Research Article |
Corresponding author: Viktor Brygadyrenko ( brigad@ua.fm ) Academic editor: Warren Steiner
© 2015 Viktor Brygadyrenko, Sergii Nazimov.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Brygadyrenko VV, Nazimov SS (2015) Trophic relations of Opatrum sabulosum (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) with leaves of cultivated and uncultivated species of herbaceous plants under laboratory conditions. ZooKeys 481: 57-68. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.481.7015
|
We carried out a quantitative assessment of the consumption of herbaceous plants by Opatrum sabulosum (Linnaeus, 1761) – a highly significant agricultural pest species. We researched the feeding preferences of this pest species with respect to 33 uncultivated and 22 cultivated plant species. This species of darkling beetle feeds on many uncultivated plant species, including those with hairy leaves and bitter milky sap, such as Scabiosa ucrainca (5.21 mg/specimen/24 hours), Euphorbia virgata (3.45), Solanum nigrum (3.32), Centauria scabiosa (2.47), Lamium album (2.41), Aristolochia clematitis (1.76), Chenopodium album (1.73), Arctium lappa (1.51), Asperula odorata (1.20). A high rate of leaf consumption is also characteristic for cultivated species, for example, Perilla nankinensis (5.05 mg/specimen/24 hours), Lycopersicon esculentum (3.75), Tropaeolum majus (3.29), Nicotiana tabacum (2.66), Rumex acetosa (1.96), Beta vulgaris (1.27). O. sabulosum is capable of feeding on plants which are poisonous to cattle. This species of darkling beetle consumes 95.5% of the cultivated and 48.5% of the uncultivated herbaceous plants researched.
Opatrum sabulosum , Tenebrionidae , Food Preferences, Laboratory Experiments, Plant-eating Insects
For many species of phytophages and saprophages the consumption of leaves of herbaceous plants is the main aspect of their negative influence on natural ecosystems. If a particular species of insect feeds on one particular species of grass, it is quite easy to control its numbers in agricultural conditions (
The imagines of O. sabulosum are most active in the first half of spring (
In natural conditions the imago of O. sabulosum feeds on the leaves of steppe plants, and in fields it begins to damage both weeds and agricultural crops (
The new generation emerges at the end of August (
According to the information in the literature, the imagines of O. sabulosum feed on wild and weedy species of plants in natural environments, and in agricultural ecosystems they transfer their consumption to cultivated plants and weeds. It is also widely assumed that this species of darkling beetle does not feed on species with bitter milky juice, such as Euphorbia stepposa Zoz ex Prokh. and Cichorium intybus L., and on hairy leaf species, such as Agrimonia eupatoria L. and Asclepias syriaca L., though statements on this point are fragmentary and require support.
Controlling the numbers of O. sabulosum in its capacity as a highly significant pest on agricultural crops is impossible without a quantitative assessment of its consumption spectrum with respect to herbaceous plants. There is only fragmentary information in the scientific literature on the damage caused by this species to specific species of agricultural crops and this lacks a quantitative assessment of the amount of food consumed by an individual beetle. As a result of our preliminary research we have established that, though this species of darkling beetle has traditionally been considered a saprophage, its consumption of six types of soil and four types of steppe litter have not been observed in laboratory conditions (
So, the following questions are of considerable interest: (1) whether O. sabulosum eats the leaves of plants poisonous to cattle, (2) whether it eats green leaves of hairy plants, (3) whether the beetles prefer species from the natural flora or cultivated plants. In connection with these questions, the aim of this study is to establish in laboratory conditions the potential trophic relations of O. sabulosum with the leaves of herbaceous plants belonging to different taxonomic groups.
The research was carried out on the outskirts of Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, at the end of July beginning of August 2013. A total of 1,920 O. sabulosum individuals were collected on plots in steppe habitat and kept for 10 days on an optimal diet consisting of lettuce, cabbage and vine leaves. Sprinkling devices were placed in the containers so the beetles did not experience lack of water.
Each food item was offered in eight transparent plastic containers (8 × 12 × 10 cm) without any substrate provided, each with four beetles (two male, two female), a total of 32 imago specimens being involved in each experiment with a particular plant species. The temperature in the laboratory was maintained at 25–28 °C and the humidity at 60–80%. Each experiment lasted for five days. A control group was kept in 32 containers identical to those used in the main experiment, also without any substrate, but without any food, each holding four specimens.
