ZooKeys 332: 95–175, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.332.4753
Pachybrachis (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cryptocephalinae) of Eastern Canada
Robert J. Barney 1, Laurent LeSage 2, Karine Savard 2
1 Gus R. Douglass Land-Grant Institute, West Virginia State University, Institute, West Virginia, United States 25112-1000
2 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Neatby Building, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6

Corresponding author: Robert J. Barney (rbarney@wvstateu.edu)

Academic editor: M. Schmitt

received 23 January 2013 | accepted 29 May 2013 | Published 19 September 2013


(C) 2013 Robert J. Barney. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.

Citation: Barney RJ, LeSage L, Savard K (2013) Pachybrachis (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Cryptocephalinae) of Eastern Canada. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 4. ZooKeys 332: 95–175. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.332.4753

Abstract

Seventeen Pachybrachis species occurring in eastern Canada [Ontario (ON), Québec (QC), New Brunswick (NB), Nova Scotia (NS), and Prince Edward Island (PE)] are treated by the authors. Two new national records were discovered, both from southernmost Ontario: P. cephalicus Fall and P. luctuosus Suffrian. Four species were new provincial records: P. cephalicus (ON), P. luctuosus (ON, QC), P. obsoletus Suffrian (NB), P. peccans (PE). A fully illustrated key to the Pachybrachis of eastern Canada is provided and supported with extensive photographs, distribution maps, and plant associations.

Three species were distributed from southern Ontario into at least one province in the Maritimes (P. nigricornis (Say), P. obsoletus Suffrianand P. peccans Suffrian). Six species were distributed along the shores of the Great Lakes (Erie, Michigan, and Ontario) and rivers (Ottawa, Saguenay and St. Lawrence), but unknown from central and northern ON and QC (P. bivittatus (Say), P. hepaticus hepaticus (F. E. Melsheimer), P. othonus othonus (Say), P. pectoralis (F. E. Melsheimer), P. spumarius Suffrianand P. trinotatus (F. E. Melsheimer)). Seven species were rare, five being found exclusively from southern ON (P. calcaratus Fall, P. cephalicus, P. luridus (Fabricius), P. subfasciatus (J. E. LeConte)and P. tridens (F. E. Melsheimer)), with two having, in addition, a disjunct population in QC (P. atomarius (F. E. Melsheimer)and P. luctuosus). One species was found to be the northern most extension of an eastern United States (US) distribution into the eastern townships of QC (P. m-nigrum (F. E. Melsheimer)). There were no Pachybrachis that could be considered arctic, subarctic, or boreal species; no specimens were found from Labrador and Newfoundland, and all species had southern affinities. Pachybrachis atomarius, P. calcaratus, P. luridus, P. subfaciatus, and P. tridens, not seen over the last 30–70 years, may be extirpated from eastern Canada.

Résumé

Les auteurs traitent des 17 espèces de Pachybrachis présentes dans l’est du Canada [Ontario (ON), Québec (QC), Nouveau-Brunswick (NB), Nouvelle-Écosse (NS), Île-du-Prince-Édouard (PE)]. Deux espèces en provenance de l’extrême sud de l’Ontario sont nouvelles pour le pays: P. cephalicus Fall et P. luctuosus Suffrian. Quatre espèces représentent de nouvelles mentions provinciales: P. cephalicus (ON), P. luctuosus (ON, QC), P. obsoletus Suffrian (NB) et P. peccans (PE). La clé d’identification des espèces de l’est du Canada s’appuie sur de nombreuses illustrations en plus d’inclure des cartes de répartition et les associations avec les plantes.

Trois espèces se répartissent du sud de l’ON jusqu’à au moins l’une ou l’autre des provinces Maritimes (P. nigricornis (Say), P. obsoletus Suffrianet P. peccans Suffrian). Six espèces sont limitées aux rives des Grands-Lacs (Érié, Michigan et Ontario), du fleuve Saint-Laurent et des grandes rivières (des Outaouais, Saguenay) sans atteindre le centre et le nord de l’ON et du QC (P. bivittatus (Say), P. hepaticus (F. E. Melsheimer), P. othonus (Say), P. pectoralis (F. E. Melsheimer), P. spumarius Suffrianet P. trinotatus (F. E. Melsheimer)). Cinq, parmi les sept espèces rares, proviennent exclusivement du sud de l’ON (P. calcaratus, P. cephalicus, P. luridus (Fabricius), P. subfasciatus (J. E. LeConte) et P. tridens (F. E. Melsheimer)), alors que les deux autres possèdent, en outre, une population disjointe au QC (P. atomarius et P. luctuosus). Une espèce, présente seulement en Estrie (QC), se trouve à la limite septentrionale de sa répartition dans l’est des États-Unis (P. m-nigrum (F. E. Melsheimer)). Aucune espèce, parmi les Pachybrachis étudiés, n’est arctique, subarctique ou boréale, mais toutes présentent des affinités méridionales. Aucun spécimen en provenance de Terre-Neuve et du Labrador n’a été observé. Les espèces Pachybrachis atomarius, P. calcaratus, P. luridus, P. subfaciatus et P. tridens n’ont pas été vues depuis les 30–70 dernières années de sorte qu’elles sont probablement disparues de la faune de l’Est du Canada.

Keywords

Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Pachybrachis, eastern Canada, taxonomy

Introduction

In the Catalog of Leaf Beetles of America North of Mexico Riley et al. (2003) listed Pachybrachis (Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae) as one of the genera most in need of taxonomic revision, because many species cannot be identified with confidence. The senior author of the current investigation has been struggling with Pachybrachis for over 30 years and recently began a systematic review of all specimens housed in public and private collections, with a goal of a revision of the species found within the eastern United States. This effort then expanded into eastern North America after the junior authors provided access to the major collections in Canada as part of their Canadian Beetles Project. This collaboration has resulted in this paper as a prelude to the more diverse and daunting challenge of the entire eastern North American Pachybrachis fauna.

Historical review

When Johann Christian Fabricius (1798) described Cryptocephalus luridus from “America borealis”, the genus Cryptocephalus represented the entire Cryptocephalini tribe of today. The generic concept was even larger for Melsheimer (1806) in his Catalogue of insects of Pennsylvania, since several of the 28 species listed under Cryptocephalus are currently placed in non-cryptocephaline genera (Glyptoscelis, Paria, etc.) and only six belong to Pachybrachis. Chevrolat (1836) split this broad genus into several new genera, including Pachybrachis, to which Pachybrachis luridus was the first Nearctic species to be transferred by Suffrian (1852). Because this species was variable and common, it was subsequently described under several names which are all currently considered synonyms: Cryptocephalus femoratus Say, 1824; Cryptocephalus aesculi Melsheimer, 1847; Pachybrachis moerens Stål, 1857; and the varieties Pachybrachis luridus nigrinus Blatchley, 1910 and Pachybrachis luridus festivus Fall, 1915.

Thomas Say (1824) was one of the first North American entomologists to describe Nearctic insects. Under the old concept of Cryptocephalus Geoffroy, 1762, he described Cryptocephalus bivittatus, Cryptocephalus nigricornis, and Cryptocephalus othonus, three species currently placed in Pachybrachis Chevrolat, 1836 (Riley et al. 2003).

The same year, John Eatton LeConte (1824) described several new beetle species from Georgia (US) including Cryptocephalus subfasciatus, which was transferred to Pachybrachis by Haldeman (1849). F. E. Melsheimer (1847) described six new species of Pachybrachis (as Cryptocephalus) from Pennsylvania (US) that have subsequently been found in eastern Canada: Pachybrachis atomarius, Pachybrachis hepaticus, Pachybrachis m-nigrum, Pachybrachis pectoralis, Pachybrachis tridens and Pachybrachis trinotatus. Haldeman (1849) provided the first key to 16 species of Pachybrachis, including seven found in eastern Canada: Pachybrachis bivittatus, Pachybrachis carbonarius (= Pachybrachis nigricornis), Pachybrachis luridus, Pachybrachis m-nigrum, Pachybrachis othonus, Pachybrachis subfasciatus, and Pachybrachis trinotatus.

The beetles collected by the Swiss scientist Louis Agassiz and the Italian explorer John Cabot during the exploration of several regions of Lake Superior (ON) were studied and identified by LeConte (1850) who cited Pachybrachis abdominalis (probably Pachybrachis peccans) and Pachybrachis m-nigrum with no additional information.

The German entomologist Christian Wilhelm Ludwig Eduard Suffrian specialized in Coleoptera, especially Chrysomelidae. He described many North American species, including four in Pachybrachis that are found in eastern Canada: Pachybrachis luctuosus, Pachybrachis obsoletus, Pachybrachis peccans, and Pachybrachis spumarius (Suffrian 1852, 1858).

The Catalogue of the described Coleoptera of the United States (Melsheimer 1853, revised by S. S. Haldeman and J. L. LeConte) listed 20 species of Pachybrachis, eight of which are found in eastern Canada (Pachybrachis atomarius, Pachybrachis bivittatus, Pachybrachis carbonarius (= Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius), Pachybrachis luridus, Pachybrachis m-nigrum, Pachybrachis othonus, Pachybrachis subfasciatus, and Pachybrachis trinotatus), and four additional Pachybrachis species listed as Cryptocephalus (Pachybrachis hepaticus, Pachybrachis nigricornis, Pachybrachis obsoletus, and Pachybrachis tridens).

During the next 50 years, several Canadian collectors explored various areas of Ontario and Québec, but no records show that they were successful in collecting Pachybrachis: William Couper in Toronto (ON) and in various localities in the province of Québec (Couper 1855a, 1855b); Robert Bell (1858) in Gaspesia [list revisited by D’Urban (1859a)]; D’Urban (1859b, 1859c, 1860a, 1860b) in Argenteuil County (QC), in the vicinity of Montréal (QC), at Hudson Bay (QC) and in Ottawa (ON); Beadle (1861) in the county of Lincoln (ON); Couper (1864, 1865) in the vicinity of Toronto (ON) and in Québec City (QC); Saunders (1868) in the Saguenay region (QC); Ritchie (1869) on the Island of Montréal (QC); Reed (1869) in the neighbourhood of London (ON), listing only the families of collected beetles; Jones (1870) in Halifax (NS); Packard (1870) at Caribou Island (LB); Provancher (1870) at Portneuf (QC); Packard (1872), listing the beetles known to occur in Labrador and later adding spiders, myriapods and other groups of insects (Packard 1888); Couper (1874) in Anticosti Island (QC); Couper (1881, 1882, 1883) in the province of Québec in general; Bell (1881) at Belleville (ON); Harrington (1882) at Ottawa (ON) and at Chelsea, Hull and Montebello (QC); LeConte (1883), studying the specimens collected by J.T. Bell and others in various areas north of Lake Superior (ON); Fletcher (1888), identifying the specimens collected by J.S. Cotter and J.M. Macoun on the south coast and islands of James Bay (QC); Harrington (1890a, b, c), relisting several of the previous reports; Hausen (1893) at Saint-Jérome (QC); Hanham (1894) in Québec City and vicinity (QC); Harrington (1894a, b) at Ottawa (ON) and Copper Cliff (ON); Evans (1899) at Halifax (NS); Ouellet (1902) at Montréal, Rigaud and Joliette (QC); Evans (1905) at light at Trenton (ON); and Sherman (1910) in Labrador.

Pettit (1868–1872) listed 1290 species in a series of articles on beetles collected at Grimsby (ON), including three Pachybrachis species (Pachybrachis mollis, Pachybrachis subfasciatus, and Pachybrachis tridens). His Pachybrachis mollis is now considered a synonym of Pachybrachis tridens (Riley et al. 2003).

The priest Léon Provancher (1877a) was the first Canadian to describe and key out two Pachybrachis species (luridus, othonus) in his Petite faune entomologique du Canada, to which was added Pachybrachis atomarius (Provancher 1877b). It should be noted here that Pachybrachis luridus in the key was erroneously transcribed as Pachybrachislividus in the description. This is an evident misspellingsince Fabricius never described any insect under such name (Zimsen 1964). Two years later, Provancher (1879) added Pachybrachis litigiosus from Saint-Hyacinthe.

William Couper (1883) listed three species collected in the province of Québec but did not specify the localities from where they were obtained: Pachybrachis atomarius, Pachybrachis luridus, and Pachybrachis othonus. Brodie and White (1883a, b) prepared a checklist of the insects of the Dominion of Canada (= Ontario and Québec) and listed nine names under Pachybrachis, but two were misidentified (Pachybrachis litigiosus, and Pachybrachis morosus).

In his list of the Ottawa Coleoptera, Harrington (1884) reported four species found in this locality: femoratus, litigiosus, tridens and viduatus. However, his report of Pachybrachis femoratus was most likely based on misidentified specimens of Pachybrachis luridus, his report of Pachybrachis litigiosus was probably based on misidentified specimens of the striped version of Pachybrachis nigricornis (difficilis), and Pachybrachis bivittatus was often misidentified as Pachybrachis viduatus, which is a southern US species not found in Canada.

Henshaw (1885, 1887, 1889) updated the aging checklist of Melsheimer (revised by Haldeman and LeConte 1853) including its supplement (Austin 1880). At the beginning of the 20th century, Clavareau (1913) published the first world catalogue of the subfamily Cryptocephalinae, including species in the genus Pachybrachis. As regards the eastern Canadian species, Pachybrachis bivittatus was given as a synonym of Pachybrachis viduatus (Fabricius 1801) and Pachybrachis m-nigrum as a synonym of Pachybrachis picturatus (Germar 1824); since, Pachybrachis viduatus and Pachybrachis picturatus are fairly rare species only found in the southern US, these two species were evidently misidentified. The same year, Weise (1913) proposed Pachybrachis praeclarus as a replacement name for Pachybrachis elegans Blatchley, 1910, since this name was already preoccupied by a Pachybrachis species described by Graëlls (1851) from Spain.

Evans (1895a, b) listed several beetle species collected in the district of Sudbury (ON), including Pachybrachis femoratus (= Pachybrachis luridus?) and Pachybrachis infaustus (= Pachybrachis atomarius); however, voucher specimens were not found for this study. In a series of papers on the Chrysomelidae of Ontario and Québec, Wickham (1896) provided a key to nine species of Pachybrachis, plus a description and illustration of beetles reported to be Pachybrachis viduatus, but that in actuality were clearly Pachybrachis bivittatus.

In his report on the insects of the Toronto region (ON), Walker (1913) listed Pachybrachis atomarius, Pachybrachis femoratus (= Pachybrachis luridus?), Pachybrachis hepaticus, Pachybrachis othonus and Pachybrachis trinotatus. Gibson (1915, 1919) reported several collection records of Pachybrachis in his reports to the Entomological Society of Ontario, but they were all from Manitoba.

During the same period, H. C. Fall (1915) thoroughly revised the Nearctic Pachybrachis (Pachybrachys), and his revision is still, today, the only available complete taxonomic work on this genus. Out of the 159 recognized species, only six were given with a distribution extending into eastern Canada: luridus (ON), othonus (MB, ON), peccans (MB, NB, ON), relictus (ON), subfasciatus (ON), and trinotatus (ON), with calcaratus located in nearby Detroit (USA, Michigan). The well-known Catalogue of the Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico of Leng (1920) relisted the species treated by Fall (1915), but the distributions were reduced to a few state records or short statements, with the result that only Pachybrachis peccans was clearly reported from New Brunswick. No relevant information on Pachybrachis was added in the supplements, except the record of Pachybrachis donneri from Oregon (Leng and Mutchler 1927, 1933; Blackwelder 1939; Blackwelder and Blackwelder 1948).

Gustave Chagnon (1917) treated the Coleoptera of Québec in the third part of a preliminary list of the insects of this province. Eight species of Pachybrachis were collected in Montréal or in neighboring localities: Pachybrachis atomarius, Pachybrachis carbonarius (= Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius), Pachybrachis femoratus (= Pachybrachis luridus), Pachybrachis infaustus (= Pachybrachis atomarius), Pachybrachis othonus, Pachybrachis tridens, Pachybrachis trinotatus, and Pachybrachis viduatus (= Pachybrachis bivittatus). In 1918, he published a list of corrections brought to his attention by Fall (Chagnon 1918), noting Pachybrachis viduatus as a wrong determination in Chagnon (1917) and Wickham (1896).

In the thirties, Chagnon published a series of contributions on the most important beetles of the province of Québec in the journal Le Naturaliste canadien (Chagnon 19331939). The Cryptocephalini were treated in 1937 (Chagnon 1937). Four species of Pachybrachis were keyed out (Pachybrachis bivittatus, Pachybrachis carbonarius (= Pachybrachis nigricornis), Pachybrachis othonus and Pachybrachis trinotatus), and an additional four only mentioned (Pachybrachis atomarius, Pachybrachis femoratus (= Pachybrachis luridus), Pachybrachis peccans, Pachybrachis relictus Fall). The year after, Chagnon (1940) grouped together his previous contributions and published them as a separate book. The brother Adrien Robert of the Université de Montréal updated the nomenclature used in the book of Chagnon (1940), but did not otherwise modify its contents (Chagnon and Robert 1962), except that a table was added at the end of the book, giving both the nomenclature used by Chagnon (1940) and the more recent nomenclature. As regards Pachybrachis, no changes were noted between the two editions.

The list of Coleoptera collected by Notman (1919) at Cochrane in northern Ontario did not include Pachybrachis.

Father Léopold (1934) of the entomology laboratory at the agriculture institute of Oka (QC) published a list of beetles preserved in the collection of the institution. Seven species of Pachybrachis were listed, five of which are still valid: Pachybrachis atomarius, Pachybrachis difficilis (= Pachybrachis nigricornis), Pachybrachis hepaticus, Pachybrachis peccans, and Pachybrachis tridens. His Pachybrachis pubescens (= Pachybrachis morosus) and Pachybrachis vestigialis were very likely misidentified.

Hicks (1944, 1945, 1947a, b) collected mainly in southern Ontario and provided several new province records or information on the host plants or biology of species. He reported that Pachybrachis calcaratus, Pachybrachis peccans, Pachybrachis othonus and Pachybrachis relictus were taken by sweeping the vegetation, and Pachybrachis obsoletus was observed on willows (Salix sp.).

Latendresse (1963) increased to 36 the number of known chrysomelid species from the Saguenay region on the north shore of the St. Lawrence, in Québec. A century before, Saunders (1868) had found only two species of leaf beetles, but neither collector found Pachybrachis species in their survey.

Balsbaugh (1973) studied the geographical variation in Pachybrachis othonus, recognized three subspecies, and described Pachybrachis othonus sioux Balsbaughas a new subspecies. The geographical variation of Pachybrachis nigricornis was treated three years later (Balsbaugh and Tucker 1976), but the distribution of subspecies needs to be clarified in eastern Canada since three have been reported for this region (Riley et al. 2003).

The Checklist of Chrysomelidae of Canada, United States, Mexico, Central America and the West Indies of Wilcox (1975) was a working draft which was pretty complete taxonomically, but lacked detailed information on the distribution of species. LeSage (1991) provided the known distribution in Alaska and in Canada by province for all chrysomelid species, including Pachybrachis. Laplante et al. (1991) extracted the information for Québec only, and published it as a separate checklist for this province.

Lawson (1976) described and illustrated the structural details of the egg and larval case of Pachybrachis bivittatus. The mature larva of the same species was sketched by Lawson (1991), and LeSage (1985) described and illustrated all its larval instars and egg. This author also treated in detail these life stages for Pachybrachis peccans. Eggs were distinguished by their external ornamentation, the larval instars by their size and by their head and leg chaetotaxy.

Edward G. Riley, Shawn M. Clark, R. Wills Flowers and Arthur J. Gilbert are the authors of the most recent synthesis on American Chrysomelidae (Riley et al. 2002). The reader is referred to this major work for diagnoses and keys to subfamilies, tribes and genera. The North American Pachybrachis species have not been assigned to subgenera as the Palaearctic species were in the recent Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera (Schöller et al. 2010).

The Catalogue of the Leaf Beetles of America North of Mexico by Riley et al. (2003) was the first extensive and complete catalogue ever published on this family of beetles for the North American continent north of Mexico. Consequently, we have followed the nomenclature and classification adopted by these authors. The compiling by Clark et al. (2004) of the known host plants of the Nearctic Pachybrachis is the best and most extensive source of information available on the subject. Both works are essential tools to anybody interested in Pachybrachis species and Nearctic leaf beetles in general.

