Research Article
Print
Research Article
The immatures of Bezzia chilensis Spinelli & Ronderos, 2001 (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae)
expand article infoDanielle Anjos-Santos, Florentina Díaz§|, Gustavo Ricardo Spinelli§, María Marcela Ronderos§|
‡ Laboratório de Investigaciones en Ecología y Sistemática Animal, Esquel, Argentina
§ División Entomología, Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina
| Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores, La Plata, Argentina
¶ Instituto de Limnología “Dr. Raúl A. Ringuelet”, La Plata, Argentina
Open Access

Abstract

The fourth instar larva and the pupa of Bezzia chilensis Spinelli & Ronderos, 2001 are described for the first time. The immature stages were collected from macrophytes and filamentous algae in streams of the Patagonian steppe, in the provinces of Neuquén and Chubut, Argentina. The described stages were photographed and illustrated with a phase-contrast microscope and scanning electron microscope. Data on the bionomics of the species, new records and tables for characters of the known larvae and pupae of Bezzia Kieffer, 1899 from the Neotropical region are provided.

Keywords

Aquatic, biting midges, immature stages, Neotropical region, Palpomyiini

Introduction

Bezzia Kieffer, 1899, a worldwide genus of the tribe Palpomyiini, includes 322 species of which 48 inhabit the Neotropical region, 46 of them recorded by Borkent and Spinelli (2007), and two more recently described: B. ventanensis Spinelli, 2012 (Spinelli et al. 2012) and B. galesa Spinelli, 2013 (Spinelli et al. 2013). The adults are important predators of small invertebrates and the immature stages are relatively common inhabitants of various kinds of freshwater environments, mainly streams, lakes and ponds, as well as other breeding habitats, such as sphagnum bogs, rice fields, footprints in sandy creek beds, and water gathered in tree holes and bromeliads (Spinelli and Ronderos 2001). The majority of the Neotropical species are known from adults, and only 12 of them are also known as immatures: B. bivittata (Coquillett, 1905), B. blantoni Spinelli & Wirth, 1989, B. brevicornis (Kieffer, 1917); B. bromeliae Spinelli, 1991; B. galesa Spinelli, 2013; B. gibbera (Coquillett, 1905); B. glabra (Coquillett, 1902), B. nobilis (Winnertz, 1852), B. pulchripes Kieffer, 1917; B. roldani Spinelli & Wirth, 1981, B. snowi Lane, 1958; and B. ventanensis Spinelli, 2012.

Bezzia chilensis Spinelli & Ronderos, 2001 is a member of the venustula species group in the subgenus Homobezzia Macfie, 1932, distributed in Valparaiso Province (Chile), and Salta and Río Negro provinces (Argentina) (Spinelli and Cazorla 2003). During a recent survey carried out in the northwestern Argentine Patagonia, larvae and pupae of B. chilensis were collected. The purpose of this paper is to describe the fourth instar larva and pupa of this species, with phase-contrast and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and to provide tables for characters of the known larvae and pupae of Bezzia from the Neotropical region.

Material and methods

Larvae and pupae were collected on the bordering vegetation in three streams on the Patagonian steppe in the provinces of Neuquén and Chubut. The substrate was removed with the aid of a strainer and transferred to a white tray where larvae and pupae were collected with a pipette. Further substrate samples were carried to the laboratory to search for more specimens. Larvae were placed in individual containers with water and substrate from their natural environment. Pupae were isolated in a vial with a drop of water, and observed daily until adult emergence. Adults were allowed to harden for 24 h before being preserved in ethanol to ensure their complete pigmentation. For detailed examination with a phase-contrast microscope, larval and pupal exuviae and adults were mounted in Canada balsam following the technique described by Borkent and Spinelli (2007). Mounted larval exuviae were oriented ventral side up to facilitate examination of the epipharyngeal combs within the head capsule. Pupal exuviae were mounted dorsoventrally. Photomicrographs were taken with a Micrometrics SE Premium digital camera, through a Nikon Eclipse E200 microscope and a Leica EC3 digital camera, through a Leica DM 500 microscope. Illustrations were drawn with a camera lucida and Adobe illustrator CC. The map was drawn in QGIS v. 2.14. Larvae were also examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JOEL 2000) following the technique of Ronderos et al. (2000, 2008). Measurements were taken with a (BCM) Leitz Wetzlar binocular compound microscope. The temperature of the water and air were measured with an alcohol thermometer in degrees Celsius. For larval terms and abbreviations of measurements, see Anjos-Santos et al. (2017); for pupal terms, see Borkent (2014). Studied specimens are deposited in the collection of the Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Argentina (MLPA).

