A new species of Carvalhomiris from Colombia with an assessment of its phylogenetic position (Heteroptera, Miridae, Orthotylinae)

Dimitri Forero; Juanita Rodríguez; Valentina Ocampo

doi:10.3897/zookeys.796.22058

Abstract

Plant bugs, species of Miridae (Heteroptera), are not well known in the Neotropics, and Colombia is not an exception. Based on data from the available systematic catalog (Schuh 2002–2013) fewer than 150 species are recorded from the country, clearly an underestimation. Recent fieldwork has resulted in several new interesting taxa from Colombia. Carvalhomiris Maldonado & Ferreira, 1971, contains three described species from Colombia and Ecuador. From specimens collected in Jardín, Antioquia, Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n. is described. Images of the dorsal habitus and the male and female genitalia are provided. Based on morphological examination of the new species and published information, morphological characters were coded to construct a phylogenetic matrix for a cladistic analysis in which the phylogenetic position of the new species is assessed. Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n. is the northernmost species of the genus and noteworthy because it is the first record of any species of the genus in the Western Cordillera: all other species are known from the eastern flank of the Andes (Ecuador) or the Eastern Cordillera (Colombia). Natural history observations of the new species, including associations with composites (Asteraceae) are provided. It is speculated that the mirid might be predacious.

Keywords

Andes, genitalia, Hemiptera , Neotropical region, Zanchius group

Introduction

Miridae are the most diversified family of Heteroptera with more than 11,000 described species (Ferreira et al. 2015, Wheeler and Krimmel 2015, Henry 2017). In the Neotropics, taxonomic efforts to reveal the family’s diversity were carried out most notably by José Candido de Melo Carvalho and colleagues (Carvalho and Froeschner 1987, 1990, 1994, Henry and Wheeler 1995). Taxonomic knowledge for the family in the Neotropics is still inadequate (Wheeler 2001), partly because the fauna of certain areas is poorly documented. Colombia, for instance, despite being considered a megadiverse country (Mittermeier 1988, Mittermeier et al. 2011, Arbeláez-Cortés 2013), has only about 150 mirid species listed (Schuh 2002–2013), which clearly underestimates the family’s actual diversity.

Among mirid subfamilies, the Orthotylinae comprise six tribes (Schuh 2002–2013), one of which is the paraphyletic Orthotylini (Cassis and Schuh 2012). Within this tribe, Schuh (1974) recognized several informal generic groupings, one of which is the Zanchius group, which includes Carvalhomiris Maldonado & Ferreira, 1971 (Forero 2009). The generic composition of the Zanchius group has varied through time (Schuh 1974, Henry 1995, Forero 2009), but a phylogenetic analysis for the group is not yet available.

Carvalhomiris is characterized by an overall pale yellow coloration with greenish areas, usually strong brachypterism in both sexes, and eyes removed from the anterior margin of the pronotum (Maldonado and Ferreira 1971, Forero 2009). The genus has three described species: C. brachypterus Maldonado & Ferreira, 1971 and C. truncatus Forero, 2009, from three localities in Colombia on the Eastern Cordillera, and C. bifurcatus Forero, 2009, from a locality in Ecuador on the eastern flank of the Andes.

Recent fieldwork in Jardín, Antioquia, Colombia, led to the discovery of an additional undescribed species of Carvalhomiris. This new species represents the northernmost distribution of the genus and highlights the wide distributional gap among the known species. Additionally, the discovery of this new species allows the putative synapomorphies for Carvalhomiris proposed by Forero (2009) to be tested. Therefore, we describe this new species of Carvalhomiris, propose the first phylogenetic hypothesis for the genus, and evaluate the phylogenetic position of the new species with respect to previously described species.

Materials and methods

Study area and specimens

Specimens were collected near Jardín, Antioquia, Colombia, by beating vegetation along the road. Specimens were mounted, labelled, and deposited in the Entomological collection of the Museo Javeriano de Historia Natural Lorenzo Uribe S.J., of the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia (MPUJ_ENT) and in the Entomology Collection of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, USA (USNM). Quotation marks were used for specimen data cited verbatim. Different labels were separated by a backslash, with comments placed between square brackets.