An examination of leaf beetle specimens in the largest beetle collections in Kentucky, inventory work in state nature preserves and other protected areas, and a review of the literature revealed 20 species of Pachybrachis present in Kentucky, 14 of which were new state records (Barney et al. 2011). Twenty species of Pachybrachis were also reported for Illinois (Barney 1984).

The latest contribution on the eastern Canadian Pachybrachis is by Webster et al. (2012), based on extensive collecting of beetles in New Brunswick by the senior author. Pachybrachis bivittatus and Pachybrachis m-nigrum were added to the previously known Pachybrachis peccans and Pachybrachis pectoralis for this province.

Material and methods
Provinces

For the purposes of this study, eastern Canada is defined as provinces east of Manitoba: Ontario (ON), Québec (QC), New Brunswick (NB), Nova Scotia (NS), Prince Edward Island (PE), Newfoundland (NF) and Labrador (LB). When not given on labels, counties were found using the gazetteer of CPCGN (1974, 1988) for Ontario, CTQ (1987) for Québec, CPCGN (1994a) for New Brunswick, CPCGN (1993) for Nova Scotia, and CPCGN (1994b) for Prince Edward Island. No specimens were available from Labrador and Newfoundland. In older specimens, for example those collected by Brimley in Prince Edward and Hasting Counties, only the county names were given in the collection data.

Species data

For each species of Pachybrachis found in eastern Canada, the following information is provided: name, synonymies, habitus photo, brief description of species recognition characters, distribution and maps, label data, recorded or potential host plants, and comments.

Label data

For each specimen examined the following information is provided: province, county/district, date, label information that may include potential host plants, habitat or collection method, collector, number of males and females, and museum. If a specimen had a H. C. Fall identification label or was found in Fall’s personal collection (Fall-MCZ), this information was cited before the museum name. Within a species treatment, data are ordered alphabetically by province, county/district, locale, and then date.

Sex determination

Determination of sex is relatively easy as follows: males (Figure 9a) are generally smaller and less robust than females, with the abdomen flat and more or less concave; in females (Figure 9b) the abdomen is convex beneath, the last segment with a deeply rounded fovea (depression). Singleton females of many species cannot be confidently identified without associated males for dissection.

Size measurement

Ten males (when available) of each species were measured using a Leica Z16 APO microscope equipped with a DFC295 digital color camera and Leica Application Suite software.

There are many species of Pachybrachis in the eastern US and Canada that could only be confidently separated and identified via examination of the male reproductive organ (aedeagus). This was accomplished by removing the labels from a pinned (and usually pointed) specimen and placing the pointed, pinned specimen in gently boiling water for one minute. The now relaxed pinned (or separated) beetle was placed in a Petri dish with a small amount of 70% Ethanol. The beetle was held upside down with featherweight forceps and the abdomen pried off with an insect pin. The abdomen was then held by the pygidium with a pin and the aedeagus removed with fine forceps. After drying, the beetle was reattached to a new point using clear nail polish, as were the abdomen and aedeagus.

Plant nomenclature

The scientific and popular names of plants were taken in Fernald (1950), Scoggan (1978) and Marie-Victorin (1995).

Physiographic features

The Carolinian Life Zone is by far the richest zone for the Pachybrachis fauna of eastern Canada, several species being exclusively associated to it (e.g. Pachybrachis calcaratus [Map 3], Pachybrachis cephalicus [Map 4], etc.). Some species are primarily present in this zone but also have, small additional northern disjunct populations (e.g. Pachybrachis atomarius [Map 1]). The Carolinian Zone extends into southwestern Ontario between Lakes Huron and Erie. In addition to the usual common trees of the larger Great Lakes-St. Lawrence forest region (e.g. sugar maple [Acer saccharinum Marsh.], beech [Fagus grandiflora Ehrh.], etc.), the northern limits of several deciduous trees are found in this zone: tulip-tree [Liriodendron tulipifera L.], pawpaw [Asimina triloba (L.) Dunal], black walnut [Juglans nigra L.], etc. (Fox and Soper 1952, 1953, 1954; Shelford 1963; Hosie 1979; Johnson 2012).

The major rivers seem to play an important role in the distribution of some species. For example, Pachybrachis bivittatus [Map 2] is closely spread along the Great-Lakes-St. Lawrence River system and in the Ottawa River valley. The Saguenay River seems a northern limit impassable for all species.

There are two noticeable disjunct refugia. The most important is the well-known Eardley Escarpment located on the south border of Gatineau Park. It corresponds to about 40 km of steep cliffs oriented southwards which are significantly warmer than the Ottawa Valley below and the Laurentian Highlands above. Eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana L.) is well represented on the cliffs, and the relatively recent discovery of its associated olive hairstreak, Callophrys grynea (Hubner), has been an enthusiastically received discovery for butterfly collectors (Hall 1991, NCC 2011a). There are over thirty additional vascular plant species growing exclusively there at their northernmost limits, considerably disjunct from their main distribution south of the Great Lakes (Brunton and Lafontaine 1971).

The second refugium corresponds to a small zone between the islands Île-aux-Allumettes and Île-du-Grand-Calumet, both in Pontiac County (QC), within the Ottawa River. A special flora has been identified there by botanists, but no results were published. On the other hand, Desroches and Laparé (2004) reported the first captures of the ribbonsnake (Thamnophis sauritus septentrionalis Rossman) in this refugium. The distribution of Pachybrachis luctuosus corresponds to this pattern [Map 6].

Finally, the influence of Lake Champlain cannot be ignored. Although almost completely lying in the states of Vermont and New York in the United States, it extends about 10 km across the Canadian border. Its microclimate is important enough to allow some plants and animals to cross the border and reach their northernmost limits in the southeastern townships of Québec (DECNY 2012). The very recent discovery of two sycamores (Platanus occidentalis L.) in this region - a first record for Québec - is a good exemple of such distribution (Bibeau-Lemieux 2010, 2011).

Codens of collections examined and referred to in this study are as follow:

The major insect collections (and curators) in eastern Canada and the United States, which contained Pachybrachis specimens from eastern Canada, are listed below:

AJGC Art J. Gilbert Collection (private), Fresno, CA

AMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY (Lee Herman)

CDFA California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, CA (Chuck Bellamy)

CEUM Collection entomologique de l’Université de Montréal, QC (Louise Cloutier)

CFIM Collection en Fiducie de l’Insectarium de Montréal, QC (Stéphane LeTirant)

CNC Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON (Laurent LeSage)

FALL H. C. Fall Collection, Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA (Phillip Perkins)

FSCA Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Gainesville, FL (Paul Skelley)

LEM Lyman Entomological Museum, McGill, QC (Stéphanie Boucher)

LFC Laurentian Forestry Center (Insectarium René-Martineau) Québec, QC (Jan Klimaszewski)

LSAM Louisiana State Arthropod Museum, Baton Rouge, LA (Victoria Bayless)

MCZ Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA (Phillip Perkins)

MSUC Michigan State University Collection, East Lansing, MI (Gary Parsons)

RWIC Reginald Webster Insect Collection (private), Charters Settlement, NB

OSUC Ohio State University Collection, Columbus, OH (Creighton Freeman)

UNHM University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH (Donald Chandler)

USNM National Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C. (Alex Konstantinov)

Results
Pachybrachis Chevrolat, 1836

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis

Pachybrachis Chevrolat in Dejean, 1836: 420. Type species: Cryptocephalus hieroglyphicus Laicharting, 1781, by subsequent designation of Jacoby 1908: 265.
Pachybrachys: Mannerheim 1843: 311. [incorrect subsequent spelling].
Remarks.

There has been some debate as to the correct spelling of the genus Pachybrachis. Fall’s (1915) monumental work used Pachybrachys Chevrolat and cited its general American usage by J. L. LeConte. However, this emendation was unjustified under the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999, Article 32).

Pachybrachis is a member of the subfamily Cryptocephalinae Gyllenhall, 1813, commonly known as the case bearers due to the fact that all known larval stages live in a case constructed of their fecal matter and often plant debris (LeSage 1985). Their cylindrical, compact body characterizes the adults, which usually have the head retracted into the pronotum to the level of the eyes.

In the recent revision of family-group names in Coleoptera (Bouchard et al. 2011), the former tribe Pachybrachini Chapuis, 1874 was relegated to subtribe under the tribe Cryptocephalini Gyllenhal, 1813. Pachybrachina Chapuis, 1874 contains only two genera north of Mexico, Griburius and Pachybrachis, and is characterized by long filiform antennae, with a marginal bead at the base of pronotum which is not crenulate. Riley et al. (2002) separated the two genera by prosternal charateristics (prosternum broad, as wide as long in Griburius, narrower, longer than wide in Pachybrachis). Additional generic keys can be found in Blatchley (1910), Chagnon and Robert (1962), Downie and Arnett (1996), and Ciegler (2007).

Useful morphological characters. Fall (1915) provided a very detailed “Review of Structural Characters Useful in Taxonomy”, which we will not repeat here. However, there are a few key characters that will be useful to separate the seventeen Canadian species. These features will be described, detailed and illustrated, most of them being used in the identification key.

Size. The seventeen species can generally be divided into four size classes by average length: very small, <1.75 mm; small, >1.75 mm to 2.35 mm; medium, >2.35 mm to 2.85 mm; and large, >2.85 mm to 3.30 mm. Pachybrachis hepaticus is the only species in the very small category, with a mean length of 1.68 mm. Pachybrachis m-nigrum (2.59 mm), Pachybrachis othonus othonus (2.63 mm), and Pachybrachis luridus (2.65 mm) are in the medium category. Pachybrachis trinotatus (3.09 mm) and Pachybrachis bivittatus (3.12 mm) are the only species with males averaging over 3 mm in length. Small is the largest category, with the remaining eleven species. Mean length and width of males are reported for each species. Females are generally larger, thus accounting for the larger overall sizes reported by Fall (1915).

Antennae. In most species (e.g. Pachybrachis atomarius, Habitus 1; Pachybrachis bivittatus, Habitus 2), the length of antennae equals about 2/3 to 3/4 the length of the body. There are two noticeable exceptions. In Pachybrachis hepaticus (Habitus 5) the antennae do not exceed half of the body length, whereas in Pachybrachis trinotatus (Habitus 17) the antennae equal or exceed the body length.

Eyes. The eyes of Pachybrachis pectoralis are close to each other and separated by less than their width (Figure 1a). In most species the distance between the eyes roughly corresponds to their width (e.g. Pachybrachis peccans, Figure 1b). A normal distance between eyes, coupled with the head coloration, can be diagnostic, as in Pachybrachis atomarius that has a largely yellow face (Figure 1c). In Pachybrachis hepaticus, the eyes are very small and markedly remote, separated by much more than their diameter (Figure 1d).

Ocular lines. Many Pachybrachis species have an impressed line, called the ocular line, around the margin of the eyes, and in some species the line diverges from each eye as lines of darker colored punctures between the eyes (e.g. Pachybrachis peccans, Figure 2a). This character is very consistent within each species, and it is easy to see provided the specimens are properly oriented and lighted. In Pachybrachis hepaticus the ocular lines are very short but distinct above the eyes (Figure 2b). In other species, however, such ocular lines are absent (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius, Figure 2c).

Figure 1.

Eyes: a close eyes, Pachybrachis pectoralis b normal eyes, Pachybrachis peccans c normal eyes and yellow face, male Pachybrachis atomarius d remote eyes, Pachybrachis hepaticus.

Figure 2.

Ocular lines: a present, Pachybrachis peccans b small, Pachybrachis hepaticus c absent, Pachybrachis spumarius.

Femora. Except for Pachybrachis hepaticus (Figure 3a), the femora on the forelegs of all species (Figure 3b) are incrassate or thickened in relation to the other femora. This character is difficult to see because in most cases legs are folded and pressed tightly against the body. Consequently, it might be necessary to relax the legs and spread them out to compare the front femora with those of the middle and hind legs. When such preparation is achieved, the larger size of the femora becomes evident (e.g. Pachybrachis calcaratus, Habitus 3).

Figure 3.

Front femora: a not enlarged, Pachybrachis hepaticus b thickened, Pachybrachis peccans.

Claws. In Pachybrachis, the tarsal claws are all simple (Figures 4a–d), but claws on the forelegs (Figures 4a, b) of several species are distinctly enlarged relative to the claws on the other legs (Figures 4c, d), as in Pachybrachis peccans (Habitus 12) or Pachybrachis pectoralis (Habitus 13). Due to the position of the legs in dead specimens, this character is often easier to see in lateral view (Figures 4c, d) than in front view (Figures 4a, b).

Figure 4.

Claws: a, b front claws enlarged c, d normal.

Tibial spurs. In Pachybrachis atomarius (Habitus 1), Pachybrachis m-nigrum (Habitus 8), and Pachybrachis trinotatus (Habitus 17), there is no apical spur on front tibia (Figure 5a), but a tuft of large apical setae grouped together may superficially look like a spur. In Pachybrachis spumarius (Figure 5b, Habitus 14) the front tibial spur is very small, hidden and difficult to see, but the very large and exposed front tibial spur is unique and distinctive of Pachybrachis calcaratus (Figure 5c, Habitus 3). In all species, except Pachybrachis hepaticus, the middle tibiae are armed with small slender apical spur (Figure 5d). In all species studied here, the hind tibiae are unarmed.

Figure 5.

Tibial spurs: a absent from front leg, Pachybrachis atomarius b minute on front leg, Pachybrachis spumarius c large on front leg, Pachybrachis calcaratus d small and pointed on middle legs in most species.

Pronotum. In Pachybrachis, the pronotum is margined at base, the margin usually ornamented with a row of large punctures (Figure 6a, close up). This character is very useful to separate Pachybrachis Chevrolat from Cryptocephalus Geoffroy or Bassareus Haldeman. The last two genera superficially look like Pachybrachis but are not margined at the base of the pronotum.

Figure 6.

Pronotum: a reddish, with close-up of marginal bead, Pachybrachis bivittatus b mottled, Pachybrachis spumarius c with black M-mark, Pachybrachis m-nigrum d almost black, Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius.

The density and pattern of pronotal punctures can be a useful character. Punctures usually dissipate near the side margins, and are generally a darker color than the background.

The pronotal coloration varies from a common mottled pattern (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius, Figure 6b), to a black M-mark on a light background (e.g. Pachybrachis m-nigrum, Figure 6c), to an almost entirely black pronotum with only yellow basal and lateral markings (e.g. Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius, Figure 6d).

Elytra. As on the pronotum, the density and pattern of punctures on the elytra are easily seen and useful characters. The elytral punctures generally form fairly regular deep striae, consisting of one sutural, one marginal and eight discal striae on each elytron, although the first may be somewhat irregular in the basal third (e.g. Pachybrachis luctuosus, Figure 7a). Punctures may be confused in the basal half but with a tendency towards regular rows in the apical half, as in Pachybrachis calcaratus (Figure 7b). Finally, punctures may be completely confused and not aligned at all in rows (e.g. Pachybrachis hepaticus, Figure 7c).

Figure 7.

Elytral punctures and coloration: a in rows in deep striae, Pachybrachis luctuosus b confused in basal half, in rows in apical half, Pachybrachis calcaratus c all confused, Pachybrachis hepaticus d confused and mottled, Pachybrachis spumarius e vittate with marginal vitta interrupted, Pachybrachis bivattatus f black, margined with yellow, Pachybrachis nigriconis carbonarius g entirely black, Pachybrachis luridus.

The elytral color pattern is, of course, a very useful character for the identification of many species. The mottled pattern is common (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius, Figure 7d). Some species are vittate (= with longitudinal black stripes), sometimes with a lateral vitta interrupted as in Pachybrachis bivittatus (Figure 7e). In some species, the elytra are largely black with only a few yellow markings or with narrow apical and lateral margins (e.g. Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius, Figure 7f), or the elytra can be entirely black (e.g. Pachybrachis luridus, Figure 7g).

Pygidium. The coloration of the pygidium can be largely yellow (e.g. Pachybrachis bivittatus, Figure 8a), dark with distinct yellow spots of various sizes (e.g. Pachybrachis cephalicus, Figure 8b), or dark with faint small reddish spots (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius, Figure 8c). A completely black pygidium is distinctive of Pachybrachis atomarius (Figure 8d).

Figure 8.

Pygidium: a largely yellow, Pachybrachis bivittatus b with well-defined yellow spots, Pachybrachis cephalicus c with faint reddish spots, Pachybrachis spumarius d black, Pachybrachis atomarius.

Sexes. Males are usually smaller and less robust than females, with their abdomen flat (Figure 9a). In females, the abdomen is convex beneath, the last visible segment having a deep, round, concave depression or fovea (Figure 9b).

Figure 9.

Sexes: a male abdomen, ventral view, Pachybrachis bivittatus b female abdomen, ventral view, Pachybrachis bivittatus.

Genitalia. In most cases, individuals of each sex can be identified to species using coloration and external morphological features alone. However, an examination of the aedeagus is essential for the determination of superficially similar and variable species, such as Pachybrachis cephalicus, luctuosus and spumarius.

In Pachybrachis, the basal portion of the aedeagus may appear bulbous (e.g. Pachybrachis luctuosus, Figure 10a) or more tubular (Figure 10b), but we don’t know yet if this character is reliable and consistent. The apical half is usually considerably bent, sometimes at a right angle, the degree of the curvature being an important diagnostic feature. In lateral view, the tip of the aedeagus may appear straight, sinuous and curved upwards, or sinuous and curved downwards (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius, Figure 10b). In dorsal view, the tip offers various shapes: small, large, pointed, triangular, lanceolate, nipple-shaped (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius, Figure 10c), etc.

Figure 10.

Aedeagus: a lateral view, Pachybrachis luctuosus b lateral view, Pachybrachis spumarius c apex, dorsal view, Pachybrachis spumarius.

Although the genitalic features are very constant and most reliable, they have been rarely described and illustrated in Pachybrachis. In the following key to the males of the 17 species treated here, the aedeagus is reported for only three species when external morphological characters may not be sufficient. The female genitalia are still unknown for all of them.

