Research Article
Print
Research Article
Lithobius (Ezembius) varioporus, a new species from eastern China (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae)
expand article infoSujian Pei, Huiqin Ma, Haipeng Liu, Yanmin Lu, Xiaojie Hou
‡ Hengshui University, Hengshui, China
Open Access

Abstract

Lithobius (Ezembius) varioporus sp. nov. (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae), recently discovered from Longquanguan Town, Fuping County, Baoding City, Hebei Province, China, is described. Morphologically it resembles to Lithobius (Ezembius) laevidentata Pei, Ma, Hou, Zhu & Gai, 2015 from the Xinjiang Autonomous Region, but can be easily distinguished from the latter by the Tömösváry’s organ, slightly smaller than the adjoining ocelli, no secondary sexual modifications on male tibia 14 and 15, posterior accessory spine of legs 14 and 15 present and the number of coxal pores varying considerably from three to eight. The main morphological characters of the known Chinese species of the subgenusEzembius Chamberlin, 1919 based on adult specimens are presented.

Keywords

Centipede, Chilopoda, Hebei Province, myriapods

Introduction

Ezembius was originally proposed as a subgenus of Lithobius Leach, 1814 in the family Lithobiidae by Chamberlin (1919); it accommodates a group of approximately 60 species and subspecies mostly known from Asia, with little extension into north-western North America. Known species colonise a wide range of habitats, from the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions to tropical and sub-tropical forests, from steppe and overgrazed stony areas of central Asia to Himalayan montane forests, from the seashore up to 5500 m (Himalayas) (Zapparoli and Edgecombe 2011, Qiao et al. 2018). Although the subgenus was formally proposed as new (Chamberlin 1923), according to Jeekel (2005) its name was validated in 1919 (Chamberlin 1919). Ezembius is characterised by antennae with ca. 20 articles; ocelli 1+4–1+20; forcipular coxosternal teeth usually 2+2; porodonts generally setiform, sometimes stout. Tergites are generally without posterior triangular projections. Female gonopods are with uni-, bi-, or tridentate claws, and 2+2–3+3 (rarely 4+4) spurs (Zapparoli and Edgecombe 2011).

The myriapod fauna of China is still poorly known and very little attention has been paid to the study of Lithobiomorpha, with only 88 species and subspecies known from the country. Altogether, 25 species of Ezembius have been recorded from China, but only one of them has been reported from Hebei Province (Pei et al. 2019, Qiao et al. 2019a, b). Herein, a new species recently discovered in the Hebei Province, China, is described and illustrated. Tables of the main morphological characters of Chinese Ezembius species are also presented.

Materials and methods

All specimens were hand-collected under leaf litter or stones. The material was examined with the aid of a Nikon SMZ–1500 stereo microscope equipped with a drawing attachment. The colour description is based on specimens preserved in 75 % ethanol, and the body length is measured from the anterior margin of the cephalic plate to the posterior margin of the postpedal tergite. Type specimens are preserved in 75 % ethanol and deposited in the School of Life Sciences, Hengshui University, Hengshui, China (HUSLS). The terminology of the external anatomy follows Bonato et al. (2010).

The following abbreviations are used in the text and the tables:

a, anterior;

C, coxa;

DaC anterior dorsal spur of coxa;

F, femur;

m, median;

p, posterior;

P, prefemur;

S, SS, sternite, sternites;

T, TT, tergite, tergites;

Ti, tibia;

To, Tömösváry’s organ;

Tr, trochanter.

Taxonomy

Lithobiomorpha Pocock, 1895

Lithobiidae Newport, 1844

Lithobius Leach, 1814

Lithobius (Ezembius) Chamberlin, 1919

Lithobius (Ezembius) varioporus , sp. nov.

Figures 1–7, Tables 1, 2

Diagnosis

Body length 12.4–19.1 mm, antennae composed of 20–22 articles, commonly 20 articles, 9–10 ocelli on each side of the head, arranged in three irregular rows, posterior two comparatively large ocelli; Tömösváry’s organ larger than the adjacent ocelli; commonly 2+2 forcipular coxosternal teeth, porodonts moderately slender, posterolateral to the lateral-most tooth, posterior angles of all tergites without triangular projections; 3–8 coxal pores, arranged in one row; female gonopods with 3+3 (few 3+2) moderately small coniform spurs, apical claw simple; male gonopods short and small, with three or four long setae on the terminal segment.

Figures 1–7. 

Lithobius (Ezembius) varioporus sp. nov., 1–2, 4, 7 holotype, male 1 habitus, dorsal view 2, 3 ocelli and Tömösváry’s organ (To), lateral view 4 forcipulae, ventral view 5, 6 paratype, female 5 posterior segments and gonopods, ventral view 6 gonopods, ventral view 7 posterior segments and gonopods, ventral view. Scale bars: 2 mm (1); 250 μm (2, 3); 500 μm (4–7).

