For a complete listing of the extensive generic synonymy of Anastatus see Gibson (1995) and Noyes (2019). Bouček (1977) recognized two subgenera in Anastatus, the nominate subgenus and A. (Cladanastatus) Bouček, 1979). Currently, the nominate subgenus comprises all presently described species except for the type species of A. (Cladanastatus). Females and males of Anastatus and A. (Anastatus) can be distinguished from those of other genera of Eupelminae using the key by Gibson (1995).

Female. Macropterous (Fig. 1A); fore wing with broad hyaline cross band behind marginal vein with similarly curved basal and apical margins so band uniformly wide, and without isolated dark setae medially (Fig. 1E). Mesosoma (excluding legs) dark except prepectus and lateral, vertical surface of pronotum entirely or mostly pale (Fig. 1A–D); procoxa dark, similar in color to prosternum and acropleuron (Fig. 1D). Mesoscutum with posterior concave portion almost entire setose (Fig. 1C). Mesotarsus with basal two tarsomeres infuscate over at least dorsal and posterior surfaces, obviously darker than subsequent two tarsomeres (Fig. 3F, G). Antenna with at least apical funicular slightly transverse and previous one or two funiculars subquadrate (Fig. 1B).

Male. Structure plus color, setal and sculptural patterns (Fig. 1F) similar to those described for A. gansuensis except clava at least about as long as combined length of fl6–fl8 + 0.25 apical length of fl5 (Fig. 1G, H), and sometimes as long as combined length of fl5–fl8, with fl8 quadrate to slightly transverse, fl7 quadrate to slightly longer than wide, and fl6 and fl5 longer than wide (Fig. 1H).

Anastatus fulloi (Genbank accession no. MK604241) was described originally from Jiangxi Province from two localities (Wuyi Mountains and Meiling) (Sheng et al. 1997) as detailed by Peng et al. (1997). We reared it in the field from the following two new localities: Gansu Province: Longnan City, collected 23.I.2018, Yong-Ming Chen (1♀, 1♂ AICF; 1♀, 1♂ BMNH; 19♀, 21♂ CNC; 5♀, 3♂ FAFU; 12♀,7♂ IZCAS; 1♀, 1♂ USNM). Liaoning Province: Benxi, Manchu Autonomous Co., Benxi City, Tai Shan Forest Farm, 23.IV.2017, Yong-Ming Chen.

The type series was reared from the eggs of the yellow spotted stink bug, Erthesina fullo (Thunberg, 1783) (Hemiptera, Pentatomidae). Here we newly report it as an egg parasitoid of the lepidopteran hosts C. japonica and, in the laboratory, A. pernyi.

Of the species we reared from C. japonica, females of A. fulloi are most similar to those of A. gansuensis because they are fully winged (cf. A. meilingensis) and have a dark acropleuron that does not contrast with the mesonotum (cf. A. japonicus). However, females differ from those of A. fulloi in color, setal and structural features, as given in the key to species and diagnoses.

Sheng et al. (1997, fig. 14) and Peng et al. (2017, figs 25, 26) described and illustrated the flagellar structure of males from the type series of A. fulloi reared from E. fullo; they have the clava at least as long as the previous four segments combined. However, the males we reared with females from A. pernyi eggs that we identify as A. fulloi have the clava quite obviously shorter than the combined length of the four preceding funiculars (Figs 1G, H), being about as long as the combined length of fl6–fl8 plus about the apical quarter (Fig. 1H) to half of fl5. The difference between the flagellar structures observed between our males and those of the type series could be explained by populational or host correlated differences or, perhaps, indicate two cryptic species that are more host-taxon restricted than is currently considered for A. fulloi. Regardless, compared to males of A. gansuensis (Fig. 4H) and A. meilingensis (Fig. 6H), males of A. fulloi (Fig. 1H) have somewhat short apical funiculars so that the clava relative to the combined length of the funiculars is greater. Because of similarity in their flagellar structures (cf. Figs 1H, 5H) we cannot currently reliably differentiate A. fulloi from A. japonicus males.

