Janinellia peebeehi sp. n. by original designation.

Dilepididae, Dilepidinae. Body small to medium. Scolex without rostellum, apical structures consist of unarmed glandular pouch. Suckers weakly muscular. Genital pores irregularly alternating. Genital ducts passing between osmoregulatory canals. Cirrus sac weakly muscular, elongate. Cirrus unarmed. Vagina posterior to cirrus sac. Testes numerous, posterior, in one field. Uterus initially reticular. Parasite of South-American passerines (Tyrannidae).

The genus name (feminine) is dedicated to Prof. Janine N. Caira (Storrs, Connecticut, USA) in recognition of her remarkable and tireless action in favour of tapeworm systematics.

Dilepidids with distinct but unarmed apical structures are known from various avian hosts, and are presently classified within several genera as synthesized by Bona (1994). Their classification is difficult, as they are mostly known only from a few species (or even specimens) and show few distinctive characters. According to Bona (1994), they are presently attributed to genera according to their apical glandular or muscular structures. Most of them can easily be differentiated from the material described above: Cotylorhipis Blanchard, 1909 because of its armed suckers; Unciunia Skrjabin, 1914 because of its cirrus armament with a tuft of setae resembling those in the genus Spiniglans Yamaguti, 1959 (see Mariaux and Georgiev 2018 for a recent discussion); Ptilotolepis Spasskii, 1969 because its genital ducts pass the osmoregulatory canals dorsally and egg capsules; Platyscolex Spasskaya, 1962 because its genital ducts are dorsal to the osmoregulatory canals, scolex shape, genital atrium structure and testis distribution; Eburneotaenia Bona, 1994 (see Mariaux and Vaucher 1991 for description of its type and only species), and Emberizotaenia Spasskaya, 1970 because of the presence of an unarmed rudimentary rostellum in their apical apparatus (see Georgiev and Genov 1993; Bona 1994). Moreover all these groups are parasitic in very specific groups of birds and, with the exception of Cotylorhipis and Unciunia, have never been recorded in South America. Our material is most similar to Pseudochoanotaenia Burt, 1938. However, Pseudochoanotaenia spp. are very small (up to 10 mm long) and our material is at least 2–3 times larger; they have a clear apical cavity in the glandular pouch which is lacking in our material; they have a short pyriform vagina versus a longer straight one in our specimens. Furthermore, Pseudochoanotaenia is presently restricted to Apodiformes and has never been reported from South America. In consequence, we consider the present material as belonging to a new genus.

Elaenia chilensis Hellmayr, 1927 (Passeriformes, Tyrannidae), Fio-fio, Chilean White-crested Elaenia.

2/12 (16.7%).

1–2.

Small intestine.

HSFS, Comau Fjord, Los Lagos region, Chile, −42.39, −72.42. Altitude 10–30 m. (Type locality).

29.11.2008 and 2.12.2008.

3 specimens. Holotype: MHNG-PLAT-82292 (on slide). Paratypes: MHNG-PLAT-120515; MHNG-PLAT-82293 (2 specimens, on slides).

MHNG-PLAT-82292 [CHIL-002/C2] and MHNG-PLAT-120515 [CHIL-038/C2]. Partial COI sequence, Genbank MH663460 and MH663461.

The species name phonetically reminds one of the acronyms of the NSF program that was sponsoring the project (Planet Biodiversity Inventory, PBI).

Body of small to medium size, up to 34 mm long (inferred from fragmented specimen). Strobila with almost parallel margins, gradually expanding in posterior direction: immature, mature, pregravid and gravid proglottides up to 250, 550, 700 and 1025 wide, respectively. Maximum width achieved at level of early gravid proglottides. Most complete specimens consisting of up to 157 proglottides. Proglottides weakly craspedote, wider than long except for very last gravid ones, which can be up to twice longer than wide. Two pairs of osmoregulatory canals. Ventral canals up to 50 in diameter, with posterior transverse anastomosis in each proglottis. Dorsal ones up to 11 in diameter.