Material examined

Holotype : ♂ (Fig. 1) (EV1). Body length 19.1 mm, cephalic plate 1.8 mm long, 1.7 mm wide, Heiyagou Village, Longquanguan Town, Fuping County, Baoding City, Hebei Province, China, 38°57'03.77"N, 113°48'40.70"E, 1100 m, under litter of the forest floor in a mixed coniferous broad-leaved forest, 5 August 2014, leg. S. Pei, H. Ma. Paratypes [13♀♀, 19 ♂♂] (EV1): same data as holotype. Other material: 26 ♀♀, 32 ♂♂ (EV2) Liaodaobei, Longquanguan Town, Fuping County, Baoding City, Hebei Province, China, 38°50'50.12"N, 113°49'50.33"E, 1800 m, 5 August 2014, leg. S. Pei, H. Ma. 20♀♀, 21♂♂ (EV3) Wuyuezhai Mountain, Lingshou County, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China, 38°43'15.02"N, 114°08'32.62"E, 500 m, under litter of the forest floor in a mixed coniferous broad-leaved forest, 28 Sept 2014, leg. S. Pei, H. Ma.

Description

Body length: 12.4–19.1 mm, cephalic plate 1.4–2.0 mm long, 1.4–1.8 mm wide.

Colour : antennal articles yellow-brown with blackish hue, the black gradually becomes lighter at the end of articles 6 and 7, distal-most article yellow-brown; and all tergites yellow-brown, TT 1, 3, 14, and 15 darker, pleural region pale grey with lavender hue, and sternites pale yellow-brown; basal and proximal parts of forcipules, forcipular coxosternite, SS 14 and 15 darker yellow-brown; all legs yellow-brown, distal tarsi darker.

Antennae : 20–22 articles, commonly 20+20 articles (Fig. 1), few specimens 20+21 or 20+22 articles; antennae article lengths are longer than wide except basal articles, which are equal to widths, distal-most article 2.9–3.2 times as long as wide; abundant setae on the antennal surface, less so on the basal articles, gradual increase in density of setae to ca. the fifth article, then more or less constant.

Cephalic plate smooth, convex, slightly longer than wide; tiny setae emerging from setal sockets scattered very sparsely over the whole surface; frontal marginal ridge with shallow anterior median furrow; short to long setae scattered along the marginal ridge of the cephalic plate; lateral marginal ridge discontinuous, posterior margin continuous, straight, wider than lateral marginal ridge, the middle of the posterior edge is very slightly concaved forward (Fig. 1). Nine to ten approximate oval ocelli on each side (Figs 2, 3), domed, translucent, usually darkly pigmented, situated in three irregular rows; the posterior two ocelli comparatively large; others subequal in size. Tömösváry’s organ situated at anterolateral margin of the cephalic plate, slightly smaller than the adjoining ocelli and lying well apart from them (Figs 2, 3).

Coxosternite subtrapezoidal (Fig. 1), anterior margin narrow, lateral margins slightly longer than medial margins; median diastema moderately deep, narrow U-shaped; anterior margin with 2+2 blunt triangular teeth; porodonts slender, lying posterolateral to and separated from the lateral-most tooth (Fig. 4); scattered long setae on the ventral side of coxosternite, longer setae near the dental margin.

All tergites smooth, without wrinkles, dorsum slightly convex; tiny setae emerging from setal sockets scattered sparsely over the entire surface, few long setae near the margin. Lateral marginal ridges of all tergites continuous. Posterior margin of TT 1, 3, and 5 feebly concave, posterior marginal ridges continuous, posterior margins of TT 7, 8, 10, 12, and 14 feebly concave, posterior marginal ridges discontinuous. Posterior angles of tergites generally rounded, without triangular projections. Miniscule setae scattered sparsely over the surface, two or three slightly thick and long setae on anterior and posterior angles of each tergite.

Sternites. Posterior side narrower than anterior side, generally inverted trapezoidal, smooth; setae emerging from setal sockets sparsely scattered on the surface and lateral margin, 3–5 long setae on the surface of the anterior part of each sternite, two or three comparatively long setae scattered sparsely on the surface of the posterior part of each sternite.

Legs robust, tarsal articulation ill-defined on legs 1–13, faint trace on ventral side, well-defined on legs 14 and 15; short to long setae sparsely scattered over the surface of prefemur, femur, tibia, and tarsus of all legs, with more setae on the tarsal surface; setae on dorsal and ventral surface of tarsus slightly longer than the anterior and posterior, one row of thicker setae regularly arranged on the medial ventral side of tibia of legs 1–13, with setae significantly reduced in legs 14 and 15, no thicker setae regularly arranged in one row on the medial ventral side of tibia. All legs with fairly long curved claws; legs 1–13 with anterior and posterior accessory spines; anterior accessory spines moderately long and slender, forming a moderately small angle with the claw, posterior accessory spines slightly more robust, forming a comparatively large angle with the claw, legs 14 and 15 only with small posterior accessory spines; legs 14 and 15 moderately thicker and longer than the anterior pairs in the female; In the female, tarsus 1 4.0–6.0 times as long as wide in legs 15, tarsus 2 ca. 73.1 %–77.3 % length of tarsus on legs 15; In the male, tarsus 1 3.3–7.3 times as long as wide in legs 15, tarsus 2 ca. 51.1 %–77.6 % length of tarsus on legs 15. Leg plectrotaxy provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Leg plectrotaxy of Lithobius (Ezembius) varioporus sp. nov. (based on 59 females).

