Print
A review of the family Trichopolydesmidae in North Africa with a description of a new species from Tunisia
expand article infoNesrine Akkari, Jean-Paul Mauriès§
‡ Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Wien, Austria
§ Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
Open Access

Abstract

A new species of the genus Haplocookia Brölemann, 1915 is described from Cap Bon Peninsula in Tunisia (North Africa) and a historical account of the poorly understood genera Haplocookia and Heterocookia Silvestri, 1898 is provided. Comments on the taxonomy of the family Trichopolydesmidae are presented, as well as an identification key to the trichopolydesmid species hitherto known from North Africa and an updated list of the Polydesmida in the region.

Keywords

Haplocookia, Heterocookia, identification key, North Africa, new species, taxonomy, Tunisia, updated checklist

Introduction

The order Polydesmida Leach, 1815 is represented in North Africa with five families, nine genera, and 22 species (see list below). Most of these species are endemic, marginally studied, and the taxonomy of several species and genera remain far from adequate (see Brölemann 1921, Schubart 1960, Tabacaru 1975, Mauriès 1984, Hoffman 1980, Akkari and Enghoff 2011, Enghoff et al. 2015). Among these, the genera Haplocookia Brölemann, 1915 and Heterocookia Silvestri, 1898, represented with four endemic species, have particularly been subject to taxonomic controversies and remain poorly understood in comparison with the rest of the polydesmidans in this region.

The genus Haplocookia is characterised by a deeply divided gonopod telopodite bearing short and simple processes. It was first established by Brölemann (1915) to accommodate Haplocookia mauritanica, he then described from Kabylie, Algeria. The genus remained monotypic until Schubart (1960) described Haplocookia franzi from Morocco. Haplocookia franzi Schubart, 1960 differs from the type species in the shape and processes of the distal part of the telopodite.

The genus Heterocookia was described much earlier, based on a species collected and described from Aϊn Draham Region in northwestern Tunisia by Silvestri (1896), Heterocookia novator (Silvestri, 1896). The genus counts a second species, Heterocookia tunisiaca Ceuca, 1967 described from Le Kef (Ceuca 1967). Both genera were first placed with six other genera in the tribe Trichopolydesmini (Brölemann 1915). Subsequently, Attems (1940) considered Haplocookia as a junior synonym of Heterocookia Silvestri, 1898, listing the species mauritanica under the genus Heterocookia in his Tierreich volume on Polydesmoidea. Two decades later, Schubart (1960) re-established Haplocookia as a valid genus, placed it in the family Vanhoeffeniidae Attems, 1914 and described a third species, H. franzi from several localities in Morocco. After two more decades, Hoffman (1980) also considered Haplocookia as a valid genus although he listed only one of the two described species, and assigned both Haplocookia and Heterocookia to the family Polydesmidae Leach, 1815. Mauriès (1984) was the last to discuss the taxonomy of the genus Haplocookia and he recommended placing it back in the family Trichopolydesmidae as previously suggested by Brölemann (1915) and Tabacaru (1975). Golovatch (2013) accepts both Haplocookia and Heterocookia in Trichopolydesmidae but in the latest taxonomic overview of the order Polydesmida, the genus Haplocookia is absent, whereas Heterocookia is listed under the family Trichopolydesmidae (Enghoff et al. 2015).

In this paper, we shed light on this obscure genus, describe a new species from Tunisia, Haplocookia enghoffi sp. n., and we further provide an updated checklist of the polydesmidan fauna of North Africa and an identification key to the species of Haplocookia and Heterocookia in this region.

Material and methods

The material of the new species was collected by NA, stored in 70% ethanol, and deposited in the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle (MNHN), Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum – University of Copenhagen (ZMUC), and Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (NHMW). Type material of Haplocookia mauritanica (MNHN) was examined for comparison. General characters were studied with a Wild Heerbrug 308700 stereomicroscope from Zeiss. Measurements and drawings were obtained using a camera lucida of a compound microscope Axioskop from Zeiss. Parts of some specimens were mounted on microscope preparations in lactic acid for examination. Micrographs were made in NHMW with a Nikon DS-F2.5 camera mounted on a Nikon SMZ25 stereomicroscope, using NIS-Elements Microscope Imaging Software with an Extended Depth of Focus (EDF) patch. All images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS6 and assembled in Adobe InDesign CS6.

Taxonomy

Order Polydesmida Leach, 1815

Family Trichopolydesmidae Verhoeff, 1910

Genus Haplocookia Brölemann, 1915

Haplocookia enghoffi sp. n.

