ZooKeys 418: 1–103, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.418.7629
A review of Cunaxidae (Acariformes, Trombidiformes): Histories and diagnoses of subfamilies and genera, keys to world species, and some new locality records
Michael J. Skvarla 1, J. Ray Fisher 1, Ashley P. G. Dowling 1
1 Department of Entomology, 319 AGRI Building, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701, USA

Corresponding author: Michael J. Skvarla (mskvarla36@gmail.com)

Academic editor: Vladimir Pesic

received 2 April 2014 | accepted 5 June 2014 | Published 20 June 2014
(C) 2014 Michael J. Skvarla. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.

Citation: Skvarla MJ, Fisher JR, Dowling APG (2014) A review of Cunaxidae (Acariformes, Trombidiformes): Histories and diagnoses of subfamilies and genera, keys to world species, and some new locality records. ZooKeys 418: 1–103. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.418.7629

Abstract

Cunaxidae are predaceous mites found in a variety of habitats. This work provides comprehensive keys to world subfamilies, genera, and species. Diagnoses and historical reviews are provided for subfamilies and genera.

Cunaxa boneti, C. denmarki, C. exoterica, C. floridanus, C. lehmanae, C. lukoschusi, C. metzi, C. myabunderensis, C newyorkensis, C. rackae, C. reevesi, and C. reticulatus are moved to Rubroscirus and C. otiosus,  C. valentis, and C. rasile are returned to Rubroscirus. Cunaxoides neopectinatus is moved to Pulaeus. Neocunaxoides pradhani and N. gilbertoi are transferred to Scutopalus. Pulaeus minutus and P. subterraneus are moved to Lupaeus. Pseudobonzia bakari, P. malookensis, and P. shamshadi are transferred to Neobonzia. Dactyloscirus bifidus is transferred to Armascirus.

Scirula papillata is reported from the Western Hemisphere for the first time. Armascirus ozarkensis, A. primigenius, and Dactyloscirus dolichosetosus are reported from new localities.

Keywords

Identification, key, Bdelloidea, Prostigmata, Eupodina

Introduction

Cunaxidae (Fig. 1) are common predatory mites that are present in forest systems, grasslands, agricultural fields, and anthropogenically disturbed areas. Surveys of mites in these habitats often report only family or generic-level identification. This is problematic because little is known about where cunaxid species occur, both regionally and in what habitats, and unfortunate because such reports are potentially very useful collectively if species were identified.

Figure 1.

Examples of cunaxids in ethanol illustrating how they would appear while sorting. 1a Armascirus 1b Cunaxa 1c Pulaeus 1d Parabonzia 1e Coleoscirus 1f Neobonzia.

Part of the reason behind the lack of specific identification is the difficulty in reliably identifying cunaxids without extensive knowledge of the primary literature. Keys to cunaxid species are often regional, so of little use to researchers outside of that specific region, and scattered across countless journals. The last comprehensive attempt to present keys to world species was by Smiley (1992). The number of described species since Smiley published his monograph has more than doubled (166 to 400+). Updated keys reflecting known diversity and current taxonomic opinion are therefore imperative if researchers are to identify individuals to the specific rather than generic or family level.

Biology. All cunaxids are thought to be opportunistic predators, though an undescribed Rubroscirus was observed to drink drops of honeydew in addition to feeding on live prey (Walter and Proctor 1999). Cunaxids have been reported to feed on active prey such as Collembola (Sellnick 1926, Heryford 1965), bark lice (Zaher et al. 1975a), and thrips (Milne 1977), and relatively inactive prey such as scales (Ewing and Webster 1912, Gerson 1971), nematodes (Taha et al. 1988, Walter and Kaplan1991), phytophagous mites (Meyer and Ryke 1959, Zaher et al. 1975a, Den Heyer and Ryke 1970, Taha et al. 1988, Smiley 1992, Sathiamma 1995, Arbabi and Singh 2000, Ferla 2001, Lahiri et al. 2004, Castro and Moraes 2010), and paratydeid mites (pers. obs.). They fail to survive when offered only plant material (Zaher et al. 1975a).

Both ambush and active hunting have evolved within the family, sometimes within the same subfamily. Within Cunaxinae, for instance, Armascirus and Dactyloscirus wait, sometimes for hours, to ambush prey (Walter and Proctor 1999), whereas Allocunaxa actively search for prey (Castro and Moraes 2010).

Cunaxids occur in most terrestrial habitats, including soil and leaf litter (Den Heyer 1977a, Luxton 1982; Javan et al. 2012); moss and lichen (Sepasgosarian 1984, Tseng 1980); on vegetation (Miller 1925, Swift and Goff 2001, Ferla and Moraes 2002) including coniferous trees (Lehman 1982), tropical trees (Castro and Moraes 2007) including guava trees (Mallikarjunappa and Nageshchandra 1990), Ferla and Moraes 2002), mango trees (Mohamed et al. 2014), coconut trees (Mariau and Biggins 2001; da Silva et al. 2014), and rubber trees (Hernandes and Feres 2006), ornamental plants (Tagore and Putatunda 2003), invasive weeds (Walter 1999), agricultural plants such as citrus trees (Muma 1960, Olivier 1968, Ramsey et al. 1972a, Soliman and Mahfood 1978, Vacante and Nucifora 1986, Quilici et al. 1997, Grout and Ueckermann 1999, Ferla and Moraes 2002, Fadamiro et al. 2009), deciduous fruit trees (Nesbitt 1946, Garman 1948, Lord 1949, Ramsey et al. 1972b, Quilici et al. 1997, Ferla and Moraes 1998, Ferla and Moraes 2002; Shakhsi Zare et al. 2012), cotton (Kuznetzov and Sizova 1978), strawberries (Ferla et al. 2007), grape vineyards (Schruft 1971, Jubb et al. 1985, Molnar 1997), alfalfa fields (Badieritakis et al. 2014), and plants in urban settings (Lahiri et al. 2004); vertebrate nests (Garman 1948, Gupta and Chattopadhyay 1978, Gupta and Paul 1985, Estebanes-Gonzales 1997); caves (Cooreman 1954, Turk 1972, Zacharda 1978); animal debris (Corpuz Raros et al. 1988, Taha et al. 1988); tree holes (Atyeo 1958, Lin and Zhang 2002); house dust (Oliveria and Daemon 2003); and stored food products (Huges 1976, Tseng 1980, Fan 1992). Individual species, however, are thought to be restricted to a particular habitat. For example, Armascirus taurus is reported to be most prevalent on the leaves of citrus trees while Coleoscirus simplex and Coleoscirus curtipalpus are more common in the leaf litter (Muma 1965) and Parabonzia bdelliformis is usually collected from treeholes but not nearby litter (Smiley 1992).

While cunaxids are often often found on plants in agricultural settings, their effect on prey populations is unclear. Ewing and Webster (1912) observed Cunaxoides parvus feeding on oyster-shell scales on apple trees and Schruft (1971) reported Cunaxoides oliveri feeding on eriophyid mites on grapes. Sathiamma (1995) reported Cunaxa setirostris to be “a very active and efficient predator on all the motile stages of Oligonychus iseilemae [white spider mite]” and that the “predator larva preferred the larval prey; nymphal predator preferred the larvae and early nymphs of the prey and the adult preferred the prey nymphs and adults”. Nucifora and Vacante (1986) reported cunaxids to be auxiliary predators that are useful for crops, but not main predators used in “integrated control techniques”. Rigorous studies investigating the effect of cunaxids on prey populations, however, have not been conducted.

Cunaxids appear to be active year round. Den Heyer (1980a) collected all life stages of Neocunaxoides in the Transvaal Highveld during the summer (30 °C+) and winter (minimum 0 °C) months. Zaher et al. (1975b) collected cunaxids throughout the year and demonstrated a positive correlation between abundance and temperature; they also found a slight negative correlation between abundance and relative humidity.

Cunaxids have been reported to be found phoretically on bark beetles, though they were not identified to species (Penttinen et al. 2013).

Both sexual reproduction and thelytokous parthenogenesis have been reported in cunaxids (Walter and Proctor 1999, Castro and Moraes 2010). Within Cunaxinae, Coleoscirinae, and Cunaxoidinae, precopulatory guarding of the quiescent tritonymphal female has been reported (Walter and Kaplan 1991). Dactyloscirus males possess a well-developed, sclerotized aedeagus; Armascirus and Rubroscirus males also possess an aedeagus, though less developed and sclerotized than in Dactyloscirus (Den Heyer 1978a, 1979a, 1981a). Castro and Moraes (2010) suggest that Cunaxatricha tarsospinosa may be cyclically or facultatively parthenogenetic – one population they studied consisted entirely of females while another population approximately 450 km distant contained males – and that parthenogenesis may be induced by cellular endosymbionts.

Cunaxids spin silk, which is used for a variety of purposes. Cunaxatricha tarsospinosa produces a webbing around eggs laid on leaves, but not branches; Castro and Moraes (2010) report that destruction of webbing may reduce viability of the eggs. Nymphal Armascirus taurus, Dactyloscirus inermis, Coleoscirus simplex, and an undescribed Pulaeus construct silken molting chambers (Alberti and Ehrnsberger 1977; Walter and Kaplan 1991); the breadth of this behavior suggests it may be widespread among cunaxids. Cunaxa setirostris constructs an irregular net of two silk varieties which is used during prey capture (Alberti and Ehrnsberger 1977). It has also been proposed that some species may be venomous, though this has not been confirmed (Den Heyer 1980a, Smiley 1992, Walter and Proctor 1999).

Biogeography. Cunaxids have been found on every continent except Antarctica. South Africa and the Philippines have the most well-documented cunaxid diversity – 68 and 57 species respectively – thanks to the efforts of Den Heyer and Corpuz-Raros (Den Heyer 2011a). South America was little studied until Castro and Den Heyer described 8 genera and 10 species from Brazil between 2008 and 2009. Only two species are known from Australia, both reported by Womersley (1933), though Walter (1999) reported 5 undescribed species in 4 genera and Callan et al. (2011) reported another two species at the family level, suggesting many species await discovery there.

The cunaxid fauna of Europe and North America north of Mexico fall between these extremes. Most reports have been sporadic and span more than a century, beginning with Banks (1894) in the United States and Berlese (1887) in Europe. Robert L. Smiley, a well-known North American worker, never collected material. He instead worked on samples that were sent to him, often intercepted by the USDA at ports of entry, so rather than focusing on North American fauna he more generally worked on world species. This has led to a scattered understanding of the species and genera that occur in North America.

Methods

The diagnoses and keys presented are based on published descriptions and examination of available type specimens. However, for many species the types were not available for examination. The accuracy of the keys is therefore dependent upon the accuracy of the published descriptions. This also influenced which characters were chosen for couplets. Often a character that is potentially useful and informative (such as the presence or absence of a cheliceral seta) was not reported in the original description. Thus, unlike previous keys, characters such as setal counts of leg segments were often preferred. This may prove to be problematic as extra setae are sometimes reported on leg segments; however, examination of multiple specimens in a population should help overcome this.

Den Heyer (2011b, 2013) transferred many species into different genera in the Bdelloidea database that is used by Species 2000 and ITIS Catalogue of Life (CoL). However, nomenclatural acts proposed within these databases are not considered valid under The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature as they do not conform to Article 8.4.2.2. This is intentional for a number of reasons, including avoiding circularity (e.g., a paper that cites CoL about a nomenclatural act, and CoL citing that paper) and time limitations in pursuing a publication that includes all nomenclatural acts proposed within the databases each year (Roskov and Bailly, 2 May 2014, pers. comm.).

Terminology

An effort is made to utilize terminology that is broadly applicable and well-accepted across mite taxa, despite conventions used among bdelloid researchers. Some terms widely used by bdelloid researchers are either inaccurate or outdated, and others are misleading. Therefore, we follow the suggestions outlined by Fisher et al. (2011), which are elaborated upon below.

Subcapitulum. The part of the gnathosoma that bears the palps and chelicerae has been variously termed by researchers of Bdelloidea. One such term – hypostome – more properly refers to the area of the subcapitulum anterior to the oral opening (Evans 1992; Krantz and Walter 2009), and therefore its use in reference to the entire subcapitulum is incorrect. The other term – hypognathum – is synonymous with subcapitulum, and is therefore not inaccurate, but also not broadly used across mite taxa. Thus, we reject the use of hypognathum in favor of subcapitulum and reserve the use of hypostome to the region of the subcapitulum anterior to the oral opening.

Body segmentation. The terminology associated with the acariform idiosoma remains controversial. Classically, these regions have been most widely called the propodosoma and hysterosoma. However, Grandjean (1970) proposed an alternate view of acariform idiosomal organization based on a segmentation hypothesis of van der Hammen (1963). Grandjean postulated that the podosoma is dorsally overtaken by the gnathosoma and the opisthosoma and termed the outgrowth of the gnathosoma that obscures the propodosoma the ‘aspidosoma’. Under this hypothesis, referring to the anterio-dorsal half of the idiosoma as the propodosoma is inaccurate, while referring to posterio-dorsal idiosoma as the hysterosoma (opisthosoma + metapodosma) is more inclusive than necessary and should instead be denoted simply as the opisthosoma. This hypothesis has gained popularity and ‘aspidosoma’ is currently used across disparate acariform taxa (e.g., Caeculidae: Coineau 1974; Erythraeidae: Mąkol 2010; Penthalodidae: Jesionowska 2010; Tydeidae: Kazmierski 2008). Contrary to this, Weigmann (2001) pointed out there is neither evidence for the dorsal overgrowth of the gnathosoma obscuring the propodosoma, nor for the overgrowth of the opisthosoma obscuring the metapodosoma. Further, he provided good evidence for retaining ‘propodosoma’ and ‘hysterosoma’. Ultimately, this matter will not be resolved without detailed investigation into developmental biology. Barnett and Thomas (2012, 2013) investigated the embryology of an oribatid (Archegozetes longisetosus Aoki, 1965) and demonstrated the opisthosoma of that mite comprises only two segments. Unfortunately, their investigations are as yet unable to resolve the problem of the dorsal podosoma.

Fisher et al. (2011) proposed avoiding hypothesis-dependent terminology pending further evidence for a given hypothesis. Thus, they retained ‘hysterosoma’ to refer to the idiosoma posterior to the sejugal furrow and implemented ‘proterosoma’ for the anterior idiosoma. Both terms were considered hypothesis-independent, but suffered from being more inclusive than necessary. Regardless, ‘hysterosoma’ is already used by many authors to refer to the dorsum posterior to the sejugal furrow, therefore its implementation is uncontroversial. Conversely, ‘proterosoma’ is not widely used to refer to the anterior idiosoma. Thus, referring to those setae as ‘proterosomal setae’ is novel, and therefore less preferred. However, recent investigations provide some support for implementing ‘proterosoma’ – this is discussed below.

Phylogenetic analyses of large datasets that include molecular data has corroborated previous suspicions of the non-monophyly of “Acari” and provided substantial support for a clade that combines camel spiders with acariforms called Poecilophysidea (Dabert et al. 2010, Pepato et al. 2010). In addition to characteristics of the reproductive system that have been previously noted (Alberti 1980a, b, 2000, Alberti and Peretti 2002, Klann et al. 2009), Dunlop et al. (2012) suggested that the sejugal furrow of Acariformes is homologous to a similar body division in Solifugae, lending another potential synapomorphy for this clade. Because of this, the sejugal furrow was elevated as a key morphological trait among both camel spiders and acariforms, which now makes it possible to construct terminology founded in a well-supported hypothesis. This renders terms that are denoted relative to the sejugal furrow (like ‘proterosoma’ and ‘hysterosoma’) as hypothesis-dependent, which is only preferred over hypothesis-independent terminology when the hypothesis is well-supported.

Therefore, we continue with the suggestions of Fisher et al (2011) in using ‘proterosoma’ and ‘hysterosoma’ for two reasons: 1) they are hypothesis-independent with respect to Grandjean’s ‘aspidosoma’ and Weigmann’s ‘propodosoma’; and 2) since 2011, they have been found to be hypothesis-dependent, but on well-supported hypotheses. Obviously, as future research resolves the issue of the acariform idiosomal dorsum (i.e. Grandjean vs. Weigmann), we suggest that new terminology based on those hypotheses should be adopted.

Idiosomal setae. For hysterosomal setae, we follow the notation of Grandjean (1939, 1947) that has been widely adopted by acarologists (e.g., van der Hammen 1970; Lindquist 1976, 1977; Kethley 1990; Swift 1996). However, proterosomal setae remain problematic. Historically, proterosomal chaetotaxy followed Grandjean (1939, 1947), which identified internal/external verticals (vi and ve) and internal/external scapulars (sci and sce). This notation has always been cumbersome for groups like Bdelloidea which have sci always external to sce. Given that homology has not been determined for these setae across mite taxa, some authors suggested simply switching the designations of sci and sce to reflect their position (Den Heyer and Castro 2008a, b, c; Den Heyer 2011c). As a result, frustratingly, the literature now has both sci and sce referring to each set of setae.

Therefore, we reject the suggestion of Den Heyer and Castro (2008) and follow the suggestion of Fisher et al. (2011), which resorts to a modified version of Atyeo (1960) when referring to proterosomal setae: anterior/posterior trichobothria (at/pt), and lateral/median proterosomal setae (lps/mps). Obviously, once homology of these setae can be determined across mite taxa, we suggest revising the terminology accordingly.

Abbreviations. The following abbreviations (Fig. 2) are used: attenuate solenidion (asl), blunt rod-like solenidion (bsl), famulus (fam)(=peg organ), microseta (mst), solenidion (s) (this is used only when a description does not specify what type of solenidion and may refer to any solenidion type), spine-like seta (spls), simple tactile seta (sts), trichobothrium (T). When setal types are not specified (e.g., coxae I–IV setal formula 5-5-4-3) it is assumed all setae are simple (sts).

Figure 2.

Setal types. Relative sizes will vary within a given setal type 2a Attenuate solenidion (asl) 2b Blunt rod-like solenidion (bsl) 2c Elongate, tri-pronged famulus (fam), as seen in Dactyloscirus 2d Famulus (fam), as seen in the majority of cunaxids 2e Duplex setae - microseta (mst) and attenuate solenidion 2f Spine-like seta (spls) 2g Simple tactile seta (sts) 2h Trichobothrium (T).

Illustrations were produced using the methods outlined by Fisher and Dowling (2010).

Systematics
Cunaxidae Thor, 1902
Historical review.

Linnæus (1758) described Acarus and included all mites therein. Hermann separated three mite species with elongated gnathosomas (i.e., Bdellidae and Cunaxidae) from Acarus into Scirus. However, Hermann died in 1794 and his papers were not published until after his death by his brother-in-law F. L. Hammer in 1804 (as Hermann 1804). Latreille (1795) had by then separated the same mites into Bdella. Von Heyden (1826), recognizing that Bdella had priority over Scirus, synonomised Scirus with Bdella and erected Cyta and Cunaxa. However, many authors, including Dugés (1834a), Kramer (1881, Banks (1894), and Berlese (1904, 1910), continued to describe new species in Scirus. Dugés (1834a) erected Bdellidae (Bdelloidea) for Bdella and Scirus, having apparently not seen Von Heyden’s synonymization of the two genera. Trouessart (1892) moved Cunaxa from Bdellidae to Trombidiidae and erected the subfamily Scirinae. Oudemans (1902) used Cunaxinae in the same sense that Trouessart (1892) used Scirinae, that is for those mites in the family Bdellidae (sensu Dugés) that have pedipalps with a curved terminal segment and movable chela only (= Cunaxidae sensu Thor). Thor (1902) erected Cunaxidae as a family separate from Bdellidae. Oudemans (1906) disregarded Thor’s (1902) erection of Cunaxidae and kept Cunaxinae as a subfamily within Bdellidae. Van der Hammen (1972) erected the superfamily Cunaxoidea over Bdelloidea, disregarding the priority of Bdella Latreille (1795) over Cunaxa Von Heyden (1826). Den Heyer (1977b) erected Bonziinae for Bonzia and Parabonzia. Den Heyer (1978a) preserved the name Cunaxinae, but limited its concept to those cunaxids possessing 5-segmented pedipalps which extend past the subcapitulum by at least the distal two segments. Den Heyer (1978b) erected Coleoscirinae. Den Heyer (1980c) erected the monobasic Scirulinae and recognized the priority of Bdelloidea over Cunaxoidea. Bu and Li (1987a) erected Orangescirulinae. Smiley (1992) erected Denheyernaxoidinae, Neobonzinae, and Paracunaxoidinae as monotypic subfamilies and monographed and provided keys to known species. Den Heyer and Castro (2009) moved Denheyernaxoides and Paracunaxoides to Cunaxoidinae, thus disregarding Denheyernaxoidinae and Paracunaxoidinae as valid subfamilies. Lin and Zhang (2010) provided a detailed historical review of Cunaxidae in China and a checklist of species found in that country. Den Heyer (2011) moved Neobonzia to Coleoscirinae, effectively disregarding Neobonzinae, and synonymized Coleobonzia with Neobonzia.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma (Figs 3–6). Pedipalps 3-, 4-, or 5-segmented and end in a strong claw (except in Pseudobonzia). They may be shorter than, equal to, or extend beyond the distal end of the subcapitulum. Femora of 5-segmented pedipalps divided into basi- and telofemora, though may be secondarily fused; a dark line often indicates the previous articulation (Fig. 5a, b illustrate a fully divided femur and Fig. 6a, b illustrate a secondarily fused femur. This is for illustration purposes only, i.e., cunaxids with long and short 5-segmented pedipalps may have either fully divided or secondarily fused femora). Telofemora and genua are uniquely fused in Allocunaxa, though the basifemoral/telofemoral articulation is present. Apophyses present or not on the telofemora, adjoining the genua and tibiotarsi, or on the tibiotarsi. Subcapitulum wedge-shaped and may be patterned with random dots or papillae, dots or papillae forming lines, a single row of cells on the posterior edge, or reticulations forming polygonal cells. Subcapitulum with up to 6 pairs of setae are present: hg14 and 2 pairs of adoral setae. Seta hg1 usually straight, but geniculate in Bonziinae and may be curved in Neoscirula; hg4 often longest pair of subcapitular setae. Chelicerae with or without seta near the cheliceral digit.

Figures 3–6.

a. dorsal. b. ventral. 3 3-segmented pedipalp (Cunaxoidinae) 4 4-segmented pedipalp (Scirulinae) 5 5-segmented pedipalp that does not extend beyond the subcapitulum by more than the distal half of the genua (Bonziinae, Coleoscirinae, and Orangescirulinae) 6 5-segmented pedipalp that reaches beyond the subcapitulum by at least the distal half of the genua (Cunaxinae).

Idiosoma, dorsal (Fig. 7a). Idiosoma diamond-shaped. Dorsal proterosoma covered with a sclerotized shield that bears 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensilla (at and pt); rarely one pair of setae or sensillae absent. Dorsal hysterosoma complemented with 0–2 large shields or plates and 0–4 pairs of platelets. These plates and platelets may capture one or more pairs of setae. Up to 8 pairs of dorsal hysterosomal setae present (c1h1, c2, f2, and h2); h2 may occur ventrally. Setae may occur on small platelets that are barely larger than the setal socket. Integument not covered in shields, plates, or platelets is striated. Cupule im present, usually laterad and slightly posterior to e1. Dorsal idiosomal shields and plates smooth or patterned with random dots or papillae, dots or papillae forming lines, reticulations forming polygonal cells, or cells which form rows.

Figure 7.

Generalized schematic of cunaxid idiosomal morphology. 7a Dorsal. 7b Ventral.

Idiosoma, ventral (Fig. 7b) Ventral idiosoma may be complemented with 1 or a few small platelets in addition to the coxae. Coxae fused to body and form plates. Coxae I–II are often fused in adults and may coalesce medially to form a sternal shield. Coxae III–IV are often fused in adults and may extend caudally beyond the genital plates. Each coxa complemented with 0–4 setae; in addition, extensive coxae or sternal shields may capture setae normally on the integument and therefore have more. Coxae may be plain or patterned with random dots or papillae, dots or papillae forming lines, or reticulations forming polygonal cells. Genital plates (sometimes called anal valves) present in adults and bear 3 (rarely) or 4 (usually) setae, except in Parabonzia which have up to 9 pairs of setae. 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates (sometimes called anal valves) bear 1–2 setae (ps1-2). Setae ps2 may occur off the anal plates. Legs 6-segmented in larvae, 7-segmented in nymphs and adults. In adults these segments are coxa, trochanter, baifemur, telofemur, genu, tibia, and tarsus, however, the coxae are often treated separately from the other leg articles. Femora undivided in larvae. Trichobothrium present on leg tibia IV. Ambulacral claws present on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to Subfamilies of Cunaxidae

(modified from Smiley 1992)

1 Pedipalpal telofemoral multi-branched seta present (except Parabonzia mindanensis) (Fig. 7a) Bonziinae
Pedipalpal telofemoral multi-branched seta absent 2
2 (1) Pedipalps 3-segmented (Figs 3a, b) Cunaxoidinae
Pedipalps 4-segmented (Figs 4a, b) Scirulinae
Pedipalps 5-segmented (basi-and telofemora may be partially fused) (Figs 5a, b; 6a, b) 3
3 (2) Pedipalps extend beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the tibiae (Figs 5a, b) 4
Pedipalps extend beyond the subcapitulum by at least the distal half of the tibiae (Figs 6a, b) Cunaxinae
4 (3) Trichobothrium on tibiae IV present; setae hg1 not geniculate; cheliceral seta usually present Coleoscirinae
Trichobothrium on tibiae IV absent; setae hg1 geniculate; cheliceral seta absent Orangescirulinae
Bonzinae Oudemans, 1927
Historical review.

Oudemans (1927) erected Bonzia within Cunaxidae for Bonzia halacaroides. Smiley (1975) erected Parabonzia for Bonzia bdelliformis. Den Heyer (1975) erected Cunabdella for Cunabdella marthae. Den Heyer (1977b) erected Bonzinae for the two genera; he also moved Cunabdella marthae to Parabonzia, effectively synonymizing Cunabdella with Parabonzia.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and reach beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the tibiae. Apophyses absent. A multi-branched seta present dorsally on the telofemora. Tibiotarsi terminate in a stout claw or two strong setae. 2 pairs of adoral setae present or absent. Subcapitulum with 4 pairs of setae (hg14) present in Bonzia; up to 6 pairs of subcapitular setae (hg1-4 + additional setae) present in Parabonzia.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears a shield complemented with 2 pairs of setae (at and pt) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (lps and mps). Dorsal hysterosoma may bear a shield; if a shield is present it may be complemented with a variable number of setae depending on the extent of the shield. Setae c1h1, c2, f2 and h2 present and are smooth or spiculate. Cupule im present laterad and caudally of e1. Integument that does not bear shields or plates is striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II fused or not and coxae III–IV fused or not. Genital plates bear 4–9 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Up to 4 pairs of setae present on the anal plates. Up to 9 pairs of setae present on the integument between coxae II and the anal plates. Legs. Trichobothrium present on leg tibia IV. The ambulacral claws occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Bonziinae

(modified from Smiley 1992)

1 Pedipalp tibiotarsal claw present; 2 pedipalp tibiotarsal spine-like tubercles present (Fig. 8b); genital plates with 4 pairs of setae; internal genital setae absent Bonzia Oudemans, 1927
Pedipalp tibiotarsal claw absent; 2 pedipalp tibiotarsal spine-like tubercles absent (Fig. 8c); genital plates with 5–9 pairs of setae; internal genital setae present Parabonzia Smiley, 1975
Figure 8.

Bonziinae key illustrations. 8a Telofemoral branched seta present in Bonziinae 8b Bonzia 8c Parabonzia.

Bonzia Oudemans, 1927
Historical review.

Oudemans (1927) erected Bonzia for Bonzia halacaroides. Willmann (1939) described Bonzia sphagnicola from Germany. Willmann (1950) described Bonzia rufofusca. Bonzia brownei was described by Turk (1972). Den Heyer (1977) provided a detailed redescription of type material of this genus. Kuznetzov and Livshitz (1979) reported Bonzia from Russia. Michocka (1987) reported Bonzia halacaroides from Poland. Smiley (1992) described Bonzia woodi and Bonzia yunkeri and synonymized Bonzia rufofusca and Bonzia brownei with Bonzia halacaroides. Skvarla et al. reported Bonzia yunkeri from the Ozark Mountains in Arkansas.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and reach beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the tibiae. Apophyses absent. A dorsal multi-branched seta present on the telofemora. The tibiotarsi terminate in a stout claw. 2 pairs of adoral setae present or absent. Subcapitulum with 4 pairs of setae (hg14) present. Setae hg1 are geniculate.

Idiosoma, dorsal. proterosoma bears a shield complemented with 2 pairs of setae (at and pt) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (lps and mps). The dorsal hysterosoma bears a shield that may be complemented with a variable number of setae depending on the extent of the shield. Setae c1h1, c2, f2 and h2 present, and are smooth or spiculate. Cupule im present laterad and caudally of e1. Integument that does not bear shields or plates is striated.

Coxae I–II fused and coxae III–IV fused. Genital plates bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. 4 pairs of setae present on the anal plates. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Bonzia

(modified from Smiley 1992)

1 Tibiae IV trichobothrium setose (Fig. 9a) 2
Tibiae IV trichobothrium smooth (Fig. 9b) 3
2 (1) Hysterosomal shield with 2 pairs of setae; Germany Bonzia sphagnicola Willmann, 1939
Hysterosomal shield with 3 pairs of setae; N. America, S. America, Europe (possibly cosmopolitan) Bonzia halacaroides Oudemans, 1927
3 (1) Dorsal setae spiculate (Figs 10a, 11a); New Zealand Bonzia woodi Smiley, 1992
Dorsal setae smooth (Figs 10b, 11b); USA: Virginia, Ozark Highlands Bonzia yunkeri Smiley, 1992
Figures 9–11.

Bonzia key illustrations. 9a Setose tibial trichobothrium 9b Smooth tibial trichobothrium 10a Spiculate dorsal setae 10b Smooth dorsal setae 11a Close up of a spiculate seta 11b Close up of a smooth seta.

Parabonzia Smiley, 1975
Historical review.

Atyeo (1958) described Bonzia bdelliformis from a tree hole in Tennessee, USA. Smiley (1975) erected Parabonzia for Bonzia bdelliformis. Den Heyer (1975) erected Cunabdella for Cunabdella marthae. Den Heyer (1977b) synonymized Cunabdella with Parabonzia and described Parabonzia athiasae. Kuznetzov and Livshitz (1979) reported Parabonzia from Russia. Smiley (1992) described Parabonzia mumai from Florida, USA. Corpuz-Raros (1996a) described Parabonzia mindanensis from the Philippines. Lin and Zhang (1998) described Parabonzia trioxys. Later they (Lin and Zhang 2002) described Parabonzia zhangi. Skvarla et al. (2013) reported Parabonzia bdelliformis from the Ozark Mountains in Arkansas.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and reach beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the tibiae. Apophyses absent. A multi-branched seta present dorsally on the telofemora. Tibiotarsi terminate in two strong setae. 2 pairs of adoral setae present or absent. Subcapitulum with up to 8 pairs of setae present.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears a shield complemented with 2 pairs of setae (at and pt) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (lps and mps). Dorsal hysterosoma may bear a shield; if a shield is present it may be complemented with a variable number of setae depending on the extent of the shield. Setae c1h1, c2, f2 and h2 present and smooth. Cupule im is present laterad and caudally of e1. Integument that does not bear shields or plates is striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II fused or not and coxae III–IV fused or not. Genital plates with up to 9 pairs of setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Up to 4 pairs of setae present on the anal plates. Up to 9 pairs of setae on the integument between coxae II and the anal plates. Legs. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. The ambulacral claws occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Parabonzia
1 8–9 genital setae present 2
6–7 genital setae present 3
2 (1) Pedipalpal telofemoral seta unbranched (Fig. 12a); Philippines, Mindanao Is Parabonzia mindanensis Corpuz-Raros, 1996
Pedipalpal telofemoral seta branched, with 4–5 tines (Fig. 12b); China: Hubei Province Parabonzia zhangi Lin & Zhang, 2002
3 (1) Hysterosomal shield with 3 pairs of setae 4
Hysterosomal shield with 4 pairs of setae 6
4 (3) Pedipalpal tibiotarsal sigmoid setae lightly barbed (Fig. 13); South Africa: West Transvaal Parabonzia marthae (Den Heyer, 1975)
Pedipalpal tibiotarsal sigmoid setae smooth 5
5 (4) Large spur-like process present on femora III (Fig. 14); USA: Florida Parabonzia mumai Smiley, 1992
Large spur-like process absent on femora III; Ivory Coast Parabonzia athiasae Den Heyer, 1977
6 (3) Coxae I–IV setal formula 7-5-6-7 sts; basifemora I–IV setal formula 4-7-3-2 sts; China: Fujian Parabonzia trioxys Lin & Zhang, 1998
Coxae I–IV setal formula 6-6 (sometimes 7)-7-7 sts; basifemora I–IV setal formula 5-8-3-2 sts; USA, Russia Parabonzia bdelliformis (Atyeo, 1958)
Figures 12–14.

