Research Article
Research Article
Analysis of mitochondrial genomes resolves the phylogenetic position of Chinese freshwater mussels (Bivalvia, Unionidae)
expand article infoRui-Wen Wu, Xiong-Jun Liu, Sa Wang, Kevin J. Roe§, Shan Ouyang, Xiao-Ping Wu
‡ Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
§ Iowa State University, Ames, United States of America
Open Access


The Yangtze River basin is one of the most species-rich regions for freshwater mussels on Earth, but is gravely threatened by anthropogenic activities. However, conservation planning and management of mussel species has been hindered by a number of taxonomic uncertainties. In order to clarify the taxonomic status and phylogenetic position of these species, mitochondrial genomes of four species (Acuticosta chinensis, Schistodesmus lampreyanus, Cuneopsis heudei and Cuneopsis capitatus) were generated and analyzed along with data from 43 other mitogenomes. The complete F-type mitogenomes of A. chinensis, S. lampreyanus, C. heudei, and C. capitatus are 15652 bp, 15855 bp, 15892 bp, and 15844 bp, respectively, and all four F-type mitogenomes have the same pattern of gene arrangement. ML and BI trees based on the mitogenome dataset are completely congruent, and indicate that the included Unionidae belong to three subfamilies with high bootstrap and posterior probabilities, i.e., Unioninae (Aculamprotula, Cuneopsis, Nodularia, and Schistodesmus), Anodontinae (Cristaria, Arconaia, Acuticosta, Lanceolaria, Anemina, and Sinoanodonta), and Gonideinae (Ptychorhynchus, Solenaia, Lamprotula, and Sinohyriopsis). Results also indicate that A. chinensis has affinities with Arconaia lanceolata and Lanceolaria grayii and is a member of the subfamily Anodontinae.


China, classification, freshwater, F-type mitogenome, mussel


The freshwater mussel family Unionidae is the most species-rich family within the order Unionida, including more than 620 species representing 142 genera (Graf and Cummings 2007; Bogan 2008). The Unionidae is widely distributed, and its members are found on all continents, with the exception for Antarctica (Graf and Cummings 2007; Bogan 2008; Lopes-Lima et al. 2017a). Unfortunately, freshwater mussels are one of the most threatened animal groups in the world, due to habitat destruction, commercial exploitation, and water pollution (Lydeard et al. 2004; Vaughn et al. 2010; Lopes-Lima et al. 2014; Wu et al. 2017a).

Well-supported phylogenetic hypotheses for the Unionidae are crucial for understanding the evolutionary history and biogeography of its genera (e.g., Roe 2013; Graf et al. 2015), for formulating reliable classifications (e.g., Campbell et al. 2005), and for developing conservation priorities (Lopes-Lima et al. 2017b, 2018). Advances in developing improved phylogenetic hypotheses for the Unionidae have occurred in the past several decades (Davis 1984; Lydeard et al. 1996; Nagel and Badino 2001; Hoeh et al. 2001, 2002; Giribet and Wheeler 2002; Graf 2002; Campbell et al. 2005; Zanatta and Murphy 2006; Graf and Cummings 2007; Campbell and Lydeard 2012a, b; Froufe et al. 2014; Prié and Puillandre 2014; Graf et al. 2015; Pfeiffer and Graf 2015). Most of these studies have focused on North American, Australian, and European taxa, although more recently, African (Whelan et al. 2011; Graf 2013; Elderkin et al. 2016) and Asian (Huang et al. 2002; Zhou et al. 2007; Huang et al. 2013; Bolotov et al. 2017a, b) taxa have been included, and a global phylogenetic framework of the Unionidae has recently been established (Bolotov et al. 2017a; Lopes-Lima et al. 2017a). Despite these advances, the incorporation of Asian taxa into unionid phylogenetic hypotheses, particularly those from China has lagged.

The middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River are a diversity hotspot for unionids in East Asia (Graf and Cummings 2007; He and Zhuang 2013; Zieritz et al. 2017), and this region may harbor as many as 15 unionid genera (Wu et al. 2000; Shu et al. 2009; Wu et al. 2017a). As with North American freshwater mussels, much of the early descriptive work on Chinese taxa occurred during the latter part of the 19th Century (Heude 1875, 1877a, b, 1878, 1879, 1880a, b, 1881, 1883, 1885). Pierre Marie Heude was a Jesuit priest who collected freshwater and terrestrial mollusks in China. During a ten-year period between 1882 and 1902, Heude described close to 600 species including 140 freshwater mussel species (Johnson 1973). However, the validity and classification of many of these species were called in to question by Simpson (1900, 1914) and Haas (1969). Simpson (1900, 1914) presented a modified classification based on anatomical information such as marsupium size and shape, larval type and umbo sculpture in addition to conchological characters. Simpson condensed the number of Chinese freshwater mussels down to 85 species in 14 genera and placed them into two subfamilies, the Unioninae and the Hyriinae. Haas (1969) further revised the classification of the Unionidae and reduced the number of Chinese unionids to 56 species and subspecies in 20 genera, and placed them into four subfamilies: Unioninae, Quadrulinae, Anodontinae and Lampsilinae. After 1949, Chinese malacologists (e.g., Lin 1962; Tchang et al. 1965a, b; Liu et al. 1964, 1979, 1980, 1982; Wu et al. 2000) conducted a substantial amount of work on the classification of the Unionidae, and placed Chinese species into either the Unioninae or Anodontinae, based on the presence or absence of hinge teeth. In the 1990s, malacologists began to refocus their attention on the soft anatomy and changes to the classification, based on the shape of the glochidia and type of marsupium were made (Wei and Fu 1994; Wu et al.1999a, b; Shu et al. 2012). Despite these advances, the higher-level taxonomy of Chinese unionids was not updated, and only the subfamilies Unioninae and Anodontinae remained in the revised system.

At the beginning of this century, Chinese researchers investigated the molecular systematics of the Unionidae and made great progress revising the earlier classifications (Huang et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2013; Ouyang et al. 2011, 2015; Huang et al. 2013, 2015, 2018; Song et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2007, 2016a, b; Wu et al. 2016, 2017b). However, there continued to be many discrepancies regarding the classification of genera (Table 1). Most recently, Lopes-Lima et al. (2017a) constructed a phylogenetic framework for the worldwide Unionidae; however, it only contained 17 Chinese freshwater mussel species. Wu et al. (2018b) generated a phylogeny based on portions of the mitochondrial COI and ND1genes that included 34 Chinese unionids. While the resultant trees from these studies resolved a number of relationships, branch support values at certain nodes were low, and the placements of some genera (Sinohyriopsis and Lepidodesma) were not clarified.

Table 1.

Chinese freshwater mussels (Unionidae) systematic taxonomy history. Shaded genera indicate classification disputes.

