Research Article
Print
Research Article
New dustywings (Neuroptera, Coniopterygidae) from mid-Cretaceous amber of Myanmar reveal spectacular diversity
expand article infoDominika Ružičková, André Nel§, Jakub Prokop
‡ Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
§ Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
Open Access

Abstract

Two new genera and species of Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera) are described and illustrated from mid Cretaceous (Cenomanian) amber of Myanmar. Mulleroconis hyalina gen. n. et sp. n., attributed to the Coniopteryginae, bears a unique combination of venation characters and an abdomen without plicatures. The second new genus, attributed to the Aleuropteryginae, i.e. Palaeoconis azari gen. n. et sp. n., displays a unique pattern of crossveins 1m-cua and 2mp2-cua, with the latter crossing the pigmented spot. A check-list of all fossil genera and species of Coniopterygidae is provided.

Keywords

Upper Cretaceous, Cenomanian, Burmite, Insecta , Neuropterida , wing venation

Introduction

Neuroptera is one of few insect orders with a remarkably rich fossil history and spectacular diversity of morphotypes during the Mesozoic. The two early Permian families Permithonidae and Permoberothidae are currently considered as the stem groups of the clade Eidoneuroptera (Neuroptera + Megaloptera) (Prokop et al. 2015; Engel et al. 2018). Current views of phylogeny based on molecular and morphology datasets support the family Coniopterygidae as a sister group to Euneuroptera comprising all remaining recent families of Neuroptera (Winterton et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2017; Winterton et al. 2017, 2018; Randolf et al. 2017; Engel et al. 2018).

Coniopterygidae (dustywings) are an unusual family of Neuroptera with minute body-size, strongly reduced venation and, especially, wings covered by a waxy secretion. Dustywings are predators with larvae and adults feeding on mites, aphids, and sternorrhynchans. Currently, the family comprises 571 species assigned to 23 genera (Engel et al. 2018). They are divided into the three Recent subfamilies: Aleuropteryginae, Coniopteryginae, and Brucheiserinae, along with a single fossil one, Cretaconiopteryginae (Liu and Lu 2017). This current subdivision into four subfamilies needs to be tested by a global phylogenetic analysis of the fossil and extant taxa of this family, but it is out of the scope of the present paper. Meinander (1975) described the oldest Juraconiopteryx zherichini assigned to Coniopterygidae from the Upper Jurassic of Karatau in Kazakhstan, while the family is supposed to have diverged from the other Neuroptera during the Late Permian (Winterton et al. 2018). However, the record of dustywings is mainly known from amber inclusions of the following localities (see Table 1): Lower Cretaceous (Lebanon – Hammana (Neocomian), Spain – Cantabria (Albian), France – Charente – Maritime (Albian); Upper Cretaceous (Myanmar – Hukawng Valley (Cenomanian), U.S.A. – New Jersey, (Turonian), Russia – Taimyr Peninsula, (Cenomanian to Santonian), Canada – Alberta (Campanian); Eocene – India – Gujarat (Ypresian), France – Oise, Le Quesnoys (Ypresian), Baltic (Late Eocene), Ukraine – Rovno (Late Eocene); and Miocene – Dominican Republic (Burdigalian). For a long time, the Late Cretaceous amber from New Jersey was known for its high richness of neuropteran diversity (Grimaldi 2000). However, due to extensive sampling of Burmese amber during last decades it was revealed that it contains a surprisingly diverse and abundant neuropteran fauna currently attributed to 21 families, including Coniopterygidae (Grimaldi et al. 2002; Makarkin 2016; Ross 2018). Despite the fact, that the inclusions of dustywings in Burmese amber are considerably rare, six species assigned to five genera have been described so far (Ross 2018). The majority of assigned genera belong to the subfamily Aleuropteryginae. The subfamily Coniopteryginae has only two recorded genera and Brucheiserinae is still without any fossil evidence (Perrichot et al. 2014; Engel 2004, 2016; Makarkin 2016; Liu and Lu 2017, see Table 1).

Table 1.

List of extinct genera and species of Coniopterygidae.

