This species is a member of the Hoplothrips fungi complex. This comprises corticis, fungi, japonicus, karnyi, orientalis and ulmi, and Stannard (1968: 459) suggested that these various names may refer to a single species that is widespread across the Holarctic; Schliephake and Klimt (1979) even placed fungi as a synonym of ulmi. However, as indicated below, each of these six species can, at present, be distinguished from the others. In contrast, dubius from the Hawaiian Islands cannot be distinguished satisfactorily from some individuals identified as karnyi from North America, including from Vancouver, Canada. In the absence of more extensive studies on the Hoplothrips fauna of Western North America, the name dubius seems appropriate to use for the form on Hawaii. Currently, the six species in the fungi complex are distinguished from each other as follows. Specimens with antennal segment IV brown are placed in orientalis, the other five all having antennal segments IV–V yellow at the base. The males of fungi share with those of japonicus and orientalis a particularly large pore plate on sternite VIII, but fungi is distinguished by having long slender sense cones on antennal segment III, particularly the one on the inner apical margin. According to Okajima (2006), japonicus has antennal segment III particularly elongate, more than 2.6 times as long as wide, although the sense cones on that segment are as short as in ulmi; in orientalis, these sense cones are intermediate in length between fungi and ulmi. Finally, ulmi has short sense cones on antennal segment III, and the median length of the pore plate on sternite VIII of males is much shorter than in fungi (Mound et al. 1976; Okajima 2006). Specimens identified as the North American species, karnyi, have the short antennal sense cones of ulmi, but the pore plate on sternite VIII of males is variable and intermediate between the condition found in fungi and ulmi from Europe The species here identified as dubius was found quite commonly on Hawaii, in Volcano National Park, in June 2016, and also at two sites on Oahu – Makuleia trail and Manoa Cliffs trail.

Bagnall described dubius from five winged females and one “aptera”, taken variously on the three islands – Hawaii, Molokai and Lanai. However, only the macropterous female from “Molokai Mts” remains, and this has only one antenna (Fig. 14) and is slide mounted and designated lectotype (Mound 1968). The unique holotype of barbatus, a large micropterous male from Kona, Hawaii, was described as lacking the distal antennal segments, although segments III and IV are available and are brown with the basal third yellow. Sternites III–VII have paired reticulate areas similar to those illustrated on the male syntype of flavipes (Fig. 22), and the median length of the pore plate on sternite VIII is about 30 microns. The lectotype of ovatus is the single large male that was taken on Haleakala, Maui, but of the original six females mentioned by Bagnall only two remain. The three specimens were slide mounted in 1967, and they retain antennae and most setae, but there is no reason to consider this as a different species from dubius. Antennae were not available on either of the two original specimens of angusticeps, and the lectotype is the male from Kalae, Molokai. Although much smaller than the barbatus holotype, it falls within the size range expected in species of Hoplothrips and has reticulate areas laterally on the sternites, and the pore plate on sternite VIII is about 40 microns long medially. Bagnall described bicolor from a single female taken on Kaala, Oahu. This lacked antennae, and the specimen is now slide mounted and lacks all major setae except for a single lateral seta on the third tergite; contrary to the original description, the tube is no paler than in other specimens here identified as dubius. Moulton based coprosmae on four females and six males from Nauhi, Hawaii. These specimens are in good condition, and they have been compared with macropterous and micropterous specimens of both sexes collected on Hawaii and Oahu in June 2016, all of which have variably prominent cheek setae on the head. The antennal sense cones are not as elongate as in fungi from Europe, and in males the sternites have reticulate areas laterally and the pore plate on sternite VIII is about 35 microns long medially. If these recent specimens, also the coprosmae types, had been collected in North America they would have been identified as karnyi. However, as indicated above, it is not possible at present to establish further synonymies between the fauna of Hawaii and that of the mainland until suitable studies are carried out on the North American Hoplothrips fauna.

