Research Article |
Corresponding author: Boyan Zlatkov ( bzlatkov@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Erik J. van Nieukerken
© 2019 Boyan Zlatkov, Peter Huemer.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655
|
The taxonomy of some Palearctic species of the genus Clepsis Guenée, 1845 (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae), in particular C. neglectana sensu auctt. and C. consimilana sensu auctt., is revised based on combined characters of external and internal adult morphology, including everted vesicae in male genitalia, and DNA barcodes. Clepsis striolana (Ragonot, 1879), stat. rev., C. acclivana (Zerny, 1933), C. trivia (Meyrick, 1913), stat rev., and C. xylotoma (Meyrick, 1891), stat. rev. are resurrected from synonymy with C. neglectana (Herrich-Schäffer, 1851), C. semiana (Chrétien, 1915), stat. nov. is considered as a valid species; C. eatoniana (Ragonot, 1881), stat. rev., is resurrected from synonymy with C. consimilana (Hübner, 1817), and C. razowskii Gastón, Vives & Revilla, 2017, syn. nov. is synonymised with C. eatoniana.
DNA barcoding, Clepsis consimilana, C. neglectana, genitalia, vesica
Clepsis Guenée, 1845 is a large genus in the tribe Archipini with 163 valid species described worldwide (
We examined ca. 150 specimens from various European collections. Data for the specimens and their repository are given in the results for each taxon treated. The genitalia were dissected and mounted following the methods of
DNA barcode sequences of the mitochondrial COI gene, a 658 base-pair long segment of the 5’ terminus of the mitochondrial COI gene (cytochrome c oxidase 1), were obtained from 15 specimens, supplemented by 23 publicly available sequences in BOLD (Table
List of successfully sequenced specimens of the C. consimilana and C. neglectana species-groups.
Species | Country/Ocean | Sample ID | Process ID | BIN |
---|---|---|---|---|
C. consimilana | Austria | TLMF Lep 22912 | LEAST314-17 | BOLD:AAC4212 |
Austria | TLMF Lep 18827 | LEATJ967-15 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Austria | TLMF Lep 17661 | LEATI276-15 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Austria | TLMF Lep 09912 | PHLAW115-13 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Bulgaria | CCDB-11133-B10 | BTLBP212-11 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Bulgaria | CCDB-11133-B08 | BTLBP210-11 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Canada | PFC-2006-1202 | LPVIA896-08 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Canada | PFC-2006-1201 | LPVIA895-08 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Canada | PFC-2006-0914 | LPVIA672-08 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Canada | PFC-2006-0917 | LPVIA675-08 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Canada | PFC-2006-2539 | LPVIB987-08 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Canada | PFC-2006-1560 | LPVIB188-08 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Canada | PFC-2006-1559 | LPVIB187-08 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Canada | PFC-2006-1203 | LPVIA897-08 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Croatia | TLMF Lep 23752 | LEAST1249-17 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Denmark | MM19630 | LEEUA222-11 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Germany | BC ZSM Lep 27847 | FBLMU817-09 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Germany | BC ZSM Lep 25760 | FBLMU250-09 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Germany | BC ZSM Lep 25551 | FBLMU041-09 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Germany | BC ZSM Lep 23362 | FBLMT132-09 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Italy | TLMF Lep 15577 | LEATH365-14 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Italy | TLMF Lep 10273 | LEATB096-13 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
Italy | TLMF Lep 02195 | PHLAC160-10 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
United Kingdom | UKLB40C05 | CGUKD697-09 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
United Kingdom | UKLB34D07 | CGUKD152-09 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
United Kingdom | UKLB30C02 | CGUKC754-09 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
United Kingdom | UKLB22A10 | CGUKB985-09 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
United Kingdom | UKLB20D10 | CGUKB831-09 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
United States | RWWA-3675 | RWWC1018-12 | BOLD:AAC4212 | |
C. eatoniana | Spain | TLMF Lep 03187 | PHLSA012-11 | BOLD:AAJ1025 |
Spain | TLMF Lep 03186 | PHLSA011-11 | BOLD:AAJ1025 | |
C. neglectana | Finland | MM18257 | LEFIK682-10 | BOLD:AAM0282 |
Finland | MM15659 | LEFIG795-10 | BOLD:AAM0282 | |
C. striolana | Italy | TLMF Lep 18324 | LEATJ749-15 | BOLD:AAM0282 |
C. trivia | Greece | TLMF Lep 16958 | LECRT048-15 | BOLD:ACT3810 |
Greece | TLMF Lep 16957 | LECRT047-15 | BOLD:ACT3810 | |
Greece | TLMF Lep 16956 | LECRT046-15 | BOLD:ACT3810 | |
Greece | TLMF Lep 16953 | LECRT043-15 | BOLD:ACT3810 |
Degrees of intra- and interspecific variation in the DNA barcode fragments were calculated under the Kimura 2 parameter (K2P) model of nucleotide substitution using analytical tools in BOLD Systems v. 4.0 (http://www.boldsystems.org). A neighbour-joining tree of DNA barcode data of selected taxa was constructed using Mega 6 (
Institutional acronyms:
BMNH Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom
CJJ Private collection of Jari Junnilainen, Vantaa, Finland
CWK Private collection of Wojciech Kubasik, Poznań, Poland
MFN Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany
MNHN Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
MTD Senckenberg Museum für Tierkunde, Dresden, Germany
NHMW Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Austria
NMNHS National Museum of Natural History, Sofia, Bulgaria
SDEI Senckenberg Deutsche Entomologisches Institut, Müncheberg, Germany
TLMF Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck, Austria
ZMUO Zoological Museum, University of Oulu, Finland
ZSM Zoologische Staatsammlung München, Germany
The male genitalia of the studied species, especially the valva, are relatively complex. The female genitalia are simple, but there is some discrepancy in the terms used in literature. For the purpose of unification, we provide general schemes of male and female genitalia of the studied taxa.