MESOZOIC
JURASSIC
Subfamily Aleuropteryginae
Juraconiopteryx Meinander, 1975 Callovian/Oxfordian; Kazakhstan
J. zherichini Meinander, 1975
CRETACEOUS
Subfamily Aleuropteryginae
Achlyoconis Engel, 2016 Cenomanian; Myanmar
A. heptatrichia Engel, 2016
Alboconis Nel et al., 2005 Albian; France
A. cretacica Nel et al., 2005
Apoglaesoconis Grimaldi, 2000 Turonian; U.S.A.
A. ackermani Grimaldi, 2000
A. cherylae Engel, 2002 Turonian; U.S.A.
A. luzzii Grimaldi, 2000 Turonian; U.S.A.
A. swolenskyi Grimaldi, 2000 Turonian; U.S.A.
Garnaconis Perrichot & Nel in Perrichot et al. 2014 Turonian; France
G. dupeorum Perrichot & Nel, 2014
Glaesoconis Meinander, 1975 Cenomanian; Myanmar
G. baliopteryx Engel, 2004
G. cretica Meinander, 1975 Santonian; Russia
G. nearctica Grimaldi, 2000 Turonian; U.S.A
G. popovi Makarkin & Perkovsky, 2017 Santonian; Russia
Libanoconis Engel, 2002 Barremian; Lebanon
L. fadiacra Whalley, 1980
L. siberica Makarkin & Perkovsky, 2019 Cenomanian; Russia
Palaeoconis Ružičková, Nel & Prokop, n. gen. Cenomanian, Myanmar
P. azari Ružičková, Nel & Prokop, n. sp.
Subfamily Coniopteryginae
Jurasiatypus Kaddumi, 2005 Albian; Jordan
J. cretatus Kaddumi, 2005
Libanosemidalis Azar et al. 2000 Barremian; Lebanon
L. hammanaensis Azar et al. 2000
Mulleroconis Ružičková, Nel & Prokop, n. gen. Cenomanian, Myanmar
M. hyalina Ružičková, Nel & Prokop, n. sp.
Paranimboa Engel, 2016 Cenomanian; Myanmar
P. litotes Engel, 2016
P. groehni Sziráki, 2016 Cenomanian; Myanmar
Phtanoconis Engel, 2004 Cenomanian; Myanmar
P. burmitica Engel, 2004
Subfamily Cretaconiopteryginae
Cretaconiopteryx Liu & Lu, 2017 Cenomanian; Myanmar
C. grandis Liu & Lu, 2017
CENOZOIC
Subfamily Aleuropteryginae
Archiconiocompsa Enderlein, 1910 Priabonian; Russia
A. prisca Enderlein, 1910
Archiconis Enderlein, 1930 Priabonian; Russia
A. electrica Enderlein, 1930
Geroconiocompsa Engel, 2010 Priabonian; Russia
G. ostara Engel, 2010
Hemisemidalis Meinander, 1972 Priabonian; Poland
H. kulickae Dobosz & Krzemiński, 2000
Neoconis Enderlein, 1930 Burdigalian/Langhian; Dominican Republic
N. paleocaribis Grimaldi & Engel, 2013
Pararchiconis Nel, 1991 Rupelian; France
P. quievreuxi Nel, 1991
Spiloconis Enderlein, 1907 Burdigalian/Langhian; Dominican Republic
S. glaesaria Meinander, 1998
S. oediloma Engel & Grimaldi, 2007 Burdigalian/Langhian; Dominican Republic
S. eominuta Grimaldi & Engel, 2013 Ypresian; India
Subfamily Coniopteryginae
Coniopteryx Curtis, 1834 Burdigalian/Langhian; Dominican Republic
C. antiquua Engel & Grimaldi, 2007
C. timidus Hagen, 1856 Priabonian; Poland
Neosemidalis Enderlein, 1930 Holocene, Benin
N. enderleini Meunier, 1910
Parasemidalis Enderlein, 1905 Ypresian; France
P. eocenica Nel et al., 2005
P. sharovi Meinander, 1975 Priabonian; Russia
Semidalis Enderlein, 1905 Priabonian; Russia
S. fritschi Enderlein, 1930

Herein we report two new genera and species of Aleuropteryginae and Coniopteryginae from the Cenomanian amber of Myanmar. These new taxa are based on morphological characters with special attention to the wing venation and structure of the antennae.

