ZooKeys 424: 19–57, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.424.7388
Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group
Yun Bu 1, Mikhail B. Potapov 2, Wen Ying Yin 1
1 Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200032 China
2 Moscow State Pedagogical University, Kibalchich str., 6, korp. 5, Moscow, 129278 Russia

Corresponding author: Yun Bu (ybu@sibs.ac.cn)

Academic editor: L. Deharveng

received 4 March 2014 | accepted 4 June 2014 | Published 8 July 2014
(C) 2014 Yun Bu. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.

Citation: Bu Y, Potapov MB, Yin WY (2014) Systematic and biogeographical study of Protura (Hexapoda) in Russian Far East: new data on high endemism of the group. ZooKeys 424: 19–57. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.424.7388

Abstract

Proturan collections from Magadan Oblast, Khabarovsk Krai, Primorsky Krai, and Sakhalin Oblast are reported here. Twenty-five species are found of which 13 species are new records for Russian Far East which enrich the knowledge of Protura known for this area. Three new species Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n., Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. and Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. are illustrated and described. The new materials of Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977) are studied and described in details. Two new combinations, Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n. and Fjellbergella jilinensis (Wu & Yin, 2007), comb. n. are proposed as a result of morphological examination. Keys to species of the genera Fjellbergella and Yichunentulus are given. An annotated list of all species of Protura from Russian Far East is provided and discussed. Widely distributed species were not recorded in this area. This may be because of the high sensitivity of Protura to anthropogenic impact and low dispersal ability of the group.

Keywords

Key, checklist, Baculentulus, Fjellbergella, Yichunentulus, biogeography

Introduction

The Protura are minute soil-dwelling arthropods with more than 800 species known so far in the world (Bu et al. 2012, Szeptycki 2007, Shrubovych 2014). They have been a group of focus in the study of the evolutionary history of Hexapoda and Arthropoda because of their basal phylogenetic position (Chen et al. 2011, Luan et al. 2005, Mallatt et al. 2010, Meusemann et al. 2010).

The Russian Far East (abbreviated as RFE throughout the present paper) occupies an area of 3, 016 thousand sq. km. and extends from Wrangel Island southwards to Khasan Lake (Fig. 1). Forests occupy 39% of the territory and predominate in Primorsky Krai, Amur Oblast, Sakhalin Oblast, and Khabarovsk Lrai. The insect fauna is associated with mixed broadleaved-coniferous forests in the south of RFE. About 31, 500 species of insects have been recorded in the RFE so far where Eastern-Asiatic and local species make the most part of the fauna (Storozhenko et al. 2002). Eighteen species of Protura have been recorded in the RFE. Compared to the neighbouring regions, 34 species of Protura have been recorded in Northeast China (Bu et al. 2013), 20 species were found in Korea (Lee and Rim 1988) and 88 species are recorded in Japan (Kaneko et al. 2012). The only seven publications on Protura of the RFE are: Martynova who described Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977) from Magadan; Nakamura (2004) who reported eight species from Khabarovsk Krai; Shrubovych (2009, 2010, 2014) and Shrubovych and Bernard (2012, 2013) who studied the Protura materials from different collections of Primorsky Krai and Sakhalin Island and nine species have been added to the proturan fauna of RFE.

Figure 1.

The sampling sites in RFE.

Much of the material was collected by us during a joint Chinese-Russian expedition in autumn of 2011 which was a part of study of the biodiversity of basal Hexapoda of Pacific coast of Asia (2011–2012). Several localities in southern RFE were searched: three locations of Primorsky Krai (Shkotovsky, Khasansky, and Lazovsky districts) and one of Khabarovsk Krai (Vaninsky district). Other materials collected by M. Potapov et al. (2009–2010) were also used. Around a thousand individuals are included in our study. Based on this material in all 25 species were identified, including 3 new species and 10 species newly recorded for the RFE. For another 12 species we give the new data on their distribution. The genera Fjellbergella and Yichunentulus are revised and rediagnosed, and the keys to species of the two genera are given.

Materials and methods

The specimens were collected by Tullgren funnels using fast extraction with strong heating of samples during several hours. All specimens were mounted on slides in Hoyer’s medium and dried at 60 °C. Specimens were identified and drawn with the aid of a NIKON E600 phase contrast microscope. The photos were taken by digital camera Nikon DXM1200. Type specimens are deposited in the Shanghai Entomological Museum (SEM), Institute of Plant Physiology & Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Moscow State Pedagogical University (MSPU).

Eight localities of RFE were sampled so far (Fig. 1) if including our collecting (denoted as 2–5 and 7); localities 1, 6 and 8 were studied in previous publications:

  1. Magadan Oblast, Snezhnaja dolina, 59°32.92'N, 150°48.16'E.

  2. Khabarovsk Krai, Vaninsky area, Valley of Mulinka, 49°49.42'N, 140°0.50'E.

  3. Khabarovsk Krai, Khabarovsk district, Korfovsky, Khekhtsyr Range, 48°30.95'N, 135°6.06'E.

  4. Primorsky Krai, Shkotovsky area, Anisimovka, Khualaza Mt. 43°10.33'N, 132°47.16'E.

  5. Primorsky Krai, Khasansky area, 42°37.40'N, 130°52.35'E.

  6. Primorsky Krai, Partizansky area, Chondolaz Range, 42°45.97'N, 133°3.75'E.

  7. Primorsky Krai, Lazovsky area, nearby Preobrazheniye, 42°54.16'N, 133°53.33'E.

  8. Sakhalin Oblast, Sakhalin Island, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Susunaysky Range, Chenov Mt. 47°1.50'N, 142°52.35'E.

Abbreviations used in the text follow the paper of Bu and Yin (2007). Head setae and pores are marked according to Rusek et al. (2012). Arrangements of the taxa follow the system proposed by Yin (1999).

Results
Systematics
Descriptions of new species
Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/2AD017F3-F73F-4AF5-A0FE-C317387B9A77

Figs 2, 3; Table 1
Material examined.

Holotype, female (No. FE-2011022-2) (SEM), Russia, Far East, Primorsky Krai, Khasansky area, eastern part of Krabbe Peninsula, from mixed samples of soil and moss under a broad-leaved forest on a hill beside the coast, 42°37.40'N, 130°52.35'E, 16-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov. Paratypes, 2 females (Nos. FE-2011022-1, FE-2011023) (SEM; MSPU), 1 maturus junior (No. FE-2011022-3) (SEM), same data as holotype.

Description.

Adult body length 1000–1100 µm (n=3), pale yellow in color (Fig. 3A).

Head (Fig. 2A). Ovate, length 90–110 µm, width 70 µm. Setae d6 present, sd4 and sd5 short sensilliform. Setae d6 11 µm, d7 10 µm and sd7 19 µm in length. Clypeal pore cp and frontal pore fp present. Pseudoculus round, length 7–8 µm, with short posterior extension, PR=15 (Fig. 2B). Calyx of maxillary gland smooth, without any appendix, blind end split into two leaves, posterior filament 15 µm, CF=7 (Fig. 2C). Maxillary palpus with two tapering sensilla, subequal in length (Fig. 2D). Labial palpus reduced, with three setae and one lanceolate basal sensillum (Fig. 2E).

Figure 2.

Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n. holotype. A Head, dorsal view (cp = clypeal pore, fp = frontal pore) B pseudoculus C canal of maxillary gland D maxillary palpus E labial palpus F female quama genitalis G foretarsus, exterior view H foretarsus, interior view I pronotum and mesonotum, right side (al = anterolateral pore, sl = sublateral pore) J comb K tergite I, right side. Arrows indicate pores. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Foretarsus (Fig. 2G, H). Length 80 µm, claw length 20 µm, without inner flap, TR=4; empodium length 3 µm, EU=0.15. Dorsal sensilla t-1 baculiform, t-2 slender and long (17 µm), BS=0.33, t-3 broad-leaf shape. All other exterior sensilla slender, except broadened sensillum g, a surpassing base of b and c, b broad at base and extremely long (29 µm), reaching base of γ4, c nearly reaching base of e and slightly lower than b and d, d located at same level to b, e short, f long, g broad and short. Interior sensilla a’ lanceolate and broad, b’ absent, c’ reaching base of claw. Relative length of sensilla: t1 = t3 < a’ < (g = t2 = c’) < a < (c = e) < d < f < b. Setae β1 and δ4 sensillum, 6 µm and 7 µm respectively. Pores close to base of sensilla a and t3 present. Length of middle tarsus 35 µm, claw length 15 µm. Length of hind tarsus 38 µm, claw length 18 µm.

Thorax. Thoracic chaetotaxy given in Table 1. Setae 1 and 2 on pronotum 16 µm and 12 µm length respectively, mesonotum and metanotum with eight pairs of P-setae, accessory setae short sensilliform; setae P1, P1a and P2 on mesonotum 15 µm, 3 µm and 20 µm respectively (Fig. 2I). Prosternum with two pairs of anterior seta, and setae A2 and M2 sensilliform (Fig. 3B). Mesosternum and metasternum each with 7 A-setae, and setae A2 sensilliform (Fig. 3C, D). Pronotum and prosternum without pores (Figs 2I, 3B). Mesonotum with pores sl and al, metanotum with pores sl only (Fig. 2I). Mesosternum and metasternum without pores (Fig. 3C, D). Single membranal pore present on membrane between each coxa and the body.

Figure 3.

Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n. holotype. A Habitus B prosternum C mesosternum D metasternum E tergite III, left side F tergite VI, left side G tergite VIII HJ sternites V–VII. Arrows indicate pores. Scale bar: 100 μm in A, others, 20 μm.

Table 1.

Adult chaetotaxy of Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n.