Male (Fig.
Scheme of male genitalia of Clepsis neglectana and C. consimilana species groups 1 uncus 2 arm of gnathos 3 medial part of gnathos 4 labis 5 costal sclerite 6 membranous medial protuberance 7 tuft of scales and setae 8 brachiola 9 hemispherical protrusion 10 vinculum 11 juxta 12 basal part of sacculus 13 saccular process 14 distal part of sacculus 15 modified setae 16 tegumen 17 socius.
Female (Fig.
The species in this group externally are similar to taxa in the C. consimilana group but are distinguished by the absence of large modified setae on the median surface of the valvae (Fig.
neglectana Herrich-Schäffer, 1847 (uninominal): pl. 9, fig. 59
Tortrix (Lozotaenia) neglectana Herrich-Schäffer, 1851: 167 (Germany)
Tortrix (Heterognomon) betulifoliana Lederer, 1859: 248 (Poland)
Cacoecia delibatana Rotschild, 1912: 27 (Hungary)
Tortrix dorana Kennel, 1919: 60 (Kazakhstan: Ili)
Tortrix flavana Duponchel, 1834: 87, pl. 239, fig. 6 (France)
non Tortrix striolana Ragonot, 1879
non Tortrix xylotoma Meyrick, 1891
non Tortrix trivia Meyrick, 1913
non Cacoecia acclivana Zerny, 1933
Lectotype ♂ (here designated): pinned, genitalia on a slide, with 7 labels: “Typus!” [handwritten] “Origin.” [red printed] “ex coll. 1/1 / Staudinger” [printed] “Dresden / n. sp.” [handwritten] “Genital-Unters. / Nr. 0024” “H.-Sch.” [both printed] “Lectotype / Tortrix neglectana / Herrich-Schäffer, 1851 / des. Zlatkov & Huemer 2019” [red printed].
GERMANY • 1 ♂; Dresden; Staudinger leg.; GS (genitalia slide) 0024; MFN.
Other material: GERMANY •1 ♂; Disque leg.; GS M.044; ZSM • 1 ♂; Southern Germany; Disque leg.; GS 1/2.11.2018; ZSM • 1 ♂; Dresden; Schmidt leg.; GS 1/5.12.2018; MTD • 1 ♀; Dresden, Loschwitz; GS 3/4.12.2018; MTD • 1 ♀; Dresden [?];6 Jul. 1897; GS 4/4.12.2018; MTD • POLAND • 1 ♂; Szczecin, Dabie; 30 Jul.; unknown leg.; GS 1/5.11.2018; ZSM • FINLAND • 2 ♂♂; Valkeala; 28 Jul.–4 Aug. 1999; T. Mutanen leg.; GS 1/2.2.2018, 2/9.2.2018; ZMUO • 1 ♂; Valkeala; 22–27 Jul. 1999; GS 1/7.11.2018; ZMUO • 2 ♂♂; Valkeala; 20–24 Jul. 1998; P. Sundell & T. Mutanen leg.; GS 1/5.2.2018, 1/9.2.2018; ZMUO • 1 ♂; Haapasaari; 15 Jul. 1973; J. Jalava leg.; GS 1/3.2.2018; ZMUO • 2 ♀♀; Haapasaari; 6–7 Aug. 2004; J. Junnilainen leg.; GS 1/14.12.2018, 2/14.12.2018; CJJ.
Externally, C. neglectana is similar to the other species in the C. neglectana species group (apart from C. striolana) and C. consimilana, but the markings are darker and the costal fold is rudimentary. The male genitalia are very close to C. striolana, with the most obvious difference in the shape of labis; additionally, the setal tuft of the valva is less compact and smaller, the sacculus is straighter, and the vesica most often bears a single cornutus. Clepsis neglectana differs from C. acclivana and C. trivia by the shape of the uncus and numerous characters on the valvae and phallus. Apart from the forewing pattern, the female differs from C. striolana by the presence of a transparent protrusion of the colliculum on the right side, and from C. trivia by the length and shape of the colliculum. In contrast to C. trivia, both C. neglectana and C. striolana lack a plate-like signum.
Adult (Fig.