Dissection and terminology

Genitalia were dissected and examined using a Zeiss Discovery V20 stereoscope or a Nikon SMZ1270 stereoscope following Forero (2008). Digital photographs were taken with a Nikon D5300 attached either to a Nikon SMZ1270 stereoscope or a microscope Nikon Eclipse E100. When taking digital photographs using the Nikon SMZ1270 stereoscope, a modified light dome illumination system (Kawada and Buffington 2016) was used. We used a ring LED illumination system from an Olympus stereoscope.

Terminology for male genitalia follows Kelton (1959), Konstantinov (2003), and Forero (2008), except for “vesica”; instead, we refer to the membrane and sclerotizations attached to the phallotheca as endosoma (Cassis 2008, Schwartz 2011); terminology for female genitalia follows Davis (1955), Scudder (1959), and Forero (2008). For the description we assumed that characters not mentioned in the text agree with the generic description of Carvalhomiris (Forero 2009).

In proposing a rationale and terminology for the endosomal sclerotizations of male Austromirini, Cassis (2008) designated them as dorsal and ventral endosomal spicules (DES and VES, respectively). Schwartz (2011) expanded the discussion and application of these terms to the Orthotylini, discussing the various configurations of the DES. Schwartz (2011) also noted that several genera of the Orthotylini have a single spiculum that he homologized with the DES. Until further evidence among additional members of the Zanchius group is available, we treated the single spiculum of Carvalhomiris as the DES, despite not completely agreeing with Cassis (2008) that the base of the DES has an expanded keel.

Phylogenetic analyses

Based on the taxonomic revision of Carvalhomiris (Forero 2009) and the documentation of the new species described herein, morphological characters were proposed and coded to build a matrix with 45 characters (Appendix 1, Suppl. material 1). All characters were treated as non-additive. The characters coded document variation among the species relative to body size, antennal structure and coloration, pronotum structure, hemelytron development and structure, and male and female genitalia. The matrix includes seven terminals. The ingroup comprises the three previously described species of Carvalhomiris (Forero 2009) and our species. As outgroups, we included unidentified species of Parachius Distant, 1884 and Itacoris Carvalho, 1947, both members of the Zanchius group (Schuh 1974, Henry 1995, Forero 2009). We also included an additional member of the Orthotylini not closely related to other species of the Zanchius group, an unidentified species of Orthotylus, which also was used to root the trees.

For the phylogenetic analyses, we used parsimony as the optimality criterion. With the number of terminals very small, an exact solution for the matrix can be provided using a branch-and-bound algorithm (Hendy and Penny 1982, Goloboff et al. 2008). Analyses were carried out using TNT version 1.5 Beta (Goloboff and Catalano 2016).

Results

Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/EFF8C336-65BF-44E0-A092-CB005AB88FD0

Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Type locality

COLOMBIA, Antioquia, Jardín, Alto de Ventanas, carretera a Riosucio, 05.5400833°N 75.8035167°W, 2913m, 2 January 2014, D. Forero.

Type specimen

Holotype male, pinned dry brachypterous specimen (figure 1). Original printed labels: “COLOMBIA, Antioquia, Jardín, Alto de Ventanas, carretera a Riosucio, 05.5400833°N 75.8035167°W, 2913m, 2 Ene 2014, D.Forero” / “ex. Acmella sp. (Compositae)” / “MPUJ_ENT 0017990” / “♂ Holotype Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n. Det. D.Forero 2017” [red printed label] (MPUJ).

Paratypes

2♂ macropters, same data as holotype / MPUJ_ENT 0017988-MPUJ_ENT 0017989 (MPUJ); 10♂ brachypters, same data as holotype / MPUJ_ENT 0017991, MPUJ_ENT 0017993-MPUJ_ENT 0018000 (MPUJ), MPUJ_ENT 0017992 (USNM); 3♀ macropters, same data as holotype / MPUJ_ENT 0018001-MPUJ_ENT 0018002 (MPUJ), MPUJ_ENT 0018003 (USNM); 3♀ brachypters, same data as holotype / MPUJ_ENT 0018005-MPUJ_ENT 0018007 (MPUJ). 3♂ brachypters, Jardín, Alto de Ventanas, carretera a Riosucio, 05.5648333°N 75.7944500°W, 2640m, 2 Ene 2014, D. Forero / MPUJ_ENT 0018013-MPUJ_ENT 0018015 (MPUJ); 5♀ brachypters, same data / MPUJ_ENT 0018008-MPUJ_ENT 0018012 (MPUJ).

