ZooKeys 318: 91–111, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.318.5226
Fossils from the Middle Jurassic of China shed light on morphology of Choristopsychidae (Insecta, Mecoptera)
Xiao Qiao 1,†, Chung Kun Shih 1,‡, Julian F. Petrulevičius 2,§, Ren Dong 1,|
1 Key Lab of Insect Evolution & Environmental Change, College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China
2 Museo de La Plata, División Paleozoología Invertebrados - UNLP, Paseo del Bosque s/n, La Plata (1900), and CONICET, Argentina

Corresponding author: Ren Dong (rendong@mail.cnu.edu.cn)

Academic editor: Michael Engel

received 29 March 2013 | accepted 19 July 2013 | Published 26 July 2013


(C) 2013 Xiao Qiao. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.

Citation: Qiao X, Shih CK, Petrulevičius JF, Ren Dong R (2013) Fossils from the Middle Jurassic of China shed light on morphology of Choristopsychidae (Insecta, Mecoptera). ZooKeys 318: 91–111. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.318.5226

Abstract

Choristopsychidae, established by Martynov in 1937 with a single isolated forewing, is a little known extinct family in Mecoptera. Since then, no new members of this enigmatic family have been described. Based on 23 well-preserved specimens with complete body and wings from the Middle Jurassic of northeastern China, we report one new genus and three new species of Choristopsychidae, two new species of the genus Choristopsyche Martynov, 1937: Choristopsyche perfecta sp. n. and Choristopsyche asticta sp. n.; one new species of Paristopsyche gen. n.: Paristopsyche angelineae sp. n.; and re-describe Choristopsyche tenuinervis Martynov, 1937. In addition, we emend the diagnoses of Choristopsychidae and Choristopsyche. Analyzing the forewing length/width ratios of representative species in Mecoptera, we confirm that choristopsychids have the lowest ratio of forewing length/width, meaning broadest forewings. These findings, the first fossil choristopsychids with well-preserved body structure and the first record of Choristopsychidae in China, shed light on the morphology of these taxa and broaden their distribution from Tajikistan to China, while increasing the diversity of Mesozoic Mecoptera in China.

Keywords

Mecoptera, Choristopsychidae, new genus, new species, Middle Jurassic, China

Introduction

Choristopsychidae is a rather obscure extinct family in the Order Mecoptera. The family, erected by Martynov in 1937 with an isolated forewing fossil, contains only one species up to date, Choristopsyche tenuinervis. Its locality is Shurab II Ditch 63(8), which is in a Pliensbachian terrestrial horizon in the Sulyukta Formation of Tajikistan (Lower Jurassic) (Martynov 1937, Aristov et al. 2009). The family is recognized by a combination of the following characters: forewing broad, ScP long with two long anterior branches; RP and MA with two branches each; MP with five branches; and CuA coalesced with MP basally, strongly bent at about its midpoint (Martynov 1937).

Recently, we collected 23 well-preserved fossils from the Daohugou Village, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China; Jiulongshan Formation, Middle Jurassic. Herein, based on their different morphological characters, we erect one new genus with one new species and two new species of Choristopsyche Martynov, 1937, and re-describe Choristopsyche tenuinervis Martynov, 1937, while emending diagnoses of Choristopsychidae Martynov, 1937 and Choristopsyche Martynov, 1937.

There are abundant well-preserved fossil insects from Daohugou, including 19 reported orders so far (Ren et al. 2010b). The age of the Daohugou fossil-bearing beds is ca. 164–165 million years ago (Ma) (Bathonian-Callovian boundary interval, the late Middle Jurassic) (Chen et al. 2004).

Material and methods

This study is based on 23 fossil specimens housed in the fossil insect collection of the Key Laboratory of Insect Evolution & Environmental Changes, College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China (CNUB; Dong Ren, Curator).

Photographs of whole specimens were taken with a Nikon D100 digital camera coupled to a Nikkor 105 mm macro lens. The specimens were examined using a Leica MZ12.5 dissecting microscope, and illustrated with the aid of a drawing tube attached to the microscope. Line drawings were made with CoreDRAW X4 graphic software.

The wing venation nomenclature used in this paper is based on the interpretations and system proposed by Novokshonov (2002) with some revisions, Corresponding abbreviations are: ScP, posterior Subcosta; RA, anterior Radius; RP, posterior Radius; MA, anterior Media; MP, posterior Media; CuA, anterior Cubitus; CuP, posterior Cubitus; 1A, the first anal vein; 2A, the second anal vein (Fig. 1E). The length of the wing is measured by the straight-line distance from the wing base to apex, and the width of the wing, the straight-line distance from the wing anterior margin to posterior margin at its broadest point.

Figure 1.

Photographs and line drawings of Choristopsyche tenuinervis Martynov, 1937 A Photograph of part, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011075p B Photograph of counterpart, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011075c C Line drawing of whole specimen of part, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011075p D Line drawing of whole specimen of counterpart, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011075c E Line drawing of forewing of part, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011075p. Scale bars represent 5 mm.

Systematic palaeontology
Order Mecoptera Packard, 1886
Family Choristopsychidae Martynov, 1937

http://species-id.net/wiki/Choristopsychidae

Emended diagnosis.

