 5
Sub-total in the Miyazaki area 26 26 21 + 1 9
N Yaeyama Tackles and bait shops 10 11 10 4
O Yaeyama Tackles and bait shops 8 8 8 6
P Yaeyama Tackles and bait shops 28 69 21 18
Sub-total in the Yaeyama area 46 88 39 21
Total 261 325 221 + 14 68

The observed species compositions reflected the biogeography of the regions (Table 2; Suppl. material 1). For example, prints of seven individuals of Hucho perryi were recorded from only Hokkaido. Similarly, one individual of Sillago parvisquamis was recorded from only around Tokyo Bay, while three individuals of Lates japonicus were recorded from only Miyazaki Prefecture (Fig. 2). These three species are listed as threatened in national and prefectural Red Lists. In particular, populations of S. parvisquamis are probably extinct in Tokyo Bay. The last reliable record from Tokyo Bay is from 1975–1976 (Shigeta and Usuki 2011). Additionally, the populations of L. japonicus at Miyazaki Prefecture were listed on the Specified Prefectural Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora on 21 December 2012; this prohibits the capture, holding, receiving, and giving of, and other interactions with, the species without the prefectural governor’s permission (Miyazaki Prefecture 2012; Murase et al. 2019). Given the rarity of these threatened species in some regions, ‘gyotaku’ are probably important vouchers for estimating historical population status, and factors of decline or extinction.

Table 2.

The composition of the species name given for various individual ‘gyotaku’.

Species Number of Individual(s) Remarks
Hokkaido Tokyo Bay Miyazaki Yaeyama
Loliginidae
Sepia esculenta Hoyle, 1885 0 0 0 1
Sepioteuthis lessoniana Férussac, 1831 0 1 0 3
PISCES
Cyprinidae
Carassius cuvieri Temminck & Schlegel, 1846 0 2 0 0
Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 0 2 0 0
Tribolodon hakonensis (Günther, 1880) 1 0 0 0
Plecoglossidae
Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) 1 0 0 0
Salmonidae
Hucho perryi (Brevoort, 1856) 7 0 0 0
Oncorhynchus keta (Walbaum, 1792) 4 0 0 0
Oncorhynchus masou masou (Brevoort, 1856) 18 1 1 0
Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792) 5 2 0 0
Salmo trutta Linnaeus, 1758 14 0 0 0
Salvelinus leucomaenis leucomaenis (Pallas, 1814) 11 0 0 0
Sebastidae
Sebastes cheni Barsukov, 1988 0 1 0 0
Sebastes schlegelii Hilgendorf, 1880 1 0 0 0
Sebastiscus marmoratus (Cuvier, 1829) 0 1 0 0
Sebastes sp. 2 0 0 0 ‘Soi’ or ‘Mazoi’ in Japanese
Platycephalidae
Platycephalus sp. 2 sensu Nakabo (2002) 0 4 0 0
Serranidae
Epinephelus lanceolatus (Bloch, 1790) 0 0 0 1
Niphon spinosus Cuvier, 1828 0 1 0 0
Plectropomus leopardus (Lacepède, 1802) 0 0 0 2
Centrarchidae
Micropterus salmoides (Lacepède, 1802) 0 2 0 0
Lateolabracidae
Lateolabrax japonicus (Cuvier, 1828) 0 7 8 0
Latidae
Lates japonicus Katayama & Taki, 1984 0 0 3 0
Carangidae
Caranx ignobilis (Forsskål, 1775) 0 0 0 12
Caranx melampygus Cuvier, 1833 0 0 0 1
Caranx sp. 0 0 0 2 ‘Gāra’ in Japanese
Pseudocaranx dentex (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) 0 1 0 0
Seriola lalandi Valenciennes, 1833 0 2 0 0
Seriola rivoliana Valenciennes, 1833 0 0 0 1
Sparidae
Acanthopagrus latus (Houttuyn, 1782) 0 0 2 0
Acanthopagrus schlegelii (Bleeker, 1854) 1 12 6 0
Acanthopagrus sivicolus Akazaki, 1962 0 0 0 2
Pagrus major (Temminck & Schlegel, 1844) 0 3 0 0
Lethrinidae
Lethrinus nebulosus (Forsskål, 1775) 0 0 0 4
Branchiostegidae
Branchiostegus japonicus (Houttuyn, 1782) 0 1 0 0
Oplegnathidae
Oplegnathus fasciatus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1844) 0 2 0 0
Oplegnathus punctatus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1844) 0 2 1 0
Sciaenidae
Argyrosomus japonicus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1844) 0 1 1 0
Sillaginidae
Sillago japonica Temminck & Schlegel, 1843 0 1 0 0
Sillago parvisquamis Gill, 1861 0 1 0 0
Rachycentridae
Rachycentron canadum (Linnaeus, 1766) 0 0 0 1
Coryphaenidae
Coryphaena hippurus Linnaeus, 1758 0 0 0 3
Kyphosidae
Kyphosus cinerascens (Forsskål, 1775) 0 0 0 1
Girellidae
Girella leonina (Richardson, 1846) 0 0 2 0
Girella punctata Gray, 1835 0 8 0 0
Haemulidae
Plectorhinchus cinctus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1843) 0 0 1 0
Labridae
Cheilinus undulatus Rüppell, 1835 0 1 0 0
Semicossyphus reticulatus (Valenciennes, 1839) 1 0 0 0
Scaridae
Calotomus japonicus (Valenciennes, 1840) 0 1 0 0
Hexagrammidae
Hexagrammos otakii Jordan & Starks, 1895 0 4 0 0
Siganidae
Siganus guttatus (Bloch, 1787) 0 0 0 2
Scombridae
Katsuwonus pelamis (Linnaeus, 1758) 0 1 0 0
Thunnus albacares (Bonnaterre, 1788) 0 0 0 1
Sphyraenidae
Sphyraena barracuda (Edwards, 1771) 0 0 0 2
Trichiuridae
Trichiurus sp. 0 0 0 1 ‘Tachiuo’ in Japanese
Istiophoridae
Istiophorus platypterus (Shaw & Nodder, 1792) 0 0 0 1
Pleuronectidae
Kareius bicoloratus (Basilewsky, 1855) 1 0 0 0
Pleuronectes herzensteini (Jordan & Snyder, 1901) 1 0 0 0
Pleuronectes schrenki (Schmidt, 1904) 2 0 0 0
Verasper moseri Jordan & Gilbert, 1898 1 0 0 0
Paralichthyidae
Paralichthys olivaceus (Temminck & Schlegel, 1846) 2 3 0 0
Monacanthidae
Stephanolepis cirrhifer (Temminck & Schlegel, 1850) 0 4 0 0
NO NAME GIVEN* 19 55 2 46
Figure 2. 