Other material

1 nymph, same data as holotype / MPUJ_ENT 0018004 (MPUJ).

Diagnosis

Recognized by the large, basally constricted process on posterior margin of right paramere in males.

Figure 1.

Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n. Dorsal habitus images. Male and female brachypterous specimens (upper row), and male and female macropterous specimens (bottom row). The male brachypterous specimen is the holotype.

Description

Brachypterous male. Coloration (Figure 1): Overall coloration pale green. Antennal segments I-IV dark, I dorsomedially pale, II with medial broad pale ring, III basally pale yellow. Head yellowish green, postocular region greenish. Legs yellowish green, third tarsomere dark. Structure (see also Table 1): Head: Antennal segment II on medial surface of basal third with decumbent, simple setae. Thorax: Pronotum: anterior lobe flat. Hemelytron: Relatively short, not reaching apex of abdomen, apex rounded (Figure 1). Genitalia: Genital capsule, large, aperture semicircular (Figure 2E, F). Right paramere with ventral portion straight, directed caudad, apically without spines, posterior margin of paramere medially with truncate, basally constricted process with dorsal portion acutely prolongated (Figure 2A, arrow); left paramere with area caudad to dorsal sensory area with medially projected, acute process of narrow base (Figure 2C, D arrows), apex of paramere on ventral surface with small apical process (Figure 2B, arrow). Aedeagus with right margin of phallotheca with preapical area rounded, smooth (Figure 2G); dorsal endosomal spicule with dorsal portion slightly less than one half length of ventral portion, apex slightly upcurved (Figure 2G), straight in dorsal view (Figure 2H), base relatively narrow (Figure 2G); ventral portion of dorsal endosomal spicule surpassing apex of phallotheca, width homogeneous for most of length, apex strongly hooked with hook curved upwards in lateral view (Figure 2G, arrow) and left in dorsal view (Figure 2H).

Figure 2.

Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n. Male genitalia. A Right paramere, lateral right view B–D left paramere B caudal view C dorsal view D medial view. Arrows on C and D show the dorsal process E, F genital capsule E caudal view F lateral left view G, H aedeagus, not everted G lateral right view H dorsal view.

Macropterous male (Figure 1). Similar to brachypterous male in coloration and structure, but with wider pronotum (Table 1), mesoscutum greatly exposed, and forewings fully developed.

Brachypterous female (Figure 1). Similar to brachypterous male in coloration and structure, but slightly larger. Thorax: Hemelytron shorter than abdomen, reaching only abdominal segment 5. Genitalia (Figure 3): Dorsal labiate plate on lateral infoldings with small sclerotized area cephalad of sclerotized infolding (Figure 3A). Anterior wall with medial margin of gonapophysis 8 asymmetrical (Figure 3B, arrow), left margin more protuberant than right one, with sclerotized rounded area cephalad of protuberance. Posterior wall as in generic description (Forero 2009), with large, apically expanded interramal dorsal lobes (Fig. 3C).

Macropterous female (Figure 1). Similar to brachypterous female in coloration and structure, except forewings fully developed.

Figure 3.

Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n. Female genitalia. A Dorsal labiate plate and sclerotized rings, dorsal view B anterior wall, anterior view, showing the vestibulum, indicating the asymmetrical medial margin of gonapophysis 8 C posterior wall, dorsal view, showing the interramal dorsal processes.

Table 1.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Measurements of C. henryi sp. n. Abbreviations are as follows. Ant1: antennal segment 1. Brach: brachypter. Cun: cuneus. Cun-clyp: cuneus-clypeus. IntOcDi: interocular distance. Macr: macropter. Mesoscut: mesoscutellum. Pron: pronotum. Scut: scutellum. NA: not available.