Forewing broad oval or subtriangular, field between C and ScP comparatively broad; ScP well developed and forked twice, forming three long branches; RA unforked, one crossvein between ScP and RA and between RA and RP; RP and MA both with two branches; MP with five branches, and the MP4+5 forking basal to the MP2+3 forking; MP and CuA merged at the base; CuA strongly bent at its mid point; an oblique crossvein between CuA and CuP; a curved crossvein between the midpoint of CuA and MP5; CuP, 1A and 2A almost parallel. Hind wing, similar in shape to the forewing but slightly smaller, ScP short, forked twice, the second bifurcation coalesces with RA for a short distance; RP and MA both with two branches; MP with five branches, the stem of MP4+5 forked earlier than that of forewing, and with a crossvein to CuA; CuA almost straight. Head, oviform with big and oval compound eyes; antennae long and filiform; small chewing mouthpart. Thorax: prothorax smaller than mesothorax and metathorax. Legs: long and slender, all legs nearly of the same shape, but hind legs longer than fore legs and mid legs, and femora wider than tibia, and tibia longer than femora. Abdomen slender, tapering apically, about eleven segments and the female terminal segment with cercus.

Genus Choristopsyche Martynov, 1937

http://species-id.net/wiki/Choristopsyche

Type species.

Choristopsyche tenuinervis Martynov, 1937 (Lower Jurassic of Tajikistan)

Emended diagnosis.

Forewing, the separation of RP+MA from RA distal to the separation of MP from CuA.

Included species.

Type species (Choristopsyche tenuinervis Martynov, 1937), Choristopsyche perfecta sp. n. and Choristopsyche asticta sp. n.

Choristopsyche tenuinervis Martynov, 1937

http://species-id.net/wiki/Choristopsyche_tenuinervis

Figs 1, 2
Emended diagnosis.

Forewing, RP+MA forking distal to MP forking.

Description of new material.

CNU-MEC-NN2011075p/c (Fig. 1), a well preserved specimen with part and counterpart in dorsal view, with almost complete forewings, but partially preserved hind wings and body, and forewings overlapping hind wings. The terminus of abdomen is missing, sex unknown. Wings: Left forewing, length 11.0 mm, width 6.7 mm, broadly oval, RP forking distal to MA forking; MP2+3 forking basal to the forking of MA, and the stem of MP3 about twice as long as the stem of MP2+3; with one crossvein between RA and RP, and between MP2+3 and MP4; CuP, 1A, 2A single. Right forewing is similar to left forewing, but parts missing. Hind wings, smaller than forewings, overlapped by forewings, the venation visible but unclear. There are many spots on all four wings, symmetric between left and right wings.

In addition, there are nine new materials with analogous wing venation to that of specimen CNU-MEC-NN2011075p/c. They are listed as follows.

CNU-MEC-NN2011080 (Figs 2A, C), a well preserved specimen with clear wings, but parts of body, and the right forewing overlapping the right hind wing. Sex unknown. Wing: Right forewing, length 11.8 mm, width 6.7 mm, RP forking distal to the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking at about the same level as the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about twice as long as the stem of MP2+3; with one crossvein between MP2+3 and MP4; CuP, 1A, 2A single. Left forewing is similar to right forewing, but the apex of the wing absent. Hind wings, length at about 10.1 mm, width 6.2 mm, similar to forewings but smaller. CNU-MEC-NN2009317 (Figs 2B, D), an almost complete specimen, female, with forewings overlapping hind wings, and nearly complete body, but legs absent in dorsal view. Wings: right forewing, length at about 9.5 mm, width 4.9 mm; RP forking distal to the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking at about the same level to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 as long as the stem of MP2+3; CuP, 1A, 2A single. Left forewing is similar to right forewing. Hind wings, similar to forewings, but smaller; CuA almost straight. CNU-MEC-NN2009414 (Figs 2E, F), an almost complete preserved specimen in lateral view, female, with complete body and forewings, and right forewing overlapped with body and parts of left forewing, and right hind wing overlapped with left hind wing. The mouthparts are missing, the maxillary palpus with five segments visible. Abdomen: tapering apically, with eleven segments, and a pair of cercus can be visible, female. Wings: Left forewing, length at about 10.1 mm, width 6.4 mm, broadly oval, RP forking basal to the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking significantly basal to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about three times as long as the stem of MP2+3; with one crossvein between RA and RP, and between MA and MP1; CuP, 1A, 2A single. Right forewing is similar to left forewing, but there are crossveins between ScP and RA, RA and RP, MA and MP1. Hind wing: similar to forewing but smaller, RA straight, with one crossvein to RP. CNU-MEC-NN2009318 (Fig. 2G), a partially preserved specimen in dorsal view, with parts of forewings, hind wings and body, but the filiform antennae and venation visible, and the forewings overlapping the hind wings. CNU-MEC-NN2011070 (Fig. 2H), an almost completely preserved specimen in ventral view, with almost complete body and four wings, and hind wings overlapped with forewings. CNU-MEC-NN2011071 (Fig. 2I), a partially preserved specimen in dorsal view, with parts of body and forewings, but left hind wing is missing, and right hind wing is obscure. CNU-MEC-NN2009383 (Fig. 2J), a partially preserved specimen with four outspread wings and parts of body. CNU-MEC-NN2011083 (Fig. 2K), a specimen in dorsal view, female, with almost complete body but some legs not visible due to coverage by wings, and forewings overlapping hind wings. CNU-MEC-NN2011085 (Fig. 2L), a comparatively complete specimen in lateral view, male, and forewings overlapping hind wings; chewing mouthparts visible; Abdomen almost completely-preserved, the posterior six segments can be seen clearly, and abdomen bent at six and seven segment, but the posterior segments faint below the left forewing, the scorpion-like terminal visible.

