Research Article |
Corresponding author: Wonchoel Lee ( wlee@hanyang.ac.kr ) Academic editor: Danielle Defaye
© 2014 Jinwook Back, Wonchoel Lee.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Back J, Lee W (2014) A new genus (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Laophontidae) from Jeju Island of Korea. ZooKeys 447: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.447.7603
|
A survey on the harpacticoid copepods from an intertidal zone in Hyeopjae sandy beach, Jeju Island, Korea, resulted in the discovery of an unusual laophontid, Jejulaophonte hyeopjaeensis sp. n., which cannot be placed in any extant genus within the family. To accommodate the species, a new genus of the family Laophontidae T. Scott, 1905 is proposed and fully described here. The new species is closely related to the lineage of the five primitive genera, Carraroenia McCormack, 2006, Coullia Hamond, 1973, Hemilaophonte Jakubisiak 1933, Psammoplatypus Lee & Huys, 1999, and Robustunguis Fiers, 1992 (the CCHPR-lineage) by the reduced P2 endopod, ovate shape of the female P5 exopod and sexual dimorphism in the P3 endopod. However, it displays discrepancies from the species of the CCHPR-lineage in the presence of an inner seta on P3 and P4 exp-2, four setae on P4 enp-2, and an inner seta on P3 and P4 enp-2 in the female. Furthermore, no other species within the family Laophontidae has three setae on P2 exp-3 and a seta on P2 enp-2 at the same time. The new species has sexual dimorphism in the antennule, genital segmentation and the legs from P2 to P5. The terminal seta on the second endopodal segment of P2 in the male is longer than that in the female. The endopod of P3 is 3-segmented and displays a short inner apophysis on the second segment in the male. The outer setae on the exopod of P3 and P4 are distinctly thicker and stronger in the male than in the female. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (mtCOI) sequencing of the new species has been realized in order to be used in future phylogenetic analysis.
Jejulaophonte , Taxonomy, DNA barcode, intertidal, Marine
Laophontid harpacticoids inhabit various environments including deep sea (
The family Laophontidae T. Scott, 1905 is a large group of harpacticoid copepods, comprising over 262 species in 63 genera and two families: Esolinae and Laophontinae (
In this study, a survey on the harpacticoid copepods from an intertidal zone in Jeju Island, Korea resulted in the discovery of an unusual laophontid, which could not be allocated to any extant genera in the family Laophontidae. Sandy sediments around Jeju Island originate from volcanic rock called basalt. The sediment type of studied area, Hyeopjae beach, is silvery sand that is mixed with sand and various shell dusts. In addition, there are a lot of marine algae that are washed ashore by waves. The family Laophontidae includes various organisms, which are adapted to a habitat style, namely their cylindrical body shape and a reduced segmentation of their swimming legs (
Sediments were collected by a small shovel and acryl cores (diameter 5.4 cm) in a submerged area of Hyeopjae sandy beach, Jeju island, Korea (about 1 m depth). The sediment samples were fixed in 5% neutralized formalin for taxonomic study. Copepods are extracted from the sediment samples by using the Ludox method (
For scanning electron microscopy copepods were prefixed in 70% ethanol, dehydrated through graded ethanol for Hitachi S-2380N in Hanyang University or acetone series for Philips XL-30 in the Natural History Museum London, critical point dried, mounted on stubs using double-sided tape, coated with gold, and then examined with a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-2380N, Philips XL-30).
The descriptive terminology is adopted from
For DNA sequencing, copepods were collected using hand net (mesh size 63 µm). Salt was washed from these samples on the sieve (mesh size 38 µm) and then, the samples were fixed in pure (100%) ethanol. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (mtCOI) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using PCR premix (BiONEER Co). The amplification primers used were LCO-1490 (5´-GGT CAA CAA ATC ATA AAG ATA TTG G-3´) and HCO-2198 (5´-TAA ACT TCA GGG TGA CCA AAA AAT CA-3´) (
Laophontidae. Body elongate, sub-cylindrical, not dorsoventrally depressed; genital field with 2 setae each on P6 and small copulatory pore located in median depression; anal operculum well developed. Sexual dimorphism in antennules, P3–P6, and genital segmentation; rostrum small, fused at base; antennule with a small process in segment 2 and 7–segmented subchirocer in male, aesthetasc on segment 4 and 6 in female, 5 and 7 in male; maxillary syncoxa with 2 endites, endopod represented by 2 setae fused basally and 1 small naked seta; P1 exopod–2 with 5 setae; P2 smaller than P3 and P4; P3 enp-2 in male produced into a conspicuous apophysis.
Jejulaophonte hyeopjaeensis sp. n.
Intertidal zone at Hyeopjae beach Jeju island, Korea (33°23'41"N, 126°14'22"E) on 10 April 2004 (type specimen). For DNA analysis, specimens collected on 3 June 2010 (for DNA analysis) at type locality.
