Research Article
Print
Research Article
The impact of a new genus on the molecular phylogeny of Hemisphaeriini (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Issidae)
expand article infoSongping Zhao, Thierry Bourgoin§, Menglin Wang
‡ China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
§ Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
Open Access

Abstract

A new genus, Retaldar gen. nov. of the family Issidae (Hemisphaeriinae, Hemisphaeriini) is described from Guangxi Province of China. A revised molecular analysis for the Hemisphaeriini based on partial sequences of 18S, 28S, COXI and Cytb, provides evidence for a new lineage within the subtribe Mongolianina. With two subgroups of genera now identified, the monophyly of Mongolianina is discussed from both a morphological and a molecular basis.

Keywords

Hemisphaeriinae, molecular, morphology, new species, Oriental, planthoppers

Introduction

Recently Wang et al. (2016) proposed important changes to the classification of the planthopper family Issidae based on the first molecular analysis of the family. Supported also by a new set of morphological characters, several new lineages were identified forming a major group including almost all Oriental genera in the subfamily Hemisphaeriinae Melichar, 1906 sec. Wang et al. (2016). This important monophyletic unit currently groups around 100 genera and 486 species distributed in the Oriental region (Bourgoin 2019) with a few taxa in the New World such as Picumna Stål, 1864 (Wang et al. 2016). The subfamily is divided into four tribes according to the following topology: (Kodaianellini Wang, Zhang & Bourgoin, 2016 + (Sarimini Wang, Zhang & Bourgoin, 2016 + (Parahiraciini Cheng & Yang, 1991 + Hemisphaeriini Melichar, 1906))) (Wang et al. 2016). The last tribe currently contains 28 genera and is divided into two sister subtribes: Mongolianina Wang, Zhang & Bourgoin, 2016 (6 genera) and Hemisphaeriina Melichar, 1906 (11 genera). Two unnamed lineages in each subtribe were also identified in the Wang et al. (2016) analysis. They were not discussed being considered as artificial due to sampling bias: several taxa belonged to the same genus (viz. Mongoliona Distant, 1909 and Hemisphaerius Schaum, 1850). Beside these 17 Hemisphaeriini genera, 11 other genera still remain in an incertae sedis position within the Hemisphaeriini (Bourgoin 2019).

In this paper, we describe and sequence the genes (18S, 28S (D3–D5) and (D6–D7), COXI and Cytb) of a new species of Hemisphaeriini from Guangxi Province of China, and provide several sequences for other known genera. These new data allow the reassessment of the subtribal division of Hemisphaeriini proposed by Wang et al. (2016).

Materials and methods

The specimens were collected by net capture and stored in alcohol. The genitalia were separated from the insect body using micro-scissors, and then boiled in 10% NaOH solution for few minutes until muscles were completely dissolved leaving tegumentary structures. After rinsing in distilled water several times to clean the residual NaOH solution, the abdomen was subsequently transferred to glycerine for final dissection and observation. Genitalia were finally conserved under the specimen in genital vials. Photographs for external morphology and genitalia characters were taken using Leica DFC camera attached to Leica M205FA stereomicroscope and further refined with LAS X software. Morphological interpretations and subsequent terminologies follow Bourgoin (1987, 1993) for male and female genitalia respectively, Emeljanov (1971) for the term “hypocostal plate” on the forewing and Bourgoin et al. (2015) for wing venation. The type specimens are deposited in China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, China.

Total genomic DNA was extracted from the legs of type specimens using a Sangon Ezup column animal genomic DNA purification kit. The genes (18S, 28S, COXI, Cytb) were amplified using the same primers and amplification procedure as in Wang et al. (2016). DNA sequencing was conducted at Sangon Company (Shanghai, China). Taxon sampling includes all Hemisphaeriini taxa available from a previous analysis (Wang et al. 2016) for which several new sequences are added (Table 1). Both the newly described genus and an undescribed Mongoliana species from Thailand (Mongoliana sp. 1) were included in the new analysis. From Wang et al. (2016), 11 genera representing all major lineages were used as outgroups, plus a new species of the genus Rhombissus Gnezdilov & Hayashi, 2016 (Rhombissus sp.) from the issid tribe Parahiraciini. All sequences are registered in GenBank with their accession numbers provided in Table 1. Contigs assembly was made using the software SEQMAN from package DNASTAR v5.01 (www.dnastar.com). MEGA v7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016) was used for performing alignments. IQTREE v1.4.1 (Nguyen et al. 2015) was used for maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using 10,000 ultrafast bootstraps (Minh et al. 2013) with substitution model automatically selected for partitions unlinked; other parameters were used as per default. FIGTREE v1.1.2 (Rambaut 2016) was used to visualize the tree.