Genus Liu et al. 1979 Huang et al. 2002 Zhou et al. 2007 Ouyang et al. 2011 Huang et al. 2013 Ouyang et al. 2015 Wu et al. 2018b This study
Aculamprotula Wu et al., 1999 Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae
Sinanodonta Modell, 1944 Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae
Cristaria Schumacher, 1817 Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae
Cuneopsis Simpson, 1900 Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae
Schistodesmus Simpson, 1900 Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae
Nodularia Conrad, 1853 Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae
Anemina Haas, 1969 Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae Anodontinae
Acuticosta Simpson, 1900 Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Anodontinae Anodontinae
Arconaia Conrad, 1865 Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Anodontinae Anodontinae
Lamprotula Simpson, 1900 Unioninae Ambleminae Ambleminae Ambleminae Ambleminae Gonideinae Gonideinae
Lanceolaria Conrad, 1853 Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Unioninae Anodontinae Anodontinae
Lepidodesma Simpson, 1896 Anodontinae Unioninae Incertae sedis Incertae sedis
Ptychorhynchus Simpson, 1900 Ambleminae Gonideinae Gonideinae
Solenaia Conrad, 1869 Anodontinae Ambleminae Ambleminae Gonideinae Ambleminae Gonideinae Gonideinae
Sinohyriopsis Starobogatov, 1970 Unioninae Ambleminae Ambleminae Ambleminae Ambleminae Incertae sedis Gonideinae

The purpose of this study was to clarify the taxonomic status and phylogenetic position of Chinese Unionidae using the DNA sequences of mitochondrial genomes to infer phylogenetic relationships. Phylogenetic hypotheses based on the analysis of mitochondrial genomes of unionids are becoming more common (Walker et al. 2006; Huang et al. 2013, 2018; Burzyński et al. 2017). In the Unionoida, Mytiloida, and Veneroida, an unusual mode of mitochondrial DNA transmission termed Doubly Uniparental Inheritance (DUI) occurs, in which two distinct, tissue-specific and gender-associated mitogenomes (i.e., F-type and M-type) (Breton et al. 2007) are present. For the remainder of this paper, all references to mitogenomes refer to the F-type mitogenome.

In this study, we sequenced and described the complete mitogenomes of four Chinese unionids: Acuticosta chinensis (Lea, 1868), Schistodesmus lampreyanus (Baird & Adams, 1867), Cuneopsis heudei (Heude, 1874), and Cuneopsis capitatus (Heude, 1874), with the aim of combining these new genome sequences with existing mitochondrial genomes to develop a phylogenetic framework for the Chinese Unionidae. In addition, we were particularly interested in determining the taxonomic position of the genus Acuticosta. This genus was erected by Simpson (1900) and Acuticosta chinensis (Lea, 1868) was used as the type species. The genus Acuticosta has been placed in a number of unionid subfamilies including the Hyriinae (Simpson, 1900), Unioninae (Liu 1979), Acuticostinae (Prozorova et al. 2005), and Unioninae (Huang et al. 2002, Graf and Cummings 2007, Zhou et al. 2007, Ouyang et al. 2011, 2015), and most recently, the Anodontinae (Wu et al. 2018b).

Materials and methods

Taxon sampling, mitochondrial genome sequencing, and assembly

Samples of four species were collected from Poyang Lake (28°47.84'N; 116°2.03'E) in Jiangxi Province, China (Figure 1), and specimens were preserved and vouchers deposited in the Biological Museum of Nanchang University. Information for primers used for PCR amplification of F-type mitogenomes can be found in Table 2. Complete mitogenomes were sequenced and annotated according to our previous study (Wu et al. 2016).

Figure 1. 

Shells of the unionids species in this study. A Acuticosta chinensis (Lea, 1868) B Schistodesmus lampreyanus (Baird & Adams, 1867) C Cuneopsis heudei (Heude, 1874) D Cuneopsis capitatus (Heude, 1874). Scale bar: 4 cm. Photogaphs R-W Wu.

Table 2.

Primers used for PCR amplification of female Acuticosta chinensis, Schistodesmus lampreyanus, Cuneopsis heudei, and Cuneopsis capitatus mitochondrial genomes.

Fragment Primer name Primer sequence (5’ to 3’) Length
COI (universal primer) LCO1490 GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG ~700 bp
16S (universal primer) 16SarL CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT ~500 bp
ND1 (universal primer) Leu-uurF TGGCAGAAAAGTGCATCAGATTAAAGC ~1000 bp
ND1→16S (A. chinensis) ZGN1H CGAAGCCTGACAATGTCTA ~4500bp
16S→COI (A. chinensis) ZG1CH CTAGTGTTGCCTTTCACTG ~5200 bp
COI→ND1 (S. lampreyanus) SXCNH CTGGTTGGACGGTGTATC ~3200 bp
ND1→16S (S. lampreyanus) SXN1H GAGATGGTTTGAGCTATGG ~4500 bp
16S→COI (S. lampreyanus) SX1CH TTCCTAGTCTTGCCATTCA ~3600 bp
ND1→16S (C. heudei) YTN1H TGTCTCTGCGAGGATTACT ~1300 bp
ND1→16S (C. capitatus) JSN1H GTATTTGGAGTTGGATGATC ~4700 bp
16S→COI (C. capitatus) JS1CH TATTCCTAGTCTTGCCATTC ~5000 bp

Dataset construction

We downloaded all published unionid mitogenomes from GenBank (as of March 2018), and combined them with the four mitogenomes generated in this study for a total of 41 unionid mitogenomes (22 Chinese taxa). In addition, we included additional genomes, also downloaded from GenBank, from the Margaritiferidae (four species), Iridinidae (one species), and Hyriidae (one species) as out-groups for the phylogenetic analysis (Table 3).

Table 3.

F-type mitochondrial genomes used in this study.

Taxon GenBank accession number Reference
Quadrula quadrula (Rafinesque, 1820) FJ809750 Breton et al. 2009
Venustaconcha ellipsiformis (Conrad, 1836) FJ809753 Breton et al. 2009
Potamilus alatus (Say, 1817) KU559011 Wen et al. 2017
Leptodea leptodon (Rafinesque, 1820) NC_028522 Feng et al. 2016
Toxolasma parvum (Barnes, 1823) HM856639 Breton et al. 2011
Lampsilis ornata (Conrad, 1835) NC_005335 Serb and Lydeard 2003
Pronodularia japanensis (Lea, 1859) AB055625 Unpublished
Lamprotula leaii (Griffith & Pidgeon, 1833) NC_023346 Chen et al. 2012
Ptychorhynchus pfisteri (Heude, 1874) KY067440 Zhou et al. 2016a
Potomida littoralis (Cuvier, 1798) NC_030073 Froufe et al. 2016
Solenaia oleivora (Heude, 1877) NC_022701 Huang et al. 2015
Solenaia carinatus (Heude, 1877) NC_023250 Huang et al. 2013
Sinohyriopsis schlegelii (Martens, 1861) HQ641406 Unpublished
Sinohyriopsis cumingii (Lea, 1852) NC_011763 Unpublished
Acuticosta chinensis (Lea, 1868) MH919390 This study
Arconaia lanceolata (Lea, 1856) KJ144818 Wang et al. 2014
Lanceolaria grayana (Lea, 1834) NC_026686 Unpublished
Pyganodon grandis (Say, 1829) FJ809754 Breton et al. 2009
Utterbackia peninsularis Bogan & Hoeh, 1995 HM856636 Breton et al. 2011
Utterbackia imbecillis (Say, 1829) HM856637 Breton et al. 2011
Lasmigona compressa (Lea, 1829) NC_015481 Breton et al. 2011
Anodonta anatina (Linnaeus, 1758) NC_022803 Soroka et al. 2015
Sinanodonta woodiana (Lea, 1834) HQ283346 Soroka et al. 2010
Sinanodonta lucida (Heude, 1877) KF667529 Song et al. 2016
Anemina arcaeformis (Heude, 1877) KF667530 An et al. 2016
Anemina euscaphys (Heude, 1879) NC_026792 Xue et al.2016
Cristaria plicata (Leach, 1814) KM233451 Wang et al. 2016
Lepidodesma languilati (Heude, 1874)* NC_029491 Zhou et al. 2016b
Schistodesmus lampreyanus (Baird & Adams, 1867) MH919388 This study
Cuneopsis pisciculus (Heude, 1874) NC_026306 Han et al. 2016
Cuneopsis heudei (Heude, 1874) MH919389 This study
Cuneopsis capitatus (Heude, 1874) MH919387 This study
Nodularia douglasiae (Griffith & Pidgeon, 1833) NC_026111 Unpublished
Unio delphinus Spengler, 1793 KT326917 Fonseca et al. 2017
Unio pictorum (Linnaeus, 1758) NC_015310 Soroka et al. 2010
Unio crassus Retzius, 1788 KY290446 Burzyński et al. 2017
Unio tumidus Retzius, 1788 KY021076 Soroka et al. 2018
Aculamprotula tortuosa (Lea, 1865) NC_021404 Wang et al. 2013
Aculamprotula scripta (Heude, 1875) MF991456 Wu et al. 2017b
Aculamprotula coreana (Martens, 1886) NC_026035 Lee et al. 2016
Aculamprotula tientsinensis (Crosse & Debeaux, 1863) NC_029210 Wu et al. 2016
Gibbosula rochechouartii (Heude, 1875) KX378172 Huang et al. 2018
Margaritifera falcata (Gould, 1850) NC_015476 Breton et al. 2011
Cumberlandia monodonta (Say, 1829) NC_034846 Guerra et al. 2017
Margaritifera dahurica (Middendorff, 1850) NC_023942 Yang et al. 2015
Echyridella menziesii (Dieffenbach, 1843) NC_034845 Guerra et al. 2017
Mutela dubia (Gmelin, 1791) NC_034844 Guerra et al. 2017

