As part of the ongoing discussion on the sustainable use of landscapes and ecosystem services we give here an overview on the relationship between biodiversity and carbon sequestration in forests as revealed by a long-term study in north-western Poland with particular reference to carabid beetle diversity.

From the very beginning of life, environmental resources on Earth have been shaped by natural succession processes, influenced by climate, and by various disturbances such as orogenic movements, windfall, floods and fires. Depending on latitude and the geological base, these disturbance factors vary among various places on the globe. The lack of catastrophes entails the buildup of organic substances, which can be measured simply with the content of carbon. The content of carbon in a single hectare of natural forest of the moderate climatic zone shaped by succession processes for thousands of years, exceeds 350 tons/ha with upper limits estimated between 500 and 700 tons/ha (Luyssaert et al. 2008). Half of this resource is stored in living organisms (plants, animals, fungi) while the other half is stored in the soil (litter and humus compounds in the mineral soil) (e.g. Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2010).

In such old forests (old ecosystems created by nature), ecosystems have a specific composition of plant, animal and fungal species. Species that are linked to old trees, old decaying wood, and well developed soil, occur here (Fig. 1). In such forests in the European geographic zone the full range of carabid species with a narrow geographic arrangement, low dispersal power and large body size occurs. The Mean Individual Biomass (MIB) of the carabids beetles might exceed 350 mg in such forests (Szyszko 1990, 2002). Forests of old successional stage are poor in butterflies (Szyszko 2003), the majority of bumblebees (Skrok 2003) and open-area birds (Kruszewicz 2007). With no humans present, their occurrence could only be possible due to ecological catastrophes mentioned above. Fires, floods or windfalls decelerated developmental succession processes (buildup of organic substance) and thereby impoverish these systems by releasing carbon in the form of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere (Magnani et al. 2007). Such disturbances create opportunities for species characteristic for early stages of succession, e.g., carabids species of open and low vegetation or the above mentioned butterflies, bumblebees and birds characteristic of open areas. Historically, nature itself provided advantageous conditions for the full range of biodiversity of the native fauna and flora thanks to events we call “ecological catastrophes”. These catastrophes destroy old stages of succession containing much carbon and create room for species characteristic of early successional stages (Fig. 2). It is here that species such as the nightjar (Caprimulgus europaeus), skylark (Alauda arvensis), northern dune tiger beetle (Cicindela hybrida) and, with the appearing pine wilding, the sticky bun (Suillus luteus) can strive (Fig. 2). The created open areas are also an excellent place for “landscape species”, i.e., species that need different succession stages in a wider landscape for establishment of their populations (Szyszko K. 2003, Skrok 2003). Such species breed for example in places of advanced stages of succession (natural forests with high carbon content) and hunt in open areas (early successional stages with low carbon content). The common buzzard and the majority of falconids are typical examples of such species. They nest in old trees in forests and hunt where visibility is good, i.e. in open areas or environmental systems of early successional stages, with low carbon content. Ecological catastrophes also create opportunities for many species associated with different stages of natural succession by setting back the climax situation and thereby reducing the carbon content in the environmental systems (Fig. 3).

