Research Article |
Corresponding author: Miłosz Adam Mazur ( mazurmilosz@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Miguel Alonso-Zarazaga
© 2019 Miłosz Adam Mazur.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Mazur MA (2019) Redescription of the forgotten New Caledonian weevil genus Callistomorphus Perroud, 1865 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Eugnomini) with descriptions of eight new species. ZooKeys 821: 45-83. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.821.29019
|
Callistomorphus is one of the “forgotten” genera of the tribe Eugnomini inhabiting rain forest in New Caledonia. In this paper, the genus Callistomorphus and the type species C. farinosus are redescribed. Eight new species, Callistomorphus fundatus sp. n., C. gibbus sp. n., C. malleus sp. n., C. minimus sp. n., C. rutai sp. n., C. szoltysi sp. n., C. torosus sp. n. and C. turbidus sp. n., are described, originating from the main island of New Caledonia. Illustrations and SEM photographs of the external morphology and the male and female terminalia are provided, as well as dorsal habitus colour photographs of the adults, a key to the species, a distribution map, and a discussion of the systematic position of Callistomorphus within the tribe.
Beetles, biodiversity, endemic species, New Caledonia, new taxa, taxonomy, weevils
For many years, only three genera of Eugnomini from New Caledonia were known: Pactola Pascoe, 1876, with two species (a third was synonymised by
Callistomorphus was described three years after the fundamental work of Lacordaire was published (
Since that time, the systematic position of the genus Callistomorphus has not been discussed in detail. In Junk’s “Coleopterorum Catalogus” (Pars, 140) (
It is probable that Voss, who studied the Eugnomini in the 1930s and gave them subfamily status, did not examine any Callistomorphus specimens. He mentioned the genus only once (1937), vaguely indicating its similarity to the genus Macropoda (now a synonym of Pactola, see above). Subsequently, he pointed out the necessity for a closer examination of the genus and its affiliation to Stephanorhynchina, which was the species group established by him one year earlier (
A more detailed study of the Eugnominae was carried out by
Another comprehensive taxonomic paper on the Eugnominae was that of
In this paper, a redescription of the genus Callistomorphus is presented, as well as descriptions of eight new species from New Caledonia, along with a key to all the species within the genus and comments about the taxonomic position of the genus within the tribe.
This study is based on 26 specimens. Holotypes are deposited in the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris (
Measurements were made using a calibrated stereomicroscopic grid eyepiece (C-W10xB/22) in a Nikon SMZ-800 stereomicroscope. Genitalia preparations were made according to the standard method of macerating the separated abdomen for 5–10 min in a warm KOH solution. After dissection, if necessary, terminal structures were stained with a solution of Chlorazol Black E in glycerine for 5–10 min under visual control. Habitus photographs were taken using a Canon Power Shot A640 camera connected with the stereomicroscope and processed using the Helicon Focus v. 4.50 and PhotoFiltre v. 6.1 software programmes. All drawings were made by using the Corel Draw package. Scanning electron micrographs were taken using a Hitachi S-3400N.
The nomenclature of the male terminalia and abbreviations of particular measurements (partly modified) follows
al abdomen length (measured through the middle of ventrites);
apw pronotum width at anterior margin;
arw width of rostrum apex;
aw abdomen maximum width;
bew width of elytral base (measured through the middle of humeral calli);
bpw pronotum width at the base;
el elytra length (measured in top view in a position when the base and apex of elytra are at the same level);
eyl eye length (measured in top view, when the head is positioned horizontally);
frw minimum frons width;
hl head length (measured in top view, from anterior edge of pronotum to fore margin of eyes);
hw head width (measured across the middle of the eyes);
lb length of body exclusive of rostrum;
lvl last ventrite length (measured through the middle);
lvw last ventrite maximum width;
mpw minimum pronotal width;
pl pronotum length (measured through the middle);
rl rostrum length, measured in dorsal view, when base and apex of rostrum are at the same level;
scl antennal scape length.
All dimensions are given in millimetres.
The distribution maps (Fig.
Callistomorphus
Perroud, 1865:
Distinguished from other genera of Eugnomini by the following combination of characters: rostrum elongate, longer than pronotum alone, but shorter than head and pronotum taken together; in dorsal view with distinct, polished longitudinal carina. Mandibles elongate, distinctly protruding beyond apical margin of rostrum, not exodont, overlapping. Head behind eyes distinctly constricted. Pronotum strongly narrowed before apical part with pair of various developed tubercles near middle of length. Elytra strongly scabrous with numerous, small tubercles and pair of large, elongate tubercles near middle of length (next as “middle tubercles”). Legs elongate, all femora strongly broadened, with distinct, enlarged tooth that is usually larger than half of maximum femoral width; all tibiae distinctly sinuate, without mucro in male; tarsal claws free at base, glabrous, only regularly extended basally.