Alignments, partitioning strategies, and phylogenetic analyses

Nucleotide sequences of 12 mitochondrial protein-coding genes (we excluded atp8) and 2 rRNA genes were concatenated for construction of the phylogenetic trees. Nucleotide sequences of protein coding genes (PCG) were translated to amino acid sequences using MEGA 5.0 (Tamura et al. 2011), and genes were aligned based on the amino acid sequence (PNGs), or nucleotide sequence (rRNA) using the MUSCLE program (Edgar 2004) with default settings. Alignments of sequences were manually checked and areas of ambiguous alignment were excluded. Finally, 12 PCGs and the 2 rRNA genes were concatenated (11862 bp) using SequenceMatrix (Vaidya et al. 2011). The dataset was then partitioned according to codon position of each PCG and each rRNA gene for phylogenetic analysis. Prior to phylogenetic analysis, a partition homogeneity test was carried out in PAUP* version 4.0b10 (Swofford 2003) to determine rate heterogeneity among genes and codon positions. The partition homogeneity test indicated there was no significant difference in signals (P > 0.05).

PartitionFinder v1.1.1 (Lanfear 2012) was used to select optimal substitution models for the 2 rRNA genes and each codon position of the 12 PCG. Bayesian analyses were undertaken in MrBayes Version 2.01 (Ronquist 2012), four chains were run simultaneously for 1 million generations, and trees were sampled every 1000 generations, with a burn-in of 25%. Stationarity was considered to be reached when the average standard deviation of split frequencies was less than 0.01.

The gene and codon site-based partitioned ML analysis was performed in RAxML implemented in raxmlGUI v.1.3 (Stamatakis 2014), using the GTRGAMMAI model of nucleotide substitution with the search strategy set for rapid bootstrapping. ModelFinder (Chernomor et al. 2016; Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) implemented in IQ-TREE was used to choose the appropriate models, which additionally considers the FreeRate heterogeneity model (+R). IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015) was also used for ML tree reconstruction, and 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates were run to estimate branch support (Minh et al. 2013). The optimal substitution models for each partition by PartitionFinder and ModelFinder are shown in Suppl. material 1: Tables S1, S2.


General features of the mitochondrial genomes

The lengths of the complete mitogenomes of Acuticosta chinensis, Schistodesmus lampreyanus, Cuneopsis heudei, and Cuneopsis capitatus were 15652bp, 15855bp, 15892bp and 15844bp, respectively. The newly sequenced four mitogenomes all contained 13 protein-coding genes, two rRNA genes, 22 tRNAs, and one female specific gene (FORF). All four F-type mitogenomes had the same pattern of gene arrangement. Among the 38 mitochondrial genes, 11 genes were encoded on the heavy chain, and the remaining 27 genes were encoded on the light chain (Figure 2).

Figure 2. 

The gene arrangement of the F-type mitochondrial genome of Acuticosta chinensis, Schistodesmus lampreyanus, Cuneopsis heudei, and Cuneopsis capitatus.

The nucleotide composition of the Acuticosta chinensis, Schistodesmus lampreyanus, Cuneopsis heudei and Cuneopsis capitatus had obvious A+T bias (A. chinensis: 65.73%; S. lampreyanus: 64.54%; C. heudei: 62.45%; C. capitatus: 63.69%). In the base composition analysis for the four species, the A+T skews were negative, and the G+C skew were positive, indicating that the bases composition ratios of the four mitogenomes were T biased to A, and G biased to C. In invertebrate mitochondria, there are three conventional start codons: ATG, ATA and ATT, and three alternative start codons: ATC, TTG, and GTG (Wolstenholme 1992). The mitochondrial genomes of A. chinensis and C. capitatus had eleven protein coding genes which used the conventional start codons, and the remaining two used alternative start codons. S. lampreyanus and C. heudei had 12 PCG which used the common start codons, and one used the alternative start codon (Table 4).

Table 4.

Structural characteristics of F-type mitochondrial genomes of Acuticosta chinensis, Schistodesmus lampreyanus, Cuneopsis heudei, and Cuneopsis capitatus. For each protein coding genes, start and stop codons and anticodons are presented in parentheses. Gene lengths are in bp.

