Research Article |
Corresponding author: Chris Carter ( chris.carter@utas.edu.au ) Academic editor: Ingo S. Wehrtmann
© 2014 Chris Carter, Heath Westbury, Bradley Crear, Cedric Simon, Craig Thomas.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Carter CG, Westbury H, Crear B, Simon C, Thomas C (2014) Agonistic behaviour in juvenile southern rock lobster, Jasus edwardsii (Decapoda, Palinuridae): implications for developing aquaculture. In: Wehrtmann IS, Bauer RT (Eds) Proceedings of the Summer Meeting of the Crustacean Society and the Latin American Association of Carcinology, Costa Rica, July 2013. ZooKeys 457: 323-337. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.457.6760
|
The Southern rock lobster, Jasus edwardsii, is a temperate species of spiny lobster with established well managed fisheries in Australia and New Zealand. It has also been under consideration as a species with aquaculture potential. Agonistic behaviour has important consequences under aquaculture conditions that encompass direct effects, such as damage or death of protagonists, and indirect effects on growth that relate to resource access, principally food and refuge. This study aimed to identify and characterize behaviours and to make a preliminary investigation of their occurrence under tank culture. Juvenile Jasus edwardsii were examined in a flow-through seawater system using a remote video camera system. Twenty-nine behaviours were divided into three sub-groups: aggressive (11), avoidance (6) and others (12). Aggressive behaviours included attacks, pushing, lifting, clasping and carrying an opponent. Avoidance behaviours included moving away in a backwards-, forwards- or side-stepping motion as well as with more vigorous tail flips. These behaviours were components of twelve behavioural groups that described contact, attack and displacement between individuals. Activity was crepuscular with two clear peaks, one in the morning and the other in the evening. The occurrence of behavioural groups was not different between the morning and evening. The frequency of aggressive behaviours was not affected by changes made to stocking density or access to food. The implications of agonistic behaviours are discussed further in relation to developing aquaculture.
Spiny lobster, aquaculture, con-specific, behaviour, inter-individual interaction, growth depensation
Spiny lobster species are found around the world from tropical to temperate seas, they are important in relation to conservation, fisheries and aquaculture (
Clawed lobsters exhibit an array of aggressive behaviours, they readily fight to establish and maintain dominance hierarchies and therefore exhibit behaviours that are not ideal for high productivity under typical intensive communal aquaculture systems (
Compared to clawed lobsters (
Juvenile Jasus edwardsii stock were caught as puerulus from the East coast of Tasmania and maintained in 4 m3 rathbun tanks. Stock and experimental animals were held at 18 °C, and fed on a mixed diet of whole blue mussel, frozen squid and a commercial prawn feed. Lobsters held under standard conditions were used in experiments (
Behaviours were examined in two rectangular 25L (width 300 × length 500 × depth 250 mm) tanks that were part of a flow-through seawater system. The flow rate was 7.4 L min-1 so that water was replaced approximately 18 times per hour. The system was enclosed by black plastic sheeting to control photoperiod and minimise visual disturbance from external sources. Light was provided from fluorescent tubes and a 12:12 photoperiod used with lights-on at 06:00 and lights-off at 18:00. An infrared light provided illumination for the camera during the dark phase. Each tank system was equipped with a video camera and the tanks were stocked with 5 animals (equivalent to 33.5 individuals per square metre, ind. m-2). The carapace was marked to identify each individual. The floor of each tank was marked with a 100 × 100 mm grid so distance and direction of movements could be assessed more easily.
An initial assessment of activity was made on two groups of five animals that were monitored continuously for seven days. Focal sampling (
Four new groups of five animals were used to investigate the occurrence of the behavioural groups. Occurrence was the number of times a behavioural group was observed as the first behaviour exhibited during each period of observation: each occurrence of behavioural unit was given a score of 1, observations were made over five days and data adjusted to one hour of observation (
For each experiment the same sampling regime was used: eight 15 min time blocks, four from the morning (05:00–06:45) and four from the evening (18:00–19:45) periods of peak activity, were analysed and behavioural group recorded against individuals (occ. h-1). Mean group occurrence was calculated for each behavioural group as total occurrence divided by the number of individuals (five) and standardised to an hour of observation, it was expressed as occurrence per individual per hour (occ. Ind-1 h-1). Non-parametric statistical analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by multiple comparison using all pairwise comparisons was conducted due to preliminary nature of the data and the lack of homogeneous variance according to Levene’s test. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics version 22.
Twenty-nine component behaviours were identified and described; 11 aggressive and 6 avoidance (Table
Component behaviours of Jasus edwardsii grouped as aggressive or avoidence behaviour.