Holotype ♀ (FAFU), Shanchacun, Yuntai Town, Kangxian County, Gansu Province, China, 01.III.2017, Yong-Ming Chen. Allotype ♂ (FAFU), same data as holotype (from subsequently established colony on A. pernyi).

Same data as holotype (2♀, 1♂ FAFU). Gansu Province, Kang Co., Longnan City, collected 23.I.2018, Yong-Ming Chen, ex. Caligula japonica Moore egg, lab reared on eggs of Antheraea pernyi (Guérin-Méneville) (Lep: Saturniidae) (2♀, 1♂ AICF; 2♀, 1♂ BMNH; 67♀, 18♂ CNC; 5♀, 3♂ FAFU; 6♀ IZCAS; 2♀, 1♂ USNM).

Female. Macropterous (Fig. 2B); fore wing with broad hyaline cross band behind marginal vein and with apical margin more distinctly angulate (V-like) than basal margin such that length of hyaline band along marginal vein about twice medial length of hyaline band (Fig. 3A), and usually with a few isolated dark setae within band medially (Fig. 3C). Mesosoma (excluding legs) dark except prepectus and pronotum or at least lateral, vertical surface of pronotum, pale (Fig. 2A, B, E, F); procoxa pale, similar in color to lateral surface of pronotum (Fig. 2F). Mesoscutum with posterior concave portion setose only medially, width of setose region about equal to width of bare region on either side (Fig. 2E). Mesotarsus (excluding tarsal pegs) with at least basal four tarsomeres similarly pale (Fig. 3C). Antenna with all funiculars (fl2–fl8) longer than wide (Fig. 2G–I).

Male. Legs with all femora mostly to entirely dark, mesotibia entirely pale, and metatibia mostly dark, pale basally for a distance at most equal to about apical width or about one-quarter length of tibia (Fig. 4B). Flagellum (Fig. 4G) with clava distinctly shorter than combined length of fl6–fl8, with at least fl6 and fl7 obviously longer than wide (Fig. 4H).

Female (habitus, Fig. 2A, B). Body length 2.2–3.9 mm.

Color. Head (Fig. 2C, D) mostly metallic green to bluish-green but with variably extensive and distinct coppery to reddish-violaceous lusters on at least parascrobal region and interantennal prominence (Fig. 2C) and sometimes on frontovertex, including ocellar triangle (Fig. 2D). Maxillary and labial palpi dark brown. Antenna with scape mostly pale, yellowish (Fig. 2G), except variably extensively darker brown and sometimes with slight metallic luster dorsoapically (Fig. 2C); pedicel and flagellum dark brown (Fig. 2G–I).

