Citation: Breure ASH, Ablett JD (2014) Annotated type catalogue of the Bulimulidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Orthalicoidea) in the Natural History Museum, London. ZooKeys 392: 1–367. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.392.6328
The type status is described of 404 taxa classified within the family Bulimulidae (superfamily Orthalicoidea) and kept in the London museum. Lectotypes are designated for Bulimus aurifluus Pfeiffer, 1857; Otostomus bartletti H. Adams, 1867; Helix cactorum d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimus caliginosus Reeve, 1849; Bulimus chemnitzioides Forbes, 1850; Bulimus cinereus Reeve, 1849; Helix cora d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimus fallax Pfeiffer, 1853; Bulimus felix Pfeiffer, 1862; Bulimus fontainii d’Orbigny, 1838; Bulimus fourmiersi d’Orbigny, 1837; Bulimus (Mesembrinus) gealei H. Adams, 1867; Bulimus gruneri Pfeiffer, 1846; Bulimus humboldtii Reeve, 1849; Helix hygrohylaea d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimus jussieui Pfeiffer, 1846; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) binominis lascellianus E.A. Smith, 1895; Helix lichnorum d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) lucidus da Costa, 1898; Bulimus luridus Pfeiffer, 1863; Bulimus meleagris Pfeiffer, 1853; Bulimus monachus Pfeiffer, 1857; Bulimus montagnei d’Orbigny, 1837; Helix montivaga d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimus muliebris Reeve, 1849; Bulimus nigrofasciatus Pfeiffer in Philippi 1846; Bulimus nitelinus Reeve, 1849; Helix oreades d’Orbigny, 1835; Helix polymorpha d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimus praetextus Reeve, 1849; Bulinus proteus Broderip, 1832; Bulimus rusticellus Morelet, 1860; Helix sporadica d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimus sulphureus Pfeiffer, 1857; Helix thamnoica var. marmorata d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulinus translucens Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832; Helix trichoda d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulinus ustulatus Sowerby I, 1833; Bulimus voithianus Pfeiffer, 1847; Bulimus yungasensis d’Orbigny, 1837.
The type status of the following taxa is changed to lectotype in accordance with Art. 74.6 ICZN: Bulimulus (Drymaeus) caucaensis da Costa, 1898; Drymaeus exoticus da Costa, 1901; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) hidalgoi da Costa, 1898; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) interruptus Preston, 1909; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) inusitatus Fulton, 1900; Bulimulus latecolumellaris Preston, 1909; Bulimus (Otostomus) napo Angas, 1878; Drymaeus notabilis da Costa, 1906; Drymaeus notatus da Costa, 1906; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) nubilus Preston, 1903; Drymaeus obliquistriatus da Costa, 1901; Bulimus (Drymaeus) ochrocheilus E.A. Smith, 1877; Bulimus (Drymaeus) orthostoma E.A. Smith, 1877; Drymaeus expansus perenensis da Costa, 1901; Bulimulus pergracilis Rolle, 1904; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) plicatoliratus da Costa, 1898; Drymaeus prestoni da Costa, 1906; Drymaeus punctatus da Costa, 1907; Bulimus (Leptomerus) sanctaeluciae E.A. Smith, 1889; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) selli Preston, 1909; Drymaeus subventricosus da Costa, 1901; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) tigrinus da Costa, 1898; Drymaeus volsus Fulton, 1907; Drymaeus wintlei Finch, 1929; Bulimus zhorquinensis Angas, 1879; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) ziczac da Costa, 1898.
The following junior subjective synonyms are established: Bulimus antioquensis Pfeiffer, 1855 = Bulimus baranguillanus Pfeiffer, 1853; Drymaeus bellus da Costa, 1906 = Drymaeus blandi Pilsbry, 1897; Bulimus hachensis Reeve 1850 = Bulimus gruneri Pfeiffer, 1846 = Bulimus columbianus Lea, 1838; Bulimus (Otostomus) lamas Higgins 1868 = Bulimus trujillensis Philippi, 1867; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) binominis lascellianus E.A. Smith, 1895 = Bulimulus (Drymaeus) binominis E.A. Smith, 1895; Drymaeus multispira da Costa, 1904 = Helix torallyi d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimulus (Drymaeus) plicatoliratus Da Costa, 1898 = Bulimus convexus Pfeiffer, 1855; Bulimus sugillatus Pfeiffer, 1857 = Bulimus rivasii d’Orbigny, 1837; Bulimus meridionalis Reeve 1848 [June] = Bulimus voithianus Pfeiffer, 1847.
New combinations are: Bostryx montagnei (d’Orbigny, 1837); Bostryx obliquiportus (da Costa, 1901); Bulimulus heloicus (d’Orbigny, 1835); Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lusorius (Pfeiffer, 1855); Drymaeus (Drymaeus) trigonostomus (Jonas, 1844); Drymaeus (Drymaeus) wintlei Finch, 1929; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) conicus da Costa, 1907; Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culminea culminea (d’Orbigny, 1835); Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culmineus edwardsi (Morelet, 1863); Kuschelenia (K.) gayi (Pfeiffer, 1857); Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) tupacii (d’Orbigny, 1835); Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) anthisanensis (Pfeiffer, 1853); Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) aquilus (Reeve, 1848); Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) bicolor (Sowerby I, 1835); Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) caliginosus (Reeve, 1849); Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) cotopaxiensis (Pfeiffer, 1853); Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) filaris (Pfeiffer, 1853); Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) ochracea (Morelet, 1863); Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) petiti (Pfeiffer, 1846); Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) purpuratus (Reeve, 1849); Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) quechuarum (Crawford, 1939); Naesiotus cinereus (Reeve, 1849); Naesiotus dentritis (Morelet, 1863); Naesiotus fontainii (d’Orbigny, 1838); Naesiotus orbignyi (Pfeiffer, 1846); Protoglyptus pilosus (Guppy, 1871); Protoglyptus sanctaeluciae (E.A. Smith, 1889).
Type material of the following taxa is figured herein for the first time: Bulimus cinereus Reeve, 1849; Bulimus coriaceus Pfeiffer, 1857; Bulimulus laxostylus Rolle, 1904; Bulimus pliculatus Pfeiffer, 1857; Bulimus simpliculus Pfeiffer, 1855.
Bulimulidae, types
This is the third paper on the types of Orthalicoidea in the Natural History Museum, London. Earlier papers (
References are given to the original publication, plus those of following papers where type material has been mentioned or is (re-)figured. Dates of publication are in accordance with
This systematic list follows
Auris Spix, 1827
Auris swainsoni Pfeiffer, 1845.
Bostryx Troschel, 1847 sensu
Bostryx acalles Pfeiffer, 1853; Bostryx affinis Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832; Bostryx agueroi Weyrauch, 1960; Bostryx aileenae Breure, 1978; Bostryx albicans Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832; Bostryx albicolor Morelet, 1863; Bostryx albus Sowerby I, 1833; Bostryx andoicus Morelet, 1863; Bostryx apodemeta d’Orbigny, 1835; Bostryx atacamensis Pfeiffer, 1856; Bostryx balsanus Morelet, 1863; Bostryx cactorum d’Orbigny, 1835; Bostryx ceratacme Pfeiffer, 1855; Bulimus cercicola
Bulimulus Leach, 1814
Bulimulus barbadensis Pfeiffer, 1853; Bulimulus cacticolus Reeve, 1849; Bulimulus dysoni Pfeiffer, 1846; Bulimulus effeminatus Reeve, 1848; Bulimulus erectus Reeve 1849; Bulimulus haplochrous Pfeiffer, 1855; Bulimulus heloica d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimulus ignavus Reeve, 1849; Bulimulus inutilis Reeve, 1850; Bulimulus istapensis Crosse & Fischer, 1873; Bulimulus juvenilis Pfeiffer, 1855; Bulimulus mollicellus Reeve, 1849; Bulimulus monachus Pfeiffer, 1857; Bulimulus montevidensis Pfeiffer, 1846; Bulimulus nubeculatus Pfeiffer, 1853; Bulimulus pervius Pfeiffer, 1853; Bulimulus pessulatus Reeve, 1848; Bulimulus petenensis Morelet, 1851; Bulimulus pliculatus Pfeiffer, 1857; Bulimulus rubrifasciatus Reeve, 1848; Bulimulus sporadica d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimulus transparens Reeve, 1849; Bulimulus turritella d’Orbigny, 1835; Bulimulus vesicalis Pfeiffer, 1853.
Drymaeus (Drymaeus) Albers, 1850
Drymaeus (Drymaeus) abruptus Rolle, 1904; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) abscissus Pfeiffer, 1855; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) abyssorum d’Orbigny, 1835; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) aequatorianus E.A. Smith, 1877; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) acervatus Pfeiffer, 1857; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) acuminatus da Costa, 1906; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) alabastrinus da Costa, 1906; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) albolabiatus E.A. Smith, 1877; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) ambustus Reeve, 1849; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) angustus da Costa, 1906; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) antioquiensis Pfeiffer, 1855; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) arcuatostriatus Pfeiffer, 1855; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) auris Pfeiffer, 1866; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) baranguillanus Pfeiffer, 1853; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bartletti H. Adams, 1867; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bellus da Costa, 1906; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bogotensis Pfeiffer, 1855; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bolivarii d’Orbigny, 1835; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bolivianus Pfeiffer, 1846; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) boucardi da Costa, 1907; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bourcieri Pfeiffer, 1853; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) brachysoma d’Orbigny, 1835; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) buckleyi Sowerby III, 1895; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) canaliculatus Pfeiffer, 1845; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) castaneostrigatus da Costa, 1906; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) caucaensis da Costa, 1898; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) chamaeleon Pfeiffer, 1855; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) chimborasensis Reeve, 1848; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) chiriquensis da Costa, 1901; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) clathratus Pfeiffer, 1858; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) coarctatus Pfeiffer, 1845; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) confluens Pfeiffer, 1855; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) convexus Pfeiffer, 1855; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) cuticula Pfeiffer, 1855; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) cuzcoensis Reeve, 1849; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) cylindricus da Costa, 1901; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) dacostae Sowerby III, 1892; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) dombeyanus Pfeiffer, 1846; Drymaeus (Drymaeus) dunkeri Pfeiffer in
Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) Albers, 1850
Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) aestivus Pfeiffer, 1857; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) amandus Pfeiffer, 1855; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) andicola Pfeiffer, 1847; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) apicepunctata Preston, 1914; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) apiculata J.E. Gray, 1834; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) attenuatus Pfeiffer, 1853; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) aureolus Guppy, 1866; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) aurifluus Pfeiffer, 1857; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) broadwayi E.A. Smith, 1896; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) bugabensis Martens, 1893; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) californicus Reeve, 1848; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) cancellata da Costa, 1906; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) castus Pfeiffer, 1847; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) championi Martens, 1893; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) citronellus Angas, 1879; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) columbiensis Pfeiffer, 1856; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) conicus da Costa, 1907; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) demotus Reeve, 1850; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) depictus Reeve, 1849; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) deshayesi Pfeiffer, 1845; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) discrepans Sowerby I, 1833; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) dubius Pfeiffer, 1853; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) dutaillyi Pfeiffer, 1857; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) electrum Reeve, 1848; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) erubescens Pfeiffer, 1847; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) feriatus Reeve, 1850; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) fidustus Reeve, 1849; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) flavidulus E.A. Smith, 1877; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) floridanus Pfeiffer, 1857; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) fuscobasis E.A. Smith, 1877; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) gabbi Angas, 1879; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) gruneri Pfeiffer, 1846; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) hachensis Reeve, 1850; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) hepatostomus Pfeiffer, 1861; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) hoffmanni Martens, 1893; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) hondurasanus Pfeiffer, 1846; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) hypozonus Martens, 1893; Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) immaculatus C.B. Adams in
Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) Hylton Scott, 1951
Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) confusus Reeve, 1848; Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culminea d’Orbigny, 1835; Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) edwardsi Morelt, 1863; Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) gayi Pfeiffer, 1857; Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) jussieui Pfeiffer, 1846; Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) lithoica d’Orbigny, 1835; Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) thamnoica d’Orbigny, 1835; Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) tupacii d’Orbigny, 1835.
Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) Breure, 1978
Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) anthisanensis Pfeiffer, 1853; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) aquilus Reeve, 1848; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) badius Sowerby I, 1835; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) bicolor Sowerby I, 1835; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) caliginosus Reeve, 1849; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) coagulatus Reeve, 1849; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) cotopaxiensis Pfeiffer, 1853; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) filaris Pfeiffer, 1853; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) nucinus Reeve, 1850; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) ochraceus Morelet, 1863; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) peaki Breure, 1978; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) petiti Pfeiffer, 1846; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) polymorpha d’Orbigny, 1835; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) purpuratus Reeve, 1849; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) quechuarum Crawford, 1939; Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) subfasciatus Pfeiffer, 1853.
Naesiotus Albers, 1850 sensu
Naesiotus achatellinus Forbes, 1850; Naesiotus albemarlensis Dall, 1917; Naesiotus apertus Pfeiffer, 1855; Naesiotus catlowiae Pfeiffer, 1853; Naesiotus chamayensis Weyrauch, 1967; Naesiotus chemnitzioides Forbes, 1850; Naesiotus cinereus Reeve, 1849; Naesiotus crepundia d’Orbigny, 1835; Naesiotus curtus Reibisch, 1892; Naesiotus darwini Pfeiffer, 1846; Naesiotus exornatus Reeve, 1849; Naesiotus fernandezae Weyrauch, 1958; Naesiotus fontainii d’Orbigny, 1838; Naesiotus fourmiersi d’Orbigny, 1837; Naesiotus galapaganus Pfeiffer, 1855; Naesiotus irregularis Pfeiffer, 1848; Naesiotus jacobi Sowerby I, 1833; Naesiotus lycodus Dall, 1917; Naesiotus montivaga d’Orbigny, 1835; Naesiotus munsterii d’Orbigny, 1837; Naesiotus nucula Pfeiffer, 1853; Naesiotus nux Broderip, 1832; Naesiotus orbignyi Pfeiffer, 1846; Naesiotus pallidus Reibisch, 1892; Naesiotus paziana d’Orbigny, 1835; Naesiotus perspectivus Pfeiffer, 1846; Naesiotus phlegonis Dall & Ochsner, 1928; Naesiotus quitensis Pfeiffer, 1848; Naesiotus rimatus Pfeiffer, 1847; Naesiotus rivasii d’Orbigny, 1837; Naesiotus rocayana d’Orbigny, 1835; Naesiotus rugiferus Sowerby I, 1833; Naesiotus sugillatus Pfeiffer, 1857; Naesiotus terebra Reibisch, 1892; Naesiotus trichoda d’Orbigny, 1835; Naesiotus unifasciatus Sowerby I, 1833; Naesiotus ustulatus Sowerby I, 1833; Naesiotus ventrosus Reibisch, 1892; Naesiotus verrucosus Pfeiffer, 1855; Naesiotus wolfi Reibisch, 1892.
Neopetraeus Martens, 1885
Neopetraeus altoperuvianus Reeve, 1849; Neopetraeus atahualpa Dohrn, 1863; Neopetraeus binneyanus Pfeiffer, 1857; Neopetraeus cora d’Orbigny, 1835; Neopetraeus decussatus Reeve, 1849; Neopetraeus excoriatus Pfeiffer, 1855; Neopetraeus lobbii Reeve, 1849; Neopetraeus myristicus Reeve, 1849; Neopetraeus patasensis Pfeiffer, 1858; Neopetraeus platystomus Pfeiffer, 1858; Neopetraeus ptychostylus Pfeiffer, 1858.
Newboldius Pilsbry, 1932
Newboldius crichtoni Broderip, 1836; Newboldius illustris Rolle, 1905.
Protoglyptus Pilsbry, 1897
Protoglyptus martinicensis Pfeiffer, 1846; Protoglyptus pilosus Guppy, 1871; Protoglyptus sanctaeluciae E.A. Smith, 1889.
Rabdotus Albers, 1850
Rabdotus juarezi Pfeiffer, 1866; Rabdotus liquabilis Reeve, 1848; Rabdotus ragsdalei Pilsbry, 1890; Rabdotus schiedeanus Pfeiffer, 1841.
Scutalus Albers, 1850
Scutalus baroni (Helix) Fulton, 1896; Scutalus baroni (Bulimulus) Fulton, 1897; Scutalus chiletensis Weyrauch, 1967; Scutalus cretaceus Pfeiffer, 1855; Scutalus grandiventris Weyrauch, 1960; Scutalus latecolumellaris Preston, 1909; Scutalus proteus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832; Scutalus versicolor Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832.
Stenostylus Pilsbry, 1898
Stenostylus meleagris Pfeiffer, 1853; Stenostylus nigrolimbatus Pfeiffer, 1853.
Nomina inquirenda
clarus Pfeiffer, 1857; dukinfieldi Melvill, 1900; gelidus Reeve, 1849; nivalis d’Orbigny, 1835; pallens Reeve, 1849; sowerbyi Pfeiffer, 1847.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_abruptus
Figs 26J–L, L1i”Huancabamba in Peru”; see remarks.
”Huancabamba, / Peru 1904”; in Rolle’s handwriting. Another label in pencil indicating that it came from the Fulton collection.
”Alt. 44, diam. max. 24 (..) mm”; figured specimen herein H 42.5, D 21.5 W 6.3.
NHMUK 1947.2.10.1, syntype (ex Rolle).
Rolle did not state on how many specimens his description was based upon. However, the shell height is close to the original measurements and together with the indication ”type” on the label in Rolle’s handwriting, there is no doubt about the status of the specimen. The locality is ambiguous, as there are several places called ”Huancabamba” in Peru. There were, however, several other species described from the same locality, amoung them Columbinia huancabambensis, which is regarded by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) abruptus (Rolle, 1904).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_abscissus
Figs 26A–C, L1ii”Province of Quito, Ecuador”.
”Ecuador”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 28, diam. 13 mill.”; lectotype H 27.8, D 14.3, W 5.5.
NHMUK 1975497, lectotype; 1975498 five paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based; no variety has been mentioned by him. Two sets of labels are with this lot, which is originating from the Cuming collection; one reading ”Ecuador” in the handwriting of one of Cuming’s secretaries. On both labels the taxon name is in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. One of the lots has been labelled ”abscissus var.” in a later handwriting.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) abcissus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_abyssorum
Figs 27A–C, L1iii”provincia Lagunacensi (republica Boliviana)”; see
”pampa ruis, Pce Laguna, Bolivia”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 52 mil., latit. 25 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 43.7 D 23.3, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.125, five paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
d’Orbigny did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The types series appears to have been split between the MNHN and NHMUK collections. None of the specimens in London match the original figures, while one of the specimens in Paris is close to the published dimensions. The current systematic position follows the synonymisation of this taxon with Helix hygrohylea d’Orbigny, 1835, by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) abyssorum (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_acalles
Figs 6A, L1iv”in Andibus Peruvianis”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 10, diam. 6 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 13.2, D 7.7, W 5.3.
NHMUK 20100651, two possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The specimens found are slightly larger than the original measurements; the largest has shell height 13.2 mm. The material—not accompanied by a taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting—is from the Cuming collection, on which Pfeiffer based the description for this taxon; he did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The specimens are treated as possible syntypes.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx acalles (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_acervatus
Figs 50A–C, L1v”Brasilia. (Strain)”.
”Brazils. Mr Strain”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 41, diam. 21 mill.”; lectotype H 41.5, D 24.7, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1975461, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) acervatus (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_achatellinus
Figs 14J, L2i[Ecuador, Galápagos, Isla San Cristóbal] ”Chatham Island, Gelepagos”.
”Chatham Is Galapagos”, added on a different label with E.A. Smith’s handwriting. The taxon name is on a second label ”Bulimus achatenellinus [sic] Forbes, figured specimen, Proc Zool Soc (...) fig. 5”. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 19, diam. 10 mill.”; holotype H 19, D 9.52, W 8.7.
NHMUK 1855.4.5.25, holotype (Cuming coll.).
Forbes writes ”This shell (...)”, therefore the single specimen found, together with the indication on the label that it was figured, makes it justifiable to consider it a holotype.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus achatellinus (Forbes, 1850).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_acuminatus
Figs 45A–C, L2ii”Matto Grosso, Brazil”.
”Matto Grosso / Brazil”; in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 33, diam. 14 mm.”; holotype H 33.4, D 14.1, W 7.4.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.10, holotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa wrote ”A rather peculiar shell, unlike any known to the writer, who obtained it at the dispersal of the collection of the late Mr. Miers”; given the singular form, it may be assumed that da Costa only had one specimen at hand.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) acuminatus da Costa, 1906.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_aequatorianus
Figs 28E–G, L2iii”Ecuador”.
”Ecuador”. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 26 1/2 mill., diam. 11”; lectotype H 26.6, D 13.4, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1975137, lectotype. NHMUK 1975138, three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) aequatorianus (E.A. Smith, 1877).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_aequatorius
Figs 69A–B, L2v–vi”in republica Aequatorius, in monte Schinchulagua Equador”.
”Woods on the / mountain / Schinchulaqua / Equador”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 34, diam. 17 mill.”. Figured specimen H 37.8, D 18.2, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1975377, lectotype; 1975378, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did no indicate on how many specimens his description was based. He described two varieties from ”Chimborazo (Bourcier)”. The second label in the lot indicates ”var.” and ”Chimborazo, Equador / Mons. Bourcier / Consul General”. The systematic position at the species level follows
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) aequatorius (Pfeiffer, 1853) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_aestivus
Figs 19A–B, L2iv”Meobamba, Peru (Mr. Gueinzius)”.
”Ecuador”; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 17, diam. 7 1/3 mill.”; syntype H 16.9 D 7.9, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1975462, syntype (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this taxon from Cuming’s collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The specimen found corresponds to the shell height given by Pfeiffer. This is a case where the locality information provided by Cuming to the describer (viz. Pfeiffer) has been lost; the label ”Ecuador” on the frontside of the wooden tablet has been added in a later handwriting and may be erroneous.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) aesitvus (Pfeiffer, 1857) (comb.n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_affinis
Figs 8A, L3i–ii”in Peruviâ (Mexillones, desert of Atacama)”.
”Peru”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”long 1, lat. 1/2 poll. [H 25.3, D 12.7 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 27.5, D 12.6, W 8.3.
NHMUK 20100610, five possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Broderip described this taxon from the Cuming collection, but did not indicate on how many specimens his description was based. These specimens are herein regarded as possible syntypes; one is corresponding to Reeve’s figure. The presence of a label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting together with specimens apparently seen by Reeve as evidenced by the figured specimen, corroborates the assumption (
Bulimulidae, Bostryx affinis (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_agueroi
Fig. 4E”Mittel-Peru, Fundo Yacca, auf der rechten Seite des Río Cañete, an der Autostraße von Cañete nach Yauyos, 2300 m”.
” WW 1462-A/ 2 Paratypes” ”C-Peru: Yacca, 2300m, Rio Canete, leg. W. Weyrauch”; printed label.
”H. 22, 8 D. 8, 5”; figured specimen herein H 21.1, D 7.4, W 7.3.
NHMUK 1975333, two paratypes (ex Weyrauch).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx agueroi Weyrauch, 1960.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_aileenae
Fig. 5A”Peru, Dept. Lima, Río Cañete valley, 1 km above Puente Auco, 2070 m”.
”Peru, Dept. Lima, Río Cañete valley, 1 km above Puente Auco, 2070 m. Sta. 79”.
”shell height 14.9 mm, diameter 7.6 mm”; figured specimen herein H 13.7, D 7.0, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1975229, three paratypes (Breure leg.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx aileenae Breure, 1978.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_alabastrinus
Figs 43J–L, L3iii”Honda, Colombia”.
”Honda, Colombia”; in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 33, diam. 15 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 33.0, D 15.3, W 7.6.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.16, holotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not clearly state on how many specimens his description was based. However, since he mentioned ”a shell” it may be safely assumed that he had only one specimen at hand.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) alabastrinus da Costa, 1906.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_albemarlensis
Figs 13F, L3iv[Ecuador, Galápagos, Isla Isabela] ”near Villamil, at 2300 to 3300 feet elevation”.
”Galapagos Isl. / Albemarle Isl.”.
”Length of shell 15; diameter 9 mm”; figured specimen herein H 14.7, D 10.0, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1937.6.18.13-16, three possible paratypes, California Academy of Sciences Expedition 1905–1906 leg. (ex Schlesch).
The type status of these specimens is not fully resolved and is here viewed with much caution, as it remains unclear how Schlesch obtained specimens from the original series.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus albemarlensis (Dall, 1917).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_albicans
Figs 7I, L3v–vi”Copiapo, Chili”.
”Chili”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”long. 9/12, lat. 7/12 poll. [H 19, D 14.8 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 22.1, D 13.1, W 5.7.
NHMUK 20100611, five possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Broderip described this taxon from the Cuming collection, but did not indicate on how many specimens his description was based. These specimens are herein regarded as possible syntypes; one is corresponding to Reeve’s figure. This is another case of material that has been studied by both Reeve and Pfeiffer. See also affinis Broderip, 1832.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx albicans (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_albicolor
Figs 4F, L3vii[Peru, Dept. Ayacucho] ”Huanta et de la vallée de l’Apurimac”.
”Pérou / Apurimac, Huanta”; in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit 28, diam. 9 mm”; figured specimen herein H 28.2, D 10.92, W 8.3.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.169–170, two syntypes (Morelet coll.).
Further syntype material is present in the MHNG and RBINS collections. See also
Bulimulidae, Bostryx orophilus (Morelet, 1860).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_albolabiatus
Figs 29G–I, L3viii”Malacatos, South Ecuador” [Prov. Loja].
”Malacatos, S. Ecuador”; both locality and taxon name in Smith’s handwriting.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 34.0, D 14.2, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1877.3.28.3, holotype.
According to the label, a paratype has been ”smashed [in] 1896”. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) albolabiatus (E.A. Smith, 1877).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_albus
Figs 7J, L3ix–x[Chile] ”Copiapo”.
”Chili”. M.C. label style I.
”long. 0.8, lat. 0.5 poll. [H 20.3, D 12.7 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 15.0, D 10.7, W 4.7.
NHMUK 1842.5.10.149–151, three possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The name was introduced in Sowerby I 1833 [
As mentioned before, the publication dates of Sowerby’s publications are according to
Bulimulidae, Bostryx albus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_altoperuvianus
Figs 56A–C, L4i[Peru, Dept. Amazonas] ”Chachapoyas, Alto-Peru”.
”Province of Caxamarca [Dept. Cajamarca], Peru”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 46.5, D 25.4, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975437, lectotype; 1975438, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The lectotype corresponds to Reeve’s fig. 521a, while fig. 521b corresponds to the paralectotype.
Bulimuludae, Neopetraeus altoperuvianus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_amandus
Figs 19C, L4ii”Venezuela”.
No locality given. No taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting.
”Long. 30, diam. 11 1/2 mill.”; lectotype H 29, D 13.1, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1997457, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The lectotype corresponds to Pfeiffer’s figure, although the colours have faded. The current systematic position corresponds to
Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) amandus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_ambustus
Figs 40J–L, L4iii”—?”.
[Ecuador] ”Between Jacunga [Prov. Cotapaxi, Latacunga] and / [Prov. Tungurahua] Ambato”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 29.0, D 13.1, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1975441/1–3, lectotype and two paralectotypes, Bourcier leg. (Cuming coll.).
Although the label given is more precise than the locality given in Reeve’s publication and the specimens bear a label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting, one of the shells does corresponds to the specimen figured by Reeve. The current systematic position follows
Drymaeus (Drymaeus) ambustus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_andicola
Figs 23A, L4iv”Columbian Andes”.
”Andes of Columbia”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
”Long. 24, diam. 11 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 24.1, D 10.7, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1975315, lectotype; NHMUK 1975316, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) andicola (Pfeiffer, 1847).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_andoicus
Figs 10G, L4v[Peru] ”vallées (..) d’Ayacucho”.
”Pérou, Pomacoche”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Long. 26–30; diam. 9–10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 29.5, D 12.12, W 7+.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.171, lectotype (Morelet coll.).
The type locality was broadly defined by Morelet and probably also covers adjacent parts of Dept. Apurimac. There are two places called ”Pomacocha” in the valley of Río Apurimac, one in Dept. Ayacucho and the other in Dept. Apurimac. Given the range in dimensions given by Morelet, it is clear that he had a larger type series at hand. The top of the lectotype is slightly damaged. There are additional lots in the MHNG collection, as described by
Bulimulidae, Bostryx andoicus (Morelet, 1863).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_angustus
Figs 37L–N, L4vi[Colombia] Bogotá.
”Bogota”; in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 31.5, diam. 10”; figured specimen herein H 31.5, D 10.4, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.14, holotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa wrote ”this unique specimen”, which makes the specimen found the holotype. The taxon name on the label reads ”angusta”, but the name ”angustus” was published. The top of the holotype is slightly damaged.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) angustus angustus da Costa, 1906.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_anthisanensis
Figs 69E–F, 69I, L5i[Ecuador, Prov. Napo] ”monte Anthisana (44000’ [sic]) reipublicae Aequatoris (Bourcier)”.
”the Anthisana / 14000 feet high / Monsr Bourcier / Consul General”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 40, diam. 17 mill. (Mus. Cuming)”; figured specimen herein H 40.2, D 19.5, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1975372, lectotype; 1975373, three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The published altitude at which the type material was collected is clearly in error, as evidenced by the label information.
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) anthisanensis (Pfeiffer, 1853) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_antioquensis
Figs 31D–F, L5ii[Colombia] ”Province of Antioquia, New Granada. (Schlim)”.
”Province of Antioquia / Monsr Schlim”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 30, diam. 13 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 29.6, D 16.4, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1975450, lectotype, Schlim leg. (Cuming coll.).
This taxon is now considered a junior subjective synonym of Bulimus baranguillanus Pfeiffer, 1853 (syn. n.). The current systematic position is based on a revision of Colombian Drymaeus species (Breure and Borrero, unpublished data).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) baranguillanus (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_apertus
Figs 15D, L5iii”?”.
”Andes of Peru”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 19, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 18.1 D 9.23 W 6.5.
NHMUK 1975317, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
This is the first time a locality for this taxon is published; Bulimus apertus is now considered a junior subjective synonym of Bulimus orbignyi Pfeiffer, 1846 (syn. n.), whose type locality is ”Bolivia” (see under Bulimus orbignyi Pfeiffer). Any specific Peruvian locality for this taxon may likely be expected in one of the southern departments, close to the Bolivian border.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus orbignyi (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_apicepunctata
Figs 23J–K, L5iv”Santa Rita, E. Peru”.
”Santa Rita, E. Peru”.
”Alt. 17.5, diam. maj. 9, diam. min. 7 mm”; figured specimen herein H 17.5, D 8.3, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1915.1.6.23, holotype (ex Preston).
Preston did not state on how many specimens his description was based; the reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) apicepunctata (Preseton, 1914).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_apiculatus
Figs 23B, L5vNot given.
No locality given.
”Axis 10, diam. 4 1/4 lin.” [H 21.1, D 9.0 mm]; figured specimen herein H 20.2, D 9.5, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1982297, holotype (see remarks).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) elongatus (Röding, 1789).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_apodemeta
Figs 9A–B, L5vi”republica Argentina; republica Boliviana”; see
”Monte grande, chiquitos (Bolivia)” [.178, . 181]; ”Pampa ruis (laguna) Bolivia” [.179]; ”Vilna (Valle grande) Bolivia” [.180]; ”Sn Lorenzo Parana Rep. argentina” [.182], all in in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Assez variables; les plus along´s ont, de longueur, 28 millimètres sur 18 de largeur, tandis que les plus courts offerent 23 millimètres de longueur, sur 12 de largeur”; largest specimen H 28.3, shortest H 22.7, figured specimen H 23.0, D 12.6, W 6.2 [.182].
NHMUK 1854.12.4.178–182, five lots with resp. eight, seven, seven, three and three syntypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx apodemetus (d’Orbigny, 1835) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_aquilus
Figs 70A–B, 70K, L6i”Peru, Tacna”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 27.1, D 14.6, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975376, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position at the species level follows
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) aquilus (Reeve, 1848) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_arcuatostriatus
Figs 41A–C, L6iii”Peru”.
”Peru”; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 30, lat. 13 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.6, D 15.6, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1975455, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The basal lip of the lectotype is damaged. The current systematic position folows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) arcuatostriatus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_atacamensis
Figs 2A–B, L6ii”Paposo in deserto Atacamensi reipublicae Chilensis. (R.A. Philippi)”.
”Desert of Atacama, / Chile // Philippi has sent it”, ”Bolivia” [in a later handwriting]; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting.
”Long. 19, lat. 5 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 19.0, D 5.9, W 10.2.
