Citation: Merino-Sáinz I, Torralba-Burrial A, Anadón A (2014) The relevance, biases, and importance of digitising opportunistic non-standardised collections: A case study in Iberian harvestmen fauna with BOS Arthropod Collection datasets (Arachnida, Opiliones). ZooKeys 404: 71–89. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.404.6520 GBIF Key: http://www.gbif.org/dataset/7cebf715-c3b0-4477-99e7-f6f3aca27bbe
Resource citation: Universidad de Oviedo (2014). BOS Arthropod Collection of University of Oviedo (Spain): Opiliones unplanned collection events subset, as part of BOS Arthropod Collection Dataset: Opiliones (BOS-Opi). 472 data records in subset (3772 data records in original dataset). Contributed by: Merino-Sáinz I, Anadón A, Torralba-Burrial A. Online at http://www.gbif.es:8080/ipt/resource.do?r=bos-opi_unplanned_collection_events (subset description), http://www.gbif.es:8080/ipt/archive.do?r=Bos-Opi (original dataset), and http://www.unioviedo.es/BOS/Zoologia/artropodos/opiliones (original dataset), version 1.0 (last updated on 2013-06-30). GBIF key: http://www.gbif.org/dataset/7cebf715-c3b0-4477-99e7-f6f3aca27bbe (subset metadata), and http://www.gbif.org/dataset/cc0e6535-6bb4-4703-a32c-077f5e1176cd (original dataset), Data Paper ID: doi: 10.3897/zookeys.404.6520 and doi: 10.3897/zookeys.341.6130 (original dataset).
In this study, we analyse the relevance of harvestmen distribution data derived from opportunistic, unplanned, and non-standardised collection events in an area in the north of the Iberian Peninsula. Using specimens deposited in the BOS Arthropod Collection at the University of Oviedo, we compared these data with data from planned, standardised, and periodic collections with pitfall traps in several locations in the same area. The Arthropod Collection, begun in 1977, includes specimens derived from both sampling types, and its recent digitisation allows for this type of comparative analysis. Therefore, this is the first data-paper employing a hybrid approach, wherein subset metadata are described alongside a comparative analysis. The full dataset can be accessed through Spanish GBIF IPT at http://www.gbif.es:8080/ipt/archive.do?r=Bos-Opi, and the metadata of the unplanned collection events at http://www.gbif.es:8080/ipt/resource.do?r=bos-opi_unplanned_collection_events. We have mapped the data on the 18 harvestmen species included in the unplanned collections and provided records for some species in six provinces for the first time. We have also provided the locations of Phalangium opilio in eight provinces without published records. These results highlight the importance of digitising data from unplanned biodiversity collections, as well as those derived from planned collections, especially in scarcely studied groups and areas.
Biodiversity collections, entomological collections, digitisation priorities, sampling methodology, biases, Opiliones, distribution, Iberian Peninsula
Purpose: Existing knowledge on the distribution of harvestmen throughout the Iberian Peninsula is still highly fragmented (
Within this context, biodiversity data on specimens from the BOS Arthropod Collection (hosted at the Department of Organisms and Systems Biology, (Spanish acronym BOS), University of Oviedo) are being digitised and the data released through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data-portal (Department information as data published and available datasets: http://www.gbif.org/publisher/95cb537c-74c5-4c1e-ae24-32e7ea08f380; general digitisation and data release workflow of the BOS Arthropod Collection:
The BOS Arthropod Collection includes harvestmen from the northern part of the Iberian Peninsula that, since 1977, have been obtained through systematic repeated sampling in several locations, as well as through non-harvestmen-specific sampling and accidental occurrences. Specimens were collected systematically from the Muniellos Biosphere Reserve between 2000 and 2002 (
Project title: Informatización de la Colección de Artrópodos BOS de la Universidad de Oviedo / Digitisation of the BOS Arthropod Collection of University of Oviedo
Personnel digitisation and metadata creator: A. Torralba-Burrial
Administrative contact: A. Anadón
BOS-Opi determination specialist: I. Merino-Sáinz
Subset collectors: Most of the collectors provided less than ten harvestmen records in this subset. Only Merino-Sáinz collected more than 10 specimens. All of the collectors are listed in Supplementary material 1 (http://hdl.handle.net/10651/24734) next to each specimen.
Funding: The digitisation of this biological collection was supported by the Spanish National R+D+i Plan (MICINN, Spanish Government, grant ref. PTA2010-4108-I) and PCTI Asturias (Asturias Regional Government, ref. COF11-38) through a contract with ATB.
