Research Article |
Corresponding author: Ji-Nian Feng ( jinianf@nwsuaf.edu.cn ) Academic editor: Roger Blackman
© 2018 Na Zhang, Tong Cao, Ji-Nian Feng.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Zhang N, Cao T, Feng J-N (2018) Description of a new species of Saissetia from China (Hemiptera, Coccomorpha, Coccidae). ZooKeys 791: 97-105. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.791.27186
|
The adult female of a new species of soft scale Saissetia puerensis Zhang & Feng, sp. n. is described and illustrated from the genus Saissetia Deplanche, 1859. This species was collected on Lithocarpus uvariifolius (Hance) in Yunnan province, China. A key is provided to separate adult females of all Saissetia species known from China. A table is provided showing the distribution of Saissetia in various zoogeographical regions throughout the world.
Coccinae , distribution, Saissetia , soft scale insect, taxonomy
Soft scale insects, the third largest family of the Coccoidea, are distributed around the world, and currently include 169 genera and 1183 species (
The genus Saissetia, described by Deplanche in 1859, is a member of the tribe Saissetiini, subfamily Coccinae, and includes 44 species from around the world (
In this paper, the adult female of a new species Saissetia puerensis Zhang & Feng, sp. n. is described and illustrated. In addition, the genus Saissetia is described and a key is provided to separate the six species of Saissetia currently known from China. A list of Saissetia species throughout the world and their distributions in various zoogeographical regions is presented in Table
All specimens were collected from Yunnan province in China, and mounted according to the methods described by
All specimens were deposited in the Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China (NWAFU).
Saissetia Deplanche, 1859: 6.
Bernardia Ashmead, 1891: 100.
Lecanium coffeae Walker, 1852.
Adult female. Body oval, slightly or distinctly convex, H-shaped ridge distinctively present on dorsal surface. Dorsum. Derm membranous, oval or polygonal areolations. Dorsal setae coniform; dorsal tubercles present or absent; dorsal tubular ducts absent; anal plate triangular, with obvious discal seta. Margin. Marginal setae branched or apex pointed; stigmatic spines of three setae, the median spine longer than others; stigmatic cleft shallow or deep. Venter. Antennae of 6–8 segments; legs well developed, with tibio-tarsal articulation sclerosis (except in S. neglecta); spiracular disc-pores with 5–6 loculi; pregenital disc-pores with 10–12 loculi, present around anal plate, some on abdominal segment, a few pregenital disc-pores extend to thorax; ventral tubular ducts present in submargin.
Holotype: adult female. CHINA, Yunnan, Puer. 24. vii. 2017, on Lithocarpus uvariifolius (Hance) Rehd, Na Zhang (NWAFU). Paratypes: two adult females mounted on different slides, data same as holotype.
The adult female of S. puerensis can be diagnosed by the combination of the following features: (1) body convex and sclerotized, distinct H-shaped ridge present on dorsum surface; (2) dorsal tubercles present; (3) dorsal tubular ducts absent; (4) dorsal setae tapered; (5) antennae 8 segments; (6) legs well developed, with tibio-tarsal articulation and articulation sclerosis; (7) spiracular disc-pores present in a rather broad band 7–8 pores wide; (8) anal plates with a discal seta; (9) ano-genital fold with four or five pairs of setae; (10) four types of ventral tubular ducts: (i) type I present on medial submarginal area and inner and medial submarginal area of posterior abdominal segments, some scattered on inner submarginal area mingling with type II, some on outer submarginal area mingling with type III, (ii) type II present mainly on inner submarginal area, few present on procoxa and mesocoxa, and a few ducts present near antennae and mouthparts, some mingling with type I in medial submarginal area, (iii) type III present on outer broad submarginal area, some ducts present in inner submarginal area, (iv) type IV present on anal cleft and broad submarginal band mingling with t types I, II and III, most present on posterior abdominal segments, few ducts present on mesocoxa; (11) pregenital disc-pores, 10–11 loculi, mainly with ten loculi, abundant around anal opening, some extending in transverse bands on abdominal segments, and some laterad of metacoxa and mesocoxa.
Saissetia puerensis Zhang & Feng, sp. n., adult female. The dorsal surface is depicted on the left side and the ventral surface on the right side, with enlargements of some important characters shown around the main illustration. Abbreviations: AGF ano-genital fold ANP anal plates ANT antenna DA dermal areolations DMD dorsal microduct DS dorsal seta DT dorsal tubercles LG tibio-tarsus of hind leg MS marginal setae PGDP pregenital disc-pore POP preopercular pores SDP spiracle disc-pore SSP stigmatic spine VTD ventral tubular ducts of types I-IV VS ventral setae.
Appearance in life. Pre-reproductive adult female: Body elongate-oval, dorsum greenish. Mature adult female: Body oval, dorsum reddish-brown, convex and sclerotized, distinct H-shaped ridge present on dorsum surface.