The leaves of naturally occurring herbaceous plant species were collected from natural ecosystems which were not affected by anthropogenic pollution. The leaves of cultivated plants were collected from a private plot where the plants had been cultivated without the use of growth stimulators, herbicides, organic or mineral fertilisers. The green leaves were dried out over a period of 12 to 20 days in the open air on shelves in an open sided roofed structure. After this procedure the drying of the leaves was completed with a 24 hour period in a drying chamber.
To determine the mass of food consumed we took into account the degree of decomposition of the leaves under the influence of microorganisms. For this purpose, simultaneously with the main experiment we placed leaves of each plant species in eight identical containers (making a total of 440 containers) without O. sabulosum. The consumption of food by the beetles was calculated using the optimised formula proposed by David (1998). All experiments were carried out in identical light, temperature and humidity conditions.
The weight of the food and the beetles was determined on analytical scales JD-100 (precision 1 mg). In the statistical analysis of the data we calculated x ± Sx, the median and range of fluctuation for each characteristic. The most significant characteristic is the median (the normal distribution of the characteristics was not observed as the beetles do not eat daily in equal portions, but at an uneven rate, each “meal” varying considerably in the weight of food consumed).
From the wild growing herbaceous plants imagines of O. sabulosum consume predominantly the following species (Table
Consumption of leaves (mg/specimen/24 hours) of different species of uncultivated herbaceous plants by O. sabulosum in laboratory conditions (n = 32).
Family | Species | Median | x ± Sx | Min–Max |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apiaceae | Aegopodium podagraria L. | 0.20 | 0.21 ± 0.11 | 0.04–0.35 |
Apocynaceae | Vinca minor L. | 0.40 | 0.39 ± 0.27 | 0.04–0.77 |
Aristolochiaceae | Aristolochia clematitis L. | 1.76 | 1.76 ± 0.75 | 0.65–3.00 |
Asclepiadaceae | Asclepias syriaca L. | 0.18 | 0.18 ± 0.10 | 0.05–0.35 |
Asteraceae | Arctium lappa L. | 1.51 | 1.42 ± 0.59 | 0.00–2.13 |
–“– | A. tomentosum Mill. | 0.21 | 0.25 ± 0.20 | 0.00–0.71 |
–“– | Artemisia absinthium L. | 0.40 | 0.36 ± 0.22 | 0.00–0.65 |
–“– | Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. | 0.88 | 0.79 ± 0.31 | 0.00–1.03 |
–“– | Cichorium intybus L. | 0.60 | 0.64 ± 0.77 | 0.10–2.55 |
–“– | Centaurea scabiosa L. | 2.47 | 2.47 ± 0.84 | 1.50–4.30 |
–“– | Hieracium pilosella L. | 0.85 | 0.86 ± 0.58 | 0.15–2.15 |
–“– | Senecio vernalis Waldst. & Kit. | 0.16 | 0.16 ± 0.09 | 0.00–0.25 |
Cannabaceae | Humulus lupulus L. | 0.58 | 0.72 ± 0.56 | 0.00–1.63 |
Chenopodiaceae | Chenopodium album L. | 1.73 | 2.03 ± 1.74 | 0.00–5.52 |
Convallariaceae | Convallaria majalis L. | 0.54 | 0.44 ± 0.39 | 0.00–1.08 |
Dipsacaceae | Scabiosa ucranica L. | 5.21 | 5.21 ± 1.31 | 3.10–7.45 |
Euphorbiaceae | Euphorbia stepposa Zoz ex Prokh. | 0.74 | 0.74 ± 0.21 | 0.40–1.15 |
–“– | E. virgata W.K. | 3.45 | 3.86 ± 1.76 | 2.50–8.30 |
Fabaceae | Astragalus borysthenicus Klokov. | 0.55 | 0.55 ± 0.27 | 0.00–0.94 |
–“– | Medicago romanica Prodan. | 0.95 | 1.11 ± 0.56 | 0.40–2.05 |
Hypericaceae | Hypericum perforatum L. | 0.60 | 0.60 ± 0.30 | 0.00–1.15 |
Lamiaceae | Ajuga genevensis L. | 0.25 | 0.62 ± 0.73 | 0.15–2.40 |
–“– | Lamium album L. | 2.41 | 2.49 ± 1.36 | 0.00–5.31 |
–“– | Salvia nemorosa L. | 0.60 | 0.58 ± 0.34 | 0.00–1.05 |
–“– | Thymus marschallianus Willd. | 0.65 | 1.02 ± 1.25 | 0.15–4.25 |
Papaveraceae | Chelidonium majus L. | 0.55 | 0.55 ± 0.30 | 0.16–1.04 |
Polygonaceae | Polygonum aviculare L. | 0.70 | 0.87 ± 0.78 | 0.00–2.31 |
Rosaceae | Agrimonia eupatoria L. | 0.08 | 0.08 ± 0.05 | 0.00–0.15 |
–“– | Fragaria vesca L. | 0.15 | 0.17 ± 0.10 | 0.00–0.35 |
–“– | Potentilla argentea L. | 0.35 | 0.35 ± 0.20 | 0.10–0.60 |
Rubiaceae | Asperula odorata L. | 1.20 | 0.89 ± 0.65 | 0.00–1.60 |
Solanaceae | Solanum nigrum L. | 3.32 | 3.15 ± 1.67 | 0.00–5.14 |
Violaceae | Viola tricolor L. | 0.36 | 0.38 ± 0.31 | 0.00–0.97 |
In various containers the maximum speeds of food consumption significantly exceeded the average figures for each plant species, an effect most likely connected with the prolonged reproductive period of individual beetles and the intensive consumption of food for the development of eggs.
