Research Article |
Corresponding author: Yongjie Wang ( wangyjosmy@foxmail.com ) Academic editor: Shaun Winterton
© 2018 Hui Fang, Dong Ren, Jiaxi Liu, Yongjie Wang.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Fang H, Ren D, Liu J, Wang Y (2018) Revision of the lacewing genus Laccosmylus with two new species from the Middle Jurassic of China (Insecta, Neuroptera, Saucrosmylidae). ZooKeys 790: 115-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.790.28286
|
The genus Laccosmylus Ren & Yin, 2003 belonging to Saucrosmylidae was erected by using a single hind wing only. Based on new fossil material and re-examination of the type specimen, the diagnosis of the genus is emended with supplementary forewing characters, reported for the first time. In addition, two new species Laccosmylus cicatricatus sp. n. and Laccosmylus latizonus sp. n. are described.
Daohugou, Inner Mongolia, Jiulongshan Formation, Mesozoic, Ningcheng
The family Saucrosmylidae is an enigmatic lineage of Neuroptera, characterised by the typically large body size, extensively expanded RA-RP area and complicated venation (
Notably, the saucrosmylids are restricted to two Middle Jurassic localities, i.e., the Jiulongshan Formation of China and the Kubekovo locality of Russia. To date, eight genera with nine species have been formally described (
This type of taxonomic treatment, i.e., establishing a new taxon based on a single hind wing, is common among Saucrosmylidae and other large neuropterans (
All the specimens reported here were collected from the Middle Jurassic Jiulongshan Formation at Daohugou Village, Ningcheng County, Inner Mongolia, northeastern China (
ScP (= Sc, subcosta) subcostal posterior;
R radius;
RA (= R1, first branch of radius) radius anterior;
RP (= Rs, radial sector) radius posterior;
RP1 (= Rs1) proximal-most branch of RP;
RP2 (= Rs2) branch of RP distal to RP1;
M media;
MA media anterior;
MP media posterior;
Cu cubitus;
CuA cubitus anterior;
CuP cubitus posterior;
AA1-AA3 (= 1A-3A) first to third anal veins.
Laccosmylus calophlebius Ren & Yin, 2003.
Laccosmylus calophlebius Ren & Yin, 2003; Laccosmylus cicatricatus sp. n.; Laccosmylus latizonus sp. n.
Large body size, body length more than 35 mm, forewing length approx. 60–80 mm, hind wing length approx. 55–76 mm. Forewing elongated, with undulant outer margin. Hind wing broader and shorter than forewing, with slightly undulant outer margin. Forewing and hind wing with similar venation, i.e., presence of 6–7 rows of smaller veinlets between costal veinlets; RA-RP area expanded, with 4 to 7 rows of irregular cells; RP sharply bent towards RA anteriorly, forming an angle of approx. 45°; space between other longitudinal veins producing 1 to 4 rows of cells.
Laccosmylus Ren & Yin, 2003 was assigned to Saucrosmylidae according to its expanded RA area and complicated wing venation of hind wing (Ren & Yin, 2003). Nevertheless, this remarkable genus was established without forewing information which prevent to conduct full comparisons with other saucrosmylids. Herein, the newly collected fossil specimen related to the genus provides significant forewing information to address the issue. The new specimen CNU-NEU-NN2018007P/C of L. cicatricatus sp. n. clearly belongs to Laccosmylus because of the similar characters of hind wing (Figs
This new species of L. cicatricatus sp. n. and L. latizonus sp. n. together with a new specimen of L. calophlebius Ren & Yin, 2003 provide significant information, especially the supplement of forewing features, to corroborate the status of Laccosmylus. Laccosmylus is definitely different from Rudiosmylus Ren & Yin, 2003, Ulrikezza Fang, Ren & Wang, 2015 and Huiyingosmylus
Hind wing with many hyaline patch-like markings and mottled with some irregular pigmented patch-like markings, and the costal region with intermittent marking; outer margin undulant. RA-RP area expanded with 6–7 rows of irregular cells. One or two rows of cells present among RP branches and MA-CuA area.
Hind wing length approx. 70 mm, width approx. 35 mm. Costal veinlets distally forked, interlinked by 6–7 rows of smaller veinlets. ScP fused with RA apically. RP with 5 main branches before RP sharply bent towards RA anteriorly. MA forked at 1/3 part of hind wing or forked terminally (Figure
Holotype: CNU-NEU-NN99003, only hind wing preserved. New material: CNU-NEU-NN2018006P/C, only hind wing preserved. These specimens are deposited in the Key Laboratory of Insect Evolution and Environmental Changes, College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Jiulongshan Formation, Daohugou locality (41°18.5'N, 119°13'E (DDM)), Shantou Township, Ningcheng County, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia, China; Middle Jurassic, Bathonian-Callovian boundary.
The new material CNU-NEU-NN2018006P/C evidently belongs to the L. calophlebius Ren & Yin, 2003 according to the same hind wing shape, marking and venation. This species was first erected based on only one specimen with a hind wing. Moreover, at that time, this species was the representative with generic diagnosis for the Laccosmylus, which led some unilateral diagnosis of the genus and species. Here, the MA in the new specimen shows the previous diagnosis of L. calophlebius with MA early branching needs to be changed. In addition, individual differences might have happened frequently in Saucrosmylidae, which has multiple venation.