Material and methods

All herein examined specimens are preserved in Burmese amber recovered from the deposits in northern Myanmar (Hukawng Valley, Kachin) (Cruickshank and Ko 2003; Grimaldi and Ross 2017). The age of these fossiliferous layers was previously considered as Late Albian or Early Cenomanian on the basis of palynomorphs (Cruickshank and Ko 2003), and recently confirmed as the lowermost Cenomanian (98.79 ± 0.62 Ma) by radiometric analysis of zircons (Shi et al. 2012). The record from this locality has recently been reviewed by Grimaldi and Ross (2017). Contemporary investigations on various insect lineages has emphasized the tremendous diversity and disparity of the entomofauna (e.g., Grimaldi and Ross 2017), as well as its impact on an understanding of changes in Late Cretaceous biotas along with the Late Cretaceous-Paleogene faunal turnover, such as replacement by specialized angiosperm pollinators and evidence of remarkable parasitoid strategies (e.g., Grimaldi et al. 2002; Batelka et al. 2016, 2018, in press; Huang et al. 2016; Makarkin 2016).

The material was studied with Leica MZ12.5 stereomicroscope and Olympus BX40 microscope, and photographed using a Canon D550 digital camera mounted on a tripod and coupled with a MP-E 65 mm macro-lens, or attached to an Olympus BX40. The original photographs were processed using Adobe Photoshop CS4, while some images we prepared a series of focal layers which were them combined using the focus-stacking software packages Helicon Focus Pro or Zerene Stacker. The specimens reported herein are originally from the private collection of Patrick Müller, Käshofen, Germany (accession numbers abbreviated as BUB – Burmese Bernstein). All type specimens are deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin.

Terminology of wing venation nomenclature and interpretation of veins follow Breitkreuz et al. (2017) who studied the wing venation and tracheation across the neuropteran families. Abbreviations of longitudinal veins: C – costa, ScP – subcosta posterior, R – radius, RA/ RP – radius anterior/ posterior, M – media, MA/ MP – media anterior/ posterior, Cu – cubitus, CuA/CuP – cubitus anterior/ posterior, A – anal vein.

Systematics

Order Neuroptera Linnaeus, 1758

Family Coniopterygidae Burmeister, 1839

Subfamily Coniopteryginae Burmeister, 1839

Mulleroconis gen. n.

Type species

Mulleroconis hyalina gen. et. sp. n.

Diagnosis

Forewing hyaline; one straight crossvein in proximal part of costal area; ScP2 diverges obliquely from ScP1; crossvein ra-rp absent; crossvein rp-ma undulated; M without macrosetae reaching posterior wing margin with two branches; crossvein cua-cup straight and aligned with 2cup-a1.

Etymology

The generic name is a combination collector’s surname (Müller) and the Greek ‘conis’ meaning dust. The generic name is feminine in gender.

Mulleroconis hyalina gen. et., sp. n.

Figures 1, 2

Holotype

BUB 2907; lowermost Cenomanian amber (Shi et al. 2012); Myanmar, Kachin, Hukawng Valley; preserved in a polished, transparent yellow piece of amber (5.68 × 5.00 × 1.09 mm), deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin (ex. coll. Patrick Müller). The holotype is in amber syninclusion with one representative of the Auchenorrhyncha.

Etymology

The specific epithet is after the hyaline forewing membrane.

Diagnosis

As for the genus (vide supra).

Description

Male. Body length ca. 1.17 mm (measured from tip of head to tip of genitalia). Head poorly preserved, only the last three segments of one maxillary palp are visible and the terminal segment is distinctly broader and longer than two remaining. Length of terminal palpomere ca. 0.09 mm. Thorax length ca. 0.28 mm.