This species was based on “several specimens… in alcohol” from Maui but with no date of collection; also “numerous specimens” (presumably dry and carded) from Maui on Mt. Haleakala in 1896. In the BMNH, only 1 male and 2 female micropterae remain of this species; these were slide mounted by Bagnall presumably from the series in alcohol, but without data apart from Maui. Similar specimens were sent to Hood (1939: 587) who claimed that the yellow legs were the result of storage in alcohol, and placed japonicus and major as synonyms of flavipes. Certainly flavipes is a member of the northern hemisphere fungi species-complex to which japonicus and major (a synonym of karnyi) belong. These species share the character states of a rather slender antennal segment VIII, an extra pair of discal setae on the metanotum, and the head with prominent cheek setae. However, because the coxae of the available flavipes specimens are also clear yellow, it is possible that the leg colour may be natural and not due to storage in ethanol. The identity and relationships of these specimens thus remain equivocal. They share many character states with H. flavafemora Okajima from southern Japan, but the available specimens are too poorly preserved to be sure that these two represent a single species. Moreover, if it were true that the pale legs of the flavipes specimens is due to storage in alcohol, then these specimens could not be distinguished from dubius. The male paralectotype is large, and laterally on sternites III–VII are extensive paired areas of iridescent reticulation (Fig. 22), and sternite VIII has a broad pore plate with a median length of about 35 microns. The female paralectotype is in particularly poor condition, but the lectotype female mounted onto a slide with the male has the lateral setae on tergites III–IV short, scarcely half as long as the tergite median length.

Moulton described this species from 45 specimens taken in 1927 on Waipio Ridge, Oahu. He compared this briefly to japonicus as well as lanaiensis, laticornis and ovatus. However, flavitibia shares with corticis from the northern hemisphere the following character states: rather short antennal segment III but slender VIII; metanotum without sculpture medially but with an additional pair of discal setae (Fig. 17); pelta posterolateral angles almost confluent with tergite II anterior margin (Fig. 18). At present there is insufficient material to establish a formal synonymy, but no obvious character states have been observed to distinguish flavitibia from corticis, a species that is widespread in Europe, North America and Japan, and also known from New Zealand. Zimmerman (1948) indicated that flavitibia had been found on Kauai, Maui, and Hawaii in addition to Oahu, and nine females with four males (in BMNH) have been studied that were collected and identified by Sakimura as flavitibia from Olinda, Maui. During July 2016, several specimens were taken near Volcano, Hawaii, and also on the Makuleia Trail, Oahu.

In describing hawaiiensis from eight females and two males (presumably all micropterae) taken on Oahu and Maui, Moulton compared it to perkinsi, claiming that this was the only species from Hawaii with “spines so reduced at the posterior angles of abdominal segments”. However, Bagnall clearly stated of lanaiensis “abdominal bristles obsolete” when he described this species from 10 female and 8 male micropterae taken on Lanai, Molokai and Hawaii. The tergal lateral setae on the only remaining specimens of this species (two females and the lectotype male from Lanai) are similar to those on hawaiiensis (Figs 23, 24). As in perkinsi, the metanotum is reticulate medially. However, in perkinsi the lateral setal pair on tergites VI–VIII are longer (on VII 180 microns) than on the type specimens of lanaiensis and hawaiiensis (on VII no more than 30 microns). The published year of collection differs for the type specimens of perkinsi and lanaiensis, but their collection numbers (Perkins 91 and 92) suggest that they were actually collected together at the same locality on Lanai. If more specimens become available, the differences in tergal setal lengths may be found to fall within the range of a single species, and lanaiensis would thus be a synonym of perkinsi. However, a single macropterous female was collected on Oahu, Mokuleia Trail, in July 2016 that is here identified as lanaiensis. The pronotal epimeral setae, and also setae S1 and S2 on tergite VIII, are short with curiously blunt apices.

Bagnall described this species from a single, slide-mounted, macropterous female collected at Kona, Hawaii, in 1892. This specimen is mounted ventral side uppermost, with the wings folded on the body. Moulton described mauiensis from 21 specimens taken at Olinda, Maui in 1926 and 1927. This species appears to be diagnosed by the following character states: antennal segment VIII slender and narrowed to base, segment III no more than 1.6 times as long as wide, segment IV not sharply paler in basal third and no more than 1.5 times as long as wide; pronotal anteroangular setae no more than 30 microns long; metanotal median area without sculpture, one pair of rather short median setae; pelta lateral lobes weakly curving away from anterior margin of tergite II; tergite IX with three pairs of setae about 0.8 as long as tube. The only available male of mauiensis appears to lack a pore plate on sternite VIII, but this is possibly an artefact due to poor slide preparation. The relatively short and broad, almost uniformly coloured, fourth antennal segment (Fig. 20) does not seem to have been reported in any other member of this genus from any part of the world, although an almost similar condition exists in a few specimens identified as flavitibia.

