Taxon treatments Taxon names Citations Map localities Turn highlighting On/Off
ZooKeys 415: 53–80, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.415.6656
Towards a revision of the South American genus Praocis Eschscholtz (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae), with estimation of the diversity of each subgenus
Gustavo E. Flores 1,†, Jaime Pizarro-Araya 2,‡
1 CONICET, Laboratorio de Entomología, Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas (IADIZA, CCT CONICET Mendoza), Casilla de correo 507, 5500 Mendoza, Argentina
2 Laboratorio de Entomología Ecológica, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de La Serena, Casilla 599, La Serena, Chile
† http://zoobank.org/D416E119-2A31-4661-B9CA-DDB068787606
‡ http://zoobank.org/A2622ED3-90B4-4D80-B7A3-BF8DAE1BED28

Corresponding author: Gustavo E. Flores (gflores@mendoza-conicet.gov.ar)

Academic editor: P. Bouchard

received 20 November 2013 | accepted 19 March 2014 | Published 12 June 2014
(C) 2014 Gustavo E. Flores. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.

Citation: Flores GE, Pizarro-Araya J (2014) Towards a revision of the South American genus Praocis Eschscholtz (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae), with estimation of the diversity of each subgenus. In: Bouchard P, Smith AD (Eds) Proceedings of the Third International Tenebrionoidea Symposium, Arizona, USA, 2013. ZooKeys 415: 53–80. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.415.6656

Abstract

A review of the subgenera of the South American genus Praocis Eschscholtz (Pimeliinae: Praociini) is presented. Praocis comprises 77 species and 8 subspecies arranged in nine subgenera distributed in arid lands from Central Peru and Bolivia to the Southern part of Patagonia in Chile and Argentina. For each subgenus of Praocis: Praocis Eschscholtz, Mesopraocis Flores & Pizarro-Araya, subgen. n., Anthrasomus Guérin-Méneville, Filotarsus Gay & Solier, Postpraocis Flores & Pizarro-Araya, subgen. n., Hemipraocis Flores & Pizarro-Araya, subgen. n., Orthogonoderes Gay & Solier, Praonoda Flores & Pizarro-Araya, subgen. n., and Praocida Flores & Pizarro-Araya, subgen. n., we present a diagnosis using new and constant characters of adult morphology such as clypeal configuration, length and proportion of antennomeres 9, 10 and 11, arrangement of apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomeres 10 and 11, anterior margin of prosternum, lateral margin of elytron, ventral surface of profemora, and shape of protibiae. An identification key for the nine subgenera of Praocis is presented. Type species are designated for the five new subgenera; for Mesopraocis: Praocis calderana Kulzer, for Postpraocis: Praocis pentachorda Burmeister, for Hemipraocis: Praocis sellata Berg, for Praonoda: Praocis bicarinata Burmeister, for Praocida: Praocis zischkai Kulzer, and for the previously described subgenus Orthogonoderes: Praocis subreticulata Gay & Solier. The current number of species and the estimated number of species to be described are presented. The distribution ranges of the subgenera, including new records from collections and recent expeditions, are given. Habitat preferences and a discussion of the biogeography of the genus are also presented.

Keywords

Taxonomy, Pimeliinae, Praociini, Praocis, key, diversity, South America

Introduction

The genus Praocis Eschscholtz belongs to the Praociini, an endemic Neotropical tribe of Pimeliinae with 151 species arranged in 15 genera (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012). Praocis is the most specious genus of the tribe (52% of the species). It comprises 77 species and 8 subspecies, arranged in nine subgenera (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012), distributed from central Peru to the southern part of Patagonia in Argentina and Chile. The distribution of Praocis species coincides with the whole distribution of the tribe (Fig. 1) and is related to the arrangement of the Andes mountain range in arid and semiarid lands of southern South America (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2006).

Figures 1–2.

1 Distribution area of the whole genus Praocis 2 Dorsal view of Praocis (Praocis) bicentenario, holotype (previously published in Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012, Zootaxa 3336: Fig. 17; copyright Magnolia Press, reproduced with permission).

The last revision of Praocis was made by Kulzer (1958) in the context of a tribal review. Kulzer (1958) classified the species of Praocis into 10 subgenera, six of which were new: Mesopraocis, Postpraocis, Parapraocis, Hemipraocis, Praonoda, and Praocida, plus the four previously recognized as valid by Solier (1840): Praocis s. str., Anthrasomus Guérin-Méneville 1834, Orthogonoderes Gay & Solier, 1840, and Filotarsus Gay & Solier, 1840. Kulzer (1958) did not characterize his new subgenera nor designate type species, but in his key he mentioned character states for identifying some of them except between Anthrasomus and Filotarsus, and between Orthogonoderes and Praocida, which can be keyed only by body size. Kulzer (1958) also failed to assess the geographic distribution of the subgenera, reporting only isolated localities of the species.

The subgeneric classification of the genus was recently reviewed (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012) and the genus was redefined on the basis of five constant character states. The subgenus Parapraocis was excluded from Praocis because its species exhibit different character states from those defining the genus and it was recognized as a separate genus within Praociini (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012).

In the current study we report new constant characters to define each Praocis subgenus, such as shape of clypeus, frons and clypeal suture, length and proportion of antennomeres 9, 10 and 11, arrangement of apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomeres 10 and 11, and ventral surface of profemora. We also used the characters defined by Kulzer: shape of anterior margin of prosternum, posterior angles of pronotum, lateral margin of pronotum, lateral margin of elytron, shape of body and apical process of protibiae.

The objectives of this study are to present elements for a revision of the genus Praocis by incorporating new constant characters from external morphology to define each subgenus, to designate type species for some subgenera that remain unavailable, to estimate the diversity of each subgenus, to detail the geographic distribution and habitat of each subgenus and to report new distributional records for some subgenera.

Material and methods

Material examined. The present study is based on an examination of specimens deposited in the following collections (we follow Arnett et al. 1993 where possible for collection abbreviations):

FMNH Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA

IADIZA Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas, Mendoza, Argentina

LEULS Laboratorio de Entomología Ecológica, Universidad de La Serena, Chile

MACN Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia, Buenos Aires, Argentina

MLPA Museo de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

MNHN Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France

MNHUB Museum fur Naturkunde der Humboldt Universitat, Berlin, Germany

MNNC Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Santiago, Chile

NHMB Natural History Museum, Basel, Switzerland

Type species. For the subgenera Praocis, Anthrasomus, and Filotarsus the type species were designated prior to this study. For Orthogonoderes Gay & Solier (in Solier 1840) the authors characterized this new taxon but did not indicate the type species. We designate the type species of Orthogonoderes in this paper (Article 67.4 ICZN 1999) based on one of the six specific names available in the original publication (Article 67.2.1 ICZN 1999).

