ZooKeys 187: 71–89, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.187.3219
Cheiriphotis trifurcata, new species (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Corophiidae, Protomedeiinae) from the Seagrass Bed of the Lower Gulf of Thailand
K. Wongkamhaeng 1,†, B.A.R. Azman 2,‡, R. Puttapreecha 3,§
1 Marine and Coastal Resources Institute (MACORIN), Prince of Songkla University, 90112 THAILAND
2 Marine Ecosystem Research Centre (EKOMAR), Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, MALAYSIA
3 Southern Marine and Coastal Resources Research Center, 158 Moo 8, Phawong, Muang, Songkhla 90100 THAILAND

Corresponding author: K. Wongkamhaeng (koraon@gmail.com)

Academic editor: Charles Coleman

received 11 April 2012 | accepted 19 April 2012 | Published 27 April 2012


(C) 2012 K. Wongkamhaeng. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


For reference, use of the paginated PDF or printed version of this article is recommended.

Abstract

A new species of corophiid Amphipoda, Cheiriphotis trifurcata, collected from the seagrass bed of the Lower Gulf of Thailand, is described. Cheiriphotis trifurcata is characterized by its trifurcated tip of the modified setae on the outer ramus in male pleopod 3. In this paper, the new species is fully described and compared with related species and a complete key of the 16 valid species in the genus Cheiriphotis is given.

Keywords

Crustacea, Amphipoda, Isaeidae, Cheiriphotis trifurcata, Gulf of Thailand, taxonomy

Introduction

Species of the genus Cheiriphotis Walker, 1904, are predominant and widespread in both marine circumtropical and warm-temperate waters of the world. Of the 15 valid species that have been described so far, only Cheiriphotis megacheles (Giles, 1885) was reported in the Andaman Sea while the Gulf of Thailand has no reports of amphipods in this genus (e.g. Angsupanich and Kuwabara 1995; Angsupanich et al. 2005; Ariyama et al. 2010; Bussarawich 1985; Chilton 1925; and Ruensirikul et al. 2007).

Cheiriphotis megacheles was first described from the Bay of Bengal in 1885 by Giles, and later reported from Sri Lanka (Ceylon) by Walker in 1904. However, the specimens from the two localities are clearly distinctive in male gnathopod 1 and uropod 3 which Walker (1904) concluded as an ontogeny. Salman and Jabbar (1990) redescribed Cheiriphotis megacheles based on material collected from the north-west of the Arabian Gulf and found that the variation between Giles’s and Walkers’ specimens is not an ontogeny, instead they are two distinct species.In the present study we provide a detailed description and illustration of both male and female species of Cheiriphotis trifurcata new species collected from the seagrass bed area. This description represents the first record of the genus Cheiriphotis in the Gulf of Thailand. A key for the genus Cheiriphotis is also presented.

Material and methods

Amphipods were collected using a 20×20 cm2 Ekman’s grab in a seagrass bed of Talet bay (Figure 1). The sites were visited at low tide and amphipods were collected from the subtidal zone. Seagrass and sediment were sieved with a 0.5 mm sieve. Amphipod specimens were sorted out and fixed in formalin for 1 week and then stored in 70% alcohol. In the laboratory, the animals were examined using a compound microscope and later selected for dissection. The appendages were examined and figures were produced using an Olympus CH30 light microscope with a camera lucida. The following abbreviations are used: A, antenna; G, gnathopod; HD, head; LL, lower lip; MD, mandible; MX, maxilla; MP, maxilliped; P, pereopod; Pl, pleopod; T, telson; U, uropod; UR, urosome; UL, upper lip; r, right; l, left; ♂, male; ♀, female. The type material of the new species is deposited at Prince of Songkla University Zoological Collection (PSUZC) and the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Muzium Zoologi (UKMMZ), Malaysia.

Results

Corophiidae Leach, 1814

Protomedeiinae Myers & Lowry, 2003

Cheiriphotis (Giles, 1885)

http://species-id.net/wiki/Cheiriphotis

Type species.

