(C) 2013 Ming-Fu Wang. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.
New synonymies and new combinations are proposed, based mainly on the study of type materials. They are as follows: Helina sarmentosa Fang & Fan, 1993 = Helina dianica Qian & Feng, 2005, syn. n.; Helina dianxiia Xue and Li, 2002 = Helina aureolicolorata Feng & Xue, 2002, syn. n.; Myospila lenticeps (Thomson, 1869) = Helina magnimaculata Feng, 1995, syn. n.; Spilogona angulisurstyla (Xue & Xiang, 1998), comb. n.; Spilogona apicicauda(Xue, Wang & Tong, 2003), comb. n.; Hebecnema arcuatiabdomina (Feng & Fan, 2001), comb. n.
New synonymies, new combinations, Helina, Myospila, Spilogona, Hebecnema, Muscidae
The genus Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 is the second largest genus in the dipteran family Muscidae. It occurs in all zoogeographic regions of the world and comprises over 520 species (
Helina includes so many species that it is an intimidating task to undertake research on, or even to identify the species correctly. Furthermore, many specialists consider that Helina is a ‘‘catch-all’’ repository for species that cannot be assigned elsewhere (
This study has been based on materials from the following museums:
IESNU Institute of Entomology, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
IMEAMMS Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
IZCAS Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
SEMCAS Shanghai Entomological Museum, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
Morphological terms follow
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helina_sarmentosa
MALE. Body length 8.5–9.5mm. Eye with dense and long hairs; frons about 1.3–2.0 times as wide as the width of anterior ocellus; frontal setae reaching ocellar triangle; fronto-orbital plate and parafacial with silveryish-grey pollinosity; parafacial bare, about 1.5–2.0 times as wide as postpedicel; antenna black, postpedicel about 2.6–3.0 times as long as broad, about 1.8 times as long as pedicel, arista plumose, the longest hair about equal or slightly longer than postpedicel width; gena and postgena with black hairs, gena with 5 rows of subvibrissal setae in anterior margin, genal height about 2/5 times of eye height; proboscis stout, prementum about 2.0 times as long as height; palpus black, slightly flat in distal half. Thorax ground-color black, scutum with four dark vittae in posterior view, acr 0+1, 9 rows of irregular fine setae between two dc rows, dc 2+4, ia 0+2, pra absent; anepisternum with hairs around anepisternal setae, meron with hairs around the lower margin of posterior spiracle, scutellum with black hairs in the lateral margin; basisternum, proepisternum, anepimeron, katepimeron bare; katepisternal setae 2+2, spiracles dark brown. Wing hyaline, brownish, with heavier color in the basal part and around veins; costal spine inconspicuous, radial node bare; veins R4+5 and M conspicuously diverging distally, crossveins r-m and dm-cu lightly clouded, crossvein m-m sinuate; calypteres yellowish; halteres brownish-yellow. Legs black; fore tibia with 2–4 p; basal half of mid femur with row of 8–10 pv (stout towards distally), distal half with 2 or 3 slender setae, mid tibia with 1 or 2 ad and 6 or 7 developed p, the length of longest seta about 3/5 of width of tibia; hind coxa bare on rear surface, hind femur with 5–7 strong setae on distal half, hind tibia with 7–10 av, 3–5 developed ad and 6–9 p. Abdomen ground-color black, with dense greyish-blue pollinosity, tergites 2 to 4 with one large dark lateral patch on each side, tergites 4 and 5 with posterior marginal setae, tergite 5 with irregular discal setae, sternite 1 with hairs.
FEMALE. Unknown.
Both Helina sarmentosa and Helina dianica can be easily separated from the other Helina species by mid and hind tibiae with very long and stout setae. Having examined the holotypes of both nominal species, we were unable to find differences justifying their separation, which has led us to consider all the examined specimens to be conspecific. Therefore, we synonymized Helina dianica under Helina sarmentosa.
Holotype of Helina sarmentosa, ♂: China: Yunnan, Deqin, Mt. Meili, alt. 4, 300–4, 680m a.s.l., 29.VII.1982, Coll. H.C. Cai(IZCAS); paratype of Helina sarmentosa, ♂: China: Yunnan, Deqin, Mt. Meili, alt. 4, 300–4, 680m a.s.l., 28.VII.1982, Coll. X.Z. Zhang(SEMCAS). Holotype of Helina dianica, ♂: China: Yunnan, Deqin, alt. 2, 400m a.s.l., 29.VII.1991, Coll. unknown (IMEAMMS).