Legs Ventral Dorsal
C Tr P F Ti C Tr P F Ti
1 mp amp am mp ap ap
2 mp am am amp ap ap
3–10 mp amp am amp ap ap
11 amp amp am amp ap ap
12 m amp amp am amp ap ap
13 m amp amp am a amp p ap
14 m amp amp am a amp p p
15 m amp amp a a amp p

Coxal pores 3–8, round to slightly oval, in a row; in the female, 4554, 67(8)7(8)6, 5(6)765, 6(7)776, 66(7)65, in the male, 66(7)7(6)5(4), 565(6)3, coxal pore field set in a relatively shallow groove, the coxal pore-field fringe with a prominence; prominence with 10–15 short to moderately long setae sparsely scattered over the surface.

Female S 15 anterior margin broader than posterior, generally inverted trapezoidal, posteriomedially straight, colour usually yellow-brown; short to long sparse setae evenly scattered on surface; surface of the lateral sternal margin of genital segment well chitinised, posterior margin of genital sternite deeply concave between condyles of gonopods, except for a small, median approximately rhombic-shaped bulge; relatively long setae sparsely scattered over ventral surface of the genital segment. Gonopods (Figs 5, 6): first article fairly broad, bearing 22–26 moderately long setae, arranged in five irregular rows; generally with 3+3 (3+2 in only two specimens) moderately long and slender, coniform spurs, inner spur slightly smaller than the outer, dorsolateral setae absent; second article with 12–16 long setae, arranged in three irregular rows, 9–12 stout setae on the dorsal side; third article with five or six comparatively long setae, arranged in two irregular rows, four or five stout setae on the dorsal side; third article with a simple broad apical claw (Figs 5, 6).

Male S 15 posterior margin narrower than anterior, posteriomedially straight, sparsely covered with long setae on the surface; sternite of genital segment smaller than in female, usually well sclerotised, posterior margin deeply concave between the gonopods, without median bulge; long setae sparsely scattered on the ventral surface of the genital segment, fringed with longer setae along the posterior margin; gonopods short, appearing as a small hemispherical bulge, with three or four long setae, apically slightly sclerotised (Fig. 7).

Habitat

The specimens studied here were collected from a mixed coniferous broad-leaved forest at ca. 500–1800 m above sea level, in moderately moist habitats under roadside stones and litter of the forest floor.

Etymology

The specific epithet varioporus refers to the coxal pore numbers varying considerably from three to eight.

Discussion

The new species is morphologically close to L. (E.) laevidentata Pei, Ma, Hou, Zhu & Gai, 2015 and to L. (E.) tetraspinus Pei, Lu, Liu, Hou & Ma, 2018, both from the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China, with which it shares 20–22 antennal articles, 9–10 ocelli arranged in three irregular rows, the posterior two ocelli comparatively large, 3+3 spurs on female gonopods, no anterior accessory spines on legs 15.

However, the new species can be easily distinguished from L. (E.) laevidentata by the size of the Tömösváry’s organ, slightly smaller than the adjoining ocelli, rather than subequal to the largest ocellus as in L. (E.) laevidentata. The new species has no secondary sexual modifications on the male 15 tibia compared to L. (E.) laevidentata, in which a distinct and shallow dorsal furrow is present on the same leg; moreover, in the new species legs 14 and 15 bears a small accessory spines only on the posterior side vs. both anterior and posterior accessory spines are present on legs 14, and only with posterior accessory spines present on legs 15 in L. (E.) laevidentata.

The new species can be easily distinguished from L. (E.) tetraspinus by the Tömösváry’s organ, slightly smaller than the adjoining ocelli in contrast to subequal in size to adjoining ocelli in L. (E.) tetraspinus. Moreover, the new species has no secondary sexual modifications on the leg 15 male tibia vs. the dorsal sulci on the femur in L. (E.) tetraspinus. In the new species, legs 14 and 15 bear small accessory spines only in the posterior side instead of both anterior and posterior accessory spines present on legs 14, and lacking accessory spines on legs 15 in L. (E.) tetraspinus. The new species must be also easily distinguished from the other Lithobius (Ezembius) species to date known from China by the coxal pore number, varying considerably from three to eight, not only among specimens, but also in the same individual.

To assist in the identification of the Lithobius species of the subgenus Ezembius from China, the main morphological characters based on adult specimens are presented in Table 3.

Table 2.