Illustrated key to males
1a Front femora not thicker than others (Fig. 1.i); eyes small and remote (Fig. 1.iii); punctures of pronotum and elytra dense and confused (Habitus 5) hepaticus (F. E. Melsheimer)
1b Front femora thicker than others (Fig. 1.ii); eyes narrowly separated or normal (Fig. 1.iv) 2
2a Ocular lines between eyes present (Fig. 2.i) 3
2b Ocular lines absent (Fig. 2.ii) 6
3a Front claws larger (Figs 3.i, 3.ii) than middle or hind claws 4
3b Front claws not enlarged; size similar to those in middle and hind legs (Figs 3.iii, 3.iv) 5
4a Eyes very close, separated by less than their width; ocular lines fine to indistinct (Fig. 4.i; Habitus 13) pectoralis (F. E. Melsheimer)
4b Eyes normal, more distant, ocular lines very distinct, with darker punctures (Fig. 4.ii; Habitus 12) peccans Suffrian
5a Last antennomere brownish; pronotum with subrectangular black markings pierced with yellow spots; elytral dark markings diffuse and irregular (Habitus 10) obsoletus Suffrian
5b Antennae entirely yellow; pronotum with solid black rectangular markings; elytral dark markings well-defined (Habitus 16) tridens (F. E. Melsheimer)
6a Elytra vittate (with longitudinal color stripes) (Fig. 6.i) 7
6b Elytra mottled (Fig. 6.ii), spotted (Fig. 16.iii), or mostly to entirely black (Fig. 6.iv) 9
7a Elytral punctures confused, outer (marginal) vitta often interrupted, pronotum yellow with darker reddish M-shaped mark (Habitus 2) bivittatus (Say)
7b Many elytral punctures arranged in rows (Fig. 7.i); pronotum not reddish, rather yellow with black markings of various sizes and shapes (Fig. 7.ii) 8
8a Pronotum black, margined with yellow; sutural, discal and marginal vittae of elytra distinct (Habitus 11) othonus (Say)
8b Pronotum yellow with large, black, M-shaped marking; marginal and discal vittae of elytra very variable, usually not distinct (Habitus 9a) difficilis Fall
9a Body entirely black, or sides and apex narrowly margined with yellow in some females (Habitus 9b) carbonarius Haldeman
9b Pronotum mottled (Fig. 9.i) or with reddish spots (Fig. 9.ii); elytra variable, black (Fig. 9.iii) to mottled (Fig. 9.iv) 10
10a Elytra almost or entirely black (Fig. 10.i) 11
10b Elytra spotted (Fig. 10.ii) or mottled (Fig. 10.iii) 13
11a Antennae longer than body; pronotum reddish with black M-mark; elytra entirely black (Habitus 17) trinotatus (F. E. Melsheimer)
11b Antennae shorter than body; pronotum black (Fig. 11.i), mottled (Fig.11.ii), or with M-shaped marking (Fig. 11.iii, H 8 below); if pronotum with M-shaped marking, then elytra mottled, not entirely black 12
12a Elytra entirely black to streaked with whitish-yellow in outer areas; pronotum with reddish sides and upside-down reddish Y-mark (Habitus 7) luridus (Fabricius)
12b Elytra with large median reddish spots almost joining at suture, with additional smaller apical spots; pronotum entirely black (Habitus 15) subfasciatus (J. E. LeConte)
13a Elytra yellow with black markings; pronotum with well-defined black M-mark; size larger, 3+ mm (Habitus 8) m-nigrum (F. E. Melsheimer)
13b Elytra (Fig. 13.i) and pronotum mottled (Fig. 13.ii), no decernable pattern; size smaller, less than 3 mm 14
14a Front tibia with large, curved spur (Fig. 14.i, Habitus 3) calcaratus Fall
14b Front tibia with tiny spur (Fig. 14.ii), or without spur (Fig. 14.iii) 15
15a Face largely yellow in males (Fig. 15.i); pygidium entirely black (Fig. 15.iii); pronotum and elytra mottled (Habitus 1) atomarius (F. E. Melsheimer)
15b Face largely dark (Fig. 15.ii); pygidium spotted, with spots of some specimens being smaller and fainter than illustrated (Fig. 15.iv) 16
16a Elytral punctures regular in deeply impressed striae; size small (2 mm) (Habitus 6); aedeagus with apical diamond-shaped denticle (Figs 16.i, 16.ii) luctuosus Suffrian
16b Elytral punctures confused, not inserted into deep striae (Fig. 16.iii); size larger (2+ mm); aedeagus different (Figs. 17.i, 17.iii) 17
17a Pronotum mostly fuscous, with relatively few pale markings, densely punctate, darker than elytra (Habitus 4); aedeagus slender, sinuous, and sharper at apex in lateral view (Fig. 17.i); aedeagal tip triangular in dorsal view (Fig. 17.ii) cephalicus Fall
17b Markings of pronotum and elytra numerous; darker areas dark brown to rufous (Habitus 14); aedeagus sinuous and thicker at apex in lateral view (Fig. 17.iii); aedeagal tip nipple-shaped in dorsal view (Figs. 17.iv) spumarius Suffrian
Pachybrachis atomarius (F. E. Melsheimer, 1847)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_atomarius

Habitus 1; Map 1; Figures 1c, 5a, 8d
Cryptocephalus atomarius F. E. Melsheimer, 1847: 170.
Pachybrachis infaustus Haldeman, 1849: 262.
Pachybrachys atomus Bowditch, 1909: 319.
Recognition.

Body largely fuscous, dull, mottled with many yellow spots (Habitus 1); elytral puncturation dense, confused discally, more or less arranged in rows towards rear and sides; face of males predominately yellow; pygidium entirely black, convex (Figure 8d); male size small: length 1.85 ± 0.07 mm, width 1.01 ± 0.03 mm.

Distribution.

The distribution in eastern Canada is restricted in southern Ontario to remnants of the Carolinian forest (Johnson 2012; Shelford 1963). In Québec, the distribution is isolated from the main distribution area (Map 1). The unique specimen available was probably collected on the Eardley Escarpment, which is a warmer refugium created by cliffs of the Laurentian Highlands oriented southwards (Brunton and Lafontaine 1971).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Essex Co., Ojibway, 7.VIII.1943, S. D. Hicks [6♀, CNC]; same data, except 8.VII.1943, S. D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; Point Pelee, 9.VII.1931, W. J. Brown [5♂ 1♀, CNC]; Roseland, 24.VI.1944, S. D. Hicks [1♂, CNC]; Lambton Co., Walpole Island [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Norfolk Co., Normandale, 4.VI.1931, W. J. Brown [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Turkey Point, 8.VII.1931, W. J. Brown [1♂ 4♀, CNC]; Walsh, 10.VI.1931, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; Ontario Co., Fisher Glen, 12.VI.1931, W. J. Brown [2♂ 6♀, CNC].

QUÉBEC: Pontiac Co., Old Chelsea, 12.VII.1961, J. R. Vockeroth [1♂, CNC].

Host plants.

No plant association records were available from specimens examined, and Barney et al. (2011) did not report any either. Clark et al. (2004) presents the known literature, but since adults were usually swept from vegetation, these records cannot automatically be interpreted as real host associations.

Comments.

Pachybrachis atomarius is one of Fall’s (1915) Group C species that have “great variation in the degree of (elytral) maculation.” In spite of the extremely variable elytral mottling, ranging from heavily speckled with yellow to almost entirely black, Pachybrachis atomarius males are relatively easy to identify by the combination of the predominately yellow face (Figure 1c) and entirely black, convex pygidium (Figure 8d). The entirely black, convex pygidium character also permits identification of singleton females.

Although Pachybrachis atomarius is a typical eastern North American species distributed from Manitoba to Oklahoma to Atlantic states (Riley et al. 2003; LeSage 1991; Barney, unpublished data), in Ontario it is restricted to the Carolinian Zone in the southernmost part of the province. Its presence in Québec is considerably disjunct from its main distribution area, and this isolation is due to the warmer microhabitat of the Laurentian Highlands cliffs of Eardley Escarpment, which are fully exposed southwards and harbor similarly disjunct insects and plants (Hall 1991; Layberry et al. 1998; NCC 2011a).

Since Pachybrachis atomarius has not been collected in eastern Canada over the last 50 years, it is likely extirpated from the eastern Canadian fauna.

Pachybrachis bivittatus (Say, 1824)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_bivittatus

Habitus 2; Map 2; Figures 6a, 7e, 8a, 9a, 9b
Cryptocephalus bivittatus Say, 1824: 440.
Pachybrachys albescens Suffrian, 1858: 404.
Recognition.

Body very large, primarily yellow (Habitus 2); prothorax suffused with rufous; elytral punctation confused, with somewhat apparent rows on disc; elytral color pattern bivittate, with outer vitta rarely entire (Figure 7e); pygidium yellow (Figure 8a); male size large: length 3.12 ± 0.16 mm, width 1.64 ± 0.05 mm. These characters allow identification of even singleton females.

Distribution.

Pachybrachis bivittatus is a transcontinental species found across Canada and the United States (LeSage 1991; Riley et al. 2003). In Ontario, it is most common in the southernmost counties. In Québec, it occurs in the Ottawa Valley and in the St. Lawrence Lowlands. The Saguenay Region is probably its northernmost limit (Map 2).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Carleton Co., Constance Bay, 26.VI.1995, B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♀, CNC]; Elgin Co., New Sarum, 16.VI.1956, W. J. Brown [5♂ 5♀, CNC]; Essex Co., Amherstburg, 6.VI.1936, G. M. Stirrett [2♀, CNC]; Belle River, 26.V.1946, S. D. Hicks [1♂, CNC]; Kingsville, 23.V.1962, Kelyone & Thorpe [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 19.VI.1954, G. B. Wiggins [1♀, ROM]; Pelee Island, 24–27.VI.1935, R. C. Osburn [1♂ 1♀, OSUC]; same data, except 4.VII.1940, W. J. Brown [2♀, CNC]; Point Pelee, 29.VI.1931, W. J. Brown [4♂ 7♀, CNC]; same data, except 1.VI.1933, G. M. Stirrett [3♂, CNC]; same data, except 29.V.1955, S. D. Hicks [3♂ 4♀, CNC]; same data, except 28.VI.1961, Kelton & Brumpton [2♂ 1♀, CNC]; Haldimand Co., Dunnville, 7.VII.1961, W. & W. Plath [1♂, USNM]; same data, except 7.VIII.1961, W. Plath [1♂, USNM]; Kent Co., Thamesville, 15.VI.1930, G. M. Stirrett [1♀, CNC]; Rondeau Park, 5.VI.1985, J. M. Campbell & A. Davies [1♀, CNC]; Lambton Co., Grand Bend, 17.VI.1956, W. J. Brown [1♂ 4♀, CNC]; Lincoln Co., Beamsville, 19.VII.1939, S. D. Hicks [3♂ 3♀, CNC].

QUÉBEC: Argenteuil Co., Carillon, 24.V.1974, E. J. Kiteley [2♂ 1♀, CNC]; Deux-Montagnes Co., La Trappe, 5.VIII.1932, J. Ouellet [1♂, CEUM]; Île-de-Montréal Co., Montréal, F. Knab [1♂, USNM]; same data, except 31.V.1941 [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 15.VI.1961, M. Larochelle [1♂, CEUM]; same data, except 3–14.VII.1969, E. J. Kiteley [4♂ 6♀, CNC]; same data, except 17.VI, J. Ouellet [1♀, USNM]; Nicolet Co., Bécancour, 24.VI.1967, J. L. Laliberté [1♂, IDM]; Portneuf Co., Neuville, 9.VII.1939, J. Filteau [1♂ 1♀, CEUM]; Sainte-Catherine, 17.VI.1953, J. C. Aubé [1♂ 7♀, LEM]; same data, except 8.VII.1956 [2♀, LEM]; Québec Co., Sainte-Foy, 17.VI.1933, V. Boulet [1♀, CEUM]; Cap-Rouge, 27.VI.1956, J. L. Laliberté [2♂ 2♀, IDM]; Saguenay Co., Rivière Deschênes, 22.VI.1966, A. Franeslier [1♀, CEUM]; Saint-Jean Co., Cantic, 25.VI.1983, on Salix amygdaloides Andersson, A. Larochelle [1♂ 3♀, CNC]; Saint- Maurice Co., Pointe-du-Lac, 3.VII.1937 [1♀, CEUM]; Vaudreuil Co., Rigaud, 12.VII.1908, J. Ouellet [1♂, CEUM].

Host plants.

Pachybrachis bivittatus is typically associated with willows (Salix spp., Salicaceae) (Fall 1915; Barney 1984; Downie and Arnett 1996; Clark et al. 2004 for literature review). In Canada, MacNay (1958) reported a light infestation of Pachybrachis bivittatus on the foliage of willow along the river banks north of Coaldale, in Alberta. In eastern Canada, LeSage (personal observations) observed it on Bebb’s willow (Salix bebbiana Sarg.), sand-bar willow (Salix interior Rowlee), and stalked willow (Salix petiolaris J.E. Smith). Larochelle (see above) collected it on the peach-leaved willow (Salix amygdaloides Andersson). The larvae feed in the litter, on willow leaves, but only when they are decayed (LeSage 1985).

Comments.

With its large size, bivittate elytra, and close association with willows, Pachybrachis bivittatus is one of the easiest species to identify.

Pachybrachis calcaratus Fall, 1915

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_calcaratus

Habitus 3; Map 3; Figures 5c, 7b
Pachybrachys calcaratus Fall, 1915: 389
Recognition.

Color dull yellow, with diffuse brown markings on pronotum, with more contrasting markings on elytra (Habitus 3); ocular lines absent; front tibiae of male with subapical rectangular tooth on inner margin, due to abrupt narrowing of tibia, and with long stout curved terminal spur (Figure 5c); terminal spur of front tibia of female reduced to narrow spine; male size small: length 2.09 ± 0.07 mm, width 1.106 ± 0.04 mm.

Distribution.

Pachybrachis calcaratus has been found across the central portion of the United States but only in small numbers (Barney, unpublished data). Within the area of this study, it is restricted to the Carolinian Life Zone in southern Ontario (Map 3).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Essex Co., Roseland, 24.VI.1942, ‘compared with type’, J. A. Wilcox [1♂, CDFA]; same data, except 24.VI.1944, S. D. Hicks [1♂, CNC].

Host plants.

No information was recorded on the specimens collected in southern Ontario. Clark et al. (2004) reported Pachybrachis calcaratus nibbling purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria L. (Lythraceae), in Ohio.

Comments.

Pachybrachis calcaratus is another of Fall’s (1915) Group C species that have “great variation in the degree of (elytral) maculation.” The tibial spur (Figure 5c) is a defining character. Pachybrachis calcaratus was very likely associated with the Carolinian Life Zone in southern Ontario in the past. However, it has not been seen from there for the last 68 years.

Pachybrachis cephalicus Fall, 1915

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_cephalicus

Habitus 4; Map 4; Figure 8b
Pachybrachys cephalicus Fall, 1915: 419.
Pachybrachys cephalicus var. dixianus Fall, 1915: 419.
Pachybrachys cephalicus var. parvus Fall, 1915: 419.
Recognition.

Pronotum and head generally fuscous, densely punctate and darker than elytra; elytra with puncturation dense and confused (Habitus 4); ocular lines absent; male size small: length 1.94 ± 0.12 mm, width 1.05 ± 0.08 mm.

Distribution.

A typical eastern species distributed from Louisiana to New York to Atlantic Coast (Riley et al. 2003), restricted to southern Ontario in eastern Canada (Map 4).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Norfolk Co., Walsingham Forest Station, 28.VII.1982, ex. Potentilla or strawberry, L. LeSage [11♂ 14♀, CNC].

Host plants.

Cinquefoil (Potentilla sp.) and strawberry (Fragaria sp.) (both Rosaceae) are the first host associations reported for Pachybrachis cephalicus. The specimens were swept from these two plants growing in a sandy clearing within a dry oak-pine forest (LeSage, personal field notes). Since 1984, the previous Walsingham Forestry Station is part of the St. Williams Dwarf Oak Forest, the largest block of publicly owned forest in the Carolinian Life Zone (NHIC 1998).

Comments.

Pachybrachis cephalicus is another of Fall’s (1915) Group C species that have “great variation in the degree of (elytral) maculation.” The fairly large number of examined specimens may be misleading since they all come from only one event. In fact, Pachybrachis cephalicus is very rarely collected in eastern Canada and known from only one locality within the Carolinian Life Zone. This is also a first record of this species for Canada.

Pachybrachis hepaticus hepaticus (F. E. Melsheimer, 1847)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_hepaticus_hepaticus

Habitus 5; Map 5; Figures 1c, 3a, 7c
Cryptocephalus hepaticus F. E. Melsheimer, 1847: 171.
Cryptocephalus punctatus Haldeman, 1849: 257.
Recognition.

Front femora not enlarged in comparison to those of middle and hind legs (Figure 3a); eyes small and remote (Figure 1d); antennae short, less than half body length (Habitus 5); integument densely, diffusely punctate (Figure 7c); elytra tapered to apex; male size very small: length 1.68 ± 0.07 mm, width 0.96 ± 0.07 mm.

Distribution.

Transcontinental, extending from California to Maine (Riley et al. 2003). In eastern Canada, Pachybrachis hepaticus hepaticus occurs in southern Ontario from Lake Ontario to the Ottawa River Valley in Québec (Map 5).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Carleton Co., Jockevale, 4.VII.1934, W. J. Brown [1♂, CNC]; Ottawa, 24.VI.1995, [ex. field notes: “pinery forest preserve, on sand dunes…”], B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♀, CNC]; Essex Co., Leamington, 3.VII.1931, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 17.VI.1940 [1♂, CNC]; Point Pelee, 24.VI.1931, W. J. Brown [1♂, CNC]; Haldimand-Norfolk Cos., Turkey Point, 24.VII.1984, sweeping in marshy area, L. LeSage [1♀, CNC]; Hasting Co., 10.VII.1938, Brimley [1♀, CNC]; Norfolk Co., Forestville, 15.VI.1931, W. J. Brown [1♂, CNC]; Parry Sound Dist., Scotia Junction, 28.VII.1934, H. W. Wenzel [1♂ 1♀, OSUC]; Prince Edward Co., 22.VI.1919, Brimley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 28.VI.1921 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 2.VIII.1925 [1♀, CNC]; Renfrew Co., Arnprior, 20.VII.1941, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; Russell Co., Mer Bleue, 18.VI.1986, W. J. Brown [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 10.VII.1936 [1♀, CNC]; Toronto Co., Toronto, F. Knab [1♀, USNM]; same data, except 26.V.1896, R. J. Crew [1♀, ROM]. Unknown Co., East Ontario, 1885 [1♀, CNC].

QUÉBEC: Deux-Montagnes Co., La Trappe, 30.VI.1931, J. Ouellet [1♂, CEUM]; same data, except 27–29.VI.1933 [21♂ 15♀, CEUM]; same data, except 23.VII.1933 [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 28.VII.1934 [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 20.VIII.1936 [1♂, CEUM]; same data, except 26.VIII.1946 [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 7.VII.1949 [1♂, CEUM]; Gatineau Co., Alcove, 24.VIII.1936, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; Gatineau Park, Meach Lake, 30.VII.1972, A. Davies [1♀, CNC]; Wakefield, 20.VII.1932, W. J. Brown [2♀, CNC]; Wright, 27.VI.1933, G. S. Walley [1♂, CNC]; Labelle Co., Nominingue, 29.VII.1931, J. Ouellet [3♀, CEUM]; same data, except 6–21.VII.1932 [20♂ 13♀, CEUM]; same data, except 4.VII.1933 [2♂ 1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 2.VII.1934 [1♂, CEUM]; same data, except 8.VII.1935 [1♂, CEUM]; same data, except 22.VII.1936 [2♀, MSUC]; same data, except 2.VIII.1936 [1♂, CEUM].

Host plants.

No plant association records were available from specimens examined. Pachybrachis hepaticus hepaticus may be a polyphagous species, considering the number of plant families listed in Clark et al. (2004): Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Juncaceae, Salicaceae, and Tamaricaceae.

Comments.

Of all the species here studied, the shortest antennae (Habitus 5) and smallest eyes are found in Pachybrachis hepaticus hepaticus. Further investigation may require that a new genus is established for the eastern and western subspecies of hepaticus. Fall (1915) cited specimens from Montréal, May 24 (Liebeck Coll.); Toronto (Crew); and Scotia Junction, July 27 (Wenzel), but these specimens could not be located and examined.

Pachybrachis luctuosus Suffrian, 1858

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_luctuosus

Habitus 6; Map 6; Figures 7a, 10a
Pachybrachys luctuosus Suffrian, 1858: 401.
Recognition.

Color black or piceous; ocular lines absent; pronotum and sides of elytra with few yellow marks; elytral punctures confused in scutellar area, in fairly regular rows in apical half; elytral striae deep and quite regular (Habitus 6); aedeagus with terminal nodule and denticle forming small, 90o diamond shape (Figure 10a); male size small: length 1.87 ± 0.10 mm, width 0.95 ± 0.11 mm.

Distribution.

A relatively rare Atlantic species distributed from Alabama to New York in the United States (Riley et al. 2003; Barney, unpublished data). The Parry Sound specimens in Ontario and those of the Île-du-Grand-Calumet in the Ottawa River are two small populations disjunct from the main Atlantic one (Map 6).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Hastings Co., 20.VI.1952, J. F. Brimley [1♂, CNC]; Parry Sound Dist., Hwy. 69, 12 km S Shawanaga, 13.VII.1995, B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♂, CNC]. Leeds Co., 7.VIII.1950, ex. pine, J. F. Brimley [3♂ 12♀, CNC].

QUÉBEC: Pontiac Co., L’Île-du-Grand-Calumet, 3.VIII.1985, on Pinus resinosa Ait., Larochelle & Larivière [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Luskville, 4.VII.1985, on Quercus rubra L., Larochelle & Larivière [1♂, CNC].

Host plants.

A large series was taken on pine in Leeds Co., ON. Pachybrachis luctuosus was first reported from Pinus virgiana P. Mill. in Alabama (Balsbaugh and Hays 1972). This record was extended to the northeastern states by Wilcox (1979), and assumed to be valid as well in West Virginia (Clark 2000). Specimens from Larochelle & Larivière had label notations reporting collections from Pinus resinosa Ait. and Quercus rubra L.

Comments.

Pachybrachis luctuosus is another of Fall’s (1915) Group C species that have “great variation in the degree of (elytral) maculation.” Fall commented that he would not be surprised if Pachybrachis carolinensis Fallwas a paler form of Pachybrachis luctuosus. Our comparison of aedeagi of specimens identified by Fall as either luctuosus or carolinensis revealed the same, distinctive form – the subplanar surface with one median subapical denticle. Pachybrachis carolinensis appears to be a larger, more yellow variation, but more work needs to be done. Pachybrachis luctuosus is reported for the first time in Canada, and therefore, is also a first record for ON and QC.