Figs 1, 2, 3

Material

Holotype. Male, Tunisia, Cap Bon peninsula, Nabeul district, Jebel Abderrahman, Tunisia, 28.11.2004, N. Akkari leg. (MNHN – JC 380). Paratypes. 2 males, same data as holotype, N. Akkari leg. (MNHN – JC 380); 2 males, same data as holotype, N. Akkari leg. (NHMW 9366; NHMW 9367); 1 male, same data as holotype, N. Akkari leg. (ZMUC 00039891).

Additional material studied

Heterocookia novator, 1 male, Tunisia, Gov. Béja, Jebel El Jouza Amdoun, coll. & det. N. Akkari, MNHN; Heterocookia tunisiaca, 1 male, Algeria, wilaya El Tarf, El Kala, coll. Kahina Houd-Chaker, det. J.-J. Geoffroy, MNHN.

Diagnosis

A small polydesmidan of the genus Haplocookia, differing from its congeners in the shape of the distal part of the gonopod telopodite having simple curved processes.

Etymology

The species epithet honours Prof. Henrik Enghoff, a leading expert in myriapod systematics, author of major works on millipede taxonomy, and always a dear friend.

Description

(all measurements in mm). Pale, almost white (Figure 1), 20 body rings; length: 8−8.6 mm, width of the 10th metazonite, including paranota: 0.83−1.18; prozonite: 0.62−0.69.

Figure 1. 

Haplocookia enghoffi sp. n. ♂ paratype NHMW 9366: A Habitus, lateral view B Head and first body rings, lateral view.

Head occipital furrow not clear; mandibles and gnathochilarium with many small and regularly distributed setae, labrum with three teeth. Antenna (Figure 2A) 1.21 mm long, articles: 1st: 0.12, 2nd: 0.15, 3ed: 0.24, 4th: 0.16, 5th: 0.18, 6th: 0.26, 7th& 8th: 0.10, no special characters observed on 6thantennomere (only the usual external long seta).

Collum (Figure 2B) semicircular, not broader than head, flattened, with four irregular transverse rows of tubercles bearing stout and long setae, paranotal edges incised into three well-developed lobes, each one bearing 1 seta.

Metaterga (Figure 2C) with three transverse rows of 10−14 tubercles each bearing a short and stout seta (anterior and posterior rows with ten tubercles each, median row with variable number), median row closer to posterior one.

Paranota (Figure 2C) well expanded dorsolaterally, with four incised lobes bearing one long and stout seta each. Ozopore large, round and lying between the two posterior metatergal rows, present on rings 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15 −19.

Legs (Figure 2D) without special features, articles: coxa: 0.17, prefemur: 0.20, femur: 0.08, postfemur: 0.10, tibia: 0.15, tarsus: 0.10, apical claw circa three times longer than broad (length: 0.04, basal width: 0.01).

Figure 2. 

Haplocookia enghoffi sp.n. ♂ paratype MNHN- JC 380: A Antenna B Collum C 10th metatergite bearing ozopore D leg, tarsus and apical claw. Scale bar 0.1 mm.

Telson with two transverse rows of tubercles bearing long and strong setae, epiproct almost triangular, with relatively long setae.

Gonopods (Figure 3). Coxa (Cx) well-developed, hemispherical, internal margin not indented, external border extended in a large anterior rounded lobe with 2 long and 1 shorter setae seen in posterior view. Prefemoral part (p) with strong setae, medially folded and sheltering basal opening of seminal groove. Cannula (C) concealed in coxa, its tip entering mesal fold of the prefemur, where seminal groove (S) arises. Distal part of telopodite divided into solenomere (So) and tibiotarsus (t). Tibiotarsus simple, relatively broad and apically bent, with barely perceptible blunt bump on internal margin. Solenomere (So) slender and bent bearing the opening of the seminal groove at apex. Seminal groove (S) uniformly broad from femoral basis up to apex of solenomere, noticeably thickening at femoral level, just above bifurcation of telopodite.

Comments

H. tunisiaca is reported here for the first time from Algeria.

Figure 3. 

Haplocookia enghoffi sp. n. ♂ paratype: A Left gonopod, mesal view B Left gonopod, postero-lateral view. Abbreviations: C cannula, Cx Coxa, p prefemur, S seminal groove, So solenomere, t tibiotarsus. Scale bar 0.1 mm.