Pronotum mostly pale (Fig. 2E, F) except black posterolaterally anterior each spiracle, and concave, dorsomedial part often variably darker brownish (Fig. 2A, E); propleuron similarly pale as lateral surface of pronotum but prosternum dark. Mesonotum (Fig. 2E) mostly dark with metallic green to bluish-green lusters similar to head except convex part of mesoscutal medial lobe and/or scutellar-axillar complex anteriorly usually with slight coppery to reddish lusters, and concave posteromedial part of mesoscutum more distinctly blue to purple adjacent to medially dark violaceous to black setose part (Fig. 2E). Prepectus similarly pale as lateral surface of pronotum (Fig. 2F). Tegula dark brown. Mesopleurosternum mostly dark with greenish luster except variably distinctly paler anterodorsally near prepectus, the paler region at most extending to or slightly beyond level of base of tegula, and strigose medial part of acropleuron usually with slight coppery to reddish-violaceous lusters under some angles of light (Fig. 2F). Front leg with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus similarly pale as lateral surface of pronotum and prepectus; femur with anterior and/or dorsal surfaces and tibia with anterior surface similarly pale as coxa, but otherwise variably dark brown; tarsus with at least apical tarsomere brown but basal four tarsomeres pale to variably dark brown. Middle leg with trochanter and trochantellus at least ventrally dark; femur with dorsal surface longitudinally dark at least posteriorly, but ventral surface and usually dorsal surface anteriorly paler, and more whitish-translucent, anteroapically; tibia dark dorsally but paler basally, ventrally, and apically except for dark apical pegs; mesotibial spur and mesotarsus similarly pale, yellowish-white to white, except for dark pegs (Fig. 3E). Hind leg with at least ventral surface of trochanter and trochantellus dark; femur with dorsal and ventral surfaces paler than longitudinally dark anterior and posterior surfaces; tibia with dorsal surface dark but paler basally, apically and ventrally; tarsus with at least apical tarsomere brown and often one or two basal tarsomeres variably distinctly brownish. Macropterous, with fore wing extending beyond gastral apex when folded over dorsum (Fig. 2B); fore wing (Fig. 3A) with basal region mostly hyaline but brownish basally, with dark setae posteriorly along vanal and cubital areas and apically within basal brownish part (Fig. 3B), and hyaline part with whitish-translucent setae over at least about posterior half bare but behind length of SMV from level of base of parastigma; discal region (Fig. 3A) brownish from base of parastigma to level slightly beyond apex of PMV but hyaline towards wing apex and with complete hyaline cross band behind MV; hyaline cross band with white hair-like setae except for a few isolated dark setae within band medially (Fig. 3C), with apical margin reaching base of STV along leading margin and noticeably angulate compared to more evenly curved basal margin such that length of hyaline band along MV is about twice medial length (Fig. 3A); brownish region basal to hyaline cross band with slightly lanceolate dark brown setae except often for variably distinct, more orangish region of lanceolate setae behind parastigma and base of MV anterior to medial fold (when apparent, orangish region of setae reaching parastigma and base of MV, but at least narrowly separated by dark brown setae from basal cell basally and hyaline cross vein apically, Fig. 3B), and with entirely dark setae beyond hyaline cross band, the setae slightly lanceolate behind venation but more hair-like apically within more hyaline part. Metanotum and propodeum (Fig. 2E) dark brown or with slight metallic purple luster.

Gaster (Fig. 3D) mostly dark but syntergal flange and ovipositor sheaths pale, yellowish; in dorsal view Gt1 brown basally and variably extensively white apically and Gt2 translucent-hyaline so with sub-basal whitish region (Fig. 3D), but in lateral view basal two sternites entirely white (Fig. 2B); Gt3–Gt5 dark brown or with slight violaceous luster, and Gt6 and syntergum except for flange with green to bluish luster (Fig. 3D).

Setation. Head with slightly lanceolate, whitish-translucent setae on lower face, interantennal prominence, lower parascrobal region (Fig. 2C) and gena behind eye (Fig. 2B, D), and with dark hair-like setae on upper parascrobal region and frontovertex (Fig. 2D).

Pronotum mostly bare but with a few long, bristle-like setae in transverse line anterior to spiracle and similar seta medially on either side of mediolongitudinal groove (Fig. 2E). Mesonotum (Fig. 2E) with convex anteromedial mesoscutal lobe, uniformly, inconspicuously setose with whitish hair-like setae, outer convex surface of lateral lobe laterally with 1–2 rows of somewhat longer whitish setae, and posteromedial concave part of mesoscutum with more conspicuous, very slightly lanceolate white setae medially, the region of white setae about as wide as bare region on either side of band and not extending to line of dark hair-like setae on inner inclined surface of lateral lobe near dorsally carinate posteromedial part of lateral lobe; scutellar-axillar complex bare, except for dark setae laterally on axillae and posterolaterally on scutellum, the posteriormost setae somewhat longer and more bristle-like than others. Mesopleurosternum sparsely setose with whitish-translucent hair-like setae ventrally and more densely, uniformly setose with very slightly lanceolate whitish-translucent setae anterolaterally to level about equal with apex of tegula; acropleuron bare (Fig. 2F). Propodeum bare except for a few slightly lanceolate white setae along anterior margin lateral of spiracle and along extreme lateral margin (Fig. 2E).