Three species targeted in leisure fishing and listed as threatened species in the Japanese national Red List. A Hucho perryi (Brevoort, 1856) from a shop in Hokkaido B Sillago parvisquamis Gill, 1861 from a shop facing Tokyo Bay C Lates japonicus Katayama & Taki, 1984 from a shop in Miyazaki Prefecture.

Species belonging to other families such as Salmonidae and Pleuronectidae, which originate in cold waters, were mostly recorded from Hokkaido rather than the other surveyed regions (Table 2; Suppl. material 1). On the other hand, several carangid fishes (Caranx spp.), the Okinawa seabream (Acanthopagrus sivicolus Akazaki, 1962), the spangled emperor [Lethrinus nebulosus (Forsskål, 1775)], the orange-spotted spinefoot [Siganus guttatus (Bloch, 1787)] and others originating from warm waters were recorded from only the Yaeyama region (Table 2). Another seabream species, Acanthopagrus latus (Houttuyn, 1782), which shares a similar distributional pattern with L. japonicus, was recorded from only Miyazaki Prefecture. Furthermore, our list (Table 2) also included exotic non-native species, i.e., the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792) and the brown trout, Salmo trutta Linnaeus, 1758, from the fishing tackle stores at Hokkaido, and O. mykiss and the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides (Lacepède, 1802), from a fishing tackle store in Tokyo Metropolis. Furthermore, some images printed of ‘gyotaku’ were found at stores well outside the pictured species’ known range; generally, these resources had been provided by customers who had traveled to other regions for leisure fishing trips. Overall, the species composition displayed in the ‘gyotaku’ approximately reflected the fish faunas of each biogeographic region.

We also obtained a statistically estimated result using a state space model (Fig. 3). This estimation showed very few ‘gyotaku’ available from before 1985, with a peak in 2002. These results suggest that using this technique to gather historical data is valid for perhaps the last 30 years or so and not prior to that. Obtaining useful ‘gyotaku’ more than 30 years old is unlikely. A decline in number was observed during 2011 and 2012, which probably reflects an indirect effect of the catastrophic tsunamis and the nuclear accidents caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake on 11 March 2011 (see also Kataoka 2013). Our data does not support the hypothesis that the use of ‘gyotaku’ will be decreasing over recent years due to the rise of digital photography. We suggest that Japanese recreational fishers may be continuing to use the ‘gyotaku’ method in addition to digital photography to record their memorable catches.

Figure 3. 

The number of ‘gyotaku’ rubbings stocked at the 16 fishing shops targeted by the present study based on the year of creation. The bold and dotted lines indicate the estimation and the 95% CI (upper and lower limits) based on the statistical analysis using a state space model.

