Research Article |
Corresponding author: Shuqiang Li ( lisq@ioz.ac.cn ) Academic editor: Charles Oliver Coleman
© 2018 Zhonge Hou, Shuangyan Zhao, Shuqiang Li.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Hou Z, Zhao S, Li S (2018) Seven new freshwater species of Gammarus from southern China (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Gammaridae). ZooKeys 749: 1-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.749.23165
|
Seven new species of the genus Gammarus are described and illustrated from southern China. The new species Gammarus vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n., G. qinling Hou & Li, sp. n., G. zhigangi Hou & Li, sp. n. and G. jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n. are characterized by inner ramus of uropod III half the length of outer ramus. Gammarus longdong Hou & Li, sp. n. is characterized by inner ramus of uropod III 0.9 times as long as outer ramus. Gammarus mosuo Hou & Li, sp. n. is characterized by pereopods V–VII with long setae on anterior margins and both rami of uropod III armed with simple setae. Gammarus caecigenus Hou & Li, sp. n. can be distinguished from other species by eyes absent. DNA barcodes of the new species are documented as proof of molecular differences between species. A key to the new species and a map of their distributions are provided.
Cave, DNA barcoding, morphology, new species, taxonomy
The genus Gammarus Fabricius, 1775 contains more than 200 freshwater, brackish, and marine species in the Northern Hemisphere (Väinölä et al. 2008), of which 80% species inhabit fresh waters. They are essential components of freshwater ecosystems, often forming bioindicators for water quality assessment (
In the last 15 years several collecting trips were carried out in southern China including Qinling, Daba Mountain, and Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. This effort allowed the collection of many freshwater Gammarus, and was followed by the preliminary description of some new species (
The specimens were collected with a fine-meshed hand net. Samples were preserved in 95% ethanol in the field, and then deposited at -20 °C refrigerator for long preservation. Type specimens are lodged in the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (
The body length was recorded by holding the specimen straight and measuring the distance along the dorsal side of the body from the base of the first antenna to the base of the telson. All dissected appendages were mounted in glycerol on slides. Appendages were drawing using a Leica DM2500 compound microscope equipped with a drawing tube. Terminology and taxonomic descriptions follow
A partial fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) was proposed as a crustacean barcode (
Collection localities of seven Gammarus species from southern China. 1 Gammarus vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n. 2 G. qinling Hou & Li, sp. n. 3 G. zhigangi Hou & Li, sp. n. 4 G. jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n. 5 G. longdong Hou & Li, sp. n. 6 G. mosuo Hou & Li, sp. n. 7 G. caecigenus Hou & Li, sp. n.
GenBank accession numbers and uncorrected pairwise distance of the COI partial sequences between species in this text.
Species | GenBank accession number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gammarus vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n. | MG550237 | ||||||
2 | Gammarus qinling Hou & Li, sp. n. | MG550238 | 0.177 | |||||
3 | Gammarus zhigangi Hou & Li, sp. n. | MG550239 | 0.207 | 0.209 | ||||
4 | Gammarus jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n. | MG550240 | 0.251 | 0.270 | 0.243 | |||
5 | Gammarus longdong Hou & Li, sp. n. | MG550241 | 0.213 | 0.202 | 0.239 | 0.255 | ||
6 | Gammarus mosuo Hou & Li, sp. n. | MG550242 | 0.214 | 0.208 | 0.227 | 0.244 | 0.227 | |
7 | Gammarus caecigenus Hou & Li, sp. n. | MG550243 | 0.264 | 0.274 | 0.275 | 0.275 | 0.288 | 0.254 |
Raw sequences were edited and assembled using MacClade 4.0 (
Gammarus pulex (Linnaeus, 1758)
Holotype: male (
The specific name alludes to its typical biotope, living in a valley; adjective.
Antenna II with setae along peduncle articles and flagellum, calceoli absent; merus to propodus of pereopods III and IV with short straight setae on posterior margins; epimeral plate II with blunt posterodistal corner; epimeral plate III with subacute posterodistal corner; uropod III inner ramus reaching 0.5 times the length of outer ramus, second article of outer ramus subequal to adjacent spines, both rami with a few plumose setae on inner margins.
(
Head (Fig.
Gammarus vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n., male holotype. A head B antenna I C flagellar article of antenna I with aesthetasc D antenna II E upper lip F lower lip G left mandible H incisor and lacinia mobilis of right mandible I left maxilla I J distal part of palp article II of right maxilla I K maxilla II L maxilliped M dorsal margins of urosomites I–III.