Structure. Head in frontal view (Fig. 2C) about 1.3× wider than high; in dorsal view (Fig. 2D) width about 2× length and about 3.5× minimum distance between eyes, with vertex gradually curved to occiput without margin or carina; in lateral view about 1.6× higher than long; eye height about 2× length of malar space; OOL: LOL: POL: MPOD (holotype) = 3: 6: 11.4: 6.2; scrobal depression (Fig. 1C) with abrupt to carinate margins laterally but dorsally margins less distinct and not complete below anterior ocellus, separated medially by short, lighter colored line or vertical ridge below ocellus, with indistinctly delimited dorsal margin separated from anterior ocellus by distance slightly less than longitudinal diameter of ocellus. Antenna (holotype) with relative length (width) of scape = 43(7); pedicel = 10(5); fl1–fl8 = 4(5), 13(6), 15(6), 16(7), 14(7), 14(7.5), 12(8), 11(8); clava 23(9).

Mesoscutum (Fig. 2E) slightly wider than long, with anterior, convex part of medial lobe V-shaped with slightly sinuate to slightly outcurved sides convergent posteriorly for about 0.7× medial length of mesoscutum; lateral lobe carinately margined over almost posterior half; medial length of scutellar-axillar complex, including frenal area, about as long as maximum width with scutellum about 1.25× as long as own width, Fore wing about 2.7× as long as maximum width; smv: mv: pmv: stv (holotype) = 51: 70: 33: 10. Propodeum typical of genus, bowtie-like (Fig. 2E). Profemur with ventral margin evenly arched, without abrupt angulation or denticle within about apical third, and with 2 or 3 dorsoapical pegs. Mesotibia with apical patch of 3–6 pegs (Fig. 3E). Mesotarsus with single row of pegs on either side of basal three tarsomeres and single peg apically on either side of penultimate tarsomere (Fig. 3E).

Gaster with ovipositor sheaths at least slightly protruding beyond syntergal flange (Fig. 3D), but for distance up to about 2× length of flange.

Sculpture. Head with vertex and interocellar triangle transversely alutaceous to alutaceous-strigose, upper parascrobal region and frons to posterior ocelli on either side of anterior ocellus more mesh-like coriaceous to coriaceous-imbricate or coriaceous-granular, and lower half of parascrobal region reticulate-rugulose; lower face reticulate to reticulate-rugose; interantennal prominence reticulate-imbricate; scrobal depression mostly reticulate-imbricate.

Mesoscutum with convex anterior part of medial lobe uniformly punctate-reticulate, posteromedial concave part or medial lobe smooth and shiny, and lateral lobes mostly finely mesh-like coriaceous to alutaceous, with sculpture of inner inclined surfaces more distinct lateral of anteromedial lobe and much finer to smooth and shiny posteriorly near scutellar-axillar complex. Scutellar-axillar complex uniformly, similarly punctate-reticulate as convex part of medial lobe. Mesopleurosternum with anterolateral region finely mesh-like coriaceous but dorsally bare part near tegula more alutaceous-coriaceous; acropleuron mostly longitudinally strigose, more minutely centrally, sculpture dorsally and ventrally more longitudinally strigose-coriaceous and posteriorly mesh-like coriaceous with larger cell size.

Gaster (Fig. 3D) with Gt1 and Gt2 dorsally almost smooth, only obscurely and very finely mesh-like coriaceous, Gt3–Gt5 more distinctly, somewhat transversely, coriaceous-reticulate with sculpture defined by slightly raised lines, and Gt6 and syntergum more transversely coriaceous-alutaceous to mesh-like coriaceous.

Male (habitus, Fig. 4A, B). Body length 2.0–2.2 mm.

Color. Head with frontal surface (Fig. 4C) mostly green to bluish-green, frontovertex variably extensively dark or with slight coppery to reddish-violaceous lusters (Fig. 4A, C). Maxillary and labial palpi dark brown. Antennae with scape mostly yellow, but dorsoapically dark with variably distinct metallic green luster (Fig. 4G); pedicel dark except ventral surface usually paler; flagellum uniformly dark such that mps not conspicuous from surrounding cuticle (Fig. 4G).