Figure 2.

Photographs and line drawings of Choristopsyche tenuinervis Martynov, 1937 A Photograph of no. CNU-MEC-NN2011080 B Photograph of no. CNU-MEC-NN2009317 C Line drawing of no. CNU-MEC-NN2011080D Line drawing of no. CNU-MEC-NN2009317 E Photograph of no. CNU-MEC-NN2009414 F Line drawing of no. CNU-MEC-NN2009414 G Photograph of no. CNU-MEC-NN2009318 H Photograph of no. CNU-MEC-NN2011070 I Photograph of no. CNU-MEC-NN2011071 J Photograph of no. CNU-MEC-NN2009383 K Photograph of no. CNU-MEC-NN2011083 L Photograph of no. CNU-MEC-NN2011085. Scale bars ofA, C, K, L represent 2 mm. Scale bars of B, D, E, F, G, H, I, J represent 5 mm.

New material.

CNU-MEC-NN2011075p/c, CNU-MEC-NN2011080, CNU-MEC-NN2009317, CNU-MEC-NN2009414, CNU-MEC-NN2009318, CNU-MEC-NN2011070, CNU-MEC-NN2011071, CNU-MEC-NN2009383, CNU-MEC-NN2011083, CNU-MEC-NN2011085, deposited in CNUB.

Type locality and horizon.

Daohugou Village, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China, Jiulongshan Formation, Middle Jurassic (Bathonian-Callovian boundary interval, ca 164–165 Ma).

Remarks.

These ten specimens exhibit differences in the characters of “RP forking vs. MA forking”, “MP2+3 forking vs. MA forking” and “Length ratio of the stem of MP3 and the stem of MP2+3”, which are considered as intraspecific variations.

Diagnosis.

Forewing, RP+MA forking almost at the same level to MP forking.

Description.

HolotypeCNU-MEC-NN2011082 (Figs 3A, B), an almost complete preserved specimen, maybe male, with four outspread wings, but with partially preserved body. Head is partially preserved, only with one compound eye visible. Thorax: prothorax smaller than mesothorax and metathorax in ventral view. Legs: some parts of fore legs and left hind leg visible. Abdomen: tapering apically, with six segments visible, but the terminal visible, maybe male. Wings: Right forewing, length 22.2 mm, width at about 11.4 mm, RP forking distal to the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking distal to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about twice as long as the stem of MP2+3; with one crossvein between CuP and 1A; CuP, 1A single. Left forewing is partially preserved, similar to right forewing. Hind wings, length 18.4 mm, width at about 10.3 mm, similar to forewings but smaller than forewings, and left hind wing partially preserved. There are many spots on all four wings, symmetric between left and right wings.

Figure 3.

Photographs and line drawings of Choristopsyche perfecta sp. n. A Photograph of holotype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011082 B Line drawing of holotype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011082 C Photograph of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2009352 D Photograph of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011079 E Line drawing of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2009352 F Photograph of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011084. Scale bars of A, B, D, F represent 2 mm; scale bars of C, E represent 5 mm.

Paratypes: CNU-MEC-NN2009352 (Figs 3C, E), an almost complete preserved specimen, with clear wing venation and structure of body in side pressure, and forewings partially overlapped with hind wings, sex unknown. Wings: Left forewing, length 18.8 mm, width 10.0 mm, RP forking slightly distal to the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking at about the same level to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about twice as long as the stem of MP2+3; with one crossvein between MP1 and MA4, MP1 and MP2, MP2+3 and MP4; CuP, 1A, 2A, 3A single, and one crossvein between CuP and 1A. Right forewing is similar to left forewing. Hind wing, similar to forewing, but smaller. CNU-MEC-NN2011079 (Fig. 3D), female, a well-preserved specimen with complete body, and the terminal of abdomen visible, but the end of legs absent, and forewings overlapping hind wings, but parts of wings missing, RP forking distal to the forking of MA; Abdomen: tapering apically, with eleven visible segments, the tenth and eleventh segments smaller, and the eleventh segment with cerci visible. CNU-MEC-NN2011084 (Fig. 3F), a specimen with legs absent, and hind wings overlapped by forewings in dorsal view, sex unknown. Forewing, length 19.4 mm, width 10.0 mm, RP forking at the same level to the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking basal to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about twice as long as the stem of MP2+3.

Material.

Holotype CNU-MEC-NN2011082, Paratypes CNU-MEC-NN2009352, CNU-MEC-NN2011079, CNU-MEC-NN2011084, deposited in CNUB.

Type locality and horizon.

Daohugou Village, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China, Jiulongshan Formation, Middle Jurassic (Bathonian-Callovian boundary interval, ca 164–165 Ma).

Etymology.

The name is derived from the Latin word of perfectus, meaning “complete”.

Remarks.

These four specimens exhibit differences in the character of “RP forking vs. MA forking”, “MP2+3 forking vs. MA forking”, which is considered as intraspecific variations.

Diagnosis.

Forewing, RP+MA forking basal to MP forking.

Description.

