Review Article |
Corresponding author: Andrzej Wolski ( andrzej.wolski@uni.opole.pl ) Academic editor: Thomas Henry
© 2014 Andrzej Wolski, Jacek Gorczyca.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Wolski A, Gorczyca J (2014) Revision of the plant bug genus Xenocylapidius (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Miridae, Cylapinae), with descriptions of five new species from Australia and New Caledonia. ZooKeys 459: 73-94. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.459.8015
|
The genus Xenocylapidius Gorczyca, 1997 is revised. Five new species: Xenocylapidius acutipennis sp. n., X. ater sp. n., X. bimaculatus sp. n., X. gemellus sp. n., and X. rolandi sp. n. are described from Australia and New Caledonia. Illustrations of the male genitalia, color photographs of dorsal and lateral views of the adults of all species, and key to species of the genus Xenocylapidius are provided.
Heteroptera , Miridae , Cylapinae , Xenocylapidius , new species, keys, Australian Region, Australia, New Caledonia
With 75 species included in 28 genera (
The genus Xenocylapidius was described by
In this contribution, we revise the genus Xenocylapidius and describe five new species. All previously known species are diagnosed, and identification key to species is provided.
Observations were made using an Olympus SZX12 stereomicroscope and an Olympus BX50 optical microscope. Color pictures of the adults (Figs
Measurements were taken using an eyepiece (ocular) micrometer; all measurements are given in millimeters. The total body length is defined by the length from the apex of the clypeus to the posterior margin of the membrane, and the body width by the length between the lateral margins of the hemelytra at their widest point. Lengths and widths of the head are defined as follows: length, from the apex of the clypeus to the occipital carina; width, between the outer margins of each eye; diameter of eye, between the outer and inner margin of eye; length of the antennal and labial segments, between the base and apex. Lengths and widths of the pronotum are defined as follows: length, measured between the anterior and posterior margins; width of the anterior margin, between anterior angles; length of lateral margin, between the anterior and humeral angles; width of the posterior margin, between the humeral angles.
Dissections of male genitalia were done according to
AR – apical ring – apical portion of basal sac, composed of tiny spiculi and denticles, not forming a fully closed ring;
BP – basal fig – irregularly shaped, sclerotized figd situated at base of the endosoma;
BSC – basal sac – sclerotized sac situated at base of the endosoma, almost entirely embracing sclerotized portion of ductus seminis inside the endosoma (DSS);
DLS – dextrolateral sclerite – situated on the dextrolateral portion of the apical part of the endosoma;
DSS – sclerotized portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma;
MS – medial sclerite – situated at middle of the endosoma, with base localized near apex of DSS;
SLS – sinistrolateral sclerite – situated on the sinistrolateral portion of the apical part of the endosoma;
SP1, SP2, and SP3 – endosomal spiculi – bundles of spiculi situated basally, medially, and apically on the endosoma.
The material examined includes specimens borrowed from the institutions listed below:
BPBM Department of Entomology Collection, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA;
HNHM Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary;
MNHN Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France;
NHRS Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden;
US Department of Zoology, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland;
USNM National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA;
ZSM Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Munich, Germany.
Xenocylapidius:
Recognized by the following combination of characters: labial segment II subdivided medially or subapically; lateral margin of pronotum somewhat elevated; scent gland efferent system broad, occupying entire ventral margin of metepisternum; endosoma with a characteristic sclerotized basal sac with a relatively broad, ringlike structure apically (AR = apical ring) that is composed of numerous denticles and spiculi (Figs
STRUCTURE, TEXTURE, AND VESTITURE (Figs
Male genitalia.Aedeagus (Figs
Xenocylapidius is differentiated from other genera of Cylapinae primarily by the presence of the characteristic sclerotized sac at the base of endosoma (BS = basal sac) with the apical portion composed of numerous denticles and spiculi (AR = apical ring) surrounding well developed sclerotized part of ductus seminis inside endosoma (DSS) (Figs
Xenocylapidius is superficially similar to Peritropis Uhler, primarily in sharing elevated lateral margins of pronotum but can be easily distinguished by the shape of the male genitalia.
