Research Article |
Corresponding author: Artur Taszakowski ( artur.taszakowski@us.edu.pl ) Academic editor: Fedor Konstantinov
© 2020 Artur Taszakowski, Junggon Kim, Claas Damken, Rodzay A. Wahab, Aleksander Herczek, Sunghoon Jung.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Taszakowski A, Kim J, Damken C, Wahab RA, Herczek A, Jung S (2020) Two new genera and species of the Gigantometopini (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae, Isometopinae) from Borneo with remarks on the distribution of the tribe. ZooKeys 941: 71-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.941.47432
|
Two new genera, each represented by a single new species, Planicapitus luteus Taszakowski, Kim & Herczek, gen. et sp. nov. and Bruneimetopus simulans Taszakowski, Kim & Herczek, gen. et sp. nov., are described from Borneo. Detailed photographs of male habitus and genital structures are presented. The checklist with distributional records for all known taxa of Gigantometopini is also provided.
Asia, biodiversity, distribution, jumping tree bugs, plant bugs, true bugs
The Isometopinae are a highly autapomorphic group possessing paired ocelli which are absent in all other members of the plant bug family Miridae (
The group has a worldwide distribution, but the majority of known taxa are thermophilic, and occur in the tropics, subtropics, and warm temperate climate zones (
The last tribe is Gigantometopini created by
The most characteristic feature of Gigantometopini distinguishing it from other tribes is the large numbers of trichobothria (five or six on both mesofemur and metafemur) (
In this paper, two new genera and species Planicapitus luteus gen. et sp. nov. and Bruneimetopus simulans gen. et sp. nov. are diagnosed and described; photographic images of habitus and genital structures, as well as scanning electron micrographs of the selected structures of both species are provided.
The specimens were imaged by the following equipment: Leica M205C stereo microscope with high diffuse dome illumination Leica LED5000 HDI, Leica DFC495 digital camera and Leica application suite 4.9.0 software; Leica DM 3000 upright light microscope with Leica MC 190 HD digital camera and Leica Application Suite 4.12.0 software. SEM photographs were obtained using Phenom XL field emission scanning electron microscope at 5 and 10 kV accelerating voltage with a BackScatter Detector (BSD). Graphic editor Adobe Photoshop CS6 was used to prepare the figures. In case of legs, the preparations for SEM were made with methods traditionally used in morphological studies (e.g.
Map was prepared in SAGA GIS 7.1.1 (http://www.saga-gis.org) using WGS84 datum and EPSG: 3395 (World Mercator cylindrical projection).
Measurements were made with Leica application suite 4.9.0 software and are presented in millimetres (mm). Terminology of morphological structures mainly follows
Planicapitus luteus Taszakowski, Kim & Herczek, sp. nov.
Distinguished by vertical, flattened head, not punctured but wrinkled and distinctly higher than wide, dorsally extending to level of highest point of pronotum; vertex convex, protruding above eye level; width of vertex slightly larger than eye width; dorsum and pleurites of thorax with deep and dense punctures; calli slightly marked, tarsi two segmented, claw without subapical tooth; labium reaching third abdominal segment; right paramere very small, short, dagger-shaped; left paramere ca. 2.5 times as long as right one.
Male. Body oval, slightly elongated (Fig.
Affiliation of Planicapitus luteus to the Gigantometopini is clearly confirmed by the following features: compound eyes relatively small, significantly separated from each other, pronotum deeply punctate and elongate, calli separated by shallow fossa, pronotal collar demarcated by row of punctures, inflated scutellum, and five mesofemoral trichobothria (
Set of features mentioned in the diagnosis clearly differ the new genus from other genera belonging to Gigantometopini. Planicapitus luteus belongs to the smallest representatives of tribe. The new genus is similar in size to Isometopidea lieweni which body length of the only known specimen equals to 3.0 mm. It is a female, so probably (like other representatives of tribe) males reach a smaller body size (
Combined from Latin adjective: planus, flat and noun: caput, capitis, head; gender masculine.
See generic diagnosis.
Male. Body shiny, yellow-brownish, covered by semi-erect pale-brown seta (Fig.
Comparison of metric features of Planicapitus luteus and Bruneimetopus simulans.