Body length (lb) – 7.20–14.70 mm.
Body colour and vestiture (Figs
Rostrum (Figs
Head (Figs
General morphology of Callistomorphus: 1 C. farinosus Perr., head and rostrum, dorsal view 2 C. malleus sp. n., head and rostrum ventral view 3 C. fundatus sp. n., ventral view of eye with magnification of setae between ommatidia (a C. fundatus sp. n., b C. gibbus sp. n.) 4 C. farinosus Perr., apical part of rostrum with antennal insertion, dorsal view 5 C. turbidus sp. n., mouth parts 6 C. gibbus sp. n., head and pronotum, frontodorsal view; a medial tubercles on pronotum, b thickened front “wall” of pronotum (greened) 7 C. rutai sp. n., fore coxae 8 C. gibbus sp. n., hind femur, dorsal view 9 C. fundatus sp. n., abdomen a C. torosus sp. n. b C. fundatus sp. n., apical setae on last ventrite 10 C. malleus sp. n., hind leg, lateral view 11 C. turbidus sp. n., hind tarsus 12 C. rutai sp. n., tarsal claws.
Pronotum (Figs
Elytra (Figs
Legs (Figs
Abdomen (Figs
Male terminalia (Figs
Apodemes shorter than penis body; basally narrow, than distinctly extended, laterally flattened.
Tegmen (Figs
Spiculum gastrale (Figs
Female terminalia (Figs
Sexual dimorphism. Callistomorphus is a genus with a very indistinct sexual dimorphism. Specimens within particular species vary in size and proportion of the body and values of these parameters overlap each other (Tab.
Distribution. The genus is endemic in New Caledonia, known only from the main island, Grande Terre. Localities where particular species were collected are shown in Fig.
Biology. The detailed biology of species is unknown. Although other members of Eugnomini have been reared from dead wood, subcortical tissues, live stems, galls, and the leaves or fruits of many species of plants from different families (e.g.
Remarks. Members of the genus are variable in terms of their size, body proportions and colour. However, they are separated from the other genera of the tribe by the set of characters presented in the above diagnosis. Many of the species are also the biggest members of the tribe. Despite their large size and characteristic body form, members of this genus are not common in museum collections or in the field. For example, during the French fieldwork conducted in the 1980s and 1990s, where fogging and standard collecting methods were used (pers. com. Hélène Perrin), no single specimen of Callistomorphus was found (see the label data of the specimens deposited in
Indices for species of Callistomorphus Perr., where: m – male, f – female.
C. farinosus | C. fundatus | C. gibbus | C. malleus | C. minimus | C. rutai | C. szoltysi | C. torosus | C. turbidus | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
hw/hl | m: 1.07 | m: 1.07 | m: 1.00–1.20 | m: 1.00–1.20 | f: 1.17 | m: 1.08 | f: 1.08 | m: 0.92 | m: 0.92 |
f: 1.00–1.10 | f: 1.00–1.33 | f: 1.00 | |||||||
eyl/hl | m: 0.50–0.53 | m: 0.43 | m: 0.45–0.55 | m: 0.50–0.60 | f: 0.56 | m: 0.50 | f: 0.50 | m: 0.38 | m: 0.42 |
f: 0.47–0.53 | f: 0.45–0.55 | f: 0.46 | |||||||
rl/pl | m: 1.09–1.12 | m: 1.04 | m: 1.00–1.12 | m: 1.17–1.21 | f: 1.21 | m: 1.20 | f: 1.20 | m: 1.12 | m: 1.11 |
f: 1.03–1.11 | f: 1.12–1.24 | f: 1.07 | |||||||
rl/arw | m: 4.00–4.22 | m: 3.38 | m: 3.00–3.17 | m: 3.80–4.30 | f: 3.40 | m: 4.00 | f: 3.35 | m: 3.50 | m: 2.86 |
f: 3.67–4.00 | f: 4.00–4.50 | f: 3.33 | |||||||
scl/rl | m: 0.74–0.78 | m: 0.85 | m: 0.82–0.90 | m: 0.75–0.80 | f: 0.76 | m: 0.80 | f: 0.80 | m: 0.82 | m: 0.75 |
