Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new Cervinotaptera species from northern Madagascar (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Aradidae)
expand article infoPetr Baňař, Ernst Heiss§
‡ Moravian Museum, Department of Entomology, Brno, Czech Republic
§ Tiroler Landesmuseum, Innsbruck, Austria
Open Access

Abstract

A new species, Cervinotaptera tomhenryi, sp. n. (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Aradidae: Mezirinae), from Montagne d’Ambre National Park in northern Madagascar is described and illustrated. The newly described species is compared with the only other known species, Cervinotaptera guilberti Heiss & Marchal, 2012.

Keywords

apterous, Cervinotaptera , Mezirinae , new species, northern Madagascar

Introduction

The first comprehensive studies on Aradidae of Madagascar and adjacent islands were provided by Ludvík Hoberlandt (1957, 1963). In the last two decades Ernst Heiss published several taxonomic papers, describing many new genera and species, and summarized all published works in a catalogue (Heiss 2012). Most recently, two new genera and five new species of aradids were published (Heiss et al. 2012, Heiss and Marchal 2012, Heiss and Baňař 2013, Baňař et al. 2016, Baňař and Heiss 2018).

The genus Cervinotaptera Heiss & Marchal, 2012 (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Aradidae: Mezirinae) was erected for the apterous species Cervinotaptera guilberti Heiss & Marchal, 2012 from northern Madagascar (Heiss and Marchal 2012). During the expeditions of the first author in January 2015 and January 2016 to Montagne d’Ambre National Park in northern Madagascar, twelve specimens of a new species of Cervinotaptera were collected. The species is described in this paper.

Materials and methods

The body surface of most apterous, litter-living aradids is frequently covered by a layer of incrustations, which obscure body structures and intersegmental boundaries (Figure 1C). It was therefore necessary to clean the specimens before examination. In this case, we used a combination of mechanical cleaning in distilled water with common detergent and short treatment in 10% KOH.

The term "dorsal ocular index" refers to the ratio of the minimum interocular distance to the maximum width of the eye; it is best calculated if measured as: (twice minimum interocular distance) / (maximum width across eyes, minus minimum interocular distance).

Color photographs of the newly described species were taken with a Leica MSV266 camera. Scanning electron micrographs of a gold-coated specimen were taken using a JEOL 6380 LV scanning electron microscope.

Measurements were taken using a SZP 11 ZOOM stereoscopic microscope with an eyepiece micrometer. Label data are cited verbatim, including potential errors, using a slash (/) to separate lines on the label; different labels are mentioned and indicated by a double slash (//). Notes of the authors are in [square brackets].

Abbreviations used in text:

deltg dorsal external laterotergite (connexivum),

mtg mediotergite,

vltg ventral laterotergite,

pe-angle posteroexterior angle (of deltg).

The material studied is deposited in following collections:

MMBC Moravian Museum, Brno, Czech Republic

CEHI Ernst Heiss collection, Tiroler Landesmuseum, Innsbruck, Austria.

Taxonomy

Family Aradidae Brullé, 1836

Subfamily Mezirinae Oshanin, 1908

Genus Cervinotaptera Heiss & Marchal, 2012

Cervinotaptera tomhenryi sp. n.

Figures 1A–C; 2; 3; 4A–B, D–E, G

Material examined

Type material. Holotype male, ‘MDA/Jan.2015/11 N MADAGASCAR / MONTAGNE D‘AMBRE ~945m, circuit / „Sommet“, S12°31’28‘‘E49°09’52‘‘ / sifting litter+rotten wood, Winkler app. extr. / 14.1.2015, P. Baňař & E.M. Rabotoson lgt.’ [printed] // ‘HOLOTYPE / Cervinotaptera / tomhenryi sp. nov. / Baňař & Heiss des. 2018’ [printed red label] (MMBC). Paratypes: 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, same locality label as holotype [one male gold-coated for SEM] (1 ♂, 1 ♀ MMBC; 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ CEHI); 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀: ‘MDA/Jan.2015/12 N MADAGASCAR / MONTAGNE D‘AMBRE ~1100m / sifting litter close to camp, 16.1.2015 / Winkler apparatus extraction / P. Baňař & E.M. Rabotoson lgt.’ (1 ♀ MMBC; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ CEHI), 3 ♂♂: ‘MDA/Jan.2016/02 N MADAGASCAR / MONTAGNE D‘AMBRE 1165m, circuit / „Sommet“, S12°31’50‘‘E49°10’16‘‘ / sifting Pandanus litter, Winkler app. extr. / 13.1.2016, P. Baňař & E.M. Rabotoson lgt.’ [all three males permanently stored in absolute ethanol available for DNA study] (MMBC). All paratypes are provided with a label: ‘PARATYPE / Cervinotaptera / tomhenryi sp. nov. / Baňař & Heiss des. 2018’ [printed red label].

