Research Article
Print
Research Article
Lithobius (Ezembius) ternidentatus sp. n. (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae), a new species from China
expand article infoSujian Pei, Haipeng Liu, Yanmin Lu, Xiaojie Hou, Huiqin Ma
‡ Hengshui University, Hengshui, China
Open Access

Abstract

Lithobius (Ezembius) ternidentatus sp. n. (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae), recently discovered from Wuyuezhai Mountain, Lingshou County, Shijiazhuang City, Hebei Province, China, is described. Morphologically it resembles L. (E.) multispinipes Pei, Lu, Liu, Hou, Ma & Zapparoli, 2016, but can be easily distinguished from the latter by having a different sized Tömösváry’s organ, different numbers of ocelli, obvious differences in ventral plectrotaxy of legs 14, and tarsal articulation ill-defined on legs 1–13, well-defined on legs 14–15. The main morphological characters of the known Chinese species of the subgenus Ezembius Chamberlin, 1919 based on adult specimens is presented.

Keywords

Centipede, Chilopoda, China, Hebei Province, myriapods

Introduction

Ezembius was originally proposed as a subgenus of Lithobius Leach, 1814 in the family Lithobiidae by Chamberlin (1919); it accommodates a group of 60 species/subspecies mostly known from Asia, with little extension into north-western North America. Known species colonize a wide range of habitats, from the Arctic and Subarctic to tropical and sub-tropical forests, to steppe and overgrazed stony areas of central Asia, to Himalayan montane forests, from the sea shore up to 5500 m (Himalayas) (Zapparoli and Edgecombe 2011, Qiao et al. 2018). Although the subgenus was formally proposed as new and described in 1923 (Chamberlin 1923), according to Jeekel (2005) its name had been already validated in 1919 (Chamberlin 1919). Ezembius is characterized by antennae with ca 20 articles; ocelli 1+4–1+20; forcipular coxosternal teeth usually 2+2; porodonts generally setiform, sometimes stout. Tergites are generally without posterior triangular projections; tarsal articulation of legs 1–13 is distinct. Female gonopods are with uni-, bi or tridentate claws, and 2+2–3+3 (rarely 4+4) spurs (Zapparoli and Edgecombe 2011).

The myriapod fauna of China is still poorly known and very little attention has been paid to the study of Lithobiomorpha, with only 82 species/subspecies hitherto known from the country. Altogether, 21 species of Ezembius have been recorded from China, but none of them have been reported from Hebei Province (Pei et al. 2018, Qiao et al. 2018). Here a new species, recently found in the Hebei Province, China, is described and illustrated. Tables of the main morphological characters of Chinese Ezembius species are presented.

Materials and methods

All specimens were hand-collected under leaf litter or stones. The material was examined with the aid of a Motic-C microscope (Xiamen, China). The colour description is based on specimens preserved in 75% ethanol, and the body length is measured from the anterior margin of the cephalic plate to the posterior margin of the postpedal tergite. Type specimens are preserved in 75% ethanol and deposited in the School of Life Sciences, Hengshui University, Hengshui, China (HUSLS). The terminology of the external anatomy follows Bonato et al. (2010).

The following abbreviations are used in the text and the tables: a, anterior; C, coxa; DaC spine, anterior dorsal spine of coxa; F, femur; m, median; p, posterior; P, prefemur; S, SS, sternite, sternites; T, TT, tergite, tergites; Ti, tibia; To, Tömösváry’s organ; Tr, trochanter.

Taxonomy

Lithobiomorpha Pocock, 1895

Lithobiidae Newport, 1844

Lithobius Leach, 1814

Lithobius (Ezembius) Chamberlin, 1919

Lithobius (Ezembius) ternidentatussp. n.