f: 0.82–0.83 | f: 0.70–0.85 | f: 0.83 | |||||||
bpw/pl | m: 0.97–1.03 | m: 1.04 | m: 1.06–1.15 | m: 1.00–1.05 | f: 1.21 | m: 1.08 | f: 1.20 | m: 1.04 | m: 1.17 |
f: 0.97–1.00 | f: 0.95–1.10 | f: 1.11 | |||||||
bpw/apw | m: 1.46–1.52 | m: 1.35 | m: 1.26–1.47 | m: 1.25–1.35 | f: 1.70 | m: 1.35 | f: 1.43 | m: 1.30 | m: 1.24 |
f: 1.55–1.64 | f: 1.28–1.38 | f: 1.35 | |||||||
mpw/apw | m: 0.71 | m: 0.65 | m: 0.63–0.71 | m: 0.66–0.68 | f: 0.90 | m: 0.65 | f: 0.67 | m: 0.65 | m: 0.59 |
f: 0.70–0.73 | f: 0.61–0.69 | f: 0.61 | |||||||
mpw/bpw | m: 0.47–0.49 | m: 0.48 | m: 0.48–0.50 | m: 0.48–0.53 | f: 0.53 | m: 0.45 | f: 0.47 | m: 0.50 | m: 0.48 |
f: 0.45–0.49 | f: 0.48–0.50 | f: 0.45 | |||||||
el/bew | m: 1.52 | m: 1.65 | m: 1.48–1.55 | m: 1.56–1.66 | f: 1.68 | m: 1.55 | f: 1.55 | m: 1.51 | m: 1.47 |
f: 1.48–1.58 | f: 1.50–1.68 | f: 1.55 | |||||||
al/aw | m: 1.04-1.06 | m: 1.18 | m: 0.94-1.20 | m: 1.08-1.17 | f: 1.15 | m: 1.05 | f: 0.98 | m: 1.00 | m: 1.06 |
f: 1.02-1.06 | f: 1.06-1.20 | f: 0.93 | |||||||
lvw/lvl | m: 2.20-2.50 | m: 1.75 | m: 2.14-2.37 | m: 2.25-2.57 | f: 2.60 | m: 2.75 | f: 2.27 | m: 2.56 | m: 2.13 |
f: 2.33-2.55 | f: 2.13-2.38 | f: 2.78 |
Callistomorphus farinosus Perroud, 1865: 170, pl. 1, fig. 7
The largest member of the genus. Last three antennomeres of funicle wider than long. Apical margin of pronotum widely concave medially in dorsal view. Elytra with characteristic whitish spot in the area from medial tubercles to 7th intervals, not reaching apical part. Penis body distinctly, regularly narrowed from base to apex in lateral view. Parameroid lobes of tegmen slightly divided apically. Female abdominal tergite VIII with maximum width near middle.
Body length (lb) – 12.80–14.70 mm.
Body colour and vestiture (Fig.
Dorsal habitus colour photographs of New Caledonian species from the genus Callistomorphus: 13 C. farinosus Perr., lectotype, female with original labels 14 C. fundatus sp. n., male, holotype 15 C. gibbus sp. n., holotype, male 16 C. malleus sp. n., paratype, female 17 C. minimus sp. n., holotype, female 18 C. rutai sp. n., holotype, male 19 C. szoltysi sp. n., holotype, female 20 C. torosus sp. n., paratype, female 21 C. turbidus sp. n., holotype, male. Scale bar = 5 mm.
Head (Figs
Pronotum (Figs
Elytra (Figs
Abdomen (Figs
Male terminalia (Figs
Female terminalia (Figs
Measurements. ♂: al 4.80–5.00, apw 2.10–2.40, arw 0.90, aw 4.60–4.70, bew 5.80–6.00, bpw 3.20–3.50, el 8.80–9.10, eyl 0.70–0.80, frw 0.70–0.80, hl 1.40–1.50, hw 1.50–1.60, lb 13.60–13.70, lvl 0.90–1.00, lvw 2.20–2.30, mpw 1.50–1.70, pl 3.30–3.40, rl 3.60–3.80, scl 2.80.
♀: al 4.70–5.40, apw, 2.00–2.20, arw 0.90–1.00, aw 4.40–5.20, bew 5.30–6.40, bpw 3.10–3.60, el 8.40–9.50, eyl 0.70–0.80, frw 0.60–0.70, hl 1.50, hw 1.50–1.65, lb 12.80–14.70, lvl 0.90–1.00, lvw 2.10–2.40, mpw 1.40–1.60, pl 3.20–3.60, rl 3.30–4.00, scl 2.70–3.30.
Lectotype, 1♀ (here designated, see Remarks) – “Callistomorphus farinosus, Perroud Kanala” – handwritten; “type” – handwritten; “♀” – printed; small red circle; Lectotype Callistomorphus farinosus Perroud, 1865; Museum Paris, coll. B. Perroud (
1♀ – New Caledonia (S); 22°01.9'S, 166°28.0'E, Dzumac Mts 900 m (Mt Ouin road junction), 28.12.2006 night collecting, leg. M. Wanat & R. Dobosz (MNHW).
1♂ – New Caledonia (N), 20°57'19.1"S, 165°17'27.”E, Pic d’Amoa (Povilla), 18.11.2010 450 m, end 0.5 km of road, leg. M. Wanat, R. Ruta (MNHW).