Segment Dorsal Ventral
Formula Setae Formula Setae
Th. I 4 1, 2 (4+4)/6 A1, 2, M1, 2
P1, 2, 3
II–III 6/16 A2, 4, M
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 5, 5a
(7+2)/4 Ac, 2, 3, 4, M
Pc, 1, 2
Abd. I 6/12 A1, 2, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4
3/4 Ac, 2
P1, 2
II–III 6/16 A1, 2, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/5 Ac, 2
Pc, 1a, 2
IV–V 6/16 A1, 2, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/8 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2, 3
VI 8/16 A1, 2, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/8 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2, 3
VII 8/18 A1, 2, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 3a, 4, 4a, 5
3/8 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2, 3
VIII 6/16 A2, 4, 5
M1, 2, 3, 4, P2, 3, 4, 5
4 A1, 2
IX 14 1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 3a, 4 4 1, 2
X 12 1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4 4 1, 2
XI 6 1, 3, 4 6 1, 1a, 2
XII 9 6

Abdomen. Abdominal chaetotaxy given in Table 1. Tergite I with three pairs of anterior setae (A1, A2, A5) and six pairs of posterior setae (Fig. 2K). Tergites II–VI with eight pairs of posterior setae. Tergite VI and VII with four pairs of anterior setae (A1, A2, A4, A5). Tergites VII with nine pairs of posterior setae, P3a present. All accessory setae on tergites I–VII sensilliform, 5–6 µm on tergites I–VI and 7 µm on VII. Tergite VIII with paired setae M1 (Fig. 3G). Sternite IV–VII each with eight posterior setae, Pc absent (Fig. 3H, I, J). Sternite VIII with 4 setae.

Tergites I and VIII with pores psm only (Figs 2K, 3G), II–V with pores psm and al (Fig. 3E), VI–VII with pores psm, al and psl (Fig. 3F), IX–XI without pores, XII with single medial pore. Sternites I–III without pores, IV with 1+1 anteromembranal pores, V and VI each with 1+1 posterior pores anterior to seta P1 and 1+1 anteromembranal pores (Fig. 3H, I), VII with single posterior pore asymmetrical located left or right and 1+1 anteromembranal pores (Fig. 3J), VIII–XI without pores, XII with 1+1 pores al.

Abdominal appendages I, II, III with 2, 1, 1 segments and 4, 2, 2 setae respectively. On appendages II and III, subapical seta 15–17 µm, apical seta 11–12 µm in length. Striate band on abdominal segment VIII reduced, anterior margin regular wave shaped (Fig. 3G). Comb on abdomen VIII rectangular, with 12–13 teeth (Fig. 2J). Female squama genitalis with very short basal apodeme, extremely long and pointed acrostyli (Fig. 2F). Male unknown.

Etymology.

The species is named after Krabbe Peninsula where the type specimens were collected.

Distribution.

Known only from type locality.

Diagnosis.

Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n. is characterized by extremely long sensilum b on foretarsus, sensillum a’ located distal to t1, sensillum b’ absent, eight A-setae on tergite VI and VII, presence of P3a on tergite VII, and special female genitalia with short basal apodeme.

Remarks.

We placed the present new species in the genus Baculentulus because the baculiform sensillum t1 on foretarsus, reduced labial palpus with three setae and one sensillum, smooth calyx of maxillary gland, reduced striate band, two pairs of anterior setae on mesonotum and metanotum, abdominal appendages II and III each with two setae of different length, and only 4 setae on sternite VIII. It is similar to Baculentulus samchonri (Imadaté & Szeptycki, 1976) from North Korea in having eight A-setae on both tergites VI and VII, absence of sensillum b’ and extremely long sensillum b on foretarsus. They can be distinguished by the posterior setae on tergite VII (9 pairs of P-setae with P3a present in Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n. vs. 8 pairs of P-setae with P3a absent in Baculentulus samchonri), the anterior setae on tergite I (6 A-setae in Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n. vs. 4 in Baculentulus samchonri), the length of sensillum f (extremely long and surpassing the base of claw in Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n. vs. short and not reaching base of claw in Baculentulus samchonri), and the shape of female squama genitalis (basal apodeme very short in Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n. vs. basal apodeme in moderate length in Baculentulus samchonri).

Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/152D05AF-CE80-4BDA-B821-833163392DC1

Figs 4, 5; Table 2
Material examined.

Holotype, female (No. FE-2011051-2) (SEM), Russia, Far East, Primorsky Krai, Lazovsky area, nearby Preobrazheniye, from the mixed samples of humus (full of white mycelium) and a little soil under a broad-leaved forest close to the seashore, 42°54.16'N, 133°53.33'E, 22-IX-2011. coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov. Paratypes, 5 females (Nos. FE-2011046-2, FE-2011052-4, FE-2011052-5, FE-2011052-6, FE-2011073-1) (SEM), 5 males (Nos. FE-2011071-1, FE-2011072-1, FE-2011074-1, FE-2011075-1, FE-211075-3) (SEM; MSPU), same data as holotype. Other materials, 3 male preimagos (Nos. FE-2011048-2, FE-2011048-3, FE-2011049-3) (SEM), same date as holotype.

Description.

Adult body length 1100–1300 µm (n=10), pale yellow in color (Fig. 5A).

Head (Fig. 4A). Ovate, length 120–125 µm, width 85 µm. Setae d6 present, sd4 and sd5 short sensilliform. Setae d6 and d7 subequal in length. Seta sd7 18 µm in length. Clypeal pore cp and frontal pore fp present. Pseudoculus round, length 9–10 µm, with short posterior extension, some irregular lines visible under light microscope, PR=12–13 (Fig. 4B). Calyx of maxillary gland smooth, with one helmet-like dorsal appendix, blind end split into two leaves, and posterior filament 15 µm, CF=8 (Fig. 4C). Maxillary palpus with two tapering sensilla, dorsal one (8–10 µm) slightly longer than lateral one (7–9 µm) (Fig. 4D). Labial palpus reduced, with two-branched terminal tuft of setae, with one leaf-shape basal sensillum (Figs 4E, 5B).

Figure 4.

Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. holotype. A Head, dorsal view B pseudoculus C canal of maxillary gland D maxillary palpus E labial palpus F female squama genitalis G male squama genitalis H foretarsus, exterior view I foretarsus, interior view J nota, right side K part of striate band L comb. Arrows indicate pores. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Figure 5.

Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. holotype. A Habitus B ventral side of head C prosternum D mesosternum E metasternum F tergites VIII–XII G sternites VIII–XII H–J sternites I–III K sternite IV L sternite VI M sternite VII N–P laterotergites of abdominal segments IV, V and VI. Arrows indicate pores. Scale bar: 100 μm in A, others, 20 μm.

Foretarsus (Fig. 4H, I). Length 90–95 µm, claw length 20–21 µm, without inner flap, TR=4.3–4.7; empodium length 4 µm, EU=0.2. Dorsal sensilla t-1 claviform, t-2 slender and long (25–26 µm), BS=0.38–0.42, t-3 short and lanceolate. All other exterior sensilla slender, with except a slightly broad, surpassing base of c, b shorter than c and located in subequal level, d lower than c, e slender, f long, g short. Interior sensilla a’ short and broad, b’ slender and surpassing base of δ5, c’ reaching base of claw. Relative length of sensilla: t3 < t1< a’ < b < (a = g = d = b’ = c’) < (c = e = f = t2). Setae β1 and δ4 sensillum, 7 µm and 5 µm respectively. Pores close to base of sensilla a and t3 present. Length of middle tarsus 40–45 µm, claw length 18–20 µm. Length of hind tarsus 45–50 µm, claw length 20–23 µm.

Thorax. Thoracic chaetotaxy given in Table 2. Setae 1 and 2 on pronotum 20 µm and 15 µm length respectively, mesonotum and metanotum with eight pairs of P-setae, accessory setae short sensilliform, 2.5 µm; setae P1, P1a and P2 on mesonotum 18–20 µm, 2.5 µm and 22–25 µm respectively (Fig. 4J). Prosternum with two pairs of anterior seta, and setae A2 and M2 sensilliform (Fig. 5C). Mesosternum and metasternum each with 7 A-setae, and setae A2 and A4 sensilliform (Fig. 5D, E). Pronotum and prosternum without pores (Figs 4J, 5C). Mesonotum with pores sl and al, metanotum with pores sl only (Fig. 4J). Mesosternum and metasternum each with single median pore, situated anterioral to level of setae M (Fig. 5D, E).

Table 2.

Adult chaetotaxy of Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n.

Segment Dorsal Ventral
Formula Setae Formula Setae
Th. I 4 1, 2 (4+4)/6 A1, 2, M1, 2
P1, 2, 3
II–III 6/16 A2, 4, M
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 5, 5a
(7+2)/4 Ac, 2, 3, 4, M
Pc, 1, 2
Abd. I 6/12 A1, 2, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4
3/4 Ac, 2
P1, 2
II–III 6/16 A1, 2, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/5 Ac, 2
Pc, 1a, 2
IV–V 6/16 A1, 2, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/8 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2, 3
VI 8/16 A1, 2, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/8 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2, 3
VII 8/18 A1, 2, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 3a, 4, 4a, 5
3/8 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2, 3
VIII 6/16 A2, 4, 5
M1, 2, 3, 4, P2, 3, 4, 5
4/2 A1, 2
P1
IX 14 1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 3a, 4 4 1, 2
X 12 1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4 4 1, 2
XI 6 1, 3, 4 6 1, 1a, 2
XII 9 6

Abdomen. Abdominal chaetotaxy given in Table 2. Tergite I with three pairs of anterior setae (A1, A2, A5) and six pairs of posterior setae. Tergites II–VI with eight pairs of posterior setae. Tergite VI and VII with four pairs of anterior setae (A1, A2, A4, A5). Tergite VII with nine pairs of posterior setae, P3a present. All accessory setae on tergites I–VII short sensilliform, 3 µm on tergites I–VI and 6 µm on VII. Tergite VIII with paired setae M1 (Fig. 5F). Sternites IV–VII each with eight posterior setae, Pc absent (Fig. 5K, L, M). Sternite VIII with two rows of setae (4/2) (Fig. 5G).