Forewing ca. 1.46 mm long, ca. 0.65 mm wide; ScP1 long and parallel to costal margin; Scp2 present; division of R into RA and RP at about one-third wing length; RA simple distally connected to ScP2, parallel to ScP1; RP forked; rp-ma markedly sinuate, near the fork RP1 and RP2, connected to MA; stem of M running close to stem of R, briefly connecting each other, M distally branched into MA and MP, without stiff setae; crossveins 1m–cua and 2m-cua present, 1m–cua near the base of wing, between M and CuA, 2m-cua slightly sinuate, between M and CuA, situated slightly behind midwing; CuP separated from CuA near the base of wing; cua-cup present, located at level of division veins RA and RP; crossveins 1cup-a1 and 2cup-a1 present, 1cup-a1 connected to CuP near to fork of CuA and CuP, 2cup-a1 almost aligned with cua-cup; A1 and A2 clearly connected near the base of wing, a1-a2 present. Hindwing ca. 1.25 mm long, ca. 0.55 mm wide with venation very similar to forewing, differing in position of sinuate crossvein rp2-ma; crossvein m-cua partially preserved and basal part of wing with hardly recognizable venation pattern. Legs slender; fore femora (only left femur is visible) a bit shorter and wider than femora of second and third pair of legs; tibias covered with setae; tarsi five-segmented; first tarsomere distinctly longer than remaining tarsomeres; fifth tarsomere elongated with two apical claws. Abdomen large, length 0.64 mm, width 0.22 mm, including genitalia, with widest part approximately in middle of its length, greatly tapering to narrow apical segments; abdominal plicatures absent. Genital structures hardly discernible, presumably below projection of gonarcus, ultimate apices of parameres visible from dorsal view.

Figure 1. 

Mulleroconis hyalina gen. et. sp. n., holotype BUB 2907. A Drawing of left fore wing B drawing of left hindwing. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Figure 2. 

Mulleroconis hyalina gen. et. sp. n. holotype BUB 2907. A Habitus dorsally B wing venation – detail. Scale bar: 100 µm.

Discussion

Mulleroconis gen. n. can be attributed to the Coniopteryginae based on the following combination of forewing characters: M is bifurcate (a trait occurring in almost all members of this subfamily) (Makarkin and Perkovsky 2019), the absence of two macrosetae on the media, the presence of only one crossvein between RP and M (in our species between RP and MA), and the absence of the abdominal plicatures. The Mesozoic record of Coniopteryginae currently comprises four genera, i.e. Jurasiatypus Kaddumi, 2005; Libanosemidalis Azar et al. 2000; Paranimboa Engel, 2016 and Phthanoconis Engel, 2004 (see list below). All four genera share the presence of two basal crossveins in the costal space, unlike Mulleroconis gen. n. In addition, Libanosemidalis, Paranimboa and Jurasiatypus differ from Mulleroconis gen. n. in the presence of one crossvein between RA (ScP2) and RP. Libanosemidalis, described from the Lower Cretaceous amber of Lebanon, differs from Mulleroconis gen. n. in the presence of rp2-ma while in Mulleroconis gen. n. the crossvein rp-ma is shifted proximally, followed by a single crossvein between M and CuA and the presence of crossvein a2 connecting A2 and the hind margin of the wing (Azar et al. 2000). Paranimboa and Phthanoconis are both known from the Cenomanian amber of Myanmar (Engel 2016; Sziráki 2016, 2017). Paranimboa has a simple RP unlike in Mulleroconis gen. n. where the RP has two terminal branches. Furthermore, it differs in the position of the crossvein between RP and M and in the position of crossvein 1cup-a1 which is branching off from point where Cu is divided into CuA and CuP and in the presence of crossvein a2 (Engel 2016; Sziráki 2016, 2017).

Phthanoconis and Jurasiatypus both differ from Mulleroconis gen. n. in the presence of a single crossvein between M and CuA and in the complete absence of crossveins between CuA and CuP, CuP and A1, as well as between A1 and A2. Moreover, Phthanoconis differs from Mulleroconis gen. n. in the absence of a crossvein between RP and M (Engel 2004). Jurasiatypus was based on single found specimen (holotype) from the Lower Cretaceous amber of the Kurnub in Jordan (Kaddumi 2005). It differs from Mulleroconis gen. n. in the position of the crossvein between RP2 and MA (Kaddumi 2005).