Holotype 1♀ (CR235161) dissected on 9 slides. Paratypes 1♂ (CR235162) dissected on 8 slides, and 11♀♀ (CR235163), 5♂♂ (CR235164) in 70% alcohol. 9 specimens (6♀♀, 3♂♂) dried, mounted on stubs, and coated with gold for SEM. All specimens are from the type locality.
Specific name refers the type locality of new species, Hyeopjae beach, Jeju Island, Korea.
Total body (Fig.
Body (Fig.
Rostrum (Fig.
Prosome (Fig.
Urosome (Fig.
Caudal rami (Fig.
Antennule (Fig.
Antenna (Figs
Labrum (Fig.
Mandible (Fig.
Maxillule (Figs
Maxilla (Figs
Maxilliped (Fig.
P1 (Fig.
P2 (Fig.
P3 (Fig.
P4 (Fig.
Armature formulae as follows:
Exopod | Endopod | |
P2 | 0.0.021 | 0.010 |
P3 | 0.1.222 | 0.121 (0.0.111 in ♂) |
P4 | 0.1.232 (0.1.231 in ♂) | 0.121 |
P5 (Fig.
Body (Fig.
General body shape, ornamentation and sensilla pattern as in female. Sexual dimorphisms in A1, P3, P4, P5, and P6.
Antennule (Figs
Swimming legs 1–2 similar to those of female.
P3 (Figs
P4 (Fig.
P5 (Fig.
P6 (Fig.
Jejulaophonte hyeopjaeensis gen. n., sp. n. A prosome in ♀, lateral, a’, dorso-posterior margin of prosomites B mouthparts part in ♀ C distal part of P1 endopod-2 in ♀ D apophysis of P3 endopod in ♂, d’; small processes on distal outer corner of P3 endopod-2 E antennulary segments 3, 4 and 5 in ♂ F A2 endopod in ♂, f’ antennary exopod G P6 in ♂ H urosome, ventral, h’, ventro-posterior margin of urosomite, h’’, anal somite in ♂, dorsal.
The new species has a unique character set including the seta formula of P2–P4, and the shape of P5. Based on the Wells’ key (
While the new genus shares the reduced P2 endopod with the CCHPR-lineage, there are several conspicuous differences in the seta formula of appendages (Table
Armature formulae of five genera in the CCHPR-lineage related to the new genus, Jejulaophonte.
Genus | species | A1 | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
exp-2 | exp | enp | exp | enp | exp | enp | exp | benp | |||
Robustunguis | ungulatus (♀) | 6 | 4 | 0.0.022 | 010 | 0.0.022 | 020 | 0.0.022 | 020 | 6 | 4 |
(♂) | 6 | 4 | 0.1.022 | 0.010 | 0.0.022 | 0.020 | 0.0.022 | 0.021 | 5 | 2 | |
minor (♀) | 6 | 4 | 0.022 | 010 | 0.022 | 0.020 | 0.022 | 1 | 5 | 0 | |
(♂) | 6 | 4 | 0.022 | 010 | 0.022 | 0.020 | 0.022 | 1 | 1 | ? | |
Carraroenia | ruthae (♀) | 6 | 4 | 0.1.023 | 0.010 | 0.1.123 | 0.121 | 0.1.123 | 0.220 | 6 | 5 |
(♂) | 8 | 4 | 0.1.023 | 0.010 | 0.1.123 | 0.0.020 | 0.1.123 | 0.111 | 5 | 2 | |
Psammoplatypus | discipes (♀) | 6 | 5 | 0.0.023 | 0.020 | 0.1.023 | 0.121 | 0.1.023 | 0.121 | 4 | 5 |
(♂) | 6 | 4 | - | 0.120 | - | 0.0.120 | - | - | 4 | 2 | |
proprius (♂) | 8 | 4 | 0.0.023 | 0.120 | 0.1.023 | 0.0.020 | 0.1.023 | 0.120 | 4 | 2 | |
Hemilaophonte |
janinae (♀) |
6 | 4 | 0.0.023 | 0.020 | 0.0.023 | 0.020 | 0.022 | 0.021 | 6 | 4 |
janinae (♂) |
6 | 0.0.023 | 0.020 | 0.0.023 | 0.020 | 0.022 | 0.021 | 5 | 2 | ||
janinae (♀) |
6 | 4 | 0.0.022 | 020 | - | - | 0.022 | 0.011 | 6 | 3 | |
janinae (♂) |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | 3 | |
Coullia
|
clysmae (♀) | 6 | 4 | 0.0.023 | absent | 0.0.023 | 021 | 0.0.022 | 021 | 6 | 4 |
heteropus (♀) | 6 | 4 | 0.0.023 | 010 | 0.0.023 | 021 | 0.0.022 | 020 | 6 | 3 | |
platychelipusoides (♀) | 7 | 4 | 0.0.023 | 0.020 | 0.0.023 | 0.021 | 0.0.022 | 0.011 | 6 | 5 | |
mediterranea (♀) | ? | 4 | 0.0.023 | 0.020 | 0.0.023 | 0.010 | 0.0.022 | 0.021 | 6 | 4 | |
insularis (♀) | 6 | 5 | 0.0.023 | 020 | 0.0.023 | 0.021 | 0.0.023 | 0.021 | 6 | 5 | |
(♂) | ? | 5 | 0.1.023 | 0.020 | 0.1.023 | 0.020 | 0.0.022 | 0.021 | 5 | 2 | |
tongariki (♀) | 6 | 5 | 0.1.023 | 0.020 | 0.0.023 | 0.021 | 0.0.023 | 0.021 | 6 | 5 | |