Holotype, CNU-MEC-NN2009394p/c (Figs 4A–D), an almost complete specimen, female, with well-preserved four outspread wings. Head: compound eyes are big and oval in ventral view, but mouthparts invisible and antenna partially preserved. Thorax: prothorax smaller than mesothorax and metathorax, visible in ventral view. Legs: all legs nearly the same shape and nearly completely preserved, long and slender in ventral view. Abdomen: slender and elongate, tapering apically, with eight visible segments. Wings: four wings are elongated and broad, with rounded apical margin. Forewings: Right forewing, length 20.7 mm, width 10.2 mm, almost triangular, dark color between C and RA; RP forking basal to the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking at about the same level to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about twice as long as the stem of MP2+3; the stem of MA strongly bent posteriorly; and the stem of MP2+3 strongly bent at its basal one third part; with one crossvein between MA and MP1, MP1 and MP2, and between MP2+3 and MP4; and one oblique crossvein between the base of CuA and CuP, and at the point one oblique crossvein between CuP and 1A, CuP, 1A, 2A single. Left forewing is similar to right forewing. Hind wings: similar to forewing, but slightly smaller, length at about 16.8 mm, width at about 10.0 mm; Right hind wing, with one crossvein between RA and RP+MA. Left hind wing is similar to right hind wing. No spots on entire wings.

Figure 4.

Photographs and line drawings of Choristopsyche asticta sp. n. A Photograph of part of holotype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2009394p B Photograph of counterpart of holotype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2009394c C Line drawing of part of holotype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2009394p D Line drawing of counterpart of holotype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2009394c E Photograph of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011081 F Photograph of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011086. Scale bars of A–D represent 5 mm. Scale bars of E–F represent 2 mm.

Paratypes: CNU-MEC-NN2011081 (Fig. 4E), female, a well-preserved specimen, with complete body and wings; Head, oval with two big compound eyes, filiform antenna and chewing mouthparts; Abdomen, slender and elongate in lateral view, tapering apically and complete preserved, length at about 13.4 mm; Wings, forewings overlapping some parts of hind wings, and with clear venation; Forewing, length 19.8 mm, width 8.4 mm, RP forking basal to the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking at the same level to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about twice as long as the stem of MP2+3. Hind wing, length at about 16.6 mm, width 8.1 mm. CNU-MEC-NN2011086 (Fig. 4F), female, an fairly well-preserved specimen in dorsal view, forewings overlapping hind wings, with almost complete body; Forewing, length 20.8 mm, width at about 9.4 mm; RP forking basal to the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking at the same level to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about twice as long as the stem of MP2+3. Hind wing, length 17.3 mm, width at about 9.0 mm.

Material.

Holotype CNU-MEC-NN2009394p/c, Paratypes CNU-MEC-NN2011081, CNU-MEC-NN2011086, deposited in CNUB.

Type locality and horizon.

Daohugou Village, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China, Jiulongshan Formation, Middle Jurassic (Bathonian-Callovian boundary interval, ca 164–165 Ma).

Etymology.

The name is derived from the Latin word of astictus, meaning “no spots”.

Type species.

Paristopsyche angelineae sp. n..

Diagnosis.

Forewing, the separation of RP+MA from RA at about the same level as the separation of MP from CuA.

Included species.

Type species: Paristopsyche angelineae sp. n..

Etymology.

The name is derived from the Greek word of paris-, meaning “equal”, and psyche, from the Greek, meaning “soul” or “mind”. The gender is feminine.

Diagnosis.

Forewing, RP+MA forking distal to MP forking.

Description.

Holotype, CNU-MEC-NN2011076p/c (Figs 5A–D), a well preserved specimen in dorsal view, with outspread clear wings, but parts of body visible. Some segments of head, thorax, legs visible, but faint. Wings: Right forewing, length 8.4 mm, width 5.5 mm, broadly oval with clear venation, RP forking distal to MA forking; MP2+3 forking at about the same level of the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about three times as long as the stem of MP2+3; with one crossvein between MA and MP1+2+3, and between MP2+3 and MP4. Left forewing is similar to right forewing, but the apex of the wing absent. Right hind wing, length at about 7.5 mm, width 4.6 mm, similar to forewing, but smaller, and overlapping with forewing partially. Left hind wing is similar to left hind wing, but partly folded as preserved. There are many spots on all four wings, symmetric between left and right wings.

Figure 5.

Photographs and line drawings of Paristopsyche angelineae gen. et sp. n. A Photograph of part of holotype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011076p B Photograph of counterpart of holotype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011076c C Line drawing of part of holotype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011076p D Line drawing of counterpart of holotype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011076c E Photograph of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2009319 F Photograph of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011074. Scale bars of A–E represent 5 mm. Scale bar of F represents 1 mm.