Fig. 1A–E, Tables 1, 2

Diagnosis

Body length 7.1–8.5 mm, antennae commonly composed of 24 articles, but also 22+24 or 24+25, 5–6 ocelli on each side of head, arranged in two irregular rows, posterior two ocelli comparatively large; Tömösváry’s organ larger than the adjacent ocelli; commonly 3+3, but also 3+2 or 2+2 prosternal teeth, porodonts moderately slender, posterolateral to the lateral-most tooth, posterior angles of all tergites without triangular projections; coxal pore formula 3-4-4-3, oval to round, arranged in one row; female gonopods with 2+2 moderately small coniform spurs, apical claw simple; male gonopods short and small, with 1–3 long setae on the terminal segment.

Material examined

Holotype: ♀ (Fig. 1), China, Hebei Province, Wuyuezhai Mountain, Lingshou County, Shijiazhuang City, 38°43'15.02"N, 114°08'32.62"E, 480 m, under litter of the forest floor in a mixed coniferous broad-leaved forest, 28 Sept 2014, leg. S. Pei, H. Ma. Paratypes: 33♀♀, 38♂♂, same data as holotype. Other material: 9♀♀, 6♂♂, China, Hebei Province, Shanyanggou, Longquanguan Town, Fuping County, Baoding City, 38°50'13.57"N, 114°03'26.93"E, 941 m, 7 Sept 2014, leg. S. Pei, H. Ma. Type specimens and other material are deposited in the HUSLS.

Description

Body length: 7.1–8.5 mm, cephalic plate 0.75–0.97 mm long, 0.60–0.75 mm wide.

Colour: antennal articles and whole body pale yellow-brown, tergites darker, pleural region and sternites pale yellow with greyish hue; basal and proximal parts of forcipules, forcipular coxosternite, and SS XIV and XV darker.

Antennae: 22–25 articles, commonly 24 articles (Fig. 1A), 2 specimens 22+24, 3 specimens 24+25 articles; antennae articles length is approximately equal to width except basal articles II–V slightly longer than wide, distal-most article 2.7–3.1 times as long as wide; abundant setae on the antennal surface, less so on the basal articles, gradual increase in density of setae to about the fourth article, then more or less constant.

Cephalic plate smooth, convex, slightly wider than long; tiny setae emerging from pores scattered very sparsely over the whole surface; frontal marginal ridge with shallow anterior median furrow; short to long setae scattered along the marginal ridge of the cephalic plate; lateral marginal ridge discontinuous, posterior margin continuous, straight, wider than lateral marginal ridge (Fig. 1A).

Five or six oval to rounded ocelli on each side (Fig. 1B), most of them rounded, domed, translucent, usually darkly pigmented, situated in two irregular rows; the posterior two ocelli comparatively large; others subequal in size.

Tömösváry’s organ situated at anterolateral margin of the cephalic plate, about same size as the largest two ocelli and lying well apart from them (Fig. 1B).

Coxosternite subtrapezoidal (Fig. 1C), anterior margin narrow, lateral margins slightly longer than medial margins; median diastema moderately deep, narrow V-shaped; anterior margin with 3+3 acute triangular teeth, very few 2+2 (8% of studied individuals) or 2+3 (3% of studied individuals); porodonts slender, lying posterolateral to and separated from the lateral-most tooth (Fig. 1); scattered long setae on the ventral side of coxosternite, longer setae near the dental margin.

Figure 1. 

Lithobius (Ezembius) ternidentatus sp. n., holotype female and paratype male: A male habitus, dorsal view B male ocelli and Tömösváry’s organ (To), lateral view C female forcipular coxosternite, ventral view D female posterior segments and gonopods, ventral view E male: posterior segments and gonopods, ventral view. Scale bars: 2 mm (A); 200 μm (B); 250 μm (C–E).

All tergites smooth, without wrinkles, dorsum slightly convex; tiny setae emerging from pores scattered sparsely over the entire surface, near the margin with few long setae; T I narrower posterolaterally than anterolaterally, generally trapezoidal, narrower than the cephalic plate and T III, obvious shorter than T III, the cephalic plate slightly wider than T III. Lateral marginal ridges of all tergites continuous. Posterior margin of TT I, III, V, and VII slightly concave, posterior marginal ridges continuous. Posterior margins of TT VIII, IX, XI, XIII, and XV concave, posterior marginal ridges discontinuous. Posterior angles of tergites generally rounded, without triangular projections. Miniscule setae scattered sparsely over the surface, 3–5 slightly thick and long setae on anterior and posterior angles of each tergite.