The remaining five names of the subgenera proposed by Kulzer (1958): Mesopraocis, Postpraocis, Hemipraocis, Praonoda, and Praocida are unavailable because Kulzer (1958) did not designate type species for these subgenera. To be available, every new genus-group name published after 1930 must, in addition to satisfying the provisions of Article 13.1 (ICZN 1999), be accompanied by the fixation of a type species in the original publication (Article 67.4.1 ICZN 1999). These five names will be made available for the first time in this article. To fix the current interpretation of these names and to ensure stability as these names were used in previous works (Peña 1966; Flores 2007, 2009; Alfaro et al. 2009; Flores et al. 2011; Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012; Cortés-Contreras et al. 2013), we use the same names proposed by Kulzer (1958), present a diagnosis of each subgenus and hereby designate the type species on the basis of the specific names available for this nomenclatural act, the type specimens are not lost and the species is representative of the characters of the subgenus.

Characters. For each subgenus of Praocis we present a diagnosis using the following characters and character states:

Clypeal configuration (characters 1–3). The anterior margin of clypeus, in most subgenera, extends beyond the lateral expansion of frons (Fig. 3); in some species of Filotarsus it appears at same level as lateral expansion of frons. The width of the anterior margin of the clypeus, in most subgenera, does not exceed half the interocular width (Fig. 3), while in some species of Filotarsus it is equal to interocular width. The clypeal suture shows two different states: as horizontal groove (Fig. 4), the clypeus being lower than frons; and as vertical groove, in this state the clypeus and frons are at the same level (Fig. 3).

Figures 3–6.

3 Praocis (Praocis) subaenea, head in dorsal view 4 Praocis (Orthogonoderes) rotundata, head in frontal view 5 Praocis (Praocis) bicentenario, antennomeres 9–11 in dorsal view 6 Praocis (Orthogonoderes) rotundata, antennomeres 9–11 in dorsal view (Figs 3 and 5 scanning electron micrographs previously published in Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012, Zootaxa 3336: Figs 1 and 2; copyright Magnolia Press, reproduced with permission).

Length and proportion of antennomeres 9, 10 and 11 (characters 4–5) are very variable among subgenera. Antennomere 9 can be longer than antennomere 10 (Fig. 5) or equal in length to antennomere 10. Antennomere 11 is in most subgenera longer than antennomere 10 (Fig. 5), in Orthogonoderes it is shorter than antennomere 10 (Fig. 6) and equal in length to antennomere 10 in Mesopraocis.

Arrangement of apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomeres 10 and 11 (characters 6–7) are also variable among the subgenera. The apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 are arranged in two areas subequal in size (Fig. 6), or in a dorsally continuous semicircle (Fig. 5). On antennomere 11, the apical tomentose sensory patches are located in a single area on the distal third (Fig. 6) or on the distal half of its surface (Fig. 5).

The anterior margin of the prosternum (character 8) presents two states: with a narrow sharp edge or lacking that edge. The lateral margin of the elytron (character 9) can be not defined, rounded, continuous between dorsal area of elytron and pseudopleuron, or well defined by a narrow, sharp carina-shaped edge or by a wide longitudinal, prominent edge. The ventral surface of the profemora (character 10) presents a row of setae on the anterior edge or lacks that row of setae. The shape of protibiae (character 11) varies between explanate, distal margin width exceeding 1/3 of protibial length, and not explanate, distal margin width equal to 1/4 of protibial length.

Distribution. With the distributional data published (Kulzer 1958; Peña 1966; Ferrú and Elgueta 2011; Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012) and from specimens deposited in the examined collections we made approximate maps of the current geographic distribution for each subgenus. New records are reported for some subgenera and enlargement of their distribution. As a result of recent expeditions (Alfaro et al. 2009; Flores et al. 2011) we recorded the subgenera present on Pacific islands and Peninsula Valdés in the Atlantic Ocean. For distribution of the species we used the biogeographic classification by Morrone (2006).

Estimation of the diversity of each subgenus. Based on the types of known species (deposited at FMNH, MACN, MLPA, MNHUB, MNHN, MNNC, and NHMB) and the keys of Kulzer (1958), all specimens available in collections were determined and we identified specimens belonging to species to be described. Other unnamed species were found in collecting trips made for our projects in IADIZA and LEULS since 2001 until now. A list of the unnamed species by subgenus was made with these records and the diversity of each subgenus and of the whole genus was estimated, including the species to be described.

Species list. Based on the last revision of the genus (Kulzer 1958) and on most recent studies of types and new synonymies (Flores 2007, 2009; Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2010, 2012; Flores et al. 2011), we made a list of species included for each subgenus. Some species were described after Kulzer’s revision (Kaszab 1964, 1969; Molinari 1969; Marcuzzi 1977, 2001) or rediscovered (Flores 2007), so we assigned these species to some subgenus according to the diagnostic characters presented here.

Results
Genus Praocis Eschscholtz, 1829

http://species-id.net/wiki/Praocis

Generic characteristics.

The species of Praocis can be recognized by having maxillary palps with last segment axe-shaped (apex twice as wide as base), antennomere 3 shorter than 4 + 5 combined, pronotum with anterior margin concave, width of posterior margin exceeding width of anterior margin, single lateral margin slender, expanded, remote from disc, and anterior angles rounded; mesosternum inclined forward, separated from prosternum; elytron with punctuate surface; apterous.

(1) Subgenus Praocis (Praocis) Eschscholtz, 1829 Figs 2, 15–16
Type species.

Praocis rufipes Eschscholtz, 1829, subsequent designation by Guérin-Méneville (1834: 8-9).

Diagnosis.

Clypeus with anterior margin extending beyond to lateral expansion of frons, width of anterior margin not exceeding half the interocular width, clypeal suture as a vertical groove, not covered by frons, clypeus and frons at same level; antennomere 10 wider than long, antennomere 9 longer than antennomere 10, antennomere 11 longer than antennomere 10; apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 in a dorsally continuous semicircle, on antennomere 11 on distal half; prosternum with a narrow edge on anterior margin; lateral margin of elytron well defined; ventral surface of profemora with a row of setae on anterior edge; protibiae explanate.

Distribution.

Species of Praocis s. str. are endemic to central and southern Chile and occur from 26°South (Quebrada el León, Atacama Region) to 42°South (Carelmapu, Los Lagos Region) in the biogeographic provinces of Atacama, Coquimbo, Santiago, Maule and Valdivian Forest (Morrone 2006) (Fig. 15).

New records.

We present new records for some Pacific islands. We recorded Praocis (Praocis) spinolai Gay & Solier for Damas (29°13'S, 71°31'W), Gaviota (29°15'S, 71°28'W) and Choros (29°15'S, 71°32'W) islands (Alfaro et al. 2009), Praocis (Praocis) subaenea Erichson and Praocis (Praocis) curta Solier for Chañaral Island (29°02'S, 71°36'W) (pers. obs), and Praocis (Praocis) costata Gay & Solier was recorded for Mocha Island (38°23'S, 73°52'W) (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012).

Diversity.

This subgenus contains 18 species of which 2 species were recently described (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012), increasing 13 percent the number of species (Fig. 33).

Habitat.