1♂ – New Caledonia (S), 22°02'13.6"S, 166°29'44.5"E, Mt. Dzumac (base), 1.5–3 km E of Ouin rd jct., 6.12.2010, 800 m, rainforest, leg. M. Wanat, R. Ruta (MNHW).
1♀ – New Caledonia (N); 20°57'23.7"S, 165°17'27.7"E, Pic d’Amoa (Povila), 450 m, end 0.5 km of road, 22.11.2008, leg. M. Wanat (MNHW).
Kuschel selected a female specimen from Perroud’s original series as a syntype in 2004 but this action was never published. To ensure stability in nomenclature and to clarify identity of this species I herein designate the same female specimen as the lectotype. I take this action under the article 74.1 of the Code (ICZN).
This species can be distinguished from other members of the genus by the following set of characters: elytra elongate, 1.6 × as long as wide across humeral calli; colour of body generally brown; pronotum with apical margin almost straight, corrugated due to numerous, small tubercles, basal margin concave; last ventrite less than 2 × wider than long with shallow apical depression.
Body length (lb) – 11.40 mm.
Body colour and vestiture (Fig.
Head (Figs
Pronotum (Figs
Elytra (Figs
Abdomen (Figs
Male terminalia (Figs
Female – unknown
Measurements. ♂: al 4.50, apw, 2.00, arw 0.80, aw 3.80, bew 4.80, bpw 2.70, el 7.90, eyl 0.60, frw 0.70, hl 1.40, hw 1.50, lb 11.40, lvl 1.20, lvw 2.10, mpw 1.30, pl 2.60, rl 2.70, scl 2.30.
Holotype, ♂ (here designated) – New Caledonia (N); 20°57.2'S, 165°17.5'E; Pic d’Amoa 360 m; 14.01.2007 forest at light; leg. M. Wanat & R. Dobosz (
This epithet is derived from the Latin word “funda” (slingshot) and refers to the shape of spiculum gastrale. A variable adjective.
Only one specimen of this new species has been found within the studied collections. A set of characteristic features, including the almost uniform brown colour, elongate elytra and last ventrite, as well as terminal structures, indicates that this is a new species.
This species can be distinguished from other members of the genus by the following suite of characters: apical margin of pronotum concave in dorsal view, base sinuate, protruding towards elongate scutellum. Rostrum distinctly bent in middle of length.
Body length (lb) – 7.90–9.60 mm.
Body colour and vestiture (Fig.
Head (Figs
Pronotum (Figs
Elytra (Figs
Abdomen (Figs
Male terminalia (Figs
Female – unknown.
Measurements. ♂: al 3.20–3.60, apw, 1.40–1.90, arw 0.60–0.70, aw 2.90–3.50, bew 3.40–4.20, bpw 1.80–2.50, el 5.30–6.50, eyl 0.50–0.60, frw 0.50–0.60, hl 0.90–1.10, hw 1.00–1.20, lb 7.90–9.60, lvl 0.70–0.85, lvw 1.50–2.00, mpw 0.90–1.20, pl 1.70–2.20, rl 1.80–2.20, scl 1.60–1.80.
Holotype, ♂ (here designated) – New Caledonia (N); 21°08'56.0"S, 165°19'20.9"E; Aoupinié (refuge), 400 m, at light; 25.11.2006; leg. M. Wanat (
Paratypes: 1♂ – New Caledonia (N); 21°08.9'S, 165°19.4'E; Aoupinié (refuge), 18.01.2007, 420 m, at light, leg. M. Wanat & R. Dobosz (MNHW).
1♂ – New Caledonia (N), 20°57.2'S, 165°17.5'E, Pic d’Amoa, 360 m, 14.01.2007, forest at light, leg. M. Wanat & R. Dobosz (MNHW).
1♂ – New Caledonia (S), 22°01'54.5"S, 166°28'02.6"E, Mt. Ouin Rd, 900 m, 0–0.5 km N of Dzumac jct, 5.12.2010, night coll., leg. M. Wanat & R. Dobosz (MNHW).
This epithet is the Latin noun “gibbus” (protuberance, hump) and refers to a pair of large tubercles on elytra. A noun in apposition.
The shape of pronotum together with the lateral profile of the rostrum are characteristic for this new species. The terminalia are quite similar to C. fundatus sp. n. but differ in the shape of the apex of the penis (in dorsal view more rounded, in lateral view more upwardly directed in C. gibbus sp. n.). One small specimen was quite similar to C. turbidus sp. n. in bodily proportions, but distinctly different in the shape of the pronotum, rostrum length and form of terminal structures.
This species can be distinguished from other members of the genus by the following suite of characters: rostrum gently curved, regularly narrowed to apex in lateral view. Middle tubercles on elytra flattened, lower than maximal width at base. Apex of penis in lateral view expanded into small tubercles. Apical lobes of female abdominal sternite VIII with characteristic shape (Fig.