Parabonzia key illustrations. 12a Unbranched pedipalp telofemoral seta 12b Multi-branched pedipalp telofemoral seta 13 Lightly barbed pedipalp tibiotarsal sigmoid seta 14 Spur-like process on femora III.

Cunaxoidinae Den Heyer, 1978
Historical review.

Koch (1838) established Eupalus and described the first mite belonging to Cunaxoidinae, Eupalus croceus. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) proposed Cunaxoides to replace Eupalus Koch as the name was preoccupied (a fact that acarologists had missed for 100 years) by Eupalus Gistl; they also redescribed and reillustrated a number of known species. Radford (1950) proposed Haleupalus to replace Eupalus, though this name is invalid because it is predated by Cunaxoides. Smiley (1975) erected Neocunaxoides and reviewed Cunaxoides. Both genera were assigned to the newly established Cunaxoidinae by Den Heyer (1978c). Pulaeus was established by Den Heyer (1979b); the name is an anagram and nod to Eupalus. Den Heyer (1979c) erected Scutopalus for those cunaxoidines with well-demarcated dorsal and ventral plates. Smiley (1992) synonymized Scutopalus with Neocunaxoides and Haleupalus with Cunaxoides; he also erected Denheyernaxoides and Paracunaxoides as monotypic genera in two new subfamilies, Denheyernaxoidinae and Paracunaxoidinae respectively. Castro and Den Heyer (2009) split a new genus, Lupaeus, from Pulaeus based on the number of setae on basifemora IV (1 and 2, respectively) and the number of pointed processes on the pedipalpal tibiotarsi (2 and 1, respectively). Den Heyer and Castro (2009) split Bunaxella, Dunaxeus, Funaxopsis, and Qunaxella from Cunaxoides; they also moved Denheyernaxoides and Paracunaxoides to Cunaxoidinae, thus disregarding Denheyernaxoidinae and Paracunaxoidinae as valid subfamilies.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented: a trochanter which lacks setae, fused femurogenu (femur + genu) which is complemented with 5 or 6 setae, and tibiotarsus (tibia + tarsus) which is complemented with 5 or 6 setae. Tibiotarsi may be complemented with a bladder- or bulb-like apophysis. Pedipalps do not reach beyond the subcapitulum by more than the distal half of the tibiotarsi. Chelicera with or without seta near the cheliceral digit. Subcapitulum with 4 pairs of setae (hg14) are present; setae hg4 is often the longest. 2 pairs of adoral setae are present or absent.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Female with proterosomal shield (absent in Cunaxoides ulcerosus) which is complemented with two pairs of setae (lps and mps) and two pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt) and may bear a hysterosomal plate complemented with a varying number of setae; when present the dorsal hysterosomal plate may be fused with the proterosomal shield. Dorsal plates well demarcated or not. Dorsal setae c1h1 are present; c2, f2 and h2 may also be present. If f2 is present, f1 and f2 may be located together on a small platelet. Setae not on larger plates may be born on small platelets barely larger than the setal socket. Cupule im present laterad and posterior of e1. Integument that is not covered in shields or plates is striated

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae of female vary in size, from being restricted to the trochantral bases to being extensive and nearly forming a holoventral shield. Coxae may or may not be well demarcated. Coxae I–II fused (usually) or not, coxae III–IV fused (usually) or not. Coxae I–II may coalesce medially to form a sternal shield. The genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14); 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. The anal plates bear one pair of setae (ps1); one pair of setae is present ventrally on the integument near the anal plates (either ps2 or pa). Cupule ih is present ventrally laterad the integumental setae associated with the anal plates. The integument that is not covered in shields or plates is striated. Legs. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws are rippled and occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Cunaxoidinae

(modified from Den Heyer and Castro 2009)

1 Pedipalpal tibiotarsi with 3 sts, 1 spls; New Zealand Paracunaxoides Smiley, 1992
Pedipalpal tibiotarsi with 5 or 6 sts, 0 spls 2
2 (1) Pedipalpal femurogenu with 5 setae; long setae ending in terminal bulb-like knob (very small) on tarsi III and IV present; telofemoral setal formula not 5-5-4-3; usually 6 setae on pedipalp tibiotarsus Cunaxoidini 3
Pedipalpal femurogenu with 6 setae; long setae ending in terminal bulb-like knob (very small) on tarsi III and IV absent; telofemoral setal formula 5-5-4-3; usually 5 setae on pedipalp tibiotarsus Pulaeini 9
3 (2) Femora I and II divided; setae f2 absent; trichobothrium on tibiae IV present or absent 4
Femora I and II not divided; setae f2 present; trichobothrium on tibiae IV absent Denheyernaxoides Smiley, 1992
4 (3) Dorsum with ill-defined weakly sclerotized dorsal plates (Fig. 15a); subterminal pointed process on pedipalp tibiotarsal claw present (Fig. 16a); small teeth (=serrated edge) on pedipalp tibiotarsal claw present (Fig. 16a); cheliceral setae absent 5
Dorsum with well-defined and sclerotized dorsal plates (Fig. 15b); subterminal pointed process on pedipalp tibiotarsal claw absent (Fig. 16b); small teeth on pedipalp tibiotarsal claw absent (Fig. 16b); cheliceral setae present Scutopalus Den Heyer, 1979
5 (4) Trichobothrium on tibiae IV present; famulus present, on distal portion of tarsus I Cunaxoides
Trichobothrium on tibiae IV absent; famulus present or absent 6
6 (5) Tibiae III with 1 bsl, 3–5 sts; tibiae IV with 2 or 4 sts 7
Tibiae III with 1 lts, 4 sts; tibiae IV with 1 lsts, 4 sts Dunaxeus Den Heyer & Castro, 2009
7 (6) Tibiae III with 1 bsl, 3–5 sts; tibiae IV with 1 lts, 2 sts Funaxopsis Den Heyer & Castro, 2009
Tibiae III with 1 bsl, 5 sts; tibiae IV setal formula not as above 8
8 (7) Tibiae IV with 1 lsts, 4 sts; famulus present Qunaxella Den Heyer & Castro, 2009
Tibiae IV with 4 sts; famulus absent Bunaxella Den Heyer & Castro, 2009
9 (2) Setae f2 present; basifemora I–IV setal formula 4-6-3-1 or 4-6-3-2 10
Setae f2 absent; basifemora I–IV setal formula 3-5-2-0 (rarely with 3-5-2-1) Neocunaxoides Smiley, 1975
10 (9) Basifemora I–IV setal formula 4-6-3-2; pedipalp tibiotarsus with one pointed process (ventral) (Fig. 17a); famulus on proximal half of tarsus I; tibiae I–II with non-striated blunt solenidia Pulaeus Den Heyer, 1979
Basifemora I–IV setal formula 4-6-3-1; pedipalp tibiotarsus with two pointed processes (1 ventral, 1 median) (Fig. 17b); famulus on distal half (subapical) of tarsus I; tibiae I–II with transversely striated blunt solenidia Lupaeus Castro & Den Heyer, 2009
Figures 15–17.

Cunaxoidinae key illustrations. Setae are removed from figures 16–17 for clarity 15a Idiosoma with poorly demarcated dorsal plates 15b Idiosoma with well demarcated dorsal plates 16a Pedipalp tibiotarsus with subapical process and small teeth present 16b Pedipalp tibiotarsus with subapical process and small teeth absent 17a Pedipalp tibiotarsus with a single pointed process 17b Pedipalp tibiotarsus with two pointed processes.

Bunaxella Den Heyer & Castro, 2009
Historical review.

Den Heyer (1981b) described Cunaxoides oribensis, Cunaxoides quini, and Cunaxoides zebedielensis. Den Heyer and Castro (2009) erected Bunaxella and transferred Cunaxoides oribensis, Cunaxoides quini, and Cunaxoides zebedielensis to the new genus.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femurogenua are at least twice as long as wide and complemented with 5 setae. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide and usually complemented with 6 setae. A small apophysis present basally and a pointed process occurs near the terminal tip; a ridge present between the apophysis and pointed process. Subcapitulum with 6 pairs of setae (hg14 and 2 pairs of adoral setae) present; setae hg4 is often the longest. Chelicera without seta.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears an ill-defined and weakly sclerotized shield which is complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). The dorsal hysterosoma may or may not bear a plate; if a plate is present it is ill-defined and weakly sclerotized, may be complemented with a variable number of setae, and may or may not be fused with the proterosomal shield. Setae c1h1, c2, and h2 are present. Seta c2 plumose or fan-shaped. Cupule im is present laterad and posterior of e1. Integument that is not covered in shields or plates is striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae are weakly sclerotized and ill-defined; they can be recognized by possessing somewhat denser striations than the surrounding integument. Coxae I–II may be fused and may coalesce medially to form a sternal shield. Coxae III–IV fused or not. Each coxa complemented with 2-4 setae. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14); 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear one pair of setae; one pair of setae is present ventrally on the integument near the anal plates. Up to 7 pairs of setae present on the integument between the coxal and genital plates. Cupule ih present ventrally laterad the integumental setae associated with the anal plates. Integument that is not covered in shields or plates is striated. Legs. Tarsi are never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Depression for the famulus on tarsus I is absent. Tibia III complemented with 1 bsl, 5 sts. Tibia IV is complemented with 4 sts and lacks a trichobothrium. Ambulacral claws occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Bunaxella

(modified from Den Heyer and Castro 2009)

1 Basifemora I–IV with 3-3-3-0 sts; telofemora IV with 1 sts; dorsal setae fan-shaped, except for smooth f2 Bunaxella quini (Den Heyer, 1981)
Basifemora I–IV with 4-4-3-1 sts; telofemora IV with 2 sts; dorsal setae plumose, except for h2 which may be plumose or smooth 2
2 (1) Setae h2 plumose Bunaxella oribensis (Den Heyer, 1981)
Setae h2 smooth Bunaxella zebedielensis (Den Heyer, 1981)
Cunaxoides Baker & Hoffmann, 1948
Historical review.

Koch (1838) described the first two Cunaxoides as Eupalus croceus and Eupalus minutissimus. Koch (1841) described Eupalus vitellinus. Trägårdh (1910) described Eupalus minima. Ewing (1917) described Eupalus parvus and its feeding on oyster-shell scale in the USA. Thor and Willmann (1941) redescribed and figured Eupalus croceus, Eupalus minutissimus,  and Eupalus vitellinus. Nesbitt (1946) described Eupalus biscutum. Garman (1948) reported Eupalus biscutum from apple trees in Connecticut. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) recognized that the name Eupalus was preoccupied and erected Cunaxoides to replace it; they transferred all known Eupalus to the new genus and figured each species. Haleupalus oliveri was described by Schruft (1971). Smiley (1975) synonymized Cunaxoides vitellinus with Cunaxoides croceus and provided a translation of Thor and Willmann’s (1941) description of Cunaxoides croceus. Den Heyer (1978c) placed Cunaxoides as the type genus in the newly erected Cunaxoidinae; he also redescribed the genus and redescribed and designated a neotype for Cunaxoides croceus. Kuznetzov and Livshitz (1979) described Cunaxoides ulcerosus, Cunaxoides longistriatus, Cunaxoides fidus and Cunaxoides desertus and reported and figured Cunaxoides biscutum, and Cunaxoides parvus from Russia. Gupta and Ghosh (1980) described Cunaxoides nicobarensis. Cunaxoides kielczewskii was described by Michocka (1982). Smiley (1992) synonymized Haleupalus oliveri with Cunaxoides biscutum, effectively synonymizing Haleupalus with Cunaxoides. Hu (1997) reported Cunaxoides croceus and Cunaxoides ulcerosus from China. Sionti and Papadoulis (2003) described Cunaxoides paracroceus from Greece. Bashir and Afzal (2004a) described Cunaxoides trisetosis. Bashir et al. (2007) described Cunaxoides sargodhaensis from Pakistan. Bashir and Afzal (2009) described Cunaxoides daskaensis, Cunaxoides negans, and Cunaxoides sialkotensis Den Heyer et al. (2013) described Cunaxoides decastroae and Cunaxoides lootsi.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femurogenua at least twice as long as wide and complemented with 5 setae. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide and usually complemented with 6 setae. A small apophysis present basally and a pointed process present near the terminal tip; a ridge present between the apophysis and pointed process. Subcapitulum with 6 pairs of setae (hg14 and 2 pairs of adoral setae) are present; setae hg4 longest. Chelicera without seta.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears an ill-defined and weakly sclerotized shield which is complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). The dorsal hysterosoma may or may not bear a plate; if a plate is present it is ill-defined and weakly sclerotized, may be complemented with a variable number of setae, and may or may not be fused with the proterosomal shield. Setae c1h1, c2, and h2 are present. Cupule im present laterad and posterior of e1. Integument that is not covered in shields or plates is striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae weakly sclerotized and ill-defined; they can be recognized by possessing somewhat denser striations than the surrounding integument. Coxae I–II may be fused and may coalesce medially to form a sternal shield. Coxae III–IV may be fused. Each coxa is complemented with 2-4 setae. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14); 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear one pair of setae; one pair of setae present ventrally on the integument near the anal plates. Up to 7 pairs of setae present on the integument between the coxal and genital plates. Cupule ih present ventrally laterad the integumental setae associated with the anal plates. Integument that is not covered in shields or plates is striated. Legs. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Trichobothrium present on leg tibia IV. Ambulacral claws are rippled and occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Cunaxoides

The following species have not been included because the original descriptions and subsequent papers describing them (Thor and Willmann 1941; Baker and Hoffmann 1948) are not in English; known illustrations do not contain enough detail; and the types were not examined: Cunaxoides minima (Trägårdh, 1910), Cunaxoides minutissimus (Koch, 1938), Cunaxoides vitellinus (Koch, 1941).

1 Dorsal hysterosomal median plate present (may be fused with proterosomal shield or only suggested by cuticular pattern) (Figs 18a–c, 19a–d, 20) 2
Dorsal hysterosomal median plate absent (Figs 21a, b, 22) 9
2 (1) Hysterosomal median plate obvious, sclerotized (Figs 18a–d, 19a–c) 3
Hysterosomal median plate not be obvious or sclerotized, may only be suggested by cuticular pattern (Fig. 20) 8
3 (2) Hysterosomal median plate not complemented with setae; USA Cunaxoides parvus (Ewing, 1917)
Hysterosomal median plate complemented with setae 4
4 (3) Hysterosomal median plate and proterosomal shield separate (Figs 18a–c) 5
Hysterosomal median plate and proterosomal shield fused (Figs 19a–d) 6
5 (4) Hysterosomal median plate complemented with c1, d1 (Fig. 18a); Canada, USA Cunaxoides biscutum (Nesbitt, 1946)
Hysterosomal median plate complemented with c1, d1, c2 (Fig. 18b); Russia Cunaxoides fidus Kuznetzov & Livshitz, 1979
Hysterosomal median plate complemented with c1e1, c2 (Fig. 18c); Russia Cunaxoides longistriatus Kuznetzov & Livshitz (1979
6 (4) Hysterosomal shield complemented with setae c1, d1, c2; (Figs 19a, b) 7
Hysterosomal shield complemented with setae c1- e1, c2; (Figs 19c) Cunaxoides decastroae Den Heyer, 2013
7 (6) Genua IV with 1 asl, 5 sts; striae between sci and c1 U-shaped (Fig. 19a); Greece Cunaxoides paracroceus Sionti & Papadoulis, 2013
Genua IV with 2 asl, 5 sts; striae between sci and c1 parallel (Fig. 19b); Europe Cunaxoides croceus (Koch, 1838)
8 (2) Dorsal striae form one “shield-like” area, similar to fused proterosomal and hysterosomal shield (Fig. 23a); Poland Cunaxoides kielczewskii Gupta & Ghosh, 1980
Dorsal striae form two “shield-like” areas, similar to separate proterosomal and hysterosomal shields (Fig. 23b); Iran Cunaxoides lootsi Den Heyer, 2013
9 (1) Proterosomal shield present (Figs 21a, b) 10
Proterosomal shield absent (Fig. 22); Russia Cunaxoides ulcerosus Kuznetzov & Livshitz (1979)
10 (9) Dorsal shield reticulated (Fig. 21a); Russia Cunaxoides desertus Kuznetzov & Livshitz (1979)
Dorsal shield striated (Fig. 21b) 11
11 (10) Telofemora I–III setal formula 4-3-3; India Cunaxoides nicobarensis Gupta & Ghosh, 1980
Telofemora I–III setal formula 5-5-4 or 5-5-6 12
12 (11) Telofemur III with 3 sts; Pakistan Cunaxoides sialkotensis Bashir & Afzal, 2009
Telofemur III with 4 sts 13
Telofemur III with 6 sts; Pakistan Cunaxoides negans Bashir & Afzal, 2009
13 (12) Basifemur I with 1 sts 14
Basifemur I with 2 sts; Pakistan Cunaxoides daskaensis Bashir & Afzal, 2009
14 (13) Basifemora II–IV setal formula 1-1-0; Pakistan Cunaxoides trisetosis Bashir & Afzal, 2004
Basifemora II–IV setal formula 4-2-0; Pakistan Cunaxoides sargodhaensis Bashir, Afzal & Raza, 2007
Figures 18–23.

Cunaxoides key illustrations. See key for explanations.

Denheyernaxoides Smiley, 1992
Historical review.

Canestrini (1885) described Eupalus brevirostris. Berlese (1894, 1897) redescribed Eupalus brevirostris and provided illustrations of the dorsal idiosoma, chelicera, and palp. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) proposed Cunaxoides as nomen novum as Eupalus was preoccupied. Smiley (1992) erected Denheyernaxoidinae and Denheyernaxoides for Denheyernaxoides martini. Lin (2001) moved transferred Cunaxoides brevirostris to Denheyernaxoides and redescribed the species based on specimens from China. Den Heyer (2009) considered Denheyernaxoidinae as a junior synonym of Cunaxoidinae. Den Heyer and Castro (2009) considered Denheyernaxoides to belong to Cunaxoidini. Sergeyenko (2011) reported Denheyernaxoides brevirostris from Ukraine and erected Denheyernaxoidini for the genus.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femurogenua at least twice as long as wide, complemented with 5 setae. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide, usually complemented with 6 setae. A small apophysis occurs basally and a pointed process occurs near the terminal tip; a ridge runs between the apophysis and pointed process. Subcapitulum with 4 pairs of setae (hg14); setae hg4 often the longest. Adoral setae absent. Chelicera without seta.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma lacks a shield, complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma lacks a plate. Setae c1h1, c2, and f2, h2 present. Cupule im present laterad and posterior of e1. Integument not covered in shields or plates is striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II connected by small apodemes. Coxae III–IV fused. Each coxa complemented with 2–4 setae. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14); 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear 1 pair of setae; 1 pair of setae present ventrally on the integument near the anal plates. 5 pairs of setae present on the integument between the coxal and genital plates. Cupule ih present ventrally laterad the integumental setae associated with the anal plates. Integument not covered in shields or plates is striated. Legs. Femora I and II not divided. Trichobothrium on tibia IV absent. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Ambulacral claws on either side of a 4-rayed empodium present.


Key to adult female Denheyernaxoides
1 Coxa I with 1 sts; trochanters I–IV setal count 1-1-1-1; femora I-II setal count 2–2; gnathosoma with deep indention posterioventrally Denheyernaxoides martini Smiley, 1992
Coxa I with 3 sts; trochanters I–IV setal count 0-0-1-0; femora I-II setal count 4–5; gnathosoma with slight indention posterioventrally Denheyernaxoides brevirostris (Canestrini 1885)
Dunaxeus Den Heyer & Castro, 2009
Historical review.

Den Heyer (1981b) described Cunaxoides capensis and Cunaxoides elongatus. Den Heyer and Castro (2009) erected Dunaxeus, transferred Dunaxeus capensis and Dunaxeus elongatus to the genus, and described Dunaxeus duosetosus.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femurogenua at least twice as long as wide, complemented with 5 setae. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide, usually complemented with 6 setae. A small apophysis occurs basally and a pointed process occurs near the terminal tip; a ridge runs between the apophysis and pointed process. Subcapitulum with 4 pairs of setae (hg14 and 2 pairs of adoral setae); setae hg4 is often the longest. Chelicera without seta.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears an ill-defined and weakly sclerotized shield which is complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma may or may not bear a plate; if a plate is present it is ill-defined and weakly sclerotized, may be complemented with a variable number of setae, and may or may not be fused with the proterosomal shield. Setae c1h1, c2, and h2 are present. Cupule im is present laterad and posterior of e1. The integument that is not covered in shields or plates is striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae weakly sclerotized and ill-defined; they can be recognized by possessing somewhat denser striations than the surrounding integument. Coxae I–II may be fused and may coalesce medially to form a sternal shield. Coxae III–IV fused. Each coxa complemented with 2–4 setae. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14); 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath plates. Anal plates bear 1 pair of setae; 1 pair of setae present ventrally on the integument near the anal plates. Up to 7 pairs of setae present on the integument between the coxal and genital plates. Cupule ih present ventrally laterad the integumental setae associated with the anal plates. Integument not covered in shields or plates is striated. Legs. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Tibia III complemented with 5 sts (4 short, 1 long). Tibia IV complemented with 5 sts (4 short, 1 long), and lacks a trichobothrium. Ambulacral claws on either side of a 4-rayed empodium present.


Key to adult female Dunaxeus
1 Basifemora IV with 1 sts Dunaxeus elongatus (Den Heyer, 1981)
Basifemora IV with 2 sts 2
2 (1) Famulus on tarsus I present Dunaxeus capensis (Den Heyer, 1981)
Famulus on tarsus I absent Dunaxeus duosetosus Den Heyer & Castro, 2009
Funaxopsis Den Heyer & Castro, 2009
Historical review.

Den Heyer (1981b) described Cunaxoides passerinae, Cunaxoides vaneedeni, and Cunaxoides visci. Den Heyer and Castro (2009) erected Funaxopsis and transferred Funaxopsis passerinae, Funaxopsis vaneedeni, and Funaxopsis visci to the genus.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femurogenua at least twice as long as wide, complemented with 5 setae. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide, usually complemented with 6 setae. A small apophysis occurs basally and a pointed process occurs near the terminal tip; a ridge runs between the apophysis and pointed process. Subcapitulum with 6 pairs of setae (hg14 and 2 pairs of adoral setae); setae hg4 is often longest. Chelicera without seta.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears an ill-defined and weakly sclerotized shield complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma may or may not bear a plate; if plate present, it is ill-defined and weakly sclerotized, may be complemented with a variable number of setae, and may or may not be fused with the proterosomal shield. Setae c1h1, c2, and h2 present. Cupule im present laterad and posterior e1. Integument not covered in shields or plates striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae weakly sclerotized and ill-defined; they can be recognized by possessing somewhat denser striations than the surrounding integument. Coxae I–II may be fused and may coalesce medially to form a sternal shield. Coxae III–IV may be fused. Each coxa complemented with 2–4 setae. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14); 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear 1 pair of setae; 1 pair of setae present ventrally on the integument near the anal plates. Up to 7 pairs of setae present on the integument between the coxal and genital plates. Cupule ih present ventrally laterad integumental setae associated with the anal plates. Integument not covered in shields or plates striated. Legs. Tibia III complemented with 1 bsl and 3, 4, or 5 sts. Tibia IV complemented with 3 sts (2 short, 1 long) and lacks a trichobothrium. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Ambulacral claws on either side of a 4-rayed empodium present.


Key to adult female Funaxopsis

(modified from Den Heyer and Castro 2009)

1 Basifemora I–IV setal formula 3-3-3-1 sts; sci smooth Funaxopsis visci (Den Heyer, 1981)
Basifemora I–IV setal formula 2-2-2-0 sts; sci finely setose 2
2 (1) Telofemora I–IV setal formula 4-3-1-1 sts; h1 smooth Funaxopsis passerinae (Den Heyer, 1981)
Telofemora I–IV setal formula 4-4-3-1 sts; h1 finely setose Funaxopsis vaneedeni (Den Heyer, 1981)
Lupaeus Castro & Den Heyer, 2009
Historical review.

Berlese (1916) described Eupalus subterraneus. Thor and Willmann (1941) redescribed Eupalus subterraneus. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) erected Cunaxoides in place of Eupalus as Eupalus was preoccupied; they also described Cunaxoides minutus and redescribed and illustrated Cunaxoides subterraneus. Den Heyer (1979b) erected Pulaeus, moving those species with f2 present and setae present on basifemora IV to the new genus from Cunaxoides; he also described Pulaeus martini and Pulaeus clarae and placed Pulaeus into the subfamily Cunaxoidinae. Pulaeus platygnathus was described by Bu and Li (1991). Corpuz-Raros (1996b) described Pulaeus dentatus, Pulaeus lenis, Pulaeus longisetus, Pulaeus villacarlosae, and Pulaeus filipinus from the Philippines. Hu (1997) reported Pulaeus platygnathus from China. Lin and Zhang (2000) reported Pulaeus platygnathus from China. Lin and Zhang (2003) reported Pulaeus minutus from China. Corpuz-Raros (2007) described Pulaeus polilloensis and Pulaeus philippinensis from the Philippines. Castro and Den Heyer (2009) erected Lupaeus and moved into it those species of Pulaeus that possess two pointed processes on the pedipalp tibiotarsus and 1 simple seta on basifemora IV; they also described Lupaeus lectus and Lupaeus lobidorsalis and provided a key to the Brazilian and South African species. Sergeyenko (2011b) described Lupaeus valentinae. Den Heyer et al. (2013) described Lupaeus iranensis and Lupaeus sativae.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femurogenua at least twice as long as wide, complemented with 6 setae. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide, usually complemented with 6 setae; they possess 2 or 3 pointed processes and may possess a bladder- or knob-like apophysis (Fig. 24a). Subcapitulum with 6 pairs of setae (hg14 and 2 pairs of adoral setae); setae hg4 often the longest. Chelicera with seta present.

Figures 24–27.

Lupaeus illustrations. 24a Pedipalp tibiotarsus 24b Genital setae not in a row, g3 out of line 25–27 Lupaeus key illustrations. Setae and cupules removed from figures 25a, b to increase clairity 25a Lupaeus longisetus, dorsal 25b Lupaeus polilloensis, dorsal 26a Ventral, small platelet present 26b Ventral, small platelet absent 27a Setae f1, f2 born on small platelets 27b Setae f1, f2 born on integument.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears a well-sclerotized shield complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma bears a sclerotized plate that is variable in size and fused with the proterosomal shield; it may be complemented with a variable number of setae depending on the size of the plate. Setae c1h1, c2, f2, and h2 present. Cupule im present laterad and posterior of e1. Integument not covered in shields or plates is striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae sclerotized and well-defined. Coxae I–II may be fused and may coalesce medially to form a sternal shield. Coxae III–IV may be fused. Each coxa complemented with 2–4 setae. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14). Setae g1, 2, 4 usually occur in a straight line near the midline and setae g3 occur near the edge of the genital plates (Fig. 24b). 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear 1 pair of setae; 1 pair of setae present ventrally on the integument near the anal plates. Cupule ih present ventrally laterad; the integumental setae associated with the anal plates. Integument not covered in shields or plates striated. Legs. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Basifemora setal formula 4-6-3-1. Depression of the famulus occurs on distal half of tarsus I. Tibiae I–II possess striated blunt solenidia. Ambulacral claws rippled and occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Lupaeus

Lupaeus longisetus is known only from the male and is not included in the key. It can be recognized by the following characters: small platelet between the edges of a divided sternal shield absent, basifemora I with 3 sts, and setae e1 elongate and barbed (Fig. 25a).

Lupaeus polilloensis is only known from the male and is not included in the key. It can be recoginized by the following characters: small platelet between the edges of a divided sternal shield absent; basifemora I–II setal formula 4-6; platelets complemented with setae f1, f2 with fused medially into one plate; and the dorsal shield densely granulate (Fig. 25b).

As suggested by Den Heyer (2011b) the following species are moved to Lupaeus from Pulaeus: Lupaeus minutus (Baker and Hoffmann) and Lupaeus subterraneus (Berlese).

1 Small platelet ventromedially between edges of divided sternal plate present (Fig. 26a); South Africa, Brazil Lupaeus martini (Den Heyer, 1979)
Small platelet ventromedially between edges of divided sternal plate absent (Fig. 26b) 2
2 (1) Basifemora I with 4 sts 3
Basifemora I with 5 sts; Philippines Lupaeus filipinus (Corpuz-Raros, 1996)
3 (2) Basifemora II with 4 sts; USA Lupaeus minutus (Baker & Hoffmann, 1948)
Basifemora II with 5 sts 4
Basifemora II with 6 sts 7
4 (3) Setae f1 shorter than c1; Philippines Lupaeus lenis (Corpuz-Raros, 1996)
Setae f1 the same length as c1 Lupaeus lectus Castro & Den Heyer, 2009
Setae f1 longer than c1, usually by at least 1.5 times 5
5 (4) Genua I with 9 total simple setae and solenidia; Philippines Lupaeus dentatus (Corpuz-Raros, 1996)
Genua I with 7 total simple setae and solenidia 6
6 (5) Setae c1e1 equal in length; Brazil Lupaeus lobidorsalis Castro & Den Heyer, 2009
Setae e1 one-fourth longer than c1, d1; Italy, USA Lupaeus subterraneus (Berlese, 1916)
7 (3) Setae f1, f2 on platelets, which may be separate or fused medially (Fig. 27a) 8
Setae f1, f2 on integeument (Fig. 27b) 11
8 (7) Tibia II with 1 s, 5 sts 9
Tibia II with 2 s (1 asl, 1 bsl), 5 sts; Ukraine Lupaeus valentinae Sergeyenko, 2011
9 (8) Pedipalp tibiotarsus with 4 sts; Philippines Lupaeus villacarlosae (Corpuz-Raros, 1996)
Pedipalp tibiotarsus with 5 sts 10
10 (9) Tarsus I with 3 asl, 2 terminal solenidion, 1 fam, 20 or 21 sts; tarsus IV with 14 sts Lupaeus iranensis Den Heyer, 2013
Tarsus I with 3 asl, 1 dorsodistal solenidion, 1 terminal solenidion, 1 fam, 22 sts; tarsus IV with 16 sts Lupaeus sativae Den Heyer, 2013
11 (7) Cheliceral seta not as long as width of cheliceral digit; China Lupaeus platygnathus (Bu & Li, 1991)
Cheliceral seta longer than width of cheliceral digit; South Africa, Brazil Lupaeus clarae (Den Heyer, 1979)
Neocunaxoides Smiley, 1975
Historical review.

Baker and Hoffmann (1948) described Cunaxoides andrei. Smiley (1975) erected Neocunaxoides and moved Neocunaxoides andrei to the genus. Gupta and Chattopadhyay (1978) described Neocunaxoides biswasi from bird nests in Bengal, India. Den Heyer (1978c) placed Neocunaxoides in the subfamily Cunaxoidinae. Kuznetzov and Livshitz (1979) reported Cunaxoides andrei from Russia, having either disagreed with or been unaware of Smiley’s 1975 publication. Den Heyer (1980a) described Neocunaxoides lajumensis, Neocunaxoides rykei, and Neocunaxoides zuluensis from South Africa. Tseng (1980) reported and figured Neocunaxoides andrei and Neocunaxoides whartoni from Taiwan. Michocka (1987) reported Neocunaxoides andrei from Poland. Inayatullah and Shahid (1989) described Neocunaxoides dilato and Neocunaxoides kalamiensis. Neocunaxoides cerasoides was described by Gupta (1991). Smiley (1992) synonymized Scutopalus with Neocunaxoides and moved Cunaxoides trepidus to Neocunaxoides. Corpuz-Raros (1996c) described Neocunaxoides grandis and Neocunaxoides mahabaeus. Hu (1997) reported Neocunaxoides andrei from China. Lin, Zhang, and Ji (2001) described Neocunaxoides boltoides and Neocunaxoides fani and later (2003) described Neocunaxoides ovatus. Fawzy (2007) described Neocunaxoides metwallyi. Corpuz-Raros and Gruèzo (2007) described Neocunaxoides ornatus. Castro and Den Heyer (2009) moved Pulaeus trepidus (=Neocunaxoides trepidus) to Scutopalus.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femurogenua at least twice as long as wide, complemented with 6 setae. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide and usually complemented with 6 setae. Tibiotarsi possess two or three knob-like apophyses, a single spur, or sometimes a flange-like seta. Subcapitulum with 6 pairs of setae (hg14 and 2 pairs of adoral setae); setae hg4 often the longest. Chelicera with seta present.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears a well-sclerotized shield which is complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma bears a sclerotized plate which is variable in size and fused with the proterosomal shield; it may be complemented with a variable number of setae depending on the size of the plate. Setae c1h1, c2, and h2 present. Setae f2 absent. Cupule im present laterad and posterior of e1. The integument not covered in shields or plates is striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae sclerotized and well-defined. Coxae I–II may be fused and may coalesce medially for form a sternal shield. Coxae III–IV may be fused. Each coxa complemented with 2–4 setae. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14), which are usually in a straight now; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear one pair of setae; one pair of setae is present ventrally on the integument near the anal plates. Cupule ih present ventrally laterad the integumental setae associated with the anal plates. Integument not covered in shields or plates is striated. Legs. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Basifemora setal formula 3-5-2-0. Ambulacral claws rippled and occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Neocunaxoides

Cunaxoides philippinensis (Corpuz-Raros, 2007) is regarded as belonging to Neocunaxoides because it has 6 seatae on the femurogenu and lacks setae f2. Neocunaxoides makapalus, Neocunaxoides philippinensis (Corpuz-Raros, 1996c), Neocunaxoides unguianalis, and Neocunaxoides rugosus are regarded as belonging to Scutopalus as they possess 5 sts on pedipalp femurogenu and extensive dorsal shields. They have therefore not been included in the following key.