Antenna I (Fig.
Antenna II (Fig.
Upper lip (Fig.
Mandible (Fig.
Lower lip (Fig.
Maxilla I (Fig.
Maxilla II (Fig.
Maxilliped (Fig.
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopod III (Fig.
Gammarus vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n., male holotype. A pereopod III B dactylus of pereopod III C pereopod IV D dactylus of pereopod IV E pereopod V F dactylus of pereopod V G pereopod VI H dactylus of pereopod VI I pereopod VII J dactylus of pereopod VII K epimeral plate I L epimeral plate II M epimeral plate III.
Pereopod IV (Fig.
Pereopod V (Fig.
Pereopod VI (Fig.
Pereopod VII (Fig.
Coxal gills: coxal gill of gnathopod II and gills of pereopods III–V longer than bases; gill of pereopod VI a little shorter than basis; gill of pereopod VII smallest, half the length of basis.
Pleon.Epimeral plates (Fig.
Pleopods I–III (Fig.
Urosome.Urosomites (Fig.
Uropods I–III (Fig.
Telson (Fig.
(
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopods III–VII (Fig.
Oostegite (Fig.
Urosome.Uropods I–III (Figs
Telson (Fig.
This species was collected from a valley of south part of the Qinling. Individuals inhabit a stream, usually under decomposing leaves.
The new species of Gammarus vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n. is similar to G. craspedotrichus Hou & Li, 2002a in antenna II calceoli absent; pereopods III and IV with straight setae on posterior margins; and both rami of uropod III with plumose setae on inner margins. It differs from G. craspedotrichus (G. craspedotrichus in parentheses) by peduncle of antenna II with setae along ventral margin, setae as long as article’s diameter (antenna II with long setae along ventral margin, setae as long as three times of article’s diameter); uropod I peduncle with one basofacial spine (without basofacial spine); inner ramus of uropod III 0.5 times the length of outer ramus (as long as first article of outer ramus); terminal article of outer ramus of uropod III subequal to adjacent spines (shorter); and urosomites I–III with four clusters of dorsal spines and setae (with two clusters of dorsal spines and setae).
Gammarus vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n. is also similar to G. emeiensis Hou, Li & Koenemann, 2002 in antenna II calceoli absent; epimeral plate II with blunt posterodistal corner and plate III with subacute posterodistal corner; peduncle of uropod I with one basofacial spine; and terminal article of outer ramus of uropod III approx. as long as adjacent spines of first article. It can be distinguished from G. emeiensis by the following characters (G. emeiensis in parentheses): second article of left palp of maxilla I with seven slender spines apically (seven slender spines and three stiff setae); pereopod III with short setae on posterior margin (with long setae on posterior margin); and inner ramus of uropod III 0.5 times the length of outer ramus (0.74 times the length of first article of outer ramus).
The new species of Gammarus vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n. can be distinguished from G. martensi Hou & Li, 2004a which was collected on the summit of the Qinling by the following characters (G. martensi in parentheses): antenna II flagellum with a few setae, calceoli absent (with flag-like brush of setae, calceoli present); merus and carpus of pereopods V–VII with few marginal setae (with marginal setae); and uropod III inner ramus approx. half of outer ramus, both with a few plumose setae on inner margins (inner ramus 0.75 times as long as outer ramus, both rami densely with plumose setae on inner and outer margins).
Holotype: male (
The specific name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Antenna II calceoli present in male; pereopods III and IV with short straight setae on posterior margins of merus and propodus; epimeral plates II and III with blunt posterodistal corners; uropod III inner ramus reaching half the length of outer ramus, terminal article of outer ramus a little longer than adjacent spines, both rami with plumose setae on inner and outer margins.
(
Head (Fig.
Gammarus qinling Hou & Li, sp. n., male holotype. A head B antenna I C flagellar article of antenna I with aesthetasc D antenna II E calceoli of antenna II F upper lip G lower lip H left mandible I incisor and lacinia mobilis of right mandible J left maxilla I K distal part of palp article II of right maxilla I L maxilla II M maxilliped.
Antenna I (Fig.
Antenna II (Fig.
Upper lip (Fig.
Mandible (Fig.
Lower lip (Fig.
Maxilla I (Fig.
Maxilla II (Fig.
Maxilliped (Fig.
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopod III (Fig.
Pereopod IV (Fig.