Body length (lb) – 8.60–10.50 mm.
Body colour and vestiture (Fig.
Head (Figs
Pronotum (Figs
Elytra (Figs
Abdomen (Figs
Male terminalia (Figs
Female terminalia (Figs
Measurements. ♂: al 3.50–4.00, apw, 1.60–1.80, arw 0.60–0.70, aw 3.00–3.7, bew 3.50–4.30, bpw 2.00–2.40, el 5.80–6.90, eyl 0.60, frw 0.40–0.50, hl 1.00–1.20, hw 1.15–1.20, lb 8.60–10.40, lvl 0.70–0.80, lvw 1.60–2.00, mpw 1.05–1.20, pl 1.90–2.40, rl 2.30–2.80, scl 1.80–2.20.
♀: al 3.80–4.10, apw, 1.60–1.80, arw 0.60–0.70, aw 3.30–3.80, bew 3.90–4.30, bpw 2.20–2.40, el 6.00–7.20, eyl 0.50–0.60, frw 0.50–0.60, hl 0.9–1.20, hw 1.10–1.25, lb 9.50–10.50, lvl 0.80, lvw 1.70–2.00, mpw 1.10–1.20, pl 2.10–2.50, rl 2.50–2.80, scl 1.90–2.10.
Holotype, ♂ (here designated) – New Caledonia (S); 22°04'08.9"S, 166°26'48.0"E; Dzumac road; S of Mts Couvélé rd jct; 870→670 m beating; 31.10.2008; leg. M. Wanat (
Paratypes:
1♂ – New Caledonia (S); 22°05.9'S, 168°38.3'E; Riviére Bleue Parc; 23.12.2006, 190 m, refuge; sifting forest litter; leg. R. Dobosz (
1♂ – New Caledonia (S); 22°14.9'S, 166°49.7'E; Pic du Pin, base; 25.12.2006, 280 m, forest & plantation; leg. R. Dobosz & M. Wanat (
1♂ – New Caledonia (S); 22°10'19.2"S, 166°45'40.0"E; Bois du Sud, 220 m, at light; 25.10.2008; leg. M. Wanat (MNHW).
1♀ – New Caledonia (S); 22°10'22.4"S, 166°45'47.9"E; Bois du Sud, 220–250 m, beating along track entering forest reserve; 20.10.2008; leg. M. Wanat (MNHW).
1♀ – New Caledonia (S); 22°05.8'S, 166°40.2'E; Riviére Bleue: Gue de la; 22.12.2006, 140 m Pourina; night coll. (lamp & beating); leg. M. Wanat & R. Dobosz (MNHW).
1♀ – New Caledonia (S); 22°01.9'S, 166°28.0'E; Dzumac Mts, 900 m; Mt. Ouin, road junction; 28.12.2006, night collecting; leg. M. Wanat & R. Dobosz (MNHW).
2♀♀ – New Caledonia (S); 22°12'21.2"S, 166°40'46.9"E; Col des Deux Tétons, 30.10.2010; humid forest, 220–250 m; leg. M. Wanat & R. Ruta (MNHW).
1♀ – New Caledonia (S); 22°06.0'S, 166°39.3'E; Riviére Bleue, Pont Germain to kaori géant (left river side), 160–180 m; 22.01.2007; leg. M. Wanat (MNHW).
This epithet is derived from the Latin noun “malleus” (hammer) and refers to the shape of female sternite VIII. A noun in apposition.
The species is variable in size and colour but easily distinguished by the elongate elytra with relatively small medial tubercles and weakly curved rostrum. Also, penis and female sternite VIII are characteristic.
The smallest member of the genus with several characteristic features. Eyes strongly convex, distinctly protruding above margin of head in lateral view. Pronotum distinctly narrowed from base to approximately three-quarters of length, apically sides only slightly expanded towards anterior margin; dorsal surface glabrous, medially only with small, obtuse tubercle. Elytra slender, elongate; without distinct medial tubercles, only with single, small tubercles on intervals. Apical part of elytra and sides of pronotum dark brown, in contrast to colour of the rest parts of body.
Body length (lb) – 7.20 mm.
Body colour and vestiture (Fig.
Head (Figs
Pronotum (Figs
Elytra (Figs
Abdomen (Figs
Female terminalia (Figs
Male – unknown
Measurements. ♀: al 3.00, apw 1.00, arw 0.50, aw 2.60, bew 2.85, bpw 1.70, el 4.80, eyl 0.50, frw 0.40, hl 0.80, hw 1.05, lb 7.40, lvl 0.50, lvw 1.30, mpw 0.90, pl 1.40, rl 1.70, scl 1.30.