Slide-mounted specimens: Body oval, 1.5–2.3mm long, 1.0–1.5mm wide, margin with a distinct indentation at each stigmatic cleft; anal cleft 1/8–1/10 body length.
Dorsum: Derm membranous or slight sclerotized. Dermal areolations well developed, with one dorsal microductule. Dorsal setae 5.3–7.8 μm long, tapered, apex slightly curved, with a well-developed basal socket, scattered all over the dorsum. Dorsal tubercles present on submarginal area, 2–5 on head, 0–2 between stigmatic clefts, 2–3 between posterior stigmatic cleft and anal cleft. Preopercular pores small, 2.7–4.5 μm wide, 14–26 in front of anal plates. Dorsal tubular ducts absent. Anal plates together quadrate, 139.6–155.1 μm long, 67.5–78.1 μm wide, outer angle slightly obtuse; posterolateral margin slightly longer than anterolateral: anterolateral margin 84.5–100.9 μm long, posterolateral margin 103.5–122.3 μm long; posterolateral margin slightly convex and anterolateral margin slightly concave, with four apical setae and a discal seta; supporting bars not contacted with each other. Ano-genital fold with four or five pairs of setae, 37.1–60.7 μm long, present along anterior margin; three pairs of setae, 28.6–57.2 μm long, present along lateral margin. Anal ring subcircular, with four pairs of setae, 163.1–189.4 μm long. Eyespots near margin.
Margin: Marginal setae, 12.8–44.1 μm long, branched, straight or curved, a few spinous, all with well-developed basal sockets, with 36–46 setae between anterior clefts, 12–16 setae between each anterior cleft and posterior cleft, and 27–35 setae between each posterior cleft and anal cleft; some over 50 μm around anal cleft. Stigmatic cleft distinct and deep, with three stigmatic spines: one medial spine, 60.3–65.9 μm long, blunt, slightly curved apex and broadly based; lateral spines, 15.5–21.2 μm long, stout, straight; median four to five times longer than laterals.
Venter: Derm membranous. Antennae 8 segments, 328.6–357.2 μm long, the third segment longest; with three pairs of interantennal setae, 21.4–88.5 μm long. Spiracular disc-pores, with 5–6 loculi, mainly with five loculi, occasionally six loculi, each about 3.2–4.9 μm wide; present in a rather broad band 7–8 pores wide between stigmatic cleft and each spiracle; 30–66 pores in each anterior spiracle band and 45–93 pores in each posterior band. Legs well developed, slender, with tibio-tarsal articulation and articulation sclerosis; claws without denticle; tarsal digitules and claw digitules both with knobbed apices, but tarsal digitules longer and thinner than claw digitules, tarsal digitules length 49.5–66.7 μm, claw digitules length 27.2–36.0 μm; dimensions of metathoracic leg: coxa 105.2–135.4 μm, trochanter+ femur 182.3–230.3 μm, tibia + tarsus 229.6–249.8 μm, tibia about two times longer than tarsus, claw 21.4–27.9 μm. Pregenital disc-pores, 10–11 loculi, mainly with ten loculi, occasionally 11 loculi, each about 3.8–5.9 μm wide; abundant around anal opening, some extending in transverse bands on abdominal segments, and some laterad of metacoxa and mesocoxa; with three pairs of long pregenital setae, each 95.7–138.3 μm long. There are four types of ventral tubular ducts:
Type I: a duct with large terminal gland, inner ductule almost as wide and long as outer ductule; present on medial submarginal area and inner and medial submarginal area of posterior abdominal segments, some scattered on inner submarginal area mingling with type II, some on outer submarginal area mingling with type III.
Type II: inner ductule almost twice as long as outer ductule, inner ductule thinner than outer ductule, but not filamentous, with a well-developed terminal gland; present mainly on inner submarginal area, few present on procoxa and mesocoxa, and a few ducts present near antennae and mouthparts, some mingling with type I in medial submarginal area.
Type III: outer ductule of this type slightly shorter than type I, a filamentous inner ductule without terminal gland; present on outer broad submarginal area, some ducts present in inner submarginal area.
Type IV: inner ductule almost two times as long as outer ductule, a filamentous inner ductule with a ball-shaped terminal gland; present on anal cleft and broad submarginal band mingling with t types I, II, and III, most present on posterior abdominal segments, few ducts present on mesocoxa. Ventral tubular ducts distributed irregularly; a few are scattered near anal cleft, becoming progressively more frequent anteriorly. Submarginal setae present in a single row, each 7.5–14.2 μm long; other ventral setae slender, each 7.9–18.6 μm long, quite sparsely distributed.
The species epithet puerensis is a noun in apposition, referring to the place where this new species was collected.