Subfamily Aleuropteryginae Enderlein, 1905

Palaeoconis gen. n.

Type species

Palaeoconis azari gen. et. sp. n.

Diagnosis

Antennae with 19 flagellomeres. Forewing with three pigmented spots; two crossveins present in apical part of costal area. Crossvein rp2-ma approximately as long as basal abscissa of RP2. Media with one macroseta, ending with three terminal branches. Crossveins 1m-cua, 2mp2-cua and a1 present. Abdomen with discernible plicatures on sternites II-IV.

Etymology

The generic name is a combination of Palaeo and the suffix conis meaning dust.

Palaeoconis azari gen. et., sp. n.

Figures 3, 4

Holotype

BUB 2914; lowermost Cenomanian amber (Shi et al. 2012); Myanmar, Kachin, Hukawng Valley; preserved in a polished, transparent yellow piece of amber (9.18 × 6.77 × 2.18 mm), deposited in the Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin (ex. coll. Patrick Müller). The amber piece contains also one syninclusion of an imago of Diptera.

Etymology

The specific epithet honors Prof. Dany Azar (Lebanese University, Fanar, Lebanon), friend and colleague of AN and JP and worldwide known palaeoentomologist.

Diagnosis

As for the genus (vide supra).

Description

Male. Body length ca. 1.93 mm (measured from tip of head to tip of genitalia). Head hypognathous, ca. 0.34 mm. Compound eyes well developed, 0.22 mm x 0.14 mm (from lateral view). Antennae 21-segmented (with 19 flagellomeres), scape and pedicel stouter, longer and broader than flagellomeres, first flagellomere longer and wider than remaining flagellomeres, flagellomeres subquadrate, nearly as long as wide, terminal flagellomere conical. Maxillary palps five-segmented, fifth segment distinctly larger than other palpomeres, length of fifth segment ca. 0.12 mm. Labial palps three-segmented, third segment larger than remaining. Thorax well developed. Prothorax narrower and overall smaller than meso- and metathorax.

Forewing ca. 2.19 mm long, ca. 0.93 mm wide; two distinct apical crossveins in costal area; division of ScP1 and ScP2 0.31 mm from wing apex; R branching into RA and RP 0.48 mm from wing base; RA simple, distally ending connecting with branch of ScP2; RP branched into RP1 and RP2; ra-rp1 present; first spot on basal abscissa of RP2 near RP1 (near place where is RP forked); crossvein rp-m oblique crossing dark spot about mid-length; M with three branches (MA, MP1 and MP2), M with one stiff seta near crossvein rp-m (Figs 3A, 4C); crossvein rp2-ma relatively long, approximately as long as basal abscissa of RP2; crossvein 1m–cua near rp-m, but not aligned; crossvein 2mp2-cua near to wing apex, with third spot over it; crossveins cua-cup and a1 present. Hindwing ca. 2.12 mm long, ca. 0.92 mm wide; venation pattern very similar to forewing with exception of only single crossvein between C and ScP, wing membrane in hindwing hyaline without any pigmented spots; crossveins ra-rp1 and rp2-ma present; basal part of hindwing without clearly recognizable venation.

Figure 3. 

Palaeoconis azari gen. et sp. n., holotype BUB 2914. A Drawing of right fore wing B drawing of left hindwing. Scale bars: 100 µm.

Figure 4. 

Palaeoconis azari gen. et sp. n., holotype BUB 2914. A Habitus lateral view B wing venation and spots C detail of forewing venation with stiff seta on vein M D head from dorso-lateral view showing antennae, terminal segment of maxillary palp and eye. Scale bars: 500µm (A, B); not in scale: (C); 50 µm (D).