Melita megacheles Giles, 1885 by monotypy.

Diagnosis.

Eyes small. Antenna 1, accessory flagellum pluriarticulate. Mandibular palp article 3 rectolinear or clavate. Coxae small, relatively short, coxa 1 dilated, produced forward. Gnathopod 1 (male) subchelate. Gnathopod 2 subchelate and greatly larger than gnathopod 1. Pereopods 6–7, dactylus elongate, falcate. Uropods 1 – 2 biramous; rami slighty subequal; peduncle with ventrodistal process. Uropod 3 uniramous. Telson entire.

Species composition.

Cheiriphotis contains 16 species: Cheiriphotis australiae Stebbing, 1910; Cheiriphotis delloyei Pirlot, 1934; Cheiriphotis durbanensis K.H. Bamard, 1916; Cheiriphotis erythraeus Ruffo, 1969; Cheiriphotis geniculata K.H. Barnard, 1916; Cheiriphotis madagascarensis Ledoyer, 1979; Cheiriphotis mediterranea Myers, 1983; Cheiriphotis megacheles (Giles, 1885); Cheiriphotis minima Ledoyer, 1982; Cheiriphotis neotropicalis Valerio-Berardo, 2007; Cheiriphotis pediformis Myers, 1995; Cheiriphotis quadrichelatus Ortiz & Lalana, 1997; Cheiriphotis rotui Myers, 1989; Cheiriphotis walkeri Stebbing, 1918; Cheiriphotis williamsoni Salman & Jabbar, 1990;

Type material.

Holotype. ♂, THAILAND, Lower Gulf of Thailand, Talet Bay (09˚18'39.5"N, 99˚46'46.4"E), seagrass bed (associated with Thalassia hemprichii), 24 September 2008, Puttapreecha, R., PSUZC-CR-0264.

Allotype. ♀, collected with holotype, PSUZC-CR-0265 (adult female, 4.16 mm)

Other material. Same data as for holotype, UKMMZ-1446 (5♂; 15♀); PSUZC-CR-0266 (5♂; 20♀)

Description.

Male (holotype). Total body length 3.5 mm (from tip of rostrum to apex of telson). Body rather slender and subcylindrical. Head subequal in length to first 2 pereonites; rostrum not developed; inferior antennal sinus short and concave, about 0.3 times of head length; eye distinct. Antenna 1 slightly longer than antenna 2, ratio of peduncular article 1–3 as 5:9:8; article 1 slender, with 2 postero-marginal setae; flagellum with 10 articles, 0.7 times as long as peduncle; accessory flagellum with 4 articles, last article scale-like. Antenna 2 peduncle slender; article 1–4 in ratio of 2:5:4:2; inner margin of article 4 and 5 with long postero-marginal setae; article 5 shorter than 4; flagellum short with long setae, subeaqual in length to peduncular article 5, composed of 7 articles, last article scale-like.

Upper lip or labrum round and broad, with small depression in the middle and pubescent on each lobe. Lower lip inner lobe small and pubescent, mandibular process well developed; outer plate with a group of finger-like setae on the inner face of the outer lobe, covered with thin hair-like setae. Mandible, both incisors with 5 teeth; lacinia mobilis armed with 4 teeth on the left side and 5 teeth on the right side; molar process columnar, ridged distally; palp 3-articulate with ratios of 1:3:3, article 1 with 2 marginal setae, article 2–3 with apical and marginal setae. Maxilla 1, inner plate small with 2 apical setae, outer plate with 8 apical and marginal serrate robust setae; palp extending beyond outer plate, biarticulate with 6 apical serrate robust setae. Maxilla 2, inner plate with 19 slender marginal setae; outer plate larger than inner plate with 20 slender setae. Maxilliped, inner plate broad and short, reaching half of outer plate, apically provided with 4 conate setae and fine setae; outer plate broad, almost reaching palp article 2 with 7 conate setae; palp 4-articulate with ratio of 3:5:2:1.