The following species were practically not consumed by O. sabulosum: Cirsium vulgare (0.88), Euphorbia stepposa (0.74), Hypercium perforatum (0.60), Salvia nemorosa (0.60), Astragalus borysthenicus (0.55), Chelidonium majus (0.55), Convallaria majalis (0.54), Artemisia absinthium (0.40), Vinca minor (0.40), Viola tricolor (0.36), Potentilla argentea (0.35), Arctium tomentosum (0.21), Aegopodium podagraria (0.20), Asclepias syriaca (0.18), Senecio vernalis (0.16), Fragaria vesca (0.15) and Agrimonia eupatoria (0.08). For this group of plants the maximum rate of food consumption for any container did not exceed 1.2 mg per specimen per 24 hours.
The decrease in beetles’ body weight during the experiment (Table
Changes in body weight (mg/specimen/24 hours) of O. sabulosum on diet of different uncultivated herbaceous plant species in laboratory conditions (n = 32).
Family | Species | Median | x ± Sx | Min–Max |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apiaceae | Aegopodium podagraria L. | –0.33 | –0.33 ± 0.31 |
–1.00–+0.15 |
Apocynaceae | Vinca minor L. | –1.85 | –2.41 ± 2.09 |
–6.25––0.50 |
Aristolochiaceae | Aristolochia clematitis L. | –0.65 | –0.69 ± 0.25 |
–1.20––0.35 |
Asclepiadaceae | Asclepias syriaca L. | –0.95 | –0.89 ± 0.12 | –1.05––0.65 |
Asteraceae | Arctium lappa L. | –0.80 | –0.73 ± 0.18 |
–1.05––0.40 |
–“– | A. tomentosum Mill. | –0.67 | –0.67 ± 0.19 |
–0.95––0.40 |
–“– | Artemisia absinthium L. | –1.14 | –1.14 ± 0.30 | –1.45––0.55 |
–“– | Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. | –1.20 | –1.14 ± 0.14 |
–1.35––0.85 |
–“– | Cichorium intybus L. | –1.60 | –1.66 ± 1.19 |
–4.15–+0.25 |
–“– | Centaurea scabiosa L. | –0.55 | –0.60 ± 0.14 |
–0.80––0.45 |
–“– | Hieracium pilosella L. | –0.95 | –0.95 ± 0.24 | –1.35––0.65 |
–“– | Senecio vernalis Waldst. & Kit. | –0.90 | –0.94 ± 0.29 | –1.60––0.65 |
Cannabaceae | Humulus lupulus L. | –1.05 | –0.94 ± 0.29 | –1.20––0.40 |
Chenopodiaceae | Chenopodium album L. | –0.65 | –0.71 ± 0.27 |
–1.25––0.40 |
Convallariaceae | Convallaria majalis L. | –0.80 | –0.72 ± 0.36 |
–1.20––0.15 |
Dipsacaceae | Scabiosa ucranica L. | –0.53 | –0.53 ± 0.24 |
–0.95––0.25 |
Euphorbiaceae | Euphorbia stepposa Zoz ex Prokh. | –1.19 | –1.19 ± 0.40 |
–2.00––0.75 |
–“– | E. virgata W.K. | –1.14 | –1.14 ± 0.40 | –1.75––0.65 |
Fabaceae | Astragalus borysthenicus Klokov. | –0.25 | –0.21 ± 0.25 |
–0.55–+0.25 |
–“– | Medicago romanica Prodan. | –0.80 | –0.77 ± 0.19 |
–0.95––0.40 |
Hypericaceae | Hypericum perforatum L. | –0.65 | –0.48 ± 0.55 |
–0.80–+0.95 |