1 | Hemelytron with mottled, brown to blackish and yellow to dirty yellow coloration (Figs |
2 |
– | Hemelytron uniformly blackish (Fig. |
6 |
2 | Metafemur brown to dark brown with large, yellow patches (Fig. |
X. tamasi Gorczyca |
– | Metafemur uniformly dirty yellow to black (Figs |
3 |
3 | Apical half of antennal segment II mixed with dense, fine, semirecumbent setae and sparse, protruding, bristlelike setae | X. bioculatus (Girault) |
– | Apical half of antennal segment II with only fine, semirecumbent setae, without sparse, protruding, bristlelike setae | 4 |
4 | Pronotal collar indistinct; yellow mottling on hemelytron composed of relatively small patches and spots (Fig. |
X. gressitti Gorczyca |
– | Pronotal collar well developed; yellow mottling on hemelytron composed of large patches (Figs |
5 |
5 | Antennal segment II dark brown (Fig. |
X. acutipennis Wolski & Gorczyca sp. n. |
– | Antennal segment II brownish yellow; endosoma with only one apical sclerite (SLS); medial sclerite (MS) with basal one third nearly rounded, apical two thirds tapering toward apex, sharply pointed apically (Fig. |
X. gemellus Wolski & Gorczyca sp. n. |
6 | Hemelytron entirely black (Fig. |
X. ater Wolski & Gorczyca sp. n. |
– | Hemelytron chocolate brown or black, with a large, white patch near base of corium (Figs |
7 |
7 | Hemelytron chocolate brown with a large, white patch near base of corium and with a small white patch on embolium apically (Fig. |
X. bimaculatus Wolski & Gorczyca sp. n. |
– | Hemelytron black with a large, white patch near base of corium and with a large, white patch on apex of embolium, apicolateral surface of corium, and medial portion of inner margin of cuneus (Fig. |
X. rolandi Wolski & Gorczyca sp. n. |
Recognized by the dorsum mottled with brownish yellow (Fig.
Most similar to X. gemellus in sharing the brownish yellow mottling on dorsum (Figs
Male. COLORATION (Figs
Male genitalia.Aedeagus (Figs
♀/♂ (n=2, holotype measurements second). Body. Length 6.00/4.70, width 2.15/1.76. Head. Length 1.00/0.98, width 0.85/0.79, interocular distance 0.35/0.35. Antenna. Length of segment I 0.74/0.64, II 1.83/1.83 (III and IV missing in both specimens). Labium. Length of segment I 0.98/0.95 (II, III, and IV immeasurable in both specimens). Pronotum. Length 0.85/0.73, width of anterior margin 0.68/0.65, length of lateral margin 0.98/0.80, width of posterior margin 1.60/1.38.
Female. Similar to male in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture.
Unknown.
Australia (Queensland) (Fig.
The specific name is derived from the Latin “acutus”, meaning sharpened, and is used to denote the sharply pointed mesial process (MS) of the endosoma.
Holotype ♂: Malanda; Queensl[and] Mjöberg; Swedish Museum of Natural History Stockholm NHRS (NHRS); paratype 1 ♀: Glen Lamington Queensl[and] Mjöberg; Swedish Museum of Natural History Stockholm NHRS (NHRS).
Dorsal habitus color photographs of Xenocylapidius spp.: 1 X. acutipennis (holotype) 2 X. ater (holotype) 3 X. bimaculatus (holotype) 4 X. bioculatus (♀: Australia N. S. W., Manly nr Sydney, North Head 16–21.2., D. Shcherbakov 1997) 5 X. gemellus (holotype) 6 X. gressitti (holotype) 7 X. rolandi (holotype) 8 X. tamasi (♀: New Caledonia, Foret di Thi, 29.X.–1.XI.1967).
Color photographs of Xenocylapidius spp., lateral views: 9 X. acutipennis (holotype) 10 X. ater (holotype); 11. X. bimaculatus (holotype) 12 X. bioculatus (♀: Australia N. S. W., Manly nr Sydney, North Head 16–21.2., D. Shcherbakov 1997) 13 X. gressitti (holotype) 14 X. rolandi (holotype) 15 X. tamasi (♀: New Caledonia, Foret di Thi, 29.X.–1.XI.1967).
Male genitalia of X. acutipennis (16–20) and X. ater (21–25): 16, 21 Endosoma (dorsal view) 17, 22 Basal sac of endosoma (ventral view) 18, 23 Left paramere (left lateral view) 19, 24 Left paramere (dorsal view) 20, 25 Right paramere (right lateral view). APR = apical process of paramere; AR = apical ring of endosomal basal sac; BP = basal fig; BPR = basal process of paramere; BSC = basal sac; DLS = dextrolateral sclerite; DSS = sclerotized portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma; MS = medial sclerite; PB = paramere body; SL = sensory lobe; SLS = sinistrolateral sclerite; SP1 and SP2 = endosomal spiculi.