Results

Bezzia chilensis Spinelli & Ronderos, 2001

Figs 1a–f, 2a–d, 3a–g, 4a–f

Bezzia chilensis : Spinelli and Ronderos 2001: 752 (male, female; Chile); Spinelli and Cazorla 2003: 47 (Argentina records); Borkent and Spinelli 2007: 93 (in Neotropical catalogue); Spinelli and Marino 2009: 205 (species list from Patagonia); Borkent 2016: 160 (in online world catalog).

Description of fourth instar larva

(Figs 1a–f, 2a–d). Head capsule (Figs 1a–c, 2a) pale brown, about 2 times longer than wide, apex slightly bent ventrally, HL 0.30–0.32 (0.31, n = 7) mm; HW 0.12–0.19 (0.16, n = 7) mm, HR 1.70–2.41 (2.00, n = 6); SGW 0.083–0.116 (0.098, n = 6) mm; SGR 1.29–1.82 (1.66, n = 6). Setae simple, thin, medium to long sized, chaetotaxy as in Figure 1a–c. Antenna bottom-shaped, small, length 0.01 (n = 3) mm. Labrum (Fig. 1c) longer than wide, not extending beyond hypostoma, with three pairs of anterolateral sensilla styloconica; palatum (Fig. 1d) with two pairs of closely spaced sensilla, one trichoidea, one campaniform sensillum; messors (Figs 1d, 2a) small, gently sclerotized, curved structures, situated away from mandibles, without scopae; palatal bar present (Fig. 1d), triangular, situated immediately posterior to messors. Mandible (Figs 1c–f, 2a, d) hooked, curved, strongly sclerotized, apical tooth long, deep fossa mandibularis on ectal surface; MDL 0.045–0.073 (0.052, n = 6) mm, MDW 0.02 (n = 6) mm. Maxilla (Fig. 1c–e) with pyriform sensillum, galeolacinia with lacinial sclerite 1 (Fig. 1e) and lacinial sclerite 2 (Fig. 1c–f) with 2 setae, one medium-sized stout, other short; maxillary palpus (Fig. 1c–f) cylindrical, with 4 subapical papillae, three medium-sized, one elongate. Hypostoma (Fig. 1c–f) finely toothed, with 6 or 7 stout lateral teeth. Epipharynx (Fig. 2a, c) less massive, with 2 combs: ventral comb with 5 stout, short teeth, dorsal comb with 7 or 8 long, pointed teeth on posterior edge; lateral arms elongate; LAW 0.048–0.050 (0.049, n = 4) mm, DCW 0.025–0.038 (0.028, n = 4) mm. Hypopharynx (Fig. 2a) elongate, thin, gently sclerotized, arms slender, without fringe. Thoracic pigmentation uniformly pale yellowish. Caudal segment (Fig. 2b) about 2.7 times as long as wide, with one pair of long, stout setae “o”, one medium-sized, thin setae “i”, one pair of short, thin setae “l1”. CSL 0.51–0.57 (0.55, n = 5) mm, CSW 0.21–0.28 (0.25, n = 5) mm, CSR 1.88–2.71 (2.7, n = 5), OL 0.20–0.30 (0.27, n = 6) mm, OD 0.020–0.072 (0.049, n = 5) mm.

Figure 1. 