Discussion

Notes on the North African trichopolydesmids

Except for the special structure of the seminal groove (a small bulb-like extension, reminding of genus Polydesmus), the gonopod of Haplocookia enghoffi sp. n. is built in the same way as that of H. mauritanica and H. franzi, with a typically polydesmoid crescent-shaped telopodite arising from a large coxa (Figs 3, 5A, B). In all three species, the telopodite is divided into a tibiotarsus and a slender solenomere. However, these two processes show different configurations in the three species (Figs 3, 5A, B). In H. mauritanica, the two processes separate at the apical third of the telopodite and the solenomere is a very slender process orthogonal to the main telopodite axis. In H. franzi, the solenomere is a small and elongated branch, slightly bent and forked, laterally protected by a larger tibiotarsus. The telopodite is clearly indented in H. franzi, presenting a subapical triangular tooth in H. mauritanica, and only a small subapical blunt bump in H. enghoffi sp. n.

The genus Heterocookia includes two species from Tunisia, viz. H. novator (Figure 4A) and H. tunisiaca (Figure 4B), the latter is recorded here for the first time from El Tarf in Algeria. Both species are larger than the Haplocookia species despite sharing the same external characters. Their gonopods (Figure 5C, D) are characterised by a deep ramification of the telopodite, which clearly shows three slender processes composed of a simple solenomere, a more complex tibiotarsus, and a third process.

Figure 4. 

Heterocookia novator (Silvestri, 1896) and Heterocookia tunisiaca Ceuca, 1967, habitus. A Heterocookia novator (Tunisia, Gov. Béja, Jebel El Jouza Amdoun, coll. & det. N. Akkari, MNHN) B Heterocookia tunisiaca (Algeria, wilaya El Tarf, El Kala, coll. Kahina Houd-Chaker, det. J.-J. Geoffroy, MNHN).

Figure 5. 

North African Trichopolydesmidae, right gonopod in postero-lateral view: A Haplocookia mauritanica Brölemann, 1915 (redrawn after Brölemann 1915) B Haplocookia franzi Schubart, 1960 (redrawn after Schubart 1960) C Heterocookia novator (Silvestri, 1896) D Heterocookia tunisiaca Ceuca, 1967. Scale bar 0.1 mm.

Notes on the family Trichopolydesmidae

The taxonomy of the family Trichopolydesmidae has remained controversial. Verhoeff (1910) erected the subfamily Trichopolydesminae for the two genera Trichopolydesmus Verhoeff, 1898 and Bacillidesmus Attems, 1898. Later, Attems (1926, 1940) placed the genus Trichopolydesmus in the family Vanhoeffeniidae Attems, 1914. Although Verhoeff (1943) reestablished the Trichopolydesmidae as a full family, Schubart (1960) described Haplocookia franzi in the family Vanhoeffeniidae. The families Vanhoeffeniidae and Sphaerotrichopodidae were synonymised with Dalodesmidae by Jeekel (1956). Tabacaru (1975, 1980) provided a new circumscription of Trichopolydesmidae based on the works of Verhoeff (1943), Ceuca (1958, 1974) and Kraus (1957). In his survey, Tabacaru (1980) gathered in the same group five genera: the type genus Trichopolydesmus [including the subgenus Banatodesmus Tabacaru, 1980 he then described, and which was later treated by Mauriès (1983, 1984) as a full genus and placed in the Fuhrmannodesmidae Brölemann, 1916] together with Bacillidesmus, Galliocookia Ribaut, 1955, Verhoeffodesmus Strasser, 1959 and Napocodesmus Ceuca, 1974. Following the same logic, Mauriès (1980, 1984) established a list and an identification key for the nine genera in the Trichopolydesmidae, adding Haplocookia, Cottodesmus Verhoeff, 1936, Occitanocookia Mauriès, 1981 [1980 in Nomenclator 3] and Ingurtidorgius Srasser, 1974 to the five above mentioned genera.

Almost simultaneously, Hoffman (1980) placed the genera Galliocookia, Haplocookia and Heterocookia in the family Polydesmidae and separated a small number of genera from the Fuhrmannodesmidae, placing them within three subfamilies of Trichopolydesmidae, viz. Trichopolydesminae (Trichopolydesmus), Bacillidesminae Verhoeff, 1910 (Bacillidesmus and Napocodesmus) and Ingurtidorgiinae Strasser, 1974 (Ingurtidorgius Strasser, 1974). Mauriès (1984) included four more genera in the Trichopolydesmidae, viz. Haplocookia, Verhoeffodesmus, Cottodesmus and Occitanocookia.