Pachybrachis luridus (Fabricius, 1798)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_luridus

Habitus 7; Map 7; Figure 7g
Cryptocephalus luridus Fabricius, 1798: 109.
Cryptocephalus femoratus Say, 1824: 439.
Cryptocephalus aesculi F. E. Melsheimer, 1847: 171.
Pachybrachys moerens Stål, 1857: 63.
Pachybrachys luridus var. nigrinus Blatchley, 1910: 1130.
Pachybrachys luridus var. festivus Fall, 1915: 470.
Recognition.

Body dull black, densely, coarsely punctured; pronotum black with anterior median line and sides red or reddish yellow, varying to almost entirely red; elytra mottled with yellow, especially toward sides, varying to entirely yellow to entirely black (Habitus 7); front claws of male much enlarged (as in Figure 4a); male size medium: length 2.65 ± 0.23 mm, width 1.45 ± 0.12 mm.

Distribution.

Occuring in the eastern half of the United States (Riley et al. 2003) to the Rocky Mountains, but in Canada restricted to the Carolinian Life Zone of southern Ontario (Map 7).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Essex Co., Ojibway, 9.VI.1943, S. D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; Lambton Co., Grand Bend, 20.VII.1930, G. E. Shewell [1♀, CNC]; Simcoe Co., 19.VI.1939, G. S. Walley [1♀, CNC]; Toronto Co., Toronto, 26.VI.1896, C. T. Hills [2♂ 2♀, LEM]; same data, except 15–30.VI.1927, L. J. Milne [1♀, UNHC]; same data, except F. Knab [29♂ 20♀, USNM]; Toronto, High Park, 4.VI.1897 [3♂ 2♀, ROM]; Unknown Co., Black Creek, 14.VI.1897 [1♀, ROM]; Springfield [2♀, ROM]; Can., G. M. Greene [1♂, USNM].

Host plants.

No plant association records were available from Canadian specimens. In the United States, the false indigos (Baptisia leucantha T. & G., Baptisia tinctoria (L.) R. Br.) (Fabaceae) were the associations most often cited by authors (Frost 1945, details in Clark et al. 2004). However, these plants are not present in Québec (Marie-Victorin 1995), and extremely rare in southern Ontario (Scoggan 1978). Barney et al. (2011) stated that recently collected specimens in Kentucky were probably from oak (Quercus spp., Fagaceae).

Comments.

Fall (1915) observed specimens from Ontario: Toronto (Wickham). However, no specimens of Pachybrachis luridus have been collected from the province in the last 68 years, and one of its potential hosts (Baptisia spp.) were always extremely rare in southern Ontario (Scoggan 1978). Consequently, Pachybrachis luridus is likely extirpated from the eastern Canadian fauna.

Pachybrachis m-nigrum (F. E. Melsheimer, 1847)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_m-nigrum

Habitus 8; Map 8; Figure 6c
Cryptocephalus m-nigrum F. E. Melsheimer, 1847: 170.
Pachybrachys intricatus Suffrian, 1852: 180.
Recognition.

Pronotum usually with thick, black, M-shaped marking; elytra yellow with variable black markings, but these usually leaving basal, lateral and sutural margins yellow, in addition to a basal and median yellow spots on each elytron (Habitus 8); male size medium: length 2.59 ± 0.11 mm, width 1.42 ± 0.07 mm.

Distribution.

A typical eastern species distributed in the eastern half of the United States (Riley et al. 2003). Its presence in the south of the eastern Townships, in Québec, corresponds to the northernmost limit of this species (Map 8).

Material examined.

NEW BRUNSWICK: York Co., 15 km W of Tracy, off Rt 645, 45.6837°N, 65.8809°W, 22.vii.2007, red pine forest, sweeping foliage of Comptonia peregrina, R. P. Webster [1?, RWIC].

QUÉBEC: Châteauguay Co., Ormstown, 12.VII.1977, sweeping, E. J. Kiteley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 30.VII.1978 [1♂, CNC]; Huntingdon Co., Covey Hill, 30.VI.1927, G. S. Walley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 1.VII.1927, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC].

Host plants.

An old record by Schwarz (1890) concerned Toxicodendron radicans (L.) Kuntze) (Anachardiaceae), but this was probably based on misidentified specimens of Pachybrachis tridens. Clark et al. (2004) reviewed the literature. More recently, Webster swept it from Comptonia peregrina (Myricaceae) (Webster et al. 2012). Recent surveying in Kentucky barrens/prairies by Barney et al. (2011) cited Pachybrachis m-nigrum collected from and found to feed on St. John’s-wort, Hypericum dolabriforme Vent. (Clusiaceae) (Barney and Hall (2011)).

Comments.

Based upon external morphlogy, these specimens appear to be Pachybrachis m-nigrum. However, extensive dissections of material from across the eastern half of the US reveal an externally similar species, but with a distinctly different aedeagus, from the midwestern states (Barney, unpublished data).

Pachybrachis nigricornis (Say, 1824)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_nigricornis

Habitus 9a, 9b, 9c; Map 9; Figures 6d, 7f
Cryptocephalus nigricornis Say, 1824: 436.
Pachybrachys carbonarius Haldeman, 1849: 260.
Pachybrachys autolycus Fall, 1915: 458.
Pachybrachys autolycus var. difficillis Fall, 1915: 459.
Pachybrachys autolycus var. wahsatchensis Fall, 1915: 459.
Pachybrachys carbonarius var. janus Fall, 1915: 462.
Recognition.

Pronotum strongly alutaceous and opaque, more finely punctate than elytra. In subspecies difficilis, black stripes usually complete and distinct (Habitus 9a), but in some specimens fused together. In subspecies carbonarius, elytra largely black (Habitus 9b), margined with yellow, or with yellow at edge of elytra in some females (Habitus 9c); male size small: length 2.20 ± 0.14 mm, width 1.21 mm ± 0.06 mm (difficilis); length 2.10 ± 0.07 mm, width 1.17 ± 0.04 mm (carbonarius).

Distribution.

The species Pachybrachis nigricornis is distributed across the eastern two-thirds of North America (Riley et al. 2003). The distribution of the subspecies remains a subject of debate (Balsbaugh and Tucker 1976; Barney and Hall 2009) (Map 9).

Material examined.

NEW BRUNSWICK: Kent Co., Kouchibouguac National Park, 7.VII.1978, Code 7785K, H. Goulet [3♂, CNC]; same data except Code 7754F [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except 13.VII.1977, code 5599I, G.A. Calderwood [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except 4.VIII.1977, code 5779G [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 25.VIII.1977, code 5849Y, S.J. Miller [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Queens Co., Jemseg, 18.VI.1981, ex. Potentilla simplex, L. LeSage & D. Ward [1♀, CNC].

ONTARIO: Carleton Co., Britannia, 14.VI.1949, R. de Ruette [2♀, CNC]; Constance Bay, 12.VII.1996, lot 3, B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♀, CNC]; Innis Point, 9–16.VII.1985, Interception trap, J. Denis & L. Dumouchel [1♂, CNC]; Ottawa, 17.VII.1912, G. Ouellet [1♀, IDM]; Hasting Co., Trenton, 28.V.2000, Evans [1♂, CNC]; Kenora Co., Berens River, 4–9.VII.1938, W. J. Brown [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Hwy 17, 15 km east of Borups Corners, 23.VI.1996, lot 2, B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♀, CNC]; Leeds Co., Saint-Lawrence Island National Park, Grenadier Island Center, 27.V.1975, sweeping, E. Sigler [1♀, CNC]; Lennox - Addington Co. Kaladar, 21.VII.1996, lot 3, B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♂, CNC]; Muskoka Co., Bala, 24.VI.1956, W. J. Brown [3♂ 11♀, CNC]; Nipissing Co., Algonquin Provincial Park near Brent, 19.VIII.1980, R. Baranowski [1♀, CNC]; Hwy11, 30 km north of North Bay, 14.VII.1995, lot 3, B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Hwy 17, 13 km west of Mattawa, 14.VI.1995, lot 1, B. F. & J. L. Carr [2♀, CNC]; Parry Sound Co., Parry Sound, 12.VII.1961, G. Brumpton [2♂, CNC]; same data, except 12.VII.1995, lot 1, B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♂, CNC]; Hwy 69, 12 km south Shawanaga, 13.VII.1995, Lot 3, B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♀, CNC]; Prescott Co., Alfred Bog, 8.VI.1982, breeding, ex. Cassandra calyculata, L. LeSage [4♂ 4♀, CNC]; same data, except 4.VI.1982, ex. Ericaceae [2♂ 4♀, CNC]; Prince Edward Co., 23.VI.1933, J. F. Brimley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 1.VII.1936 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 28.VI.1939 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 19.VII.1942 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 11–18.VI.1947 [12♂ 7♀, CNC]; same data, except 9.VI.1948 [8♂ 7♀, CNC]; same data, except 21.VI.1950 [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 17.VI.1953 [8♂ 14♀, CNC]; same data, except 19.VII.1961 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 2.VII.2000, Evans [1♀, CNC]; Russell Co., Mer Bleue, 13.VI.1932, W. J. Brown [2♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except 30.VI.1932 [5♂, CNC]; same data, except 26.VII.1932 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 30.VI.1934 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 10.VIII.1936 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 25.VII.1932, L. J. Milne [6♂ 3♀, CNC]; same data, except 29.VI.1954, E. C. Becker [2♂ 2♀, CNC]; same data, except 3.VII.1981, ex. Cassandra calyculata, L. LeSage [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except 30.VII.1979, sweeping, H. Goulet [1♂, CNC]; Sudbury Co., Sudbury, 1898 [1♀, CNC]; Thunder Bay Co., Manitouwadge, paper yard, 3.VII.1985, T. Baker [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; 59 km north junction of highways 516 & 599, 24.VI.1992, lot 1 B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♂, CNC].

QUÉBEC: Beauce Co., Beauceville, 21.VI.1937, Frère Étienne-Maurice [1♀, CEUM]; Bonaventure Co., Cascapédia, 22.VI.1933, W.J. Brown [1♂ CNC]; same data, except 9.VII.1933 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 16.VIII.1933 [1♀, CNC]; Châteauguay Co., Ormstown, 12.VII.1977, E. J. Kiteley, sweeping [1♂, CNC]; Deux-Montagnes Co., La Trappe, VII.1933 [1♂ 1♀, autolycus, var. difficillis Fall, Fall-MCZ]; same data, except 25.V.1929, P. Leopold [4♀, CEUM]; same data, except 2–19.VI.1936 [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 21.VI.1933, J. Ouellet [5♂ 3♀, CEUM]; same data, except 23.VII.1933 [1♂, CEUM]; same data, except 3–28.VII.1934 [2♂ 1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 3–17.VII.1935 [1♂ 1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 15.VI.1946 [1♂, CEUM]; Gatineau Co., Aylmer, 11.VI.1932, W. J. Brown [6♂ 4♀, CNC]; Gracefield, 22.VI.1937, O. Peck [1♂, CNC]; Kazabazua, 28.VIII.1928, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; Lytton, 1.VII.1981, weeds, side of road, A. Larochelle [1♂, CNC]; Mont King, Parc de la Gatineau 7–14.VII.1997, L. LeSage & C. Lacroix [1♂ CNC]; Huntingdon Co., Saint-Antoine- Abbé, 16.VI.1983, fern, A. Larochelle [2♀, CNC]; Joliette Co., Joliette, 12.VII.1922, J. Ouellet [1♂ 2♀, CEUM]; Labelle Co., Nominingue, 21.VII.1932 [1♂, autolycus, var. difficillis Fall, Fall-MCZ]; same data, except 12–19.VII.1932, J. Ouellet [4♂ 3♀, CEUM]; same data, except 4.VII.1934, L. Daviault [1♀, CEUM]; Lac-Saint-Jean-Ouest Co., Mistassini, 28.VII.1944, A. Robert [1♂ 1♀, CEUM]; Montcalm Co., Parc du Mont-Tremblant, 22.VI.1956, A. Robert [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 11.VII.1961 [1♀, CEUM]; Pontiac Co., Beech Grove, 10.VIII.1966, H. Goulet [1♂, CNC]; Portneuf Co., Sainte-Catherine, 3.VII.1956, J. C. Aubé [1♀, LEMC]; Territoires-du-Nouveau-Québec Co., Casa-Berardi, 22–29.VI.1997, interception trap, P. Paquin [2♂, LEM]; same data, except 6–27.VII.1997 [4♂ 2♀, LEM]; same data, except 3–24.VIII.1997 [3♂ 1♀, LEM]; Chemin Selbale, 6–27.VII.1997, interception trap, P. Paquin [1♂ 4♀, LEM].

Host plants.

Although over 200 specimens were examined, the only potential host plants recorded by collectors were Cassandra calyculata (L.) D. Don (Ericaceae) and Potentilla simplex Michx. (Rosaceae). Balsbaugh and Tucker (1976) reported that they collected series of carbonarius on wild strawberry (Fragaria sp.) (Rosaceae), and tick-trefoil (Desmodium sp.) (Fabaceae) in Alabama. Barney and Hall (2009) reared the same subspecies on Desmodium paniculatum L. DC and Lespedeza virginica (L.) Britton (Fabaceae) in Kentucky.

Comments.

Balsbaugh and Tucker (1976) and Riley et al. (2003) recognized Pachybrachis nigricornis as having four subspecies in North America. Fall (1915) described Pachybrachis autolycus as a separate species with two “varieties”, and he added the variety janus to Pachybrachis carbonarius, which he also recognized as a separate species. Specimens from each of the provinces of NB, ON and QC included an assortment of var. carbonarius, var. difficilis, and the yellow variation of carbonarius as per Barney and Hall (2009). In the “Material examined” section above, the QC specimens from Fall’s personal collection (Fall-MCZ) are listed, with an indication of his identification label of autolycus, var. difficillis.

Pachybrachis obsoletus Suffrian, 1852

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_obsoletus

Habitus 10; Map 10
Pachybrachys obsoletus Suffrian, 1852: 200.
Recognition.

Background color yellow, with numerous, usually not sharply outlined black spots on both pronotum and elytra (Habitus 10); eyes distant; ocular lines faint; male size small: length 1.87 ± 0.16 mm, width 0.98 ± 0.08 mm.

Distribution.

Species broadly distributed from North Dakota to New Mexico to Atlantic Coast in the United States (Riley et al. 2003), and in Canada from British Columbia to New Brunswick. In eastern Canada, it is found in Ontario, Québec and New Brunswick (Map 10).

Material examined.

NEW BRUNSWICK: Kent Co., Kouchibouguac National Park, 21.VII.1977, Code 5680L, D. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 17.VII.1978, Code 7291K, D. B. Lyons [1♀, CNC]; Queens Co., Canning Grand Lake near Flowers Cove, 1.VII.2004, D. Sabine and R. Webster [2♂ 2♀, RWIC]; White’s Cove, Grand Lake, 24.VII.1957, ex. Salix lucida [2♂ 2♀, CNC]; Sunbury Co., 9.5 km NE Jct. 101 & 645, 22.VII.2007, R. P. Webster [1♀, RWIC]; York Co., Fredericton, French Lake, 20.VII.1931, C. W. Maxwell [1♀, LEM]; Fredericton, 22.VII.1936, R. E. Balch [1♀, CNC]; French Lake, 2.VI.1928, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC].

ONTARIO: Carleton Co., Carp, 5.VII.1932, W. J. Brown [1♂, CNC]; Merivale, 16.VII.1936, W. J. Brown [2♀, CNC]; Stittsville, 18.VII.1963, J. F. McAlpine [1♂, CNC]; Stittsville, 18.VIII.1963, Malaise trap [1♀, CNC]; Durham Co., Durham, VI.1969, [1♀, CNC]; Hastings Co., 10.VII.1938, J. F. Brimley [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 16.VII.1950 [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 31.VI.1936 [1♀, CNC]; Marmora, 19.VI.1952, J. R. Vocheroth [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 4.VII.1952, J. R. McGillis [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 18.VIII.1952, E. H. N. Smith [1♀, CNC]; Kent Co., Tilbury, 20.VIII.1947, on willow, S. D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; Lambton Co., Grand Bend, 11.VII.1939, G.E. Shewell [1♀, CNC]; same data except 20.VII.1939 [1♀, CNC]; Lanark Co., Bell’s Corners, 6.VI.1942, F.I. Survey 1942, Rec 5436C, White Pine [1♀, CNC]; Leeds Co., Mulcaster Island, Saint-Lawrence Island National Park, 17.VIII.1976, Sweeping Pinus strobus, Code 4438, W. Reid [1♀, CNC]; Thwartway Island, Saint-Lawrence Island National Park, 18.VII.1976, Malaise trap, Code 4147-M, W. Reid [3♀, CNC]; Middlesex Co., Coldstream, 22.VI.1922, A. A. Wood [1♂ 5♀, CNC]; Nipissing Co., North Bay, 11.VII.1972, E. J. Kiteley [1♂, CNC]; Peterborough Co., 3.VII.1958, J. F. Brimley [1♀, CNC]; Prescott, Co., Alfred Bog, 7.VI.1982, sweeping vegetation in a bog, L. LeSage [2♂, CNC]; Prince Edward Co., 12.VII.1914, J. F. Brimley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 29.XI.1914 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 11.VII.1920 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 15–30.VII.1922, J. F. Brimley [3♀, CNC]; same data, except 19.VI.1926 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 6.VII.1935 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 28.VI.1936 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 26.VII.1936 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 17.VIII.1938 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 9.VII.1941 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 5.VII.1942 [3♀, CNC]; same data, except 18.VI.1947 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 29.VIII.1948 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 29.VI.1949 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 31.VIII.1949 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 19.VII.1950 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except VII.1953 [2♂ 4♀, USNM]; same data, except 24.VII.1955 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 29.VII.1956 [4♂ 10♀, CNC]; same data, except 26.VI.1966 [1♀, CNC]; Renfrew Co., Chalk River, 3.VIII.1937, J. M. Cameron [1♀, LEM]; Russell Co., Mer Bleue, 30.VI.1932, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 17.VII.1936 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 2.VII.1938, G. E. Shewell [1♂, CNC]; Sudbury Co., Sudbury, 4.VIII.1979, R. S. Anderson [1♀, CNC]; Thunder Bay Dist., Black Sturgeon Lake, 1–15.VIII.1956, Lindberg [1♂1♀, CNC]; Jarvis Island, 20.VIII.1952, on white pine, J. F. McAlpine [1♂, CNC]; Manitouwadge, 22.VI.1988, T. Baker [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 30.VII.1992 [1♂, CNC]; Toronto Co., Toronto, 27.V.1896, H. R. [1♀, LEM]; Quetico Provincial Park, 8.VIII.1982, C. B. Barr [2♀, LSAM]; Unknown Co., East Ontario [1♀, CNC].

QUÉBEC: Abitibi Co., Duparquet, 7.VIII.1983, ex. Pinus banksiana Lamb., A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Berthier Co., Berthierville, 8.VII.1950, A. Robert [1♀, CEUM]; Lanoraie, VII.1935, G. Chagnon [1♀, H. C. Fall, CEUM]; Charlevoix-Est Co., Clermont, 17.VIII.1982, ex. Pinus strobus L., A, Larochelle [2♀, CNC]; Port-au-Saumon, 19.VIII.1982, ex. spruce sp., A. Larochelle [1♂, CNC]; Drummond Co., Saint-Cyrille, 10.VII.1982, ex. Cassandra calyculata, L. LeSage [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Gatineau Co., Wakefield, 5.VIII.1974, ex. Pinus strobus, R. Sexton [1♀, CNC]; Île-Jésus Co., Île-Jésus, 5.VII.1935, G. Chagnon [1♀, CEUM]; Montcalm Co., Parc du Mont-Tremblant, 13.VIII.1932, A. Robert [1♂, CEUM]; Montgomery Co., Saint-Jean-d’Orléans, 22.VII.1957, J. L. Laliberté [1♀, IDM]; Montmagny Co. Montmagny, 8.VIII.1981, ex. Pinus strobus L., A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Pontiac Co., Beech Grove, 15.VIII.1948, S. D. Hicks [3♀, CNC]; Saguenay Co., Grandes-Bergeronnes, 15.VIII.1982, ex. Pinus resinosa Ait., A, Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Stanstead Co., Barnston, 26.VIII.1984, ex. Thuya sp., Larochelle & Larivière [1♀, CNC]; Terrebonne Co., Terrebonne, 1.VII.1933, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; Vaudreuil Co., Rigaud, 19.VII.1985, ex. Pinus strobus L., Larochelle & Larivière [2♀, CNC]; same data except 20.V.1977, sweeping sumac sp., E. J. Kiteley [1♀, CNC]; Saint-Lazare, 6.VIII.1985, ex. Betula papyrifera Marsh., A. Larochelle [1♂, CNC].

