ZooKeys 313: 1–8, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.313.5106
A review of the Oriental genus Eudeferunda Chen, Yang & Wilson (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Achilidae) with description of one new species from Hainan, China
Jian-Kun Long 1,2,†, Lin Yang 1,2,‡, Xiang-Sheng Chen 1,2,§
1 Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, P.R. China
2 The Provincial Key Laboratory for Agricultural Pest Management of Mountainous Region, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550025, P.R. China

Corresponding author: Xiang-Sheng Chen (chenxs3218@163.com)

Academic editor: Mike Wilson

received 11 March 2013 | accepted 27 June 2013 | Published 27 June 2013


(C) 2013 Jian-Kun Long. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.


Citation: Long J-K,Yang L, Chen X-S (2013) A review of the Oriental genus Eudeferunda Chen, Yang & Wilson (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Achilidae) with description of one new species from Hainan, China. ZooKeys 313: 1–8. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.313.5106


Abstract

A new species of Eudeferunda Chen, Yang & Wilson, 1989 (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Achilidae: Plectoderini), Eudeferunda alatea Long & Chen sp. n. from Hainan, China, is described and illustrated. The generic characters are modified, including the addition of male genitalia characters. A key to the species of the genus is provided.

Keywords

Achilid, Fulgoroidea, Oriental region, planthopper, taxonomy

Introduction

The achilid genus Eudeferunda (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Achilidae: Plectoderini) was established by Chen et al. (1989), and with Eudeferunda lenita Chen, Yang & Wilson, 1989 as its type species. To date, this genus contains only the type species. Here, we described and illustrated a new species: Eudeferunda alatea Long & Chen sp. n. from South China. A key to separate these two species of Eudeferunda is provided.

Materials and methods

Specimens were collected by sweeping. Dry specimens were used for the description and illustration. External morphology was observed under a stereoscopic microscope and characters were measured with an ocular micrometer. The genital segments of the examined specimens were macerated in 10% KOH and drawn from preparations in glycerin jelly using a Leica MZ 12.5 stereomicroscope. Illustrations were scanned with Canon CanoScan LiDE 200 and imported into Adobe Photoshop CS3 for labeling and plate composition. Terminology for morphology following by Szwedo and Żyła (2009) and Bourgoin and Huang (1990). The type material of specimens are deposited in the Institute of Entomology, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China (IEGU).

Taxonomy
Eudeferunda Chen, Yang & Wilson, 1989

http://species-id.net/wiki/Eudeferunda

Figs 128
Eudeferunda Chen et al. 1989: 16.
Type species.

Eudeferunda lenita Chen, Yang & Wilson, 1989, by original designation.

Diagnosis.

Small size. Head with eyes narrower than pronotum (0.7–0.8:1) (Figs 7, 19). Vertex produced before eyes about 0.4 times of its length, longer in middle line than wide at base (1.4:1), disk distinctly depressed, median carina basal half prominent, anterior half obsolete, anterior margin acutely rounded convex, lateral margins carinate, straight, diverging posteriorly, posterior margin in middle angulately convex (Figs 7, 19). Frons longer in middle line than widest part (1.25–1.4:1), basal margin subtruncate or truncate, about quarter length of widest part, lateral margins strongly foliate basally, slightly convex laterally, thence incurved into suture (Figs 8, 20). Postclypeus shorter than frons in middle line (0.4–0.6:1) (Figs 8, 20). Eyes incised beneath, not or slightly overlapping pronotum (Figs 7, 9, 19, 21). Ocelli detached from eyes. Antennae with pedicel subglobose. Pronotum moderately short, as long behind eyes as in middle line, disc with median carina shorter than lateral carinae (0.5:1) (Figs 7, 19). Mesonotum tricarinate, longer than vertex and pronotum together, lateral carinae slightly diverging posteriorly, middle carina apically obsolete (Figs 7, 19). Forewing 2.5–2.9 times as long as broad, CuA1 not convex strongly, Sc+R forking level of CuA1 fork, both slightly distally union of PCu with A1, clavus terminating at midway of forewing (Figs 10, 22). Post-tibia with a single lateral spine at basal 2/5, metatibio-tarsal formula of hind leg 8–7–6 (Figs 5–6). Anal segment relatively short, in dorsal view apical margin concave in middle (Figs 12, 23). Pygofer in lateral view distinctly longer ventrally than dorsally, anterior margin concave, posterior margin convex and produced a curved process directing downward (Figs 13, 24); in ventral view medioventral processes paired, median cleft deep (Figs 14, 25). Dorsal margin of gonostyle with a large triangular process laterad, thence laterad convex near base (Figs 15–16, 26). Male genitalia with phallobase submembraneous, tube-like, phallobase with dorsal and ventral lobes; ventral lobe of phallobase in ventral view cleft at apical margin in middle, each lateral side with a pointed processes, bilateral areas with thorns; in dorsal view, dorsal lobe of phallobase with apical margin broadly incised in middle; phallic appendages longer than phallobase about 3:1, gradually narrowing apically (Figs 17–18, 27–28).