Adults of Clepsis neglectana species group A–C C. neglectana: A lectotype of Tortrix neglectana B male, Southern Germany C Female, Germany D–G C. striolana: D lectotype of T. striolana E paralectotype of T. striolana F male, Austria, South Tyrol G female, Austria, South Tyrol H–K C. trivia: H holotype of T. trivia I–J males, Crete K female, Crete L–M C. acclivana: L lectotype of Cacoecia acclivana M paralectotype of C. acclivana N T. severana holotype O Cacoecia unifasciana var. semiana holotype. Scale bar: 5 mm, all to scale.
Male genitalia of the Clepsis neglectana species group (some without phallus) A, B C. neglectana: A Tortrix neglectana lectotype B C. neglectana, Southern Germany C, D C. striolana: C T. striolana lectotype D C. striolana, Austria, North Tyrol E, F C. trivia: E T. trivia holotype F C. trivia, Crete. Scale bar: 500 μm, all to scale.
Labides of Clepsis spp. A, B C. neglectana: A Southern Germany B Finland C C. striolana, Austria, North Tyrol D C. trivia, Crete E C. acclivana, paralectotype of Cacoecia acclivana F, G C. consimilana: F Germany, neotype of Tortrix consimilana G Italy H C. eatoniana, Spain. Scale bar: 100 μm, all to scale.
Phalli with vesicae everted of the Clepsis neglectana species group A C. neglectana, Germany B C. striolana, Austria C C. trivia, Crete D C. acclivana, paralectotype of Cacoecia acclivana. The phallus of each species is shown in three aspects from top to bottom: sclerotised phallic tube (without vesica) in dorsal view (viewpoint marked with black arrow), vesica in dorsal view (viewpoint marked with white arrow) and whole phallus in left view. 1 cornutus, 2 diverticulum, 3 location of gonopore, 4 phallic process, 5 caulis. Scale bar: 250 μm.
Specialised male setae in Clepsis spp. A–E cornuti: A C. neglectana, Finland B C. striolana, Austria C C. trivia, Crete D C. consimilana, neotype of Tortrix consimilana E C. eatoniana, Spain F modified large seta from the medial surface of valva of C. consimilana, Germany. Scale bar: 100 μm, all to scale.
Female genitalia of the Clepsis neglectana species group A C. neglectana, Finland B C. striolana, Austria C C. trivia, Crete. The top row shows the whole genitalia, the bottom row shows the sterigma and colliculum enlarged. 1 papilla analis, 2 apophysis posterior, 3 sterigma, 4 colliculum, 5 apophysis anterior, 6 ductus seminalis, 7 ductus bursae, 8 cestum, 9 corpus bursae, 10 falcate signum, 11 plate shaped signum, 12 ostium, 13 sclerotised plicae, 14 protrusion. Scale bars: 1 mm (top row), 250 μm (bottom row).
Signa of bursa copulatrix in Clepsis spp. A C. neglectana B C. striolana C C. trivia D C. consimilana E C. eatoniana F A detail of plate shaped signum of C. consimilana consisting of sclerotised papillae. 1 falcate signum, 2 plate shaped signum, 3 cestum. Scale bars: 250 μm (A–E, all to scale), 25 μm (F).
Preimaginal stages are unknown.
(Fig.
(Fig.
Moths were collected in July and the beginning of August. The larval host plant is stated as Fragaria (
This is the oldest described taxon from the group. Many other taxa were subsequently synonymised, but at least three of them are species bona and three others are incertae sedis (see below).
Tortrix striolana Ragonot, 1879: 132 (Switzerland)
Lectotype ♂ by designation of
SWITZERLAND • 1 ♂; E. L. Ragonot leg.; GS 287; MNHN.
Paralectotype ♀ pinned, with three labels: “Striolatana [sic] / Rag. Helv.” [handwritten] “1901 / coll. E. L. Ragonot / Muséum Paris” [printed] ‘Allotype’ [handwritten red].
SWITZERLAND • 1 ♀; E. L. Ragonot leg.; MNHN.
Other material: AUSTRIA • 2 ♂♂; North Tyrol, Stanzach, Blockau; alt. 920 m; 5 Jul. 1989; P. Huemer leg.; GS TOR 6; TLMF • 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀; same collection data; 16 Jul. 1989; P. Huemer leg.; GS 1/11.10.2017, 2/11.10.2017; TLMF • 6 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; same collection data; 26 Jul. 1989; P. Huemer leg.; GS 3/11.10.2017; TLMF • ITALY • 3 ♂♂; Südtirol, Prad, Praderfeld; alt. 900 m; 9 Jul. 1991; P. Huemer leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; same collection data; 20. Jun. 1998; T. Mayr leg.; TLMF; • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; prov. Torino, Val Chisone, Fenestrelle; alt. 1150 m; Aug. 1928; G. Della-Beffa leg.; NHMW.
This is the only species of the C. neglectana group with a uniform wing pattern in both sexes. Unlike the males of C. neglectana, the costal fold is developed. The male genitalia are very similar to C. neglectana but the setal tuft of the valva is better developed, the uncus is slightly longer, the sacculus is more angled, the vesica bears two cornuti instead of one, and the shape of the labis is different. The female genitalia are also similar to C. neglectana, although some differences in the colliculum (the transparent cuticular protrusions) are present. The colliculum is much shorter and straighter in C. striolana than in C. trivia.