Host plants.

Pachybrachis obsoletus may be associated with peat bogs in eastern Canada. Specimens were collected in Alfred Bog (Pope 2011), and Mer Bleue (NCC 2011b; Wikipedia 2011), two well-known bogs of Ontario. The Lanoraie specimens, in Québec, were collected in an ecological preserve, which includes several fens and bogs (MDDEP 2011). Larochelle specimens, also from Québec, had a wide range of potential plant associations. Leather leaf (Cassandra calyculata (L.) D. Don.) (Ericaceae) is definitively a host (LeSage, collecting and personal observations), whereas the beetles’ presence on white pine (Pinus strobus) (Pinaceae) is very likely incidental. Sweeping from willows (Salix spp.) (Salicaceae) was reported by Barney et al. (2011). Additionally, Pachybrachis obsoletus was reported as causing light injury to cultivated roses in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, but the species identification cannot be confirmed (Arnason 1942, 1943; Arnason et al. 1946; King et al. 1944, 1945; Campbell et al. 1989).

Comments.

Pachybrachis obsoletus has a broad distribution from Manitoba to Oklahoma and eastwards to the Atlantic Ocean, with Alberta and British Columbia disjunct from this main area (Riley et al. 2003). It is reported here for the first time from NB.

Pachybrachis othonus othonus (Say, 1825)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_othonus_othonus

Habitus 11; Map 11
Cryptocephalus othonus Say, 1825: pl. 28.
Cryptocephalus marginaticollis Randall, 1838: 46.
Recognition.

Body robust. Pronotum black, with all margins and narrow median anterior stripe yellow; each elytron black, with rather narrow sub sutural, discal and marginal vittae yellow; legs yellow. Punctures of pronotum larger and denser than those on elytra; elytral punctures in somewhat regular rows on disc and sides (Habitus 11); male size medium: length 2.63 ± 0.12 mm, width 1.56 ± 0.09 mm.

Distribution.

A typical eastern species distributed from North Dakota to Texas to the Atlantic Coast in the United States (Riley et al. 2003), and in the south of Ontario and Québec in eastern Canada (Map 11).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Carleton Co., Britannia, 17.VI.1948, S. D. Hicks [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 23.VI.1950, R. de Ruette [1♀, CNC]; Constance Bay, 14.VII.1950, S. D. Hick [1♀, CNC]; Dirleton, 4.VII.1956, S. D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; Ottawa, 7.VIII.1914, F. G. Ouellet [1♂, IDM]; same data, except 15.VII.1957, J. E. H. Martin [1♂, CNC]; Essex Co., Leamington, 24.VI.1940, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; Ojibway, 27.VI.1943, S. D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 10.VI.1944 [1♂, CNC]; Roseland, 17–24.VI.1944, S. D. Hicks [1♂ 3♀, CNC]; same data, except 17.VI.1946 [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 30.VI.–13.VII.1946 [2♂ 9♀, CNC]; Halton Co., Burlington, 1920, G. M. Stirrett [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Hastings Co., Chatterton, 16.VII.1950, J. F. Brimley [2♂, CNC]; same data, except 2.VII.1951, J. C. Martin [1♀, CNC]; Marmora, 6.VII.1951, J. F. McAlpine [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 29.VIII.1952, C. Boyle [1♂, CNC]; Lanark Co., Bell’s Corners, 15–26.VI.1950, S. D. Hicks [1♂ 2♀, CNC]; same data, except 4.VII.1950 [1♀, CNC]; Niagara Co., St. Catherines, Decew Falls, 27.VII.1940, S. D. Hick [1♀, CNC]; Toronto Co., Kingsport, 3.VII.1965, D. D. Munroe [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Toronto, 26.VI.1896, C. T. Hills [1♂ 2♀, LEM]; same data, except 27.V.1896 [1♂ 2♀, LEM]; same data, except 9.VI.1905, E. C. Oakley [3♀, ROM]; same data, except F. Knab [3♂ 1♀, USNM]; Wentworth Co., Ancaster, 10.VII.1965, J. E. Martin [2♂, CNC].

QUÉBEC: Berthier Co., Berthierville, 27.VII.1938, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 8.VII.1950 [1♀, CEUM]; Lanoraie, 1.VII.1932 [1♂, CEUM]; Chambly Co., Boucherville, 1.VII, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; Deux-Montagnes Co., Saint-Eustache, 12.VIII.1917, J. Ouellet [2♀, CEUM]; Saint-Placide, 13.VII.1931, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; Gatineau Co., Aylmer, 21.VII.2009, ex. Hypericum, Lythrum, Daucus, graminées, etc, L. LeSage [1♀, CNC]; Île-de- Montréal Co., Montréal, 14.VII.1904, Beaulieu [1♀, USNM]; Joliette Co., Joliette, 12.VII.1909, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 7–13.VII.1922 [29♂ 46♀, CEUM]; Napierville Co., Saint-Rémi, 1.VII.1920, J. Ouellet [1♂ 1♀, CEUM]; Papineau Co., Montebello, 16.VII.1937, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; Pontiac Co., Beech Grove, 18.VII.1951, J. F. McAlpine [1♀, CNC]; Yarm, 23.VII.1955, C. H. Mann [1♂, CNC]; Vaudreuil Co., Hudson Heights, 24–30.VII.1956, Lindberg [1♀, CNC]; Rigaud, 5.VII.1920, J. Ouellet [2♂ 1♀, CEUM].

Host plants.

No specific plant associations were recorded on labels of specimens examined. Chagnon (1937, 1940) and Chagnon and Robert (1962) gave willow (Salix sp.) (Salicaceae) as a host in Québec, but Pachybrachis othonus was reported on a large number of questionable “hosts” by authors (details in Clark et al. 2004). Barney and Hall (2011) reported feeding, mating and oviposition on Desmodium marilandicum (L.) (Fabaceae).

Comments.

Balsbaugh (1973) and Riley et al. (2003) recognized Pachybrachis othonus as having three subspecies in North America.More information on habitats and hosts are needed on Pachybrachis othonus othonus, which is one of the easiest species to recognize.

Pachybrachis peccans Suffrian, 1852

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_peccans

Habitus 12; Map 12; Figures 1b, 2a
Pachybrachis peccans Suffrian, 1852: 192.
Recognition.

Ocular lines prominent (Figure 2a); males with enlarged foreleg claws (Figures 4a, b); color extremely variable, ranging from yellowish with faint black spots to almost black speckled with small yellow marks (Habitus 12); male size small: length 2.15 ± 0.16 mm, width 1.13 ± 0.09 mm.

Distribution.

Transcontinental species, widely distributed from Texas to Yukon to Atlantic Coast (LeSage 1991; Riley et al. 2003). Found in eastern Canada from Ontario to Prince Edward Island (Map 12).

Material examined.

NEW BRUNSWICK: Kent Co., Kouchibouguac National Park, 5–6.VII.1977, M. Ivanochko [40♂ 28♀, CNC]; same data, except 5–19.VII.1977, S. J. Miller [2♂ 7♀, CNC]; same data, except 8–13.VIII.1977 [2♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except 27.VII.1977, G. A. Calderwood [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 4.VIII.1977 [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except 16.VI.1978, D. B. Lyons [1♂, CNC]; Kings Co., Mechanic’s Lake, 30.VII.1926 [1♂, CNC]; Penobsquis, 21–31.VII.1926, C. A. Frost [1♂ 2♀, CNC]; Queens Co., Canning Grand Lake near Flowers Cove, 1.VII.2004, D. Sabine and R. Webster [1♂, RWIC]; Saint John Co., St. John, 8.VII.1902, W. McIntosch [1♀, USNM]; same data, except 19.VI.1981, sweeping vegetation, D. R. Ward [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; York Co., New Maryland Charters Settlement, 27.VI.2004, R. P. Webster [1♂, RWIC].

NOVA SCOTIA: Annapolis Co., Annapolis Royal, 21.VII.1928, W. J. Brown [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Inverness Co., Cape Breton Highlands National Park, Grande Falaise, 30 m, 0.5 km north, 9.VI.1983, forest, flood plain, H. Goulet [1♂, CNC]; Kings Co., Kentville, 20.VI.1981, sweeping, D. Ward [1♀, CNC]; Queens Co., Greenfield Queens, 13.VI.1910, P. G. Bolster [1♀, MCZ]; Port Medway & vic. Queen, 7–20.VII.1910 [2♂ 2♀, MCZ].

ONTARIO: Algoma Dist., Lake Superior Provincial Park, Agawa Bay Campground, 8.VII.1970, ROM Field Party [1♂ 2♀, ROM]; Carleton Co., Britannia, 14.VI.1949, R. de Ruette [1♂, CNC]; Britannia Bay, 3.VI.1959, S. D. Hicks [2♂ 1♀, CNC]; Britannia Heights, 16.VII.1958, S. D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 7.VII.1961, ex. Populus balsamifera [17♂ 12♀, CNC]; Constance Bay, 30.VIII.1982, L. J. Milne [1♀, CNC]; Ottawa, 14.VI.1972, F. G. Ouellet [1♀, IDM]; Cochrane Dist., Smoky Falls, Mattagami River, 6.VII.1934, G. S. Walley [1♂, CNC]; Timmins, 16.VI.1982, on plants in gravel, J. Pilny [1♀, CNC]; same data, except Mattagami River, 48°30'N, 81°15'W, 16.VI.1982, Pilny & Motz [2♀, CNC]; Essex Co., Belle River, 26.V.1946, S. D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; Leamington, 4.VI.1937, G. S. Walley [1♂ 3♀, CNC]; Ojibway, 9.VI.1943, S. D. Hicks [2♂ 2♀, CNC]; same data, except 28.V.1944 [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Pelee Island, VI.24, R. C. Osburn [1♂, OSU]; same data, except 3.VII.1931, W. J. Brown [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 11.VI.1940, ex. Salix [6♂ 4♀, CNC]; Point Pelee, 23–29.VI.1931, W. J. Brown [18♂ 18♀, CNC]; same data, except 3.VII.1931 [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except 29.V.1940 [3♂ 2♀, CNC]; same data, except 1.VII.1940 [1♂ 2♀, CNC]; same data, except 3.VI.1929, L. J. Milne [5♂ 5♀, CNC]; same data, except 1.VI.1933, ex. willow, G. M. Stirrett [2♂ 4♀, 6, CNC]; same data, except 19–20.V.1955, ex. Salix interior, S. D. Hicks [2♂ 8♀, CNC]; same data, except 30.V.1929, G. S. Walley [3♂ 3♀, CNC]; same data, except 25.VI.1920, N. K. Bigelow [1♂ 1♀, ROM]; Point Pelee National Park, 6.VI.1981, ex. Salix spp., L. LeSage & D. Ward [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 29.VII.1982, L. LeSage [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Haldimand Co., Dunville, 30.V.1954, R. Plath [1♂ 1♀, USNM]; Hastings Co., Marmora, 1.VII.1952, sweep from Rubus spp., G. P. Holland [1♀, CNC]; Kenora Dist., Malachi, 13–14.VII.1947, W. Y. Watson [1♂ 1♀, ROM]; Willard Lake, 22.VI.1992, lot 1, B.F. & J.L. Carr [1♂, CNC]; Kent Co., Erieau, 26.VI.1932, ex. Cornus sp., G. M. Stirrett [5♂ 4♀, CNC]; Rondeau Park, 3.VI.1981, L. LeSage [3♂ 11♀, CNC]; same data, except 4.VI.1981, ex. Salix spp. [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 29.V.1985, marsh trail [2♂ 3♀, CNC]; same data, except 28.V.1985, sandy beach [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 7.VI.1981, sifted litter under willows, L. LeSage & D. Ward [4♂ 7♀, CNC]; same data, except 3.VI.1981, sweep willow and grasses, D. Ward [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 5.VI.1985, under willow, J. M. Campbell & A. Davies [1♂, CNC]; Lanark Co., Bell’s Corner, 30.VI.1950, S. D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; Niagara Co., Ridgeway, A. H. Kilman [1♀, ROM]; Nipissing Dist., Algonquin Park, 18.VI.1922, J. McDunnough [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 4.VII.1965, W. F. O. [1♀, CNC]; North Bay, 11.VII.1972, E. J. Kiteley [1♀, CNC]; North Bay, Trout Creek, 25.VI.1984, willow [1♀, CNC]; Norfolk Co., Hemlock, 9.VIII.1945, ex. Salix, G. M. Stirrett [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Turkey Point, 8.VI.1931, W. J. Brown [2♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except 24.VII.1984, sweeping in marshy area, L. LeSage [5♂ 1♀, CNC]; Walsingham Forestry Station, 25.VII.1984, sweeping in ditch, L. LeSage [1♂ 3♀, CNC]; Parry Sound Dist., Burk’s Falls, 14.VII.1926, F. P. Ide [1♀, CNC]; Scotia Junction, 28.VIII.1934, H. W. Wenzel [1♂, OSU]; Peel Co., Port Credit, 4.VII.1908 [1♂, ROM]; Peterborough Co., Hastings, 2.VI.1934, J. F. Brimley [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 31.VI.1934 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 9.VI.1935 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 4.VI.1950 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 5.IX.1956 [2♀, CNC]; Prince Edward Co., same data, except 9–13.VII.1941 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 24.VII.1945 [1♀, CNC]; Prince Edward Co., Picton, 22.VI.1985, M. Davis [1♀, CNC]; Rainy River Dist., 13–15.VII.1924, J. F. Brimley [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 24.VIII.1924 [1♀, CNC]; Renfrew Co., Petawawa, 17.VI.1980, ex. Comptonia peregrina, L. LeSage [1♀, CNC]; Sudbury Dist., Sudbury 1988 [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except Wickham [1♀, USNM]; Thunder Bay Dist., Black Sturgeon Lake, 1–15.VIII.1956, Lindberg [7♂ 24♀, CNC]; Manitouwadge, 22.VII.1983, T. Baker [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 7.VII.1991, on weeds near woodpile pine logs, [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 21.VI.1992 [1♀, CNC]; 59 km north of junction of highway 516 & 599, 24.VI.1992, lot 2, B.F. & J.L. Carr [1♀, CNC]; Timiskaming Dist., Elk Lake, 30.VI.1958, G. H. Dieke [1♂, USNM]; Toronto Co., Toronto, F. Knab [10♂ 6♀, USNM]; same data, except 2.VII.1894, [1♀, ROM]; same data, except VII.1933 [2♂ 2♀, ROM]; same data, except 30.V.1896, H. R. [1♂ 1♀, LEM]; same data, except 26.VI.1896, C. T. Hills [1♀, LEM]; same data, except 20.VI.1908, R. J. Crew [1♀, ROM]; same data, except 8.VI.1926, E. C. Oakley [1♂ 2♀, LEM]; same data, except VII.1933, L. J. Milne [2♀, UNHC]; Victoria Co., Fenelon Falls, Lindsay, 17.VI.1959, ex. Salix sp., F.I.S. [1♂, CNC]; Unknown Co., Sultan road, 68 km west of junction of highway 144, 26.VI.1996, Lot 2, B.F. & J.L. Carr [1♂ 2♀, CNC].

PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND: Kings Co., Souris, 12.VII.1993, ex. lowbush blueberry, M. E. M. Smith [2♂ 1♀, CNC]; Queens Co., PEI National Park Stanhope Campground, 13.VIII.1991, D. S. Chandler [2♂, UNHC].

QUÉBEC: Abitibi Co., Saint-Vital-de-Clermont, 9.VIII.1983, sweeping weeds in Pinus banksiana Lamb. forest, A. Larochelle [1♂, CNC]; Argenteuil Co., Saint-Philippe-d’Argenteuil, 21.VI.1983, ex. Betula populifolia Marsh., Larochelle [1♂, CNC]; Arthabaska Co., Blandford, 21.VI.1980, ex. Salix sp., A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Bellechasse Co., Saint-Étienne, 1.VI.1980, J. C. Aubé [3♂ 2♀, LEM]; Berthier Co., Berthierville, 4.VI.1944, A. Robert [1♀, CEUM]; Bonaventure Co., Carleton, 29.VII.1981, waste land on weeds, A. Larochelle [1♂, CNC]; Cascapédia, 11–14.VI.1933, W. J. Brown [7♂ 12♀, CNC]; Port-Daniel, 30.VII.1981, field on weeds, A. Larochelle [1♂, CNC]; Brome Co., Knowlton, 10–12.VII.1928, G. H. Fish [2♂ 1♀, CNC]; Champlain Co., La Tuque. 8.VIII.1981, ex. Myrica asplenifolia L., A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Chicoutimi Co., Jonquière, 27.VI.1970, ex. Populus tremuloides, C. Chantz [1♂, AJGC]; Deux-Montagnes Co., La Trappe, 25.V.1929, P. Leopold [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 27.VI.1933, J. Ouellet [3♂ 1♀, Det. by H. C. Fall, CEUM]; same data, except 2.VII.1933 [2♂ 1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 28.VI.1935 [14♂ 19♀, CEUM]; same data, except 23.VII.1950 [2♂ 2♀, CEUM]; Saint-Placide, 4.VI.1933 [1♀, CEUM]; Gaspé-Est Co., Gaspé, 7.VII.1931 [1♂, Fall-MCZ]; same data, except 25.VII.1954, W. J. Brown [1♂ 2♀, CNC]; Percé, 30.VII.1981, roadside, on weeds, A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Val-d’Espoir, 18.VIII.1939, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; Gatineau Co., Lytton, 1.VII.1981, ex. Salix sp., A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Île-de- Montréal Co., Montréal, 28.VI, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 2.VII.1917 [1♂, CEUM]; same data, except 30.V.1940, A. Robert [2♂ 3♀, CEUM]; same data, except 15.VI.1951, M. Larochelle [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 17.VI.1980, E. J. Kiteley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 30.V.1981 [1♂, CNC]; Joliette Co., Joliette, 15.VII.1924 [1♂, Fall- MCZ]; same data, except, 15.VII.1917, J. Ouellet [3♀, CEUM]; same data, except 7–13.VII.1922 [2♂ 2♀, CEUM]; same data, except 7–15.VII.1924 [15♂ 5♀, CEUM]; same data, except 12.VI.1930 [1♂, CEUM]; Kamouraska Co., Sully, 24–26.VI.1936, J. Ouellet [33♂ 45♀, CEUM]; same data, except 1–2.VII.1936 [17♂ 26♀, CEUM]; same data, except 9.VII.1936 [25♂ 24♀, CEUM]; same data, except 13–14.VII.1936 [18♂ 22♀, CEUM]; same data, except 21.VII.1936 [2♂ 4♀, CEUM]; Labelle Co., Lac Saguay, 19.VI.1981, ex. Salix sp., A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Nominingue, 25.VIII.1930, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 12–24.VII.1932 [22♂ 37♀, CEUM]; same data, except 24.VII.1933, A. Robert [1♂ 2♀, CEUM]; same data, except 19.VI.1934, L. Daviault [1♂, CEUM]; same data, except 21.VII.1932 [1♀, Fall- MCZ]; Lévis Co., Lauzon, 29.VI.1932, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; Montcalm Co., Parc du Mont-Tremblant, 15.VIII.1954, A. Robert [1♂ 1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 27.VI.1971, E. J. Kiteley [1♂, CNC]; Nicolet Co., Blandford, 21.VI.1980, A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Papineau Co., Montebello, 3.VII.1937, J. Ouellet [1♀, CEUM]; Portneuf Co., Lac Sergent, 2.VII.1961, J. L. Laliberté [1♀, IDM]; Saint-Augustin, 17.VI.1967, J. L. Laliberté [1♂, IDM]; same data, except 22.VI.1977 [1♂, IDM]; Sainte-Catherine, 8–14.VII.1956, J. C. Aubé [7♂ 4♀, LEM; 2♂ 2♀, AMNH, 1♂, USNM]; same data, except 19.VI.1957 [1♂, LEM]; same data, except 11.VI.1960 [1♀, LEM]; same data, except 9–15.VII.1960 [1♂ 1♀, LEM; 1♀, USNM]; same data, except 26.VII.1961 [2♀, LEM]; same data, except 5.VIII.1961 [1♀, LEM]; same data, except 15.VII.1956, J. L. Laliberté [1♂ 2♀, IDM]; Québec Co., Cap-Rouge, 27.VI.1959, J. C. Aubé [1♂, LEM]; same data, except 24.VI.1981, D. R. Ward [1♀, CNC]; Lac Beauport, 11–23.VII.1956, J. L. Laliberté [1♂ 2♀, IDM]; Québec, 15.VI.1957, J. C. Aubé [1♂, LEM; 1♂, AMNH]; Saguenay Co., Grandes- Bergeronnes, 20.VII.1981, field on weeds, A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Rivière Barthélemy, 22.VII.1981, field on weeds, A. Larochelle [1♂, CNC]; Tadoussac, 23.VII.1932, A. F. Winn [3♀, CEUM]; Saint-Jean Co., Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu (as “St. Johns”), F. Knab [1♂, USNM]; Saint-Maurice Co., Pointe-du-Lac, 11.VII.1926, J. L. Laliberté [1♀, IDM]; same data, except 5.VIII.1927 [1♂ 1♀, IDM]; same data, except 26.VII.1928 J. L. Laliberté [1♀, IDM]; same data, except 20.VII.1936 [2♀, IDM]; Soulanges Co., Rivière-Beaudette, 10.VIII.1985, Larochelle & Larivière [1♀, CNC]; Témiscamingue Co. Laniel, 5–6.VI.1963, W. Gagné [1♂, CNC]; Notre- Dame-du-Nord, 36.VI [2♂, CEUM]; Vaudreuil Co., Rigaud, 13.VII.1973, sweeping Salix sp., E. J. Kiteley [3♂ 3♀, CNC]; same data, except 7.VI.1985, willow in flower (Salix sp.), Larochelle & Larivière [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 7.VI.1985, old field birch (Betula populifolia Marsh.), Larochelle & Larivière [1 ♀, CNC]; Saint-Lazare, 20.VI.1983, ex. Salix fragilis L., A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC]; Mont Lyall 1500 ft, 31.VII.1933, W. J. Brown [2♂ 4♀, CNC].

