Research Article |
Corresponding author: Wilson J. E. M. Costa ( wcosta@acd.ufrj.br ) Academic editor: Maria Elina Bichuette
© 2019 Wilson J. E. M. Costa.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Costa WJEM (2019) Description of a new species of cynopoeciline killifish (Cyprinodontiformes, Aplocheilidae), possibly extinct, from the Atlantic Forest of south-eastern Brazil. ZooKeys 867: 73-85. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.867.34034
|
Specimens found between 1985 and 1988 in the Magé River Basin, south-eastern Brazil were misidentified as L. splendens. The recent rediscovery of other specimens in the Estrela River Basin near the type locality of L. splendens has clarified the species’ concept, making it possible to recognise the Magé River Basin specimens as a new species. The new species is herein described as Leptopanchax sanguineus sp. nov. and is distinguished from all other cynopoecilines by a unique colour pattern in males, including red bars with sinuous margins. It was collected in a well-preserved, temporary shallow swampy area within dense moist forest, but since 1990 the species has not been found again. Leptopanchax sanguineus sp. nov. is one of three species of cynopoeciline killifishes living in lowland moist forests of the coastal plains of Rio de Janeiro State, where the greatest diversity of endemic cynopoecilines is concentrated. Each of these species has been recorded a single time in the last 30 years, a surprisingly low record attributable to intense deforestation during the last several decades resulting in small fragmented lowland moist forests of today. This study indicates that seasonal killifishes adapted to uniquely live in this kind of habitat should be regarded with special concern in studies evaluating conservation priorities.
Biodiversity, conservation, moist tropical forest, systematics, taxonomy
The Atlantic Forest of south-eastern Brazil encompasses one of the most species-rich biota in the world, with a high diversity of plants and animals (
The greatest species diversity of cynopoecilines is concentrated in the coastal plains of Rio de Janeiro State, south-eastern Brazil (i.e., eight valid endemic species in three genera, of which two genera are endemic), with most taxa consisting of miniature species not surpassing 25 mm standard length (SL) and exhibiting high diversification of morphological traits (
Among areas of endemism for seasonal killifishes in the Rio de Janeiro coastal plains is the area encompassing river basins draining the southern flank of the coastal mountain range, Serra do Mar, and flowing into the Baía de Guanabara (i.e. Guanabara Bay area in
The description of the new species was based on specimens collected over 30 years ago and then preserved for study, deposited in the ichthyological collections of the Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (
Male fin morphology and life colour patterns in Leptopanchax. A coloured pencil drawing illustrating L. sanguineus sp. nov. in life, about 20 mm SL B L. splendens, UFRJ 6902, 22.7 mm SL C L. aureoguttatus, UFRJ 6331, 22.3 mm SL D L. itanhaensis, UFRJ 6453, 20.7 mm SL E L. citrinipinnis, UFRJ 8899, 20.6 mm SL F L. opalescens, UFRJ 8986, 20.2 mm SL.
Holotype | Paratypes | ||
male | male | male | |
Standard length (mm) | 20.9 | 20.8 | 20.6 |
% of standard length | |||
Body depth | 25.9 | 27.4 | 26.2 |
Caudal peduncle depth | 14.9 | 16.1 | 15.6 |
Pre-dorsal length | 61.0 | 61.8 | 59.7 |
Pre-pelvic length | 52.4 | 53.1 | 50.6 |
Length of dorsal-fin base | 25.7 | 25.1 | 26.4 |
Length of anal-fin base | 31.4 | 29.0 | 31.4 |
Caudal-fin length | 35.3 | -* | 34.7 |
Pectoral-fin length | 22.3 | 22.5 | 21.2 |
Pelvic-fin length | 9.1 | 9.4 | 8.9 |
Head length | 29.6 | 29.8 | 31.1 |
% of head length | |||
Head depth | 76.7 | 77.4 | 77.4 |
Head width | 71.0 | 75.2 | 69.5 |
Snout length | 10.2 | 11.1 | 10.9 |
Lower jaw length | 20.9 | 21.6 | 17.3 |
Eye diameter | 36.1 | 36.5 | 33.8 |
Leptopanchax sanguineus differs from other cynopoecilines, except L. splendens, by the presence of red bars on the whole flank in males (vs. absence); uniquely in L. sanguineus, the bars are broad, wider than the interspace width (vs. narrow, half interspace width or less) and have sinuous margins (vs. straight). Leptopanchax sanguineus is further distinguished from L. splendens by having 15 dorsal-fin rays (vs. 12–14), 6 pelvic-fin rays (vs. 5), 27 scales on the longitudinal series and 9 on the transverse series (vs. 24–25 and 7, respectively), 29 vertebrae (vs. 26–27), pelvic fin tip posteriorly reaching the anal fin in males (vs. reaching urogenital papilla), pelvic-fin bases medially separated, in close proximity (vs. medially united), absence of filamentous rays on the caudal fin (vs. short filamentous rays on the posterior margin of the caudal fin in males), presence of a golden stripe on the distal margin of the dorsal fin in males (vs. white stripe), absence of contact organs on the male pectoral fin (vs. presence) and absence of the dermosphenotic bone (vs. presence). Leptopanchax sanguineus also differs from L. splendens and all other cynopoecilines by the presence of a small red spot on the posterior portion of the iris (vs. spot absent).