Adult (Fig.
Preimaginal stages are unknown.
(Fig.
(Fig.
Moths were collected from late June to August on sparse scree along alpine rivers. The larval host plant is unknown.
The genitalia of this species resemble those of C. neglectana, only a few details in certain structures are different. The genetic distance (though small) and wing pattern both support the existence of two separate taxa.
Tortrix trivia Meyrick, 1913: 297 (Tunisia)
Holotype ♂, pinned, with 6 labels: “Tunis / 27.5 / Coll. O. Leonhard” “T / 29” “Tortrix / trivia Meyr. / type” “Holotypus” [red label] “DEI Müncheberg / Lep-00335” [green label] “Gen.-Präp. / 3145 / präp. Karisch, 2014”.
TUNISIA • 1 ♂; 27 May; Leonhard leg.; GS 3145; SDEI Lep-00335.
Other material: GREECE • 1 ♀; Crete, Lassithi region, Agios Joannis; alt.250 m; 28 Apr. 2003; W. Ruckdeschel leg.; GS 1/12.10.2017; TLMF • 1 ♀; same collection data; 1 May 2003; GS 2/12.10.2017; TLMF • 2 ♂♂; Crete, Lassithi region, Koutsounari; alt. 100 m; 1 May 2003; W. Ruckdeschel leg.; GS 1/13.10.2017, 2/13.10.2017; TLMF • 1 ♀; Crete, Lassithi region, Achlia at Koutsouras; alt. 30 m; 5 Nov. 2004; W. Ruckdeschel leg.; GS 3/13.10.2017; TLMF • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; same collection data; 7 Nov. 2004; GS 4/13.10.2017, 5/13.10.2017, 6/13.10.2017; TLMF • 1 ♀; same collection data; 9 Apr. 2008; GS 1/14.10.2017; TLMF • 3 ♂♂; same collection data; 12 Apr. 2008; GS 1/15.10.2017, 2/15.10.2017, 3/15.10.2017; TLMF.
The species is most similar to C. acclivana. Externally the males differ in their wing markings, which are better defined in C. acclivana. The wings in C. trivia are also more elongated. The gnathos of C. trivia has angled arms, the sacculus is straighter, the brachiola is displaced dorsally, the phallic process has a different orientation but the vesica is very similar to C. acclivana. The wing pattern of C. trivia females is similar to those of both the C. consimilana and C. neglectana groups, but is C. trivia is paler. Clepsis trivia has the longest colliculum among the known females of the C. neglectana group.
Adult. Sexual dimorphism prominent. Male (Fig.
(Fig.
(Fig.
The moths fly in the middle of April to late May and in early November, which may indicate two generations per year.
Cacoecia acclivana Zerny, 1933:108, pl. 1, fig. 11 (Lebanon)
Lectotype ♂ by designation of
LEBANON • 1 ♂; Bsharri; alt. 1400 m; 21–28 Jun. 1931; Zerny leg.; GS V. 49; NHMW 2533.
Paralectotype ♂, pinned, with four labels: “Nord-Libanon / Becharré, 1400 m / 11.–20.vi.[19]31. Zerny” “Lectoparatype” [green label] “Cacoecia / acclivana / Zerny Type!” [handwritten] “NHMW / Gen. Prep. ♂ / No. 1/15.2.2018”; male genitalia on a slide with two labels: “Paralectotype / Cacoecia acclivana / Zerny, 1933 / Nord-Libanon, Becharré, 1400 / m, 11.–20.vi.[19]31, Zerny” [red label] “NHMW / Gen. prep. / ♂ / No. 1/15.2.2018 / B. Zlatkov 2018 Euparal”.
LEBANON • 1 ♂; Bsharri; alt. 1400 m; 11–20 Jun. 1931; Zerny leg.; GS 1/15.2.2018; NHMW.
Clepsis acclivana is most similar to C. trivia but the forewings are paler and wider with more distinct markings, the uncus is narrower, the median part of the gnathos is smaller and its arms are not angled, the sacculus is more curved, the labis is more massive and with shorter acanthae, and the apex of the phallic process is curved ventrolaterally instead of dorsally.
Adult. Sexual dimorphism unknown. Male (Fig.
Male genitalia of the Clepsis neglectana species group (some without phallus) A–B C. acclivana: A Cacoecia acclivana lectotype B C. acclivana paralectotype, right valva intentionally not cleaned from scales C Clepsis semiana, holotype of Cacoecia unifasciana var. semiana. Scale bar: 500 μm, all to scale.
Female unknown.
Preimaginal stages unknown.
Unknown.
Known from the type locality only: Lebanon (Fig.
Not known.
Comparison of the wing pattern and genitalia of the lectotype and paralectotype of C. acclivana with the species considered above confirmed the assumption that it is a distinct species. The barcoding distance to the other species was not studied because of lack of fresh material, but the great similarity in all morphological characters of the two specimens convinced us that they can represent a distinct species, therefore we resurrect the initial status of the taxon acclivana synonymised by
Without further morphological or genetic support the following species cannot be interpreted with certainty, but the synonymy with C. neglectana, C. acclivana or C. trivia does not seem justified for now. They demonstrate some morphological gap; at least the differences between them are not smaller than the differences with the above mentioned species of the group. Additional material and genetic study is necessary to solve their real status.