NHMUK 1975312, lectotype; NHMUK 1975128, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx atacamensis (Pfeiffer, 1856).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_atahualpa
Figs 56D–F, L6iv–vNot given.
”Huallaga”, ”Province of / Patas, Andes of Peru” [see remarks]. M.C. label style IV.
”Long 43, lat 21 (..) mill.” (largest specimen); figured specimen herein H 38.5, D 26.4, W 6+.
NHMUK 1975436, three possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Neopetraeus atahualpa (Dohrn, 1863).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_attenuatus
Figs 17F–H, L6vi[Mexico] ”Vera Cruz”.
”Vera Cruz”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 34, lat. 13 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 34.0, D 14.4, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1975458, lectotype; NHMUK 1975459, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) attenuatus (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_aureolus
Figs 21A, L7i[Trinidad].
”Trinidad”; in Guppy’s handwriting.
”Height 0.6 inch, breadth 0.3 inch” [H 15.2, D 7.6 mm]; figured specimen H 23.2, D 10.71, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1866.1.3.8, two syntypes (ex Guppy).
Guppy described this taxon from immature specimens: ”The specimens from which the species was described by me in the Annals and Magazine of Natural History (1866) were young and imperfect.” (
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) aureolus (Guppy, 1866).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_aurifluus
Figs 25A, L6vii[Mexico] ”Cordova”.
”Cordova (Mexico)”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 22, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 21.8, D 11.1, W 5.1.
NHMUK 1975502, lectotype; 1975502/2, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
One of the two specimens found corresponds to the figure of Pfeiffer and is here selected as the lectotype (design. n.). The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) aurifluus (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_auris
Figs 37A–C, L7ii”Venezuela”.
”Venezuela”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 39, diam. 14 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 38.8, D 20.1, W 6+.
NHMUK 1975499, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. Only one specimen was found, which corresponds to Pfeiffer’s original measurements; the top is damaged.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) auris (Pfeiffer, 1866).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_badius
Figs 67J, L7iii”in provincia Peruviae Xagua” (see remarks).
”Prov. of Xagua, Peru”. M.C. label style I.
”long. 1, lat. 0.6 poll. [H 25.3, D 15.2 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 25.8, D 15.5, W 5.9.
NHMUK 20100631, three possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The specimen figured by Reeve was found in the collection and, together with two other specimens, are considered possible syntypes. The type locality may refer to Dept. Jauja in Central Peru (teste
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) bicolor (Sowerby I, 1835) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_balsanus
Figs 5B, L7iv[Peru] ”Balsa de Cocharcas”.
”Balsa de Cocharcas”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Long. 19, diam. 8 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 17.9, D 9.0, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.173, lectotype; 1893.2.4.174, paralectotype (Morelet coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx nigropileatus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_baranguillanus
Figs 31A–C, L7v”Baranguilla in Andibus Colombianus”.
”Baranguilla / Andes of Colombia”; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 32, diam. 13 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 31.5, D 15.6, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975452, lectotype (Cuming coll., ex Bland).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) baranguillanus (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_barbadensis
Figs 60A–B, L8i[West Indies] ”Barbados. (Mus. Cuming)”.
No locality given. The taxon label is in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 20, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 21.3, D 10.8 W 5.9.
NHMUK 1974054, lectotype; 1974055, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows the revison of
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus fuscus (Guilding, 1828).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_baroni
Figs 65A–B, L8iii[Peru, Dept. Cajamarca] ”Rio Yonan, Peru, 4000 feet (C.T. Baron)”.
”Rio Yonan, Peru, 4000’ / C.T. Baron”, in Fulton’s handwriting.
”Height 12 millim., maj. diam. 30 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 12.7, D 29.3, W 4.6.
NHMUK 1896.6.23.1, lectotype; 1896.6.23.2, one paralectotype, Baron leg. (ex Fulton).
Fulton did not mention on how many specimens his description was based. From
Bulimulidae, Scutalus baroni (Fulton, 1896).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_baroni
Figs 65E–F, L8ii”Rio Yonan, Peru, 4000 feet (C.T. Baron)”.
”4000 ft / Rio Yonan / Peru”, in Fulton’s handwriting.
”Long. 31–36 millim., maj. diam. 19–22 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 34.3, D 23.2, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1897.8.3.173, lectotype; 1897.8.3.179, one paralectotype, Baron leg. (ex Fulton).
Fulton states ”Type specimens (three) in British Museum”. Only two specimens have been found. This taxon is considered a junior subjective synonym of Scutalus cretaceus (Pfeiffer, 1855) by
Bulimulidae, Scutalus cretaceus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Otostomus_bartletti
Figs 41G–I, L8iv”[Upper Amazons, and on the River Ucayali, Eastern Peru]”.
”E. Peru”; ”Upper Amazons” added in a later handwriting. Taxon label in H. Adam’s handwriting.
”Long. 25 mill., diam. maj. 26 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 28.5, D 26.7, W 4+.
NHMUK 1867.5.18.4, lectotype, Bartlett leg.
The type locality was not specified for each species, but is taken from the title of Adam’s paper. ”Two examples, one in good condition, of this very finely marked and interesting species were obtained by Mr. Bartlett” (
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bartletti (H. Adams, 1867).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_bellus
Figs 28H–J, L8v”Colombia, San Martin”.
”San Martin, Colombia”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 33, diam. 16 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 33.2, D 16.6, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.8, holotype; 1907.11.21.9, paratype (da Costa coll.).
The current systematic position follows the revision of Breure and Borrero (unpublished data) and da Costa’s taxon is now placed in the synonymy of Drymaeus blandi Pilsbry, 1897 (syn. n.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) blandi Pilsbry, 1897.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_bicolor
Figs 66O–P, L9i”provinciae Peruviae Xagua” (see remarks).
”Peru” on two labels with different handwriting, ”Zagua” written on board. M.C. label style I, V.
”Long. 0.9, lat. 0.4 poll. [H 22.8, D 10.1 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 23.6, D 10.9, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975151 lectotype; 1975152, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Sowerby described this taxon from the Cuming collection. So far the publication date for this taxon has been cited as 1834 or 1835. According to
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) bicolor (Sowerby I, 1835) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_binneyanus
Figs 58C–E, L9ii”in Andibus prov. Patas, Peru (Dr. Farris)”.
”Province of Patas / Andes of Peru”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 26, diam. 19 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 25.2, D 20.8, W 5.2.
NHMUK 1975426, lectotype; 1975427, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based; from Pfeiffer 1858 it is clear this he described this taxon from the Cuming collection. The specimen originally figured by
Bulimulidae, Neopetraeus binneyanus (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_bogotensis
Figs 42A–C, L9iii[Colombia] ”Santa Fé de Bogota”.
”Santa Fe da Bogata [sic]”; taxon name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 38, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 37.4, D 17.5, W 6.9.
NHMUK 1975191, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this taxon from Cuming’s collection; he did not state on how many specimens his description was based. Only one specimen was found. On the original label, Pfeiffer has added ”(spectatus Reeve t. 81. / f. 601 b.)”. Reeve described Bulimus spectatus from specimens in ”Mus. Taylor”; his figure does not correspond to the specimen designated as lectotype and we consider Reeve’s taxon to be distinct.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bogotensis (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_bolivarii
Figs 52A–B”provincia Cochabambacensi (republica Boliviana); see
Not found.
”Longit. 54 millim., latit. 26 millim.”.
Not found.
No material of this species was found. In the NHMUK-copy of the ”Voyage...” a note on p. 309 states ”No examples of this sp. could be traced in d’O. colln in Sept. 1958. S.P. Dance”. Also, in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bolivarii (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_bolivianus
Figs 42D–F, L9iv[Venezuela] ”Merida, Andes of Bolivia”.
”Merida”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 33, diam. 13 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 33, D 13.7, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975444, lectotype; 1975445, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.); see remarks.
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based; the lot found contains three specimens. The smallest shell of the lot is a juvenile specimen not belonging to this species, and is here excluded from the type material. The locality as originally stated by Pfeiffer seems in error as there is no place with that name in Bolivia; the taxon is now tentatively assigned to the Venezuelan malacofauna.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bolivianus (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_boucardi
Figs 36A–C, L9v[Panama] ”Chiriqui”.
”Chiriqui”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 27, diam. 11 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 26.9, D 12.4, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.26, holotype, Boucard leg. (da Costa coll.).
In his remarks, da Costa states ”this shell’, which might imply that he had only one specimen. The material is considered herein a holotype. The basal part of the lip is damaged. This taxon has not been mentioned by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) boucardi da Costa, 1907.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_bourcieri
Figs 26G–I, L9vi”Pichincha reipublicae Aequatoris (Bourcier)”.
”Pichincha / Ecuador / Monsr Bourcier”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 25, diam. 11 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 23.9, D 13.0, W 5.5.
NHMUK 1975446, lectotype; 1975447, two paralectotypes, Bourcier leg. (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bourcieri (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_brachysoma
Figs 52C–D”provincia Santa Cruz de la Sierra (republica Boliviana)”; see
”Longit. 40 millim., latit. 19 millim.”.
In the NHMUK copy of the ”Voyage...”, there is a note in pencil in the margin of p. 309, which states ”No examples of this sp. could be traced in d’O. colln. in Sept. 1958. S.P. Dance”. Also, in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) brachysoma (
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_broadwayi
Figs 20I, L9vii[Trinidad].
”Trinidad”.
”Longit. 14 millim., diam. 8 1/2”; holotype H 11.9, D 7.59, W 5.4.
NHMUK 1895.11.28.10, holotype, W.E. Broadway leg. (ex W. Moss).
Smith remarked ”Mr. Moss, who received from him [Broadway] a fine series (...), has liberally placed one of his three specimens of this species in the British Museum collection”. The specimen found is thus the holotype, despite the fact it is somewhat smaller than the dimensions given by Smith.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) broadwayi (E.A. Smith, 1896).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_buckleyi
Figs 36D–F, L10i”Ecuador”.
”Ecuador”. The label also mentions ”2 co-types”.
”Long. 27, diam. 9 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 27.3, D 11.1, W 5.7.
NHMUK1907.11.21.48, lectotype; 1907.11.21.49–50, two paralectotypes (da Costa coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) buckleyi (Sowerby III, 1895).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Otostomus_bugabensis
Figs 25B, L10ii”S. Panama, Bugaba, Department of Chiriqui, at an elevation of 1000 feet (Champion)”.
”Bugaba Panama” on two labels in Martens’ handwriting, one of which states ”Champion 166”.
”Long. 27, diam. 11 millim.”; lectotype H 26.3, D 11.0, W 5.8 (see remarks).
NHMUK 1901.6.22.958, lectotype; 1901.6.22.820, paralectotype, Champion leg. (Godman coll.).
The lectotype has a damaged palatal lip and could be only subadult. Both shells are discoloured by age. The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) bugabensis (Martens, 1893).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_cacticolus
Figs 60E–F, L10iii”Curiana, Venezuela. (Mus. Dyson)”.
”Curiana, Venezuela”, in a later handwriting on board. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 24.4, D 13.7, W 6.2.
NHMUK 20100515, one syntype (Cuming coll.).
The specimen corresponds to Reeve’s figure, except that the spire is less pointed; therefore, considered a possible syntype. No other material is present in the collection that can be matched to Reeve’s figure or can be attributed to Dyson.
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus cacticolus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_cactorum
Figs 6D, L10iv”provincia Tacnacensi (rep. Peruviana)”.
”Tacna, Pérou”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 25 millim., latit. 15 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 24.4, D 12.8, W 7.0.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.189, lectotype and six paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Seven specimens are present in the d’Orbigny collection, of which one corresponds to
Bulimulidae, Bostryx hennahi (J.E. Gray, 1830).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_californicus
Figs 23C, L10v”California”.
”California”. M.C. label style III.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 25.9, D 11.7, W. 6.3.
NHMUK 1975136, three syntypes (Cuming coll.).
This taxon is considered as a junior subjective synonym of Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) ziegleri (Pfeiffer, 1847) by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) ziegleri (Pfeiffer, 1847).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_caliginosus
Figs 69C–D, 69K, L10vi”—?”.
”?”. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 35.4, D 17.9, W 6.1.
NHMUK 20100518.1–3, lectotype and two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
This taxon was classified as a Naesiotus species by
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) caliginosus (Reeve, 1849) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_canaliculatus
Figs 38G–I, L11i”Bolivia”.
”Bolivia”; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 37, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 36.0, D 16.2, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1975514, lectotype; 1975515, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The lectotype has also been figured by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) canaliculatus (Pfeiffer, 1845).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_prestoni_cancellata
Figs 24K, L11ii”Chiriqui, Panama”.
”Chiriqui”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 18.1, D 9.8, W 5.3.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.13, holotype (da Costa coll.).
As da Costa speaks about ”this pretty shell”, it is implied that he had only one specimen at hand; thus the specimen found should be regarded holotype. The current systematic position follows the synonymisation by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) tripictus hoffmanni (Martens, 1893).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_castaneostrigatus
Figs 36G–I, L11iii”Pozuzo, Eastern Peru”.
”Pozuzo. E. Peru”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 19, diam. 8.5 mm”; figured specimen herein H 20.4, D 8.6, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.19; holotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa referred to ”This shell (..)”, which might imply that he had only seen one specimen. The NHMUK material is herein regarded the holotype.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) castaneostrigatus da Costa, 1906.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_castus
Figs 19D, L11iv”Central America ?”.
”Central America?”. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 19, diam. 9 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 19.0, D 9.4, W 5.1.
NHMUK 1975197, lectotype; 1975198, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The specimen figured by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) castus castus (Pfeiffer, 1847).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_catlowiae
Figs 15C, L11v[Ecuador] ”prope Quito (Bourcier)”.
”near Quito / Monsr Bourcier / Consul General”; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 25, diam. 11 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 25.1, D 12.8, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1975414, lectotype; 1975415, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
This taxon is considered a junior subjective synonym of Naesiotus quitensis (Pfeiffer, 1848) (
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus quitensis (Pfeiffer, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_caucaensis
Figs 31G–I, L11vi”Valley of the R. Cauca, Colombia”.
”Cauca, Colombia”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 35, diam. 16 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 34.8, D 16.6, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.43, lectotype (da Costa coll.).
The specimen is labelled ”type”; however, since da Costa did not state on how many specimens his description was based upon, the reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) caucaensis (da Costa, 1898).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_ceratacme
Figs 3F–G, L11vii”Peru?”.
”Peru”; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 18 1/2, diam. 6 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 18.0, D 6.11, W 7.5.
NHMUK 1975374, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx ceratacme (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_cercicola
Figs 4G, L12i[Peru] ”vallées chaudes d’Abancay et d’Acostambo, situées à l’ouest du Cuzco”.
”Abancay, Pérou”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Long. 20; diam. 9 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 18.7, D 8.75, W 5+.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.175–176, two syntypes (Morelet coll.).
One of the syntypes is severely damaged; the other has the top damaged. The current systematic position as given by
Bulimulidae, Bostryx orophilus (Morelet, 1860).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_chamaeleon
Figs 40A–C, L12ii[Ecuador] ”Quito (Mr. Bourcier)”.
”near Quito / Ecuador / Monsr Bourcier / Consul General”; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long 27, diam. 11 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.6, D 12.2, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975448, three syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) ambustus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Naesiotus_subcostatus_chamayensis
Fig. 15E”Norte interandino de Perú, cerca de pueblo Chamaya, sobre la margen izquierda del río Chamaya, afluente occidental del río Maranon, 550–660 m”.
”Above Chamaya, Río Chamaya, western affluent of Río Marañon, 600 m”; printed label.
”A. 18.2, D. 7.3 [mm]”; figured specimen H 17.5 D 7.7 W 7.5.
NHMUK 1975423, three paratypes (ex Weyrauch).
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus subcostatus chamayensis Weyrauch, 1967.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Otostomus_championi
Figs 19E–F, L12iii”W. Guatemala, Hacienda de Los Nubes, Cerro Zunil, Pacific slope, in the vicinity of the coffee-plantations, at an elevation of about 5000 feet (Champion)”.
”Cerro Zunil / Champion”.
”Long. 27, diam. 14 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.0, D 13.8, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1901.6.22.781, lectotype (Godman coll.).
The specimen is not accompanied by a taxon label in von Marten’s handwriting, but bears the name of the collector and corresponds to the original figure. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) championi (Martens, 1893).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_chemnitzioides
Figs 12I, L12iv[Ecuador] ”Chatham Island, Gelepagos [sic, Galápagos]”.
”Chatham Island / Galapagos / Proc. Zool. Soc. / fig. 6”.
”Long. 19, diam. 4 mil..”; figured specimen herein H 18.5, D 3.64, W 16.0.
NHMUK 1855.4.5.23, lectotype; 1850.4.23.14–15, two paralectotypes (ex Kellett and Wood).
The specimen originally figured is here designated lectotype (design. n.). The two other specimens also originate from the voyage of Kellett and Wood (
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus chemnitzioides (Forbes, 1850).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Scutalus_chiletensis
Fig. 65G”Norte de Péru, vertiente occidental de la Cordillera Occidental, cerro encima del pueblo Chilete, sobre la margen izquierda del río Jequetepeque, 850–950 m”.
”N-Peru, mountain above Chilete, Rio Jequetepeque, 850-950m”; printed label.
”A. 33.1, D. 21 [mm]”; figured specimen herein H 34.2 D 23.4 W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975384, five paratypes (ex Weyrauch).
Bulimulidae, Scutalus chiletensis Weyrauch, 1967.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_chimborasensis
Figs 38A–C, L12v”Chimborazo, Columbia, New Granada”.
”Chimborazo”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 39.7, D 15.0, W 7.0.
NHMUK 1975460, three syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Reeve described this species from ”Mus. Dennison”, and said it was identical to Bulimus decoratus Lea, 1838 (not Férussac, 1821); he referred to Lea’s figure (pl. 23 fig. 8). The specimens found correspond to Reeve’s description, but none can be matched to the shell figured on his plate 44.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) chimborasensis (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_chiriquensis
Figs 42J–L, L12vi”Boqueti, Chiriquí, Panama”.
”Boqueti / Chiriqui / Panama”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 29, diam. 14 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 29.1, D 13.6, W 5.5.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.119, holotype (da Costa coll.).
As
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) chiriquensis da Costa, 1901.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_cinereus
Figs 15F–G, L12vii”Bolivia”.
”Bolivia”. M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 15.5, D 6.8, W 7.5.
NHMUK 20100519, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The specimen figured by
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus cinereus (Reeve, 1849) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_citronellus
Figs 20E, L13i”Uren to Lipurio, Costa Rica (Gabb)”.
”Uren to Lipurio / low hills / Gabb / Costa rica”, in Angas’s handwriting.
”Diam. 6, alt. 12 lin. [H 25.0, D 12.5 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 25.0, D 11.9, W 6.9.
Type material. NHMUK 1879.7.22.19–22, lectotype and three paralectotypes (ex Angas).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) sulphureus (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_clarus
Figs 73I–J, L13ii”Meobamba, Peru (Mr. Gueinzius)”.
”Ecuador” [see remarks]; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 16, diam. 7 2/3 mill.”. See remarks.
NHMUK 1975487, two possible syntypes [see remarks] (Cuming coll.).
The type material consists of a mixed lot, one specimen belonging to Naesiotus sensu
Bulimulidae.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_clathratus
Figs 43D–F, L13iii”Province of Patas, Andes of Peru (Dr. Farris)”.
”Province of Patas, / Andes of Peru / Dr Farris”; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting.
”Long. 30, diam. 11 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 30, D 12.2, W 7.8.
NHMUK 1975449, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
This hitherto unfigured taxon is known from a single specimen. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) clathratus (Pfeiffer, 1858).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_coagulatus
Figs 66E, L13iv”Peru”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 15.6, D 9.3, W 5.1.
NHMUK 1975351, lectotype; 1975352 two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
This is a mixted lot of four specimens. The lectotype is an inmature specimen and is considered by
Bulimulidae, Scutalus versicolor (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_coarctatus
Figs 37F–H, L13v”Locality unknown”.
”Brazil” (added in later handwriting); taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 34, diam. 17 mill.”; figured specimen herein 34.6, D 20.2, W 6.9.
NHMUK 1975560, lectotype; 1975561, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The specimen designated lectotype has the best match with the original measurements. The other specimen has been figured in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) coarctatus (Pfeiffer, 1845).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_columbiensis
Figs 19I–J, L25v”Columbia”.
”Columbia”; ”Venezuela” in a later handwriting. Labels for both taxon names in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 28, diam. 11 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 28.0, D 11.9, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975521, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The original taxon label has been corrected to Bulimus gratus, in a different ink. However, also a label with this name in Pfeiffer’s handwriting has been glued to the board. It may be noted that Lea’s name (Bulimus columbianus) is sufficiently different to retain Pfeiffer’s original taxon name. On the front side, a later hand has written ”Venezuela”, which may be seen as a further precision to reflect the later political-administrative situation. Breure and Borrero (unpublished data) could not recognise this species in the Colombian material they studied.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) columbiensis (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_compactus
Figs 7H, L13vi”Chicani, Bolivia”.
”Chicani Bolivia”, in Fulton’s handwriting.
”Alt. 16, maj. diam. 9 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 15.8, D 7.62, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1902.5.28.1, syntype (ex Fulton).
Fulton did not state on how many specimens his description was based; the specimen is therefore regarded as a syntype. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx compactus (Fulton, 1902).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_confluens
Figs 31J–L, L14i[Colombia] ”Marmato, New Granada”.
”Venezuela” [see remarks]; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 40, diam. 17 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 39.5, D 20.8, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1975196, lectotype and one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
According to Pfeiffer (1859: 443) the type is in ”Mus. Cuming”. The original specimen appears to be lost. The specimens are labelled ”Bulimus con-/fluens Pfr. var. / Venezuela”. There is no variety mentioned by Pfeiffer, nor in his original paper nor in subsequent publications, which is interpreted as him considering this a variable taxon; the specimens are thus regarded to be from the type series.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) confluens (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_confusus
Figs 66I–K, L14iiNot given.
”Peru”, corrected to ”?Peru” on a label in E.A. Smith’s handwriting. M.C. label style III, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 29.0, D 13.1, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975194, lectotype; 1975195, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The protoconch sculpture is typically for Kuschelenia Hylton Scott, 1952. The placement of this taxon within Drymaeus by
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culminea (d’Orbigny, 1835) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_conicus
Figs 25E, L14iii”Oaxarca [sic], Mexico”.
”Oaxarca, Mexico”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 17.5, diam. 7 mm.”; lectotype H 17.5, D 7.5, W 6.9.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.32, lectotype and one paralectotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not state on how many specimens his description was based. A lectotype was designated by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) conicus da Costa, 1907.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_conspersus
Figs 6C, L15i[Peru] ”collinis prope Lima” (see remarks).
”Peru”. M.C. label style I, V.
”Long. 0.65, lat. 0.4 poll. [H 16.5, D 10.1 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 19.8, D 12.1, W 5.5.
NHMUK 20100619, five probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The original material of Sowerby has not been traced; however, one of the specimens from this lot corresponds to
Bulimulidae, Bostryx conspersus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_convexus
Figs 39A–C, L14iv”New Granada”.
”Ecuador”, added in a later handwriting; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 38, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 38.5, D 16.2, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975192, lectotype; 1975193, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) convexus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_cora
Figs 58A–B, L14v[Peru] ”republica Peruviana”.
”Perou”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Latit. 44 millim.; longit. 29 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 43.9, D 28.0, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.124, lectotype and two paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Neopetraeus cora (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_coriaceus
Fig. 60K–L, L67ii[Mexico] ”Cordova”.
”Mexico”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 18, diam. 9 mill.”. Figured specimen H 17.1, D 9.5, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975409, three possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The type material was based on material collected by Sallé; however, the material is accompanied by a taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting and is herein considered as possible syntypes. Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The type material was up till now unfigured. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus coriaceus (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_pygmaeus_costatus
Fig. 1I[Peru] ”Bei Alis, auf der rechten Seite des Río Alis, Zufluss des Río Cañete, 3300 m”.
”C-Peru, Alis, Río Alis, affluent of Río Cañete, 3300 m”; printed label.
”H. 8.7 D. 5.1”; figured specimen herein H 8.45, D 4.9, W 5.2.
NHMUK 1975357, one paratype (ex Weyrauch, WW 318).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx pygmaeus Weyrauch, 1960.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_imeldae_costifer
Fig. 1J[Peru, Dept. Lima] ”Mittel-Peru, Quichao, 5 km von Laraos, am Fusspad nach Yauyos, auf der linken Seite des Río Mayo im Tal des Río Cañete, 3500 m”.
”C-Peru, Quichao, 5 kms from Laraos, valley of Río Cañete, 3500 m”; printed label.
”H. 11.0 D. 5.0 [mm]”; figured specimen herein H 9.6, D 4.2, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975354, one paratype, ex Weyrauch (WW 3319).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx imeldae Weyrauch, 1958.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_cotopaxiensis
Figs 69G–H, 69J, L15ii[Ecuador] ”reipublicae Aequatoris, montem Cotopaxi”.
”Cotopaxi, Equador / Monsr Bourcier / Consul General”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 34, diam. 16 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 33.9, D 17.1, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975370, lectotype; 1975371, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The original paper only quotes material collected by Bourcier as a variety from Cayembe. However, if the type was in the Pfeiffer collection it must now considered to be lost (
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) cotopaxiensis (Pfeiffer, 1853) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_crepundia
Figs 15H–I, L14vi”provincia Chiquitensi, republica Boliviana”; see
Only the taxon name is given in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Latit. 15 millim., long. 10 millim.”, corrected to ”Longueur totale, 25 millimètres” in
NHMUK 1854.12.4.173, six paralectotypes; 1854.12.4.174, one paralectotype (d’Orbigny coll.).
One specimen was marked with ‘x’ on the original board, which suggests a special selection; however, it is smaller than the type (H 23.7) and has the lip damaged. Another specimen, which shows the full lip as in d’Orbigny’s figure, is here figured. The lectotype is in MNHN (
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus crepundia (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_cretaceus
Figs 65C–F, L15iii”Eastern Islands [sic, see remarks] (Captain Keppell)”.
”No locality but I / had the from Cap. Keppell / who got them in the / Eastern Islands but don’t / recollect”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 36, diam. 18 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 35.2, D 23.2, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975388, lectotype; 1975389, one paralectotype, ex Keppell (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Scutalus cretaceus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_crichtoni
Figs 59A–C, L15iv[Peru] ”ad Ambo juxta Huanuco Peruviae”.
”Peru, Ambo, Sir A Crichton”, added in pencil. Taxon label probably in Broderip’s handwriting.
”Long. 3 (circiter), latit. 1 1/8 poll. [H 76.0, D 28.5 mm]”; holotype H 71.3, D 33.5, W 4+.
NHMUK 1958.9.3.4, holotype (Broderip coll.).
The top whorl of the specimen is missing. Broderip refers to ”the apex of the shell under description, the only specimen I ever saw, is broken, and its actual length is 2 inches and 7/8 [72.8 mm]”; we consider this specimen the holotype.
Bulimulidae, Newboldius crichtoni (Broderip, 1836).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_culminea
Figs 66F–H, L15v”culminibus Andesensibus, republica Boliviana” (see remarks).
”Titicaca, Bolivia”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Latit. 17 millim., longit. 13 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 31.2, D 14.1, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.198, six paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culminea (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_curtus
Figs 13G–H, L16i[Ecuador, Galápagos, Isla San Cristóbal] ”Chatam-Island [sic] (Wolf)”.
”Chatham Is. Galapagos”.
”Long. 10, 25, diam. maj. 5 mm”; figured specimen herein H 9.6, D 4.62, W 6.9.
NHMUK 1894.6.8.8–9, two syntypes, T. Wolf leg.
Reibisch did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus curtus (Reibisch, 1892).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_cuticula
Figs 42G–I, L16ii”Rio Janeiro”.
”Rio”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 28, diam. 13 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.5, D 13.75, W 4.7.
NHMUK 1975451, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
There is only one specimen, of which the lip has been broken, and the last whorl is badly damaged. The specimen is probably subadult.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) cuticula (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_cuzcoensis
Figs 43A–C, L16iii[Peru] ”Cuzco, Bolivia [sic]”.
”Peru”, added in a later handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 36.6, D 15.7, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975453, lectotype; 1975454, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) cuzcoensis (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_dacostae
Figs 33M–O, L16iv[Colombia] ”Bogota (Mus. Da Costa)”.
”Bogota”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 26, diam. maj. 11 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 26.3, D 11.0, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.51, holotype (da Costa coll.).
Sowerby writes ”I have seen as yet only one specimen of this species”. Therefore the specimen is considered as holotype.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) dacostae (Sowerby III, 1892).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_darwini
Figs 13J, L66vii[Ecuador] ”Gallapagos [sic] Islands”.
”Galapagos Is.”, in E.A. Smith’s handwriting. M.C. label style III, V.
”Long. 17, diam. 19 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 8.64, D 6.87 W 4.9.
NHMUK 20100523, two possible syntypes, C. Darwin leg. (Cuming coll.).
The two juvenile specimens were labelled ”ustulatus Sow.” by E.A. Smith as coming from the Cuming museum, and were probably collected by Darwin during his visit to the archipelago with the ‘Beagle’. They are considered as possible syntypes. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus darwini (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_decussatus
Figs 56G–I, L16vi”Andes of Caxamarca [sic, Cajamarca], Peru”.
”Andes of Caxamarca, Peru”; in unknown handwriting, obviously added in a later stage (see remarks).
Not given; figured specimen herein H 37.7, D 16.5, W 7.7.
NHMUK 1975180, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The printed label, that is typical of specimens figured by Reeve, has been lost. The label, probably in the handwriting of a NHMUK employee during the latter half of the 19th century, refers to Reeve’s species number (519), stating that it is ”the type”. In the lower left corner, ”one on right” has been added (probably by E.A. Smith), which seems to indicate that the specimens originally were glued on board. There is a second note ”now marked x”, which apparently refers to the type specimen. See also Bulimus myristicus Reeve, 1849, which is a junior synonym (
Bulimulidae, Neopetraeus decussatus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_delumbis
Figs 9C, L17i”—?”.
”Peru + Bolivia”, added in a later handwriting. M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 21.2, D 14.0, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975124, lectotype; 1975558, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx delumbis (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_demotus
Figs 25F, L17iii”Venezuela”.
”Venezuela”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 31.8, D 15.3, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975504, lectotype; 1975505, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The lectotype corresponds to Reeve’s figure. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) granadensis (Pfeiffer, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_denickei
Figs 7G, L17iv[Peru, Dept. Arequipa] ”Chala, near Callao”.
”Chala, near Callao”. M.C. label style IV.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 26.4, D 17.5, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1851.5.15.1–3, three syntypes, E. Denicke leg. (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx reentsi (Philippi, 1851).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_dentritis
Figs 16G, L17ii[Peru, Dept. Cuzco] ”près de Huiro, vallée de Santa-Anna”.
”Miota, Vallée de Sta Anna”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 20, diam. 8 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 19.9, D 7.42, W.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.237, paralectotype (Morelet coll.).
The species is hitherto classified as Bulimulus. However, the protoconch sculpture consists of axial riblets; it is here re-classified under Naesiotus sensu
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus dentritis (Morelet, 1863) (comb.n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_depictus
Figs 22C, L17v”New Granada”.
”Venezuela”, added in a later handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 27.9, D 12.1, W 5+.
NHMUK 1975529, lectotype; 1975530, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The top of the lectotype is damaged. The difference between the published type locality and the locality on the label is explained by political changes around 1850.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) depictus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_depstus
Figs 6B, L17vi”Chachapoyas, Alto-Peru”.
No label found (see remarks).
Not given; figured specimen herein H 18.5, D 9.71, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1975318, lectotype; 1975319, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx depstus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_derelictus
Figs 10H, L17vii”Cobijam Bolivia [now Chile] (Puerto del Mar)”.
”Bolivia S. America”, with a taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I, V.
”Long. 6/12, lat. 5/8 poll. [H 12.7, D 15.8 mm, see remarks]”; figured specimen herein H 30.3, D 18.8, W 6.6.
NHMUK 20100609, four probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Broderip described this taxon from the Cuming collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The original measurments seem to be erroneous, as these indicate a height/diameter ratio uncommon for this genus.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx derelictus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_deshayesi
Figs 24D, L18i”Locality unknown”.
”New Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
”Long. 45, diam. 15 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 44.5, D 16.8, W 8.1.
NHMUK 1975526, lectotype; 1975527, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows the revision of Breure and Borrero (unpublished data).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) deshayesi (Pfeiffer, 1845).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_devians
Figs 4C, L18iiNo type locality given [Peru].