Pereon. Gnathopod 1 subchelate, smaller than gnathopod 2; coxal plate subtriangular, produced anteriorly with long fine setae on anteroventral corner; length ratio of articles from basis to dactylus about 14:5:6:13:10:9; basis slender, broader distally, posterior margin bearing long setae; ischium short, subrectangular with apical setae; merus subtriangular with posteromarginal setae, longer than ischium; carpus longer than propodus with plumose setae on posterior margin; propodus shorter than dactylus, palm oblique with a robust seta at the proximal half, surface of palm toothed; dactylus slightly longer than palm, falcate, inner margin with a robust seta, . Gnathopod 2 subchelate; coxal plate short and wide, subrectangular, length ratio of articles from basis to dactylus about 9:5:8:8:19:19; basis robust, nearly as long as wide, broader distally, anterior margin straight, both sides naked; ischium subrectangular; merus longer than ischium; carpus distal and anterior margin fused with propodus; propodus enlarged, as long as wide, anterior margin with a row of plumose setae, posterior margin with short setae; palm transverse, with 4 blunt teeth and one acute palmar corner; dactylus slightly longer than palmar margin, inner margin smooth.

Pereopod 3 slender and elongate; coxal plate small and suboval, with 3 plumose setae on anterior side; length ratio of articles from basis to dactylus 10:3:6:2:6:4; basis slender, distally extended; ischium short, subrectangular; merus longer than carpus, slightly produced anterodistally; carpus subrectangular, medially broad, posterior margin setose; propodus subrectangular; basis – propodus bearing plumose setae on both sides; dactylus falcate, long and thin, shorter than propodus. Pereopod 4 rather similar to pereopod 3, coxal plate suboval with plumose setae on ventral side; length ratio of articles from basis to dactylus about 10:2:5:3:6:4; basis slender; ischium short, subrectangular; merus longer than carpus, slightly produced anterodistally; carpus subquadrate, shorter than propodus; basis to propodus with plumose setae on both margins; propodus long and narrow; dactylus long and thin, shorter than propodus. Pereopod 5 shorter than pereopod 6 and 7; coxa bilobed; length ratio of articles from basis to dactylus about 14:2:3:3:6:3; basis subrectangular with plumose setae on both margins; ischium shortest with posteromarginal plumose setae; merus subequal to carpus, with posteromarginal plumose setae and 1 anterodistal seta; carpus with posteromarginal plumose setae; propodus with 4 robust setae along posterior margin; dactylus short, strongly curved. Pereopod 6 elongate, 1.5 times as long as pereopod 5; coxa posteriorly produced with rounded lobe; length ratio of articles from basis to dactylus about 5:2:3:3:5:2; basis oval with plumose setae on both margins; ischium short with plumose setae on anteroventral corner; merus oblong, with plumose setae on both margins; carpus shorter than propodus, bearing long setae; propodus slender with marginal robust setae and setose posterodistally; dactylus falcate. Pereopod 7 elongate, 1.6 times as long as pereopod 5; coxa short and wide, subtriangular, anteriorly produced; length ratio of articles from basis to dactylus about 13:5:7:7:11:6; basis posteriorly produced, bearing plumose setae on both margins; ischium short and subquadrate with plumose setae on anterodistal corner; merus elongate with plumose setae on both sides; carpus subequal to merus, both margins with sparse setae; propodus slender, longer than merus, distally extended; bearing setae on both margins and one robust seta on anterodistal corner; dactylus falcate, with one thin seta at 2/3 from proximal end.

Pleon. Pleopods 1–2 well developed; peduncles subcylindrical, longer than broad and fringed with several plumose setae and a pair of retinaculae on the inner margin; inner ramus subequal to peduncle with 9–10 articles, outer ramus shorter than inner ramus, both rami with facial setae.

Pleopod 3 similar to pleopod 1 and 2 except the tip of outer ramus modified; bearing long setae with sparse setule and having three additional modified setae with three forked tips respectively, outer ramus longer than inner ramus.