Legs long and slender; femora covered with fine and sparse setae; tibiae covered with stiff and dense setae; tarsi five-segmented, first tarsomere distinctly longer than remaining tarsomeres, terminal tarsomere elongated ending with two claws, tarsi covered with fine dense setae. Abdomen large and broad, tapered to the end (visible from lateral view only); plicatures present on sternites II-IV; length of abdomen including genitalia 1.22 mm, width 0.54 mm. Structures of external genitalia hardly discernible with exception of domed and well-sclerotized ectoproct in lateral view and the caudal projection of gonarcus below.

Discussion

Palaeoconis gen. n. can be attributed to the Aleuropteryginae based on the presence of two crossveins between RP and M and also the presence of plicatures on abdominal sternites II-IV. Nevertheless, Zimmermann et al. (2009) considered this last character as a symplesiomorphy of the Coniopterygidae. However, Palaeoconis does not possess in the forewings two long stiff setae on M, which is the diagnostic character for Aleuropteryginae. In contrast to this, the absence of these setae on the media and the presence of three-branched media are considered as plesiomorphic characters typical for Mesozoic Coniopterygidae (Engel 2002). In addition, Palaeoconis possesses in forewing crossvein a1 connecting A1 to posterior wing margin. According to Engel (2016) the subfamily Aleuropteryginae contains 14 genera (Mesozoic and Cenozoic), i.e., Achlyoconis Engel, 2016; Alboconis Nel et al., 2005; Apoglaesoconis Grimaldi, 2000; Archiconiocompsa Enderlein, 1910; Archiconis Enderlein, 1930; Garnaconis Perrichot and Nel in Perrichot et al., 2014; Geroconiocompsa Engel, 2010; Glaesoconis Meinander, 1975; Hemisemidalis Meinander, 1972; Juraconiopteryx Meinander, 1975; Libanoconis Engel, 2002; Neoconis Enderlein, 1930; Pararchiconis Nel, 1991, and Spiloconis Enderlein, 1907.

Achlyoconis, Alboconis, Apoglaesoconis, Glaesoconis, and Libanoconis share the presence of two distinct basal crossveins in the costal area, and in addition Achlyoconis, Alboconis and Libanoconis share the presence of crossvein a1–a2, vein A2 and crossvein a2. These traits separate these genera from Palaeoconis gen. n. In addition, Glaesoconis described from the Lower Cretaceous Myanmar amber differs from Palaeoconis gen. n. by a distinctly shorter crossvein rp2-ma , single crossvein m–cua, presence of A2 and four pigmented spots on wing membrane instead of three in Palaeoconis (Engel 2004). Libanoconis, known from the Lower Cretaceous amber of Lebanon, differs from Palaeoconis gen. n. in the positions of crossveins between M and CuA (1m–cua is near to wing base; 2m–cua approximately at mid-length of wing), and lack pigmented spots on membrane (Engel 2002; Nel et al. 2004). Achlyoconis described from the Upper Cretaceous amber of northern Myanmar differs from Palaeoconis gen. n. in the presence of seven thickenings with specialized setae on M, positions of crossveins 1m-cua and 2m-cua, presence of a single crossvein between CuP and A1, and four pigmented spots (Engel 2016). Alboconis, described from the Lower Cretaceous French amber, differs from Palaeoconis gen. n. by a two branched media bearing two long setae, crossvein between CuA and R+M, and two crossveins between CuP and A1 (Nel et al. 2004). Apoglaesoconis and Garnaconis share the following features such as M with two long setae, presence of crossveins cup–a1; a1–a2, vein A2 and absence of pigmented spots on wing membrane. Apoglaesoconis, from the Late Cretaceous amber of New Jersey, differs from Palaeoconis gen. n. by one crossvein between RP and M, branches RP2 and MA forming a cross, and by a single crossvein between M and CuA (Engel 2002). Garnaconis, from the Late Cretaceous amber of Vendée in northwestern France, differs from Palaeoconis gen. n. in the remote positions of separated transverse ScP2 and crossvein between RA+ScP2 and RP1 (see Fig. 3), unlike both being aligned in Garnaconis. Palaeoconis gen. n. bears two crossveins beween RP and M, a two-branched media with setae instead of only one crossvein between RP2 and MA and a three-branched media without setae in Garnaconis (Perrichot et al. 2014). Juraconiopteryx, Upper Jurassic of Kazakhstan, represents the oldest record of Coniopterygidae. Wing venation of Juraconiopteryx is very poorly preserved (Meinander 1975), therefore we are unable to make a reliable comparison with Palaeoconis.