Pereopod V (Fig.
Pereopod VI (Fig.
Pereopod VII (Fig.
Coxal gills: coxal gill of gnathopod II and gills of pereopods IV and V a little longer than bases; gill of pereopod III approx. as long as basis; gill of pereopod VI a little shorter than basis; gill of pereopod VII smallest, more than half the length of basis.
Pleon.Epimeral plates (Fig.
Pleopods I–III (Fig.
Urosome.Urosomites (Fig.
Uropods I–III (Fig.
Telson (Fig.
(
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopods III and IV (Fig.
Pereopods V–VII (Fig.
Oostegite (Fig.
Urosome.Uropods I–III (Figs
Telson (Fig.
Specimens were collected from a spring of Wulong Cave in Zibo Mountain National Forest Park, which is famous for the specific topography of sinkholes. Zibo Mountain is located in the south of Qinling.
This new species of Gammarus qinling Hou & Li, sp. n. is most similar to G. vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n. in pereopods III and IV with short setae on posterior margins; pereopods V–VII with spines along anterior and posterior margins, but few setae; and epimeral plates II and III posterior margins blunt. Gammarus qinling Hou & Li, sp. n. can be distinguished from G. vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n. by the following characters (G. vallecula in parentheses): antenna II calceoli absent (present); uropod III inner ramus approx. half the length of outer ramus, both rami armed with plumose setae (uropod III approx. half the length of outer ramus, both rami with a few plumose setae on inner margins, outer margins with no plumose setae).
This new species of Gammarus qinling Hou & Li, sp. n. can be distinguished from the closely related species G. murarius Hou & Li, 2004a (G. murarius in parentheses) by the following characters: merus and carpus of pereopod III with straight setae on posterior margins (with long curled setae); epimeral plate I bearing five setae and one spine on anteroventral margin (only with four setae); and inner ramus of uropod III 0.5 times the length of outer ramus (0.65 times the length of first article of outer ramus).
Holotype: male (
The new species is named after Mr. Zhigang Chen who extensively collected gammarids from China; noun (name) in genitive case.
Antenna II calceoli present in male; merus of pereopod III with long, straight setae on posterior margin; inner ramus of uropod III reaching 0.6 times the length of outer ramus, outer ramus with no plumose setae on outer margin but with a row of plumose setae on inner margin.
(
Head (Fig.
Gammarus zhigangi Hou & Li, sp. n., male holotype. A head B antenna I C flagellar article of antenna I with aesthetasc D antenna II E calceoli of antenna II F upper lip G lower lip H left mandible I incisor and lacinia mobilis of right mandible J left maxilla I K distal part of palp article II of right maxilla I L maxilla II M maxilliped.
Antenna I (Fig.
Antenna II (Fig.
Upper lip (Fig.
Mandible (Fig.
Lower lip (Fig.
Maxilla I (Fig.
Maxilla II (Fig.
Maxilliped (Fig.
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopod III (Fig.
Pereopod IV (Fig.
Pereopod V (Fig.
Pereopod VI (Figs
Pereopod VII (Fig.
Coxal gills: coxal gill of gnathopod II and gills of pereopods III to V a little longer than bases; gill of pereopod VI a little shorter than basis; gill of pereopod VII smallest, approx. half the length of basis.
Pleon.Epimeral plates (Fig.
Pleopods I–III (Fig.
Urosome.Urosomites (Fig.
Uropods I–III (Fig.
Telson (Fig.
(
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopods III and IV (Fig.
Pereopods V–VII (Fig.
Oostegite (Fig.
Urosome.Uropods I–III (Fig.
Telson (Fig.
Specimens were collected from a geyser in Tiantai Mountain National Forest Park. The geyser is influenced by the formation of cavities in the deep strata. When the groundwater is filled with cavities, the geyser will erupt from the rock cracks. The intermittent geyser is considered as person’s breathing, therefore it is known as a breathing spring. This park is located in the middle of the southern slope of Qinling with lush forests; the topography is full of deep valleys and steep mountains.
The new species of Gammarus zhigangi Hou & Li, sp. n. is most similar to Gammarus qinling Hou & Li, sp. n. in antenna II calceoli present; merus of pereopod III with straight setae on posterior margin; and epimeral plates II and III blunt on posterodistal corners. Gammarus zhigangi Hou & Li, sp. n. differs from Gammarus qinling Hou & Li, sp. n. (Gammarus qinling in parentheses) by pereopod V of male and female with more setae on anterior margin of merus; and uropod III inner ramus 0.6 times the length of outer ramus (0.5 times), outer margin of outer ramus with no plumose setae (with plumose setae).