Male microptera. Head yellowish-brown and darkest around antennal bases; fore legs yellowish-brown, prothorax and pterothorax brown, abdomen paler, tube with yellow sub-apical area; mid and hind femora brown, tibiae and tarsi yellowish; antennal segment I brown, apex of II and basal half of III yellow, rest of antenna brown; major setae pale. Head slender, twice as long as width at base, with prominent lateral tubercles behind small eyes (Fig. 1); ocelli absent; postocular setae long and acute, longer than half of head width; maxillary stylets retracted to postocular setae, close together medially; ventrally all setae small, frons of largest male with pair of large irregular tubercles, absent in small male; mouth cone short and rounded. Antennae 8-segmented (Fig. 5); major male with segment I exceptionally long; VIII narrowed to small pedicel; 3 sense cones on III, 4 on IV, sense cone length little more than half of segment width. Pronotum massive, median longitudinal apodeme weak; anteromarginal setal pair very small, posteroangular pair unusually long in smaller male; prosternal basantra absent (Fig. 4), ferna large with median margins parallel in largest male but rounded in smaller males; mesopresternum of three weakly joined small sclerites; metathoracic sternopleural sutures present but short. Fore femora elongate, extending to apical margin of head in largest male, but not beyond mid-point of head in smaller males; fore tibia with large, broadly rounded tubercle at inner apex dorsal to the normal apical seta (Fig. 2); fore tarsal tooth as long as tarsal width. Meso and metanota transverse, metanotum without sculpture medially; fore wing lobe 50 microns long, bearing one seta. Pelta broadly D-shaped (Fig. 3), posterior margin confluent with anterior margin of tergite II; tergites II–VII each with 2 pairs of short, straight wing-retaining setae; tergite IX setae shorter than tube, tube much shorter than head. Sternite VIII with slender pore plate, median length about 15 microns, extending fully across sternite; median sternites without any lateral reticulate areas.

Figures 1–6. 

Hoplothrips magnaccai, males. Holotype 1–5: 1 head 2 fore tibia and tarsus 3 pelta 4 prosternites 5 antenna 6 Small male head and pronotum.

Measurements (holotype male and smallest paratype male in microns). Body length 3500 (2900). Head, length 380 (250); width posterior to tubercles 230 (215); po setae 125 (135). Pronotum, length 500 (280); width 500 (350); major setae: aa 20 (30), ml 100 (100), epim 120 (130), pa 180 (185). Tergite IX setae, S1 180 (185), S2 75 (70), S3 180 (160). Tube length 240 (215). Antennal segments I–VIII length 100 (65), 75 (60), 115 (85), 105 (85), 90 (70), 80 (?), 60 (?), 60 (?).

Female microptera. Body and femora brown, basal half of head paler than pronotum, antennae brown except for base of segment III (Fig. 12), tibiae and tarsi shading yellowish-brown to yellow. Head with convex cheeks (Fig. 11), constricted behind small eyes with small tubercle ventro-laterally just behind eyes; ocelli absent; po setae long and acute; maxillary stylets close together medially and retracted to eyes. Pronotum transverse, ml, epim and pa setae long. Prosternal ferna large, narrowing medially; mesopresternum of three small sclerites. Tergites similar to those of male microptera.

Female macroptera. Darker than microptera, head dark brown (Fig. 7) and darker than pronotum, mid and hind tibiae mainly brown; fore wings pale. Head with cheeks convex, slightly constricted behind large eyes, without any tubercles; ocelli large, stylets retracted to eyes. Body similar to microptera; metanotum with no sculpture medially (Fig. 8); mesopresternum almost entire with three sclerites joined; fore wing with only two pairs of long sub-basal setae; tergites III–VII each with only one pair of sigmoid wing-retaining setae, anterior pair short and straight on these tergites, and both pairs short and straight on tergite II.

Figures 7–12. 

Hoplothrips magnaccai, females. Macroptera 7–9: 7 head 8 meso and metanota 9 pelta. Microptera 10–12: 10 pelta 11 head 12 antenna.

Measurements (macropterous female paratype in microns). Body length 3200. Head, length 300; width 250; po setae 140. Pronotum, length 230; median width 350; major setae: aa 15, am 75, ml 140, epim 130, pa 190. Fore wing length 1250; sub-basal setae 80. Posteroangular tergal setae: tergite II 30, tergite VI 180. Tergite VIII setae S1 180, S2 210, S3 240. Tube length 250. Antennal segments I–VIII length 60, 68, 100, 95, 90, 85, 60, 60.