Posterior side of sternites narrower than anterior side, generally trapezoidal, smooth; setae emerging from sparsely scattered pores on the surface and lateral margin, few long setae on the surface of the anterior part of each sternite, 1–2 comparatively long setae scattered sparsely on the surface respective both of the middle part and posterior part of each sternite.

Legs robust, tarsal articulation ill-defined on legs 1–13, well-defined on legs 14–15; all legs with fairly long curved claws; legs 1–13 with anterior and posterior accessory spurs; anterior accessory spurs moderately long and slender, forming a moderately small angle with the claw, posterior accessory spurs slightly more robust, forming a comparatively large angle with the claw, legs 14 and 15 only with small posterior accessory spurs; long setae sparsely scattered over the surface of prefemur, femur and tibia of all legs, more setae on the tarsal surface; setae on dorsal surface of tarsus slightly shorter than the ventral, one row of thicker setae regularly arranged on the medial ventral side of tibia of legs 1–13, with setae significantly reduced in legs 14 and 15, no thicker setae regularly arranged in one row on the medial ventral side of tibia; legs 14 and 15 moderately thicker and longer than the anterior pairs in the female; leg plectrotaxy as in Table 1.

Table 1.

Leg plectrotaxy of Lithobius (Ezembius) ternidentatus sp. n.

Legs Ventral Dorsal
C Tr P F Ti C Tr P F Ti
1–9 mp amp am ap ap ap
10 mp amp am a ap ap ap
11 mp amp am a amp ap ap
12 (a)mp amp am a amp p ap
13 m amp amp am a amp p ap
14 m amp am am a amp p p
15 m amp am a a amp p

Coxal pores 3-3(4)-4(5)-3, commonly 3-4-4-3, round to slightly oval, in a row; coxal pore field set in a relatively shallow groove, the coxal pore-field fringe with prominence; prominence with short to moderately long setae sparsely scattered over the surface.

Female S 15 anterior margin broader than posterior, generally trapezoidal, posteromedially straight, colour yellow-brown; short to long sparse setae evenly scattered on surface; surface of the lateral sternal margin of genital segment well chitinized, posterior margin of genital sternite deeply concave between condyles of gonopods, except for a small, median tongue-shape bulge; relatively long setae sparsely scattered over ventral surface of the genital segment; gonopods: first article fairly broad, bearing 8–10 moderately long setae, arranged in three irregular rows; with 2+2 moderately long and slender, coniform spurs, inner spur slightly smaller than the outer; second article with 5–6 long setae, arranged in two irregular rows; third article with 3–4 comparatively long setae, arranged in one or two irregular rows; third article with a simple apical claw (Fig. 1D).

Male S 15 posterior margin narrower than anterior, posteromedially straight, sparsely covered with long setae on the surface; sternite of genital segment smaller than in female, usually well sclerotized, posterior margin deeply concave between the gonopods, without medial bulge; long setae sparsely scattered on the ventral surface of the genital segment, fewer setae near S 15, fringed with longer setae along the posterior margin; gonopods short, appearing as a small hemispherical bulge, with 1–3 long setae, apically slightly sclerotized (Fig. 1E).

Habitat

The specimens here studied were collected in a mixed coniferous broad-leaved forest at ca 480–900 m above sea level, in moderately moist habitats under roadside stones and litter of the forest floor.

Etymology

The specific name ternidentatus refers to the coxosternite anterior margin with 3+3 slightly acute triangular teeth.