Table 1.

Taxa sampling used for the phylogeny tree and corresponding sequence numbers registered in GenBank. The symbol * denotes new added sequences in this study.

Taxa name Collecting location Gene 18S Gene 18S Gene 18S Gene 28S Gene 28S COXI Cytb
(1F–5R) (3F–Bi) (A2–9R) (D3–D5) (D6–D7)
Hemisphaeriini
Ceratogergithus pseudotessellatus (Che, Zhang & Wang, 2007) China KX761574 KX761576 KX761444 KX702806 KX702919 KX702906
Ceratogergithus spinosus (Che, Zhang & Wang, 2007) China KX761491 KX761491 KX761491 KX761532 KX761521 KX761502 KX761513
Choutagus longicephalus Zhang, Wang & Che, 2006 China KX650620 KX650620 KX650620 KX761450 KX702810 KX761460
Clypeosmilus centrodasus Gnezdilov & Soulier-Perkins, 2017 Vietnam KX761575 KX761470 KX761474
Eusudasina nantouensis Yang, 1994 China JX196136 HM052838 HM452266
Euxaldar lenis Gnezdilov, Bourgoin & Wang, 2017 Vietnam KX761573 KX761565 KX761412
Gergithoides carinatifrons Schumacher, 1915 China KX761538 KX761538 KX702805 KX761555 KX702905
Gergithoides rugulosus (Melichar, 1906) China JX196163 HM052835 HM452279
Gergithus yunnanensis Che, Zhang & Wang, 2007 China KX702831 KX702831 KX702831 KX761456 MN381848* KX702924 KX702915
Hemisphaerius palaemon Fennah, 1978 China KX761486 KX761486 KX761486 KX761526 KX761517 KX761497 KX761508
Hemisphaerius rufovarius Walker, 1858 China KX702825 KX702825 KX702825 KX761454 KX702812 KX702923 KX702913
Hemisphaerius lysanias Fennah, 1978 Vietnam KX702833 KX702833 KX702833 KX761404 KX702860 KX702933 KX702883
Hemisphaerius coccinelloides (Burmeister, 1834) Philippines KX702834 KX702834 KX702834 KX761405 KX702861 KX702934 KX702884
Hemisphaerius sp. Laos KX702835 KX702835 KX702835 KX761406 KX702862 KX761556 KX702885
Hemisphaerius testaceus Distant, 1906 China JX196135 HM052831 HM452258
Macrodaruma pertinax Fennah, 1978 Vietnam KX702832 KX702832 KX702832 KX761402 KX702859 KX702931 KX702882
Macrodaruma sp. China KX702828 KX702828 KX702828 KX761399 KX702857 KX702927 KX702881
Maculergithus multipunctatus (Che, Zhang & Wang, 2007) China KX702816 KX702816 KX702816 KX761443 KX702804 KX702918 KX702904
Maculergithus nonomaculatus (Meng & Wang, 2012) China KX761492 KX761492 KX761492 KX761533 KX761522 KX761503 KX761514
Mongoliana triangularis Che, Wang & Chou, 2003 China KX761561 KX761528 KX761510
Mongoliana sinuata Che, Wang & Chou, 2003 China KX702820 KX702820 KX702820 KX761448 KX761459 KX702908
Mongoliana sp.1 Thailand MN422135* MN381854* MN332233*
Mongoliana sp. 2 China KX761572 MN422136* KX761566 KX761534 MN381849*
Mongoliana serrata Che, Wang & Chou, 2003 China JX196160 HM052830 HM452272
Neogergithoides tubercularis Sun, Meng & Wang, 2012 China KX702822 KX702822 KX702822 KX761451 MN381845* KX761558 KX702910
Ophthalmosphaerius trilobulus (Che, Zhang & Wang, 2006) China KX702826 KX702826 KX702826 KX761455 KX702813 KX761462 KX702914
Retaldar yanitubus sp. nov. China MN381856* MN381856* MN381856* MN381853* MN381851* MN381857* MN332232*
Thioniini
Thionia sp. Panama KX761539 KX761539 KX761407 KX702935 KX702886
Hysteropterini
Celyphoma quadrupla Meng & Wang, 2012 China KX702815 KX702815 KX702815 KX761442 KX702803 KX702917 KX702903
Mulsantereum maculifrons (Mulsant & Rey, 1855) France KX761569 KX761569 KX761569 KX761400 MN381847* KX702928 KX761551
Issini
Issus coleoptratus (Fabricius, 1781) France KX761568 KX761568 KX761568 KX761403 KX761560 KX702932 KX761550
Kodaianellini
Kodaianellissus intorqueus Wang, Bourgoin & Zhang, 2017 China KX761476 KX761476 KX761476 KX761480 KX761482 KX761472
Kodaianella bicinctifrons Fennah, 1956 China KX702814 KX702814 KX702814 KX761441 KX702802 KX761458 KX702902
Sarimini
Sarima bifurca Meng & Wang, 2016 China KX702819 KX702819 KX702819 KX761447 KX702808 KX702921 KX761552
Tetrica sp. China KX702821 KX702821 KX702821 KX761449 KX702809 KX702922 KX702909
Parahiraciini
Flavina hainana (Wang & Wang, 1999) China KX702824 KX702824 KX702824 KX761453 MN381846* KX702912
Fortunia sp. China KX761487 KX761487 KX761487 KX761527 KX761518 KX761498 KX761509
Neodurium hamatum Wang & Wang, 2011 China KX702818 KX702818 KX702818 KX761446 MN381844* KX702920
Rhombissus sp. China MN381855* MN381855* MN381855* MN381852* MN381850* MN332231*