Neocunaxoides biramus is not included in the key because it is only known from the male. It can be distinguished from all other Neocunaxoides, and indeed all described cunaxids, by the presence of a branched sci and 4 teeth on the lateral lips of the hypostome.

Neocunaxoides metwallyi is not included in the key as, despite the best efforts of the authors and the University of Arkansas Interlibrary Loan Department, the description could not be obtained.

We agree with and follow Castro and Den Heyer (2009) and Den Heyer and Castro (2009) in regarding Scutopalus as a valid and separate genus.

1 Coxae I–II fused medially to form sternal shield (Figs 28a–d) 2
Coxae I–II not fused medially (may be connected anteromedially) (Figs 29a–d) 6
2 (1) Posterior edge of coxae IV extending beyond anterior edge of genital plates (Figs 28a, b) 3
Posterior edge of coxae IV not extending beyond anterior edge of genital plates (Figs 28c, d) 5
3 (2) Small platelet anteriomedially of genital plates present (Fig. 28a) Neocunaxoides fani Lin, Zhang & Ji, 2001
Small platelet anteriomedially of genital plates absent (Fig. 28b) 4
4 (3) Solid or broken band of papillae on ventral subcapitulum present (Fig. 30a); subcapitulum longer, length: width 1.75:1 Neocunaxoides zuluensis Den Heyer, 1980
Solid or broken band of papillae on ventral subcapitulum absent (Fig. 30b); subcapitulum shorter, length: width 1.25:1 Neocunaxoides lajumensis Den Heyer, 1980
5 (2) Hysterosomal plate present, fused with proterosomal shield, and bearing c1e1, c2; small platelet anteriomedially of genital plates present (Fig. 28c) Neocunaxoides boltoides Lin, Zhang & Ji, 2001
Hysterosomal plate absent; small platelet anteriomedially of genital plates absent (Fig. 28d) Neocunaxoides philippinensis (Corpuz-Raros, 2007)
6 (1) Median platelet between coxae II present (Figs 29a–c) 7
Median platelet between coxae II absent (Fig. 29d) 13
7 (6) Basifemora V with 1 sts 8
Basifemora V with 0 sts 11
8 (7) Basifemora I with 2 sts Neocunaxoides biswasi Gupta & Chattopadhyay, 1978
Basifemora I with 3 sts 9
9 (8) All setae on pedipalp of normal length, none extremely long 10
2 setae on pedipalp femurogenu extremely long, nearly as long as segment; 1 distal pedipalp tibiotarsal setalong, longer than segment (Fig. 31) Neocunaxoides mahabaeus Corpuz-Raros, 1996
10 (9) Basal subcapitular polygonal pattern elongate (Fig. 32a); foveolae on dorsal shield present (Fig. 33a) Neocunaxoides ornatus Corpuz-Raros & Gruèzo, 2007
Basal subcapitular polygonal pattern not elongate (Fig. 32b); foveolae on dorsal shield absent (Fig. 33b) Neocunaxoides grandis Corpuz-Raros, 1996
11 (7) Small platelet anteriomedially of genital plates present (Fig. 29a) Neocunaxoides ovatus Lin, Zhang & Ji, 2003
Small platelet anteriomedially of genital plates absent (Fig. 29b, c) 12
12 (11) Coxae I connected anteromedially (Fig. 29b); mushroom-shaped seta on pedipalp tibiotarsi absent Neocunaxoides rykei Den Heyer, 1980
Coxae I not connected anteromedially (Fig. 29c); mushroom-shaped seta on pedipalp tibiotarsi present (Fig. 34) Neocunaxoides andrei (Baker & Hoffmann, 1948)
13 (6) Femora I (basifemora I + telofemora I) with 6 setae Neocunaxoides cerasoides Inayatullah & Shahid, 1989
Femora I (basifemora I + telofemora I) with 9 setae 15
14 (13) Coxae I-IV setal formula 2-3-3-1; combined femora (basifemora + telofemora) II-IV setal formula 11-7-5 Neocunaxoides dilato Inayatullah & Shahid, 1989
Coxae I-IV setal formula 2-2-3-2; combined femora (basifemora + telofemora) II-IV setal formula 10-7-4 Neocunaxoides kalamiensis Inayatullah & Shahid, 1989
Figures 28–34.

Neocunaxoides key illustrations. See key for explanations of figures.

Paracunaxoides Smiley, 1992
Historical review.

Smiley (1992) erected Paracunaxoides for a single species, Paracunaxoides newzealandicus. Den Heyer and Castro (2009) state that Paracunaxoides could be synonomyous with Cunaxoides but refrained from sinking the genus as they had not examined the type material.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femerogenu complimented with 5 setae. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide and complemented with 3 setae. Tibiotarsi possess a stout, spine-like apophysis. Subcapitulum with 4 pairs of setae (hg14); setae hg2–4 subequal. Adoral setae absent.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). A pair of oval shields formed by flat, bacillus-like striae present between the sensillae. Setae c1h1, c2, and h2 present. Setae f2 absent. Integument not covered in shields or plates is striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae sclerotized and well-defined. Coxae I–II thinly connected. Coxae III–IV more broadly connected. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14); 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear 1 pair of setae; 1 pair of setae present ventrally on the integument near the anal plates. Integument not covered in shields or plates is striated. Legs. Trichobothrium on tibia IV present.

Pulaeus Den Heyer, 1978
Historical review.

Ewing (1909) described the first species of Pulaeus as Eupalus pectinatus. Berlese (1916) described Eupalus sternalis. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) proposed Cunaxoides to replace Eupalus as the name was preoccupied; described Cunaxoides patzcuarensis, Cunaxoides whartoni, and Cunaxoides americanus; and synonymized Cunaxoides sternalis with Cunaxoides pectinatus. They also redescribed and illustrated Cunaxoides pectinatus. Muma (1960) described Cunaxoides pectinellus. Shiba (1978) described Cunaxoides neopectinatus, Cunaxoides parapatzuarensis, and Cunaxoides pseudominutus. Chaudhri, Akbar, and Rasool (1979) described Neocunaxoides krama. Kuznetzov and Livshitz (1979) reported Cunaxoides pectinatus and Cunaxoides americanus from Russia. Den Heyer (1979b) erected Pulaeus and moved the previously mentioned species into the new genus; he also redescribed Pulaeus pectinatus and described Pulaeus glebulentus. Neocunaxoides cinctus was described by Chaudhri (1980). Den Heyer (1981c) confirmed the synonymy of Pulaeus sternalis with Pulaeus pectinatus, and synonymized Cunaxoides pectinellus with Pulaeus pectinatus; he also described Pulaeus franciscae and placed Pulaeus within Cunaxoidinae, tribe Pulaeini. El-Bishlawy and Rakha (1983) described Pulaeus zaherii from Egypt. Liang (1983) reported Pulaeus pseudominutus from China. Pulaeus musci was described by Liang (1985). Zaher and El-Bishlawy (1986) described Pulaeus niloticus. Bu and Li (1987b) described Pulaeus longignathos and Pulaeus chongqingensis. Muhammad and Chaudhri (1990) described Pulaeus desitis, Pulaeus ferventis, Pulaeus osculum, and Pulaeus verno from Pakistan. Pulaeus ardeola was described by Barilo (1991). Muhammad and Chaudhri (1991a) described Pulaeus camar, Pulaeus erinaceus, Pulaeus galumma, Pulaeus haurio, Pulaeus silicula, and Pulaeus stultus from Pakistan. Smiley (1992) synonymized Pulaeus niloticus with Pulaeus subterraneus and provided a key to known world species; he also transferred Cunaxoides neopectinatus to Neocunaxoides. Li et al. (1992) recorded Pulaeus glebulentus from Chongqing, China. Corpuz-Raros (1996b) described two species, Pulaeus payatopalpus and Pulaeus rimandoi, from the Philippines. Lin and Zhang (2000) reported Neocunaxoides neopectinatus,  Pulaeus longignathos, Pulaeus musci, and Pulaeus pseudominutus from China. Lin et al. (2003) reported Pulaeus minutus from China. Bashir, Afzal, and Akbar (2005) described Pulaeus punctatus. Bashir and Afzal (2006b) described Pulaeus anjumi. Corpuz-Raros (2007) also described Pulaeus cebuensis, Pulaeus palawanensis, and Pulaeus samarensis. Castro and Den Heyer (2009) split Lupaeus from Pulaeus and described two new species: Pulaeus myrtaceus and Pulaeus quadrisolenidius; they also synonymized Pulaeus longignathos with Neocunaxoides krama and transferred Neocunaxoides krama to Pulaeus. Bashir and Afzal (2009) described Pulaeus akbari, Pulaeus banksi, and Pulaeus walii. Lin and Zhang (2010) argue that the “original species name longignathos [as in Pulaeus longignathos] is the correct form in Greek. Some authors emended it to the Latinized form longignathus (e.g. Castro and Den Heyer, 2009: 2).” The spelling longignathos is followed here. Sergeyenko (2011b) described Pulaeus leonidi, Pulaeus maslovi, and Pulaeus semistriatus and synonymized Pulaeus longignathos and Pulaeus chongqingensis with Pulaeus krama as he considered them to be male and female of that species, respectively. Den Heyer et al. (2013) described Pulaeus razanensis.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femurogenua at least twice as long as wide, complemented with 6 setae. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide, usually complemented with 6 setae, 1 pointed process, and may possess a bladder- or knob-like apophysis (Fig. 39a–c). Subcapitulum with 6 pairs of setae (hg14 and 2 pairs of adoral setae); setae hg4 often the longest. Chelicera with seta present.

Figures 35–39.

Pulaeus illustrations. 35 Genital setae in a row 36–39 Pulaeus key illustrations 36, 37 Venter, setae removed for clairity 36a Coxae I–II not coalesced medially, median platelet present 36b Coxae I–II not coalesced medially, median platelet absent 37a Coxae I–II coalesced medially, median platelet present 37b Coxae I–II coalesced medially, median platelet absent 38a Dorsal shield with punctures 38b Dorsal shield with broken striae 39a–c Pedipalp tibiotarsus 39a Tibiotarsus with elongate apophysis 39b Tibiotarsus with flat apophysis 39c Tibiotarsus with flange-like apophysis.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears a well-sclerotized shield, complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma bears a sclerotized plate which is variable in size and fused with the proterosomal shield; it may be complemented with a variable number of setae depending on the size of the plate. Setae c1h1, c2, f2, and h2 and present. Cupule im present laterad and posterior of e1. Integument not covered in shields or plates striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae sclerotized and well-defined. Coxae I–II may be fused and may coalesce medially to form a sternal shield. Coxae III–IV may be fused. Each coxa complemented with 2–4 setae. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14), which are usually in a straight row; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear one pair of setae; 1 pair of setae present ventrally on the integument near the anal plates. Cupule ih present ventrally laterad the integumental setae associated with the anal plates. The integument not covered in shields or plates striated. Legs. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Depression of the famulus occurs on proximal half of tarsus I. Tibiae I–II possess non-striated blunt solenidia. Ambulacral claws rippled and occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Pulaeus

Pulaeus ardeola was not included in the key because the original text is in Cyrillic script and the illustrations do not provide enough characters to differentiate it from other species. Neocunaxoides cinctus is moved from Neocunaxoides to Pulaeus based on features given in the original description, namely that f2 is present and basifemora IV are complemented with 2 sts.

The following were species assigned to Pulaeus before Lupaeus was erected. The characters that divide the two genera are not given in the original species descriptions and types have not been viewed. These indeterminable species are therefore not included in either generic key, but instead characters are given for each species that will serve to identify them.

Pulaeus parapatzuarensis (Shiba, 1978) – This species has a divided sternal plate, lacks a sclerotized area anterior to the genital plates, and does not have f1, 2 located on platelets. In addition it has 6 pairs of setae on the integument between coxal and genital plates.

Pulaeus patzcuarensis (Baker & Hoffmann, 1948) – This species can be recognized by the sternal plates being connected anteriorly and divided in a v-shape posteriorly.

Pulaeus pseudominutus (Shiba, 1978) – Setae e1 being 3 times the length of c1 and d1 distinguishes this species.

Pulaeus payatopalpus (Corpuz-Raros, 1996) – The hypostome is 2/3 the length of the gnathosoma and the pedipalps are extremely long and slender, at least 8 times longer than wide. In addition the tibiotarsus is complemented with a seta that is longer than the segment.

Pulaeus zaherii (El-Bishlawy & Rakha, 1983) – This species can be recognized by the divided sternal plates, f1 being 4/5 the length of e1, and f1 being ½ the length of f2.

1 Sternal plate divided medially (Fig. 35a, b) 2
Sternal plate not divided medially (Fig. 36a, b) 23
2 (1) Median platelet between coxae II–III present (Fig. 35a) 3
Median platelet between coxae II–III absent (Fig. 35b) 7
3 (2) Dorsal shield with surface smooth anteriorly and broken striae or lobes posteriorly; Ukraine Pulaeus semistriatus Sergeyenko, 2011
Dorsal shield with surface patterned (broken striae/lobes or dotted) on entire surface 4
4 (3) Dorsal shield patterend with dots; Pakistan Pulaeus punctatus Bashir, Afzal & Akbar, 2005
Dorsal shield patterned with broken striae/lobes 5
5 (4) Genua II with solenidia present 6
Genua II with solenidia absent; Pakistan Pulaeus banksi Bashir & Afzal, 2009
6 (5) Genua II with 1 asl, 5 sts; genua III with 2 asl, 5 sts; South Africa Pulaeus glebulentus Den Heyer, 1979
Genua II with 2 asl, 4 sts; genua III with 1 asl, 5 sts; Iran Pulaeus razanensis Den Heyer, 2013
7 (2) Setae f1 and f2 located on sclerotized platelets or shields 8
Setae f1 and f2 not located on sclerotized platelets or shields 20
8 (7) Pedipalp femurogenu at least 6 times as long as wide; Philippines Pulaeus rimandoi Corpuz-Raros, 1996
Pedipalp femurogenu at most 4 times as long as wide 9
9 (8) Genua II with 0 solenidia; Pakistan 10
Genua II with 1 solenidion 12
Genua II with 2 solenidia; Philippines Pulaeus samarensis Corpuz-Raros, 2007
Genua II with 3 solenidia 17
Genua II with 4 solenidia 19
10 (9) Genua I wth 2 bsl, 6 sts; tibia I with 1 bsl, 6 sts; Pakistan Pulaeus ferventis Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1990
Genua I with 2 asl, 3 bsl, 3 sts; tibia I with 1 bsl, 7 sts; Pakistan Pulaeus erinaceus Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1991
Genua I with 3 bsl, 6 sts; tibia I with 1 asl, 1 bsl, 6 sts; Pakistan Pulaeus galumma Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1991
Genua I with 4 asl, 4 sts; tibia I with 1 asl, 6 sts; Pakistan Pulaeus walii Bashir & Afzal, 2009
Genua I with 5 bsl, 4 sts; tibia I with 1 bsl, 6 sts; Pakistan 11
11 (10) Basifemora I–IV setal formula 5-5-4-3; Pakistan P. silicula Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1991
Basifemora I–IV setal formula 4-6-3-1; Pakistan Pulaeus stultus Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1991
12 (9) Basifemora I with solenidion present; telofemora I–IV setal formula 5-5-3-2; Pakistan Pulaeus camar Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1991
Basifemora I with solenidion absent; telofemora I–IV setal formula not as above 13
13 (12) Basifemora II with 5 (rarely 4) sts; Ukraine Pulaeus leonidi Sergeyenko, 2011
Basifemora II with 6 sts 14
14 (13) Genua II with solenidia present 15
Genua II with solenidia absent; Pakistan Pulaeus akbari Bashir & Afzal, 2009
15 (14) Genua II with 1 asl, 5 sts; Ukraine Pulaeus maslovi Sergeyenko, 2011
Genua II with 1 bsl, 6 sts 16
16(15) Genua III–IV setal formula 5 sts–5 sts; Pakistan Pulaeus osculum Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1990
Genua III–IV setal formula 5 sts–6 sts; Pakistan Pulaeus haurio Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1991
Genua III–IV setal formula 1 bsl, 4 sts–2 bsl, 4 sts; Pakistan Pulaeus verno Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1990
17 (9) Setae f1 and h1 approximately equal in length 18
Setae f1 approximately half the length as h1; China Pulaeus musci Liang, 1985
18 (17) Coxa IV with 2 sts; basifemora IV with 2 sts; Brazil Pulaeus myrtaceus Castro & Den Heyer, 2009
Coxa IV with 3 sts; basifemora IV with 1 sts; Pakistan Pulaeus anjumi Bashir & Afzal, 2006
19 (9) Dorsal shield with punctuations (Fig. 37a); Brazil Pulaeus quadrisolenidius Castro & Den Heyer, 2009
Dorsal shield with flat broken striae (Fig. 37b); USA Pulaeus whartoni (Baker & Hoffmann, 1948
20 (7) 4 pairs of setae on integument between coxal and genital plates Pulaeus cinctus (Chaudhri, 1980)
5 pairs of setae on integument between coxal and genital plates 21
6 pairs of setae on integument between coxal and genital plates 22
21 (20) Coxae II with 2 sts; telofemora II with 5 sts; Pakistan Pulaeus desitis Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1990
Coxae II with 2 sts; telofemora II with 4 sts; Philippines Pulaeus palawanensis Corpuz-Raros, 2007
22 (20) Sensillum at approximately as long as sce; setae f1 approximately equal in length to h1 Pulaeus cebuensis Corpuz-Raros, 2007
Sensillum at longer than sce; setae f1 approximately 1.25 the length of h1 Pulaeus franciscae Den Heyer, 1981
23 (1) Ventral medial platelet present (Fig. 36a); dorsum punctuate (Fig. 37a); pedipalpal tibiotarsus with truncate, flange-like apophysis (Fig. 38a); USA Pulaeus pectinatus Den Heyer, 1979
Ventral medial platelet absent (Fig. 36b); dorsum striated (Fig. 37b); pedipalpal tibiotarsus with elongate apophysis (Fig. 38b) 24
24 (23) Posterior pedipalpal tibiotarsal seta bifurcate (Fig. 39) Pulaeus neopectinatus (Shiba, 1978)
Posterior pedipalpal tibiotarsal seta not bifurcate 25
25 (24) Pedipalp femurogenua at most 4 times as long as wide; setae f1 and f2 approximately equal in length; USA Pulaeus americanus (Baker & Hoffmann, 1948)
Pedipalp femurogenua at least 6 times as long as wide; setae f1 ¼ longer than f2; Pakistan Pulaeus krama (Chaudhri, Akbar & Rasool 1979)
Qunaxella Den Heyer & Castro, 2009
Historical review.

Den Heyer and Castro (2009) erected Qunaxella for a single species, Qunaxella triasetosa.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femurogenu complimented with 5 sts. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide and complemented with 5 sts, 1 asl. Subcapitulum with 6 pairs of setae (hg14 and 2 pairs of adoral setae).

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma with weakly defined shield present which is complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma lacks a plate. Setae c1h1, c2, and h2 present. Setae c1f1 finely setose and c2, h1, and h2 smooth. Setae f2 absent. Integument not covered in shields or plates striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae weakly sclerotized and ill-defined. Coxae I–II fused. Coxae III–IV fused. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14); 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Integument not covered in shields or plates striated. Legs. Basifemora I–IV setal formula 3-4-2-0 sts. Telofemora I–IV setal formula 4-4-3-3. Tibiae III with 1 bsl, 5 sts. Tibiae IV with 5 sts (4 short, 1 long).

Scutopalus Den Heyer, 1979
Historical review.

Den Heyer (1979c) erected Scutopalus for Scutopalus arboreus and Scutopalus latisetosus. Shiba (1978) described Cunaxoides clavatus. Kuznetzov and Livshitz (1979) described Cunaxoides trepidus. Tseng (1980) described Neocunaxoides osseus and Neocunaxoides unguianalis. Gupta and Ghosh (1980) described Neocunaxoides pradhani. Smiley (1992) synonymized Scutopalus with Neocunaxoides and transferred Cunaxoides trepidus to Neocunaxoides. Corpuz-Raros (1996c) described Neocunaxoides makapalus, Neocunaxoides philippinensis, and Neocunaxoides rugosus. Lin and Zhang (2000) recorded Neocunaxoides clavatus from tea in China. Sionti and Papadoulis (2003) described Neocunaxoides abiesae and Neocunaxoides smolikensis. Bashir and Afzal (2004b) described Neocunaxoides gilbertoi. Castro and Den Heyer (2009) transferred Pulaeus trepidus (=Neounaxoides trepidus) to Scutopalus. Rocha et al. (2013) described Scutopalus tomentosus and transferred Neocunaxoides makapalus, Neocunaxoides philippinensis, Neocunaxoides rugosus, and Neocunaxoides unguianalis to Scutopalus.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 3-segmented. Femurogenu complimented with 5 sts. Tibiotarsi at least twice as long as wide and complemented with 5 sts, 1 asl. Subterminal pointed process on pedipalp tibiotarsal claw absent; small teeth on pedipalp tibiotarsal claw absent. Subcapitulum with 6 pairs of setae (hg14 and 2 pairs of adoral setae). Chelicera without seta.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma with a well-defined shield present, complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma with a well-defined plate fused to the proterosomal plate. Small platelets may be present laterad and posterior to the dorsal shield. Setae c1h1, c2, and h2 present. Setae f2 absent. Integument not covered in shields or plates striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae well-sclerotized. Coxae I–II fused medially. Coxae III–IV fused. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14); 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. A small platelet may be present laterad the genital plate. Integument not covered in shields or plates striated. Legs. Basifemora I–IV setal formula 3-4-2-0 sts. Telofemora I–IV setal formula 5-5-4-3. Tibiae III with 1 bsl, 5 sts. Tibiae IV with 5 sts (4 short, 1 long).

Key to female Scutopalus

(modified from Rocha et al. 2013).

As suggested by Den Heyer (2011b) Neocunaxoides pradhani (Gupta and Ghosh 1980) and Neocunaxoides gilbertoi (Bashir and Afzal 2004) are transferred to Scutopalus as they posses 5 setae on the femurogenu instead of 6 as in Neocunaxoides and have well-demarcated plates.

1 Coxae I–II faintly or totally divided (Fig. 40a, b) 2
Coxae I–II fused medially (Fig. 40c) 7
2 (1) Coxae I–II faintly divided (Fig. 40a) 3
Coxae I–II totally divided (Fig. 40b) 4
3 (2) Sternal shield bearing 6 pairs of setae; setae c2 and mps simple; coxae II with 2 setae; basifemora I–IV setal formula 3-3-2-0; Greece Scutopalus abiesae Sionti & Papadoulis, 2003
Sternal shield bearing 5 pairs of setae; setae c2 and mps setose; coxae II with 1 setae; basifemora I–IV setal formula 2-2-2-1; South Africa Scutopalus arboreus Den Heyer, 1979
4 (2) At least 2 pairs of thick rod-like setae on the dorsum (Fig. 41); India Scutopalus pradhani (Gupta & Ghosh, 1980)
Rod-like setae on dorsal shield absent 5
5 (4) Coxae II with 2 sts 6
Coxae II with 3 sts; Pakistan Scutopalus gilbertoi (Bashir & Afzal, 2004)
6 (4) Setae f1 and h1 on small platelets; ratio c1: c2 2:1; genua I with 4 asl, 5 sts; genua II with 2 asl, 5 sts; South Africa Scutopalus latisetosus Den Heyer, 1979
Setae f1 and h1 on integument; ratio c1: c2 1:1; genua I with 3 asl, 5 sts; genua II with 1 asl, 5 sts; Greece Scutopalus smolikensis Sionti & Papadoulis, 2003
7 (1) Dorsal shield smooth and/or punctate (Fig. 42a) 8
Dorsal shield sparse granulate, rugose, or reticulate (Fig. 42b–d) 12
8 (7) Coxae II and IV with 2 setae 9
Coxae II and IV with 3 setae 11
9 (8) Setae mps, c1, c2, d1, e1, f1 clavate (Fig. 43); a small subscutum situated posterior to the dorsal shield present; Malaysia Scutopalus clavatus (Shiba, 1978)
Setae mps, c1, c2, d1, e1, f1 setiform; a small subscutum situated posterior to the dorsal shield absent 10
10 (9) Setae f1 on dorsal shield; setae lps, mps, c1, c2, d1, e1, f1 set on tubercles (Fig. 44); area between pt more heavily sclerotized, forming ridges; Taiwan Scutopalus osseus (Tseng, 1980)
Setae f1 on integument; setae lps, mps, c1, c2, d1, e1, f1 set normally; area between pt normally sclerotized, not forming ridges; Ukraine Scutopalus trepidus (Kuznetzov & Livshitz, 1979)
11 (8) 4 pairs of hysterosomal setae around genital shield; long slender platelet laterad genital shield present; with a narrow transverse sclertie behind main shield; Philippines Scutopalus philippinensis (Corpuz-Raros, 1996)
3 pairs of hystersomal setae around genital shield; long slender platelet laterad genital shield absent; dorsal sclerites absent; Philippines Scutopalus makapalus (Corpuz-Raros, 1996)
12 (7) 1 or more dorsal sclerites present (behind or laterad dorsal shield); dorsal shield rugose or reticulate (Fig. 42b, c); basifemora IV with 1 seta; pedipalpal tibiotarsus with 6 setae present and apophysis absent 13
Dorsal sclerites absent; dorsal shield sparsely granulate; basifemora IV with 2 setae; pedipalpal tibiotarsus with 5 setae and a rod-shaped dorsal apophysis present; Taiwan Scutopalus unguianalis (Tseng, 1980)
13 (12) Dorsal shield rugose (Fig. 42b); setae f1 and h1 on integument; dorsal setae (except c2 and h2) distally rod-like (slightly clavate), with minute barbs; narrow transverse shield behind main dorsal shield present; Philippines Scutopalus rugosus (Corpuz-Raros, 1996)
Dorsal shield reticulate (Fig. 42c); setae f1 and h1 on small platelets; dorsal setae (except c2 and h2) broad and serrate; sclerites laterad and behind dorsal shield present; Brazil Scutopalus tomentosus Rocha, Skvarla & Ferla, 2013
Figures 40–44.

Scutopalus key illustrations. 40a Coxae I–II faintly divided 40b Coxae I–II totally divided 41 Coxae I–II fused medially 42 Dorsal shield with thick, rod-like setae present 43 Dorsal shield smooth or punctate 44a Dorsal shield rugose 44b Dorsal shield reticulate 44c Dorsal shield sparsely granulate 45a Setae mps, c1, c2, d1, e1, f1 clavate 45b Setae mps, c1, c2, d1, e1, f1 setiform 46 Setae lps, mps, c1, c2, d1, e1, f1 set on tubercles.

Scirulinae Den Heyer, 1980
Scirula Berlese, 1887
Remarks.

This is a monobasic subfamily, with the single genus containing two described and one undescribed species. The subfamily and genus are therefore treated together.

Historical review.

Berlese (1887) erected Scirula for Scirula impressa. Thor and Willmann (1941) and Baker and Hoffmann (1948) redescribed and illustrated Scirula impressa. Den Heyer (1980c) erected Scirulinae for the then monotypic genus. Michocka (1987) reported Scirula impressa from Poland. Smiley (1992) redescribed and illustrated Scirula impressa. Lin (1997) described Scirula papillata from China.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 4-segmented and do not reach beyond the subcapitulum. A flange-like apophysis present on either the genua or tibiotarsi. Pedipalps end in a stout claw. Subcapitulum with 4 pairs of r setae (hg1-4).

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma covered in a plate which bears 4 pairs of setae: 2 pairs of simple setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensilla (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma may or may not be complemented with a plate. 6 dorsal setae, c1–h1, c2 present. Cupule im present.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I– IV fused, resulting in a complete shield covering the ventral idiosoma. Genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Cupule ih present. Anal plates bear 2 pairs of setae (ps1 and ps2); 1 pair of setae born on integument next to anal plates.


Key to adult female Scirula
1 Hysterosomal shield present (Fig. 45a); Japan, USA, Denmark, Italy Scirula impressa Berlese, 1887
Hysterosomal shield absent (Fig. 45b); China, USA Scirula papillata Lin, 1997
Figures 45.

Scirula key illustrations. 45a Scirula impressa 45b Scirula papillata.

Cunaxinae Den Heyer, 1978
Historical review.

Von Heyden (1826) erected Cunaxa for Scirus setirostris. Oudemans (1902) used Cunaxinae in the same sense that Trouessart (1892) used Scirinae, that is for those mites in the family Bdellidae (sensu Koch) that have pedipalps with a curved terminal segment and movable chela only (= Cunaxidae sensu Thor). Oudemans (1906) substituted Cunaxinae for Cunaxidae. Berlese (1916) erected Dactyloscirus as a subgenus of Scirus to accommodate Scirus (Dactyloscirus) eupaloides. Oudemans (1922) erected Rosenhofia to accommodate Rosenhofia machairodus. Vitzthum (1931) raised Dactyloscirus to full generic status but later (1940–43) treated it as a subgenus. Thor and Willmann (1941) again elevated Dactyloscirus to generic status and designated Dactyloscirus eupaloides as the type specimen. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) regarded Dactyloscirus as a senior synonym of Cunaxa. Smiley (1975) synonymized Rosenhofia with Dactyloscirus. Den Heyer (1978a) preserved the name Cunaxinae, but limited its concept to those cunaxids possessing 5-segmented pedipalps that extend past the subcapitulum by at least the distal two segments; he also erected Armascirus. Den Heyer (1979d) erected Rubroscirus for Rubroscirus africanus. Gupta and Ghosh (1980) erected Indocunaxa. Smiley (1992) synonymized Rubroscirus with Cunaxa but failed to give his reasoning for doing so. Den Heyer (2006) erected Riscus for a species known only from Thailand. Castro and Den Heyer (2008) erected Cunaxatricha and provided a key to the genera of Cunaxinae. Den Heyer and Castro (2008) erected Allocunaxa for a Neotropical species, synonymized Indocunaxa with Armascirus, and provided the most up-to-date key to world genera of Cunaxinae.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and extend beyond the subcapitulum by at least the distal half of the tibiae. Basifemora and telofemora fused but often dark line remains to indicate the division between the segments; telofemora and genua also fused in this manner in Allocunaxa. Apophyses may be present on the telofemora and between the genua and tibiotarsi. Tibiotarsi end in a strong claw. Chelicera with or without seta. Subcapitulum with up to 6 pairs of setae; setae hg14 always present, 2 pairs of adoral setae present or absent. Setae hg4 longest. In species with pedipalpal apophyses, the apophyses of the males shorter.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Female proterosoma bears a shield complemented with 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma may bear any combination of a median plate and lateral platelets (i.e., median plate and platelets absent, only median plate present, only lateral platelets present, or both median plate and lateral platelets present). Median plate, if present, may be complemented with 0–6 pairs of dorsal setae; lateral platelets, if present, may bear setae c2. Setae not born on plates or platelets may be born on tiny platelets barely larger than the setal socket. Integument that does not bear plates or platelets striated. Males differ in that the dorsal shields often more extensive and may be holodorsal.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II fused or divided and may coalesce medially to form a sternal shield; coxae III–IV fused or divided and may extend caudally past the genital plates. Coxae each complemented 0–3 setae. Genital plates each bear 4 setae (g14); 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates complemented with at least one pair of setae, ps1. Setae ps2 present or absent, either on the anal plates or on the integument adjacent to the anal plates. Setae h2 present ventrally on the integument adjacent to the anal plates. Cupule ih present laterad of h2. Integument that does not bear plates striated. Legs. Tarsi constricted apically so as to end in lobes. A trichobothrium on tibia IV present or absent.