Tergites I and VIII with pores psm only, II–VII with pores psm and al, IX–XI without pores, XII with single medial pore (Fig. 5F). Sternites I–III without pores (Fig. 5H–J), IV with 1+1 anteromembranal pores (Fig. 5K, N), V and VI each with 1+1 posterior pores close to seta P1 and 2+2 anteromembranal pores (Fig. 5L, O, P), VII with single posterior pore asymmetrical located left or right (Fig. 5M), VIII–XI without pores, XII with 1+1 pores al.

Abdominal appendages I, II, III with 2, 1, 1 segments and 4, 3, 3 setae respectively. On appendages II and III, subapical seta 19–21 µm, two apical setae 11–12 µm, and 5–7 µm in length (Fig. 5I–J). Striate band on abdominal segment VIII reduced, anterior margin with sparse irregular teeth (Figs 4K, 5F, G). Comb on abdomen VIII rectangular, with 12 teeth (Fig. 4L). Female squama genitalis with short subuliform acrostyli (Fig. 4F). Male squama genitalis with 5+5 setae on dorsal side and 3+3 setae on ventral side (Fig. 4G).

Chaetal variability. Chaetal variations were observed in 4 specimens: on tergite VI, asymmetrical absence of A4 of right side (No. FE-2011071-1); on tergite VII, asymmetrical absence of P1 of right side (No. FE-2011052-4); on sternite VII, absence of Ac (No. FE-2011075-1), and asymmetrical absence of A2 of left side (No. FE-2011052-6).

Etymology.

The species is named after Lazovsky Nature Reserve where the type specimens were collected.

Distribution.

Known only from type locality.

Diagnosis.

Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. is characterized by three pairs of anterior setae on tergites II-V which is different to any other members of the genus, four pair of anterior setae, nine pairs of posterior setae on tergite VII, foretarsal sensilla b, c and d located in subequal level, b shorter than c, and tergite IX and X with 14, 12 setae respectively.

Remarks.

The present species is located in the genus Fjellbergella because three setae on abdominal legs, labial palpus with two-branched terminal tuft of setae, claviform sensillum t1 on foretarsus, reduced striate band, two pairs of anterior setae on mesonotum and metanotum, and 4/2 setae on sternite VIII. Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. is similar to Fjellbergella tuxeni Nosek, 1980 from Alaska in having 8 A-setae on tergite VII and presence of P1a on tergite I–VII. They can be distinguished by the chaetotaxy of tergite IX and X (14 and 12 setae in Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. respectively vs. 12 and 8 setae in Fjellbergella tuxeni), length and location of foretarsal sensilla b and c (b shorter than c and they located at the same level in Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. vs. b and c subequal in length and c located lower than b distinctly in Fjellbergella tuxeni), shape and length of sensillum a’ (broad and reaching base of sensillum b’ in Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. vs. slender and far surpassing base of sensillum b’ in Fjellbergella tuxeni), and shape of claw of foreleg (absence of inner flap in Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n. vs. presence in Fjellbergella tuxeni). In addition, the new species has only 6 anterior setae on tergites II-V contrary to two other members of this genus, which have 8 anterior setae.

Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/513B6344-D78B-4777-90A9-AEB3BAEAB83E

Fig. 6; Table 3
Material examined.

Holotype, female (No. FE-2011035-1) (SEM), Russia, Far East, Primorsky Krai, Lazovsky area, nearby Preobrazheniye, from the mixed samples of soil and humus from mountains, 42°54. 48'N, 133°53. 96'E, 21-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov. Paratypes, 1 female (No. FE-2011035-6), 3 males (Nos. FE-2011035-4, FE-2011037-1, FE-2011045-3) (SEM; MSPU), 2 male preimagos (Nos. FE-2011038-1, FE-2011038-2) (SEM), same data as holotype.

Description.

Adult body length 1200–1350 µm (n=5).

Head (Fig. 6A). Ovate, length 120–130 µm, width 70–80 µm. Setae d6 present, sd4 and sd5 short sensilliform. Setae d6 11 µm, d7 10 µm and sd7 18 µm in length. Clypeal pore cp and frontal pore fp present. Pseudoculus round, length 7–8 µm, with short posterior extension, PR=16 (Fig. 6B). Calyx of maxillary gland smooth, without any appendix, blind end split into two leaves, posterior filament 16–17 µm, CF=7–8 (Fig. 6C). Maxillary palpus with two tapering sensilla, dorsal snsillum is evidently longer than lateral one (Fig. 6D). Labial palpus completed, with one-branched terminal tuft of setae, with three setae and one lanceolate basal sensillum (Fig. 6E).

Figure 6.

Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. holotype. A Head, dorsal view B pseudoculus C canal of maxillary gland D maxillary palpus E labial palpus F female squama genitalis G foretarsus, exterior view H foretarsus, interior view I comb J male squama genitalis. Arrows indicate pores. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Foretarsus (Fig. 6G, H). Length 86–93 µm, claw length 20–23 µm, without inner flap, TR=4; empodium length 4 µm, EU=0.18. Dorsal sensilla t-1 baculiform, t-2 slender and long (23 µm), BS=0.5, t-3 lanceolate. Exterior sensilla a surpassing base of b and c, b slender and short (16 µm), not reaching base of γ3, c reaching base of f and in subequal level to b, d located higher than b and c, e long and reaching base of claw (30 µm), f slender, g broad and short (18 µm). Interior sensilla a’ broad, b’ slender and reaching base of α6, c’ nearly reaching base of claw. Relative length of sensilla: t3 < t1 < b < (a = a’) < g < (b’ = c’) < d < t2 < c < e < f. Setae β1 setiform and δ4 sensilliform. Pores close to sensilla a and t3 present. Length of middle tarsus 40 µm, claw length 17 µm. Length of hind tarsus 45 µm, claw length 20 µm.

Thorax. Thoracic chaetotaxy given in Table 3. Setae 1 and 2 on pronotum 20 µm and 12–14 µm length respectively. Mesonotum and metanotum with eight pairs of P-setae, accessory setae short sensilliform, 2 µm in length; setae P1, P1a and P2 on mesonotum 17–20 µm, 3 µm and 20–24 µm respectively. Prosternum with two pairs of anterior seta, and setae A2 and M2 sensilliform. Mesosternum and metasternum each with 7 A-setae, and setae A2 sensilliform. Pronotum and prosternum without pores. Mesonotum with pores sl and al, metanotum with pores sl only. Mesosternum and metasternum each with single median pore, situated anterioral to level of setae M.

Table 3.

Adult chaetotaxy of Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n.

Segment Dorsal Ventral
Formula Setae Formula Setae
Th. I 4 1, 2 (4+4)/6 A1, 2, M1, 2
P1, 2, 3
II–III 6/16 A2, 4, M
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 5, 5a
(7+2)/4 Ac, 2, 3, 4, M
Pc, 1, 2
Abd. I 6/12 A1, 2, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4
3/4 Ac, 2
P1, 2
II–III 6/16 A1, 2, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/5 Ac, 2
Pc, 1a, 2
IV–V 6/16 A1, 2, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/8 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2, 3
VI 8/16 A1, 2, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/8 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2, 3
VII 8/16 A1, 2, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 3a, 4, 4a, 5
3/8 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2, 3
VIII 6/16 A2, 4, 5
M1, 2, 3, 4, P2, 3, 4, 5
4/2 A1, 2
P1
IX 14 1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 3a, 4 4 1, 2
X 12 1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4 4 1, 2
XI 6 1, 3, 4 6 1, 2
XII 9 6

Abdomen. Abdominal chaetotaxy given in Table 3. Tergite I with three pairs of anterior setae (A1, A2, A5). Tergites II–VI with eight pairs of posterior setae. Tergites VI and VII with four pairs of anterior setae (A1, A2, A4, A5). Tergite VII with nine pairs of posterior setae, P3a present. All accessory setae on tergites I–VII short sensilliform, 3 µm on tergites I–V, 4 µm on tergite VI, and 5 µm on VII. Tergite VIII with paired setae M1. Sternite IV–VII each with eight posterior setae, Pc absent. Sternite VIII with two rows of setae (4/2).

Tergites I and VIII with pores psm only, II–V with pores psm and al, VI–VII with pores psm, al and psl, IX–XI without pores, XII with single medial pore. Sternites I–IV without pores, V and VI each with 1+1 posterior pores anterior to seta P1 and 1+1 anteromembranal pores, VII with single posterior pore asymmetrical located left or right and 1+1 anteromembranal pores, VIII–XI without pores, XII with 1+1 pores al.

Abdominal appendages I, II, III with 2, 1, 1 segments and 4, 2, 2 setae respectively. On appendages II and III, subapical setae 16–17 µm, apical setae 13–14 µm in length. Striate band on abdominal segment VIII reduced, anterior margin regular wave shaped. Comb on abdomen VIII rectangular, with 12–13 teeth (Fig. 6I). Female squama genitalis robust, with moderate basal apodeme and pointed acrostyli (Fig. 6F). Male squama genitalis with 5+5 setae on dorsal side and 3+3 setae on ventral side (Fig. 6J).

Etymology.

The species is named after Dr. V. Alpatov who accompanied us during our scientific trips.

Distribution.

Known only from type locality.

Diagnosis.

Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. is characterized by the presence of sensillum b’ on foretarus and short sensilum b on foretarsus, 6 anterior seate on tergites IV–V, swelled sensillum a’, presence of pores psl only on tergites VI and VII, and female squama genitalis with moderate basal apodeme and pointed acrostyli.

Remarks.