Lamiaceae | Ajuga genevensis L. | –0.95 | –0.88 ± 0.44 | –1.45–+0.15 |
–“– | Lamium album L. | –0.79 | –0.79 ± 0.19 |
–1.20––0.55 |
–“– | Salvia nemorosa L. | –1.35 | –1.47 ± 0.47 |
–2.15––0.95 |
–“– | Thymus marschallianus Willd. | –1.05 | –1.05 ± 0.42 | –1.70––0.40 |
Papaveraceae | Chelidonium majus L. | –0.90 | –1.06 ± 0.49 | –2.20––0.55 |
Polygonaceae | Polygonum aviculare L. | –0.86 | –0.86 ± 0.27 |
–1.20––0.40 |
Rosaceae | Agrimonia eupatoria L. | –1.06 | –1.06 ± 0.35 | –1.55––0.55 |
–“– | Fragaria vesca L. | –0.68 | –0.68 ± 0.16 |
–0.95––0.40 |
–“– | Potentilla argentea L. | –1.20 | –1.14 ± 0.34 | –1.60––0.55 |
Rubiaceae | Asperula odorata L. | –1.44 | –1.44 ± 0.41 |
–2.15––0.75 |
Solanaceae | Solanum nigrum L. | –1.44 | –1.44 ± 0.41 |
–2.15––0.75 |
Violaceae | Viola tricolor L. | –0.66 | –0.66 ± 0.22 |
–1.05––0.40 |
The minimum loss in body weight of O. sabulosum compared to the start of the experiment was observed for the following species: Astragalus borysthenicus (–0.25 mg/specimen/24 hours), Aegopodium podagraria (–0.33), Scabiosa ucrainca (–0.53), Centaurea scabiosa (–0.55), Aristolochia clematitis (–0.65), Chenopodium album (–0.65), Hypericum perforatum (–0.65), Viola tricolor (–0.66), Arctium tomentosum (–0.67), Fragaria vesca (–0.68), Lamium album (–0.79), Medicago romanica (–0.80), Convallaria majalis (–0.80) and Arctium lappa (–0.80).
Maximum faecal formation by the beetles was observed following diets of Polygonum aviculare (0.73) and Solanum nigrum (0.70), and the minimum rate (equal to 0 mg/specimen/24 hours in all eight experimental containers) was observed after feeding on Convallaria majalis and Vinca minor. The intensity of faecal formation was at an intermediate level with the other plant species tested.
It is interesting that for Aegopodium podagraria one of the minimum rates of food consumption was observed (0.20 mg/specimen/24 hours), one of the minimum losses of body weight compared to the control group of beetles (–0.33 compared to –1.02 mg/specimen/24 hours for the group without access to food) and also the minimum rates of excrement formation (0.10 mg/specimen/24 hours). Thus, from 0.20 mg of food consumed per day 0.10 mg of excrement was formed, the remainder being expended on anabolism and respiration.
The leaves of cultivated herbaceous plant species were consumed on average with the same intensity as the leaves of wild plant species (Table
Consumption of leaves (mg/specimen/24 hours) of different cultivated herbaceous plant species by O. sabulosum in laboratory conditions (n = 32).