The distribution range of the subgenus extends from sea level to an altitude of ~1300 m. Most species are distributed between the Huasco coastal desert and the coastal shrub steppe (Gajardo 1994), with 4 and 10 species each, and are ecologically related to shrub and herbaceous vegetation (perennial and annual) characteristic of the Chilean Coastal Desert (CCD), in sandy soils or clayey, poorly-permeable soils (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012; Cortés-Contreras et al. 2013; collection data FMNH, IADIZA, LEULS, and pers. obs.). One species (Praocis (Praocis) costata Solier) inhabits deciduous woodlands of Nothofagus spp. (Gajardo 1994) in the Valdivian Forest biogeographic province (Morrone 2006) (Fig. 16).

Species included.

Praocis rufipes Eschscholtz, 1829 (= Sternodes mannerheimi Fischer, 1844, male, synonymy by Motschulsky 1845) (= Praocis interrupta Solier, 1851, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis costata Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840 (= Praocis ciliata Germain, 1855, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis sanguinolenta Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840 (= Praocis audouini Solier, 1840, synonymy by Flores 2007); Praocis quadrisulcata Germain, 1855; Praocis curta Solier, 1840 (= Praocis nigroaenea Solier, 1840, synonymy by Kulzer 1958) (= Praocis rugipennis Germain, 1855, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis hirtella Kulzer, 1958a; Praocis sulcata Eschscholtz, 1829 (= Sternodes mannerheimi Fischer, 1844, female, synonymy by Motschulsky 1845) (= Praocis rotundata Laporte, 1840, synonymy by Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2010); Praocis subsulcata Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840; Praocis spinolai Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840; Praocis aenea Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840; Praocis parva Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840; Praocis tibialis Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840 (= Praocis rufitarsis Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840, synonymy by Flores 2007) (= Praocis aenipennis Germain, 1855, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis subaenea Erichson, 1834 (= Praocis submetallica Guérin-Méneville, 1834, synonymy by Flores 2007) (= Praocis laevicosta Curtis, 1845, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis marginata Germain, 1855; Praocis elliptica Philippi & Philippi, 1864 (= Praocis angustata Philippi & Philippi, 1864, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis bicentenario Flores & Pizarro-Araya, 2012; Praocis medvedevi Flores & Pizarro-Araya, 2012; Praocis bicostata Philippi & Philippi, 1864 (type lost, assigned to (Praocis) by Kulzer 1958).

(2) Subgenus Praocis (Mesopraocis) Flores & Pizarro-Araya, subgen. n.

http://zoobank.org/C6C1EBD7-2CD9-4698-8D8A-A0823A43B03A

Figs 7, 17–18
Type species.

Praocis calderana Kulzer, 1958, present designation.

Diagnosis.

Clypeus with anterior margin extending beyond to lateral expansion of frons, width of anterior margin not exceeding half the interocular width, clypeal suture as a vertical groove, not covered by frons, clypeus and frons at same level; antennomere 10 wider than long, antennomere 9 of equal length to 10, antennomere 11 of equal length to 10; apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 in two areas subequal in size, on antennomere 11 on distal third; prosternum with a narrow edge on anterior margin; lateral margin of elytron not defined; ventral surface of profemora with a row of setae on anterior edge, protibiae very explanate.

Distribution.

Species of Praocis (Mesopraocis) are endemic to northern Chile and occur from 25°South (Paposo, Antofagasta Region) to 31°South (Caleta Limarí, Coquimbo Region) in the biogeographic provinces of Atacama and Coquimbo (Morrone 2006) (Fig. 17).

New records.

We present new records for some Pacific islands. We recorded the species Praocis (Mesopraocis) pilula Laporte and Praocis (Mesopraocis) flava Kulzer for Damas (29°13'S, 71°31'W) and Gaviota Islands (29°15'S, 71°28'W) (Alfaro et al. 2009).

Diversity.

This subgenus contains 4 species (Kulzer 1958) plus 1 species to be described, 5 species in total, with a 25 percent increase in the number of species (Fig. 33).

Habitat.

The distribution range of the subgenus extends from sea level to an altitude of ~1325 m. All Mesopraocis species are associated with coastal dunes stabilized with vegetation or paleodunes in the transitional coastal desert of Chile and have nocturnal habits, remaining during the day under stones or plants (Cortés-Contreras et al. 2013, collection data FMNH, IADIZA, LEULS, MNNC, and pers. obs.) (Fig. 18).

Species included.

Praocis pilula Laporte, 1840 (= Coelus hirticollis Solier, 1840, synonymy by Lacordaire 1859); Praocis calderana Kulzer, 1958; Praocis flava Kulzer, 1958; Praocis nitens Kulzer, 1959.

Figures 7–10.

Dorsal view of Praocis species. 7 Praocis (Mesopraocis) calderana, paratype 8 Praocis (Postpraocis) pentachorda, lectotype (previously published in Flores 2009, Zootaxa 1985: Fig. 3; copyright Magnolia Press, reproduced with permission) 9 Praocis (Anthrasomus) chevrolatii nigra 10 Praocis (Filotarsus) peltata.

(3) Subgenus Praocis (Postpraocis) Flores & Pizarro-Araya, subgen. n.

http://zoobank.org/2EA923F4-48C6-4DA4-A0C7-A7E3B6714881

Figs 8, 19–20
Type species.

Praocis pentachorda Burmeister, 1875, present designation.

Diagnosis.

Clypeus with anterior margin extending beyond to lateral expansion of frons, width of anterior margin not exceeding half the interocular width, clypeal suture as a vertical groove, not covered by frons, clypeus and frons at same level; antennomere 10 wider than long, antennomere 9 longer than antennomere 10, antennomere 11 longer than antennomere 10; apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 in two areas subequal in size, on antennomere 11 on distal half; prosternum with a narrow edge on anterior margin; lateral margin of elytron well defined; ventral surface of profemora without a row of setae on anterior edge, protibiae not explanate.

Distribution.

Species of Praocis (Postpraocis) inhabit central and northern Chile and western and northern Argentina. They occur from 19°South (Termas de Enquelga, Colchane, Tarapacá Region, Chile) to 34°South in Chile (Rancagua) and 33°South in Argentina (Mendoza) in the biogeographic provinces of Atacama, Coquimbo, Santiago, Puna, Prepuna and Monte (Morrone 2006) (Fig. 19).

New records.

We present new records of Praocis (Postpraocis) pentachorda Burmeister for the Region Tarapacá of Chile and southern Bolivia and of Praocis (Postpraocis) curtisi Solier for the Pacific islands Damas (29°13'S, 71°31'W), Gaviota (29°15'S, 71°28'W) and Choros (29°15'S, 71°32'W) (Alfaro et al. 2009; Ferrú and Elgueta 2011; collection data).

Diversity.

This subgenus contains 7 species/subspecies (Kulzer 1958; Flores 2007, 2009) plus 3 species to be described, 10 species in total, with a 43 percent increase in the number of species (Fig. 33).

Habitat.

Species of Praocis (Postpraocis) have diurnal habits, remaining during the night under stones or plants. In central Chile they can be observed walking on coastal plains or in sandy places lying from sea level to an altitude of ~1300 m. In Argentina, northern Chile and Bolivia, they occur from 1600 m in high altitudinal valleys associated with the Andes mountain range to an altitude of 4200 m in the high Puna plateau, in sandy soils or clayey, poorly permeable soils (Ferrú and Elgueta 2011; Cortés-Contreras et al. 2013; collection data FMNH, IADIZA, LEULS, and pers. obs.) (Fig. 20).