”[Peru]”, added in a later handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 15, lat. 6 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 14.9, D 6.78, W 5.1.
NHMUK 1975339, one possible syntype (Cuming coll.).
Dohrn’s collection is known to be completely destroyed in the 1939–1945 war (
Bulimulidae, Bostryx devians (Dohrn, 1863).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_discrepans
Figs 23D, L18iii”Americâ Centrali” (see remarks).
”Conchagua, C. America”. M.C. label style IV, V.
”Long. 0.7, lat. 0.33 poll. [H 17.7, D 8.4 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 20.7, D 9.3, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1975181, four syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Sowerby added is his remarks ”This was found at Conchagua” [El Salvador, dept. La Union], which is thus the type locality. Of the four specimens in the lot, two are juveniles and one is subadult; the largest specimen is marked ”59”. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) discrepans (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_dombeyanus
Figs 37I–K, L18v”Peru (Mus. Britt.)”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 56, diam. 26 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 56.8, D 31.7, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1844.10.2.32, syntype (ex Férussac, ”purchd of Turner”).
This taxon is generally regarded as a Mexican species (
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) dombeyanus (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_dubius
Figs 25C, L18iv”in Andibus Novae Granadae”.
”Andes, N. Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 28, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.1, D 11.0, W 6.2+.
NHMUK 1975519, lectotype; 1975520, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Of the lectotype the lip and the apex are damaged. Of the paralectotypes, one shell is broken.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) dubius (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_dukinfieldi
Figs 60C–D, L19i”Salto Grande do Rio dos Patos (upper waters of Rio Ivahy), Paraná, Brazil”.
”Salto Grande do Rio / dos Patos. (Upper waters of River Ivahy). / Paraná. Brazil.”.
”Long. 28, lat. 13 mm”; figured specimen herein H 28.1, D 14.8, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1900.9.27.2, lectotype (ex Melvill).
Melvill wrote ”Two specimens, precisely similar, were obligingly handed me by Mr. R. Dukinfield Darbishire”; ”the type” was placed in the NHMUK collection, the whereabouts of the second specimen are unknown. The reference to ”HT 1900.9.27.2” in
Bulimulus (?) dukinfieldi Melvill, 1900. Nomen inquirendum.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_dunkeri
Figs 50D–F, L19ii”respublica mexicana, prope Michoacan”.
”Michoacan”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 18, diam. 8’’’ [H 39.2, D 17.4 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 34.8, D 18.5, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975512, lectotype; 1975513, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The original measurements are interpreted as German lines (2.18 mm), and do not correspond to those of the specimen in the NHMUK. However, Pfeiffer’s collection is known to have been destroyed (
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) dunkeri dunkeri (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_durangoanus
Figs 73F–H, L19iii”N. Mexico, Villa Lerdo, State of Durango”.
”Mexico”, taxon label in Martens’ handwriting.
”Long. 15, diam. 6 (...) millim.”. Figured specimen H 15.0, D 6.4, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1901.6.22.871, holotype (ex Godman).
Martens wrote ”I have seen only one specimen of this species”; the specimen found is thus the holotype. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus durangoanus (Martens, 1893).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_dutaillyi
Figs 22G, L19iv”Brazils”.
”Brazils Mon. Dutailly”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 31, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 30.8, D 12.5, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1975516, lectotype, Dutailly leg. (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) dutaillyi (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_dysoni
Figs 62K–L, L19v”Honduras”.
”Honduras”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
”Long. 20, diam. 9 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 19.2, D 9.5, W 7.4.
NHMUK 1975453, three syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The specimen figured by Reeve is damaged at the penultimate whorl.
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus dysoni (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_edwardsi
Figs 67C–D, 67L, L19vi[Peru, Dept. Huancavelica] ”le type (...) Huancabelica; la variété, (...) vallée de Huanta” [Dept. Ayacucho].
”Pérou Huanta”, taxon label (”var.”) in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 29; diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 25.4, D 13.3, W 5.7.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.177–178, two syntypes (Morelet coll.).
Morelet considered this to be a variable taxon and distinguished explicitly a smaller variety ”Testa minor, (...)”.
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culmineus edwardsi (Morelet, 1863) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_effeminatus
Figs 62A–B, L20i”—?”.
”Valley of the / Madeleine [= Río Magdalena, Colombia] / N. Grenada”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 31.1, D 14.2, W 7.9.
NHMUK 1975508, lectotype; 1975509, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
This taxon was erroneously placed under Drymaeus by
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus effeminatus (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_electrum
Figs 22E, L20ii”Venezuela”.
”Venezuela”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 29.6, D 14.1, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975510, lectotype; 1975511, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The lectotype corresponds to Reeve’s original figure. The current systematic position is in accordance with
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) electrum (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_elsteri
Figs 33G–I, L20iii”Chachapoyas, prov. Amazonas, Peru”.
”Chacapoyas [sic]”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 34, diam. 15 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 33.9, D 14.9, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.34, lectotype; 1907.11.21.35–36, two paralectotypes (da Costa coll.).
da Costa indicated that he had several specimens at hand when describing this taxon. The lectotype chosen is closely matching the original measurements.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) elsteri da Costa, 1901.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_emaciatus
Figs 3E, L20iv[Peru] ”les vallées et sur les plateaux de l’intérieur de la Sierra, depuis Ayacucho jusqu’au Cuzco” (see remarks).
”Pérou”, taxon label in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 22, diam. 5 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 21.7, D 5.43, W 10.6.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.248–250, three paralectotypes (Morelet coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx emaciatus (Morelet, 1863).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_erectus
Figs 60G–H, L20v”Curiana, Venezuela”.
”Curiana, Venezuela”. M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 22.0 D 12.24 W 6.8.
NHMUK 20100516, three syntypes, Dyson leg. (Cuming coll.).
Although none of the specimens exactly fits Reeve’s figure, they are regarded as possibly syntypes as they are originating from Dyson. See also Bulimus cacticolus Reeve, 1849.
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus erectus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_erosus
Figs 7A, L20vi”Peruviâ, Huantajaya near Iquiqui”.
”Peru”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I, V.
”long. 11/12, lat. 6/12 poll. [H 23.2, D 12.66 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 22.9, D 13.32, W 6.3.
NHMUK 20100612, five syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx erosus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_erubescens
Figs 25D, L21i”Locality unknown”.
”Jamaica”, added in a later handwriting on the front of the cardboard. M.C. label style I, V.
”Long. 24, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 24.2, D 9.74 W 6.3.
NHMUK 1975562, lectotype; 1975563, paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The lectotype corresponds to Pfeiffer’s original measurements and is figured in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) (?) rufescens (J.E. Gray, 1825).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_eschariferus
Figs 74A, L21ii”Galapagos”.
”Chatham Is. / Galapagos”, in E.A. Smith’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
Not given. Figured specimen H 18.4, D 7.1, W 7.5.
NHMUK 1975153, one possible syntype (Cuming coll.).
Sowerby did not state on how many specimens he based himself. The specimen found was figured by Reeve and the label is evidently based on the information given by him. The material is considered as possible syntype; see
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus eschariferus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_excoriatus
Figs 58F–G, L21iii”Andes of Peru (Captain Keppell)”.
”Andes of Peru”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 39, diam. 19 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 38.4, D 25.2, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975500, lectotype, Keppell leg. (Cuming coll.).
The specimen is subadult and aged; it is possibly a synonym of Neopetraeus catamarcanus (Pfeiffer, 1858), in which case Neopetraeus excoriatus would have priority.
Bulimulidae, Neopetraeus excoriatus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_exornatus
Fig. L21iv”Chilon, Bolivia” [Dept. Santa Cruz].
”Bolivia”. M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; lectotype H 13.1, D —, W 5.5.
NHMUK 1975331, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The lectotype was damaged when it was returned from a loan in 1988; the remaining shell is too fragile to be figured herein. The lot consisted of a second specimen (1975332), which appears to be a juvenile Drymaeus species; this specimen is now excluded as type material.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus exornatus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_exoticus
Figs 33D–F, L21v”The hot country, Upper Magdalena River, Colombia”.
”hot country / Columbia”, taxon label in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 23.5, diam. 11 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 24.8, D 12.2, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.38, lectotype (da Costa coll.).
This material was considered as holotype by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) exoticus (da Costa, 1901).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_expatriatus
Figs 51A–C, L21vi”E. Bolivia”.
”E. Bolivia”, taxon label in Preston’s handwriting.
”Alt. 28, diam. maj. 11.5 mm”; figured specimen herein H 28.1, D 11.5, W 7.0.
NHMUK 1975201, lectotype; 1915.1.6.43, one paralectotype (ex Preston).
The paralectotype is a juvenile shell.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) expatriatus (Preston, 1909).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_fabrefactus
Figs 38D–F, L22i[Venezuela] ”Province of Merida, New Granada”.
”New Granada”. M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 38.5, D 16.5, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975531, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fabrefactus (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_fallax
Figs 26D–F, L21vii[Ecuador] ”Tunguragua reipublicae Aequatoris (Bourcier)”.
”Tunguragua / Equador / Monsr Boissier [sic] / Consul General”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 24, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 22.4, D 13.8, W 5.7.
NHMUK 1969142, lectotype and one paralectotype, Bourcier leg. (Cuming coll.).
Given the label, there is no doubt that this material was part of the type series. One specimen is now designated lectotype (design. n.) to define this poorly understood taxon.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fallax (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_farrisi
Figs 45J–L, L22ii”Province of Patas, Andes of Peru (Dr. Farris)”.
”Province of Patas, / Andes of Peru / Dr. Farris”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 47, diam. 16 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 46.8, D 18.4, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975506, lectotype; 1975507, three paralectotypes, Farris leg. (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) farrisi (Pfeiffer, 1858).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_felix
Figs 45D–F, L22iii”New Granada”.
”New Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 33, diam. 13 mill.”; lectotype H 34.0, D 14.8, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975206, lectotype and three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. A lot with four specimens was found, which is considered as type material. The specimen marked with ‘x’ has been selected as lectotype (design. n.) to define this often confused taxon.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) felix (Pfeiffer, 1862).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_fenestratus
Figs 51J–L, L22iv”Mexico”.
”Mexico”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
”Long. 45, diam. 18 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 44.0, D 20.3, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1975525, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fenestratus (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_feriatus
Figs 17I–K, L22vi”Venezuela”.
No locality label. M.C. label style III, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 29.4, D 12.1, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975204, lectotype; 1975205, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) feriatus (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Naesiotus_fernandezae
Fig. 12H[Peru, Dept. Amazonas] ”Interandines Nord-Peru, auf rechter Seite des Río Marañon, bei Balsas, 850 m”.
”N-Peru: Balsas, Rio Marañon, 850 m, leg. B. Fernandez”, printed label.
”H. 16.0 D. 3.4”; figured specimen herein H 15.1, D 3.3, W 8.1.
NHMUK 19831, one paratype (ex Weyrauch).
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus fernandezae Weyrauch, 1958.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_ferrugineus
Figs 9D, L22v”Peru”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 19.0, D 10.7, W 5.4.
NHMUK 1975380, lectotype; 1975381, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
All type material is subadult; the two paralectypes are relatively bigger, with the largest having a shell height of 26.4 mm. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx ferrugineus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_fidustus
Figs 23G–H, L23i[Colombia, Dept. Putumayo / Ecuador, Prov. Napo] ”Sebundoi, New Granada”.
”Sebundoi / New Granada”. M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 22.5, D 11.4, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1975517, lectotype; 1975518, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The lip of the lectotype is slightly damaged.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) fidustus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_filaris
Figs 70C–D, 70L, L23iiNot given.
No locality given, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long 26, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 25.1, D 12.3, W 5.6.
NHMUK 1975569, two syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. On the label a note is added by a later hand ”same as one of / Morelet”; it is unclear to us to what taxon this refers. The current systematic position at the species level follows
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) filaris (Pfeiffer, 1853) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_flavidulus
Figs 24A, L23iii[Ecuador, Prov. El Oro] ”Zaruma, South Ecuador”.
”Zaruma, S. Ecuador”, taxon label in Smith’s handwriting.
”Long. 21 mill, diam. 9”; figured specimen herein H 21.4, D 9.4, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1975134, lectotype; 1877.3.28.5, two paralectotypes.
The lip of the lectotype is slightly damaged.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) flavidulus (E.A. Smith, 1877).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_flexilabris
Figs 49J–L, L23iv”in Brasilia”.
”Brazils”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 28, diam. 12 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.1, D 13.8, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1975559, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
This taxon is a junior subjective synonym of Drymaeus bivittatus (Sowerby I, 1833), of which the type material has not been traced in the NHMUK collection.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bivittatus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_flexuosus
Figs 34A–C, L23v[Colombia, Dept. Caldas] ”Marinato [sic, Marmato] Novae Granadae”.
”Marinata / New Grenada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 40, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 43.0, D 20.0, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975202, lectotype; 1975203, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
This taxon is restricted to the Central Cordillera in Colombia and has partly been confused with other Drymaeus species (Breure and Borrero, unpublished data).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) flexuosus (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_floridanus
Figs 19H, L24i[U.S.A.] ”Florida”.
”Florida”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 15 2/3–17, diam. 7 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 16.7, D 8.0, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975199, lectotype; 1975200, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
This taxon was considered by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) umbraticus (Reeve, 1850).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_fontainii
Figs 16H, L24ii[Ecuador, Prov. Guayas] ”environs de Guayaquil”.
”Guayaquil”, label in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longueur totale, 13 millimètres; largeur 6 millimètres”; figured specimen herein H 13.2, D 6.4, W 8.5.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.165, lectotype (d’Orbigny coll.).
d’Orbigny did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The single specimen found in his collection matches the dimensions given, and is here designated lectotype (design. n.). The weak axial sculpture of the protoconch makes us considering this taxon to belong to Naesiotus sensu
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus fontainii (d’Orbigny, 1838) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_fourmiersi
Figs 16I, L24iii[Argentina] ”la province de Corrientes, non loin du Rio de Santa-Lucia, au lieu nommé Pasto reito”; see
”corrientes Rep. argentina”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Long. 11 millim., lat. 7 millim.”; see remarks.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.210, lectotype (d’Orbigny coll.).
The single specimen is severely damaged, and only the upper whorls are retained. The original figures of d’Orbigny, which are heirein designated as lectotype (design. n.), are figured instead of the type specimen. The protoconch scultpture suggests this taxon to belong to Naesiotus; more detailed studies are needed to corraborate this classification. According to the collation data the figures were published in 1837, the text in 1838 (
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus fourmiersi (d’Orbigny, 1837).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_fucatus
Figs 45G–I, L24v[Colombia] ”Sebundoi, New Granada”.
”New Granada”.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 23.5, D 11.1, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1874.12.11.224, lectotype, ex Mrs. T. Lombe-Taylor.
Reeve did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The distribution of this species in Colombia needs further evidence (Breure and Borrero, unpublished data).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fucatus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_fuscobasis
Figs 24B, L24vi”Tarapoto, Andes of Peru, Mr. Spruce (Mus. Cuming)”.
”Tarapoto, Andes of Peru / Mr. Spruce”; taxon label in Smith’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Longit. 29 mill., diam. 12”; figured specimen herein H 28.7, D 12.3, W 8.2.
NHMUK 1975139, lectotype; 1975140, one paralectotype, Spruce leg. (Cuming coll.).
The specimen selected lectotype by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) fuscobasis (E.A. Smith, 1877).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_fusoides
Figs 29D–F, L24iv”provincia Yungacensi (republica Boliviana)”
”Yunga..... olivia”; in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 4 centim., latit. 1 centim. 4 millim.” (corrected to ”Long. 40 millim., lat. 15 millim.” in
NHMUK 1854.12.4.133, one paralectotype.
d’Orbigny did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The type locality was specified in d’Orbigny 1838 [1834-1847]: 316 as ”près du lieu dit Yunga de la Palma” (see
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fusoides (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_gabbi
Figs 24L, L24vii[Costa Rica, Prov. Limón, Cerro Kámuk] ”flanks of Pico Blanco, at an altitude from 3000 to 6000 feet [914–1828 m]”.
”flanks / of Pico Blanco / 3–6000 ft / Costa Rica”.
”Diam. 7, alt. 10 1/2 lin. [H 22.2, D 14.8 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 20.6, D 12.06, W 4.7.
NHMUK 1879.7.22.23, lectotype; 1879.7.22.24–26, three paralectotypes, Gabb leg. (ex Angas).
Angas did not state on how many specimens his description was based; he distinguished three varieties, which differ in their colour pattern. The lectotype corresponds to Angas’ right-hand sided figure. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) gabbi (Angas, 1879).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_galapaganus
Figs 14H, L24viii[Ecuador] ”Galapagos Islands”.
”Galapagos Islds”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 15 1/2, diam. 6 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 15.1, D 6.28, W 7.6.
NHMUK 1975146, lectotype; 1975147, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus galapaganus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_gayi
Figs 67E–F, 67M, L25i”Bolivia”.
”Bolivia”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 27, diam. 16 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.7, D 16.2, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975382, lectotype; 1975383, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
This taxon is now transferred to the genus Kuschelenia Hylton Scott, 1952.
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) gayi (Pfeiffer, 1857) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_gealei
Figs 51G–I, L25iii”Mexico. Collected by Mr. Boucard”.
”Mexico”.
”Long. 29, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 26.4, D 13.4, W 6+.
NHMUK 1867.1.9.20, lectotype and two paralectotypes; 1867.1.9.21, three paralectotypes, ex Geale.
One of the specimens corresponds to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fenestrellus (Martens, 1864).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_gelidus
Figs 62C–D, L25ii”Central America”.
”C. America”. M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 32.5, D 15.0, W 7.7.
NHMUK 1975402, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
On the back of the cardboard a handwriting in pencil has noted ”seems to be the same as monte-vidensis Pfr.”.
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus. Nomen inquirendum.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_geometricus
Figs 46J–L, L25iv[Colombia] ”Vallis Magdalenae Novae Granadae”.
”Valley of the Madelein / New Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
”Long. 35, diam. 13 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 34.6, D 18.0, W 6.9.
NHMUK 1975564, lectotype; 1975565, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) geometricus (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_zilchi_glomeratus
Fig. 3I”Mittel-Peru: Quichao, 5 km von Laraos, am Fusspfad nach Yauyos, im Tale des Río Cañete und auf der linken Seite des Río Mayo, 3500 m”.
”C-Peru, Quichao, 5 kms. from Laraos, valley of Río Cañete, 3500 m”; printed label.
”H. 19.5, D. 6.5”; figured specimen herein H 18.6, D 6.1, W 7.7.
NHMUK 1975154, five paratypes, ex Weyrauch (WW 3320).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx zilchi Weyrauch, 1958.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Scutalus_grandiventris
Fig. 65H”N-Peru, am Westhang der westlichen Anden, oberhalb Cascas ± 100 km nö. Trujillo und Cajamarca (1400 m)”.
”N-Peru: Cascas, 1400 m”; printed label.
”H. 53.0, D. 29.7”; figured specimen herein H 54.2 D 29.1 W 7.0.
NHMUK 1975386, two paratypes, ex Weyrauch (WW 1364).
Bulimulidae, Scutalus grandiventris Weyrauch, 1960.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_gruneri
Figs 24E, L25vii”Mexico”.
”Mexico”, added in a later handwriting. M.C. label style I, V.
”Long. 28, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.8, D 10.5, W 7.3.
NHMUK 20100563/1, lectotype; NHMUK 20100563/2–3, two paralectotypes; NHMUK 20100562, three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The quotation by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) columbianus (Lea, 1838).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_gueinzii
Figs 30M–O, L25vi”Meobamba, Peru (Mr Gueinzius)”.
”Meobamba”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 23, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 23.2, D 10.9, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975539, lectotype, Gueinzius leg. (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) gueinzii (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_guttatus
Figs 7E, L26i[Chile] ”Peruviâ. (Cobija or Puerto De la Mar)”.
”Bolivia, S. America”, added in a later handwriting. M.C. label style III, V.
”long. 7/8, lat. 3/8 poll. [H 22.1, D 9.5 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 22.0, D —, W 6.2.
NHMUK 20110175, five possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The type locality is now part of Chile, but during the 19th century has also been part of Bolivia and Peru. This taxon has been treated as nomen inquirendum by
Bulimulidae, Bostryx guttatus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_hachensis
Figs 19K–L, L26ii”Guatemala, banks of the Rio Hacha”.
”Rio Hacha, Guatemala”. M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 26.4, D 11.3, W 7.7.
NHMUK 1975392, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Reeve did not state on how many specimens his description was based. We consider this taxon to be a junior subjective synonym of Bulimus columbianus Lea, 1838 (syn. n.), which is partly based on unpublished data of Breure and Borrero.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) columbianus (Lea, 1838).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_hamiltoni
Figs 1F, L26iii”Near the Lake of Titicaca, Bolivia”.
”Bolivia”. A second label indicates ”appartient [?] à Mr Pentlan[d]” [belongs to Mr. Pentland] and refers to the figure published in
Not given; figured specimen herein H 17.0, D 6.55, W 8.0.
NHMUK 1849.5.14.53, lectotype; 1849.5.14.54–57, four paralectotypes.
According to Reeve the material was collected by Mr. Pentland and belonged to ”Mus. Hamilton”; the lectotype corresponds to
Bulimulidae, Bostryx hamiltoni (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_haplochrous
Figs 61G–H, L26iv”—?”.
”New Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 30, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 28.6, D 13.3, W 5.3.
NHMUK 1975405, lectotype; 1975406, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus haplochrous (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_heloica
Figs 62E–F, L26v[Bolivia] ”provincia Chiquitensi, republica Boliviana”.
”Sn Xavier de Chiquitos Bolivia”, label in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 28 millim., diam. 6 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 25.6, D 12.0, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.164, five syntypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus heloicus (d’Orbigny, 1835) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_hepatostomus
Figs 17D–E, L26vii”Mexico (Mr Boucard)”.
”Tepenistlahuaca / Mexico. Mr Boucard”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 32, diam. 13 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 30.1, D 15.0, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1975571, lectotype; 1975221, one paralectotype, Boucard leg. (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) hepatostomus (Pfeiffer, 1861).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_hidalgoi
Figs 32A–C, L26vi”Ecuador”.
”Equador”, label in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 39, diam. 13 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 39.0, D 17.0, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.28, lectotype; 1907.11.21.29–30, two paralectotypes, Buckley leg. (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not state on how many specimens his description was based, only that he had ”examples collected by the late Mr. Buckley”. The reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) hidalgoi (da Costa, 1898).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_holostoma
Figs 2O–P, L26viii[Chile] ”Cobija, Bolivia”.
”Cobija Bolivia Hills under Bushes”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
”Long. 9, diam. 2 2/3 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 7.84, D 2.43, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1975345, lectotype; 1975346, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this species from the Cuming collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx holostoma (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_hondurasanus
Figs 24I, L27i”Honduras”.
”Honduras on leaves / of Bushes Dyson”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
”Long. 18 1/2, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 28.6, D 13.7, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1975265, lectotype; 1975117, one paralectotype, Dyson leg. (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) hondurasanus (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_huascensis
Figs 8B, L27ii[Chile] ”Huasco, Chili”.
”Chili”. M.C. label style III, IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 19.1, D 10.9, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975159, lectotype; 1975160, four paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx huascensis (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_humboldtii
Figs 37D–E, L27iii”Mexico”.
”Mexico”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 27.6, D 14.5, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1975528, lectotype and one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The specimen corresponding to Reeve’s figure is selected lectotype (design. n.) to define this taxon, for which Reeve did not state on how many specimens his description was based. This taxon is considered a junior subjective synonym of Bulimus mexicanus Lamarck, 1822 by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) mexicanus (Lamarck, 1822).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_hygrohylaea
Figs 27D–F, L27iv”provincia Chiquitensi (republica Boliviana)”.
Three labels, ”Sta Cruz de la sierra, Bolivia” [.126], ”guarayos, Bolivia” [.127], ”chiquitos, Bolivia” [.128]; all in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 41 millim., latit. 19 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 40.4, D 19, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.127, lectotype and five paralectotypes; 1854.12.4.126, four paralectotypes; 1854.12.4.128, two paralectotypes.
The specimen that corresponds to the original figure of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) abyssorum (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Otostomus_emeus_hypozonus
Figs 23E, L27v”East Mexico”.
”E. Mexico”, in Martens handwriting.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 19.3, D 11.3, W 5.7.
NHMUK 1901.6.22.794–795, two paralectotypes, H. Strebel leg. (Godman coll.).
Strebel gave the measurements of nearly 30 specimens in his description of Bulimulus palpaloensis, but did not mention the material as presented by Martens—who remarked on the label ”Otostomus palpaloensis Streb /.../ collected by Strebel”. From their remarks (
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) emeus (Say, 1830).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_ignavus
Figs 62I–J, L27vi”Central America”.
”Central America”. M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 17.1 (see remarks).
NHMUK 1975411, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The last whorl of the specimen is very damaged. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus unicolor (Sowerby I, 1833).
”Peru, Huancabamba”.
”Huancabamba Peru”.
”Alt. 63, diam. max. 26, 5 (...) mm”; figured specimen herein H 61.2, D 24.9, W 5+.
NHMUK 1922.2.24.40, holotype (ex Rolle).
The top of the holotype is damaged. The current systematic position is after
Bulimulidae, Newboldius crichtoni (Broderip, 1836).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_immaculatus
Figs 17L–M, L28iii”Jamaica”.
”Jamaica”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 30.5, D 13.17, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1975540, lectotype; 1975541, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The specimen was described and figured on the basis of specimens received from Adams with a manuscript name.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) immaculatus (C.B. Adams in
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_incarnatus
Figs 22A, L28ii”Venezuela”.
”Venezuela”. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 31, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 30.7, D 13.1, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1975566, lectotype; 1975567, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The paralectotype is a juvenile shell. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) granadensis (Pfeiffer, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_inclinatus
Figs 47A–C, L28iv”New Grenada”.
”New Grenada”. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 33, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 33.1, D 17.2, W 5.7.
NHMUK 1975532, lectotype; 1975533, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The diameter mentioned by Pfeiffer does not fit with his figure and is likely in error.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) inclinatus (Pfeiffer, 1862).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_incognita
Figs 33A–C, L28v[Colombia] ”Bogota”.
”Bogota”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 29.5, diam. 12 mm”; figured specimen herein H 29.8, D 13.7, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.24, holotype; 1907.11.21.25, one paratype (da Costa coll.).
This taxon was described by da Costa on the basis of ”two specimens”.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) incognitus da Costa, 1907.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_incrassatus
Figs 14B–C, L29i[Ecuador] ”insulis Gallapagos”.
”Brazils”, ”Galapagos”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 17 1/2, diam. 8 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 17.3, D 9.0, W 7.0.
NHMUK 1975157, lectotype; 1975158, three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The original label had the locality as ”Brazils”, but in a later hand (probably E.A. Smith’s) this has been corrected to Galapagos. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus nux (Broderip, 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_infundibulum
Figs 1C–D, L30iii”Andibus Peruvianis”.
”Peru + Bolivia”. M.C. label style I, IV.
”Long. 18, diam. 7 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 18.3, D 6.82, W 9.0.
NHMUK 1975163, lectotype; 1975164, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The label is apparently partly in error, as this species is only known from southern Peru. The current systematic position is after
Bulimulidae, Bostryx infundibulum (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_inglorius
Figs 24J, L30i”—?”.
”—?”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 25.6, D 13.2, W 5.7.
NHMUK 1975536, lectotype; 1975537, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) inglorius (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_interruptus
Figs 18A–B, L29iii”Merida, Venezuela”.
”Merida, Venezuela”.
”Alt. 25.5, diam. maj. 10.5 mm”; figured specimen herein H 24.5, D 11.3, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1914.4.3.38, lectotype and five paralectotypes (ex Preston).
Preston described for this taxon also two forms (interruptus form α and β), and three varieties (var. pallidus, var. pallidus form γ, and var. pallidu s form δ); as he gave them explicitly infrasubspecific rank these names are not available (Art. 45.6 ICZN). The shells, from the same locality, clearly show the intraspecific variation that may occur in this taxon.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) interruptus (Preston, 1909).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_inusitatus
Figs 20F–G, L30ii”Costa Rica”.
”Costa Rica”, in Fulton’s handwriting.
”Alt. 29 1/5, diam. maj. 13 (...) mill.”; figured specimen herein H 28.3, D 13.1, W 7.8.
NHMUK 1901.4.25.28, lectotype (ex Fulton).
Fulton did not mention on how many specimens his description was based.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) inusitatus (Fulton, 1900).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_inutilis
Figs 62G–H, L30iv”—?”.
”?Centr. America”. M.C. label style III, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 16.5, D 8.9, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975162, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus inutilis (Reeve, 1850).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_iodostylus
Figs 54C–D, L30v”Mexico”.
”Mexico”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 30, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 32.2, D 15.3, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975568, three syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The largest specimen in the syntype lot was measured and is here figured. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) ghiesbreghti iodostylus (Pfeiffer, 1861).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_irregularis
Figs 15B, L30vi”Quito, Ecuador”.
”Ecuador”. M.C. label style I, V.
”Long. 19, diam. 9 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 18.8, D 9.28, W 6.2.
NHMUK 20100564, one possible syntype (Cuming coll.).
A lot was found under this name, containing two specimens. One specimen corresponds to the measurements given by Pfeiffer and to Reeve’s figure; it is, however, not accompanied by a taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting, and therefore considered a possible syntype. The other specimen belongs to a different species, viz. Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) anthisanensis (Pfeiffer, 1853), and is here excluded from the type series. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus quitensis (Pfeiffer, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_istapensis
Figs 63O–P, L30vii”Istapa, Guatemalae, in silvis (A. Morelet)”.
”Forests d’Istapa, Guatemala”, in Morelet’s hamdwriting.
”Long. 14 1/2, diam. maj. vix 7 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 11.2, D 6.33, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.1185–1187, three possible syntypes (Morelet coll.).
The original description does not mention on how many specimens it was based, but does refer to a specimen in the Morelet collection. The specimens, of which one is broken, are considered possible syntypes. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus unicolor (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_jacobi
Figs 13B–C, L31i”ad Insulam Jacobi, inter Gallapagos”.
”Galapagos Is.” [1842.5.10.250–252], ”James I. Galapagos” [20100648], both in E.A. Smith’ handwriting. M.C. label style III, V.
”long. 0.55, lat. 0.3 poll. [H 13.9 D 7.6 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 11.9, D 6.8, W 5.7.
NHMUK 1842.5.10.250–252, three possible syntypes; 20100648, four possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The two lots originating from the Cuming collection are considered possible syntypes. One specimen from lot 20100648 corresponds to Reeve’s figure. There is one additional specimen (NHMUK 1837.4.8.33.576), which according to the registration book, was ”purchased from Mr. Eling, Deptford, from Capt Fitzroy’s vessel”; this is not considered as type material but may have been collected by Darwin on his voyage with the ‘Beagle’.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus jacobi (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Otostomus_lilacinus_jansoni
Figs 53D–F, L30viii”Nicaragua”.
”Nicaragua”, taxon label in Martens’ handwriting.
”Long. 46, diam. 22 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 45.7, D 22.3, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1901.6.22.951, lectotype, Janson leg. (Godman coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lilacinus jansoni (Martens, 1893).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimuss_jonasi
Figs 18F–G, L31ii”Vera Cruz Americae centralis (Lattre in coll. Cuming)”.
”Vera Cruz, C. America”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I, IV, V.
”Long 13´´´, Diam. 5´´´ [H 28.3, D 10.9 mm]”; figured specimen herein herein H 26.6, D 11.6, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975557, six syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The measurements as given by Pfeiffer are interpreted as German lines, i.e. 2.18 mm. The current systematic position is following
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) jonasi (Pfeiffer in
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_josephus
Fig. L31iii”San José, Costa Rica”.
”in the low hills / Talamanca / Costa Rica”.
”Diam. 7 lines, alt. 16 [H 33.8 D 14.8 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 31.0, D 15.6, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1879.7.22.16–18, three possible syntypes (ex Angas).
Angas did not mention on how many specimens his description was based, but mentioned ”Mus. Boucard”. The lot found consists of smaller specimens and are considered as possible syntypes. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) josephus (Angas, 1878).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_juarezi
Figs 72G–I, L31iv[Mexico] ”in provinciae pacifica reipublicae mexicanae”.
”West Mexico”. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 31, diam. 18 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 31.5, D 19.3, W 5.4.
NHMUK 1975421, three syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Rabdotus (Rabdotus) sufflatus (Gould, 1859).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_jussieui
Figs 66L–N, L31v[Peru] ”Cusoo” (sic, Cusco).
