First records of Gnathia Leach, 1814 and Tachaea Schioedte &amp; Meinert, 1879 from South Korea, with descriptions of two new species (Isopoda, Cymothoida, Cymothooidea)

Ji-Hun Song; Gi-Sik Min

doi:10.3897/zookeys.787.26291

Abstract

Two new species of cymothoid isopods, Gnathia koreana sp. n. and Tachaea koreaensis sp. n., are described from South Korea. The genera Gnathia Leach, 1814 and Tachaea Schioedte & Meinert, 1879 are recorded for the first time in South Korea. Gnathia koreana sp. n. is distinguished from its congeners by having the smooth dorsal surface of the pereon, the strongly ridged unornamented paraocular ornamentation, the strong bifid mediofrontal process, and the serrated superior frontolateral process. Tachaea koreaensis sp. n. is distinguished from its congeners by having the expanded propodus with serrated inferior margins in pereopods 1–3, the propodus with serrated inferodistal margins in pereopods 4–7, one seta on the apical lobe of the maxilla, and ten robust setae on the posterior margin of the pleotelson.

Keywords

Corallanidae , Gnathia , Gnathiidae , Isopoda , South Korea, Tachaea

Introduction

The isopod crustacean family Gnathiidae Leach, 1814 is one of the nine families belonging to the superfamily Cymothooidea Leach, 1814. This family is unusual among isopods as its members exhibit peculiar morphological differences between juveniles (praniza stage) and adults (Cohen and Poore 1994, Ota 2012, Tanaka 2004, Tanaka and Nishi 2011). In addition, they have biphasic life cycles with ectoparasitic larva (praniza stage) and free-living adults (Hadfield et al. 2009, Ota et al. 2012, Smit et al. 2003). Pranizas are regarded to be parasites of fishes, whereas adults are non-feeding and have a degenerated intestine (Golovan 2006; Tanaka and Nishi 2011). The genus Gnathia Leach, 1814 is the largest group in this family and is currently composed of 126 species distributed worldwide (Boyko et al. 2008; Cohen and Poore 1994).

The family Corallanidae Hansen, 1890 also belongs to the superfamily Cymothooidea. The genus Tachaea Schioedte & Meinert, 1879 is the smallest group in this family and is currently composed of seven species (Boyko et al. 2008). The type species, Tachaea crassipes Schioedte & Meinert, 1879 is the only marine species found in the coral reefs of Singapore, whereas other species are found in freshwater habitats as ectoparasites of fish and various shrimp species (Delaney 1989).

Herein, we report two new species collected from South Korea, Gnathia koreana sp. n. and Tachaea koreaensis sp. n. The genera Gnathia and Tachaea were first found in the United Kingdom and Singapore, respectively, but the present study represents the first record of these genera in South Korea.

Materials and methods

Sampling

Specimens of G. koreana sp. n. were collected using light traps from Geomun-do Island (approximately 10 m depth) in South Korea. The sediment at the sampling site was characterized as organic-rich muddy sand. Specimens of T. koreaensis sp. n. were collected as ectoparasites on the freshwater shrimps Macrobrachium nipponense (De Haan, 1849) and Palaemon paucidens De Haan, 1844 collected from reservoirs in South Korea. All specimens were preserved immediately after collection in 95% ethyl alcohol. The type specimens of the two new species have been deposited in the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), Incheon, South Korea.

Morphological analysis

The specimens were transferred to glycerine for dissection, and then examined and dissected under a dissection microscope (Olympus, model SZX-7). Figures of dissected appendages were drawn under a light microscope with an attached drawing tube (Leica, model DM 2500). Figures of the whole body were drawn using a drawing tube attached to a stereomicroscope (Olympus, model SZX-12). The lengths of all appendages and the whole body were measured with a stage micrometre (Leica, model no. 11513106) and an ocular micrometre. The photograph of the whole body of G. koreana sp. n. was taken using a digital camera (eXcope, model K6) mounted on a stereomicroscope, and those of the cephalon was taken using a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi, model S-4200). Pre-treatments were performed based on the methods described by Song and Min (2016).