Paratypes: CNU-MEC-NN2009319 (Fig. 5E), a partially preserved specimen with forewings and one hind wing, but body absent; forewing, length 9.0 mm, width 5.4 mm, RP forking distal to MA forking; MP2+3 forking at about the same level of the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about three times as long as the stem of MP2+3. CNU-MEC-NN2011074 (Fig. 5F), a specimen with one complete and clear forewing, length 7.4 mm, width 5.2 mm, RP forking distal to MA forking; MP2+3 forking at about the same level of the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about three times as long as the stem of MP2+3. CNU-MEC-NN2011069 (Figs 6A, B), a partially preserved specimen, with complete left wings and most of body except for the terminalia, but incomplete right wings in dorsal view. Wings: right forewing, length 11.2 mm, width 7.5 mm, broadly oval, field between C and RA wide; RP forking distal to MA forking; MP2+3 forking distal to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about twice as long as the stem of MP2+3; CuP, 1A, 2A, single. Right hind wing is similar to forewing, but slightly smaller. Left wings partially preserved. CNU-MEC-NN2011078 (Figs 6C, D), an almost preserved specimen in dorsal view, with outspread clear wings, but parts of body absent. Wings: Left forewing, length 10.7 mm, width 6.4 mm, RP forking at the same level of the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking basal to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about four times as long as the stem of MP2+3; with one crossvein between MP3 and MP4, and between 1A and 2A; CuP, 1A, 2A single. Right forewing, similar to left forewing, but individual asymmetry is shown by right wing having MP3 with two branches, not the typical one branch in the left wing. Hind wings, length 8.2 mm, width 6.2 mm, similar to forewings but smaller, and partially preserved. CNU-MEC-NN2011077 (Fig. 6E), a partially preserved specimen with complete hind wings but parts of forewings and body; Forewing, length at about 10.3 mm, RP forking at the same level of the forking of MA; MP2+3 forking basal to the forking of MA; the stem of MP3 about three times as long as the stem of MP2+3; Hind wing, length at about 7.9 mm, width 5.0 mm.

Figure 6.

A–B Photographs and line drawings ofparatypesof Paristopsyche angelineae sp. n. A Photograph of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011069 B Line drawing of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011069 C Photograph of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011078 D Line drawing of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011078 E Photograph of paratype, no. CNU-MEC-NN2011077. Scale bars of A, B, E represent 5 mm. Scale bars of C-D represent 2 mm.

Material.

Holotype CNU-MEC-NN2011076p/c, Paratypes CNU-MEC-NN2011078, CNU-MEC-NN2011077, CNU-MEC-NN2011069, CNU-MEC-NN2009319, CNU-MEC-NN2011074, deposited in CNUB.

Type locality and horizon.

Daohugou Village, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, China, Jiulongshan Formation, Middle Jurassic (Bathonian-Callovian boundary interval, ca 164–165 Ma).

Etymology.

The specific name is dedicated to Ms. Janet Angeline for her professionalism, dedication and accomplishments in her field and providing inspiration and support to CKS’s palaeontology studies.

Remarks.

These six specimens exhibit differences in the characters of “RP forking vs. MA forking”, “MP2+3 forking vs. MA forking” and “Length ratio of the stem of MP3 and the stem of MP2+3”, which are considered as intraspecific variations.

Discussion

Willmann (1989) synonymized Choristopsychidae with Agetoparnopidae Carpenter, 1930 because of forewing venation. Novokshonov (2002) synonymized Choristopsychidae and Agetoparnopidae with Permochoristidae Tillyard, 1917 also because of wing venation of the forewing. Based on our new findings about the characters of Choristopsychidae and the reported family of Agetoparnopidae by Carpenter (1930) and Permochoristidae by Tillyard (1917), there are significant differences between Choristopsychidae, Agetopanorpidae and Permochoristidae. For example, the former has broad oval wings (vs. long and narrow), MA vein with 2 branches (vs. 3 branches), MP vein with 5 branches (vs. 6 branches), CuA strongly bent at its mid point (vs. CuA without bending) etc. Therefore, we consider that it is justifiable for Martynov in setting up the family of Choristopsychidae.

Based on studies of our specimens and the reported species of Choristopsychidae, we found the wing venation of this family is comparatively stable, that is, the numbers of branches of ScP, RP, MA, MP have almost no changes in these specimens. However we observed significant differences regarding the relative positions between bifurcation points of two different veins, especially the origination locations of the main veins. In the literature of Mecoptera taxonomy, these characters have been used as diagnostic characters for genera or species, such as in Orthophlebiidae, Aneuretopsychidae and so on (Hong and Zhang 2007, Qiao et al. 2012a, 2012b, Ren et al. 2011). Therefore, we contend the character of “the separation of RP+MA from RA distal, basal or at the same level to the separation of MP from CuA” is the generic diagnostic character for Choristopsychidae; and the character of “the relative positions (basal or distal) between the forking of RP+MA and the forking of MP” is the specific diagnostic character. On the other hand, to avoid over classification of species, we also consider the characters of “RP forking vs. MA forking”, “MP2+3 forking vs. MA forking” and “Length ratio of the stem of MP3 and the stem of MP2+3” are intraspecific variations.

Choristopsychids have relatively broad wings, either oval or subtriangular-shaped, with length/width ratio from 1.5 to 2.0, in contrast to long and narrow wings of most mecopterans. To compare relative forewing broadness for representative mecopterans, we summarize the data of forewing length, width and ratio of wing length/width in Table 1 and plot the ratio of wing length/width vs. wing length (in mm) in Fig. 7. The data and Fig. 7 indicate the family of Choristopsychidae has the lowest ratio, meaning broadest forewings among mecopterans. In addition, the data and Fig. 7 seem to show a general trend that for representative specimens of these families, the larger the body size, the narrower the forewings (comparatively higher ratio). The linear regression trend line is represented by Y1 = 0.036*X + 2.620. For example, the family of Cimbrophlebiidae have large body size, with forewing length from 25 mm to 30 mm, and high ratio, with L/W ratio from 3.5 to 4.4 (Bruce 2009, Yang et al. 2012b). It is also noted that Panorpidae have unusually high ratio (more slender), with L/W ratio from 4 to 5, for their relatively small body size, with forewing length from 10 mm to 14 mm (Fu and Hua 2009, Zhou et al. 1993). If we exclude the data of Panorpidae, the linear regression trend line is Y2 = 0.056*X + 1.977. The higher value of slope indicates clearer trend that the larger the body size, the narrower the forewings for all these families of Mecoptera excluding Panorpidae.