Leg plectrotaxy of Lithobius (Ezembius) varioporus sp. nov. (based on 73 males).

Legs Ventral Dorsal
C Tr P F Ti C Tr P F Ti
1 mp amp am mp ap a
2–11 mp amp am amp ap ap
12 amp amp am a amp ap ap
13 m amp amp am a amp p ap
14 m amp amp am a amp p p
15 m amp am(p) a a amp p
Table 3.

Range and main morphological characters of the known Chinese species of subgenus Lithobius (Ezembius) Chamberlin, 1919.

Characters L. anabilineatus L. anasulcifemoralis L. bidens L. bilineatus L. chekianus L. datongensis
Authorities Ma et al. 2015 Ma et al. 2013 Takakuwa 1939 Pei et al. 2014 Chamberlin and Wang 1952 Qiao et al. 2018
Distribution China S (Guangxi) China S (Guangxi) China S (Taiwan) China S (Guangxi) China S (Zhengjiang and Taiwan) China NW (Qinghai Province)
Body length (mm) 11.9–12.1 10.1–12.3 15.0 9.0–9.1 16.0 12.3–14.2
Number of antennal articles 23+23 articles in female, unkown in male 19+19–24+24, commonly 20+20 20–21 two specimens with 20+21, one specimen with 20+23 20+20 20+20
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 5 – 6, in 2 rows 6, in 3 rows 7 5–6, in 2 rows 5, in 3 rows 10, in 3 rows
Posterior ocellus round, large oval to round, large comparatively large oval to rounded oval to round, comparatively large comparatively large
Seriate ocelli subequal, all ocelli domed, translucent, usually darkly pigmented one near ventral margin moderately small, others almost equal not reported subequal, all ocelli domed, translucent, usually darkly pigmented not reported not reported
Tömösváry’s organ round, smaller than adjoining ocelli moderately large, rounded, slightly larger than adjoining ocelli at most same size as one ocellus slightly larger than adjoining ocelli not reported slightly larger than nearest ocellus
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 2+2, subtriangular 2+2, moderately blunt 2+2 2+2, slightly triangular 2+2 2+2 slightly acute
Porodont long, lying posterolateral to lateral-most teeth slender, lying posterolateral to lateral-most tooth, their base moderately bulged moderately long thick and long, lying posterolateral to lateral-most tooth not reported setiform porodonts separated from lateral tooth laterally
Characters L. anabilineatus L. anasulcifemoralis L. bidens L. bilineatus L. chekianus L. datongensis
Tergites smooth, backside slightly hunched smooth not reported smooth, slightly hunched behind not reported almost smooth
Number of coxal pores 3–5, female 4454, 3554; male 4443, 4453 3–6, usually 4663, 5654, 5553, 5563 and 5565 5 (6) 555 usually females 4554, 5565; males 4553, 4454 6655 or 7665 4655 and 5575. Coxal pores 4654 and 4554 in male
Shape of coxal pores round or slightly ovate round or slightly ovate round ovate not reported rounded
Tarsus 1–tarsus 2 articulation on legs 1–13 not well-defined not well-defined Well-defined not well-defined not reported distinct
Male 14th legs Obvious, thicker and stronger than other legs markedly thicker and stronger than 1–13 legs, thicker and stronger than female not reported distinctly thick and strong not reported not reported
Male 15th legs obvious thicker and stronger than other legs markedly thicker and stronger than 1–13 legs, thicker and stronger than female not reported distinctly thick and strong not reported not reported
Dorsal sulci on male 14th legs absent absent not reported with two, shallow longitudinal sulci not reported not reported
Dorsal sulci on male 15th legs two distinct, shallow, dorsal sulci on femur and tibia with a distinct, shallow, dorsal sulci on tibia not reported with two, shallow longitudinal sulci not reported not reported
DaC spure on 14th–15th legs on 14th–15th legs absent on 4th–15th legs on 14th–15th legs on 12th–15th
14th accessory spine anterior accessory spine reduced in size, only half length of posterior accessory spine absent not reported anterior accessory spine absent present present
15th accessory spine absent absent not reported anterior accessory spine absent present anterior accessory spine absent
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 2+2 moderately small, blunt, coniform spurs, inner spur slightly smaller than the outer 2+2 moderately blunt, with conical spurs, inner spur slightly smaller 3+3 or 4+4, sharp 2+2 moderately small, blunt, coniform spurs, inner spur slightly smaller than outer one not reported 2+2 moderately large, coniform spurs
Dorsal side of second article of female gonopods with one spine lying dorsally on its external margin no striking features not reported with three short, robust setae lying dorsally on its external margin not reported 5-6 setae and five long curved spines
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) simple, small subtriangular teeth in the inner apical claw dimidiate simple, small sharply teeth in the inner apical claw bipartite, and its inner aspect broader not reported undivided, bearing a small triangular protuberance on ventral side