Bezzia chilensis Spinelli & Ronderos, 2001, fourth instar larva (SEM) a Head chaetotaxy, ventrolateral view b Head chaetotaxy, dorsolateral view c Head capsule detail, oblique anteroventral view d Head capsule detail, ventral view e Mouthpart, ventral view f Hypostoma and mouthparts, ventral view. Antennae (AN); collar (CO); fossa mandibularis (MF); galeolacinea (GL); hypostoma (HY); labrum (LB); lacinial sclerite 1 (LC1); lacinial sclerite 2 (LC2); mandible (MD); messors (MS); maxilla (MX); maxillary palpus (MP); palatal bar (PB); palatum (PL); sensilla campaniformia (SCa); sensilla styloconica (SS); sensilla trichoidea (ST); Head capsule chaetotaxy: o, parahypostomal setae; p, posterior perifrontal setae; q, postfrontal setae; s, anteroperifrontal setae; t, prefrontal setae; u, mesolateral setae; v, posterolateral setae; w, anterolateral setae; x, parantennal setae; y, ventral setae.

Figure 2. 

Bezzia chilensis Spinelli & Ronderos, 2001, fourth instar larva a Head capsule detail, ventral view b Caudal segment, ventral view c Epipharynx, ventral view d Left mandible, ventral view. Dorsal comb (DC); epipharynx (epy); fossa mandibularis (MF); hypopharynx (hyp); mandible (MD); messors (MS); ventral comb (VC). Caudal segment chaetotaxy: i, inner setae; l1, first lateral seta; o, outer setae. Scale bars: 0.05 mm (a–c), 0.01 mm (d).

Description of pupa

Female (Figs 3e–g, 4a–f). Habitus as male pupa (Fig. 3a). Exuviae brownish. Total length 3.14–3.91 (3.48, n = 13) mm. Head: Dorsal apotome (Fig. 3f) with disc surface bearing rounded small tubercle mesally, anterior margin slightly rounded, covered with stout, rounded spinules; posterior margin slightly concave, mesal portion with pair of raised areas; antenna extending posteriorly to midleg; mouthparts (Fig. 4a) with mandible well developed; palpus extending to posterolateral margin of labium; labium separated medially by labrum; apex of labrum slightly rounded; sensilla: dorsal apotomals (Fig. 3f): DA-1-H elongate, stout seta, located on rounded small tubercle, DA-2-H campaniform sensillum; DAL 0.08–0.10 (0.09, n = 10) mm; DAW 0.20–0.23 (0.22, n = 10) mm; DAW/DAL 2.24–2.64 (2.46, n = 10); two dorsolateral cephalic sclerites (Fig. 4b): DL-1-H short, stout seta, DL-2-H campaniform sensillum; clypeal/labrals (Fig. 4a): CL-1-H medium-sized thin seta CL-2-H long, thin seta; oculars (Fig. 4a): O-1-H short, stout seta, O-2-H campaniform sensillum, O-3-H long, stout seta. Cephalothorax rectangular, surface predominantly smooth with small spinules on mesonotum, between bases of respiratory organs. Length of cephalothorax 1.12–1.35 (1.22, n=13) mm, width 0.81–1.00 (0.92, n = 13) mm. Thorax: Respiratory organ (Fig. 3d, e) smooth, medium-sized, pale brown except distal 1/3 darker, about 3.05–5.70 (4.38, n = 13) times longer than broad, almost straight with rounded apex, with convoluted row of 30–35 (33, n = 13) pores closely abutting at apex and apicolateral 1/4 of respiratory organ; pedicel slender, P 0.024–0.040 (0.034, n = 13) mm; RO length 0.20–0.24 (0.22, n = 13) mm, RO width 0.04–0.08 (0.05, n = 13) mm; P/RO 0.10–0.18 (0.15, n=13); sensilla: three anteromedials (Fig. 4b): AM-1-T medium-sized, stout seta, AM-2-T long, thin seta, AM-3-T campaniform sensillum; one anterolateral (Fig. 4b): AL-1-T medium-sized, stout seta; dorsals (Fig. 4c): D-1-T, D-2-T, D-4-T, long, thin setae, D-3-T campaniform sensillum, D-5-T medium-sized, thin seta, all on small rounded tubercle; supraalar (SA-2-T) campaniform sensillum; metathoracic (Fig. 4d): M-3-T campaniform sensillum, near anterior margin of metathorax. Abdomen: Abdominal segments with dark spots, with simple setae, covered with very small spicules, segment 9 (Fig. 3g) approximately twice as long as wide, length 0.24–0.29 (0.27, n = 13) mm, width 0.14–0.20 (0.17, n = 13) mm; dorsal surface covered with pointed spicules; ventral surface smooth; terminal process moderately short, nearly straight, base wide, smooth, extreme tips darker, length 0.07–0.10 (0.09, n = 13) mm, width 0.03–0.04 (0.04, n = 13) mm; sensilla: tergite 1 (Fig. 4e) with two anteromesals: D-2-I medium-sized, thin seta, D-3-I long, thin seta; 5 posterior sensilla: D-4-I, D-7-I campaniform sensilla, D-5-I minute seta, D-8-I medium-sized, thin seta, D-9-I long, thin seta; 3 lateral sensilla: L-1-I long, thin seta, L-2-I, L-3-I medium-sized, thin setae; segment 4 (Fig. 4f): D-2-IV medium-sized, thin seta, D-3-IV long, thin seta, D-4-IV, D-7-IV campaniform sensilla, D-5-IV short, stout seta, D-8-IV medium-sized, stout seta, D-9-IV long, thin seta; L-1-IV short, stout seta, L-2-IV long, thin seta, L-3-IV, L-4-IV medium-sized, stout setae, all on bifid tubercles with wide base and pointed apex; V-5-IV, V-6-IV, V-7-IV medium-sized, stout setae, all on elongate tubercles; segment 9 (Fig. 3g) with D-5-IX campaniform sensillum.