Discussion

The new species resembles L. (E.) multispinipes Pei, Lu, Liu Hou, Ma & Zapparoli, 2016 from the Xinjiang Autonomous Region in having 3+3 prosternal teeth commonly, the posterior two ocelli comparatively large, coxal pores 3–5 and with two coniform spurs on female gonopods. However, the new species can be easily distinguished by the following characters: the Tömösváry’s organ about same size as the largest ocellus in contrast to slightly smaller than the adjoining ocelli in L. (E.) multispinipes; and with five or six ocelli in new species instead of eight ocelli in L. (E.) multispinipes; and tarsal articulation ill-defined on legs 1–13 in the new species in contrast to well-defined on legs 1–13 in L. (E.) multispinipes; and legs 14 posterior accessory spur absent versus present in L. (E.) multispinipes, moreover, the 14 legs ventral plectrotaxy are obviously different: 0-1-3-2-2 compared to 0-1-3-2-1 in L. (E.) multispinipes.

To assist in the identification of the Chinese species of Lithobius (Ezembius), the main morphological characters (Table 2) of the known Chinese species of the subgenus Ezembius Chamberlin based on adult specimens are presented.

Table 2.

The main morphological characters of the known Chinese species of subgenus Ezembius Chamberlin, 1919.

Characters anabilineatus anasulcifemoralis bidens bilineatus chekianus datongensis gantoensis giganteus insolitus irregularis
Authorities Ma et al. 2015 Ma et al. 2013 Takakuwa 1939 Pei et al. 2014 Chamberlin and Wang 1952 Qiao et al. 2018 Takakuwa and Takashima 1949 Eason 1986 Eason 1993 Takakuwa and Takashima 1949
Distribution China S (Guangxi) China S (Guangxi) China S (Taiwan) China S (Guangxi) China S (Zhengjiang and Taiwan) China NW (Qinghai Province) China NW (Shanxi) China N (Inner Mongolia Autonomous region) China S (Hong Kong) China W (Shanxi)
Body length (mm) 11.9–12.1 10.1–12.3 15.0 9.0–9.1 16.0 12.3–14.2 9.0 15.0–50.0 10.0 –11.5 12.0
Number of antennal articles 23+23 articles in female, unkown in male 19+19–24+24, commonly 20+20 20–21 two specimens with 20+21, one specimen with 20+23 20+20 20+20 20–23 20+20 18+18 – 19+19 20+20
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 5 – 6, in 2 rows 6, in 3 rows 7 5–6, in 2 rows 5, in 3 rows 10, in 3 rows 6 6–10, in 2–3 rows 6–8, in 2 rows 7, in 2 rows
Posterior ocellus round, large oval to round, large comparatively large oval to rounded oval to round, comparatively large comparatively large oval to round, comparatively large oval to round, comparatively large oval to round, comparatively large round, comparatively large
Seriate ocelli subequal, all ocelli domed, translucent, usually darkly pigmented one near ventral margin moderately small, others almost equal not reported subequal, all ocelli domed, translucent, usually darkly pigmented not reported not reported comparatively large not reported not reported subequal
Tömösváry’s organ round, smaller than adjoining ocelli moderately large, rounded, slightly larger than adjoining ocelli at most same size as one ocellus slightly larger than adjoining ocelli not reported slightly larger than nearest ocellus subequal in size to adjoining medium large ocelli slightly smaller than adjoining ocelli slightly smaller than adjoining ocelli same size as largest ocellus
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 2+2, subtriangular 2+2, moderately blunt 2+2 2+2, slightly triangular 2+2 2+2 slightly acute 2+2, approximately sharp, small 2+2 2+2, approximately sharp, small 2+2, small
Porodont long, lying posterolateral to lateral-most teeth slender, lying posterolateral to lateral-most tooth, their base moderately bulged moderately long thick and long, lying posterolateral to lateral-most tooth not reported setiform porodonts separated from lateral tooth laterally not reported not reported slender, lying posterolateral to lateral tooth, their base slightly bulged long, their base slightly bulged