Family | Species | Median | x ± Sx | Min–Max |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apiaceae | Daucus carota L. | 0.80 | 0.80 ± 0.47 | 0.00–1.74 |
Asteraceae | Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench. | 0.29 | 0.49 ± 0.61 | 0.00–2.04 |
–“– | Matricaria recutita L. | 0.54 | 0.65 ± 0.50 | 0.00–1.54 |
–“– | Helianthus annuus L. | 1.05 | 1.05 ± 0.26 | 0.77–1.55 |
–“– | H. tuberosus L. | 0.32 | 0.36 ± 0.26 | 0.00–0.77 |
Boraginaceae | Borago officinalis L. | 0.86 | 1.05 ± 1.13 | 0.00–2.97 |
Chenopodiaceae | Beta vulgaris L. | 1.27 | 1.49 ± 0.73 | 0.58–2.82 |
Cucurbitaceae | Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai. | 0.61 | 0.76 ± 0.68 | 0.00–1.89 |
–“– | Cucurbita pepo L. | 0.37 | 0.37 ± 0.25 | 0.00–0.76 |
Lamiaceae | Perilla nankinensis (Lour.) Decne. | 5.05 | 4.60 ± 1.75 | 0.00–5.66 |
Malvaceae | Malva erecta J. Presl & C. Presl | 1.13 | 1.13 ± 0.51 | 0.32–1.74 |
Onagraceae | Oenothera biennis L. | 0.73 | 0.96 ± 0.77 | 0.23–2.82 |
Phytolaccaceae | Phytolacca americana L. | 0.49 | 0.57 ± 0.47 | 0.03–1.23 |
Poaceae | Zea mays L. | 0.17 | 0.17 ± 0.08 | 0.02–0.31 |
Polemoniaceae | Phlox paniculata L. | 0.44 | 0.44 ± 0.13 | 0.26–0.56 |
Polygonaceae | Rumex acetosa L. | 1.96 | 2.00 ± 1.52 | 0.00–4.36 |
Ranunculaceae | Aquilegia vulgaris L. | 0.68 | 0.63 ± 0.38 | 0.05–1.03 |
Rosaceae | Fragaria moschata (Duchesne) Weston. | 0.24 | 0.87 ± 1.71 | 0.00–5.38 |
Solanaceae | Capsicum annuum L. | 1.10 | 1.25 ± 0.40 | 0.82–2.04 |
–“– | Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. | 3.75 | 3.74 ± 2.66 | 0.00–8.20 |
–“– | Nicotiana tabacum L. | 2.66 | 3.05 ± 2.72 | 0.00–9.08 |
Tropaeolaceae | Tropaeolum majus L. | 3.29 | 3.10 ± 2.23 | 0.00–6.54 |
Leaves of the following species were those consumed least intensively by O. sabulosum: Oenothera biennis (0.73), Aquilegia vulgaris (0.68), Citrullus lanatus (0.61), Matricaria recutita (0.54), Phytolacca americana (0.49), Phlox paniculata (0.44), Cucurbita pepo (0.37), Helianthus tuberosus (0.32), Echinacea purpurea (0.29), Fragaria moschata (0.24) and Zea mays (0.17 mg/specimen/24 hours). It is interesting that of all the cultivated grasses researched, the minimum quantity of dried leaves was consumed for maize despite the fact that this is the main crop damaged by O. sabulosum. It is worth emphasising once again that phytophages eat the fresh or decaying leaves of this species but hardly ever dry leaves.
Compared to the control group without access to food, for which we observed a decrease in body weight of 1.02 ± 0.27 mg/specimen/24 hours, the consumption of many species of cultivated plants minimises the loss of the original body weight. This can be seen with Daucus carota (–80 mg/specimen/24 hours), Nicotiana tabacum (–0.80), Phlox paniculata (–0.80), Capsicum annuum (–0.76), Phytolacca americana (–0.75), Helianthus tuberosus (–0.74), Malva erecta (–0.74), Oenothera biennis (–0.70), Rumex acetosa (–0.67), Lycopersicon esculentum (–0.65), Fragaria moschata (–0.64), Helianthus annuus (–0.58), Matricaria recutita (–0.55), Zea mays (–0.55), Citrullus lanatus (–0.53), Aquilegia vulgaris (–0.49), Tropaeolum majus (–0.40), Cucurbita pepo (–0.25) and Borago officinalis (–0.20). In our experiment the consumption of dry leaves of Beta vulgaris did not lead to a reliable tendency towards preservation in the beetles’ body weight compared to the control group (–1.08 and –1.02 mg/specimen/24 hours respectively).
The maximum intensity of faecal formation for O. sabulosum was characteristic for diets of dry leaves of the following species: Daucus carota (1.03 mg/specimen/24 hours), Lycopersicon esculentum (0.65), Fragaria moschata (0.55), Perilla nankinensis (0.55), Citrullus lanatus (0.53), Rumex acetosa (0.45), Nicotiana tabacum (0.41), Zea mays (0.41), Capsicum annuum (0.30), Cucurbita pepo (0.30) and Helianthus annuus (0.30).
