ZooKeys 353: 61–70, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.353.5990
Two new species and one subspecies of Craniophora Snellen, 1867 (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) from China
Ádám Kiss 1,†, Péter Gyulai 2,‡
1 University of Debrecen, Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
2 H-3530 Miskolc, Mélyvölgy 13/A, Hungary

Corresponding author: Ádám Kiss (woodpecker.86@gmail.com)

Academic editor: D. Lafontaine

received 18 July 2013 | accepted 22 October 2013 | Published 20 November 2013


(C) 2013 Ádám Kiss. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.

Citation: Kiss Á, Gyulai P (2013) Two new species and one subspecies of Craniophora Snellen, 1867 (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae) from China. ZooKeys 353: 61–70. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.353.5990

Abstract

Three Craniophora taxa from China, C. fujianensis Kiss and Gyulai, sp. n., C. fujianensis hainanensis Kiss and Gyulai, ssp. n. and C. sichuanensis Kiss, Gyulai and Saldaitis, sp. n., are newly described. Adult habitus and male genitalia are illustrated and compared with those of C. harmandi (Poujade) and C. praeclara (Graeser). Females of the new taxa are unknown.

Keywords

New taxa, Noctuidae, Acronictinae, Craniophora, China, Fujian, Hainan, Sichuan

Introduction

Craniophora Snellen, 1867 is an Old World genus of the Acronictinae restricted to the Palaearctic, Oriental, Australian and Ethiopian regions (Fibiger et al. 2009). Most of the 20 described species occur in eastern Asia (Poole 1989; Han and Kononenko 2010). Only a few taxonomic studies of the genus have been undertaken (e.g., Hampson 1909; Kozhanchikov 1950; Chen 1999; Han and Kononenko 2010, Kononenko 2010), and most of the publications mentioning Craniophora are faunistic works or check lists (e.g., Draudt 1937, 1950; Inoue et al. 1982; Holloway 1989; Kononenko et al. 1998; Yoshimoto 1994; Kononenko 2005). A diagnosis of the genus is given by Fibiger et al. (2009) and Han and Kononenko (2010).

In the subfamily Acronictinae there are two main branches according to the external and genital features. The first branch consists of the genera Acronicta Ochsenheimer, Gerbathodes Warren, Moma Hübner, Oxicesta Hübner, Simyra Ochsenheimer, Subleuconycta Kozhanchikov with diverse external features, but with similar genitalia with a heavily-sclerotised clasping apparatus and a simple structure of the vesica. The second group consists of the genus Craniophora with very similar external features, weakly sclerotised valvae and more complex vesica than in the first group.

The majority of the taxa of Craniophora and Acronicta are separable without checking their genital structures. In smaller species groups, however, the separation of species using external features requires thorough study due to the similarity in forewing pattern and shared features of the typical noctuid maculation. Forewing traits shared by many Craniophora and Acronicta include the variably strong basal dash, and the black streak of the tornus situated in the submedial fold, often extending from the medial area or the postmedial line to the terminal line. Moreover, in the three main species-groups of Craniophora, such as the pontica-, harmandi- and the fasciata-groups (although these have not previously been proposed formally, the common external and genital features suggest it), identification of some species requires detailed study of the genitalia.

Additionally, the species of Cranionycta de Lattin, which is a distinct lineage, probably with intermediate position between Acronicta and Craniophora (distributed in the Russian Far East, China, Nepal) externally can also be very similar to Craniophora, although they are usually smaller with narrower wings than most of the Craniophora species. The main differences are found in the specific features of the genitalia of both sexes (see de Lattin 1949; Inoue and Sugi 1958; Kononenko et al. 1998); in the males of Craniophora, the most conspicuous features are the much broader, but shorter, less sclerotised valvae, slighter corona, more diverticulated or twisted and more or less larger vesica; in the females the corpus bursae is more developed, without signa.