Measurements		Length							Width
Measurements		Total	Cun-Clyp	Head	Pron	Mesoscut	Scut	Cun	Head	Pron	IntOcDi	Ant1
Male brach	Mean	2.96	2.50	0.44	0.55	NA	0.38	NA	0.66	0.72	0.38	0.11
	SD	0.07	0.07	0.05	0.02	NA	0.03	NA	0.03	0.04	0.02	0.02
	Range	0.18	0.18	0.15	0.06	NA	0.06	NA	0.07	0.11	0.04	0.04
	Min.	2.85	2.39	0.36	0.53	NA	0.34	NA	0.61	0.65	0.35	0.09
	Max	3.03	2.57	0.51	0.59	NA	0.40	NA	0.68	0.76	0.39	0.13
Female brach	Mean	2.47	1.85	0.35	0.38	NA	0.35	NA	0.54	0.62	0.30	0.07
	SD	0.04	0.10	0.03	0.01	NA	0.16	NA	0.01	0.06	0.00	0.01
	Range	0.05	0.14	0.04	0.02	NA	0.23	NA	0.01	0.08	0.00	0.01
	Min.	2.44	1.78	0.33	0.37	NA	0.23	NA	0.53	0.58	0.30	0.06
	Max	2.49	1.92	0.37	0.39	NA	0.46	NA	0.54	0.66	0.30	0.07
Male macr	Mean	4.51	3.73	0.30	0.48	0.30	0.37	0.78	0.65	1.06	0.37	0.09
	SD	0.01	0.05	0.08	0.10	0.09	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.04	0.01
	Range	0.02	0.07	0.12	0.14	0.13	0.03	0.03	0.01	0.02	0.05	0.01
	Min.	4.50	3.69	0.24	0.41	0.23	0.35	0.76	0.64	1.05	0.34	0.08
	Max	4.52	3.76	0.36	0.55	0.36	0.38	0.79	0.65	1.07	0.39	0.09
Female macr	Mean	4.50	3.73	0.41	0.53	0.26	0.36	0.74	0.63	1.06	0.38	0.09
	SD	0.26	0.29	0.07	0.01	0.00	0.03	0.06	0.00	0.07	0.02	0.04
	Range	0.37	0.41	0.10	0.02	0.00	0.04	0.08	0.00	1.04	0.37	0.07
	Min.	4.31	3.52	0.36	0.52	0.26	0.34	0.70	0.63	0.07	0.02	0.04
	Max	4.68	3.93	0.46	0.54	0.26	0.38	0.78	0.63	1.11	0.39	0.11

Etymology

We are pleased to dedicate this new species to our friend and colleague Thomas J. Henry. The new name is treated as a Latin noun in the genitive case. Tom is an indefatigable entomologist, always willing to share his knowledge and help others. Tom’s enthusiasm for Heteroptera is contagious, not only in the lab but also in the field. Tom collected a long series of specimens of Carvalhomiris in Ecuador in 1996 that was described as C. bifurcatus (Forero 2009); therefore, we take great pleasure in dedicating this new Colombian species of Carvalhomiris to Tom.

Distribution

Known from the type locality on a road near Jardín, Antioquia, in the western Cordillera in Colombia. It was found from 2640 to 2913 meters in elevation, in a high Andean cloud forest (Figure 4A). This locality is the northernmost for any species of the genus (Figure 5).

Plant associations

Specimens of the new species were mostly associated with small roadside herbs of Acmella sp. (Asteraceae) (Figure 4B). Despite multiple observations, no direct plant feeding was observed.

Figure 4.

A Roadside vegetation in a montane cloud forest on the road to Ventanas, where C. henryi sp. n. was found B Acmella sp. (Asteraceae), plant on which specimens of C. henryi sp. n. were found.

Figure 5.

Distribution map of species of Carvalhomiris, including C. henryi sp. n. (modified from Forero 2009).