Host plants.

Large series of Pachybrachis peccans were reportedly taken on Populus balsami-fera L. and Salix spp. (Salicaceae). Other plant associations recorded on labels were Populus tremuloides Michx.; lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) (Ericaceae); Rubus spp. (Rosaceae); and Comptonia peregrina (L.) (Myricaceae). Larvae were reared on dead leaves of sand-bar willow (Salix interior Rowlee) by LeSage (1985). Larochelle specimens from Québec had a wide range of potential plant associations. Several additional potential hosts are listed by Clark et al. (2004) from their literature review.

Comments.

Pachybrachis peccans was the most commonly examined species (over 900 specimens; Table 1). It has also the largest distribution, being found from Nova Scotia to Yukon (Map 12). Pachybrachis peccans is reported here for the first time from PE.

Table 1.

List of Pachybrachis species recorded from eastern Canada, with number of specimens examined per province. No specimens were found bearing a label from Newfoundland or Labrador.

ON QC NB NS PE Total
Pachybrachis atomarius (F. E. Melsheimer) 32 1 0 0 0 33
Pachybrachis bivittatus (Say) 59 43 0 0 0 102
Pachybrachis calcaratus Fall 2 0 0 0 0 2
Pachybrachis cephalicus Fall* 25** 0 0 0 0 25
Pachybrachis hepaticus hepaticus (F. E. Melsheimer) 19 91 0 0 0 110
Pachybrachis luctuosus Suffrian* 17** 3** 0 0 0 20
Pachybrachis luridus (Fabricius) 66 0 0 0 0 66
Pachybrachis m-nigrum (F. E. Melsheimer) 0 4 1 0 0 5
Pachybrachis nigricornis (Say) 143 82 11 0 0 236
Pachybrachis obsoletus Suffrian 87 22 14** 0 0 123
Pachybrachis othonus othonus (Say) 59 94 0 0 0 153
Pachybrachis peccans Suffrian 337 483 93 9 5** 927
Pachybrachis pectoralis (F. E. Melsheimer) 15 36 0 0 0 51
Pachybrachis spumarius Suffrian 179 142 0 0 0 321
Pachybrachis subfasciatus (J. E. LeConte) 18 0 0 0 0 18
Pachybrachis tridens (F. E. Melsheimer) 8 0 0 0 0 8
Pachybrachis trinotatus (F. E. Melsheimer) 53 11 0 0 0 64
Total per province 1119 1012 119 9 5 2264

*New national record for Canada,

**New provincial record.


As one of several species in North America having distinct ocular lines, enlarged claws, and varying degrees of maculation, there is much potential confusion with other species. Fall (1915) stated, “While peccans varies toward melanostictus in its darker individuals, it approaches so closely to diversus and abdominalis in some of its paler forms as to make distinction purely discretional.” At this time, we believe diversus is a more southern species not found in Canada, and abdominalis and melanostictus are not found in eastern Canada.

Pachybrachis pectoralis (F. E. Melsheimer, 1847)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_pectoralis

Habitus 13; Map 13; Figure 1a
Cryptocephalus pectoralis F. E. Melsheimer, 1847: 171.
Pachybrachis sobrinus Haldeman, 1849: 262.
Pachybrachis oculatus Suffrian, 1852: 178.
Pachybrachis sticticus Blatchley, 1910: 1130.
Recognition.

Form, especially of the male, narrower than usual; color dull yellow, maculate with brown or black (Habitus 13); surface not or scarcely shining; eyes narrowly separated; ocular lines present (Figure 1a); front tibiae sinuate on inner margin beyond middle; front claws of male obviously, though not greatly, enlarged; male size small: length 1.92 ± 0.07 mm, width 0.96 ± 0.04 mm.

Distribution.

Eastern species distributed from Nebraska to Texas to Atlantic Coast in the United States (Riley et al. 2003). In eastern Canada, Pachybrachis pectoralis has been found in southern Ontario and the Ottawa Valley in Québec (Map 13).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Hastings Co., 10.vii.1938, J. F. Brimley [2♀, CNC]; same data, except 5.VIII.1957 [1♀, CNC]; Muskoka Dist., Norway Point Lake of Bays, 30.XI.1922, J. McDunnough [1♀, CNC]; Prince Edward Co., 3.VIII.1938, J. F. Brimley [3♂ 3♀, CNC]; Kawartha Gull Lake, 2.VIII.1943, J. F. Brimley [2♂, CNC]; same data, except 19.VII.1950 [1♀, CNC]; Toronto Co., Toronto, 15–30.VI.1927, L. J. Milne [1♀, CNC]; Unknown Co., East Ontario [1♂, CNC].

QUÉBEC: Gatineau Co., Mont King, Parc de la Gatineau, 19.VIII.1996, L. LeSage [8♂ 13♀, CNC]; same data, except 6.IX.1996 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 28.V.1997 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 21.VII.1997 [1♂ 3♀, CNC]; Pontiac Co., Luskville, 4.VII.1985, ex. Quercus rubra L. Larochelle & Larivière [1♀, CNC]; same data except 30.VII.1985, ex. Quercus alba L. [1♂, CNC]; Vaudreuil Co., Rigaud, A. Robert [2♂ 2♀, CEUM]; same data, except 20.VIII.1984, ex. Quercus rubra L., Larochelle & Larivière [2♂, CNC]; same data except 19.VIII.1985, ex. Quercus rubra L., Larochelle & Larivière [1♀, CNC].

Host plants.

No information is available from the specimens examined. According to Blatchley (1924a, b), Fall (1915), Barney (1984) and Clark (2000), Pachybrachis pectoralis is associated with common locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) (Fabaceae). Larochelle’s specimens were found on Quercus alba L. and Quercus rubra L. Additional potential hosts are given in Clark et al. (2004).

Comments.

No specimens from New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, from where this species was reported by LeSage (1991) and Riley et al. (2003), were located, although the material of all the important collections of eastern Canada was examined. The Ottawa River Valley is the northernmost limit of Pachybrachis pectoralis, in Québec. This species may extend further north to the Maritime Provinces along the Atlantic Coast, but it has not yet been recorded from Maine (Riley et al. 2003; Majka et al. 2011).

Pachybrachis spumarius Suffrian, 1852

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_spumarius

Habitus 14; Map 14; Figures 2b, 5b, 6b, 7d, 8c, 10b, 10c
Pachybrachys spumarius Suffrian, 1852: 179.
Pachybrachis roboris Fall, 1915: 420.
Recognition.

Elytra and pronotum with small yellow spots and diffuse rufous mottled marks; prothoracic puncturation dense, extending to side margins (Habitus 14); ocular lines absent; aedeagus tubular with terminal nodule (Figure 10b) or nipple-shaped apex when seen from above (Figure 10c); male size small: length 1.91 ± 0.13 mm, width 1.06 ± 0.05 mm.

Distribution.

Eastern species distributed from southern Saskatchewan to Texas to Atlantic Coast (Riley et al. 2003), and present in southern Ontario and Québec in eastern Canada. The Ottawa Valley and the south of eastern Townships, in Québec, are probably the northernmost distribution limit of Pachybrachis spumarius (Map 14).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Carleton Co., Britannia, 28.VI.1931, L. J. Milne [1♂ 1♀, UNHC]; same data, except 19.VII.1949, R. de Ruette [1♀, CNC]; Britannia Heights, 16.VII.1958, S. D. Hicks [1♂, CNC]; Constance Bay, 10.VII.1941, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; Carp, 5.VII.1932, W. J. Brown [1♂, CNC]; Essex Co., Ojibway, 24.VI.1945 [1♀, CNC]; Pelee Island, 3.VII.1931, W. J. Brown [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Roseland, 26.VI.1944, S. D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; Hasting Co., 2.IX.1934, J. F. Brimley [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except 25.VII.1954 [1♂, CNC]; Leeds Co., Lindsay Island, Saint Lawrence Island National Park, 15.VII.1976, ex. Betula papyrifera, W. Reid [2♂, CNC]; Mermaid Island, Saint Lawrence Island National Park, 23.VII.1976, W. Reid [1♀, CNC]; Lennox & Addington Co., 16.VII.1939, J. F. Brimley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 6.IX.1948 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 10.VII.1949 [3♀, CNC]; Lincoln Co., DeCew Falls, 27.VII.1940, S. D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; Norfolk Co., Turkey Point Provincial Park, 24.VII.1984, sweeping in mixed forest, L. LeSage [3♂, CNC]; Walsingham, 11.VII.1956, W. J. Brown [6♂ 7♀, CNC]; Walsingham Forest Station, 25.VII.1984, ex. Rhus typhina, L. LeSage [45♂ 47♀, CNC]; Northumberland Co., 2.IX.1950, J.F. Brimley [1♀, CNC]; Prince Edward Co., 10.VII.1935, J. F. Brimley [3♂ 3♀, CNC]; same data, except 21–25.VII.1937 [5♂ 9♀, CNC]; same data, except 3.VII.1938 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 13.VII.1941 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 16.VII.1947 [6♂ 2♀, CNC]; same data, except 5–19.VII.1950 [3♂ 3♀, CNC]; same data, except 5.VII.1953 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 7.VII.1954 [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Clearwater Bay, 30.VII.1996, sweeping miscellaneous vegetation, B. F & J. L. Carr [2♀, CNC]; Toronto Co., Toronto, 15.VIII.1908, R. J. Crew [1♀, ROM]; Kelly Lake, 26.VII.1933, L. J. Milne [1♂, UNHC]; Victoria Co., Coboconk, 2.VIII.1948, J. F. B. [2♂ 1♀, CNC]; Unknown Co., East Ontario [1♂ 1♀, CNC].

QUÉBEC: Bagot Co., Saint-Pie, 1.VII.1985, ex. Acer rubrum L., Larochelle & Larivière [1♂, CNC]; Châteauguay Co., Ormstown, 12.VII.1977, sweeping sumac, E. J. Kiteley [3♂ 2♀, CNC]; Deux-Montagnes Co., La Trappe, 19–22.VII.1945, J. Ouellet [1♂ 1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 7.VII.1946, [1♀, CEUM]; same data, except 13–15.VII.1949 [2♂ 4♀, CEUM]; same data, except 8–23.VII.1950, ex. Virginia sumac [27♂ 35♀, CEUM]; same data, except 1–8.VIII.1950, ex. Virginia sumac [9♂ 5♀, CEUM]; same data, except 27.VII.1951 [6♂ 7♀, CEUM]; Gatineau Co., Mont-King, Parc de la Gatineau, 19.VII.1981, P. Bélanger [1♂ 2♀, LFC]; Kazabazua, 3.IX.1967, H. J. Teskey [1♀, CNC]; Missisquoi Co., Phillipsburg, 15–19.VII.1969, J. L. Laliberté [1♂ 1♀, IDM]; same data, except 29.VII.1972 [3♂ 4♀, IDM]; same data, except 22.VI.1975 [2♂, IDM]; Pontiac Co., Luskville, 30.VII.1985, ex. Quercus alba L., Larochelle & Larivière [1♀, CNC]; Témiscamingue Co., Laniel, 14.VIII.1932, W.J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; Vaudreuil Co., Hudson Heights, 24–30.VII.1956, Lindberg [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Rigaud, 26.VII.1902, F. Knab [1♂ 1♀, USNM]; same data, except 25.VII.1939, A. Robert [1♂, CEUM]; same data, except 15.VIII.1972, on sumac, E. J. Kiteley [3♂, CNC]; same data, except 13.VII.1973, sweeping sumac [1♂ 3♀, CNC]; same data, except 22.VII.1974, on sumac [3♂ 2♀, CNC]; same data, except 27.VIII.1977, on sumac [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except 16.VIII.1984, ex. Rhus typhina L., Larochelle & Larivière [1♀, CNC]; Saint-Lazare, 9.VIII.1982, UV light in a pine plantation, A. Larochelle [1♀, CNC].

Host plants.

Several specimens were recorded as being collected from Rhus typhina L., Virginia sumac, or just sumac (Anachardiaceae), which are various names for the same plant. Barney and Hall (2011) reported collecting specimens in abundance on Rhus copallina L. and Rhus glabra L., and observed feeding, mating and oviposition on these species in the laboratory. Larochelle cited Acer rubrum L. (Aceraceae) and Quercus alba L. (Salicaceae) as potential hosts on his labels. Betula papyrifera Marsh. (Betulaceae) was also reported here but cannot be confirmed as a plant association.

Comments.

Pachybrachis spumarius is the second most commonly collected species in eastern Canada and can often be found in large series on Rhus spp. (Table 1).

Pachybrachis subfasciatus (J. E. LeConte, 1824)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_subfasciatus

Habitus 15; Map 15
Cryptocephalus subfasciatus J. L. LeConte, 1824: 173.
Pachybrachys biguttatus Suffrian, 1852: 167.
Pachybrachys impurus Suffrian, 1852: 186.
Pachybrachys xanthias Suffrian, 1852: 199.
Pachybrachys impurus var. umbrosus Fall, 1915: 379.
Recognition.

Color dark, pronotum with sides narrowly yellow; elytra with red or yellow, more or less broad, irregular or indented transverse median fascia often interrupted at suture, and with red or yellow apical spot (Habitus 15); Disc of pronotum often, and head more rarely, variegated with reddish yellow; male size small: length 2.21 ± 0.09 mm, width 1.18 ± 0.06 mm.

Distribution.

Eastern species distributed from Kansas to Louisiana to Atlantic Coast in the United States (Riley et al. 2003), restricted to the Carolinian Zone in southern Ontario in eastern Canada (Map 15).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Essex Co., Leamington, 6.VII.1931, G. S. Walley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 9.VI.1937 [1♀, CNC]; Hastings Co., 19.VII.1938, J. F. Brimley [2♀, CNC]; Lennox & Addington Co., 16.VII.1938, J. F. Brimley [1♂, CNC]; Norfolk Co., Normandale, 5.VI.1931, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; Walsingham, 3.VI.1944, W. J. Brown [3♀, CNC]; same data, except 11.VII.1956 [2♀, CNC]; Northumberland Co., Hamilton, 15.VII.1981, M. Sanborne [1♂, CNC]; Toronto Co., Toronto, 15.VI.1896 [3♀, LEM]; same data, except 30.V.1897, C. T. Hills [1♂ 1♀, LEM].

Host plants.

No records are available from the specimens examined. Downie and Arnett (1996) reported Pachybrachis subfasciatus from black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) (Juglandaceae).

Comments.

Pachybrachis subfasciatus is another possible example of a species once living in the Carolinian Zone which may have been extirpated from the Canadian fauna. No specimens were collected in the last 55 years. If its association with black walnut is correct, this may explain its rarity, or even extinction, since Fox and Soper (1953) reported this tree occurring naturally only in rich woods in southernmost Ontario and considered recent trees above these limits to have been planted.

Pachybrachis tridens (F. E. Melsheimer, 1847)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_tridens

Habitus 16; Map 16
Cryptocephalus tridens F. E. Melsheimer, 1847: 172.
Cryptocephalus flavicornis F. E. Melsheimer, 1847: 172.
Pachybrachys mollis Haldeman, 1849: 263.
Recognition.

Color pale yellow with broad, sharply limited, black markings; antennae (usually) and legs entirely yellow (Habitus 16). Lustre dull. Eyes separated by about twice length of basal antennomere in male, and by two and one-half to three times length of this antennomere in female. Ocular lines fine. Front claws of male not enlarged (as in Figure 4c); male size small: length 1.93 ± 0.10 mm, width 1.01 ± 0.04 mm.

Distribution.

Pachybrachis tridens is an eastern species distributed from Manitoba to Texas to the Atlantic Coast in the United States (Riley et al. 2003), and restricted to the Carolinian Zone of southern Ontario in eastern Canada (Map 16).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Prince Edward Co., 21–28.VI.1950, J. F. Brimley [3♂ 5♀, CNC].

Host plants.

No records are available from the specimens examined. Poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans (L.) Kuntze) (Anachardiaceae) was given as the preferred host by Fall (1915), Blatchley (1924a), Wilcox (1954, 1979), Furth (1985), and others. A complete list of citations is found in Clark et al. (2004).

Comments.

Since Pachybrachis tridens has not been collected in the last 55 years, it can be considered as extirpated from the Canadian fauna. Formerly, it was probably restricted to the Carolinian Life Zone, which is now reduced to minute remnants. For this reason, the Manitoba record reported by LeSage (1991) and Riley et al. (2003), and the Québec record cited by Riley et al. (2003) are questionable. No specimens were available to confirm them.

Pachybrachis trinotatus (F. E. Melsheimer, 1847)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Pachybrachis_trinotatus

Habitus 17; Map 17
Cryptocephalus trinotatus F. E. Melsheimer, 1847: 170.
Recognition.

Pronotum red with heavy, sharply defined, black M-mark, and with pale anterior and lateral margins; elytra entirely black (Habitus 17); male size large: length 3.09 ± 0.13 mm, width 1.75 ± 0.09 mm.

Distribution.

Pachybrachis trinotatus is an eastern species distributed from Kansas to the Atlantic Coast in the United States (Riley et al. 2003), and in Ontario and Québec in eastern Canada (Map 17).

Material examined.

ONTARIO: Carleton Co., Stittsville, 26.VII.1961, G. Brumpton [1♂, CNC]; Essex Co., Leamington, 27.VI-3.VII.1931, W. J. Brown [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Hamilton Co., Ancaster, 2.VII.1958, J. E. H. Martin [1♂, CNC]; Hastings Co., 10.VII.1938, J. F. Brimley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 24.VII.1960, J. F. Brimley [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Marmora, 2.VII.1952, C. Boyle [1♀, CNC]; Lambton Co., Grand Bend, 10.VII.1939, G. E. Shewell [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Lanark Co., Bell’s Corners, 15.VII.1954, S. D. Hicks [3♂ 2♀, CNC]; same data, except Lanark, Kerr Lake 13.VII.1975 [1♂, CNC]; Lincoln Co., DeCew Falls, 29.VI.1940, S. D. Hicks [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 27.VII.1940 [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; same data, except VIII.1941 [1♂, CNC]; Northumberland Co., Hamilton, 14–19.VII.1984, M. Sanborne [1♀, CNC]; Prince Edward Co., 21.VII.1937, beaten from oak, J. F. Brimley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 4.VII.1946 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 11.VIII.1947 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 14.VII.1948 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 10.VIII.1948 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 20.VI.1949 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 6.VII.1949 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 17.VII.1950 [5♂ 3♀, CNC; 1♂, AMNH; 2♂ 1♀, St. John’s wort blossom, FSCA]; same data, except 7.VII.1955 [1♂, CNC]; same data, except 29.VII.1956 [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 27.VII.1962 [1♂ 1♀, CNC]; Renfrew Co., Hwy 512 15 km W Eganville, 5.VII.1996, B. F. & J. L. Carr [1♂, CNC]; Simcoe Co., Craighurst, 30.VIII.1963, G. G. E. Scudder [1♀, CNC]; Tiny Township, Cawaja Beach, 17.VII.1968, J. C. E. Riotte [1♂ 1♀, ROM]; Toronto Co., Toronto, Kelly Lake, 13–26.VII.1933, L. J. Milne [2♂ 1♀, UNHC]; Victoria Co., Coboconk, 7.VIII.1940, S.D. Hicks [1♀, CNC]; Wellington Co., Guelph, VII.1924, D. C. B. Duff [1♂, ROM].