Morphological terminology and the orientation of each appendage largely follows Bruce (2009); some morphological terms were taken from Cohen and Poore (1994) to retain descriptive consistency for the cephalic appendages of G. koreana sp. n. Setal terminology largely follows Watling (1989). Unless otherwise specified, the setae are simple.

Taxonomy

Suborder Cymothoida Wägele, 1989

Superfamily Cymothooidea Leach, 1814

Family Gnathiidae Leach, 1814

Genus Gnathia Leach, 1814

Type species

Gnathia maxillaris (Montagu, 1804) by original designation.

Key to the species of Gnathia from Japan, Korea, and Russian Far East

This key is based on males.

1	Dorsal surface of pereon without tubercles	2
–	Dorsal surface of pereon with tubercles, especially anteriorly	13
2	Paraocular ornamentation absent; mandible without incisor	3
–	Paraocular ornamentation present; mandible with incisor	8
3	Dorsal surface of cephalon with tubercles; pylopod with three articles	G. limicola Ota & Tanaka, 2007
–	Dorsal surface of cephalon without tubercles; pylopod with two articles	4
4	Body very setose; inferior margins of pereopods without tubercles	G. capillata Nunomura & Honma, 2004
–	Body smooth or sparsely setose; inferior margins of pereopods with tubercles	5
5	Mediofrontal process bifid	6
–	Mediofrontal process a single projection	7
6	Mediofrontal process broad, not elongated; superior frontolateral process triangular; mandible mediocre	G. bungoensis Nunomura, 1982
–	Mediofrontal process narrow anteriorly, elongated; superior frontolateral process rounded; mandible stout	G. mutsuensis Nunomura, 2004
7	Mediofrontal process acute; mandibular setae absent	G. nasuta Nunomura, 1992
–	Mediofrontal process rounded; mandibular setae present	G. sanrikuensis Nunomura, 1998
8	Mediofrontal process absent	G. maculosa Ota & Hirose, 2009
–	Mediofrontal process present	9
9	Mediofrontal process dividing into two apices; internal lobe of mandible absent	10
–	Mediofrontal process not divided, a single projection; internal lobe of mandible present	12
10	Lateral margins of pereonites 2 and 3 with serrations; mediofrontal process broad, with remarkably concave apex	G. scabra Ota, 2012
–	Lateral margins of pereonites 2 and 3 without serrations; mediofrontal process narrow, with bifid apex	11
11	Paraocular ornamentation forming a ridge; superior frontolateral process rounded, serrated	G. koreana sp. n.
–	Paraocular ornamentation not forming a ridge, with three indistinct tubercles; superior frontolateral process acute, not serrated	G. excavata Ota, 2012
12	Cephalon without tubercles; paraocular ornamentation forming a ridge; mediofrontal process conical, longer than superior frontolateral process	G. camuripenis Tanaka, 2004
–	Cephalon with tubercles; paraocular ornamentation not forming a ridge, with several tubercles; mediofrontal process rounded, shorter than superior frontolateral process	G. kumejimensis Ota, 2012
13	Mandible as long as or shorter than half-length of cephalon, with smooth blade	14
–	Mandible longer than half-length of cephalon, with dentate blade	16
14	Cephalon with distinct serrations on lateral margins; mandible as long as half-length of cephalon	G. tuberculata Richardson, 1909
–	Cephalon serrated, but without distinct serrations on lateral margins; mandible shorter than half-length of cephalon	15
15	Epimera linguiform, visible dorsally on pleonites 1–5, directed to the sideward	G. derzhavini Gurjanova, 1933
–	Epimera acute, visible dorsally on pleonites 4 and 5, directed downward	G. schmidti Gurjanova, 1933
16	Body sparsely setose; pylopod with two articles	G. teruyukiae Ota, 2011
–	Body very setose, covered with long setae; pylopod with three articles	17
17	Mediofrontal process broad, not elongated; epimera not visible dorsally on all pleonites	18
–	Mediofrontal process narrow anteriorly, elongated; epimera visible dorsally on pleonites 3–5	20
18	Mediofrontal process dividing into two apices; supraocular lobe with blunt apex	G. rufescens Ota, 2015
–	Mediofrontal process not divided, rounded; supraocular lobe with dentate apex	19
19	Dorsal surface of pereonite 4 without tubercles; superior frontolateral process with four setae	G. albipalpebrata Ota, 2014
–	Dorsal surface of pereonite 4 with tubercles; superior frontolateral process with several setae and tubercles	G. parvirostrata Ota, 2014
20	Dorsolateral surface of pereonites 5 and 6 with tubercles; pleotelson with acute apex	G. nubila Ota & Hirose, 2009
–	Dorsolateral surface of pereonites 5 and 6 without tubercles; pleotelson with rounded apex	G. dejimagi Ota, 2014