Mesosoma (Fig. 4A, B, D) dark with mostly green to bluish-green lusters, though scutellar-axillar complex (Fig. 4A) and dorsellum (Fig. 4E) dark with coppery to reddish-violaceous lusters similar to frontovertex, propodeum (Fig. 4E) more distinctly blue to purple, and mesepisternum posteriorly near metapleuron usually more violaceous (Fig. 4D). Front leg with coxa, trochanter and most of femur dark, but following pale: trochantellus, femur apically, tibia except for dark mesotibial apical pegs, and tarsus except pale often apical tarsomere variably darker brown. Middle leg color pattern similar to front leg except femur often somewhat more extensively pale apically or dorsoapically along anterior margin and apical tarsomere more distinctly dark, but mesotibial spur similarly pale as basal four tarsomeres. Hind leg mostly dark but at least ventral surface of trochantellus, tibia basally for distance less than one-third length of tibia, and basal four tarsomeres pale (Fig. 4B). Fore wing entirely hyaline with yellowish to yellowish-brown venation and dark, hair-like setae.

Gaster mostly dark brown but with variably distinct metallic green luster dorsobasally on Gt1 (Fig. 4B).

Setation. Head with very slightly lanceolate white setae on lower face, interantennal prominence and parascrobal region ventrally, but more hair-like dark setae on parascrobal region dorsally and frontovertex (Fig. 4C), and hair-like white setae on gena. Mesonotum with dark hair-like setae (Fig. 4D), the setae slightly longer and more bristle-like on scutellum. Fore wing (Fig. 4F) cubital cell ventrally with 3–4 rows of setae along entire length and dorsally with line of setae along entire leading margin and at least a partial second row behind first row; basal cell and disk entirely setose except for slender speculum along length of basal fold from parastigma to medial fold, though this variably obscured by setae on ventral surface at least toward parastigma.

Structure. Head in frontal view (Fig. 4C) about 1.2× wider than high, in dorsal view (Fig. 4A) about 2.1× wider than long, and in lateral view (Fig. 4B) about 1.8× higher than long; OOL: LOL: POL: MPOD (allotype) = 1.0: 1.6: 4.0: 1.6. scrobal depression (Fig. 4C) shallow, arch-like, with inclined lateral surfaces extending obscurely to anterior ocellus, but flat surface of depression above toruli usually separated from anterior ocellus by pale, yellowish line almost equal in length to longitudinal diameter of ocellus. Antenna (Fig. 4G) with scape almost 3× as long as maximum width; pedicel subglobular, as long as wide; length of pedicel + flagellum about 2.4× head width; flagellum densely microsetose with numerous rows of densely packed mps (Fig. 4G); fl1 strongly discoidal, not evident between scape and fl2; fl2 dorsoventrally flattened so as to be wider than high and in lateral view distinctly curved with ventral surface concave, but subsequent flagellomeres increasingly subcylindrical and straight (Fig. 4G); length(width) of fl2–fl8 and clava in lateral view (allotype): 24(10), 17(10), 17(10), 14(10), 14(10), 13(10), 10(10), 44(11) (Fig. 4G, H).

Structure of mesosoma and gaster (Fig. 4A–D) typical for the genus. Fore wing (Fig. 4F) 2.2–2.3× as long as wide; SMV: MV: PMV: STV (allotype) = 20: 11: 8.3: 4.7. Protibia with two dorsoapical spicules. Mid leg with spur about as long as basitarsus.

Sculpture. Head with vertex reticulate-rugose to transversely reticulate-strigose; frons and parascrobal regions mesh-like coriaceous to granular, lower face shallowly reticulate to reticulate-imbricate.

Mesoscutum (Fig. 4A) with medial lobe usually more coarsely reticulate-rugulose anteriorly, but at least about posterior two-thirds mesh-like reticulate except sculpture variably extensively finer laterally near notauli and sometimes posteriorly near transscutal articulation, and lateral lobe mostly mesh-like coriaceous; scutellar-axillar complex with dorsal surface of axilla variably distinctly reticulate-rugulose, but larger inclined lateral surface obliquely alutaceous-strigose, and scutellum usually at least slightly reticulate anteromedially but more mesh-like coriaceous to coriaceous-imbricate laterally and posteriorly. Propodeum (Fig. 4E) with complete medial carina; plical region smooth and shiny or at most with extremely obscure mesh-like coriaceous sculpture.