Distribution.

Oriental region.


Key to species of Eudeferunda Chen, Yang & Wilson (male)
1 Medioventral processes of pygofer digitate, gradually narrowing apically (Fig. 25); anal segment in dorsal view with base margin truncate and blunt laterally (Fig. 23); ventral lobe of phallobase with a couple of lateral processes near apex (Figs 27–28) Eudeferunda lenita
Medioventral processes of pygofer with apex distinctly attenuate and bent towards outboard (Fig. 14); anal segment in dorsal view with basal margin slightly sinuate and angular laterally (Fig. 12); ventral lobe of phallobase with a couple of lateral processes at base 1/3 (Fig. 17) Eudeferunda alatea sp. n.
Type material.

Holotype: 1♂, China: Hainan, Ledong, Jianfengling National Natural Reserve (18°41'N, 108°36'E), 16 Jan. 2011, J.-K Long. Paratypes: 1♂, 3♀♀, Hainan, Ledong, Jianfengling National Natural Reserve (18°41'N, 108°36'E), 13–16 Jan. 2011, J.-K Long; 1♀, Hainan, Ledong, Jianfengling National Natural Reserve (18°41'N, 108°36'E), 14 Jan. 2011, W.-B. Zheng (IEGU).

Etymology.

The species name is derived from the Latin word “alate”, indicating the phallobase with a pointedly alate process at base 1/3 of each lateral side.

Description.

Body length (from apex of vertex to tip of forewings): male 3.75– 3.80 mm (N=2), female 4.50–4.75 mm (N=4); forewing length: male 2.95–3.05 mm (N=2), female 3.55–3.75 mm (N=4).

Coloration. Ivory white to black brown (Figs 19). Vertex ivory white, with black brown at base, longitudinal black brown stripe, gradually narrowing forward (except middle carina light brown) in middle, anterior and lateral margins brown, lateral margin with two transverse black brown stripes respectively at the level of anterior margin of eyes and base (Fig. 7). Frons with disk in middle black brown, basal and apical fourth ivory white, lateral margins with three big and one small fuscous spots (Fig. 8). Postclypeus with basal half ivory-white and apical half fuscous; preclypeus light brown except the base fuscous (Fig. 8). Genae ivory white, with three fuscous transverse stripes before eyes, two dorsad, area between ocellus and antenna fuscous, genae coloration at level of clypeus same the face (Fig. 9). Eyes reddish brown, ocelli pale reddish-brown (Fig. 9). Antennae fuscous (Figs 7–9). Pronotum dark brown, area between out side of two lateral carinae ivory white; mesonotum dark brown, with yellowish brown at apical angle (Fig. 7). Tegula dark brown, with dorsally lateral margin yellowish brown (Fig. 7). Forewing yellowish brown to dark yellowish brown, costal margin with three ivory white spots, clavus with three ivory white spots inside A2 and one longitudinal ivory white stripe between A2 and posterior margin (Fig. 10). Hindwing pale brown, veins pale brown. Legs pale brown (Figs 2, 4, 5–6). Abdomen dark brown.

Head and thorax. Head with eyes narrower than pronotum (0.81:1) (Fig. 7). Vertex long, broad across base than anterior (5.00:1), produced before eyes about 0.36 times of its length, width of vertex measured at base of middle line 0.66 times length along middle, longer in middle line than wide at base (1.41:1). Frons longer in middle line than widest part (1.25:1), basal margin subtruncate, middle carina gradually weakening basally (Fig. 8). Postclypeus shorter than frons in middle line (0.42:1) (Fig. 8). Rostum with apical segment longer than subapical one (1.47:1). Pronotum shorter than vertex in middle line (0.31:1). Mesonotum longer than pronotum in middle line (6.8:1), than vertex and pronotum together (1.61:1) (Fig. 7). Disc of tegula with several small longitudinal ridges (Fig. 7). Forewing 2.93 times as long as broad (Fig. 10). Hindwing 1.78 times as long as broad (Fig. 11).

