Research Article |
Corresponding author: Fahad Jaber Alatawi ( falatawi@ksu.edu.sa ) Academic editor: Vladimir Pesic
© 2018 Muhammad Kamran, Eid Muhammad Khan, Fahad Jaber Alatawi.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Kamran M, Khan EM, Alatawi FJ (2018) The spider mites of the genus Eutetranychus Banks (Acari, Trombidiformes, Tetranychidae) from Saudi Arabia: two new species, a re-description, and a key to the world species. ZooKeys 799: 47-88. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.799.25541
|
Two new species of the genus Eutetranychus Banks are described and illustrated based on adult females and males, E. spinosus sp. n. from Indigofera spinosa Forssk (Leguminosae), E. neotransversus sp. n. from Juniperus procera Hochst. ex Endl. (Cupressaceae), and E. palmatus Attiah, 1967 is redescribed from Washingtonia robusta H. Wendl. (Arecaceae). Additionally, the intraspecific morphological variations within E. orientalis populations, collected from 28 various host plants and 80 different localities from six regions of Saudi Arabia from 2009 to 2017, are discussed and presented. The genus Eutetranychus is divided into two species groups based on the presence of one seta (orientalis group) or two setae (banksi group) on coxa II. In addition, seven Eutetranychus species are suggested as synonyms of E. orientalis (Klein, 1936) and E. papayensis Iqbal & Ali, 2008 is considered as species inquirenda. A key to all known species of the genus Eutetranychus is provided.
Key, morphological variations, new species, palmatus , phytophagous mites
The spider mites belonging to the genus Eutetranychus (Acari: Tetranychidae) mostly feed on shrub and tree leaves (
The genus Eutetryanchus belongs to the tribe of Eurytetranychini Reck of the subfamily Tetranychinae.
The two species E. orientalis and E. banksi are widely distributed over the world and have been reported from approximately 223 and 84 various host plants, respectively (
The aims of the present study were to explore Eutetranychus species from Saudi Arabia, to develop a key to the world species of this genus and to discuss the morphological intraspecific variations in E. orientalis populations collected from different hosts and localities from Saudi Arabia. In this study, two new species of Eutetranychus; E. spinosus sp. n. and E. neotransversus sp. n. are described and illustrated based on adult females and males (Figs
Eutetranychus spider mites were collected from diverse host plants from different localities in six regions (Al–Ula, Madina, Nijran, Riyadh, Tabuk, and Taif) of SA during 2009–2017. The mite specimens were collected by shaking the aerial parts of plants over a white piece of paper. The mites moving on paper were picked with camel hair brush and preserved in small vials containing 70% alcohol, then mounted in Hoyer’s medium under a stereomicroscope (SZX10, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were examined and identified under a phase contrast microscope (BX51, Olympus®, Japan) using keys and available literature. Different mite body parts were pictured by using an auto-montage software system (Syncroscopy, Cambridge, UK) and then drawn with Adobe Illustrator (Adobe SystemInc., San Jose, CA, USA). All measurements are given in micrometers. The lengths of the legs were measured from the base of the trochanter to the tip of tarsus. The measurements are presented for the holotype followed by the range of paratypes in parenthesis. The morphological terminology used in this study follows that of
Neotetranychus (Eutetranychus) Banks, 1917: 197.
Anychus McGregor, 1919: 644.
Eutetranychus
Banks,
Tetranychus banksi McGregor, 1914.
Based on
Diagnosis. Coxa II with two setae.
(Based on female). Dorsal body setae long, slender, serrate, all set on small tubercles except v2 and sc1, dorsocentral setae c1, e1 and f1 longer than the distance between their base and the bases of next consecutive setae; setae c1 and f1 shorter than distances between c1−c1 and f1−f1 respectively, setae e1 almost as long as distance e1−e1; dorsum with simple striae except area anterior to setae sc1 with lobed striae, striae between setae d1 “V” shaped, genua and tibiae I−IV 5−5−3−3; 9(1)−7−8−8, respectively.