Discussion

Species of Carvalhomiris are rather homogeneous in external morphology, but their male genitalia are distinct (Forero 2009). Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n. is more closely related to C. brachypterus and C. truncatus, than to C. bifurcatus based on characters of the male and female genitalia (see also phylogenetic analysis below). Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n. is similar to C. truncatus in having a medial process on the posterior margin of the paramere, but this process in C. henryi sp. n. is basally constricted, whereas in C. truncatus it is not. Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n. is similar to C. brachypterus in structure of the left paramere with an acute, medially directed, dorsal process caudad of the sensory area; in C. henryi sp. n. this process is large, not small as in C. brachypterus, and differs from that in C. truncatus which is large and broad. The structure of the dorsal endosomal spicule differentiates C. henryi sp. n. from its congeners. These characters help to identify this new species, but its mixed character associations preclude an unambiguous assessment of phylogenetic relationships.

Heteropteran distributions have been little documented in Colombia, especially for geographically restricted taxa such as species of Carvalhomiris in the high Andes. An increased knowledge of biogeographic patterns might reveal diversification processes that produced these distributional ranges. Unknown is what is driving speciation processes in the Andes, a question that relates to the natural history of Carvalhomiris. It is not certain that species of this genus are strictly phytophagous. They might be omnivores, as is the case in certain orthotylines (Wheeler 2001). To begin answering these questions, further fieldwork is requisite. Because C. henryi sp. n. is known from a different cordillera than its Colombian congeners, the discovery of new species between the known localities can be anticipated. In addition, little-known habitats in Colombia above 2400 m should be thoroughly explored to attain a more complete panorama of the evolution of the group.

The collection of C. henryi sp. n. from a composite, Acmella sp., represents the second plant association for a species of Carvalhomiris. Feeding habits of the new species are unknown, but it might not be strictly phytophagous. The family Tropaeolaceae, on which C. truncatus has been found (Forero 2009), is not closely related to the Asteraceae. Although C. henryi sp. n. was most numerous on Acmella, it also was taken on other plants. This orthotyline might remain on Acmella before dispersing to other plant species when the quality of its typical host deteriorates or when prey numbers decline. The documented associated plants in Carvalhomiris are not closely related. For example, C. truncatus is associated with Tropaeolum sp. (Tropaeolaceae) (Forero 2009), a family far removed from the Asteraceae. Specimens of C. henryi sp. n. were collected on vegetation along the road, and despite being more abundant on Acmella, they were found on other plants in lesser numbers. We suggest that species in Carvalhomiris might be predators, or at least facultatively predaceous. In searching for prey, phytophagous insects can be found readily and in abundance on their host plants. The prey of predatory species, and their associated plants, can vary, which also might be the case in other members of the Zanchius group.

Key to the species of Carvalhomiris (modified from Forero 2009)

1	Right paramere with ventral portion greatly elongated and apically bifurcated; brachypterous male and female with apex of hemelytron acute; medial margin of first gonapophysis nearly symmetrical	bifurcatus Forero, 2009
– R	ght paramere neither greatly elongated nor strongly bifurcated on ventral portion; brachypterous male and female with apex of hemelytron rounded; anterior medial margin of first gonapophysis strongly asymmetrical	2
2	Posterior serrated margin of right paramere nearly straight	brachypterus Maldonado & Ferreira, 1972
– P	sterior serrated margin of right paramere with a median process	3
3	Median process of posterior margin of right paramere large, nearly truncate, with wide base; dorsal portion of endosomal spicule with apex strongly left-curved; dorsal process of left paramere short, base wide	truncatus Forero, 2009
– M	dian process of posterior margin of right paramere small, constricted basally (Fig. 2A, arrow); dorsal portion of endosomal spicule with apex straight (Fig. 2H); dorsal process of left paramere long and acute, base narrow (Fig. 2C, 2D, arrows)	henryi sp. n.