”Cusco / Peru / Val.”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III, IV.
”Long. 32, diam. 15 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 31.6, D 16.3, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1975170, lectotype and two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culminea culminea (d’Orbigny, 1835) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_juvenilis
Figs 61A–B, L31vi[Colombia] ”Santa Fé de Bogota”.
”Santa Fé de Bogota”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long 20, diam. 8 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 19.5, D 8.7, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1975161, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus juvenilis (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_kathiae
Fig. 8D”Peru, Dept. Lima, Río Cañete valley, 1 km above Puente Auco, 2070 m”.
”Peru, Dept. Lima, Río Cañete valley, 1 km above Puente Auco, 2070 m”.
”H 18.5 D 9.4”; figured specimen herein H 17.5, D 8.8, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1975228, one paratype, A.S.H. Breure leg.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx kathiae Breure, 1978.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_keppelli
Figs 25G, L32i”in Andibus Peruanis (Keppell)”.
”Andes of Peru / Hon. Cap. Keppell”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 34 1/2, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 33.2, D 14.2, W 6+.
NHMUK 1975538, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The top of the specimen is damaged. The current systematic position is following
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) vexillum (Wood, 1828).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_knorri
Figs 51D–F, L32iii”La Guayra”.
”La Guayra”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I, V.
”Long. 18, diam 6´´´ [H 39.2, D 13.1 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 34.1, D 17.1, W 6.5.
NHMUK 20100654, three possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not describe on how many specimens his description was based. The lot found has the taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting and the locality corresponds to the original one; it is not know whether this locality lies in the Colombian or Venezuelan part of La Guayra. The largest specimen is smaller than indicated in the original description; the specimens are considered as possible syntypes. Given the shell shape, and the expanded lip this taxon may be better placed in Drymaeus s. str. At species level the current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) trigonostomus (Jonas, 1844) (comb.n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_koppeli
Figs 24H, L32iv[Colombia] ”Bogota”.
”Bogota”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 25, diam. maj. 15 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 25.5, D 15.0, W 5.6.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.133, lectotype, 1907.11.21.134, one paralectotype (da Costa coll.).
Sowerby III (1892) described the species on the basis of ”two specimens lent [to] me for description by Mr. Da Costa”. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) koppeli (Sowerby III, 1892).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_lactifluus
Figs 2C–D, L32ii”Chili”.
”Chile”. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 16 1/2–17, diam. 4 2/3 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 16.2, D 4.7, W 10.6.
NHMUK 20100642, four possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
From the measurements given by Pfeiffer it is clear that he had multiple specimens for his description. As he described this species from the Cuming collection, but no taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting was found, this lot is considered as possible syntypes. The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Bostryx lactifluus (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_laetus
Figs 18E, L32v[Colombia] ”Sebundoi, New Granada”.
”in Abejonal [?, labels partly illegible]”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 26.6, D 13.15, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975534, lectotype, 1975535, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Reeve described the taxon from ”Mus. Cuming” and noted ”Mr Taylor has a specimen collected independently of this, of exactly similar pattern and colour”. The lot found is accompanied by a label that indicates that it was figured by Reeve (
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) laetus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_lamas
Figs 54E, L33i”Jouctabamba, Peru”.
”Peru”.
”Long. 33, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 29.2, D 9.6, W 7.9.
NHMUK 1868.4.3.3, three possible syntypes (ex R. Geale).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) trujillensis (Philippi, 1867).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_binominis_lascellianus
Figs 23I, L33ii[West Indies, Grenada] ”Annandale estate” (see remarks).
”Grenada”.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 22.1, D 11.22, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1895.9.10.1, lectotype; 1895.9.10.2, one paralectotype.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) binominis (E.A. Smith, 1895).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_latecolumellaris
Figs 65I–J, L33iii”Peru”.
”Peru”, label in Preston’s handwriting.
”Alt. 54, diam. maj. 24 mm”; figured specimen herein H 54, D 23.9, W 7+.
NHMUK 1922.2.24.39, lectotype (ex Preston).
The top of the specimen is damaged.
Bulimulidae, Scutalus latecolumellaris Preston, 1909.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_lattrei
Figs 50G–I, L33iv”America centralis; prope Veracruz legit Lattre” (see remarks).
”Mons Lattre / Mountains of Vera / Cruz, Central America”. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 21, diam. 10´´´ [H 45.8, D 21.8 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 42.6, D 22.2, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1975555, lectotype; 1975556, eight paralectotypes (Cuming coll.) (see remarks).
The type locality was corrected to Guatemala, Vera Paz [Dept. Altaverapaz] by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lattrei lattrei (Pfeiffer in
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_laxostylus
Figs 74E–G, L33v”Huancabamba in Peru”.
”Huancabamba / Peru / Andes 6–10.000 ft.”, taxon label in Rolle’s handwriting.
”Alt. 40, diam. 16, 5 mm”; figured specimen herein H 39.9, D 15.4, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1922.2.24.32, lectotype (ex Rolle).
Rolle did not mention on how many specimens his description was based; the label reads ”largest is type”, suggesting that more than one specimen might have been seen. The record of the holotype in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) laxostylus (Rolle, 1904).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_lesueureanus
Figs 1G–H, L33vi”[in intimâ Peruvii regione]” (see remarks).
”Pomacocha, Pérou”, taxon label in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 21; diam. 7 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 22.5, D 7.7, W 7.7.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.1182–1183, two syntypes (Morelet coll.).
The type locality was specified in
Bulimulidae, Bostryx orophilus (Morelet, 1860).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_lichnorum
Figs 2E–F, L34i[Chile] ”Cobija (republica Boliviana)”.
”cobija. Bolivia”, taxon label in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 17 millim., latit. 5 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 15.8, D 5.14, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.96, lectotype and four paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
The type locality now belongs to the political administration of Chile. The lot found consists of five specimens, of which one corresponds to the figure of d’Orbigny and is here designated lectotype (design. n.) to define the taxon.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx lichnorum (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_lilacinus
Figs 53A–C, L34iii”—?”.
”New Granada”, in a later handwriting (see remarks). M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 45.5, D 20.3, W 6+.
NHMUK 20100520, four probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
One lot was found, of which one shell is very similar to Reeve’s figure. The shells are considered probable syntypes. Pfeiffer (1853: 326) considered these shells juveniles and conspecific with Bulimus patricius Reeve, 1849, which was published later in the same year.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lilacinus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_limensis
Figs 6E, L34v”Lima and Quito, South America”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 19.6, D 10.46, W 7.0.
NHMUK 1975326, lectotype; 1975327, three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx modestus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_limonoica
Figs 11B, L34ii”provincia Chiquitensi (republica Boliviana)”; see
”Sn Juan. P.Chiquitos Bolivia”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Latit. 19 millim., longit. 8 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 15.8, D 5.14, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.190, two paralectotype (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx limonoicus (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_linostoma
Figs 28A–C, L34iv”provincia Chiquitensi (republica Boliviana)”; see
”guarayos, Bolivia”; in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. a 26 ad 31 millim., latit. 2 ad 14 millim.”; in
NHMUK 1854.12.4.132, four paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
None of the specimens correspond to the original figured by d’Orbigny. A lectotype—closest to the measurements given by d’Orbigny—has been chosen by Breure from among the material in the Paris museum (
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) linostoma (
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_liquabilis
Figs 73D–E, L34vi”Texas”.
”Texas”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 21.3, D 12.3, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1975422, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Rabdotus dealbatus dealbatus (Say, 1821).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_lirinus
Figs 20A, L34viii[Guatemala] ”Petenensium San-Luis”.
”Peten, Forets de S. Luis”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 30.—Diam. 11 [mm]”; figured specimen herein H 30.2, D 13.15, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.1954, holotype (ex Morelet).
Morelet indicated that he had only one specimen at hand, thus this is the holotype. The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) lirinus (Morelet, 1851).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_lithoica
Figs 67A–B, 67K, L34vii”provincia Pazensi (republica Boliviana)”.
”La Paz. Bolivia”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit 15 millim.; latit. 35 millim. [sic, H 35, D 15 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 34.3, D 17.1, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.197, six paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culminea culminea (d’Orbigny, 1835) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_lividus
Figs 18C–D, L34ix”Venezuela”.
”Venezuela”. M.C. label style III, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 24.5, D 11.22, W 6.7+.
NHMUK 1975208, lectotype; 1975209, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The aperture of the lectotype has been damaged and the thin lip has been broken off; also the top is slightly damaged. We tentively follow
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) granadensis (Pfeiffer, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_lobbii
Figs 57A–C, L35i”Banks of the Maranon near Balsas, Peru”.
See remarks.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 44.3, D 19.4, W 7.6.
NHMUK 1975431, lectotype; 1975432, two paralectypes (Cuming coll.).
The locality label is no longer legible. The lectotype corresponds to
Bulimulidae, Neopetraeus lobbii (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_longinquus
Figs 11A, L35iii[Peru, Dept. Cuzco] ”Limatambo, Ollantaïtambo, Yucay et Piré”.
”Ollantaitambo Pérou”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 31, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 30.9, D 13.8, W 7.8.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.185–187, three paralectotypes (ex Morelet).
This taxon was described from several localities and with two unnamed varieties; the lectotype is in the MHNG collection. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx longinquus (Morelet, 1863).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_lophoica
Figs 44M–O, L35ii”provincia Yungacensi (republica Boliviana)”; see
”Chulumani de Yungas”; in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 33 millim., latit. 12 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 32.7, D 12.9, W 7.3.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.135, three paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
The lectotype is in the MNHN collection (
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lophoicus (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Otostomus_loxanus
Fig. L35iv[Ecuador] ”Loxa” [Loja].
”Ecuador”. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 29, diam. 11 mill.”; specimen found H 26.5, D 12.2, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1975552, one specimen (Cuming coll.).
Higgins did not state on how many specimens his description was based; however, his material was said to be collected by Buckley. This shell from the Cuming collection cannot be traced to that collector, but corresponds to the original figure of Higgins albeit the colour has faded away; the shell height is slightly less than given by Higgins. This specimen is no longer considered to be type material and loses its status as lectotype.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_loxensis
Figs 22I, L35v[Ecuador] ”El Catamaija prope Loxa reipublicae Aequatoris (Hartweg in coll. Cuming)”.
”from El Catamaija / near Loxa. Republic of / the Equator. 4 South Lat / on Bushes. Mr Hartweg”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I, V.
”Long. 35, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 34.7, D 14.2, W 7.3.
NHMUK 1975553, lectotype; 1975554, two paralectotypes, Hartweg leg. (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) loxensis (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_lucidus
Figs 35G–I, L35vi”Ecuador”.
”Ecuador”, taxon label in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 19, diam. 11 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 18.6, D 10.7, W 4.9.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.44, lectotype; 1907.11.21.45, one paralectotype, Buckley leg. (da Costa coll.).
da Costa described this taxon on the basis of material collected by Buckley, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The specimen figured by da Costa is selected as lectotype (design. n.) to define this taxon.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lucidus (da Costa, 1898).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_lucidus
Figs 20B, L35viii[West Indies] ”St. Vincents”.
”St. Vincents”. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 28.9, D 14.2, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1975524, three syntypes (Cuming coll.).
One of the specimens corresponds to Reeve’s figure. The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) stramineus (Guilding, 1824).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_luridus
Figs 9E, L35vii”New Caledonia” (see remarks).
”New Caledonia”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 22, diam. 11 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 21.7, D 12.55, W 6.2.
NHMUK 19991535, lectotype and one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
This taxon, hitherto unfigured, has not been collected on New Caledonia (see also Crosse 1871: 183).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx luridus (Pfeiffer, 1863).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_lusorius
Figs 17A–C, L36i”Banks of Amazon, Brazils”.
”Brazil Banks of Ama[zon]”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 25, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 24.4, D 10.84, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1975543, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The shape of the shell, aperture and the colour pattern suggest in combination that this taxon belongs to Drymaeus s. str.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lusorius (Pfeiffer, 1855) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_lycodus
Figs 55F, L36ii”Galapagos, Indefatigable Island, 450–550 ft.”.
”Galapagos, Indefatigable Island, 450–550 ft.”.
”Length of shell 11; diameter 8 mm”; figured specimen herein H 10.0, D 7.3, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1937.6.18.11–12, two possible paratypes, CAS expedition leg. 1905–1906 (ex Schlesch).
These specimens are here considered only as possible paratypes, despite the evidence on the label. The reason is that material of Naesiotus snodgrassi (Dall, 1900) was found (NHMUK 1937.6.18.6–7), originating from Schlesch and designated as ‘paratypes’, which proved to be collected by the expedition of the California Academy of Sciences in 1905–1906 according to the label; for that reason it is impossible that they belonged to the type series. All type material from this source is thus viewed with much suspicion.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus lycodus (Dall, 1917).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_malleatus
Figs 53G–I, L36iii”La Paz, Bolivia, 3, 600 metres”.
”La Paz, 3600 Mts / Bolivia”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 34, diam. 15 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 34.5, D 15.5, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.130, holotype (da Costa coll.).
This taxon was explicitly described ”from a single specimen”.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) malleatus (da Costa, 1898).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_manupictus
Figs 21E, L36iv[Venezuela, Edo. Merida] ”Andes of Columbia” (see remarks).
”Merida, Columb.”. M.C. label style I, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 33.3, D 14.24, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1975522, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The label reveals that this is a species from the Venezuelan Andes region of Merida, for which in the beginning of the 19th century politically the name ‘Colombia’ has been applied. Contrary to a remark on a modern label from 1980s, this specimen fits the figure by Reeve. The top of the specimen is slightly damaged.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) manupictus (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_marcidus
Figs 63I–J, L36v”Brasilia”.
”Brazil”. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 20, diam. 8 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 18.0, D 8.4, W 5.9.
NHMUK 20100649, three possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer based himself on material from Cuming’s collection, although his description was not published until 1854 (
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus marcidus (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_marmarina
Figs 27G–I, L36vi”provincia Yungacensi (republica Boliviana)”; see
”Yungas, Bolivia”; in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 42 millim., latit. 18 millim.”; lectotype H 37.9, D 18.8, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.129, lectotype and five paralectotypes.
One specimen, corresponding to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) marmarinus (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_martinicensis
Figs 53B–C, L37i”island of Martinique”.
”Martinique”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
”Long. 20, diam. 8 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 19.5, D 8.14, W 7.1.
NHMUK 197451, lectotype; 197452, two paralectotypes (ex Petit, Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this species on the basis of material from Petit. One of the labels is nearly illegible, but corresponds to the handwriting of Petit (cf.
Bulimulidae, Protoglyptus martinicensis (Pfeiffer, 1846) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_mejillonensis
Figs 8C, L37iii[Chile] ”Mejillones in deserto Atacamensi”.
”Desert of Atacama”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 25, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 24.1, D 12.8, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975322, lectotype; 1975323, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx mejillonensis (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_meleagris
Figs 75D–F, L37ii”Andibus Novae Granadae”.
”Andes N. Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 31, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 31.3, D 16.0, W 5.0.
NHMUK 20100583, lectotype and one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
One of the specimens corresponds to the original measurements and Pfeiffer’s figure, and is here designated lectotype (design. n.). The paralectotype is subadult. Upon re-examining these specimens, it is clear that the specimens referred to by
Bulimulidae, Stenostylus meleagris (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_meridanus
Figs 22J, L37iv[Venezuela] ”Merida, Andes of Bolivia [sic]”.
”New Granada”. taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III, V.
”Long. 29, diam. 11 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 35.9, D 14.0, W 7.3.
NHMUK 1975523, two syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The material has a taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting and is considered as syntypes. One of the specimens corresponds to Reeve’s figure.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) meridanus (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_metagyra
Figs 1K, L37v”Peru”.
”without locality, from the original series”.
”Height 8.2 mm., diameter 8.6 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 7.2, D 7.6, W 4.9.
NHMUK 20100630, four probable paratypes (ex Weyrauch).
Pilsbry and Olsson (1949: 10) remarked ”paratypes 184900 ANSP and in Museo Historia Natural, Lima, where many specimens were preserved without locality”. As it is known that Weyrauch worked in the Lima museum during many years in the 1940s–1950s (
Bulimulidae, Bostryx metagyra Pilsbry & Olsson, 1949.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_haasi_minor
Fig. 3H[Peru] ”Mittel-Peru, am Westhang der westlichen Anden: auf der rechten Seite des Río Rimac, gegenüber der Selterswasserquelle San Mateo (3300 m)”.
”C-Peru, on the right side of Rio Rimac, above San Mateo, 3300 m”; printed label.
”H 19–23.5, D 10.5”. Figured specimen herein H 14.0, D 5.2, W 7.9.
NHMUK 1975353, ten paratypes (ex Weyrauch).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx haasi Weyrauch, 1960.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_modestus
Fig. 6G”Peruviae montibus, Huacho”.
Lost, see remarks.
”Long. 1 2/8, lat. 4/8 poll. [H 31.6, D 12.66 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 31.6, D 13.8, W 8.6.
NHMUK 20120232, four possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Broderip described this taxon from the Cuming collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The label is lost, but considering this material is from the Cuming collection and the specimen figured herein corresponds with the original measurements, the material is considered as possible syntypes.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx modestus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_mollicellus
Figs 60I–J, L37vi”—?”.
See remarks. M.C. label style III, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 17.2, D 7.88, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975185, lectotype; 1975186, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
Reeve did not state on how many specimens his description was based; of the two specimens the smaller corresponds to Reeve’s figure.
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus mollicellus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_monachus
Figs 63A–B, L37vii”Meobamba, Peru”.
”Meobamba M. Gueinzius”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 31, diam. 11 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 31.2, D 12.6, W 8.3.
NHMUK 20100584, lectotype and two paralectotypes, Gueinzius leg. (Cuming coll.).
The specimen which is nearest to the original shell height is herein selected lectotype (design. n.) to define this taxon.
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus monachus (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_moniezi
Figs 1B, L37viii”le Haut-Pérou”.
”Andes of Bolivia” (handwriting of E.A. Smith?).
”Longit. 14 millim., latit. 6 1/2 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 12.5, D 5.9, W 7.9.
NHMUK 1908.6.13.22, one possible syntype (ex Preston, ex Dautzenberg?).
The specimen is labelled ”co-type” but is not accompanied by a Dautzenberg label; however, its type status is not questioned here as Dautzenberg is known to have been in regular contact with Preston and the London museum (
Bulimulidae, Bostryx moniezi (Dautzenberg, 1896).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_monilifer
Figs 23F, L38i”—?”.
”—?”. M.C. label style IV.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 26.3, D 13.22, W 5.7.
NHMUK 1975403, lectotype; 1975404, one paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) monilifer (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_montagnei
Figs 12D, L37ix[Bolivia] ”principalement à la côte de Petaca [Dept. Santa Cruz, Cuevas Petacas; see
”côte de Petaca Valle grande (Bolivia)”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Long. 21 millim.; lat. 9 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 23.3, D 9.4, W 8.0.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.194, lectotype and seven paralectotype (d’Orbigny coll.).
d’Orbigny did not state on how many specimens his description was based. One of the specimens corresponds to
Bulimulidae, Bostryx montagnei (d’Orbigny, 1837).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_montevidensis
Figs 64G–H, L38ii”Montevideo, Buenos Ayres”.
”Montevideo & Buenos Ayres”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 28, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 34.2, D 17.0, W 7.7.
NHMUK 1975401, four syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus bonariensis bonariensis (Rafinesque, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_montivaga
Figs 15J, L38iv[Bolivia] ”provincia Lagunensis (republica Boliviana)”; see remarks.
”pampa ruis; Laguna. Bolivia” [1854.12.4.167], ”pampa grande Bolivia” [1854.12.4.168], ”[..] Grande Sta Cruz Bolivia” [1854.12.4.169], ”[illegible]” [1854.12.4.170], all labels in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 16 millim.; latit. 7 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 20.5, D 7.45, W 8.3.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.167, eight paralectotypes; 1854.12.4.168, seven juvenile paralectotypes; 1854.12.4.169, five paralectotypes; 1854.12.4.170, lectotype and five paralectotypes; 1854.12.4.172, five paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus montivagus (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_mordani
Fig. 4D”Peru, Dept. Lima, Río Santa Eulalia valley, 3 km above Autisha, 2500 m, sta. 67”.
”67. Peru, Dept. Lima, Río Santa Eulalia valley, 3 km above Autisha, 2500 m”.
”shell height 23.5, diameter 9.1 mm”; figured specimen herein H 22.5, D 8.9, W 7.7.
NHMUK 1975266, paratype, A.S.H. Breure leg., 1.ii.1975.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx mordani Breure, 1978
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_moricandi
Figs 22H, L38v[Guatemala] ”Mount Coban, Central America (Lattre)”.
”M. Lattre / Coban C Am[erica]”. M.C. label style III, V.
”Lat. 24, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 23.6, D 12.7, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975212, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The lectotype, however, matches the original measurements and also corresponds to Reeve’s figure. The current systematic position is after
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) moricandi moricandi (Pfeiffer, 1847).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Otostomus_moritinctus
Figs 54I, L39i”W. Mexico: Chilpancingo, in the State of Guerrero, at an elevation of 4600 feet above the sea (H.H. Smith)”.
”Chilpancingo”.
”Long. 26–29, diam. 13 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 25.2, D 12.8, W 5.6.
NHMUK 1901.6.22.841, lectotype; 1901.6.22.842–847, 851–852, eight paralectotypes, H.H. Smith leg. (Godman coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) moritinctus (Martens, 1893).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_mossi
Figs 21B, L39iv[Trinidad].
”Trinidad”.
”Longit. 21 1/2 millim., diam. 9 1/2”; figured specimen herein H 21.8, D 9.7, W 5.5.
NHMUK 1912.5.11.1, holotype, W. Moss leg.
Smith mentioned that he examined a single specimen.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) mossi (E.A. Smith, 1896).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_moussoni
Figs 23L, L39ii”St. Domingo (Sallé)”.
”Haiti”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 26, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 26.0, D 12.9, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975210, lectotype; 1975211, two paralectotypes, Sallé leg. (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The published type locality could be interpreted as located in the Dominican Republic, while the label indicates Haiti; he did, however, mention Sallé as collector.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) moussoni (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_muliebris
Figs 18K–L, L39iii”New Granada”.
”New Granada”.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 29.9, D 13.06, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1879.2.26.251, lectotype (ex Taylor).
Reeve did not mention on how many specimens his description was based. The sole specimen corresponds to Reeve’s figure and is here designated lectotype (design. n.). The current systematic position as a sepatate taxon follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) muliebris (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_multispira
Figs 11C, L39vi”Chuco Chaca, Bolivia, 4, 000 feet”.
”Chuco Chaca / Bolivia 4000 ft”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 20, diam. 11 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 19.9, D 11.11, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.31, lectotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa wrote ”the shells of this species”, implying that he had seen more than one specimen.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx torallyi (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_munsterii
Figs 74D, L39v”la côte de Petaca (...) dans les plaines de Santa-Cruz de la Sierra, en Bolivia”; see
”cote de Petaca Sta Cruz”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longueur, 23 millimètres; largeur, 10 millimètres”; figured specimen herein H 21.7, D 10.85, W 8.2.
NHMUK 1854.12.11.177, six paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
This taxon was published with a wrong name (Helix camba) in the legend of the plate (as noticed and corrected by d’Orbigny in his text and on the label). According to
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus munsterii (d’Orbigny, 1837).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_murrinus
Figs 38J–L, L40i”Santa Fé de Bogota”.
”Marinata / New Granada”, taxon label also in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 37.1, D 16.2, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1975213, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The specimen designated lectotype by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) murrinus (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_musivus
Figs 29J–L, L39vi”Meobamba, Eastern Peru (Mr. Yates)”.
”Meobamba Eastern / Peru M Yates”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 22, diam. 9 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 21.5, D 11.9, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1975292, lectotype; 1975293, two paralectotypes, Yates leg. (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) strigatus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_myristicus
Figs 57G–I, L40ii”Andes of Caxamarca, Peru”.
”Andes of Caxamarca, Peru”. M.C. label style IV.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 40.3, D 17.6, W 8.1.
NHMUK 1975433, lectotype, W. Lobb leg. (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position is following
Bulimulidae, Neopetraeus decussatus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_nanus
Figs 2G–H, L40iv”Chili”.
”Chili”. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 15.4, D 4.75, W 7.8.
NHMUK 1975463, six syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The material was found with the specimens still glued on cardboard; one specimen was removed and is figured herein.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx pumilio Rehder, 1945.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_napo
Figs 47G–I, L40iii”Ecuador”.
”Ecuador”.
”Alt. 1 inch 3 lines, diam. 5 1/2 lines [H 31.7, D 11.6 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 31.3, D 15.0, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1879.1.21.4, lectotype (ex Angas).
As Angas did not state on how many specimens his description was based, the reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) quadrifasciatus (Angas, 1878).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_nigrofasciatus
Figs 21J, L40v–vi”Novae Granadae, vallis Magdalenae”.
”Brazil” and ”Venezuela” (see remarks), taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV / I.
”Long. 12´´´. Diam. 6´´´ [H 26.1, D 13.0 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 23.5, D 12.95, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975542, lectotype and two paralectotypes; 20120333, one probable syntype (Cuming coll.).
According to the labels of lot NHMUK 1975542, the specimens would have originated from Brazil. This is probably an erroneous Cumingian label, as the species has only been found in Colombia (Breure and Borrero, unpublished data). A label stating ”Bul. helena Quoy” and a second, illegable, label have supposedly been added afterwards. Another label makes clear that one of the specimens was figured by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) nigrofasciatus (Pfeiffer in
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_nigrolimbatus
Figs 75A–C, L40vii”Andes of New Granada”.
”Andes, N. Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 28, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 28.0, D 16.4, W 4.8.
NHMUK 1975549, lectotype; 197550, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Stenostylus nigrolimbatus (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_nigropileatus
Figs 5C, L41i”Chachapoyas, Alto-Peru”.
No locality given. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 20.5, D 10.25, W 7.0.
NHMUK 1975335, lectotype; 1975336, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The specimens were said by Reeve to have been collected by W. Lobb and were described from the Cuming collection; the type status is herein not disputed.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx nigropileatus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_nitelinus
Figs 22F, L41ii”Mexico”.
”Mexico”. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 29.4, D 14.0, W 6.3.
NHMUK 20100570, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Reeve did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The single specimen, with the colours faded on the ventral side, corresponds to his figure and is here selected lectotype (design.n.). The current systematic position is following
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) serperastrus (Say, 1830).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_nitidus
Figs 23M, L41iii”in Peruviâ”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style IV.
”long. 1 1/5, lat. 4/5 poll.” [H 30.4, D 20.2 mm]; figured specimen herein H 28.8, D 13.0, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1975551, five possible syntypes; 1842.5.10.135–138, four + two possible syntypes (see remarks) (Cuming coll.).
Broderip described his taxon from the Cuming collection, but did not specify on how many specimens his description was based. Two lots are considered possible syntypes. Lot 1842.5.10.135–138 contains four specimens, with a note by FGN[aggs] that labels had been stuffed inside; also two specimens, which were apparently glued upon the same cardboard, have been added to this lot. Lot 1975551 has been used for the figure in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) cactivorus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_nivalis
Fig. L41ivNot given; ”Potosi (Bolivia)”, in
”Potosi, Bolivia”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
Not given; see remarks.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.144, one paralectotype (d’Orbigny coll.).
The type locality was mentioned for the first time by
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia. Nomen inquirendum.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_notabilis
Figs 32J–L, L41v”Antioquia, Colombia”.
”Antioquia / Colombia”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 33, diam. 17 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 32.8, D 16.8, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.5, lectotype (da Costa coll.).
Da Costa did not mention on how many specimens his description was based; therefore, the reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) notabilis (da Costa, 1906).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_notatus
Figs 32G–I, L41vi”Antioquia, Colombia”.
”Antioquia”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 34.5, diam. 16 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 34.5, D 15.4, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.6, lectotype; 1907.11.21.7, one paralectotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not mention on how many specimens his description was based; in his remarks he wrote ”this shell”, but as there were two specimens in the type lot, this cannot be interpreted as reference to a single shell. The reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) notatus (da Costa, 1906).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_nubeculatus
Figs 63E–F, L41vii”America centrali (Morelet)”.
”Central Americ[a]”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 16, diam. 8 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 16.0, D 9.12, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975407, lectotype; 1975408, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
This taxon is regarded as a questionable variety of Bulimulus corneous (Sowerby I, 1833) by
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus corneous (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_nubilus
Figs 54J–K, L42i”Azarhar de Cartago, Costa Rica”.
”Azarhar de Cartago, / Costa Rica”.
”Diam. maj. 10.5, alt. 25 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 22.3, D 10.45, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1903.5.4.1, lectotype (ex Preston).
Preston did not mention on how many specimens his description was based. The single specimen in the NHMUK is not accompanied by a label in Preston’s handwriting, but its type status is here not disputed as the specimen originates from Preston. The record of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) recluzianus (Pfeiffer, 1847).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_nucinus
Figs 70G–H, L42ii”—?”.
”—?”. M.C. label style IV.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 36.8, D 18.1, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975379, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Reeve did not state on how many specimens his description was based, but mentioned the specimens were from Cuming’s collection. The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) nucinus (Reeve, 1850).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_nucula
Figs 14G, L42iii[Ecuador] ”insulis Gallapagos”.
”Galapagos”. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 11 1/2, diam. 6 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 11.25, D 5.62, W 6+.
NHMUK 1975155, lectotype; 1975156, three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The top of the lectotype is slightly damaged.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus nucula (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_nux
Figs 14A, L42iv”Insula Gallapagos. (Charles’s Island)”.
”Charles I. Galapagos”. M.C. label style III.
Dimensions. ”long. 10/12, lat. 9/12 poll.” [H 21.1, D 18.9]; figured specimen herein H 21.5, D 12.06, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975172, lectotype: 1975173, three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The material is accompanied by labels denoting its figuration in
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus nux (Broderip, 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_nystianus
Figs 39J–L, L42v”in valle Pomasqui reipublicae Aequatoris (Bourcier)”.
”Valley of / Pomasqui, Equador / Monsr Bourcier / Consul General”. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 32, diam. 15 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 31.9, D 16.5, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975573, lectotype; 1975574, two paralectotypes, Bourcier leg. (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) nystianus (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_obliquistriatus
Figs 8E, L42vi”San Pablo, Peru”.
”San Pablo, Peru”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 30, diam. 12 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 28.9, D 12.7, W 7.8.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.41, lectotype (da Costa coll.).
The type locality remains unspecified, as there are several localities named ”San Pablo” throughout Peru. Da Costa did not mention on how many specimens his description was based. The reference of
Bulimulidae, Bostryx obliquistriatus (da Costa, 1901) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_ochraceus
Figs 71E–F, 71J, L42viii[Peru, Dept. Cuzco] ”à Soraï et à Salcantaï”.
”Pérou. Soraï”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Long. 37–40; diam. 17–18 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 36.0, D 18.5, W 5.3.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.164, lectotype; 1893.2.4.165–166, two paralectotypes (ex Morelet).
Morelet remarked that this taxon occurs in the lower part of ‘puna brava’, i.e. at high elevations. The type locality is thus at the slopes of Nevado Salcantay and near Soray, which is at ca. 4100 m elevation in Dept. Cuzco, to which the type locality is now restricted.
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) ochracea (Morelet, 1863) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_ochrocheilus
Figs 48A–C, L42vii”Malacatos, South Ecuador”.
”Malacatos, S. Ecuador”, in E.A. Smith’s handwriting.
”Long. 37 mill., diam. 13”; figured specimen herein H 37.1, D 14.2, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1877.3.28.4, lectotype.
Smith did not mention on how many specimens his description was based. The reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) ochrocheilus (E.A. Smith, 1877).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_orbignyi
Figs 15D, L43i”Locality unknown”.
”Bolivia”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 19, diam. 8 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 18.5, D 9.1, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1975349, lectotype; 1975350, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
In his original publication Pfeiffer stated the type locality as unknown. In
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus orbignyi (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_oreades
Figs 54L–M, L43ii”provinvia Corrientes (republica Argentina)”.
”corrientes Rep. argentina”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 32 millim.; latit. 7 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 31.6, D 14.1, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.161, lectotype and five paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
The type locality has been specified in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) oreades (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_orophilus
Figs 4H, L43iii”les vallées tempérées des plateaux de Cuzco; (..) notablement à Talavera, Silque, Incahuasi et Mollepata” (restricted to Peru, Dept. Cuzco, Prov. Anta, Distr. Limatambo, Mollepata;
”Pérou, Mollepata” [.188–190], ”Pérou, Ollantaytambo” [.182–184], ”Pérou, Talavera” [.191], all in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Long. 22; diam. 9 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 20.8, D 10.5, W 6+.