Gnathia koreana sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/BF1A7F54-5E72-41B3-9573-54D967EF55BE

Figures 1, 2, 3, 4

Material examined

Holotype: adult male (4.6 mm, NIBRIV0000554213); Yeogaekseon terminal, Geomundo Island, Yeosu-si, Jeollanam-do, South Korea; 34°01'37"N, 127°18'27"E; 31 May 2014; approximately 10 m; coll. J.-H. Song. Paratype: adult male (4.3 mm, NIBRIV0000554214), same sample as holotype.

Etymology

The specific name ‘koreana’ is derived from the name of the nation from which the specimens were collected.

Diagnosis

Pereon dorsal surface smooth, sparsely setose, without tubercles. Cephalon dorsal surface sparsely setose with several granules medially. Paraocular ornamentation strongly developed, forming a ridge, without tubercles. Mediofrontal process strong and bifid. Superior frontolateral process shorter than mediofrontal process, rounded, and serrated. Mandible without pseudoblade and internal lobe.

Figure 1.

Gnathia koreana sp. n., male holotype A body, dorsal view B body, dorsal view C cephalon D mandible E paraocular ornamentation, dorsal view F paraocular ornamentation, lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm (A, B), 0.5 mm (C, F), 0.4 mm (D), 0.1 mm (E).

Description

(adult male, holotype).Body (Figures 1A, B, 2A) 3.2 times as long as greatest width; dorsal surfaces smooth, sparsely setose. Cephalon (Figure 1C) rectangular, 0.7 times as long as wide, lateral margins slightly convex and smooth; dorsal surface sparsely setose with several granules medially; dorsal sulcus wide, deep; paraocular ornamentation (Figure 1E, F) strongly developed, forming ridge, without tubercles; posteromedian tubercle present. Eyes (Figure 2A) 0.3 times as long as cephalon. Supraocular lobe (Figure 2A) weak, with blunt apex; accessory supraocular lobe not pronounced. Mediofrontal process (Figure 2B) elongated, bifid. Superior frontolateral process (Figure 2B) shorter than mediofrontal process, serrated. Inferior frontolateral process absent. Pereonites 1–7 (Figure 2A) without tubercles on dorsal surface, lateral margins smooth; pereonite 1 not fused dorsally with cephalon, dorsolateral margins fully obscured by cephalon; pereonite 2 wider than pereonite 1; pereonite 4 with anterior constriction; areae laterales present on pereonite 5; pereonite 6 with lobi laterales; pereonite 7 narrow, overlapping pleon; lobuii weak, globular. Pleonites 1–5 (Figure 2A), epimera not visible dorsally. Pleotelson (Figure 4F) 0.9 times as long as anterior width, lateral margins smooth, anterolateral margins not concave, posterolateral margins weakly concave; mid-dorsal surface with two sub-median setae, posterolateral margins with two submarginal setae, apex with two setae.

Antennula (Figure 2C) peduncle article 2 0.6 times as long as article 1; article 3 1.7 times as long as article 2; flagellum with five articles. Antenna (Figure 2D) peduncle article 4 3.0 times as long as wide, 1.2 times as long as article 3, with two penicillate setae; flagellum with seven articles.

Figure 2.

Gnathia koreana sp. n., male holotype A body, dorsal view B mediofrontal process and superior frontolateral process C antennula D antenna E mandible F maxilliped G pylopod. Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 0.5 mm (B), 0.1 mm (C–E), 0.2 mm (F, G).