Phylogenetic analysis

The implicit enumeration search strategy for the phylogenetic analysis resulted in two equally parsimonious trees (Figure 6A; Ci: 81, Ri: 67). The strict consensus showed that either Itacoris or Parachius could be considered the sister group of Carvalhomiris depending on the topology chosen. The strict consensus also showed that Carvalhomiris is monophyletic, but that their internal relationships are not completely resolved. Carvalhomiris henryi sp. n. is placed in a polytomy with C. brachypterus and C. truncatus, with C. bifurcatus as the sister group of this clade. These associations not only show the similarities among the three species, but also point to the particular apomorphies exhibited by C. bifurcatus. Carvalhomiris bifurcatus is also the southernmost species of the genus (Ecuador); it is not known if there is a particular character transformation scheme in relation to geography. The resulting phylogenetic hypotheses do not allow a clear-cut interpretation of a geographic pattern within the C. brachypterus clade. Even though geographically close species also might be expected to be phylogenetically close, the recovered pattern was ambiguous in this respect. The further description of new species of Carvalhomiris might resolve this ambiguity.

The monophyly of Carvalhomiris was suggested without the testing of a cladistic hypothesis, but a few putative synapomorphies were noted (Forero 2009). An evaluation of these putative characters in our phylogenetic analysis enables most of the previously suggested synapomorphies to be corroborated: strong brachyptery in both sexes; large genital capsule in males with the anterolateral margin strongly curved; dorsal endosomal spicule C-shaped inserted near the base of the aedeagus; dorsal labiate plate with a median dorsal depression; and lateral infoldings of the sclerotized rings with a caudad acute process. The following were also proposed as putative synapomorphies (Forero 2009), but were not recovered as such in this analysis: right paramere apically expanded, apical margin of paramere serrated, and endosoma with a single spicule.

Further collecting in the wide geographic gap between the known localities of Carvalhomiris species might reveal additional species and allow further testing of phylogenetic relationships in the genus.

Figure 6.

Phylogenetic analysis of Carvalhomiris species, including C. henryi sp. n. A One of the two trees obtained (Ci: 81, Ri: 67) with characters and character states indicated on the branches B consensus tree of the two trees obtained.

Acknowledgements

We thank Douglas Knapp (Reserva la Esperanza, Jardín), who provided logistical support in the field. Mateo Hernández (Sopó, Cundinamarca) kindly helped us identify the plants. Financial support was provided to JRS and VO from the Centro de Fomento de la Identidad y Construcción de la Comunidad, Vicerrectoria del Medio, and from Decanatura de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Al Wheeler kindly provided criticism and suggestions in an earlier version of the manuscript. This paper is a contribution of the project “Actividades docentes y de investigación como apoyo al conocimiento de la biodiversidad colombiana” ID PPTA 00006416 of the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana.

References

Arbeláez-Cortés E (2013) Knowledge of Colombian biodiversity: published and indexed. Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 2875–2906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0560-y

Carvalho JCM, Froeschner RC (1987) Taxonomic names proposed in the insect order Heteroptera by José Candido de Melo Carvalho from 1943 to January 1985, with type depositories. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 95: 121–224. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25009604

Carvalho JCM, Froeschner RC (1990) Taxonomic names proposed in the insect order Heteroptera by José Candido de Melo Carvalho from January 1985 to January 1989, with type depositories. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 98: 310–346. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25009842

Carvalho JCM, Froeschner RC (1994) Taxonomic names proposed in the insect order Heteroptera by José Candido de Melo Carvalho from January 1989 to January 1993. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 102: 481–508. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25010124

Cassis G (2008) The Lattinova complex of austromirine plant bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylinae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 110: 845–939. https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797-110.4.845

Cassis G, Schuh RT (2012) Systematics, biodiversity, biogeography, and host associations of the Miridae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Cimicomorpha). Annual Review of Entomology 57: 377–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-121510-133533

Davis NT (1955) Morphology of the female organs of reproduction in the Miridae (Hemiptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 48: 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/48.3.132

Ferreira P, Henry T, Coelho L (2015) Plant Bugs (Miridae). In: Panizzi A, Grazia J (Eds) True Bugs (Heteroptera) of the Neotropics.Springer, New York, 237–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9861-7_10