Figure 3. 

Bezzia chilensis Spinelli & Ronderos, 2001, male pupa (a–d), female pupa (e–g) a Habitus, ventral view b, f Dorsal apotome, dorsal view c, g Segment 9, ventral view d Respiratory organ, anterodorsal view (SEM) e Respiratory organ ventral view. Antenna (AN); dorsal apotome sensilla (DA-1-H, DA-2-H); genital lobe (GL); pore (p); pedicel (P); respiratory organ (MD); segment 1 (1st seg.); segment 4 (4th seg.); segment 9 (Seg. 9); terminal process (TP). Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Figure 4. 

Bezzia chilensis Spinelli & Ronderos, 2001, female pupa a Mouthparts, ventral view b Anterolateral, anteromedial and dorsal lateral sensilla, ventral view c Dorsal sensilla and supraalar sensillum, dorsal view d Metathoracics chaetotaxy, dorsal view e Tergite 1 chaetotaxy, dorsal view f Segment 4 chaetotaxy, dorsal and ventral view. Anterolateral sensillum (AL-1-T); anteromedial sensilla (AM-1-T, AM-2-T, AM-3-T) ; clypeal/labral sensilla (CL-1-H, CL-2-H); dorsal sensilla (D-1-T, D-2-T, D-3-T, D-4-T, D-5-T); dorsal sensilla of segment 1 (D-2-I, D-3-I, D-4-I, D-5-I, D-7-I, D-8-I, D-9-I); dorsal sensilla of segment 4 (D-2-IV, D-3-I, D-4-I, D-5-IV, D-7-IV, D-8-IV, D-9-IV); dorsolateral cephalic sclerite sensilla (DL-1-H, DL-2-H); lateral sensilla of segment 1 (L-1-I, L-2-I, L-3-I); lateral sensilla of segment 4 (L-1-IV, L-2-IV, L-3-IV, L-4-IV); ocular sensilla (O-1-H, O-2-H, O-3-H); metathoracic sensillum (M-3-T); supraalar sensillum (SA-2-T); ventral sensilla of segment 4 (V-5-IV, V-6-IV, V-7-IV). Scale bar: 0.05 mm.