The present species is located in the genus Yichunentulus because the labial palpus with one-branched terminal tuft of setae, with three setae and one lanceolate basal sensillum, the baculiform sensillum t1 on foretarus, reduced striate band, two pairs of anterior setae on mesonotum and metanotum, 4/2 setae on sternite VIII, and abdominal appendages II and III each with two setae of different length. Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. is close to the type species Yichunentulus yichunensis Yin, 1980 in having short sensillum b and identical body chaetotaxy. However, it can be easily distinguished from Yichunentulus yichunensis and Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n. by the presence of sensillum b’ on foretarsus. It also differs from Yichunentulus yichunensis in the length of sensillum e (extremely long in Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. vs. short in Yichunentulus yichunensis) and sensilla c’ (long and surpassing base of δ6 in Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. vs. short and only reaching base of β7 in Yichunentulus yichunensis). It differs from Yichunentulus borealis in the chaetotaxy of tergites IV–V (each with 6 A-setae in Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. vs. 8 in Yichunentulus borealis), shape of sensillum a’ (slightly broad and as long as sensillum a in Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. vs. distinctly swell and shorter than sensillum a in Yichunentulus borealis), and the body porotaxy (pore psl present on tergites VI and VII only and sternites I–IV without pores in Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n. vs. psl present on tergites III–VII and sternites II and IV each with 1+1 anteromembranal pores in Yichunentulus borealis).

New records of genera, keys and new taxonomic combinations
Genus Acerentulus Berlese, 1908, new to RFE
Acerentulus Berlese, 1908: 122.
Type species.

Acerentomon confine Berlese, 1908.

Diagnosis.

Abdominal appendages II and III each with 3 setae, mesonotum and metanotum each with two pairs of anterior setae, foretarsal sensillum t1 claviform, sensillum b’ present, t3 willow-leaf shaped, sensillum b’ present, labial palpus with terminal tuft of setae, striate band on abdominal segment VIII well developed, and sternite VIII with 4/2 setae or with 4 setae only.

Remarks.

The genus Acerentulus has 47 species described in the world and most from Europe (Szeptycki 2007; Shrubovych et al. 2012), and only five species (Acerentulus kisonis Imdadaté, 1961, Acerentulus keikoae keikoae Imdadaté, 1988, Acerentulus keikoae capillatus Imdadaté, 1988, Acerentulus omoi Imdadaté, 1988 and Acerentulus sinensis Wu & Yin, 2007) were recorded in East Asia so far. Acerentulus kisonis Imdadaté, 1961 is new to RFE and very rare in the samples like in Japan (Imdadaté 1988), which has single individual present in hundreds of specimens.

Genus Fjellbergella Nosek, 1978 neto RFE
Fjellbergella Nosek, 1978: 57.
Type species.

Fjellbergella tuxeni Nosek, 1980.

Diagnosis.

Mesonotum and metanotum each with two pairs of anterior setae, labial palpus with two-branched terminal tuft of setae, sensillum d located near t2 insertion, abdominal appendages II and III each with three setae, foretarsal sensillum t1 claviform, sensillum b’ present, striate band on abdominal segment VIII reduced and sternite VIII with 4/2 setae.

Remarks.

The genus Fjellbergella containes only two species so far: Fjellbergella tuxeni Nosek, 1980 from Alaska and Fjellbergella uteorum Shrubovych & Bernard, 2013 from Colorado (Nosek 1980; Shrubovych and Bernard 2013). Except that, one species of the similar form Brasilidia jilinensis Wu & Yin, 2007 was also found from Northeast China. However, the species of genus Brasilidia has reduced labial palpus without tuft, and all of them occurred in tropical area (South America and India). After recheck the type specimens, we confirmed that Brasilidia jilinensis has reduced striate band, the labial palpus with reduced tuft (two-brunched), and three setae on abdominal appendages II and III which indicate it is a member of Fjellbergella. Thus we transfer Brasilidia jilinensis to the genus Fjellbergella as a new combination Fjellbergella jilinensis (Wu & Yin, 2007), comb. n. Plus the new species described in present paper, the genus Fjellbergella contains 4 species. They can be distinguished by the following key.


Key to the species of the genus Fjellbergella Nosek, 1978
1 Tergite VII with 4 pairs of anterior setae, seta Pc absent 2
Tergite VII with 5 pairs of anterior setae, seta Pc present Fjellbergella uteorum Shrubovych & Bernard, 2013; USA (Colorado)
2 Tergites I–VI without seta P1a Fjellbergella jilinensis (Wu & Yin, 2007), comb. n.; China (Jilin)
Tergites I–VI with seta P1a 3
3 Tergites IX and X with 14 and 12 setae respectively, sensillum b shorter than c and they located at the same level, claw of foreleg without inner flap Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n.; Russia (Far East)
Tergites IX and X with 12 and 8 setae respectively, sensillum b and c subequal in length and c located lower than b distinctly, claw of foreleg with one inner flap Fjellbergella tuxeni Nosek, 1980; USA (Alaska)
Fjellbergella jilinensis (Wu & Yin, 2007), comb. n.
Brasilidia jilinensis Wu & Yin, 2007: 53–61, figs 19–36. Syn.
Material examined.

Holotype, female, Paratype, 1 female, China, Jilin Province, Dehui city, 15-IX-2006, coll. D. H. Wu.

Distribution.

China (Jilin).

Genus Yichunentulus Yin, 1980, new to RFE
Yichunentulus Yin, 1980: 146-147, 155.
Type species.

Yichunentulus yichunensis Yin, 1980.

Diagnosis.

Mesonotum and metanotum each with two pairs of anterior setae, abdominal appendages II and III each with two setae, labial palpus with one-branched terminal tuft of setae, with 3 setae and 1 sensillum, foretarsal sensillum t1 baculiform, sensillum b’ absent or present, sensillum a’ located distal to t1, maxillary gland simple and without appendages, sternite VIII with 4/2 setae, striate band on abdominal segment VIII reduced, and sternites II–VI each has 1+1 membranal pores.

Remarks.

The genus Yichunentulus Yin, 1980 has only one species described from Heilongjiang, Northeast China (Yin 1980). After compare Baculentulus borealis Nakamura, 2004 with congeners, we find two important characters of this species: presence of one-branched terminal tuft of setae and 3 seate on labial palpus and 4/2 setae on sternite VIII are different to any other species of the genus Baculentulus. On the contrary, those two characters match well with genus Yichunentulus. Two specimens of Baculentulus borealis newly collected from type locality are also studied. We proposed to transfer Baculentulus borealis to the genus Yichunentulus as a new combination Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n. The three species of the genus Yichunentulus can be distinguished by the following key.


Key to the species of the genus Yichunentulus Yin, 1980
1 Tergites IV and V each with 4 pairs of anterior setae Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n.
Tergites IV and V each with 3 pairs of anterior setae 2
2 Foretarsal sensillum b’ absent Yichunentulus yichunensis Yin, 1980
Foretarsal sensillum b’ present Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n.
Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n.
Baculentulus borealis Nakamura, 2004: 17–20, figs 1–15. Syn.
Material examined.

1 female, 1 male, Locality 3, 25-IV-2010, coll. E. Sokolova & M. Potapov.

Distribution.

Russia (Far East, Khabarovsk Krai).

Notes.

Body length 1300–1380 µm, foretarsus length 110 µm. We studied the new materials of Yichunentulus borealis collected from type locality and redescribe the head chaetotaxy and body porotaxy. Head with d6 seta present, sd4 and sd5 sensilliform. Pronotum and prosternum without pores. Mesonotum with pores sl and al, metanotum with pores sl only. Mesosternum and metasternum each with single medial pore. Tergites I and VIII with pores psm only, II with pores psm and al, III–VII with pores psm, al and psl, IX–XI without pores, XII with single medial pore. Sternites I with single medial pore, II–IV without 1+1 anteromembranal pores, V and VI each with 1+1 posterior pores anterior to seta P1 and 1+1 anteromembranal pores, VII with single posterior pore asymmetrical located left or right, VIII–XI without pores, XII with 1+1 pores al.

Description of known species
Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977)
Figs 7, 8; Table 4
Acerella sharovi Martynova, 1977: 164–166, Figs 1, 2. Syn.
Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977), Imadaté 1981: 144.
Material examined.

7 females (Nos. FE-2011062-1, FE-2011062-4, FE-2011062-5, FE-2011085-1, FE-2011085-2, FE-2011087-1, FE-2011089-1) (SEM; MSPU), 5 males (Nos. FE-2011062-2, FE-2011062-3, FE-2011086-1, FE-2011086-2, FE-2011087-2) (SEM; MSPU), 1 male preimago (No. FE-2011090-2), Russia, Far East, Khabarovsk Krai, Vaninsky area, nearby Vysokogorny, Valley of Mulinka, from Picea and Abies forest on Northeast slope, sample No. 27, 750 m alt., 30-IX-2011, 1 male preimago (No. FE-2011059-2), 1 maturus junior (No. FE-2011059-1), Russia, Far East, Khabarovsk Krai, Vaninsky area, nearby Datta, from coastal larch-wood on East slope (green moss), sample No. 24, 28-IX-2011. 1 female (No. FE-2011060-1), Russia, Far East, Khabarovsk Krai, Vaninsky area, nearby Vysokogorny, Valley of Mulinka, from spruce forest at pass, sample No. 26, 900 m alt., 29-IX-2011. 2 females (FE-2011067-2, FE-2011088-1), 1male (No. FE-2011088-2), Russia, Far East, Khabarovsk Krai, Vaninsky area, nearby Vysokogorny, Valley of Mulinka, from mixed sample of spruce-forest and rotten wood, sample No. 30, 600 m alt., 29-ix-2011. 1 female (No. FE-2011069-1), Russia, Far East, Khabarovsk Krai, Vaninsky area, nearly Vysokogorny (5 km South), Valley of Dopolnitel’ny Stream, from mixed sample of litter under old poplar-trees in floodplain, sample No. 32, 400 m alt., 30-IX-2011. All specimens are collected by M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Description of new materials.

Adult body length 1000–1200 µm (n=16), yellow in color (Fig. 8A).