Type material. NHMUK 1893.2.4.188, lectotype; 1893.2.4.189–190, two paralectotypes; 1893.2.4.182–184, three paralectotypes; 1893.2.4.191, one paralectotypes (ex Morelet).
Morelet described this taxon based on various specimens and described also two colour forms. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx orophilus (Morelet, 1860).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_orthostoma
Figs 29A–C, L43iv”Ecuador?”.
”Ecuador”. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 37 mill., diam. 11 1/2”; figured specimen herein H 36.5, D 13.05, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1975132, lectotype; 1975133, two paralectotypes, Buckley leg. (Cuming coll.).
Smith did not mention that he based himself on a shell from the Cuming collection; the question mark in his published type locality may be associated with this source (see
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) orthostoma (E.A. Smith, 1877).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_pallens
Figs 20J, L43v”—?”.
No locality given. M.C. label style II.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 17.9, D 11.25, W 4.9.
NHMUK 20120056, one syntype (Cuming coll.).
The shell corresponds with Reeve’s figure; its protoconch sculpture equals those found in Drymaeus species. The shell is a juvenile, but at present its systematic specific position cannot be ascertained. This taxon has not been mentioned in monographs (e.g.,
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus. Nomen inquirendum.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_pallidus
Figs 13D, L43vi”Albemarle-Island (Wolf)”.
”Albemarle Is Galapagos”.
”Long. 12.7, diam maj. 6.6 mm”; figured specimen herein H 11.37, D 5.59, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1894.5.8.3, syntype, Theodor Wolf leg.
Reibisch based his description on four shells, of which only one was fully adult. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus jacobi (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_panamensis
Figs 18Q, L44i”Sinu Panamae. (King’s and Saboga Islands.)”.
”Panama”, taxon label in Broderip’s handwriting (?). M.C. label style I.
”long. 1, lat. 1/2 poll.” [H 25.3, D 12.6 mm]; figured specimen herein H 18.2, D 11.0, W 6.2.
NHMUK 20100614, six possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
The lot is accompanied by a label—possibly added in the 1980s—stating ”The writing on the old label [Broderip’s handwriting?] on back of board corresponds with that on labels on material purchased from H. Cuming in 1842. Possible type”. The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) translucens panamensis (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_papillatus
Figs 8E, L44ii”[intimâ Peruvii regionae]” (see remarks).
”Pérou, Pucra”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit 25; diam. 1 1/4 [sic, 14] mill.”; figured specimen herein H 22.7, D 18.0, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.192–194, three syntypes (ex Morelet).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx rhodolarynx papillatus (Morelet, 1860).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_paposensis
Figs 9F–H, L44iii[Chili] ”Paposo in deserto Atacamensi reipublicae Chilensis”.
”Atacama”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 18, diam. 9 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 21.2, D 10.3, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1975311, four paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described his taxon on the basis of specimens collected by R.A. Philippi. Part of this material reached the ZMB via Albers (
Bulimulidae, Bostryx paposensis (Pfeiffer, 1856).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_patasensis
Figs 56J–L, L44iv”Province of Patas, Andes of Peru (Dr. Farris)”.
”Province of Patas, / Andes of Peru / Dr. Farris”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 47, diam. 24 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 46.8, D 27.7, W 7.1.
NHMUK 1975439, lectotype; 1975440, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Neopetraeus patasensis (Pfeiffer, 1858).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_patricius
Figs 75H–I, L44v”—?”.
”New Granada ?” (see remarks).
Not given; figured specimen herein H 52.1, D 25.0, W 8.1.
NHMUK 1874.12.11.220, lectotype (T. Lombe Taylor coll.).
In his remarks in the text to his plate, Reeve added ”probably from New Granada, but I have no authority for stating it to be the locality”; the taxon was described from ”Mus. Taylor”. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lilacinus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_spiculatus_paucicostatus
Fig. 3D”Peru, Dept. Cuzco, 2.8 km SE Pisac, 2980 m”.
”102: Peru, Dept. Cuzco, 2.8 km SE Pisac, 2980 m”.
”H 16.52 D 4.81”; figured specimen herein H 16.5, D 5.0, W 8.0.
NHMUK 1975267, ten paratypes, A.S.H. Breure leg., 15.ii.1975.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx spiculatus paucicostatus Breure, 1978.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_paziana
Figs 73I–J, L45i[Bolivia] ”provincia Sicasica (republica Boliviana)”; see remarks.
Two labels, ”Cavari Sicasica (Bolivia)” and ”rio Miguilla Yungas Bolivia”, in in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 27 millim.; long. 11 millim.”, corrected to ”Longit. 25 millim.; lat. 11 millim.” in
NHMUK 1854.12.4.196, eight paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
The type locality refers to the environs of Sicasica, prov. Aroma, Dept. La Paz. In
Naesiotus pazianus (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Scutalus_peaki
Figs 71A–B, 71I”Peru, Dept. Ancash, 20 km [W] Huaráz, 3750 m”.
”Peru, Dept. Ancash, 20 km W Huaráz, 3750 m”.
”H 25.6 D 15.27”; figured specimen herein H 23.5, D 15.7, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975579, three paratypes, F.G. Thompson leg., 31.iii.1971.
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) peaki (Breure, 1978) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_expansus_perenensis
Figs 54A–B, L45ii”Peréné, Peru” [Dept. Junín, Perené].
”Peréné, Peru”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 46, lat. 23 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 45.8, D 23.4, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.39, lectotype, C. Codd leg. (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not mention on how many specimens his description was based. The reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) expansus perenensis da Costa, 1901.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_pergracilis
Figs 54G, L45iii”Huancabamba in Peru”.
”Huancabamba / Peru”, in Rolle’s handwriting.
”Alt. 35, diam. max. 12 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 33.2, D 11.0, W 7.8.
NHMUK 1922.2.4.33, lectotype (ex Rolle).
Rolle did not mention on how many specimens his description was based. The reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) pergracilis (Rolle, 1904).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_perspectivus
Figs 13I, L45iv”Locality unknown”.
”Galapagos Is.” (in E.A. Smith’s handwriting), taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III, V.
”Long. 16, diam. 6 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 15.7, D 6.34, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1975166, lectotype; 1975176, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this taxon from Cuming’s collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus perspectivus (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_pervariabilis
Figs 21I, L45iv”Columbia”.
”New Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 33, diam. 14 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 33.3, D 17.1, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1975547, lectotype; 1975548, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer gave ”Columbia” [= Colombia] as type locality; the Cumingian material is, however, labelled as ”New Granada”, which may refer to a broader area than Colombia. During a revision of Colombian Drymaeus species, Breure and Borrero were unable to recognize this taxon in the material studied (unpublished data); the data in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) perviabilis (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_pervius
Figs 64C–D, L45vi”—?”.
No locality given. Taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 24, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 24.3, D 14.0, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1975165, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
No locality was given in both papers of Pfeiffer. According to
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus pervius (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_pessulatus
Figs 64A–B, L46i”Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia”.
”Bolivia”. M.C. label style IV.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 21.6, D 13.45, W 5.5.
NHMUK 1975313, lectotype; 1975314, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
This taxon was described by Reeve on the basis of material collected by Bridges in the Cuming collection. The collector is not mentioned on the label, but the specimen confirms to Reeve’s figure and its type status is not disputed here. The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Bostryx apodemetes (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_petenensis
Figs 63M–N, L45vii[Guatemala] ”campos Petenensis”.
”Savanes du Peten”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 19.—Diam. 8”; figured specimen herein H 18.7, D 9.23, W 5.5.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.1176, lectotype; 1893.2.4.1177–1178, paralectotypes (ex Morelet).
Morelet did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus unicolor (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_petiti
Figs 70I–J, L46ii”Peru”.
”Bolivia”, ”Chachopo”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 26, diam. 16 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 36.0, D 18.5, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975374, lectotype; 1975375, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described the taxon from ”Peru” on account of specimens from the Cuming collection. Reeve based himself on the same collection and gave ”Chacopo [sic], Bolivia”; one of labels mentions ”Chachopo”, which is in Venezuela where this genus does not occur. The measurements given by Pfeiffer appear to have been erroneous, as already mentioned by
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) petiti (Pfeiffer, 1846) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_philippii
Figs 6F, L46iii”Peru; prope Lima”.
”Peru”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 20, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 24.3, D 14.1, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1975348, four syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer first mentioned his taxon as a synonym of ”[Bulimus] striatulus Sow.”, and stated in
Bulimulidae, Bostryx modestus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_phlegonis
Figs 14F, L46iv[Ecuador, Galápagos, Isla San Cristóbal] ”lemon grove, on bushes at 1650 ft.”.
”Galapagos Isl. / Charles Isl”.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 12.5, D 7.90, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1937.6.1.8.2–5, four possible syntypes, California Academy of Sciences Expedition 1905–1906 leg. (ex Schlesch).
These specimens have been purchased from Schlesch as syntypes. However, their status has to be treated with much caution (see lycodus, p. 116). The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus ustulatus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_phryne
Figs 39G–I, L46v”Andes of Peru”.
”Andes of Peru”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 31, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 30.8, D 13.05, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1975214, lectotype; 1975215, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) murrinus (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_pictus
Figs 11H, L46vi”Peru”.
”Peru”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 23, diam. 11 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 22.5, D 12.1, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975545, lectotype; 1975546, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx pictus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Buliminus_pilosus
Figs 55A, L46vii”[Trinidad]”.
”Trinidad”.
”Length 14 mill., breath 7 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 14.95, D 8.05, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1875.2.8.3, four syntypes (ex R. Lechmere Guppy).
Bulimulidae, Protoglyptus pilosus (Guppy, 1871) (comb.n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_platystomus
Figs 57J–L, L46viii”Province of Patas, Andes of Peru (Dr. Farris)”.
”Province of Patas, / Andes of Peru / Dr. Farris”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 40, diam. 18 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 34.4, D 22.0, W 5+.
NHMUK 1975428, lectotype; 1975429, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The measurements given originally by Pfeiffer seem to be erroneous. The type status of this lot is not disputed herein, and the specimen selected as lectotype corresponds to Pfeiffer’s figure. The top of the lectotype is damaged.
Bulimulidae, Neopetraeus platystomus (Pfeiffer, 1858).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_plicatoliratus
Figs 39D–F, L47i[Colombia] ”Bogotá”.
”Bogota”.
”Long. 37, diam. 15.5 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 36.6, D 16.8, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.120, lectotype; 1907.11.21.121, one paralectotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not mention on how many specimens his description was based. The reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) convexus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_pliculatus
Figs 61E–F, L47ii”Bolivia”.
”Bolivia”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 23, diam. 11 1/3 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 23.0, D 12.02, W 7.0.
NHMUK 1975390, lectotype; 1975391, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
This taxon, which has mostly been cited under the unjustified emendated name, was hitherto unfigured.
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus pliculatus (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_poecila
Figs 45M–N, L47iii”provincia Chiquitensi (republica Boliviana)”; see remarks.
”valle grande, Bolivia” [1854.12.4.152], ”Monte grande. Sta Cruz (Bolivia)” [.153], ”chiquitos, Bolivia” [.154], ”Chiquitos, Bolivia” [.155], ”Chiquitos, Bolivia” [.156], [No locality given, . 157], all in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit 22 1/2 mil.; latit. a 15 ad 16 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 34.8, D 17.9, W 5+.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.152–157, 53 paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
In
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) poecilus (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_polymorpha
Figs 67H–I, L48i”republica Peruviana”.
”le Pérou”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 33 millim., latit. a 11 ad 12 millim.” (see remarks); figured specimen herein H 22.8, D 11.6, W 5.6.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.199, lectotype and one paralectotype, Fontaine leg. (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) bicolor (Sowerby I, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_ponsonbyi
Figs 54H, L48ii”Surco, Peru, at an elevation of 2, 050 metres”.
”Surco 2050 M. / Peru”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 33, diam. 12 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 33.5, D 12.82, W 8.0.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.27, holotype (ex da Costa).
da Costa writes ”a shell”, implying that he had only one specimen; thus the specimen is the holotype. Searching for ”Surco” in modern gazetteers for Peru does not give any locality at the elevation indicated; the type locality thus remains to be ascertained.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus ponsonbyi da Costa, 1907.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_praetextus
Figs 43G–I, L48iii”Andes of Caxamarca, Peru”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 39.0, D 15.9, W 8.2.
NHMUK 198340, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Reeve did not mention on how many specimens his description was based. The specimen matches his figure and is here selected as lectotype (design. n.). The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) praetextus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_prestoni
Figs 18J, L48iv”Chiriqui, Panama”.
”Chiriqui. / Panama”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 21, diam. 10 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 21.3, D 10.58, W 5.4.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.12, lectotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not state on how many specimens his description was based, but mentioned ”represented by several examples hitherto unnamed in the British Museum”; in the same paper he did also describe a ”var. cancellata” (see p. 38). On the original label ”Type” is striked through and, in a different handwriting, added ”Holotype”. This cannot, however, be regarded as holotype designation by da Costa, so the reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembinus) prestoni da Costa, 1906.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_primula
Figs 18H–I, L48v”Venezuela”.
”Venezuela”. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 25.0, D 11.61, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1975478, lectotype; 1975479, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
Reeve did not state on how many specimens his description was based.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) studeri (Pfeiffer, 1847).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_proteus
Figs 66A–B, L49i”in Peruviae montibus. (St. Jacinta, near Samanca)”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style I.
”long. 1 8/9, lat. 1 2/10 poll. [H 47.8, D 30.4 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 44.1, D 24.1, W 6.8.
NHMUK 20100638, lectotype and three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Broderip described this taxon and three varieties from the Cuming collection; they were figured by Sowerby (
Bulimulidae, Scutalus proteus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_protractus
Figs 49G–I, L48vii”Meobamba, Eastern Peru (Mr. Yates)”.
”Meobamba Eastern / Peru M. Yates”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 30, diam. 11 1/1 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 29.3, D 13.06, W 7.3.
NHMUK 1975494, lectotype; 1975495, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Given our current understanding, we disagree with
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) protractus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_pruinosus
Figs 7F, L48vi”in Peruviâ” (see remarks).
”Peru”. M.C. label style I.
”long. 0.55, lat. 0.3 poll. [H 13.9, D 7.6 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 13.48, D 7.32, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1975544, four syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Sowerby described this species from the Cuming collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. In the remarks he stated ”found on dead leaves in the clefts of rocks in the mountains of Cobija”. This area now belongs to Chile.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx pruinosus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_pseudofusoides
Figs 44J–L, L49ii”Bogota, Colombia”.
”Bogota”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 33.5, diam. 12 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 33.6, D 13.35, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.11, holotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa wrote ”only one example of this form (...) was obtained”. The shell in the NHMUK is thus the holotype.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) pseudofusoides da Costa, 1906.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_ptychostylus
Figs 57D–F, L49iv”Province of Patas, Andes of Peru (Dr. Farris)”.
”Province of Patas, / Andes of Peru /Dr. Farris”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 47, diam. 15 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 46.7, D 19.7, W 5+.
NHMUK 1975430, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The top of the lectotype is damaged. The current systematic position is in accordance with
Bulimulidae, Neopetraeus lobbii (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_puellaris
Figs 20H, L49iii”Brazil”.
”Brazil”. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 22.4, D 10.68, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975400, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) puellaris (Reeve, 1850).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Otostomus_pulcherrimus
Figs 46D–F, L49v”[Eastern Peru]”.
”E. Peru”, taxon label in H. Adam’s handwriting.
”Long. circa 45, diam. 17 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 39.1, D 18.2, W [1.3].
NHMUK 1867.5.18.3, holotype, Bartlett leg. (ex H. Adams).
As is shown in Adam’s figure, his shell (”one example of this beautiful species”) was badly broken, with only the lower part of the shell remaining. The shell height he gave was clearly a guess, as the actual shell is smaller. The lot is accompanied by a photo ”of [a] perfect specimen from H.B. Preston”; assuming that this photograph is natural size, the dimensions are H 58.1, D 21.0. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) pulcherrimus (H. Adams, 1867).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_punctatus
Figs 46A–C, L50i”Chanchamayo, Peru”.
”Chanchamayo. / Peru”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 34, diam. 11 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 36.6, D 12.7, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.20, lectotype; 1907.11.21.21, one paralectotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not state on how many specimens his description was based, but mentioned ”there appears to be much variation both in form and colour among the specimens collected of this species”; on the same page he did also describe a ”var. albida” (his figs 2–2a) and a ”var. ventricosa” (his figs 3–3a). The reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) punctatus da Costa, 1907.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_pupiformis
Figs 2K–L, L50ii”Chili (Huasco)”.
”Chili”. M.C. label style I.
”long. 7/8, lat. 2/8 poll. [H 22.2, D 6.33 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 23.5, D 6.29, W 10+.
NHMUK 20100613, four probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
One of the specimens, which are considered probable syntypes, corresponds to Reeve’s figure. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx pupiformis (Broderip, 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_purpuratus
Figs 71G–H, L50iii”Andes of Caxamarca, Peru; Mr. W. Lobb”.
No locality (see remarks). M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 37.3, D 18.3, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1975364, lectotype; 1975365, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The locality on the registration card in the collection is ”Andes of Catamarca”; the original label seems to be lost. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) purpuratus (Reeve, 1849) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_pustulosus
Figs 9I–K, L50iv”Chili (Huasco)”.
”Chili”. M.C. label style IV.
”long. 7/12, lat. 3/12 (circa) poll. [H 14.8, D 6.33 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 16.4, D 8.1, W 5.5.
NHMUK 1975589, five probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Broderip did not state on how many specimens his description was based. One of the specimens corresponds to Reeve’s figure. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx pustulosus (Broderip, 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_quadrifasciatus
Figs 47D–F, L50v”Ecuador”.
”Ecuador”.
Dimensions. ”Alt. 1 inch 3 lines, diam. 5 1/2 lines [H 31.6, D 11.1 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 28.9, D 15.1, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1879.1.21.3, lectotype (ex Angas).
Angas did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The label states ”P.Z.S., the type”, but this is not in Angas’ handwriting.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) quadrifasciatus (Angas, 1878).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_quechuarum
Figs 71C–D, 71K, L51i[Peru, Dept. Puno] ”Capachica”.
”Capachica, near Puno, / Peru / 12, 600 ft.” [1939.4.17.226–227], ”Saracocha 13, 600 ft.” [.230–231], ”Lake Junin, alt. 13000 ft Peru” [1925.12.16.20].
”length 21.5 mm., breath 9.0 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 21.5, D 9.0, W 5.2.
NHMUK 1939.4.17.226, holotype (soft parts. 229); 1939.4.17.227–228, . 230–231, four paratypes, Percy Sladen Expedition leg., 16.iv.1937; 1925.12.16.20, five paratypes, Godman Thomas Expedition leg.
The holotype is indicated on the label, on which is remarked ”smallest spec. quite likely / a different sp.”; in fact, this specimen is a juvenile Bostryx species and may have been mixed up with this lot. Crawford mentioned two specimens from the type locality and two from Saracocha, which is in the same region; the fifth, juvenile specimen was not mentioned by him and is here excluded from the type material. Another lot is from the Lake Junín area; we concur with the doubt expressed by Crawford himself about this being conspecific (”Junin lies …about 500 miles NW of the other two localities”), but refrain from making definitive conclusions as this is beyond the scope of this paper.
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) quechuarum (Crawford, 1939) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_quitensis
Figs 15A, L50vi”Quito (De Lattre)”.
”Quito / Monsr Delattre”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I/IV.
”Long. 26, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 26.5, D 13.25, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975320, lectotype; 1975321, two paralectotypes; 19991539, three paralectotypes, Delattre leg. (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based when he described this taxon from Cuming’s collection.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus quitensis (Pfeiffer, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_radiatus
Figs 12A–C, L51ii[Peru, Dept. Junín/Cuzco] ”la vallée de Jauja et des pentes du Cuzco”.
”Chaullas, Pérou”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 24–29; diam. 10–10 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 23.7, D 11.58, W 6.9.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.198, lectotype; 1893.2.4.199–200, two paralectotypes (Morelet coll.).
According to
Bulimulidae, Bostryx angrandianus (Pilsbry 1897). Nomen inquirendum.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_ragsdalei
Figs 73A–C, L51iii[U.S.A.] ”Cook and Montagu Counties, Texas”.
”St. Joe, Montagu Co. / Texas”.
”Alt. 22, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 18.3, D 10.34, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1898.2.1.9–10, two paratypes.
The material is labelled as ”co-types”. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Rabdotus dealbatus (Say, 1821).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_rawsonis
Figs 20C, L51iv[West Indies] ”Tobago (Mr. Rawson)”.
”Tobago”, in H. Adam’s handwriting.
”Long. 24, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 23.7, D 10.06, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1878.1.28.209, lectotype (H. Adams coll.).
Adams did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The specimen was designated as lectotype by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) rawsoni (Guppy, 1871).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_recedens
Figs 48D–F, L51v[Peru] ”Meobamba”.
”Meobamba”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 27, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.3, D 13.3, W 5.7.
NHMUK 1975477, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position agrees with
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) recedens (Pfeiffer, 1864).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_reconditus
Figs 5D–F, L51vi”—?”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style IV.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 19.8, D 9.7, W 7.3.
NHMUK 1975189, lectotype; 1975190, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
Reeve did not state a locality; his description was based on the Cuming collection.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx nigropileatus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_rectilinearis
Figs 24F, L51vii”Meobamba, Eastern Peru (Mr. Yates)”.
”Tarapoto Andes of P[eru] / Mr Spence”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 24, diam. 10 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 23.9, D 11.2, W 7.7.
NHMUK 1975337, three specimens (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) rectilinearis (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_regularis
Figs 48J–L, L51viii”Chanchamayo, Peru”.
”Chanchamayo / Peru”, in Fulton’s handwriting.
”Maj. diam. 16, alt. 31 [mm]”; figured specimen herein H 29.6, D 16.3, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1905.11.17.2, lectotype (ex Fulton).
Fulton did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The specimen found corresponds to Fulton’s figure.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus regularis Fulton, 1905.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_rehderi
Fig. 4B”Mittel-Peru am Westhang der westlichen Anden: 2–3 km weit von Churin, an der Autostraβe nach Oyón, Río Huaura (2400–2450 m), zwischen Huacho und Cerro de Pasco”.
”C-Peru, 2–3 km from Churin on the highway to Oyón, 2400 m”; printed label.
”H. 12.6, D. 3.3”; figured specimen herein H 10.45, D 3.0, W 7.9.
NHMUK 1975356, five paratypes (ex Weyrauch).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx rehderi Weyrauch, 1960.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_rhodolarynx
Figs 8G, L52i[Peru] ”Banks of the Aparimao [sic, Apurimac], Alto-Peru, W. Lobb”.
”Andes of Peru”. M.C. label style IV.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 34.5, D 19.6, W 7.7.
NHMUK 1975434, lectotype; 1975435, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx rhodolarynx (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_rimatus
Figs 72A–C, L52ii”Locality unknown”.
No locality given. Taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 33, diam. 11 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 33.1, D 12.7, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1975418, lectotype; 1975419, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The taxon label in Pfeiffer’s hand is only partially conserved. Later authors have recognized this taxon as a Mexican species (see e.g.,
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus rimatus (Pfeiffer, 1847).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_rivasii
Figs 16A–C, L52iii[Bolivia] ”les plaines de Santa-Cruz de la Sierra, principalement à la Cuesta de Petaca, et dans tous les ravins qui bordent le Rio grande”.
”Monte grande Chiquitos (Bolivia)”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longueur totale, 19 millimètres; largeur, 8 millimètres”; figured specimen herein H 17.7, D 8.67, W 8.2.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.171, seven paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
The specimen originally figured in
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus rivasii (d’Orbigny, 1837).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_rocayana
Figs 15K–L, L52iv”provincia Santa Cruz de la Sierra (republica Boliviana)”.
”rio Grande. Sta Cruz (Bolivia)”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Latit. 14 millim. [see remarks]; longit. 8 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 22.9, D 9.07, W 8.5.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.176, six paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus rocayanus (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_rodriguezae
Figs 4A, L52v”Peru, [Dept. Lima] left margin of Mayo Creek [Río Laraos], tributary to Río Cañete, 4 km from Laraos on the trail to [Cerro] Quichao, 3500 m”.
”C-Peru, between Laraos and Quichao, valley of Rio Cañete, 3500 m”; printed label.
”H. 27.5, D. 10.4”; figured specimen herein H 25.5, D 8.8, W 8.3.
NHMUK 1975355, five paratypes (ex Weyrauch WW3331).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx rodriguezae Weyrauch, 1967.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_roseatus
Figs 18M–N, L52vi”Venezuela”.
”Venezuela”. M.C. label style IV.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 35.6, D 14.45, W 7.0.
NHMUK 1975309, lectotype; 1975310, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The lectotype corresponds to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) roseatus (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_rosenbergi
Figs 40D–F, L52vii”Pozuzo, Eastern Peru”.
”Pozuzo / E Peru”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 20.5, diam. 9 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 19.0, D 8.66, W 5.9.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.17, lectotype; 1907.11.21.18, one paralectotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not state on how many specimens his description was based.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) rosenbergi da Costa, 1906.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_rubrifasciatus
Figs 63C–D, L52x”—?”.
No locality label.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 22.9, D 9.55, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975393, lectotype; 1975394, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Reeve did not state on how many specimens his description was based; the shell matches his figure. The label may have either been lost or never have been present. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus gadalupensis (Bruguière, 1789).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_rubrovariegatus
Figs 54F, L67i”Huamachuco, Peru”.
”Peru”.
”Long. 37, diam. 13 mill.”. Figured specimen H 32.8, D 12.1, W 7.5.
NHMUK 1868.4.3.1, three possible syntypes, ex R.F. Geale.
Higgins described this taxon from ”several specimens” which were found (in part?) by Mr. Farris. The lot found was received from the shell dealer R.F. Geale; further data are missing. As the shells were registered at the same time of Higgins’ publication, it is possible that they were part of the original series; they are treated herein as possible syntypes. The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) rubrovariegatus Higgins, 1868.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_rugiferus
Figs 12J, L52viii”ad Insulam Jacobi, inter Gallapagos Insulis”.
”James Is.”, in E.A. Smith’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
Dimensions. ”long. 0.5, lat. 0.2 poll. [H 12.6, D 5.06 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 12.52, D 4.28, W 8.4.
NHMUK 1975178, lectotype; 1975179, four paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Sowerby I did not state on how many specimens from the Cuming collection his description was based. One of the specimens found has also been figured by Reeve, and was selected as lectotype by
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus rugiferus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_rugulosus
Fig. 74B, L67iv”Galapagos”.
”Chatham Island / Galapagos”. M.C. label style III.
Not given. Figured specimen H 20.5, D 8.25, W 7.6.
NHMUK 1975176, lectotype; 1975177, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Sowerby did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus rugulosus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_rusticellus
Figs 7D, L52ix[Peru] ”[intimâ Peruviii regionae]”; see remarks.
”Pérou, Jauja”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 20; diam 10 1/1 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 19.9, D 13.83, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.201, lectotype; 1893.2.4.202–203, two paralectotypes (Morelet coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx rusticellus (Morelet, 1860).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_saccatus
Figs 30D–F, L53i”Meobamba, Eastern Peru (Mr. Yates)”.
”Meobamba Eastern / Peru M Yates”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 22, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 21.5, D 11.5, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1975207, lectotype; 1975218, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
This taxon appears to be a colour form of Bulinus strigatus Sowerby I, 1833; the current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) strigatus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_sanctaeluciae
Figs 53D–E, L53ii[West Indies] ”[St. Lucia]” (see remarks).
”St. Lucia / Fonds St Jacques”.
”Longit. 21 millim., lat. 9”; figured specimen herein H 20.7, D 9.5, W 7.3.
NHMUK 1889.3.23.12, lectotype, G.A. Ramage leg.
Bulimulidae, Protoglyptus sanctaeluciae (E.A. Smith, 1889) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_scabiosus
Figs 2I–J, L53iii[Chile] ”ad Cobijam”.
”Peru” (see remarks). M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 15.9, D 4.9, W 6.8.
NHMUK 2011076, three probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Sowerby described his species from the Cuming museum; see
Bulimulidae, Bostryx scabiosus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_scalaricosta
Figs 1E, L53iv[Peru] ”[intimâ Peruviii regionae]”; see remarks.
”Huerta de Yucay”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit 15; diam. 5 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 15.5, D 5.7, W 7.5.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.1170, lectotype; 1893.2.4.1171, one paralectotype (Morelet coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx tubulatus scalaricostus (Morelet, 1860).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_scalariformis
Figs 7B, L53v”in Peruviâ. (Ancon)”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style I.
”long. 5/10 lat. 3/10 poll. [H 12.6, D 7.6 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 11.6, D 7.7, W 5.5.
NHMUK 20100635, five probable syntypes; 20100636, five probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
There are two lots with the same same label. As Broderip described this taxon from Cuming’s collection, we consider them as probable syntypes; see also the remarks under Bulinus scabiosus. One of the specimens of lot 20100635 corresponds to
Bulimulidae, Bostryx scalariformis (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_schiedeanus
Figs 72D–F, L53vi”Mejico (Dr. Schiede)”.
”Mexico”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 16, diam. 9 lin. [H 34.8, D 19.6 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 28.4, D 16.0, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975240, three probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer probably described this taxon from a specimen in his own collection, which is likely to be lost. The measurements given by Pfeiffer are thus interpreted as German lines. The specimens from Cuming’s collection also bear Pfeiffer’s handwriting and are probably the only extant ones that confirms his identification; they are considered as probable syntypes. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Rabdotus (Rabdotus) schiedeanus schiedeanus (Pfeiffer, 1841).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_schmidti
Fig. L54i”...?”.
”—?”.
”Long. 34, diam 17 mill.”. Figured specimen H 34.0, D 18.9, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1975270, two specimens (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described his taxon from ”einer alten Sammlung” from an unknown locality. His first reference of Reeve’s figure being conspecific is given in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) schmidti (Pfeiffer, 1854).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_scitulus
Figs 44D–F, L54ii”Chachapoyas, Alto-Peru”.
”Chachapoyas, Peru”. M.C. label style III.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 29.5, D 11.7, W 7.5.
NHMUK 1975217, lectotype and two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The label is in E.A. Smith’s handwriting; the type has been marked with a ‘x’. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) scitulus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Otostomus_scitus
Figs 41D–F, L54iii[Peru] ”[Upper Amazons, and on the River Ucayali, Eastern Peru]”.
”Upper Amazons”.
”Long. 28, diam. maj. 17 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.1, D 16.8, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1867.5.18.5, holotype (ex H. Adams).
Adams stated ”one example only”, thus there is no doubt this is the holotype. The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) expansus (Pfeiffer, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_sculpturatus
Figs 74C, 67iii”Gallapagos Islands”.
”Galapagos Is.”. M.C. label style III, V.
”Long. 14, diam. 6 1/2 mill.”. Figured specimen H 14.4, D 7.7, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1975174, lectotype; 1975175, three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described his material from the Cuming collection, based on material ”found on bushes by Darwin”. Reeve based himself on the same material. Although the specimens are not accompanied by a taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting, their type status is not disputed as the shell height closely agrees with Pfeiffer’s data. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus sculpturatus (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_selli
Figs 49A–C, L54iv”British Guiana”.
”British Guiana”.
”Alt. 24, diam. maj. 13 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 24.0, D 12.8, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1915.1.6.36, lectotype (ex Preston).
Preston did not state on how many specimens his description was based; the reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) selli (Preston, 1909).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_serotinus
Figs 12E, L54v[Peru] ”[intimâ Peruviii regionae]”; see remarks.
”Pérou. Andahuaylas”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 26; diam. 10 1/2 mil.”; figured specimen herein H 25.5, D 11.75, W 7.5.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.204, lectotype; 1893.2.4.205–206, two paralectotypes (Morelet coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx serotinus (Morelet, 1860).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_serratus
Figs 49D–F, L54vi”Meobamba, Eastern Peru (Mr. Yates)”.
”Meobamba Eastern / Peru M Yates”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 27, diam. 11 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 26.3, D 12.6, W 5.7.
NHMUK 1975475, lectotype; 1975476, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The lectotype is damaged on the penultimate whorl. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) serratus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_signifer
Figs 25I–K, L55i”Venezuela?”.
”Venezuela?”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 33, diam. 13 1/1 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 32.9, D 15.1, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1975216, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position is in agreement with
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) signifer (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_simpliculus
Figs 10C, L55ii”—?”.