Key to adult female Cunaxinae

(modified from Den Heyer and Castro 2008a)

1 Anal seta ps2 absent; pedipalp telofemora with dorsal simple seta (Figs 46a–e); tarsal lobes small to medium size (Fig. 47a); dorsal plates reticulated or not (Figs 48a–c) Cunaxini 2
Anal seta ps2 present; pedipalp telofemora with dorsal spine-like seta (Figs 46f, g); tarsal lobes medium to large size (Fig. 47b); dorsal plates always reticulated (Fig. 48c) Armascirini 6
2 (1) Dorsal plates never reticulated (Figs 48a, b); integumental striae smooth or lobed; coxae II–IV setal formula usually 1-3-2 (rarely 2-3-1) Cunaxa Von Heyden, 1826
Dorsal plates usually reticulated (Fig. 48c); integumental striae usually papillated; coxae II–IV setal formula usually 1-3-1 3
3 (2) Pedipalpal telofemora with one or more apophyses (Fig. 46a); sensillae at and pt not densely pilose Rubroscirus Den Heyer, 1979
Pedipalpal telofemora without apophyses (Figs 46b–e); sensillae at and pt densely pilose 4
4 (3) Tibiae IV trichobothrium present 5
Tibiae IV trichobothrium absent Cunaxatricha Castro & Den Heyer, 2008
5 Articulation joint between pedipalpal telofemora and genua functional (Fig. 46b) Riscus Den Heyer, 2006
Articulation joint between pedipalpal telofemora and genua fused/non-functional (Fig. 46c) Allocunaxa Den Heyer & Castro, 2008
6 (1) Pedipalpal basifemora with simple seta (Fig. 46f); coxae II–IV setal formula usually 1-3-3 (male) or 2-3-3 (female); famulus normal; pedipalpal apophyses (when present) usually long in females and short in males, and with pointed apices (Fig. 46f) Armascirus Den Heyer, 1978
Pedipalpal basifemora with spine-like seta (Fig. 46g); coxae II–IV setal formula usually 3-3-3; famulus large, broad based with tri-pronged tip; pedipalpal apophyses (when present) usually equal length in females and males, and with bulbous apices (Fig. 46g) Dactyloscirus Berlese, 1916
Figures 46–48.

Cunaxinae key illustrations. 46 Pedipalps, dorsal 46a Rubroscirus 46b Riscus 46c Allocunaxa 46d Cunaxatricha 46e Cunaxa 46f Armascirus 46g Dactyloscirus. 47a, b. Distal end of tarsus 47a Armascirini, showing large tarsal lobes 47b Cunaxini, showing small to medium tarsal lobes 48a–c Idiosoma, dorsal. Setae and cupules have been removed for clairity. Shape of proterosomal plate and presence or absence, shape, and extent of hysterosomal plate(s) will differ between species 48a Plates smooth 48b Plates with dot-like pattern 48c Plates with reticulated pattern.

Allocunaxa Den Heyer & Castro, 2008
Historical review.

Den Heyer and Castro (2008a) erected Allocunaxa for Allocunaxa heveae.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented, end in a strong claw, and extend beyond the subcapitulum by at least the last segment. Pedipalpal apophyses absent. Basifemora complemented with a long simple seta and telofemora with a short simple seta; these two segments fused, although a line remains visible and they can thus be differentiated. Telofemora and genu nearly fused, although a line remains visible and they can thus be differentiated. Subcapitulum complemented with 6 pairs of setae (hg1–4 and 2 pairs of adoral setae) and covered by integumental papillae.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma with an ill-defined, weakly sclerotized shield that bears 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt) and 2 pairs of simple setae (lps and mps). 7 pairs of setae, c1–2, d1–h1, present. Cupule im present, usually posteriolaterad of e1. Integument striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I and II fused. Coxae III and IV fused. Genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Integument between plates striated and bears 4 pairs of additional setae. Legs shorter than the body. Leg 4 longest. Famulus on tarsi I normally shaped. Tarsi constricted apically, resulting in large tarsal lobes. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws on either side of a 4-rayed empodium present.

Armascirus Den Heyer, 1978
Historical review.

The first Armascirus was described by Kramer (1881) as Scirus taurus. Berlese (1888) described Scirus taurus var. bison. Banks (1894) described Scirus quadripilis. Thor (1902) transferred Scirus taurus to Cunaxa. Banks (1914) described Cunaxa armata. Miller (1925) reported Scirus quadripilis from Ohio. Womersley (1933) reported Cunaxa taurus from Australia. Thor and Willmann (1941) transferred Scirus taurus var. bison to Cunaxa and raised it to full species status, viz. Cunaxa bison and transferred Scirus quadripilis to Cunaxa; they also redescribed and figured Cunaxa armata, Cunaxa bison, Cunaxa quadripilis, and Cunaxa taurus. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) synonymized Scirus quadripilis and Cunaxa armata with Cunaxa taurus; they followed Thor and Willmann (1941) in placing Cunaxa taurus var. bison in Cunaxa but declined to recognize it as a species and instead kept it as a variety or subspecies of Cunaxa taurus. Zaher et al. (1975b) collected Cunaxa taurus in Egypt. Chaudhri (1977) described Dactyloscirus ebrius and Dactyloscirus fuscus from Pakistan. Den Heyer (1978a) split Armascirus from Dactyloscirus and Cunaxa and raised the subfamily Cunaxinae to accommodate them, thus refining the definitions of all three genera; he transferred Cunaxa taurus and Cunaxa bison to the new genus Armascirus; and described Armascirus huyssteeni, Armascirus lebowensis, Armascirus limpopoensis, and Armascirus albiziae. Kuznetzov and Livshitz (1979) redescribed and figured Cunaxa taurus and Cunaxa bison from Russia, either disagreeing with or being unaware of Den Heyer’s 1978 publication. Tseng (1980) reported Armascirus taurus from Taiwan. Chaudhri (1980) described Dactyloscirus fixus from Pakistan. Den Heyer (1980c) erected the tribe Armascirini and made Dactyloscirus and Armascirus the sole representatives. Gupta and Ghosh (1980) erected Indocunaxa, a monotypic genus with Indocunaxa smileyi as the type species. Liang (1983) reported Armascirus taurus from China. Shiba (1986) described Armascirus hastus and Armascirus multioculus. Michocka (1987) described Dactyloscirus rafalskii from Poland. Armascirus mactator and Armascirus pluri were described by Muhammad and Chaudhri (1991b). Smiley (1992) described Armascirus gimplei, Armascirus anastosi, Armascirus harrisoni, Armascirus heryfordi, Armascirus virginiensis, Dactyloscirus bakeri, and Dactyloscirus campbelli; he also transferred Armascirus bison to Dactyloscirus (which was later returned to Armascirus by Den Heyer and Castro 2008a). Corpuz-Raros (1995) described Armascirus garciai and Armascirus makilingensis from the Philippines. Hu (1997) reported Armascirus bison and Armascirus taurus from China. Bashir and Afzal (2005) described Armascirus satianaensis and Armascirus asghari. Corpuz-Raros and Gruèzo (2007) described Armascirus javanus. Corpuz-Raros (2008) described Dactyloscirus bifidus. Bashir, Afzal, and Khan (2008) described four species from Pakistan: Armascirus akhtari, Armascirus jasmina, Armascirus sabrii, and Armascirus gojraensis. Den Heyer and Castro (2008a) synonymized Indocunaxa with Armascirus and transferred Dactyloscirus bison, Dactyloscirus campbelli, Dactyloscirus ebrius, Dactyloscirus fixus, Dactyloscirus fuscus, and Dactyloscirus rafalskii to Armascirus javanus. Corpuz-Raros (2008) described Armascirus apoensis. Kalúz (2009) described Armascirus cyaneus and Armascirus cerris from Central Europe Skvarla and Dowling (2012) described Armascirus ozarkensis, Armascirus pennsylvanicus, and Armascirus primigenius. Den Heyer and Castro (2012) described Armascirus brasiliensis and Armascirus bahiaensis. Kalúz and Vrabec (2013) described Armascirus fendai and Armascirus masani.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented, end in a strong claw, and extend beyond the subcapitulum by at least the last segment. Apophysis between the genua and tibiotarsi, which tapers to a point, usually present; this apophysis shorter in males than in females. Basifemora complemented with a simple seta; telofemora with a spine-like seta. These two segments fused, although a line remains visible and they can thus be differentiated. Subcapitulum complemented with 6 pairs of setae (hg1–4 and 2 pairs of adoral setae). It can be covered by integumental papillae which are either randomly distributed or form a polygonal, reticulated pattern.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Female dorsal idiosoma with at least one sclerotized plate that bears 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt) and 2 pairs of simple setae (lps and mps). 0–4 other major plates and platelets may also be present. All plates, if present, covered by integumental papillae that form a reticulated pattern. Integument between the plates is striated. 7 pairs of setae, c1–2, d1–h1, present. Each seta, when not on a major plate or platelet, surrounded by a minute platelet that is only slightly larger than the setal socket. Cupule im present, usually laterad or in the proximity of e1. Dorsal idiosoma of males is similar except a single large plate complemented with c1–2, d1–e1 present.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae reticulated in the same manner as the dorsal plates. Coxae I–II often fused; Coxae III–IV often fused. Setal formula of coxae I–IV in males 3-1-3-3 (including the paracoxal seta), in females 3-2-3-3 (including the paracoxal seta). Genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear 1 pair of setae (ps1). 2 pairs of setae (ps2 and h2) associated with but do not occur on the anal plates. Cupule ih present in close proximity to h2. Integument between plates striated and bears 5–7 pairs of additional setae. The ventral idiosoma of males similar except the coxae are much more extensive. A sclerotized aedeagus is often visible in association with the genital plates. Legs comparatively long, at least ¾ the length, and often longer than the body. Famulus on tarsi I normally shaped. Tarsi are constricted apically, resulting in large tarsal lobes. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Armascirus

(modified from Kalúz and Vrabec 2013)

Dactyloscirus bifidus Corpuz-Raros, 2008 is transferred to Armascirus as it posessess a spine-like seta on the pedipalpal basifemora.

Armascirus gojraensis and Armascirus sabrii appear to be nymphs based on the leg setal counts given in the original descriptions. Having not seen the type material, however, they are retained within the key. Caution should be exercised if these species are reached.

1 Hysterosomal median shield present (Figs 49a–h, 50a–d) 2
Hysterosomal median shield absent (Figs 51a–c) 30
2 (1) Median shield complemented with setae, small or large (Figs 49a–h) 3
Median shield not complemented with setae, small (Figs 50a–d) 22
3 (2) One pair of setae (d1) on hysterosomal median shield (Figs 49a–f) 4
Two or more pairs of setae on hysterosomal median shield (Figs 49g–h) 18
4 (3) Lateral hysterosomal platelets present (Figs 49a–d) 5
Lateral hysterosomal platelets absent (Figs 49e, f) 15
5 (4) Setae c1 very short, the distance between the bases of c1–c1 20 times the length of c1; venter caudally from coxae II with 5 pairs of simple setae (excluding genital, coxal, and anal setae); Poland Armascirus rafalskii (Michocka, 1987)
Setae c1 longer, the distance between the bases of c1–c1 less than 10 times the length of c1; venter caudally from coxae II with 6 or more pairs of simple setae (excluding genital, coxal, and anal setae) 6
6 (5) The distance between caudal parts of hysterosomal lateral platelets wider than the distance between their frontal parts (Figs 49a, b) 7
The distance between caudal parts of hysterosomal lateral platelets shorter than the distance between their frontal parts (Figs 49c, d) 9
7 (6) Lateral hysterosomal platelets equal to or longer than hysterosomal median shield (Fig. 49a); venter caudally from coxae II with 6 pairs of simple setae (excluding genital, coxal, and anal setae); Pakistan Armascirus jasmina Bashir, Afzal & Khan, 2008
Lateral hysterosomal platelets shorter than hysterosomal median shield (Fig. 49b); venter caudally from coxae II with 7 pairs of simple setae (excluding genital, coxal, and anal setae) 8
8 (7) Pedipalpal genua with 3 spls, 1 sts; important leg I–IV sts chaetotaxy: coxae 3-1-3-2, basifemora 4-5-3-1, genua 8-8-6-5, tibiae 5-6-6-6, tarsi 15-12-8-9; Pakistan Armascirus akhtari Bashir, Afzal & Khan, 2008
Pedipalpal genua with 3 spls; important leg I–IV sts chaetotaxy: coxae 3-2-3-3, basifemora 4-4-3-3, genua 8-4-6-7, tibiae 6-5-6-5, tarsi 11-10-9-7; Pakistan Armascirus satianaensis Bashir & Afzal, 2005
9 (6) Venter caudally from coxae II with 4 pairs of simple setae (excluding genital, coxal, and anal setae); Brazil Armascirus bahiaensis Den Heyer & Castro, 2012
Venter caudally from coxae II with 6 pairs of simple setae (excluding genital, coxal, and anal setae) 10
Venter caudally from coxae II with 7 pairs of simple setae (excluding genital, coxal, and anal setae) 14
Venter caudally from coxae II with 8 pairs of simple setae (excluding genital, coxal, and anal setae); South Africa Armascirus albiziae Den Heyer, 1978
10 (9) Tarsus I with more than 27 setae; tarsus II with at least 24 setae 11
Tarsus I with less than 25 setae; tarsus II with less than 23 setae 12
11 (10) Leg genua I with 4 bsl, 4 sts; genital valve with random dot-like lobes; tarsal sts chaetotaxy I–IV 29-25-23-22; Pakistan Armascirus pluri Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1991
Leg genua I with 2 asl, 4 bsl, 3 sts; genital valve longitudinal rows of dot-like lobes; tarsal sts chaetotaxy I–IV 29-24-22-21; Pakistan Armascirus mactator Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1991
12 (10) Pedipalpal telofemora with 1 apophysis, 2 spls; pedipalpal genua with 1 ap, 2 spls, 2 sts; South Africa Armascirus huyssteeni Den Heyer, 1978
Pedipalpal telofemora with 1 apophysis, 1 spls; pedipalpal genua with 1 ap, 3 spls, 1 sts 13
13(12) Genua II with 1 asl, 5 sts; genua IV with 2 asl, 5 sts; cosmopolitan Armascirus taurus (Kramer, 1881)
Genua II with 1 asl, 6 sts; genua IV with 1 asl, 4 or 5 sts; USA Armascirus primigenius Skvarla & Dowling, 2012
14 (9) Median shield pointed caudally (Fig. 49c); Pakistan Armascirus asghari Bashir & Afzal, 2005
Median shield truncated caudally (Fig. 49d); Brazil Armascirus brasiliensis Den Heyer & Castro, 2012
15 (4) Hysterosomal median shield with a straight or concave frontal margin and with very acute anterior lateral corners (angle less than 45°) (Fig. 49e) 16
Hysterosomal median shield with convex frontal margin and with rounded anterior lateral corners (Fig. 49f) 17
16 (15) Pedipalpal genua with 1 ap, 2 spls, 1 sts; legs I–IV sts formulae (excluding solenidia): basifemora 1-2-1-0; telofemora 4-4-4-4; genua 6-7-5-6; h1 4 times the length of c1;hysterosomal shield width: length = 2.2:1; Pakistan Armascirus sabrii Bashir, Afzal & Khan, 2008
Pedipalpal genua with 1 ap, 3 spls, 1 sts; legs I–IV sts formulae (excluding solenidia): basifemora 2-2-1-1; telofemora 4-4-4-3; genua 8-6-6-6; h1 3 times the length of c1;hysterosomal shield width: length 1.5:1; Pakistan Armascirus gojraensis Bashir, Afzal & Khan, 2008
17 (15) Apophysis adjoining genu and tibiotarsus shorter than pedipalpal tibiotarsus; pedipalpal telofemoral apophyses three times longer than spine-like seta; distance between the bases of sci–sci 9 times the length of sci; Brazil, Mexico Armascirus bison (Berlese, 1988)
Apophysis adjoining genu and tibiotarsus longer than pedipalpal tibiotarsus; pedipalpal telofemoral apophyses three times longer than spine-like seta; distance between the bases of sci–sci 5 times the length of sci; Pakistan Armascirus fixus (Chaudhri, 1980)
18 (3) Hysterosomal median shield with 2 pairs of setae (c1, d1) (Fig. 49g) 19
Hysterosomal median shield with more than 3 pairs of setae (Fig. 49h) 20
19 (18) Pedipalpal telofemora with 2 ap, 1 spls; pedipalpal genua with 2 spls, 2 sts; venter caudally from coxae II with 6 pairs of simple setae (excluding genital, coxal, and anal setae); tarsi I–IV with 21-20-15-13 sts (excluding solenidia); the distance between bases of c1–c1 4 times the distance of h1–h1; distance between c1–c1 5 times the length of c1 Armascirus anastosi Smiley, 1992
Pedipalpal telofemora with 1 ap, 1 spls; pedipalpal genua with 3 spls, 1 sts; venter caudally from coxae II with 5 pairs of simple setae (excluding genital, coxal, and anal setae); tarsi I–IV with 19-13-13-13 sts (excluding solenidia); the distance between c1–c1 2 times the distance between h1–h1; the distance between c1–c1 4 times the length of c1 Armascirus heryfordi Smiley, 1992
20 (18) Apophysis adjacent to pedipalpal genua and tibiotarsi present Armascirus multioculus Shiba, 1986
Apophysis adjacent to pedipalpal genua and tibiotarsi absent 21
21 (20) 5 pairs of genital setae; pedipalp claw bifid (Fig. 52a); hysterosomal setae not serrate; Philippines Armascirus apoensis Corpuz-Raros, 2008
4 pairs of genital setae; pedipalp claw entire, not bifid (Fig. 52b); hysterosomal setae serrate; Pakistan Armascirus fuscus (Chaudhri, 1977)
22 (2) Lateral hysterosomal platelets present (Figs 50a–c) 23
Lateral hysterosomal platelets absent (Fig. 50d) 27
23 (22) Hysterosomal median shield width: length 1:1; venter caudally from coxae II with 6 or 7 pairs of sts (excluding genital and anal setae) 24
Hysterosomal median shield width: length 2:1; venter caudally from coxae II with 5 or 6 pairs of sts (excluding genital and anal setae) 25
24 (23) Hysterosomal platelets large, as long as median shield (Fig. 50a); venter caudally from coxae II with 7 sts; pedipalp telofemur with 1 apophysis Armascirus cerris Kalúz, 2009
Hysterosomal platelets about 1/3 the length of median shield; venter caudally from coxae II with 6 sts; pedipalp telofemur with 2 apophysis Armascirus fendai Kalúz & Vrabec, 2013
25 (23) Hysterosomal platelets as long as median shield (Fig. 50b) 26
Hysterosomal platelets ½ as long as median shield (Fig. 50c); Mexico, USA Armascirus gimplei
26 (25) Hysterosomal plate concave on lateral edges (Fig. 53a); USA Armascirus ozarkensis Skvarla & Dowling, 2012
Hysterosomal plate not concave on lateral edges (Fig. 53b); Japan Armascirus hastus Shiba, 1986
27 (22) Apophysis on pedipalp telofemur extends to distal margin of segment; 2 pairs of ventral pregenital setae thickened and spiculate; f1 1/3 length of h1; Philippines Armascirus makilingensis Corpuz-Raros, 1995
Apophysis on pedipalp telofemur extends well beyond distal margin of segment; ventral pregenital setae not thickened and spiculate; f1 subequal to h1 28
28 (27) Pedipalpal telofemora with 2 ap, 1 spls; the distance between the bases of c1–c1 two times the distance of d1–d1; South Africa Armascirus limpopoensis Den Heyer, 1978
Pedipalp telofemora with 1 ap, 1 spls; the distances between the bases of c1–c1 = d1–d1 29
29 (28) Pedipalp tibiotarsus with 1 spls, 4 sts; USA Armascirus harrisoni Smiley, 1992
Pedipalp tibiotarsus with 1 spls, 3 sts; Canada Armascirus bakeri (Smiley, 1992)
30 (1) Pedipalpal telofemoral apophyses long, reaching apical apophysis on pedipalpal genu; lateral platelets present 31
Pedipalpal telofemoral apophyses short, not reaching apical apophysis on pedipalpal genu; lateral platelets present or absent 32
31 (30) Pedipalpal basifemora with 1 subrectangular apophysis; pedipalp tibiotarsal spls 3 times the length of terminal claw; hysterosomal platelets small, equal in length to c2 (Fig. 51a); coxal chaetotaxy I–IV 3-2-3-3; South Africa Armascirus lebowensis Den Heyer, 1978
Pedipalpal basifemora without subrectangular apophysis; pedipalp tibiotarsal spls equal in length to terminal claw; hysterosomal platelets long, 2–3 times the length of c2 (Fig. 51b); coxal chaetotaxy I–V 3-1-3-1; USA Armascirus campbelli (Smiley, 1992)
32 (30) Coxal setal count I–IV 3-2-3-3 33
Coxal setal count I–IV 3-2-3-2 35
Coxal setal count I–IV 3-3-3-3 Armascirus bifidus (Corpuz-Raros, 2008)
33 (32) Pedipalpal telofemora with 1 apophysis, 2 spls, 1 sts; the distance between d1–d1 9 times the length of d1; pedipalpal genua with 2 spls, 1 sts; Slovakia Armascirus cyaneus Kalúz, 2009
Pedipalpal telofemora with 1 apophysis, 2 spls; the distance between d1–d1 4 times the length of d1; pedipalpal genua chaetotaxy not as above 34
34 (33) Hysterosomal platelets present (Fig. 51b); pedipalpal genua with 2 spls, 2 sts; basifemora with 5-5-4-2 sts; USA Armascirus virginiensis Smiley, 1992
Hysterosomal platelets absent (Fig. 51c); pedipalpal genua with 1 spls, 1 sts; basifemora with 6-6-4-2 sts; Philippines Armascirus javanus Corpuz-Raros & Gruèzo, 2007
35 (32) Pedipalpal telofemoral apophyses as long as width of telofemora; pedipalpal genu with 1 apophysis, 2 spls, 2 sts; USA Armascirus pennsylvanicus Skvarla & Dowling, 2012
Pedipalpal telofemoral apophyses only 1/3 width of telofemora; pedipalpal genu with 1 apophysis, 3 spls, 1 sts; Philippines Armascirus garciai Corpuz-Raros, 1995
Figures 49–53.

Armascirus key illustrations. 49–51 Dorsal idiosoma 49a–e Hysterosomal shield complemented with setae 50a–d Hysterosomal shield small, not complemented with setae 51a–c Hysterosomal shield absent 52a, b Pedipalp tibiotarsal claw 52a Single claw 52b Bifid claw 53a Hysterosomal plate concave on lateral edges 53b Hysterosomal plate not concave on lateral edges.

Key to adult male Armascirus

(modified from Kalúz and Vrabec 2013)

1 Venter with 5 or fewer pairs of setae, excluding genital, anal, and adanal setae; setal formula of coxae I–IV not as below; setal formula of basifemora I–IV not as below 2
Venter with 6 pairs of setae, excluding genital, anal, and adanal setae; setal formula of coxae I–IV 3-2-3-3; setal formula of basifemora I–IV 5-5-4-2; cosmopolitan Armascirus taurus (Kramer, 1881)
2 (1) Setal formula of basifemora I–IV 5-5-4-1; Pakistan Armascirus ebrius (Chaudhri, 1977)
Setal formula of basifemora I–IV not as above 3
3 (2) Coxae I–IV setal formula 3-1-3-3; papillae on circular region anterior to setae pt present; South Africa Armascirus huyssteeni Den Heyer, 1978
Coxae I–IV setal formula 3-2-3-3; papillae on circular region anterior to setae pt present or absent 4
4 (3) Setal formula of basifemora I–IV 5-4-3-0; papillae on circular region anterior to setae pt present; South Africa Armascirus limpopoensis Den Heyer, 1978
Setal formula of basifemora I–IV not as above; papillae on circular region anterior to setae pt absent; South africa 5
5 (4) Genua I with 3 asl, 5 sts; South Africa Armascirus lebowensis Den Heyer, 1978
Genua I with 2 asl, 1 mst, 5 sts; Ukraine Armascirus masani Kalúz & Vrabec, 2013
Cunaxa Von Heyden, 1826
Historical review.

Hermann (1804) erected Scirus for Scirus setirostris and placed it with two mites that are now considered to belong to the family Bdellidae. Von Heyden (1826) erected Cunaxa for Scirus setirostris. Dugés (1834a) described Scirus elaphus. Dugés (1834b) described Scirus tenuirostris. Koch (1836) described Scirus stabulicola and Scirus sagax and later (1838) Scirus paludicola. Gervais (1841) described Scirus obisium. Berlese (1887) described Scirus capreolus. Berlese (1888) synonymized Scirus elaphus, Scirus stabulicola, Scirus sagax, and Scirus paludicola with Scirus setirostris. Thor (1902) erected Cunaxidae and split Cunaxa from Bdellidae. Ewing (1913) described Scirus laricis. Scirus setirostris var. gazella was described by Berlese (1916). Thor and Willmann (1941) redescribed and figured Scirus laricis after transferring it to Cunaxa; they also transferred Scirus setirostris var. gazella to Cunaxa, though kept it as a subspecies of Cunaxa setirostris and synonymized Scirus tenuirostris and Scirus obisium with Cunaxa setirostris. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) redescribed and figured Cunaxa setirostris var. gazella and Cunaxa capreolus and described Cunaxa womersleyi and Cunaxa veracruzana. Zaher et al. (1975b) reported Cunaxa setirostris and Cunaxa capreolus from Egypt. Den Heyer (1978a) erected Cunaxinae and assigned Cunaxa to the subfamily. Den Heyer (1979e) elevated Cunaxa setirostris var. gazella to full species status, viz. Cunaxa gazella; described Cunaxa carina, Cunaxa terrula, Cunaxa lamberti, Cunaxa meiringi, and Cunaxa grobleri and redescribed and figured Cunaxa capreola and Cunaxa gazella. He then (Den Heyer 1979f) described five more species from South Africa: Cunaxa hermanni, Cunaxa sordwanaensis, Cunaxa potchensis, Cunaxa brevicrura, and Cunaxa magoebaensis. Kuznetzov and Livshitz (1979) redescribed and figured Cunaxa capreolus and Cunaxa setirostris from Russia. Chaudhri (1980) described Cunaxa doxa. Tseng (1980) reported Cunaxa womersleyi and Cunaxa setirostris from Taiwan. Gupta and Ghosh (1980) described Cunaxa myabunderensis. Gupta and Paul (1985) described Cunaxa prinia. Bu and Li (1987c) reported Cunaxa capreola from China. Michocka (1987) reported Cunaxa setirostris from Poland. Muhammad et al. described Rubroscirus valentis from Pakistan. Smiley (1992) described Cunaxa mageei, Cunaxa thailandicus, Cunaxa evansi, and Cunaxa neogazella; he also synonymized Rubroscirus with Cunaxa, though failed to include his evidence for doing so. Gupta (1992) described Cunaxa anacardae and Cunaxa magniferae. Muhammad and Chaudhri (1993) described Rubroscirus rasile and Rubroscirus otiosus from Pakistan. Corpuz-Raros and Garcia (1995) described five species from the Philippines: Cunaxa luzonica, Cunaxa romblonensis, Cunaxa pantabanganensis, Cunaxa cogonae, and Cunaxa mercedesae. Hu (1997) reported 28 species of Cunaxidae from China. Khaustov and Kuznetzov (1998) described Cunaxa heterostriata, Cunaxa anomala, Cunaxa sudakensis and Cunaxa bochkovi. Chinniah and Mohanasundaram (2001) described Cunaxa eupatoriae. Sergeyenko (2003) described Cunaxa dentata. Sionti and Papadoulis (2003) described Cunaxa thessalica from Greece. Bei et al. recorded Cunaxa mageei from China. Bashir, Afzal, and Ali (2005) described Cunaxa reticulatus and moved Rubroscirus valentis, Rubroscirus rasile, and Rubroscirus otiosus to Cunaxa. Bashir and Afzal (2006) described Cunaxa jatoiensis. Sergeyenko (2009) described Cunaxa gordeevae, Cunaxa guanotoleranta, Cunaxa maculata, Cunaxa papuliphora, Cunaxa violaphila and Cunaxa yaylensis. Den Heyer and Sergeyenko (2009) redescribed Cunaxa setirostris and designated a neotype for the species. Bashir and Afzal (2009) described Cunaxa bashiri, Cunaxa clusus, Cunaxa dotos, Cunaxa lodhranensis, Cunaxa mahmoodi, Cunaxa nankanaensis, Cunaxa okaraensis, Cunaxa pakpatanensis. Bashir et al. (2010) described Cunaxa rafiqi and Cunaxa leuros. Bashir et al. (2011) “described” Cunaxa nankanaensis as a new species using the same illustrations Bashir and Afzal (2009) used to describe the species originally. Den Heyer et al. (2011a) described the male of Cunaxa capreolus.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps–5-segmented and reach beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the tibiae. An apophysis on the telofemora present or absent. Dorsolateral setae on the basi- and telofemora simple. Stout spine-like setae on the genua and tibiotarsi present or absent. Tibiotarsi end in a strong claw. Subcapitulum with 6 pairs of setae: 2 pairs of adoral setae and 4 pairs of subcapitular setae (hg1–4). Subcapitulum smooth or patterned with random dots, but never reticulated.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears a shield that is complemented with 2 pairs of setae (at and pt) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (lps and mps). Dorsal hysterosoma may bear a shield; if a shield is present, it may bear up to 4 pairs of setae. Dorsal shields may be smooth or patterned with random dots, but never reticulated. Lateral platelets (as in Armascirus and Dactyloscirus) absent. Setae c1h1, and c2 present. Setae not born on the median plate may be born on small platelets that are barely larger than the setal socket. Cupule im present laterad and caudally of e1. Integument not bearing the proterosomal shield and median plate (if present) striated. These striations smooth or lobed but never papillated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II may be fused and coxae III–IV may be fused. Coxae II–IV setal formula 1-3-2. Genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear 1 pair of setae (ps1). 1 pair of setae (h2) associated with, but do not occur on, the anal plates. Cupule ih present in close proximity to h2. Integument between plates striated and bears up to 7 pairs of additional setae. Legs. Tarsi long and slender. Tarsi constricted distally but the tarsal lobes are small and not conspicuous as in Armascirus and Dactyloscirus. A trichobothrium on tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws on either side of a 4-rayed empodium present.


Key to adult female Cunaxa

Cunaxa bochkovi is not included in the key because the original description is in Cyrillic and the illustration does not contain enough detail or diagnostic characteristics. Den Heyer (pers. comm., Jan. 13, 2014) indicated that Cunaxa setirostris var. plurisetosa and Cunaxa setirostris var. diversa were described in “Mihelčič, F. 1958” but did not have the entire citation and had not seen the original description. The authors have also not been able to locate such a publication after extensive searching and so have not included the taxa here.

As suggested by Den Heyer (2011b), Cunaxa boneti, Cunaxa denmarki, Cunaxa exoterica, Cunaxa floridanus, Cunaxa lehmanae, Cunaxa lukoschusi, Cunaxa metzi, Cunaxa myabunderensis, Cunaxa newyorkensis, Cunaxa rackae, Cunaxa reevesi, and Cunaxa reticulatus are moved to Rubroscirus and Cunaxa otiosus,  Cunaxa valentis, and Cunaxa rasile returned to Rubroscirus as they possess dorsal plates that are reticulated instead of smooth as in Cunaxa.

Cunaxa nankanaensis Bashir, Afzal, Ashfaq, Raza, Kamran, 2011 is considered a junior synonym and junior homonym of Cunaxa nankanaensis Bashir & Afzal, 2009.