The new species of Gammarus zhigangi Hou & Li, sp. n. is similar to G. preciosus Wang, Hou & Li, 2009 in antenna II calceoli present; uropod III without plumose setae on outer margin of outer ramus, and terminal article longer than adjacent spines; and telson long than wide. Gammarus zhigangi Hou & Li, sp. n. can be distinguished from G. preciosus Wang, Hou & Li, 2009 (G. preciosus in parentheses) in epimeral plate I with three setae and two spines on anteroventral margin (with eight long setae on anteroventral margin); epimeral plate III with five setae on posterior margin (with 11 setae on posterior margin); and uropod III inner ramus 0.6 times the length of outer ramus (inner ramus 0.4 times the length of outer ramus).
This new species can be distinguished from G. murarius Hou & Li, 2004 (G. murarius in parentheses) by the following characters: merus and carpus of pereopod III with straight setae on posterior margins (with long curled setae); epimeral plate I bearing three setae and two spines on anteroventral margin (only with four setae); and uropod III without plumose setae on outer margin of outer ramus (with plumose).
Holotype: male (
The species name is a Chinese phrase, “jidutanxian”, meaning “adventure exploration”, in honour of Mr. Chunjiang Sang extensively exploring karst biota in southern China; noun in apposition.
Antenna II peduncle with long setae, calceoli absent; epimeral plate III with subacute posterodistal corner; uropod III inner ramus reaching 0.6 times the length of outer ramus, outer ramus with no plumose setae on outer margin, terminal article of outer ramus shorter than adjacent spines; each lobe of telson with plumose setae on surface.
(
Head (Fig.
Gammarus jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n., male holotype. A head B antenna I C flagellar article of antenna I with aesthetasc D antenna II E upper lip F lower lip G left mandible H incisor and lacinia mobilis of right mandible I left maxilla I J distal part of palp article II of right maxilla I K maxilla II L maxilliped M dorsal margins of urosomites I–III.
Antenna I (Fig.
Antenna II (Fig.
Upper lip (Fig.
Mandible (Fig.
Lower lip (Fig.
Maxilla I (Figs
Maxilla II (Fig.
Maxilliped (Fig.
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopod III (Fig.
Pereopod IV (Fig.
Pereopod V (Fig.
Pereopod VI (Fig.
Pereopod VII (Fig.
Coxal gills: coxal gills of gnathopod II and pereopod III a little shorter than bases; gill of pereopod IV longer than basis; gills of pereopods V and VI shorter than bases; gill of pereopod VII smallest, less than half the length of basis.
Pleon.Epimeral plates (Fig.
Pleopods I–III (Fig.
Urosome.Urosomites (Fig.
Uropods I–III (Figs
Telson (Fig.
(
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopods III and IV (Fig.
Pereopods V–VII (Fig.
Oostegite (Fig.
Urosome.Uropods I–III (Fig.
Telson (Fig.
This species was collected along the shore of a brook, usually in gravel and decomposing leaves. The type locality is located in a valley of north part of Daba Mountain.
The new species of Gammarus jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n. is most similar to G. craspedotrichus Hou & Li, 2002 in antenna II with long setae along peduncular articles and calceoli absent; and outer margin of outer ramus in uropod III with simple setae. It differs from G. craspedotrichus (G. craspedotrichus in parentheses) in peduncle of uropod I with one basofacial spine (without basofacial spine); inner ramus reaching 0.6 times of outer ramus in uropod III (inner ramus approx. as long as outer ramus); and urosomites with four groups of spines and setae (with two clusters of spines and setae).
The new species of Gammarus jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n. is most similar to G. vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n. in antenna II with long setae on peduncle margin and calceoli absent; pereopods III and IV with straight setae on posterior margin; and urosomites with four groups of spines and setae on dorsal margin. Gammarus jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n. can be distinguished from G. vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n. (G. valleculain parentheses) in uropod III inner ramus reaching 0.6 times the length of outer ramus, terminal article shorter than adjacent spines (inner ramus approx. half the length of outer ramus, terminal article subequal or longer than adjacent spines); and telson as long as wide, with no spines on surface (telson 0.8 times as long as wide, each lobe with one spine accompanied by setae on surface).