Scolex (Fig. 1) not clearly separated from neck, 210–295 (258, n = 3) wide at middle of suckers; anterior part of scolex conically tapering; apex may form pipette-like protrusion. Suckers weakly muscular, oval 110–137 × 82–105 (120 × 96, n = 12). Apical apparatus consisting of oval rostellar pouch, 127–142 × 65–75, thin-walled, densely filled with glandular tissue, reaching to level of middle to posterior half of suckers. No rostellum. Neck straight, 225–325 wide. Genital ducts passing between osmoregulatory canals. Genital pores at border of first third of lateral proglottis margin, often forming genital papilla, irregularly alternating. Genital atrium simple, inconspicuous, thin-walled, tubular, with infundibular orifice.

Figures 1–5. 

Janinellia peebeehi gen. n., sp. n. 1 scolex 2 mature proglottis 3 cirrus sac 4 gravid proglottis 5 eggs. Scale bars: 50 µm (1), 100 µm (2, 4), 20 µm (3, 5).

Testes 13–17 (14.8, n = 25) in number, disposed in two dense layers, forming a continuous field filling most of posterior two thirds of median field of proglottides; posterior, lateral and dorsal to vitellarium, overlapping posterior parts of ovary; in younger proglottides, testes may occupy most of dorsal parenchyma (Fig. 2); testes 75–100 (89, n = 15) in diameter. External vas deferens very developed, forming multiple coils at extremity of cirrus-sac, filling the antero-poral and central part of median field. Cirrus-sac 130–182 × 25–38 (157 × 32, n = 30), oblique, straight, thin-walled, reaching or crossing poral osmoregulatory canals. Internal vas deferens coiled, making several loops in proximal half of cirrus-sac (Fig. 3). Evaginated cirrus short (up to 44 long), almost cylindrical, thin, 8–9 in diameter at its basal part, slightly tapering distally; unarmed.

Vitellarium large, up to 130 wide, central, lobate, oval or bean-shaped. Ovary transversely-elongate, massive and multilobulate, with two poorly marked and slightly asymmetrical wings, occupying entire width of median field and up to 30–40% of proglottis length. Mehlis’ gland not distinct as glandular structure. Ootype central, just anterior to vitellarium. Seminal receptacle oval 45–58 × 35–45 when empty, up to 150 × 87 when full. Vagina posterior to cirrus-sac, straight, distally thin-walled, proximally bordered with a row of large, dense cells; distal part often dilated, sometimes filled with spermatozoa (Figs 2, 3).

Uterus initially as loose reticulated network, then becoming denser as eggs develop, overlapping osmoregulatory canals and filling most of proglottis, including part of lateral fields (Fig. 4). Embryophore thick, 37–42 × 30–38 (39.5 × 34.5, n = 25). Oncosphere 27–30 × 22–27 (28.5 × 24, n = 25). Embryonic hooks sub-equal: central pair 13–15 (14, n = 10) long, lateral pairs 13–15 (13.5, n = 12) long (Fig. 5).

The new species is the type species of the newly erected monotypic genus Janinellia gen. n.

Huinaylepis elegans sp. n. by original designation.

Dilepididae, Dilepidinae. Small strobila. Rostellum armed with two rows of hooks with peculiar and irregular 2-1 alternation. Rostellar pouch glandular. Suckers armed on anterior half, with largest antero-central hooks and progressively shorter ones laterally. Genital pores irregularly alternating. Genital ducts dorsal to osmoregulatory canals. Cirrus sac reaching osmoregulatory canals. Cirrus armed with strong spines. Testes in one field extending bilaterally and often also anteriorly to form circle reaching anterior proglottis margin. Ovary small. Uterus labyrinthic. Parasite of South American passerines (Furnariidae).

The genus name (feminine) derives from the name of the locality and the Latin suffix –lepis (scales).

Dilepidids with armed suckers, especially armed with true hooks and not merely spines, are very uncommon. The present material can only be compared with Cotylorhipis Blanchard, 1909, which is also found in South American furnariid birds. Although the general aspect of C. furnarii (Del Pont, 1906) and our specimens is similar because of the obvious sucker armament and despite an incomplete description of the former taxon [based on Del Pont (1906) as reported and completed in Blanchard (1909)], a number of characters easily separate them. Cotylorhipis specimens do not have any rostellum, their sucker armament is complete (all around the suckers circumference), and the testes never reach the anterior proglottis margin whereas our material shows an obvious armed rostellum in a large and distinctive rostellar pouch; sucker armament is restricted to the anterior half of suckers and testes are often far found anterior. Furthermore, the terminal gravid proglottides contain thousands of eggs and their length reaches up to 4–5 times their width in Cotylorhipis, while there are only a few hundreds of eggs and they are twice as long as wide in our specimens. These characters are sufficient to separate our material from Cotylorhipis and we propose to place it in the new genus Huinaylepis. It is, however, very likely that Cotylorhipis and Huinaylepis are closely related given the general appearance of their genital anatomy, presence of armed suckers, and shared host and geographical distribution.