Outline of the eye, dorsal view: 76 C. farinosus Perr., male 77 C. fundatus sp. n., male 78 C. gibbus sp. n. 79 C. malleus sp. n. 80 C. minimus sp. n. 81 C. rutai sp. n. 82 C. szoltysi sp. n. 83 C. torosus sp. n. 84 C. turbidus sp. n. Last ventrite: 85 C. farinosus Perr., male 86 C. fundatus sp. n., male 87 C. gibbus sp. n., male 88 C. malleus sp. n., male 89 C. minimus sp. n., female 90 – C. rutai sp. n., male 91 C. szoltysi sp. n., female 92 C. torosus sp. n., male 93 C. turbidus sp. n., male.
Holotype, ♀ (here designated) – New Caledonia (S); 21°37'17.8"S, 165°52'38.6"E; Plateau de Dogny, 9.11.2010, 960 m; leg. R. Ruta (
This epithet is the Latin adjective “minimus” (small, little), the new species is the smallest member of the genus.
C. minimus sp. n. is a very characteristic species. It is easy to distinguish from other members of the genus by small size, shape of pronotum (not extended apically), reduced tubercles on elytra and pronotum and contrasting coloration of the body.
This species can be distinguished from other member of the genus by the following set of characters: medial tubercle on elytra very high; smaller tubercles numerous, very distinct and sharp; rostrum slender, slightly curved; penis narrowed before widely rounded apex; parameroid lobes of tegmen distinctly divided from midlength.
Penis: 94 C. farinosus Perr. 95 C. fundatus sp. n. 96 C. gibbus sp. n. 97 C. malleus sp. n. 98 C. rutai sp. n. 99 C. torosus sp. n. 100 C. turbidus sp. n. Male pygidium, ventral view: 101 C. farinosus Perr. 102 C. fundatus sp. n. 103 C. gibbus sp. n. 104 C. malleus sp. n. 105 C. rutai sp. n. 106 C. torosus sp. n. 107 C. turbidus sp. n – ventral and frontal view.
Body length (lb) – 10.80 mm.
Body colour and vestiture (Fig.
Head (Figs
Pronotum (Figs
Elytra (Figs
Abdomen (Figs
Male terminalia (Figs
Female – unknown
Measurements. ♂: al 4.30, apw 2.00, arw 0.75, aw 4.10, bew 4.80, bpw 2.70, el 7.40, eyl 0.60, frw 0.60, hl 1.20, hw 1.30, lb 10.80, lvl 0.80, lvw 2.20, mpw 1.30, pl 2.50, rl 3.00, scl 2.40.
Holotype, ♂ (here designated) – New Caledonia (S); 22°11'S, 166°30'E; Koghi Mts.; humid forest, 500–550 m; 21.01.2004, leg. M. Wanat (
This species is dedicated to my colleague Rafał Ruta, PhD (Wrocław, Poland), a great field researcher and specialist in Scirtidae (Coleoptera), who collected some specimens used in this paper, including the holotype of C. minimus sp. n.
In lateral view the head and rostrum are similar to those of C. malleus sp. n. (rostrum elongate, slightly curved). However, C. rutai sp. n. has more prominent medial tubercles on the pronotum and elytra, the outline of elytra in dorsal view is more robust, and the shape of the penis is characteristic.
Male. Tegmen: 108 C. farinosus Perr. 109 C. fundatus sp. n. 110 C. gibbus sp. n. 111 C. malleus sp. n. 112 C. rutai sp. n. 113 C. torosus sp. n. 114 C. turbidus sp. n. Spiculum gastrale: 115 C. farinosus Perr. 116 C. fundatus sp. n. 117 C. gibbus sp. n. 118 C. malleus sp. n. 119 C. rutai sp. n. 120 C. torosus sp. n. 121 C. turbidus sp. n.
Together with C. farinosus Perr. and C. torosus sp. n. this new species is one of the largest members of the genus. Easy to distinguish by several features: body colour generally whitish; apical margin of pronotum distinctly rounded in lateral view, slightly concave in dorsal view; antennae slender with long, protruding setae; medial tubercles on elytra relatively small; elytra strongly convex in lateral view. Male abdominal sternite VIII with short apodeme, apical lobe enlarged.
Body length (lb) – 12.30 mm.
Body colour and vestiture (Fig.
Head (Figs
Female. Abdominal tergite VIII: 122 C. farinosus Perr. 123 C. malleus sp. n. 124 C. minimus sp. n. 125 C. szoltysi sp. n. 126 C. torosus sp. n. Pygidium: 127 C. farinosus Perr. 128 C. malleus sp. n. 129 C. minimus sp. n. 130 C. szoltysi sp. n. 131 C. torosus sp. n. Spermatheca: 132 C. farinosus Perr. 133 C. malleus sp. n. 134 C. szoltysi sp. n.