Uropod 1 longest, extending beyond uropods 3; peduncle longer than both rami, beset with robust setae, peduncular apex bearing 3 posteroventral robust setae; outer and inner margins of both rami lined with a row of robust setae, distal margin rounded and bearing several robust setae. Uropod 2 not reaching uropod 3, peduncle shorter than rami, both outer and inner margins with a row of robust setae; outer ramus slightly longer than inner one, both rami lined with a row of robust setae and distal margin bearing several short and long robust setae. Uropod 3 uniramous, peduncle extended with robust seta on apex, subequal to ramus; apically 3 robust setae and 2 setae. Telson subtrapezoidal, distally excavated with long simple setae near both distal corners.

Female. (allotype). Total body length 4.2 mm (from tip of rostrum to apex of telson). – (sexually dimorphic characters).

Antenna 1 flagellum with 12 articles.

Pereon. Gnathopod 2 subchelate, smaller than that of male, basis to propodus setose; basis more slender, about 2.3 times as long as broad; carpus subtriangular, as long as broad; propodus suboval, longer than carpus, palm oblique and defined by a large bifid robust seta, palmar margin convex, distal end covered with sparse setae; dactylus curved with 5 inner marginal short setae. Coxa 4 and 5 longer than those of male.

Pleopod 3 without modified tip of outer ramus.

Figure 1.

Map of sampling area

Figure 2A.

Photography of Cheiriphotis trifurcata sp. n. i holotype, male, (PSUZC-CR-0264), 3.47 mm. ii allotype, female, (PSUZC-CR-0265), 4.16 mm. Talet Bay, Lower Gulf of Thailand.

Figure 2B.

Cheiriphotis trifurcata sp. n., holotype, male, (PSUZC-CR-0264), 3.47 mm. Talet Bay, Lower Gulf of Thailand. All scales represent 0.2 mm.

Figure 2C.

Cheiriphotis trifurcata sp. n., holotype, male, (PSUZC-CR-0264), 3.47 mm. Talet Bay, Lower Gulf of Thailand. All scales represent 0.2 mm.

Figure 2D.

Cheiriphotis trifurcata sp. n., holotype, male, (PSUZC-CR-0264), 3.47 mm. Talet Bay, Lower Gulf of Thailand. All scales represent 0.1 mm.

Figure 2E.

Cheiriphotis trifurcata sp. n., holotype, male, (PSUZC-CR-0264), 3.47 mm. Talet Bay, Lower Gulf of Thailand. Scales for U1– U3 and T represent 0.1 mm; PL1 – PL3 represent 0.2 mm.

Figure 3A.

Cheiriphotis trifurcata sp. n., allotype, female, (PSUZC-CR-0265), 4.16 mm. Talet Bay, Lower Gulf of Thailand. All scales represent 0.2 mm.

Figure 3B.

Cheiriphotis trifurcata sp. n., allotype, female, (PSUZC-CR-0265), 4.16 mm. Talet Bay, Lower Gulf of Thailand. All scales represent 0.1 mm.

Figure 3C.

Cheiriphotis trifurcata sp. n., allotype, female, (PSUZC-CR-0265), 4.16 mm. Talet Bay, Lower Gulf of Thailand. All scales represent 0.1 mm.

Figure 3D.

Cheiriphotis trifurcata sp. n., allotype, female, (PSUZC-CR-0265), 4.16 mm. Talet Bay, Lower Gulf of Thailand. Scale for U1-U3 and T represents 0.1 mm; remaining represents 0.2 mm.

Etymology.

The specific name “trifurcata” is from latin ‘tri = three’ and ‘furcated = forked’, referring to the distinct three forked tips of the modified setae on the outer ramus in male pleopod 3.

Remarks.