Humans play a similar role in shaping ecosystems and landscapes. Ecological catastrophes can destroy the effects of our economic activities and constitute a danger our its safety. This is why humans manage the environment by trying to reduce floods, fires and windfalls. However, to preserve the full range of biodiversity, humans replace the forces of nature and mimic its destructive role by active management. This can clearly be illustrated for forests in Poland. If it was not for the interference with natural succession and the reduction of the carbon content of up to a few dozen tons per ha (Fig. 4a) due to clearcuts, no pine cultivations could have emerged in forest areas. Consequently, bird species such as the nightjar (Camprimulgus europaeus) and woodlark (Lullula arborea) would have had no place to nest and the majority of birds of prey nesting in old trees would not have been able to hunt. Carabid beetles like Carabus nitens, Bembidion nigricorne, Pterostichus lepidus, Calathus erratus, Masoreus wetterhallii and Harpalus rufitarsis (resulting in a MIB value of about 50 mg) would not have occurred in this region (Szyszko 1990). Additionally, the mass appearance of fungal species such as sticky buns (Suillus luteus), sulfur tufts (Hypholoma fasciculare) or, slightly later, chanterelles (Cantharellus cibarius) and porcinis (Boletus edulis) would not have been possible (Fig. 4a). The destruction of forest habitats due to the felling of trees provides opportunities for the natural succession to start again, entailing a change in species composition with time. With an increase in the carbon content of a stand an increase in the MIB value of epigeic carabid beetles takes place, indicating regeneration of the environmental resources. In a ca. sixty year old pine stand (Fig. 4b), carbon content and the MIB value (about 250 mg) is higher compared to a young pine plantation (Fig. 4a). The species composition of birds, carabids and fungi differs clearly. Birds characteristic for the old pine stand include the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebes), great tit (Parus major) and coal tit (Parus ater). Carabids characteristic for this stage of succession include Carabus arcensis, Carabus nemoralis and Pterostichus niger and the most frequent and numerous fungi include the sickener (Russula emetica), brown roll-rim (Paxillus involutus), false morel (Gyromitra esculenta) and the cauliflower mushroom (Sparassis crispa). The planting of beech as undergrowth in ca. sixty year old pine stands followed by the removal of the pines ten years later results in the creation of beech stands, several of which in Poland are about eighty years old (Rylke and Szyszko 2002, Fig. 4c). When compared with a sixty year old pine stand, those old beech stands have higher carbon content and the MIB value of the carabid beetles exceeds 350 mg. Logically, characteristic species of birds, carabids and fungi are also different for the forest types (successional stages) presented above. Characteristic birds in the old beech stands are the black woodpecker (Drycopus martius), stock pigeon (Columba oenas) and chaffinch (Fringilla coelebes). Characteristic carabids include Carabus coriaceus, Carabus hortensis and Carabus intricatus. Characteristic fungi are the dotted stem bolete (Boletus erythropus), fleecy milk-cap (Lactarius vellereus) and the death cap (Amanita phalloides).

Data on different forests presented above suggest that a greater spatial differentiation of the carbon content in environmental systems, or in other words a greater differentiation of successional stages as measured using the MIB value of carabid coenoses, entails greater biodiversity (Fig. 5, Szyszko 2002). Hence, variability in space of the MIB value is a good measure for the value of the landscape (Fig. 5, see also Rylke and Szyszko 2001). However, the value of a landscape can be even more completely assessed if we also take into account the occurrence of species that use various successional stages, so called landscape species (Szyszko 2002). Typical examples of such species among birds are the black stork (Ciconia nigra) and the lesser spotted eagle (Aquila pomarina) (Fig. 6). These birds nest in old trees in vast forests, similar to natural ones, while they hunt in nearby meadows, floodplains and marshes. If these species are present, we can be sure that the said habitats occur in a given environmental complex and, what is more, they are not far apart. Species with similar requirements are the white-tailed eagle (Haliaetus albicilla) and the wolf (Canis lupus) (Szyszko 2002). The existence of both species seems to be linked to vast areas covered by both old and young successional stages. The former seem to play a significant role as localities for reproduction while the latter serves as a food acquisition area. Among these generally known and easily recognizable species, two others are worth mentioning: the crane (Grus grus) and white stork (Ciconia ciconia) (Szyszko 2002). Cranes choose old peatbogs and marshes surrounded by forests as a nesting site and gather food in meadows and fields, while the white stork nests mainly in villages surrounded by extensively used arable lands and feeds in meadows, marshes, fields and pastures. If we adopt Andrzejewski’s (1992) definition of the landscape as a “set of ecosystems linked by mutual dependencies creating an ecological system of a higher order”, we can assume that, as the occurrence of species characteristic for individual stages of succession is a measure of the advancement of these processes in biocoenoses, the occurrence of species using varied successional stages can be a measure of the quality and value of a landscape and an indicator of its functionality in space (Szyszko 2002). In light of these results, the suggestion to adopt the mentioned ‘landscape species’ as landscape value indicators has to be taken into account, with order of importance as follows: black stork, lesser spotted eagle, white tailed eagle, wolf, crane and white stork. The higher the number of these species and the greater their density, the higher the value of a landscape, in terms of environmental quality and biodiversity (Szyszko 2002).

Landscape quality includes biodiversity (highest in mosaic landscapes) and carbon storage (highest in peat bogs and old forests) and sequestration (highest in regenerating forests), as well as other ecosystem services. Sustainable land use is essential in maintaining or creating landscapes with high natural qualities. There is a need to assess measures of sustainable land use, and various animals mentioned in this paper, including carabid beetles and their MIB values, may serve as important indicators for this.