P. luteus | B. simulans holotype | B. simulans paratype | B. simulans average | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Body length | 2.61 | 2.52 | 2.47 | 2.50 |
Body width | 1.24 | 1.13 | – | 1.13 |
Head length | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
Head width | 0.58 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.52 |
Head height | 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.71 |
Dorsal width of eye | 0,20 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
Vertex width | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.18 |
Antennal segments I:II:III:IV | 0.10:0.62:0.67:0.21 | 0.10:0.59:0.78:0.20 | 0.09:0.60:0.82:0.20 | 0.10:0.60:0.80:0.20 |
Labium length | 1.30 | 1.26 | – | 1.26 |
Labial segments I:II:III:IV | 0.35:0.26:0.30:0.37 | 0.34:0.36:0.23:0.39 | – | 0.34:0.36:0.23:0.39 |
Pronotum length | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.46 |
Anterior width of pronotum | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.46 |
Posterior width of pronotum | 1.19 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 |
Mesoscutum length | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.11 |
Scutellum length | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.46 |
Scutellum width | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.64 |
Claval commissure | 0.27 | 0.23 | – | 0.23 |
1st femur length | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.68 | 0.66 |
1st tibia length | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.75 |
1st length of tarsus | 0.26 | 0.20 | ||
1st length of tarsus I: II | 0.09:0.22 | 0.08:0.17 | 0.08:0.17 | 0.08:0.17 |
2nd femur length | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
2nd tibia length | 0.96 | 0,84 | 0.88 | 0.86 |
2nd length of tarsus | 0.21 | 0,19 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
2nd length of tarsus I: II | 0.08:0.18 | 0.08:0.16 | 0.07:0.15 | 0.08:0.16 |
3rd femur length | – | – | 0.92 | 0.92 |
3rd femur width | – | – | 0.23 | 0.23 |
3rd tibia length | – | – | 1.28 | 1.28 |
3rd tarsus length | – | – | 0.22 | 0.22 |
3rd length of tarsus I: II | – | – | 0.09:0.15 | 0.09:0.15 |
Heme length | 1.99 | 1.84 | – | 1.84 |
Corium length | 1.55 | 1.25 | – | 1.25 |
Cuneus length | 0.29 | 0.23 | – | 0.23 |
Cuneus width | 0.33 | 0.27 | – | 0.27 |
From Latin adjective luteus, yellow.
Holotype (♂): ‘Borneo, Sabah / Danum Valley / 70km W Lahad Datu / M.J. & J.P. Duffels // East Ridge Trail / 150m / 2.XII.1989 // sample Sab. 53 / understorey rainforest, / at light’. The holotype is deposited in RBINS.
Bruneimetopus simulans Taszakowski, Kim & Herczek, sp. nov.
Distinguished by vertical, slightly flattened head, not punctured but wrinkled and higher than wide, dorsally not extending to level of highest point of pronotum; vertex slightly convex, protruding above eye level, width of vertex equal to eye width; dorsum and pleurites of thorax with deep and dense punctures; calli slightly marked, tarsi two segmented, claw with very small, barely noticeable apical tooth; labium reaching third abdominal segment, right paramere well developed, with knee-shaped sensory lobe; left paramere ca. 1.5 times as long as right one.
Male. Body oval, slightly elongate (Fig.
Affiliation of Bruneimetopus to the Gigantometopini is clearly confirmed by the same set of features as for Planicapitus (see above). It is also indicated by presence of six metafemoral trichobothria (the specimen of Planicapitus luteus is devoid of hindlegs).
As in the case of Planicapitus, set of features mentioned in the diagnosis clearly differ the new genus from other genera belonging to Gigantometopini. The newly described genera are very similar morphologically to each other. However, in addition to small differences in the proportions of body parts and coloration, they can easily be distinguished by the completely different shape and size of the right paramere. This was a premise to describe them in separate genera.
Name combines Brunei (the type locality) with part of the generic name Isometopus, the type genus of the subfamily.
See generic diagnosis.
Male. Body shiny, in various shades of yellow and brown, covered by semi-erect pale brown and brown setae (Fig.
Bruneimetopus simulans: holotype: head in frontal view (A), lateral view of head (B), head in dorsal view (C), tarsus of middle leg, lateral view (D), pretarsus of middle leg, lateral view (E), paratype: femur of middle leg in ventral view, showing trichobothrial pattern (F), femur of hind leg in ventral view, showing trichobothrial pattern (G).
The species name simulans (resembling) is the present participle of the Latin verb simulo (to make like or to assume the appearance of anything), in allusion to the resemblance of this species to Planicapitus luteus.
Holotype (♂): ‘Borneo, Brunei, Tutong // Tutong area, mangroves forest / small stream near water edge, Malaise / trap 1; 16.viii.2014, leg: C. Damken / 4°46'9.54"N, 114°36'20.64"E // ID code: tutong.mangroves.01780’; Paratype (♂):‘Borneo, Brunei, Labu FR. / mangrove forest, Malaise trap ID4 / 06.viii.2018; leg: C. Damken / 4°50'53.11"N, 117°7'45.65"E// ID code: labu.mangroves.01777’. The holotype and paratype are deposited in the UBDM.