Male genitalia of X. bimaculatus: 26 Endosoma (dorsal view) 27 Basal sac of endosoma (ventral view) 28 Left paramere (left lateral view) 29 Left paramere (dorsal view) 30 Right paramere (right lateral view). APR = apical process of paramere; AR = apical ring of endosomal basal sac; BPR = basal process of paramere; BSC = basal sac; DSS = sclerotized portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma; PB = paramere body; SL = sensory lobe; SLS = sinistrolateral sclerite; SP1 = endosomal spiculi.
Recognized by the black dorsal coloration (Fig.
Most similar to X. rolandi in sharing blackish dorsal coloration (Figs
Male. COLORATION (Figs
Male genitalia.Aedeagus (Figs
Holotype ♂: Body. Length 5.3, width 2.15. Head. Length 1.0, width 0.88, interocular distance 0.35. Antenna. Length of segment I 0.71, II 1.82, III 0.62, IV (missing). Labium. Length of segment I 0.87, II 1.43, III 0.85, IV 0.7. Pronotum. Length 0.82, width of anterior margin 0.75, length of lateral margin 1.00, width of posterior margin 1.75.
Female. Unknown.
Unknown.
Australia (Western Australia) (Fig.
The specific name is derived from the Latin “ater”, meaning black, and is used to denote the blackish dorsal coloration.
Holotype ♂: Australia, WA 06/85, 30 km nnw. Leonora 28.61799S, 121.19967E, 441 m, 30.1.2006, M. Baehr (ZSM).
Recognized by the chocolate brown dorsum with two large whitish patches, each situated near base of the hemelytron (Fig.
Most similar to X. rolandi in sharing a large, pale patch near base of hemelytron (Figs
Female. COLORATION (Figs
Male. Similar to female in coloration, structure, texture, and vestiture.
Male genitalia.Aedeagus (Figs
♀/♂ (n=3, holotype measurements in parentheses). Body. Length 4.30–4.70/4.00 (4.70), width 1.65–1.75/1.65 (1.75). Head. Length 0.70–0.82/0.88 (0.82), width 0.70–0.73/0.70 (0.73), interocular distance 0.32–0.33/0.30 (0.32). Antenna. Length of segment I 0.44–0.50/0.45 (0.50), II 1.20–1.35/1.25 (1.35), III 0.60–0.65/0.63 (0.65) (IV missing in examined specimens). Labium. I (holotype) 0.80 (remaining segments immeasurable in examined specimens). Pronotum. Length 0.65–0.68/0.65 (0.68), width of anterior margin 0.63–0.65/0.58 (0.65), length of lateral margin 0.73–0.75/0.78 (0.75), width of posterior margin 1.30–1.38/1.33 (1.38).
Unknown.
Australia (South Australia) (Fig.
The specific name is derived from the Latin “bi”, meaning two, and “macula”, meaning spot, and is used to denote the presence of two large dorsal patches, each situated near base of each hemelytron.
Holotype ♀: Australien 78, Wilpena Pound, Flinders Range, SA, 25.12.1972, M. Baehr (ZSM). Paratypes 1 ♀ and 1 ♂: same data as for holotype (ZSM).
Rhinomiridius bioculatus
Xenocylapidius australis Gorczyca, 1999: 16, 17, Fig.
Recognized by the following set of characters: dorsum with a mottled, blackish yellow coloration (Fig.
Most similar to X. acutipennis, X. gemellus, X gressitti, and X. tamasi in sharing mottled dorsal coloration (Figs
Unknown.
Australia (New South Wales, South Australia) (Fig.
Holotype of X. australis ♀: Australia N. S. W., Manly nr Sydney, North Head 16-21.2., D. Shcherbakov 1997 (US); 1?: Mt. Gibraltar National Park, N.S.W., 24 Feb 1965, D.K. McAlpine; Eeastern scarp, c. 3000 ft.; Carvalho to Drake Coll 1993 (USNM).
Recognized by the mottled, brownish yellow coloration (Fig.
Most similar to X. acutipennis in sharing a brownish yellow mottling on dorsum (Figs
Male. COLORATION (Fig.
Male genitalia.Aedeagus (Figs
Holotype ♂: Body. Length 5.50, width 2.00. Head. Length 0.88, width 0.77, interocular distance 0.33. Antenna. Length of segment I 0.75, II 1.8, III 0.75, IV (partly broken). Labium. Immeasurable in specimen examined. Pronotum. Length 0.83, width of anterior margin 0.68, length of lateral margin 0.90, width of posterior margin 1.70.