1 Setae lps present (Figs 54a–d) 2
Setae lps absent (Fig. 54e) Cunaxa anomala Khaustov & Kuznetzov, 1998
2 (1) Setae at normal, nearly as long as pt 3
Setae at short and stubby, less than half the length of pt Cunaxa anacardae Gupta, 1992
3 (2) Basifemora I with 1 sts 4
Basifemora I with 2 sts 5
Basifemora I with 3 sts 7
Basifemora I with 4 sts 14
Basifemora I with 5 sts 43
4 (3) Basifemora I–IV setal formula 1-2-3-0; telofemora I–IV setal formula 2-2-4-3; India Cunaxa prinia Gupta & Paul, 1985
Basifemora I–IV setal formula 1-1-1-2; telofemora I–IV setal formula 2-2-1-1; India Cunaxa magniferae Gupta, 1992
5 (3) Basifemora II-IV setal formula 2-1-0 6
Basifemora II-IV setal formula 3-3-1 Cunaxa dotos Bashir & Afzal, 2009
6 (5) Tibia II with 5 sts; Pakistan Cunaxa mahmoodi Bashir & Afzal, 2009
Tibia II with 7 sts; Pakistan Cunaxa okaraensis
7 (4) Genua I with 3 solenidia 8
Genua I with 4 solenidia 9
8 (7) Genua II with 1 solenidion; setae f1, h1 smooth (Fig. 55a) Cunaxa setirostris (Hermann, 1804)
Genua II with 2 solenidia; setae f1, h1 spiculate (Fig. 55b) Cunaxa magoebaensis Den Heyer, 1979
9 (7) Coxae I–IV setal formula 3-1-3-2 sts 10
Coxae I–IV setal formula 3-2-3-1 sts Cunaxa eupatoriae Chinniah & Mohanasundaram, 2001
10 (9) Dorsal setae short (c1f1, c2: 7-10, h1: 17) Cunaxa mercedesae Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1995
Dorsal setae longer (19-40) 11
11 (10) Oval area formed by broken striae around setae sci present (Fig. 54a) Cunaxa maculata Sergeyenko, 2009
Oval area formed by broken striae around setae sci absent (Fig. 54b) 12
12 (11) Genua II proximal solenidion extremely short, its length subequal to the diameter of its alveolus; ventral surface of the coxal region of hypognathum smooth Cunaxa guanotoleranta Sergeyenko, 2009
Genua II proximal solenidion long, its length several times longer than the diameter of its alveolus; ventral surface of the coxal region of the hypognathum with numerous papillae 13
13 (12) Length of setae sci longer than half the distance between their bases; dorsal hysterosomal striae distinctly lobed (= with festoons) (Fig. 56a) Cunaxa papuliphora Sergeyenko, 2009
Length of setae sci shorter or equal to half the distance between their bases; dorsal hysterosomal striae smooth (Fig. 56b) Cunaxa gordeevae Sergeyenko, 2009
14 (3) Basifemora III with 2 sts 15
Basifemora III with 3 sts 17
Basifemora III with 4 sts 41
15 (14) Telofemoral apophysis uncinated (e.g., bent, hook-shaped) (Fig. 59a) Cunaxa jatoiensis Bashir & Afzal, 2006
Telofemoral apophysis straight, not uncinated 16
16 (14) Basifemora IV with 1 sts; cheliceral longitudinal striations present (Fig. 57a) Cunaxa heterostriata Khaustov & Kuznetzov, 1998
Basifemora IV with 0 sts; cheliceral longitudinal striations absent (Fig. 57b) Cunaxa yaylensis Sergeyenko, 2009
17 (14) Basifemora IV with 0 sts Cunaxa violaphila Sergeyenko, 2009
Basifemora IV with 1 sts 18
Basifemora IV with 2 sts Cunaxa brevicrura Den Heyer, 1979
Basifemora IV with 5 sts Cunaxa meiringi Den Heyer, 1979
18 (17) Median plate present (may be indistinctly defined) (Figs 58a–e) 19
Median plate absent (Fig. 58f) 36
19 (18) Telofemoral apophysis uncinated (e.g., bent, hook-shaped) (Fig. 59a) 20
Telofemoral apophysis present or absent; if present, not uncinated (Figs 59b–e) 25
20 (19) Setae c1 not on hysterosomal shield, on integument 21
Setae c1 on hysterosomal shield 22
21 (20) Tibiae I with 3 asl, 4 sts; Pakistan Cunaxa clusus Bashir & Afzal, 2009
Tibiae I with 2 asl, 4 sts; Pakistan Cunaxa nankanaensis
22 (20) Setae f1 on hysterosomal shield 23
Setae f1 not on hysterosmal shield, on integument 24
23 (22) Tibia III with 5 sts Cunaxa leuros Bashir, Afzal, Ashfaq, Akbar & Ali 2010
Tibia III with 6 sts Cunaxa rafiqi Bashir, Afzal, Ashfaq, Akbar & Ali 2010
24 (22) Genua I with 2 asl, 5 sts Cunaxa capreolus (Berlese, 1887)
Genua I with 3 asl, 3 sts; tibia I with 2 asl, 4 sts; Pakistan Cunaxa pakpatanensis
Genua I with 3 asl, 4 sts; tibia I with 2 asl, 4 sts; Pakistan Cunaxa bashiri Bashir & Afzal, 2009
25 (19) Telofemoral apophysis truncated (Fig. 59b) Cunaxa carina Den Heyer, 1979
Telofemoral apophysis not truncated (Figs 59c–e) 26
26 (25) Line of small sharp spines on pedipalp tibiotarsi present (Fig. 60a) Cunaxa dentata Sergeyenko, 2003
Line of small sharp spines on pedipalp tibiotarsi absent (Fig. 60b) 27
27 (26) Median plate complemented with c2 (Figs 58a–d) 28
Median plate not complemented with c2 (Fig. 58e) Cunaxa terrula Den Heyer, 1979
28 (27) Median plate indistinctly defined (Fig. 58a) 29
Median plate distinctly defined (Fig. 58b–d) 30
29 (28) Setae f1, h1 smooth Cunaxa romblonensis Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1995
Setae f1, h1 finely setose Cunaxa sordwanaensis Den Heyer, 1979
30 (28) Median shield complemented with c1, d1, c2 (Fig. 58b) Cunaxa sudakensis Khaustov & Kuznetzov, 1998
Median shield complemented with c1e1, c2 (Fig. 58c, d) 31
31 (30) Coxae IV with 1 sts 32
Coxae IV with 2 sts 33
32 (31) Broken striae that form cell-like structures on median shield present (Fig. 58c) Cunaxa thailandicus Smiley, 1992
Broken striae that form cell-like structures on median shield absent (Fig. 58d) Cunaxa veracruzana Baker & Hoffmann, 1948
33 (31) Setae c1 longer than all other dorsal setae Cunaxa womersleyi Baker & Hoffmann, 1948
Setae c1 not longer than all other dorsal setae 34
34 (33) Genua I–IV with 4-2-1-1 solenidia Cunaxa lamberti Den Heyer, 1979
Genua I–IV with 3-1-1-1 solenidia 35
35 (34) Setae c1h1 approximately equal in length Cunaxa hermanni Den Heyer, 1979
Setae c1e1 half as long as f1, h1 Cunaxa thessalica Sionti & Papadoulis, 2003
36 (18) Telofemoral apophysis uncinated (Fig. 59a) 37
Telofemoral apophysis not uncinated (Fig. 59b-e) 38
37 (36) Genua I–IV setal formula 1 asl, 6 sts-7-6-6; Philippines Cunaxa pantabanganensis Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1995
Genua I–IV setal formula 1 asl, 4 sts-5-6-6; Pakistan Cunaxa lodhranensis Bashir & Afzal, 2009
38 (36) Proterosomal shield striated (Fig. 54c) 39
Proterosomal shield smooth (Fig. 54d) Cunaxa potchensis Den Heyer, 1979
39 (38) Setae f1, h1 smooth (Fig. 55a) 40
Setae f1, h1 spiculate (Fig. 55b) Cunaxa gazella (Ewing, 1913)
40 (39) Pedipalp telofemoral apophysis short and cone-like (Fig. 59c) Cunaxa mageei Smiley, 1992
Pedipalp telofemoral apophysis short and finger-like (Fig. 59d) Cunaxa neogazella, Smiley, 1992
41 (14) Median plate present (Fig. 58d); basifemora IV with 1 sts Cunaxa luzonica Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1995
Median plate absent (Fig. 58f); basifemora IV with 1 or 2 sts 42
42 (41) Basifemora IV with 1 sts Cunaxa cogonae Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1995
Basifemora IV with 2 sts Cunaxa doxa Chaudhri, 1980
43 (3) Basifemora III with 4 sts Cunaxa evansi Smiley, 1992
Basifemora III with 6 sts Cunaxa grobleri Den Heyer, 1979
Figures 54, 55.

Cunaxa key illustrations. 54a–e Proterosomal shield, dorsal 54a Proterosomal shield with oval area formed by broken striae around pt present, mps present 54b Proterosomal shield with oval area formed by broken striae around pt absent, mps present 54c Proterosomal shield striated, mps present 54d Proterosomal shield smooth, mps present 54e Proterosomal shield with lps absent 55a Smooth f1, h1 55b Spiculate f1, h1.

Figures 56–60.

Cunaxa key illustrations. 56a, b Integumental striations 57a Chelicera with longitudinal striations present 57a Chelicera with longitudinal striations absent 58a–f Examples of variation in the hysterosomal median plate 59a Pedipalp telofemoral apophysis uncinated 59b Pedipalp telofemoral apophysis truncated 59c Pedipalp telofemoral apophysis short and cone-like 59d Pedipalp telofemoral apophysis short and finger-like 59e Pedipalp telofemoral femoral apophysis long 60a Pedipalp tibiotarsus with small teeth present 60b Pedipalp tibiotarsus with small teeth absent.

Cunaxatricha Castro & Den Heyer, 2008
Historical review.

Castro and Den Heyer (2008) erected Cunaxatricha for Cunaxatricha tarsospinosa.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and end in a strong claw. They extend beyond the subcapitulum by at least the last segment; apophyses absent. Basifemora complemented with a long simple seta; telofemora complemented with a short simple seta. These two segments fused, although a line remains visible and they can thus be differentiated. Subcapitulum complemented with 6 pairs of setae (hg1–4 and 2 pairs of adoral setae). Setae hg4 located between hg2–3 instead of in the coxal region. Chelicera with seta present.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Female dorsal idiosoma bears a sclerotized shield that bears 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt) and 2 pairs of simple setae (lps and mps). Idiosomal shield reticulated. 7 pairs of setae, c1–2, d1–h1, present. Cupule im present, usually posteriolaterad of e1. Integument striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I and II fused, as are coxae III and IV. 6 pairs of setae present between and posterior to the coxae. Genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae not visible underneath the plates. Integument between plates striated and bears 4 pairs of additional setae. Legs shorter than the body. Leg 4 longest. Famulus on tarsi I normally shaped and set in a deep depression. Tarsi slightly constricted apically, resulting in small tarsal lobes. Basifemora and telofemora of legs I and II partially fused. A trichobothrium on leg tibia IV absent. Ambulacral claws on either side of a 4-rayed empodium present.

Dactyloscirus Den Heyer, 1978
Historical review.

Trägårdh (1905) described Scirus inermis. Berlese (1916) erected Dactyloscirus as a subgenus of Scirus to accommodate Scirus (Dactyloscirus) eupaloides. He also described Scirus dorcas but failed to recognize that they were congeneric. Oudemans (1922) described Rosenhofia machairodus. Halbert (1923) redescribed and figured Scirus inermis from Ireland. Sellnick (1926) transferred Scirus inermis to Cunaxa. Vitzthum (1931) raised Dactyloscirus to full generic status but later (1940-43) treated it as a subgenus. Thor and Willmann (1941) again elevated Dactyloscirus to generic status and designated Dactyloscirus eupaloides as the type specimen; they also transferred Cunaxa inermis and Scirus dorcas to Dactyloscirus. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) regarded Dactyloscirus as a senior synonym of Cunaxa. Smiley (1975) synonymized Rosenhofia with Dactyloscirus. Zaher et al. (1975b) reported Dactyloscirus inermis from Egypt (though they called it Cunaxa inermis). Den Heyer (1978a) split Armascirus from Dactyloscirus and Cunaxa and raised the subfamily Cunaxinae to accommodate them, thus refining the definitions of all three genera. Den Heyer (1979a) described Dactyloscirus condylus and Dactyloscirus dolichosetosus. Den Heyer (1980c) erected the tribe Armascirini and made Dactyloscirus and Armascirus the sole representatives. Gupta and Ghosh (1980) described Cunaxoides nicobarensis. Dactyloscirus pataliputraensis was described by Gupta (1981). Liang (1986) described Dactyloscirus humuli from China. Shiba (1986) described Dactyloscirus mesonotus. Michocka (1987) reported Dactyloscirus inermis from Poland. Smiley (1992) transferred Cunaxoides nicobarensis to Dactyloscirus (though see discussion below) and described Dactyloscirus mansoni, Dactyloscirus johnstoni, and Dactyloscirus poppi. Gupta (1992) described Dactyloscirus bengalensis. Corpuz-Raros (1995) described Dactyloscirus philippinensis, Dactyloscirus rosarioae,  and Dactyloscirus agricolus. Inayatullah and Shahid (1996) described Dactyloscirus illutus, Dactyloscirus minys,  and Dactyloscirus orsi. Swift (1996) described Dactyloscirus hoffmannae and Dactyloscirus smileyi from the Hawaiian Islands. Hu (1997) reported Dactyloscirus inermis and Dactyloscirus humuli from China. Bashir and Afzal (2006a) described Dactyloscirus imbecillus and Dactyloscirus manzoori. Bashir, Afzal, and Akbar (2005) described Dactyloscirus kahrorensis. Corpuz-Raros (2008) described Dactyloscirus discocondylus and Dactyloscirus trifidus. Skvarla and Dowling (2012) described Dactyloscirus pseudophilippinensis. Den Heyer and Castro (2012) described Dactyloscirus saopauloensis.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented, extend beyond the subcapitulum by at least the last segment, and end in a strong claw. An apophysis between the genua and tibiotarsi usually present. This apophysis long or short and generally ends in a bulbous, hyaline tip; it can, however, end in a tapering point as in Armascirus. This apophysis approximately equal between males and females or shorter in males. Basifemora and telofemora complemented with spine-like setae; these two segments fused, although a line remains visible and they can thus be differentiated. Subcapitulum complemented with 6 pairs of setae (hg1–4 and 2 pairs of adoral setae) and covered by integumental papillae that are either randomly distributed or form a polygonal, reticulated pattern.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Female dorsal idiosoma has at least one sclerotized plate that bears 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt) and 2 pairs of simple setae (lps and mps). 0–4 other major plates and platelets present. All plates, if present, covered by integumental papillae that form a reticulated pattern. Integument between plates striated. 7 pairs of setae (c1–2, d1–h1) present. Each seta, when not on a major plate or platelet, surrounded by a minute platelet only slightly larger than the setal socket. Cupule im present, usually laterad or in the proximity of e1. Dorsal idiosoma of males similar except a single large plate complemented with c1–2, d1–e1 present.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I and II often fused; coxae III and IV often fused. Setal formula for coxae I–IV 3-3-3-3 (including paracoxal seta). Genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear 1 pair of setae (ps1). 2 pairs of setae (ps2 and h2) associated with, but do not occur on, anal plates. Cupule ih present in close proximity to h2. Integument between plates striated and bears 5–7 pairs of additional setae. Ventral idiosoma of males similar except the coxae much more extensive. A sclerotized aedeagus often visible in association with the genital plates. Legs comparatively short, generally not exceeding ¾ the length of the body. Famulus on tarsi I enlarged and ends in a tri-tipped prong. Tarsi constricted apically, resulting in large tarsal lobes. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Dactyloscirus

(modified from Skvarla and Dowling 2012)

Smiley (1992) transferred Cunaxoides nicobarensis to Dactyloscirus as Dactyloscirus nicobarensis (Gupta & Ghosh, 1980). However, later in the same work he attributes the same holotype (No. 3146/17) and same description (viz. Gupta and Ghosh 1980:191) to Cunaxoides nicobarensis Gupta & Ghosh, 1980. The original description and illustration by Gupta and Ghosh clearly state the species in question has three pedipalpal segments, which precludes it from being assigned to Dactyloscirus. Smiley illustrated a Dactyloscirus with 5-segmented pedipalp “after Gupta and Ghosh 1980” when discussing Dactyloscirus nicobarensis, though it looks like nothing in the publication. Because of this Dactyloscirus nicobarensis (Gupta and Ghosh 1980) is declared nomen dubium.

1 Pedipalpal tibiotarsi and genua with adjoining apophyses present (Figs 61a–i) 2
Pedipalpal tibiotarsi and genua with adjoining apophyses absent (Figs 62a–d) 21
2 (1) Dorsal hysterosomal lateral platelets present (Figs 63a–d) 3
Dorsal hysterosomal lateral platelets absent (Figs 64a–f) 15
3 (2) Pedipalp telofemora with one or two apophyses (Figs 65a–c) 4
Pedipalp telofemora without an apophysis; distribution unknown Dactyloscirus poppi Smiley, 1992
4 (3) Pedipalpal telofemora with 1 apophysis (Figs 65a, b) 5
Pedipalpal telofemora with 2 apophyses: 1 basal, flattened and disc-shaped, 1 apical, short, thick and bulbous (Fig. 65c); South Africa Dactyloscirus condylus Den Heyer, 1979
5 (4) Lateral platelets inconspicuous, length less than 2 times the length of c1 or c2; cosmopolitan (Fig. 63a) Dactyloscirus inermis (Trägårdh, 1905)
Lateral platelets large, length greater than 2 times the length of c1 or c2 (Figs 63b–d) 6
6 (5) Dorsal setae f1 and h1 equal in length; median shield present (Figs 63b, c) or absent (Fig. 63d) 7
Dorsal setae f1 shorter than h1; median shield absent (Fig. 63d) 11
7 (6) Apophysis adjoining pedipalpal genua and telofemora shorter than length of genu, blunt distally (Fig. 61a); median shield absent (Fig. 63d) 8
Apophysis adjoining pedipalpal genua and telofemora as long or longer than length of genu, blunt or pointed distally (Fig. 61c); median shield present or absent(Figs 63b, c) 10
8 (7) Median shield present 9
Median shield absent; Japan Dactyloscirus mesonotus Shiba, 1986
9 (8) Coxa IV with 2 sts; Pakistan Dactyloscirus manzoori Bashir & Afzal, 2006
Coxa IV with 3 sts; South Africa Dactyloscirus dolichosetosus Den Heyer, 1979
10 (7) Apophysis adjoining pedipalpal genua and telofemora pointed distally (Fig. 61b); pedipalp tibiotarsi with 4 sts; median shield complimented with setae c1, d1; e1 on small platelets (Fig. 63b); leg basifemora with 5-5-3-1 sts; Luzon I., Philippines Dactyloscirus philippinensis Corpuz-Raros, 1995
Apophysis adjoining pedipalpal genua and telofemora blunted distally (Fig. 61c); setae c1e1 on median shield (Fig. 63c); pedipalp tibiotarsi with 5 sts; leg basifemora with 5-5-3-2 sts; Ozark Mountains, USA Dactyloscirus pseudophilippinensis Skvarla & Dowling, 2012
11 (6) Apophysis adjoining pedipalpal genua and telofemora inconspicuous: circular, minute and hyaline (Fig. 61d); Oahu I., Hawaiian Islands Dactyloscirus hoffmannae Swift, 1996
Apophysis adjoining pedipalpal genua and telofemora conspicuous, blunt apically (Fig. 61e) 12
12 (11) Coxa IV with 2 sts 13
Coxae IV with 3 sts 14
13 (12) Tibiae I with 1 asl, 4 sts; tibiae III with 1 asl, 5 sts Dactyloscirus kahrorensis Bashir, Afzal & Akbar, 2006
Tibiae I with 2 asl, 4 sts; tibiae III with 2 asl, 4 sts Dactyloscirus imbecillus Bashir & Afzal, 2006
14 (12) Genital setae g3 longest, 1.5–1.7 times the length of g2 and g4, more than 2 times the length of g1; Kauai I., Hawaiian Islands Dactyloscirus smileyi Swift, 1996
Genital setae g4 longest, 2 times the length of g1–3; Shanghai, China Dactyloscirus humuli Liang, 1986
15 (2) Dorsal hysterosomal median shield present (Figs 64a–e) 16
Dorsal hysterosomal median shield absent (Fig. 64f) 18
16 (15) Median shield complemented with c1, d1 (Fig. 64b); apophysis adjacent to pedipalpal genua and tibiotarsi blunt distally (Fig. 61c); Mexico, Philippines Dactyloscirus mansoni Smiley, 1992
Median shield complemented with c1–e1 (Figs 64c, d); apophysis adjacent to pedipalpal genua and tibiotarsi blunt or pointed distally 18
Median shield complemented with c1–e1, c2 (Fig. 64e); apophysis adjacent to pedipalpal genua and tibiotarsi pointed distally Dactyloscirus illutus Inayatullah & Shahid, 1996
17 (18) Apophysis adjacent to pedipalpal genua and tibiotarsi blunt distally (Fig. 61e); median shield triangular and nearly as wide as proterosomal shield (Fig. 64c); Bihar, India Dactyloscirus pataliputraensis Gupta, 1981
Apophysis adjacent to pedipalpal genua and tibiotarsi tapering and pointed distally (Fig. 61f); median shield subrectangular and not as wide as proterosomal shield (Fig. 64d); Mexico Dactyloscirus johnstoni Smiley, 1992
18 (17) Pedipalpal telofemora without apophysis (Fig. 61g); apophysis adjoining pedipalpal genua and telofemora longer than telofemora and tapering to a point; Sumatra, Indonesia Dactyloscirus machairodus (Oudemans, 1922)
Pedipalpal telofemora with 1 or 2 apophyses (Figs 65a–d); apophysis adjoining pedipalpal genu and telofemur shorter than telofemora and with a bulbus tip (Fig. 61a, d) 19
19 (18) Pedipalpal telofemora with 1 apical apophysis (Figs 65a, b); apophysis adjoining genua and tibiotarsi larger (Fig. 61a) 20
Pedipalpal telofemora inner surface with 2 apophyses: 1 basal, flattened and disc-shaped, 1 apical, short, thick and bulbous (Fig. 65d); apophysis adjoining genua and tibiotarsi small, inconspicuous (Fig. 61d); Luzon I., Philippines Dactyloscirus discocondylus Corpuz-Raros, 2008
20 (19) Basal pair of adoral setae very long, more than 4 times the distal pair; pedipalp telofemoral apophysis about as long as width of segment (Fig. 65a); genital setae g4 twice as long as g1–g3; Luzon I., Philippines Dactyloscirus rosarioae Corpuz-Raros, 1995
Basal pair of adoral setae not unusually long, subequal to distal pair; pedipalp telofemoral apophysis short, less than width of segment (Fig. 65b); genital setae g4 only slightly longer than g1–g3; Luzon I., Philippines Dactyloscirus agricolus, Corpuz-Raros, 1995
21 (1) Median shield present (Figs 64d, e) 22
Median shield absent (Fig. 64f) 23
22 (21) Median shield complimented with c1–e1 (Fig. 64d); Europe, North and South America Dactyloscirus eupaloides Berlese, 1916
23 (21) Coxa I with 2 sts; Pakistan Dactyloscirus bengalensis Gupta, 1992
Coxa I with 3 sts 24
24 (23) Pedipalp tibiotarsal claw trifid (Fig. 62c, d); coxa II–IV setal formula 3-3-3 sts; Luzon I., Philippines Dactyloscirus trifidus Corpus-Raros, 2008
Pedipalp tibiotarsal claw entire, unbranched (Fig. 62a, b); coxa II–IV setal formula not as above 25
25 (24) Coxal setal formula II–IV 1-3-2 sts; Peshawar, Pakistan Dactyloscirus orsi Inayatullah & Shahid, 1996
Coxal setal formula II–IV 2-3-1 sts; Brazil Dactyloscirus saopauloensis Den Heyer & Castro, 2012
Figures 61–62.

Dactyloscirus key illustrations. 61a–h Pedipalp genu and tibiotarsus with adjoining apophysis present 61i Close up of bifid claw 62a–d Pedipalp genu and tibiotarsus with adjoining apophysis absent 62e Close up of trifid claw.

Figures 63–65.

Dactyloscirus key illustrations. 63a–d Dorsal idiosoma, lateral hysterosomal platelets present 64a–f Dorsal idiosoma, lateral hysterosomal platelet absent 65a Pedipalp telofemur with one apophysis, which is about as long as the width of the telofemur 65b Pedipalp telofemur with one apophysis, which is shorter than the width of the telofemur 65c, d Pedipalp telofemur with two apophyses, one apical and one basal which is flattened and disc-shaped.

Riscus Den Heyer, 2006
Historical review.

Gupta and Ghosh (1980) described Cunaxa bambusae, Cunaxa cynodonae Den Heyer (2006) erected Riscus for Riscus thailandensis. Den Heyer (2011) transferred Cunaxa bambusae and Cunaxa cynodonae to Riscus based on the redescriptions by Corpuz-Raros (2008). Den Heyer and Castro (2012) described Riscus austroamericanus.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented, extend beyond the subcapitulum by at least the last segment, and end in a strong claw; apophysis absent. Basifemora and telofemora complemented with simple setae; these two segments fused, although a line remains visible and they can thus be differentiated. Subcapitulum complemented with 6 pairs of setae (hg1–4 and 2 pairs of adoral setae). Setae hg3 and hg4 both near the coxal bases of the pedipalps.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Female dorsal idiosoma has a sclerotized plate that bears 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt) and 2 pairs of simple setae (lps and mps). Idiosomal shield covered by integumental papillae that form a reticulated pattern. Hysterosoma lacks a plate and bears 7 pairs of setae (c1–2, d1–h1). Cupule im present, usually laterad or in the proximity of e1.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae ill-defined. Coxae I and II fused; coxae III and IV fused. Coxae I–IV setal formula 3-1-3-1 (including paracoxal seta). Genital plates each bear 4 setae. Anal plates bear 1 pair of setae (ps1). 2 pairs of setae (ps2 and h2) associated with, but do not occur on, the anal plates. Cupule ih present in close proximity to h2. Integument between plates striated and bears 5 pairs of additional setae. Legs. Ambulacral claws on either side of a 4-rayed empodium present.


Key to adult female Riscus

(modified from Den Heyer and Castro 2012)

1 Five pairs of genital setae Riscus austroamericanus Den Heyer & Castro, 2008
Four pairs of genital setae; tibiae IV with 1 T, 4 sts; tibiae II with {1 asl, 1 sts}, 4 sts 2
2 (1) Pedipalpal genu with 3 sts 3
Pedipalpal genu with 4 sts Riscus bambusae (Gupta & Ghosh 1980)
3 (2) Pedipalpal tibiotarsus with 1 spls, 3 sts, 1 dorsoterminal solenidion Riscus thailandensis Den Heyer, 2006
Pedipalpal tibiotarsus with 5 sts, 1 dorsoterminal solenidion (original description states 6 sts present; one of these is assumed to be a solenidion here) Riscus cynodonae (Gupta & Ghosh, 1980)
Rubroscirus Den Heyer, 1979
Historical review.

Baker and Hoffmann (1948) described Cunaxa boneti. Den Heyer (1979d) erected Rubroscirus, described Rubroscirus africanus, Rubroscirus rarus, and Rubroscirus vestus, and transferred Cunaxa boneti to the the genus. Tseng (1980) desbribed Cunaxa exoterica. Muhammad, Chaudhri, and Akbar (1989) described Rubroscirus valentis. Smiley (1992) synonymized Rubroscirus with Cunaxa and described Cunaxa denmarki, Cunaxa floridanus, Cunaxa lehmanae, Cunaxa lukoschusi, Cunaxa metzi, Cunaxa newyorkensis, Cunaxa rackae, and Cunaxa reevesi. Fan (1992) described Rubroscirus denheyeri and Rubroscirus sinensis. Muhammad and Chaudhri (1993) described Rubroscirus rasile and Rubroscirus otiosus. Corpuz-Raros and Garcia (1995) described Cunaxa venusae and Cunaxa viscayana. Bashir, Afzal, and Ali (2005) described Cunaxa reticulatus and transferred Rubroscirus valentis, Rubroscirus rasile, and Rubroscirus otiosus to Cunaxa. Sergeyenko (2006) recognized Rubroscirus as a valid genus and described Rubroscirus khaustovi. Ferla and Rocha (2012) described Rubroscirus nidorum.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and reach beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the tibiae. An apophysis on the telofemora present. Stout spine-like seta on the genua and tibiotarsi setae present or absent. Tibiotarsi end in a strong claw. Subcapitulum with 6 pairs of setae: 2 pairs of adoral setae and 4 pairs of subcapitular setae (hg1–4). Subcapitulum is reticulated.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma bears a shield, complemented with 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt) and 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps). Sensillae at and pt not as densely pilose as in Allocunaxa, Cunaxatricha, and Riscus. Proterosomal shield reticulated. Hysterosomal shield absent in females. Lateral platelets (as in Armascirus and Dactyloscirus) absent. Setae c1h1, and c2 present. Cupule im present laterad and caudally of e1. Integument not bearing the l shield striated. Striations papillated, not smooth or lobed as in Cunaxa.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II may be fused; coxae III–IV may be fused. Coxae II–IV setal formula 1-3-1. Genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear 1 pair of setae (ps1). 1 pair of setae (h2) associated with, but do not occur on, the anal plates. Cupule ih present in close proximity to h2. Integument between plates striated and bears up to 7 pairs of additional setae. Legs. Tarsi long and slender, and constricted distally but tarsal lobes small and not conspicuous as in Armascirus and Dactyloscirus. A trichobothrium on tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws either side of a 4-rayed empodium present.


Key to adult female Rubroscirus

Rubroscirus is recognized as a valid genus. As suggested by Den Heyer (2011b) Cunaxa boneti, Cunaxa denmarki, Cunaxa exoterica, Cunaxa floridanus, Cunaxa lehmanae, Cunaxa lukoschusi, Cunaxa metzi, Cunaxa newyorkensis, Cunaxa rackae, Cunaxa reevesi, Cunaxa reticulatus, Cunaxa venusae and Cunaxa viscayana are transferred to Rubroscirus as they possess reticulated proterosomal shields.

1 Basifemora I with 3 sts 2
Basifemora I with 5 sts Rubroscirus denmarki (Smiley, 1992)
2 (1) Basifemora III with 1 sts 3
Basifemora III with 2 sts; Pakistan Rubroscirus reticulatus Bashir, Afzal & Ali, 2006
3 (2) Basifemora IV with 1 sts 4
Basifemora IV with 2 sts; Mexico, Central America, USA Rubroscirus boneti (Baker & Hoffmann, 1948)
4 (3) Coxae I with 2 sts; Taiwan Rubroscirus exoterica (Tseng, 1980)
Coxae I with 3 sts 5
5 (4) Coxae II with 1 sts 6
Coxae II with 2 sts 16
6 (5) Coxae IV with 1 sts 7
Coxae IV with 2 sts 12
7 (6) Genua I with 1 asl, 5 sts; Ukraine Rubroscirus khaustovi Sergeyenko, 2006
Genua I with 2 asl, 4 or 6 sts 8
Genua I with 3 asl, 5 or 6 sts 10
Genua I with 3 asl, 1 bsl, 5 sts; Pakistan Rubroscirus rasile Chaudhri, 1993
8 (7) Genua I with 2 asl, 4 sts; genua IV with 1 asl, 5 sts 9
Genua I with 2 asl, 6 sts; genua IV with 2 asl, 5 sts; USA Rubroscirus newyorkensis (Smiley, 1992)
9 (8) Genua II with 1 asl, 5 sts; China Rubroscirus denheyeri Fan, 1992
Genua II with 1 asl, 6 sts; Brazil Rubroscirus nidorum Ferla & Rocha, 2012
10 (7) Genua I with 5 sts; genua II with 1 asl, 5 sts; USA Rubroscirus lehmanae (Smiley, 1992)
Genua I with 6 sts; genua II with 2 asl, 5 or 6 sts 11
11 (10) Genua II with 2 asl, 5 sts; Pakistan Rubroscirus valentis Muhammad, Chaudhri & Akbar, 1989
Genua II with 2 asl, 6 sts; Pakistan Rubroscirus otiosus Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1993
12 (6) Genua I with 7 sts; Phillipines Rubroscirus viscayana Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1995
Genua I with 2 asl, 5 or 6 sts 13
Genua I with 3 asl, 4 sts; China Rubroscirus sinensis Fan, 1992
Genua I with 4 asl, 5 sts; USA Rubroscirus floridanus (Smiley, 1992)
13 (12) Genua I with 2 asl, 5 sts; genua II with 2 asl, 5 sts; genua IV with 1 asl, 5 sts 14
Genua I with 2 asl, 6 sts; genua II with 6 sts; genua IV with 6 sts; Philippines Rubroscirus venusae Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1995
14 (13) Genua III with 1 asl, 5 sts; setae c1, c2, d1, e1, f1, and h1 smooth 15
Genua III with 2 asl, 5 sts; setae c1, c2, d1, e1, f1, and h1 spiculate; Costa Rica Rubroscirus rackae (Smiley, 1992)
15 (14) Minute thorn-like seta adjacent to median spine-like seta on pedipalp tibiotarsus present; New Zealand Rubroscirus reevesi (Smiley, 1992)
Minute thorn-like seta adjacent to median spine-like seta on pedipalp tibiotarsus absent; USA Rubroscirus metzi Smiley, 1992
16 (5) Basifemora I with 1 asl, 5 sts; basifemora II with 1 asl, 5 sts; basifemora III with 1 asl, 5 sts; basifemora IV with 1 asl, 5 sts; South Africa Rubroscirus africanus Den Heyer, 1979
Basifemora I with 2 asl, 5 sts; basifemora II with 1 asl, 5 sts; basifemora III with 1 asl, 5 sts; basifemora IV with 2 asl, 5 sts 17
Basifemora I with 3 asl, 5 sts; basifemora II with 1 asl, 5 sts; basifemora III with 1 asl, 5 sts; basifemora IV with 1 asl, 5 sts; South Africa Rubroscirus vestus Den Heyer, 1979
Basifemora I with 4 asl, 5 sts; basifemora II with 2 asl, 5 sts; basifemora III with 2 asl, 5 sts; basifemora IV with 1 asl, 5 sts; South Africa Rubroscirus rarus Den Heyer, 1979
17 (16) Setae c1, c2, d1, e1, f1, and h1 smooth; India Rubroscirus myabunderensis (Gupta & Ghosh, 1980)
Setae c1, c2, d1, e1, f1, and h1 spiculate; Australia, Cominican Republic Rubroscirus lukoschusi (Smiley, 1992)
Coleoscirinae Den Heyer, 1978
Historical review.

