ZooKeys 150: 1–3, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.150.2458
Collaborative electronic infrastructures to accelerate taxonomic research
Vincent S. Smith 1, Lyubomir Penev 2
1 Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, U.K.
2 Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria

Corresponding author: Vincent S. Smith (vince@vsmith.info)

received 27 November 2011 | accepted 28 November 2011 | Published 28 November 2011


(C) 2011 Vincent S. Smith. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.


The discipline of taxonomy lives in a state of perpetual beta, constantly evolving as species hypotheses change to reflect the latest character evidence. Likewise, the electronic infrastructures that underpin taxonomic research are evolving to reflect the latest technical advances. This collection of articles illustrates how advances to research infrastructures are reciprocally changing the practice of taxonomy. The infrastructures have, in part, been developed through the EU funded ViBRANT project. This is the latest in a series of EU funded initiatives that aim to move taxonomy towards a more collaborative, electronic framework in an effort to accelerate the pace of biodiversity research. Through a platform of web-based informatics tools and services, ViBRANT project partners are building a framework that allows distributed groups of scientists to create their own virtual research communities that support biodiversity science. To mark the first year of the ViBRANT project we have brought together a set of reviews, essays and research articles that reflect some of the project highlights and illustrate a number of associated activities. Fittingly, many of the contributions are from researchers who have no direct support from the ViBRANT project, but have used or reviewed some aspect of the infrastructure. This marks an important transition from many EU funded infrastructure projects have typically focused on technical developments, and less on the communities that use these systems.

A detailed review of data issues in the life sciences (Thessen and Patterson 2011) sets the tone for subsequent articles in this special issue, whose contributions broadly fall into three categories. The initial articles consider some of the major infrastructure platforms that support the production and management of biodiversity data. These include the EDIT Platform for Cybertaxonomy, Wiki-based approaches including BioWikiFarm and the Scratchpads Virtual Research Environment. Later articles provide deeper coverage of specialist areas of interest to taxonomic and biodiversity researchers. The topics covered include the mark-up (Penev et al. 2011) and management (King et al. 2011) of taxonomic literature, geospatial assessment of species distributions (Bachman et al. 2011) and licensing issues specific to life science data (Hagedorn et al. 2011). Finally, the special issue closes with a series of research and review papers that provide detailed use cases illustrating how these research infrastructures are being put into practice. These articles make up the majority of this special issue and are subdivided into the sociological analysis of how people are using these infrastructures, as well as the practical experience of biodiversity researchers developing taxonomic data with these systems. Highlights from this section include citizen science approaches to collecting species information by the COMBER Marine observation network (Arvanitidis et al. 2011) and the Australian Bush Blitz programme (Lambkin and Bartlett 2011); use of new tools for data publishing like the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Integrated Publishing Toolkit (IPT) and the DRYAD Data Repository; new forms of publication via “data papers” that allow checklists and identification keys to be formally published as structured datasets (e.g., Narwade et al. 2011); and finally new taxonomic revisions and species descriptions constructed from within the collaborative systems like XPER2 and Scratchpads.

This diverse collection of articles illustrates how the paradigm of scholarly communication in taxonomy is being changed by new electronic infrastructures. These support new ways to collaborate and disseminate taxonomic information, facilitating greater reuse of the underlying data. The infrastructures described here are in many cases experimental, but illustrate a number of possible trajectories for how taxonomic data might be assembled and disseminated in the future. These infrastructures will continue to change and evolve, but it now seems certain that the future of taxonomy is increasingly digital, to the point that non-digital work is becoming invisible and perhaps irreverent to the next generation of scholars.

Achnowledgements

We sincerely thank the authors and reviewers of these articles who have responded, often at very short notice, to our requests for assistance. We would also like to thank all members of the ViBRANT consortium, and in particular Dave Roberts, without whose help the compilation of this special issue would have been impossible. VS is indebted the Scratchpad team at the Natural History Museum (Simon Rycroft, Irina Brake, Ben Scott, Edward Baker, Laurence Livermore and Vladimir Blagoderov), and in particular his partner Helen Whitaker, who endured a “holiday” with VS while the final version of these manuscripts was being edited. This work was supported by the EU funded FP7 ViBRANT project (contract number RI-261532).

References
Arvanitidis C, Faulwetter S, Chatzigeorgiou G, Penev L, Bánki O, Dailianis T, Pafilis E, Kouratoras M, Chatzinikolaou E, Fanini L, Vasileiadou A, Pavloudi C, Vavilis P, Koulouri P, Dounas C (2011) Engaging the broader community in biodiversity research: the concept of the COMBER pilot project for divers in ViBRANT. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds). e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 211–229. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.150.2149
Bachman S, Moat J, Hill AW, de la Torre J, Scott B (2011) Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds). e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 117–126. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
Hagedorn G, Mietchen D, Morris RA, Agosti D, Penev L, Berendsohn WG, Hobern D (2011) Creative Commons licenses and the non-commercial condition: Implications for the re-use of biodiversity information. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds). e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 127–149. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.150.2189
King D, Morse DR, Willis A, Dil A (2011) Towards the bibliography of life. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds). e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 151–166. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.150.2167
Lambkin CL, Bartlett JS (2011) Bush Blitz aids description of three new species and a new genus of Australian beeflies (Diptera, Bombyliidae, Exoprosopini). In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds). e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 231–280. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.150.1881
Narwade S, Kalra M, Jagdish R, Varier D, Satpute S, Khan N, Talukdar G, Mathur VB, Vasudevan K, Pundir DS, Chavan V, Sood R (2011) Literature based species occurrence data of birds of northeast India. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds). e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 407–417. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.150.2002
Penev L, Lyal CHC, Weitzman A, Morse DR, King D, Sautter G, Georgiev T, Morris RA, Catapano T, Agosti D (2011) XML schemas and mark-up practices of taxonomic literature. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds). e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 89–116. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.150.2213
Thessen AE, Patterson DJ (2011) Data issues in the life sciences. In: Smith V, Penev L (Eds). e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 15–51. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.150.1766