Taxonomy

Hemisphaeriini Melichar, 1906

Mongolianina Wang, Zhang & Bourgoin, 2016

Retaldar gen. nov.

Type species

Retaldar yanitubus sp. nov., here designated.

Etymology

Genus name masculine from the free combination of the latin word ‘rete’ meaning network as for the reticulated forewings and the suffix ‘-aldar’ from the genus Euxaldar Fennah, 1978.

Diagnosis

This new genus is similar to the genus Clypeosmilus Gnezdilov & Soulier-Perkins, 2017 in general appearance, but differs by: 1) a more complex and obscure reticular venation of the forewing (Fig. 1) while a simpler pattern is found in Clypeosmilus (Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 1A); 2) an asymmetrical male genitalia with the periandrium more developed on right side and the aedeagus processes emerging at different levels, more posteriorly on right side (Figs 9, 10) while it is symmetrical in Clypeosmilus (Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 3A); 3) gonostyli with ventral margin deeply convex (Fig. 8), while it is much more elongated in Clypeosmilus (Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 3C). The new genus is also similar to the genus Eusudasina Yang, 1994, from which it differs also by its more complex reticulate venation and by its longer frons, around 1.2 times longer (in middle) than broad at widest part (Figs 3, 21), only around 0.9 times longer in Eusudasina (Chan and Yang 1994, fig. 34C). With Euxaldar Fennah, 1978, Retaldar gen. nov. shares the general form of the gonostyli, which is strongly developed ventrally (Fennah 1978, fig. 251; Gnezdilov et al. 2017, fig. 8) but definitively differs by its distal postero-ventral protuberance (Fig. 8) and by its near-symmetric subapical processes on the periandrium (Figs 9, 10) while they are asymmetrical in the former (Gnezdilov et al. 2017, figs 1, 2).

Figures 1–5. 

Retaldar yanitubus sp. nov. 1 adult (holotype, male), dorsal view 2 adult (holotype, male), lateral view 3 adult (holotype, male), frontal view 4 forewing (paratype, female) 5 hindwing (paratype, female).

Figures 6–11. 