Berlese (1888) described the first Coleoscirinae, Scirus curtipalpus, from Argentina. Berlese (1916) then erected Coleoscirus for two new species, Coleoscirus halacaroides and Coleoscirus corniculatus (Coleoscirus corniculatus was later synonomised with Coleoscirus curtipalpus by Den Heyer 1978b). Smiley (1975) erected Pseudocunaxa and Pseudobonzia. Scutascirus was erected by Den Heyer (1976) for a South African species, Scutascirus polyscutosus. Den Heyer (1977a) erected Neoscirula for three South African cunaxids. Den Heyer (1978b) synonymized Pseudocunaxa with Coleoscirus and erected Coleoscirinae for the known genera. Tseng (1980) erected Lapicunaxa for two species from Taiwan. Smiley (1992) moved Neoscirula from Coleoscirinae to Bonziinae, synomised Lapicunaxa with Coleoscirus, and erected Neobonzia in Neobonzinae. Den Heyer and Castro (2008b) erected Coleobonzia for some species previously contained in Pseudobonzia. Den Heyer and Castro (2008c) moved Neoscirula back to Coleoscirinae. Den Heyer (2011c) moved Neobonzia to Coleoscirinae, effectively disregarding Neobonzinae, and synonymized Coleobonzia with Neobonzia.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and reach beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the tibiotarsi. Basifemora and telofemora fused but retain a dark line. Tibiotarsi usually complemented with a tubercle and a dorsodistal solenidion. Pedipalps end in a stout claw. Chelicera with seta present or absent. Subcapitulum bears 6 pairs of setae: 2 pairs of adoral setae and 4 pairs of subcapitular setae (hg14). Setae hg4 often longest.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma covered in a shield which bears 4 pairs of setae: 2 pairs of simple setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensilla (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma median plate present or absent; if present this plate separate or fused to the proterosomal shield. Plates and shields smooth or variously covered with papillae that form reticulations. Up to 8 pairs of setae present on the dorsal hysterosoma (c1f1, c2, f2, h2); if these setae do not occur on larger plates or shields they may be born on small platelets that are barely larger than the setal socket. Cupule im present, usually laterad or in the proximity of e1. Unsclerotized integument striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II fused and may coalesce medially to form a single sternal plate. Each pair of coxae complemented with 3 pairs of setae; if they form an extensive sternal shield, setae normally born on the unsclerotized integument may be located on the shield. Coxae III–IV fused; they may be restricted to the trochantral bases or extend posteriorly beyond the genital plates. Each pair of coxae complemented with 3 pairs of setae; if the plates are extensive they may bear setae normally born on the unsclerotized integument. The genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. 1–8 pairs of setae present on the integument between coxae III and the genital plates. Anal plates complemented with 2 pairs of setae (ps1-2). Two pairs of setae (h2, pa) located on the integument near the anal plates. Cupule ih present in close proximity to h2. Legs shorter than idiosoma; they are never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws on either side of a four-rayed empodium present.


Key to adult female Coleoscirinae

(modified from Den Heyer and Castro 2008b)

1 Idiosomal plates well-developed and defined; hysterosomal shield present and fused to proterosomal plate (Fig. 66a, b); females and most males with coxae I–II fused medially into a sternal shield (Fig. 67a); apices of some solenidia, especially on tarsi I, swollen 2
Idiosomal plates poorly developed and sometimes ill-defined; hysterosomal plate absent (Fig. 66c, d); coxae I–II usually not fused medially and restricted to trochantral bases (Fig. 67b, c); solenidia on tarsi I and II usually cylindrical 3
2 (1) Idiosoma with 15 to 19 plates, including 4 pairs of dorsolateral plates (Fig. 66a); 2 dorsal plates; pedipalp tibiotarsal ventral tubercle often bifurcate (Fig. 68a) Scutascirus
Idiosomal with no more than 8 plates; dorsolateral plates absent (Fig. 66b); females with only one dorsal plate but males with up to 3 dorsal plates; pedipalp tibiotarsal ventral tubercle not bifurcate, plain (Fig. 68b) Coleoscirus Berlese, 1916
3 (1) Pedipalp tibiotarsus short and nearly cone-like (Fig. 69a); cheliceral trochanters broad; ambulacral claws smooth Neoscirula Den Heyer, 1977
Pedipalp tibiotarsus long and usually narrow and S-shaped (Fig. 69b); cheliceral trochanters narrow; ambulacral claws rippled 4
4 (3) Subcuticular reticulated pattern present on proterosomal, coxal, and genital plates: usually very conspicuous, even proximal leg segments may possess such pattern (Fig. 67c) Pseudobonzia Smiley, 1975
Subcuticular reticulated pattern absent or restricted to the edge of coxae (Fig. 67d) Neobonzia Smiley, 1992
Figures 66–69.

Cunaxoidinae key illustrations. 66a–d Idiosoma, dorsal. Position of setae will vary between species. 67a–d Idiosoma, ventral 66a, 67a Generalized Scutascirus. Presence, position, and extent of lateral plates will vary between species 66b, 67b Generalized Coleoscirus 66c, 67c Generalized Pseudobonzia 66d, 67d Generalized Neobonzia 68a Scutascirus pedipalp tibiotarsus, arrow indicates bifurcate tubercle 68b Coleoscirus pedipalp tibiotarsus, arrow indicates plan tubercle 69a Neoscirula pedipalps with short, cone-like tibiotarsus 69b Pseudobonzia and Neobonzia pedipalps with elongate, s-shaped tibiotarsus.

Coleoscirus Berlese, 1916
Historical review.

Berlese (1916) erected Coleoscirus to accommodate two species, the type-species Coleoscirus halacaroides and Coleoscirus corniculatus. He had previously described two other species that would be assigned to the genus, Scirus curtipalpus (Berlese, 1888) and Scirus brevicornis (Berlese, 1905), but failed to recognize they belonged to Coleoscirus. Ewing (1917) described Scirus simplex from refuse hog hair in Illinois, USA. Thor and Willmann (1941) transferred Scirus curtipalpus, Scirus brevicornis, and Scirus simplex to Cunaxa and provided redescriptions and illustrations. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) described Cunaxa mexicana, as well as redescribing and illustrating Cunaxa simplex, Coleoscirus curtipalpus, and Coleoscirus brevicornis. Zaher et al. (1975b) reported Coleoscirus simplex from Egypt. Smiley (1975) provided an English translation of Berlese’s (1916) description of Coleoscirus but failed to include the genus in his key to genera; he also erected Pseudocunaxa for Cunaxa simplex and closely related species. Den Heyer (1978a) erected Coleoscirinae, designating Coleoscirus as the type genus and described Coleoscirus magdalenae and Coleoscirus tuberculatus; he also synonymized Pseudocunaxa with Coleoscirus and Coleoscirus corniculatus with Coleoscirus curtipalpus. Shiba (1978) described Cunaxa mizunoi. Tseng (1980) erected Lapicunaxa horidula and Lapicunaxa monospinosus. Chaudhri (1980) described Pseudocunaxa baptus. Den Heyer (1980b) described Coleoscirus coatesi, Coleoscirus breslauensis, and Coleoscirus buartsus, and synonymized Coleoscirus magdalenae with Coleoscirus simplex. Den Heyer (1980c) erected the tribes Coleoscirini for Coleoscirus and Scutascirus and Neoscirulini for Neoscirula and Pseudobonzia. Smiley (1992) synonymized Lapicunaxa with Coleoscirus and transferred Cunaxa mizunoi and Pseudocunaxa baptus to Coleoscirus; he also synonymized Cunaxa mexicanus with Coleoscirus curtipalpus and provided a key to known world species. Coleoscirus carnus and Coleoscirus disparis were described by Muhammad and Chaudhri (1992a). Inayatullah and Shahid (1993) described Pseudocunaxa carex, Pseudocunaxa mardi, and Pseudocunaxa kifayati, apparently unaware or ignoring that Den Heyer (1980) had synonymized Pseudocunaxa with Coleoscirus thirteen years earlier. Bu and Li (1987c) reported Coleoscirus buartsus from China. Corpuz-Raros (1996d) described six species of Coleoscirus: Coleoscirus intermedius, Coleoscirus barrioni, Coleoscirus dayamilocus, Coleoscirus bakeri, Coleoscirus leytensis, and Coleoscirus philippinensis. Hu (1997) reported Coleoscirus monospinosus, Coleoscirus horidula, and Coleoscirus buartsus from China. Bashir, Afzal, and Khan (2006) reaffirmed Den Heyer’s (1980) synonymization of Pseudocunaxa and Coleoscirus by treating Pseudocunaxa carex, Pseudocunaxa mardi and Pseudocunaxa kifayati as Coleoscirus and described Coleoscirus trudus; they also mention a second paper by Muhammad and Chaudhri (1992b) that described two additional species of Coleoscirus from Pakistan that I have been unable to obtain. Lin et al. (2003) reported Coleoscirus simplex from China. Fawzy (2007) described Coleoscirus zaherii. Bashir, Afzal, and Khan (2008) described Coleoscirus raviensis and Coleoscirus tobaensis. Bashir and Afzal (2009) described Coleoscirus afzali.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented; basifemora and telofemora fused but retain a dark line which indicates the presence of the joint. Pedipalps extend beyond the subcapitulum by at most the apical half of the tibiotarsi. Pedipalp tibiotarsal tubercle plain, not bifurcate as in Scutascirus. Subcapitulum bears 6 pairs of setae: 2 pairs of adoral setae and 4 pairs of subcapitular setae (hg14).

Idiosoma, dorsal. Dorsal idiosoma heavily sclerotized and the plates well-demarcated. A single dorsal shield present; it may range in size from terminating anteriorly to cupule im to being holodorsal. No papillated line or other marking indicates the separation of the proterosomal and hysterosomal shields. 2 pairs of setae and 2 pairs of setose sensillae present on the proterosomal. Setae c1h1, c2, and f2 and cupule im present dorsally. Dorsolateral plates (such as present in Scutascirus) absent.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II fused and coalesce medially to form a sternal shield which often has a prominent apex caudally. Sternal plate complemented with 5–7 pairs of setae. Coxae III–IV fused and may extend laterally and caudally past the genital plates. Genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. Anal plates bear two pairs of setae (ps1 and ps2). Seta h2 located ventrally near the anal plates. Cupule ih present in close proximity to h2. Legs shorter than the idiosoma, never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. The apices of solenidia, especially on tarsi I, may be swollen. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws on either side of a four-rayed empodium present.

Males similar, except up to three shields or plates may occur on the dorsal idiosoma (that is the proterosomal shield may not be fused to a hysterosomal plate and up to two hysterosomal plates may be present) and coxae I–IV may be fused into a holoventral shield.


Key to adult female Coleoscirus

Coleoscirus brevicornis (Berlese) has been excluded from the key as the original publication (Berlese 1904) and subsequent publication detailing the species (Thor and Willmann 1941) are in Italian and German and the accompanying illustrations provide too little detail. Den Heyer (1978b) is the last author to mention the species, but only indicates that it belongs to the genus Coleoscirus.

Coleoscirus carex, Coleoscirus kifayati, and Coleoscirus mardi have been excluded from the key as the authors did not provide enough information in the original descriptions to include them.

Coleoscirus zaherii is not included in the key as, despite the best efforts of the authors and the University of Arkansas Interlibrary Loan Department, the description could not be obtained.

1 Basifemora I with 4 setae 2
Basifemora I with 5 setae 4
2 (1) Basifemora II-IV setal formula 5-4-2 3
Basifemora II-IV setal formula 6-4-2; Pakistan Coleoscirus trudus Bashir, Afzal & Khan, 2006
Basifemora II-IV setal formula 6-5-2; Pakistan Coleoscirus afzali Bashir & Afzal, 2009
3 (2) Telofemora I-IV setal formula 4-4-4-3; Pakistan Coleoscirus baptus (Chaudhri, 1980)
Telofemora I-IV setal formula 4-5-4-3; Pakistan Coleoscirus raviensis Bashir, Afzal & Khan, 2008
4 (1) Basifemora II with 5 setae 5
Basifemora II with 6 setae 12
5 (4) Basifemora III with 4 setae 6
Basifemora III with 5 setae 8
6 (5) Basifemora IV with 2 setae 7
Basifemora IV with 3 setae; Java, South Africa Coleoscirus halacaroides Berlese, 1916
7 (6) Horizontal reticulations on dorsal shield present (Fig. 70); Taiwan Coleoscirus horidula (Tseng, 1980)
Horizontal reticulations on dorsal shield absent; Taiwan Coleoscirus monospinosus (Tseng, 1980)
8 (5) Basifemora I-IV setal formula 4-5-3-3; Argentina Coleoscirus curtipalpus (Berlese, 1888)
Basifemora I-IV setal formula not as above 9
9 (8) Sternal shield bilobed posteriorly; Philippines Coleoscirus barrioni Corpuz-Raros, 1996
Sternal shield not bilobed posteriorly 10
10 (9) Extensive reticulations on gnathosoma present (Fig. 71); Philippines Coleoscirus bakeri Corpuz-Raros, 1996
Extensive reticulations on gnathosoma absent 11
11 (10) Hysterosomal shield present, complemented with c1-f1, c2, f2; Philippines Coleoscirus philippinensis Corpuz-Raros, 1996
Hysterosomal shield absent; Philippines Coleoscirus intermedius Corpuz-Raros, 1996
12 (4) Basifemora III with 4 setae 13
Basifemora III with 5 setae 17
Basifemora III with 6 setae 20
13 (12) Telofemora I-IV setal formula 4-4-4-3; USA, South Africa, Japan Coleoscirus simplex (Ewing, 1917)
Telofemora I-IV setal formula 5-5-4-3 14
14 (13) Setae f1, f2 born on soft integument 15
Setae f1, f2 born on dorsal shield; Pakistan Coleoscirus tobaensis Bashir, Afzal & Khan, 2008
15 (14) Sternal plate rounded posteriomedially (Figs 72a, b); South Africa Coleoscirus tuberculatus Den Heyer, 1978
Sternal plate truncated posteriomedially (Fig. 72c) 16
16(15) Light reticulation on dorsal shield present; dorsal shield evenly sclerotized (Fig. 73a); South Africa Coleoscirus buartsus Den Heyer, 1980
Light reticulation on dorsal shield absent; dorsal shield unevenly sclerotized (Fig. 73b); South Africa Coleoscirus coatesi Den Heyer, 1980
17(12) Sternal shield indented posteriomedially (Fig. 72a); Malaysia Coleoscirus mizunoi (Shiba, 1978)
Sternal shield not indented posteriomedially (Fig. 72b) 18
18 (17) Setae f2 born on soft integument; Pakistan Coleoscirus disparis Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1992
Setae f2 born on dorsal shield 19
19 (18) Integumental dots on legs I-IV forming rows (Fig. 74a); Pakistan Coleoscirus carnus Muhammad & Chaudhri, 1992
Integumental dots on legs I-IV forming random (Fig. 74b); South Africa Coleoscirus breslauensis Den Heyer, 1980
20 (12) Basifemora IV with 2 setae; Philippines Coleoscirus leytensis Corpuz-Raros, 1996
Basifemora IV with 3 setae; Philippines Coleoscirus dayamilocus Corpuz-Raros, 1996
Figures 70–74.

Coleoscirus key illustrations. 70 Dorsal idiosomal shield with horizontal reticulations present 71 Gnathosoma with extensive reticulations present 72a Sternal plate rounded posteriomedially, indentation absent 72b Sternal plate rounded posteriomedially, indentation present 72c Sternal plate truncated posteriomedially 73a Dorsal idiosomal shield even sclerotized, light reticulation present 73b Dorsal idiosomal shield unevenly sclerotized, light reticulation absent 74a Integumental dots on legs forming rows 74b Integumental dots on legs random.

Neobonzia Smiley, 1992
Historical review.

Berlese (1910) described the first species of Neobonzia, Scirus parvirostris. Thor and Willmann (1941) moved Scirus parvirostris to Cunaxa. Baker and Hoffmann (1948) described Cunaxa snowi. Heryford (1965) described Cunaxa reticulata. Smiley (1975) erected the genus Pseudobonzia, with Cunaxa reticulata as the type species. Den Heyer (1977c) redescribed Pseudobonzia, moved Coleoscirus parvirostris to Pseudobonzia, and described six new species from South Africa: Pseudobonzia argillae, Pseudobonzia nona, Pseudobonzia lootsi, Pseudobonzia themedae, and Pseudobonzia saaymani. Pseudobonzia parilis was described by Chaudhri (1977). Den Heyer (1980b) described Pseudobonzia smileyi and transferred Cunaxa snowi to Pseudobonzia. Chaudhri (1980) described Pseudobonzia numida. Luxton (1982) described Pseudobonzia breviscuta from New Zealand peat moss. Liang (1983) reported Pseudobonzia themedae from China. Pseudobonzia shanghaiensis was described by Liang (1984). Smiley (1992) described Pseudobonzia newzealandicus, Pseudobonzia landwehri, and Pseudobonzia summersi; reported Pseudobonzia saaymani from the USA and Canada; and erected a new monotypic subfamily, Neobonzinae, and genus, Neobonzia, for Neobonzia moseri. Corpuz-Raros and Garcia (1996) described two species from the Philippines, Pseudobonzia gruezoi and Pseudobonzia longispina. Hu (1997) reported Pseudobonzia shanghaiensis and Pseudobonzia themedae from China. Sergeyenko (2005) described Pseudobonzia kuznetzovi. Pseudobonzia clavata was described by Corpuz-Raros (2008). Den Heyer and Castro (2008b) split a new genus, Coleobonzia, from Pseudobonzia; They retained 6 speciesin Pseudobonzia (Pseudobonzia clathratus, Pseudobonzia delfinadobaakerae, Pseudobonzia landwehri, Pseudobonzia neoreticulata, Pseudobonzia reticulata, and Pseudobonzia yini) and transferred all other species to Coleobonzia and described Coleobonzia clava and Coleobonzia moraesi. Bashir and Afzal (2009) described Pseudobonzia bakari, Pseudobonzia malookensis, and Pseudobonzia shamshadi. Den Heyer (2011) synonymized Coleobonzia with Neobonzia and moved Neobonzia to Coleoscirinae, effectively disregarding Neobonzinae.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and reach beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the last segment. Simple setae present on the basi- and telofemora. Pedipalp tibiotarsi long and S-shaped (as opposed to short and cylindrical as in Neoscirula). Subcapitulum with 4 pairs of setae (hg1–4). 2 pairs of adoral setae present. Chelicera with seta usually present. Extensive reticulated pattern absent from the gnathosoma, though a row of single cells may be present caudally.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Plates lightly sclerotized and may not be well defined or demarcated. Proterosomal plate bears 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Extensive reticulated pattern absent, although a pair of rows of up to 6 cells may be present. Proterosomal plate may be covered with random dots or papillae. Hysterosomal plate absent. Setae c1h1, and usually c2 and f2 present dorsally; h2 present or absent. Cupules im present laterad and sometimes caudally of e1. Integument striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae usually restricted to the trochantral bases, though sometimes coxae I–II may nearly touch medially. Coxae I–II fused. Coxae III–IV fused. All coxae lightly sclerotized and may be ill-defined. Extensive reticulated pattern absent from the coxae, though a row of cells or reticulated pattern may be present near the edges. Coxae may be covered with random dots or papillae. Coxae I–IV usually have the simple setal formula 3-3-3-3 (Neobonzia parilis is the exception with 2-2-3-2). Genital plates each bear 3–4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. 2 pairs of setae (ps12) usually occur on the anal plates and 1 pair of setae (pa) occurs on the integument near the anal plates. However, at least one species (Neobonzia clavata) has 3 pairs of setae present on the anal plates and 0 pairs of setae on the integument. Cupules ih present ventrally near the anal plates. Legs. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. The apices of solenidia cylindrical, not swollen as in Coleoscirus and Scutascirus. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws rippled and occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Neobonzia

As suggested by Den Heyer (2013) Pseudobonzia bakari, Pseudobonzia malookensis, and Pseudobonzia shamshadi are transferred to Neobonzia.

Neobonzia parvirostris (Berlese, 1910) is known only from the male and so is not included in the key. Neobonzia breviscuta (Luxton, 1982) is not included in the key as an insufficient number of characters are given in the original description.

1 Sensilla at and pt clavate (Figs 75a, b) 2
Sensilla at and pt not clavate, normal (Fig. 75c) 3
2 (1) Sensilla at and pt short, length less than width of proterosomal plate (Fig. 75a); Philippines Neobonzia clavata (Corpuz-Raros, 2008)
Sensilla at and pt long, length greater than width of proterosomal plate (Fig. 75b); Brazil Neobonzia clava (Den Heyer & Castro, 2008)
3 (1) Coxae I–IV setal formula 2-2-3-2 sts; Pakistan Neobonzia parilis (Chaudhri, 1977)
Coxae I–IV setal formula 3-3-3-3 sts 4
4 (3) Basifemora I with 2 sts 5
Basifemora I with 3 sts; Philippines Neobonzia longispina (Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1996)
Basifemora I with 4 sts 7
Basifemora I with 5 sts 12
5 (4) Basifemora II–IV setal formula 2-2-1 sts; USA Neobonzia moseri Smiley, 1992
Basifemora II–IV setal formula 2-1-0 sts; Pakistan Neobonzia malookensis (Bashir & Afzal, 2009)
Basifemora II–IV setal formula 3-3-1 sts 6
Basifemora II–IV setal formula 4-4-1 sts Neobonzia bakari (Bashir & Afzal, 2009)
6 (5) Telofemora I–IV setal formula 4-6-4-2 sts; China Neobonzia themedae (Den Heyer, 1977)
Telofemora I–IV setal formula 5-5-4-3 sts; South Africa Neobonzia lootsi (Den Heyer, 1977)
7 (4) Basifemora II with 4 sts 8
Basifemora II with 5 sts Pseudobonzia shamshadi (Bashir & Afzal, 2009)
Basifemora II with 6 sts 10
8 (7) Basifemora III–IV setal formula 4-2 sts 9
Basifemora III–IV setal formula 6-1 sts; New Zealand Neobonzia newzealandicus (Smiley, 1992)
9 (8) Pedipalp tibiotarsal tubercle present; Brazil Neobonzia moraesi (Den Heyer & Castro, 2008)
Pedipalp tibiotarsal tubercle absent; South Africa Neobonzia saaymani (Den Heyer, 1977)
10 (7) Basifemora III–IV setal formula 3-0 sts; South Africa Neobonzia nona (Den Heyer, 1977)
Basifemora III–IV setal formula 3-1 sts; South Africa Neobonzia argillae (Den Heyer, 1977)
Basifemora III–IV setal formula 4-2 sts 11
11 (10) Setae lps and mps subequal; South Africa Neobonzia smileyi (Den Heyer, 1980)
Setae lps about half as long as mps; USA Neobonzia summersi (Smiley, 1992)
12 (4) Basifemora II with 5 sts 13
Basifemora II with 6 sts 14
13 (12) Coxae I–II nearly touching medially (Fig. 76a); USA, Austria Neobonzia snowi (Baker & Hoffmann, 1948)
Coxae I–II widely separated medially (Fig. 76b); Philippines Neobonzia gruezoi (Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1996)
14 (12) Basifemora III–IV with 5-2 sts 15
Basifemora III–IV with 6-2 sts; Pakistan Neobonzia numida (Chaudhri, 1980)
15 (14) Setae g4 longest; posterior corners of proterosomal shield angled; China Neobonzia shanghaiensis (Liang, 1980)
Setae g3 longest; posterior corners of proterosomal shield rounded; Russia Neobonzia kuznetzovi (Sergeyenko, 2005)
Figures 75, 76.

Neobonzia key illustrations 75a Sensilla at and pt clavate, short, length less than the width of the proterosomal shield 75b Sensilla at and pt clavate, long, length greater than the width of the proterosomal shield 75c Sensilla at and pt normal, not clavate 76a Coxae I–II nearly touching medially 76b Coxae I–II widely separated medially.

Neoscirula Den Heyer, 1977
Historical review.

Den Heyer (1977a) erected Neoscirula for three African cunaxids, Neoscirula theroni, Neoscirula natalensis, and Neoscirula sevidi. Shiba (1978) described the first Neoscirula outside of Africa, Coleoscirus ogawai. Den Heyer (1978b) erected the subfamily Coleoscirinae, tribus Neoscirulini and assigned Neoscirula to it. Den Heyer (1980b) described another African Neoscirula, Neoscirula delareyi. Neoscirula vitulus was described from Ukraine by Barilo (1991). Smiley (1992) transferred Neoscirula from Coleoscirinae to Bonziinae as he thought setae g1 were geniculate; he also described Neoscirula luxtoni, Neoscirula proctorae, Neoscirula kenworthyi, moved Neoscirula ogawai from Coleoscirus, and provided a key to known world species. Neoscirula abraensis, Neoscirula aspirasi, Neoscirula imperata, Neoscirula makilingica, Neoscirula puntiglupa were described by Corpuz-Raros (1996e) from the Philippines. Lin and Zhang (1998) described Neoscirula miaofengensis and Neoscirula bidens. Neoscirula saitoi was described by Lin and Zhang (2002). Corpuz-Raros (2007) described two more Philippine Neoscirula: Neoscirula laboensis, Neoscirula taclobanensis. Mejía-Recamier and Palacios-Vargas (2007) described Neoscirula aliciae, Neoscirula baloghi, and Neoscirula hoffmannae. Den Heyer and Castro (2008c) described Neoscirula flechtmanni, Neoscirula oliveirai, and Neoscirula queirozi. Skvarla, Fisher, and Dowling (2011) described Neoscirula reticulata. Den Heyer (2011c) described Neoscirula sepasgosariani.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and end in a strong claw, which is complemented with a tooth in some species; they extend to the tip of the hypognathum or slightly beyond. Basifemur and telofemur are fused but retain the suture; each has a dorsolateral simple or spine-like seta. Pedipalp tibiotarsus short and cone-like. Subcapitulum with 4 pairs of setae (hg14). Seta hg1 longest and in some species bent at 90 degrees, though not geniculate as in Bonziinae. Adoral setae present or absent. Chelicera with seta present or absent.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosomal shield weakly sclerotized and ill-defined, granulated or papillated; some species possess subcuticular reticulations.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II separate or fused medially into a single sternal shield. Coxae III–IV contiguous on either side, restricted to area around trochantral bases. Dorsal cupules im present laterad to e1; ventral cupules ih present near h2, anal plates. Legs shorter than body. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Apices of solenidia cylindrical, not swollen as in Coleoscirus and Scutascirus. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws smooth and occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Neoscirula.

Neoscirula hoffmannae Mejía-Recamier & Palacios-Vargas, 2007 is excluded from the following key as it is only known from the male.

1 Coxae I–II fused to form a sternal shield 2
Coxae I–II separated 6
2 (1) Cheliceral seta present 3
Cheliceral seta absent 5
3 (2) Pedipalp basifemoral dorsal seta spine-like (Fig. 77a); Luzon Is., Philippines Neoscirula makilingica Corpuz-Raros, 1996
Pedipalp basifemoral dorsal seta simple (Fig. 77b) 4
4 (3) Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing present (Fig. 78a); posteromedial portion of sternal shield V-shaped, polygonal subcuticular sculpturing absent (Fig. 79a); 6 pairs of setae between coxae III–IV (excluding genital setae); Luzon Is., Philippines Neoscirula aspirasi Corpuz-Raros, 1996
Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing absent (Fig. 78b); posteromedial portion of sternal shield rounded, polygonal subcuticular sculpturing present (Fig. 79b); 4 pairs of setae between coxae III–IV (excluding genital setae); Malaysia; Philippines Neoscirula ogawai (Shiba, 1978)
5 (2) Chelicerae with dorsomedial reticulations present (Fig. 80a); genua II with 5 setae and 2 solenidia; genua IV with 5 setae and 1 solenidion; Interior Highlands, USA Neoscirula reticulata Skvarla, 2011
Chelicerae dorsomedial reticulations absent (Fig. 80b); genua II with 4 setae and 2 solenidia; genua IV with 4 setae and 1 solenidion; Jalisco, Mexico Neoscirula baloghi Mejía-Recamier & Palacios-Vargas, 2007
6 (1) Pedipalp genua hook-like apophysis present (Fig. 81a); South Africa Neoscirula natalensis Den Heyer, 1977
Pedipalp genua hook-like apophysis absent (Fig. 81b) 7
7 (6) Pedipalp tibiotarsal claw a tooth present, giving bifid appearance (Fig. 82a) 8
Pedipalp tibiotarsal claw a tooth absent (Fig. 82b) 13
8 (7) Cheliceral seta present; pedipalp tibiotarsal tubercle present (Fig. 83a) 9
Cheliceral seta absent; pedipalp tibiotarsal tubercle absent (Fig. 83b); São Paulo, Brazil Neoscirula oliveirai Den Heyer & Castro, 2008
9 (8) Basifemora II with 4 setae; telofemora I–II 4-4 setae; hypognathum with ventroapical shield-like process present (Fig. 84a); New Zealand; Philippines Neoscirula luxtoni Smiley, 1992
Basifemora II with 5 or 6 setae; telofemora I–II 5-5 setae; hypognathum with ventroapical shield-like process absent (Fig. 84b) 10
10 (9) Basifemora II with 5 setae 11
Basifemora II with 6 setae 12
11 (10) Basifemora I with 4 setae; telofemora III with 4 setae; 7 pairs of setae between coxae III–IV (excluding genital setae); Jalisco, Mexico Neoscirula aliciae Mejía-Recamier & Palacios-Vargas, 2007
Basifemora I with 5 setae; telofemora III with 3 setae; 5 pairs of setae between coxae III–IV (excluding genital setae); Luzon Is., Philippines Neoscirula laboensis Corpuz-Raros, 2007
12 (10) Chelicerae tapering gradually (Fig. 85a); Fujian, China Neoscirula bidens Lin & Zhang, 1988
Chelicerae tapering suddenly (Fig. 85b); São Paulo, Brazil Neoscirula flechtmanni Den Heyer & Castro, 2008
13 (7) Pedipalp basifemoral dorsal seta spine-like (Fig. 77a) 14
Pedipalp basifemoral dorsal seta simple (Fig. 77b) 18
14 (13) Telofemora I–II with 4-4 setae; New Zealand Neoscirula proctorae Smiley, 1992
Telofemora I–II with 5-5 setae 15
15 (14) Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing present (Fig. 86a); Fujian, China Neoscirula saitoi
Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing absent (Fig. 86b) 16
16 (15) Cheliceral seta short, less than half the length of movable digit; South Africa Neoscirula sevidi Den Heyer, 1977
Cheliceral seta long, nearly as long or longer than movable digit 17
17 (16) Basifemora I–IV setal formula 5-5-4-3; Iran Neoscirula sepasgosariani Den Heyer, 2011
Basifemora I–IV setal formula 4-4-3-1; Brazil Neoscirula queirozi Den Heyer & Castro, 2008
18 (13) Coxae I–II with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing present (as in Fig. 79a) 19
Coxae I–II with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing absent (as in Fig. 79b) 23
19 (18) Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing present (Fig. 78a) 20
Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing absent (Fig. 78b) 21
20 (19) Basifemora II with 4 setae; telofemora I–II 4-4 setae; Maryland, USA Neoscirula kenworthyi Smiley, 1992
Basifemora II with 5 setae; telofemora I–II with 5-5 setae; Leyte Is., Philippines Neoscirula taclobanensis Corpuz-Raros, 2007
21 (19) Hypognathal setae hg1 more than two times as long as setae hg2–4; coxae II with 4 setae; Fujian, China Neoscirula miaofengensis Lin & Zhang, 1988
Hypognathal setae hg1 no more than two times as long as setae hg2–4; coxae II with 3 setae 22
22 (21) Chelicerae basally narrow, less than three times the width of the distal end; hypognathum narrow, nearly twice as long as wide; Uzbekistan Neoscirula vitulus Barilo, 1991
Chelicerae basally broad, four times the width of the distal end; hypognathum wide, nearly as wide as long; South Africa Neoscirula delareyi Den Heyer, 1980
23 (18) Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing present 24
Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing absent; Luzon Is., Philippines Neoscirula imperata Corpuz-Raros, 1996
24 (23) Subcapitulum with row of basal polygonal subcuticular sculpturing present (Fig. 87a); ventrally with 7 pairs of simple setae between coxae III–IV 25
Subcapitulum with row of basal polygonal subcuticular sculpturing absent (Fig. 87b); ventrally with 6 pairs of simple setae between coxae III–IV; Luzon Is., Philippines Neoscirula abraensis Corpuz-Raros, 1996
25 (24) Basifemora II with 4 setae; telofemora I–II with 4-4 setae; Western Transvaal, South Africa Neoscirula theroni Den Heyer, 1977
Basifemora II with 5 setae; telofemora I–II with 5-5 setae; Luzon Is., Philippines Neoscirula puntiglupa Corpuz-Raros, 1996
Figures 77–87.

