Research Article |
Corresponding author: Piyaporn Pitaktunsakul ( ppiyaporn@kru.ac.th ) Academic editor: Marek Borowiec
© 2019 Weeyawat Jaitrong, Yuppayao Tokeeree, Piyaporn Pitaktunsakul.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Jaitrong W, Tokeeree Y, Pitaktunsakul P (2019) A new species of the ant genus Recurvidris Bolton, 1992 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae) from Thailand. ZooKeys 830: 53-61. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.830.31147
|
Recurvidris Bolton, 1992 is a small myrmicine genus of the tribe Crematogastrini. Until now, eleven species are known in this genus from Asia. A new species, Recurvidris lekakuli sp. n., is here described from Thailand based on the worker caste. The type series of the new species was collected from leaf litter in a dry evergreen forest. A key to the Asian species of Recurvidris based on the worker caste is provided.
Formicidae, ants, Recurvidris, new species, taxonomy, Thailand
Recurvidris Bolton, 1992 is a small myrmicine genus of the tribe Crematogastrini (
Surveys of ants in Kanchanaburi province, western Thailand under the project “Conservation and economic assessment at Kanchanaburi limestone community forest for sustainable uses”, led to the discovery of a few unidentified Recurvidris specimens belonging to the R. kemneri species group (sensu
The material was collected from western Thailand, Kanchanaburi province, Thong Phaphum district, Sahakhon Nikhom village (14.76255556N, 98.80966667E). The area was covered with a dry evergreen forest. The holotype and paratypes of Recurvidris lekakuli sp. n. are pin-mounted dry specimens. The type material of the new species was compared with the holotype and paratypes of the most closely related species, Recurvidris chanapaithooni Jaitrong & Wiwatwitaya, 2015 (in Natural History Museum of the National Science Museum, Thailand). Most morphological observations were made with a ZEISS Discovery V12 stereoscope.
Multi-focused montage images were produced using NIS-Elements-D from a series of source images taken by a Nikon Digital Sight-Ri1 camera attached to a Nikon AZ100M stereoscope. The holotype and paratypes were measured for the following parts using a micrometer (accurate to 0.01 mm).
The abbreviations used for the measurements and indices are as follows (edited from
DPW Dorsal Petiole Width. Maximum width of petiole in dorsal view.
ED Eye Diameter. Maximum diameter of eye with head positioned in profile view, such that anterior and posterior eye margins are in same plane of focus.
HL Head length. Length of head capsule, excluding mandibles, measured by a straight line from anterior clypeal margin to mid-point of a line drawn across posterior margin of head.
HW Head width. Maximum width of head, in full-face view, measured behind eyes (excluding eyes).
ML Mesosomal length. Maximum diagonal length of mesosoma in profile view, measured from posterodorsal border of pronotal flange to posterior basal angle of metapleuron.
PW Pronotal width. Maximum width of pronotum in dorsal view.
SL Scape length. Maximum length of antennal scape excluding basal constriction and condylar bulb.
TL Total length. Roughly measured from anterior margin of head to tip of gaster in stretched specimens.
CI Cephalic index. HW/HL × 100.
DPI Dorsal petiole index. DPW/PL × 100.
OI Ocular Index. ED/HW × 100.
SI Scape index. SL/HW × 100.
Abbreviations of the type depositories are as follows:
SKYC Seiki Yamane’s Collection at Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History and Human History, Japan.
THNHM Natural History Museum of the National Science Museum, Thailand.
Holotype: worker (THNHM-I-01219, THNHM), West Thailand, Kanchanaburi Province, Thong Phaphum District, Ban Sahakhon Nikhom, dry evergreen forest (DEF), 14.76255N, 98.80966E, 13.VII.2018, W. Jaitrong leg., WJT130718-07. Paratypes: three workers (THNHM-I-01220 to THNHM-I-01222, THNHM), same data as holotype; one worker (THNHM-I-01249, THNHM), West Thailand, Kanchanaburi Province, Thong Phaphum District, Ban Sahakhon Nikhom, dry evergreen forest (DEF), 14.76255N, 98.80966E, 26.VIII.2018, C. Sathiandee leg.; five workers (THNHM-I-02617,
Holotype and four paratype workers (n = 5): DPW 0.10–0.12, ED 0.12–0.13, HL 0.50–0.56, HW 0.50–0.56, PW 0.23–0.26, ML 0.69–0.73, SL 0.53–0.56, TL 2.28–2.34, CI 97–100, DPI 30–35, OI 22–27, SI 100–107.