Retaldar yanitubus sp. nov., holotype. 6 male genitalia, lateral view 7 male anal tube, dorsal view 8 gonostylus, lateral view 9 phallic complex, left lateral view 10 phallic complex, right lateral view 11 apical half of phallic complex, ventral view. The arrows on Fig. 8 indicates the distal postero-ventral protuberance of gonostyli.

Description

Head with compound eyes slightly wider than pronotum, almost same width as mesonotum (Fig. 1). Vertex rectangular, obviously broader than long at midline, anterior margin almost straight, lateral margins nearly parallel, posterior margin slightly roundly concave at middle; median carina absent on disc (Fig. 1). Frons obviously longer than wide, gradually broadening from dorsal margin to below the level of antennae, then curved to frontoclypeal suture (Figs 3, 21); dorsal margin slightly concave, lateral margins slightly broaden below level of compound eyes, median carina nearly invisible. Frons with numerous tiny tubercles on the whole disc. The tubercles larger on the lateral areas, arranged into a vertical line on each side of frons (Figs 3, 21). Frontoclypeal suture straight (Figs 3, 21). Gena in lateral view flattened and oblique (Fig. 2). Clypeus in lateral view with a protuberance below frontoclypeal suture slightly surpassing the gena (Fig. 2); in ventral view, clypeus without median carina (Figs 3, 21). Rostrum reaching midcoxae; apical segment slightly shorter than subapical one. Antennae with scape extremely short, pedicel rounded (Figs 3, 21). Pronotum triangular, apical margin roundly convex, posterior margin nearly straight, with some faint small nodules on each side or nodules invisible, median carina absent (Figs 1, 19, 20). Mesonotum triangular, a little longer than pronotum in midline, without carina on the disc; with (Fig. 1) or without (Figs 19, 20) some faint small nodules in lateral part apically. Forewings obviously longer than broad, without hypocostal plate, with elevated irregular reticular venations and venation poorly recognizable, costal margin and posterior margin subparallel, costal margin roundly convex, apical margin straight and oblique inward to posterior margin (Fig. 4), CuP obvious, Pcu and A1 fused exceeding middle of clavus (Figs 1, 4). Hindwing one-lobed. Metatibia with two lateral spines on apical half and seven spines apically.

Figures 12–18. 

Retaldar yanitubus sp. nov., paratype. 12 female anal tube, dorsal view 13 gonoplacs, lateral view 14 gonoplacs, dorsal view 15 gonapophysis IX and gonaspiculum bridge, dorsal view 16 gonapophysis IX and gonaspiculum bridge, lateral view 17 sternite VII 18 gonocoxa VIII and gonapophysis VIII, ventral view.

Figures 19–21. 

Retaldar yanitubus sp. nov., paratype. 19 adult (female), dorsal view 20 adult (female), dorsal view 21 adult (female), frontal view.

Male genitalia

Anal tube in lateral view long and curved (Fig. 6). Pygofer long triangular in lateral view, posterior margin roundly convex (Fig. 6). Gonostyli irregularly quadrangular in profile, almost as high as long, dorsal margin nearly straight, ventral margin strongly convex with a strong posteroapical protuberance, caudo-ventral angle rounded (Figs 6, 8). Capitulum of gonostyli finger-shaped, with a small peaked spine (Fig. 8). Periandrium tubular, subapical nearly symmetric, medially constricted and slightly asymmetric in ventral view. Aedeagus processes asymmetric, right one emerging more posteriorly than left one (Figs 9, 10). Aedeagus a little longer than dorsolateral lobe and ventral lobe of periandrium (Figs 9, 10).

Female genitalia

Anal tube in dorsal view a little longer than wide (Fig. 12). Gonoplacs nearly rectangular in lateral view, apical margin rounded (Fig. 13), in dorsal view fused at middle near base, broadest near base, outer lateral margins straight and roundly convex at base (Fig. 14). Gonapophysis IX in lateral view long and narrow, boat-shaped (Fig. 16); in dorsal view nearly triangular, basal half broader than apical half, with a spine on each side (Fig. 15); gonospiculum bridge developed (Fig. 16). Gonocoxa VIII long rectangular (Fig. 18). Three teeth at apex and three keeled teeth on outer lateral margin of anterior connective lamina of gonapophysis VIII (Fig. 18). Endogonocoxal process membranous (Fig. 18).