Currently, the oldest ‘gyotaku’ material is a collection of the Tsuruoka City Library made in 1839 (Nakajima 2005). Others from the 19th Century were made in 1850s–1860s and are now collections of the Homma Museum of Art and the Chido Museum (Hiyama 1964a, b; Shimizu 1972, 1975). The oldest material found in the present study was made in 1936, indicating that it is difficult to find very old ‘gyotaku’ rubbings at leisure fishing stores and shops. Storage of ‘gyotaku’ in the public areas of shops and stores is usually less than ideal, with exposure to tobacco smoke, sunlight, and moisture. This is the main reason for deteriorating ‘gyotaku’. In fact, some shop owners reported disposing of older damaged materials. Further field surveys of, for example, museum and private collections are required to discover older ‘gyotaku’ and extract relevant data.

In conclusion, distributional data related to fish diversity records were able to be mined from ‘gyotaku’. However, this method is time limited with respect to data rescue from the general public. The volume of data obtained in this study is too small to analyze statistically from the perspective of ecology, biogeography, or other similar disciplines. Additionally, validation of the identifications sourced from the ‘gyotaku’ is required via taxonomic evaluations. This could be done by examining the external morphology captured in the printed image and possibly by trying to obtain biological material from the print for molecular analysis (i.e., based on the residuum of dried DNA on the sheet). Overall, further research is required into the use of ‘gyotaku’ rubbings for acquiring historical biodiversity data.

Acknowledgements

We express our deepest gratitude to O. Adachi (Casting Shinagawa Seaside Branch), H. Egami (Egami Tsuriguten), Y. Hayasaka (Yokohama Sao-no-Shioyoshi), M. Kinjou (Yaeyama Tsurigu), K. Miyagi (Miyagi Tsuriguten), S. Shimabukuro (Umi-no-Sougou Super Shima), S. Yoshino (Funayado Yoshinoya), and other all staff of the fishing shops and stores for their kind cooperation, and to G. Yearsley (Ellipsis Editing, Australia) for English technical editing of the manuscript. We also thank Y. Nagashima (Uonofu), and Y. Ogawa (Tatsumi Publishing) for guiding to the leisure fishing shops and stores, and K. Naoe and J. Yamaide (zukan.com, Inc.) for setting up the database. This research was partly supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (No. 16K16225).