Male (Fig. 3a–d). Similar to female with usual sexual differences: Total length 2.68–3.77 (n = 15) mm. Dorsal apotome (Fig. 3b) darker with anterior margin slightly triangular, DAL 0.07–0.10 (0.08, n = 12) mm; DAW 0.18–0.22 (0.19, n = 12) mm, DAW/DAL 2.0–3.0 (2.4, n = 12). Cephalothorax: length 0.97–1.17 (1.09, n = 15) mm, width 0.70–0.85 (0.77, n = 13) mm. Respiratory organ (Fig. 3d), about 3.36–4.90 (4.01, n = 15) times longer than broad, P 0.020–0.036 (0.031, n = 15) mm; RO length 0.168–0.244 (0.205, n = 15) mm, RO width 0.040–0.060 (0.051, n = 15) mm; P/RO 0.106–0.196 (0.156, n = 15). Segment 9 (Figs 3a, c) darker, ventral surface covered anteriorly with pointed spicules, length 0.124–0.288 (0.241, n = 15) mm, width 0.120–0.248 (0.153, n = 15) mm; terminal process length 0.07–1.00 (0.08, n = 15) mm, width 0.032–0.044 (0.037, n = 15) mm; genital lobe short, each slightly longer than wide and apex anterior to base of terminal process.

Material examined

Argentina, Neuquén Province, Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi, río Cuyín Manzano, 40°44'13"S, 71°09'17"W, alt. 760 m, 06-II-2009, A. Siri, 2 females and 1 male (with pupal exuviae). Argentina, Chubut Province, Ruta Nacional 40, arroyo La Cancha, 42°45'35.9"S, 71°06'28.4"W, alt. 860 m, 13-II-2015, adults emerged in laboratory 14-II-2015, D. Anjos-Santos and P. Pessacq, 1 female, 3 males (with pupal exuviae); same data except adult emerged 15-II-2015, 1 male (with pupal exuviae); same data except adults emerged 17-II-2015, 2 females, 1 male (with pupal exuviae); same data except adults emerged 18-II-2015, 2 females, 1 male (with pupal exuviae); same data except adults emerged 17-II-2015, 1 female, 1 male (with pupal exuviae); same data except pupa emerged in laboratory 26-II-2015, adult emerged 28-II-2015, 1 female (with larval and pupal exuviae); same data except adult emerged 03-III-2015, 1 female (with pupal exuviae); Argentina, Chubut prov., Ruta Nacional 40, arroyo Madera, 42°39'57.59"S, 71°04'19.72"W, alt 930 m, 18-II-2015, pupa emerged in laboratory 23-II-2015, adult emerged 28-II-2015, D. Anjos-Santos and P. Pessacq, 1 male (with larval and pupal exuviae); same data except pupae emerged 23-II-2015, adults emerged 02-III-2015, 2 females (with larval and pupal exuviae); same data except pupa emerged 24-II-2015, 1 male (with pupal exuviae); same data except pupa emerged 26-II-2015, 1 male (with pupal exuviae); Argentina, Chubut Province, arroyo Montoso, 42°42'01.26"S; 70°48'12.36"W, alt. 630 m, 14-I-2016, pupa emerged in laboratory 16-I-2016, D. Anjos-Santos and P. Pessacq, 1 male (with pupal exuviae); same data except pupa emerged 17-I-2016, adult emerged 21-I-2016, 1 female (with larval and pupal exuviae); same data except pupa emerged 17-I-2016, adult emerged 22-I-2016, 1 male (with larval and pupal exuviae); same data except pupa emerged 20-I-2016, adult emerged 25-I-2016, 1 male (with larval and pupal exuviae).

Material examined by SEM

Argentina, Chubut Province, Ruta Nacional 40, arroyo Madera, 42°39'57.59"S, 71°04'19.72"W, alt. 930 m, 18-II-2015, D. Anjos-Santos and P. Pessacq, 3 larvae, 1 male pupa.