Species included.

Praocis curtisii Solier, 1851; Praocis costatula Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840 (= Praocis angulifera Philippi & Philippi, 1864, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis pubescens Philippi & Philippi, 1864; Praocis pentachorda Burmeister, 1875 (= Praocis larraini Marcuzzi, 2001, synonymy by Flores 2009); Praocis pentachorda minor Kulzer, 1958; Praocis aenescens Kulzer, 1958; Praocis concinna Burmeister, 1875.

(4) Subgenus Praocis (Anthrasomus) Guérin-Méneville, 1834 Figs 9, 21–22
Type species.

Anthrasomus chevrolatii Guérin-Méneville, 1834, monotypy.

Diagnosis.

Clypeus with anterior margin extending beyond to lateral expansion of frons, width of anterior margin not exceeding half the interocular width, clypeal suture as a horizontal groove covered by frons, clypeus lower than frons; antennomere 10 wider than long, antennomere 9 longer than antennomere 10, antennomere 11 longer than antennomere 10; apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 in two areas subequal in size, on antennomere 11 on distal half; prosternum with a narrow edge on anterior margin; lateral margin of elytron not defined; ventral surface of profemora without a row of setae on anterior edge, protibiae not explanate.

Distribution.

Species of Praocis (Anthrasomus) inhabit central Chile and occur from 28°South (Freirina, Atacama Region) to 33°South (San Fernando, Libertador General Bernardo O’Higgins Region) in the biogeographic provinces of Atacama, Coquimbo, and Santiago (Morrone 2006) (Fig. 21).

Diversity.

This subgenus contains 5 species/subspecies (Kulzer 1958; Flores 2007) plus 1 species to be described, 6 species in total, with a 20 percent increase in the number of species (Fig. 33).

Habitat.

Species of Praocis (Anthrasomus) have nocturnal habits, remaining during the day under stones or plants in coastal plains, gullies, and transverse valleys in semiarid Chile. They occur from sea level to an altitude of 2800 m, in stony-clayey, poorly permeable soils (collection data FMNH, IADIZA, LEULS, and pers. obs.) (Fig. 22).

Species included.

Praocis chevrolatii Guérin-Méneville, 1834 (= Praocis gayi Solier, 1840, synonymy by Kulzer 1958) (= Praocis hispidula Philippi & Philippi, 1864, synonymy by Kulzer 1958) (= Praocis laticollis Philippi & Philippi, 1864, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis chevrolatii subcostata Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840 (= Praocis chevrolatii coquimboana Kaszab, 1969, synonymy by Flores 2007); Praocis chevrolatii nigra Kulzer, 1958; Praocis hirtuosa Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840 (= Praocis pubens Philippi & Philippi, 1864, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis nuda Kulzer, 1958.

(5) Subgenus Praocis (Filotarsus) Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840 Figs 10, 23–24
Type species.

Filotarsus tenuicornis Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840, monotypy and original designation by Solier (1840: 241).

Diagnosis.

Clypeus with anterior margin extending beyond to lateral expansion of frons or at same level as lateral expansion of frons, width of anterior margin not exceeding half the interocular width or width of anterior margin same as interocular width, clypeal suture as a vertical groove, not covered by frons, clypeus and frons at same level or clypeal suture as a horizontal groove not covered by frons, clypeus lower than frons; antennomere 9 longer than antennomere 10, antennomere 11 longer than antennomere 10; apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 in a dorsally continuous semicircle, on antennomere 11 on distal half; prosternum with a narrow edge on anterior margin; lateral margin of elytron not defined; ventral surface of profemora without a row of setae on anterior edge, protibiae explanate.

Distribution.

Species of Praocis (Filotarsus) inhabit central and northern Chile, western and northern Argentina, estern Bolivia and southern Peru. They occur from 12°South (Cuzco, Peru) to 39°South (Neuquén, Argentina) in the biogeographic provinces of Puna, Atacama, Coquimbo, Santiago, Prepuna, Monte, and Central Patagonia (Morrone 2006) (Fig. 23).

Diversity.

This subgenus contains 14 species (Kulzer 1958; Flores 2009) plus 6 species to be described, 20 species in total, with a 43 percent increase in the number of species (Fig. 33).

Habitat.

Species of Praocis (Filotarsus) have nocturnal habits, remaining during the day under stones or plants. In central Chile they can be observed in gullies and Coastal and Andean mountain ranges from 400 m to an altitude of 2500 m. In Argentina, Bolivia, northern Chile and Peru they occur from 1600 m in high altitudinal valleys associated with the Andes mountain range to an altitude of 5200 m in the high Puna plateau, in clayey, poorly permeable soils (Ferrú and Elgueta 2011; collection data FMNH, IADIZA, LEULS, and pers. obs.) (Fig. 24).

Species included.

Praocis tenuicornis Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840; Praocis castanea Germain, 1855; Praocis rufilabris Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840; Praocis uretai Kulzer, 1958 (= Praocis freyi Marcuzzi, 1977, synonymy by Flores 2009); Praocis reedi Kulzer, 1958; Praocis oblonga Solier, 1851; Praocis peltata Erichson, 1834; Praocis forsteri Kulzer, 1958; Praocis obesa Kulzer, 1958; Praocis titschacki Kulzer, 1958; Praocis brevicornis Kulzer, 1958; Praocis weyrauchi Kulzer, 1958; Praocis peruana Fairmaire, 1902; Praocis grossa Kulzer, 1958.

(6) Subgenus Praocis (Hemipraocis) Flores & Pizarro-Araya, subgen. n.

http://zoobank.org/1EF65CCD-D4C2-4B9F-BB5B-7BB98170599D

Figs 11, 25–26
Type species.

Praocis sellata Berg, 1889, present designation.

Diagnosis.

Clypeus with anterior margin extending beyond to lateral expansion of frons, width of anterior margin not exceeding half the interocular width, clypeal suture as a horizontal groove not covered by frons, clypeus lower than frons; antennomere 9 longer than antennomere 10, antennomere 11 longer than antennomere 10; apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 in two areas subequal in size, on antennomere 11 on distal half; prosternum without a narrow edge on anterior margin; lateral margin of elytron well defined; ventral surface of profemora without a row of setae on anterior edge, protibiae explanate.

Distribution.

The species of Praocis (Hemipraocis) occur from central Argentina (southern Mendoza 36°S and coastal Buenos Aires 36°S), to southern Argentina and Chile (northern Magellan Strait 52°S), in the biogeographic provinces of Patagonia, Monte and Pampa (Morrone 2006) (Fig. 25).

New records.

We present a new record for the Peninsula Valdés in Argentina (Flores et al. 2011).

Diversity.

This subgenus contains 8 species/subspecies (Kulzer 1958; Flores 2007, 2009; Flores et al. 2011) of which 2 subspecies were recently described (Flores et al. 2011), plus 8 species to be described, 16 species in total, with a 167 percent increase in the species number (Fig. 33).

Habitat.