QUÉBEC: Huntingdon Co., Covey Hill, 1.VII.1927, W. J. Brown [1♂, CNC]; Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, 10.VII.1977, sweeping field, E. J. Kiteley [1♂, CNC]; Missisquoi Co., Phillipsburg, 31.VII.1972, J. L. Laliberté [1♂, IDM]; Québec Co., Québec, 26.VII.1902, F. Knab [1♂ 1♀, USNM]; Vaudreuil Co., Hudson Heights, 24–30.VII.1956, Lindberg [1♀, CNC]; Rigaud 29.VI.1907, J. Ouellet [1♂, CEUM]; same data, except 18.VIII.1921 [2♂, CEUM]; same data, except 23.VII.1974, E. J. Kiteley [2♀, CNC].

Host plants.

No information was available from specimens examined. Barney and Hall (2011) reported handpicking specimens from St. John’s wort, Hypericum punctatum L. (Clusiaceae), and observed feeding, mating and oviposition on Hypericum punctatum, Hypericum perforatum L. and Hypericum dolabriforme Vent. in the lab. Following Banks (1912), New Jersey tea, Ceanothus americanus L. (Rhamnaceae) was often given by authors as a host for Pachybrachis trinotatus (complete citation in Clark et al. 2004).

Comments.

With its black elytra and reddish pronotum ornamented with a large, black, M-shaped marking, Pachybrachis trinotatus is very easily distinguished from all other Canadian species of the genus (Habitus 17). It is widely distributed in southern Ontario but is found only in the Ottawa River Valley and south of the eastern Townships in Québec (Map 17). Both areas very likely represent its northernmost distribution limit in this province.

Conclusion

According to the Catalog of Leaf Beetles of America North of Mexico (Riley et al. 2003), there are 17 species of Pachybrachis in the eastern provinces. This study verified 15 of those species (all except Pachybrachis praeclarus and Pachybrachis relictus), and discovered two new national and provincial records, both from southernmost Ontario: Pachybrachis cephalicus and Pachybrachis luctuosus. Pachybrachis obsoletus is new to NB, and Pachybrachis peccans is new to PE.

The Pachybrachis relictus records cited by Fall (1915) (ON: Toronto, Blaisdell Coll.; Scotia Junction, July 27, Wenzel) cannot be confirmed, and there is no evidence Pachybrachis praeclarus ever existed in eastern Canada.

A review of the distribution and abundance of the seventeen Pachybrachis species reveals four general groups: (1) species distributed from Ontario into at least one province in the Maritimes (Pachybrachis nigricornis, Pachybrachis obsoletus and Pachybrachis peccans); (2) species distributed along the shores of the Great Lakes (Erie, Michigan and Ontario) and rivers (Ottawa, Saguenay and St. Lawrence), but unknown from central and northern ON and QC (Pachybrachis bivittatus, Pachybrachis hepaticus hepaticus, Pachybrachis othonus othonus, Pachybrachis pectoralis, Pachybrachis spumarius and Pachybrachis trinotatus); (3) rare species exclusively from southern ON (Pachybrachis calcaratus, Pachybrachis cephalicus, Pachybrachis luridus, Pachybrachis subfasciatus and Pachybrachis tridens) and/or with an additional disjunct population in QC (Pachybrachis atomarius and Pachybrachis luctuosus); and (4) species having the northernmost extension of an eastern US distribution into the southeastern Townships of QC (Pachybrachis m-nigrum). There are no Pachybrachis that could be considered arctic, subarctic, or boreal species; no specimens were found from Labrador or Newfoundland; and all species had southern affinities.

Pachybrachis bivittatus, Pachybrachis hepaticus and Pachybrachis peccans are transcontinental species extending from the Atlantic to the Pacific Oceans. They are common across eastern Canada, and have been collected rather recently (1990s – present).

A large group of species found in this study share a similar eastern United States Pachybrachis distribution, occurring from the Atlantic coastal states into the Great Plains: Pachybrachis atomarius, Pachybrachis luridus, Pachybrachis m-nigrum, Pachybrachis nigricornis, Pachybrachis obsoletus, Pachybrachis othonus othonus, Pachybrachis pectoralis, Pachybrachis spumarius, Pachybrachis subfasciatus, Pachybrachis tridens, and Pachybrachis trinotatus (Riley et al. 2003; Barney, unpublished data). Pachybrachis nigricornis, Pachybrachis obsoletus, Pachybrachis othonus othonus, and Pachybrachis pectoralis have all been collected within the last 20 years and probably have viable populations, but Pachybrachis atomarius, Pachybrachis calcaratus, Pachybrachis luridus, Pachybrachis subfasciatus, Pachybrachis tridens, and Pachybrachis trinotatus have not been collected in over 30 years (luridus in over 70 years) and may be considered extirpated from eastern Canada.

The remaining species, Pachybrachis calcaratus, Pachybrachis cephalicus, and Pachybrachis luctuosus, were from the relatively small, southern Carolinian Ecozone, but their North American distribution is not as well defined or widespread as the others (Riley et al. 2003; Barney, unpublished data). Pachybrachis calcaratus has not been collected in Canada since 1944 and is very likely extirpated from Canadian fauna. Pachybrachis cephalicus may survive in its refugium in the Walsingham Forest (ON). Pachybrachis luctuosus was collected recently in southern Ontario and is probably still surviving there, but we have no recent information on the disjunct population in the Ottawa Valley.

Of course, any faunal survey such as this is only as good as the naturalists and collectors out in the field. There have been five major collectors of eastern Canadian Pachybrachis: J. Ouellet, 680 specimens during 1900s to 1940s; J. F. Brimley, 257 specimens during 1910s to 1950s; W. J. Brown, 234 specimens during 1920s to 1950s; S. D. Hicks, 120 specimens during 1940s and 1950; and L. LeSage, 224 specimens during 1980s to 2000s. This demonstrates that 57% of all eastern Canada Pachybrachis ever collected were found by four collectors between 1900 and 1959. The loss of habitat appears to be accompanied by a loss of people monitoring the habitats. Hopefully, the species cited above as possibly being extirpated from eastern Canada are still out there waiting to be rediscovered.

One of the consequences of global warming of the climate is that many plant and animal species will move northward. Woodall et al. (2009) stated that the process of northward migration of trees in the eastern United Stated is currently underway. According to Diffenbaugh et al. (2008) and Woodall et al. (2009), the relaxed cold limitations and a greater accumulation of degree-days should favor several herbivores, but native Pachybrachis species and their host plants could benefit as well of expected warmer conditions.

Legends for habitus
Habitus 1.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis atomarius. Scale bar, 1mm.

Habitus 2.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis bivittatus. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 3.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis calcaratus. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 4.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis cephalicus. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 5.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis hepaticus hepaticus. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 6.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis luctuosus. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 7.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis luridus. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 8.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis m-nigrum. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 9a.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis nigricornis difficilis. Scale bar, 1 mrn.

Habitus 9b.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius. Almost black. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 9c.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius. Yellow at edge of elytra. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 10.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis obsoletus. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 11.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis othonus othonus. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 12.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis peccans. Scale bar, 1 mn.

Habitus 13.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis pectoralis. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 14.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis spumarius. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 15.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis subfasciatus. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 16.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis tridens. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Habitus 17.

Dorsal habitus of Pachybrachis trinotatus. Scale bar, 1 mm.

Map
Map 1.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis atomarius in eastern Canada. Carolinian Zone in dark beige; EE – Eardley Escarpment.

Map 2.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis bivittatus in eastern Canada. OR – Ottawa River; SLR – St. Lawrence River; SR – Saguenay River.

Map 3.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis calcaratus in eastern Canada. Carolinian Zone in dark beige.

Map 4.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis cephalicus in eastern Canada. Carolinian Zone in dark beige.

Map 5.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis hepaticus hepaticus in eastern Canada. OL – Ontario Lake; OR – Ottawa River.

Map 6.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis luctuosus in eastern Canada. IR – Île-du-Grand-Calumet in Ottawa River.

Map 7.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis luridus in eastern Canada. Carolinian Zone in dark beige.

Map 8.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis m-nigrum in eastern Canada. CL – Champlain Lake; SLR – St. Lawrence River.

Map 9.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis nigricornis in eastern Canada. SR – Saguenay River.

Map 10.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis obsoletus in eastern Canada. SR – Saguenay River.

Map 11.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis othonus othonus in eastern Canada. OR – Ottawa River; SLR – St. Lawrence River.

Map 12.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis peccans in eastern Canada. SR – Saguenay River.

Map 13.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis pectoralis in eastern Canada. OR – Ottawa River.

Map 14.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis spumarius in eastern Canada. OR – Ottawa River.

Map 15.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis subfasciatus in eastern Canada. Carolinian Zone in dark beige

Map 16.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis tridens in eastern Canada. Carolinian Zone in dark beige.

Map 17.

The known distribution of Pachybrachis trinotatus in eastern Canada.

Acknowledgements

The assistance of the curators of the collections listed above was greatly appreciated. They are thanked for allowing us to study their Pachybrachis holdings. Robert Bourchier (Agriculture Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Biological Control) forwarded to us historical specimens identified in the past as “Pachybrachis obsoletus.” Klaus Bolte (Bio Imaging) is credited for all habitus photos, as well as photos of various structures, and Henri Goulet (ECORC) is credited for some close-ups of heads. André Larochelle and Marie-Claude Larivière generously provided host plant information preserved in their field notes. The comments and suggestions of Shawn M. Clark and an anonymous reviewer of a manuscript version of the present communication are most appreciated.