A. chinensis S. lampreyanus C. heudei C. capitatus
Total size (bp) 15652 15855 15892 15844
AT% 65.73 64.54 62.45 63.69
CG% 34.27 35.46 37.55 36.31
AT skew -0.18 -0.19 -0.21 -0.18
GC skew 0.28 0.33 0.33 0.32
No. of NCR 29 27 29 29
No. of overlapping genes 3 3 2 1
Size range of gene overlap 1 to 8 1 to 8 1 to 8 1
cox1 1539 (TTG/TAG) 1578 (ATA/TAG) 1566 (TTG/TAA) 1542 (TTG/TAG)
tRNA-Asp (D) 63 (GTC) 64 (GTC) 64 (GTC) 64 (GTC)
cox3 780 (ATG/TAA) 780 (ATG/TAA) 780 (ATG/TAA) 780 (ATG/TAG)
atp6 702 (ATG/TAA) 702 (ATG/TAG) 702 (ATG/TAG) 702 (ATG/TAG)
atp8 189 (ATG/TAA) 192 (ATG/TAA) 192 (ATG/TAG) 192 (ATG/TAG)
nd4L 297 (GTG/TAG) 279 (ATG/TAA) 255 (ATG/TAG) 255 (ATG/TAG)
nd4 1347 (ATT/TAA) 1347 (ATT/TAA) 1347 (ATT/TAA) 1329 (ATA/TAA)
nd6 489 (ATT/TAG) 486 (ATC/TAA) 507 (ATA/TAA) 507 (ATA/TAA)
tRNA-Gly (G) 62 (TCC) 63 (TCC) 63 (TCC)) 63 (TCC))
nd1 900 (ATA/TAA) 900 (ATA/TAG) 900 (ATA/TAG) 900 (ATA/TAA)
tRNA-Leu (L2) 64 (TAA) 64 (TAA) 63(TAA) 64 (TAA)
tRNA-Val (V) 64 (TAC) 63 (TAC) 63 (TAC) 64 (TAC)
tRNA-Ile (I) 64 (GAT) 67 (GAT) 64 (GAT) 64 (GAT)
tRNA-Cys (C) 64 (GCA) 62 (GCA) 64 (GCA) 61 (GCA)
tRNA-Gln (Q) 69 (TTG) 70 (TTG) 69 (TTG) 69 (TTG)
nd5 1728 (ATA/TAA) 1713 (ATA/TAA) 1794 (ATA/TAA) 1734 (ATG/TAA)
tRNA-Phe (F) 66 (GAA) 65 (GAA) 65 (GAA) 64 (GAA)
Cob 1137 (ATA/TAA) 1146 (ATT/TAA) 1149 (ATA/TAA) 1020 (ATC/TAA)
tRNA-Pro (P) 64 (TGG) 66 (TGG) 64 (TGG) 64 (TGG)
tRNA-Asn (N) 65 (GTT) 66 (GTT) 68 (GTT) 65 (GTT)
tRNA-Leu (L1) 66 (TAG) 64 (TAG) 63 (TAG) 64 (TAG)
rrnL 1285 1304 1302 1297
tRNA-Tyr (Y) 60 (GTA) 61 (GTA) 63 (GTA) 63 (GTA)
tRNA-Thr (T) 61 (TGT) 66 (TGT) 64 (TGT) 63 (TGT)
tRNA-Lys (K) 68 (TTT) 70 (TTT) 70 (TTT) 70 (TTT)
rrnS 853 857 859 853
tRNA-Arg (R) 66 (TCG) 67 (TCG) 65 (TCG) 65 (TCG)
tRNA-Trp (W) 65 (TCA) 64(TCA) 63 (TCA) 62 (TCA)
tRNA-Met (M) 65 (CAT) 65 (CAT) 65 (CAT) 65 (CAT)
nd2 966 (ATG/TAA) 966 (ATG/TAA) 966 (ATG/TAA) 966 (ATG/TAA)
tRNA-Glu (E) 63 (TTC) 72 (TTC) 68 (TTC) 68 (TTC)
tRNA-Ser (S2) 68 (AGA) 73 (AGA) 68 (TCT) 68 (TCT)
tRNA-Ser (S1) 64 (TGA) 64 (TGA) 64 (CGA) 64 (CGA)
tRNA-Ala (A) 67 (TGC) 65 (TGC) 66 (TGC) 64 (TGC)
tRNA-His (H) 65 (GTG) 69 (GTG) 69 (GTG) 67 (GTG)
nd3 357 (ATG/TAG) 357 (ATG/TAG) 357 (ATG/TAA) 357 (ATG/TAG)
cox2 681 (ATG/TAA) 681 (ATG/TAG) 681 (ATG/TAA) 681 (ATG/TAG)

The overlapping of neighboring genes is common in freshwater mussel mitochondria. There were three overlaps of neighboring genes in the mitochondrial genome of Acuticosta chinensis and Schistodesmus lampreyanus, and two in Cuneopsis heudei. The position of the largest gene overlap (8 bp) was between ND4 and ND4L. The mitochondrial genome of Cuneopsis capitatus only had one overlapping region between tRNAMet and ND2. There were 29 non-coding regions (NCRs) in A. chinensis, C. heudei, and C. capitatus, and 27 NCRs in S. lampreyanus. The longest NCRs of the A. chinensis, S. lampreyanus, C. heudei, and C. capitatus were 224 bp, 349 bp, 216 bp, and 323 bp, respectively; all were located between ND5 and tRNAGln (Table 4).

All four mitochondria contained 22 tRNAs, including two serine tRNAs and two leucine tRNAs. The histidine tRNA and aspartate tRNA were located in the heavy chain, whereas the remaining 20 tRNAs were encoded by the light chain. The length of tRNAs differed slightly in each species (Table 4). The tRNA anticodons were the same in all species with the exception of two serine tRNAs. The anticodons of the two serines tRNAs of A. chinensis and S. lampreyanus were AGA and TGA, while those of C. heudei and C. capitatus were TCT and CGA (Table 4).

Phylogenetic analyses

ML and BI trees have completely congruent topologies and in general are well supported by high bootstrap and posterior probability values at almost all nodes (Figure 3). The mitogenomic dataset supports the monophyly of four Unionidae subfamilies (i.e., Unioninae, Anodontinae, Ambleminae, and Gonideinae) by both ML and BI methods. Phylogenetic analyses reveal the following relationships: (((Unioninae + Anodontinae) + Gonideinae) + Ambleminae) within the Unionidae.

Figure 3. 

Phylogenetic trees of freshwater mussels obtained by Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses of 12 mitochondrial protein-coding gene sequences (except atp8) and two rRNA combined dataset. Support values above the branches are posterior probabilities and bootstrap support. (*) indicates 100 percent bootstrap support and posterior probabilities. Red font indicates Chinese species.

Our phylogenetic analyses indicate that except for Lepidodesma languilati (Heude, 1874), the 21 Chinese species belong to the following three subfamilies: Unioninae (Aculamprotula, Cuneopsis, Nodularia and Schistodesmus), Anodontinae (Cristaria, Arconaia, Acuticosta, Lanceolaria, Anemina and Sinoanodonta), and Gonideinae (Ptychorhynchus, Solenaia, Lamprotula, Sinohyriopsis). Our results support the placement of Acuticosta chinensis in the Anodontinae, but Leidodesma languilati is not placed as a member of any subfamily, but instead is the well-supported sister taxon to the monophyletic group formed by the Unioninae and Anodontinae.


Phylogenetic relationships of subfamilies in the Unionidae

In this study, we provide a novel phylogenetic hypothesis for relationships between subfamilies in the Unionidae (Figure 4). Other phylogenetic analyses of the Unionidae have been based on selected gene regions. For example, Lopes-Lima et al. (2017a) proposed the phylogenetic relationship of the subfamily based on COI and 28S as follows: (Anodontinae + Unioninae) + (Rectidentinae + (Ambleminae + Gonideninae)). Bolotov et al. (2017a) proposed relationships based on three loci (COI, 16S and 28S), and adding more taxa: ((Anodontinae + Unioninae) + (Ambleminae + Gonideninae)) + (Rectidentinae + Pseudodontinae). Prior investigations into subfamily relationships in the Unionidae, based on complete mitochondrial genomes, seem to be consistent with these earlier studies, (Anodontinae + Unioninae) + (Ambleminae + Gonideninae) (Huang et al. 2013; Burzyński et al. 2017; Huang et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2016, 2017b). The current study is based on the mitochondrial genome sequences for the largest number of unionid species (41). By increasing the number of taxa and the amount of DNA sequences, we obtain a unique set of phylogenetic relationships: ((Anodontinae + Unioninae) + Gonideninae) + Ambleminae). Our phylogeny differs from other studies based on mitochondrial genome sequences in that the Ambleminae is the basal subfamily as opposed to the sister Gonideninae.

Figure 4. 

Hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships among subfamilies of the Unionidae form this and other studies. ALopes-Lima et al. (2017a)BBolotov et al. (2017a)CHuang et al. 2013; Burzyński et al. 2017; Huang et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2016, 2017bD This study.