Tortrix severana Kennel, 1901: 227 (Algeria)
The species was synonymised with C. neglectana by
Cacoecia unifasciana var. semiana Chrétien, 1915: 296 (Tunisia)
Holotype ♂: pinned, with 4 labels: “Cacoecia / unifasciana / v. semiana” [handwritten] “Type” [red, printed] “8.6” [handwritten] “Holotype / Clepsis semiana / (Chrétien, 1915) / Zlatkov & Huemer, 2019 des.” [red, printed].
TUNISIA • 1 ♂; MNHN.
The male genitalia of C. semiana (Fig.
This species group is characterised by the presence of large modified setae on the median surface of the valvae (Fig.
[Tortrix] consimilana Hübner, 1817: pl. 38, fig. 239 (Europe).
Tortrix unifasciana Duponchel, 1842: 135, pl.61, fig. 6 (France).
Tortrix unifasciana f. cinnamomeana Dufrane, 1957: 6 (Belgium).
Tortrix fallaciana Fuchs, 1903: 4 (Sicily).
Tortrix unifasciana f. fuscana Dufrane, 1957: 6 (Belgium).
Tortrix unifasciana f. obliterana Dufrane, 1957: 6 (Belgium).
Paramesia peregrinana Stephens, 1852: 90 (Britain), unavailable, published in synonymy with Lozotaenia obliquana Humphreys and Westwood 1845.
Tortrix productana Zeller, 1847: 660 (Sicily).
obliterana Herrich-Schäffer, 1847 (uninominal): pl. 9, fig. 60.
Tortrix (Lozotaenia) obliterana Herrich-Schäffer, 1851: 164 (Italy).
Siclobola placida Diakonoff, 1948: 25 (Madagascar).
non Tortrix eatoniana Ragonot, 1881
non Cacoecia unifasciana var. semiana Chrétien, 1915
non Cacoecia acclivana Zerny, 1933
Neotype ♂ (here designated): pinned, with 5 labels: “Gehegs / Dresden / 18.vi.1922 / E. Möbius” “Coll. E. Möbius / Ankauf 1946” “Neotype / Tortrix consimilana / Hübner, 1817 / Zlatkov & Huemer, 2019 des.” [red printed] “Museum für Tierkunde Dresden / Gen. prep. / ♂ / No. 2/30.11.2018” “Clepsis consimilana / (Hübner, 1817) / Zlatkov & Huemer, 2019 det.”; genitalia on a slide with two labels: “Neotype / Tortrix consimilana / Hübner, 1817 / [Germany] Dresden, Gehegs / 18.vi.1922, E. Möbius / Zlatkov & Huemer, 2019 des.” [red printed] “Museum für Tierkunde Dresden / Gen. Prep. / ♂ / No. 2/30.11.2018 / B. Zlatkov 2018 Euparal”.
GERMANY • 1 ♂; Dresden, Gehegs; 18 Jun. 1922; E. Möbius leg.; GS 2/30.11.2018; MTD.
Lectotype ♂ of Tortrix unifasciana (here designated): pinned, with 5 labels: “unifasciana” [handwritten] “Duponch[el]” [round, handwritten] “713” [round handwritten] “Type” [red printed] “Chr. Gibeaux dét. / prép. génit. n° 4231 ♂ / unifasciana / Dup.” [printed and handwritten]; male genitalia on a slide with two labels: “Tortrix / unifasciana / Dup., 1842 / Type” [handwritten with red border] “Chr. Gibeaux dét. / prép. génit. n° 4231 ♂ / Clepsis / consimilana Hb. / 30.x.91 Euparal M. P.” [printed and handwritten].
FRANCE • 1 ♂; GS 4231; MNHN.
Holotype ♂ of Siclobola placida: pinned, with four labels: “Tananarive” “Type: ♂ / Siclobola / placida / A. Diakonoff 1946” [printed and handwritten] “Holotype” [printed red] “Siclobola / unifasciana / placida / 1959 Diak. / det. A. Diakonoff” [printed and handwritten]; genitalia on glass slide pinned to the holotype, with one label: “536.D.”
MADAGASCAR • 1 ♂; Antananarivo; MNHN 536.D.