Distribution

Argentina (Salta, Neuquén, Río Negro and Chubut provinces); Chile (Valparaiso Province).

Bionomics

The immature described here were collected in northwestern Argentine Patagonian steppe (Fig. 5): río Cuyín Manzano, located in the Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi in southern Neuquén Province and arroyo La Cancha, arroyo Madera and arroyo Montoso, that flow into tributaries of the Chubut river in northern Chubut Province. All sites are surrounded by shrubby steppe, composed mainly of willow tree (Salicaceae) and grass, and are used as a water source for cattle. Immatures were collected in puddles of water with a rocky or sandy bottom, on the bank of the streams, among macrophytes (Ceratophyllum L.), bryophytes and filamentous algae. Larvae were distributed through all the puddles, but pupae only in the bordering vegetation. In La Cancha, Madera and Montoso streams water temperature ranged between 15–19 °C, and air temperature between 16–25 °C. In Cuyín Manzano river, the air and water temperature data were not measured. Under laboratory conditions, the larvae took 4–14 days to reach the pupal stage, and 2–7 days to complete its development to the adult stage. Pupae found at the site completed their development in 1–8 days. Larvae of Bezzia chilensis showed the same movement reported by Spinelli et al. (2013) for B. galesa, alternated fast undulating movements with static periods. Pupae observed on trays showed a semi-circular, slow abdominal movement typical of other ceratopogonid pupae.

Figure 5. 

Collection sites of Bezzia chilensis Spinelli & Ronderos, 2001.

Taxonomic discussion

In a series of contributions reviewing the Neotropical Bezzia, Spinelli and Wirth (1989a, b, 1990, 1991) recognized the subgenus Bezzia, including the gibbera, nobilis and punctipennis groups, and the subgenus Homobezzia including the dentifemur, glabra, venustula and brevicornis groups. These papers also present diagnoses, descriptions and keys to subgenera and species groups, the last ones based mainly on adult characters. Spinelli et al. (2012) suggested a cladistic analysis is needed to propose a phylogenetic classification of the genus Bezzia.

Borkent (2014) presented a generic pupal description of Bezzia and in his taxonomic discussion mentioned the difficulties in diagnosing the genus and affirmed that providing a key to the species in a given region is superfluous. The current knowledge of immature stages of the Neotropical Bezzia is incipient. The subgenus Bezzia has only two species known as larvae and two known as pupae and the subgenus Homobezzia has five known as larvae and 10 known as pupae, with some of these immatures being poorly described and impossible to compare with their congenerics. Main diagnostic characters for larvae and pupae are given in the Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

The immatures of Bezzia chilensis are herein compared with four species belonging to the subgenus Homobezzia; these four are the only ones which have a complete description: B. blantoni (described by Ronderos and Spinelli 2009), B. galesa (described by Spinelli et al. 2013), B. roldani (described by Ronderos et al. 2007) and B. ventanensis (described by Spinelli et al. 2012).

The larva of Bezzia chilensis shares with B. blantoni, B. galesa and B. roldani features typical of predatory larvae: hooked mandibles with fossa mandibularis, epipharynx less massive with 2 combs and cylindrical maxillary palpus (Hribar and Mullen 1991). The labrum and palatum sensilla are very similar among the species. However, the larvae of these three species can be distinguished from B. chilensis by the features given in Table 1 and by the following additional characters: Bezzia blantoni by the maxilla with a blunt sensillum, epipharynx with 4–6 stout, short teeth and auxiliary sclerite shorter; Bezzia galesa by the maxilla with a blunt sensillum, galeolacinia with a stout, sharp, pointed and medium-sized seta, epipharynx with 6 or 7 stout and small teeth on the ventral comb; and Bezzia roldani by the W-shaped palatal bar and the ventral comb of the epipharynx bearing 4 or 5 stout and short teeth. The larva of B. ventanensis remains unknown.

Table 1.

Main diagnostic characters for the known larvae of Neotropical species of Bezzia.