Description

Apterous, body short, broadly oval (Figures 1A–C, 2A). Coloration dark brown to blackish, tarsi and apex of antennal segment IV somewhat paler. Thorax and abdominal laterotergites with tubercle-like processes.

Figure 1. 

Cervinotaptera species, dorsal habitus. A C. tomhenryi sp. n., male holotype B C. tomhenryi sp. n., female paratype C C. tomhenryi sp. n., male paratype, uncleaned specimen D C. guilberti Heiss & Marchal, 2012, female holotype. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Measurements

(in mm). Male holotype (one female paratype in brackets). Total body length: 3.62 (4.04); head length (without collar): 0.67 (0.71); head width across eyes: 0.84 (0.86); minimum interocular distance: 0.59 (0.60); length of antennal segments: I: 0.37 (0.39), II: 0.22 (0.23), III: 0.67 (0.69), IV: 0.37 (0.38); pronotum length [including tubercles]: 0.60 (0.60), pronotum width [including tubercles]: 1.42(1.42); maximum width of abdomen: 1.98 (2.33), tergal plate length: 0.93 (0.93); tergal plate width: 1.22 (1.33).

Head (Figures 2C–D, 4A–B) with longitudinal furrows and ridges and few globular tubercles on dorsal and lateral faces, numerous and more conspicuous on ventral face; wider than long, width : length ratio 1.25 in male, 1.21 in female; clypeus reaching nearly middle of antennal segment I, antenniferous lobes short, slightly shorter than clypeus; antennae long, 1.92 times as long as width of head in male, 1.95 times in female, segment I slightly bent at base, thickest, segment II thinner and shortest, segment III thinnest and longest, segment IV fusiform, antennal formula (longest segment first): III:I=IV:II. Eyes very small, globular, slightly stalked, ocular index 4.72 in male, 4.60 in female. Labium very short, hardly reaching two thirds of head length.

Figure 2. 

Cervinotaptera tomhenryi sp. n., male paratype, scanning electron micrographs. A dorsal habitus B dorsal habitus, anterior view C head, anterior view D head, dorsal view E pronotum, dorsal view. Scale bars in mm.

Pronotum 2.37 times as long as wide across lateral tubercles in both sexes; anterior lobe with two pairs of lateral tubercles (Figures 2E, 4G), posterior lobe smooth at middle, lateral lobes each with four finger-like processes, posterior margin convex with two small tubercles directed posteriorly. Pronotum separated from mesonotum by deep and wide furrow.

Mesonotum fused to metanotum, fusion lines only partly visible, posteriorly with conspicuous median elevation bearing two semicircular tubercles. Posterior margin with two deep pits connected with very deep and broad median depression on metanotum.

Metanotum (Figure 3B). Fused to mesonotum and mtg I+II, with rectangular median depression on anterior margin. Fused mtg I+II with deep median pit anteriorly, posteriorly with prominent median elevation, lateral parts with two (1+1) round elevations. Posterior margin of mtg I+II almost straight, clearly delimited from tergal plate by conspicuous furrow.

Figure 3. 

Cervinotaptera tomhenryi sp. n., male paratype, scanning electron micrographs. A tergal plate B mesonotum and metanotum with fused mediotergites I+II C triangular sclerite of fused dorsal external laterotergites II+III D apex of tubercle of dorsal external laterotergites II+III E pygophore dorsal view F pygophore lateral view. Scale bars in mm.

Abdomen. Tergal plate (Figure 3A) shorter than wide, ratio width to length 1.31 in male, 1.43 in female. Scent gland scars visible on posterior margins of mtg III and IV only. Deltg II+III fused to elongate triangular sclerite (Figure 3C), bearing two pairs of finger-like processes, inner process directed upwards, outer process strictly lateral. Deltg III-VII well separated from each other, bearing pair of processes similar to those on deltg II+III, shorter on deltg VI and VII. Vltg VII of male with posteriorly directed glabrous finger-like projections. Spiracles on ventral laterally produced tubercles decreasing in size from vltg II–VII, visible from above, those of paratergites VIII terminal. Metathoracic scent gland with long curved evaporatorium and additional ovate evaporatorium laterally of anterior coxae.

Legs unarmed, slender, sparsely covered with short, semi-erect setae. Femora widening distally, tibiae slightly curved.

Male genitalia (Figures 3E–F). Visible part of pygophore convex, short, and wide, surface with rugosities; parameres hook-like; paratergites VIII rounded, shorter than pygophore.

Female. General body structures similar in both sexes, female larger and wider.

Etymology

Dedicated to our dear colleague and friend Thomas J. Henry, eminent student of the Heteroptera.