Distribution

China (Guangxi).

Retaldar yanitubus sp. nov.

Etymology

Specific epithet built by the arbitrary combination of the alphabet letter “Y” and “anal tube” latinised into “anitubus”, referring to the Y-shaped male anal tube in dorsal view.

Diagnosis

The species is close to Clypeosmilus centrodasus Gnezdilov & Soulier-Perkins, 2017, from which it differs by its generic characters (complex reticular venation (Fig. 1), more or less quadrangular gonostyli bearing a postero-apical protuberance) and the form of the male anal tube, which is deeply concave on the apical margin, Y-shaped in dorsal view (Fig. 7), while very shallowly concave and cylindrical in the latter species (Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 3E). From Euxaldar guangxiensis Zhang, Chang & Chen, 2018, another Guangxi species, it differs by: 1) its tegmina pattern black (Fig. 19) to dark tawny with a yellow slender or broader transverse marking (Figs 1, 4, 20), while it is dark brown with more than four yellow irregular markings in E. guangxiensis (Zhang et al. 2018, figs 1, 3); 2) the form of the male anal tube which is obviously protruded in the later (Zhang et al. 2018, fig. 10), and 3) the base of periandrium with a finger-shaped dorsal process (Figs 9, 10), while it is with three dorsal processes in E. guangxiensis (Zhang et al. 2018, figs 15a, b, 16a, b).

Type materials

Holotype: ♂, CHINA: Guangxi Province, Jinxiu, Dayaoshan natural reserve, Hekou, 24°14'11"N, 110°14'11"E, 689.9 m, 23 vii 2018, Feilong Yang & Kun Zhao leg.

Paratypes: 2♀♀, same data as for holotype.

Description

Length: male (including forewings) (N =1): 3.1 mm; female (including forewings) (N =2): 3.3–3.4 mm.

Coloration

Vertex tawny, disc with two dark brown circular markings; anterior, lateral and posterior margins tawny (Figs 1, 19, 20). Center of the compound eyes mostly black, surrounded by brown (Figs 1, 3, 20) or compound eyes grayish (Figs 19, 21). Frons mostly tawny, scattered with many yellow nodules on the whole disc (Figs 3, 21); the central area slightly black (Figs 3, 21); lateral areas black, with the yellow nodules arranged into a distinct line on each side (Figs 3, 21); lateral margins tawny (Figs 3, 21). Clypeus in frontal view tawny, with two vertical dark brown markings at middle (Fig. 3) or tawny but the vertical dark brown markings invisible; the basal part black (Fig. 21). Rostrum tawny (Fig. 21). In lateral view gena tawny (Fig. 2), clypeus with a broad black oblique patch covering the base of the gena and most part of the clypeus (Fig. 2). Antennae dark brown (Figs 3, 21). Pronotum tawny, with three small yellow nodules present on each side (Fig. 1) or without them (Figs 19, 20), anterior and posterior margins brown (Figs 1, 19, 20). Mesonotum mainly tawny mixed with some black, disc with two small yellow nodules on each side (Fig. 1) or disc black with nodules almost invisible (Figs 19, 20); anterior margin tawny. Forewings dark tawny, with a discontinuous yellow transverse band from the end of clavus to the middle of forewing (Figs 1, 2) or the transverse marking lighter and broader (Figs 4, 20), or the whole forewing black without any markings (Fig. 19); venations tawny or black, reticular and inconspicuous (Figs 1, 2, 4, 19, 20). Hindwing grayish-brown, with grayish reticulate venations (Fig. 5).

Head and thorax. Vertex 2.5 times wider than long in midline, without median carina; anterior margin straight; posterior margin roundly concaved (Fig. 1). Frons 1.2 times longer in middle than broad at widest part, 1.4 times wider at the widest part than apical margin (Fig. 3). Pronotum with posterior margin 3.6 times wider than long in midline, anterior margin roundly protruded (Fig. 1). Mesonotum with anterior margin 2.0 times wider than long in midline, anterior margin straight (Fig. 1). Forewings 1.6 times longer in longest part than widest part (Fig. 4), clavus obvious, the tip reaching to the middle of forewing in dorsal view (Fig. 1). Metatibiotarsal formula: 2–7/7/2.