Anastatus gansuensis (Genbank accession no. MK373759) originally described from China (Gansu Province).

Solitary endo-parasitoid of the eggs of C. japonica in the field and, at least in the laboratory, of A. pernyi. Caligula japonica has one generation a year and overwinters in the egg stage; its egg-laying period is from late August to late October in northwestern China (Qiao et al. 2014). In the winter of 2017 were collected a total 283 egg masses of C. japonica from Gansu Province and reared them in the laboratory (T: 25±1° C, RH: 70±5%, L: D=14h: 10h). Of these, 12 egg masses (4.2%) were parasitized by A. gansuensis. All the emerged wasps of A. gansuensis were females. These were subsequently offered the eggs of A. pernyi in the laboratory as an alternative host for propagation, which led to the discovery that A. gansuensis is thelytokous parthenogenetic. When unmated females were reared on A. pernyi eggs in the laboratory both sexes were produced in a highly female-biased sex ratio (sex ratio about 113:1, ♀:♂ = 5987:53; N =29). There can be 12–14 generations in one year, with one generation completed in 28–33 days under a 25±1° C temperature and 70±5% humidity regime. The average longevity and fecundity of a female (N =29) was 67 (37–93) days and 303 (68–506) eggs, respectively, when fed with honey water (honey: water = 3:7). The results of our rearing experiments indicate that this species has potential as a biological control agent for suppression of C. japonica.

Derived from the name of the province in China from which the type series was originally collected through rearing.

Because of their dark acropleuron, females of A. gansuensis key most closely to females of A. fulloi in Peng et al. (2017), but the two are readily differentiated by the color, setal and structural features as given in the key and diagnoses. Females key to A. tenuipes Bolivar y Pieltain, 1925 in Narendran (2009), in part because the apical margin of the hyaline cross band is angulate and all funiculars are longer than wide in both, but A. tenuipes females are readily differentiated by their pale mesosoma. Similarly, depending on the interpretation of whether or not the scrobal depression “by far” does not reach the anterior ocellus, A. gansuensis females could key to A. tenuipes in Kalina (1981) or to A. splendens Nikol’skaya, 1952 and A. brevicaudus Kalina, 1981. However, in contrast to the key features of Kalina (1981), the mesoscutum is slightly wider than long (Fig. 2E), unlike that keyed for A. splendens and the anterior convex portion of the mesoscutal medial lobe is triangular with gradually convergent sides (Fig. 2E), unlike that keyed for A. brevicaudus. Furthermore, females of both A. brevicaudus (Kalina 1981, fig. 14) and A. splendens have at least the apical two funiculars subquadrate to slightly transverse and the acropleuron pale to coppery.

Two features of the fore wing of female A. gansuensis are not apparent in all females: the presence of isolated dark setae within the hyaline cross band medially (Fig. 3C) and a region of more orangish setae behind the parastigma and base of the marginal vein anterior to the medial fold (Fig. 3B). Although the latter feature is distinctive it is not unique to A. gansuensis, being possessed also by the brachypterous females of A. meilingensis (Fig. 6E) and by some females we recognize as A. japonicus, but not by A. fulloi females.

As noted under A. fulloi, a flagellar structure differentiates males of both A. gansuensis and A. meilingensis from those of A. fulloi and A. japonicus. Males of the former two species have the clava distinctly shorter than the combined length of the three apical funiculars (Figs 4H, 6H) whereas males of the latter two species have the clava at least as long and sometimes distinctly longer than the combined length of the three apical funiculars (Figs 1H, 5H).