Conclusion

In this contribution we extended our knowledge on past diversity of Coniopterygidae. Two new genera and species assigned to the two subfamilies Aleuropteryginae and Coniopteryginae are herein described and illustrated from the Early Cenomanian amber of Myanmar. These new taxa are established mainly on the basis of wing venation patterns, number of antennal flagellomeres along with other body structures like abdominal plicatures. Our research uncovers spectacular diversity of Coniopterygidae in mid-Cretaceous ecosystems and in the same time supports the antiquity of this group that seems to have had a remarkable evolutionary stasis since the mid-Cretaceous.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Patrick Müller (Käshofen, Germany) for making all the amber inclusions reported herein available for our descriptions. We thank to Vladimir Makarkin and Xingyue Liu for their insightful reviews and comments, which improved the manuscript. The work of the first author was supported by the Institutional Research Support grant of the Charles University, Prague (No. SVV 260 434 / 2018).

References

  • Azar D, Nel A, Solignac M (2000) A new Coniopterygidae from Lebanese amber. Acta Geologica Hispanica 35: 31–36.
  • Batelka J, Prokop J, Engel MS (2016) New ripiphorid beetles in mid-Cretaceous amber from Myanmar (Coleoptera: Ripiphoridae): first Pelecotominae and possible Mesozoic aggregative behaviour in male Ripidiinae. Cretaceous Research 68: 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2016.08.002
  • Batelka J, Engel MS, Prokop J (2018) A remarkable diversity of parasitoid beetles in Cretaceous amber, with a summary of the Mesozoic record of Tenebrionoidea. Cretaceous Research 90: 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2018.04.019
  • Batelka J, Prokop J, Pohl H, Bai M, Zhang W, Beutel RG (2018) Highly specialized Cretaceous beetle parasitoids (Ripiphoridae) identified with optimized visualization of microstructures. Systematic Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12331
  • Breitkreuz LCV, Winterton SL, Engel MS (2017) Wing tracheation in Chrysopidae and other Neuropterida (Insecta): a resolution of the confusion about vein fusion. American Museum Novitates 3890: 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1206/3890.1
  • Comstock JH (1918) The wings of insects. Comstock Publishing Co. , Ithaca, New York, 430 pp.
  • Engel MS (2016) Two new genera of Cretaceous dustywings in amber from Myanmar (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae). Novitates Paleoentomologicae 17: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17161/np.v0i17.6465
  • Grimaldi DA (2000) A diverse fauna of Neuropterodea in amber from the Cretaceous of New Jersey 259–303. In: Grimaldi DA (Ed.) Studies on fossils in amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey.Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 1–498.
  • Grimaldi DA, Engel MS (2005) Evolution of the insects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Grimaldi DA, Ross AJ (2017) Extraordinary Lagerstätten in amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of Burma. In: Fraser NC, Sues HD (Eds) Terrestrial conservation Lagerstätten: Windows into the Evolution of Life on Land.Dunedin Academic Press, Edinburgh, 287–342.
  • Huang DY, Bechly G, Nel P, Engel MS, Prokop J, Azar D, Cai CY, van de Kamp T, Staniczek AH, Garrouste R, Krogmann L, dos Santos Rolo T, Baumbach T, Ohlhoff R, Shmakov AS, Bourgoin T, Nel A (2016) New fossil insect order Permopsocida elucidates major radiation and evolution of suction feeding in hemimetabolous insects (Hexapoda: Acercaria). Scientific Reports 6: 23004. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23004
  • Kaddumi HF (2005) Amber of Jordan, the oldest prehistoric insects in fossil resin. Eternal River Museum of Natural History 2007, 298 pp.
  • Liu X, Lu X (2017) A remarkable new genus of Cretaceous dustywings (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae) in amber from northern Myanmar. Zoological Systematics 42: 380–389.