Male gonopods short and small bulge, with one to two long setae, apically slightly sclerotised with a small bulge, without setae and apically less sclerotised hemispherical, with two long setae short and small bulge, having a long seta, apically slightly sclerotised not reported a hemispherical bulge, with three setae
Characters L. dulanensis L. gantoensis L. giganteus L. insolitus L. irregularis L. laevidentata
Authorities Qiao et al. 2019 Takakuwa and Takashima 1949 Eason 1986 Eason 1993 Takakuwa and Takashima 1949 Pei et al. 2015
Distribution China NW (Qinghai Province) China NW (Shanxi) China N (Inner Mongolia Autonomous region) China S (Hong Kong) China W (Shanxi) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur)
Body length (mm) 20.5 9.0 15.0–50.0 10.0–11.5 12.0 9.6–13.3
Number of antennal articles 20–21 20–23 20+20 18+18–19+19 20+20 19+19–21+21 commonly 20+20
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 11–12, in 3 rows 6, in 2 rows 6–10, in 2–3 rows 6–8, in 2 rows 7, in 2 rows 8–10, in 3 rows
Characters L. dulanensis L. gantoensis L. giganteus L. insolitus L. irregularis L. laevidentata
Posterior ocellus oval to rounded, comparatively large oval to round, comparatively large oval to round, comparatively large oval to round, comparatively large round, comparatively large posterior two ocelli bigger than seriate ocelli
Seriate ocelli the second row smaller than the first, the third smallest comparatively large not reported not reported subequal other seriate ocelli slightly larger than ocelli adjoining ventrally
Tömösváry’s organ Slightly smaller than the adjoining ocelli subequal in size to adjoining medium large ocelli slightly smaller than adjoining ocelli slightly smaller than adjoining ocelli same size as largest ocellus subequal in size to adjoining ocelli
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 2+2 moderately robustteeth 2+2, approximately sharp, small 2+2 2+2, approximately sharp, small 2+2, small 2+2, approximately blunt
Porodont Slender lying posterolateral to the most lateral tooth not reported not reported slender, lying posterolateral to lateral tooth, their base slightly bulged long, their base slightly bulged thick and long, lying posterolateral to lateral-most teeth
Tergites Smooth and all posterior angles rounded without projections smooth, without wrinkles smooth, with slightly wrinkles T1 smooth, other with wrinkles smooth smooth, without wrinkles, backside slightly hunched
Number of coxal pores 5667 or 5666 3333 3333, 4554, 4555, 4565, 5565 or 5566 3–6, male 3443; female 4454, 4555, 5555, 5565 3–10, female 3–6 in 12th leg, 4–6 in 13th leg, 7–10 in 14th and 15th leg 2–5, female commonly 4555, 4554, sometime 3454, 3455, 3343. male commonly 2332, 2333, sometime 3444, 3333
Shape of coxal pores Circularor slightly ovate round round round round round or slightly ovate
Tarsus 1–tarsus 2 articulation on legs 1–13 fused not reported Well-defined not defined Well-defined not well-defined
Male 14th legs longer and thicker than legs 1–13 not reported not reported distinctly thick and strong not reported remarkably thicker and stronger
Male 15th legs longer and thicker than legs 1–13 not reported not reported distinctly thick and strong, with dark zones on dorsal of tibia not reported markedly thicker and stronger
Dorsal sulci on male 14th legs absent not reported not reported absent not reported absent
Dorsal sulci on male 15th legs absent not reported not reported absent not reported with a distinct, shallow, dorsal sulci on the tibia
DaC spure on 11th–15th absent on 12th–15th legs (on 11th and 12th legs sometimes present) absent on 13th–15th legs on 12th–15th legs
14th accessory spine anterior accessory spines absent present present not reported not reported present
15th accessory spine absent present absent absent not reported anterior accessory spines absent
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 2+2 moderately small coniform spurs 1+1, conical spurs 2+2 3+3, coniform spurs 2+2 or 2+3, moderately small, blunt, coniform spurs 3+4, or 4+4 small, blunt, coniform spurs, commonly with 3+3, inner spur smaller than outer one
Dorsal side of second article of female gonopods with six dorsolateral setae not reported with eight spines in two irregular rows lying dorsally on its external margin not reported not reported with three long setae lying dorsally on its anterior external margin
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) unidentate, curved simple simple simple simple and broad simple and broad
Male gonopods small, one-segmented, with two long setae, apically slightly chitinized, flat not reported not reported not reported not reported small bulge, with one to two long setae apically slightly sclerotised
Characters L. longibasitarsus L. lineatus L. mandschreiensis L. maqinensis L. multispinipes L. parvicornis
Authorities Qiao et al. 2018 Takakuwa 1939 Takakuwa 1940 Qiao et al. 2019b Pei et al. 2016 Zapparoli 1991