Female. Macropterous (Fig. 5A, B); fore wing with broad hyaline cross band behind marginal vein with similarly curved basal and apical margins so band uniformly wide, and without isolated dark setae medially (Fig. 5E). Mesosoma (excluding legs) with mesonotum, prosternum and usually acropleuron anteriorly dark, but at least about posterior two-thirds of acropleuron, pronotum except for dark spot anterior to each spiracle (Fig. 5B, D), prepectus (Fig. 5D), and tegula at least basally (Fig. 5C) contrastingly paler; procoxa, except often in part laterally (Fig. 5D), similarly pale as pronotum and acropleuron posteriorly; mesotarsus with all tarsomeres similarly pale yellowish to white or with basal two tarsomeres only inconspicuously darker infuscate in part (Fig. 5B). Mesoscutum with posterior concave part comparatively broadly setose but white setae not attaining lateral margins (Fig. 5C). Antenna with at least apical funicular slightly transverse and previous one or two funiculars subquadrate.

Male. Structure as well as color, setae and sculptural patterns (Fig. 5F) similar to those described for A. gansuensis except clava at least about as long as combined length of fl6–fl8 (Fig. 5H), with fl8 and fl7 slightly transverse to quadrate and fl6 and fl5 slightly longer than wide (Fig. 5H).

Anastatus japonicus (Genbank accession no. MK604240) was reported previously from China (Beijing, Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hong Kong, Jiangsu, Jilin, Liaoning, Shaanxi, Shandong) by several authors (Han et al. 1999; He 2001; He et al. 2001). We reared it in the field from the following localities: Gansu Province: Kang Co., Longnan City, collected 23.I.2018, Yong-Ming Chen (1♀, 1♂ AICF; 1♀, 1♂ BMNH; 21♀, 16♂ CNC; 5♀, 3♂ FAFU; 7♀,6♂ IZCAS; 1♀, 1♂ USNM). Jilin Province: Changchun City, Jilin Agricultural University, 20.VII.2017, Yong-Ming Chen (1♀, 1♂ AICF; 1♀, 1♂ BMNH; 33♀, 17♂ CNC; 1♀, 1♂ USNM).

Extralimital distribution listed for A. japonicus by Noyes (2019) includes at least one country from all biogeographic regions except the Neotropical. It is widely distributed throughout the entire Palaearctic region where it is native.

Noyes (2019) lists A. japonicus as a parasitoid of over 15 host species in two families of Hemiptera (Alydidae, Pentatomidae) and five families of Lepidoptera (Lymantriinae (Erebidae), Lasiocampidae, Notodontidae, Papilionidae, Saturniidae), sometimes as a hyperparasitoid through Braconidae and Encyrtidae primary parasitoids (Peck 1963; Kochetova 1968). It was reared in China previously on A. pernyi (Wu et al. 2000) and it has been utilized for biocontrol of the litchi stink bug, T. papillosa, being identified in the literature most commonly either as Anastatus sp. (Lu and Yang 1983; Lin and Lin 1998) or as A. japonicus (Xin and Li 1989, 1990; Tang et al. 1993; Xian et al. 2008; Li et al. 2017). Here we newly report it as an egg parasitoid of C. japonica.

Females of A. japonicus are most easily distinguished from two species with macropterous females reared from C. japonica by the acropleuron being extensively paler, lighter brown to yellowish (Fig. 5D), in contrast with its dark mesonotum (Fig. 5C). Females of A. fulloi and A. gansuensis either have the acropleuron entirely dark (Fig. 1D, 2F), similar in color to the mesonotum, or paler anteriorly only near the base of the prepectus (Fig. 2F).

As noted under A. fulloi, males of A. japonicus and A. fulloi are differentiated from those of A. gansuensis and A. meilingensis by a longer clava relative to the combined length of the apical funiculars. This is because in A. fulloi (Fig. 1H) and A. japonicus (Fig. 5H) the apical funiculars are somewhat shorter compared to those of A. gansuensis (Fig. 4H) and A. meilingensis (Fig. 6H). Currently, we cannot reliably differentiate A. japonicus from A. fulloi males.