Method

Specimens were collected in China using ultraviolet light traps. Genital slides were prepared following standard techniques (abdominal integument cut lengthwise after KOH maceration male and female genitalia were dissected and mounted in euparal or in Canada balsam on glass slides). Additional material for comparison was borrowed from the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest (HNHM). Additionally, numerous genitalia dissections were examined, both material on loan and own material.

The genital slides were digitalized with an Olympus SZX12 zoom stereo microscope with an Olympus DP 70 digital microscope camera in the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest. After the digitalization, the pictures were converted to greyscale mode and the unnecessary grey background was deleted by photo editing software (Gimp). The habitus pictures were taken with Nikon D200 with Micro-Nikkor 200mm F/4 lens and Nikon D90 with Nikkor 200mm F/4 lens, after deleted the background by software.

The authors of all of the newly described taxa are the authors of this paper; however, Craniophora sichuanensis sp. n. is described in co-authorship with Aidas Saldaitis.

Systematic part
Genus Craniophora Snellen, 1867

Craniophora Snellen, 1867, De Vlinders van Nederland, Macrolepidoptera systematisch beschreven: 262.

Type species. Noctua ligustri [Denis et Schiffermüller], 1775, Ankündung eines systematischen Werkes von den Schmetterlingen der Wienergegend: 70.

Type material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 1), China, Fujian, Dai Mao Shan, 20 km NW of Longyan, 25°32'N, 116°51'E, 1300 m, 21–30.Nov.2004, leg V. Siniaev and team; slide No.: 3207 Gyulai (coll. P. Gyulai, to be deposited in Hungarian Natural History Museum (HNHM), Budapest). Paratypes: None. We exclude specimens of Craniophora fujianensis from Hainan, China, as these represent a separate subspecies, described below.

Figures 1–6.

Adults. 1 Craniophora fujianensis sp. n., holotype, male, China, Fujian, coll. P. Gyulai 2 Craniophora fujianensis hainanensis ssp. n., holotype, male, China, Hainan, coll. P. Gyulai 3 Craniophora fujianensis hainanensis ssp. n., paratype, male, China, Hainan, coll. G. Ronkay 4 Craniophora sichuanensis sp. n., holotype, male, China, Sichuan, coll. P. Gyulai 5 Craniophora harmandi, male, Nepal, coll. HNHM 6 Craniophora praeclara, male, North Korea, coll. HNHM.

Diagnosis and description.

Wingspan 37 mm. Craniophora fujianensis resembles Craniophora praeclara (Graeser, 1890) (Fig. 6) and especially Craniophora harmandi (Poujade, 1898) (Fig. 5) externally. Reliable separation of the three taxa does not require genitalic study, since Craniophora fujianensis exhibits unique external characteristics. The shared features of the two related taxa are the more or less similar forewing pattern and noctuid maculation, the presence of the strong or weaker black streaks in the basal area, in the termen and the tornus (the latter streak in the submedial fold, regularly from the medial area or the postmedial line towards the terminal line; the oblique, wavy antemedial line, the double, crenulate postmedial line and the less wavy whitish-grey subterminal line. Craniophora fujianensis can be distinguished from Craniophora praeclara and Craniophora harmandi by its more uniform vestiture of thorax, light brownish-grey (and not chequered white) forewing fringe and the less evenly broad, somewhat shorter blackish streak extending through the submedial fold from the medial area outwards to the lowest part of the terminal line. In comparison with Craniophora harmandi, the new species has a more unicolorous, lighter brownish-grey forewing ground colour; lighter, more obsolescent, narrower dark suffusion in the medial area, conspicuous clear white colouration of the small quadrangular basal spot, which is not confluent with the whitish spot of the costal field; rather ashy grey (and not white), less conspicuous comma-like tiny spot beside the claviform stigma; the stigmata are smaller, the orbicular spot is not evenly white encircled. Craniophora fujianensis is distinguished from Craniophora praeclara by its smaller average size, more unicolorous, lighter brownish-grey forewing ground colour, without mossy green shades; lighter, more obsolescent, narrower dark suffusion in the medial area; clear white small quadrangular basal spot; less crenulate postmedial line, much smaller, blackish-filled stigmata and especially by the almost white hindwing of the male. Male genitalia (Figs 7, 8): a close relationship with Craniophora harmandi (Figs 13, 14) is evident; however, the differences are very conspicuous. Craniophora fujianensis can be easily distinguished from both of the allied taxa by its much larger, longer uncus, larger juxta and vinculum, large bundle of long hairs on the tegumen, strikingly elongate, curved valvae with straighter dorsal and almost evenly curved (with one angle medially) ventral costa and broader corona with much longer setae. The aedeagus is larger, the vesica ventrally curved; the two medial spines are straight, almost evenly thin and parallel, the third, weaker medial spine weakly sclerotised and hardly visible; whereas the two large spines are oppositely positioned in Craniophora harmandi, and the third, medial, cornutus is weaker than the others but stronger than in Craniophora fujianensis; Craniophora praeclara has no cornuti in the vesica (Figs 15, 16). Additionally, Craniophora fujianensis has a tiny semiglobular, sclerotised medial diverticulum, finely serrate on its surface, from which a longitudinal, wavy-ribbed, sclerotised area is situated towards the terminal section of the vesica.