Female (n = 12) (Figures
Body oval, color in life greenish yellow. Length of body (excluding gnathosoma) 315 (312−325), (including gnathosoma) 396 (390−405), maximum width 221 (218−231).
Dorsum (Figure
Venter (Figure
Gnathosoma (Figure
Legs (Figures
Male (n = 3) (Figures
Length of body (excluding gnathosoma) 300−310, (including gnathosoma) 350−361, maximum width 237−246.
Dorsum (Figure
Venter (Figure
Gnathosoma (Figure
Aedeagus (Figure
Legs (Figures
unknown.
The species name is derived from name of the host plant species, Indigofera spinosa, of which type specimens were collected.
Holotype female and four paratype females, Indigofera spinosa (Leguminosae), Al- Shifa road, Taif, 21°05.824'N, 040°19.111'E, elevation 2102 m, 11 Oct 2016, leg. M Kamran and M Rehman; five paratype females, Indigofera spinosa (Leguminosae), As Sayl Saghir, Taif, 21°30.521'N, 040°28.202'E, elevation 1516 m, 10 Sept 2017, leg. Eid M Khan and M Rehman; two paratype females, Indigofera spinose (Leguminosae), Al Sayl Kabeer, Taif, 21°37.371'N, 040°24.212'E, elevation 1240 m, 15 Sept 2017, leg. Eid M Khan and M Rehman.
Eutetranychus spinosus sp. n. belongs to the banksi species group. It closely resembles E. namibianus
Legs chaetotaxy of world species of the genus Eutetranychus (including new species).
Species | Femora I–IV | Genua I–IV | Tibiae I–IV | Tarsi I–IV | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species group orientalis | |||||
neotransversus sp. n. | 5-4-2-1 | 4-4-1-2 | 6(1)-5-4-4 | 15(2)-14(1)-10(1)-10(1) | Present study |
bilobatus | 8-5-4-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-6-7 | 15(2)-13(2)-10-10 |
|
caricae | 7-6-2-1 | 5-4-1-1 | 8-5-5-5 | 15(2)-12 (1)-10(2)-10(1) |
|
citri | – | – | 9(1)-5 | – |
|
maximae | 8-6-3-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-5-7 | 15(2)-13(2)-10(1)-9(1) |
|
mirpuriensis | 8-6-3-2 | 5-5-2-2 | 10-6-6-7 | 14-12-11-11 |
|
nagai | 8-5-3-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-6-7 | 15(2)-13(1)- 9(2)-10 (1) |
|
orientalis | 8-6-3/4 -1/2 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1-4)-6(0-2)-6(0-1)-7 | 15(3)-13(1-2)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
8-6-4-2 | 5-5-2-2 | 9-7-6-7 | 15-13-11-11 |
|
|
8-7/6-3/4-1/2 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-6-7 | 15(3)-13(1)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
|
8/7-7/6/5-4/3-1/2 | 5-5-2-2 | 9/8(1)-7/6-6/5-7/6 | 15(3)-13(1)-10(1)-10(1) | Present study | |
palmatus | – | – | 9(1) | – |
|
8-6-2-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(2)-6(2)-6-7 | 15(3)-13(2)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
|
8-7-4-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-6-7 | 15(3)-13(1)-10(1)-10(1) | Present study | |
pantopus | – | – | 9(1)-5 | – |
|
pyri | – | – | 9(1)-5 | – |
|
transverstriatus | 7-7-4-3 | 4-4-2-2 | 10-6-6-6 | 10-10/9-10(1)-10(1) |
|
*fici | 8-6-3-2 | 5-5/6-2-2 | 9(1)-6-6-7 | 15(1-3)-13(1)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
*phaseoli | 8-7-3-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-6-7 | 15(3)-13(2)-10(1)-10 |
|
* pruni | 8-7-3-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-6-7 | 12(3)-11(1)-8(1)-8(1) |
|
*ricinus | 8-7-4/3-2 | 5-5-2-2 | 9/8(1)-6-6-7 | 15(1)-10(1)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