Female. Brachypterous, fore wing extending only to about level of posterior margin of Gt1 when body uncontorted (Fig. 6A, B); basal 0.6× (basal region) hyaline and much more sparsely setose than densely setose apical 0.4× (discal region) (Fig. 6C); basal region with slightly lanceolate dark setae extending from discal region for half-length within slender vanal region and with white or mostly white hair-like setae immediately anterior to venal fold and at least narrowly along base of discal region, though often bare behind submarginal vein; discal region uniformly covered with slightly lanceolate dark setae except for conspicuous region of orangish setae medially and often variably conspicuous but slender, sometimes interrupted remnant of hyaline cross band apically (Fig. 6: cbr), with orangish setae extending at least to leading margin, including part of marginal vein, though sometimes not to posterior margin of wing so as to be enclosed by dark setae basally and apically and sometimes posteriorly; submarginal vein, including parastigma, extending slightly beyond basal region and partly orangish marginal vein extending most of length of discal region, without differentiated stigmal or postmarginal veins. Mesosoma (excluding legs) with prosternum dark but pronotum mostly pale except for dark spot anterior to each spiracle (Fig. 6C) and posterolateral, vertical surface (panel) often brown to dark (Fig. 6D); prepectus (Fig. 6D) and tegula (Fig. 6C) at least basally pale; mesonotum (Fig. 6C) with scutellar-axillar complex and mesoscutum medially dark, but mesoscutal lateral lobes with at least outer, inclined surfaces partly to mostly pale; acropleuron mostly pale except dark anteriorly in region ventral to tegula (Fig. 6D); procoxa, except often in part laterally, similarly pale as at least anterolateral surface of pronotum and most of acropleuron (Fig. 6D); mesotarsus with all tarsomeres similarly pale yellowish to white (Fig. 6B). Mesoscutum with posterior concave part completely setose with white setae (Fig. 6C). Antenna with at least apical funicular subquadrate and previous two funiculars only slightly longer than wide.

Male. Structure as well as color, setae and sculptural patterns (Fig. 6F–H) similar to those described for A. gansuensis except about basal half of metatibia pale and apical half lighter brown, lighter in color than respective femur (Fig. 6F).

Anastatus meilingensis (Genbank accession no. MK604242) was described originally from Jiangxi Province from three localities (Shangrao, Yushan, and Meiling, Nanchang) as detailed by Peng et al. (2017). We reared A. fulloi in the field from the following new locality: Gansu Province: Kang Co., Longnan City, 23.I.2018, Yong-Ming Chen (2♀, 2♂ AICF; 2♀, 2♂ BMNH; 58♀, 36♂ CNC; 5♀, 3♂ FAFU; 15♀,12♂ IZCAS; 2♀, 2♂ USNM).

Originally described reared from the eggs of the pine moth, Dendrolimus punctatus Walker, and of the Simao pine moth, D. kikuchii Matsumura (Lepidoptera, Lasiocampidae) (Sheng and Yu 1988). Here we newly report it as an egg parasitoid of C. japonica and, in the laboratory, of A. pernyi.

Of the species we reared from C. japonica, females of A. meilingensis are readily distinguished because they are the only ones that are brachypterous. The fore wing color pattern, with the discal region having a distinct region of orangish setae behind the venation and often also a slender remnant of a hyaline cross band more apically (Fig. 6E: cbr), is unique among described Anastatus species with brachypterous females. However, except for the reduced hyaline cross band, the setal pattern is similar to that described for A. gansuensis. Females of one other described Anastatus species from China, those of A. huangi Sheng & Yu (1998), are also brachypterous. However, the reduced fore wings of female A. huangi have a color pattern more similar to macropterous females, having a distinct hyaline cross band with white, hair-like setae behind the marginal vein (Peng et al. 2017, fig. 32).

Although Sheng and Yu (1998) reared a single male as part of the type series of A. meilingensis this male was not found by Peng et al. (2017). The line drawn figure of the antenna stated as that of a male by Sheng and Yu (1998, fig. 4) is obviously that of a female because of the presence of a visible, anelliform fl1, and a three segmented clava. Of the species treated, males of A. meilingensis are mostly similar to those of A. gansuensis because both have a clava that is distinctly shorter than the combined length of the apical funiculars (Figs 4H, 6H). However, based on our reared material males of A. meilingensis have a different metatibial color pattern, the metatibia being more extensively pale basally and lighter brown apically than for males of A. gansuensis (cf. Figs 4B, 6F).