Other material: GERMANY • 1 ♂; Dresden, Gehegs; 24 Jun. 1921; E. Möbius leg.; GS 1/30.11.2018; MTD • 1♂; Dresden, Lössaltz; 28 Jun. 1935; E. Möbius leg.; GS 2/3.12.2018; MTD • 1 ♂; same collection data; 3 Aug. 1935; GS 1/3.12.2018; MTD • 1 ♀; Fritzsche leg.; GS 1/4.12.2018; MTD • 1 ♂; Sylt; GS 2/5.11.2018; ZSM • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Baden Württemberg, Marbach am Neckar; 29 Jun. 1957; L. Süssner leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Bayern, München, Hochmutting; 19 Aug. 1988; H. Kolbeck leg.; TLMF • 1 ♀; Kehlheim; 12 Jun. 1997; H. Kolbeck leg.; TLMF • ITALY • 1 ♂; prov. Verona, Monte; alt. 300 m; 20 Aug. 1994; Franz leg.; GS 1/16.10.2017; TLMF • 1 ♂, same collection data; 7 Jun. 1991; K. Burmann et al. leg.; GS 2/16.10.2017; TLMF • 2 ♀♀; same collection data; 1 Oct. 1994; Burmann et Erlebach leg.; GS 3/16.10.2017, 4/16.10.2017; TLMF • 1 ♂; prov. Verona, Albisano; alt. 450 m; 27 May–3 Jun. 1962; K. Burmann leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; prov. Trentino, Pietramurata; alt. 250 m; mid Jun. 1978; F. Zürnbauer leg.; TLMF • 1 ♀; Verona, Mte. Maderno; alt. 250 m; mid Sep. 1963; K. Burmann leg.; TLMF • 1 ♀; Südtirol, Auer; 21 Jun. 1957; Hernegger leg.; TLMF • 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Südtirol, Eing. Schnalstal; alt. 700 m; mid Jun.1968; K. Burmann leg.; TLMF • 2 ♀♀; Südtirol, S Kalterer See; alt. 230 m; 26 Jun. 1990; P. Huemer leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; same collection data; 14 Jun. 1991; TLMF • 2 ♂♂; Südtirol, Umg. Bozen, Kampenn; 26 Jun. 1991; P. Huemer leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Carrara; alt. 200 m; early Jun. 1979; F. Zürnbauer leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Elba, Porto Ferroio; alt. 40 m; late May 1967; F. Zürnbauer leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Sardinia, Umg. Tempio, Mte. Limbara; alt. 1200 m; 27 May1973; Laubmeier, Sommerer & Witt leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Sardinia, Umg. Aritzo, Gennargentu; alt. 750 m; 4–5 Jun. 1973; Laubmeier, Sommerer & Witt leg.; TLMF • POLAND • 1 ♂; Poznań, Ogrody; 13 Jun. 2012; W. Kubasik leg; GS 1/15.3.2019; • CWK 1♂; Poznań, Ogrody; 19 Jun. 2012; W. Kubasik leg.; GS 2/15.3.2019; CWK • 1 ♀; Komorniki; 19 Jun. 2002; GS 1/15.3.2002; W. Kubasuk leg.; CWK • AUSTRIA • 2 ♂♂; Wien, Döbling, Cobenzl; alt. 385 m; 15 Jun. 2012; F. Lichtenberger leg.; TLMF • 3 ♂♂; Niederösterreich, 10 km SE Schwechat, Seiherwiese; 1 Jul. 1998; F. Lichtenberger leg.; TLMF • 3 ♂♂; Niederösterreich, Ebreichsdorf, Welscherhalten; 2 Jul. 1999, F. Lichtenberger leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Niederösterreich, Rubring; 20 Jun. 1998; F. Hofmann leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Niederösterreich, Amstetten, Sonnleiten; 16 Jun. 1997; H. Brandstetter leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Niederösterreich, Purgstall/Erlauf; 7 Jul. 1995; F. Ressl leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Oberösterreich, Linz, Biologiezentrum; 11 Jun. 2002; J. Wimmer leg.; GS 3771; TLMF • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Vorarlberg, Hard, Fußach, NSG Rheindelta-Rohrspitz; alt. 397 m; 29 Jun. 1992; P. Huemer leg.; TLMF • FRANCE • 1 ♂; Alpes Maritimes, Nice, Bd. Tzarewitsch; 26 May 1971; F. Dujardin leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Alpes Martitimes, mt. Alban; alt. 200 m; 4 Jun. 1962; F. Dujardin leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Bouches du Rhone, La Ciotat; 4 May 1994; J. Nel leg.; GS 9763 TLMF • 1 ♂; Var, Massif du Pradet; J. Nel leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Vaucluse, Mormoiron; alt. 20 m; 6 May 2000; J. Nel leg.; TLMF • 2 ♂♂; Corse, Pinarello; alt. 10 m; early Jun. 1972; F. Zürnbauer leg.; TLMF • CROATIA • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Rovinij; alt. 50 m; 10 Sep. 2002; H. Deutsch leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂; Cres isl., Stivian; 14–17 May 1996; F. Lichtenberger leg.; TLMF • GREECE • 1 ♂; Crete, Heraklion prefecture, Fodele; alt. 100 m; 25 May 2000; W. Ruckdeschel leg.; GS 5/16.10.2017; TLMF • BULGARIA • 1 ♂; Petrich district, Rupite area; 41.4620°N, 23.2583°E; alt. 200 m; 15 May 2007; B. Zlatkov leg.; GS 6/16.10.2017; NMNHS • ALBANIA • 1 ♂; Korça Region, Boboshtica Village; 40.5405°N, 20.7918°E; alt. 1220 m; 4 Jun. 2018; S. Beshkov leg.; GS 1/17.10.2018; NMNHS • MACEDONIA (Republic of Northern) • 1 ♂; Vardar River Valley, Demir Kapiya; 41.3826°N, 22.1958°E; alt. 240 m; 10 Jun. 2018; S. Beshkov & A. Nahirnic leg.; GS 2/17.10.2018; NMNHS • SPAIN • 4 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Catalonia, Vidreras; 6–15 Jun. 1993; J. Wimmer leg.; TLMF.