Specimens were identified by IMS, which was supported by a Severo Ochoa pre-doctoral grant (ref. BP08039, FICYC, Asturias Regional Government).
Study area descriptions/descriptor: Harvestmen data in the subset are from the same area as the full Opiliones of the BOS Arthropod Collection dataset. Specimens are mainly from the northern third of the Iberian Peninsula (chiefly the Spanish provinces of Asturias, Cantabria, and León, with a few records from other neighbouring provinces) (see Figure 1).
Distribution of specimens included in this subset.
Data sources of harvestmen data from planned collection events with pitfall trapping:
Design description: The data subset is part of the large dataset of Opiliones housed in the BOS Arthropod Collection (
A diagram depicting the methodological design of this hybrid data paper. Harvestmen in the BOS Arthropod Collection (
General taxonomic coverage description: Seventeen taxa were identified to the species level. Due to the biological phase or sex of the specimens, or unresolved taxonomic issues, 39 records (8%) were assigned only to the genus level. Those specimens belonging to the genus Paramiopsalis represent species number 18. The numbers of records per species and per family (also including specimens identified to the genus level) are shown in Table 1.
Harvestmen families and species included in the data subset.
Family | Species | Abundance | Chorology |
---|---|---|---|
Sclerosomatidae | Leiobunum blackwalli Meade | 129 | EU |
Leiobunum rotundum (Latreille) | 94 | EU | |
Homalenotus laranderas Grasshoff | 28 | EI | |
Gyas titanus Simon | 19 | EU | |
Leiobunum spp. | 5 | ||
Homalenotus quadridentatus (Cuvier) | 3 | EU | |
Homalenotus spp. | 3 | ||
Total Sclerosomatidae | 5 | 281 | |
Phalangiidae | Phalangium opilio Linnaeus | 109 | HO |
Odiellus spp. | 37 | ||
Paroligolophus agrestis (Meade) | 16 | HO | |
Dicranopalpus ramosus (Simon) | 13 | EU | |
Odiellus simplicipes (Simon) | 10 ♂♂ | EI | |
Odiellus seoanei (Simon) | 6 ♂♂ | EI | |
Paroligolophus spp. | 5 | ||
Odiellus spinosus (Bosc) | 2 ♂♂ | EU | |
Megabunus diadema (Fabricius) | 4 | EU | |
Total Phalangiidae | 7 | 202 | |
Ischyropsalididae | Ischyropsalis hispanica Roewer | 10 | EI |
Nemastomatidae | Nemastomella dentipatellae (Dresco) | 8 | EI |
Nemastoma hankiewiczii (Kulczynski) | 1 | EI | |
Total Nemastomatidae | 2 | 9 | |
Trogulidae | Trogulus sp. aff. nepaeformis (Scopoli) | 21 | |
Anelasmocephalus cambridgei (Westwood) | 1 | EU | |
Total Trogulidae | 2 | 22 | |
Sironidae | Paramiopsalis sp. | 12 | EI |
EI: Iberian endemic, EU: European, HO: Holarctic (
The family Phalangidae comprised the largest number of identified species (seven), followed by Sclerosomatidae (five). However, when the number of records is considered, Sclerosomatidae was the most frequent family (around one hundred records for both Leiobunum blackwalli and Leiobunum rotundum), followed by Phalangidae, with only one species Phalangium opilio with a high number of records, similar to the Leiobunum species, and other species with only a few records. Five families (and the remaining species) had less than 30 records each.
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Arachnida
Order: Opiliones
Family: Sclerosomatidae, Phalangiidae, Ischyropsalididae, Nemastomatidae, Trogulidae, Sironidae
Common names: Animals, Arthropods, Arachnids, Harvestmen
Parent collection identifier: Colección de Artrópodos BOS
Collection name: Colección de Artrópodos BOS de la Universidad de Oviedo: Opiliones (BOS-Opi) subset recolecciones no planeadas
Collection identifier: http://www.gbif.org/dataset/7cebf715-c3b0-4477-99e7-f6f3aca27bbe
Curatorial unit: 472 with an uncertainty of 0 (Data records)
Curatorial unit: 536 with an uncertainty of 0 (Specimens)
Method step description: This data subset was extracted from the large dataset of harvestmen in the BOS Arthropod Collection (
Bibliographic records on each harvestmen taxon (except Odiellus spinosus) are listed in
We conducted a hierarchical cluster analysis (group average clustering algorithm, see algorithm choice discussion in
Study extent description: Harvestmen specimens included in the subset came from different localities in the Iberian Peninsula, at different distances from one another, and were collected at different dates between 1977 and 2011. Nonetheless, most of them came from the north of the Iberian Peninsula, and all of them came from the northern half (see Figure 1). The heterogeneity of the localities, most of which are only represented by a single sample or even only an isolated specimen, means that a general list of localities is not useful to short data exposition; rather, the locations are listed beside each specimen in Supplementary material 1 - Appendix A (supplementary file http://hdl.handle.net/10651/24734).