Table 1.

Data of forewing length, width and length/width ratio of representatives of ten Families in Mecoptera.

Family Genus Species No. of fossil Length of forewing (mm) Width of forewing (mm) Ratio of length/width
Aneuretopsychidae Rasnitsyn & Kozlov, 1990 Jeholopsyche Ren, Shih & Labandeira, 2011 Jeholopsyche liaoningensis Ren, Shih & Labandeira, 2011 CNU-M-LB2005002 21.5 6 3.6
Jeholopsyche completa Qiao, Shih & Ren, 2012 CNU-MEC-LB2011062 16.5 5.2 3.2
Jeholopsyche bella Qiao, Shih & Ren, 2012 CNU-MEC-LB2011063 17 5.4 3.2
Jeholopsyche maxima Qiao, Shih & Ren, 2012 CNU-MEC-LB2011064 31.7 8.5 3.7
Orthophlebiidae Handlirsch, 1906 Orthophlebia Westwood, 1845 Orthophlebia liaoningensis Ren, 1997 LB95055 16 4.6 3.5
Orthophlebia nervulosa Qiao, Shih & Ren, 2012 CNU-MEC-NN2011060 27.5 6.0 4.6
Eomeropidae Cockerell, 1909 Tsuchingothauma Ren & Shih, 2005 Tsuchingothauma shihi Ren & Shih, 2005 M-NN200401 28 10.5 2.7
Typhothauma Ren & Shih, 2005 Typhothauma yixianensis Ren & Shih, 2005 M-LB200401 18 8 2.3
Pseudopolycentropodidae Handlirsch, 1925 Pseudopolycentropus Handlirsch, 1906 Pseudopolycentropus janeannae Ren, Shih & Labandeira, 2010 CNU-M-NN2005001 8 4 2
Pseudopolycentropus novokshonovi Ren, Shih & Labandeira, 2010 CNU-M-NN2005002 8 3.9 2.1
Sinopolycentropus Shih, Yang & Labandeira, 2011 Sinopolycentropus rasnitsyni Shih, Yang & Labandeira, 2011 CNU-MEC-NN2010044 6.1 2.4 2.5
Cimbrophlebiidae Willmann, 1977 Cimbrophlebia Willmann, 1977 Cimbrophlebia flabelliformis Bruce, 2009 UCCIPR L-18 F-763 28 7 4
Cimbrophlebia leahyi Bruce, 2009 TRUIPR L-018 F-1161 31 8 3.9
Cimbrophlebia brooksi Bruce, 2009 SR062005 31 7 4.4
Cimbrophlebia westae Bruce, 2009 SRUI099600 25 6 4.2
Perfecticimbrophlebia Yang, Shih & Ren, 2012 Perfecticimbrophlebia laetus Yang, Shih & Ren, 2012 CNU-M-NN2010004 26.9 7.6 3.5
Nannochoristidae Tillyard, 1917 Protochoristella Sun, Ren & Shih, 2007 Protochoristella polyneura Sun, Ren & Shih, 2007 CNU-M-NN2006049 7.5 2 3.8
Protochoristella formosa Sun, Ren & Shih, 2007 CNU-M-NN2006006 8 3 2.7
Itaphlebia Sukatsheva, 1985 Itaphlebia exquisita Liu, Zhao & Ren, 2010 CNU-MEC-NN2009145 10.2 3.5 2.9
Itaphlebia laeta Liu, Zhao & Ren, 2010 CNU-MEC-NN2009311 8.2 2.6 3.2
Mesopsychidae Tillyard, 1917 Lichnomesopsyche Ren, Labandeira & Shih, 2010 Lichnomesopsyche gloriae Ren, Labandeira & Shih, 2010 CNU-M-NN2005020 25 7 3.6
Lichnomesopsyche daohugouensis Ren, Labandeira & Shih, 2010 CNU-M-NN2005022 22 6.5 3.4
Vitimopsyche Novokshonov & Sukatasheva, 2001 Vitimopsyche kozlovi Ren, Labandeira & Shih, 2010 CNU-M-HP2005001 24 8 3
Bittacidae Handlirsch, 1906 Exilibittacus Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012 Exilibittacus lii Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012 CNU-M-NN2010001 7.5 2.2 3.4
Preanabittacus Novokshonov, 1993 Preanabittacus validus Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012 CNU-MEC-NN2010005 18.7 5.6 3.3
Megabittacus Ren, 1997 Megabittacus spatiosus Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012 CNU-MEC-NN2010003 41.0 11.5 3.6
Formosibittacus Li, Ren & Shih, 2008 Formosibittacus macularis Li, Ren & Shih, 2008 CNU-M-NN2007001 23 5 4.6
Jurahylobittacus Li, Ren & Shih, 2008 Jurahylobittacus astictus Li, Ren & Shih, 2008 CNU-M-NN2007002 12.6 3.0 4.2
Panorpidae Latreille, 1805 Panorpa Linnaeus, 1758 Panorpa kunmingensis Fu & Hua, 2009 28-08-1985 10.0-10.3 2.1-2.5 4.1-4.8
Panorpa kiautai Zhou, Hu & Wu, 1993 1982-03-25 14.0 3.0 4.7
Panorpa choui Zhou, Hu & Wu, 1993 1986-07-20 14.0 3.5 4
Neopanorpa Zhou, Hu & Wu, 1993 Neopanorpa obstrusa Zhou, Hu & Wu, 1993 1987-06-20 11.0 2.2 5
Neopanorpa moganshanensis Zhou, Hu & Wu, 1993 1982-07-20 12.5 3 4.2
Neopanorpa tengchongensis Zhou, Hu & Wu, 1993 1983-05-24 14 3 4.7
Neopanorpa menghaiensis Zhou, Hu & Wu, 1993 1984-04-25 14.5 2.8 5.2
Choristopsychidae Martynov, 1937 Choristopsyche Martynov, 1937 Choristopsyche tenuinervis Martynov, 1937 9.5 5 1.9
CNU-MEC-NN2011080 11.8 6.7 1.8
CNU-MEC-NN2009317 9.5 4.9 1.9
CNU-MEC-NN2009414 10.1 6.4 1.6
Choristopsyche perfecta sp. n. CNU-MEC-NN2009352 18.8 10.0 1.9
CNU-MEC-NN2011082 22.2 11.4 1.9
Choristopsyche asticta sp. n. CNU-MEC-NN2009394 20.7 10.2 2.0
Paristopsyche gen. n. Paristopsyche angelineae sp. n. CNU-MEC-NN2011069 11.2 7.5 1.5
CNU-MEC-NN2011078 10.7 6.4 1.7
CNU-MEC-NN2011076 8.4 5.5 1.5
Figure 7.