Morphometric data appear in Table
Dorsal fin subtriangular, pointed and terminating in short filamentous ray in males, its tip posteriorly reaching vertical through caudal-fin base; dorsal fin slightly pointed to rounded in females. Anal fin sub-rectangular, pointed and longer posteriorly in males, rounded in females. Caudal fin elliptical to sub-lanceolate in males, slightly longer than deep, often posteriorly terminating in minute tip; caudal fin elliptical in females. Pectoral fin elliptical, posterior margin reaching between base of pelvic-fin base and anus. Pelvic fin small, tip reaching anal-fin origin; pelvic-fin bases separated, medially in close proximity. Dorsal-fin origin at vertical between base of 4th and 5th anal-fin rays. Dorsal-fin rays 15; anal-fin rays 18; caudal-fin rays 28; pectoral-fin rays 15; pelvic-fin rays 6. No contact organs on fins. Four neuromasts on caudal-fin base. Total vertebrae 29.
Scales small, cycloid. Body and head entirely scaled, except anterior ventral surface of head. Body squamation extending over anterior 20 % of caudal-fin base; no scales on dorsal, anal and pectoral-fin bases. Frontal squamation E-patterned; E-scales not overlapping medially; supraorbital scales absent. Longitudinal series of scales 27; transverse series of scales 9; scale rows around caudal peduncle 12. Three, or four, minute contact organ per scale of ventral portion of flank in males. Cephalic neuromasts: supraorbital 1 + 10; parietal 1; anterior rostral 1, posterior rostral 1; infraorbital 1 + 15; preorbital 3; otic 1, post-otic 2; supratemporal 1; median opercular 1, ventral opercular 1; pre-opercular 11, mandibular 7; lateral mandibular 4, paramandibular 1.
Males . Flank light metallic blue with 12 or 13 red bars, wider than interspace, margins sinuous producing overall zigzag shape. Dorsum pale yellowish brown, venter pale blue with red bars. Head light blue to greenish blue on opercle, with red reticulation; red stripe between orbit and middle opercle. Jaws red. Ventral surface of head pale blue, scale margin red. Iris bright blue, with dark reddish-brown bar through orbit centre, and small red spot on its posterior margin. Unpaired fins red with metallic blue to greenish-blue vertical vermiculate marks; broad golden stripe on distal margin of dorsal fin. Pelvic fin red with bright blue margin. Pectoral fin hyaline.
Females. Flank pale brownish grey. Dorsum pale brown, venter white. Head side grey, with pale golden iridescence on opercle. Iris yellow, with dark brownish grey bar through orbit centre, and small red spot on its posterior margin. Fins hyaline.
In both sexes, specimens with head and flank pale brown; fins hyaline in females, hyaline with pale brown pigmentation in males.
Leptopanchax sanguineus is known from specimens collected between 1985 and 1987, from a single locality (Fig.
In 1988, some killifish breeders tried to breed L. sanguineus in aquaria, but offspring contained only male specimens (J. C. Ghisolfi pers. comm. 1990). Between 1989 and 2000, annual attempts were made to collect the species again. Using GPS, the exact point of the original collection was recorded and new sites were sampled, but no specimen was found. In 2001, monthly collections were made but again no specimen of L. sanguineus was found. The shallow temporary swamp channels disappeared, probably as a result of the lowering of the water table caused by the diversion of waters from the streams to supply an ornamental fish farm in the vicinity of the forest (
The name sanguineus, from the Latin, meaning blood-coloured, is an allusion to the predominantly red colouration in males, unique among Neotropical killifishes.
Morphological data of L. sanguineus, then identified as L. splendens, were used in a phylogenetic analysis of the Cynopoecilini (
The recent rediscovery of L. splendens poses some incongruence in its positioning. This species also has a red stripe between the orbit and the preopercle and shares with L. sanguineus the presence of red bars on the whole flank and blue iris in males (Fig.
Leptopanchax sanguineus, known from a single locality, is a typical moist-forest species, an ecological adaptation considered to have arisen three times independently among cynopoecilines (
1 | Flank in males with continuous longitudinal rows of iridescent light blue to yellowish green spots on each scale (Fig. |
2 |
– | Flank in males with interrupted zones of iridescent marks (Fig. |
3 |
2 | Well-delimited dark-red stripe on distal margins of dorsal and anal fins in males (Fig. |
L. opalescens |
– | Diffuse dark-reddish brown pigmentation on distal margins of dorsal and anal fins in males (Fig. |
L. citrinipinnis |
3 | Iris bright greenish yellow in males (Fig. |
4 |
– | Iris bright blue in males (Fig. |
5 |
4 | Two dark-red stripes along entire dorsal and ventral submarginal parts of caudal fin in males (Fig. |
L. aureoguttatus |
– | Two dark-red stripes on anterior portion of dorsal and ventral submarginal parts of caudal fin in males (Fig. |
L. itanhaensis |
5 | Flank in males with narrow red bars, narrower than interspace width, with straight margins (Fig. |
L. splendens |
– | Flank in males with broad red bars, wider than interspace width, with sinuous margins (Fig. |
L. sanguineus sp. nov. |
Thanks are due to M. Britto and C. Moreira for hospitality and assistance during visits to their institution, to J. L. Mattos for photographing L. splendens, P. F. Amorim for assistance in the laboratory, and to M. Moutinho for supporting several field studies in the Campo Escoteiro Geraldo Hugo Nunes. A former version of the manuscript befitted from the criticisms provided by P. Buckup and J. Maldonado. This study was supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Ministério de Ciência e Tecnologia, grant number 307349/2015-2) and FAPERJ (Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, grant number E-26/202.954/2017).