Species of Praocis (Hemipraocis) have diurnal and crepuscular habits, hiding during the night under shrubs, stones or buried in sand. They inhabit the Patagonian steppes and coastal Pampa from sea level to an altitude of 1700 m, in sandy soils or clayey, poorly permeable soils (Flores et al. 2011; collection data FMNH, IADIZA, and pers. obs.) (Fig. 26).

Species included.

Praocis sellata Berg, 1889; Praocis sellata bergi Kulzer, 1958; Praocis sellata bruchi Kulzer, 1958 (= Praocis sellata topali Kaszab, 1964, synonymy by Flores et al. 2011); Praocis sellata peninsularis Flores & Carrara, 2011 (in Flores et al. 2011); Praocis sellata granulipennis Flores & Carrara, 2011 (in Flores et al. 2011); Praocis fimbriata Burmeister, 1875; Praocis striolicollis Fairmaire, 1883a (= Praocis denseciliata Fairmaire, 1883b, synonymy by Flores 2007) (= Praocis silvestrii Marcuzzi, 2001, synonymy by Flores 2009); Praocis inermis Burmeister, 1875 (= Praocis compacta Fairmaire, 1883b, synonymy by Flores 2007).

Figures 11–14.

Dorsal view of Praocis species. 11 Praocis (Hemipraocis) sellata peninsularis, holotype (reproduced from Flores et al. 2011) 12 Praocis (Praonoda) bicarinata 13 Praocis (Orthogonoderes) ecostata, holotype 14 Praocis (Praocida) montana, holotype (previously published in Flores 2009, Zootaxa 1985: Fig. 9; copyright Magnolia Press, reproduced with permission).

(7) Subgenus Praocis (Praonoda) Flores & Pizarro-Araya, subgen. n.

http://zoobank.org/5D327D83-AAE6-4E40-B7BC-B338ADE4CA09

Figs 12, 27–28
Type species.

Praocis bicarinata Burmeister, 1875, present designation.

Diagnosis.

Clypeus with anterior margin extending beyond to lateral expansion of frons, width of anterior margin not exceeding half the interocular width, clypeal suture as a horizontal groove not covered by frons, clypeus lower than frons; antennomere 9 longer than antennomere 10, antennomere 11 longer than antennomere 10; apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 in two areas subequal in size, on antennomere 11 on distal half; prosternum without a narrow edge on anterior margin; lateral margin of elytron well defined; ventral surface of profemora without a row of setae on anterior edge, protibiae explanate.

Distribution.

The species of Praocis (Praonoda) occur from Neuquén and Rio Negro provinces in Argentina (40°S) to northern Tierra del Fuego Island (52°30'S) with the species Praocis (Praonoda) bicarinata as the unique species of Praocis inhabiting Tierra del Fuego. They inhabit the biogeographic provinces of Patagonia and Monte (Morrone 2006) (Fig. 27).

Diversity.

This subgenus contains 2 species (Kulzer 1958) plus 2 species to be described, 4 species in total, with a 100 percent increase in the number of species (Fig. 33).

Habitat.

Species of Praocis (Praonoda) have diurnal and crepuscular habits, hiding during the night under shrubs or stones. They inhabit the Patagonian steppes from sea level to an altitude of 1250 m, in sandy soils or clayey, poorly permeable soils (collection data FMNH, IADIZA and pers. obs.) (Fig. 28).

Species included.

Praocis bicarinata Burmeister, 1875 (= Praocis silphomorpha Fairmaire, 1883a, synonymy by Berg 1884); Praocis molinari Kulzer, 1958.

(8) Subgenus Praocis (Orthogonoderes) Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840 Figs 13, 29–30
= Aulacus Gray, 1832: 783. Type species: Aulacus chilensis Gray, 1832, monotypy. Synonymy by Kulzer (1958).
= Eurygona Laporte, 1840: 187. Type species: Aulacus chilensis Gray, 1832, monotypy. Synonymy by Kulzer (1958).
Type species.

Praocis subreticulata Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840, present designation.

Diagnosis.

Clypeus with anterior margin extending beyond to lateral expansion of frons, width of anterior margin not exceeding half the interocular width, clypeal suture as a horizontal groove covered by frons, clypeus lower than frons; antennomere 9 longer than antennomere 10, antennomere 11 shorter than antennomere 10; apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 in two areas subequal in size, on antennomere 11 on distal third; prosternum without a narrow edge on anterior margin; lateral margin of elytron well defined; ventral surface of profemora without a row of setae on anterior edge, protibiae explanate.

Distribution.

Species of Praocis (Orthogonoderes) inhabit central and northern Chile, western and northern Argentina, western Bolivia and southern Peru. They occur from 12°South (Cuzco, Peru) to 38°South in Chile (Nahuelbuta) and 39°South in Argentina (Neuquén) in the biogeographic provinces of Puna, Atacama, Coquimbo, Santiago, Maule, Prepuna, Monte, and Central Patagonia (Morrone 2006). One species (Praocis (Orthogonoderes) insularis Kulzer) has been recorded in the Guacolda island in the Pacific Ocean (28°S) (Kulzer 1958; Peña 1966) (Fig. 29).

New records.

We present a new record of Praocis argentina Kulzer for the Atlantic coast in Argentina, the isthmus of Peninsula Valdés, 42°30'S.

Diversity.

This subgenus contains 23 species (Kulzer 1958; Flores 2007, 2009) plus 10 species to be described, 33 species in total, with a 43 percent increase in the number of species (Fig. 33).

Habitat.

Species of Praocis (Orthogonoderes) have diurnal and crepuscular habits, hiding during the night under shrubs or stones. In central Chile they can be observed in coastal dunes stabilized with vegetation or paleodunes, gullies, coastal plains, transverse valleys and Coastal and Andean mountain ranges from sea level to an altitude of 2700 m. In Argentina, Bolivia, Peru, and northern Chile, they occur from 1600 m high altitudinal valleys associated with the Andes mountain range to an altitude of 4200 m in the high Puna plateau, in sandy soils or in clayey, poorly permeable soils (Cortés-Contreras et al. 2013; collection data FMNH, IADIZA, LEULS, and pers. obs). The only species inhabiting Patagonian steppes, Praocis (Orthogonoderes) argentina, is recorded from 1700 m in southern Mendoza to sea level on the Atlantic coast in Argentina (collection data IADIZA, LEULS, and pers. obs.). Orthogonoderes is the only subgenus inhabiting both the Pacific and Atlantic coasts of South America (Fig. 30).

Species included.

Praocis cribrata Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840; Praocis adspersa Germain, 1855; Praocis depressicollis Germain, 1855; Praocis ecostata Kulzer, 1958; Praocis subreticulata Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840; Praocis dentipes Germain, 1855; Praocis pleuroptera Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840 (= Praocis convexa Germain, 1855, synonymy by Flores 2007); Praocis plicicollis Germain, 1855; Praocis laevicollis Philippi & Philippi, 1864 (= Praocis nitidicollis Philippi & Philippi, 1864, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis ebenina Germain, 1855; Praocis picipes Germain, 1855 (= Praocis consobrina Philippi & Philippi, 1864, synonymy by Kulzer 1958) (= Praocis rotundicollis Philippi & Philippi, 1864, synonymy by Kulzer 1958); Praocis costipennis Solier, 1851; Praocis rugata Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840; Praocis punctata Gay & Solier in Solier, 1840; Praocis rotundata Lacordaire, 1830 (= Praocis soror Kulzer, 1958, synonymy by Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2010); Praocis variolosa Erichson, 1834; Praocis variolosa laxepunctata Kulzer, 1958; Praocis penai Kulzer, 1958 (incorrect original spelling: peñai, Article 32.5 ICZN 1999); Praocis chilensis (Gray, 1832); Praocis insularis Kulzer, 1958; Praocis tibiella Kulzer, 1958; Praocis argentina Kulzer, 1962; Praocis magnoi Molinari, 1969.