Mandible (Figures 1C, D, 2E) 0.5 times as long as width of cephalon, curved upward; mandibular seta present; carina present, unornamented; incisor elevated, distally rounded; dentate blade with five weak processes; pseudoblade absent; internal lobe absent; dorsal lobe absent; basal neck short; erisma absent; lamina dentate absent. Maxilliped (Figure 2F) article 1 lateral margin with continuous marginal setae; article 2 lateral margin with three plumose setae; article 3 lateral margin with seven plumose setae; article 4 lateral margin with four plumose setae; article 5 with seven plumose setae; endite extending to distal margin of article 2; without coupling setae. Pylopod (Figure 2G) with three articles; article 1 1.4 times as long as wide, without distolateral lobe, with three areolae; posterior and lateral margins forming rounded curve; lateral margin with 30 plumose setae; mesial margin with continuous setae, distal margin with 5–6 setae; article 2 1.3 times as long as wide; article 3 minute.

Pereopods 2–6 (Figure 3A–E) without long plumose setae; basis superior margin with 2–3 penicillate setae; dactylus superodistal margin with one penicillate seta. Pereopod 2 basis 2.4 times as long as greatest width, superior margin with two setae, inferior margin with three setae; ischium 0.7 times as long as basis, 2.4 times as long as wide, superior margin with three setae, inferior margin with four setae and four tubercles; merus 0.6 times as long as ischium, 1.8 times as long as wide, superodistal margin with one seta, inferior margin with one seta and four tubercles; carpus as long as merus, 2.1 times as long as wide, superodistal margin with one seta, inferior margin with three setae and three tubercles; propodus 0.8 times as long as ischium, 3.5 times as long as wide, superior margin with three setae, inferior margin with two robust setae; dactylus 0.3 times as long as propodus. Pereopods 3–6 similar, but basis superior margin with 3–6 tubercles.

Figure 3.

Gnathia koreana sp. n., male holotype. A pereopod 2 B pereopod 3 C pereopod 4 D pereopod 5 E pereopod 6. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–E).

Pleopods 1–5 (Figure 4A–E) similar. Pleopod 2 exopod 2.3 times as long as wide, with 8 plumose setae; endopod 2.5 times as long as wide, with seven plumose setae; appendix masculina with parallel margins, 0.6 times as long as endopod, distally rounded. Uropod (Figure 4F) rami extending beyond pleotelson, apices rounded; peduncle with two setae; endopod 2.6 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin with three setae, mesial margin with eight plumose setae, dorsally with one penicillate seta; exopod not extending to end of endopod, 4.0 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin with three setae; mesiodistal margin with three plumose setae.

Figure 4.

Gnathia koreana sp. n., male holotype A pleopod 1 B pleopod 2 C pleopod 3 D pleopod 4 E pleopod 5 F pleotelson and uropod. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–E), 0.1 mm (F).

Habitat

This species was collected at approximately 10 m depth corresponding to a sedimentary bottom of muddy sand.

Remarks

Gnathia koreana sp. n. is distinguished from other known species of Gnathia by the following characters: 1) the dorsal surface of the pereon without tubercles, 2) the paraocular ornamentation is strongly developed, forming a ridge, without tubercles, 3) the mediofrontal process is strong and bifid, 4) the superior frontolateral process is shorter than the mediofrontal process, rounded, and serrated, and 5) the mandible without internal lobe.

Gnathia koreana sp. n. is most similar to G. excavata from Japan in terms of the following characters: the body is smooth, the mediofrontal process is bifid, and the mandible without internal lobe. However, the new species is distinguished from G. excavata by the shape of the paraocular ornamentation and superior frontolateral process. In G. excavata, the paraocular ornamentation with three indistinct tubercles and the superior frontolateral process is acute and not serrated. In comparison, in the new species, the paraocular ornamentation with distinct unornamented ridge and the superior frontolateral process is rounded and serrated.

Distribution

Only known from the type locality.

Family Corallanidae Hansen, 1890

Genus Tachaea Schioedte & Meinert, 1879

Type species

Tachaea crassipes Schioedte & Meinert, 1879

Distribution

Six species are distributed in Asia: Tachaea chinensis Thielemann, 1910 (China, Japan, Thailand, and Malaysia); T. crassipes Schioedte & Meinert, 1879 (Singapore); T. koreaensis sp. n. (South Korea); T. lacustris Weber, 1892 (Indonesia); T. spongillicola Stebbing, 1907 (India); and T. tonlesapensis Nunomura, 2006 (Cambodia). Two species are distributed in Australia: T. caridophaga (Riek, 1953) (Queensland); T. picta (Riek, 1967) (Queensland and New South Wales) (Delaney 1989; Nunomura 2006).