  • Makarkin VN (2016) The neuropteran assemblage (Insecta) of the mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber confirms transitional character of its biota. In: Dzyuba OS, Pestchevitskaya EB, Shurygin BN (Eds) Short papers for the Fourth International Symposium of International Geoscience Programme IGCP, Novosibirsk, Russia, Project 608: 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2017.03.019
  • Makarkin VN, Perkovsky EE (2017) A new species of Glaesoconis Meinander (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae) from the Santonian Taimyr amber. Cretaceous Research 75: 120–124.
  • Meinander M (1972) A revision of the family Coniopterygidae (Planipennia). Acta Zoologica Fennica 136: 1–357.
  • Meinander M (1975) Fossil Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera). Notulae Entomologicae 55: 53–57.
  • Nel A, Perrichot V, Azar D (2004) New and poorly known fossil Coniopterygidae in Cretaceous and Cenozoic ambers (Insecta: Neuroptera). Annales Zoologici 55: 1–7.
  • Perrichot V, Garrouste R, Azar D, Néraudeau D, Nel A (2014) A new genus of dustywings (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae) in Late Cretaceous Vendean amber. Paleontological Contributions 10F: 25–29.
  • Prokop J, Fernandes FR, Lapeyrie J, Nel A (2015) Discovery of the first lacewings from the Guadalupian of Lodève Basin in southern France (Neuroptera: Permithonidae). Geobios 48: 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2015.03.001
  • Randolf S, Zimmermann U, Aspöck U (2017) Head anatomy of adult Coniopteryx pygmaea Enderlein, 1906: effects of miniaturization and the systematic position of Coniopterygidae (Insecta: Neuroptera). Arthropod Structure & Development 46: 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2016.12.004
  • Shi G, Grimaldi DA, Harlow GE, Wang J, Wang J, Wang M, Lei W, Li Q, Li X (2012) Age constraint on Burmese amber based on U-Pb dating of zircons. Cretaceous Research 37: 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2012.03.014
  • Sziráki D (2016) A new dusty lacewing genus and species (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae) from Cretaceous Burmese amber. Folia Historico-Naturalia Musei Matraensis 40: 89–93.
  • Sziráki D (2017) Taxonomic position of Paranimboa groehni Sziráki, 2016, with remarks on the Cretaceous genus Paranimboa Engel, 2016 (Neuroptera, Coniopterygidae). Folia Historico-Naturalia Musei Matraensis 41: 181–182.
  • Sziráki G, Gröhn C (2015) Presence of two extant genera of dusty lacewings (Neuroptera: Coniopterygidae) in Baltic amber, with remarks on some earlier described fossil taxa. Folia Historico-Naturalia Musei Matraensis 39: 63–71.
  • Wang Y, Liu X, Garzón-Orduña IJ, Winterton SL, Yan Y, Aspöck U, Aspöck H, Yang DJ (2017) Mitochondrial phylogenomics illuminates the evolutionary history of Neuropterida. Cladistics 33: 617–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12186
  • Winterton SL, Hardy NB, Wiegmann BM (2010) On wings of lace: phylogeny and Bayesian divergence time estimates of Neuropterida (Insecta) based on morphological and molecular data. Systematic Entomology 35: 349–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2010.00521.x
  • Winterton SL, Zhao J, Garzón-Orduña IJ, Wang Y, Liu Z (2017) The phylogeny of lance lacewings (Neuroptera: Osmylidae). Systematic Entomology 42: 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12231
  • Winterton SL, Lemmon AR, Gillung JP, Garzoni IJ, Badano D, Bakke DK, Breitkreuz LCV, Engel MS, Moriarty-Lemmon E, Liu X, Machado RJP, Skevington JH, Oswald JD (2018) Evolution of lacewings and allied orders using anchored phylogenomics (Neuroptera, Megaloptera, Raphidioptera). Systematic Entomology 43: 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12278
  • Zimmermann D, Klepal W, Aspöck U (2009) The first holistic SEM study of Coniopterygidae (Neuroptera) – structural evidence and phylogenetic implications. European Journal of Entomology 106: 651–662. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2009.081
login to comment