Subgenus species Head capsule ratio Head capsule setae Hypostoma Fossa mandibularis Scopae Maxillary palpus Hypopharyngeal fringe Caudal segment Reference
Bezzia bivittata ? ? Finely toothed Deep Absent 3 subapical papillae Absent ? Hribar and Mullen (1991)
nobilis 2.7 times as long as wide Medium-sized to long Finely toothed Deep Absent ? Absent 2.5 times as long as wide Wirth (1983b)
Homobezzia blantoni 2.6–3.4 times as long as wide Minute Finely toothed, not flanked by stout teeth Shallow Present, with 5 teeth 2–3 subapical papillae Present 4 times as long as wide Ronderos and Spinelli (2009)
chilensis 2 times as long as wide Medium-sized to long Finely toothed flanked by 6–8 stout teeth Deep Absent 4 subapical papillae Absent 2 times as long as wide This study
galesa 2.8 times as long as wide Minute Finely toothed, with strong lateral teeth Deep Absent 4 subapical papillae Absent 5–6 times as long as wide Spinelli et al. (2013)
glabra 4 times as long as wide ? ? ? ? ? ? 10 times as long as wide Wirth (1983a)
roldani 3.4 times as long as wide Minute Finely toothed, not flanked by stout teeth Shallow Absent 2–3 subapical papillae Absent 5 times as long as wide Ronderos et al. (2007)

With regard to the pupa, besides the features given in Table 2, these four species can be distinguished from B. chilensis as follows: B. blantoni: O-2-H absent, AL-2-T present; B. galesa: D-5-T, D-7-I and D-7-IV absent; Bezzia roldani O-2-H and V-5-IV absent; Bezzia ventanensis AM-3-T absent.

Table 2.

Main diagnostic characters for the known pupae of Neotropical species of Bezzia.

Subgenus Species Dorsal apotomals sensilla Dorsolateral cephalic sclerite sensilla Clypeal/labral sensilla Oculars sensilla Respiratory organ apex Respiratory organ pores Sensillum D-7-IV Terminal process of segment 9 References
Bezzia nobilis 1 seta, 2 campaniform 3 setae 2 setae 1 seta, 1 campaniform Rounded 16–25 on distal 1/4 Present Short Borkent (2014); Wirth (1983b)
gibbera 1 seta, 1 campaniform ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Borkent (2014)
Homobezzia blantoni 1 seta, 2 campaniform 1 seta 2 setae 2 setae Rounded 31–35 on distal apex Absent Long Ronderos and Spinelli (2009); Spinelli and Wirth (1989)
brevicornis 1 seta, 1 campaniform ? ? ? Asymmetrical (outer side curved, inner side straight) 23–25 on distal 1/3 ? Short Spinelli and Wirth (1989)
bromeliae 1 seta ? ? ? Asymmetrical (outer side curved, inner side straight) 4 on distal apex ? Short Spinelli and Wirth (1991)
chilensis 1 seta, 1 campaniform 1 seta, 1 campaniform 2 setae 2 setae, 1 campaniform Rounded 31–41 on distal apex and apicolateral 1/4 Present Short This study
galesa 1 seta, 2 campaniform 1 seta 2 setae 2 setae, 1 campaniform Rounded 50–60 on distal apex, 10–11 lateral ones Absent Long Spinelli et al. (2013)
glabra 1 seta, 2 campaniform ? ? ? Rounded 50–60 on distal 1/3 ? Long Wirth (1983a)
pulchripes 1 seta, 2 campaniform ? ? ? Bilobed 40–52 on distal apex Absent Long Mayer (1959)
roldani 1 seta, 2 campaniform 2 setae 2–3 setae 2 setae Rounded 50–60 on distal 1/3 Absent Long Ronderos et al. (2007); Spinelli and Wirth (1989)
snowi 1 seta, 1 campaniform ? ? ? Rounded 11–12 on distal 1/4 ? Short Spinelli and Wirth (1991)
ventanensis 1 seta, 1 campaniform 2 setae 2 setae 1 seta, 1 campaniform Asymmetrical (outer side curved, inner side straight) 13–15 on distal 1/3 Absent Short Spinelli et al. (2012)

In addition, a detailed revision during this study revealed that D-4-T of B. galesa is a seta and was erroneously described as campaniform sensillum by Spinelli et al. (2013) and D-5-T and D-8-I of B. ventanensis described by Spinelli et al. (2012) as campaniform sensilla are long, a thin seta and a medium-sized seta, respectively.