Ten years later, Simonsen (1990) underlined a clear geographical discontinuity between the Euro-Mediterranean and the Afrotropical taxa, placing them in Trichopolydesmidae and the Fuhrmannodesmidae, respectively, which was supported subsequently by Shelley (2003). Recently, Shear (2011) provided a list of Trichopolydesmoidea, where the family Trichopolydesmidae was not mentioned, very likely merged with the Fuhrmannodesmidae. Among the latest contributions, Golovatch (2013) reclassified the superfamily Trichopolydesmoidea, presented a diagnosis for the family Trichopolydesmidae, based on male sexual characters and provided a new circumscription of the family in which he included the Fuhrmannodesmidae, Macrosternodesmidae Brölemann, 1916, Mastigonodesmidae Attems, 1914 and Nearctodesmidae Chamberlin and Hoffman, 1950. This same classification was also adopted by Enghoff et al. (2015) in their classification of the Polydesmida. The Trichopolydesmidae currently includes around 75 genera and 140 species (see Golovatch 2013), among which nearly 20 genera and 40 species with Euro-Mediterranean distribution, and two genera and five species in North Africa.

Key to North African species of Trichopolydesmidae based mostly on male gonopods

1 Pale species (Fig. 1). Gonopod with two processes (Figs 3, 5A, B) Haplocookia 2
Pigmented species (Fig. 4). Gonopod with three processes (Figs 3, 5C, D) Heterocookia 4
2 Tibiotarsus with strong subapical or apical indentations (Figs 3, 5A, B) 3
Tibiotarsus with a faint subapical projection (Fig. 3) Haplocookia enghoffi sp. n.
3 Tibiotarsus with apical indentation (Fig. 5A), solenomere short and bent orthogonally to tibiotarsus Haplocookia mauritanica
Tibiotarsus with subapical marginal indentations; solenomere slender and bent in same plane as tibiotarsus (Fig. 5B) Haplocookia franzi
4 Tibiotarsus with an upturned tip. Accessory process with lateral serrated expansion (Fig. 5C) Heterocookia novator
Tibiotarsus with cleaver-shaped tip. Accessory process slender, without serrations (Fig. 5D) Heterocookia tunisiaca

List of species of Polydesmida in North Africa

Family Polydesmidae Leach, 1815

Archipolydesmus chreensis Abrous-Kherbouche & Mauriès, 1996

Archipolydesmus fodili Abrous-Kherbouche & Mauriès, 1996

Archipolydesmus kabylianus Abrous-Kherbouche & Mauriès, 1996

Archipolydesmus maroccanus Attems, 1898

Polydesmus dismilus (Berlese, 1891)

Polydesmus proximus (Latzel, 1884)

Polydesmus superus (Latzel, 1884)

Family Pyrgodesmidae Silvestri, 1896

Rharodesmus cherifiensis Schubart, 1960

Rharodesmus tabarkensis Akkari & Enghoff, 2012

?Tonodesmus bolivari Silvestri, 1923

Family Trichopolydesmidae Verhoeff, 1910

Haplocookia enghoffi sp. n.

Haplocookia franzi Schubart, 1960

Haplocookia mauritanica Brölemann, 1915

Heterocookia novator (Silvestri, 1896)

Heterocookia tunisiaca Ceuca, 1967

Family Xystodesmidae Cook, 1895

?Melaphe blainvillei (Eydoux & Gervais, 1836)

Melaphe mauritanica (Lucas, 1844)

Macellolophus rubromarginatus (Lucas, 1846)

Family Paradoxosomatidae Daday, 1889

Boreviulisoma liouvillei Brölemann, 1928

Eviulisoma abadi Mauriès, 1985

Oranomorpha guerinii (Gervais, 1836)

Stosatea italica (Latzel, 1886)

Ackowledgements

Many thanks are due to Jean-Jacques Geoffroy for arranging the loan of H. novator and H. tunisiaca to study them in Vienna. NA is grateful to Christine Rollard, Monique Nguyen Duy-Jacquemin and Jean-Jacques Geoffroy for the very pleasant work atmosphere and their encouragements during her visit to MNHN more than 10 years ago, the time when the species was discovered. Oliver Macek (NHMW) kindly helped with photography. The authors are also very grateful to Boyan Vagalinski, Robert Mesibov, and Sergei Golovatch for their valuable comments and numerous corrections on an earlier version of this work.