*sanaae | 8-7-4/3-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-7/6-6-7 | 11(1)-11(2)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
*guangdongensis | Mentioned in original description same as E. orientalis | Ma and Yaun 1982 | |||
*xianensis | Ma and Yaun 1982 | ||||
Species group banksi | |||||
spinosus sp. n. | 8/7-6-2-1 | 5-5-4/3-3 | 9(1)-7-8-8 | 15(2)-13(2)-10(1)-10(1) | Present study |
acaciae | 6/7-4-3-1 | 3-3-1-1 | 8(1)-4/5-3-5 | 13(4)- 12(3)-10(1)-10(1) | Based on pictures send by Dr. Owen D. Seeman |
africanus | 8-6-3-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-6-7 | 15(2/3)-13(1)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
anitae | 9-6-4-3 | 5-5-3-2 | 9(4)-7(2)-6/7-7 | 13(3)-12(2)-11(1)-10(1) | By personal communication with Dr. Elizeu Castro |
banksi | 6/7-4/6-2-1 | 4-4-2-2 | 9(1)-6-4/5-5/6 | 14(2)-12(2)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
bredini | 8-7-4-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-5-5 | – |
|
carinae | 8-6-2-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-5-6 | 15(2)-13(1)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
clastus | 8-6-3-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-5-5-6 | 15(3)-13(1)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
concertativus | 7-6-2-2 | 5-5-5-3 | 9(1)-7-8-8 | 15(2)-13(2)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
cratis | 8-6-3-2 | 3-3-2-2 | 6(1)-5-4-5 | 14(3)-13(1)-10-10(1) |
|
eliei | 8-6-2-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-5-6 | 15(1)-13(1)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
enodes | 8-6-3-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-6-5-7 | 15(2)-13(2)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
namibianus | 7-6-2-1 | 5-5-3-3 | 9(1)-7-8-8 | 15(2)-13(1)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
nomurai | 6-6-2-1 | 5-5-2-2 | 9(1)-8/7-8/7-8/7/9 | 12/13/14(3)-12/13(1/2)-12/13(1/2)-10(1) |
|
rhusi | 7-6-2-1 | 5-5-3-3 | 9(1)-7-7-8/7 | 15(2)-13(1)-10(1)-10(1) |
|
swazilandicus | 8-6-2-2 | 5-5-3-3 | 9(1)-7-8-8 | 15(3)-13(2) - 10(1) - 10(1) |
|
Diagnosis. Coxa II with one seta.
Dorsal body setae slender and serrate, all set on small tubercles; hysterosoma medially with transverse striae; propodosoma with lobed striae, hysterosomal striae simple (without lobes); stylophore slightly notched anteriorly; leg I shorter than body length; femora, genua, tibiae and tarsi I−IV: 5−4−2−1; 4−4−1−2; 6 (1)−5−4−4; 12(3ζ, 2ω)−11(3ζ, 1ω)−10(1ω)−10(1ω), respectively.
Female (n = 8) (Figures
Dorsum (Figure
Venter (Figure
Gnathosoma (Figure
Legs (Figures
Male (n = 2) (Figures
Body oval; Length of body (excluding gnathosoma) 236−246, (including gnathosoma) 335−353, maximum width 154−165.
Dorsum (Figure
Venter (Figure
Gnathosoma (Figure
Aedeagus (Figure
Legs (Figures
Unknown.
The species name is derived from the transverse striations on dorsal hysterosoma.
Holotype female and four paratype females, Juniperus procera Hochst. Ex Endl. (Cupressaceae), Al-Shifa road, Taif, 21°04.690'N, 040°18.928'E, elevation 2244 m, 11 Oct 2016, leg. M Kamran and M Rehman; three paratype females, J. procera , Ash Shifa road, Taif, 21°06.481'N, 040°20.526'E, elevation 2133 m, 12 Sept 2017, leg. Eid M Khan and M Rehman.