The wing pattern of males resembles that of C. neglectana and C. eatoniana. The male genitalia are most similar to C. eatoniana but the phallic process is smaller, the phallus lacks a keel, the cornuti are smaller, the valvae are more slender, and the labis is different. The females of C. consimilana and C. eatoniana externally are very similar but the genitalia (colliculum) show considerable difference, it is much larger in C. eatoniana, with a long process at the left side.
Adult. Sexual dimorphism prominent. Male (Fig.
Adults of Clepsis consimilana species group A–H C. consimilana: A illustration from the original description of Tortrix consimilana B neotype of T. consimilana C male, Bulgaria D lectotype of T. unifasciana E Holotype of Siclobola placida F male, Poland G female, Italy H female, Poland I–L C. eatoniana: I Lectotype of T. eatoniana J male, Spain K Lectotype of Tortrix xylotoma (courtesy by D. Lees and Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London) L female, Spain. Scale bar: 5 mm, all to scale.
Male genitalia of the Clepsis consimilana species group (some without phallus) A–E C. consimilana: A Tortrix consimilana neotype B C. consimilana, Italy C C. consimilana, Albania D Siclobola placida holotype E T. unifasciana lectotype F T. eatoniana lectotype. Scale bar: 500 μm, all to scale.
Phalli with vesicae everted of the Clepsis consimilana species group A–B C. consimilana: A neotype of Tortrix consimilana B specimen from Italy C C. eatoniana, Spain. The phallus of each species is shown in three aspects from top to bottom: sclerotised phallic tube (without vesica) in dorsal view, tip of vesica in dorsal view and whole phallus in left view. Scale bar: 250 μm.
Detailed descriptions of the ovum, larvae of all instars, and pupa are provided by
(Fig.
(Fig.
Moths are on the wing from May to October in shrubby habitats. The larvae feed on dead or withered leaves of Crataegus, Malus, Carpinus, Polygonum, Hedera, Lonicera, Ligustrum, Syringa, and overwinter in the third instar (
The collection of Jakob Hübner was acquired by Vincenz Abbate Edler von Mazzola in the early part of the 19th Century, and the European material was deposited in the “Hof-Naturalien-Kabinett” in 1823 where most of the material was destroyed by fire during the Vienna Rebellion of 1848 (
Tortrix eatoniana Ragonot, 1881: 231 (Portugal).
Tortrix xylotoma Meyrick, 1891: 13 (Algeria) syn. nov.
Clepsis razowskii Gastón, Vives & Revilla, 2017: 691 (Spain) syn. nov.
non Clepsis consimilana (Hübner, 1817)
Lectotype ♂ by designation of
PORTUGAL • 1 ♂; Lisbon, Olivais; 24 Apr. 1880; Ragonot leg.; GS 3699; MNHN.
Lectotype ♂ of Tortrix xylotoma by designation of
ALGERIA • 1 ♂; Béjaïa; 25 Apr. 1890; Meyrick leg.; BMNH NHMUK010219594.
Other material: SPAIN • 8 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Valencia, El Saler, Albufera ; 39.3278°N, -0.3078°W; alt. 5 m; 18 May 2004; P. Huemer leg.; GS 1/18.10.2017, 2/18.10.2017, 3/18.10.2017; TLMF • 5 ♂♂, same collection data; 8 Sep. 2005; P. Huemer leg.; TLMF • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Valencia, 5 km NE Albufera, Sierra de Crevillente; alt. 450 m; 26 May 2004; P. Huemer leg.; TLMF • 1 ♀; Valencia, Santa Pola, Playa del Pinet; 38.1585°N, -0.6256°W; alt. 5 m; 5Sep. 2005; P. Huemer leg.; GS 4/18.10.2017; TLMF.
The wing pattern in males resembles those of C. trivia, C. acclivana, and C. consimilana. Clepsis eatoniana differs from C. consimilana, by the more yellowish instead of fulvous forewing ground colour. The most characteristic feature in the external morphology of C. eatoniana is the absence of a forewing costal fold, in contrast to C. consimilana. The male genitalia are similar to those in C. consimilana but the valva is more slender, elongate distally, and the modified large setae are more numerous and more slender. The phallus is adorned with spines, with the keel and terminal process overpassing its tip; in C. consimilana the phallus lack lateral spines and a keel, and the phallic process is shorter. The caulis in C. eatoniana is larger, the vesica is bent at nearly a right angle to the phallus, its diverticulum has different location, and the cornuti are more slender and smoother. Females of C. eatoniana are not distinguishable externally from the females of C. consimilana but differ from C. striolana by the presence of two brown dots on the forewing. The female genitalia of C. eatoniana are similar to those in both the C. neglectana and C. consimilana species groups, but the protrusion on the right side of the colliculum is much larger and elongated, and the sterigma has larger lateral pockets.
Adult. Sexual dimorphism prominent. Male (Fig.
Female genitalia (Fig.
Preimaginal stages unknown.