Aphrastura spinicauda (Gmelin, 1789) (Passeriformes, Furnariidae), Rayadito, Thorn-tailed Rayadito.

4/5 (80%).

4 to about 10 specimens.

Small intestine.

HSFS, Comau Fjord, Los Lagos region, Chile, −42.39, −72.42. Altitude 10–30 m. (Type locality).

29.11–10.12.2008.

Holotype: MHNG-PLAT-82294 (on slide). Paratypes: MHNG-PLAT-82295; MHNG-PLAT-120512 to MHNG-PLAT-120514 (about 30 specimens, on slides). Additional non-type material: Locality: “Valdivia Forest Reserve, First refuge” (according to Franco Bona’s field books, deposited in MHNG). MHNG-PLAT-87937 16 slides from Pygarrhichas albogularis (King, 1831) (Furnariidae), 19.01.1985, field number 657/5; MHNG-PLAT-87938, 5 slides from Pygarrhichas albogularis, 20.01.1985. Field number 667/10; MHNG-PLAT-87939 14 slides from Aphrastura spinicauda, 20.01.1985. Field number 672/12.

MHNG-PLAT-120512 [CHIL-013/C2] and MHNG-PLAT-82295 [CHIL-071/C2 and C/4]. Partial COI sequence, Genbank MH663462 to MH663464.

The species name refers to the elegant (Latin: elegans) aspect of the worm’s scolex.

Body of small size, up to 18 mm long and with maximum width 600 at level of gravid or late mature proglottides. Up to 36 acraspedote proglottides (observed; maximum number of proglottides inferred from various fragments is about 44). Proglottides initially wider than long, progressively becoming as long as wide at level of male proglottides, then up to about twice as long as wide (terminal gravid proglottides). Development of strobila with marked steps instead of being progressive (similar to serial maturation sensu Spasskii 1951), i.e. with maturation of cirrus sac, testes or eggs sudden from one proglottis to next. Two pairs of osmoregulatory canals. Ventral canals with posterior transverse anastomoses in each proglottis.

Scolex (Fig. 6) rounded. Rostellum musculo-glandular, mushroom-shaped, elongate, 67–112 × 40–55 (96 × 48, n = 18), with maximum diameter at level of crown of hooks. Rostellar pouch oval, 105–142 × 65–92 (126 × 78, n = 17), densely filled with glandular masses, reaching but usually not exceeding posterior margin of suckers. Rostellar hooks 29–35 in number, 16–18 long, in two rows, with particular 1-2 arrangement (1 hook on anterior row alternates with two on posterior row) but with recurring irregularities (i.e. 1-1-1, 2-2-2, 1-3-1) or sometimes intermediate positions (Fig. 11C–E). Hooks with long handle with small epiphyses, short blade and massive guard (Figs 7, 11E, F). Suckers round to slightly oval, with maximum diameter 60–90 (76, n = 79), bearing highly visible and very typical anterior semicircle of 12–17 (14.3, n = 109) hooks of similar shape as those of rostellum but with proportionally longer handle (Fig. 11A, B); epiphyses of sucker-hooks not always well marked but maybe conspicuous on handle (Fig. 11F); hooks of suckers up to 40 long, larger centrally and becoming gradually shorter (20–25) laterally (Fig. 11A B). Neck very short, formation of proglottides appears immediately behind scolex. Genital ducts dorsal to osmoregulatory canals. Genital pores alternating irregularly in short series, at border of first fifth of lateral proglottis margin.

Figures 6–10. 

Huinaylepis elegans gen. n., sp. n. 6 scolex 7 rostella hooks 8 mature proglottis 9 cirrus sac 10 eggs. Scale bars: 40 µm (6), 20 µm (7, 9, 10), 100 µm (8).