(9) Subgenus Praocis (Praocida) Flores & Pizarro-Araya, subgen. n.

http://zoobank.org/4B6EC138-1D93-4567-BB66-E3A6B1FC4593

Figs 14, 31–32
Type species.

Praocis zischkai Kulzer, 1958, present designation.

Diagnosis.

Clypeus with anterior margin extending beyond to lateral expansion of frons, width of anterior margin not exceeding half the interocular width, clypeal suture as a horizontal groove not covered by frons, clypeus lower than frons; antennomere 9 longer than antennomere 10, antennomere 11 longer than antennomere 10; apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 in two areas subequal in size, on antennomere 11 on distal third; prosternum without a narrow edge on anterior margin; lateral margin of elytron well defined; ventral surface of profemora without a row of setae on anterior edge, protibiae explanate.

Distribution.

Species of Praocis (Praocida) inhabit southern Peru, central and southern Bolivia and northern Argentina. They occur from 12°South (Cuzco, Peru) to 31°South in Cordoba (northern Argentina), in the biogeographic provinces of Puna, Chaco, and Pampa (Morrone 2006) (Fig. 31). Praocida is the only subgenus of Praocis inhabiting the biogeographic province of Chaco.

New records.

We present a new record of Praocis (Praocida) teniucosta Kulzer for the mountains in South Buenos Aires province (38°S).

Diversity.

This subgenus contains 4 species (Kulzer 1958; Flores 2009) plus 3 species to be described, 7 species in total, with a 75 percent increase in number of species (Fig. 33).

Habitat.

Species of Praocis (Praocida) have nocturnal habits, hiding during the day under shrubs, stones or logs in clayey, poorly permeable soils. They occur from 1200 m in the Chacoan forest to an altitude of 4000 m in Puna (collection data FMNH, IADIZA and pers. obs.) (Fig. 32).

Species included.

Praocis tenuicosta Kulzer, 1958; Praocis zischkai Kulzer, 1958; Praocis kuscheli Kulzer, 1958; Praocis montana Kulzer, 1958 (= Praocis baloghi Marcuzzi, 2001, synonymy by Flores 2009).

Species of Praocis incertae sedis.

Praocis pentagona Lacordaire, 1830; Praocis squalida Lacordaire, 1830; Praocis silphoides Lacordaire, 1830; Praocis spinipes Laporte, 1840; Praocis hirticollis Laporte, 1840. Type material belonging to these five species is missing (Kulzer 1958; Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2010) and the original descriptions do not provide information for the subgeneric assignment.

Key to the subgenera of Praocis
1 Anterior margin of prosternum with a narrow, sharp edge 2
– Anterior margin of prosternum rounded, smooth, lacking edge 6
2 Lateral margin of elytron well defined by a sharp edge carina-shaped, narrow or broad (Figs 2, 8), dorsal area of elytron well differentiated from pseudopleuron 3
– Lateral margin of elytron not defined, rounded (Figs 7, 9–10), surface continuous between dorsal area of elytron and pseudopleuron 4
3 Apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 arranged in a dorsally continuous semicircle (Fig. 3); ventral surface of profemora with a row of setae on anterior edge (Fig. 2) Praocis Eschscholtz
– Apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 arranged in two areas subequal in size (Fig. 4); ventral surface of profemora lacking a row of setae on anterior edge (Fig. 8) Postpraocis Flores & Pizarro-Araya
4 Antennae very short, reaching only 1/4 of lateral margin of pronotum; antennomere 9 equal length as antennomere 10; antennomere 11 equal length as antennomere 10; apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 11 on distal third (Fig. 4); ventral surface of profemora with a row of setae on anterior edge (Fig. 7) Mesopraocis Flores & Pizarro-Araya
– Antennae long, reaching or surpassing the midpoint of lateral margin of pronotum; antennomere 9 longer than antennomere 10 (Fig. 3); antennomere 11 longer than antennomere 10 (Fig. 3); apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 11 on distal half (Fig. 3); ventral surface of profemora lacking a row of setae on anterior edge 5
5 Apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 arranged in two areas subequal in size (Fig. 4); dorsal area of elytron with 2 to 5 carinae; protibiae not explanate (Fig. 9) Anthrasomus Guérin-Méneville
– Apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 arranged in a dorsally continuous semicircle (Fig. 3); dorsal area of elytron lacking carinae; protibiae explanate (Fig. 10) Filotarsus Gay & Solier
6 Apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 11 on distal half (Fig. 3) 7
– Apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 11 on distal third (Fig. 4) 8
7 Body spherical, wide, rounded seen from above; lateral margin of elytra as a wide, prominent edge; lateral margin of pronotum with a row of long, black or golden setae (Fig. 11) Hemipraocis Flores & Pizarro-Araya
– Body elongate, narrow, subparallel seen from above, lateral margin of elytra as sharp edge carina-shaped; lateral margin of pronotum lacking a row of setae (Fig. 12) Praonoda Flores & Pizarro-Araya
8 Antennomere 11 shorter than antennomere 10; clypeal suture as a horizontal groove covered by frons (Figs 4, 13) Orthogonoderes Gay & Solier
– Antennomere 11 longer than antennomere 10; clypeal suture as a horizontal groove not covered by frons (Figs 3, 14) Praocida Flores & Pizarro-Araya
Figures 15–18.

15 Distribution area of the subgenus Praocis (Praocis) 16 Punta de Choros (Coquimbo Region, Chile), habitat of Praocis (Praocis) spinolai 17 Distribution area of the subgenus Praocis (Mesopraocis) 18 Chañaral de Aceituno, Huasco (Atacama Region, Chile), habitat of Praocis (Mesopraocis) pilula.

Figures 19–22.

19 Distribution area of the subgenus Praocis (Postpraocis) 20 Totoralillo Norte (Coquimbo Region, Chile), habitat of Praocis (Postpraocis) curtisii 21 Distribution area of the subgenus Praocis (Anthrasomus) 22 Socos (Coquimbo Region, Chile), habitat of Praocis (Anthrasomus) chevrolatii subcostata.

Figures 23–26.

23 Distribution area of the subgenus Praocis (Filotarsus) 24 Uspallata Valley (Mendoza, Argentina), habitat of Praocis (Filotarsus) oblonga 25 Distribution area of the subgenus Praocis (Hemipraocis) 26 Peninsula Valdés (Chubut, Argentina), habitat of Praocis (Hemipraocis) sellata peninsularis.

Figures 27–30.