Tergites smooth, backside slightly hunched smooth not reported smooth, slightly hunched behind not reported almost smooth smooth, without wrinkles smooth, with slightly wrinkles T1 smooth, other with wrinkles smooth
Number of coxal pores 3–5, female 4454, 3554; male 4443, 4453 3–6, usually 4663, 5654, 5553, 5563 and 5565 5(6)555 usually females 4554, 5565; males 4553, 4454 6655 or 7665 4655 and 5575. Coxal pores 4654 and 4554 in male 3333 3333, 4554, 4555, 4565, 5565 or 5566 3–6, male 3443; female 4454, 4555, 5555, 5565 3–10, female 3–6 in 12th leg, 4–6 in 13th leg, 7–10 in 14th and 15th leg
Shape of coxal pores round or slightly ovate round or slightly ovate round ovate not reported rounded round round round round
Tarsus 1–tarsus 2 articulation on legs 1–13 not well-defined not well-defined Well-defined not well-defined not reported distinct not reported Well-defined not defined Well-defined
Male 14th leg Obvious, thicker and stronger than other legs markedly thicker and stronger than 1–13 legs, thicker and stronger than female not reported distinctly thick and strong not reported not reported not reported not reported distinctly thick and strong not reported
Male 15th leg obvious thicker and stronger than other legs markedly thicker and stronger than 1–13 legs, thicker and stronger than female not reported distinctly thick and strong not reported not reported not reported not reported distinctly thick and strong, with dark zones on dorsal of tibia not reported
Dorsal sulci on male 14th legs absent absent not reported with two, shallow longitudinal sulci not reported not reported not reported not reported absent not reported
Dorsal sulci on male 15th legs two distinct, shallow, dorsal sulci on femur and tibia with a distinct, shallow, dorsal sulci on tibia not reported with two, shallow longitudinal sulci not reported not reported not reported not reported absent not reported
DaC spine on 14th–15th legs on 14th–15th legs absent on 4th–15th legs on 14th–15th legs on 12th–15th absent on 12th–15th legs (on 11th and 12th legs sometimes present) absent on 13th–15th legs
14th accessory spur anterior accessory spur reduced in size, only half length of posterior accessory spur absent not reported anterior accessory spur absent present present present present not reported not reported
15th accessory spur absent absent not reported anterior accessory absent present anterior accessory absent present absent absent not reported
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 2+2 moderately small, blunt, coniform spurs, inner spur slightly smaller than the outer 2+2 moderately blunt, with conical spurs, inner spur slightly smaller 3+3 or 4+4, sharp 2+2 moderately small, blunt, coniform spurs, inner spur slightly smaller than outer one not reported 2+2 moderately large, coniform spurs 1+1, conical spurs 2+2 3+3, coniform spurs 2+2 or 2+3, moderately small, blunt, coniform spurs
Dorsal side of second article of female gonopods with one spine lying dorsally on its external margin no striking features not reported with three short, robust setae lying dorsally on its external margin not reported 5-6 setae and five long curved spines not reported with eight spines in two irregular rows lying dorsally on its external margin not reported not reported
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) simple, small subtriangular teeth in the inner apical claw dimidiate simple, small sharply teeth in the inner apical claw bipartite, and its inner aspect broader not reported undivided, bearing a small triangular protuberance on ventral side simple simple simple simple and broad
Male gonopods short and small bulge, with one to two long setae, apically slightly sclerotised with a small bulge, without setae and apically less sclerotised hemispherical, with two long setae short and small bulge, having a long seta, apically slightly sclerotised not reported a hemispherical bulge, with three setae not reported not reported not reported not reported