Even Cheiriphotis trifurcata shows a distinct character, with the presence of the three additional modified setae in male pleopod 3 and each seta equipped with three forked tips, but this character might be overlooked in other species. Besides, the general characters in the present species are closely related to Cheiriphotis williamsoni, Cheiriphotis neotropicalis, Cheiriphotis mediterranea and Cheiriphotis walkeri especially in the; 1) fused carpus-propodus of male gnathopod 2; 2) propodus with transverse palm and; 3) uropod 3 uniramus. Further examination on the present species also indicated that Cheiriphotis trifurcata can be distinguished from Cheiriphotis williamsoni by the male gnathopod 1 which has the carpus longer than the propodus and the palm of male gnathopod 2 which bears 4 blunt teeth and 4 blunt teeth and one acute palmar corner. The present species also differs from Cheiriphotis neotropicalis in the carpus of male gnathopod 1 which is longer than the propodus and the propodus of male gnathopod 2 as long as broad in contrast to Cheiriphotis neotropicalis where the carpus of gnathopod 1 is subequal to propodus and propodus of gnathopod 2 is broader than long.

Cheiriphotis trifurcata shares a character of epimeron 2 with plumose setae on the ventral margin of epimera 2 with four known congeners, Cheiriphotis erythraeus, Cheiriphotis mediterranea, Cheiriphotis williamsoni and Cheiriphotis neotropicalis. The former can be distinguished from Cheiriphotis erythraeus by the carpus of the male gnathopod 1 which is partly fused with the propodus, the transverse palm which has 4 blunt teeth and the uniramus uropod while in the latter the carpus of the male gnathopod 1 is not fused with the propodus, the palm is medially V-shaped excavated with two teeth on both sides and the uropod is biramus. Cheiriphotis trifurcata is easily separated from Cheiriphotis mediterranea by the distally expanded peduncle of uropod 3 (vs. peduncle of uropod 3 not expanded distally).

To date, only one species of Cheiriphotis (i.e. Cheiriphotis megacheles)has been reported from the Andaman Sea and the South China Sea (Imbach 1967 and Rabindranath 1971). The absence of robust setae along the palm of gnathopod 1, the unfused carpus-propodus of the male gnathopod 2, a rounded epimeron 2, and the biramus uropod 3 in Cheiriphotis megacheles readily differentiates that species from the present one.

Table 1.

Comparison of some distinguished characters between Cheiriphotis trifurcata sp. n. and the related species