The ratio of forewing length (L)/width (W) vs. forewing length (in mm) of ten representative Families of Mecoptera. For all data points, the linear regression trend line is represented by Y1 = 0.036*X + 2.620. Excluding the data of Panorpidae, the linear regression trend line is Y2 = 0.056*X + 1.977.

The oval-shape forewings for choristopsychids are rather unique for mecopterans. Broad subtriangular (Choristopsyche asticta sp. n.) forewings can be found in Pseudopolycentopus (e.g. Pseudopolycentopus janeannae Ren, Shih & Labandeira, 2010, Pseudopolycentopus novokshonovi Ren, Shih & Labandeira, 2010, and Sinopolycentropus rasnitsyni Shih, Yang, Ren & Labandeira, 2011) with length/width ratio 2.1, 2.2 and 2.5 respectively (Ren et al. 2010c, Shih et al. 2011), slightly narrower than that of Choristopsyche asticta sp. n. with a subtriangular forewing and a ratio of 2.0.

Spots and bands of dark and light color are rather common for many mecopteran fossils from the Middle Jurassic of northeastern China. However, the patterns and many dark and light spots on all four wings, symmetric between left and right wings, are unique for choristopsychids (except for Choristopsyche asticta sp. n. without dots). It is likely that these spots and patterns on forewings might have served potential functions of mimicry, disruptive camouflage, or mate identification. The symmetric pattern between the left and right wings suggests that these dots may have been genetically controlled for an individual. We do not use the spots and bands as a diagnostic character.

The paratype of Paristopsyche angelineae sp. n. (CNU-MEC-NN2011078) exhibits individual asymmetry by having vein MP3 with two branches on the right wing, not the typical one branch on the left wing. Numerous cases of asymmetric variations within individual fossil insects have been reported from the Mesozoic of northeastern China. In the paratype of Synapocossus sciacchitanoae Wang, Shih & Ren, 2012 from Daohugou, China, the left and right forewings of CNU-HEM-NN2007008p/c show some individual variation, i.e., 1 mm of coalescence within the left wing and only a point contact on the right wing (Wang et al. 2012). An odonatan species, belonging to Campterophlebiidae Handlirsch, 1920, has veins MA and MP fusing before the nodus in the left wing whereas the right wing has normal venation (Zhang et al. 2008, Fig. 6). For Plecoptera, the variability of wing venation and the difference between the left and right wings of the same individual have been described in Sinosharaperla zhaoi Liu, Sinitshenkova & Ren, 2007 (Liu et al. 2007). Exilibittacus lii Yang, Ren & Shih, 2012 of Bittacidae (Mecoptera) has interesting asymmetric venational characters that RP+MA and MP of its left hind wing having only three branches and RP1+2 and MP3+MP4+CuA1+2 not forking, even though RP+MA and MP of its left and right forewings with typical four branches as those of most hangingflies (Yang et al. 2012a). Also the bittacid Mongolbitacus daohugoensis Petrulevičius, Huang and Ren, 2007 shows asymmetry in the anal veins of the forewings (Petrulevičius et al. 2007).