Pronotum (Figs
Elytra (Figs
Abdomen (Fig.
Female terminalia (Figs
Male – unknown
Measurements. ♀: al 4.50, apw 2.10, arw 0.90, aw 4.60, bew 5.50, bpw 3.00, el 8.50, eyl 0.60, frw 0.65, hl 1.50, hw 1.40, lb 12.30, lvl 1.10, lvw 2.50, mpw 1.40, pl 2.50, rl 3.00, scl 2.40.
Holotype, ♀ (here designated) – New Caledonia (S); 22°05.9'S, 166°40.7'E; Rivière Bleue Parc Kaori géant, 180 m; humid forest, 22.12.2006, rainforest; leg. R. Dobosz & M. Wanat. Additional museums (
With great pleasure I dedicate this species to Henryk Szołtys (Brynek, Poland), excellent coleopterologist, field researcher and my first entomology teacher.
This large member of the genus is easy to distinguish from other similarly-sized species (C. farinosus Perr. and C. torosus sp. n.) by the whitish colour of the dorsal vestiture, funicle antennomeres with protruding, elongate setae, the robust pronotum and distinctly smaller medial tubercles on elytra.
Together with C. farinosus Perr. and C. szoltysi sp. n. it is one of the largest members of the genus. Body uniformly dark brown. Eyes weakly convex. Elytra in lateral view weakly convex; medial tubercles large; in dorsal view sides of elytra with distinctly protruding small tubercles. Apical part of penis in lateral view strongly upturned, narrowed, apically pointed. Ovipositor gonocoxite and stylus of similar length, set diagonally to each other.
Body length – 11.30–12.00 mm.
Body colour and vestiture (Fig.
Head (Figs
Pronotum (Figs
Elytra (Figs
Abdomen (Figs
Male terminalia (Figs
Female terminalia (Figs
Measurements. ♂: al 4.10, apw 2.00, arw 0.80, aw 4.10, bew 4.90, bpw 2.60, el 7.20, eyl 0.50, frw 0.60, hl 1.30, hw 1.20, lb 11.00, lvl 0.90, lvw 2.30, mpw 1.30, pl 2.50, rl 2.90, scl 2.30.
♀: al 4.30, apw 2.30, arw 0.85, aw 4.60, bew 5.30, bpw 3.10, el 8.00, eyl 0.60, frw 0.60, hl 1.30, hw 1.30, lb 12.00, lvl 0.90, lvw 2.50, mpw 1.40, pl 2.80, rl 3.00, scl 2.50.
Holotype, ♂ (here designated) – New Caledonia (N); 20°23.9'S, 164°32.0'E; Mandjélla (subsummit), 11.01.2007, 700–750 m, night beating; leg. M. Wanat & R. Dobosz (
Paratype, ♀ – New Caledonia (N); 20°23.9'S, 164°31.9'E; Mandjélla (summit), 10.01.2007, 750–780 m, beating, montane rainforest; leg. M. Wanat & R. Dobosz (MNHW).
This epithet is derived from the Latin adjective “torosus” (muscular) and refers to “muscular” shape and size.
Easy to distinguish by combination of several features: apical and basal margin of pronotum slightly concave, apical margin in lateral view distinctly protruding towards head; rostrum relatively short and stout, less than 3 × as long as maximum width apically; strongly curved; penis strongly upwards before two-thirds of length; pygidium apically with distinct depression in ventral view; lateral margin of pygidium in ventral view irregular.
Body length (lb) – 8.50 mm.
Body colour and vestiture (Fig.
Head (Figs
Pronotum (Figs
Elytra (Figs
Abdomen (Figs
Male terminalia (Figs
Female – unknown
Measurements. ♂: al 3.40, apw 1.70, arw 0.70, aw 3.20, bew 3.80, bpw 2.10, el 5.60, eyl 0.50, frw 0.55, hl 1.20, hw 1.10, lb 8.50, lvl 0.80, lvw 1.70, mpw 1.00, pl 1.80, rl 2.00, scl 1.50.
Holotype, ♂ (here designated) – New Caledonia (N); 20°24'00.3"S, 164°31'40.4"E; Mt. Mandjélla 700–780 m; montane rainforest; 20.11.2008, leg. M. Wanat. (
This epithet is derived from the Latin adjective “turbidus” (confused, impatient) and refers to my feelings after I wasted too much time trying to create any suitable name for this creature.
By the short, distinctly curved rostrum, small size and very characteristic male terminalia (unique form of pygidium, strongly upwardly-directed penis body in lateral view), this species is easy to distinguish within the genus. A female is unknown but may be easily to distinguished based on the description presented above.