Figures 7–12.

Male genitalia. 7, 8 Craniophora fujianensis sp. n., holotype, male genitalia, China, Fujian, slide No.: 3207 Gyulai, coll. P. Gyulai 7 valvae 8 aedeagus. 9, 10 Craniophora fujianensis hainanensis ssp. n., holotype, male, China, Hainan, slide No.: 3502 Gyulai, coll. P. Gyulai 9 valvae 10 aedeagus 11,  12 Craniophora sichuanensis sp. n., holotype, male genitalia, China, Sichuan, slide No.: 2883 Gyulai, coll P. Gyulai 11 valvae 12 aedeagus.

Figures 13–16.

Male genitalia. 13, 14 Craniophora harmandi, male genitalia, Nepal, slide No.: KA138m, coll. HNHM 13 valvae 14 aedeagus. 15, 16 Craniophora praeclara, male genitalia, North Korea, slide No.: KA054m, coll. HNHM 15 valvae 16 aedeagus.

Female. Unknown.

Etymology.

The species name refers to Fujian Province, China, where the species was discovered.

Distribution.

The species is known from Fujian and Hainan Provinces, China, with the nominate subspecies known only from the type locality in Fujian; subspecies hainanensis occurs in Hainan. Craniophora fujianensis is the allopatric sister taxa of Craniophora harmandi, which occurs from the western Himalaya to Taiwan, in the region with monsoonic influence.

Craniophora fujianensis hainanensis Kiss & Gyulai, ssp. n.

http://zoobank.org/3A6BE9D1-5170-4B00-925A-5A8E250C5909

http://species-id.net/wiki/Craniophora_fujianensis_hainanensis

Figs 2, 3, 9, 10
Type material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 2), China, prov. Hainan, Wuzhi Shan, 1333 m, 03–10.Jan.2008, leg local collector; slide No.: 3502 Gyulai (coll. P. Gyulai, to be deposited in HNHM, Budapest). Paratype: Male (Fig. 3), same data as holotype; slide No.: 3209 Gyulai (coll. G. Ronkay, Budapest, Hungary).

Diagnosis and description.

Craniophora fujianensis hainanensis is endemic to the island of Hainan. It can be separated at first sight from similar Craniophora by its whitish-ochreous forewing ground colour, indistinct wing pattern, with a more double-angled inner edge of the medial fascia, the whitish fringe and the conspicuous clear white hindwing. Wingspan 35–38 mm. Male genitalia (Figs 9, 10): In the male genitalia, ssp. hainanensis has a somewhat shorter uncus, with the ventral costa evenly rounded, and a distally more dilated valvae compared to the nominate subspecies. More specimens are needed to evaluate if these differences represent individual or subspecific variation. The two thin medial spines of the vesica are not parallel, but V-shaped, arising from the same sclerotised plate; the tiny semiglobular, medial diverticulum is hardly visible because the surface is not sclerotised or spinulose; the longitudinal, wavy-ribbed, sclerotised area towards the end of the vesica is bifurcate anteriorly then confluent.