Bolotov et al. (2017a) proposed that the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of the Anodontinae, Unioninae, Ambleminae, and Gonideninae likely originated in East Asia (Probability 65.8%). Under this scenario the MRCA of Anodontinae + Unioninae arose in East Asia during the Cretaceous period, whereas the MRCA of Ambleminae + Gonideninae was continuously distributed in East Asia and North America. The ancestor of the Ambleminae was most likely to originate in North America. The diversification of each subfamily occurred in the late Cretaceous (Bolotov et al. 2017a). The results of phylogenetic analyses in the current study have different evolutionary implications. Our results indicate that the Ambleminae is basal to the other three subfamilies, and its origin is therefore earlier than the other three subfamilies. Globally, eight subfamilies (Anodontinae, Unioninae, Pseudodontinae, Gonideinae, Ambleminae, Rectidentinae, Parreysiinae, and Modellnaiinae) are recognized in the Unionidae (Bolotov et al. 2017a; Lopes-Lima et al. 2017a; Whelan et al. 2011). The lack of mitochondrial genomes for Rectidentinae, Parreysiinae, Modellnaiinae, and Pseudodontinae, precluded their incorporation into this study. However, we believe that the fully resolved phylogenetic tree, with high branch support in the present study, serves as a framework for further studies on the Unionidae, Future phylogenetic analyses based on complete mitochondrial genome sequences of representatives of all the subfamilies in the Unionidae will ultimately produce well-supported phylogenetic hypotheses for the Unionidae.

Phylogeny and taxonomy of Chinese taxa

The classification of the Chinese unionid genera has been in a state of flux, different studies having placed the same genus in different subfamilies. For example, based on the presence or absence of the glochidial hooks and the type of marsupium, Wu et al. (1999a) divided the genus Lamproulasensu lato Simpson, 1900 into Lamprotulasensu stricto and Aculamprotula Wu, Liang, Wang & Ouyang, 1999. This distinction was later confirmed by molecular data (Zhou et al. 2007; Pfeiffer and Graf 2013; Wu et al. 2018b), but the classification of Lamprotula has also been disputed. Our results do not support the taxonomy of Huang et al. (2002), Zhou et al. (2007) and Ouyang et al. (2011; 2015) that placed Lamprotula sensu stricto in the Ambleminae. Our phylogenetic analyses instead confirm the results of Pfeiffer and Graf (2013), Lopes-Lima et al. (2017a), Bolotov et al. (2017a; b) and Wu et al. (2018b) that Lamprotula is a member of the Gonideninae. The classification of the genus Sinohyriopsis has also been unstable. The shape of the glochidia of Sinohyriopsis cumingii (Lea, 1852) is semi-elliptical and unhooked, and resembles the typical morphology of glochidia in the Gonideninae (Wu et al. 2018a). But the marsupium of S. cumingii is restricted to the outer two demibranchs of the gills (ectobranchous), whereas in other species in the Gonideninae (Lamprotula leaii (Griffith & Pidgeon, 1833) Solenaia carinatus (Heude, 1877) and Solenaia oleivora (Heude, 1877)) the marsupium includes all four demibranchs (tetragenous) (Wu et al. 2018a). Therefore, based on anatomical features alone, the classification of the Sinohyriopsis in the Gonideninae has always been in doubt. Prior phylogenetic analyses based on one or two mitochondrial molecular markers (Huang et al. 2002; Zhou et al. 2007; Ouyang et al. 2011; 2015) placed Sinohyriopsis in the Ambleminae, However, our results indicate that Sinohyriopsis should be placed in the Gonideninae, confirming the conclusions of Lopes-Lima et al. (2017a) and Bolotov et al. (2017a, b). The placement of Aculamprotula has not been as controversial and our results place it in the Unioninae.

The genus Lepidodesma Simpson, 1896 is endemic to China and Lepidodesma languilati (Heude, 1874) is the type species. The juvenile of this species is thin and fragile, and the adult shell is robust. In addition, adults lack pseudocardinal teeth, but possess lateral teeth and the glochidia are triangular and have hooks. The breeding period is from February to August, and the type of marsupium is ectobranchous (Wu et al. 2018a). These characteristics are similar to species in the subfamily Unioninae and Anodontinae. Other characters, such as the size of the glochidia, which is large, and the tripartite water tubes (Wu et al. 2018a), indicate an affinity with the subfamily Anodontinae. The classification of Lepidodesma has alternated between these two subfamilies with some (Simpson 1900, Huang et al. 2002, Graf and Cummings 2007, Zhou et al. 2016) placing it in the Unioninae, and others (Haas 1969, Liu et al. 1979, Prozorova et al. 2005) in the Anodontinae. The results of our study indicate a novel result in which L. languilati is place in neither of these subfamilies, but is sister to a clade that includes both the Unioninae and Anodontinae. The robust branch support values indicate that L. languilati is not a member of either subfamily, but is instead a member of another, as yet unrecognized clade or perhaps is the remnant of a once larger more diverse group. Owing to the lack of available mitochondrial genomes for representatives of the Rectidentinae, Parreysiinae, and Pseudodontinae, our study did not include these subfamilies, and we recognize that their inclusion could produce a different set of relationships.

Due to the emphasis on the morphological characteristics of the shell, malacologists have consistently supported including both Arconaia and Lanceolaria in the Unioninae (Haas 1969; Liu 1979; Graf and Cummings 2007). The shells of Arconaia and Lanceolaria are thick and have distinct hinge teeth, and the morphology of the glochidia (triangular; hooked) and type of marsupium (ectobranchous) are similar to species of the subfamily Unioninae and Anodontinae (Wu et al. 2018a). The phylogenetic relationships inferred by different molecular markers, seem to confirm the phylogenetic position of these genera in the Unioninae (Huang et al. 2002; Zhou et al. 2007; Ouyang et al. 2015). However, the above-mentioned phylogenetic analyses included a limited number of taxa, and several key nodes in the phylogeny had low branch support. The results of the current study support the placement of Arconaia and Lanceolaria in the Anodontinae, confirming the results of Lopes-Lima et al. (2017a) and Wu et al. (2018b).

The genus Acuticosta was erected by Simpson and Acuticosta chinensis (Lea, 1868) was designated as the type species. Based on the marsupium, anatomy, larvae type and umbo sculpture, Simpson (1900) placed this genus in the Hyriinae. Subsequently, Chinese malacologists (Liu et al. 1979) re-classified the genus as a member of the Unioninae based on the presence or absence of hinge teeth. Prozorova et al. (2005) in a review of the bivalves in the Yangtze River drainage, placed the genus in Acuticostinae, although Graf and Cummings (2007) still maintained Acuticosta in the Unioninae. Molecular genetic analyses of a variety of markers by Huang et al. (2002), Zhou et al. (2007), and Ouyang et al. (2011; 2015) all indicated that A. chinensis was a member of the Unioninae. However, the limited taxon sampling and low branch support values in molecular phylogenetic analyses have allowed questions concerning the true affinities of Acuticosta to persist (Pfeiffer and Graf 2013; Huang et al. 2013; Lopes-Lima et al. 2017). Recently, Wu et al. (2018b) indicated that A. chinensis is a member of the Anodontinae based on mitochondrial DNA sequences of two genes. The current analysis of mitochondrial genomes provides further support for the placement of Acuticosta in the Anodontinae and indicates affinity of Acuticosta to the genera Arconaia and Lanceolaria.