Male genitalia. Anal tube in lateral view arc-shaped, gradually narrowing from the base to the end, apical part conical (Fig. 6); in dorsal view anal tube Y-shaped with two long straight posterolateral arms, middle part in between deeply concave; in dorsal view arms as long as median part of anal tube (Fig. 7); anal opening located at the basal 1/4 of anal tube, epiproct protruded (Fig. 7). The highest length of pygofer around 3.4 times of the widest length, no basal notch (Fig. 6). Periandrium with a finger-shaped process originated from dorsal margin of base extending to the middle, directed to caudal (Figs 9, 10); dorsolateral lobe of periandrium a little longer than ventral lobe (Figs 9, 10), the ventral lobe in ventral view rounded in apex (Fig. 11). Aedeagus asymmetric, left hooked process emerging at its mid length, S-shaped, curved and directed dorso-cephalad in lateral view, the tip not exceeding the base of right process (Figs 9, 10); right hooked process almost same length as the left but emerging from its apical 1/4, curved and directed dorsad (Figs 9, 10); apex of aedeagus rounded in lateral view, slightly exceeding dorsolateral and ventral lobe of periandrium (Figs 9, 10). The connective with strongly developed tectiductus (Figs 9, 10).

Female genitalia. Anal tube in dorsal view ovate, widest near middle, 1.2 times longer in midline than widest part, apical margin and lateral margins rounded (Fig. 12); anal opening situated at basal 1/4 (Fig. 12). Gonoplacs in dorsal view fused at middle near base, broadest near base, outer lateral margins straight and roundly convex at base (Fig. 14). Posterior connective lamina of gonapophysis IX in dorsal view nearly triangular, the basal half relatively sclerotized, slightly broader than apical half, apical half membranous, the inner bifurcation at apical 1/3 (Fig. 15); the posterior fibula sclerotized, with a spine on each side on apical 1/4 (Fig. 15). In lateral view, gonapophysis IX long and narrow, dorsal and ventral margins nearly parallel each to another, tip pointed (Fig. 16); gonospiculum bridge in lateral view triangular, needle-like ventrally (Fig. 16). Anterior connective lamina of gonapophysis VIII subrectangular, with three closely situated teeth at apex and three keeled teeth on the outer lateral margin, inner lateral margin without teeth (Fig. 18). Endogonocoxal process membranous, reaching the level of the apical teeth (Fig. 18). Gonocoxa VIII long rectangular, vertical with the gonapophysis VIII (Fig. 18). Hind margin of sternite VII with middle part slightly prominent and truncates in ventral view (Fig. 17).

Molecular data

Genes sequences were registered in GenBank with accession numbers as following: MN381856 (whole 18S), MN381853 (28S D3–D5), MN381851 (28S D6–D7), MN381857 (COXI), MN332232 (Cytb). The COXI sequence of this species differs respectively by 87 bp (over 601 bp: 14.5%) and 103 bp (over 681 bp: 15.1%) from Eusudasina nantouensis Yang, 1994 (Genbank accession number: HM052838) and Clypeosmilus centrodasus (Genbank accession number: KX761470).

Note

As in the genus Euxaldar (Gnezdilov et al. 2017), color and color-pattern variation on forewing is reported in R. yanitubus sp. nov. Forewings might be nearly black (Fig. 19) or dark tawny (Figs 1, 2, 20), while color-patterns on the forewing varies from a light yellowish broad traverse band apically curved upward (Fig. 4) to a much thinner band only visible on the middle of forewing (Figs 1, 2) or even absent (Fig. 19).

Phylogenetical analysis

In-group sampling comprised 14 Hemisphaeriini genera and 27 species while 12 other issid genera were used as outgroups (Fig. 22). In all configurations tested, Hemisphaeriini reached a full 100% boostrap (BS). Monophyly of Hemisphaeriina appears less supported (BS=69) than in Wang et al. (2016: BS=98) although the group was recovered in all analyses. Monophyly of Mongolianina is not recovered but appeared paraphyletic, disclosing a new well-supported lineage (BS=94). It includes Retaldar gen. nov. at its base in the following relationship (Retaldar + (Clypeosmilus + Eusudasina)). The other Mongolianina taxa form another weakly supported lineage (BS=49) comprising three taxa in the following relationship: (Mongoliana + (Euxaldar+ Macrodaruma)). In several analyses, these two lineages appear in a sister group relationship.