Head (Fig. 7A). Ovate, length 130–135 µm, width 80–85 µm. Setae d6 present, sd4 and sd5 short. Setae d6 14–15 µm, d7 16–17 µm and sd7 18–19 µm in length. Clypeal pore cp and frontal pore fp present. Pseudoculus round, length 7–8 µm, with short posterior extension, PR=16–17 (Fig. 7B). Maxillary gland large, calyx with lateral racemose appendices and one helmet-like dorsal appendix, and bilobed posterior dilation, posterior filament length 20–22 µm, CF=6–7 (Fig. 7C). Labial palpus reduced, with one-branched terminal tuft of setae, three setae and one leaf-shaped basal sensillum (Figs 7D, 8B), but well developed in five specimens (Figs 7E, 8C). Maxillary palpus with two tapering sensilla, subequal in length (Fig. 7F).

Figure 7.

Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977) A Head, dorsal view B pseudoculus C canal of maxillary gland D labial palpus (specimens from samples 24 and 27) E labial palpus (specimens from samples 26, 30 and 32) F maxillary palpus G female squama genitalis H foretarsus, exterior view I foretarsus, interior view J nota, right side K comb L male squama genitalis. A–D and F–L specimen No. FE-2011062-4; E specimen No. FE-2011060-1. Arrows indicate pores. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Figure 8.

Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977) A Habitus B ventral side of head, shows reduced labial palpus C ventral side of head, shows well developed labial palpus D part of striate band E prosternum F mesosternum G metasternum H–M sternites I–III, IV, VI and VII. A–B and D–M specimen No. FE-2011062-4; C specimen No. FE-2011060-1. Arrows indicate pores. Scale bar: 100 μm in (A), others, 20 μm.

Foretarsus (Fig. 7H, I). Length 85–92 µm, claw length 23–29 µm, with one inner flap, TR=3.5–3.7; empodium length 4 µm, EU=0.15–0.18. Dorsal sensilla t-1 filiform, t-2 slender and long (17 µm), BS=0.33, t-3 lanceolate and short. All exterior sensilla slender, a far surpassing base of b and c, b slightly longer than c, c short and lower than b, d and e short, f long, g broad and short. Interior sensilla a’ broad and long, surpassing base of δ5, b’ absent, c’ slender and surpassing base of claw. Relative length of sensilla: t3 < g < t1 < (c = d = e) < b < a’ < a < t2 < c’ < f. Setae β1 and δ4 sensilliform, 12–13 µm in length. Pores close to sensilla c and t3 present. Length of middle tarsus 40 µm, claw length 15–20 µm. Length of hind tarsus 45 µm, claw length 18–20 µm.

Thorax. Thoracic chaetotaxy given in Table 4. Setae 1 and 2 on pronotum 26–35 µm and 16–17 µm length respectively, mesonotum and metanotum with eight pairs of P-setae, accessory setae sensilliform; setae P1, P1a and P2 on mesonotum 30 µm, 10 µm and 43 µm respectively (Fig. 7J). Prosternum with two pairs of anterior seta, and setae A2 and M2 sensilliform (Fig. 8E). Mesosternum with 5 A-setae, and metasternum each with 7 A-setae, and setae A2 sensilliform (Fig. 8F, G). Pronotum and prosternum without pores (Figs 7J, 8E). Mesonotum with pores sl and al, metanotum with pores sl only (Fig. 7J). Mesosternum and metasternum each with single medial pore (Fig. 8F, G). Single membranal pore present on membrane between each coxa and the body.

Table 4.

Adult chaetotaxy of Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977).

Segment Dorsal Ventral
Formula Setae Formula Setae
Th. I 4 1, 2 (4+4)/6 A1, 2, M1, 2
P1, 2, 3
II 8/16 A2, 3, 4, M
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 3a, 4, 5
(5+2)/4 Ac, 2, 3, M
P1, 2
III 10/16 A1, 2, 3, 4, M
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 3a, 4, 5
(7+2)/4 Ac, 1, 2, 3, M
P1, 2
Abd. I 6/12 A1, 2, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4
3/4 Ac, 2
P1, 1a
II 10/16 A1, 2, 3, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/5 Ac, 2
Pc, 1a, 2
III 10/16 A1, 2, 3, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/6 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2
IV–V 10/16 A1, 2, 3, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/8 Ac, 2
P1, 1a, 2, 3
VI 10/16 A1, 2, 3, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/9 Ac, 2
Pc, 1, 1a, 2, 3
VII 8/16 A2, 3, 4, 5
P1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4, 4a, 5
3/9 Ac, 2
Pc, 1, 1a, 2, 3
VIII 6/15 A1, 3, 5
Mc, 2, 3, 4, P2, 3, 4, 5
4/2 1, 2
1a
IX 12 1, 1a, 2, 2a, 3, 4 4 1, 2
X 10 1, 2, 2a, 3, 4 4 1, 2
XI 6 1, 3, 4 6 1, 2, 3
XII 9 6

Abdomen. Abdominal chaetotaxy given in Table 4. Tergite I with three pairs of anterior setae (A1, A2, A5) and six pairs of posterior setae. Tergites II–VII with eight pairs of posterior setae, P3a present. Tergite VII with four pairs of anterior setae (A2, A3, A4, A5). Tergite VII with nine pairs of posterior setae. All accessory setae on tergites I–VII sensilliform, 14–15 µm on tergites I–VI and 17 µm on VII. Tergite VIII with setae Mc). Sternite IV–V each with three anterior setae and eight posterior setae (Fig. 8K), VI–VII each with three anterior setae and nine posterior setae, Pc present (Fig. 8L, M). Sternite VIII with 4/2 setae. Hind margin of tergite IX smooth. Hind margin of tergites X–XI with very short fine ciliation. Hind margin of sternites IX–XI smooth. Posterior margin of tergite XII smooth, sternite with delicate serration in central part.

Tergites I and VIII with pores psm only, II–VII with pores psm and al, IX–XI without pores, XII with single medial pore. Sternites I and VI without pores (Fig. 8H, L), II–V each with single medial pore (Fig. 8I, J), VII with single anterior pore asymmetrical located left or right on the line (Fig. 8M), VIII–XI without pores, XII with 1+1 pores al.

Abdominal appendages I, II, III with 2, 1, 1 segments and 4, 2, 2 setae respectively. On appendages II and III, subapical seta 16–18 µm, apical seta 12–15 µm in length. Striate band on abdominal segment VIII well developed, anterior margin regular wave shaped (Fig. 8D). Comb on abdomen VIII rectangular, with 10–12 teeth (Fig. 7K). Female squama genitalis with short basal apodeme and pointed acrostyli (Fig. 7G). Male squama genitalis with 4+4 setae on dorsal side and 2+2 setae on ventral side (Fig. 7L).

Chaetal variability. Chaetal variations were observed in 7 specimens: on tergite II, absence of P4a (No. FE-2011067-2); on tergite IV, asymmetrical absence of A1 of right side (No. FE-2011060-1); on sternite II, absence of Pc and present of P1 on right side (No. FE-2011060-1, Fig. 70); on sternite III, present of Pc (No. FE-2011060-1, Fig. 71); on sternite VI, absence of Pc (Nos. FE-2011067-2, FE-2011088-2, FE-2011089-1); on sternite VIII, asymmetrical absence of P1 of left side (Nos. FE-2011062-3, FE-2011062-5, FE-2011069-1), or both side (No. FE-2011060-1).

Distribution.

Russia (Far East, Magadan Oblast; Khabarovsk Krai).

Diagnosis.

Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977) is characterized by the presence of setae Pc on sternite VI and 4/2 setae on sternite VIII.

Remarks.

Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977) is the first species of Protura described in RFE. We give the redescription of Imadateiella sharovi basing on our vast material since it shows minor differences from the redescription of Shrubovych (2014) (labial palpus, length of sensilla b, e and t2 on fortarsus and pores on sternite I). The male squama genitalis is also described for the first time. The variation on labial palpus is also uncommon – 15 specimens from samples 27 and 24 have labial palpus with reduced terminal tuft of setae (Figs 7D, 8B) while other 5 specimens from samples 26, 30 and 32 have it well developed (Figs 7E, 8C). According to the redescription of Shrubovych (2014), the type specimens have well developed labial palpus. We treat all our populations as belonging to one variable species.

List of species of Russian Far East
Family Berberentulidae Yin, 1983
Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n.

The description is given above.

Baculentulus loxoglenus Yin, 1980
Material examined.

3 females, locality 4, 10-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Northeast China; Russia (Far East: Khabarovsk Krai; Primorsky Krai). For Russia, it was already recorded from Khabarovsk Krai by Nakamura (2004) and we found it from Primorsky Krai.

Baculentulus morikawai (Imadaté & Yosii, 1956)
Material examined.

2 females, 2 males, locality 3, 25-IV-2010, E. Sokolova & M. Potapov collected; 2 females, 5 males, locality 5, 16-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov; 36 females, 39 males, 5 male preimagos, locality 7, 22-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Widely distributed in eastern areas of Asia: China (Anhui, Taiwan, Xianggang, Yunnan, Zhejiang); Japan; Korea; Russia (Far East: Khabarovsk Krai: Khekhtsyr Range; Primorsky Krai: Shkotovsky area). New for Russia.

Baculentulus samchonri Imdadaté & Szeptycki, 1976
Material examined.

1 female, 1 male, locality 5, 16-IX-2011, 12 females, 7 males, locality 7, 22-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Korea; Russia (Far East: Primorsky Krai). New for Russia.

Baculentulus potapovi Shrubovych, 2010
Material examined.

3 females, 4 males, 2 maturi juniors, 1 prelarva, locality 4, 10-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Russia (Far East: Primorsky Krai). It was described from Partizansky, Shkotovsky and Khasansky areas by Shrubovych (2010) and we found it from the same areas.

Family Acerentomidae Silvestri, 1907
Acerentulus kisonis Imdadaté, 1961
Material examined.

1 female, locality 7, 21-IX-2011. coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Japan; Russia (Far East: Primorsky Krai). New for Russia.