(Fig.
Neighbour-joining tree of Clepsis neglectana and C. consimilana species groups (Kimura 2 parameter, built with MEGA6; cf.
(Fig.
Distribution map of examined material of Clepsis neglectana and C. consimilana species groups. Map created with SimpleMappr (http://www.simplemappr.net).
The moths were collected in macchie habitat (
The species was described by
The taxa treated in the present paper are not easily distinguished from each other because of prominent sexual dimorphism in some of them, variability in wing pattern and considerable similarity in the genitalia. The subtle differences in both male and female (when available) genitalia, secondary sex characters (male forewing costal fold) and barcode gap between the populations support presence of more than the two taxa currently recognised. The most defining characters are found in the genitalia. Two groups of taxa can be recognised: those with large modified setae on the median surface of the valvae in males, and those without such setae. Apparently, this was the main criterion for prior synonymisation resulting in only two species: C. consimilana (with setae) and C. neglectana (without setae). Further scrutinising of the genital characters revealed existence of several taxa, which can be treated as species. Here we propose two species groups named after the oldest described taxon in each of them. They should not be confused with the groups proposed by
Since recently collected material for mtDNA sequencing was available for European populations only, the status of some taxa of the C. neglectana species group remains unresolved. Clepsis severana and C. semiana appear to be closely related considering the genital morphology, and their synonymy with some of the remaining species of the group cannot be excluded. They are known only from their holotypes (by monotypy), and moreover, the morphology of the vesica is inaccessible because of the prolonged embedding in microscope slide media (C. semiana) or the genitalia slide is missing (C. severana). On the other hand, each of them demonstrates some differences with all remaining members of the group, which seemingly are not lesser than those between well separated taxa as C. neglectana and C. trivia. Tortrix xylotoma is certainly a synonym of a member of the C. consimilana species group, namely C. eatoniana, but not of C. neglectana as it was treated up to now. The status of C. acclivana is more or less controversial because of lacking DNA barcode sequences, but the two male specimens with practically identical morphology, different to all the other taxa convinced us that they represent a distinct species.
The Cretan population of C. trivia is well separated genetically and morphologically from the other European species (C. neglectana and C. striolana), but demonstrates certain morphological similarity with the other Mediterranean taxon, C. acclivana, and is probably related to it. It should be emphasised that the Cretan specimens were assigned to C. trivia solely on male genitalia morphology without studying the vesica of the holotype and its DNA barcode and it may still represent a separate taxon.
The barcode distance between C. neglectana and C. striolana is comparatively small. The genital morphology of these two taxa also demonstrates considerable similarity, but they are well distinguished by wing pattern and costal fold. Apparently, C. striolana has a range limited in the region of the Alps. It can be assumed that these species had been isolated recently, maybe only after the last glacial period, and even continuing gene flow cannot be dismissed. Some taxa still in synonymy with C. neglectana may turn out to be species bona as well, e.g., Tortrix dorana from Eastern Kazakhstan.
The C. consimilana species group encompasses only two species and is separated from the C. neglectana group by considerable morphological and genetic gaps. The species have strikingly disproportional distribution ranges: C. eatoniana appears to be a Western-Mediterranean species distributed in the Iberian Peninsula and Algeria, and possibly part of France, but C. consimilana is distributed throughout the rest of Europe, part of Asia and has been introduced to the tropics (Madagascar) and North America. Some morphological variability in C. consimilana (the position of cornuti and other minor male genitalia characters) somewhat contradicts the genetic invariance within this species in Europe.
The overreliance or underestimation of certain genital characters can cause incorrect taxonomic interpretations, as it is demonstrated by the above mentioned taxonomic problems. Traditionally, the shape of uncus, gnathos and valvae is widely used in taxonomy of Lepidoptera, but our experience with other groups as well (
This study would not have been possible without the support of Christian Gibeaux (Paris, France), who assisted us very much in searching, dissecting and photographing several type specimens. We are especially grateful to Todd Gilligan (Fort Collins, Colorado, USA) for his comments on an earlier version of the paper, which improved it much. Furthermore, we are grateful to Paul D.N. Hebert and the entire team at the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding (CCDB, Guelph, Canada) for carrying out the sequence analyses.
PH is particularly indebted to the Promotion of Educational Policies, University and Research Department of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano – South Tyrol for funding the project “Genetische Artabgrenzung ausgewählter arktoalpiner und boreomontaner Tiere Südtirols. Several colleagues supported our work in various aspects, particularly with material, photographs and/or other important information, namely Harald Bruckner (Vienna, Austria), Javier Gaston (Getxo, Spain), Robert Heckford (Plymouth, U.K.), Jari Junnilainen (Vantaa, Finland), David Lees (London, U.K.), Matthias Nuss (Dresden, Germany), Sabine Gaal-Haszler (Vienna, Austria), Wojciech Kubasik (Poznań, Poland), Andreas Segerer (Munich, Germany), Christian Kutzscher (Vienna, Austria). We thank also Joaquin Baixeras (València, Spain), Jason Dombroskie (Cornell, USA), and Erik J. van Nieukerken (Leiden, Netherlands) for helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the paper.