Male genitalia. Anal segment in dorsal view slightly shorter than broad (0.90:1), basal margin slightly sinuate and angular laterally, apical margin concave (Fig. 12). Medioventral processes of pygofer paired, with apex distinctly attenuate and bent towards outboard, median cleft deep (Figs 13–14). Dorsal margin of gonostyle with a small dentiform process dorsad and a large triangular process laterad, thence laterad convex near base, apical margin broadly convex (Figs 15–16). Male genitalia with phallobase in ventral view (Fig. 17), ventral lobe cleft at apical margin in middle, bilateral areas hump-shaped and protuberated subapically, a pointedly alate process at base 1/3 of each lateral side, with its base of inside margin denticulated and apically extended; in dorsal view (Fig. 18), dorsal lobe with apical margin broadly incised in middle, bilateral margin ox-horn like produced. Phallic appendages longer than phallobase (3:1), gradually narrowing apically (Figs 17–18).

Figures 1–6.

Eudeferunda alatea Long & Chen sp. n. 1 Male habitus, dorsal view 2 Male habitus, lateral view 3 Female habitus, dorsal view 4 Female habitus, lateral view 5 Hind tibia and tarsus 6 Apex of hind leg.

Figures 7–18.

Eudeferunda alatea Long & Chen sp. n. 7 Head and thorax, dorsal view 8 Frons and clypeus 9 Head, lateral view 10 Forewing 11 Hindwing 12 Anal segment, dorsal view 13 Male genitalia, lateral view 14 Male genitalia, ventral view 15 Left gonostyle, dorsal view 16 Left gonostyle, ventral view 17 Aedeagus, ventral view 18 Aedeagus, dorsal view. Scale bars: = 1 mm (Figs 10–11); 0.5 mm (Figs 7–9, 13–14, 17–18); 0.2mm (Figs 12, 15–16).

Distribution.

South China (Hainan).

Remarks.

This new species differs from Eudeferunda lenita Chen, Yang & Wilson, 1989 by: mesonotum dark brown, only with yellowish brown at apical angle (between lateral carinae white in lenita); forewing with three ivory white spots along costal margin (ivory white area among costal cell, Sc+R, and stigma in lenita); disk of tegula with several small longitudinal ridges (without in lenita); male pygofer of medioventral processes with apex distinctly attenuate and bent towards outboard (digitate and gradually narrowing apically in lenita); anal segment in dorsal view with basal margin slightly sinuate and angular laterally (base margin truncate and blunt laterally in lenita); ventral lobe of phallobase with a couple of lateral processes at base 1/3 (near apex in lenita).

Eudeferunda lenita Chen, Yang & Wilson, 1989

http://species-id.net/wiki/Eudeferunda_lenita

Figs 19–28
Eudeferunda lenita Chen et al. 1989: 16.
Distribution.

South China: Henchun (22°00'N, 120°44'E), Pingtung City, Taiwan.

Material examined.

No specimen has been collected by the authors.

Figures 19–28.

Eudeferunda lenita Chen, Yang & Wilson, 1989. 19 Head and thorax, dorsal view 20 Frons and clypeus 21 Head, lateral view 22 Forewing 23 Anal segment, dorsal view 24 Male genitalia, lateral view 25 Male genitalia, ventral view 26 Left gonostyle 27 Aedeagus, dorsal view 28 Phallobase, ventral view. Scale bars: = 1 mm (Figs 10–11); 0.5 mm (Figs 7–9, 13–14, 17–18); 0.2mm (Figs 12, 15–16) (all after Chen et al. 1989).

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Wei-Bing Zheng (IEGU) for collecting valuable specimen. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31060290, 31093430, 31160163) and the International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of Guizhou (20107005).

References
Bourgoin T, Huang J (1990) Morphologie comparée des genitalia mâles des Trypetimorphini et remarques phylogénétiques (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Tropiduchidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 26: 555-564.
Chen CL, Yang CT, Wilson MR (1989) Achilidae of Taiwan (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea). Taiwan Museum Special Publication Series, 8: 1-64.
Fennah RG (1950) A generic revision of the Achilidae (Homoptera: Fulgoroidea) with descriptions of new species. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology, 1 (1): 1-170.
Szwedo J, Żyła D (2009) New Fulgoridiidae genus from the Upper Jurassic Karatau deposits, Kazakhstan (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoroidea). Zootaxa 2281: 40−52
Yang CT, Chang TY (2000) The external male genitalia of Hemiptera (Homoptera – Heteroptera). Taichung, Shih Way Publication, 746 pp.