Eutetranychus neotransversus sp. n. belongs to orientalis species group. It closely resembles E. transverstriatus Smiley & Baker, 1995 because the entire hysterosoma dorsomedially in both bear transverse striations. The new species is different from E. transverstriatus by stylophore anteriorly slightly notched vs. rounded; hysterosomal striae without lobes vs. with distinct lobed striae; number of setae on femora I−IV 5−4−2−1 vs. 7−7−4−3; genu III 1 vs. 2 and tibiae I−IV 6(1)−5−4−4 vs. 10−6−6−6 in E. transverstriatus (Table
Eutetranychus
palmatus
Attiah, 1967: 12−13,
Eight females, Washingtonia sp. (Arecaceae), Taif, 21°17.220'N, 040°21.963'E, elevation 1736 m, 11 Oct 2016, leg. M Kamran and M Rehman; seven females, Washingtonia sp., Tabuk, 28°23.754'N, 036°32.81'E.
Date palm, Phoenix dactylifera L. (
Egypt, Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia.
of female (n = 15) (Figures
Body oval, color in life greenish yellow. Length of body (excluding gnathosoma) 414−425, (including gnathosoma) 435−455 and maximum width 325−345.
Dorsum (Figure
Venter (Figures
Gnathosoma (Figure
Legs (Figures
Male (n= 4) (Figures
Body oval, length of body (excluding gnathosoma) 340−355, (including gnathosoma) 405−425 and maximum width 206−220.
Dorsum (Figure
Venter (Figure
Gnathosoma (Figure
Aedeagus (Figure
Legs (Figures
Eutetranychus palmatus Attiah, 1967 is different from all other species of the genus Eutetranychus by having all dorsal body setae without tubercles. It was described and illustrated from date palm trees in Egypt (
Anychus latus Klein, 1936: 3.
Eutetranychus
orientalis
(Klein):
Eutetranychus monodi Andre, 1954: 859.
Eutetranychus anneckei Meyer, 1974: 148−149.
Eutetranychus sudanicus Elbadry, 1970: 301−305.
Twenty seven females, Citrus sp., Education Farm, King Saud University, Riyadh, 24°44.253'N, 46°37.225'E, 01 Feb 02 Apr 2009, 26 Oct 01 Nov 2010, 14, 24 Apr 2011, leg. J Basahih, and T Martibi; one female, Citrus sp., Dariyah, Riyadh, 24°44.866'N, 46°34.624'E, 02 Feb 2009, leg. J Basahih; seven females, Vitis vinifera and Citrus sp., Ammaria, Riyadh, 24°49.194'N, 46°28.163'E, 12 Apr 2009, 10 Mar 2011, leg. W Negm; five females, Hayer, Riyadh, 24°23.611'N, 46°49.464'E, 28 Apr 2009, leg. J Basahih; two females, Rhodat ul Khoraim, Riyadh, 03, 9 May 2009, leg. J Basahih;, three females, Citrus sp., Waseel, Riyadh, 24°48.786'N, 46°31.180'E, 11 Oct 2009, 23 Apr 2010, leg. J Basahih; four females, Citrus sp., Juniperus sp., and Grasses under P. dactylifera, near students housing King Saud University, Riyadh, 24°43.484'N, 46°36.985'E, 20 Sep 2010, 28 Mar 2011, leg. J Basahih; eight females, P. dactylifera, Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud University, Riyadh, 24°48.759'N, 46°42.735'E, 13, 27 Dec 2010, 01, 25 Jan 25, 23 Mar 2011, leg. J Basahih ; twelve females, Citrus sp., Nijran, 18 Apr 28 Sept 2011, leg. Jaid; six females, Citrus sp. Qassim, 26°00.612'N, 044°00.166'E, 26 May 2011, leg. J. Basihih and A. Majeed; two females, Acacia sp., and soil under P. dactylifera Al-Madina, 24°26.335'N, 39°36.866'E, 19 Jun 13 Oct 2011, leg. M Kamran and W Negm; eleven females, Datura sp., and Citrus sp., Wadi Namar, Riyadh, 24°34'18.9N, 46°40'40.4E, 14 Oct 2012, leg. M Kamran; two females, Nerium oleander, Dariyah, Riyadh, 24°44.866'N, 46°34.624'E, 5 Apr 2014, 18 Mar 2015 leg. M Kamran; two females, Tamarix sp. and Saccharum sp., Deesa valley, Tabuk, 27°36'049N, 36°25'785E, 17, 18 Oct 2015, leg. M Kamran; two females, P. dactylifora, Al-Sail Kabeer, Taif, 21°33.882'N, 040°18.048'E, 15 Oct 2016, leg. M Kamran and M Rehman; two females, Citrus sp., Khayber, 25°34.563'N, 39°19.375'E, 1 Nov 2016, leg. M Kamran and E M Khan; nine females, Citrus sp., Ziziphus sp., and Albizia sp., Al-Ula, 26°48.757'N, 37°58.241'E, 2 Nov 2016, leg. M Kamran and E M Khan; twenty five females, Citrus sp., Mangifera sp., P. dactylifera, Olea sp., Psidium sp., Azadirachta sp., and Ficus sp., Al-Ula, 26°39.923'N, 37°55.032'E. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 May 2017, leg. E M Khan and M Rehman.