27 Distribution area of the subgenus Praocis (Praonoda) 28 Southern Santa Cruz (Argentina), habitat of Praocis (Praonoda) bicarinata 29 Distribution area of the subgenus Praocis (Orthogonoderes) 30 Choros Bajos, (Coquimbo Region, Chile), habitat of Praocis (Orthogonoderes) chilensis.

Figures 31–32.

31 Distribution area of the subgenus Praocis (Praocida) 32 Capilla del Monte (Córdoba, Argentina), habitat of Praocis (Praocida) teniucosta (Photo by Liliana Arguello).

Figure 33.

Diversity of the subgenera of Praocis. Current number of species (dotted); number of species to be described or recently described (grey) and percentage of increasing of species for each subgenus (black).

Discussion
Estimation of the diversity of the whole genus

Praocis currently contains 77 species and 8 subspecies (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2012) arranged in 9 subgenera (Fig. 33). Taking into account the 34 currently undescribed species, the genus will have 119 species/subspecies (Fig. 33), with a 47 percent increase in the number of species in the entire genus. All these undescribed species fall within the present generic concept of Praocis. An assessment of the subgeneric characters presented herein among these species to be described show a preliminary affiliation as detailed in Fig. 33. Three species that did not fit in any generic concept of Praociini or subgeneric concept of Praocis were recently described in a new genus, Patagonopraocis (Flores and Chani-Posse 2005).

Character states

A table was made with the character states used in the diagnoses (Table 1). This table summarizes the distribution of character states among the subgenera. It can be observed that each subgenus can be defined by a particular combination of these characters, stated in each diagnosis. For the characters here named 1-3, different species of Filotarsus present both the states found for each character, which are constant and well defined in all the species of the other subgenera, suggesting that in Filotarsus there are at least two groups of species which will be elucidated further by examining all the species of the subgenus and conducting a cladistic analysis of the group.

Table 1.

Characters studied and distribution of character states among the subgenera of Praocis.

Characters Character states Subgenera
Praocis s. str. Mesopraocis Postpraocis Anthrasomus Filotarsus Hemipraocis Praonoda Orthogonoderes Praocida
1) Clypeus, anterior margin A) extending beyond to lateral expansion of frons × × × × × × × × ×
B) at same level as lateral expansion of frons ×
2) Clypeus, width of anterior margin A) not exceeding half the interocular width × × × × × × × × ×
B) same width as interocular distance ×
3) Clypeal suture A) as horizontal groove × × × × × ×
B) as vertical groove × × × ×
4) Antennomere 9 A) longer than antennomere 10 × × × × × × × ×
B) equal in length to antennomere 10 ×
5) Antennomere 11 A) Longer than antennomere 10 × × × × × × ×
B) shorter than antennomere 10 ×
C) equal in length to antennomere 10 ×
6) Apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 10 A) in two areas subequal in size × × × × × × ×
B) in a dorsally continuous semicircle × ×
7) Apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomere 11 A) on distal third × × ×
B) on distal half × × × × × ×
8) Prosternum A) with a narrow edge on anterior margin × × × × ×
B) without edge on anterior margin × × × ×
9) Lateral margin of elytron A) well defined × × × × × ×
B) not defined × × ×
10) Ventral surface of profemora A) with a row of setae on anterior edge × ×
B) without a row of setae on anterior edge × × × × × × ×
11) Protibiae A) explanate × × × × × × ×
B) not explanate × ×

Some character states appear as unique for some subgenera such as antennomere 11 of equal length to 10 in Mesopraocis and antennomere 11 shorter than antennomere 10 in Orthogonoderes. One third of the characters analysed here are from the antennae, suggesting the importance of studying the length and proportion of antennomeres 9, 10 and 11 and the arrangement of the apical tomentose sensory patches on antennomeres 9, 10 and 11. Using these character states, we presented a preliminary identification key for the subgenera of Praocis.

Biogeography

The distribution of the whole genus Praocis is related to the arrangement of the Andes mountain range in southern South America. The Andes are the only high mountain chain in the continent, running along the Pacific coast of South America from Venezuela down South to Tierra del Fuego, extending over 8500 km and separating xeric habitats both eastward and westward (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2006). Among the genera of Pimeliinae, the distributional patterns of the nine subgenera of Praocis were analysed in relation to the Andes mountain range. We found three distribution patterns: three endemic subgenera west of the Andes, in central and northern Chile, Praocis, Mesopraocis and Anthrasomus (Figs 15, 17, 21); three endemic subgenera east of the Andes, in Patagonian steppes, Monte, Chaco and eastern Puna (Argentina, Bolivia and Peru), Hemipraocis, Praonoda and Praocida (Figs 25, 27, 31); and three subgenera widely distributed on both sides of the Andes and inhabiting also high altitudes of the Andes, Postpraocis, Filotarsus and Orthogonoderes (Figs 19, 23, 29). Based on these distribution patterns, and despite the current lack of a phylogeny for the genus, we can hypothesize that the ancestor of all Praocis species was older than the uplift of these mountains and the distribution of the species of six current subgenera was affected by a vicariant event caused by the uplift of the Andes. This vicariant event, which was analyzed in known phylogenies of tribes and genera of Pimeliinae in South America, left genera and species both east and west of the Andes (Flores and Pizarro-Araya 2006).

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge to the organizators of the Third International Symposium on Tenebrionoidea 2013 (Arizona, USA) for the invitation to write this paper presented at the meeting; to the curators for the loan of material: Margaret Thayer, James Boone (FMNH), Sergio Roig-Juñent (IADIZA), Jorge Cepeda-Pizarro (LEULS), Arturo Roig-Alsina (MACN), Analía A. Lanteri, Nora Cabrera (MLPA), Claude Girard, Antoine Mantilleri (MNHN), Manfred Uhlig, Bernd Jaeger (MNHUB), Mario Elgueta D. (MNNC) and Eva Sprecher (NHMB); Margaret Thayer and Alfred Newton for their hospitality during the visit of GEF to FMNH; Nelly Horak for correction of the English language; Mariana Chani Posse and Aaron Smith for suggestions improving the manuscript; Remedios Marin for help with the artwork; two anonymous reviewers for suggestions for improving this paper and Patrice Bouchard (Editor) for his advise on nomenclatural questions. This study was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET, Argentina), by a grant PIP 112-201101-00987 (CONICET, Argentina) (GEF) and DIULS-PR13121-VACDDI001 from DIULS (Universidad de La Serena) (JPA).