Jejulaophonte | hyeopjaeensis (♀) | 6 | 5 | 0.0.021 | 0.010 | 0.1.222 | 0.121 | 0.1.232 | 0.121 | 5 | 4 |
(♂) | 7 | 5 | 0.0.021 | 0.010 | 0.1.222 | 0.0.111 | 0.1.231 | 0.121 | 4 | 1 |
1 | P1 well developed; longer than half of body length; P2 endopod 1-segmented; distal segment of P3 exopod with 4 elements in both sexes | Robustunguis |
– | P1 shorter than half of body, these characters not combined | 2 |
2 | P4 exp-2 with inner seta in both sexes; P4 enp-2 with 4 elements in female | 3 |
– | P4 exp-2 without inner seta; P4 enp-2 with 3 elements at most in female | 5 |
3 | P2 exp-2 with inner seta | Carraroenia |
– | P2 exp-2 without inner seta | 4 |
4 | P2 and P3 exp-3 with 5 elements in both sexes | Psammoplatypus |
– | P2 exp-3 with 3 elements and P3 exp-3 with 6 elements in both sexes | Jejulaophonte gen. n. |
5 | P4 exopod 2-segmented | Hemilaophonte |
– | P4 exopod 3-segmented | Coullia |
Although the female of Psammoplatypus proprius (Lang, 1965) has not yet been described, we suppose that the seta formula in the distal segment of P2 and P3 exopod is common in both sexes as the other species in this group do not have sexual dimorphism in the seta formula on the distal segment of P2 and P3 exopod (Table
Family | Genus | species | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Canthocamptidae | Australocamptus | hamondi |
|
Cletocamptus | deitersi |
|
|
Cletocamptus | helobius |
|
|
Elaphoidella | humphreysi |
|
|
Darcythompsoniidae | Leptocaris | canariensis | Unpublished |
Harpacticidae | Tigriopus | brevicornis |
|
Tigriopus |
californicus
|
|
|
Tigriopus | fulvus |
|
|
Tigriopus |
japonicus
|
|
|
Laophontidae | Jejulaophonte | hyeopjaeensis | This study |
Miraciidae | Macrosetella | gracilis |
|
Miracia | efferata |
|
|
Schizopera | akation |
|
|
Schizopera | akolos |
|
|
Schizopera | analspinulosa |
|
|
Schizopera | analspinulosa linel |
|
|
Schizopera | cf. uranusi |
|
|
Schizopera | emphysema |
|
|
Schizopera | kronosi |
|
|
Schizopera | leptafurca |
|
|
Schizopera | uranusi |
|
|
Paramesochridae | Remanea | naksanensis |
|
Parastenocarididae | Dussartstenocaris | idioxenos |
|
Kinnecaris | lined |
|
|
Kinnecaris | linel |
|
|
Kinnecaris | linesae |
|
|
Kinnecaris | uranusi |
|
|
Parastenocaris | jane |
|
While Jejulaophonte shares some primitive characters with the lineage, the new species can be distinguished from the species of CCHPR-lineage by the reduced P5 setation. Except for Robustunguis minor Fiers, 1992 and Psammoplatypus discipes, all species in the CCHPR-lineage share the characters of the reduced P2, and the six setae on the P5 exopod in the female. However, the new species possesses a reduced setation of five setae on the P5 exopod in the female and four setae in the male. Furthermore, endopodal lobe of the male has only one seta (the others of CCHPR-lineage have at least two setae except for Robustunguis minor).
The nuclear ribosomal genes are useful for phylogenetic study (
This work was supported by grants from the discovery of marine species project by Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK 2014–001–05–04), the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR) of Ministry of Environment (MOE), Korea (NIBR No. 1834–302 & 2014–02–001), and Deep-Sea Environment Study in North East Pacific (PM57953&PM57954) of MOMAF (Ministry of maritime Affairs and Fisheries). The authors extend their appreciation to Dr. Rony Huys (Natural History Museum London) for his great help in early identification, and SEM preparations.