Large body size, body length more than 37.8 mm, forewing length approx. 60–80 mm, hind wing length approx. 55–76 mm. Forewing distinctly painted with three irregular pigmented marking, outer margin deeply undulant. Hind wing with many hyaline patch-like markings and mottled with some irregular pigmented patch-like markings, and the entire dark costal region. The venation of fore- and hind wings: RA-RP area expanded with 6–7 rows of irregular cells; 1–4 rows of cells present among RP branches and MA-CuA area.
Forewing elongated, with irregularly undulant outer margin. Forewings most heavily pigmented, with two irregular hyaline stripes and a patch-like marking near the outer margin. Trichosors present along distal half of wing margin. Costal veinlets distally forked, interlinked by 6–7 rows of smaller veinlets. ScP fused with RA apically. RA-RP area expanded, with 6–7 rows of irregular cells. RP with five main branches before RP sharply bent towards RA anteriorly. One to three rows of crossveins existing between main longitudinal veins from radius area to anal area. MA forked terminally. The first branch of MP forming several dichotomous branches terminally, the second branch of MP with multiple pectinate branches terminally. CuA forming a large triangular area, with numerous oblique pectinate branches. CuP much shorter and simpler than CuA, with only two main branches. AA1 with approx. eight pectinate branches, while AA2 and AA3 almost invisible.
Hind wing broader and shorter than forewing, with outer margin slightly undulant. The membrane of hind wing covered with numerous dark and hyaline patch-like markings. Trichosors preserved along distal half of wing margin. Venation of hind wing similar to forewing from costal section to media area. CuP in hind wing with approx. eight branches, more complicated than those in forewing. AA1 partially preserved. AA2 and AA3 invisible.
Holotype: CNU-NEU-NN2018007P/C, sex unknown, body, and four wings preserved. This specimen is deposited in Inner Mongolia Ningcheng Daohugou Paleontological Protection Museum, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia, China.
Jiulongshan Formation, Daohugou locality (41°18.5'N, 119°13'E (DDM)), Shantou Township, Ningcheng County, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia, China; Middle Jurassic, Bathonian-Callovian boundary.
The Latin cicatricatus is derived from mottles and patches on pigmented wings of this species.
The new species belongs to the Laccosmylus according to the features of hind wing, i.e. the broad hind wing shape, undulate outer margin, similar venation, and similar distinct colour markings. L. cicatricatus sp. n. can be distinguished from the type species L. calophlebius by the following characters in hind wing, e.g., the entire dark costal region vs. the costal region with intermittent marking on L. calophlebius, and more rows of cells present among RP branches and MA-CuA area than in L. calophlebius. In addition, a hyaline spot on the hind wing apex presents in the L. calophlebius but absent in L. cicatricatus sp. n.
Forewing with four pigmented patch-like markings. Hind wing with three pigmented stripes, and the third stripe interlinked with a fuscous patch covering wing apex. The venation of fore- and hind wing: RA area forming 4–5 rows of irregular cells; 1 to 2 rows of cells between longitudinal veins from radius area to anal area.
Forewing more than 54.4 mm long, partially preserved, outer margin unknown (Figure
Hind wing length 56–59 mm, width 22–26 mm. Hind wing broad, with outer margin slightly undulant, same shape as the type species L. calophlebius (Figures
Holotype: CNU-NEU-NN2018008P/C, only hind wing preserved; Paratypes: CNU-NEU-NN2018009, four wings partially preserved and joined together; CNU-NEU-NN2018010P/C, only hind wing partially preserved. These specimens are deposited in the Key Laboratory of Insect Evolution and Environmental Changes, College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Jiulongshan Formation, Daohugou locality (41°18.5'N, 119°13'E (DDM)), Shantou Township, Ningcheng County, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia, China; Middle Jurassic, Bathonian-Callovian boundary.
The Latin latizonus is derived from the stripe-like wing markings of this species.
The new species evidently belongs to Laccosmylus according to the emended diagnosis of the genus, i.e., the same broad hind wing shape, undulate outer margin and similar venation, and even the arrangement of wing markings. Laccosmylus latizonus sp. n. can be easily distinguished from L. calophlebius and L. cicatricatus sp. n. by the following characters of the hind wing markings, i.e. three distinct pigmented stripes in the L. latizonus vs. scattered patch-like markings on the other two species. In addition, the venation of these species are also distinctively different, e.g., L. latizonus sp. n. with 4–5 rows of irregular cells between RA and RP vs. 6–7 rows of irregular cells in the other two species; relatively simpler cross-veins in L. latizonus sp. n. in radial sector than in the other two species.
We sincerely thank Dr. Xingyue Liu, Alexander Khramov, Vladimir Makarkin, Sonja Wedmann, and an anonymous reviewer’s critical comments to improve this paper. We also thank Dr. Chungkun Shih (Capital Normal University and Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC) for the copy-editing to improve this paper. Moreover, we thank the Inner Mongolia Ningcheng Daohugou Paleontological Protection Museum (Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia, China) for providing the important specimen CNU-NEU-NN2018007P/C. This work is supported by National Science Foundation of China (grants 31672323, 31730087, 41372013 and 41688103), Youth Innovative Research Team of Capital Normal University, and Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT-17R75) and Project of High-level Teachers in Beijing Municipal Universities (IDHT20180518).