Notes.

Body large and robust, 1700 µm in length. Foretarsus length 115 µm, setae β1 and δ4 sensilliform, 5 µm in length. Setae d6 present on head, 16 µm. Clypeal pore cp and frontal pore fp present. Pronotum and prosternum without pores, mesonotum with pores sl and al, metanotum with pores sl. Mesosternum and metasternum each with 1 medial pore. Tergites I and VIII with pores psm only, II–V with pores psm and al, VI–VII with pores psm, al, and psl. X–XI without pores, XII with single medial pore. Pores on sternites I–IV and VII not observed. Sternite V with 1 posterior pore. Sternite VI with 4 posterior pores composed by two groups, each group contains two close adjacent pores. VIII–XI without pores, XII with 1+1 pores al.

Filientomon gentaroanum Nakamura, 2001
Material examined.

1 female, 2 maturi juniors, locality 5, 16-IX-2011. coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Japan; Russia (Far East: Primorsky Krai). New for Russia.

Filientomon takanawanum (Imdadaté, 1956)
Material examined.

1 female, 2 maturi juniors, locality 4, 9-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov; 5 females, 2 males, 3 maturi juniors, 2 Larvae II, locality 2, 30-ix-2011, coll. M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Widely distributed in Asia: China (Anhui, Hebei, Jilin, Shanxi, Zhejiang); Japan; Korea; Russia (Far East: Primorsky Krai; Khabarovsk Krai). New for Russia.

Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n.

The description is given above.

Tuxenentulus ohbai Imdadaté, 1974
Material examined.

1 female, 1 male, locality 2, sample No. 29, 30-IX-2011, coll. M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Northeast China; Japan; Russia (Far East: Khabarovsk Krai). New for Russia.

Yamatentomon yamato Imadaté & Yosii, 1956
Material examined.

4 females, 2 males, 2 maturi juniors, 1 Larva LII, locality 3, 20-IX-2009. coll. O. Smirnova; 2 females, 1 larva I, 1 larva II, locality 3, 24-IV-2010, coll. E. Sokolova & M. Potapov; 2 females, 3 males, 2 larvae II, locality 4, 10-IX-2011; 3 females, 1 males, 1 maturus junior, locality 5, 16-IX-2011; 5 females, 4 males, 3 maturi juniors, 3 larvae II, 1 males preimago, locality 7, 22-IX-2011. coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Northeast China; Japan; Korea; Russia (Far East: Primorsky Krai; Khabarovsk Krai). It was reported from Shkotovsky and Khasansky areas by Shrubovych (2014) and we found it from the same areas.

Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n.

The description is given above.

Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n.

The description is given above.

Family Nipponentomidae Yin, 1996
Callientomon chinensis Yin, 1980
Material examined.

5 females, locality 7, 22-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Northeast China; Russia (Far East: Primorsky Krai, Lazovsky area). It was reported from Shkotovsky and Khasansky areas by Shrubovych (2014) and we also found it from Lazovsky area.

Verrucoentomon louisanne Shrubovych, 2012
Material examined.

4 females, locality 4, 10-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Russia (Far East, Primorsky Krai). It was recorded from Ussuriysky, Khasansky and Shkotovsky areas by Shrubovych and Bernard (2012) and we found it from Shkotovsky area again.

Verrucoentomon shirampa Imadaté, 1964
Material examined.

10 females, 9 males, locality 3, 20-IX-2009. coll. O. Smirnova; 2 females, 1 male, locality 3, 24-IV-2010, E. Sokolova & M. Potapov collected; 1 female, locality 4, 10-IX-2011, Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov collected.

Distribution.

Japan; Korea; Russia (Far East: Khabarovsk Krai; Prmorsky Krai). It was already recorded from Ussuriysky and Shkotovsky areas by Shrubovych and Bernard (2012) and we found it also occurred in Khabarovsk Krai.

Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977)

The description of the new material from Russian Far East is given above.

Nipponentomon cf. bidentatum Nakamura, 2004
Material examined.

2 males, locality 3, 20-IX-2009, coll. O. Smirnova; 3 females, 2 males, locality 2, 30-IX-2011, coll. M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Russia (Far East, Khabarovsk Krai). New for Russia.

Notes.

The present species is nearly identical to Nipponentomon bidentatum Nakamura, 2004 found from Korfovsky area of Khabarovsk Krai, they have the same shape of sensilla on foretarsus and the body chaetotaxy (seta P3a absent on tergites II–VII and A3 present on tergite I), our form only differs in the presence of seta d6 on head and 1 inner flap on the claw. Final decision on the status of our population calls for the additional study.

Nipponentomon cf. heterothrixi Yin & Xie, 1993
Material examined.

2 males, locality 5, 16-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Russia (Far East, Primorsky Krai). New for Russia.

Notes.

The present species has nearly the same body chaetotaxy (with P2a’ on mesonotum and metanotum) and the shape of sensilla on foretarsus as in Nipponentomon heterothrixi described from Northeast China, but differs by presence of setae P3a on tergites II–V which are absent in Nipponentomon heterothrixi. Insufficient material does not allow describing a new species.

Nipponentomon khabarovskense Nakamura, 2004
Material examined.

2 females, 2 males, locality 7, 21-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov. 1 female, 1 male, locality 2, 30-IX-2011, coll. M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Russia (Far East, Khabarovsk Krai; Primorsky Krai ). New for Russia.

Notes.

The present species was described from Korfovsky area of Khabarovsk Krai by Nakamura (2004) and we found it also occurred in Primorsky Krai.

Nipponentomon jaceki Shrubovych, 2009
Material examined.

3 females, locality 4, 10-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Russia (Far East, Primorsky Krai). It was recorded from Shkotovsky area by Shrubovych (2009) and we found it from the same area again.

Nipponentomon nippon (Yoshii, 1938)
Material examined.

1 female, locality 5, 16-IX-2011; 2 females, locality 7, 21-IX-2011. coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Russia (Far East, Primorsky Krai). It was already recorded from Partizansky and Khasansky areas by Shrubovych (2009). We found it also occurred in Lazovsky area.

Family Eosentomidae Berlese, 1909
Eosentomon asahi Imadaté, 1961
Material examined.

1 male, locality 3, 2-X-2009, coll. O. Smirnova; 5 females, 1 male, 1 larva I, and 1 larva II, locality 4, 10-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Russia (Far East: Khabarovsk Krai; Primorsky Krai). It is already recorded from Khabarovsk Krai by Nakamura (2004), and we also found it in Primorsky Krai.

Eosentomon brevicorpusculum Yin, 1965
Material examined.

1 female, locality 4, 10-IX-2011; 1 female, 1 male, 1 larva I, locality 7, 21-IX-2011, 1 female, 1 male, locality 7, 22-IX-2011; coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Widely distributed in China. Russia (Far East, Primorsky Krai). New for Russia.

Eosentomon orientale Yin, 1965, new to RFE
Material examined.

4 females, 1 male, locality 7, 22-IX-2011, coll. Y. Bu, C. W. Huang, M. Potapov & V. Alpatov.

Distribution.

Widely distributed in China; Russia (Far East, Primorsky Krai). New for Russia.

Discussion

The 31 species of Protura recorded from RFE so far are listed in Table 5. They belong to 12 genera and 4 families Berberentulidae, Acerentomidae, Nipponentomidae and Eosentomidae, half the species are known only from the RFE. The most species are representatives of Acerentomidae and Nipponentomidae, each with 11 species (70%). The family Eosentomidae is rare and consists of only 3 species. Palearctic genera Yamatentomon, Imadateiella, Yichunentulus, Callientomon and Holarctic genera Filientomon, Fjellbergella, Nipponentomon, Tuxenentulus, Verrucoentomon are the dominant taxa composing 66% of all species.

Table 5.sList of Protura from RFE and their distributions.
Classification Species RFE China Korea Japan
Acerentomata Yin, 1996
Berberentulidae Yin, 1983
Baculentulus Tuxen, 1977 Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n.* 5**
Baculentulus loxoglenus Yin, 1980 3, 4 +
Baculentulus morikawai (Imdadaté & Yosii, 1956) 3, 5, 7 + + +
Baculentulus pomorskii Shrubovych, 2010* 4, 5, 6
Baculentulus potapovi Shrubovych, 2010* 4, 5, 6
Baculentulus samchonri Imdadaté & Szeptycki, 1976 5, 7 +
Acerentomidae Silvestri, 1907
Acerentulus Berlese, 1908 Acerentulus kisonis Imdadaté, 1961 7 +
Filientomon Rusek, 1974 Filientomon duodecimsetosum Nakamura, 2004* 3
Filientomon gentaroanum Nakamura, 2001 5 +
Filientomon takanawanum (Imdadaté, 1956) 2, 4 + + +
Fjellbergella Nosek, 1978 Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n.* 7
Tuxenentulus Imdadaté, 1974 Tuxenentulus ohbai Imdadaté, 1974 2 + +
Tuxenentulus solncevae Shrubovych & Bernard, 2013* 8
Yamatentomon Imdadaté, 1964 Yamatentomon kunnepchupi Imadaté, 1964 3 +
Yamatentomon yamato Imadaté & Yosii, 1956 3, 4, 5, 7 + + +
Yichunentulus Yin, 1980 Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n.* 7
Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n.* 3
Nipponentomidae Yin, 1996
Callientomon Yin, 1980 Callientomon chinensis Yin, 1980 4, 5, 7 +
Imadateiella Rusek, 1974 Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977)* 1, 2
Nipponentomon Imdadaté & Yosii, 1959 Nipponentomon bidentatum Nakamura, 2004 3 +
Nipponentomon cf. bidentatum Nakamura, 2004* 2, 3
Nipponentomon cf. heterothrixi Yin & Xie, 1993* 5
Nipponentomon khabarovskense Nakamura, 2004* 2, 3, 7
Nipponentomon jaceki Shrubovych, 2009* 4
Nipponentomon nippon (Yoshii, 1938) 5, 6, 7 + + +
Verrucoentomon Rusek, 1974 Verrucoentomon kawakatsui Imadaté, 1964 3 +
Verrucoentomon louisanne Shrubovych, 2012* 4
Verrucoentomon shirampa Imadaté, 1964 3, 4 + +
Eosentomata Yin, 1996
Eosentomidae Berlese, 1909
Eosentomon Berlese, 1909 Eosentomon asahi Imadaté, 1961 3, 4 + + +
Eosentomon brevicorpusculum Yin, 1965 3, 7 +
Eosentomon orientale Yin, 1965 7 +

* Known only from RFE so far.