”Peru + Bolivia”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 19 1/2, diam. 9 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 18.9, D 9.3, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975340, lectotype; 1975341, two paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
This taxon, for which no precise localities are known, is here figured for the first time. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx simpliculus (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_sisalensis
Figs 24G, L55iii”cum precedente [circa Sisalensem pagum Yucatanorum]”.
”Sisal”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 24.—Diam. 9 1/2”; figured specimen herein H 24.1, D 10.25, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.1655–1657, three paralectotypes (Morelet coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) multilineatus (Say, 1825).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_smithii
Figs 30G–I, L55iv[Colombia] ”Bogotá”.
”Bogota”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 29.5, diam. 15 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 29.5, D 15.4, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.52, lectotype; 1907.11.21.53–54, two paralectotypes (da Costa coll.).
da Costa wrote ”this shell”, although three specimens are present in the original lot. Only if we assume that ”this shell” is implying that da Costa had only one specimen at hand, the lectotype designation by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) smithii (da Costa, 1898).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_solidus
Figs 32D–F, L55v”Bogota, United States of Colombia”.
”Bogota, U.S. Colombia”.
”Alt. 32.5, diam. maj. 15 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 32.8, D 15.0, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1908.7.2.72–73, two syntypes (ex Preston).
Preston did not state on how many specimens his description was based. Breure and Borrero (unpublished data) have found no material with a precise locality for this species. The locality quoted by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) solidus (Preston, 1907).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_sowerbyi
Figs 23N, L55vi”Columbian Andes (Linden)”.
”Andes of Colombia”. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 22, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 21.7, D 11.15, W 6.2.
NHMUK 20100566, one probable syntype (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer, who described this taxon from Cuming’s collection, did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The specimen found corresponds to Reeve’s figure, which was copied by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus). Nomen inquirendum.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_spadiceus
Figs 34D–F, L56i”Bogota”.
”Bogota”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 39, diam. 19 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 37.3, D 19.8, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.15, holotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa described this species ”from an unique specimen”; the specimen found is thus the holotype. The top of the specimen is slightly damaged and appears to be subadult.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) spadiceus da Costa, 1906.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_spectatus
Figs 48G–I, L56ii”New Granada”.
”New Granada”.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 39.2, D 17.0, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1874.12.11.226, lectotype (ex Mrs. T. Lombe Taylor).
Reeve described this taxon from ”Mus. Taylor” and figured three different shells. The specimen selected lectotype by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) spectatus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_spiculatus
Figs 3B–C, L56iii[Peru] ”[intimâ Peruviii regionae]”; see remarks.
”Pérou Ollantaïtambo”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Longit. 20; diam. 5 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 23.3, D 5.07, W 11+.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.1156, lectotype; 1893.2.4.1157–1160, four paralectotypes (Morelet coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx spiculatus spiculatus (Morelet, 1860).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_sporadica
Figs 64E–F, L56iv”provincia Corrientes (republica Argentina); provincia Chiquitensi (republica Boliviana)”; see remarks.
”Corrientes. rep. Argentina [.158]”, ”Chiquitos Bolivia [.159–160]”, all in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 33 millim.; latit. 14 ad 17 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.8, D 12.8, W 7.6.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.160, lectotype and six paralectotypes; 1854.12.4.158, seven specimens (see remarks); 1854.12.4.159, six paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.); see remarks.
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus bonariensis sporadicus (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_stenacme
Figs 12F, L56v”Bolivia”.
”Province of Patas, / Andes of Peru / Dr Farris [1975342–3]”, ”Peru”, in a later handwriting; in both cases taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 20 1/2, diam. 9 mil..”; figured specimen herein H 28.0, D 12.6, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1975342, lectotype; 1975343, two paralectotypes, Farris leg.; 1975344, three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer (1857) described this taxon from Cuming’s collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. In Pfeiffer (1859) he emendated his measurements and locality to ”Long. 20 1/2–28, diam. 9–11 mill.” resp. ”Bolivia; in prov. Patas, Peru (Farris)”. Subsequently, in
Bulimulidae, Bostryx stenacme (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_strigatus
Figs 29J–L, L57i[Peru] ”Huallaga”.
”Huallaga, Peru”, added in a later hand; taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 24.9, D 13.7, W 6.5.
NHMUK 20090168, three possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Sowerby likely based his material on the Cuming collection; however, none of his material has been traced with certainty. The specimens found, and labelled by Pfeiffer, are therefore treated as possible syntypes; they are partly damaged.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) strigatus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_studeri
Figs 18O–P, L57ii”Central America? (H. Cuming)”.
”Merida / New Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 25, diam. 10 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 25.2, D 11.24, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1975480, lectotype; 1975481, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer based himself on material from Cuming’s collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The type locality was corrected to ”Merida / Novae Granadae” in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) studeri (Pfeiffer, 1847).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_subfasciatus
Figs 70E–F, 70M, L57iii[Ecuador] ”repulicae Aequatoris, monte Anthisana”.
”Anthisana Equador / Monsr Bourcier”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 32, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 31.0, D 16.0, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975368, lectotype; 1975369, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
This taxon is now placed in the genus Kuschelenia; the synonymy follows
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) anthisanensis (Pfeiffer, 1853) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Gonyostomus_subhybridus
Figs 46G–I, L57iv”Pozuzo, Eastern Peru, 800 metres”.
”Pozuzo. Eastern Peru. 800 Ms”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 50, diam. 19 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 49.2, D 19.5, W 6+.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.127, holotype (da Costa coll.).
”Of this fine shell only one specimen has been received” (
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) subhybridus (da Costa, 1906).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_subinterruptus
Figs 49O, L57v”in Andibus Boliviae”.
”Andes, N. Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 37, diam. 13 1/1 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 36.7, D 15.7, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1975470, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this species from Cuming’s collection; he did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The type locality may have been in error, as Pfeiffer (1853 [1840–1865]: 80) corrected it to ”Anden von Neu-Granada”. In the same work Pfeiffer recognized a smaller variety (figured on pl. 21 figs 22–23; these figures were copied by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) subinterruptus (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_subpellucidus
Figs 21G, L57vi”Ecuador”.
”Ecuador”.
”Long. 23 mill. diam. 9”; figured specimen herein H 20.0, D 10.0, W 4+.
NHMUK 1872.5.22.19, one syntype.
Smith did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The label states ”type”, but this cannot be interpreted as holotype designation; there is also remarked ”Purch[ased] of Cutter”, and ”1/6” in the lower right corner of the label. The top of the specimen is broken, hence the lower shell height than the measurement given by Smith.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) subpellucidus (E.A. Smith, 1877).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_subventricosus
Figs 33J–L, L57vii”Bogota, Colombia”.
”Bogotá”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 30, diam. 14 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 30.1, D 14.0, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.37, lectotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not state on how many specimens his description was based; the reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) subventricosus da Costa, 1901.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_sugillatus
Figs 16C, L58ii”Bolivia”.
”Bolivia”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 24, diam. 9 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 23.7, D—, W 8.3.
NHMUK 1975259, lectotype and two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Restudy of the type lot reveals that the protoconch sculpture consists of axial riblets with fine, spiral lines in between. This characteristic makes us now to classify this taxon with Naesiotus sensu
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus rivasii (d’Orbigny, 1837).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_sulcosus
Figs 23O, L58i[Mexico] ”prope Tacubaya Mexicanorum”.
”Mexico”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 15 1/2, diam. 7 lin. [H 31, D 13.5 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 37.0, D 16.5, W 6.5.
NHMUK 20110084, two possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer probably described this taxon from a specimen in his own collection, which is likely to be lost; Pfeiffer (1843 in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) sulcosus (Pfeiffer, 1841).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_sulphureus
Figs 20D, L58iv[Mexico, Edo. Veracruz] ”Cordova”.
”Cordova (Mexico)”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 29, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 28.7, D 13.6, W 6.5.
NHMUK 20100585, lectotype and two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this taxon on the basis of specimens collected by Sallé and kept in the Cuming collection; Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. One of the specimens found corresponds to the figure and original shell height mentioned by Pfeiffer, and is here designated lectotype to define the taxon (design. n.). The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) sulphureus (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_swainsoni
Figs 75G, L59i”Brasilia”.
”Brazil”. M.C. label style I, V.
”Long. 61. diam. 23 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 60.0, D 37.2, W 5+.
NHMUK 20100586, three probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer referred in his original description to ”Bul. melanost. var. Conch. Ill. f. 88”; this figure was likely published in 1838 (
Bulimulidae, Auris chrysostoma (Moricand, 1836).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_sykesi
Figs 35J–L, L58iii[Colombia] ”Bogotá”.
”Bogota”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 52, diam. 19 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 51.7, D 19.8, W 6+.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.4, holotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa described this species ”from a single specimen”; the specimen found is thus the holotype. The top whorls are missing.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) sykesi da Costa, 1906.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_tenuilabris
Figs 21F, L59ii”Venezuela”.
”Venezuela”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 30, diam. 12 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 30.2, D 15.1, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975338, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position agrees with
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) tenuilabris (Pfeiffer, 1866).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_terebra
Figs 55G, L59iii”Chatam-Island [sic] (Wolf)”.
”Chatham Is / Galapagos”.
”Long. 18–19, diam. maj. 4.67 mm”; figured specimen herein H 19.1, D 4.5, W 15.2.
NHMUK 1894.6.8.2, one possible syntype, T. Wolf leg. (ex Reibisch).
Reibisch described this taxon from four specimens. The current systematic position accounts the fact that Dall published his Bulimulus (Pleuropyrgus) habeli ‘Stearns ms.’ in January 1892, while Reibisch’ taxon has not been associated with a specific date and hence has to be dated as 31 December 1892.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus habeli (Dall, 1892).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_terebralis
Figs 2M–N, L60i”Coquimbo, Chile”.
”Chili”. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 21, diam. 4 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 19.8, D 5.0, W 10.0.
NHMUK 20110082, five probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this species from specimens collected by Mr. Bridges [a son-in-law of H. Cuming]; he did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The material was likely deposited in the Cuming collection and one specimen corresponds to Reeve’s figure. The material is herein considered as probable syntypes. The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bostryx ischnus (Pilsbry, 1902).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_thamnoica
Figs 68A, L60ii”Var. A. [Not given]. Var. B. [Not given]. Var. C. Cavari (republica Boliviana). Var. D. provincia Chuquisacensi (republica Boliviana)”; see remarks and
”Var. A. Palca d’ayupaya Bolivia”, ”Var. B. Cochabamba, Bolivia”, ”Var. C. Cavari, Bolivia”, ”Var. D chuquisaca Bolivia”, all in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. a 45 ad 80 millim.; latit. a 22 ad 39 millim.”, corrected in
NHMUK 1854.12.4.111, five paralectotypes ”var. A.”; 1854.12.4.109, six paralectotypes ”var. B.”; 1854.12.4.107, four paralectotypes [var. B]; 1854.12.4.110, nine syntypes ”var. C.”; 1854.12.4.108, lectotype (design. n.) and four paralectotypes ”var. D.” (all material d’Orbigny coll.).
d’Orbigny’s varieties have proven to belong to different species, already noticed by
Var. A. ”Magna, reticulata” (pl. 37 figs 4–5) is recorded from ”près de Palca, capitale de la province d’Ayupaya” [Dept. Cochabamba, Indepencia; see
Var. B. ”Magna, crassa, striata” (pl. 37 fig. 7) is listed from ”environs de Capiñata [Dept. La Paz]” and from ”vallée de Cochabamba (...) principalement à Viloma. Longueur, 65 millimètres”; see
Var. C. ”Minor, fasciata” (pl. 37 fig. 8) has been found at ”les coteaux du bourg de Cavari”, near the top of the mountains; see
Var. D. ”Marmorata” (pl. 37 fig. 9) was collected ”aux environs de la ville de Chuquisaca”; see
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) species. See under remarks.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_tigrinus
Figs 36J–L, L60iv”Ecuador”.
”Equador”, in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 21, diam. 10 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 20.8, D 9.96, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.55, lectotype; 1907.11.21.56, one paralectotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not state on how many specimens his description was based; the material was said to be from ”Buckley’s Coll.”. The reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) tigrinus (da Costa, 1898).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_torallyi
Figs 11D, L60iii”provincia Valle-Grande, republica Boliviana” [Bolivia, Dept. Santa Cruz, Prov. Valle Grande].
”pampa ruis (Laguna) Bolivia”; in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Long. 31 millim.; lat. 11 millim.”; figured specimen H 28.6, D 11.3, W 8.5 [.191].
”var. A.” NHMUK 1854.12.4.191, seven paralectotypes; ”var. B.” NHMUK 1854.12.4.192, nine paralectotypes.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx torallyi (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_translucens
Figs 18R, L61i”in America Meridionali (King’s and Saboga Islands, Bay of Panama)”.
”Panama” (see remarks). M.C. label style I.
”long. 7/8, lat. 4/8 poll. [H 22.2, D 12.66 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 21.2, D 11.7, W 5.3.
NHMUK 1842.5.10.139, eight paralectoypes; 20100634, lectotype and three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Two lots were found, of which one has a taxon label ”B. translucidus” possibly written in Broderip’s hand; note the different spelling compared to the published taxon name. The other lot has been used by Reeve for his fig. 71; this lot has a taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. All material consists mostly of subadults and juveniles, but one of adult shells agrees with Broderip’s shell height and is here designated lectotype (design.n.) to define the taxon.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) translucens (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_transparens
Figs 63G–H, L60v”—?”.
”Venezuela”, added in a later hand. M.C. label style I.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 18.4, D 8.38, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1975397, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Reeve described this taxon from ”Mus. Cuming”, but did not give a locality. It is not clear if the locality added during later years may be trusted. This is a subadult specimen and the taxon may prove to be synonymous with one of the many similar-looking other Bulimulus taxa occurring in this region.
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus transparens (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_trichoda
Figs 16D–F, L60vi”provincia Santa Cruz de la Sierra (republica Boliviana)”.
”Sta Cruz (Bolivia)”. in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 20 millim.; latit. 10 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 20.8, D 9.06, W 7.7.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.175, lectotype and four paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus trichodes (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_tricinctus
Figs 11F, L61ii”.—?”.
No locality. M.C. label style III.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 19.2, D 8.94, W 7.0.
NHMUK 1975182, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Reeve described this taxon from the Cuming collection, without giving a locality. The figured specimen was selected lectotype by
Bulimulidae, Bostryx tricinctus (Reeve, 1848).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Otostomus_trimarianus
Figs 22D, L61iii”N.W. Mexico: Tres Marias Islands”.
”Tres Marias / Richardson”.
”Long. 32, diam. 14 (...) millim.”; figured specimen herein H 31.5, D 13.5, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1901.6.22.950, lectotype (Godman coll.).
The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) trimarianus (Martens, 1893).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_trinitarius
Figs 21C, L61iv”[Trinidad]”.
”Trinidad”.
”Longit. 19 millim., diam. 9”; figured specimen herein H 20.1, D 9.84, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1875.2.8.2, lectotype and one paralectotype; 1866.1.3.13 (part), ten paralectotypes, both R.J.L. Guppy leg.
Smith remarked ”the only two adult specimens I have seen”.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) imperfectus (Guppy, 1866).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_tristis
Figs 22B, L62i”New Granada”.
”New Granada”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 28, diam. 11 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 29.3, D 13.3, W 6.6.
NHMUK 1975299, three syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based. Breure and Borrero were not able to recognize this species in the material they revised from Colombia (unpublished data). The locality data in
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) pertristis (Pfeiffer, 1855).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_tropicalis
Figs 21K, L62ii”ad plagam civitas Campeche”.
”Campeche”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Long. 28—Diam. 11 [mm]”; figured specimen herein H 27.5, D 12.9, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.210, lectotype; 1893.2.4.211–212, two paralectotypes (Morelet coll.).
Morelet did not state on how many specimens his description was based. This sinistral species may prove to be identical with one of the other, dextral, Drymaeus species occurring in its distribution range as enantiomorphy within this group may be more commenly found than currently thought (Breure, unpublished data).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) tropicalis (Morelet, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_tumidulus
Figs 11G, L62iiiNot given, see remarks.
”Peru”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV, V.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 22.7, D 12.85, W 7.0.
NHMUK 1975324, lectotype; 1975325, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer (1842 [1841–1846]) introduced this name as replacement for Bulinus inflatus Broderip, 1838 not Bulimus inflatus Lamarck, 1822 [which is a homonym of Bulimus inflatus Olivier, 1801; see
Bulimulidae, Bostryx tumidulus (Pfeiffer, 1842).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_tupacii
Figs 68D–E, L62iv”provincia Yungasensi (republica Boliviana)”; restricted to Dept. La Paz, Yanacachi (
”cavari. Sicasica. Bolivia ” [.113], ”Palca d’ayapaya, Bolivia” [.114], ”yungas Bolivia ” [.115], all in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 4 centim.; latit. 2 centim.”; figured specimen herein H 76.0, D 35.3, W 6+.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.113, four paralectotypes; 1854.12.4.114, five paralectotypes; 1854.12.4.115, seven paralectotypes (all d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) tupacii (d’Orbigny, 1835) (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_turritella
Figs 63K–L, L62v”provincia Chiquitensi (republica Boliviana)”.
”Sn Juan Chiquitos Bolivia”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Latit. 19 millim.; longit. 9 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 19.3, D 9.57, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.166, seven paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus turritellatus (Beck, 1838).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_turritus
Figs 10D, L62vi”in Peruviae montibus (Truxillo)”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style I.
”long. 11/12, lat. 4/12 poll. [H 23.2, D 8.4 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 25.3, D 8.59, W 10.5.
NHMUK 20100616, five possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Broderip described this taxon from Cuming’s collection; it is likely that Reeve also used the same material in his work. One of the specimens corresponds to Reeve’s figure and the material is herein considered as possible syntypes.
Bulimulidae, Bostryx turritus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_umbilicaris
Figs 1A, L63i”Les environs de Cobija, en Bolivie”.
”de Cobija au Bolivia”, taxon label in Souleyet’s handwriting.
”Long. 13, diam. 7 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 12.8, D 7.2, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1854.7.24.359, five paralectotypes (‘Voyage of the Bonité’ coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx umbilicaris (Souleyet, 1842).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_umbricatus
Figs 19G, L63ii”Central America”.
”Central America”. M.C. label style IV.
Not given; figured specimen herein H 15.3, D 8.0, W 6.0.
NHMUK 1975184, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
The classification of this taxon by
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) umbraticus (Reeve, 1849).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_unifasciatus
Figs 13A, L63iii[Ecuador] ”ad Insulas Gallapagos”.
”Charles Id / Galapagos”, in E.A. Smith’s handwriting.
”long. 0.8, lat. 0.45 poll. [H 20.3, D 11.4 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 20.4, D 11.1, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1975187, lectotype; 1975188, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
Sowerby described this taxon from the collection of H. Cuming; he specified ”Charles’s Island”, currently called Isla San Cristóbal. E.A. Smith, as curator of the collection, considered this probable type material; its status is here not disputed. The paralectotype (H 22.0, D 11.06, W 6.7) is better preserved and shows the characteristic pale band along the periphery of the last whorl.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus unifasciatus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_ustulatus
Figs 14E, L63iv[Ecuador] ”ad Insulas Gallapagos”.
”Charles Id / Galapagos”, in E.A. Smith’s handwriting. M.C. label style III, V.
”long. 0.6, lat. 0.3 poll. [H 15.2, D 7.6 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 13.95, D 7.24, W 7.0.
NHMUK 20100633, lectotype and one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
Sowerby described this taxon from the collection of H. Cuming; in his remarks he specified ”Charles’s”, nowadays called Isla San Cristóbal. The specimen illustrated by
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus ustulatus (Sowerby I, 1833).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_varicosus
Figs 25H, L63v”in republicâ Mexicanâ”.
”Mexico”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 35, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 35.5, D 16.7, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1975466, lectotype; 1975467, one paralectotype (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) attenuatus varicosus (Pfeiffer, 1853).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_ventrosus
Figs 14I, L63vi”Burrington-Island (Wolf)”.
”Barrington Is / Galapagos”.
”Long. 17, 5, diam. maj. 8.3 mm”; figured specimen herein H 18.9, D 7.93, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1894.6.8.1, one paralectotype, T. Wolf leg. (ex Reibisch).
Reibisch reported three adult and one subadult shell to have seen for his description. The current systematic position is according to
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus ventrosus (Reibisch, 1892).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_verrucosus
Figs 14D, L64i[Ecuador] ”Galapagos Islands”.
”Gallapagos Islds”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 23, diam. 11 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 22.5, D 12.4, W 7.6.
NHMUK 1975168, lectotype; 1975169, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer did not state on how many specimens his description was based.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus nux (Broderip, 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulinus_versicolor
Figs 66C–D, L64iii”in montibus Peruviae (Mongon, near Casma)”.
”Peru”. M.C. label style I.
”long. 1 1/8, lat. 5/8 poll. [H 28.5, D 15.8 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 29.6, D 17.7, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1842.5.10.180–182, four possible syntypes; 20100637, four possible syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Broderip described this taxon from Cuming’s collection; he did not state on how many specimens his description was based. Reeve’s figure was also based on material from the same collection. One of the specimens in lot 20100637 corresponds to Reeve’s figure.
Bulimulidae, Scutalus versicolor versicolor (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_veruculum
Figs 3A, L64ii[Peru] ”[intimâ Peruviii regionae]”; see remarks.
”Pérou, Ayacucho”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Long. 24; diam. 4 1/2 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 24.5, D 4.2, W 19.1.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.1141–1145, five syntypes (Morelet coll.).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx veruculum (Morelet, 1860).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_vesicalis
Figs 64I–J, L64iv”in Brasilia (Cuming)”.
”Brazils”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 25, diam. 13 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 24.8, D 12.7, W 6.2.
NHMUK 1975395, lectotype; 1975396, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Bulimulus vesicalis (Pfeiffer, 1853)
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_vespertinus
Figs 44G–I, L64v”Province of Patas, Andes of Peru (Dr. Farris)”.
”Province of Patas, / Andes of Peru / Dr. Farris”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 36, diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 34.6, D 14.8, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1975471, lectotype; 1975472, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
The current systematic position follows
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) vespertinus (Pfeiffer, 1858).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bostryx_vilchezi
Fig. 7C”Interandines N-Peru: Sócota, 20 km nö. Cutervo (1950 m), im Tale des Río Guineamaya, im Becken des Marañon”.
”N-Peru, Socota, 20 kms northeast of Cutervo, 1950m”; printed label.
”H 8.4 D 4.5”; figured specimen herein H 8.2, D 4.7, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1975468, five paratypes (ex Weyrauch).
Bulimulidae, Bostryx vilchezi Weyrauch, 1960.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_vincentinus
Figs 21D, L64vi”Island of St. Vincent (Rev. L. Guilding)”.
”St. Vincent W.I.”. M.C. label style III.
”Long. 30, diam. 11 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 29.9, D 12.4, W 6.5.
NHMUK 1975219, lectotype; 1975220, two paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this species from H. Cuming’s collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The variety he described from Venezuela is not considered to be this species.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) vincentinus (Pfeiffer, 1846).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_virginalis
Figs 24C, L65i[Venezuela] ”prope Caracas”.
”Venezuela”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 26, diam. 91/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.9, D 11.5, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1975503, five probable syntypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this taxon based on material ”teste E. Klocke”, and did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The material in the Cuming collection has a taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting, and is considered as probable syntypes.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) virginalis (Pfeiffer, 1856).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_virgultorum
Figs 10E, L65ii”les vallées chaudes du versant oriental de la Cordillère, notammant celle de Santa-Anna”.
”Pérou”, in Morelet’s handwriting.
”Long. 31; diam. 14 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 27.8, D 16.0, W 6+.
NHMUK 1893.2.4.179–181, three paralectotypes; 1893.2.4.213–218, six paralectotypes (Morelet coll.).
The classification of
Bulimulidae, Bostryx virgultorum (Morelet, 1863).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_voithianus
Figs 10A–B, L65v”Chili (T. Bridges)”.
”Chili”. M.C. label style I.
”Long. 19, diam. 7 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 19.1, D 8.1, W 6.2.
NHMUK 20100565.1–4, lectotype and three paralectotypes (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this species from H. Cuming’s collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. Reeve described the same material (”Chili; Bridges”) as Bulimus meridionalis [June 1848, not Bulimus meridionalis Reeve Dec. 1848 (pl. 56 fig. 370)]. In the index (
Bulimulidae, Bostryx voithianus (Pfeiffer, 1847).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_volsus
Figs 35A–C, L64vii”Ecuador”.
”Ecuador”, in Fulton’s handwriting.
”Maj. diam. 12 1/2, alt. 30 1/2 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 30.3, D 12.7, W 6.3.
NHMUK 1907.5.3.162, lectotype (ex Fulton).
Fulton did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) volsus Fulton, 1907.
http://species-id.net/wiki/Drymaeus_wintlei
Figs 21H, L65iii”Ecuador”.
”Ecuador”.
”alt. 21.5, diam. 9 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 21.7, D 10.1, W 5.8.
NHMUK 1929.6.11.1, lectotype (ex Finch).
Finch remarked ”a large series (...) was collected by the late Mr. Clarence Buckley”. Therefore, the reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) wintlei Finch, 1929 (comb. n.).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_wolfi
Figs 12G, L65iv[Ecuador, Galápagos] ”Indefatigale-Island (Wolf)”.
”Indefatigale Is / Galapagos”.
”Long. 13.25–14, diam. maj. abunde 8”; figured specimen herein H 12.19, D 7.97, W 6.7.
NHMUK 1894.6.8.7, paralectotype, T. Wolf leg. (ex Reibisch).
Reibisch described this species on the basis of two adult and one subadult shell.
Bulimulidae, Naesiotus wolfi (Reibisch, 1892).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_woodwardi
Figs 10F, L66i”Andes of Peru”.
”Andes of Peru”, taxon label in Pfeiffer’s handwriting. M.C. label style IV.
”Long. 31, diam. 13 1/2 mill.”; figured specimen herein H 31.0, D 13.7, W 8.1.
NHMUK 1975334, lectotype (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this taxon from the Cuming collection, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based. The protoconch is sculptured with indistinct granules, the shell shape is like those found in several taxa of Bostryx sensu
Bulimulidae, Bostryx woodwardi (Pfeiffer, 1857).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_xanthostoma
Figs 27J–L, L65iii”provincia Yungacensi (republica Boliviana)”.
”Carcuata, Yungas, Bolivia”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 46 millim., latit. 17 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 43.8, D 19.0, W 6.8.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.221, seven paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) xanthostomus (d’Orbigny, 1835).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_yungasensis
Figs 35D–F, L65iv[Bolovia] ”seulement dans les bois qui bordent le Rio de Meguilla, près de son confluent avec le Rio de la Paz”.
”megu[illa], Yungas Bolivia”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Long. 35 millim.; lat. 13 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 32.6, D 13.54, W 6.4.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.134, lectotype and four paralectotypes (d’Orbigny coll.).
d’Orbigny did not state on how many specimens his description was based. One of the specimens corresponds to his figure and is here designated lectotype (design.n.) to define the taxon.
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) yungasensis (d’Orbigny, 1837).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_zhorquinensis
Figs 40G–I, L66ii[Costa Rica] ”Middle Zhorquia to Cuabre”.
”Middle Zhorquia to / Cuabre (low hills + / flat ground) / Costa Rica”.
”Diam. 12, alt. 23 lin. [H 48.5, D 25.3 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 46.1, D 24.4, W 7.2.
NHMUK 1879.7.22.15, lectotype, W.M. Gabb leg. (ex Angas).
Angas wrote ”only three specimens were obtained”; thus the reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) zhorquinensis (Angas, 1879).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimulus_ziczac
Figs 30J–L, L66v”Valley of the R. Cauca, Colombia”.
”Llanos de Cavariare / Colombia”. in da Costa’s handwriting.
”Long. 28, diam. 15 mm.”; figured specimen herein H 26.5, D 15.0, W 4+.
NHMUK 1907.11.21.46, lectotype;. 47, one paralectotype (da Costa coll.).
da Costa did not state on how many specimens his description was based; the reference of
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) ziczac (da Costa, 1898).
http://species-id.net/wiki/Bulimus_ziegleri
”Locality unknown”.
”Brazils” [1975570], ”[C]hiapes [Chiapas] Mexico” [20120338].
”Long. 21, diam. 10 mill.”.
NHMUK 1975570, two specimens; 20120338, four specimens (Cuming coll.).
Pfeiffer described this taxon from the collection of H. Cuming, but did not state on how many specimens his description was based; he also did describe a variety and stated that the locality was unknown. In
From the data given above, we may safely conclude that Pfeiffer’s taxon—though described from an unknown locality—occurs in northwestern Mexico. The original material may have eighter been lost, or the label ”Brazils” was mistrusted by Pfeiffer as he may have seen material from other sources (see
http://species-id.net/wiki/Helix_zoographica
Figs 28D, L66vi”provincia Yungacensi (republica Boliviana)”.
”Tutulima Bolivia”, in d’Orbigny’s handwriting.
”Longit. 35 millim., latit. 13 millim.”; figured specimen herein H 31.7, D 13.72, W 6.1.
NHMUK 1854.12.4.131, one paralectotype (d’Orbigny coll.).
Bulimulidae, Drymaeus (Drymaeus) zoographicus (d’Orbigny, 1835).
Remarks. The following taxon, hitherto classified with the Bulimulidae, proved not to belong this group.
Bulimus inermis Morelet, 1851 (: 10). Type locality. [Mexico, Edo. Campeche] ”circa vicum Palizada provinciae Yucatanensis”. Type material. NHMUK 1893.2.4.1134–1135, two syntypes, ex Morelet.
Remarks. The specimens are both glued on paper. The protoconch is smooth, the teleoconch is sculptured with axial riblets, the spaces 2–3 times the width of the riblets. This is likely a Leptinaria species (Subulinidae).
Bostryx species. A Bostryx umbilicaris (Souleyet, 1842), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.7.24.359 (H = 13.3) B Bostryx moniezi (Dautzenberg, 1896), syntype NHMUK 1908.6.13.22 (H = 12.46) C–D Bostryx infundibulum (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975163 (H = 18.25) E Bostryx scalaricosta (Morelet, 1860), lectotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.1170 (H = 15.5) F Bostryx hamiltoni (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1849.5.14.53 (H = 17.0) G–H Bostryx lesueurianus (Morelet, 1860), syntype NHMUK 1893.2.4.1182 (H = 22.5) I Bostryx pygmaeus costatus Weyrauch, 1960, paratype NHMUK 1975357 (H = 8.45) J Bostryx imeldae costifer Weyrauch, 1960, paratype NHMUK 1975354 (H = 9.6) K Bostryx metagyra Pilsbry & Olsson, 1949, paratype NHMUK 20100630 (H = 7.1). All enlarged.
Bostryx species. A–B Bostryx atacamensis (Pfeiffer, 1856), lectotype NHMUK 1975312 (H = 19.0) C–D Bostryx lactifluus (Pfeiffer, 1857), syntype NHMUK 20100642 (H = 16.2) E–F Bostryx lichnorum (d’Orbigny, 1835), syntype NHMUK 1854.12.4.96 (H = 15.8) G–H Bostryx nanus (Reeve, 1849), syntype NHMUK 1975463 (H = 15.4) I–J Bostryx scabiosus (Sowerby I, 1833), syntype NHMUK 20110176 (H = 15.9) K–L Bostryx pupiformis (Broderip, 1832), syntype NHMUK 20100613 (H = 23.5) M–N Bostryx terebralis (Pfeiffer, 1842), syntype NHMUK 20110082 (H = 19.8) O–P Bostryx holostoma (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975345 (H = 7.84). All enlarged.
Bostryx species. A Bostryx veruculum (Morelet, 1860), syntype NHMUK 1893.2.4.1141 (H = 24.5) B–C Bostryx spiculatus spiculatus (Morelet, 1860), lectotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.1156 (H = 23.3) D Bostryx spiculatus paucicostatus Breure, 1978, paratype NHMUK 1975276 (H = 16.5) E Bostryx emaciatus (Morelet, 1863), syntype NHMUK 1893.2.4.248 (H = 21.7) F–G Bostryx ceratacme (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975347 (H = 18.0) H Bostryx haasi minor Weyrauch, 1960, paratype NHMUK 1975353 (H = 14.0) I Bostryx zilchi glomeratus Weyrauch, 1960, paratype NHMUK 1975154 (H = 18.7). All enlarged.