Female. Unknown.
Unknown.
Australia (Queensland) (Fig.
The specific name is derived from the Latin “gemellus”, meaning twin, and is used to denote the similarity of this species to X. acutipennis.
Holotype ♂: QUEENSLAND, Cedar Creek, Mars 1910, E. Mjöberg (NHRS).
Male genitalia of X. gemellus (32–36) and X. rolandi (37–41): 32, 37 Endosoma (dorsal view) 33, 38 Basal sac of endosoma (ventral view) 34, 39 Left paramere (left lateral view) 35, 40 Left paramere (dorsal view) 36, 41 Right paramere (right lateral view). APR = apical process of paramere; AR = apical ring of endosomal basal sac; BPR = basal process of paramere; BSC = basal sac; DSS = sclerotized portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma; MS = medial sclerite; PB = paramere body; SL = sensory lobe; SLS = sinistrolateral sclerite; SP1 and SP2 = endosomal spiculi.
Male genitalia of X. tamasi: 42 Endosoma (dorsal view) 43 Basal sac of endosoma (ventral view) 44 Left paramere (left lateral view) 45 Left paramere (dorsal view) 46 Right paramere (right lateral view). APR = apical process of paramere; AR = apical ring of endosomal basal sac; BPR = basal process of paramere; BSC = basal sac; DLS = dextrolateral sclerite; DSS = sclerotized portion of ductus seminis inside endosoma; PB = paramere body; SL = sensory lobe; SP1, SP2, and SP3 = endosomal spiculi.
Xenocylapidius gressitti
Recognized by the following set of characters: dorsum with a mottled, dark brownish yellow coloration (Fig.
Most similar to X. acutipennis, X. bioculatus, X. gemellus, and X. tamasi in sharing mottled dorsal coloration (Figs
Unknown.
New Caledonia (North Province) (Fig.
Recognized by the white head, with a fuscous vertex (Figs
Most similar to X. bimaculatus in sharing large, pale patch near base of hemelytron (Figs
Male. COLORATION (Figs
Male genitalia.Aedeagus (Figs
Holotype ♂: Body. Length 4.75, width 1.70. Head. Length 0.80, width 0.70, interocular distance 0.33. Antenna. Length of segment I 0.65, II 1.48 (III and IV missing). Labium. Length of segment I 0.87 (II, III, and IV immeasurable). Pronotum. Length 0.60, width of anterior margin 0.63, length of lateral margin 0.70, width of posterior margin 1.32.
Female. Unknown.
Unknown.
New Caledonia (South Province) (Fig.
We are happy to name this species after our friend and colleague and the collector of the type specimen Roland Dobosz (Upper Silesian Museum, Bytom, Poland).
Holotype ♂: New Caledonia (S), 22°16.8'S, 166°53.5'E, Pic du Grand Kaori, 26. 12. 2006, 240 m, night coll. (lamp & beating), leg. R. Dobosz & M. Wanat; 5915/1788, coll. (MNHN).
Xenocylapidius tamasi
Recognized by the mottled, dark brown, dorsal coloration (Fig.
Most similar to X. acutipennis, X. bioculatus, X. gemellus, and X. gressitti in sharing mottled dorsal coloration (Figs
Male genitalia.Aedeagus (Figs
Unknown.
New Caledonia (South Province) (Fig.
Holotype ♀: New Caledonia, Col d’ Amieu, Ht. Rembtai; 19. I. 1977, leg. J. Balogh; holotype [red label]; Xenocylapidius tamasi gen et sp. n., det. J. Gorczyca, 1997 (HNHM).
2 ♂♂ and 1 ♀: New Caledonia, Mt. des Koghis, 300–600 m, 19. III. 1968; J.L. Gressitt & T.C. Maa Collectors, Bishop Museum; 1 ♀: New Caledonia, Foret di Thi, 29.X. – 1.XI.1967; J. & M. Sedlacek Collectors, Bishop (US).
We thank the following people for kindly offering us specimens used in this study: Gordon Nishida (BPBM), Tamas Vásárhelyi (HNHM), Gunvi Lindberg (NHRS), Roland Dobosz (Upper Silesian Museum, Bytom, Poland), Thomas J. Henry (USNM), and Klaus Schönitzer (ZSM). Thanks are also due to Marzena Zmarzły (US) for preparing the dorsal habitus drawing of X. rolandi. We are also very indebted to two anonymous reviewers for their very useful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of the manuscript.