Key to the species of Tachaea

This key is based on females. Therefore, we excluded T. crassipes that is designated the holotype based on the male specimen.

1	Propodus of pereopod 1 expanded on inferior margin	2
–	Propodus of pereopod 1 not expanded on inferior margin	4
2	Maxillipedal palp with three articles; endopod of uropod surpassing pleotelson	*T. chinensis*
–	Maxillipedal palp with four articles; endopod of uropod not surpassing pleotelson	3
3	Pereonite 1 as long as pereonite 2; incisor of mandible with two cusps; apical lobe of maxilla without seta; pleotelson with eight robust setae on posterior margin	*T. spongillicola*
–	Pereonite 1 1.7 times longer than pereonite 2; incisor of mandible with one cusp; apical lobe of maxilla with one seta; pleotelson with ten robust setae on posterior margin	T. koreaensis sp. n.
4	Incisor of mandible with three cusps; maxillipedal palp with five articles	*T. tonlesapensis*
–	Incisor of mandible with one or two cusps; maxillipedal palp with three or four articles	5
5	Pereonite 1 longer than other pereonites, 2.0 times longer than pereonite 5; apex of pleotelson with truncated margin	*T. lacustris*
–	Pereonite 1 marginally longer or shorter than pereonite 5; apex of pleotelson with rounded margin	6
6	Pereonite 1 longer than pereonite 5; maxillipedal palp with three articles	*T. caridophaga*
–	Pereonite 1 shorter than pereonite 5; maxillipedal palp with four articles	*T. picta*

Tachaea koreaensis sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/4FB4AD83-2912-448A-8734-19C4CAD443D6

Figures 5, 6, 7

Material examined

Holotype: non-ovigerous female (4.8 mm, NIBRIV0000554215); Buheungji reservoir, Yeongcheon-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea; 35°55'19"N, 128°59'14"E; 18 April 2013; approximately 2 m; coll. K.-S. Sim; ectoparasites of Macrobrachium nipponense. Paratype: non-ovigerous female (4.3 mm, NIBRIV0000754063); Wolga reservoir, Wolga-ri, Gunnae-myeon, Jindo-gun, Jeollanam-do, South Korea; 34°29'36"N, 126°17'35"E; 23 September 2016; 1.4 m; using a landing net; coll. D.-H. Ahn, C. W. Lee, H.-M. Yang and J.-H. Song; ectoparasites of Palaemon paucidens.

Etymology

The specific name ‘koreaensis’ is derived from the name of the nation from which the specimens were collected.

Diagnosis

Pereopods 1–3 propodus expanded with serrations on inferior margins. Pereopods 4–7 propodus with serrations on inferodistal margins. Mandible incisor with one cusp. Maxilla apical lobe with one seta. Maxillipedal palp with four articles. Pleotelson with ten robust setae on posterior margin.

Figure 5.

Tachaea koreaensis sp. n., female holotype. A body, dorsal view B ventral view of bases of antennula, frontal lamina, and clypeus C antennula D antenna E mandible F maxilliped G maxillula H maxilla. Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 0.5 mm (B), 0.2 mm (C, D), 0.1 mm (E–H).

Description

(non-ovigerous female, holotype).Body (Figure 5A) 2.2 times as long as greatest width. Colour yellowish; chromatophores on all somites, including both antennae and uropods. Cephalon (Figure 5A) 2.6 times wider than medial length. Eyes (Figure 5A) with 26–28 ommatidia. Pereonite 1 (Figure 5A) longest, 1.7 times as long as pereonite 2 and 4, 1.4 times as long as pereonite 3, 1.8 times as long as pereonite 5, 2.1 times as long as pereonite 6, 2.8 times as long as pereonite 7.

Frontal lamina (Figure 5B) elongate, narrow; clypeus short and broad.