Variations within the different populations of Eutetranychus orientalis.
Morphological variations of Eutetranychus orientalis in 91 female specimens that were collected from 28 various host plants and 80 different localities in six regions of Saudi Arabia during 2009 to 2017 are shown in Figures
The most prominent variations within in E. orientalis populations are in the length and shape of dorsal setae. These variations including, dorsocentral setae length [c1 (10−51), d1 (12−50), e1 (14−41) and f1 (10−45)] and shape [oblanceolate, ovate, obovate, subspatulate and spatulate] (Figure
Striations patterns between the dorsocentral setae d1 and e1 varied either forming “V” shaped pattern (n = 80; Figure
Moreover, all dorsal setae in E. orientalis collected in this study are set on tubercles; lateral setae are on prominent tubercles as compared to dorsocentral setae (c1, d1, and e1) which are mostly set on relatively smaller tubercles (n = 73). However, in some specimens setae c1, d1, and e1 are without distinct tubercles (n = 19) as shown in Figure
Our observations also showed that legs setal count was fixed in E. orientalis on coxae, trochanters, and genua I−IV (2−1−1−1, 1−1−1−1 and 5−5−2−2), respectively (see Table
The spermathecal sacculus terminally varied from rounded to slightly pointed in some specimens of this study (Figures
The morphological variations in E. orientalis have resulted in misidentifications and additions of new species in the genus Eutetranychus. Because some morphological variations have now been reported in E. orientalis, four species Anychus ricini Rahman & Sapra, 1940, E. monodi André, 1954, E. sudanicus El Badry, 1970, and E. annecki Meyer, 1974 were synonymized with E. orientalis by
Eutetranychus fici Meyer, reported from Africa, was separated from E. orientalis by the slightly longer dorsocentral setae, shape of spermathecal sacculus, and length of palp spinneret (Table
Because these seven species have been differentiated in their original descriptions by only one or more variable characters which have also been observed in E. orientalis populations (
Variable morphological characters used to differentiate some Eutetranychus species suggested as synonyms of E. orientalis in the current study.
Suggested synonyms of E. orientalis | Characters used to differentiate in original descriptions | Reference | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dorsocentral setae, short, medium or long | Shape of dorsal setae | Setae on femur II | Setae on femur IV | Striations pattern b/w e1 and d1 | Spermatheca distally | Length of palp spinneret as compared to width | ||
E. fici | long, extending to the bases of next setae in line | Spatulate to subspatulate | 6 | 2 | V shaped | rounded | 4 times |
|
E. pruni | Short to medium | Slender | 7 | 1 | longitudinal | –* | –* |
|
E. ricinus | Short to medium | oblanceolate to subspatulate | 7 | 2 | longitudinal | –* | – |
|
E. sanaae | Short to medium | Slender | 7 | 1 | V shaped | –* | –* |
|
E. phaseoli | Short | Subspatulate | 7 | 1 | V shaped | –* | –* |
|
E. guangdongensis | Short to medium | Spatulate to Subspatulate | Mentioned the same as in E. orientalis | –* | –* | Ma and Yaun 1981 | ||
E. xianensis** | Short | Spatulate to Subspatulate | –* | –* | Ma and Yaun 1981 | |||
E. orientalis | Short, medium and long almost extending to the bases of next setae in line | Slender, Spatulate, subspatulate, oblanceolate | 6, 6/7, 7 Variable | 1, 2,1/2 Variable | V shaped or longitudinal | Pointed or rounded | 3 to 4 times |
|
Eutetranychus papayensis Iqbal & Ali, 2008: 125−130.