Harvestmen data obtained through planned collection using pitfall traps and deposited in the BOS Arthropod Collection included specimens collected from the Muniellos Biosphere Reserve between 2000 and 2002 (
Sampling description: We studied a data subset of the harvestmen specimens in the BOS Arthropod Collection at the University of Oviedo that had been directly collected (by hand) on entomological field trips by students and lecturers from this department (listed in Supplementary material 1: http://hdl.handle.net/10651/24734, beside each specimen). This subset also included our own data obtained using diverse methods—collecting directly by hand, beating vegetation over an upturned umbrella, and using Berlese funnels, light traps, Malaise traps, and sieves; only 6% of collections used pitfall traps. Therefore, the specimens included in this study did not derive from harvestmen-targeted research projects, theses, or historical collections, but were collected at random with no prior sampling design.
Specimens were identified by I. Merino-Sáinz using an Olympus SZX-ILLK200 stereoscopic microscope and the appropriate literature (
The data quality control measures adopted throughout the digitisation process were described in the data-paper of the full dataset (
Metadata language: English
Date of metadata creation: 2014-02-05
Hierarchy level: Subset
Metadata distribution: http://www.gbif.es:8080/ipt/resource.do?r=bos-opi_unplanned_collection_events
Format name metadata: Ecological Metadata Language (EML) and HTML in web.
Data distribution: BOS-Opi dataset http://www.gbif.es:8080/ipt/archive.do?r=Bos-Opi
Subset codes in dataset: BOS-Opi codes 493-960.
Publication date of data: 2013-07-04
Update police: Subset will not be updated.
Licences of use: This BOS Arthropod Collection of University of Oviedo (Spain): Opiliones unplanned collection events subset, as part of BOS Arthropod Collection Dataset: Opiliones (BOS-Opi) dataset is made available under the Open Data Commons Attribution License: http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/.
In Figure 3, we have mapped the locations where each harvestmen species was found (listed in Supplementary material 1, http://hdl.handle.net/10651/24734), in order to facilitate rapid graphic assessment.
Distribution of harvestmen records in the unplanned collection events. A Ischyropsalididae, Nemastomatidae and Phalangiidae B Scleromatidae and Trogulidae.
These records do not increase the harvestmen checklists for the provinces of Asturias and Cantabria (
Presence of each harvestmen species by province according to data included in this data subset.
Orense | Lugo | Asturias | León | Zamora | Salamanca | Cantabria | Palencia | Burgos | Vizcaya | Guipúzcoa | Álava | Navarra | Huesca | Madrid | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nemastomella dentipatellae | X | ||||||||||||||
Nemastoma hankiewiczii | X | ||||||||||||||
Trogulus nepaeformis | X | ||||||||||||||
Anelasmocephalus cambridgei | X | ||||||||||||||
Ischyropsalis hispanica | X | ||||||||||||||
Phalangium opilio | X |
X |
X | X | X |
X |
X | X |
X | X |
X |
X |
|||
Megabunus diadema | X | ||||||||||||||
Paroligolophus agrestis | X | ||||||||||||||
Odiellus simplicipes | X | ||||||||||||||
Odiellus seoanei | X | X |
|||||||||||||
Odiellus spinosus | X |
X |
|||||||||||||
Gyas titanus | X | X | X | X | |||||||||||
Dicranopalpus ramosus | X | X |
|||||||||||||
Leiobunum blackwalli | X |
X | X | X | X | X | X | ||||||||
Leiobunum rotundum | X | X | X | X | X |
X | X | X | |||||||
Homalenotus laranderas | X | X | X | ||||||||||||
Homalenotus quadridentatus | X | ||||||||||||||
Paramiopsalis sp. | X |
* first records.