Antennula (Figure 5C) peduncle article 1 triangular, 1.1 times as long as wide, with four setae and two penicillate setae; article 2 0.7 times as long as article 1, with two setae and one penicillate seta; article 3 minute, 0.2 times as long as article 2, with three setae distally; flagellum with seven articles, articles 3–6 with 2 aesthetascs, articles 6 and 7 minute. Antenna (Figure 5D) peduncle article 1 0.8 times as long as wide, with one seta; article 2 shortest, with two setae; article 3 2.0 times as long as article 2, with two setae; article 4 with two setae; article 5 with six setae and two penicillate setae; articles 4 and 5 similar length; flagellum with 12 articles, each articles with six setae.

Mandible (Figure 5E) palp article 2 with four serrate setae and two setae; article 3 with seven short serrate setae, three serrate setae. Lacinia mobilis and molar process absent; incisor monocuspid. Maxillula (Figure 5G) lateral lobe forming single large curved spine. Maxilla (Figure 5H) short, apical lobe with one seta. Maxilliped (Figure 5F) without endite; palp with four articles, narrow, 4.4 times as long as wide.

Pereopods 1–3 (Figure 6A–C) similar, propodus inferior margins expanded with serrations. Pereopod 1 basis 2.7 times as long as greatest width, superior margin with three setae, inferodistal margin with one seta; ischium 0.6 times as long as basis, 1.8 times as long as wide, superior margin with two setae, inferior margin with two setae; merus 0.6 times as long as ischium, 0.8 times as long as wide, superodistal margin with two setae and one robust setae, inferodistal margin with three robust setae, inferior margin with one seta; carpus shortest, 0.4 times as long as merus, 0.3 times as long as wide, superodistal margin without setae, inferodistal margin with five robust setae; propodus 1.2 times as long as ischium, 1.7 times as long as wide, superior margin with one seta and one penicillate seta, inferior margin with three robust setae, one comb seta and one seta; dactylus 0.5 times as long as propodus. Pereopods 4–7 (Figure 6D–G) similar, propodus inferodistal margins with serrations. Pereopods 4 and 5 carpi with three comb setae; pereopod 6 carpus with four comb setae, propodus with three comb setae; pereopod 7 carpus with seven comb setae, propodus with five comb setae.

Figure 6.

Tachaea koreaensis sp. n., female holotype. A pereopod 1 B pereopod 2 C pereopod 3 D pereopod 4 E pereopod 5 F pereopod 6 G pereopod 7. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–G).

Pleopods 1–5 (Figure 7A–E) similar; exopod broader, longer than endopod, with plumose setae; endopod naked. Pleopods 1–4 peduncle wider than long, with 5–6 coupling spines and 1–2 plumose setae. Pleopod 5 peduncle without coupling spines. Uropod (Figure 7F) rami reaching pleotelson; peduncle distal margin with three setae, proximal margin with two setae, lateral margin with one seta; endopod (Figures 5A, 7G) not surpassing pleotelson, 2.1 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin with one robust setae and plumose setae, mesial margin truncate, with seven robust setae and plumose setae; exopod (Figures 5A, 7H) not extending to end of endopod, 3.1 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin with four robust setae and plumose setae; mesiodistal margin with three robust setae and plumose setae. Pleotelson (Figure 7I) 0.8 times as long as anterior width; posterior margin rounded, with ten robust setae and numerous plumose setae.

Figure 7.

Tachaea koreaensis sp. n., female holotype. A pleopod 1 B pleopod 2 C pleopod 3 D pleopod 4 E pleopod 5 F uropod G uropod endopod H uropod exopod I pleotelson. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–H), 0.4 mm (I).

Remarks

Tachaea koreaensis sp. n. is distinguished from other known species of Tachaea by the following combination of characters: 1) the inferior margins of the propodus of pereopods 1–3 is expanded with serrations, 2) the inferodistal margins of the propodus of pereopods 4–7 with serrations, 3) the apical lobe of the maxilla with one seta, and 4) the posterior margin of the pleotelson with ten robust setae.