Female, from Carica papaya L. (Caricaceae), Abbottabad, Pakistan.
Eutetranychus papayensis was described with coxae I−IV 2−2−2−2 (whereas they illustrate 2−2−1−1 setae) and three pairs of anal setae. Also, the empodium of this species were neither described nor illustrated. So, based on these characters together, E. papayensis can neither be placed in Eutetranychus nor even in other genera of the family Tetranychidae.The first author has informed us that type specimens of this species have been lost. Therefore, E. papayensis is considered as a species inquirenda.
After excluding those seven species which we suggest as synonyms and one species inquirenda, the genus Eutetranychus includes 28 species (including the new species described herein) and is divided into two species groups based on the number of setae (one or two) on coxae II: the species group orientalis has one seta on coxa II (12 species) and the species group banksi has two setae on coxa II (16 species). The number of setae on coxae II has been considered as a solid morphometric character founded to be strongly constant in all specimens of each Eutetranychus species (
1 | Coxa II with 2 setae | species group banksi −2 |
– | Coxa II with 1 seta | species group orientalis −17 |
2 | Setae f1 two times more widely spaced as setae e1 or marginal in position | 3 |
– | Setae f1 equally spaced or slightly more widely spaced as setae e1 | 5 |
3 | Hysterosoma with elipitical elevations in between dorsocentral setae c1 and e1; dorsal setae set on strong tubercles | cratis Baker & Pritchard, 1960 (Congo) |
– | Hysterosoma without elipitical elevations in between dorsocentral setae c1 and e1, dorsal setae set on small tubercles | 4 |
4 | Genua I and II with 5 setae, setae f1 marginal in position | anitae Estebanes-Gonzalez & Baker, 1968 (Mexico) |
– | Genua I and II with 4 setae, setae f1 in normal position | banksi (McGregor, 1914) (USA) |
5 | Hysterosoma dorsomedially with transverse striations | nomurai Flechtmann, 1997 (Brazil) |
– | Hysterosoma dorsomedially with a band of “V” shaped or longitudinal striae between setae d1 and e1 | 6 |
6 | Genua III and IV with 1 seta | acaciae Miller, 1966 (Tasmania) |
– | Genua III and IV with more than 1 setae | 7 |
7 | Genu III with 5 setae | concertativus Meyer, 1974 (Namibia) |
– | Genu III with 2 or 3 setae | 8 |
8 | Genua III and IV with 3 or 4 setae | 9 |
– | Genua III and IV with 2 setae | 12 |
9 | All dorsal body setae slender, much longer; dorsocentral setae c1, e1 and f1 reaching past bases of next consecutive setae | spinosus sp. n. |
– | All dorsal body setae short, oblanceolate to subspatulate, dorsocentral setae c1, d1 and f1 reaching at least half distance of next consecutive setae | 10 |
10 | Femur I with 7 setae, femur IV with 1 setae | 11 |
– | Femur I with 8 setae, femur IV with 2 setae | swazilandicus Meyer, 1974 (South Africa) |
11 | Tibia III with 7 setae | rhusi Meyer & Ueckermann, 1988 (South Africa) |
– | Tibia III with 8 setae | namibianus Meyer, 1987 (Namibia) |
12 | Tibia II with 5 setae | 13 |
– | Tibia II with 6 setae | 14 |
13 | Setae v2 as long as to the distance v2−v2, setae f2 reaching past bases of setae h; dorsal setae slender; all setae with tubercles | bredini Baker & Pritchard, 1960 (Rwanda) |
– | Setae v2 and f2 reaching one third to the distances v2−v2 and f2−h1respectively; dorsal setae oblanceolate to subspatulate; only few opisthosomal setae set on tubercles | clastus Baker & Pritchard, 1960 (Congo) |
14 | Tibia III with 6 setae, dorsocentral (c1, d1, e1) setae on prominent tubercles | africanus (Tucker, 1926) (South Africa) |