References

  • Baggett PV, Shaw EL (2008) The art and science of gyotaku: there’s somethin’ fishy goin’ on here… Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 45(1): 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3200/SATS.45.1.3-8
  • Bohmann K, Evans A, Gilbert MTP, Carvalho GR, Creer S, Knapp M, Yu DW, de Bruyn M (2014) Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29(6): 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.003
  • Fink D, Hochachka WM (2012) Using data mining to discover biological patterns in citizen science observations. In: Dickinson JL, Bonney R (Eds) Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research. Cornel University Press, Ithaca, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801449116.003.0009
  • Hiyama H (1964a) Gyotaku. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 66 pp. [in Japanese]
  • Hiyama H (1964b) Gyotaku: The Art and Technique of the Japanese Fish Print. University of Washington Press, Seattle, 68 pp.
  • Kataoka T (2013) Dramatically changed consumptions: How is 2013 going on? The keywords are safety, family, and leisure. Nikkei Consumption Insight 1: 36–39. [in Japanese]
  • Kobori H, Dickinson JL, Washitani I, Sakurai R, Amano T, Komatsu N, Kitamura W, Takagawa S, Koyama K, Ogawara T, Miller-Rushing AJ (2016) Citizen science: a new approach to advance ecology, education, and conservation. Ecological Research 31(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-015-1314-y
  • Miller-Rushing A, Primack R, Bonney R (2012) The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6): 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1890/110278
  • Ministry of the Environment, Japan (2017) About the publication of the red list for marine species, version Ministry of the Environment. https://www.env.go.jp/press/103813.html [Accessed on 24.10.2019; in Japanese]
  • Miyazaki Y (in press) Scientific applications of citizen science data obtained via information media. Japanese e-Journal of Species Biology 2. [in Japanese]
  • Miyazaki Y, Fukui A (2018) Ichthyology for beginners: an introduction to fish diversity. Ohmsha, Tokyo, 154 pp. [in Japanese]
  • Miyazaki Y, Murase A, Shiina M, Masui R, Senou H (2015) Integrating and utilizing citizen biodiversity data on the web for science: an example of a rare triggerfish hybrid image provided by a sport fisherman. Journal of Coastal Research 31(4): 1035–1039. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00170.1
  • Miyazaki Y, Murase A, Shiina M, Naoe K, Nakashiro R, Honda J, Yamaide J, Senou H (2014) Biological monitoring by citizens using Web-based photographic databases of fishes. Biodiversity and Conservation 23(9): 2383–2391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0724-4
  • Murase A, Miki R, Wada M, Senou H (Eds) (2019) Coastal and Market Fishes around Kadogawa Bay, northern part of Miyazaki Prefecture, southern Japan. Nobeoka Marine Science Station, University of Miyazaki, Nobeoka, 208 pp. [in Japanese]
  • Nakajima M (2005) Fourth exhibition of citizens’ collections: enchanted by the fish caught. A•Museum 45: 2. [in Japanese]
  • Nishihiro J, Akasaka M, Yamanouchi T, Takamura N (2016) Time-declining potential of aquatic plant recovery from the propagule banks of lake sediments. Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology 21(2): 147–154. https://doi.org/10.18960/hozen.21.2_147 [in Japanese with English abstract]
  • Onoue K (2004) Recreation of aogisu fishing. In: Urayasu Local Museum (Ed.) The sea where aogisu inhabited. Urayasu Local Museum, Urayasu, 11–18. [in Japanese]
  • R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org [Accessed on 24.10.2019]
  • Rocha LA, Aleixo A, Allen G, Almeda F, Baldwin CC, Barclay MV, Bates JM, Bauer AM, Benzoni F, Berns CM, Berumen ML, Blackburn DC, Blum S, Bolaños F, Bowie RC, Britz R, Brown RM, Cadena CD, Carpenter K, Ceríaco LM, Chakrabarty P, Chaves G, Choat JH, Clements KD, Collette BB, Collins A, Coyne J, Cracraft J, Daniel T, de Carvalho MR, de Queiroz K, Di Dario F, Drewes R, Dumbacher JP, Engilis Jr A, Erdmann MV, Eschmeyer W, Feldman CR, Fisher BL, Fjeldså J, Fritsch PW, Fuchs J, Getahun A, Gill A, Gomon M, Gosliner T, Graves GR, Griswold CE, Guralnick R, Hartel K, Helgen KM, Ho H, Iskandar DT, Iwamoto T, Jaafar Z, James HF, Johnson D, Kavanaugh D, Knowlton N, Lacey E, Larson HK, Last P, Leis JM, Lessios H, Liebherr J, Lowman M, Mahler DL, Mamonekene V, Matsuura K, Mayer GC, Mays Jr H, McCosker J, McDiarmid RW, McGuire J, Miller MJ, Mooi R, Mooi RD, Moritz C, Myers P, Nachman MW, Nussbaum RA, Foighil DÓ, Parenti LR, Parham JF, Paul E, Paulay G, Pérez-Emán J, Pérez-Matus A, Poe S, Pogonoski J, Rabosky DL, Randall JE, Reimer JD, Robertson DR, Rödel MO, Rodrigues MT, Roopnarine P, Rüber L, Ryan MJ, Sheldon F, Shinohara G, Short A, Simison WB, Smith-Vaniz WF, Springer VG, Stiassny M, Tello JG, Thompson CW, Trnski T, Tucker P, Valqui T, Vecchione M, Verheyen E, Wainwright PC, Wheeler TA, White WT, Will K, Williams JT, Williams G, Wilson EO, Winker K, Winterbottom R, Witt CC (2014) Specimen collection: An essential tool. Science 344(6186): 814–815. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.344.6186.814
  • Schilthuizen M, Vairappan CS, Slade EM, Mann DJ, Miller JA (2015) Specimens as primary data: museums and 'open science'. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 30(5): 237–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.002
  • Shigeta T, Usuki H (2011) Small-scale sillago (Sillago parvisquamis): a symbol of tidal flat ecosystems. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 58(1): 104–107. https://doi.org/10.11369/jji.58.104 [in Japanese]
  • Shimizu Y (1972) Gyotaku: methods for making, and appreciation. Takahashi Shoten, Tokyo, 160 pp. [in Japanese]
  • Shimizu Y (1975) Gyotaku—methods for viewing and making—. Hoikusha, Tokyo, 152 pp. [in Japanese]
  • Stokes NC (2001) The fin art of science: Japanese fish printing brings interdisciplinary science and culture to the classroom. The Science Teacher 68(3): 22–24.
  • Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, Wiuf C, Rasmussen M, Gilbert MTP, Orlando L, Willerslev E (2012) Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology 21(11): 2565–2573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x
  • Yamamoto R (1998) Fish feel satisfaction with becoming gyotaku. Kyoto Shoin, Kyoto, 256 pp. [in Japanese]

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

The attributional information of the ‘gyotaku’ materials observed by the present study

Yusuke Miyazaki, Atsunobu Murase

Data type: species data

Explanation note: Although the identifications of each individual have not still validated via scientifc evaluations, the scientific names are provisional based on the fish names given by creaters with our suggestions.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (50.14 kb)