Neoscirula key illustrations 77a Pedipalp basifemoral dorsal seta spine-like 77b Pedipalp basifemoral dorsal seta simple 78a Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing present 78b Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing absent 79a Sternal shield v-shaped posteriomedially, with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing absent 79b Sternal shield rounded posteriomedially, with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing present 80a Chelicera with dorsomedial reticulations present 80b Chelicera with dorsomedial reticulations absent 81a Pedipalp genua with hook-like apophysis present 81b Pedipalp genua with hook-like apophysis absent 82a Pedipalp tibiotarsal claw with tooth present 82b Pedipalp tibiotarsal claw with tooth absent 83a Pedipalp tibiotarsus with tubercle present 83b Pedipalp tibiotarsus with tubercle absent 84a Hypognathum with ventroapical shield-like process present 84b Hypognathum with ventroapical shield-like process absent 85a Chelicera tapering gradually 85b Chelicera tapering suddenly 86a Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing present 86b Proterosomal shield with polygonal subcuticular sculpturing absent 87a Subcapitulum with row of basal subcuticular sculpturing present 87b Subcapitulum with row of basal subcuticular sculpturing absent.

Pseudobonzia Smiley, 1975
Historical review.

Heryford (1965) described the first Pseudobonzia, Cunaxa reticulata. Smiley (1975) erected the genus Pseudobonzia, with Cunaxa reticulata as the type species. Den Heyer (1977c) redescribed the genus and described Pseudobonzia neoreticulata. Shiba (1978) described Cunaxoides clathratus. Smiley (1992) described Pseudobonzia delfinadobakerae, Pseudobonzia landwehri, and Pseudobonzia yini and moved Cunaxoides clathratus to Pseudobonzia; he also provided a key to known world species. Fuangarown and Lekprayoon (2004) described Pseudobonzia tangkansingae. Den Heyer and Castro (2008b) split Coleobonzia from Pseudobonzia. Bashir, Afzal, and Akbar (2008) described Pseudobonzia ashfaqi. Skvarla et al. (2013) reported Pseudobonzia reticulata from Arkansas and corrected the description to include setae f2, which were not reported by Heryford (1965).

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and reach beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the last segment. Simple or spine-like setae on the basi- and telofemora present. Pedipalp tibiotarsi long and S-shaped (as opposed to short and cylindrical as in Neoscirula). Subcapitulum with 4 pairs of setae (hg1–4). 2 pairs of adoral setae present. Chelicera with seta present (usually) or absent. Extensive reticulated pattern present on the gnathosoma.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Plates lightly sclerotized and not be well defined or demarcated. The proterosomal plate bears 2 pairs of setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensillae (at and pt). Extensive reticulated pattern present. Hysterosomal plate absent. Setae c1h1 present; setae c2, f2, and h2 present or absent. Cupules im present laterad and caudally of e1. Integument striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae restricted to the trochantral bases. Coxae I–II fused. Coxae III–IV fused. All coxae lightly sclerotized and may be ill-defined. Coxae with extensive reticulated pattern. Coxae I–IV usually have setal formula 3-3-3-3. Genital plates each bear 3–4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. 2 pairs of setae (ps12) occur on the anal plates and 1 pair of setae (pa) occurs on the integument near the anal plates. Cupules ih present ventrally near the anal plates. Legs. Basal leg podomeres with reticulated pattern present or absent. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Apices of solenidia cylindrical, not swollen as in Coleoscirus and Scutascirus. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws are rippled and occur on either side of a 4-rayed empodium.


Key to adult female Pseudobonzia

(modified from Den Heyer and Castro 2008)

1 Pedipalp basifemora and telofemora with similar setae, either spine-like or simple (Fig. 88a, b); proterosomal shield conspicuously reticulated 2
Pedipalp basifemora with simple seta, pedipalp telofemora with spine-like seta (Fig. 88c); proterosomal shield not conspicuously reticulated; Mexico Pseudobonzia delfinadobakerae Smiley, 1992
2 (1) Pedipalp basifemora and telofemora with simple setae (Fig. 88a); setae f2 present or absent 3
Pedipalp basifemora and telofemora with spine-like setae (Fig. 88b); setae f2 present; Guam Pseudobonzia yini Smiley, 1992
3 (2) Setae f2 present 4
Setae f2 absent 5
4 (3) Proterosomal shield concave posteromedially (Fig. 89a); South Africa Pseudobonzia neoreticulata Den Heyer, 1977
Proterosomal shield straight posteromedially (Fig. 89b); USA Pseudobonzia landwehri Smiley, 1992
Proterosomal shield convex posteromedially (Fig. 89c); Pakistan Pseudobonzia ashfaqi Bashir, Afzal & Akbar, 2008
5 (3) Proximal leg podomeres reticulated; Malaysia Pseudobonzia clathratus (Shiba, 1978)
Proximal leg podomeres not reticulated; USA Pseudobonzia reticulata (Heryford, 1965)
Figures 88, 89.

Pseudobonzia key illustrations 88a Pedipalp basifemur and telofemur with spine-like setae on both segments 88b Pedipalp basifemur and telofemur with simple setae on both segments 88c Pedipalp with simple seta on basifemur, spine-like seta on telofemur 89a Proterosomal plate convex posteriomedially 89b Proterosomal plate not convex posteriomedially.

Scutascirus Den Heyer, 1976
Historical review.

Den Heyer (1976) erected Scutascirus for Scutascirus polyscutosus. Shiba (1978) described Cunaxa exasperatus. Den Heyer (1980b) described Scutascirus braziliensis. Chaudhri (1980) described Scutascirus pigrus. Smiley (1992) transferred Cunaxa exasperatus to Scutascirus. Corpuz-Raros and Garcia (1996) described Scutascirus contiguus and Scutascirus pentascutellus. Lin, Zhang and Ji (2001) described Scutascirus triangulum.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and reach beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the tibiotarsi. Basifemora and telofemora fused but retain a dark line. The tibiotarsi complemented with a tubercle and a dorsodistal solenidion. Pedipalps end in a stout claw. Chelicera with seta present or absent. Subcapitulum bears 6 pairs of setae: 2 pairs of adoral setae and 4 pairs of subcapitular setae (hg14). Setae hg4 often the longest.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma covered in a shield which bears 4 pairs of setae: 2 pairs of simple setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensilla (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma bears a median plate which is fused with the proterosomal shield and four pairs of lateral platelets. Plates and shields covered with papillae that form reticulations. 8 pairs of setae present on the dorsal hysterosoma (c1f1, c2, f2, h2); these setae occur on the fused dorsal shield. Cupule im present, usually laterad or in the proximity of e1. Unsclerotized integument striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II fused and coalesce medially to form a single sternal plate. Each pair of coxae complemented with 3 pairs of setae; if they form an extensive sternal shield setae normally born on the unsclerotized integument may be located on the shield. Coxae III–IV fused and extend posteriorly beyond the genital plates. Genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. 1–8 pairs of setae present on the integument between coxae III and the genital plates. Anal plates complemented with 2 pairs of setae (ps1-2). Two pairs of setae (h2, pa) located on the integument near the anal plates. Cupule ih present in close proximity to h2. Legs shorter than idiosoma. Tarsi never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws on either side of a four-rayed empodium present.


Key to adult female Scutascirus

Scutascirus tactus is not included in the following key as it is described only from the male.

1 Tubercle on inner margin of pedipalp tibiotarsus not branched (Fig. 90a) 2
Tubercle on inner margin of pedipalp tibiotarsus bifurcate (Figs 90b, c) 5
Tubercle on inner margin of pedipalp tibiotarsus trifurcate (Fig. 90d); China Scutascirus triangulum Lin, Zhang & Ji, 2001
2 (1) Telofemora III-IV setal formula 4-3 5
Telofemora III-IV setal formula 5-2; Philippines Scutascirus contiguus Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1996
3 (2) Genua II with 1 asl, 5 sts; dorsum with lateral scutella absent; Pakistan Scutascirus pigrus Chaudhri, 1980
Genua II with 2 asl, 1 bsl, 5 sts; dorsum with lateral scutella present; Malaysia Scutascirus exasperatus (Shiba, 1978)
4 (1) Basifemora I–IV setal formula 4-6-4-2; Telofemora I–IV setal formula 5-5-4-3; 4 pairs of dorsolateral hysterosomal plates present (Fig. 91a) 5
Basifemora I–IV setal formula 5-5-4-3; Telofemora I–IV setal formula 5-5-5-2; 5 pairs of dorsolateral hysterosomal plates present (Fig. 91b); Luzon Is., Philippines Scutascirus pentascutellus Corpuz-Raros & Garcia, 1996
5 (4) Pedipalp with entire tibiotarsus projecting past entomalae; bifurcate tubercle positioned halfway along the length of the tibiotarsus (Fig. 90b); Brazil Scutascirus braziliensis Den Heyer, 1978
Pedipalp with distal 2/3 of tibiotarsus projecting past entomalae; bifurcate tubercle positioned on distal third of tibiotarsus (Fig. 90c); South Africa Scutascirus polyscutosus Den Heyer, 1976
Figures 90, 91.

Scutascirus key illustrations. 90a (after Corpuz-Raros and Garcia 1996). Pedipalp with tubercle not branched 90b (after Den Heyer 1980b). Pedipalp tibiotarsus with bifurcate tubercle positioned halfway along the length of the segment 90c (after Den Heyer 1980b). Pedipalp tibiotarsus with bifurcate tubercle positioned on distal third of segment 90d (after Lin et al. 2001). Pedipalp tibiotarsus with trifurcate tubercle 90a (after Den Heyer 1980b). Four pairs of dorsolateral hysterosomal plates present 91b (after Corpuz-Raros and Garcia 1996). Five pairs of dorsolateral hysterosomal plates present.

Orangescirlinae Bu & Li, 1987
Orangescirula Bu & Li, 1987
Historical review.

Bu and Li (1987a) erected Orangescirulinae and Orangescirula for a new species, Orangescirula yongchuanensis. Smiley (1992) described Orangescirula kethleyi. Corpuz-Raros (1996e) described Orangescirula filipina.

Diagnosis.

Gnathosoma. Pedipalps 5-segmented and reach beyond the subcapitulum by at most the distal half of the tibiotarsi. Basifemoral seta simple or spine-like. Telofemoral seta spine-like. Pedipalps end in a stout claw. Subcapitulum bears 6 pairs of setae: 2 pairs of adoral setae and 4 pairs of subcapitular setae (hg14). Setae hg1 long and bent.

Idiosoma, dorsal. Proterosoma covered in a shield which bears 4 pairs of setae: 2 pairs of simple setae (lps and mps) and 2 pairs of setose sensilla (at and pt). Dorsal hysterosoma median plate present, fused to proterosomal shield; 1 to 5 pairs of dorsolateral plates present. Plates and shields smooth or reticulated. Seven pairs of setae present on the dorsal hysterosoma (c1f1, c2, h2). Unsclerotized integument striated.

Idiosoma, ventral. Coxae I–II fused, coxae III–IV fused; coxae may coalesce medially for form a sternal shield. Each pair of coxae complemented with 3 pairs of setae. The genital plates each bear 4 setae; 2 pairs of genital papillae visible underneath the plates. 4–9 pairs of setae present on the integument between coxae II and the genital plates. Anal plates complemented with 2 pairs of setae (ps1-2). Two pairs of setae (h2, pa) located on the integument near the anal plates. Cupule ih present in close proximity to h2. Legs shorter than idiosoma; they are never constricted apically so as to end in lobes. Trichobothrium on leg tibia IV present. Ambulacral claws on either side of a four-rayed empodium present.


Key to adult female Orangescirula

(in part modified from Smiley 1992)

1 Pedipalpal basifemora seta simple Orangescirula filipina
Pedipalpal basifemora seta spine-like 2
2 (1) Dorsal shields with large subcuticular reticulations; 2 pairs of dorsolateral plates present Orangescirula yongchuanensis
Dorsal shield with extremely small subcuticular reticulations; 5 pairs of dorsolateral plates present Orangescirula kethleyi
New locality data
Scirula papillata
Scirula papillata Lin, 1997: 169, Figs 1–6
Remarks.

The specimens examined represent the first report of Scirula papillata from the Western Hemisphere. The specimens examined correspond to Lin’s (1997) description except for telofemora I, which have 6 sts instead of 7 sts, and genua I, which have 9 setae (2 asl, 7 sts) instead of 8 setae.

Material examined(2 individuals on slides). 1 female adult (APGD 10-0424-008, #135719), ex deciduous leaf litter, USA, Arkansas, Washington Co, Devil’s Den State Park (35°46.817N, 94°14.750W), 24 April 2010, col. M. J. Skvarla ● 1 female adult (APGD 10-0826-003, # 135720), ex thick moss by creek near deciduous litter (maple, oak), USA, Pennsylvania, Somerset Co, Laurel Hill State Park, 1985’ elevation (40°00.963 N, 79°14.233 W), 26 August 2010, col. M. J. Skvarla.

Armascirus ozarkensis
Armascirus ozarkensis Skvarla & Dowling, 2012: 6, Figs 2–4.
Remarks.

The specimens examined expand the range of this species within the Interior Highlands and are a new state record for Missouri.

Material examined

(2 individuals on slides). 1 adult female (APGD 11-1129-002), ex litter, USA, Arkansas, Bradley/Drew Co, Warren Prairie Natural Area, 21 June 2010, col. L. C. Thompson ● 1 adult female (APGD 10-0523-004), ex litter, USA, Missouri, Taney Co (36°41'11.98"N, 92°58'16.44"W), 23 May 2010, col. J. R. Fisher, D. M. Keeler.

Armascirus primigenius
Armascirus primigenius Skvarla & Dowling, 2012: 13, Figs 8–10.
Remarks.

The specimens examined significantly expand the range of this species within the United States. The Ouachita specimens correspond to Skvarla and Dowling’s (2012) description except for genua IV, which have 1 asl, 5 sts instead of 1 asl, 4 sts.

Material examined

(3 individuals on slides). 1 adult female (APGD 13-0304-041, #131238), ex. Malaise trap in marsh, USA, Fairfax Co, George Washington Memorial Parkway, Dyke Marsh Wildlife Preserve, 11 April 2009, col. E. M. Barrows ● 2 adult females (APGD 12-0706-002, #135716), ex very dry oak.pine litter in small, rocky depression, USA, Arkansas, Polk Co, Ouachita National Forest, Black Fork Mountain Wilderness, Black Fork Trail (34°41.312'N, 94°18.691'W), 6 July 2012, col. M. J. Skvarla.

Dactyloscirus dolichosetosus
Dactyloscirus dolichosetosus Den Heyer, 1979: 96, figs 71–77; Sepasgosarian 1984: 141; Smiley 1992: 223, Figs 117A, B; Castro 2008: 91; Skvarla and Dowling 2012: 30.
Remarks.

The specimens examined significantly expand the range of this species within the United States.

Material examined

(3 individuals on slides). 2 adult females (APGD 12-1020-012, #135721), ex. deciduous litter (maple, sweet gum, poison ivy) in disturbed area, USA, Virginia, Fairfax Co, George Washington Memorial Parkway, Dyke Marsh Wildlife Preserve (38°46'25"N, 77°03'06"W), 22 October 2012, col. A. P. G. Dowling ● 1 adult female (JRF 12-1028-010, #135722), ex. dry mixed litter with little tree cover in recently (~5 years) cut pine stand with shrubby oaks, USA, Arkansas, Montgomery Co, Ouachita National Forest (34°23'56"N, 93°51'22"W), 28 October 2010, col. J. R. Fisher, D. M. Keeler.