Female. Unknown.

Etymology.

The name refers to the island of Hainan where this taxon occurs.

Distribution.

The subspecies is known only from the type-locality, China, Hainan Island.

Craniophora sichuanensis Kiss, Gyulai & Saldaitis, sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/E24039A7-3A32-448D-BEE0-C56FED2881A4

http://species-id.net/wiki/Craniophora_sichuanensis

Figs 4, 11, 12
Type material.

Holotype: Male (Fig. 4), China, W. Sichuan, road Yaan/Kangding, Erlang Shan Mt., 2200 m, 02.Aug.2011, 29°87.340"N, 102°30.970"E, leg. Floriani and Saldaitis; slide No.: 2883 Gyulai (coll. P. Gyulai, to be deposited in HNHM, Budapest). Paratypes: None.

Diagnosis and description.

Wingspan 32 mm. Externally most similar to Craniophora harmandi and to a lesser degree to Craniophora fujianensis. The shared features with the two related taxa are the more or less similar forewing pattern and noctuid maculation and the less sinuous whitish-grey subterminal line. It can be distinguished from Craniophora fujianensis by its smaller size, with a wingspan of 32 mm compared to 35–38 mmin the two subspecies of Craniophora fujianensis and 33–40 mm in Craniophora harmandi; the slight black circle in the centre of the thoracic tuft; the white, curved, fine, comma-like basal mark (which is not quadrangular as in the two related taxa); the conspicuous, clear white inner stripe of the medial area along the broad black medial fascia; the more recognisable white outline of the orbicular and reniform stigmata; the longer basal black streak, the diluted blackish streak extending in the submedial fold from the middle of the medial line outward to the lowest part of the terminal line (tornal area) and the more uniform, light brownish-grey hindwing with a faint dark-brown discal spot, sinuous medial line and darker suffused terminal area. Additionally, in comparison with Craniophora harmandi, Craniophora sichuanensis has darker and narrower dark suffusion in the medial area, and lacks the large whitish area extending outward from the reniform stigma toward the apex and in the postmedial line. Craniophora sichuanensis is more distinct from Craniophora fujianensis, especially in the conspicuous clear white inner third of medial area. Male genitalia (Figs 11, 12): Uncus almost evenly slender and apically hooked, valvae spatulate, lacking corona, vesica almost even in width with two equally long, weak, slender spines and one shorter, broader, stout cornutus and the broad, sclerotised distal area covered by numerous almost straight parallel ribs. These genitalia features, as well as the overall smaller male genitalia, shorter, more asymmetrical, medially broadened valvae, and V-shaped vinculum, separate the new species from the two close relatives.

Female. Unknown.

Etymology.

The species name refers to the type locality in the Province of Sichuan, China.

Distribution.

The new species is known only from the Erlang Shan at the eastern edge of the Tibetan plateau in China’s Sichuan province. The single male was collected at ultraviolet light. The new species appeared with a very local distribution, as it was discovered in only one valley in mountainous region. The new species was collected in virgin mixed forest habitat dominated by various broad-leaved trees such as oaks (Quercus dentata Thunb., Quercus glauca Thunb.), poplars (Populus cathayana Rheder, Populus simonii Carrière), elm (Ulmus parvifolia Jacq.), rhododendrons (Rhododendron brachycarpum D. Don ex G. Don, Rhododendron dauricum L.), and bamboos (Phyllostachys ssp., Borinda ssp., Fargesia spp.). Adults are on the wing with many other late summer Noctuidae species, such as Pareuplexia chalybeate (Moore, 1867), Blepharosis bryocharis Boursin, 1964, Blepharosis lamida (Draudt, 1950) and Amphipyra amentet Babics, Benedek & Saldaitis, 2013.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Aidas Saldaitis (Vilnius, Lithuania) and Alessandro Floriani (Milano, Italy) for providing the HT of Craniophora sichuanensis to the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest; Zsolt Bálint (Budapest, Hungary) for allowing us the use of a microscope to digitalize the slides, and for loaning material from the HNHM, Budapest; Zoltán Varga (Debrecen, Hungary) and László Ronkay (Budapest, Hungary) for their suggestions and checking the manuscript; Edvárd Mizsei (Debrecen, Hungary) for providing technical help with the photographs of adults.