Gammarus jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n. differs from Gammarus accretus Hou & Li, 2002a (G. accretus in parentheses) by urosomites I and II with one-one-one-one spines accompanied by setae on dorsal margins (with only one group of setae); uropod I peduncle with one basofacial spine (without basofacial spine); and inner ramus of uropod III 0.6 times the length of outer ramus (approx. the same length).
Holotype: male (
The species name is taken from the Chinese word, “longdong” meaning “Dragon Cave”, referring to a cave filled with water; noun in apposition.
Peduncle of antenna II with long setae, calceoli absent; merus and carpus of pereopod III with clusters of long setae on posterior margins; epimeral plates II and III with subacute posterodistal corners; uropod I peduncle with no basofacial spine; inner ramus of uropod III reaching 0.9 times the length of outer ramus, terminal article vestigial.
(
Head (Fig.
Gammarus longdong Hou & Li, sp. n., male holotype. A head B antenna I C flagellar article of antenna I with aesthetasc D antenna II E upper lip F lower lip G left mandible H incisor and lacinia mobilis of right mandible I left maxilla I J distal part of palp article II of right maxilla I K maxilla II L maxilliped.
Antenna I (Fig.
Antenna II (Fig.
Upper lip (Fig.
Mandible (Fig.
Lower lip (Fig.
Maxilla I (Fig.
Maxilla II (Fig.
Maxilliped (Fig.
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopod III (Fig.
Pereopod IV (Fig.
Pereopod V (Fig.
Pereopod VI (Fig.
Pereopod VII (Figs
Coxal gills: coxal gill of gnathopod II a little shorter than basis; gills of pereopods IV and V longer than bases; gills of pereopods III and VI more than half the length of bases; gill of pereopod VII smallest, less than half of the basis.
Pleon.Epimeral plates (Fig.
Pleopods I–III (Fig.
Urosome.Urosomites (Fig.
Uropods I–III (Fig.
Telson (Fig.
(
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopod III (Fig.
Pereopods IV–VII (Fig.
Oostegite (Fig.
Urosome.Uropods I–III (Figs
Telson (Fig.
The species was collected in Qinglong Cave Park. The park has a limestone karst mountain landscape. There is an underground river winding through the cave before flowing into a pool. Individuals are found along the bank of river, with no vegetation.
The new species of Gammarus longdong Hou & Li, sp. n. is similar to G. craspedotrichus Hou & Li, 2002 in antenna II with long setae along peduncle margin, calceoli absent; pereopod III merus and carpus with long setae on posterior margins; and uropod I with no basofacial spine. Gammarus longdong Hou & Li, sp. n. can be distinguished from G. craspedotrichus Hou & Li, 2002 by the following characters (G. craspedotrichus in parentheses): urosomites I and II with four groups of spines and setae (with two clusters of spines and setae); and uropod III terminal article vestigial (short but distinct).
The new species of Gammarus longdong Hou & Li, sp. n. is similar to jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n. in antenna II peduncle with long setae, calceoli absent; and uropod III outer ramus with no plumose setae on outer margin. It can be distinguished from G. jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n. (G. jidutanxian in parentheses) in uropod I without basofacial spine (with one basofacial spine); and uropod III inner ramus reaching 0.9 times the length of outer ramus (inner ramus 0.6 times the length of outer ramus).
The new species is similar to G. egregius Hou, Li & Li, 2013 in accessory flagellum of antenna I with four articles; antenna II calceoli absent; and uropod I peduncle without basofacial spine. The new species can be distinguished from G. egregius Hou, Li & Li, 2013 by the following characters (G. egregius in parentheses): urosomite I with one-one-one-one spines accompanied by setae on dorsal margin (bare); urosomite II with one-one-one spines accompanied by setae on dorsal margin (with two single spines); inner ramus of uropod III 0.9 times the length of proximal article of outer ramus (0.6 times the length of outer ramus); and both rami of uropod III with plumose setae on inner margins (simple setae).
The new species is similar to G. platvoeti Hou & Li, 2003a in accessory flagellum of antenna I with four articles; antenna II calceoli absent; epimeral plates II and III with subacute posterodistal corners; and uropod I peduncle without basofacial spine. It differs from G. platvoeti Hou & Li, 2003a (G. platvoeti in parentheses) by merus and carpus of pereopod III with long setae on posterior margins (with a few short setae); urosomites I and II with spines accompanied by setae on dorsal margin (only with setae); inner ramus of uropod III 0.9 times the length of proximal article of outer ramus (0.85 times the length of outer ramus); and both lobes of telson with simple and plumose setae on surface (bare).