Endangered status and conservation implications

China is a vast territory with a huge number of lakes and rivers. As a result, it is one of the most species-rich regions in the world (Zieritiz et al. 2017; Cai et al. 2018). However, in recent decades, freshwater mussels in China have declined drastically, and species diversity has been seriously threatened. At present, 40 species of Chinese unionids are included in the 2018 IUCN Red List, although 32 of these are categorized as data deficient or least concern. In addition, nearly half of the species included had not been evaluated. At present, advancing urbanization in the Yangtze River Basin, increasingly threatens the habitat of freshwater mussels, and conservation and management efforts targeting freshwater taxa are urgently needed.

Understanding of the phylogenetic diversity of freshwater mussels has important significance for determining the priority conservation strategies of species (Lopes-Lima et al. 2017b, 2018). This study provides support for the classification of a number of Chinese species, and lays the foundation for the future development of a more comprehensive phylogenetic based classification for freshwater unionids in China. Accurate taxonomic placement of rare and understudied species is central to many aspects of conservation as important biological characteristics (e.g., habitat preferences, reproductive traits) can be inferred from closely related taxa. Future research on Chinese unionids should focus on species delimitation and classification. In addition, more research is needed on understanding the basic ecology of Chinese mussels including species distributions, habitat preferences, and host fish identification.


We thank the two anonymous reviewers and the editor for valuable comments that have greatly improved this manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.31772412.