Characters Accessory flagellum ♂ G1 palm ♂ G1 carpus: propodus ♂G2 carpus and propodus ♂G2 propodus ♂ G2 palm epimeron 2 ♂pleopod 3 U3
Cheiriphotis trifurcata 4 articles oblique with a robust seta at the proximal half > fused as broad as long palm transverse, with 5 blunt teeth with plumose setae on ventral margin outer ramus last article modified uniramus peduncle expanded distally
Cheiriphotis erythraeus Ruffo, 1969 4 articles oblique, palm longer than posterior margin = not fused longer than broad palm transverse, half way excavated with two teeth on both side and a defining tooth with plumose setae on ventral margin normal biramus, inner ramus small
Cheiriphotis mediterranea Myers, 1983 4 articles oblique, posterodistal excavated > fused broader than long palm transverse, with 3 rounded lobes and a defining tooth with plumose setae on ventral margin normal uniramus, peduncle poorly expanded
Cheiriphotis megacheles (Giles, 1885) 5 articles oblique, not distinctly defined, > not fused as long as broad palm oblique, palmar corner with a strong tooth projecting posteriorly round normal biramus, inner ramus small
Cheiriphotis neotropicalis Valerio-Berado et al. 2007 3 articles, last article small palm excavate, defining palm with subdistal robust seta = fused broader than long palm transverse, with three rounded lobes and a defining tooth with plumose setae on ventral margin normal uniramus, peduncle poorly expanded
Cheiriphotis walkeri Stebbing, 1918 no data palm oblique, emarginate at anterior margin > fused broader than long palm transverse with 2 depressions round normal uniramus
Cheiriphotis williamsoni Salman & Jabbar, 1990 4 articles palm oblique, longer than posterior margin < not fused slightly longer than broad palm transverse, with 3 large blunt teeth and a defining tooth, round normal uniramus, peduncle broad
World key to species of Cheiriphotis
1 Male gnathopod 2 carpus vestigial, partly fused with propodus 2
Male gnathopod 2 carpus not fused with propodus 6
2 Male gnathopod 1 palm excavate, palmar corner with subdistal robust seta, carpus subequal to propodus Cheiriphotis neotropicalis Valerio-Berardo, de Sousa & Rodigues, 2007
Male gnathopod 1 palm not excavate 3
3 Male gnathopod 1 carpus shorter than propodus, palm longer than hind margin Cheiriphotis williamsoni Salman & Jabbar, 1990
Male gnathopod 1 capus longer than propodus, palm shorter than hind margin 4
4 Epimeron 2 without plumose setae on ventral margin, male gnathopod 2 basis dilated in anterodistal corner Cheiriphotis walkeri Stebbing, 1918
Epimeron 2 with plumose setae on ventral margin, male gnathopod 2 basis not dilated in anterodistal corner 5
5 Male outer ramus of pleopod 3 tip modified into fork shape, gnathopod 2 carpus rectangular Cheiriphotis trifucatasp. n.
Male outer ramus of pleopod 3 not modified, gnathopod 2 carpus triangular Cheiriphotis mediterranea Myers, 1983
6 Accessory flagellum 2 articles Cheiriphotis minima Ledoyer, 1982
Accessory flagellum more than 2 articles 7
7 Male gnathopod 2 palm oblique 8
Male gnathopod 2 palm transverse 14
8 Male gnathopod 1 palm acute, longer than hind margin Cheiriphotis australiae Stebbing, 1910
Male gnathopod 2 palm not as above, not longer than hind margin 9
9 Uropod 3 uniramus 10
Uropod 3 biramus, inner ramus small 13
10 Male gnathopod 1 carpus subequal to propodus Cheiriphotis delloyei Pirlot, 1934
Male gnathopod 2 carpus longer than propodus 11
11 Male gnathopod 2 propodus as long as broad Cheiriphotis megacheles (Giles, 1885)
Male gnathopod 2 propodus longer than broad 12
12 Epimeron 2 with 2 notches on distoinferior corner Cheiriphotis pediformis Myers, 1995
Epimeron 2 round on distoinferior corner Cheiriphotis madangensis Ledoyer, 1979
13 Male gnathopod 2 basis robust, wider than half of the length Cheiriphotis durbanensis K.H. Barnard, 1916
Male gnathopod 2 basic slender, not wider than half of the length Cheiriphotis rotui Myers, 1989
14 Palm not excavated and smooth, defining tooth long like a finger, directed fore and upward Cheiriphotis quadrichelatus Ortiz & Lalana, 1997
Palm medially V-shaped excavated with two teeth on both sides and a not much longer defining tooth Cheiriphotis erythaeus Ruffo, 1969
Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Department of Biology, Prince of Songkla University for the laboratory facilities. Thanks are also expressed to Dr. Charles Oliver Coleman from the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany for his assistance with literature.