Distribution China NW (Qinghai) China S (Taiwan) China (Taiwan, Sichuan, Jiangsu, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning) China NW (Qinghai) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur) China S (Taiwan)
Characters L. longibasitarsus L. lineatus L. mandschreiensis L. maqinensis L. multispinipes L. parvicornis
Body length (mm) 17.0–18.0 18.0 22.0–23.0 13.10–14.60 11.6–22.6 16.0
Number of antennal articles 20+20 19+19–21+21 20–28 20+20 commonly 20+20, (three specimens with 20+21, one specimen with 20+26 of 134 specimens) 20+20, 21+21
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 11, in 3 rows 8–11, in 3 rows 9–13, in 3 rows 9–10, in 3 rows 8, in 3 rows 3–4, in 1 or 2 rows
Posterior ocellus posterior ocellus largest comparatively small comparatively large the most posterior ocellus largest two ocelli large, oval to rounded comparatively large
Seriate ocelli not reported not reported same size the ocelli of the bottom row small two near ventral margin moderately small, others almost equal not reported
Tömösváry’s organ smaller than adjacent ocelli same size as adjoining ocelli larger than adjoining ocelli almost the same size as adjacent ocelli slightly smaller than adjoining ocelli not reported
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 3+2 blunt nipple-like teeth 2+2, comparatively large 2+2, small and sharp 2 + 2 3+3, slightly triangular 2+2
Porodont thick and strong separated from lateral tooth ventrolaterally long and strong lying posterolateral to lateral-most tooth setiform porodonts on small knobs thick and long, lying posterolateral to lateral-most tooth lying posterolateral to the lateral-most teeth
Tergites all smooth, without wrinkles smooth smooth, without wrinkles smooth, never rugose smooth, without wrinkles and slightly hunched behind smooth
Number of coxal pores 6555 6–7, usually 66(7)6 776(7)5(6) 6666 3–5, 4555, 5555, 4444, 4455 (females) and 4444, 3344 (males) 3334
Shape of coxal pores circular round to ovate round or ovate round and uni-seriate, the most proximal pore on 15th coxae minute round to ovate not reported
Tarsus 1–tarsus 2 articulation on legs 1–13 well-defined well-defined well-defined unipartite tarsi well-defined not reported
Male 14th leg moderately thicker and longer not reported not reported longer and thicker than 1–13 thick and strong not reported
Male 15th leg moderately thicker and longer not reported not reported longer and thicker than 1–13 thick and strong not reported
Dorsal sulci on male 14th legs absent absent not reported not reported absent not reported
Dorsal sulci on male 15th legs absent not reported not reported not reported absent not reported
DaC spure on 13th–15th legs, 12th sometimes present on 14th–15th legs on 12th–15th legs on 12th–15th legs, 11th sometimes present on 11th–15th legs, 9th–10th sometimes present not reported
14th accessory spine present present not reported posterior accessory spurs present present not reported
15th accessory spine absent present not reported absent absent not reported
Characters L. longibasitarsus L. lineatus L. mandschreiensis L. maqinensis L. multispinipes L. parvicornis
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 2+2 moderately long, bullet-shaped spurs inner spur slightly smaller and more anterior than outer one 3+3 moderately sharp, slender conical spurs 3+3, same size 2+2 moderately small, coniform spurs, inner spur smaller 2+2, blunt, coniform spurs, with inner spur smaller than outer one 2+2
Characters L. longibasitarsus L. lineatus L. mandschreiensis L. maqinensis L. multispinipes L. parvicornis
Dorsal side of second article of female gonopods three long setae along dorsolateral ridge not reported not reported not reported with 3–4 long setae and 5–6 spines lying dorsally on its external margin not reported
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) simple, having small triangular protuberance on ventral side simple simple unidentate, curved with a small triangular protuberance on ventral side simple simple
Male gonopods small, semicircular article with 3-5 seta on its surface hemispherical bulge, without setae small, undivided, oblique apically, with 2 setae hemispherical bulge, having a long seta, and apically slightly sclerotised not reported
Characters L. polyommatus L. rhysus L. sulcipes L. sulcifemoralis L. tetraspinus L. varioporus L. zhui
Authorities Qiao et al. 2019 Attems 1934 Attems 1927 Takakuwa and Takashima 1949 Pei et al. 2018 This paper Pei et al. 2011
Distribution China NW (Tibet) China S (Fujian and Taiwan) China S (Taiwan) China W (Shanxi) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur) China E (Hebei) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur)
Body length (mm) 16.10 –18.30 15.0 Not reported 12.0 9.6–13.3 12.4–19.1 8.1–15.0
Number of antennal articles 20+20 20+20 in female, 20+21 in male 19–22 20+20 19–22, commonly 20 20–22 20–24, commonly 20
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 14, in 3 rows 8, in 4 rows 7, in 2 rows 6 8–10, in 3 rows 9–10, in 3 rows 10–13, in 3–4 rows