The research showed that with 16 of the 33 wild and 21 of the 22 cultivated herbaceous plant species investigated the species of leaf consumed led to a reliable loss in the beetles’ body weight (see Tables
Changes in body weight (mg/specimen/24 hours) of O. sabulosum on diet of leaves of different cultivated herbaceous plant species in laboratory conditions (n = 32).
Family | Species | Median | x ± Sx | Min–Max |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apiaceae | Daucus carota L. | –0.80 | –0.87 ± 0.40 |
–1.60––0.40 |
Asteraceae | Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench. | –0.95 | –0.95 ± 0.39 | –1.85––0.40 |
–“– | Matricaria recutita L. | –0.55 | –0.66 ± 0.23 |
–1.20––0.40 |
–“– | Helianthus annuus L. | –0.58 | –0.58 ± 0.21 |
–0.80––0.15 |
–“– | H. tuberosus L. | –0.74 | –0.74 ± 0.36 |
–1.35––0.25 |
Boraginaceae | Borago officinalis L. | –0.20 | –0.22 ± 0.28 |
–0.80–+0.15 |
Chenopodiaceae | Beta vulgaris L. | –1.08 | –1.08 ± 0.30 | –1.65––0.55 |
Cucurbitaceae | Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai. | –0.53 | –0.53 ± 0.15 |
–0.80––0.40 |
–“– | Cucurbita pepo L. | –0.25 | –0.34 ± 0.19 |
–0.65––0.15 |
Lamiaceae | Perilla nankinensis (Lour.) Decne. | –0.95 | –0.96 ± 0.32 | –1.45––0.55 |
Malvaceae | Malva erecta J. Presl & C. Presl. | –0.74 | –0.74 ± 0.20 |
–1.05––0.40 |
Onagraceae | Oenothera biennis L. | –0.70 | –0.70 ± 0.40 |
–1.45––0.15 |
Phytolaccaceae | Phytolacca americana L | –0.75 | –0.74 ± 0.20 |
–1.05––0.40 |
Poaceae | Zea mays L. | –0.55 | –0.54 ± 0.18 |
–0.80––0.20 |
Polemoniaceae | Phlox paniculata L. | –0.80 | –0.96 ± 0.43 |
–2.00––0.40 |
Polygonaceae | Rumex acetosa L. | –0.67 | –0.67 ± 0.27 |
–1.05––0.20 |
Ranunculaceae | Aquilegia vulgaris L. | –0.49 | –0.49 ± 0.46 |
–1.05–+0.55 |
Rosaceae | Fragaria moschata (Duchesne) Weston. | –0.64 | –0.64 ± 0.33 |
–1.35––0.25 |
Solanaceae | Capsicum annuum L. | –0.76 | –0.76 ± 0.22 |
–1.20––0.55 |
–“– | Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. | –0.65 | –0.65 ± 0.14 |
–0.80––0.40 |
–“– | Nicotiana tabacum L. | –0.80 | –0.72 ± 0.16 |
–0.95––0.40 |
Tropaeolaceae | Tropaeolum majus L. | –0.40 | –0.43 ± 0.31 |
–0.80–+0.25 |
According to the work of
Opatrum sabulosum has shown an ability to feed on species of plants with hairy leaves and a bitter milky sap. The beetles lost hardly any weight when feeding on the bitter leaves of A. borysthenicus and A. clematitis, and also experienced insignificant weight loss in variants of the experiments with hairy plant species such as S. ucrainca and C. scabiosa. It follows that this species of darkling beetle consumes a fairly wide range of bitter species not eaten by livestock.
According to modern data (
It is clear that outside the reproductive period O. sabulosum is able to feed intensively on both wild and cultivated species of herbaceous plants. According to information from the literature (
The seasonal dynamic of the trophic activity of this species of darkling beetle requires further research, especially the characteristics of its trophic activity (the quantitative and qualitative differences in its diet) during the period of intensive spring feeding and during the egg laying period. The peculiarities of the larval consumption of the root parts of wild and cultivated plants requires detailed research. The sex and age differences in the diet of the beetles in their first and second years of life remain unstudied. Besides this, the differences in the consumption of dry, fresh and decaying leaves of the beetle’s main species of food plants are of considerable interest. The results of studies of the chemical content of the plants consumed by O. sabulosum will form the basis for the construction of models of the trophic relations of this species of polyphage, which is one of the most intensively studied and economically significant species of insect.