Bostryx species. A Bostryx rodriguezae Weyrauch, 1967, paratype NHMUK 1975355 (H = 25.5) B Bostryx rehderi Weyrauch, 1960, paratype NHMUK 1975356 (H = 10.45) C Bostryx devians (Dohrn, 1863), syntype NHMUK 1975339 (H = 14.9) D Bostryx mordani Breure, 1978, paratype NHMUK 1975266 (H = 22.5) E Bostryx agueroi Weyrauch, 1960, paratype NHMUK 1975333 (H = 21.1) F–H Bostryx orophilus (Morelet, 1860) F Bulimus albicolor Morelet, 1863, syntype NHMUK 1893.2.4.169 (H = 28.2) G Bulimus cercicola Morelet, 1863, syntype NHMUK 1893.2.4.175 (H = 18.7) H Bulimus orophilus Morelet, 1860, lectotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.188 (H = 20.8). All enlarged.
Bostryx species. A Bostryx aileenae Breure, 1978, paratype NHMUK 1975229 (H = 13.7) B–C Bostryx nigropileatus (Reeve, 1849) B lectotype of Bulimus balsanus Morelet, 1863, NHMUK 1893.2.4.173 (H = 17.9) C lectotype of Bulimus nigropileatus Reeve, 1849, NHMUK 1975335 (H = 20.5) D–F Bostryx reconditus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975189 (H = 19.8). All enlarged.
Bostryx species. A Bostryx acalles (Pfeiffer, 1853), possible syntype NHMUK 20100651 (H = 13.2) B Bostryx depstus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975318 (H = 18.5) C Bostryx conspersus (Sowerby I, 1833), probable syntype NHMUK 20100619 (H = 19.8) D Bostryx ?hennahi (J.E. Gray, 1830), lectotype of Helix cactorum d’Orbigny, 1835, NHMUK 1854.12.4.189 (H = 24.4) E–G Bostryx modestus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832) E Lectotype of Bulimus limensis Reeve, 1849, NHMUK 1975326 (H = 19.6) F syntype of Bulimus philippii Pfeiffer, 1842, NHMUK 1975348 (H = 24.3) G Bulinus modestus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832, possible syntype NHMUK 20120232 (H = 31.6). All enlarged.
Bostryx species. A Bostryx erosus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832), syntype NHMUK 20100612 (H = 22.9) B Bostryx scalariformis (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832), probable syntype NHMUK 20100635 (H = 11.6) C Bostryx vilchezi Weyrauch, 1960, paratype NHMUK 1975468 (H = 8.2) D Bostryx rusticellus (Morelet, 1860), lectotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.201 (H = 19.9) E Bostryx guttatus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832), possible syntype NHMUK 20110175 (H = 22.0) F Bostryx pruinosus (Sowerby I, 1833), syntype NHMUK 1975544 (H = 13.48) G Bostryx reentsi (Philippi, 1851), syntype of Bulimus denickei J.E. Gray, 1852, NHMUK 1851.5.15.1 (H = 26.4) H Bostryx compactus (Fulton, 1902), syntype NHMUK 1902.5.28.1 (H = 15.8) I Bostryx albicans (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832), possible syntype NHMUK 20100611 (H = 22.1) J Bostryx albus (Sowerby I, 1833), possible syntype NHMUK 1842.5.10.149 (H = 15.0). All enlarged.
Bostryx species. A Bostryx affinis (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832), possible syntype NHMUK 20100610 (H = 27.5) B Bostryx huascensis (Reeve, 1848), lectotype NHMUK 1975159 (H = 19.1) C Bostryx mejillonensis (Pfeiffer, 1857), lectotype NHMUK 1975322 (H = 24.1) D Bostryx kathiae Breure, 1978, paratype NHMUK 1975228 (H = 17.5) E Bostryx obliquistriatus (da Costa, 1901), lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.41 (H = 28.9) E Bostryx rhololarynx papillatus (Morelet, 1860), syntype NHMUK 1893.2.4.192 (H = 22.7) G Bostryx rhololarynx rhodolarynx (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975434 (H = 34.5). All enlarged.
Bostryx species. A–B Bostryx apodemetus (d’Orbigny, 1835), syntype NHMUK 1854.12.4.182 (H = 23.0) C Bostryx delumbis (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975124 (H = 21.2) D Bostryx ferrugineus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975380 (H = 19.0) E Bostryx luridus (Pfeiffer, 1863), lectotype NHMUK 19991535 (H = 21.7) F–H Bostryx paposensis (Pfeiffer, 1856), paralectotype NHMUK 1975311 (H = 21.2) H sculpture on dorsal side of last whorl I–K Bostryx pustulosus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832), probable syntype NHMUK 1975589 (H = 16.4) K sculpture on dorsal side of penultimate whorl. All enlarged.
Bostryx species. A–B Bostryx voithianus (Pfeiffer, 1847), lectotype NHMUK 20100565.1 (H = 19.1) B sculpture on dorsal side of (pen)ultimate whorl C Bostryx simpliculus (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975340 (H = 18.9) D Bostryx turritus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832), possible syntype NHMUK 20100616 (H = 25.3) E Bostryx virgultorum (Morelet, 1863), paralectotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.179 (H = 27.8) F Bostryx woodwardi (Pfeiffer, 1857), lectotype NHMUK 1975334 (H = 31.0) G Bostryx andoicus (Morelet, 1863), lectotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.171 (H = 29.5) H Bostryx derelictus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832), probable syntype NHMUK 20100609 (H = 30.3). All enlarged.
Bostryx species. A Bostryx longinquus (Morelet, 1863), paralectotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.185 (H = 30.9) B Bostryx limonoicus (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.190 (H = 15.8) C–E Bostryx torallyi (d’Orbigny, 1835) C lectotype of Drymaeus multispira da Costa, 1904 NHMUK 1907.11.21.31 (H = 19.9) D paralectotype of Helix torallyi d’Orbigny, 1835 NHMUK 1854.12.4.191 (H = 28.6) E ibidem NHMUK 1854.12.4.192 (H = 27.3) F Bostryx tricinctus (Reeve, 1848), lectotype NHMUK 1975182 (H = 19.2) G Bostryx tumidulus (Pfeiffer, 1842), lectotype NHMUK 1975324 (H = 22.7) H Bostryx pictus (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975545 (H = 22.5). All enlarged.
A–F Bostryx species. A–C Bostryx angrandianus (Pilsbry, 1897), lectotype of Bulimus radiatus Morelet, 1863 NHMUK 1893.2.4.198 (H = 23.7) D Bostryx montagnei (d’Orbigny, 1837), lectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.194 (H = 23.3) E Bostryx serotinus (Morelet, 1860), lectotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.204 (H = 25.5) F Bostryx nigropileatus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype of Bulimus stenacme Pfeiffer, 1857 (H = 28.0). G–J Naesiotus species. G Naesiotus wolfi (Reibisch, 1892), paralectotype NHMUK 1894.6.8.7 (H = 12.19) H Naesiotus fernandezae Weyrauch, 1958, paratype NHMUK 19831 (H = 15.1) I Naesiotus chemnitzioides (Forbes, 1850), lectotype NHMUK 1855.4.5.23 (H = 18.5) J Naesiotus rugiferus (Sowerby I, 1833), lectotype NHMUK 1975178 (H = 12.5). All enlarged.
Naesiotus species. A Naesiotus unifasciatus (Sowerby I, 1833), lectotype NHMUK 1975187 (H = 20.4) B–E Naesiotus jacobi (Sowerby I, 1833) B possible syntype NHMUK 1842.5.10.250 (H = 11.9) C sculpture on dorsal side of ultimate whorl D syntype of Bulimulus (Naesiotus) pallidus Reibisch, 1892 NHMUK 1894.5.8.3 (H = 11.37) E sculpture on dorsal side of (pen)ultimate whorl F Naesiotus albemarlensis Dall, 1917, possible paratype NHMUK 1937.6.18.13 (H = 14.5) G–H Naesiotus curtus (Reibisch, 1892), syntype NHMUK 1894.6.8.8 (H = 9.6) H sculpture on dorsal side of (pen)ultimate whorl I Naesiotus perspectivus (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975166 (H = 15.7) J Naesiotus darwini (Pfeiffer, 1846), possible syntype NHMUK 20100523 (H = 8.64). All enlarged.
Naesiotus species. A–D Naesiotus nux (Broderip, 1832) A lectotype NHMUK 1975172 (H = 21.5) B–C lectotype of Bulimus incrassatus Pfeiffer, 1853 NHMUK 1975157 (H = 17.3) C sculpture on dorsal side of (pen)ultimate whorl D lectotype of Bulimus verrucosus (Pfeiffer, 1855) NHMUK 1975168 (H = 22.5) E–F Naesiotus ustulatus (Sowerby I, 1833) E lectotype NHMUK 20100633 (H = 13.95) F possible syntype of Bulimulus (Naesiotus) ustulatus phlegonis Dall & Ochsner, 1928 NHMUK 1937.6.18.2 (H = 12.5) G Naesiotus nucula (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975155 (H = 11.2) H Naesiotus galapaganus (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975146 (H = 15.1) I Naesiotus ventrosus (Reibisch, 1892), paralectotype NHMUK 1894.6.8.1 (H = 18.9) J Naesiotus achatellinus (Forbes, 1850), holotype NHMUK 1855.4.5.25 (H = 19.0). All enlarged.
Naesiotus species. A–C Naesiotus quitensis (Pfeiffer, 1848) A lectotype NHMUK 1975320 (H = 26.5) B possible syntype of Bulimus irregularis Pfeiffer, 1848 NHMUK 20100564 (H = 18.8) C lectotype of Bulimus catlowiae Pfeiffer, 1853 NHMUK 1975414 (H = 25.1) D Naesiotus orbignyi (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype of Bulimus apertus Pfeiffer, 1855 NHMUK 1975317 (H = 18.1) E Naesiotus subcostatus chamayensis Weyrauch, 1967, paratype NHMUK 1975423 (H = 17.5) F–G Naesiotus cinereus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 20100519 (H = 15.5) G apical view of protoconch sculpture H–I Naesiotus crepundia (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotypes H NHMUK 1854.12.4.173 (H = 26.6) I NHMUK 1854.12.4.174 (H = 23.2) J Naesiotus montivagus (d’Orbigny, 1835), lectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.170 (H = 20.5) K–L Naesiotus rocayanus (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.176 (H = 22.9) L apical view of protoconch sculpture. All enlarged.
A–F Naesiotus species. A–C Naesiotus rivasii (d’Orbigny, 1837) A–B paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.171 (H = 17.7) B apical view of protoconch sculpture C lectotype of Bulimus sugillatus Pfeiffer, 1857 NHMUK 1975259 (H = 23.7) D–F Naesiotus trichodes (d’Orbigny, 1835), lectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.175 (H = 20.8) E apical view of protoconch sculpture F sculpture on dorsal side of (pen)ultimate whorl. G Naesiotus dentritis (Morelet, 1863), paralectotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.237 (H = 19.8) H Naesiotus fontainii (d’Orbigny, 1838), lectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.165 (H = 13.2) I Naesiotus fourmiersi (d’Orbigny, 1837) NHMUK 1854.12.4.210, lectotype specimen and
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) lusorius (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975543 (H = 24.4) D–E Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) hepatostomus (Pfeiffer, 1861), lectotype NHMUK 1975571 (H = 30.1) F–H Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) attenuatus (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975458 (H = 34.0) I–K Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) granadensis (Pfeiffer, 1848), lectotype of Bulimus feriatus Reeve, 1850, NHMUK 1975504 (H = 31.8) L–M Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) immaculatus (C.B. Adams in
Drymaeus species. A–B Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) interruptus (Preston, 1909), lectotype NHMUK 1914.4.3.38 (H = 24.5) C–D Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) granadensis (Pfeiffer, 1848), lectotype of Bulimus lividus (Reeve, 1850), lectotype NHMUK 1975208 (H = 24.5) E Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) laetus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975534 (H = 26.6) F–G Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) jonasi (Pfeiffer in
Drymaeus species. A–B Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) aestivus (Pfeiffer, 1857), syntype NHMUK 1975462 (H = 16.9) C Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) amandus (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975457 (H = 29.0) D Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) castus (Pfeiffer, 1847), lectotype NHMUK 1975197 (H = 19.0) E–F Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) championi (Martens, 1893), lectotype NHMUK 1901.6.22.451 (H = 27.0) G–H Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) umbraticus (Reeve, 1850) G lectotype NHMUK 1975184 (H = 15.3) H lectotype of Bulimus floridanus Pfeiffer, 1857 NHMUK 1975199 (H = 16.7) I–J Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) columbiensis (Pfeiffer, 1856), lectotype NHMUK 1975521 (H = 28.0) K–L Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) columbianus (Lea, 1838), lectotype of Bulimus hachensis Reeve, 1850 NHMUK 1975392 (H = 26.4). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) lirinus (Morelet, 1851), holotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.1954 (H = 30.2) B Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) stramineus (Guilding, 1828), syntype of Bulimus lucidus Reeve, 1848 NHMUK 1975524 (H = 28.9) C Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) rawsoni (Guppy, 1871), lectotype of Bulimulus (Drymaeus) rawsonis H. Adams, 1873 NHMUK 1878.1.28.209 (H = 23.7) D–E Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) sulphureus (Pfeiffer, 1857) D lectotype NHMUK 20100585 (H = 28.7) E lectotype of Bulimus citronellus Angas, 1879 NHMUK 1879.7.22.19 (H = 25.0) F–G Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) inusitatus (Fulton, 1900), lectotype NHMUK 1901.4.25.28 (H = 28.3) H Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) puellaris (Reeve, 1850), lectotype NHMUK 1975400 (H = 22.4) I Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) broadwayi (E.A. Smith, 1896), holotype NHMUK 1895.11.28.10 (H = 11.9) J Drymaeus sp., syntype of Bulimus pallens Reeve, 1849 [nomen inquirendum] NHMUK 20120056 (H = 17.9). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) aureolus (Guppy, 1866), syntype NHMUK 1866.1.3.8 (H = 23.2) B Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) mossi (E.A. Smith, 1896), holotype NHMUK 1912.5.11.1 (H = 21.8) C Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) imperfectus (Guppy, 1866), lectotype of Bulimulus (Drymaeus) trinitarius (E.A. Smith, 1896) NHMUK 1875.2.8.2 (H = 20.1) D Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) vincentinus (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975219 (H = 27.9) E Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) manupictus (Reeve, 1848), lectotype NHMUK 1975522 (H = 33.3) F Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) tenuilabris (Pfeiffer, 1866), lectotype NHMUK 1975338 (H = 30.2) G Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) subpellucidus (E.A. Smith, 1877), syntype NHMUK 1872.5.22.19 (H = 20.0) H Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) wintlei Finch, 1929, lectotype NHMUK 1929.6.11.1 (H = 21.7) I Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) pervariabilis (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975547 (H = 33.3) J Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) nigrofasciatus (Pfeiffer in
Drymaeus species. A Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) granadensis (Pfeiffer, 1848), lectotype of Bulimus incarnatus Pfeiffer, 1855 NHMUK 1975566 (H = 30.7) B Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) pertristis Pilsbry, 1898, syntype of Bulimus tristis Pfeiffer, 1855 NHMUK 1975299 (H = 29.3) C Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) depictus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975529 (H = 27.9) D Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) trimarianus (Martens, 1893), lectotype NHMUK 1901.6.22.950 (H = 31.5) E Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) electrum (Reeve, 1848), lectotype NHMUK 1975510 (H = 29.6) F Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) serperastrus (Say, 1830), lectotype of Bulimus nitelinus Reeve, 1849 NHMUK 20100570 (H = 29.4) G Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) dutaillyi (Pfeiffer, 1857), lectotype NHMUK 1975516 (H = 30.8) H Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) moricandi (Pfeiffer, 1847), lectotype NHMUK 1975212 (H = 23.6) I Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) loxensis (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975553 (H = 34.7) J Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) meridanus (Pfeiffer, 1846), syntype NHMUK 1975523 (H = 35.9). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) andicola (Pfeiffer, 1847), lectotype NHMUK 1975315 (H = 24.1) B Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) elongatus (Röding, 1789), holotype of Bulimus apiculata J.E. Gray, 1834 NHMUK 1982297 (H = 20.2) C Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) ziegleri (Pfeiffer, 1847), syntype of Bulimus californicus Reeve, 1848 NHMUK 1975136 (H = 25.9) D Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) discrepans (Sowerby I, 1833), syntype NHMUK 1975181 (H = 20.7) E Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) emeus (Say, 1830), paralectotype of Otostomus emeus hypozonus Martens, 1893 NHMUK 1901.6.22.794 (H = 19.3) F Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) monilifer (Reeve, 1848), lectotype NHMUK 1975403 (H = 26.3) G–H Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) fidustus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975517 (H = 22.5) I Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) binominis (E.A. Smith, 1895), lectotype of Bulimulus (Drymaeus) binominis lascellianus E.A. Smith, 1895 NHMUK 1895.9.10.1 (H = 22.1) J–K Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) apicepunctata (Preston, 1914), holotype NHMUK 1915.1.6.23 (H = 17.5) L Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) moussoni (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975211 (H = 26.0) M Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) cactivorus (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832), possible syntype of Bulinus nitidus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 NHMUK 1975551 (H = 28.8) N Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) sp., possible syntype of Bulimus sowerbyi Pfeiffer, 1847 [nomen inquirendum] NHMUK 20100566 (H = 21.7) O Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) sulcosus (Pfeiffer, 1841), possible syntype NHMUK 20110084 (H = 37.0). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) flavidulus (E.A. Smith, 1877), lectotype NHMUK 1975134 (H = 21.4) B Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) fuscobasis (E.A. Smith, 1877), lectotype NHMUK 1975139 (H = 28.7) C Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) virginalis (Pfeiffer, 1856), probable syntype NHMUK 1975503 (H = 27.9) D Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) deshayesi (Pfeiffer, 1845), lectotype NHMUK 1975526 (H = 44.5) E Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) columbianus (Lea, 1838), lectotype of Bulimus gruneri Pfeiffer, 1846 NHMUK 20100563/1 (H = 27.8) F Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) rectilinearis (Pfeiffer, 1855), NHMUK 1975337 (H = 23.9) G Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) multilineatus (Say, 1825), paralectotype of Bulimus sisalensis Morelet, 1849 NHMUK 1893.2.4.1655 (H = 24.1) H Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) koppeli (Sowerby III, 1892), lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.133 (H = 25.5) I Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) hondurasanus (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975265 (H = 28.6) J Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) inglorius (Reeve, 1848), lectotype NHMUK 1975536 (H = 25.6) K Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) tripictus hoffmanni (Martens, 1893), holotype of Drymaeus prestoni cancellata da Costa, 1906 NHMUK 1907.11.21.13 (H = 18.1) L Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) gabbi (Angas, 1879), lectotype NHMUK 1879.7.22.23 (H = 20.6). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) aurifluus (Pfeiffer, 1857), lectotype NHMUK 1975502 (H = 21.8) B Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) bugabensis (Martens, 1893), lectotype NHMUK 1901.6.22.958 (H = 26.3) C Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) dubius (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975519 (H = 27.1) D Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) (?) rufescens (J.E. Gray, 1825), lectotype of Bulimus erusbescens Pfeiffer, 1847 NHMUK 1975562 (H = 24.2) E Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) conicus da Costa, 1907, lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.32 (H = 17.5) F Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) granadensis (Pfeiffer, 1848), lectotype of Bulimus demotus Reeve, 1850 NHMUK 1975504 (H = 31.8) G Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) vexillum (Wood, 1828), lectotype of Bulimus keppelli Pfeiffer, 1853 NHMUK 1975538 (H = 33.2) H Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) attenuatus varicosus (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975466 (H = 35.5) I–K Drymaeus (Drymaeus) signifer (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975216 (H = 32.9). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) abscissus (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975497 (H = 27.8) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fallax (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1969142 (H = 22.4) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bourcieri (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975446 (H = 23.9) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) abruptus (Rolle, 1904), syntype NHMUK 1947.2.10.1 (H = 42.5). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) abyssorum (d’Orbigny, 1835) A–C Paralectotype of Helix abyssorum d’Orbigny, 1835, NHMUK 1854.12.4.125 (H = 43.7) D–F lectotype of Helix hygrohylaea d’Orbigny, 1835, NHMUK 1854.12.4.127 (H = 40.4) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) marmarinus (d’Orbigny, 1835), lectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.129 (H = 37.9) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) xanthostomus (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.221 (H = 43.8). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) linostoma (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.132 (H = 29.7) D Drymaeus (Drymaeus) zoographicus (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.131 (H = 31.7) E–G Drymaeus (Drymaeus) aequatorianus (E.A. Smith, 1877), lectotype NHMUK 1975137 (H = 26.6) H–J Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bellus da Costa, 1906, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.8 (H = 33.2). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) orthostoma (E.A. Smith, 1877), lectotype NHMUK 1975132 (H = 36.5) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fusoides (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.133 (H = 24.6) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) albolabiatus (E.A. Smith, 1877), holotype NHMUK 1877.3.28.3 (H = 34.0) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) strigatus (Sowerby I, 1833), lectotype of Bulimus musivus Pfeiffer, 1855, NHMUK 1975292 (H = 21.5). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) strigatus (Sowerby I, 1833) A–C possible syntype NHMUK 20090168 (H = 24.9) D–F lectotype of Bulimus saccatus Pfeiffer, 1855 NHMUK 1975207 (H = 21.5) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) smithii (da Costa, 1898), holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.52 (H = 29.5) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) ziczac (da Costa, 1898), lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.46 (H = 26.5) M–O Drymaeus (Drymaeus) gueinzii (Pfeiffer, 1857), lectotype NHMUK 1975539 (H = 23.2). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) baranguillanus (Pfeiffer, 1853) A–C lectotype NHMUK 1975452 (H = 31.5) D–F lectotype of Bulimus antioquensis Pfeiffer, 1855 NHMUK 1975450 (H = 29.6) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) caucaensis (da Costa, 1898), lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.43 (H = 34.8) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) confluens (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975196 (H = 39.5). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) hidalgoi (da Costa, 1898), lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.28 (H = 39.0) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) solidus (Preston, 1907), syntype NHMUK 1908.7.2.72 (H = 32.8) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) notatus (da Costa, 1906), lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.6 (H = 34.5) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) notabilis da Costa, 1906, lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.5 (H = 32.8). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) incognitus da Costa, 1907, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.24 (H = 29.8) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) exoticus (da Costa, 1901), lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.38 (H = 24.8) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) elsteri da Costa, 1901, lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.34 (H = 33.9) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) subventricosus da Costa, 1901, lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.37 (H = 30.1) M–O Drymaeus (Drymaeus) dacostae (Sowerby III, 1892), holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.51 (H = 26.3). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) flexuosus (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975202 (H = 43.0) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) spadiceus da Costa, 1906, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.15 (H = 37.3). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) volsus Fulton, 1907, lectotype NHMUK 1907.5.3.162 (H = 30.3) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) yungasensis (d’Orbigny, 1837), lectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.134 (H = 32.6) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lucidus (da Costa, 1898), lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.44 (H = 18.6) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) sykesi da Costa, 1906, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.4 (H = 51.7). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) boucardi da Costa, 1907, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.26 (H = 26.9) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) buckleyi (Sowerby III, 1895), lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.48 (H = 27.3) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) castaneostrigatus da Costa, 1906, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.13 (H = 20.4) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) tigrinus (da Costa, 1898), lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.55 (H = 20.8). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) auris (Pfeiffer, 1866), lectotype NHMUK 1975499 (H = 38.8) D–E Drymaeus (Drymaeus) mexicanus (Lamarck, 1822), lectotype of Bulimus humboldtii Reeve, 1849 NHMUK 1975528 (H = 27.6) F–H Drymaeus (Drymaeus) coarctatus (Pfeiffer, 1845), lectotype 1975560 (H = 34.6) I–K Drymaeus (Drymaeus) dombeyanus (Pfeiffer, 1846), syntype NHMUK 1844.10.2.32 (H = 56.8) L–N rymaeus (Drymaeus) angustus da Costa, 1906, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.14 (H = 31.5). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) chimborasensis (Reeve, 1848), syntype NHMUK 1975460 (H = 39.7) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fabrefactus (Reeve, 1848), lectotype NHMUK 1975531 (H = 38.5) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) canaliculatus (Pfeiffer, 1845), lectotype NHMUK 1975514 (H = 36.0) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) murrinus (Reeve, 1848), lectotype NHMUK 1975213 (H = 37.1). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) convexus (Pfeiffer, 1855) A–C lectotype NHMUK 1975192 (H = 38.5) D–F lectotype of Bulimulus (Drymaeus) plicatoliratus da Costa, 1898, NHMUK 1907.11.21.120 (H = 36.6) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) phryne (Pfeiffer, 1863), lectotype NHMUK 1975214 (H = 30.8) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) nystianus (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975573 (H = 31.9). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) chamaeleon (Pfeiffer, 1855), syntype NHMUK 1975448 (H = 27.6) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) rosenbergi da Costa, 1900, lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.17 (H = 19.0) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) zhorquinensis (Angas, 1879), lectotype NHMUK 1879.7.22.15 (H = 46.1) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) ambustus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975441/1 (H = 29.0). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) arcuatostriatus (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975455 (H = 27.6) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) expansus (Pfeiffer, 1848), holotype of Otostomus scitus H. Adams, 1867 NHMUK 1867.5.18.5 (H = 27.1) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bartletti (H. Adams, 1867), lectotype NHMUK 1867.5.18.4 (H = 28.5). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bogotensis (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975191 (H = 37.4) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bolivianus (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975444 (H = 33.0) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) cuticula (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975451 (H = 27.5) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) chiriquensis da Costa, 1901 (H = 29.1). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) cuzcoensis (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975453 (H = 36.6) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) clathratus (Pfeiffer, 1858), lectotype NHMUK 1975449 (H = 30.0) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) praetextus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 198340 (H = 39.0) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) alabastrinus da Costa, 1906, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.16 (H = 33.0). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) cylindricus da Costa, 1901, lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.42 (H = 30.6) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) scitulus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975217 (H = 29.5) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) vespertinus (Pfeiffer, 1858), lectotype NHMUK 1975471 (H = 34.6) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) pseudofusoides da Costa, 1906, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.11 (H = 33.6) M–O Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lophoicus (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.135 (H = 32.7). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) acuminatus da Costa, 1906, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.10 (H = 33.4) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) felix (Pfeiffer, 1862), lectotype NHMUK 1975206 (H = 34.0) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fucatus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1874.12.11.224 (H = 23.5) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) farrisi (Pfeiffer, 1858), lectotype NHMUK 1975506 (H = 46.8) M–N Drymaeus (Drymaeus) poecilus (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.155 (H = 34.8). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) punctatus da Costa, 1907, lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.20 (H = 36.6) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) pulcherrimus (H. Adams, 1867), holotype NHMUK 1867.5.18.3 (H = 39.1) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) subhybridus (da Costa, 1906), holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.127 (H = 49.1) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) geometricus (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975564 (H = 34.6). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) inclinatus (Pfeiffer, 1862), lectotype NHMUK 1975532 (H = 33.1) D–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) quadrifasciatus (Angas, 1878) D–F lectotype NHMUK 1879.1.21.3 (H = 28.9) G–I lectotype of Bulimus (Otostomus) napo Angas, 1878 NHMUK 1879.1.21.4 (H = 31.3). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) ochrocheilus (E.A. Smith, 1877), lectotype NHMUK 1877.3.28.4 (H = 37.1) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) recedens (Pfeiffer, 1864), lectotype NHMUK 1975477 (H = 27.3) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) spectatus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1874.12.11.226 (H = 39.2) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) regularis Fulton, 1905, lectotype NHMUK 1905.11.17.2 (H = 29.6). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) selli (Preston, 1909), lectotype NHMUK 1915.1.6.36 (H = 24.0) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) serratus (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975475 (H = 26.3) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) protractus (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975494 (H = 29.3) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bivittatus (Sowerby I, 1833), lectotype of Bulimus flexilabris Pfeiffer, 1853 NHMUK 1975559 (H = 27.1) M–O Drymaeus (Drymaeus) subinterruptus (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975470 (H = 36.7). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) acervatus (Pfeiffer, 1857), lectotype NHMUK 1975461 (H = 41.5) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) dunkeri (Pfeiffer in
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) expatriatus (Preston, 1909), lectotype NHMUK 1975201 (H = 28.1) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) trigonostomus (Jonas, 1844), possible syntype of Bulimus knorri Pfeiffer, in Philippi, 1846 NHMUK 20100654 (H = 34.1) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fenestrellus (Martens, 1864), lectotype of Bulimus (Mesembrinus) geali H. Adams, 1867 NHMUK 1867.1.9.20 (H = 26.4) J–L Drymaeus (Drymaeus) fenestratus (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975525 (H = 44.0). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–B Drymaeus (Drymaeus) bolivarii (d’Orbigny, 1835),
Drymaeus species. A–C Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lilacinus lilacinus (Reeve, 1849), probably syntype NHMUK 20100520 (H = 45.5) D–F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lilacinus jansoni (Martens, 1893), lectotype NHMUK 1901.6.22.951 (H = 45.7) G–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) malleatus (da Costa, 1898), holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.130 (H = 34.5). All enlarged.
Drymaeus species. A–B Drymaeus (Drymaeus) expansus perenensis da Costa, 1901, lectotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.39 (H = 45.8) C–D Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) ghiesbreghti iodostylus (Pfeiffer, 1861), syntype NHMUK 1975568 (H = 32.2) E Drymaeus (Drymaeus) trujillensis (Philippi, 1867), possible syntype of Bulimus (Otostomus) lamas Higgins, 1868 NHMUK 1868.4.3.3 (H = 29.2) F Drymaeus (Drymaeus) rubrovariegatus (Higgins, 1868), possible syntype NHMUK 1868.4.3.1 (H = 32.8) G Drymaeus (Drymaeus) pergracilis (Rolle, 1904), lectotype NHMUK 1922.2.3.33 (H = 33.2) H Drymaeus (Drymaeus) ponsonbyi da Costa, 1907, holotype NHMUK 1907.11.21.27 (H = 33.5) I Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) moritinctus (Martens, 1893), lectotype NHMUK 1901.6.22.841 (H = 25.2) J–K Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) recluzianus (Pfeiffer, 1847), lectotype of Bulimulus (Drymaeus) nubilus Preston, 1903 NHMUK 1903.5.4.1 (H = 22.3) L–M Drymaeus (Mesembrinus) oreades (d’Orbigny, 1835) L sculpture on ultimate whorl M lectotype NHMUK 1854.121.4.161 (H = 31.6). All enlarged.
A Protoglyptus pilosus (Guppy, 1871), syntype NHMUK 1875.2.8.3 (H = 14.95) B–C Protoglyptus martinicensis (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 197451 (H = 19.5) C sculpture on dorsal side of (pen)ultimate whorl D–E Protoglyptus sanctaeluciae (E.A. Smith, 1889), lectotype NHMUK 1889.3.23.12 (H = 20.7) E sculpture on dorsal side of (pen)ultimate whorl F Naesiotus lycodes (Dall, 1917), possible paratype NHMUK 1937.6.18.11 (H = 10.0) G Naesiotus habeli (‘Stearns’ Dall, 1892), possible syntype of Bulimulus (Pleuropyrgus) terebra Reibisch, 1892 NHMUK 1894.6.8.2 (H = 19.1) H Naesiotus orbignyi (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975349 (H = 18.5). All enlarged.
Neopetraeus species. A–C Neopetraeus altoperuvianus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975437 (H = 46.5) D–F Neopetraeus atahualpa (Dohrn, 1863), possible syntype NHMUK 1975436 (H = 38.5) G–I Neopetraeus decussatus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975180 (H = 37.7) J–L Neopetraeus patasensis (Pfeiffer, 1858), lectotype NHMUK 1975439 (H = 46.8). All enlarged.
Neopetraeus species. A–F Neopetraeus lobbii (Reeve, 1849) A–C lectotype NHMUK 1975431 (H = 44.3) D–F lectotype of Bulimus ptychostylus Pfeiffer, 1858 NHMUK 1975430 (H = 46.7) G–I Neopetraeus decussatus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype of Bulimus myristicus Reeve, 1849 NHMUK 1975433 (H = 40.3) J–L Neopetraeus platystomus (Pfeiffer, 1858), lectotype NHMUK 1975428 (H = 34.4). All enlarged.
Neopetraeus species. A–B Neopetraeus cora (d’Orbigny, 1835), lectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.124 (H = 43.9) C–E Neopetraeus binneyanus (Pfeiffer, 1857), lectotype NHMUK 1975426 (H = 25.2) F–G Neopetraeus excoriatus (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975500 (H = 38.4). All enlarged.
Newboldius crichtoni (Broderip, 1836) A–C Holotype of Bulimus (?) illustris Rolle, 1905 NHMUK 1922.2.24.40 (H = 61.2) D–F Holotype NHMUK 1958.9.3.4 (H = 71.3). All enlarged.