Holotype male microptera, OAHU, Mokuleia Trail, from dead branches, 29.vii.2016 (LAM 6310), in BPBM, Hawaii.

Paratypes: 2 female macropterae, 6 female micropterae taken with holotype; at same site and date, 25 female macropterae (many de-alate), 3 female micropterae, 2 male micropterae (A. Wells 83, 84, 86, 87). MAUI, Io’a Needle, 2 female micropterae from dead branches, 26.vii.2016 (A.Wells 77).

The macropterae of magnaccai are particularly unusual among Hoplothrips species, in that on tergite II both pairs of wing-retaining setae are small and straight and on each of tergites III–VII only the posterior pair is sigmoid with each anterior pair short and straight. Moreover, there are only two long sub-basal setae on each fore wing. In large males, the head of magnaccai is similar in appearance to that of two species known only from eastern USA: Hoplothrips flavicauda (Fig. 25) from several northeastern states (Stannard 1968), and Hoplothrips mutabilis from Florida (Hood 1955). In each of these three species, the largest short-winged males have a prominent tubercle behind the eyes, although such tubercles are not present in winged males (where known) nor in smaller short-winged males. The species most closely similar to magnaccai seems to be mutabilis, because these two share with typical Hoplothrips species both the absence of prosternal basantra (= praepectus of Stannard, 1968) and the presence in males of a transverse pore plate on sternite VIII. In contrast, both flavicauda and also Hoplothrips fungosus Moulton from eastern Asia (Okajima 2006) are distinctive within the genus Hoplothrips for the presence of prosternal basantra (Fig. 26), and the absence in males of a pore plate on sternite VIII. This new species differs from mutabilis as follows: body and first two antennal segments brown to dark brown rather than mainly yellow, postocular setae longer in all morphs, fore wing with about 15 duplicated cilia rather than eight, and sense cones of macropterae not long and slender.

Figures 13–21. 

Hoplothrips species. H. dubius 13–16: 13 female head 14 lectotype antennal segments III–V 15 lectotype metanotum 16 lectotype pelta. H. flavitibia paratype female 17–19: 17 meso and metanota 18 pelta 19 antenna. H. laticornis holotype 20–21: 20 antenna 21 pelta.

Figures 22–26. 

Hoplothrips species. 22 H. flavipes paralectotype male, sternite V. H. hawaiiensis paratype female 23–24: 23 tergites II–III 24 tergites VI–VII. H. flavicauda 25–26: 25 large male microptera, head 26 female macroptera prosternites.

Described from a single female taken on Lanai, this specimen was described as having the antennae dark brown with only segment III yellow at base, but no antennae were found when the holotype was slide mounted in 1967. Another species described by Bagnall from Hawaii that has antennal segment IV almost brown is laticornis, but that has the metanotal median area without sculpture, whereas in perkinsi this area is distinctly reticulate. However, intermedius was described from a single major male taken on Haleakala, Maui, and although the slide mounted holotype lacks the tube, the single remaining antenna has segment IV brownish-yellow on the basal third. Unfortunately, nigricans was described from a single winged female that lacked antennae, and the slide mounted holotype now lacks most major setae apart from one long lateral seta on tergite VIII. In contrast, Moulton described swezeyi from 12 females and four males taken at Olinda, Maui, and distinguished this from intermedius by “its differently colored antennae”. Micropterous females of swezeyi share with perkinsi a distinctly reticulate metanotum, also long lateral setae on tergites VI–VIII but with short lateral setae on tergites III and IV, and the largely brown antennal segment IV with the basal third brownish-yellow. The statement by Bagnall that perkinsi has “obsolete” lateral setae on tergite VIII is not correct, and was presumably based on examining the holotype dry on a card. In females, tergite IX setae S3 are unusually short, less than 0.6 as long as setae S1, the dorsal pair. The holotype of intermedius, also males of swezeyi, have reticulate areas laterally on sternites III–VII, and the median length of the pore plate on sternite VIII is about 35 microns. Apart from the differences in setal lengths, perkinsi and dubius are similar in many details, and unlike the other species considered here, the heads of both sexes and both morphs of these species have quite prominent cheek setae.