  • An CT, Ouyang S, Zhou CH, Wu XP (2016) The complete F-type mitochondrial genome of Chinese Anodonta arcaeformis (Bivalvia: Unionidae: Unionionae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27(2): 1552–1553.
  • Bolotov IN, Kondakov AV, Vikhrev IV, Aksenova OV, Bespalaya YV, Gofarov MY, Kolosova YS, Konopleva E, Spitsyn VM, Tanmuangpak K, Tumpeesuwan S (2017a) Ancient river inference explains exceptional oriental freshwater mussel radiations. Scientific Reports 7(1): 2135.
  • Bolotov IN, Vikhrev IV, Kondakov AV, Konopleva ES, Gofarov MY, Aksenova OV, Tumpeesuwan S (2017b) New taxa of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) from a species-rich but overlooked evolutionary hotspot in Southeast Asia. Scientific Reports 7(1): 11573.
  • Breton S, Beaupré HD, Stewart DT, Piontkivska H, Karmakar M, Bogan AE, Blier PU, Hoeh WR (2009) Comparative mitochondrial genomics of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) with doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA: gender-specific open reading frames and putative origins of replication. Genetics 183(4): 1575–1589.
  • Breton S, Doucet-Beaupré H, Stewart DT, Hoeh WR, Blier PU (2007) The unusual system of doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA: isn’t one enough? Trends in genetics 23(9): 465–474.
  • Breton S, Stewart DT, Shepardson S, Trdan RJ, Bogan AE, Chapman EG, Ruminas AJ, Piontkivska H, Hoeh WR (2011) Novel protein genes in animal mtdna: a new sex determination system in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida)? Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(5): 1645–1659.
  • Burzyński A, Soroka M, Mioduchowska M, Kaczmarczyk A, Sell J (2017) The complete maternal and paternal mitochondrial genomes of Unio crassus: mitochondrial molecular clock and the overconfidence of molecular dating. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 107: 605–608.
  • Cai YJ, Zhang M, Xu J, Heino J (2018) Geographical gradients in the biodiversity of Chinese freshwater molluscs: Implications for conservation. Diversity and Distributions.
  • Campbell DC, Lydeard C (2012a) Molecular systematics of Fusconaia (Bivalvia: Unionidae: Ambleminae). American Malacological Bulletin 30(1): 1–17.
  • Campbell DC, Serb JM, Buhay JE, Roe KJ, Minton RL, Lydeard C (2005) Phylogeny of North American Amblemines (Bivalvia, Unionoida): prodigious polyphyly proves pervasive across genera. Invertebrate Biology 124(2): 131–164.
  • Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2016) Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Systematic Biology 65(6): 997–1008.
  • Davis GM (1984) Genetic relationships among some North American Unionidae (Bivalvia): sibling species, convergence, and cladistic relationships. Malacologia 25: 629–648.
  • Edgar RC (2004) Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32(5): 1792–1797.
  • Elderkin CL, Clewing C, Ndeo OW, Albrecht C (2016) Molecular phylogeny and DNA barcoding confirm cryptic species in the African freshwater oyster Etheria elliptica lamarck, 1807 (Bivalvia: Etheriidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 118(2): 369–381.
  • Feng L, Zhang X, Zhao GF (2016) The complete mitochondrial genome of the scaleshell Leptodea leptodon (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Conservation Genetics Resources 8(4): 443–445.
  • Froufe E, Gan HM, Lee YP, Garneiro J, Varandas S, Teixeira A, Zieritz A, Sousa R, Lopes-Lima M (2016) The male and female complete mitochondrial genome sequences of the endangered freshwater mussel Potomida littoralis (Cuvier, 1798) (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Mitochondrial DNA part A 27(5): 3571–3572.
  • Fonseca MM, Lopes-Lima M, Eackles MS, King TL, Frofe E (2016) The female and male mitochondrial genomes of Unio delphinus and the phylogeny of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 1(1): 954–957.
  • Froufe E, Sobral C, Teixeira A, Sousa R, Varandas SC, Aldridge DC, Lopes-Lima M (2014) Genetic diversity of the pan-European freshwater mussel Anodonta anatina (Bivalvia: Unionoida) based on COI: new phylogenetic insights and implications for conservation. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 24(4): 561–574.
  • Graf DL (2002) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of two problematic freshwater mussel genera (Unio and Gonidea) and a re-evaluation of the classification of Nearctic Unionidae (Bivalvia: Palaeoheterodonta: Unionoida). Journal Molluscan Studies 68(1): 65–71.
  • Graf DL (2013) Patterns of freshwater bivalve global diversity and the state of phylogenetic studies on the Unionoida, Sphaeriidae, and Cyrenidae. American Malacological Bulletin 31(1): 135–153.
  • Graf DL, Cummings KS (2007) Review of the systematics and global diversity of freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionoida). Journal of Molluscan Studies 73(3): 291–314.
  • Graf DL, Jones H, Geneva AJ, Pfeiffer JM, Klunzinger MW (2015) Molecular phylogenetic analysis supports a Gondwanan origin of the Hyriidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) and the paraphyly of Australasian taxa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 85: 1–9.
  • Guerra D, Plazzi F, Stewart DT, Bogan AE, Hoeh WR, Breton S (2017) Evolution of sex-dependent mtDNA transmission in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida). Scientific Reports 7(1): 1551.
  • Haas F (1969) Superfamilia Unionacea. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Han ZY, Wang GL, Xue T, Chen Y, Li JL (2016) The F-type complete mitochondrial genome of Chinese freshwater mussels Cuneopsis pisciculus. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27(5): 3376–3377.
  • He J, Zhuang Z (2013) The Freshwater Bivalves of China. Harxheim, Germany.
  • Heude RP (1877a) Conchyliologie fluviatile de la province de Nanking et la Chine centrale. 2. Paies: Librairie F. Scvy.
  • Heude RP (1877b) Conchyliologie fluviatile de la province de Nanking et la Chine centrale. 3. Paies: Librairie F. Scvy.
  • Heude RP (1878) Conchyliologie fluviatile de la province de Nanking et la Chine centrale. 4. Paies: Librairie F. Scvy.
  • Heude RP (1879) Conchyliologie fluviatile de la province de Nanking et la Chine centrale. 5. Paies: Librairie F. Scvy.
  • Heude RP (1880a) Conchyliologie fluviatile de la province de Nanking et la Chine centrale. 6. Paies: Librairie F. Scvy.
  • Heude RP (1880b) Conchyliologie fluviatile de la province de Nanking et la Chine centrale. 10. Paies: Librairie F. Scvy.
  • Heude RP (1881) Conchyliologie fluviatile de la province de Nanking et la Chine centrale. 7. Paies: Librairie F. Scvy.
  • Heude RP (1883) Conchyliologie fluviatile de la province de Nanking et la Chine centrale. 8. Paies: Librairie F. Scvy.
  • Heude RP (1885) Conchyliologie fluviatile de la province de Nanking et la Chine centrale. 9. Paies: Librairie F. Scvy.
  • Hoeh WR, Bogan A, Cummings K, Guttman S (2002) Evolutionary relationships among the higher taxa of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida): inferences on phylogeny and character evolution from analyses of DNA sequence data. Malacological Review 31–32(2): 123–141.
  • Hoeh WR, Bogan AE, Heard WH (2001) A phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of morphological and reproductive characteristics in the Unionoida. In: Bauer G, Wächtler K (Eds) Ecology and evolution of the freshwater mussels Unionoida.Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 257–280.
  • Huang XC, Rong J, Liu Y, Zhang MH, Wan Y, Ouyang S, Zhou CH, Wu XP (2013) The complete maternally and paternally inherited mitochondrial genomes of the endangered freshwater mussel Solenaia carinatus (Bivalvia: Unionidae) and implications for Unionidae taxonomy. Plos One 8(12): e84352.
  • Huang XC, Wu RW, An CT, Xie GL, Su JH, Ouyang S, Zhou CH, Wu XP (2018) Reclassification of lamprotula rochechouartii, as Margaritifera rochechouartii comb. nov. (Bivalvia: Margaritiferidae) revealed by time-calibrated multi-locus phylogenetic analyses and mitochondrial phylogenomics of Unionoida. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 120: 297–306.
  • Huang XC, Zhou CH, Ouyang S, Wu XP (2015) The complete F-type mitochondrial genome of threatened Chinese freshwater mussel Solenaia oleivora (Bivalvia: Unionidae: Gonideinae). Mitochondrial DNA 26(2): 263–264.
  • Huang YY, Liu H, Wu XP, Ouyang S (2002) Testing the relationships of Chinese freshwater Unionidae (Bivalvia) based on analysis of partial mitochondrial 16S rRNA sequences. Journal of Molluscan Studies 68(4): 359–363.
  • Johnson RI (1973) Heude’s molluscan types: or, Asian land and fresh water mollusks, mostly from the People’s Republic of China, described by PM Heude. Special occasional publication; no. 1. Dept. of Mollusks, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University.
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589.
  • Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SY, Guindon S (2012) Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29(6): 1695–1701.
  • Lin ZT (1962) Unionidae (Mollusca) of Poyang Lake, Kiangsi Province, China. Acta Zoologica Sinica 14: 249–260.
  • Liu YY, Huang YY (1964) Notes on freshwater mollusks of the San-Men-Hsia reservoir on the Yellow River and its neighboring regions, China. Acta Zoologica Sinica 16: 429–439.
  • Liu YY, Zhang WZ (1982) One new species of freshwater mussel of the genus Cristaria from China. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 7: 35–36.
  • Liu YY, Zhang WZ, Wang QX, Wang EY (1979) Economic Fauna of China-Freshwater Mollusk. Science Press, Beijing.
  • Liu YY, Zhang WZ, Wang YX (1980) Bivalves (Mollusca) of the Tai Hu Lake and its surrounding waters, Jiangsu Province, China. Acta Zoologica Sinica 26: 365–369.
  • Lopes-Lima M, Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, Mehler K, Seddon M, Sousa R (2018) Conservation of freshwater bivalves at the global scale: diversity, threats and research needs. Hydrobiologia 810(1): 1–14.
  • Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Do VT, Ghamizi M, Mock K, Kebapçı Ü, Klishko O, Kovitvadhi S, Kovitvadhi U, Paulo OS, Pfeiffer JM, Raley M, Riccardi N, Şereflişan H, Sousa R, Teixeira A, Varandas S, Wu XP, Zanatta DT, Zieritz A, Bogan AE (2017a) Phylogeny of the most species rich freshwater bivalve family (Bivalvia: Unionida: Unionidae): Defining modern subfamilies and tribes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 106: 174–191.