References
Arnason AP (1942) Field crops and garden insects: Pachybrachis obsoletus Suffrian. The Canadian Insect Pest Review 20: 209.
Arnason AP (1943) Field crops and garden insects: Pachybrachis obsoletus Suffrian. The Canadian Insect Pest Review 21: 148.
Arnason AP, McDonald H, King KM, Moore HW, Fox WB, Riegert PW (1946) Insects of the season 1945 in Saskatchewan. The Canadian Insect Pest Review 24: 80-91.
Austin EP (1880) Supplement to the check list of the Coleoptera of America, North of Mexico. S.E. Cassino, Boston: 1–67.
Balsbaugh EU (1973) Geographical variation in Pachybrachis othonus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with descriptions of a new subspecies. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 66(2): 252-261.
Balsbaugh EU, Hays KL (1972) The leaf beetles of Alabama (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 441: 1-223.
Balsbaugh EU, Tucker WL (1976) Geographical variation in Pachybrachis nigricornis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 30(2): 117-131.
Banks N (1912) At the Ceanothus in Virginia. Entomological News 23(2): 102-110.
Barney RJ (1984) Records of Pachybrachis in Illinois (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Great Lakes Entomologist 17(3): 137-144.
Barney RJ, Hall SL (2009) Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius Haldeman (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): abundance, distribution, and host plant associations with legumes (Fabales: Fabaceae) in Kentucky. The Coleopterists Bulletin 63(4): 467-474. doi: 10.1649/1180.1
Barney RJ, Hall SL (2011) New host plant records for selected Cryptocephaline leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Kentucky. The Coleopterists Bulletin 65(1): 15-19. doi: 10.1649/0010-065X-65.1.15
Barney RJ, Clark SM, Riley EG (2011) Annotated list of the leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Kentucky: Subfamily Cryptocephalinae. Journal of the Kentucky Academy of Science 72(1): 3-23. doi: 10.3101/1098-7096-72.1.2
Beadle DW (1861) List of Coleoptera insects collected in the county of Lincoln, C.W. The Canadian Naturalist and Geologist 6(5): 383-387.
Bell JT (1881) Collection notes for 1880. The Canadian Entomologist 13(3): 58-60. doi: 10.4039/Ent1358-3
Bell R (1858) Catalogue of animals and plants collected and observed on the south-east side of the St. Lawrence from Quebec to Gaspé, and in the Counties of Rimouski, Gaspé and Bonaventure. Geological Survey of Canada, Report of Progress 1858: 243-263.
Bibeau-Lemieux D (2010) Le platane traverse la frontière! Flora quebeca 15(2): 11.
Bibeau-Lemieux D (2011) Le platane traverse la frontière! ... suite. Flora quebeca 16(1): 11.
Blackwelder RE (1939) Fourth supplement, 1933 to 1938 (inclusive) to The Leng Catalogue of Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico. John D. Sherman Jr., Mt. Vernon, New York, 146 pp.
Blackwelder RE, Blackwelder RM (1948) Fifth supplement, 1939 to 1947 (inclusive) to The Leng catalogue of Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico. John D. Sherman Jr., Mt. Vernon, New York, 87 pp.
Blatchley WS (1910) An illustrated descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera or beetles (exclusive of the Rhynchophora) known to occur in Indiana – with bibliography and descriptions of new species. The Nature Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Indiana, 1386 pp. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.56580
Blatchley WS (1924a) The Chrysomelidae of Florida. The Florida Entomologist 7: 33–39, 49–57.
Blatchley WS (1924b) The Chrysomelidae of Florida. The Florida Entomologist 8: 1–7, 17–23, 39–46. doi: 10.2307/3492448
Bouchard P, Bousquet Y, Davies AE, Alonso-Zarazaga MA, Lawrence JF, Lyal CHC, Newton AF, Reid CAM, Schmitt M, Slipinski SA, Smith ABT (2011) Family-group names in Coleoptera (Insecta). Zookeys 88: 1-972. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.88.807
Bowditch FC (1909) Notes on Pachybrachys and descriptions of new species. The Canadian Entomologist 41: 237–244, 285–292, 312–324. doi: 10.4039/Ent41237-7
Brodie W, White JE (1883a) Check list of insects of the Dominion of Canada. Blackett Robinson, Toronto, 65 pp.
Brodie W, White JE (1883b) Label list of insects of the Dominion of Canada. Blackett Robinson, Toronto, 69 pp.
Brunton DF, Lafontaine JD (1971) An unusual escarpment flora in western Quebec. The Canadian Field-Naturalist 88(3): 337-344.
Campbell JM, Sarazin MJ, Lyons B (1989) Canadian beetles (Coleoptera) injurious to crops, ornamentals, stored products, and buildings. Research Branch Agriculture Canada, Publication 1826. Ottawa, Ontario, 491 pp.
Chagnon G (1917) A preliminary list of the insects of the Province of Quebec. Part III - Coleoptera. Annual Report of the Quebec Society for the Protection of Plants. Supplement 1917: 161-277.
Chagnon G (1918) Corrections to the preliminary list of the Coleoptera of the Province of Quebec. Tenth Annual Report of the Quebec Society for the Protection of Plants from Insects and Fungus Diseases: 12–13.
Chagnon G (1933) Contribution à l’étude des Coléoptères de la province de Québec. Le Naturaliste canadien 60: 200–213; 289–302; 321–330; 343–351.
Chagnon G (1934) Contribution à l’étude des Coléoptères de la province de Québec. Le Naturaliste canadien 61: 16–26; 82–96; 99–110; 137–157; 180–198; 215–230; 269–282; 309–319.
Chagnon G (1935) Contribution à l’étude des Coléoptères de la province de Québec. Le Naturaliste canadien 62: 38–52; 128–141; 165–176; 220–233; 333–344.
Chagnon G (1936) Contribution à l’étude des Coléoptères de la province de Québec. Le Naturaliste canadien 63: 105–112; 201–210; 241–251.
Chagnon G (1937) Contribution à l’étude des Coléoptères de la province de Québec. Le Naturaliste canadien 64: 20–30; 101–117; 216–228; 243–253.
Chagnon G (1938) Contribution à l’étude des Coléoptères de la province de Québec. Le Naturaliste canadien 65: 13–23; 157–166.
Chagnon G (1939) Contribution à l’étude des Coléoptères de la province de Québec. Le Naturaliste canadien 66: 6–16; 36–46; 97–105; 166–178; 197–205; 229–238.
Chagnon G (1940) Contribution à l’étude des Coléoptères de la province de Québec. Département de Biologie de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, 385 pp.
Chagnon G, Robert A (1962) Principaux Coléoptères de la province de Québec. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, 440 pp.
Chapuis F (1874) Famille LXIX. Phytophages, volume 10. In: Lacordaire T, and Chapuis F (Eds) Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des coléoptères. La Librairies encyclopédique de Roret, Paris, 1-455.
Chevrolat LAA (1836) In: Dejean PE, Catalogue des coléoptères de la collection de M. le comte Dejean. Édition 2, Fascicule 5, Mégrignon-Marvis Père et Fils, Paris, 361–443.
Ciegler JC (2007) Leaf and seed beetles of South Carolina (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae and Orsodacnidae). Biota of South Carolina 5: 1-246.
Clark SM (2000) An annotated list of the leaf beetles of West Virginia (Coleoptera: Orsodacnidae, Megalopodidae, Chrysomelidae exclusive of Bruchinae). Occasional Publications of the West Virginia Department of Agriculture 1: 1-93.
Clark SM, LeDoux DG, Seeno TN, Riley EG, Gilbert AJ, Sullivan JM (2004) Host plants of leaf beetle species occurring in the United States and Canada. The Coleopterists Society, Special Publication No. 2, 476 pp.
Clavareau H (1913) Coleopterorum Catalogus. Auspiciis et auxilio W. Junk editus a S. Schenkling. Pars 53: Chrysomelidae: 5. Megascelinae, 6. Magalopodinae, 7. Clytrinae, 8. Cryptocephalinae, 9. Chlamydinae, 10. Lamprosominae. Berlin, 278 pp.
Couper W (1855a) Coleoptera collected in Canada. The Canadian Journal, a Repertory of Industry, Science, and Art and a Record of the Proceedings of the Canadian Institute. Toronto, Upper Canada: 324–325.
Couper W (1855b) Canadian Coleoptera in the collection of Fred. H. Ibbetson, Assistant Commissary General, Montreal. The Canadian Journal, a Repertory of Industry, Science, and Art and a Record of the Proceedings of the Canadian Institute. Toronto, Upper Canada: 325–327.
Couper W (1864) Paper V. -List of Coleoptera and Diptera taken at Quebec, and other parts of Lower Canada. Transactions of Literary and Historical Society, Quebec 2: 75-93.
Couper W (1865) Paper II. -List of Coleoptera taken at Quebec, and other parts of Lower Canada. Transactions of Literary and Historical Society, New Series, Part 3(1864–1865): 27-36.
Couper W (1874) Anticosti Coleoptera collected on the island in 1873. The Canadian Entomologist 6: 137-138. doi: 10.4039/Ent6137-7
Couper W (1881) Coleoptera found in the province of Quebec. Canadian Sportsman and Naturalist 1: 19; 25; 33; 50; 83; 86.
Couper W (1882) Coleoptera found in the province of Quebec. Canadian Sportsman and Naturalist 2: 155–156; 163–164; 171–172; 179–188; 196.
Couper W (1883) Coleoptera found in the province of Quebec. Canadian Sportsman and Naturalist 3: 202; 204; 219–220; 237; 245; 270.
CPCGN (Canadian Permanent Committee on Geographical Names) (1974) Gazetteer of Canada. Ontario. 2nd edition, Canada Centre for Mapping, Geomatics Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 823 pp.
CPCGN (Canadian Permanent Committee on Geographical Names) (1988) Gazetteer of Canada. Ontario. 4th edition, Canada Centre for Mapping, Geomatics Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 428 pp.
CPCGN (Canadian Permanent Committee on Geographical Names) (1993) Gazetteer of Canada. Nova-Scotia. 3rd edition, Canada Centre for Mapping, Geomatics Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 350 pp.
CPCGN (Canadian Permanent Committee on Geographical Names) (1994a) Gazetteer of Canada. New Brunswick. 3rd edition, Canada Centre for Mapping, Geomatics Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 203 pp.
CPCGN (Canadian Permanent Committee on Geographical Names) (1994b) Concise gazetteer of Canada. 1st edition, Canada Centre for Mapping, Geomatics Canada, Natural Resources Canada, 636 pp.
CTQ (Commission de toponymie) (1987) Répertoire toponymique du Québec 1987. Gouvernement du Québec, Commission de toponymie, 1900 pp.
DECNY (Department of Environmental Conservation of New York) (2012) Comprehensive wildlife conservation strategy for New York - Lake Champlain basin. 173–233. http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/30483.html [accessed 26/11/2012]
Dejean PE (1836) Catalogue des coléoptères de la collection de M. le comte Dejean. Édition 2, Fascicule 5, Mégrignon-Marvis Père et Fils, Paris, 361–443.
Desroches JF, Laparé R (2004) Première mention de la Couleuvre mince, Thamonophis sauritus septentrionalis, au Québec. The Canadian Field Naturalist 118: 135-137.
Diffenbaugh NS, Krupke DH, White MA, Alexander CE (2008) Global warming presents new challenges for maize pest management. Environmental Research Letters 3: 1-9. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044007
Downie NM, Arnett RH (1996) The Beetles of Northeastern North America. Volume II. Polyphaga: Series Bostriciformia through Curculionidea. The Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville, Florida, 831 pp.
D’Urban WSM (1859a) Catalogue of Coleoptera collected by Mr. Robert Bell, 1858. The Canadian Naturalist and Geologist 4: 242-246.
D’Urban WSM (1859b) Catalogue of animals and plants, collected and observed in the valley of the River Rouge and the neighboring townships, in the counties of Argenteuil and Ottawa. Geological Survey of Canada, Report of Progress 1858, 1859: 226–263.
D’Urban WSM (1859c) A systematic list of Coleopteran found in the vicinity of Montreal. The Canadian Naturalist and Geologist 4: 307–320; 494–496.
D’Urban WSM (1860a) Catalogue of Coleoptera collected by George Barnston, Esp. of the Hon. Hudson’s Bay Company, in the Hudson’s Bay Territorries. The Canadian Naturalist and Geologist 5: 227-229.
D’Urban WSM (1860b) Article VIII. Observations on the natural history of the valley of the River Rouge, and the surrounding townships in the counties of Argenteuil and Ottawa. The Canadian Naturalist and Geologist 5(2): 81-99.
Evans JD (1895a) The insect fauna of the Sudbury district, Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 27(6): 141-146. doi: 10.4039/Ent27141-6
Evans JD (1895b) The insect fauna of the Sudbury district, Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 27(7): 173-175. doi: 10.4039/Ent27173-7
Evans JD (1899) List of Coleoptera from Halifax, N.S. The Canadian Entomologist 31(11): 320-321. doi: 10.4039/Ent31320-11
Evans JD (1905) Insects collected at light during the season of 1904. Thirty-fifth annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario 1904, pp 82–86.
Fabricius JC (1798) Supplementum entomologiae systematicae. Profit et Storch, Hafniae, 572 pp.
Fabricius JC (1801) Systema Eleutheratorum secundum ordines, genera, species: adiectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Tomus II. Bibliopolii Academici Novi, Kiliae, 687 pp.
Fall HC (1915) A revision of the North American species of Pachybrachys. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 41: 291-486.
Fernald ML (1950) Gray’s Manual of Botany. 8th edition, D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, 1632 pp.
Fletcher J (1888) Appendix II. List of diurnal Lepidoptera and Coleoptera collected by Mr. J.S. Cotter at Moose Factory in 1888, and by Mr. J.M. Macoun on the south coast and islands of James’ Bay in 1887. In: Low AP, Report on explorations in James’ Bay and country east of Hudson Bay, drained by the big, Great Whale and Clearwater rivers. Geological and Natural History of Canada, 75J.
Fox WS, Soper JH (1952) The distribution of some trees and shrubs of the Carolinian zone of southern Ontario. Transactions of the Royal Canadian Institute 61: 67-84.
Fox WS, Soper JH (1953) The distribution of some trees and shrubs of the Carolinian zone of southern Ontario. Part II. Transactions of the Royal Canadian Institute 62: 3-32.
Fox WS, Soper JH (1954) The distribution of some trees and shrubs of the Carolinian zone of southern Ontario. Part III. Transactions of the Royal Canadian Institute 63: 99-130.
Frost SW (1945) Insects feeding or breeding on indigo, Baptisia. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 53(3): 219-225.
Furth DG (1985) The natural history of a sumac tree, with emphasis on the entomofauna. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences 46: 137-234.
Geoffroy EL (1762) Histoire abrégée des insectes qui se trouvent aux environs de Paris, dans laquelle ces animaux sont rangés suivant un ordre méthodique. Tome premier. Durand, Paris, 523 pp.
Germar EF (1824) Insectorum species novae aut minus cognitae, descriptionibus illustratae. J. C. Hendelii et Filii, Halae, 624 pp.
Gibson A (1915) The Entomological Record, 1914. Forty-fifth Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario: 123–150.
Gibson A (1919) The Entomological Record, 1918. Forty-eighth Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario: 97–134.
Graëlls M de la Paz (1851) Descripción de algunos insectos nuevos pertenecientes a la fauna central de España. Memorias de la Real Academia de Ciéncias de Madrid 1(2): 109-166.
Gyllenhal L (1813) Insecta Suecica. Classis I. Coleoptera sive Eleuterata. Tomus I, Pars III. Leverentz, Scaris, 732 pp. [2] errata corrigenda.
Haldeman SS (1849) Cryptocephalinarum boreali-americae diagnoses cum speciebus novis musei leconteiani. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (ser. 2) 1: 245–265.
Haldeman SS, LeConte JL (1853) Catalogue of the described Coleoptera of the United States. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, 174 pp.
Hall PW (1991) A surprise hairstreak summer. Trail and Landscape 25(2): 37-39.
Hanham AW (1894) Notes on Québec Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 26(12): 350-352. doi: 10.4039/Ent26350-12
Harrington WE (1882) Field Notes-1881. Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario 12: 25-26.
Harrington WH (1884(1883)) List of Ottawa Coleoptera. Transactions of the Ottawa Field Naturalist Club 2: 67-85.
Harrington WH (1890a) On the lists of Coleoptera published by the Geological Survey of Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 22(7): 135-140. doi: 10.4039/Ent22135-7
Harrington WH (1890b) On the lists of Coleoptera published by the Geological Survey of Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 22(8): 153-160. doi: 10.4039/Ent22153-8
Harrington WH (1890c) On the lists of Coleoptera published by the Geological Survey of Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 22(9): 184-191. doi: 10.4039/Ent22184-9
Harrington WH (1894a) Notes on a few Canadian Coleoptera. 25th Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario: 47–49.
Harrington WH (1894b) An entomological trip to Copper Cliff, Ont. The Canadian Entomologist 26(1): 9-16. doi: 10.4039/Ent269-1
Hausen JF (1893) A list of Coleoptera collected in the vicinity of St-Jerome, Quebec. The Canadian Record of Science 5: 41-63.
Henshaw S (1885) List of the Coleoptera of America, North of Mexico. American Entomological Society, Philadelphia, 161 pp.doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.13151
Henshaw S (1887) First supplement to the List of Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico. Entomologica Americana 2(10): 213-220.
Henshaw S (1889) Second supplement to the List of Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico. Brooklyn Entomological Society, 14 pp.
Hicks SD (1944) Notes on some species of Coleoptera taken at Objibway, Essex County, Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 76(8): 163. doi: 10.4039/Ent76163-8
Hicks SD (1945) Additional notes on Coleoptera taken in Essex County, Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 77(11): 214. doi: 10.4039/Ent77214-11
Hicks SD (1947a) Additional notes on Coleoptera taken in Essex County and southern Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 79(6): 117–119. doi: 10.4039/Ent79117-6
Hicks SD (1947b) Additional notes on Coleoptera taken in Essex County and southern Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 79(7–8): 148-149. doi: 10.4039/Ent79148-7
Hosie RC (1979) Native trees of Canada. Fitzhenry & Whiteside Ltd., Don Mills, Ontario, 380 pp.
ICZN (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature) (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature. Fourth Edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp.
Jacoby M (1908) Fauna of British India, including Celyon and Burma. Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae. Volume 1. Taylor and Francis, London, 534 pp.
Johnson L (2012) Endangered ecosystems: Carolinian Zone. On Nature. http://onnaturemagazine.com/endangered-ecosystem-carolinian-zone.html [accessed 14 March 2012]
Jones M (1870) Nova Scotian Coleoptera: Part I. Proceedings of the Nova Scotia Institute of Natural Science 2(3): 141–155. Also published separately with new pagination as: Contribution to the natural history of Nova Scotia. James Bowes & sons, Bedford Row. Halifax, Nova Scotia, 15 pp.
King KM, Arnason AP, Glen R, McDonald H, Paul LC, Fox WB (1944) Insects of the season 1943 in Saskatchewan - Insects of flowers and ornamentals. The Canadian Insect Pest Review 22: 75-86.
King KM, Arnason AP, Glen R, McDonald H, Fox WB, Moore HW (1945) Insects of the season 1944 in Saskatchewan - Insects of flowers and ornamentals. The Canadian Insect Pest Review 23: 83-86.
Laicharting JN von (1781) Verzeichniss und Beschreibung der Tyroler Insecten. I Theil Käferartige Insecten. I Band. Füessly, Zurich, 248 pp.
Laplante S, Bousquet Y, Bélanger P, Chantal C (1991) Liste des espèces de Coléoptères du Québec. Fabreries, Supplément 6, 136 pp.
Latendresse H (1963) Coléoptères recueillis sur la Côte Nord du Saguenay, compté de Chi-coutimi. Le Naturaliste canadien 90: 225-22.
Lawson FA (1976) Egg and larval case formation by Pachybrachis bivittatus. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 69(5): 942-944.
Lawson FA (1991) Chrysomelidae (Chrysomeloidea) (= Cassididae, Cryptocephalidae, Megalopodidae, Sagridae, etc.). Leaf beetles, rootworms, casebearers. etc. In: Stehr FW (Ed) Immature insects (2). Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, Iowa, 568–585.
Layberry RA, Hall PW, Lafontaine JD (1998) The Butterflies of Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 280 pp.
LeConte JE (1824) Description of some new species of North American insects. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York 1(1): 169-173.
LeConte JL (1850) IV, General remarks upon the Coleoptera of Lake Superior. In: JLR Agassiz and JE Cabot (Eds) Lake Superior, its physical character, vegetation and animals. Boston: 201-242.
LeConte JL (1883) Lists of Coleoptera collected in 1881 by Dr. Bell and others, in the Lake Superior district and in the north-west territories, east of the 112th meridian and south of the 60th parallel. Report of Progress - Geological Survey of Canada 1880–81–82. Appendix II to part c: 29c–39c.
Leng CW (1920) Catalogue of the Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico. John D. Sherman, Jr., Mount Vernon, New York, 470 pp.
Leng CW, Mutchler AJ (1927) Supplement 1919–1924 (inclusive) to Catalogue of the Coleoptera of America, north of Mexico. John D. Sherman, Jr., Mount Vernon, New York, 78 pp.
Leng CW, Mutchler AJ (1933) Second and Third Supplements 1925 to 1932 (inclusive) to Catalogue of the Coleoptera of America, North of Mexico. John D. Sherman, Jr., Mount Vernon, New York, 112 pp.
Leopold [Father] (1934) Coleoptera [liste de]. Laboratoire d’entomologie, Institut agricole d’Oka, La Trappe. No pagination. Printed for internal use.
LeSage L (1985) The eggs and larvae of Pachybrachis peccans and P. bivittatus, with a key to the known immature stages of the nearctic genera of Cryptocephalinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Canadian Entomologist 117: 203-220. doi: 10.4039/Ent117203-2
LeSage L (1991) Family Chrysomelidae leaf beetles. In: Bousquet Y (Ed) Checklist of beetles of Canada and Alaska. Research Branch, Agriculutre Canada. Publication 1861/E., Ottawa, 301–323.
MacNay CG (1958) General-feeding and miscellaneous insects. The Canadian Insect Pest Review 36: 158-188.
Majka CG, Chandler DS, Donahue CP (2011) Checklist of the beetles of Maine. Empty Mirroirs Press, Halifax, Nova-Scotia, Canada, 328 pp.
Mannerheim CG von (1843) Beitrag zur Käferfauna der Aleutischen Inseln, der Insel Sitka und Neu-Californiens. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 16: 175–314.
Marie-Victorin [Frère] (1995) Flore laurentienne, troisième édition mise à jour et annotée par L. Brouillet, I. Goulet. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, 1083 pp.
MDDEP (Ministère du Développement durable, Environnement et Parcs) (2011) Réserve écologique des Tourbières-de-Lanoraie. http://www.mddep.gouv.qc.ca/biodiversite/reserves/tourbieres_lanoraie/res_48.htm [accessed 14 March 2012]
Melsheimer FE (1847) Descriptions of new species of Coleoptera of the United States. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 3: 158-181.
Melsheimer FE (1853) Catalogue of the described Coleoptera of the United States revised by SS Haldeman and JL LeConte. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia, 174 pp. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.1562
Melsheimer FV (1806) A catalogue of the insects of Pennsylvania, part first. W. D. Lepper, Hanover, 60 pp.
NCC (National Capital Commission) (2011a) The eastern red cedar: an endangered tree protected in Gatineau Park. Capitale, Eardley Escarpment. http://www.canadascapital.gc.ca/sites/default/files/pubs/Eastern-Red-Cedar-Endangered-Tree-Protected-Gatineau-Park.pdf [accessed 14 March 2012]
NCC (National Capital Commission) (2011b) Mer Bleue bog, a special place in the National Capital Greenbelt. http://www.canadascapital.gc.ca/sites/default/files/pubs/NCC-Mer-Bleue-Bog-Special-Place.pdf [accessed 14 March 2012]
NHIC (Natural Heritage Information Center) (1998) St. Williams Dwarf Oak Forest. http://www.carolinian.org/CarolinianSites_stwilliamsdwarfoakforest.htm [accessed 14 March 2012]
Notman H (1919) Coleoptera collected at Cochrane, northern Ontario, August 22–30, 1918, with descriptions of six new species. Journal of New York Entomological Society 27: 92-102.
Ouellet CJ (1902) Liste des Coléoptères les plus remarquables capturés dans la province de Québec. Le Naturaliste Canadien 29: 82–87; 103–105; 120–124; 139–141.
Packard AS (1870) List of Coleoptera collected by A.S. Packard, Jun., at Caribou Island, Labrador, straits of Belle Isle. The Canadian Entomologist 2(8): 119.
Packard AS (1872) List of the Coleoptera collected in Labrador. Fourth Annual Report if the Trustees of the Peabody Academy of Science for the Year 1871: 92-94.
Packard AS (1888) List of the spiders, myriapods and insects of Labrador. The Canadian entomologist 20(8): 141-149. doi: 10.4039/Ent20141-8
Pettit J (1868) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 1(12): 106–107.
Pettit J (1869a) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 2(1): 7. doi: 10.4039/Ent27-1
Pettit J (1869b) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 2(2): 17-18. doi: 10.4039/Ent217-2
Pettit J (1870a) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 2(4): 53-54. doi: 10.4039/Ent253-4
Pettit J (1870b) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 2(5): 65-66. doi: 10.4039/Ent265-5
Pettit J (1870c) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 2(6): 84-86. doi: 10.4039/Ent284-6
Pettit J (1870d) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 2(7): 102-103. doi: 10.4039/Ent2102-7
Pettit J (1870e) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 2(8): 117-118. doi: 10.4039/Ent2117-8
Pettit J (1870f) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 2(9): 131-133. doi: 10.4039/Ent2131-9
Pettit J (1870g) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 2(10): 150-151. doi: 10.4039/Ent2150-10
Pettit J (1871) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 3(6): 105-107. doi: 10.4039/Ent3105-6
Pettit J (1872a) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 4(1): 12-14. doi: 10.4039/Ent412-1
Pettit J (1872b) List of Coleoptera. The Canadian Entomologist 4(5): 98-99.
Pope F (2011) The Alfred Bog. The Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club. http://www.ofnc.ca/conservation/alfredbog/index.php [accessed 14 March 2012]
Provancher L (1870) Liste des coléoptères pris à Porneuf, Québec. Le Naturaliste Canadien 2: 118.
Provancher L (1877a) Additions et corrections à la faune coléoptérologique de la province de Québec. C. Darveau, Québec, 38 pp.
Provancher L (1877b) Petite faune entomologique du Canada. Vol. I. Les Coléoptères. C. Darveau, Québec, 785 pp. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.8169
Provancher L (1879) Additions et corrections à la faune coléoptérologique de la province de Québec. Atelier typographique de C. Darveau, Québec, 30 pp.
Randall JW (1838) Descriptions of new species of coleopterous insects inhabiting the state of Massachusetts. Boston Journal of Natural Science 2(1): 34-52.
Reed EB (1869) Coleoptera taken in the neighbourhood of London, Ont., during the season of 1868. The Canadian Entomologist 1(8): 69-70.
Riley EG, Clark SM, Flowers RW, Gilbert AJ (2002) Family 124. Chrysomelidae Latreille 1802. In: Arnett RH Jr., Thomas MC, Skelley PE, Frank JH (Eds) American Beetles. Volume 2. Polyphaga: Scarabaeoidea through Curculionoidea. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida, 617–691.
Riley EG, Clark SM, Seeno TN (2003) Catalog of the leaf beetles of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae and Chrysomelidae, excluding Bruchinae). Coleopterists Society, Special Publication no. 1, 290 pp.
Ritchie AS (1869) On the Coleoptera of the island of Montreal. Canadian Naturalist and Geologist. Series 2, 4: 27–36.
Saunders W (1868) Entomological notes during a trip to Saguenay. The Canadian Entomologist 1(2): 11-13. doi: 10.4039/Ent111-2
Say T (1824) Descriptions of coleopterous insects collected in the late expedition to the Rocky Mountains performed by order of Mr. Calhoun, Secretary of War, under the command of Major Long. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 3(2): 238, 298–331, 403–462.
Say T (1825) American entomology, or descriptions of the insects of North America. Illustrated by coloured figures from original drawings executed from nature. Volume 2. Philadelphia Museum, Philadelphia. No pagination, plates 24–36.
Schwarz EA (1890) Food-plants and food-habits of some North American Coleoptera. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 1: 231-233.
Schöller M, Löbl I, Lopatin I (2010) Tribe Cryptocephalini Gyllenhal, 1813, remaining Cryptocephalini, pp. 606–617. In: Löbl I, Smetana A (Eds) Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, Volume 6, Chrysomeloidea. Apollo Books, Stenstrup, Denmark, 924 pp.
Scoggan HJ (1978) The flora of Canada: part 3. Dicotyledoneae (Sauraceae to Violaceae). National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museum of Canada, Ottawa, 547–1115.
Shelford VE (1963) The ecology of North America. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, 610 pp.
Sherman JD (1910) A list of Labrador Coleoptera. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 18(3): 173-197.
Stål C (1857) Till Kännedomen af Phytophaga. Öfversigt af Kongl. Svenska Vetenskaps- Akademiens Föhandlingar 14: 53-63.
Suffrian E (1852) Zur Kenntniss der nordamerikanischen Cryptocephalen. Linnaea Entomologica 7: 1-238.
Suffrian E (1858) Berichtigtes Verzeichniss der nordamerikanischen Cryptocephali. Linnaea Entomologica 12: 343-409.
Walker EM (1913) Chapter XXII. Insects and Their Allies. In: Faull JH (Ed) The Natural History of the Toronto Region, Ontario, Canada, The Canadian Institute, 295–403.
Webster RP, LeSage L, DeMerchant I (2012) New Coleoptera records from New Brunswick, Canada: Megalopodidae and Chrysomelidae. ZooKeys 179: 321-348.
Weise J (1913) Synonymische Mitteilungen. Wiener Entomologische Zeitung 32: 218-220.
Wickham HF (1896) The Coleoptera of Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 28(6): 151-157.
Wikipedia (2011) Mer Bleue conservation area. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mer_Bleue_Conservation_Area [accessed 14 March 2012]
Wilcox JA (1954) Leaf beetles of Ohio (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera). Ohio Biological Survey, Bulletin no. 43: 353-506.
Wilcox JA (1975) Family 129. Chrysomelidae. In: Ross HA Jr. (Ed) Checklist of the beetles of North and Central America and the West Indies. Vol. 8, The Leaf Beetles and the Bean Weevils, Gainesville: Flora and Fauna Publications, 21–32.
Wilcox JA (1979) Leaf beetle host plants in Northeastern North America (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). North American Beetle Fauna Project. World Natural History Publications, Kinderhook, New York, 30 pp.
Woodall CW, Oswalt CM, Westfall JA, Perry CH, Nelson MD, Finley AO (2009) An indicator of tree migration in forests of the eastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 1434-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.013
Zimsen E (1964) The type material of I.C. Fabricius, Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 656 pp.