Authoities Pei et al. 2015 Qiao et al. 2018 Takakuwa 1939 Takakuwa 1940 Pei et al. 2016 Zapparoli 1991 Attems 1934 Attems 1927 Takakuwa and Takashima 1949 This paper Pei et al. 2011 Pei et al. 2018
Distribution China NW (Xinjiang Uygur) China NW (Qinghai) China S (Taiwan) China (Taiwan, Sichuan, Jiangsu, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur) China S (Taiwan) China S (Fujian and Taiwan) China S (Taiwan) China W (Shanxi) China N (Hebei) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur)
Body length (mm) 9.6–13.3 17.0–18.0 18.0 22.0–23.0 11.6–22.6 16.0 15.0 Not reported 12.0 7.1–8.5 8.1-15.0 9.6–13.3
Number of antennal articles 19+19–21+21 commonly 20+20 20+20 19+19–21+21 20–28 commonly 20+20, (three specimens with 20+21, one specimen with 20+26 of 134 specimens) 20+20, 21+21 20+20 in female, 20+21 in male 19–22 20+20 22–25 20-24, commonly 20 19–22, commonly 20
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 8–10, in 3 rows 11, in 3 rows 8–11, in 3 rows 9–13, in 3 rows 8, in 3 rows 3–4, in 1 or 2 rows 8, in 4 rows 7, in 2 rows 6 5–6, in 2 rows 10-13, in 3–4 rows 8–10, in 3 rows
Posterior ocellus posterior two ocelli bigger than seriate ocelli posterior ocellus largest comparatively small comparatively large two ocelli large, oval to rounded comparatively large comparatively large comparatively large all ocelli same size posterior two ocelli comparatively large comparatively large two ocelli comparatively large
Seriate ocelli other seriate ocelli slightly larger than ocelli adjoining ventrally not reported not reported same size two near ventral margin moderately small, others almost equal not reported not reported not reported same size others subequal in size dorsal ones moderately large, those near ventral margin of ocellar field moderately small, others of moderate size the adjoining Tömösváry organ slightly small
Tömösváry's organ subequal in size to adjoining ocelli smaller than adjacent ocelli same size as adjoining ocelli larger than adjoining ocelli slightly smaller than adjoining ocelli not reported not reported not reported same size as ocelli about same size as largest ocellus slightly larger than adjoining ocelli subequal in size to adjoining ocelli
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 2+2, approximately blunt 3+2 blunt nipple-like teeth 2+2, comparatively large 2+2, small and sharp 3+3, slightly triangular 2+2 2+2 2+2 2+2, small and sharp 3+3 acute triangular, very few 2+2 or 2+3 2+2 moderately small and pointed 2+2 subtriangular slightly acute
Porodont thick and long, lying posterolateral to lateral-most teeth thick and strong separated from lateral tooth ventrolaterally long and strong lying posterolateral to lateral-most tooth thick and long, lying posterolateral to lateral-most tooth lying posterolateral to the lateral-most teeth not obvious not reported slender and long slender, lying posterolateral to, and separated from, lateral-most tooth moderately thick in basal, moderately pointed, just posterolateral to lateral tooth thick and strong, just posterolateral and separated from lateral tooth
Tergites smooth, without wrinkles, backside slightly hunched all smooth, without wrinkles smooth smooth, without wrinkles smooth, without wrinkles and slightly hunched behind smooth with shallow wrinkles Smooth, posterior angles slightly triangular in T14 not reported smooth, without wrinkles, dorsum slightly convex smooth, without wrinkles, backside slightly hunched smooth, without wrinkles, dorsum slightly convex
Number of coxal pores 2–5, female commonly 4555, 4554, sometime 3454, 3455, 3343. male commonly 2332, 2333, sometime 3444, 3333 6555 6–7, usually 66(7)6 776(7)5(6) 3–5, 4555, 5555, 4444, 4455 (females) and 4444, 3344 (males) 3334 6554 4554 5555 3-3(4)-4(5)-3, commonly3-4-4-3 2–4, 3444, 3344, 3443, 3333 in female, and 3443, 2343, 2433, 2333 in male. usually 4555, 4554, rarely 3454, 3455, 3343 in females and usually 2332, 2333, rarely 3444, 3333 in males