References
Angsupanich S, Kuwabara R (1995) Macrobenthic fauna in Thale Sap Songkla, a brackish lake in southern Thailand. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management 1: 115-125. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1770.1995.tb00012.x
Angsupanich S, Siripech A, Charoenpornthip M (2005) Macrobenthic fauna community in the Middle Songkhla Lake, Southern Thailand. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 27 (1): 365-390.
Ariyama H, Angsupanich S, Rodcharoen E (2010) Two new species of the genus Kamaka (Crustace: Amphipoda: Kamakidae) from the Songkla Lagoon, southern Thailand. Zootaxa 2404: 55-68.
Barnard KH (1916) The Amphipoda. Contribution to the crustacean fauna of South Africa. Annals of the South Africa Museum 15: 105-304.
Bussarawich S (1985) Gammaridean Amphipoda from mangroves in southern Thailand. In Fifth Seminar on Mangrove Ecosystems Phuket, Thailand, 1–17.
Chilton C (1925) The Amphipoda of Tale Sap. Zoological result of a tour in far East. Memoirs of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 6: 531-539.
Giles GM (1855) Natural history notes from H.M.’s Indian marine survey steamer ‘Inverstigator’, commander Alfred Carpenter, R.N. commanding [sic on comma]. No.1. On the structure and habitats of Cyrtophium calamicola, a new tubicolous amphipod from the Bay of Bangal. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 54: 54–59, pl.1.
Imbach MC (1969) Gammaridean Amphipoda from the South China Sea. Naga Report 4: 39-167.
Leach WE (1814) Crustaceology. – The EdinburghEncyclopaedia 7: 383-437.
Ledoyer M (1979) Les gammariens de la Pente externe du grand reçif de Tulear (Madagascar) (Crustacea Amphipoda). Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona (2nd Ser. ) 2: 1-150.
Ledoyer M (1982) Faune de Madagascar. Crustacés Amphipodes Gammariens;Families des Haustoriidae a’ Vitjazianidae. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Paris 59 (2).
Myers AA (1983) A new species of Cheiriphotis Walker from the Mediterranean Sea (Amphipoda: Iseidae) Bolletino Museo Civio Storia Naturale Verona. 10: 541-542
Myers AA (1989) Amphipoda from the South Pacific: the Society Islands. Records of the Australian Museum 41 (1): 63-82. doi: 10.3853/j.0067-1975.41.1989.136
Myers AA (1995) The Amphipoda (Crustacea) of Madang Lagoon: Aoridae, Isaeidae, Ischyroceridae, and Neomegamphopidae. Records of the Australian Museum Suppl. 22: 22-95.
Myers AA, Lowry JK (2003) A Phylogeny and a new Classification of the Corophiidea Leach, 1814 (Amphipoda). Journal of Crustacean Biology 23(2), 443–485. doi: 10.1651/0278-0372(2003)023[0443:APAANC]2.0.CO;2
Ortiz M, Lalana R (1997) Amphipoda. Travaux du Muséum National d`Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 38: 29-113.
Pirlot JM (1934) Les amphipodes de l’expédition du Siboga. Deuxième partie: Les amphipodes gammarides, II. Les amphipodes de la mer profonde 2. (Hyperiopsidae, Pardaliscidae, Astyridae nov. fam., Tironidae, Calliopiidae, Paramphithoidae, Amathillopsidae nov. fam., Eusiridae, Gammaridae, Aoridae, Photidae, Ampithoidae, Jassidae. Siboga-Exped. Monogr. 33d: 167–235.
Rabindranath P (1971) On a collection of Isaeidae (Crustacea Amphipoda) from the southern Indian region. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 41 (2): 67-93.
Ruensirikul J, Angsupanich S, Phongdara A (2007) Abundance and diversity of amphipod crustaceans in the Upper Songkhla Lagoon. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 29: 1225-1249.
Ruffo S (1969) Studi sui Crostacei anfipodi LXVII. Terzo contributo alla conoscenza degli anfipodi del mar Rosso. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Verona 17: 1-77.
Salman SD, Jabbar N (1990) A new speicies of the Genus Cheiriphotis Walker, from the North West Arabian Gulf, with a redescription of C. megacheles (Giles) (Amphipoda, Isaeidae). Crustaceana 58 (2): 214-226. doi: 10.1163/156854090X00129
Stebbing TRR (1910) Crustacea. Part V. Amphipoda: Scientific results of the trawling expedition of HMSC “Thetis”. Memoirs of the Australian Museum 4 (2): 564-658.
Stebbing TRR (1918) Some Crustacea of Natal. Annals of the Durban Museum 2: 47-75.
Valério-Berardo MT, De Souza AMT, Rodrigues CW (2007) A new species of Cheiriphotis (Crustacea : Amphipoda: Corophiidae: Protomedeiinae) from the coast of Southeastern Brazil, with a key to species in the genus. Zootaxa 1646: 41-49.
Walker AO (1904) Report on the Amphipoda collected by professor Herdman, at Ceylon, in 1902. Report to the Government of Ceylon on Pearl Oyster Fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar, Supplementary Report 17: 229-300.