Tachaea koreaensis sp. n. is most similar to T. spongillicola from India, but it can be distinguished from the latter by the following characters: the ratio of pereonite 1 to pereonite 2, the number of cusps on the mandible, the presence or absence of setae on the apical lobe of the maxilla, and the number of robust setae on the posterior margin of the pleotelson. In T. spongillicola, the pereonite 1 is as long as the pereonite 2, the incisor of the mandible with two cusps, the apical lobe of the maxilla without seta, and the posterior margin of the pleotelson with eight robust setae. In comparison, in the new species, the pereonite 1 is 1.7 times as long as the pereonite 2, the incisor of the mandible with one cusp, the apical lobe of the maxilla with one seta, and the posterior margin of the pleotelson with ten robust setae.

Distribution

Jeollanam-do and Gyeongsangbuk-do (South Korea).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from Inha University. We thank ‘Kwang-Sub Sim’ (Natural Environmental Restoration Institute Co., LTD, Korea) for providing specimens of T. koreaensis sp. n.

References

Boyko CB, Bruce NL, Hadfield KA, Merrin KL, Ota Y, Poore GCB, Taiti S, Schotte M, Wilson GDF (Eds) (2008) World Marine, Freshwater and Terrestrial Isopod Crustaceans database. Gnathia Leach, 1814. http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=118437 [2018-08-13]

Boyko CB, Bruce NL, Hadfield KA, Merrin KL, Ota Y, Poore GCB, Taiti S, Schotte M, Wilson GDF (Eds) (2008) World Marine, Freshwater and Terrestrial Isopod Crustaceans database. Tachaea Schioedte & Meinert, 1879. http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=249378 [2018-08-13]

Bruce NL (2009) The marine fauna of New Zealand: Isopoda, Aegidae (Crustacea). National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, New Zealand, 252 pp.

Cohen BF, Poore GCB (1994) Phylogeny and biogeography of the Gnathiidae (Crustacea: Isopoda) with descriptions of new genera and species, most from south-eastern Australia. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 54: 271–397. https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1994.54.13

Delaney PM (1989) Phylogeny and biogeography of the marine isopod family Corallanidae (Crustacea, Isopoda, Flabellifera). Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 409: 1–75.

Golovan’ O (2006) Gnathia gurjanovae sp. n., a new species of gnathiids (Isopoda: Gnathiidae) from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 32: 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063074006010044

Gurjanova EF (1933) Contributions to the Isopoda-Fauna of the Pacific. Gnathiidea and Asellota. Isseledovaniia Morei SSSR (Exploration of the Seas of the USSR) Leningrad 19: 79–91.

Hadfield KA, Smit NJ, Avenant-Oldewage A (2009) Life cycle of the temporary fish parasite, Gnathia pilosus (Crustacea: Isopoda: Gnathiidae) from the east coast of South Africa. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89: 1331–1339. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315409000587

Hansen HJ (1890) Cirolanidæ et familiæ nonnullæ propinquæ musei hauniensis. Et bidrag til kundskaben om nogle familier af isopode krebsdyr. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter, 6te Raekke, Naturvidenskabelig Og Mathematisk Afdeling 3: 239–426. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.10325

Leach WE (1814) Crustaceology. Brewster’s Edinburgh Encyclopaedia, Vol 7: 383–437.

Montagu G (1804) Description of several marine animals found on the South Coast of Devonshire. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 7: 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1818.tb00327.x

Nunomura N (1982) A new gnathiid isopod from Saeki Bay, western Japan. Bulletin of the Toyama Science Museum 4: 17–21.

Nunomura N (1992) Marine Isopoda from Amakusa, Kyushu (II). Publications from the Amakusa Marine Biological Laboratory, Kyushu University 11: 59–71.

Nunomura N (1998) A new species of the gnathiid isopod crustacean from the sea off Sanriku, northern Japan. Bulletin of the Toyama Science Museum 21: 55–60.

Nunomura N (2004) Isopod crustaceans collected from Aomori Prefecture Northern Japan. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University 29: 351–360.

Nunomura N (2006) A new species of the genus Tachaea (Isopoda, Corallanidae) from the Lake Tonle Sap, Cambodia. Bulletin of the Toyama Science Museum 29: 17–21.

Nunomura N, Honma Y (2004) Gnathia capillata, a new species of the genus Gnathia (Crustacea, Isopoda) from Sado Island, the Sea of Japan. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University 29: 343–349.