References
Alberti G (1980a) Zur Feinstruktur des Hodenepithels und der Spermien von Eusimonia mirabilis Roewer, 1934 (Solfugae, Arachnida). Zoologischer Anzeiger 204: 345–352.
Alberti G (1980b) Zur Feinstruktur der Spermein und Spermiocytogenese der Milben (Acari). II. Actinotrichida. Zoologischer Jahrbücher, Anatomie 104: 144–203.
Alberti G (2000) Chelicerata. In: Jamieson BMG (Ed) Progress in male gamete ultrastructure and phylogeny. In: Adiyodi KG, Aditodi RG (Eds) Reproductive biology of the invertebrates. Vol. 9. p.B. IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India / Wiley, Oxford, New York, United States, 311–388.
Alberti G, Ehrnsberger R (1977) Rasterelektronenmikroskopische untersuchungen zum spinnvermögen der Bdelliden und Cunaxiden (Acari, Prostigmata). Acarologia 19(1): 55–61.
Alberti G, Peretti AV (2002) Fine structure of male genital system and sperm in Solifugae does not support a sister-group relationship with Pseudoscorpiones (Arachnida). Journal of Arachnology 30: 268–274. doi: 10.1636/0161-8202(2002)030[0268:FSOMGS]2.0.CO;2
Aoki J (1965) Oribatiden (Acarina) Thailands. I. Nature and Life in Southeast Asia 4: 129–193.
Arbabi M, Singh J (2000) Studies on biological aspects of predacious mite Cunaxa setirostris on Tetranychus ludeni at laboratory conditions in Varanasi, India. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 2: 13–23.
Atyeo WT (1958) The genus Bonzia in the New World. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 19(1): 55–61.
Atyeo WT (1960) A revision of the mite family Bdellidae in North and Central America (Acarina, Prostigmata). The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 40: 345–499.
Badieritakis EG, Fantinou AA, Emmanouel NG (2014) A qualitative and quantitative study of mites in similar alfalfa fields in Greece. Experimental and Applied Acarology 62: 195–214. doi: 10.1007/s10493-013-9729-z
Baker EW, Hoffmann A (1948) Acaros de la familia Cunaxidae. Anales de la Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas Mexico 5(3–4): 229–273.
Banks N (1894) New American Acarina. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 21: 209–222.
Banks N (1914) New Acarina. Journal of Entomology and Zoology 6: 55–66.
Barilo AB (1991) Two new species Cunaxidae (Acariformes) from Central Asia. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 70(9): 131–136.
Barnett AA, Thomas RH (2012) The delineation of the fourth walking leg segment is temporally linked to posterior segmentation in the mite Archegozetes longisetosus (Acari: Oribatida, Trhypochthoniidae). Evolution & Development 14(4): 383–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2012.00556.x
Barnett AA, Thomas RH (2013) Posterior Hox gene reduction in an arthropod: Ultrabithorax and Abdominal-B are expressed in a single segment in the mite Archegozetes longisetosus. EvoDevo 4: 23: 1–12. doi: 10.1186/2041-9139-4-23
Bashir MH, Afzal M (2004a) New record of the genus Cunaxoides Baker and Hoffmann (Acari: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist 26(2): 25–27.
Bashir MH, Afzal M (2004b) A new species of genus Neocunaxoides (Cunaxidae) from Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist 26(2): 29–32.
Bashir MH, Afzal M (2005) New cunaxid mites of the genus Armascirus from Punjab-Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 42(3–4): 117–121.
Bashir MH, Afzal M (2006a) Two new species of the genus Dactyloscirus (Acari: Cunaxidae) from Punjab Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 38(4): 273–278.
Bashir MH, Afzal M (2006b) A new cunaxid mite of genus Pulaeus (Cunaxidae) from Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 39(1): 17–20.
Bashir MH, Afzal M (2009) Mite fauna of family Cunaxidae (Acari) form Punjab, Pakistan. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Aktiengesellschaft & Co., Saarbrücken, Germany, 322 pp.
Bashir MH, Afzal M, Akbar S (2005) A new cunaxid mite of genus Pulaeus (Cunaxidae) from Punjab-Pakistan. Biologia (Pakistan) 51(2): 163–168.
Bashir MH, Afzal M, Akbar S (2008) A new species of genus Pseudobonzia Smiley (Prostigmata: Acari) from Punjab, Pakistan. Biologia (Pakistan) 54(1): 77–82.
Bashir MH, Afzal M, Ali S (2005) Description of a new cunaxid mite Cunaxa reticulatus (Acari) from Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist 27(2): 57–60.
Bashir MH, Afzal M, Ashfaq M, Akbar S, Ali S (2010) Two new species of the genus Cunaxa (Acari: Cunaxidae) from District Nankana. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 42(3): 217–222.
Bashir MH, Afzal M, Ashfaq M, Raza ABM, Kamran M (2011) Record of one new species of the genus Cunaxa (Acari: Cunaxidae) from rice husk. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 43(1): 37–40.
Bashir MH, Afzal M, Baker A, Raza M (2007) Record of a new species Cunaxoides sargodhaensis from leaf debris. Pakistan Entomologist 29(1): 43–48.
Bashir MH, Afzal M, Akbar S (2006) Genus Dactyloscirus (Acari: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Biologia 52(1): 71–77.
Bashir MH, Afzal M, Khan BS (2006) A new species Coleoscirus trudus (Acari: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist 28(2): 73–77.
Bashir MH, Afzal M, Khan B (2008) Genus Armascirus (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Belgian journal of Zoology 138(2): 115–127.
Bei NX, Shi CM, Yin SG (2003) Cunaxa mageei Smiley, 1992 (Acari: Cunaxidae), a new record from China. Entomotaxonomia 25(1): 34.
Berlese A (1887) Acari Italiani Myriapoda et Scorpiones hucusque in Italia reperta. Redia 14: 78–105.
Berlese A (1888) Acari Austro-Americani quos collegit Aloysius Balzan. Bullettino della Società Entomologica Italiana 20: 171–222.
Berlese A (1894) Acari, Myriapoda et (Pseudo) Scorpiones hucusque in Italia Tratr. Salmin 71: 5.
Berlese A (1897) Gill Acari Agrarii. Revista patologia vegetale: 138–139.
Berlese A (1904) Acari Nuovi. Redia 2: 231–238.
Berlese A (1910) Acari Nuovi. Redia 6: 199–201, pls. 18–19.
Berlese A (1916) Centuria secunda di Acari nuovi. Redia 12(1): 125–177.
Bu G, Li L (1987a) A new cunaxid subfamily with a new genus and new species of Cunaxidae from Sichuan, China (Acari: Acariformes). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 12(2): 160–164.
Bu G, Li L (1987b) Two new species of Pulaeus from China (Acariformis: Cunaxidae). Journal of Southwest Agricultural University 9: 22–26.
Bu G, Li L (1987c) List of cunaxids fround in Sichuan, China (Acariformes: Cunaxidae). Journal of Southwest Agricultural University 9: 384–387.
Bu G, Li L (1991) A new species of the genus Pulaeus from China (Acari: Cunaxidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 16(1): 70–73.
Callan SK, Majer JD, Edwards K, Moro D (2011) Documenting the terrestrial invertebrate fauna of Barrow Island, Western Australia. Australian Journal of Entomology 50: 323–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.2011.00818.x
Castro TMMG (2008) Estudos taxonômicos e biológicos de Cunaxidae (Acari: Prostigmata) do Brasil. Thesis, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil, 99 pp.
Castro TMMG, Den Heyer J (2008) A new genus, with a new species, from Brazil (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae). Zootaxa 1771: 54–62.
Castro TMMG, Den Heyer J (2009) A revision of the genus Pulaeus Den Heyer, with descriptions of a new genus and four new Brazilian species (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae). Zootaxa 2141: 20–36.
Castro TMMG, Moraes GJ (2007) Mite diversity on plants on different families found in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Neotropical Entomology 36(5): 774–782. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2007000500020
Castro TMMG, Moraes GJ (2010) Life cycle and behaviour of the predaceous mite Cunaxatricha tarsospinosa (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 50: 133–139. doi: 10.1007/s10493-009-9303-x
Chaudhri WM (1977) Descriptions of the mites of the Family Cunaxidae (Acarina) from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 14(2–3): 41–52.
Chaudhri WM (1980) Studies on the biosystematics and control of mites of field crops, vegetables and fruit plants in Pakistan, second annual report. University of Agriculture Faisalabad, 80.
Chaudhri WM, Akbar S, Rasool A (1979) Studies on the predatory leaf inhabiting mites of Pakistan. University of Agriculture Faisalabad Technical Bulletin 2, 234 pp.
Chinniah C, Mohanasundaram M (2001) New species of acarine fauna (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Shevroy Range of Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India. Zoo’s Print Journal 16(7): 523–531. doi: 10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.16.7.523-31
Coineau Y (1974) Éléments pour une monographie morphologique, écologique et biologique des Caeculidae (Acarines). Memoirs du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Nouvelle Serie, Serie A, Zoologie 81, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, 299 pp.
Cooreman J (1954) Notes sur quelques Acariens de la faune cavernicole. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique Entomologie 35(34): 1–40.
Corpuz-Raros LA (1995) Philippine predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae (Acari). 2. Genera Armascirus Den Heyer and Dactyloscirus Berlese. The Philippine Agriculturist 78(2): 159–173.
Corpuz-Raros LA (1996a) Philippine predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae (acari). 5. Genera Neoscirula Den Heyer, Parabonzia Smiley, and Orangescirula Bu & Li. The Philippine Agriculturist 79(1&2): 15–37.
Corpuz-Raros LA (1996b) Philippine predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae (Acari). Genus Pulaeus Den Heyer with records of two species from Central Kalimantan, Borneo and Java, Indonesia. Philippine Entomologist 10(2): 119–138.
Corpuz-Raros LA (1996c) Philippine predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae (Acari). 6. Genus Neocunaxoides Smiley with a new species record from Central Kalimantan, Borneo, Indonesia. Asia Life Sciences 5(2): 125–140.
Corpuz-Raros LA (1996d) Philippine predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae (Acari). Genus Coleoscirus Berlese. Asia Life Sciences 5(1): 1–25.
Corpuz-Raros LA (1996e) Philippine predatroy mites of the family Cunaxidae (Acari). 5. Genera Neoscirula Den Heyer, Parabonzia Smiley and Orangescirula Bu and Li. Philippine Agriculturist 79: 15–37.
Corpuz-Raros LA (2007) Additional species of Bonziinae and Cunaxoidinae and description of the male of Coleoscirus horidula (Tseng) (Coleoscirinae) from the Philippines (Cunaxidae, Acari). Asia Life Science 16(2): 153–173.
Corpuz-Raros LA (2008) Additional species of Cunaxidae and first report of the subfamily Neobonzinae (Cunaxidae, Acari) from the Philippines. Asia Life Sciences 17(1): 71–89.
Corpuz-Raros LA, Garcia RC (1995) Philippine predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae (Acari). 1. Genus Cunaxa Von Heyden. Philippine Entomologist 9(6): 605–624.
Corpuz-Raros LA, Garcia RC (1996) Philippine predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae (Acari). Genera Pseudobonzia Smiley and Scutascirus Den Heyer. Philippine Entomologist 10(1): 15–28.
Corpuz-Raros LA, Gruezo WS (2007) Two new species of predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae (Acari) from Java, Indonesia. Asia Life Sciences 16(2): 175–181.
Corpuz-Raros LA, Sabio GC, Velasco-Soriano M (1988) Mites associated with stored products, poultry houses and house dust in the Philippines. Philippine Entomologist 7(3): 311–321.
Dabert M, Witalinski W, Kazmierski A, Olszanowski Z, Dabert J (2010) Molecular phylogeny of acariform mites (Acari, Arachnida): strong conflict between phylogenetic signal and long-branch attraction artifacts. Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution 56: 222–241. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.12.020
da Silva RV, Narita JPZ, Vichitbandha P, Chandrapatya A, Konvipasruang P, Kongchuensin M, de Moraes GJ (2014) Prospection for predatory mites to control coconut pest mites in Thailand, with taxonomic descriptions of collected Mesostigmata (Acari). Journal of Natural History 48(11–12): 699–719. doi: 10.1080/00222933.2013.839842
Den Heyer J (1975) A new genus Cunabdella (Prostigmata: Acari) with a description of a new species from the Ethiopian Region. Acarologia 16(4): 664–670.
Den Heyer J (1976) Scutascirus, a new cunaxid genus (Prostigmata: Acari) from South Africa. Wetenskaplike bydraes van die PU vir CHO, Reeks B: Natuurwetenskappe 92: 1–10.
Den Heyer J (1977a) A new genus Neoscirula (Cunaxidae: Prostigmata: Acari) from the Ethiopian Region. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 40(1): 73–86.
Den Heyer J (1977b) Bonzinae, a new subfamily of the Cunaxidae (Prostigmata: Acari). Acarologia 19(4): 601–618.
Den Heyer J (1977c) Six new species of Pseudobonzia Smiley, 1975 (Prostigmata: Acari) from the Ethiopian Region. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 40(2): 171–194.
Den Heyer J (1978a) Four new species of Armascirus gen. nov. (Prostigmata: Acari) from the Ethiopian Region. Journal of the Entomological Society of South Africa 41(2): 217–239.
Den Heyer J (1978b) Coleoscirinae, a new cunaxid subfamily and two new South African species of Coleoscirus Berlese, 1916 (Prostigmata: Acari). Acarologia 20(4): 522–541.
Den Heyer J (1978c) A new cunaxid subfamily and the neotype designation of Cunaxoides croceus (Koch, 1838) (Prostigmata:Acari). Acarologia 20(3): 338–193.
Den Heyer J (1979a) Notes on the cunaxid genus Dactyloscirus (Actinedida: Acarida) with descriptions of two new pecies from the Ethiopian Region. Phytophylactica 11: 87–98.
Den Heyer J (1979b) Pulaeus, a new cunaxid genus (Prostigmata: Acari). Acarologia 21(1): 18–31.
Den Heyer J (1979c) Scutopalus, a new cunaxid genus from the Ethiopian Region (Prostigmata: Acari). Acarologia 21: 187–193.
Den Heyer J (1979d) Rubroscirus, a new cunaxid genus (Prostigmata: Acari) with three new species from the Ethiopian Region. Acarologia 20(1): 70–92.
Den Heyer J (1979e) Descriptions of seven African species of Cunaxa Von Heyden, 1826 (Actinedida: Acari) with remarks on the genus. Phytophylactica 11(1): 24–42.
Den Heyer J (1979f) Five new African species of Cunaxa (Actinedida: Acarida). Phytophylactica 11: 159–171.
Den Heyer J (1980a) Three new Afrotropical species of Neocunaxoides Smiley (Actinedida: Acarida). Phytophylactica 12: 129–146.
Den Heyer J (1980b) Six new species of the subfamily Coleoscirinae (Cunaxidae: Actinedida: Acarida). Phytophylactica 12: 105–128.
Den Heyer J (1980c) A new classification system for the family Cunaxidae (Actinedida: Acarida). Publications of the University of the North Series A 23: 1–12.
Den Heyer J (1981a) Systematics of the family Cunaxidae Thor, 1902 (Actinedida: Acarida). Publications of the University of the North, Series A 24: 1–19.
Den Heyer J (1981b) New Afrotropical speices of Cunaxoides (Actinedida: Acarida). Phytophylactica, 13: 63–85.
Den Heyer J (1981c) Three new Afrotropical species of the genus Pulaeus (Cunaxidae: Acarida). Phytophylactica 13: 87–99.
Den Heyer J (2006) Riscus, a new cunaxid genus from Thailand (Acari: Actinedida: Cunaxidae). Acarologia 46(3–4): 195–201.
Den Heyer J (2009) Order Prostigmata, family Cunaxidae. In: Van Harten A (Ed) Arthropod fauna of the UAE, Vol. 2, 17–25.
Den Heyer J (2011a) Some statistics on the taxonomy of the family Cunaxidae (Acari: Prostigmata). Zoosymposia 6: 34–38. doi: 10.1080/00222933.2011.559602
Den Heyer J (2011b) BdelloideaBase: Bdellid & Cunaxid Databases (version Sep 2011). In: Roskov Y, Kunze T, Paglinawan L, Orrell T, Nicolson D, Culham A, Bailly N, Kirk P, Bourgoin T, Baillargeon G, Hernandez F, De Wever A (Eds) Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 2013 Annual Checklist. DVD; Species 2000: Reading, UK. doi: 10.1080/01647954.2010.495953
Den Heyer J (2011c) The genus Coleobonzia declared synonymous with Neobonzia Smile, 1992 (Bdelloidea: Cunaxidae: Coleoscirinae). Zootaxa 2817: 59–62.
Den Heyer J (2013) BdelloideaBase: Bdellid & Cunaxid Databases (version Feb 2013). In: Roskov Y, Kunze T, Paglinawan L, Orrell T, Nicolson D, Culham A, Bailly N, Kirk P, Bourgoin T, Baillargeon G, Hernandez F, De Wever A (Eds) Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life, 2013 Annual Checklist. DVD; Species 2000: Reading, UK. doi: 10.1080/00222933.2012.763060
Den Heyer J, Castro TMMG (2008a) A new Neotropical genus of the family Cunaxidae (Acari: Prostigmata: Bdelloidea). Zootaxa 1843: 35–46.
Den Heyer J, Castro TMMG (2008b) A new cunaxid genus with descriptions of two new species from Brazil (Acari: Prostigmata: Bdelloidea: Cunaxidae). Zootaxa 1731: 42–50.
Den Heyer J, Castro TMMG (2008c) Subfamilial affiliation of Neoscirula (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) and descriptions of three new species of this genus from Brazil. Zootaxa 1731: 51–62.
Den Heyer J, Castro TMMG (2009) Four new cunaxoidine genera (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) and the description of two new Neotropical species. Zootaxa 2140: 1–15.
Den Heyer J, Castro TMMG (2012) New Neotropical cunaxinae species (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae). Zootaxa 3265: 22–42.
Den Heyer J, Ryke PAJ (1970) The mite complex and associated insects on citrus trees at Zebediela Estates. Wetenskaplike bydraes van die P.U. vir C.H.O. Reeks B: Natuurwetenskappe 32: 1–23.
Den Heyer J, Sergeyenko AL (2009) Neotype designation for Cunaxa setirostris (Hermann, 1804) (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae). Zootaxa 2106: 61–68.
Den Heyer J, Ueckermann EA, Khanjani M (2011a) Iranian Cunaxidae (Acari: Prostigmata: Bdelloidea): Part 2. Subfamily Cunaxinae. Journal of Natural History, 45(27–28): 1667–1678.
Den Heyer J, Ueckermann EA, Khanjani M (2011b) Iranian Cunaxidae (Acari: Prostigmata: Bdelloidea). Part I. Subfamily Coleoscirinae. International Journal of Acarology 27(2): 143–160.
Den Heyer J, Ueckermann EA, Khanjani M (2013) Iranian Cunaxidae (Acari: Prostigmata: Bdelloidea). Part III. Subfamily Cunaxoidinae. Journal of Natural History 47(31–32): 2049–2070.
Dugés A (1834a) Recherches sur l’ ordre des Acariens en Generale et la Famille des Trombidies en Particulier. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Zoologie et Biologie 2: 42.
Dugés A (1834b) Recherches Sur L’Ordre des Acariens III. Ann. Sci. nat. Sér. 2. 2(2): 2001.1–26.
Dunlop JA, Krüger J, Alberti G (2012) The sejugal furrow in camel spiders and acariform mites. Arachnologische Mitteilungen 43: 8–15. doi: 10.5431/aramit4303
El-Bishlawy SM, Rakha MA (1983) A new cunaxid mite Pulaeus zahrii sp. n. from rat burrows in Egypt (Actinedida: Cunaxidae). Acarologia 24: 373–375.
Estebanes-Gonzales ML (1997) Acarofauna en nidos de aves silvestres en Mexico. Acta Zoológica Mexicana 71: 1–15.
Evans GO (1992) Principles of Acarology. CAB International, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 563 pp.
Ewing HE (1909) New species of Acarina. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 35(51): 401–417.
Ewing HE (1913) New Acarina. Part I. General considerations and descriptions of new species from Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 32(5): 93–121.
Ewing HE (1917) New Acarina. Part II. Descriptions of new species and varieties from Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 37(2): 149–172.
Ewing HE, Webster RL (1912) Mites associated with oyster-shell scale (Lepidosaphes ulmi Linne). Psyche 19: 121–134. doi: 10.1155/1912/73282
Fadamiro HY, Xiao Y, Nesbitt M, Childers CC (2009) Diversity and seasonal abundance of predacious mites in Alabama Satsuma citrus. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 102(4): 617–628. doi: 10.1603/008.102.0406
Fan QH (1992) Two new species of the genus Rubroscirus (Acari: Cunaxidae). In: Fujian Association for Science and Technology (Eds) First Academic Annual Meeting of Youth Proceedings. Fujian Sciences and Technology Press, Fuzhou, 723–726.
Fawzy MMH (2007) Two new species of cunaxid mites on cotton and castor plants from Egypt (Actinedida: Cunaxidae). Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 85(6): 2065–?
Ferla NJ (2001) Ecologia e controle de acaros (Acari) da seringueira (Hevea brasiliensis Mull. Arg.) no Estado de Mato Groso. Thesis, ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, Brazil, 141 pp.
Ferla NJ, Marchetti MM, Gonçalves D (2007) Ácaros predadores (Acari) associados à cultura do morango (Fragaria sp Rosaceae) e plantas próximas no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Biota Neotropica 7(2): 1–8. doi: 10.1590/S1676-06032007000200012
Ferla NJ, Moraes GJ (1998) Predaceous mites in apple orchards in Rio Grande do Sol. Anais da Sociedade Entomologica do Brasil 27(4): 649–654. doi: 10.1590/S0301-80591998000400019
Ferla NJ, Moraes GJ (2002) Ácaros predadores (Acari) em plantas nativas e cultivadas do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 19(4): 1011–1031. doi: 10.1590/S0101-81752002000400006
Ferla NJ, Rocha MDS (2012) A new species of Rubroscirus from Brazil (Acari: Bdelloidea: Cunaxidae). Systematic & Applied Acarology 17(4): 435–440. doi: 10.11158/saa.17.4.12
Fisher JR, Dowling APG (2010) Modern methods and technology for doing classical taxonomy. Acarologia 50(3): 395–409. doi: 10.1051/acarologia/20101981
Fisher JR, Skvarla MJ, Bauchan GR, Ochoa R, Dowling APG (2011) Trachymolgus purpureus sp. n., an armored snout mite (Acari, Bdellidae) from the Ozark Highlands: morphology, development, and key to Trachymolgus Berlese. ZooKeys 125: 1–34. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.125.1875
Garman P (1948) Mite species from apple trees in Connecticut. Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Bulletin 520, 27 pp.
Gerson U (1971) The mites associated with armored scale insects. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Acarology, 653–654.
Gervais MP (1841) Note sur quelques species de l’ ordre des Acariens. Annales des Sciences Naturelles - Zoologie et Biologie Animale 15: 6.
Grandjean F (1939) Les segments post-larvaire de l’hysterosoma chez les Oribates (Acariens). Bulletin de la Societe Zoologique de France 64: 273–284.
Grandjean F (1947) Les Enarthronota (Acariens). Premiere Serie. Annales des Sciences Naturelles-Zoologie et Biologie Animale, Série II, 8: 213–248.
Grandjean F (1970) Stases. Actinopiline. Rappel de ma classification des Acariens en 3 groupes majeurs. Terminologies en soma. Acarologia 11: 796–827.
Grout TG, Ueckermann EA (1999) Predatory mites (Acari) found under citrus trees in the Southern African Lowveld. International Journal of Acarology 25(3): 235–238. doi: 10.1080/01647959908684158
Gupta SK (1991) Studies on the predatory prostigmatid mites of Northeast with descriptions of new species and new records from India. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 88(1–4): 207–239.
Gupta SK (1992) Arachnida: Plant mites (Acari). In: Saha SK (Ed) State Fauna Series 3, Fauna of West Bengal, Part 3. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, India, 61–211.
Gupta SK, Chattopadhyay S (1978) Studies on Acari associated with bird nests in Bengal, India. International Journal of Acarology 2: 77–86.
Gupta SK (1981) Some soil prostigmatid mites (Acarina) from Bihar. Progress in Soil Biology and Ecology in India. USA Technical Series No. 37, 93–99.
Gupta SK, Ghosh SK (1980) Some prostigmatid mites (Acarina) from Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 77: 189–213.
Gupta SK, Paul K (1985) Some mites associated with birds nests in West Bengal, with descriptions of eleven new species. Bulletin of the Zoological Survey of India 7(1): 1–23.
Halbert JN (1923) Notes on Acari, with descriptions of new species. Journal of the Linnean Society 35: 363–392.
Hermann JF (1804) III. Ciron (Scirus). Mem. Apterologique 60–62; pl. 3; fig. 12; pl. 6; fig. 12.
Hernandes FA, Feres RJF (2006) Review about mites (Acari) on rubber trees (Hevea spp., Euphorbiaceae) in Brazil. Biota Neotropica 6(1). http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v6n1/pt/abstract?article+bn00406012006
Heryford N (1965) A new species of Cunaxa (Acari: Cunaxidea). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 8: 310–314.
Hu SJ (1997) Cunaxid mites recorded in China. Journal of Ninbo Teachers College 15(1): 56–59.
Huges AM (1976) The mites of stored food and houses. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food, Technical Bulletin 9.
Inayatullah, Shahid M (1989) Two new predatory mites of genus Neocunaxoides Smiley (Acarina: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 21(3): 221–228.
Inayatullah, Shahid M (1993) Three new predatory mites of the genus Pseudocunaxa Smiley (Acarina: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 25(4): 315–320.
Inayatullah, Shahid M (1996) Three new predatory mites of the genus Dactyloscirus Berlese (Acarina: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 12(5): 547–557.
Javan S, Hosseini SE, Ostovan H, Farzaneh M, Shabani S (2012) Effects of soil solarization on population of Prostigmatic mites (Acari: Trombidiformes). Journal of Entomological Research 4(2): 117–129.
Jesionowska K (2010) A morphological study of the genus Penthalodes (Acari, Prostigmata, Eupodoidea, Penthalodidae) with description of a new species. Zootaxa 2672: 29–49.
Jubb GL Jr, Masteller EC, Lehman RD (1985) Survey of Arthropods in vineyards of Erie County, Pennsylvania: Acari. International Journal of Acarology 11(3): 201–207. doi: 10.1080/01647958508683415
Kalúz S (2009) Two new Palearctic mite species of the family Cunaxidae (Acari: Prostigmata). Zootaxa 2198: 27–40.
Kalúz S, Vrabec M (2013) Two new species of Armascirus (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) from Slovakia. Zootaxa 3734(2): 141–155. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3734.2.3
Każmierski A (2008) Tydeidae Kramer, 1877 sensu Andre et Fain 2000 (Acari: Prostigmata). In: Bogdanowicz W, Chudzicka E, Pilipiuk I, Skibinska E (Eds) Fauna of Poland. Zoological Museum and Institute of the Polish Academy of Science (PAN), Warsaw, Poland, 3: 193–196 + 222.
Kethley JB (1990) Acarina: Prostigmata (Actinedida). In: Dindal DL (Ed) Soil Biology Guide. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 667–756.
Khaustov AA, Kuznetzov NN (1998) Four new species of the genus Cunaxa (Acariformes, Cunaxidae). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 77(11): 1332–1341.
Klann AE, Bird T, Peretti AV, Gromov AV, Alberti G (2009) Ultrastructure of spermatozoa of solifuges (Arachnida, Solifugae): Possible characters for their phylogeny? Tissue and Cell 41: 91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2008.07.003
Koch CL (1836) Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und Arachniden (D.C.M.A.), 1.22.
Koch CL (1838) Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und Arachniden (D.C.M.A.), 20.21, 20.22, 20.23 and 20.24.
Koch CL (1841) Deutschlands Crustaceen, Myriapoden und Arachniden (D.C.M.A.), 37.23.
Kramer P (1881) Scirus. Arch. Natura. 81:17, t. 3; fig. 9.
Krantz GW, Walter DE (2009) A Manual of Acarology. Third Edition. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, Texas, 807 pp.
Kuznetzov NN, Livshitz IZ (1979) Predatory mites of the Nikita Botanical Gardens (Acariformes: Bdellidae, Cunaxidae Camarobiidae). Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Nikitskogo Botanicheskogo Sada 79: 51–105.
Kuznetzov NN, Sizova IY (1978) The predaceous mite fauna of cotton fields in Uzbekistan. Uzbekskii Biologicheskii Zhurnal 4: 59–64.
Lahiri S, Podder S, Saha GK, Gupta SK (2004) Diversity of phytophagous and predatory mites occurring on medical plants in Kolkata metropolis. Proceedings of the Zoological Society (Calcutta) 57(1): 47–52.
Latreille PA (1795) Observation sur la variete des organs de la boche des Tiques, et distribution methodique des Insectes de cette famille d’apres les characters establish sur la conformation de ces organs. Magasin encyclopedique, ou journal des Sciences, des letters et des Arts redige par Millin. Noel et Warens, Paris, vol. 4: 18.
Lehman RD (1982) Mites (Acari) of Pennsylvania conifers. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 108: 181–286.
Li LS, Xuan JY, Fan QH (1992) Taxonomic investigation of food mites in Sichuan Province. Journal of Southeast Agricultural University 14(1): 23–34.
Liang GW (1983) Notes on four species of mite (Acarina: Cunaxidae) in China. Natural Enemies of Insects 5(3): 104–107.
Liang GW (1984) A new species and a new record of the genus Pseudobonzia from China (Acarina: Cunaxidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 9(1): 49–51.
Liang GW (1985) New species and new records of cunaxid mites from China. Entomotaxonomia 7: 79–81.
Liang GW (1986) A new species and a new record of the genus Dactyloscirus from Shanghai, China (Acarina: Cunaxidae). Entomotaxonomia 8(1–2): 159–161.
Lin J (1997) A new species of the genus Scirula from Fujian, China (Acari: Cunaxidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 2: 169–172.
Lin J (2001) New record and new combination of the genus Denheyernaxoides from Fujian, China (Acari: Cunaxidae). Wuyi Science Journal 17: 1–5.
Lin LZ, Zhang YZ (1998) Three new species of the Bonziinae from Fujian (Acari: Cunaxidae). Wuyi Science Journal 14: 24–30.
Lin LZ, Zhang YZ (2000) Bdelloidea, 9. In: Huang BK (Ed) Fauna of Insects in Fuijan Province of China. Fujian Sciences and Technology Press, Fuzhou, 109–121.
Lin LZ, Zhang YZ (2002) Two new species of the Bonziinae from China (Acari: Cunaxidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 7: 143–148.
Lin LZ, Zhang YZ (2010) Bdelloidea of China: a review of progress on systematics and biology, with a checklist of species. Zoosymposia, 4: 42–50. In: Zhang ZQ, Hong XY, Fan QH (Eds) Xin Jie-Liu Centenary: Progress in Chinese Acarology. Zoosymposia 4: 1–345.
Lin JZ, Zhang YZ, Ji J (2001) Three new species of Cunaxidae from Fujian, China. Systematic and Applied Acarology 6: 145–153.
Lin JZ, Zhang YZ, Ji J (2003) A new species of Neocunaxoides from Fujian, China (Acari: Cunaxidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology 8: 101–106.
Lindquist EE (1976) Transfer of the Tarsocheylidae to the Heterostigmata, and reassignment of the Tarsonemina and Heterostigmata to lower hierarchic status in the Prostigmata (Acari). Canadian Entomologist 108: 23–48. doi: 10.4039/Ent10823-1
Lindquist EE (1977) Homology of dorsal opisthosomal plates, setae, and cupules of heterostigmatic mites with those of other eleutherengone Prostigmata (Acari). Acarologia 19: 97–104.
Linnæus C (1758) Systema naturæ per regna tria naturæ, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Impensis Direct, Laurentii Salvii, Holmiæ, [1-4], 1–824.
Lord FT (1949) The influence of spray programs on the fauna of apple orchards in Nova Scotia. III. Mites and their predators. The Canadian Entomologist 81: 202–214. doi: 10.4039/Ent81202-8
Luxton M (1982) Some new species of mites from New Zealand peat soils. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 9: 325–332. doi: 10.1080/03014223.1982.10423864
Mąkol J (2010) A redescription of Balaustium murorum (Hermann, 1804) (Acari: Prostigmata: Erythraeidae) with notes on related taxa. Annales Zoologici 60: 439–454. doi: 10.3161/000345410X535424
Mallikarjunappa S, Nageshchandra BK (1990) Observations on predatory mites in association with pecan leaf scorch mite on guava. Current Research - University of Agricultural Sciences (Bangalore) 19(2): 31–33.
Mariau D, Biggins P (2001) The fauna of oil palm and coconut: insect and mite pests and their natural enemies. CIRAD, Montpellier, France, 264 pp.
Mejía-Recamier BE, Palacios-Vargas JG (2007) Three new species of Neoscirula (Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) from a Tropical dry forest in Jalisco, Mexico. Zootaxa 1545: 17–31.
Meyer MKP, Ryke PAJ (1959) Cunaxoidea (Acarina: Prostigmata) occurring on plants in South Africa. Annual Magazine of Natural History 13(2): 369–384.
Michocka S (1982) Two new species of the family Cunaxidae (Acari: Prostigmata) from Poland. Acarologia 23(4): 327–332.
Michocka S (1987) Mites (Acari) of the Bdellidae and Cunaxidae families in Poland. Monografie Fauny Polski 14: 1–127.
Miller AE (1925) An introductory study of the Acarina, or mites, of Ohio. Bulletin of the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, Number 386, 85–172.
Milne DL (1977) Biological control of citrus thrips, Scirthothrips aurantii: what are the prospects? The Citrus and Subtropical Fruit Journal 528: 14–16.
Mohamed O, Mohamed O, Nabil HA (2014) Survey and biological studies on mite species and scale insects inhabiting mango trees at Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. Journal of Entomology 11(4): 210–217. doi: 10.3923/je.2014.210.217
Molnár JG (1997) The Acarina fauna of vineyards on the highlands, north of the Balaton Lake. Növényvédelem 33(2): 63–68.
Muhammad T, Chaudhri WM (1990) Descriptions of four new species of genus Pulaeus Den Heyer from Pakistan (Acarina: Cunaxidae). Pakistan Entomologist 12(1–2): 18–25.
Muhammad T, Chaudhri WM (1991a) Six new cunaxid mites of the genus Pulaeus Den Heyer (Acarina: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist 13(1–2): 9–22.
Muhammad T, Chaudhri WM (1991b) Two new cunaxid mites of the genus Armascirus (Acarina: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist 13(1–2): 50–55.
Muhammad T, Chaudhri WM (1992a) Two new mite species of genus Coleoscirus Berlese (Acarinia: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 24(4): 309–311.
Muhammad T, Chaudhri WM (1992b) Genus Coleoscirus Berlese (Cunaxidae: Acarina) from Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist 14(1–2): 97–103.
Muhammad T, Chaudhri WM (1993) Descriptions of two new species of the genus Rubroscirus Den Heyer (Cunaxidae: Acarina) from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 30(1): 108–114.
Muhammad T, Chaudhri WM, Akbar S (1989) New species of genus Rubroscirus (Acarina: Cunaxidae) from Pakistan. Pakistan Entomologist 11(1–2): 1–4.
Muma MH (1960) Predatory mites of the family Cunaxidae associated with citrus in Florida. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 53(3): 321–326.
Muma MH (1965) Populations of common mites in Florida citrus groves. Florida Entomologist 48(1): 35–45. doi: 10.2307/3493522
Nesbitt HHJ (1946) Three new mites from Nova Scotian apple trees. Canadian Entomologist 78: 15–22. doi: 10.4039/Ent7815-1
Nucifora A, Vacante V (1986) Some considerations on the role of mites in te biological control of the citrus ecosystem. In: Cavalloro R, Di Martino E (Eds) Integrated pest control in citrus-groves: Proceedings of the experts’ meeting, Acireale (Italy), March 1985. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 369–372.
Olivier PG (1968) A taxonomical-ecological investigation of the soil mesofauna in the rhizosphere of citrus trees at Zebediela Estates. PhD thesis. Potchefstroom University C. H. O., 218 pp.
Oliveria AJ, Daemon E (2003) Qualitative and quantitative assessment of mites (Acari) in domiciliat dust in rural dwellings in the “Zona da Mata” region, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista Brasilera de Zoologia 20(4): 675–679. doi: 10.1590/S0101-81752003000400020
Oudemans AC (1902) Classificatie der Acari. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 45: 58–60.
Oudemans AC (1906) Notes on Acari. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 237–270.
Oudemans AC (1922) Acarologische Aanteekeningen LXVIII (Acari van Sumatra). Entomologische Berichten 1 (Amsterdam) 6: 108–111.
Oudemans AC (1927) Acari van het Eiland Heridia. Acarologische Aantekeningen LXXXVIII. Entomologische Berichten (Amsterdam) 7(157): 257–268.
Penttinen R, Viiri H, Moser JC (2013) The mites (Acari) associated with bark beetles in the Koli National Park in Finland. Acarologia 53(1): 3–15. doi: 10.1051/acarologia/20132074
Pepato AR, Rocha CEF, Dunlop JA (2010) Phylogenetic position of the actinotrichid mites: sensitivity to homology assessment under total evidence. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 235. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-235
Quilici S, Kreiter S, Ueckermann EA, Vincnot D (1997) Predatory mites (Acari) from various crops on Réunion Island. International Journal of Acarology 23(4): 283–291. doi: 10.1080/01647959708683578
Radford CD (1950) Systematic checklist of mite genera and type species. Union internationale des sciences biologiques. Série C. (Section d'entomoligie) 1: 1–232.
Ramsey AH, Zaher MA, Albagoury ME (1972a) Mites associated with citrus in the Nile Delta (U.A.R.). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 70: 183–186.
Ramsey AH, Zaher MA, Abou-Awad BA (1972b) Mites associated with deciduous fruit trees in U.A.R.. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 70: 179–183.
Rocha MDS, Skvarla MJ, Ferla NJ (2013) A new species of Scutopalus (Acari: Cunaxidae: Cunaxoidinae) from Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil with a key to world species. Zootaxa 3734(1): 38–44. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3734.1.4
Sathiamma B (1995) Biological suppression of the white spider mite Oligonychus iseilemae (Hirst) on coconut foliage. Entomon 20(3-4): 237–243.
Schruft G (1971) Haleupalus oliveri nov.spec., eine Dornpalpenmilbe an Reben (Vitis spec.) (Acari; Cunaxidae). Deutsche entomologische Zeitschrift 18: 377–382.
Sellnick M (1926) Eine parasitische milbe aus dem Balaton-See. Archivum Balatonicum II: 173–177.
Sepasgosarian H (1984) The world genera and species of the family Cunaxidae (Actinedida: Acarida). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Zoologie 71: 135–153.
Sergeyenko AL (2003) A new species of mites of the genus Cunaxa (Acarina: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) from Crimea (Ukraine). Acarina 11(2): 225–229.
Sergeyenko AL (2005) A new species of the mite genus Pseudobonzia Smiley, 1975 (Acarina: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) from Ukraine. Acarina 13(2): 159–163.
Sergeyenko AL (2006) New species and new record of mites of the genus Rubroscirus Den Heyer, 1979 (Acarina: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) from Ukraine. Acarina 14(1): 103–107.
Sergeyenko AL (2009) New mites species of the genus Cunaxa (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) from the Crimea, Ukraine. Zootaxa 2161: 1–19.
Sergeyenko AL (2011a) First record and redescription of a little known mite species Denheyernaxoides brevirostris (Canestrini, 1886) (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) from Ukraine. Systematic and Applied Acarology 16(1): 40–50. doi: 10.11158/saa.16.1.6
Sergeyenko AL (2011b) Mites of the genera Pulaeus and Lupaeus (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) of Crimea, Ukraine. Zootaxa 2088: 54–68.Shakhsi Zare F, Arbabi M, Kmali H, Ghasemzadeh M (2012) Study on faunestic, distribution and host range of Tetranychoidea (Arachnida: Acari) on fruit trees in Mashhad region, Iran. Journal of Entomological Research 4(3): 239–248
Shiba M (1978) Taxonomic investigation on free-living Prostigmata from the Malay Peninsula. Nature and Life in South East Asia 7: 83–229.
Shiba M (1986) The mites of family Cunaxidae (Acarina: Prostigmata) in Japan II. Genera Armascirus Den Heyer and Dactyloscirus Berlese. Matsuyama Shinonome Tanki Daigaku kenkyū ronsō 17: 151–163.
Sionti PG, Papadoulis GT (2003) Cunaxid mites of Greece (Acari: Cunaxidae). International Journal of Acarology 29(4): 315–325. doi: 10.1080/01647950308684347
Skvarla MJ, Dowling APG (2012) Some New Armascirine Cunaxids (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) from the Eastern United States. Zootaxa 3194: 1–34.
Skvarla MJ, Fisher JR, Dowling APG (2011) A new species of Neoscirula (Acari: Cunaxidae: Coleoscirinae) from the Ozark Highlands (USA), with notes on biogeography. Acarologia 51(3): 283–293. doi: 10.1051/acarologia/20112013
Skvarla MJ, Fisher JR, Dowling APG (2013) On some mites (Acari: Prostigmata) from the Interior Highlands: descriptions of the male, immature stages, and female reproductive system of Pseudocheylus americanus (Ewing, 1909) and some new state records for Arkansas. Zootaxa 3641(4): 401–419. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3641.4.7
Smiley R (1975) A generic revision of the mites of the family Cunaxidae (Acarina). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 68(2): 227–244.
Smiley RL (1992) The predatory mite family Cunaxidae (Acari) of the world with a new classification. Indira Publishing House, West Bloomington, Michigan, 356 pp.
Soliman ZR, Mahfood SA (1978) Phytophagous and predaceous mites of People’s Republic of Southern Yemen. Bulletin of the Zoological Society of Egypt 27: 78–84.
Swift SF (1996) Two new species of Dacyloscirus (Acari: Prostigmata: Cunaxidae) in the Hawaiian Islands. Anales del Instituto de Biologia Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Series Zoologia 67(2): 225–237.
Swift SF, Goff ML (2001) Mite (Acari) communities associated with ‘Ōhi’a, Metrosideros polymorpha (Myrtaceae), at Hono O Nā Pali and Kui’a Natural Area Reserves on Kaua’I Island, Hawaiin Islands. Pacific Science 55(1): 23–40. doi: 10.1353/psc.2001.0008
Tagore A, Putatunda BN (2003) Mites associated with some ornamental plants at Hisar, Haryana. Pest Management and Economic Zoology 11(1): 37–44.
Taha HA, El-Naggar MEE, Abou-El-Ngaga MM, Soliman SM (1988) Effect of different prey species on the development and fecundity of the predaceous mite, Neocunaxoides andrei Baker and Hoff. (Acari: Cunaxidae). Agricultural Research Review 66(1): 129–135.
Thor S (1902) Zur Systematik der Acarinenfamilien Bdellidae Koch, 1842, Grube 1859, Eupodidae Koch, 1842 und Cunaxidae Sig Thor, 1902. Verhandllungen der kaiserlich-kongiglichen zoologish-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien, 159–165.
Thor S, Willmann C (1941) Eupodidae, Penthalodidae, Penthaleidae, Rhagidiidae, Pachygnathidae, Cunaxidae. In: Thor S, Willmann C (Eds) Das Tierreich, Eine Zusammenstellung und Kennzeichung der rezenten Tierformen. Lieferung 71a. Walter De Gruyter and Co, Leipzig, 164–175.
Trägårdh I (1905) Acariden aus Ägypten und dem Sudan. Results of the Swedish Zoological Expedition to Egypt and the White Nile, 1901, Part II: 5–8.
Trägårdh I (1910) Acariden aus dem Sarekgebirge. Naturwissenschaftliche untersuchungen des Sarekgebirges in Schwedisch-Lappland 4: 1–207.
Trouessart E (1892) Considerations generales sur la classification des Acariens, suivies s’un essai de classification nouvelle. Revue des Sciences Naturelles de l'Ouest 2: 330–331.
Tseng YH (1980) Taxonomical study of the mite family Cunaxidae from Taiwan (Acarina: Tromoidiformes). Quarterly Journal of the Taiwan Museum 33(3-4): 253–277.
Turk FA (1972) Biological notes on Acari recently recorded from British caves and mites with descriptions of three new species. Transactions of the Cave Research Group of Great Britain 14(4): 187–194.
Vacante V, Nucifora A (1986) A first list of mites in citrus orchards in Italy. In: Cavalloro R, Di Martino E (Eds) Integrated pest control in citrus-groves: Proceedings of the experts’ meeting, Acireale (Italy), March 1985. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 177–188.
van der Hammen (1963) The addition of segments during the postembryonic ontogenesis of the Actinotrichida (Acarida) and its importance for the recognition of the primary subdivision of the body and the original segmentation. Acarologia 5: 443–454.
van der Hammen (1970) Tarsonemoides limbatus nov. spec., and the systematic position of the Tarsonemida (Acarida). Zoologische Verhandelingen, Leiden 108: 1–35.
van der Hammen L (1972) A revised classification of the mites (Arachnidea, Acarida) with diagnoses, a key, and notes on phylogeny. Zoologische Mededelingen 47: 273–292.
Vitzthum HG (1931) Familie 13: Cunaxidae. In: Kukenthal W, Krumbach T (Eds) Handbuch der Zoologie, band 3. Walter De Gruyter and Co, Leipzig, 140–146.
Von Heyden C (1826) Versuch einer systematischen Eintheilung der Acariden. “Isis” von Oken 18(6): 19.
Walter DE (1999) Cryptic inhabitants of a noxious weed: Mites (Arachnida: Acari) on Lantana camara L. invading forests in Queensland. Australian Journal of Entomology 38: 197–200. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6055.1999.00101.x
Walter DE, Kaplan DT (1991) Observations on Coleoscirus simplex (Acarina: Prostigmata), a predatory mite that colonizes greenhouse cultures of rootknot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.), and a review of feeding behavior in the Cunaxidae. Experimental and Applied Acarology 12: 47–59. doi: 10.1007/BF01204399
Walter DE (1999) Cryptic inhabitants of a noxious weed: Mites (Arachnida: Acari) on Lantana camara L. invading forests in Queensland. Australian Journal of Entomology 38: 197–200. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6055.1999.00101.x
Walter DE, Proctor HC (1999) Mites: ecology, evolution, and behaviour. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 322 pp.
Weigmann G (2001) The body segmentation of oribatid mites from a phylogenetic perspective. In: Halliday RB, Walter DE, Proctor HC, Norton RA, Colloff MJ (Eds) Acarology: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, 43–49.
Willmann C (1939) Die Moorfauna des Glatzer Schneeberges. 3. Die milben des Schneeberg-moore. Beiträge zur Biologie des Glatzer. Schneeberges, Breslau, 5: 427–458.
Willmann C (1950) Milben aus Mineral quellen. Zoologischer Anzeiger 145(7–8): 188–190.
Womersley H (1933) On some Acarina from Australia and South Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, Trans. 57: 108–112.
Zacharda M (1978) Terrestrial prostigmatic mites from the Amateurs’ Cave, The Moravian Kars, Czechoslovakia. Vĕstník Československé společnosti zoologické 42(3): 215–240.
Zaher MA, El-Bishlawy SM (1986) In: Zaher MA (1986) Survey and ecological studies on phytophagous, predaceous and nonphytophagous mites (Nile Valley and Delta. ) Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, 567 pp.
Zaher MA, Soliman ZR, El-Bishlawy SM (1975a) Feeding habits of the predaceous mite, Cunaxa capreolus [Acarina Cunaxidae]. Entomophaga 20(2): 209–212.
Zaher MA, Soliman ZR, El-Bishlawy SM (1975b) Studies on population dynamics of soil predaceous prostigmatid mites in Giza, Egypt. Zeitschrift für angewandte entomologie 79: 440–443.