Shape of coxal pores round or slightly ovate circular round to ovate round or ovate round to ovate not reported round round round round to slightly oval round or slightly ovate round or slightly oval
Tarsus 1–tarsus 2 articulation on legs 1–13 not well-defined well-defined well-defined well-defined well-defined not reported not reported well-defined well-defined ill-defined well–defined ill–defined
Male 14th leg remarkably thicker and stronger moderately thicker and longer not reported not reported thick and strong not reported not reported not reported thick and strong moderately thicker and longer moderately thicker and stronger significantly thicker and stronger
Male 15th leg markedly thicker and stronger moderately thicker and longer not reported not reported thick and strong not reported femur and tibia thicker femur and tibia thicker thick and strong moderately thicker and longer thicker and stronger, with a circular protuberance on distal end of tibia significantly thicker and stronger
Dorsal sulci on male 14th legs absent absent absent not reported absent not reported not reported present on femur present on femur and tibia absent absent absent
Dorsal sulci on male 15th legs with a distinct, shallow, dorsal sulci on the tibia absent not reported not reported absent not reported not reported present on femur and tibia present on femur and tibia absent absent present on femur
DaC spine on 12th–15th legs on 13th–15th legs, 12th sometimes present on 14th–15th legs on 12th–15th legs on 11th–15th legs, 9th–10th sometimes present not reported on 15th legs present on 15th legs present absent on 10th–15th legs on 13th–15th legs, 12th sometimes present on 12th–15th legs
14th accessory spur present present present not reported present not reported not reported not reported not reported anterior accessory spur absent present present
15th accessory spur anterior absent absent present not reported absent not reported absent not reported not reported anterior accessory spur absent absent absent
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 3+4, or 4+4 small, blunt, coniform spurs, commonly with 3+3, inner spur smaller than outer one 2+2 moderately long, bullet-shaped spurs inner spur slightly smaller and more anterior than outer one 3+3 moderately sharp, slender conical spurs 3+3, same size 2+2, blunt, coniform spurs, with inner spur smaller than outer one 2+2 2+2, slender 2+2, thick spurs 2+2, strong, long and sharp 2+2 moderately long and slender, coniform 2fl 2 moderately long, coniform spurs, inner spur slightly smaller and more anterior than outer 3+3, few 3+4, only one 4+4 coniform spurs
dorsal side of the second article of female gonopods with three long setae lying dorsally on its anterior external margin three long setae along dorsolateral ridge not reported not reported with 3–4 long setae and 5–6 spines lying dorsally on its external margin not reported not reported not reported not reported no setae and spines three spurs arranged in one irregular row on dorsal terminal part 3 long setae and four short, robust spines lying dorsally on posterior part of external margin
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) simple and broad simple, having small triangular protuberance on ventral side simple simple simple simple simple dimidiate simple simple broad, and tridentate simple, with a very small subtriangular blunt denticle on inner margin
Male gonopods small bulge, with one to two long setae apically slightly sclerotised small, semicircular article with 3-5 seta on its surface hemispherical bulge, without setae hemispherical bulge, having a long seta, and apically slightly sclerotised not reported not reported not reported not reported short, small hemispherical bulge, with 1–3 long setae, apically slightly sclerotized small bulge, with 1–2 long setae on surface, and terminal slightly sclerotised small hemispherical bulge, with 1–2 long setae