Head in full-face view round, almost as long as broad; masticatory margin of mandible with four sharp teeth, fourth (basal) tooth almost as large as third tooth; basal margin with a small tooth; propodeal declivity lacking infradental lamella or ridge linking propodeal spine to metapleural lobe; head, promesonotum, propodeum, petiolar node, postpetiole and gaster entirely smooth and shiny; mesopleuron and peduncle of petiole superficially reticulate with slightly smooth and shiny interspaces; propodeal dorsum with a pair of very short appressed hairs in front of spiracles.
(Holotype and paratypes). Head in full-face view round and almost as long as broad, with posterior margin convex. Eye with seven ommatidia along longest axis. Antennal scape extending posteriorly slightly beyond posterolateral corner of head. Masticatory margin of mandible with four sharp teeth, fourth (basal) tooth as large as third tooth; basal margin with a small tooth. Clypeus without paired carinae, its anterior margin almost straight. Promesonotum in profile strongly convex dorsally and sloping gradually to metanotal groove. Propodeum in profile with almost straight dorsal outline; propodeal spines very slender, divergent, and in posterior view very narrow. Propodeal declivity lacking infradental lamella or ridge linking propodeal spine to metapleural lobe. Peduncle of petiole in profile relatively long, with its dorsal outline concave and ending posteriorly in right angle; its ventral outline convex with long acute subpetiolar process.
Head entirely smooth and shiny, lacking sculpture except some short longitudinal rugulae near mandiblular base. Antennal scape smooth and shiny. Promesonotum smooth and shiny; mesopleuron superficially reticulate with smooth and shiny interspaces; entire propodeum including propodeal spine smooth and shiny. Peduncle of petiole superficially reticulate with smooth and shiny interspaces; petiolar node entirely smooth and shiny; postpetiole entirely smooth and shiny; legs smooth and shiny. Gaster smooth and shiny.
Head with relatively dense short hairs; promesonotum with sparse longer hairs (8–10 hairs); longest pronotal hairs 0.13–0.15 mm long; propodeum dorsally with a pair of very short decumbent or appressed hairs (these hairs missing in two paratypes). Petiole with two dorsal pairs of long hairs. Postpetiole with two dorsal pairs of long hairs. Body colour yellow.
The specific name is dedicated to the late Dr. Boonsong Lekakul, who was the most excellent specialist in zoological sciences in Thailand and helped and inspired many young biologists.
Recurvidris lekakuli is closely related to R. chanapaithooni Jaitrong & Wiwatwitaya, 2015; R. kemneri Bolton, 1992; R. nigrans Zettel, 2008 and R. proles Bolton, 1992 in having the following characteristics: masticatory margin of mandible with a series of four sharp teeth (acute basal tooth), basal margin of mandible with a small tooth; propodeum without infradental lamella or ridge linking the propodeal spine to metapleural lobe; head smooth and shining. Among them R. lekakuli is more similar in general appearance to R. chanapaithooni and R. kemneri than to R. nigrans and R. proles, the former two sharing the clear yellow body that is unicolorous (black to dark brown in R. nigrans and R. proles). Recurvidris lekakuli is easily separated from R. chanapaithooni by the following characteristics: clearly larger body (TL 2.28–2.34 mm, HW 0.50–0.56 mm in R. lekakuli; TL 2.00–2.10 mm, HW 0.38–0.41 mm in R. chanapaithooni); mesopleuron largely smooth and shiny, only partly superficially reticulate (strongly reticulate in R. chanapaithooni); petiole relatively longer (DPI 30–35 in R. lekakuli; 42–43 in R. chanapaithooni); petiolar node clearly smooth and shiny (petiole entirely reticulate in R. chanapaithooni); propodeal dorsum with a pair of very short appressed hairs (with 2 pairs of standing hairs in R. chanapaithooni). Recurvidris lekakuli differs from R. kemneri by the clypeus clearly smooth and shiny (median portion of clypeus weakly bicarinate in R. kemneri) and having a pair of very short appressed hairs on propodeal dorsum (without hairs in R. kemneri). The new species is also similar to R. glabriceps Zhou, 2000 from China, but the latter lacks a small tooth on basal margin of mandible.