Bulimulus species. A–B Bulimulus fuscus (Guilding, 1828), lectotype of Bulimus barbadensis Pfeiffer, 1853 NHMUK 1974054 (H = 21.3) C–D Bulimulus (?) dukinfieldi Melvill, 1900 [nomen inquirendum], lectotype NHM 1900.9.27.2 (H = 28.1) E–F Bulimulus cacticolus (Reeve, 1849), syntype NHMUK 20100515 (H = 24.4) G–H Bulimulus erectus (Reeve, 1849), syntype NHMUK 20100516 (H = 22.0) I–J Bulimulus mollicellus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975185 (H = 17.2) K–L Bulimulus coriaceus (Pfeiffer, 1857), syntype NHMUK 1975409 (H = 17.1). All enlarged.
Bulimulus species. A–B Bulimulus juvenilis (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975161 (H = 19.5) C–D Bulimulus tenuissimus (d’Orbigny, 1835), syntype NHMUK 1854.12.4.163 (H = 19.1) E–F Bulimulus pliculatus (Pfeiffer, 1857), lectotype NHMUK 1975390 (H = 23.0) G–H Bulimulus haplochrous (Pfeiffer, 1855), lectotype NHMUK 1975405 (H = 28.6). All enlarged.
Bulimulus species. A–B Bulimulus effeminatus (Reeve, 1848), lectotype NHMUK 1975508 (H = 31.1) C–D Bulimulus gelidus (Reeve, 1849)[nomen inquirendum], lectotype NHMUK 1975402 (H = 32.5) E–F Bulimulus heloicus (d’Orbigny, 1835), syntype NHMUK 1854.12.4.164 (H = 25.6) G–H Bulimulus inutilis (Reeve, 1850), lectotype NHMUK 1975162 (H = 16.5) I–J Bulimulus unicolor (Sowerby I, 1833), lectotype of Bulimus ignavus Reeve, 1849 (H = 17.1) K–L Bulimulus dysoni (Pfeiffer, 1846), syntype NHMUK 1975453 (H = 19.2). All enlarged.
Bulimulus species. A–B Bulimulus monachus (Pfeiffer, 1857), lectotype NHMUK 20100584 (H = 31.2) C–D Bulimulus guadalupensis (Bruguière, 1789), lectotype of Bulimus rubrifasciatus Reeve, 1848 NHM 1975393 (H = 22.9) E–F Bulimulus corneous (Sowerby I, 1833), lectotype of Bulimus nubeculatus Pfeiffer, 1853 NHMUK 1975407 (H = 16.0) G–H Bulimulus transparens (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975397 (H = 18.4) I–J Bulimulus marcidus (Pfeiffer, 1853), possible syntype NHMUK 20100649 (H = 18.0) K–L Bulimulus turritellatus (Beck, 1838), paralectotype of Helix turritella
A–B Bostryx apodemetes (d’Orbigny, 1835), lectotype of Bulimus pessulatus Reeve, 1848 NHMUK 1975313 (H = 21.6). C–J Bulimulus species. C–D Bulimulus pervius (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975165 (H = 24.3) E–H Bulimulus bonariensis (Rafinesque, 1833) E–F Bulimulus bonariensis sporadicus (d’Orbigny, 1835), lectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.160 (H = 27.8) G–H Bulimulus bonariensis bonariensis (Rafinesque, 1833), syntype of Bulimus montevidensis Pfeiffer, 1846 NHMUK 1975401 (H = 34.2) I–J Bulimulus vesicalis (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975395 (H = 24.8). All enlarged.
Scutalus species. A–B Scutalus baroni (Fulton, 1896), lectotype NHMUK 1896.6.23.1 (H = 12.7) C–F Scutalus cretaceus (Pfeiffer, 1855) C–D lectotype NHMUK 1975388 (H = 35.2) E–F lectotype of Bulimulus (Drymaeus) baroni Fulton, 1897 NHMUK 1897.8.3.173 (H = 34.3) G Scutalus chiletensis Weyrauch, 1967, paratype NHMUK 1975384 (H = 34.2) H Scutalus grandiventris Weyrauch, 1960, paratype NHMUK 1975386 (H = 54.1) I–J Scutalus latecolumellaris Preston, 1909, lectotype NHMUK 1922.2.24.39 (H = 54.0). All enlarged.
A–D Scutalus species. A–B Scutalus proteus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832, lectotype NHMUK 20100638 (H = 44.1) C–E Scutalus versicolor versicolor (Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832) C–D possible syntype NHMUK 20100637 (H = 29.6) E lectotype of Bulimus coagulatus Reeve 1849 NHMUK 1975351 (H = 15.6) F–P Kuschelenia species. F–N Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culminea culminea (d’Orbigny, 1835) F–H paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.198 (H = 31.2) I–K lectotype of Bulimus confusus Reeve, 1848 NHMUK 1975194 (H = 29.0) L–N lectotype of Bulimus jussieui Pfeiffer, 1846 NHMUK 1975170 (H = 31.6) O–P Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) bicolor (Sowerby I, 1835), lectotype NHMUK 1975151 (H = 23.6). All enlarged.
Kuschelenia species. A–B, K Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culminea culminea (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype of Helix lithoica d’Orbigny, 1835 NHMUK 1854.12.4.197 (H = 34.3) C–D, L Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) culminea edwardsi (Morelet, 1863), syntype NHMUK 1893.2.4.177 (H = 25.4) E–G, M Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) gayi (Pfeiffer, 1857) E–F lectotype NHMUK 1975382 (H = 27.7) G syntype of Helix thamnoica var. C d’Orbigny, 1835 NHMUK 1854.12.4.110 (H = 32.2) H–J Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) bicolor (Sowerby I, 1835) H–I lectotype resp. paralectotype of Helix polymorpha d’Orbigny, 1835 NHMUK 1854.12.4.199 (H = 23.6 resp. 21.2) J possible syntype of Bulinus badius
Kuschelenia species. A Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) thamnoica (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.111 (H = 44.0) B–C Kuschelenia (Kuschelenia) alauda Hupé, 1857 B paralectotype of Helix thamnoica var. B
Kuschelenia species. A–B Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) aequatorius Pfeiffer, 1853, lectotype NHMUK 1975377 (H = 37.8) C–D, K Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) caliginosus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 20100518.1 (H = 35.4) E–F, I Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) anthisanensis (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975372 (H = 40.2) G–H, J Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) cotopaxiensis (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975370 (H = 33.9). All enlarged.
Kuschelenia species. A–B, K Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) aquilus (Reeve, 1848), lectotype NHMUK 1975376 (H = 27.1) C–D, L Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) filaris (Pfeiffer, 1853), syntype NHMUK 1975569 (H = 25.1) E–F, M Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) anthisanensis (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype of Bulimus subfasciatus Pfeiffer, 1853 NHMUK 1975368 (H = 31.0) G–H Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) nucinus (Reeve, 1850), lectotype NHMUK 1975379 (H = 36.8) I–J Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) petiti (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975374 (H = 36.0). All enlarged
Kuschelenia species. A–B, I Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) peaki (Breure, 1978), paratype NHMUK 1975579 (H = 23.5) C–D, K Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) quechuarum (Crawford, 1939), holotype NHMUK 1939.4.17.226 (H = 21.5) E–F, J Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) ochracea (Morelet, 1863), lectotype NHMUK 1893.2.4.164 (N = 36.0) G–H Kuschelenia (Vermiculatus) purpuratus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype NHMUK 1975364 (H = 37.3)
A–C Naesiotus rimatus (Pfeiffer, 1847), lectotype NHMUK 1975418 (H = 33.1) D–I Rabdotus species. D–F Rabdotus schiedeanus schiedeanus (Pfeiffer, 1841), probable syntype NHMUK 1975240 (H = 28.4) G–I Rabdotus sufflatus (Gould, 1859), syntype of Bulimus juarezi Pfeiffer, 1866 NHMUK 1975421 (H = 31.5). All enlarged.
A–E Rabdotus dealbatus (Say, 1821). A–C paratype of Bulimulus ragsdalei Pilsbry 1890 NHMUK 1898.2.1.9 (H = 18.3) D–E lectotype of Bulimus liquabilis Reeve 1848 NHMUK 1975422 (H = 21.3) F–H Naesiotus durangoanus (Martens, 1893), holotype NHMUK 1901.6.22.871 (H = 15.0) I–J Naesiotus sp., possible syntype of Bulimus clarus Pfeiffer, 1857 [nomen inquirendum] NHMUK 1975487 (H = 15.9) K–L Naesiotus pazianus (d’Orbigny, 1835), paralectotype NHMUK 1854.12.4.196 (H = 24.3). All enlarged.
A Naesiotus eschariferus (Sowerby I, 1833), syntype NHMUK 1975153 (H = 18.4) B Naesiotus rugulosus (Sowerby I, 1838), lectotype NHMUK 1975176 (H = 20.5) C Naesiotus sculpturatus (Pfeiffer, 1846), lectotype NHMUK 1975174 (H = 14.1) D Naesiotus munsterii (d’Orbigny, 1837), syntype NHMUK 1854.12.4. (H = 21.7) E–G Drymaeus (Drymaeus) laxostylus (Rolle, 1904), holotype NHMUK 1922.2.23.32 (H = 39.9). All enlarged.
A–C Stenostylus nigrolimbatus (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 1975549 (H = 28.0) D–F Stenostylus meleagris (Pfeiffer, 1853), lectotype NHMUK 20100583 (H = 31.3) G Auris chrysostoma (Moricand, 1836), probable syntype of Bulimus swainsoni Pfeiffer 1845 NHMUK 20100586 (H = 60.0) H–I Drymaeus (Drymaeus) lilacinus (Reeve, 1849), lectotype of Bulimus patricius Reeve, 1849 NHMUK 1874.12.11.220 (H = 52.1). All enlarged.
Labels. i Bulimulus (Drymaeus) abruptus Rolle, 1904 ii Bulimus abscissus Pfeiffer, 1855 iii Helix abyssorum d’Orbigny, 1835 iv Bulimus acalles Pfeiffer, 1853 v Bulimus acervatus Pfeiffer, 1857.
Labels. i Bulimus achatellinus Forbes, 1850 ii Drymaeus acuminatus da Costa, 1906 iii Bulimus (Drymaeus) aequatorianus E.A. Smith, 1877 iv Bulimus aestivus Pfeiffer, 1857 v–vi Bulimus aequatorius Pfeiffer, 1853.
Labels. i–ii Bulinus affinis Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 iii Drymaeus alabastrinus da Costa, 1906 iv Bulimulus (Naesiotus) albemarlensis Dall, 1917 v–vi Bulinus albicans Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 vii Bulimus albicolor Morelet, 1863 viii Bulimus (Drymaeus) albolabiatus E.A. Smith, 1877 ix–x Bulinus albus Sowerby I, 1833.
Labels. i Bulimus altoperuvianus Reeve, 1849 ii Bulimus amandus Pfeiffer, 1855 iii Bulimus ambustus Reeve, 1849 iv Bulimus andicola Pfeiffer, 1847 v Bulimus andoicus Morelet, 1863 vi Drymaeus angustus da Costa, 1906.
Labels. i Bulimus anthisanensis Pfeiffer, 1853 ii Bulimus antioquensis Pfeiffer, 1855 iii Bulimus apertus Pfeiffer in Dunker et al., 1855 iv Bulimulus apicepunctata Preston, 1914 v Bulimus apiculatus J.E. Gray, 1834 vi Helix apodemeta d’Orbigny, 1835.
Labels. i Bulimus aquilus Reeve, 1848 ii Bulimus atacamensis Pfeiffer, 1856 iii Bulimus arcuatostriatus Pfeiffer, 1855 iv–v Bulimulus atahualpa Dohrn, 1863 vi Bulimus attenuatus Pfeiffer, 1853 vii Bulimus aurifluus Pfeiffer 1857.
Labels. i Bulimus aureolus Guppy, 1866 ii Bulimus auris Pfeiffer, 1866 iii Bulinus badius Sowerby I, 1835 iv Bulimus balsanus Morelet, 1863 v Bulimus baranguillanus Pfeiffer 1853.
Labels. i Bulimus barbadensis Pfeiffer, 1853 ii Bulimulus (Drymaeus) baroni Fulton, 1897 iii Helix (Xenothauma) baroni Fulton, 1896 iv Otostomus bartletti H. Adams, 1867 v Drymaeus bellus da Costa, 1906.
Labels. i Bulinus bicolor Sowerby I, 1835 ii Bulimus binneayanus Pfeiffer, 1857 iii Bulimus bogotensis Pfeiffer, 1855 iv Bulimus bolivianus Pfeiffer, 1846 v Drymaeus boucardi da Costa, 1907 vi Bulimus bourcieri Pfeiffer, 1853 vii Bulimulus (Drymaeus) broadwayi E.A. Smith, 1896.
Labels. i Bulimulus (Drymaeus) buckleyi Sowerby III, 1895 ii Otostomus bugabensis Martens, 1893 iii Bulimus cacticolus Reeve, 1849 iv Helix cactorum d’Orbigny, 1835 v Bulimus californicus Reeve, 1848 vi Bulimus caliginosus Reeve, 1849.
Labels. i Bulimus canaliculatus Pfeiffer, 1845 ii Drymaeus prestoni cancellata da Costa, 1906 iii Drymaeus castaneostrigatus da Costa, 1906 iv Bulimus castus Pfeiffer, 1847 v Bulimus catlowiae Pfeiffer, 1853 vi Bulimulus (Drymaeus) caucaensis da Costa, 1898 vii Bulimus ceratacme Pfeiffer, 1855.
Labels. i Bulimus cercicola Morelet, 1863 ii Bulimus chamaeleon Pfeiffer, 1855 iii Otostomus championi Martens, 1893 iv Bulimus chemnitzioides Forbes, 1850 v Bulimus chimborasensis Reeve, 1848 vi Drymaeus chiriquiensis da Costa, 1901 vii Bulimus cinereus Reeve, 1849.
Labels. i Bulimus citronellus Angas, 1879 ii Bulimus clarus Pfeiffer, 1857 iii Bulimus clathratus Pfeiffer, 1858 iv Bulimus coagulatus Reeve, 1849 v Bulimus coarctatus Pfeiffer, 1845 vi Bulimulus compactus Fulton, 1902.
Labels. i Bulimus confluens Pfeiffer, 1855 ii Bulimus confusus Reeve, 1848 iii Drymaeus conicus da Costa, 1907 iv Bulimus convexus Pfeiffer, 1855 v Helix cora d’Orbigny, 1835 vi Helix crepundia d’Orbigny, 1835.
Labels. i Bulinus conspersus Sowerby I, 1833 ii Bulimus cotopaxiensis Pfeiffer, 1853 iii Bulimus cretaceus Pfeiffer, 1855 iv Bulinus crichtoni Broderip, 1836 v Helix culminea d’Orbigny, 1835.
Labels. i Bulimulus (Naesiotus) curtus Reibisch, 1892 ii Bulimus cuticula Pfeiffer, 1855 iii Bulimus cuzcoensis Reeve, 1849 iv Bulimulus dacostae Sowerby III, 1892 v Bulimus darwini Pfeiffer, 1846 vi Bulimus decussatus Reeve, 1849.
Labels. i Bulimus delumbis Reeve, 1849 ii Bulimus dentritis Morelet, 1863 iii Bulimus demotus Reeve, 1850 iv Bulimus denickei J.E. Gray, 1852 v Bulimus depictus Reeve, 1849 vi Bulimus depstus Reeve, 1849 vii Bulinus derelictus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832.
Labels. i Bulimus deshayesi Pfeiffer, 1845 ii Bulimus devians Dohrn, 1863 iii Bulinus discrepans Sowerby I, 1833 iv Bulimus dubius Pfeiffer, 1853 v Bulimus dombeyanus ‘Férussac’ Pfeiffer, 1846.
Labels. i Bulimulus (Drymaeus) dukinfieldi Melvill, 1900 ii Bulimus dunkeri Pfeiffer in
Labels. i Bulimus effeminatus Reeve 1848 ii Bulimus electrum Reeve, 1848 iii Drymaeus elsteri da Costa, 1901 iv Bulimus emaciatus Morelet, 1863 v Bulimus erectus Reeve, 1849 vi Bulimus erosus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832.
Labels. i Bulimus erubescens Pfeiffer, 1847 ii Bulinus eschariferus Sowerby I, 1833 iii Bulimus excoriatus Pfeiffer, 1855 iv Bulimus exornatus Reeve, 1849 v Drymaeus exoticus da Costa, 1901 vi Bulimulus (Drymaeus) expatriatus Preston, 1909 vii Bulimus fallax Pfeiffer, 1853.
Labels. i Bulimus fabrefactus Reeve, 1848 ii Bulimus farrisi Pfeiffer, 1858 iii Bulimus felix Pfeiffer, 1862 iv Bulimus fenestratus Pfeiffer, 1846 v Bulimus ferrugineus Reeve, 1849 vi Bulimus feriatus Reeve, 1848.
Labels. i Bulimus fidustus Reeve, 1849 ii Bulimus filaris Pfeiffer, 1853 iii Bulimus (Liostracus) flavidulus E.A. Smith, 1877 iv Bulimus flexilabris Pfeiffer, 1853 v Bulimus flexuosus Pfeiffer, 1853.
Labels. i Bulimus floridanus Pfeiffer, 1857 ii Bulimus fontainii d’Orbigny, 1838 iii Bulimus fourmiersi d’Orbigny, 1837 iv Helix fusoides d’Orbigny, 1835 v Bulimus fucatus Reeve, 1849 vi Bulimus (Liostracus) fuscobasis E.A. Smith, 1877 vii Bulimus gabbi Angas, 1879 viii Bulimus galapaganus Pfeiffer, 1855.
Labels. i Bulimus gayi Pfeiffer, 1857 ii Bulimus gelidus Reeve, 1849 iii Bulimus (Mesembrinus) gealei H. Adams, 1867 iv Bulimus geometricus Pfeiffer, 1846 v Bulimus columbiensis Pfeiffer, 1855 = Bulimus gratus Pfeiffer, 1856 vi Bulimus gueinzii Pfeiffer, 1857 vii Bulimus gruneri Pfeiffer, 1846.
Labels. i Bulinus guttatus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 ii Bulimus hachensis Reeve, 1850 iii Bulimus hamiltoni Reeve, 1849 iv Bulimus haplochrous Pfeiffer, 1855 v Helix heloica d’Orbigny, 1835 vi Bulimulus (Drymaeus) hidalgoi da Costa, 1898 vii Bulimus hepatostomus Pfeiffer, 1861 viii Bulimus holostoma Pfeiffer, 1846.
Labels. i Bulimus hondurasanus Pfeiffer, 1846 ii Bulimus huascensis Reeve, 1848 iii Bulimus humboldtii Reeve, 1849 iv Helix hygrohylaea d’Orbigny, 1835 v Otostomus emeus hypozonus Martens, 1893 vi Bulimus ignavus Reeve, 1849.
Labels. i Bulimus (?) illustris Rolle, 1905 ii Bulimus incarnatus Pfeiffer, 1855 iii Bulimus immaculatus C.B. Adams in
Labels. i Bulimus incrassatus Pfeiffer, 1853 ii Bulimulus (Drymaeus) interruptus Preston, 1909.
Labels. i Bulimus inglorius Reeve, 1848 ii Bulimulus (Drymaeus) inusitatus Fulton, 1900 iii Bulimus infundibulum Pfeiffer, 1853 iv Bulimus inutilis Reeve, 1850 v Bulimus iodostylus Pfeiffer, 1861 vi Bulimus irregularis Pfeiffer, 1848 vii Bulimulus istapensis Crosse and Fischer, 1873 viii Otostomus lilacinus jansoni Martens, 1893.
Labels. i Bulinus jacobi Sowerby I, 1833 ii Bulimus jonasi Pfeiffer in
Labels. i Bulimus keppelli Pfeiffer, 1853 ii Bulimus lactifluus Pfeiffer, 1857 iii Bulimus knorri Pfeiffer in
Labels. i Bulimus (Otostomus) lamas Higgins, 1868 ii Bulimulus (Drymaeus) binominis lascellianus E.A. Smith, 1895 iii Bulimulus latecolumellaris Preston, 1909 iv Bulimus lattrei Pfeiffer in
Labels. i Helix lichnorum d’Orbigny, 1835 ii Helix limonoica d’Orbigny, 1835 iii Bulimus lilacinus Reeve, 1849 iv Helix linostoma d’Orbigny, 1835 v Bulimus limensis Reeve, 1849 vi Bulimus liquabilis Reeve, 1848 vii Helix lithoica d’Orbigny, 1835 viii Bulimus lirinus Morelet, 1851 ix Bulimus lividus Reeve, 1850.
Labels. i Bulimus lobbii Reeve, 1849 ii Helix lophoica d’Orbigny, 1835 iii Bulimus longinquus Morelet, 1863 iv Otostomus loxanus Higgins, 1872 v Bulimus loxensis Pfeiffer, 1846 vi Bulimulus (Drymaeus) lucidus Da Costa, 1898 vii Bulimus luridus Pfeiffer, 1863 viii Bulimus lucidus Reeve, 1848.
Labels. i Bulimus lusorius Pfeiffer, 1855 ii Bulimulus (Naesiotus) lycodus Dall, 1917 iii Bulimulus (Drymaeus) malleatus da Costa, 1898 iv Bulimus manupictus Reeve, 1848 v Bulimus marcidus Pfeiffer, 1853 vi Helix marmarina d’Orbigny, 1835.
Labels. i Bulimus martinicensis Pfeiffer, 1846 ii Bulimus meleagris Pfeiffer, 1853 iii Bulimus mejillonensis Pfeiffer in Pfeiffer and Dunker, 1857 iv Bulimus meridanus Pfeiffer, 1846 v Bostryx metagyra Pilsbry & Olsson, 1949 vi Bulimus mollicellus Reeve, 1849 vii Bulimus monachus Pfeiffer, 1857 viii Bulimulus (Bostryx) moniezi Dautzenberg, 1896 ix Bulimus montagnei d’Orbigny, 1837.
Labels. i Bulimus monilifer Reeve, 1848 ii Bulimus montevidensis Pfeiffer, 1846 iii Bulimus montagnei d’Orbigny, 1837 iv Helix montivaga d’Orbigny, 1835 v Bulimus moricandi Pfeiffer, 1847.
Labels. i Otostomus moritinctus Martens, 1893 ii Bulimus moussoni Pfeiffer, 1853 iii Bulimus muliebris Reeve, 1849 iv Bulimulus (Drymaeus) mossi E.A. Smith, 1896 v Bulimus munsterii d’Orbigny, 1837 vi Drymaeus multispira
Labels. i Bulimus murrinus Reeve, 1848 ii Bulimus myristicus Reeve, 1849 iii Bulimus (Otostomus) napo Angas, 1878 iv Bulimus nanus Reeve, 1849 v–vi Bulimus nigrofasciatus Pfeiffer in
Labels. i Bulimus nigropileatus Reeve, 1849 ii Bulimus nitelinus Reeve, 1849 iii Bulinus nitidus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 iv Helix nivalis d’Orbigny, 1835 v Drymaeus notabilis da Costa, 1906 vi Drymaeus notatus da Costa, 1906 vii Bulimus nubeculatus Pfeiffer, 1853.
Labels. i Bulimulus (Drymaeus) nubilus Preston, 1903 ii Bulimus nucinus Reeve, 1850 iii Bulimus nucula Pfeiffer, 1853 iv Bulinus nux Broderip, 1832 v Bulimus nystianus Pfeiffer, 1853 vi Drymaeus obliquistriatus da Costa, 1901 vii Bulimus (Drymaeus) ochrocheilus E.A. Smith, 1877 viii Bulimus ochraceus Morelet, 1863.
Labels. i Bulimus orbignyi Pfeiffer, 1846 ii Helix oreades d’Orbigny, 1835 iii Bulimus orophilus Morelet, 1860 iv Bulimus (Drymaeus) orthostoma E.A. Smith, 1877 v Bulimus pallens Reeve, 1849 vi Bulimulus (Naesiotus) pallidus Reibisch, 1892.
Labels. i Bulinus panamensis Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 ii Bulimus papillatus Morelet, 1860 iii Bulimus paposensis Pfeiffer, 1856 iv Bulimus patasensis Pfeiffer, 1858 v Bulimus patricius Reeve, 1849.
Labels. i Helix paziana d’Orbigny, 1835 ii Drymaeus expansus perenensis da Costa, 1901 iii Bulimulus pergracilis Rolle, 1904 iv Bulimus perspectivus Pfeiffer, 1846 v Bulimus pervariabilis Pfeiffer, 1853 vi Bulimus pervius Pfeiffer, 1853 vii Bulimus petenensis Morelet, 1851.
Labels. i Bulimus pessulatus Reeve, 1848 ii Bulimus petiti Pfeiffer, 1846 iii Bulimus philippii Pfeiffer, 1842 iv Bulimulus (Naesiotus) ustulatus var. phlegonis Dall & Ochsner, 1928 v Bulimus phryne Pfeiffer, 1863 vi Bulimus pictus Pfeiffer, 1855 vii Buliminus pilosus Guppy, 1871 viii Bulimus platystomus Pfeiffer, 1858.
Labels. i Bulimulus (Drymaeus) plicatoliratus Da Costa, 1898 ii Bulimus pliculatus Pfeiffer, 1857 iii Helix poecila d’Orbigny, 1835.
Labels. i Helix polymorpha d’Orbigny, 1835 ii Drymaeus ponsonbyi da Costa, 1907 iii Bulimus praetextus Reeve, 1849 iv Drymaeus prestoni da Costa, 1906 v Bulimus primula Reeve, 1848 vi Bulinus pruinosus Sowerby I, 1833 vii Bulimus protractus Pfeiffer, 1855.
Labels. i Bulinus proteus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 ii Drymaeus pseudofusoides da Costa, 1906 iii Bulimus puellaris Reeve, 1850 iv Bulimus ptychostylus Pfeiffer, 1858 v Otostomus pulcherrimus H. Adams, 1867.
Labels. i Drymaeus punctatus da Costa, 1907 ii Bulinus pupiformis Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 iii Bulimus purpuratus Reeve, 1849 iv Bulinus pustulosus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 v Bulimus (Otostomus) quadrifasciatus Angas, 1878 vi Bulimus quitensis Pfeiffer, 1848.
Labels. i Bulimulus (Scutalus) quechuarum Crawford, 1939 ii Bulimus radiatus Morelet, 1863 iii Bulimulus ragsdalei Pilsbry, 1890 iv Bulimulus (Drymaeus) rawsonis H. Adams, 1873 v Bulimus recedens Pfeiffer, 1864 vi Bulimus reconditus Reeve, 1849 vii Bulimus rectilinearis Pfeiffer, 1855 viii Drymaeus regularis Fulton, 1905.
Labels. i Bulimus rhodolarynx Reeve, 1849 ii Bulimus rimatus Pfeiffer, 1847 iii Bulimus rivasii d’Orbigny, 1837 iv Helix rocayana d’Orbigny, 1835 v Bostryx (Bostryx) rodriguezae Weyrauch, 1967 vi Bulimus roseatus Reeve, 1848 vii Drymaeus rosenbergi da Costa, 1906 viii Bulinus rugiferus Sowerby I, 1833 ix Bulimus rusticellus Morelet, 1860 x Bulimus rubrifasciatus Reeve, 1848.
Labels. i Bulimus saccatus Pfeiffer, 1855 ii Bulimus (Leptomerus) sanctaeluciae E.A. Smith, 1889 iii Bulinus scabiosus Sowerby I, 1833 iv Bulimus scalaricosta Morelet, 1860 v Bulinus scalariformis Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 vi Bulimus schiedeanus Pfeiffer, 1841.
Labels. i Bulimus schmidti Pfeiffer, 1854 ii Bulimus scitulus Reeve, 1849 iii Otostomus scitus H. Adams, 1867 iv Bulimulus (Drymaeus) selli Preston, 1909 v Bulimus serotinus Morelet, 1860 vi Bulimus serratus Pfeiffer, 1855.
Labels. i Bulimus signifer Pfeiffer, 1855 ii Bulimus simpliculus Pfeiffer, 1855 iii Bulimus sisalensis Morelet, 1849 iv Bulimulus (Drymaeus) smithii da Costa, 1898 v Bulimulus (Drymaeus) solidus Preston, 1907 vi Bulimus sowerbyi Pfeiffer, 1847.
Labels. i Drymaeus spadiceus da Costa, 1906 ii Bulimus spectatus Reeve, 1849 iii Bulimus spiculatus Morelet, 1860 iv Helix sporadica d’Orbigny, 1835 v Bulimus stenacme Pfeiffer, 1857.
Labels. i Bulinus strigatus Sowerby I, 1833 ii Bulimus studeri Pfeiffer, 1847 iii Bulimus subfasciatus Pfeiffer, 1853 iv Gonyostomus subhybridus da Costa, 1906 v Bulimus subinterruptus Pfeiffer, 1853 vi Bulimulus (Liostracus) subpellucidus E.A. Smith, 1877 vii Drymaeus subventricosus da Costa, 1901.
Labels. i Bulimus sulcosus Pfeiffer, 1841 ii Bulimus sugillatus Pfeiffer, 1857 iii Drymaeus sykesi da Costa, 1906 iv Bulimus sulphureus Pfeiffer, 1857.
Labels. i Bulimus swainsoni Pfeiffer, 1845 ii Bulimus tenuilabris Pfeiffer, 1866 iii Bulimulus (Pleuropyrgus) terebra Reibisch, 1892.
Labels. i Bulimus terebralis Pfeiffer, 1842 ii Helix thamnoica d’Orbigny, 1835 iii Helix torallyi d’Orbigny, 1835 iv Bulimulus (Drymaeus) tigrinus da Costa, 1898 v Bulimus transparens Reeve, 1849 vi Helix trichoda d’Orbigny, 1835.
Labels. i Bulinus translucens Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 ii Bulimus tricinctus Reeve, 1848 iii Otostomus trimarianus Martens, 1893 iv Bulimulus (Drymaeus) trinitarius E.A. Smith, 1896.
Labels. i Bulimus tristis Pfeiffer, 1855 ii Bulimus tropicalis Morelet, 1849 iii Bulimus tumidulus Pfeiffer, 1842 iv Helix tupacii d’Orbigny, 1835 v Helix turritella d’Orbigny, 1835 vi Bulinus turritus Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832.
Labels. i Bulimus umbilicaris Souleyet, 1842 ii Bulimus umbricatus Reeve, 1849 iii Bulinus unifasciatus Sowerby I, 1833 iv Bulinus ustulatus Sowerby I, 1833 v Bulimus varicosus Pfeiffer, 1853 vi Bulimulus (Naesiotus) ventrosus Reibisch, 1892.
Labels. i Bulimus verrucosus Pfeiffer, 1855 ii Bulimus veruculum Morelet, 1860 iii Bulinus versicolor Broderip in Broderip and Sowerby I 1832 iv Bulimus vesicalis Pfeiffer, 1853 v Bulimus vespertinus Pfeiffer, 1858 vi Bulimus vincentinus Pfeiffer, 1846 vii Drymaeus volsus Fulton, 1907.
Labels. i Bulimus virginalis Pfeiffer, 1856 ii Bulimus virgultorum Morelet, 1863 iii Drymaeus wintlei Finch, 1929 iv Bulimulus (Naesiotus) wolfi Reibisch, 1892 v Bulimus voithianus Pfeiffer, 1847.
Labels. i Bulimus woodwardi Pfeiffer, 1857 ii Bulimus zhorquinensis Angas, 1879 iii Helix xanthostoma d’Orbigny, 1835 iv Bulimus yungasensis d’Orbigny, 1837 v Bulimulus (Drymaeus) ziczac da Costa, 1898 vi Helix zo[o]graphica d’Orbigny, 1835 vii Bulimus darwini Pfeiffer, 1846.
Labels. i Bulimus (Otostomus) rubrovariegatus Higgins, 1868 ii Bulimus coriaceus Pfeiffer, 1857 iii Bulimus sculpturatus Pfeiffer, 1846 iv Bulinus rugulosus Sowerby I 1833.
This research received support from the SYNTHESYS Project (http://www.synthesys.info) which is financed by European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 Integrating Activities Programme. For all their help during ASHB’s stay at the National History Museum, he is very much indebted to J. Pickering and K. Way of the Mollusca Section. A special word of thanks is due to staff of the NHMUK Photo Unit for handling the many requests for images (P. Crabb, P. Hurst, H. Taylor). D. Gordon (Newcastle-upon-Tyne) kindly supplied information on the Angas collection in his care and F.G. Thompson kindly confirmed the identification of Morelet’s subulinid taxon.