1 | Elytra and pronotum glabrous, without prominent tubercles (Figs |
C. minimus sp. n. |
– | Elytra and pronotum strongly scabrous with distinct medial tubercles and numerous, small tubercles on entire elytra (e.g. Figs |
2 |
2 | Apical margin of pronotum strongly concave in dorsal view, protruding towards head in lateral view (e.g. Figs |
3 |
– | Apical margin of pronotum straight or slightly concave in dorsal view, not protruding towards head in lateral view (e.g. Figs |
6 |
3 | Body length greater than 10 mm; medial tubercles on elytra relatively short, subequal to one-fifth of elytral length (e.g. Fig. |
4 |
– | Body length less than 10 mm; medial tubercles relatively elongate, subequal to one-third of elytral length (e.g. Fig. |
5 |
4 | Medial tubercles on pronotum weakly protruding, obtuse (Fig. |
C. farinosus |
– | Medial tubercles on pronotum strongly protruding, rounded (Fig. |
C. szoltysi sp. n. |
5 | Base of pronotum medially rounded (Fig. |
C. gibbus sp. n. |
– | Base of pronotum slightly concave (Fig. |
C. turbidus sp. n. |
6 | Rostrum weakly curved, almost straight, slightly narrowed to apex, 4.00 × as long as maximum width or longer (e.g. Fig. |
7 |
– | Rostrum regularly curved, indistinctly narrowed to apex, 3.30–3.60 × as long as maximum width (e.g. Fig. |
8 |
7 | Medial tubercles on elytra short, less than 2 × width of intervals in the middle of elytra; numerous, small tubercles on entire elytra mostly obtuse (Fig. |
C. malleus sp. n. |
– | Medial tubercles on elytra tall, greater than 2 × width of intervals in the middle of elytra; numerous, small tubercles on entire elytra mostly sharp, pointed (Fig. |
C. rutai sp. n. |
8 | Elytra elongate, 1.64 × as long as wide (Fig. |
C. fundatus sp. n. |
– | Elytra shorter, 1.55 × as long as wide (Fig. |
C. torosus sp. n. |
For a clear presentation of measurements, important for distinguishing particular species, all indices are presented in Table
As was mentioned in the introduction, the genus Callistomorphus was forgotten or ignored for decades in most of the previously published research on Eugnomini.
Currently, the tribe seems to be not monophyletic, without any clear synapomorphies uniting all the genera.
1. Maxilla with elongate second segment of the palpus – present in Callistomorphus; maxilla not elongate in some Eugnomus, Pactola, Pactolotypus, Rasilinus, Udeus Champion, 1902.
2. Head elongate behind the eyes with the temples as long as, or longer than, the eyes – present in Callistomorphus; head not elongate in: Koghicola Mazur, 2014, Omoides Boheman, 1859, some Pactola, Pactolotypus, Udeus.
3. Antennal scrobes oblique, turning rapidly downwards and continued on the lower side of rostrum – present in Callistomorphus; within Eugnomini different (not continued) only in Goneumus Marshall, 1937.
4. Funicle with seven antennomeres – present in Callistomorphus; six-segmented in Nyxetes Pascoe, 1870, Oreocalus May, 1993, Pactolotypus.
5. Hind wings well developed – present in Callistomorphus and all other genera except flightless Pactolotypus, some Eugnomus and Stephanorhynchus.
6. Elytra with large tubercles or conspicuous cones – very characteristic for many genera, including Callistomorphus also, but absent in some others, including: Ancyttalia Zimmerman, 1994, Eugnomus, Goneumus, Hoplocneme, Koghicola, Omoides, Oreocalus, some Pactola, Pactolotypus, Rhopalomerus, Tysius Pascoe, 1875, Udeus.
7. Front coxae contiguous – present in Callistomorphus, but coxae separate (sometimes slightly) in Gonoropterus Broun, Omoides, Pactolotypus and Udeus.
8. At least posterior femora distinctly extended, strongly toothed – characteristic also for Callistomorphus, weakly extended with small tooth in Ancistropterus White, 1846, Eugnomus and Goneumus.
9. Hind tibiae strongly, regularly curved or distinctly sinuate – present in Callistomorphus, hind tibiae straight in many genera, including: Ancistropterus, Ancyttalia, Eugnomus, Goneumus, Hoplocneme, Icmalius Broun, 1893, Nyxetes, Pactolotypus, Rhopalomerus, Scolopterus, Tysius, Udeus.
10. Apex of fore tibiae not mucronate in male – lack of mucro in Callistomorphus, tibiae are mucronate in Ancistropterus, Omoides, some Rhopalomerus and Udeus.
Callistomorphus is a genus that seems to be closely related to Stephanorhynchus, as was previously suggested by
Currently, Eugnomini needs a detailed revision and a comprehensive diagnosis. Since the last study of
I would like to thank the following people for kindly offering me the material used in this study: Marek Wanat (MNHW) and Roland Dobosz (