Research Article |
Corresponding author: Jiang Zhu ( jiangzhu_gz@163.com ) Academic editor: Adam Brunke
© 2018 Cheng-Bin Wang, Ri-Xin Jiang, Jiang Zhu.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Wang C-B, Jiang R-X, Zhu J (2018) Micropeplus liweiae sp. n., a new species from Sichuan, China (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Micropeplinae). ZooKeys 775: 97-102. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.775.22620
|
A new species of micropepline beetle is described from Sichuan, China, Micropeplus liweiae sp. n. (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Important morphological characters of the new species are illustrated by colour plates.
China, Micropeplinae , Micropeplus , new species, Staphylinidae , taxonomy
Micropeplus Latreille, 1809 is the most speciose genus of Micropeplinae (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae), with members distributed in Ethiopian, Nearctic, Neotropical, Oriental and Palaearctic Regions.
In the fauna of China, 22 species had been recorded before this study (
Specimens were relaxed and softened in a hot saturated solution of potassium hydroxide for 4 minutes (for dry mounted specimens) or 8 minutes (for alcohol-preserved specimens), and then transferred to distilled water to rinse the residual potassium hydroxide off and stop any further bleaching. The softened specimens were moved into glycerin and dissected there to observe morphological details. After examination, the body parts were mounted on a glass slip with Euparal Mounting Medium for future studies. Habitus photographs were taken using a Canon MP-E 65 mm f/2.8 1-5X macro lens on a Canon 7D camera, and a Canon MT-24EX macro twin light flash was used as light source. Observations, photographs, and measurements of morphological details were performed using an Olympus CX31 microscope with a Canon G9 camera. The final deep focus images were created with Zerene Stacker 1.04 stacking software. Adobe Photoshop CS6 was used for post processing.
The material examined for this study is deposited in the following collections (with names of curators in parentheses): SNUC – Insect Collection of Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China (L. Tang); SYSB – Museum of Biology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (F.-L. Jia).
Measurement criteria in millimetres (mm) are used as follows:
Body length length between the anterior apex of clypeus and the abdominal apex along the midline.
Elytral length length between the basal border and the apex of elytra along suture.
Elytral width widest part of both elytra combined.
Fore body length between the anterior apex of clypeus and the apex of elytra along the midline.
Head length length between the anterior apex of clypeus and the posterior margin of occiput along the midline.
Head width widest part of head (including compound eyes).
Pronotal length length of the pronotum along the midline.
Pronotal width widest part of pronotum.
Vernacular name: 铠甲属
Holotype: ♂, CHINA, Sichuan: Xiaojin County [小金县], near Siguniang Shan [接近四姑娘山], 30.921623°N, 102.889709°E, under rock, 4258m, 14.VII.2017, Jiang Zhu leg. (SYSB). Paratype: 1♀, same data as holotype (SNUC).
This new species is very similar to Micropeplus songi Zheng, Li & Yan, 2014 from Mt. Wahui [瓦灰山], Sichuan, but it is easy to distinguish it from the latter by a combination of the following characteristics: head with microreticulate surface; elytral punctures moderate-sized, distinctly smaller but more numerous than that of M. songi; elytral interspace I with two to three rows, II with three to four rows, III with four rows, IV with one row and V with three rows; metathoracic wings fully developed; aedeagal parameres with two long setae at apex.
Male. Body small, 2.81 mm long. Length (mm) of different body parts: head (0.31), pronotum (0.55), elytra (1.05), fore body (1.91), aedeagus (0.58). Width (mm): head (0.64), pronotum (1.16), elytra (1.22). (Head width)/(pronotal width) = 0.55, (pronotal length)/(elytral length) = 0.52.
Habitus (Figure
Head (Figure
Pronotum subtrapezoidal, widest just before hind angles, width/length = 2.11. Sides almost obliquely linear, gradually narrowing from posterior to anterior, with ca. 4 small teeth; anterior margin broadly and distinctly emarginate and slightly arched in middle; posterior margin bisinuate; anterior angles distinctly projected forwards; posterior angles nearly rectangular; surface finely granulate; lateral areas broadly explanate; median area elevated dorsally, with fourteen cells enclosed by costae (including two small ones after anterior margin).
Scutellum shield-like with finely granulate surface.
Elytra subquadrate, width/length = 1.16, widest at about apical 2/5. Each elytron with 6 costae, one sutural, two discal, one humeral, one pseudepipleural (straight, distinctly separated anteriorly and posteriorly from epipleural costa) and one epipleural; interspaces between costae with irregular rows of moderate-sized punctures, interspace I with two to three rows, II with three to four rows, III with four rows, IV with one row and V with three rows. Metathoracic wings fully developed.
Metastemum with elongate median impression, wide and deep at base, weakening anteriorly, about half as long as metasternum. Abdomen gradually narrowed towards segment VI and abruptly narrowed from VII to apical end; tergites III–VII each strongly and transversely depressed in basal half, III with one short median longitudinal carina, IV to VI each with three longitudinal carinae almost throughout length of tergite, VII with three abbreviated carinae in about basal 1/3, VIII (Figure
Protibia without tooth on medial margin; meso- (Figure
Aedeagus (Figure
Female. Similar to male in general appearance (Figure
China (Sichuan).
The specific epithet is dedicated to Ms. Li-Wei Liu, the mother of Jiang-Zhu (the collector and corresponding author), for her care and constant support to him.
We would like to express our sincere thanks to Sui-Jun Lu (Guangzhou, China) and Alfred F. Newton (Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA) for their considerable help in our study. We are grateful to Adam Brunke (Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, Canada) and Aleš Smetana (Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Canada), reviewers who provided constructive comments on previous version of the manuscript.