** Numbers indicate the localities given in the materials and methods.

Compared with neighbouring regions, the Protura fauna of RFE is closely related to the fauna of Northeast China, Korea, and Japan, sharing 11, 7, and 11 species with each respectively (Bu et al. 2013, Imadaté 1974, Lee and Rim 1988, Szeptycki 2007, Yin 1999) (Table 5).

Based on the distributional data available so far, the species of Protura recorded in RFE can be classified into three groups:

1) Species widespread in the Eastern Asia including both its temperate and tropical parts (Fig. 9): Baculentulus morikawai (Imdadaté & Yosii, 1956), Filientomon takanawanum (Imdadaté, 1956), Eosentomon brevicorpusculum Yin, 1965 and Eosentomon orientale Yin, 1965.

Figure 9.

Distribution of two widely distributed East-Asiatic species of RFE. In addition to locations listed in the text, other records are used after Imadaté (1974), Lee and Rim (1988), Szeptycki (2007) and Yin (1999).

2) Temperate East Palearctic species: Baculentulus loxoglenus Yin, 1980, Baculentulus samchonri Imdadaté & Szeptycki, 1976, Acerentulus kisonis Imdadaté, 1961, Filientomon gentaroanum Nakamura, 2001, Tuxenentulus ohbai Imdadaté, 1974, Yamatentomon yamato Imadaté & Yosii, 1956, Yamatentomon kunnepchupi Imadaté, 1964, Callientomon chinensis Yin, 1980, Nipponentomon bidentatum Nakamura, 2004, Nipponentomon nippon (Yoshii, 1938), Verrucoentomon kawakatsui Imadaté, 1964, Verrucoentomon shirampa Imadaté, 1964, and Eosentomon asahi Imadaté, 1961. The species are recorded in RFE, Northeast China, Korea and temperate part of Japan (Fig. 10).

Figure 10.

Distribution of typical East-Palearctic species of RFE. In addition to locations listed in the text, other records are used after Imadaté (1974), Lee and Rim (1988), Szeptycki (2007) and Yin (1999).

3) Local species: Baculentulus krabbensis sp. n., Baculentulus pomorskii Shrubovych, 2010, Baculentulus potapovi Shrubovych, 2010, Fjellbergella duodecimsetosum Nakamura, 2004, Fjellbergella lazovskiensis sp. n., Tuxenentulus solncevae Shrubovych & Bernard, 2013, Yichunentulus alpatovi sp. n., Yichunentulus borealis (Nakamura, 2004), comb. n., Imadateiella sharovi (Martynova, 1977), Nipponentomon cf. bidentatum Nakamura, 2004, Nipponentomon cf. heterothrixi Yin & Xie, 1993, Nipponentomon khabarovskense Nakamura, 2004, Nipponentomon jaceki Shrubovych, 2009, Verrucoentomon louisanne Shrubovych & Bernard 2012 and Eosentomon sp. Nakamura, 2004. So far they have been recorded only in the south of RFE apart from Imadateiella sharovi distributed wider penetrating to the northern part of RFE (Fig. 11).

Figure 11.

Distribution of some local species of RFE.

The biogeographical composition of Russian Far East, including Primorsky Krai and Khabarovsk Krai, has been described for many arthropods (Belyaev 2011, Kupyanskaya 2011, Loktionov 2011, Mutin 2011, Nemkov 2011, Proshchalykin 2011, Ryabinin 2009, Storozhenko 2011, Teslenko 2007, Wang et al. 2009). Strict detailed comparison of different taxa is not possible since the authors usually used different although similar chorological nomenclatures. Generalizing the published data mentioned above, the Primorsky Krai, the region in which the Protura was mostly studied by us, shows a high portion of species distributed only in eastern parts of Asia. These species are usually called as “far-eastern” (several subgroups can be involved to this group), manchurian etc. In fact, all species of Protura recorded in RFE belong to this “far-eastern” group in wide understanding although an exact biogeographical state of them can not be understood for now, especially in group of “local” species (see above). At a species level, the unexpected thing is that neither Holarctic nor Palearctic species of Protura is found by us. In invertebrates the Holarctic and trans-Palearctic groups of species take the considerable portion, from 10 to 55% (Table 6).

Table 6.

The portion of Holarctic and trans-Palearctic species in fauna of arthropods of Primorsky Krai.

Taxa Holarctic and trans-Palearctic species References
Geometridae (Insecta: Lepidoptera) ~28% Belyaev 2011
Formicidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) ~14% Kupyanskaya 2011
Pompilidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) ~30% Loktionov 2011
Syrphidae (Insecta: Diptera) ~37% Mutin 2011
Spheciformes (Insecta: Hymenoptera) ~45% Nemkov 2011
Apiformes (Insecta: Hymenoptera) ~43% Proshchalykin 2011
Orthoptera (Insecta) ~14% Storozhenko 2011
Plecoptera (Insecta) ~10% Teslenko 2007
Oribatei (Arachnida) ~55% Ryabinin 2009
Protura (Hexapoda) 0% this study

Only three widely distributed species of Protura are known so far: Acerentulus confinis (Berlese, 1908), Berberentulus capensis (Womersley, 1931), and Gracilentulus gracilis (Berlese, 1908). These species are cosmopolitans in the broad sense, but their distribution is not fully understood (Szeptycki 2007). Two of them (Acerentulus confinis and Gracilentulus gracilis) are recorded from many European countries and, more rarely, from few other regions (Africa, North America, Australia, and New Zealand). Berberentulus capensis is scarcely recorded in warmer regions of the whole world. The reliable records of these species are unknown in Eastern Asia and, particularly, in RFE, but their presence is possible.

Several reasons can be proposed to explain the absence of the Holarctic and Palearctic species of Protura:

- High sensitivity of Protura to anthropogenic impact (Andrés 1999, Hågvar and Abrahamsen 1990, Niijima 1976, Parisi et al. 2005, Rusek 2007). The species preferring the disturbed sites are unknown in this group of animals. As a rule, in disturbed sites the portion of wider distributed and generalist species is greater while the endemic species decline, thus we can expect higher portion of endemic species in fauna of Protura. Strong negative effect of human practices on endemic species was shown, for instance, for the Collembola, the group of arthropods closely related to Protura (Cassagne et al. 2006, Deharveng 1996).

- In the Northern hemisphere, this group sharply declines at higher latitudes. In many groups of animals the portion of endemic species increases southwards in Eurasia (Chernov 1975) therefore we can assume higher endemism in Protura. The sharp decline from south to north along global transect of RFE is, however, shown for the most taxa of animals – for example, according to generalized analysis of Chernov et al. (2011) number of species of all insects in Chukotka (the most northern region) is about 20 times less than in Primorsky Krai (the most southern region).

- Low dispersal ability of Protura. This reason is possible but could not be substantiated since widely distributed species are known in other groups with low active movement but with high possibility of passive carriage (Coulson et al. 2002, Thibaud 2007). The passive carriage is unknown in Protura but only supposed by Yin et al. (1994).

In conclusion, the Protura appear to be a group with a low level of biogeographical “noise” (ruderal species), with high endemism and are candidate organisms for more detailed biogeographical analysis when more information is available for other regions.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mr. C. W. Huang (China) and Dr. V. Alpatov (Russia) for their assistance in the field. We sincerely thank Dr. P. Greenslade (Australia) for her generous help in language revision. The authors are also grateful to the management and staff of State Reserve of Lazovsky who provided the collecting permit and suitable conditions for our field work, especially to A. Laptev, Yu. Sundukov, and V. Kirsanov. We would especially like to thank A. Lelej and E. Mikhaleva (Russia, Vladivostok), who’s hospitality has made our stay in Russian Far East very efficient. A. Babenko (Russia, Moscow) made several valuable critical remarks. We cordially thank Dr. O. Nakamura (Japan) and Dr. J. Shrubovych (Ukraine) for their constructive reviews of the manuscript and valuable comments. This study was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (no: 31201706, 31301873, 31071887) and NSFC-RFBR Cooperative Research Project (31111120077 / 11-04-91179-GFENa, RFBR 14-04-91169M).