The pupae of Bezzia chilensis and the other Neotropical known pupae of Bezzia share the features of the generic description given by Borkent (2014). However, we agree on the need of a revision of the genus within a phylogenetic analysis and the redescription of the incompletely described immatures, emphasizing as well the importance of describing immatures for a better knowledge of the genus.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Lic. Luz Manzo for technical assistance and Dr Miguel Archangelsky for the critical reading of the manuscript. This work was funded by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET, Argentina), PIP114 201101 00405 and PIP 0305. This is the contribution number 131 of LIESA (CIEMEP).

References

  • Anjos-Santos D, Cazorla CG, Ronderos MM (2017) First description of immature stages and adult females of Stilobezzia (Acanthohelea) megatheca (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from Patagonia. Annales de Limnologie-International Journal of Limnology 53: 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2017005
  • Borkent A (2014) The pupae of the biting midges of the world (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), with a generic key and analysis of the phylogenetic relationships between genera. Zootaxa 3879: 1–327. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3879.1
  • Borkent A, Spinelli GR (2007) Neotropical Ceratopogonidae (Diptera: Insecta). In: Adis J, Arias JR, Rueda Delgado G, Wantzen KM (Eds) Aquatic Biodiversity in Latin America (ABLA).Vol. 4. Pensoft, Sofia-Moscow, 482–553.
  • Hribar LJ, Mullen GR (1991) Comparative morphology of the mouthparts and associated feeding structures of biting midge larvae (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute 26: 1–71.
  • Ronderos MM, Díaz F, Sarmiento P (2008) A new method using acid to clean and a technique for preparation of eggs of biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) for scanning electron microscope. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 134: 471–476. https://doi.org/10.3157/0002-8320-134.3.471
  • Ronderos MM, Spinelli GR, Díaz F (2007) Redescription of the last instar larva and pupa of Bezzia roldani Spinelli & Wirth (DipteraCeratopogonidae). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 66: 21–28. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3220/322028490004.pdf
  • Ronderos MM, Spinelli GR, Sarmiento P (2000) Preparation and mounting of biting midges of the genus Culicoides Latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) to be observed with Scanning Electron Microscope. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 126: 125–132.
  • Spinelli GR, Marino PI (2009) Estado actual del conocimiento de la familia Ceratopogonidae en la Patagonia (Diptera: Nematocera). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 68: 201–208. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/3220/322028484015.pdf
  • Spinelli GR, Ronderos MM (2001) First record of the genus Bezzia in Chile, with a description of a new species of the venustula group (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 74: 737–740. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2001000400002
  • Spinelli GR, Wirth WW (1989) The Neotropical predaceous midges of the genus Bezzia (DipteraCeratopogonidae) Part I. The glabra and brevicornis groups. Limnobios 2: 762–778.
  • Spinelli GR, Ronderos MM, Cazorla CG (2012) A new species of Bezzia Kieffer from Argentina (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Zootaxa 3232: 62–68.
  • Spinelli GR, Ronderos MM, Omad G, Pessacq P, Marino PI (2013) A new species of Bezzia galesa Kieffer from Argentinean Patagonia (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Annales Zoologici 63: 263–274. https://doi.org/10.3161/000345413X669568
  • Wirth WW (1983a) The North American predaceous midges of the Bezzia bicolor group (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Florida Entomologist 66: 292–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/3494125
  • Wirth WW (1983b) A review of the American predaceous midges of the Bezzia nobilis group (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 85: 670–685. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/16180091
login to comment