Behaviour | Description |
---|---|
Aggressive | |
Attack (A1) | Moderate contact with opponent (see Fig. |
Attack (A2) | Vigorous contact with opponent accompanied by clasp (CL). |
Burrow (BU) | Vigorous contact lifting opponent clear of substrate. |
Carry (CA) | Transport of opponent. |
Chase (CH) | Vigorous pursuit of opponent. |
Clasp (CL) | Clasp opponent with first three walking legs (see Fig. |
Dislodge (D) | Moderate contact in which aggressor dislodges opponent from position. |
Push (P) | Vigorous contact in which aggressor displaces and pushes opponent away from position. |
Rise (R1) | Orientate toward opponent and raise anterior by extending walking legs (see Fig. |
Rise (R2) | Orientate toward opponent and raise anterior above posterior by extending third, forth and fifth walking legs. |
Rise (R3) | Orientate toward opponent and raise anterior high above posterior by extending third, forth and fifth walking legs. Accompanied by waving first two pairs of walking legs at opponent (see Fig. |
Avoidance | |
Back away (BA) | Moderate backwards movement away from opponent with tail undulation (Fig. |
Flee (FL) | Vigorous movement away from opponent propelled by tail flapping (see Fig. |
Move away (MA) | Moderate movement away from opponent with no further interaction. |
Short distance escape (SDE) | Vigorous movement that separates opponents. |
Sidestep away (SSA) | Moderate sideways movement away from opponent (see Fig. |
Walk away (WA) | Moderate movement away from opponent (see Fig. |
Component behaviours of Jasus edwardsii other than aggressive or avoidence behaviour.
Behaviour | Description |
---|---|
Antennal pointing (AN) | Orientation of antennae towards approaching opponent whilst first pair of walking legs raised above substrate. |
Antennal touch (AT) | Contact with antennae (see Fig. |
Antennule touch (AT2) | Contact with antennules (see Fig. |
Approach backwards (APB) | Moderate tail-first movement towards opponent. |
Approach forwards (APF) | Moderate head-first movement towards opponent with antennae at 90° to body. |
Body touch (BT) | Contact opponent with body, usually aimed at dorsal carapace or head. |
Cautious approach (CA) | Slow head-first movement towards opponent (see Fig. |
Depress (DE) | Body is flattened on substrate and legs drawn tightly into the carapace. |
Face-to-face (FTF) | Head to head orientation, anntennae touching and usually involves contact with antennules. |
Quiescence (Q) | Stationary with movement of second and third walking legs to ventillate gills. |
Side touch (ST) | Moderate sideways movement and contact with opponent. |
Toward (U) | Moderate movement towards opponent (not APB or APF). |
Twelve behavioural groups, including one for no behaviour, were defined. Behavioural groups were divided into four broad categories (Table
Behavioural groups of Jasus edwardsii under main categories: low intensity contact, medium intensity contact, attack and displacement. Subordinate behaviour during attack is in parentheses.
Behavioural Group | Behaviours |
---|---|
Low intensity contact (LIC) | |
LIC1 | Approach forward, antennal touch, walk away. |
LIC2 | Cautious approach, antennal touch, walk away. |
Medium intensity contact (MIC) | |
MIC1 | Approach forward, antennal touch, body touch, walk away. |
MIC2 | Cautious approach, antennal touch, body touch, walk away. |
MIC3 | Approach forward, antennal touch, side touch, walk away. |
MIC4 | Cautious approach, antennal touch, side touch, walk away. |
Attack | |
LIA, Low intensity attack | Cautious approach, rise 2, antennal touch, attack 1, (flee), walk away. |
MIA, Medium intensity attack | Cautious approach, antennal touch, (back away), chase, rise 2, antennal touch, attack 2, clasp, (flee). |
HIA, High intensity attack | Approach forward, rise 3, attack 2, clasp, (short distance escape), chase, rise 3, clasp, (short distance escape), (flee). |
Displacement | |
FD, Forced displacement | Burrow, carry, dislodge, walk away. |
D, Dislodge | Approach forward, side touch, push, walk away. |
There were statistically significant difference in the occurrence of behavioural groups (Fig.
Occurrence of Jasus edwardsii behavioural groups as a) mean (± SE) individual occurrence (occ. h-1) and b) mean (± SE) group occurrence per individual per hour (occ. ind-1 h-1). Individual occurrence (a): significant difference amongst behavioural groups (N = 20, P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis Test). Group occurrence (b): significant difference amongst behavioural groups (n = 4, P < 0.001, Kruskal-Wallis Test). No significant different amongst means with same letter.
Agonistic behaviour has been divided into approach- and avoidance-orientated behaviour (
Thirty-two behaviours were observed in the spiny lobster Panulirus cygnus under a variety of situations in the wild or during captivity and sixteen related to aggressive interactions including five linked to subordinate responses (
Density has some significant effects on behaviour of spiny lobsters under culture conditions, frequency of occurrence was in the order of 10 time lower for small post-puerulii P. cygnus stocked at the lowest density of 30 individuals per m2 compared with at 60 to 150 individuals per m2 (
Pilot aquaculture studies support the conclusion from the current study that agonistic behaviours have a low occurrence in J. edwardsii (
Twenty-nine behaviours were detected and characterised into three sub-groups in this study: aggressive (11), avoidance (6) and others (12). Among the behaviours recorded, the occurrence of medium and high intensity attacks and displacement events were minimal. This suggested J. edwardsii juveniles are highly gregarious in culture, even at relatively high stocking densities (67 individuals per m2). Further research into characterising the agonistic behaviours of various spiny lobster species with potential for commercial aquaculture is warranted. Better characterisation of agonistic behaviours in culture will assist in testing and improving husbandry management strategies which may include the use of chemical cues, better feed management and shelter designs.
Particular thanks to Yvette Watt for the line drawings of lobsters. Professional staff at Taroona for assistance in maintenance of lobsters.