Figure 22. 

Maximum likelihood tree of Hemisphaeriini based on combined sequences (18S, 28S, COXI, Cytb) with genera of Thioniini, Hysteropterini, Issini, Kodaianellini, Sarimini and Parahiraciini as outgroups. At each node, values denote ML ultrafast bootstrap support

Discussion

According to their results, Wang et al. (2016) subdivided Issidae into three subfamilies. At their base, Thioniinae Melichar, 1906 with at least two genera, Thionia Stål, 1859 and Cheiloceps Uhler, 1895 form a monophyletic group sister to the rest of the Issidae. For practical reasons of classification, all New World genera were placed in Thioniinae by Wang et al. (2016), but it is important to note that the subfamily does not necessarily include all of these taxa: Picumna Stål, 1864 for instance, never grouped within Thioniinae in their analysis, but in Hemisphaeriinae sec. Wang et al. (2016), although its place is not stabilized. This indicates a mixed origin of New World Issidae, which includes at least an older lineage (Thionia, Cheiloceps) of Lower Cretaceous origin and another slightly younger one (Picumna) originating from the Oriental lineages (Bourgoin et al. 2018). Several other genera are also waiting for a better placement in the issid phylogeny and it might be that other, still younger, taxa have also expanded more recently from Asia into the Nearctic as proposed by Gnezdilov (2019). Only future phylogenetic analyses including New World genera will help to better understand the heterogeneous composition of the Issidae fauna in the Nearctic.

In the phylogeny of Wang et al. (2016), the second subfamily Issinae Spinola, 1839 was less supported (BS = 72). In all subsequent analyses including more taxa (Bourgoin et al. 2018), this node was no more supported, suggesting a paraphyletic Issinae with Issini sec. Wang et al. (2016), no longer sister to Hysteropterini but moving to sister of Hemisphaeriinae as in this study (Fig. 22). Because in some cases Thioniinae also grouped with Hysteropterini, we suggest that these tribes recover separate subfamily ranks in a basal polytomic node with the following topology [Thioniinae, Hysteropterinae, (Issinae + Hemisphaeriinae)].

Within Hemisphaeriinae, Hemisphaeriini sec. Wang et al. (2016) form a natural group of at least 28 genera (Bourgoin 2019) for which monophyly has always been strongly supported in all our analyses since 2016 with a BS=100. Two lineages were recognized as subtribes: Mongolianina and Hemisphaeriina, both well supported (BS = 95 and 98 respectively) in Wang et al. (2016). Addition of new taxa with an almost full set of sequences for the genes under this study has however slightly modified previous results allowing recognition of three main lineages within Hemisphaeriini while eleven other genera still remain in an incertae sedis position.

Hemisphaeriina remains the most diverse subtribe with, at least, 11 described genera, eight having being sequenced and providing the following topology: ((Ophthalmosphaerius + Gergithus) + (Hemisphaerius + (Ceratogergithus + (Maculergithus + (Neogergithoides + (Choutagus + Gergithoides)))))). Three genera remain unsequenced: Epyhemisphaerius Chan & Yang, 1994, Neohemisphaerius Chen, Zhang & Chang, 2014 and Rotundiforma Meng, Wang & Qin, 2013. Moreover, Gergithus yunnanensis Che, Zhang & Wang, 2007 probably belongs to another new genus and Gergithus s.s. should remain in an incertae sedis position within Hemisphaeriini. According to Gnezdilov (2017), the Maculergithus clade might include two different genera.