References
Alfaro FM, Pizarro-Araya J, Flores GE (2009) Epigean tenebrionids (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) from the Choros Archipelago (Coquimbo Region, Chile). Entomological News 120: 125–130. doi: 10.3157/021.120.0201
Arnett RH, Samuelson GA, Nishida GM (1993) The Insect and Spider Collections of the World. 2nd edition. Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville, Florida, 310 pp.
Berg C (1884) (Synonymies). Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 1884: 98–99.
Berg C (1889) Quadraginta Coleoptera nova Argentina (Tenebrionidae). Anales de la Universidad de Buenos Aires 4: 127–145.
Burmeister H (1875) Melanosoma Argentina. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 36: 457–500.
Cortés-Contreras M, Pizarro-Araya J, Alfaro FM, Cepeda-Pizarro J (2013) Coleópteros epigeos (Insecta: Coleoptera) asociados a ecotopos dunarios de la cordillera de la costa de Chile. IDESIA (Chile) 31: 95–101. doi: 10.4067/S0718-34292013000400013
Curtis J (1845) Descriptions of the insects collected by Captain P.P. King, in the survey of the Straits of Magellan. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 19: 41–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1842.tb00371.x
Erichson WF (1834) Coleoptera. In: Meyen FJF. Beiträge zur Zoologie, gesammelt auf einer Reise um die Erde. Nova Acta Physico-Medica Academiae Caesareae-Leopoldino-Carolinae, Naturae Curiosorum 16 (Suppl. 1): 219–276. Bonn.
Eschscholtz JF (1829) Zoologischer Atlas, enthaltend Abbildungen und Beschreibungen neuer Theirarten, während des Flottcapitains von Kotzebue zweiter Reise um die Welt, auf der Russisch-Kaiserlichen Kriegsschlupp Predpriaetië in the Jahren 1823–1826. Drittes Heft, G. Reimer, Berlin, 18 pp, pls. 11–15.
Fairmaire L (1883a) Note sur quelques Coléoptères de Magellan et de Santa Cruz. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France ser. 6, vol. 3: 483–506.
Fairmaire L (1883b) Description de quelques Coléoptères de la Patagonie et de la République Argentine. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France ser. 6, vol. 3: 507–516.
Fairmaire L (1902) Diagnosis de Coléoptères hétéromères recueillis par M.G.A. Baer au Pérou. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 7: 148–151.
Ferrú MA, Elgueta M (2011) Lista de Coleópteros (Insecta: Coleoptera) de las Regiones de Arica y Parinacota y de Tarapacá, Chile. Boletín del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Chile 60: 9–61.
Fischer von Waldheim G (1844) Spicilegium Entomographiae Rossicae. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 17: 3–144.
Flores GE (2007) New synonymies and lectotype designations in the Neotropical tribes Nycteliini, Praocini, and Scotobiini (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Annales Zoologici 57: 409–426.
Flores GE (2009) Revision of some types of the South American tribes Nycteliini, Praocini, and Scotobiini (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), with new synonymies. Zootaxa 1985: 21–33.
Flores GE, Chani-Posse M (2005) Patagonopraocis, a new genus of Praocini from Patagonia (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Annales Zoologici 55: 575–581.
Flores GE, Pizarro-Araya J (2006) The Andes mountain range as a vicariant event in the Pimeliinae (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in southern South America. Cahiers Scientifiques 10: 95–102.
Flores GE, Pizarro-Araya J (2010) Two new synonymies in the genus Praocis (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Zootaxa 2386: 65–68.
Flores GE, Pizarro-Araya J (2012) Systematic revision of the South American genus Praocis Eschscholtz, 1829 (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Part 1: Introduction and subgenus Praocis s. str. Zootaxa 3336: 1–35.
Flores GE, Carrara R, Cheli GH (2011) Three new Praociini (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) from Peninsula Valdés (Argentina), with zoogeographical and ecological remarks. Zootaxa 2965: 39−50.
Gajardo R (1994) La vegetación natural de Chile. Clasificación y distribución geográfica. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, Chile, 165 pp.
Germain P (1855) Descripción de Coleópteros de diversas especies que no se hallan en la obra del señor Gay. Anales de la Universidad de Chile 12: 386–407.
Gray GR (1832) Notices of new genera and species. Insecta. In: Griffith E, Pigdeon E (Eds) The Animal Kingdom arranged in conformity with its organization by the Baron Cuvier, member of the institute of France, with supplementary additions to each order. Whittaker, Treacher, and Co., London. Volume 15: 1–796.
Guérin-Méneville FE (1834) Matériaux pour une classification des Mélasomes. Magazine de Zoologie 3e. année: 1–39.
ICZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. Adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences. International trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, xxix + 306 pp.
Kaszab Z (1964) The zoological results of Gy. Topáls collectings in South Argentina. 13. Coleoptera-Tenebrionidae. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici (Pars Zoologica) 56: 353–387.
Kaszab Z (1969) The scientific results of the Hungarian soil Zoological Expeditions to South America. 17. Tenebrioniden aus Chile (Coleoptera). Opuscula Zoologica Budapest 9(2): 291–337.
Kulzer H (1958) Monographie der südamerikanischen Tribus Praocini (Col.) (16 Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Tenebrioniden). Entomologische Arbeiten aus dem Museum George Frey 9: 1–105.
Kulzer H (1962) Neue Tenebrioniden aus Südamerika (Col.) (23 Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Tenebrioniden). Entomologische Arbeiten aus dem Museum George Frey 13: 79–100.
Lacordaire JT (1830) Mémoire sur les habitudes des insectes coléoptères de l’Amérique méridionale (Hétéromères). Annales de Sciences Naturelles 20: 274–291.
Lacordaire JT (1859) Histoire Naturelle des Insectes. Generades Coléoptères ou exposé méthodique et critique de tous les genres proposés jusqu’ìci dans cet ordre d’insectes. Tome cinquième. Contenant les familles des Ténébrionides, Cistélides, Nilionides, Pythides, Mélandryides, Lagriides, Pédilides, Anthicides, Pyrochroides, Mordellides, Rhipiphorides, Stylopides, Meloïdes et Oedémérides. Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, Première partie ([1] + 1–400), Deuxième partie, [1] + 401–750.
Laporte FLNC (Comte de Castelnau) (1840) Historie naturelle des insectes, vol. 2. P. Duménil, Paris, 564 pp.
Marcuzzi G (1977) Nuove specie di tenebrionidi dell’Argentina (Coleoptera). Memorie della Societá Entomologica Italiana 55: 139–152 (1976).
Marcuzzi G (2001) New species of tenebrionid beetles from Central and South America (Col. Heteromera). Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Giacomo Doria 93: 269–291 (2000).
Molinari HJ (1969) Tenebriónidos nuevos de Jujuy (República Argentina). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 31(1–4): 133−140.
Morrone JJ (2006) Biogeographic areas and transition zones of Latin America and the Caribbean islands based on panbiogeographic and cladistics analyses of the entomofauna. Annual Review of Entomology 51: 467–494. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130447
Motschulsky V (1845) Remarques sur la collection des coléoptères Russes de Victor Motschoulsky. 1er article. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 18: 1–127.
Peña LE (1966) Catálogo de los Tenebrionidae (Coleoptera) de Chile. Entomologische Arbeiten aus dem Museum George Frey 17: 397–453.
Philippi RA, Philippi FH (1864) Beschreibung einiger neuen Chilenischen Käfer. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 25(10–12): 313–406.
Solier AJJ (1840) Essai sur les Collaptèrides. 11e Tribu. Praocites. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 9: 207–370.
Solier AJJ (1851) Fauna chilena: Coleópteros. In: Gay C. Historia Física y Política de Chile. Zoología, Vol. 5. Imprenta de Maulde et Renou, Paris, 183–204.