Recurvidris lekakuli has been known only from the type locality. The most closely related species, R. chanapaithooni was recorded from eastern and southern Thailand (
1 | Masticatory margin of mandible with 4 or 5 teeth, basal (fourth or fifth) tooth distinctly larger than preceding tooth, acute to bidenticulate; head behind level of frontal lobes sculptured (opaque, reticulate, reticulate-punctate); propodeal declivity with narrow infradental lamella or ridge linking propodeal spine to metapleural lobe | 2 |
– | Masticatory margin of mandible with 4 teeth, basal (fourth) tooth at most only slightly larger than third; head behind level of frontal lobes unsculptured; propodeal declivity lacking infradental lamella or ridge linking propodeal spine to metapleural lobe | 7 |
2 | Masticatory margin of mandible with 5 teeth | 3 |
– | Masticatory margin of mandible with 4 teeth | 4 |
3 | Dorsum of head finely and densely reticulate-punctate everywhere, dull and opaque; disc of pronotum finely and densely sculptured; subpetiolar process as a short tooth; small species (HW 0.39, see |
R. williami Bolton, 1992 |
– | Dorsum of head only with very fine superficially reticulate patterning, glossy; disc of pronotum glassy smooth; subpetiolar process as a long spine; large species (HW 0.45–0.56, see |
R. browni Bolton, 1992 |
4 | Basal tooth of mandible acute apically | 5 |
– | Basal tooth of mandible bidenticulate apically, may appear as abruptly truncated in worn mandible | 6 |
5 | Propodeal dorsum with only faint superficial sculpture and with a pair of short decumbent hairs | R. pickburni Bolton, 1992 |
– | Propodeal dorsum with fine dense reticulate-rugulae and without a pair of short decumbent hairs | R. nuwa Xu & Zheng, 1995 |
6 | In profile view, propodeal spine and petiolar peduncle relatively short and stout (Figure |
R. recurvispinosa Forel, 1890 |
– | In profile view, propodeal spine and petiolar peduncle relatively long and narrow (Figure |
R. hebe Bolton, 1992 |
7 | Propodeal dorsum with 1–2 standing (erect) hairs | 8 |
– | Propodeal dorsum with 1–2 pairs of very short decumbent or appressed hairs, without standing hairs. | 10 |
8 | Head and gaster dark brown, much darker than the yellowish mesosoma | R. proles Bolton, 1992 |
– | Body color uniformly yellow | 9 |
9 | Basal margin of mandible unarmed; head relatively long (CI < 90) | R. glabriceps Zhou, 2000 |
– | Basal margin of mandible armed with a small tooth which is widely separated from basal tooth; head relatively short and broad (CI ≥ 100) | R. chanapaithooni Jaitrong & Wiwatwitaya, 2015 |
10 | Body color uniformly blackish brown; in profile propodeal spine broad at base | R. nigrans Zettel, 2008 |
– | Body yellowish brown; in profile propodeal spine narrow at base | 11 |
11 | Entire propodeum and dorsum of petiolar peduncle smooth and shiny; propodeal spine long, slightly longer than longest pronotal hairs | R. lekakuli sp. n. |
– | Dorsum of propodeum superficially sculptured; dorsum of petiolar peduncle finely reticulate; propodeal spine short, shorter than longest pronotal hairs | R. kemneri (Wheeler & Wheeler, 1954) |
This study was supported by Office of the Higher Education Commission and Centre of Excellence on Biodiversity (project no. BDC-PG2-16009) and partly by the National Science and Technology Development Agency (Funding contract no. FDA-CO2561-5851-TH). We thank Miss Chatsarin Sathiandee (Kanchanaburi Rajabhat University), who donated us a paratype.