Posterior ocellus posterior ocellus comparatively large comparatively large comparatively large all ocelli same size two ocelli comparatively large posterior two ocelli comparatively large comparatively large
Seriate ocelli almost equal not reported not reported same size the adjoining Tömösváry organ slightly small others subequal in size dorsal ones moderately large, those near ventral margin of ocellar field moderately small, others of moderate size
Tömösváry’s organ moderately smaller than the adjoining ocelli not reported not reported same size as ocelli subequal in size to adjoining ocelli slightly smaller than the adjacent ocelli slightly larger than adjoining ocelli
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 2 + 2 subtriangular slightly acute teeth 2+2 2+2 2+2, small and sharp 2+2 subtriangular slightly acute 2+2 blunt triangular teeth 2+2 moderately small and pointed
Porodont thick and strong, just posterolateral and separated from the lateral tooth not obvious not reported slender and long thick and strong, just posterolateral and separated from lateral tooth slender, lying posterolateral to and separated from the lateral-most tooth moderately thick in basal, moderately pointed, just posterolateral to lateral tooth
Tergites smooth without wrinkles with shallow wrinkles Smooth, posterior angles slightly triangular in T14 not reported smooth, without wrinkles, dorsum slightly convex smooth, without wrinkles, dorsum slightly convex smooth, without wrinkles, backside slightly hunched
Number of coxal pores 4–7, 5676, 5666 (females) 5565, 4554 (males) 6554 4554 5555 usually 4555, 4554, rarely 3454, 3455, 3343 in females and usually 2332, 2333, rarely 3444, 3333 in males in the female, 4554, 67(8)7(8)6, 5(6)765, 6(7)776, 66(7)65, in the male, 66(7)7(6)5(4), 565(6)3 2–4, 3444, 3344, 3443, 3333 in female, and 3443, 2343, 2433, 2333 in male.
Shape of coxal pores round or slightly oval round round round round or slightly oval round to slightly oval round or slightly ovate
Tarsus 1–tarsus 2 articulation on legs 1–13 ill-defined not reported well-defined well-defined ill–defined well-defined well–defined
Male 14th legs slightly thicker in the female, significantly thicker and stronger in the male not reported not reported thick and strong significantly thicker and stronger moderately thicker and longer moderately thicker and stronger
Characters L. polyommatus L. rhysus L. sulcipes L. sulcifemoralis L. tetraspinus L. varioporus L. zhui
Male 15th legs slightly thicker in the female, significantly thicker and stronger in the male femur and tibia thicker femur and tibia thicker thick and strong significantly thicker and stronger moderately thicker and longer thicker and stronger, with a circular protuberance on distal end of tibia
Dorsal sulci on male 14th legs with a longitudinal discontinuous shallow and narrow groove on dorsal side of tibia, and a faintly black vertical line at the bottom on dorsal side not reported present on femur present on femur and tibia absent absent absent
Dorsal sulci on male 15th legs with a longitudinal discontinuous shallow and narrow groove on dorsal side of tibia, and a faintly black vertical line at the bottom on dorsal side not reported present on femur and tibia present on femur and tibia present on femur absent absent
DaC spure on 11th–15th legs on 15th legs present on 15th legs present absent on 12th–15th legs on 12th–15th legs on 13th–15th legs, 12th sometimes present
14th accessory spine present not reported not reported not reported present anterior accessory spine absent present
15th accessory spine absent absent not reported not reported absent anterior accessory spine absent absent
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 2 + 2 moderately long and slender, bullet-shape spurs 2+2, slender 2+2, thick spurs 2+2, strong, long and sharp 3+3, few 3+4, only one 4+4 coniform spurs 3+3 (seldom 3+2) moderately long and slender, coniform 2+2 moderately long, coniform spurs, inner spur slightly smaller and more anterior than outer
Dorsal side of second article of female gonopods 9 long setae lying dorsally on the posterior part of the external margin not reported not reported not reported 3 long setae and four short, robust spines lying dorsally on posterior part of external margin no setae and spines three spurs arranged in one irregular row on dorsal terminal part
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) simple simple dimidiate simple simple, with a very small subtriangular blunt denticle on inner margin simple broad, and tridentate
Male gonopods short, apically slightly sclerotized, appearing as a small hemispherical bulge with 2 long setae not reported not reported not reported small hemispherical bulge, with 1–2 long setae short, small hemispherical bulge, with 1–3 long setae, apically slightly sclerotized small bulge, with 1–2 long setae on surface, and terminal slightly sclerotised