Holotype: male (
The name derives from the Mosuo people, living in the type locality; noun in apposition.
Antenna II calceoli absent; merus to carpus of pereopod III with clusters of long setae on posterior margins; pereopods V–VII with long setae on anterior margins; epimeral plate II with five plumose setae, two simple setae and one spine on ventral margin, posterodistal corner blunt; urosomites with two clusters of spines accompanied by setae on dorsal margins; inner ramus of uropod III reaching 0.4 times the length of outer ramus, both inner and outer rami armed with simple setae.
(
Head (Fig.
Gammarus mosuo Hou & Li, sp. n., male holotype. A head B antenna I C flagellar article of antenna I with aesthetasc D antenna II E upper lip F lower lip G left mandible H incisor and lacinia mobilis of right mandible I left maxilla I J distal part of palp article II of right maxilla I K maxilla II L maxilliped M epimeral plate I N epimeral plate II O epimeral plate III.
Antenna I (Fig.
Antenna II (Fig.
Upper lip (Fig.
Mandible (Fig.
Lower lip (Fig.
Maxilla I (Fig.
Maxilla II (Fig.
Maxilliped (Fig.
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopod III (Fig.
Pereopod IV (Fig.
Pereopod V (Fig.
Pereopod VI (Fig.
Pereopod VII (Fig.
Coxal gills: coxal gill of gnathopod II and gill of pereopod IV a little longer than bases; gills of pereopods III, V and VI shorter than bases; gill of pereopod VII smallest, less than half of the basis.
Pleon.Epimeral plates (Fig.
Pleopods I–III (Fig.
Urosome.Urosomites (Fig.
Uropods I–III (Fig.
Telson (Fig.
(
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopod III (Fig.
Pereopod IV (Fig.
Pereopod V (Fig.
Pereopods VI–VII (Fig.
Oostegite (Fig.
Urosome.Uropods I–III (Figs
Telson (Fig.
This species was collected under decomposing leaves alongside a pool.
The new species of Gammarus mosuo Hou & Li, sp. n. is most similar to G. sinuolatus Hou & Li, 2004b in propodus of gnathopod II with long straight setae on anterior margin; pereopods III and IV with long setae on posterior margins; epimeral plates with long setae on ventral margins; and uropod III inner ramus approx. one-third of outer ramus, both rami armed with simple setae. Gammarus mosuo Hou & Li, sp. n. can be distinguished from G. sinuolatus in the following characters (G. sinuolatus in parentheses): antenna II calceoli absent (present); pereopods V–VII with long setae on anterior margin (with few setae on anterior margin); urosomites with two clusters of spines accompanied by setae (four groups of spines accompanied by long setae); and telson with a pair of short facial setae on each lobe (with long setae on dorsal surface).
The new species of Gammarus mosuo Hou & Li, sp. n. is similar to G. curvativus Hou & Li, 2003b in pereopods III and IV with long straight setae on posterior margins; uropod I with one basofacial spine; and uropod III inner ramus less than half of outer ramus, both rami densely with simple setae. Gammarus mosuo Hou & Li, sp. n. differs from G. curvativus Hou & Li, 2003b (G. curvativus in parentheses) by eyes oval and small (reniform, and relatively large); antenna II calceoli absent (present); gnathopod II propodus with groups of long setae on anterior margin (with long curled setae on anterior margin); pereopods V–VII with long setae along anterior margin (with no long setae); and urosomites with two clusters of spines and setae on dorsal margins (with four groups of spines and setae).
The new species is similar to G. paucispinus Hou & Li, 2002b in eyes oval; antenna II calceoli absent; merus and carpus of pereopod III with clusters of long setae on posterior margins; and both rami of uropod III with simple setae. It differs from G. paucispinus Hou & Li, 2002b (G. paucispinus in parentheses) by urosomite I with two clusters of spines and setae on dorsal margin (with a few short setae); telson 0.9 times as long as wide (0.8 times as long as wide); and each lobe with a pair of setae on surface (with two groups of long setae).
Holotype: male (
The epithet derives from the Latin word “caecigenus”, referring to the eyes absent; adjective.