References

  • Akkari N, Enghoff H (2011) The genus Rharodesmus – a tropical element in the North African millipede fauna: a new species from Tunisia and notes on the family Pyrgodesmidae (Diplopoda: Polydesmida). Zootaxa 2985: 55–63.
  • Attems C (1926) Myriapoda in Kükenthal & Krumbach. Handbuch der Zoologie, Berlin, Leipzig, 4: 1–402.
  • Attems C (1940) Myriapoda 3. Polydesmoidea III. in Das Tierreich, Berlin & Leipzig 70: i–xxxii + 1–577.
  • Brölemann HW (1915) Description d’un genre nouveau et d’une espèce nouvelle de Myriapodes d’Algérie. Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle d’Afrique du Nord, Alger 6: 88–94.
  • Brölemann HW (1921) Liste des Myriapodes signalés dans le Nord de l’Afrique. Bulletin de la Société des sciences naturelles du Maroc 1: 99–110.
  • Ceuca T (1958) Contributions à la connaissance de la Faune de la République Populaire de Roumanie III. Diplopodes cavernicoles. Studii si Cercetari de Biologie, Cluj 9, 2: 335–343.
  • Ceuca T (1967) Diplopodes de Tunisie (avec description d’une nouvelle espèce). Bulletin de l’Académie Polonaise des Sciences, Varsovie, Cl. 2, 15, 9: 551–554
  • Ceuca T (1974) Nouvelles contributions à la connaissance des Diplopodes de la faune de Roumanie. Studii Universitates Babes-Bolyai, Cluj, sér. Biologia 1: 91–97.
  • Enghoff H, Golovatch SI, Short M, Stoev P, Wesener T (2015) Diplopoda – taxonomic overview. In: Minelli, A. (Ed.) Treatise on Zoology – Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda 2, 16: 363–453.
  • Golovatch SI (2013) A reclassification of the millipede superfamily Trichopolydesmoidea, with descriptions of two new species from the Aegean region (Diplopoda, Polydesmida). ZooKeys 340: 63–78. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.93.1159
  • Hoffman RL (1980) Classification of Diplopoda. Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, Genève, 1979 (1980), 238 pp.
  • Jeekel CAW (1956) Milliped miscellany – Part III. Beaufortia, Amsterdam 5, 52: 73–99.
  • Kraus O (1957) Myriapoden aus Perou. V. Senckenbergiana biologica, Frankfurt a. Main, 38 (1−2): 95–114.
  • Mauriès JP (1981) Description d’une espèce nouvelle et d’un genre nouveau de Diplopodes polydesmides hypogés récoltés dans l’arrondissement de Béziers (Hérault). Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, 116, 3−4, 1980: 228–234.
  • Mauriès JP (1983) Un nouveau Diplopode Polydesmide cavernicole du département du Gard, Mastigonodesmus fagniezi n.sp. (Polydesmidea, Mastigonodesmidae). Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire naturelle de Toulouse, 1982, 118: 141–144.
  • Mauriès JP (1984) Le genre Galliocookia Ribaut, 1954. Deux espèces nouvelles des grottes de l’Ardèche et du Gard (Myriapoda, Diplopoda, Polydesmida). Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, 119, 1983: 103–110.
  • Schubart O (1960) Ein weiterer Beitrag zur Diplopoden-fauna Marokkos. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles et Physiques du Maroc, Rabat, 40: 159–232.
  • Shear WA (2011) Diplopoda in Zhang ZQ (Ed.) Animal Diversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148: 159–164
  • Shelley RM (2003) A revised, annotated, family-level classification of the Diplopoda. Arthropoda Selecta 2002 (2003), 113: 187–207.
  • Silvestri F (1896) Una escursione in Tunisia. Naturalista Siciliano (8−12): 143–161.
  • Simonsen Å (1990) Phylogeny and biogeography of the millipede order Polydesmida, with special emphasis on the suborder Polydesmidea. PhD thesis, Museum of Zoology, University of Bergen: 1–114.
  • Tabacaru I (1975) Napocodesmus florentzae n.sp; (Diplopoda, Polydesmida). Travaux de l’Institut de Spéologie «Emil Racovitza», Bucarest 14: 71–82.
  • Tabacaru I (1980) Trichopolydesmus (Banatodesmus) jeanneli n. sg., n. sp. (Diplopoda, Polydesmida). Travaux de l’Institut de Spéologie “Emil Racovitza”, Bucarest 29: 155–161.
  • Verhoeff KW (1910) Über Diplopoden. 42. Aufsatz: Neue Polydesmiden aus Mitteleuropa und ihre Verwandten. Zoologischen Anzeiger, Leipzig, 36, 6/7: 132−145.
  • Verhoeff KW (1943) Chilopoden und Diplopoden. In: Beiträge zur fauna Perus I. Hamburg, 1, 2: 5–80.