– | Tibia III with 5 setae, dorsocentral (c1, d1, e1) setae with small tubercles | 15 |
15 | Tibia IV with 7 setae, femur III with 3 setae | enodes Baker & Pritchard, 1960 (Congo) |
– | Tibia IV with 6 setae, femur III with 2 setae | 16 |
16 | Tarsus I with solenidion of loosly associated setae about two third as long as proximal tactile seta, tarsus II with this solenidion slightly longer than proximal tactile setae | carinae Meyer, 1974 (South Africa) |
– | Tarsus I with solenidion of loosly associated setae about less than half as long as proximal tactile seta, tarsus II with this solenidion about two third as long as than proximal tactile seta | eliei Gutierrez & Helle, 1971 (Madagascar) |
17 | Entire hysterosoma dorsomedially with transverse striations | 18 |
– | Hysterosoma dorsomedially in between setae d1 and e1 with longitudinal or “V” shaped band of striations | 19 |
18 | Femora I−IV with 5−4−2−1 | neotransversus sp. n. |
– | Femora I−V with 7−7−4−3 | transverstriatus Smiley & Baker, 1995 (Yemen) |
19 | Idiosoma with none of dorsal setae set on tubercles | palmatus Attiah, 1967 (Egypt) |
– | Idiosoma with most of the dorsal body setae set on tubercles | 20 |
20 | Tibia II with 5 setae | 21 |
– | Tibia II with 6/7 setae | 24 |
21 | Most of dorsal setae set on strong tubercles; striae on prodorsum medially tortuous forming crescentic pattern | pyri Attiah, 1982 (Egypt) |
– | Dorsal setae set on relatively small tubercles; striae on prodorsum medially longitudinal and lobed | 22 |
22 | Dorsal body setae slender tapering towards tips, most of dorsal setae longer than the distance between their base and the bases of the next consecutive setae | pantopus (Berlese, 1910) (Australia) |
– | Dorsal body setae sub-spatulate to oblanceolate with blunt tips; most of setaeespecially dorsocentrals (c1, d1, e1, f1) short far behind the next consecutive setae | 23 |
23 | Tibia I with 8 setae, all dorsal setae set on tubercles | caricae Nassar & Ghai, 1981 (India) |
– | Tibia I with 9 setae, setae c1, d1, e1, f1, sc2 and c3 without tubercles | citri Attiah, 1967 (Egypt) |
24 | Tibia III with 5 setae | maximae Nassar & Ghai, 1981 (India) |
– | Tibia III usually with 6/7 setae or (sometime 5 setae on one side while on other side of tibia in same specimen of E. orientalis) | 25 |
25 | Femur II with 5 setae | 26 |
– | Femur II usually with 6/7 except 5 setae on femur II in some specimens of E. orientalis) | 27 |
26 | Peritremes ending in bilobed bulb; setae e2 short reaching half to the bases of setae e1 and f1 | bilobatus Nassar & Ghai, 1981 (India) |
– | Peritremes ending in a simple bulb-like structure; setae e2 long reaching the bases of setae e1 and f1 | nagai Nassar & Ghai, 1981 (India) |
27 | All dorsal setae long slender with tapering tips, dorsocentral setae c1, e1, f1 crossing the bases of next consecutive setae; setae e1 crossing the bases of h1 | mirpuriensis Chaudhri, Akbar & Rasool, 1974 (Pakistan) |
– | Most of dorsal setae oblanceolate to subspatulate; setae e1 far behind the bases of h1 | orientalis (Klein, 1936) |
The authors wish to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at the King Saud University, Riyadh, for providing facilities and funds to complete this research through the research project [RG-1438-055]. We are also grateful to Dr Carlos HW Flechtmann (University of Sao Paulo, Departamento de Entolomogia e Acarologia, Brazil) and Dr Elizeu Castro (UNESP-Universidade Estadual Paulista, campus de São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil) for providing literature.