These new Chinese Choristopsychids, the first record in China, show many venational differences from the previously reported Choristopsyche tenuinervis Martynov, 1937. In addition, these new fossils with well preserved body structure and wings enhance our understanding of the morphological characters of this family, and provide a basis for future phylogenetic studies. Furthermore, these new species from China reveal that the early diversification of Choristopsychidae was well underway by the Middle Jurassic, while broadening the diversity of Mesozoic Mecoptera in China.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Qiang Yang, Yongjie Wang, Weiting Zhang, Taiping Gao in the CNU Key Lab for their detailed comments and fruitful suggestion, and appreciate reviewers for their detailed comments. This research is supported by National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2012CB821906), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31230065, 31272352, 41272006) and Project of Great Wall Scholar and KEY project of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (grants KZ201310028033).

References
Aristov DS, Wappler T, Rasnitsyn AP (2009) New and Little-Known Grylloblattids of the Family Geinitziidae (Insecta: Grylloblattida) from the Triassic and Jurassic of Europe, Asia, and South Africa. Paleontological Journal 43: 418-42. doi: 10.1134/S0031030109040091
Bruce AS (2009) New Cimbrophlebiidae (Insecta: Mecoptera) from the Early Eocene at McAbee, British Columbia, Canada and Republic, Washington, USA. Zootaxa 2249: 51-62.
Carpenter FM (1930) The Lower Permian insects of Kansas. Part 1. Introduction and the order Mecoptera. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 52: 69-101.
Chen W, Ji Q, Liu D-Y, Zhang Y, Song B, Liu X-Y (2004) Isotope geochronology of the fossil-bearing beds in the Daohugou area, Ningcheng, Inner Mongolia. Geological Bulletin of China 23: 1165-1169.
Fu Q, Hua B-Z (2009) A New Species of Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) from Yunnan, China. Entomotaxonomia 31 (3): 201-205.
Hong Y-C, Zhang Z-J (2007) Reclassification of fossil Orthophlebiidae (Insecta: Mecoptera). Entomotaxonomia 29: 26-36.
Liu Y-S, Ren D, Sinitshenkova ND, Shih C-K (2007) The oldest known record of Taeniopterygidae in the Middle Jurassic of Daohugou, Inner Mongolia, China (Insecta: Plecoptera). Zootaxa 1521: 1-8.
Martynov AV (1937) Liassic insects of Shurab and Kizilkya Mongolia. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo institute akademii nauk SSSR 7: 1-178.
Novokshonov VG (2002) Order Panorpida Latreille, 1802. The scorpionflies. In: Rasnitsyn AP, Quicke DLJ (Eds). History of Insects. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, Netherlands: 194-198.
Petrulevičius JF, Huang D-Y, Ren D (2007) A new hangingfly (Insecta: Mecoptera: Bittacidae) from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China. Proceedings of the III International Congress on Palaeoentomology (Fossil X3), African Invertebrates 48 (1): 145–152.
Qiao X, Shih C-K, Ren D (2012a) Two new Middle Jurassic species of orthophlebiids (Insecta: Mecoptera) from Inner Mongolia, China. Alcheringa 36: 467-472. doi: 10.1080/03115518.2012.671689
Qiao X, Shih C-K, Ren D (2012b) Three new species of aneuretopsychids (Insecta: Mecoptera) from the Jehol Biota, China. Cretaceous Research 36: 146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2012.03.004
Ren D, Shih C-K, Gao T-P, Yao Y-Z, Zhao Y-Y (2010b) Silent Stories – Insect Fossil Treasures from Dinosaur Era of the Northeastern China. Beijing: Science Press, 332.
Ren D, Shih C-K, Labandeira CC (2010c) New Jurassic pseudopolycentropodids from China (Insecta: Mecoptera). Acta Geologica Sinica 84 (1): 22-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2010.00166.x
Ren D, Shih C-K, Labandeira CC (2011) A well-preserved aneuretopsychid from the Jehol Biota of China (Insecta, Mecoptera, Aneuretopsychidae). ZooKeys 129: 17-28. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.129.1282
Shih C-K, Yang X-G, Labandeira CC, Ren D (2011) A new long-proboscid genus of Pseudopolycentropodidae (Mecoptera) from the Middle Jurassic of China and its plant-host specializations. Zookeys 130: 281-297. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.130.1641
Tillyard RJ (1917) Mesozoic insects of Queensland. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 42: 172-200.
Wang Y-J, Labandeira CC, Shih C-K, Ding Q-L, Wang C, Zhao Y-Y, Ren D (2012) Mid-Mesozoic mimicry: the association between a hangingfly and a ginkgoalean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205517109
Willmann R (1989) Evolution und Phylogenetisches System der Mecoptera (Insecta: Holometabola). Abhandlungen der senckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft 544: 1-153.
Yang X-G, Ren D, Shih C-K (2012a) New fossil hangingflies (Mecoptera: Raptipeda: Bittacidae) from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China. Geodiversitas 34 (4): 785-799. doi: 10.5252/g2012n4a4
Yang X-G, Shih C-K, Ren D, Petrulevicius JF (2012b) New Middle Jurassic hangingflies (Insecta: Mecoptera) from Inner Mongolia, China. Alcheringa 36 (2): 195-201. doi: 10.1080/03115518.2012.622143
Zhang B-L, Ren D, Pang H (2008) New isophlebioid dragonflies from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China (Insecta: Odonata: Isophlebioptera: Campterophlebiidae). Acta Geologica Sinica 82: 1104-1114.
Zhou W-B, Hu Y-X, Wu X-P, Wu H (1993) Six New Species and Two New Records of Mecoptera from China. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College 10 (2): 189-196.