According to our analysis, Mongolianina should be now restricted to the following genera: (Mongoliana + (Euxaldar + Macrodaruma)), separated from a third new lineage (Retaldar + (Clypeosmilus + Eusudasina)). The support of this last lineage is high (BS= 94) and higher than the Mongolianina lineage itself. Because the monophyly of the Mongolianina lineage itself remains weak and unstable, we prefer to keep provisionally a paraphyletic Mongolianina, including in it this new lineage. When more genera will be sequenced, a better and stronger topology will probably appear. Genera such as Bruneastrum Gnezdilov, 2015, Tapirissus Gnezdilov, 2014 and Neotapirissus Meng & Wang, 2016 should also join this group, but, as for Hemisphaeriina, new morphological analyses are still needed to better identify these lineages without molecular sequencing.

The new species Retaldar yanitubus gen. & sp. nov. has a protruded clypeus in lateral view. In the tribe Hemisphaeriini, several other genera also display such a protruded clypeus: Euxaldar, Clypeosmilus and Eusudasina. They also share a plesiomorphic clearly visible CuP on the forewing while this vein is not visible in Hemisphaeriina (Gnezdilov et al. 2017; Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017). Although appearing in two separate lineages, Retaldar gen. nov. and Euxaldar share also an obscure reticulate forewing venation with the main veins poorly recognizable, while these are clearer in Clypeosmilus and Eusudasina.

Including more sequenced taxa in the molecular analysis, revisiting morphological characteristics of Hemisphaeriini and investigating the etho-ecology of these fascinating ladybug-like planthoppers is now urgently needed.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Feilong Yang and Kun Zhao for collecting specimens for this study and Dr M. Wilson for useful comments and English review. This study was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2019YFH0086) and Sichuan Education Program (18ZA0481) of China, the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation (17E070), and the Fundamental Research Funds (17B009) of China West Normal University, China.

References

  • Bourgoin T (1987) A new interpretation of the homologies of the Hemiptera male genitalia, illustrated by the Tettigometridae (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha). Proceedings of the 6th Auchenorrhyncha Meeting, Turin (Italy), September 1987, 113–120.
  • Bourgoin T (1993) Female genitalia in Hemiptera Fulgoromorpha, morphological and phylogenetic data. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 29(3): 225–244.
  • Bourgoin T (2019) FLOW (Fulgoromorpha Lists On the Web): a world knowledge base dedicated to Fulgoromorpha. Version 8, updated 3 June 2019. http://hemiptera-databases.org/flow/ [accessed 3 June 2019]
  • Bourgoin T, Guilbert E, Wang ML (2018) Issidae Molecular K-libration. In: 8th European Hemiptera Congress Abstract book, 24–29 June 2018. Katowice-Zawiercie, Poland, 36.
  • Bourgoin T, Wang RR, Asche M, Hoch H, Soulier-Perkins A, Stroiński A, Yap S, Szwedo J (2015) From micropterism to hyperpterism: recognition strategy and standardized homology-driven terminology of the forewing venation patterns in planthoppers (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha). Zoomorphology 134(1): 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-014-0243-6
  • Chan ML, Yang CT (1994) Issidae of Taiwan (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea). Chen Chung Book, Taichung, 168 pp.
  • Emeljanov AF (1971) New genera of planthoppers of the families Cixiidae and Issidae (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha) from the fauna of the USSR (Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 50(3): 619–627). Entomological Review 50(3): 350–354.
  • Fennah RG (1978) Fulgoroidea (Homoptera) from Vietnam. Annales Zoologici 34(9): 207–279.
  • Gnezdilov VM (2017) Addenda to the revisions of the genera Gergithus Stål and Hemisphaerius Schaum (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Fulgoroidea: Issidae). Entomological Review 97(9): 1338–1352. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873817090123
  • Gnezdilov VM (2019) A new genus and a new species, representing a new tribe of the family Issidae (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Fulgoroidea), from Costa Rica. Zoosystematica Rossica 28(1): 108–115. https://doi.org/10.31610/zsr/2019.28.1.108
  • Gnezdilov VM, Soulier-Perkins A (2017) Clypeosmilus centrodasus gen. et sp. nov. , a new genus and species of the family Issidae (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea) from Northern Vietnam, Proceeding of the Zoological Institute RAS 321(1): 25–31.
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(7): 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Wang ML, Zhang YL, Bourgoin T (2016) Planthopper family Issidae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha): linking molecular phylogeny with classification. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 105: 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.08.012
login to comment