In total, only 49 imagines of Gigantometopini representing eleven species were ever recorded. Four species are known only from the holotype: Gigantometopus rossi, Gigantometopus schuhi, Isometopidea lieweni, and Planicapitus luteus. Below we present the complete checklist of Gigantometopini with distributional records (Fig.
Gigantometopini Herczek, 1993
Astroscopometopus Yasunaga & Hayashi, 2002
Astroscopometopus formosanus (Lin, 2004)
Isometopidea formosana Lin, 2004
1♂, Taiwan, Nantou, Chunyang (Fig.
1♂, Taiwan, Pingtung, Hengchun, Kenting National Park (Fig.
Astroscopometopus gryllocephalus (Miyamoto, Yasunaga, & Hayashi, 1996)
Isometopidea gryllocephala Miyamoto, Yasunaga, & Hayashi, 1996
1♀, Japan, Ryukyu Arc., Ishigaki Is., Shiramizu (Fig.
1♀, Japan, Ryukyu Arc., Ishigaki Is., Mt. Yarabudake (Fig.
1♂, 8 final instar nymphs, Japan, Ryukyu Arc., Ishigaki Is., Mt. Fukami-Omoto (Fig.
1♀, Japan, Ryukyu Arc., Iriomote Is. (Fig.
Gigantometopus Schwartz & Schuh, 1990
Gigantometopus rossi Schwartz & Schuh, 1990
1♀, Indonesia, Sumatra, Sumatera Barat, Mangani, mine near Kota Tinggi, 700 m a.s.l. (Fig.
Gigantometopus cf. rossi Schwartz & Schuh, 1990
1♀, South India
Gigantometopus schuhi Akingbohungbe, 2012
1♂, Brunei, Borneo, Bukit Sulang near Lamunin (Fig.
Isometopidea Poppius, 1913
Isometopidea lieweni Poppius, 1913
1♀, Sri Lanka, Anuradhapura (Fig.
Isometopidea lieweni nec Poppius, 1913
1♀, Taiwan, Nantou, Lienhachi (Fig.
Kohnometopus Yasunaga, 2005
Kohnometopus fraxini Yasunaga, 2005
1♂, Japan, Ryukyu Arc., Ishigaki Is., Mt. Fukami-Omoto (Fig.
1♀, Japan, Ryukyu Arc., Ishigaki Is., Mt. Yarabudake (Fig.
Kohnometopus yangi (Lin, 2005)
Isometopidea yangi
1♂, Taiwan, Taitung, Peinan Panchiu Station (Fig.
Sulawesimetopus Herczek, Gorczyca & Taszakowski, 2018
Sulawesimetopus henryi Herczek, Gorczyca & Taszakowski, 2018
3♂♂, Indonesia, Sulawesi Utara (Fig.
5♂♂, 1♀, Indonesia, Sulawesi Utara, Dumonga-Bone National Park, Hogg’s Back Subcamp, 660 m. a.s.1. (Fig.
Planicapitus Taszakowski, Kim & Herczek, gen. nov.
Planicapitus luteus Taszakowski, Kim & Herczek, sp. nov.
1♂, Malaysia, Borneo, Sabah Danum Valley, East Ridge Trail, 150 m. a.s.1., (Fig.
Bruneimetopus Taszakowski, Kim & Herczek, gen. nov.
Bruneimetopus simulans Taszakowski, Kim & Herczek, sp. nov.
1♂, Brunei, Borneo, Tutong area (Fig.
1 ♂, Brunei, Borneo, Labu FR. (Fig.
We are greatly indebted to Dr Jerome Constant from the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Prof Dominik Chłond (University of Silesia in Katowice) for a loan and the assistance with the loan material and Dr Agnieszka Bugaj-Nawrocka (University of Silesia in Katowice) for help in making the map. Claas Damken gratefully acknowledges the support by Ulmar Grafe (Universiti Brunei Darussalam) during the fieldwork and research on the Heteroptera of Brunei Darussalam. The authors also thank Brunei Forestry Department and Ministry of Primary Resources and Tourism for permission to conduct field work in Brunei Darussalam. The Biodiversity Research and Innovation Centre provided export permits. We also want to thank the reviewers as well as the editors for all the comments that improved this manuscript.
We wanted to apologize to Dr Anna Namyatova for misquoting the work she co-authored in our latest publication. Correct title: Namyatova AA, Cassis G (2016) Review of the seven new species of Isometopinae (Heteroptera: Miridae) in Australia and discussion of distribution and host plant associations of the subfamily on the worldwide basis. Austral Entomology 55: 392–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12202
This work was supported by Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through Exotic Invasive Species Management Program, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE)(2018002270005).
The research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1A6A3A01013374), and was funded through the UBD postdoctoral fellowship (Research and export permit file no: UBD/CAN–387(b)(SAA); UBD/ADM/R3(z)Pt.; UBD/PNC2/2/RG/1(293)).