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant No. 31572239) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Grant No. C2018111019) and Hebei Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Conservation (Grant No. hklz201908) and the Key Discipline of Zoology of Hengshui University. We are grateful to Dr Gregory D Edgecombe (London), Dr Pavel Stoev (Sofia), and Dr Marzio Zapparoli (Viterbo) for their hospitality and valuable assistance during our research. We thank Dr Rowland M Shelley, North Carolina, USA, and Dr His-Te Shih, Taichung, China, for providing us with invaluable literature.

References

  • Attems C (1927) Neue Chilopoden. Zoologischer Anzeiger 72: 291–305.
  • Attems C (1934) Einige neue Geophiliden und Lithobiiden des Hamburger Museums. Zoologischer Anzeiger 107: 310–317.
  • Bonato L, Edgecombe GD, Lewis JGE, Minelli A, Pereira LA, Shelley RM, Zapparoli M (2010) A common terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes (Chilopoda). ZooKeys 69: 17–51. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.69.737
  • Chamberlin RV (1913) The lithobiid genera Nampabius, Garibius, Tidabius and Sigibius. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard College 57: 37–104.
  • Chamberlin RV (1919) The Chilopoda collected by the Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1913–1918. In: Report of the Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1913–1918. Volume III: Insects. Part H: Spiders, Mites and Myriapods, 15–22.
  • Chamberlin RV (1923) Chilopods of the Pribilof Islands. North American Fauna 46: 240–244.
  • Chamberlin RV, Wang YX (1952) Some records and descriptions of Chilopods from Japan and other oriental areas. Proceeding of the Biological Society of Washington 65: 177–188.
  • Chao J, Lee K, Chang H (2018) Lithobius (Monotarsobius) meifengensis, a new species of centipede from high altitude forest in central Taiwan (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae). ZooKeys 741: 181–192. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21036
  • Eason EH (1983) The identity of the European and Mediterranean species of Lithobiidae (Chilopoda) described by KW Verhoeff and now represented by material preserved in the British Museum (Natural History). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 77: 111–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1983.tb00526.x
  • Eason EH (1986) On the synonymy of Lithobius giganteus Sseliwanoff, 1881 and the taxonomic status of Porobius Attems, 1926 (Chilopoda). Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums, Wien 87B: 181–192.
  • Eason EH (1993) Descriptions of four new species of Lithobius from the oriental region and a redescription of Australobius palnis (Eason 1973) from Sri Lanka (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha). Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona 17: 181–199.
  • Jeekel CAW (2005) Nomenclator generum et familiarum Chilopodorum: a list of the genus and family-group names in the class Chilopoda from the 10th edition of Linnaeus, 1758, to the end of 1957. Myriapod Memoranda Supplement 1: 1–130.
  • Ma HQ, Pei SJ, Hou XJ, Zhu TG, Gai YH (2015) Lithobius (Ezembius) anabilineatus sp. nov., a new species (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) from Eastern China. Oriental Insects 49(3–4): 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.2015.1081647
  • Pei SJ, Liu HP, Lu YM, Hou XJ, Ma HQ (2019) Lithobius (Ezembius) ternidentatus sp. n. (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae), a new species from China. ZooKeys 829: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.829.30884
  • Pei SJ, Lu YM, Liu HP, Hou XJ, Ma HQ (2018) Lithobius (Ezembius) tetraspinus, a new species of centipede from northwest China (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae). ZooKeys 741: 203–217. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.19980
  • Pei SJ, Lu YM, Liu HP, Hou XJ, Ma HQ, Zapparoli M (2016) Lithobius (Ezembius) multispinipes n. sp. a new species of centipede from North West China (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 4169(2): 390–400. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4169.2.12
  • Pei SJ, Ma HQ, Hou XJ, Zhu TG, Gai YH (2015) Lithobius (Ezembius) laevidentata sp. n., a new species (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) from the Northwest region of China. Biologia 70(8): 1113–1117. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0124
  • Qiao PH, Ma HQ, Pei SJ, Zhang TZ, Su JP (2019) Lithobius (Ezembius) polyommatus sp. n. and Lithobius (Ezembius) dulanensis sp. n. (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae), two new species from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China Biologia 74(5): 455–462. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-018-00173-z
  • Qiao PH, Qin W, Ma HQ, Zhang TZ, Su J, Lin GH (2019) Two new species of lithobiid centipedes and the first record of Lamyctes africanus Porath (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) in China. Journal of Natural History 53(15–16): 897–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2019.1606355
  • Qiao PH, Qin W, Ma HQ, Zhang TZ (2018) Two new species of Lithobius on Qinghai-Tibetan plateau identified from morphology and COI sequences (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). ZooKeys 785: 11–28. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.785.28580
  • Takakuwa Y (1939) The species of genus Lithobius from Japan. Transactions of the Sapporo Natural History Society 16: 28–37.
  • Takakuwa Y (1940) Class Chilopoda, Epimorpha, Lithobiomorpha. In: Fauna Nipponica. Vol. 9, Fas. 8, No. 3. Sanseido Book Store, Tokyo, 104 pp.
  • Zapparoli M (1991) Note su alcune specie di chilopodi della regione palestinese. Fragmenta Entomologica 23: 15–33.
  • Zapparoli M, Edgecombe GD (2011) Lithobiomorpha. In: Minelli A (Ed.) Treatise on Zoology-Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology – The Myriapoda, Volume 1 Jordaan Luchtmans, Brill, Leiden/Boston, 371–389.
login to comment