Collecting circumstances

All known specimens were collected by sifting mountain evergreen rain forest leaf litter in Montagne d’Ambre National Park (Figure 6A–B) in northern Madagascar. Sifted samples were extracted in a Winkler apparatus during two or three days and were mixed several times daily. Cervinotaptera tomhenryi sp. n. shared the microhabitat with the recently described carventine aradid Comorocoris estherineae Baňař & Heiss, 2018; the largest parts of the type series of both species were extracted from the same samples during the expedition of 2015.

Distribution

Known only from Montagne d’Ambre National Park in northern Madagascar.

Differential diagnosis

Cervinotaptera tomhenryi sp. n. differs from Cervinotaptera guilberti Heiss & Marchal, 2012 by wider head; longer and thinner antennae; less curved antennal segment I; shorter antennal tubercles (Figures 4A–C); different proportions of deltg II+III sclerite (longer and narrower in C. tomhenryi sp. n.); larger and more prominent tubercles on deltg II+III (smaller in C. guilberti) (Figure 4D–F); and shape and size of finger-like processes on pronotum (Figure 4G–H).

Figure 4. 

Cervinotaptera species. A–C outline of head D–F fused dorsal external laterotergites II+III G–H lateral finger-like processes of pronotum. A, D C. tomhenryi sp. n., male holotype B, E, G C. tomhenryi sp. n., female paratype C, F, H C. guilberti Heiss & Marchal, 2012, female holotype. Scale bars in mm, D–H schemes, not measured.

Figure 5. 

Map of distributions of Cervinotaptera species.

Figure 6. 

Microhabitats of Cervinotaptera tomhenryi sp. n. in Montagne d’Ambre National Park. A sample MDA/Jan.2015/12 B sample MDA/Jan.2015/11.

Discussion

Apterous Aradidae in stable tropical habitats of Madagascar tend to develop curious abdominal structures such as forked lateral expansions on the thorax and abdomen (Chlonocoris Usinger & Matsuda, 1959), ovate callosities and nodules (Comorocoris Heiss, 1985) or finger-like projections of different size (Cervinotaptera) and, in Mezirinae, show a remarkable development of unusual structures of metathoracic (Ambohitantelya Heiss & Baňař, 2013) and even prothoracic scent-gland evaporatoria. The adaptive value of these unusual structures and their importance in aradid classification are unknown and require further investigation.

Acknowledgments

Petr Baňař would like to thank Dr. Lala Harivelo Ravaomanarivo Raveloson (University of Antananarivo, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Entomology), Dr. Mamy A. Rakotoarijaona (Directeur des Opérations, Madagascar National Parks) and Dr. Dimby Raharinjanahary (Chargé des Bases de données de suivi biodiversité et recherche, Madagascar National Parks) for supporting our research project: ‘Étude à long terme de la biodiversité des groupes choisis d’insectes: Coléoptères, Hétéroptères, Homoptères, Lépidoptères et quelque famille de Micro Lépidoptères nocturne dans les localités préalablement sélectionnées en considération de la recherche et la protection de la biodiversité dans les aires protégées de Madagascar. Analyse des risques potentiels d’influencer négativement la biodiversité dans les régions étudiées’. This work was financially supported (to Petr Baňař) by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic, as part of its long-term conceptual development program for research institutions (ref. MK000094862).

References

  • Baňař P, Heiss E, Hubáčková L (2016) New species of Ribesaptera Heiss from eastern Madagascar (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Aradidae). Zootaxa 4088(1): 146–150. http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4088.1.9
  • Heiss E (1985) Eine neue aptere Aradidengattung aus Afrika (Heteroptera, Aradidae, Carventinae). Revue Zoologique africaine 99: 147–152.
  • Heiss E (2012) Annotated catalogue of the flat bug family Aradidae Brullé, 1836 of Madagascar and adjacent islands (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Zootaxa 3426: 45–63.
  • Heiss E, Baňař P (2013) Ambohitantelya yuripopovi gen. nov. et sp. nov. a new apterous Mezirinae from Madagascar (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Aradidae) with unique metathoracic evaporatoria. Zootaxa 3616(3): 291–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3616.3.8
  • Heiss E, Baňař P, Rahanitriniaina LS (2012) Two new species of the apterous carventinae genus Comorocoris Heiss, 1985 from Madagascar (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Aradidae). Zootaxa 3411: 63–68.
  • Heiss E, Marchal L (2012) Cervinotaptera guilberti n. gen., n. sp., a conspicuous apterous Mezirinae from Madagascar (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Aradidae). Zootaxa 3591: 84–88.
  • Hoberlandt L (1957) Aradoidea (Heteroptera) from Madagascar and Adjacent Islands. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, Supplementum 4: 1–109.
  • Hoberlandt L (1963) Additional notes on Aradidae (Heteroptera) from Madagascar and Adjacent Islands. Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 35: 127–170.
  • Usinger RL, Matsuda R (1959) Classification of the Aradidae. British Museum (N.H. ), London, 410 pp.
login to comment