Eyes absent; antenna II with long setae, calceoli absent; merus and carpus of pereopod III with clusters of long setae on posterior margins; armature of urosomites degenerated, urosomite I with setae on dorsal margin, urosomite II with two groups of spines accompanied by setae; uropod I peduncle without basefacial spine; uropods I–II with more marginal spines; inner ramus of uropod III reaching 0.9 times the length of outer ramus, terminal article of outer ramus vestigial.
(
Head (Fig.
Gammarus caecigenus Hou & Li, sp. n., male holotype. A head B antenna I C flagellar article of antenna I with aesthetasc D antenna II E upper lip F lower lip G left mandible H incisor and lacinia mobilis of right mandible I left maxilla I J distal part of palp article II of right maxilla I K maxilla II L maxilliped M article IV of maxilliped right palp.
Antenna I (Fig.
Antenna II (Fig.
Upper lip (Fig.
Mandible (Fig.
Lower lip (Fig.
Maxilla I (Fig.
Maxilla II (Fig.
Maxilliped (Fig.
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopod III (Fig.
Pereopod IV (Fig.
Pereopod V (Fig.
Pereopod VI (Fig.
Pereopod VII (Fig.
Coxal gills: coxal gill of gnathopod II and gill of pereopod V a little shorter than bases; gill of pereopod III approx. as long as basis; gill of pereopod IV a little longer than basis; gill of pereopod VI approx. half of the basis; gill of pereopod VII smallest, less than half of the basis.
Pleon.Epimeral plates (Fig.
Pleopods I–III (Fig.
Urosome.Urosomites (Fig.
Uropods I–III (Fig.
Telson (Fig.
(
Pereon.Gnathopod I (Fig.
Gnathopod II (Fig.
Pereopods III and IV (Fig.
Pereopods V–VII (Fig.
Oostegite (Fig.
Urosome.Uropods I–III (Figs
Telson (Fig.
Outer ramus of uropod III without terminal article or much shorter than adjacent spines.
This species was collected from a cave, where a pool with an area of one square meter was formed by dripping water from stalactites.
The new species of Gammarus caecigenus Hou & Li, sp. n. is most similar to G. hirtellus Hou, Li & Li, 2013 in eyes absent; epimeral plate III posterodistal corner subacute; and uropod III inner ramus 0.9 times the length of outer ramus, terminal article vestigial. Gammarus caecigenus Hou & Li, sp. n. differs from G. hirtellus Hou, Li & Li, 2013 (G. hirtellus in parentheses) in antenna II calceoli absent (present); pereopod III with long straight setae on posterior margin (with long curled setae); pereopods V–VII with groups of spines on anterior margins, but with few setae (with spines accompanied by long setae); uropods I and II with more spines along peduncle and both rami (with one spine on each side of inner and outer rami); and urosomites I and II with two groups of spines and setae (with four groups of spines and setae).
The comparison between these seven species is presented in the following key.
1 | Eyes present | 2 |
– | Eyes absent | G. caecigenus Hou & Li, sp. n. |
2 | Uropod III inner ramus reaching 0.9 times the length of outer ramus | G. longdong Hou & Li, sp. n. |
– | Uropod III inner ramus less than 0.6 times the length of outer ramus | 3 |
3 | Pereopods V–VII with many long setae on anterior margins | G. mosuo Hou & Li, sp. n. |
– | Pereopods V–VII with a few short setae on anterior margins | 4 |
4 | Uropod III both margins of inner and outer rami with plumose setae | G. qinling Hou & Li, sp. n. |
– | Uropod III outer margin of outer ramus with no plumose setae | 5 |
5 | Antenna II peduncular articles IV and V with long setae, terminal article of uropod III shorter than adjacent spines | G. jidutanxian Hou & Li, sp. n. |
– | Antenna II peduncular articles IV and V with short setae, terminal article of uropod III subequal or longer than adjacent spines | 6 |
6 | Antenna II calceoli present in male, inner margin of outer ramus in uropod III with a row of ten plumose setae | G. zhigangi Hou & Li, sp. n. |
– | Antenna II calceoli absent, inner margin of outer ramus in uropod III with three or four plumose setae | G. vallecula Hou & Li, sp. n. |
We are very grateful to Yunchuan Li and Jincheng Liu for their help in the field collection. We thank Ko Tomikawa, Alan Myers and Charles Oliver Coleman for their constructive comments. This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Category A, Tibet program), the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (NSFC-31772417), the National Science and Technology Basic Special (2014FY210700), and the Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2015CASEABRI005, Y4ZK111B01).