This paper was supported by the OTKA (K-84071) and TÁMOP 4.2.4. A/1-11-1-2012-0001 “National Excellence Program – Elaborating and operating an inland student and researcher personal support system.” The project was subsidized by the European Union and co-financed by the European Social Fund.

References
Chen YX (1999) Fauna Sinica: Insecta, Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Vol. 16. Science Press, Beijing, 1596 pp.
Draudt M (1937) Neue Agrotiden (= Noctuiden)-Arten und Formen aus den Ausbeuten von Herrn H. Höne, Shanghai. Entomologische Rundschau 54: 373–376, 381–384, 397–401.
Draudt M (1950) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Agrotiden-Fauna Chinas aus den Ausbeuten Dr. H. Höne’s. Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft 40(1): 1-174.
Hampson GF (1909) Catalogue of the Lepidoptera Phalaenae in the British museum, Volume 8. British Museum Trustees, Taylor and Francis, London, 583 pp.
Han HL, Kononenko VS (2010) New species of the genera Acronicta Ochsenheimer, 1816 and Craniophora Snellen, 1867 from China with notes on synonymy and checklist (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae: Acronictinae). Zootaxa 2678: 48-68.
Holloway JD (1989) The Moths of Borneo Part 12 – Family Noctuidae, Trifine Subfamilies: Noctuinae, Heliothinae, Hadeninae, Acronictinae, Amphipyrinae, Agaristinae. Southdene Sdn. Bhd., Kuala Lumpur. http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-12/ [accessed 19. Jun. 2013]
Fibiger M, Ronkay L, Steiner A, Zilli A (2009) Pantheinae, Dilobinae, Acronictinae, Eustrotiinae, Nolinae, Bagisarinae, Acontiinae, Metoponiinae, Heliothinae and Bryophilinae. Noctuidae Europaeae. Vol. 11. Entomological Press, Sorø, 410 pp.
Inoue H, Sugi S (1958) Checklist of the Lepidoptera of Japan. Noctuidae, Vol 5. Rikusuisha, Tokyo, 431–619 pp.
Inoue H, Sugi S, Kuroko H, Moriuti S, Kawabe A (1982) Moths of Japan, 2 volumes. Kodansha, Tokyo.
Kononenko VS (2005) An annotated Check list of the Noctuidae (s.l.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea: Nolidae, Erebidae, Micronoctuidae, Noctuidae) of the Asian part of Russia and the Ural region. Noctuidae Sibiricae, Vol. 1. Entomological Press, Sorø, 243 pp.
Kononenko VS (2010) Micronoctuidae, Noctuidae: Rivulinae – Agaristinae (Lepidoptera). Noctuidae Sibiricae, Vol. 2. Entomological Press, Sorø, 475 pp.
Kononenko VS, Ahn SB, Ronkay L (1998) Illustrated Catalogue of Noctuidae in Korea, (Lepidoptera). Insects of Korea, Series 3. Junghaeng-Sa, Seul, Korea, 507 pp.
Kozhanchikov IV (1950) Lepidoptera, Orgyiidae, Fauna SSSR. Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of SSSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 581 pp. [in Russian]
de Lattin G (1949) Neue Acronicten II. Zeitschrift der Wiener Entomologischen Gesellschaft 34: 105-112.
Poole RW (1989) Noctuidae, Part 1. Lepidopterorum Catalogus (New Series), Fascicle 118. E.J. Brill, Leiden-New York, 500 pp.
Snellen PCT (1867) De Vlinders van Nederland, Macrolepidoptera systematisch beschreven. Martinus Nijhoff, Hague, 760 pp.
Yoshimoto H (1994) Moths of Nepal, Part 3, Noctuidae. Tinea 14(1): 95-139.