Figure 11. 

Huinaylepis elegans gen. n., sp. n. A–B rostellar armament C–D rostellar hooks, showing irregular alternations, apical views E lateral view of rostellar hooks F sucker hooks with epiphyses (arrows).

Testes 16–22, rarely only 14 or up to 24 (19, n = 84) in number, disposed in entire median field reaching anterior proglottis margin and forming U-shaped field, with converging branches, often forming circle with one or two anterior testes linking the two lateral fields (Fig. 8), essentially in one layer, although some posterior testes may be superimposed; testes reaching up to 85 in diameter in late mature proglottides. Vas deferens coiled just at antiporal end of cirrus sac, often poorly visible but occasionally well-developed (up to 12 in diameter) and filling antero-central space. Cirrus-sac (Fig. 9) 90–137 × 50–77 (119 × 62, n = 55), ovoid, thin walled, anterior, with proximal extremity often touching anterior limit of proglottis, usually crossing poral osmoregulatory canals. Cirrus massive, armed with clearly visible spines (about 2 long) except on apex, 22–25 in diameter and reaching up to 145 long when evaginated. Internal vas deferens forming several coils.

Ovary central, small, compact, bilobed, anterior and dorsal to vitellarium. Vitellarium massive, central, compact, oval. Vagina posterior or ventral to cirrus pouch, straight, often dilated. Conductive part surrounded by thick but not dense cellular layer. Seminal receptacle oval, very large, commonly over 170 × 120, up to 217 × 160.

Young uterus saccular, becoming labyrinthic, filling space between osmoregulatory canals, containing a limited number (less than 200) of large eggs situated in 3 or 4 layers. Oncospheres ovoid, 29–37 × 19–25 (33 × 21.5, n = 21). Embryonic hooks 11–13 long (Fig. 10).

The new species is the type species of the newly erected monotypic genus Huinaylepis gen. n.

In 2005, the late Prof. Franco V. Bona (Torino) left his tapeworm collection to the MHNG. Among this rich material we found 35 slides of worms collected in Aphrastura spinicaudata and Pygarrhichas albogularis. All material was collected in the Valdivia Forest (about 250 km N of our study area) on 19–20 January 1985. On his accompanying notes, Bona noticed the interest of this material and indicated that it belonged to a new genus on some slides. Most of Bona’s specimens are juveniles, a few are mature and only a couple of proglottides are pregravid. We have examined all these slides and this materiel fully corresponds to Huinaylepis elegans sp. n. as described above. The only minor variations we noticed were two specimens with a slightly higher number of hooks than in the type series (36 and 38). These observations imply that H. elegans is probably more widespread in southern Chile than the few occurrences reported here may suggest. Over 30 species of Furnariidae are known in the country and, so far, have never been investigated for their parasites.

Cotylorhipis was a monotypic genus until Jadhav and Shinde (1981) described C. sureshi in domestic fowl from Aurangabad in India. Both the description and illustrations of this species are extremely succinct and of substandard quality. It is not even clear whether hooks reported by Jadhav and Shinde (1981) as “fanlike outgrowth”, and illustrated by asterisks, are present on suckers or not! In addition, and according to B. Jadhav (personal communication to M. Oros), there is no type material for C. sureshi. The disjoint geographic distribution, unrelated host, as well as the few morphological details given by Jadhav and Shinde (1981) make it highly dubious that their material belongs to Cotylorhipis. There is no possibility of checking the validity or taxonomic position of the material described as Cotylorhipis sureshi, which must consequently be considered a species inquirenda.

Xolmis pyrope (Gmelin, 1789) (Passeriformes, Tyrannidae), Diucon, Fire-eyed Diucon.

1/1.

3 specimens.

Small intestine.

HSFS, Comau Fjord, Los Lagos region, Chile, −42.39, −72.42. Altitude 10–30 m.

1.12.2008.

MHNG-PLAT-87930.

MHNG-PLAT-87930 [CHIL-028/C2]. Partial COI sequence, Genbank MH663465.