References
Andrés P (1999) Ecological risks of the use of sewage sludge as fertilizer in soil restoration effects on the soil microarthropod populations. Land Degradation and Development 10: 67–77. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199901/02)10:1<67::AID-LDR322>3.0.CO;2-H
Belyaev EA (2011) Fauna and chorology of geometrid moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of the Far East of Russia. In: Lelej AS, Storozhenko SYu, Kupianskaya AN, Proshchalykin MYu (Eds) Key to the insects of Russian Far East. Additional volume. Analysis of the fauna and general index of the names. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, Russia, 158–183.
Bu Y, Yin WY (2007) Two new species of Hesperentomon Price, 1960 from Qinghai Province, Nortwestern China (Protura: Hesperentomidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 32(3): 508–514.
Bu Y, Gao Y, Luan YX, Yin WY (2012) Progress on the systematic study of basal Heaxpoda. Chinese Bulletin of Life Sciences 24(2): 130–138. [in Chinese with English abstract]
Bu Y, Wu DH, Shrubovych J, Yin WY (2013) New Nipponentomon spp. from northern Asia (Protura: Acerentomata, Nipponentomidae). Zootaxa 3636(4): 525–546. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3636.4.2
Cassagne N, Gauquelin T, Bal-Serin MC, Gers C (2006) Endemic Collembola, privileged bioindicators of forest management. Pedobiologia 50(2): 127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.10.002
Chen WJ, Bu Y, Carapelli A, Dallai R, Li S, Yin WY, Luan YX (2011) Mitochondrial genome of Sinentomon erythranum (Arthropoda: Hexapoda: Protura) underwent highly divergent evolutiion. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11(1): 246–258. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-246
Chernov YuI (1975) Natural zonation and the terrestrial animal world. Mysl, Moscow, Russia, 222 pp. [in Russian]
Chernov YuI, Lelej AS, Storozhenko SYu (2011) Taxonomical diversity of the insects of the Far East of Russia. In: Lelej AS, Storozhenko SYu, Kupianskaya AN, Proshchalykin MYu (Eds) Key to the insects of Russian Far East. Additional volume. Analysis of the fauna and general index of the names. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, Russia, 7–45.
Coulson SJ, Hodkinson ID, Webb NR, Harrison JA (2002) Survival of terrestrial soil-dwelling arthropods on and in seawater: implications for trans-oceanic dispersal. Functional Ecology 16: 353–356. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00636.x
Deharveng L (1996) Soil Collembola diversity, endemism, and reforestation: a case study in the Pyrenees (France). Conservation Biology 10: 73–84. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010074.x
Hågvar S, Abrahamsen G (1990) Microarthropoda and Enchytraeidae (oligochaeta) in naturally lead-contaminated soil: a gradient study. Environmental Entomology 19: 1263–1277.
Imadaté G, Szeptycki A (1976) The proturans from North Korea. Bulletin of the national Science Museum Ser. A2, 267–276.
Imadaté G (1974) Protura (Insecta). Fauna japonica. Keigaku Publishing Co., Tokyo, Japan, 351 pp.
Imadaté G (1981) Occurrence of Nosekiella (Protura, Acerentomidae) in Japan. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 54: 142–146.
Imdadaté G (1988) The Japanese species of the genus Acerentulus (Protura). Kontyû 56: 1–20.
Kaneko N, Minamiya Y, Nakamura O, Saito M, Hashimoto M (2012) Species Assemblage and Biogeography of Japanese Protura (Hexapoda) in Forest Soils. Diversity 4: 318–333. doi: 10.3390/d4030318
Kupyanskaya AN (2011) The peculiarities of distribution of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Far East of Russia. In: Lelej AS, Storozhenko SYu, Kupianskaya AN, Proshchalykin MYu (Eds) Key to the insects of Russian Far East. Additional volume. Analysis of the fauna and general index of the names. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, Russia, 116–129.
Lee BH, Rim MG (1988) Acerentomid proturans (Insecta) with two new species and two new records for Korea. Korean Journal of Systematic Zoology 4: 1–11.
Lehr PA (1988) Keys to the insects of the Far East of the USSR, Volume II, Homoptera and Heteroptera. Nauka Publishing House, Leningrad, Russia, 232 pp. [U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2001, English translation]
Loktionov VM (2011) Fauna and geographical distribution of spider wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Far east of Russia. In: Lelej AS, Storozhenko SYu, Kupianskaya AN, Proshchalykin MYu (Eds) Key to the insects of Russian Far East. Additional volume. Analysis of the fauna and general index of the names. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, Russia, 81–92.
Luan YX, Mallatt JM, Xie RD, Yang YM, Yin WY (2005) The Phylogenetic Positions of Three Basal-Hexapod Groups (Protura, Diplura, and Collembola) Based on Ribosomal RNA Gene Sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1579–1592. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi148
Mallatt J, Craig CW, Yoder MJ (2010) Nearly complete rRNA genes assembled from across the metazoan animals: Effects of more taxa, a structure-based alignment, and paired-sites evolutionary models on phylogeny reconstruction. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55: 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.028
Martynova EF (1977) Acerella sharovi sp. n. (Protura, Acerentomidae) from the Magadan district. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 56: 164–167. [in Russian with English abastract]
Meusemann K, Von Reumont BM, Simon S, Roeding F, Strauss S, Kück P, Ebersberger I, Walzl M, Pass G, Breuers S, Achter V, Von Haeseler A, Burmester T, Hadrys H, Wägele JW, Misof BA (2010) Phylogenomic approach to resolve the arthropod tree of life. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27: 2451–2464. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq130
Mutin VA (2011) The peculiarities of distribution of the hover–flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in the Far East of Russia. In: Lelej AS, Storozhenko SYu, Kupianskaya AN, Proshchalykin MYu (Eds) Key to the insects of Russian Far East. Additional volume. Analysis of the fauna and general index of the names. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, Russia, 184–196.
Nakamura O (2004) Protura from Khabarovsk, the Russian Far East. Edaphologia 75: 17–35.
Nemkov PG (2011) The peculiarities of distribution of the digger wasps (Hymenoptera: Spheciformes) in the Far East of Russia. In: Lelej AS, Storozhenko SYu, Kupianskaya AN, Proshchalykin MYu (Eds) Key to the insects of Russian Far East. Additional volume. Analysis of the fauna and general index of the names. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, Russia, 93–100.
Niijima K (1976) Influence of construction of a road on soil animals in a case of sub-alpine coniferous forest of mt. Fuji. Revue D’Ecologie et Biologie du Sol 13: 47–61.
Nosek J (1978) Key and diagnoses of Proturan genera of the world. Annotationes Zoologicae et Botanicae 122: 1–59.
Nosek J (1980) A new genus and five species of Protura from Alaska. Entomologica Scandinavica 11: 165–173. doi: 10.1163/187631280794824712
Parisi V, Menta C, Gardi C, Jacomini C, Mozzanica E (2005) Microarthropod communities as a tool to assess soil quality and biodiversity: a new approach in Italy. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 105: 323–333. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.02.002
Proshchalykin MYu (2011) The peculiarities of distribution of the bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in the Far East of Russia. In: Lelej AS, Storozhenko SYu, Kupianskaya AN, Proshchalykin MYu (Eds) Key to the insects of Russian Far East. Additional volume. Analysis of the fauna and general index of the names. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, Russia, 101–115.
Rusek J (2007) Impact of different management practices on soil Collembola, Protura and Pauropoda in spruce forests attacked by bark beetles. Abstracts of 9th Central European Workshop on Soil Zoology, České Budějovice, April 17–20, 2007, 56 pp.
Rusek J, Shrubovych J, Szeptycki A (2012) Head porotaxy and chaetotaxy of order Acerentomata (Protura). Zootaxa 3262: 54–61.
Ryabinin NA (2009) Peculiarities of Oribatida mites (Acariformes: Oribatida) distribution in soils of the Far East. Vestnik DVO RAN 3: 54–60.
Shrubovych J (2009) Nipponentomon jaceki sp. n. from the Russian Far East (Protura: Acerentomidae, Nipponentominae). Zootaxa 2231: 55–61.
Shrubovych J (2010) Two new species of the genus Baculentulus from the Russian Far East (Protura: Acerentomidae, Berberentulinae). Zootaxa 2619: 39–48.
Shrubovych J (2014) Identification and character analysis of the Acerentomidae (Protura) of the northeastern Palearctic (Protura: Acerentomidae). Zootaxa 3755(2): 136–164. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3755.2.2
Shrubovych J, Bernard EC (2012) Two new species of Verrucoentomon (Protura: Acerentomidae, Nipponentominae) and a key to species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 105(5): 628–637. doi: 10.1603/AN11175
Shrubovych J, Bernard EC (2013) Review of Tuxenentulus and Fjellbergella species (Protura: Acerentomidae, Acerentominae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 106(6): 673–683. doi: 10.1603/AN12116
Shrubovych J, Schneider C, D’Haese CA (2012) Description of a new species of Acerentulus Berlese 1908 (Protura: Acerentomata: Acerentomidae) with its barcode sequence and a key to the confinis group. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (n.s.) 48(1–2): 1–7.
Storozhenko SYu (2011) The peculiarities of distribution of the orthopterans (Orthoptera) in the Far East of Russia. In: Lelej AS, Storozhenko SYu, Kupianskaya AN, Proshchalykin MYu (Eds) Key to the insects of Russian Far East. Additional volume. Analysis of the fauna and general index of the names. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, Russia, 46–64.
Storozhenko SYu, Lelej AS, Kurzenko NV, Tshistjakov YuA, Sidorenko VS (2002) Insect biodiversity of the Russian Far East. Far Eastern Entomologist 109: 1–28.
Szeptycki A (2007) Catalogue of the world Protura. Acta zoologica cracoviensia 50(1): 1–210.
Teslenko VA (2007) A survey of stonefly (Plecopetra) fauna in respect of stream zonation in the Far East of Russia. Eurasian Entomological Journal 6(2): 157–180. [in Russian with English summary]
Thibaud JM (2007) Recent advances and synthesis in biodiversity and biogeography of arenicolous Collembola. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (n.s.) 43(2): 181–185.
Wang SL, Xie H, Chen P, Jia YY, Zhou CF (2009) Diversity and biogeography of mayflies in Northeast Asia (Insecta, Ephemerptera). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 34(2): 193–198.
Wu DH, Yin WY (2007) New records of the genera Acerentulus and Brasilidia (Protura: Acerentomidae) from China, with descriptions of two new species. Zootaxa 1561: 53–61.
Yin WY (1980) Studies on Chinese Protura: Description of new species and new genera of the family Acerentomidae with discussions on their phylogenetic significance. Contributions from Shanghai Institute of Entomology 1: 135–156. [in Chinese with English summary]
Yin WY (1999) Fauna Sinica. Arthropoda. Protura. Science Press, Beijing, China, 510 pp.
Yin WY, Xie RD, Zhang J (1994) Phylogeny and biogeography of Condeellum group. Entomologica Sinica 1(3): 195–204.