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant No. 31572239) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Grant No. C2018111019). We are grateful to Dr Gregory D Edgecombe, London, Dr Pavel Stoev, Sofia, Bulgaria, and Dr Marzio Zapparoli, Viterbo, for their hospitality and everlasting help during our research. We thank Dr Rowland M Shelley, North Carolina, USA, and Dr His-Te Shih, Taichung, China, for providing us with invaluable literature.

References

  • Attems C (1927) Neue Chilopoden. Zoologischer Anzeiger 72: 291–305.
  • Attems C (1934) Einige neue Geophiliden und Lithobiiden des Hamburger Museums. Zoologischer Anzeiger 107: 310–317.
  • Bonato L, Edgecombe GD, Lewis JGE, Minelli A, Pereira LA, Shelley RM, Zapparoli M (2010) A common terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes (Chilopoda). ZooKeys 69: 17–51. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.69.737
  • Chamberlin RV (1913) The lithobiid genera Nampabius, Garibius, Tidabius and Sigibius. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard College 57: 37–104.
  • Chamberlin RV (1919) The Chilopoda collected by the Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1913–1918. In: Report of the Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1913–1918. Volume III: Insects. Part H: Spiders, Mites and Myriapods, 15–22.
  • Chamberlin RV (1923) Chilopods of the Pribilof Islands. North American Fauna 46: 240–244.
  • Chamberlin RV, Wang YX (1952) Some records and descriptions of Chilopods from Japan and other oriental areas. Proceeding of the Biological Society of Washington 65: 177–188.
  • Chao J, Lee K, Chang H (2018) Lithobius (Monotarsobius) meifengensis, a new species of centipede from high altitude forest in central Taiwan (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae). ZooKeys 741: 181–192. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.21036
  • Eason EH (1983) The identity of the European and Mediterrranean species of Lithobiidae (Chilopoda) described by KW Verhoeff and now represented by material preserved in the British Museum (Natural History). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society of London 77: 111–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1983.tb00526.x
  • Eason EH (1986) On the synonymy of Lithobius giganteus Sseliwanoff 1881 and the taxonomic status of Porobius Attems 1926 (Chilopoda) – Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums, Wien 87B: 181–192.
  • Eason EH (1993) Descriptions of four new species of Lithobius from the oriental region and a redescription of Australobius palnis (Eason 1973) from Sri Lanka (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha). Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona 17: 181–199.
  • Jeekel CAW (2005) Nomenclator generum et familiarum Chilopodorum: a list of the genus and family-group names in the class Chilopoda from the 10th edition of Linnaeus, 1758, to the end of 1957. Myriapod Memoranda Supplement 1: 1–130.
  • Ma HQ, Pei SJ, Hou XJ, Zhu TG, Gai YH (2015) Lithobius (Ezembius) anabilineatus sp. nov., a new species (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) from Eastern China. Oriental Insects 49(3–4): 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00305316.2015.1081647
  • Pei SJ, Lu YM, Liu HP, Hou XJ, Ma HQ (2018) Lithobius (Ezembius) tetraspinus, a new species of centipede from northwest China (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae). ZooKeys 741: 203–217. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.741.19980
  • Pei SJ, Lu YM, Liu HP, Hou XJ, Ma HQ, Zapparoli M (2016) Lithobius (Ezembius) multispinipes n. sp. a new species of centipede from North West China (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). Zootaxa 4169(2): 390–400. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4169.2.12
  • Pei SJ, Ma HQ, Hou XJ, Zhu TG, Gai YH (2015) Lithobius (Ezembius) laevidentata sp. n., a new species (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) from the Northwest region of China. Biologia 70(8): 1113–1117.
  • Qiao PH, Qin W, Ma HQ, Zhang TZ, Su J, Lin GH (2018) Two new species of Lithobius on Qinghai-Tibetan plateau identified from morphology and COI sequences (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae). ZooKeys 785: 11–28. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.785.28580
  • Takakuwa Y (1939) The species of genus Lithobius from Japan. Transactions of the Sapporo Natural History Society 16: 28–37.
  • Takakuwa Y (1940) Class Chilopoda, Epimorpha, Lithobiomorpha. Fauna Nipponica Vol. 9 Fas. 8 No. (3). Sanseido Book Store, Tokyo, 104 pp.
  • Zapparoli M (1991) Note su alcune specie di chilopodi della regione palestinese. Fragmenta Entomologica 23: 15–33.
  • Zapparoli M, Edgecombe GD (2011) Lithobiomorpha. In: Minelli A (Ed.) Treatise on Zoology–Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology – The Myriapoda, Volume 1 Jordaan Luchtmans, Brill, Leiden/Boston, 371–389.
login to comment