(based on only a few available mature proglottides): Body of small size, largest specimen 12.8 mm long and maximum width 675 mm wide. Up to 86 proglottides observed (up to mature stage, no complete specimens available), wider than long, craspedote. Scolex 275–330 (n = 2) in diameter, bearing four elongated and rather weak unarmed suckers155–175 (164, n = 7) in diameter. Rostellar pouch 280–285 × 123–148 (n = 2) with dense posterior glandular zone. Rostellum large, 243–265 × 95–118 (n = 2) present, strongly muscular but with distinct central glandular zone (Fig. 12). Rostellar hooks 17–18 (n = 2) in number, in one row, 41–47 long (44.5, n = 17), with long handle (Fig. 13). Neck well marked 162–250 (206, n = 3) wide. Formation of proglottides distinct at 242–312 (277, n = 3) from posterior margin of suckers. Genital pores situated in first third of length of lateral proglottis margin, alternating irregularly in small series (i.e. 3, 2, 1, 3), up to 6 consecutive pores on same side observed. Ventral osmoregulatory canals connected posteriorly in each proglottis by transverse anastomosis. Genital ducts passing between osmoregulatory canals.

Figures 12–15. 

Kintneria (?) sp. 12 scolex 13 rostellar hooks 14 mature proglottis. Dilepididae gen. sp. 2 15 rostellar hooks. Scale bars: 100 µm (12, 14), 20 µm (13, 15).

Testes 16–21 (18, n = 10) in number, situated in single posterior field, in 2–3 layers, not extending beyond osmoregulatory canals. External vas deferens coiled, forming compact aggregation. Cirrus sac thin-walled 139–168 × 30–36 (149 × 33, n = 7) extending past the osmoregulatory canals. Cirrus armed with very fine spines.

Vitellarium immediately anterior to testes field, central, slightly V-shaped. Ovary lobulated and elongate transversely, anterior (poorly visible in our material). Vagina in same plane as, and posterior to, cirrus sac; wide, straight, opening in simple genital atrium about 15 deep (Fig. 14). No gravid proglottides and no early uterine development visible.

This material is likely to represent a new species. However a complete description is not possible without observations of the uterine development. Its generic position remains uncertain. According to Bona’s (1994) keys, it could belong to one of two very similar genera: Monosertum Bona, 1994 or Kintneria Spaskii, 1968, both parasitic in passerine birds. These genera differ from one another essentially by the structure of their uterus, with or without capsules, a character, which we cannot determine in the present material due to the lack of gravid proglottides. A few other diagnostic characters are given by Bona (1994). Among them, the small size of the body of our specimens rather resembles Monosertum; however, this character can often vary among species in many dilepidid genera. On the other hand, it corresponds to the diagnosis of Kintneria because of its larger rostellar hooks, the ovary that doesn’t reach the anterior proglottis margin and its cirrus armament consisting of short spines. For these reasons, we consider that it most likely belongs to the genus Kintneria. This genus was erected by Spasskii (1968) for a parasite of introduced European sparrows Passer domesticus (L.) in North America. The type species of this genus was identified as Choanotaenia passerina (Fuhrmann, 1908) by Kintner (1938). Spasskii (1968) considered it a distinct species, differing from the Palaearctic Monopylidium passerinum (Fuhrmann, 1908); he also placed it in the newly erected subgenus Kintneria Spasskii, 1968 within the genus Monopylidium as M. (Kintneria) capsulata Spasskii, 1968. Bona (1994) eventually elevated Kintneria to the generic rank and its validity was accepted by Mariaux et al. (2017). Kintneria is known from the Nearctic and members of Xolmis are restricted to the Neotropics; however, other tyrant-flycatchers are known to migrate between North and South America, suggesting that genera of avian cestodes may have rather Pan-American than restricted distributions. This is the first cestode ever reported from the genus Xolmis.

To our knowledge the genus is monotypic and K. capsulata can easily be separated from our material by its shorter rostellar hooks and longer cirrus sac. Thus, should the observation of gravid segments confirm the placement of the present material into Kintneria, it would belong to a new species.

The two species belonging to the other similar genus, Monosertum parinum (Dujardin, 1845) and M. mariae (Mettrick, 1958), are known from European passerine birds only; furthermore, they are characterized by an osmoregulatory system forming a complicated reticular formation in the scolex and the neck (Komisarovas and Georgiev 2007). Such complicated network of osmoregulatory canals has not been observed in the present material.