China (Yunnan).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helina_dianxiia
The holotype of Helina dianxiia is almost identical to Helina aureolicolorata. The only difference between these two species is that the body color of Helina dianxiia is darker than Helina aureolicolorata. Helina dianxiia and Helina aureolicolorata are synonymized here because the two holotypes of these two nominal species characters are surprisingly consistent and genitalia are identical. Therefore, we synonymized Helina aureolicolorata under Helina dianxiia.
Holotype of Helina dianxiia, ♂: China: Yunnan, Lushui, alt. 2, 000m a.s.l., 26.V.1992, Coll. F.H. Li (IESNU). Holotype of Helina aureolicolorata, ♂: China: Sichuan, Ya’an, Mt. Zhougong, alt. 1, 700m a.s.l., 24.VI.1985, Coll. Y. Feng (IMEAMMS).
China (Sichuan, Yunnan).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Myospila_lenticeps
There are more than fifty species of the genus Myospila found in China. The species magnimaculata, previously assigned to Helina, is in my opinion a Myospila due to the following characters: vein M distinctly curved forward at tip; cerci slender and the morphology of genitalia. At the same time, I consider it to be a synonym of Myospila lenticeps for these other reasons: scutum with 4 dc; costal spine short but distinct; most part of thorax brown with dense light yellow pollinosity and vein R4+5 with fine hairs on the basal part in ventral view. Consequently, Helina magnimaculata is a new subjective junior synonym of Myospila lenticeps.
China (Guangdong, Guizhou, Hunan, Sichuan, Taiwan, Yunnan); Japan; Sri Lanka; India; Indonesia; Malaysia; Philippines; Thailand; Nepal; Kiribati (Christmas Island); Madagascar; Principe.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Spilogona_angulisurstyla
Paratype, ♂: China: Xinjiang, Dong Kunlun, Kaerdong, alt. 4, 300m a.s.l., 11.VII.1984, Coll. C.Q. Xiang (IESNU); paratype, ♂: China: Xinjiang, Hejing, alt. 3, 000–3, 500m a.s.l., 31.VII.1958, Coll. C.Q. Li (IZCAS).
Helina angulisurstyla was described by Xue and Xiang in
China (Xinjiang).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Spilogona_apicicauda
Holotype, ♂: China: Qinghai, Yushu, Batang, alt. 4, 200–4, 500m a.s.l., 15.VI.1964, Coll. S.Y. Wang (IZCAS).
Diagnostic characteristics (arista short; pra absent; katepisternal setae 1+2; costa with distinct comb-like rows on the front margin, vein m-m straight; mid tibia with 2 ad and 2 p; tergites 3 and 4 with one pair dark patches, sternite1 bare; surstyli slender, the lateral margin of cerci curved in distal half, apical of cerci sharp, sternite 5 broad and short) of the holotype indicate that it belongs to Spilogona.
China (Qinghai).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Hebecnema_arcuatiabdomina
(Translated from
FEMALE. Unknown.
The genus Hebecnema Schnabl, 1889 resembles the genus Helina but differs from it by the following characters: abdomen always without paired spots; fronto-orbital plate narrow, always narrower than antenna width; head in lateral view slightly flat on upper part; surstyli always slender.
According to the original descriptions and illustrations of Helina arcuatiabdomina given by
China (Sichuan).
I’m very grateful to Mr. Yan Feng (The Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Ya’an Municipal, Sichuan Province, China), who gave me invaluable help and extend my heartfelt gratitude to Drs. Jie Wu, Wei-bing Zhu and Xian-wei Liu (Shanghai Entomological Museum, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China); Prof. Ge-xia Qiao, Prof. Jun Chen, and Dr. Li-li Zhang (Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China); Prof. Rong-man Xu (Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Beijing, China) who gave us invaluable help with this study. I’m also extremely thankful to two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript and Ms. April Gloury (University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia) for her assistance in proofreading of the manuscript. This study is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 31071957, No. 31272347 and No. 30770252).