Lithocarpus uvariifolius (Hance) Rehd in China.
China (Yunnan).
1 | Stigmatic spines 4–7 setae | S. vivipara Williams &Watson, 1990 |
– | Stigmatic spines 3 setae | 2 |
2 | Ventral tubular ducts with a broad inner ductule present in submarginal area | 3 |
– | Ventral tubular ducts with a broad inner ductule absent in submarginal area | 5 |
3 | Marginal setae fine; dorsal submarginal tubercles absent | S. bobuae Takahashi, 1935 |
– | Marginal setae branched; dorsal submarginal tubercles present | 4 |
4 | Ventral tubular ducts of 3 types distributed regularly in a submarginal band (type I distributed on medial submarginal area, type II distributed on inner submarginal area and type III distributed on outer submarginal area); Spiracular band 2–3 pores wide | S. coffeae (Walker), 1852 |
– | Ventral tubular ducts of 4 types distributed irregularly in a submarginal band (the distribution of types I, II, III and IV is irregular, type I mingling with type II on inner submarginal area and mingling with type III on outer submarginal area); Spiracular band 7–8 pores wide | S. puerensis sp. n. |
5 | Marginal setae between each anterior cleft and posterior cleft number 15–23 | S. miranda (Cockerell & Parrott), 1899 |
– | Marginal setae between each anterior cleft and posterior cleft number 4–12 | 6 |
6 | Marginal setae branched; anal ring with four pairs of setae | S. neglecta De Lotto, 1969 |
– | Marginal setae fine; anal ring with three pairs of setae | S. oleae (Olivier), 1791 |
This species is considered to be close to Saissetia coffeae (Choi and Lee 2017) and they share some distinct characteristics: 1) more than one type of ventral tubular duct; 2) anal plate with a discal seta; 3) three pairs of setae present along lateral margin; and 4) anal ring subcircular, with four pairs of setae.
However, S. puerensis can be distinguished by the possession of the following features (character states of S. coffeae in parenthesis): 1) four types of ventral tubular ducts (three); 2) ventral tubular ducts distributed irregularly, especially on posterior abdominal segments, type I mingling with type II (regularly); 3) type II not present on medial thorax (present); 4) inner ductule of type II ventral tubular ducts almost twice as long as outer ductule (inner ductule as long as outer ductule); 5) spiracle in a rather broad band 7–8 pores wide (2–3); 6) preopercular pores 14–26 in front of anal plates (5–14); and 7) ano-genital fold with four or five pairs of setae (three).
Lithocarpus uvariifolius (Hance) Rehd is the only plant known to be a host for S. puerensis. Heavy infestations of this pest cause a sooty mold to build up, which reduces photosynthesis and stunts the growth of the plant. L. uvariifolius is only known from China (
Table
Saissetia species of the world: a simple list with indications of distribution by zoogeographical regions. Abbreviations: Pa = Palaearctic, Na = Nearctic, Et = Ethiopian, Or = Oriental, Au = Australian and Oceanic, Nt = Neotropical.
Species | Et | Nt | Or | Au | Pa | Na |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. absona | + | |||||
S. anonae | + | |||||
S. auriculata | + | |||||
S. bobuae | + | |||||
S. carnosa | + | |||||
S. cassiniae | + | |||||
S. cerei | + | |||||
S. chimanimanae | + | |||||
S. chitonoides | + | |||||
S. coffeae | + | + | + | + | + | + |
S. discoides | + | |||||
S. dura | + | |||||
S. ficinum | + | |||||
S. glanulosa | + | |||||
S. hurae | + | |||||
S. infrequens | + | |||||
S. jocunda | + | |||||
S. lucida | + | |||||
S. malagassa | + | |||||
S. minensis | + | |||||
S. miranda | + | + | + | + | + | + |
S. mirifica | + | |||||
S. monotes | + | |||||
S. munroi | + | |||||
S. neglecta | + | + | + | + | ||
S. nigrella | + | |||||
S. oleae | + | + | + | + | + | + |
S. opulenta | + | |||||
S. orbiculata | + | |||||
S. persimilis | + | |||||
S. poinsettiae | + | |||||
S. privigna | + | + | + | |||
S. reticulata | + | |||||
S. sclerotica | + | |||||
S. scutata | + | |||||
S. socialis | + | |||||
S. somereni | + | |||||
S. subpatelliformis | + | |||||
S. tolucana | + | |||||
S. velfozoi | + | |||||
S. vivipara | + | + | ||||
S. xerophila | + | |||||
S. zanthoxylum | + | |||||
S. zanzibarensis | + |
We are grateful to Prof. William H. Reissig from Cornell University (New York, USA) and Dr. John Richard Schrock (Emporia State University, USA) for helpful suggestion on the manuscript and language proofing of the manuscript before submission. This study is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31772502).