Odiellus spinosus is thus recorded for the first time in the provinces of León and Burgos. In Asturias, this species was found in Illano (
The first finding of Leiobunum rotundum in Palencia was not surprising, as this European species is widespread throughout the north of the Iberian Peninsula (
The fact that this data subset includes the first records of Phalangium opilio in eight provinces is another example of the scarcity of data on harvestmen throughout the Iberian Peninsula. Phalangium opilio is a Holarctic species distributed throughout the peninsula from Galicia to Catalonia, with records in Portugal, Central Spain, and the Balearic Island (
The data subset also includes several records older than the first published records of some species in Asturias and Cantabria provinces, confirm earlier studies. Thus, we provide older records for three harvestmen species (Megabunus diadema, Homalenotus laranderas, and Paroligolophus agrestis) first reported in Asturias in 2008 (
In the area covered by this data subset of Opiliones, systematic sampling has been conducted in seven localities; therefore, this subset should include the species caught in these samples (see
Table 3 shows that this subset of unplanned collection events, with a similar number of specimens, includes only one species fewer than the systematic study on Opiliones from the Muniellos Biosphere Reserve (
Cluster hierarchical analysis with harvestmen presence data from seven locations with planned collection events and this general subset.
Number of harvestmen specimens and species with planned collection events (Oviedo, Muniellos, Illano, Muros and Vioño) and this subset.
This subset | Oviedo | Muniellos | Illano | Muros | Vioño | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Specimens | 536 | 8452 | 770 | 1641 | 2687 | 2329 |
Species richness | 18 | 16 | 19 | 14 | 13 | 12 |
Data sources of harvestmen data from planned collection events:
These results also show that some taxa are not usually found in non-harvestmen-targeted (or soil entomofauna-targeted) samplings; this was the case for small, inconspicuous species that occupy edaphic niches throughout their entire life cycle (see previous comments on absent species). Instead, other species were better represented and appeared more frequently in the present subset, for example, large species with long legs and arboreal or shrub habits, at least during the adult phase. Taxa with these features comprised almost 56% of the species in this data subset, including the three most frequently captured species. Thus, the major abundance of adult specimens of Phalangium opilio, Leiobunum rotundum and Leiobunum blackwalli in the subset would be in line with observations in other geographic areas about vertical migration patterns throughout their life cycle (
These biases are due to the differences in body size and life history of each harvestmen species and should be considered in biogeographic analyses with accidental occurrences (unplanned samples). In the particular case of this digitised subset, European elements comprised 50% of specimens, 39% were Iberian endemics, and 11% were Holarctic taxa—percentages which are slightly different from those resulting from pitfall trapping in the same area (
Main observations on the advantages and problems arising from the digitisation of unplanned collections in the case study of Iberian harvestmen in the BOS Arthropod Collection.
Advantages | Problems |
---|---|
Less effort (identification, digitisation) needed: lower number of specimens than planned, periodical, pitfall samples | Some biases detected in harvestmen present in the subcollection (body size, life history, phases of life cycle) |
Similar species richness | Does not provide full phenological data |
Justification of the investment made to collect/house/study such collections | Not suitable for taxa with very narrow niches (e.g., subterranean/hypogean taxa) |
Bridges knowledge gaps |
A small subcollection of harvestmen from the north of the Iberian Peninsula, gathered using non-Opiliones-targeted sampling methods and in many cases by non-specialist collectors, presented a high species richness similar to planned, periodic, and costlier studies. This subcollection enabled us to extend our knowledge on the distribution of 18 species. The 536 specimens in the subset showed very interesting faunistic results, while less effort was exerted on identification and digitisation than in planned, periodic collection events using pitfall traps. The data subset contained six first provincial records of various species; Phalangium opilio locations in eight provinces without previous data were also provided. Nevertheless, we also detected some drawbacks to this type of data collection; collection was biased towards adults of larger species (with long legs or wide bodies) occupying shrubby or arboreal habitats, which may also affect the biogeographic analysis of the dataset. Nevertheless, this study highlights the importance of the general biodiversity collections in museums and at universities and the need to digitise their specimens, including the data from non-targeted, or unplanned, samplings, especially when poorly studied groups are involved. The digitisation of unplanned collections can help to justify the investments made to collect, house, and study such collections. Moreover, it is important to keep in mind that most of the collections at the university/museum, NGO, and amateur scientist levels are not comprised of data collected through planned events, but mainly through unplanned events. The digitisation of such unplanned collections has great potential to (1) bridge gaps in existing knowledge, and (2) strengthen existing understanding about the status of biodiversity.
The authors wish to express their gratitude to all of the collectors (listed in Supplementary material 1: http://hdl.handle.net/10651/24734) who deposited harvestmen specimens in the BOS Arthropod Collection. Vishwas Chavan and anonymous reviewers enhanced the paper with their suggestions.
Harvestmen specimens included in this unplanned collection events subset.
Authors: Izaskun Merino-Sáinz, Antonio Torralba-Burrial, Araceli Anadón
Data type: Specimens data.
Explanation note: Alternative link for download: http://hdl.handle.net/10651/24734
Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.