  • Lopes-Lima M, Sousa R, Geist J, Aldridge DC, Araujo R, Bergengren J, Bespalaya Y, Bódis E, Burlakova L, Van Damme D, Douda K, Froufe E, Georgiev D, Gumpinger C, Karatayev A, Kebapçi Ü, Killeen I, Lajtner J, Larsen BM, Lauceri R, Legakis A, Lois S, Lundberg S, Moorkens E, Motte G, Nagel KO, Ondina P, Outeiro A, Paunovic M, Prié V, von Proschwitz T, Riccardi N, Rudzīte M, Rudzītis M, Scheder C, Seddon M, Şereflişan H, Simić V, Sokolova S, Stoeckl K, Taskinen J, Teixeira A, Thielen F, Trichkova T, Varandas S, Vicentini H, Zajac K, Zajac T, Zogaris S (2017b) Conservation status of freshwater mussels in Europe: state of the art and future challenges. Biological Reviews 92(1): 572–607.
  • Lopes-Lima M, Teixeira A, Froufe E, Lopes A, Varandas S, Sousa R (2014) Biology and conservation of freshwater bivalves: past, present and future perspectives. Hydrobiologia 735(1): 1–13.
  • Lydeard C, Mulvey M, Davis GM (1996) Molecular systematics and evolution of reproductive traits of North American freshwater unionacean mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) as inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 351(1347): 1593–1603.
  • Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, von Haeseler A (2013) Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular biology and evolution 30(5): 1188–1195.
  • Nagel K, Badino G (2001) Population genetics and systematics of European Unionoidea. In: Bauer G, Wächtler K (Eds) Ecology and Evolution of the Freshwater Mussels Unionoida.Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 51–80.
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular biology and evolution 32(1): 268–274.
  • Ouyang JX, Su JH, Ouyang S, Zhou CH, Wu XP, Li SB (2015) DNA barcoding and molecular phylogenetic analysis of freshwater unionids. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology 23(6): 779–787.
  • Ouyang JX, Wu XP, Shan O, Li SB, Zhao DX (2011) Phylogenetic analysis of some Chinese freshwater Unionidae based on mitochondrial COI sequences. Journal of Conchology 40(5): 543–548.
  • Pfeiffer JM, Graf DL (2013) Re-analysis confirms the polyphyly of Lamprotula Simpson, 1900 (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Journal of Molluscan Studies 79(3): 249–256.
  • Pfeiffer JM, Graf DL (2015) Evolution of bilaterally asymmetrical larvae in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida: Unionidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 175(2): 307–318.
  • Prozorova LA, Sayenko EM, Bogatov VV, Wu M (2005) Bivalves of the Yangtze River drainage. The Bulletin of the Russian Far East Malacological Society 9: 46–58.
  • Roe KJ (2013) Phylogenetic analysis of the freshwater mussel genus Ptychobranchus (Bivalvia: Unionidae). American Malacological Bulletin 31(2): 257–265.
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Mark PV, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) Mrbayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542.
  • Serb JM, Lydeard C (2003) Complete mtDNA sequence of the North American freshwater mussel, Lampsilis ornata (Unionidae): an examination of the evolution and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial genome organization in Bivalvia (Mollusca). Molecular Biology and Evolution 20(11): 1854–1866.
  • Shu FY, Ouyang S, Wu XP (2012) Glochidial morphology of two species of the genus Schistodesmus (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from Lake Poyang, China. American Malacological Bulletin 30(2): 329–333.
  • Simpson CT (1914) A descriptive catalogue of the naiades, or pearly fresh-water mussels. Parts I-III. Bryant Walker, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Song XL, Ouyang S, Zhou CH, Wu XP (2016) Complete maternal mitochondrial genome of freshwater mussel Anodonta lucida (Bivalvia: Unionidae: Anodontinae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27(1): 549–550.
  • Soroka M (2010) Characteristics of mitochondrial DNA of unionid bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae). II. Comparison of complete sequences of maternally inherited mitochondrial genomes of Sinanodonta woodiana and Unio pictorum. Folia Malacologica 18(4): 189–209.
  • Soroka M, Burzyński A (2015) Complete female mitochondrial genome of Anodonta anatina (Mollusca: Unionidae): confirmation of a novel protein-coding gene (F ORF). Mitochondrial DNA 26(2): 267–269.
  • Soroka M, Burzyński A (2018) Doubly uniparental inheritance and highly divergent mitochondrial genomes of the freshwater mussel Unio tumidus (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Hydrobiologia 810(1): 239–254.
  • Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0b10.
  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) Mega5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28(10): 2731–2739.
  • Tchang S, Li SC (1965a) Bivalves (Mollusca) of the Poyang Lake and surrounding waters, Kiangsi Province, China, with description of a new species. Acta Zoologica Sinica 17: 309–319.
  • Tchang S, Li SC, Liu YY (1965b) Bivalves (Mollusca) of Tung-Ting Lake and its surrounding waters, Hunan Province, China. Acta Zoologica Sinica 17: 197–216.
  • Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R (2011) SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27(2): 171–180.
  • Vaughn CC, Allen DC, Irmscher P, Miller CJ (2010) Freshwater mussel ecology: a multifactor approach to distribution and abundance. Freshwater Biology 54(5): 1148–1148.
  • Walker JM, Curole JP, Wade DE, Chapman EG, Bogan AE, Watters G, Hoeh WR (2006) Taxonomic distribution and phylogenetic utility of gender-associated mitochondrial genomes in the Unionoida (Bivalvia). Malacologia 48(1–2): 265–282.
  • Wang H, He LP, Yang XX, Yang SB, Li C (2016) Determination of the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of mussel Cristaria plicata (Leach). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27(2): 1478–1479.
  • Wei QS, Fu CH (1994) Comparative studies on morphology of the glochidia of six mussel species (Mollusca: Unionidae). Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 18(4): 303–308.
  • Wen HB, Cao ZM, Hua D, Xu P, Ma XY, Jin W, Yuan XH, Gu RB (2017) The complete maternally and paternally inherited mitochondrial genomes of a freshwater mussel Potamilus alatus (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Plos One 12(1): e0169749.
  • Whelan NV, Geneva AJ, Graf DL (2011) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of tropical freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionoida) resolves the position of Coelatura and supports a monophyletic Unionidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61(2): 504–514.
  • Wu RW, An CT, Wu XP, Zhou CH, Ouyang S (2016) Complete maternal mitochondrial genome of freshwater mussel Aculamprotula tientsinensis (Bivalvia: Unionidae: Unioninae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27(6): 4520–4521.
  • Wu RW, Chen TH, Zanatta DT, Ouyang S, Wu XP (2018a) Reproductive traits of nine freshwater mussel species (Mollusca: Unionidae) from Poyang Lake, China. Journal of Molluscan Studies 84(3): 323–332.
  • Wu RW, Gao BY, Lan ZC, Zhang MH, Ouyang S, Wu XP (2017a) Predicting local colonization and extinction rates of freshwater mussels based on biological traits in a case of Lake Poyang. Journal of Lake Sciences 29(3): 678–686.
  • Wu RW, Liu YT, Wang S, Liu XJ, Zanatta DT, Roe KJ, Song XL, An CT, Wu XP (2018b) Testing the utility of DNA barcodes and a preliminary phylogenetic framework for Chinese freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from the middle and lower Yangtze River. Plos ONE 13(8): e0200956.
  • Wu RW, Wang S, Liu YT, Liu XJ, Zhou CH, Ouyang S, Wu XP (2017b) Characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the complete maternal mitochondrial genome of freshwater mussel Aculamprotula scripta (Bivalvia: Unionidae: Unioninae). Conservation Genetics Resources.
  • Wu XP, Liang Y, Wang H, Ouyang S (1999a) Morphological characters of glochidia of Unionidae and the taxonomic significance. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 23: 139–147.
  • Wu XP, Liang YL, Wang HZ (1999b) A comparative study on glochidial morphology of Unionidae (Bivalvia)-I. Unio douglasiae, Cuneopsis pisciulus, Acuticosta chinensis and Acuticosta ovata. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 23: 141–145.
  • Wu XP, Liang YL, Wang HZ, Xie ZC, Ouyang S (2000) Distribution and species diversity of freshwater mollusca of lakes along mid-lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Journal of Lake Sciences 12: 111–118.
  • Xue T, Chen ML, Wang GL, Han ZY, Li JL (2016) The complete F-type mitochondrial genome of Chinese freshwater mussel Anodonta euscaphys. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27(4): 2698–2699.
  • Zanatta DT, Murphy RW (2006) Evolution of active host-attraction strategies in the freshwater mussel tribe Lampsilini (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 41(1): 195–208.
  • Zhou CH, Huang XC, Ouyang S, Ouyang JX, Wu XP (2016a) Characterization of the complete maternal mitochondrial genome of Ptychorhynchus pfisteri (Bivalvia: Unionidae: Gonideinae). Conservation Genetics Resources 9(2): 233–235.
  • Zhou CH, Ouyang S, Wu XP, Ding MH (2016b) The complete maternal mitochondrial genome of rare Chinese freshwater mussel Lepidodesma languilati (Bivalvia: Unionidae: Unioninae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 27(6): 4615–4616.
  • Zhou CH, Ouyang S, Wu XP, Li M (2007) Phylogeny of the genus Lamprotula (Unionidae) in China based on mitochondrial DNA sequences of 16S rRNA and ND1 genes. Acta Zoologica Sinica 53(6): 1024–1030
  • Zieritz A, Bogan AE, Froufe E, Klishko O, Kondo T, Kovitvadhi U, Kovitvadhi S, Lee JH, Lopes-Lima M, Pfeiffer JM, Sousa R, Do TV, Vikhrev I, Zanatta DV (2017) Diversity, biogeography and conservation of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida) in East and Southeast Asia. Hydrobiologia 810(1): 1–16.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Supplementary Tables S1, S2

Rui-Wen Wu, Xiong-Jun Liu, Sa Wang, Kevin J. Roe, Shan Ouyang, Xiao-Ping Wu

Data type: molecular data

Explanation note: Table S1: Partitioning strategies from PartitionFinder for mt genome dataset; Table S2: Partitioning strategies from ModelFinder for mt genome dataset.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License ( The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (16.84 kb)
login to comment