Ota Y (2011) A new species of the gnathiid isopod, Gnathia teruyukiae (Crustacea: Malacostraca), from Japan, parasitizing elasmobranch fish. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science Series A Zoology 5: 41–51.

Ota Y (2012) Gnathiidae from Kumejima Island in the Ryukyu Archipelago, southwestern Japan, with description of three new species (Crustacea: Isopoda). Zootaxa 3367: 79–94.

Ota Y (2014) Three new gnathiid species with larvae ectoparasitic on coastal sharks from southwestern Japan (Crustacea: Isopoda). Zootaxa 3857: 478–500. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3857.4.2

Ota Y (2015) Pigmentation patterns are useful for species identification of third-stage larvae of gnathiids (Crustacea: Isopoda) parasitising coastal elasmobranchs in southern Japan. Systematic Parasitology 90: 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-015-9548-1

Ota Y, Hirose E (2009a) Description of Gnathia maculosa and a new record of Gnathia trimaculata (Crustacea, Isopoda, Gnathiidae), ectoparasites of elasmobranchs from Okinawan coastal waters. Zootaxa: 50–60.

Ota Y, Hirose E (2009b) Gnathia nubila n. sp. and a new record of Gnathia grandilaris (Crustacea, Isopoda, Gnathiidae) that parasitizes elasmobranchs from Okinawan coastal waters, Japan. Zootaxa 2238: 43–55

Ota Y, Hoshino O, Hirose M, Tanaka K, Hirose E (2012) Third-stage larva shifts host fish from teleost to elasmobranch in the temporary parasitic isopod, Gnathia trimaculata (Crustacea; Gnathiidae). Marine Biology 159: 2333–2347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-012-2018-2

Ota Y, Tanaka K, Hirose E (2007) A new species of Gnathia (Isopoda: Cymothoida: Gnathiidae) from Okinawajima Island, Ryukyu Archipelago, southwestern Japan. Zoological Science 24: 1266–1277. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.24.1266

Richardson H (1909) Isopods Collected in the Northwest Pacific by the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries Steamer “Albatross” in 1906. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 37: 75–129. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.37-1701.75

Riek E (1953) A corallanid isopod parasitic on freshwater prawns in Queensland. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 259–261.

Riek E (1967) A new corallanid isopod parasitic on Australian freshwater prawns. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 176–178.

Schioedte JC, Meinert FW (1879) De Cirolanis Aegas simulantibus commentatio brevis. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, Tredie Raekke 12: 279–302.

Smit NJ, Basson L, Van As JG (2003) Life cycle of the temporary fish parasite, Gnathia africana (Crustacea: Isopoda: Gnathiidae). Folia Parasitologica 50: 135–142. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2003.024

Song J-H, Min G-S (2016) First record of the Cleantioides rotundata (Malacostraca: Isopoda: Holognathidae) from South Korea. Journal of Species Research 5: 309–312. https://doi.org/10.12651/JSR.2016.5.3.309

Stebbing TRR (1907) A freshwater isopod from Calcutta. Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology) 30: 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1907.tb02121.x

Tanaka K (2004) A new species of Gnathia (Isopoda: Cymothoida: Gnathiidae) from Ishigaki Island, the Ryukyus, southwestern Japan. Crustacean research 33: 51–60. https://doi.org/10.18353/crustacea.33.0_51

Tanaka K, Nishi E (2011) Male Dimorphism in the Harem-Forming Gnathiid Isopod Elaphognathia discolor (Crustacea: Isopoda). Zoological Science 28: 587–592. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.28.587

Thielemann M (1910) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Isopodenfauna Ostasiens. Abhandlungen der mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der Koeniglich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Supplement 2: 1–109.

Watling L (1989) A classification system for crustacean setae based on the homology concept. In: Felgenhauer B, Watling L, Thistle AB (Eds) Functional morphology of feeding and grooming in Crustacea (Vol.6). A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 15–26.

Weber MWC (1892) Die Süsswasser-Crustaceen des Indischen Archipels. Zoologische Ergebnisse einer Reise in Niederlandisch Ost-Indien 2: 528–571.