Forero D (2008) Revision and phylogenetic analysis of the Hadronema group (Miridae: Orthotylinae: Orthotylini), with descriptions of new genera and new species, and comments on the Neotropical genus Tupimiris. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 312: 1–172. https://doi.org/10.1206/312.1

Forero D (2009) Revision of the genus Carvalhomiris (Hemiptera: Miridae: Orthotylinae). Entomologica Americana 115: 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1664/08-RA-007.1

Goloboff PA, Catalano SA (2016) TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32: 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12160

Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon KC (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x

Hendy MD, Penny D (1982) Branch and bound algorithms to determine minimal evolutionary trees. Mathematical Biosciences 60: 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(82)90027-X

Henry TJ (1995) Proboscidotylus carvalhoi, a new genus and species of sexually dimorphic plant bug from Mexico (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylinae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 97: 340–345. http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/54740

Henry TJ (2017) Biodiversity of Heteroptera. In: Foottit RG, Adler PH (Eds) Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society, Second Ed.John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 279–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch10

Henry TJ, Wheeler AG (1995) Foreword [Contributions on Heteroptera dedicated to the memory of José Candido de Melo Carvalho]. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 97: 229–230.

Kawada R, Buffington ML (2016) A scalable and modular dome illumination system for scientific microphotography on a budget. PLOS ONE 11: e0153426. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153426

Kelton LA (1959) Male genitalia as taxonomic characters in the Miridae (Hemiptera). Canadian Entomologist 91(suppl. 11): 1–72. https://doi.org/10.4039/entm9111fv

Konstantinov FD (2003) Male genitalia in Miridae (Heteroptera) and their significance for suprageneric classification of the family. Part 1: general review, Isometopinae and Psallopinae. Belgian Journal of Entomology 5: 3–36.

Maldonado J, Ferreira PS (1971) Carvalhomiris brachypterus, a new mirid genus and species from Colombia (Hemiptera, Miridae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 31(3): 345–347.

Mittermeier RA (1988) Primate diversity and the tropical forest case studies from Brazil and Madagascar and the importance of the megadiversity countries. In: Wilson EO, Peter FM (Eds) Biodiversity.National Academy Press, Washington DC, 145–154.

Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C (2011) Global Biodiversity Conservation: The Critical Role of Hotspots. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC (Eds) Biodiversity Hotspots.Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_1

Schuh RT (1974) The Orthotylinae and Phylinae (Hemiptera: Miridae) of South Africa with a phylogenetic analysis of the ant-mimetic tribes of the two subfamilies for the world. Entomologica Americana 47: 1–332. http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/177217

Schuh RT (2002-2013) On-line Systematic Catalog of Plant Bugs (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae). http://research.amnh.org/pbi/catalog/

Schwartz MD (2011) Revision and phylogenetic analysis of the North American genus Slaterocoris Wagner with new synonymy, the description of five new species and a new genus from Mexico, and a review of the genus Scalponotatus Kelton (Heteroptera: Miridae: Orthotylinae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 354: 1–290. https://doi.org/10.1206/354.1

Scudder GGE (1959) The female genitalia of the Heteroptera: morphology and bearing on classification. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 111: 405–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1959.tb02873.x

Wheeler AG (2001) Biology of the Plant Bugs. Cornell University Press, New York, 506 pp. http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/?GCOI=80140100384560

Wheeler AG Jr, Krimmel BA (2015) Mirid (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) specialists of sticky plants: adaptations, interactions and ecological implications. Annual Review of Entomology 60: 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020932

Appendix 1

Morphological character list and their character states used in the phylogenetic analysis of Carvalhomiris species.

0. Relative body size: small (0); medium (1).

1. Antenna, type of setae on segment II medially on basal third: suberect (0); decumbent (1).

2. Antenna, length of setae on segment II medially on basal third: short (0); very short (1).

3. Antennal segment II, coloration: dark brown, pale median band (0); apical half brown, basal half pale (1); dark brown (2).

4. Antennal segment III, coloration: brown, base pale (0); brown, basal half pale yellow (1); brown, basal third pale (2); dark brown (3).

5. Pronotum, anterior lobe, structure of surface: slightly convex (0); flat (1).

6. Hemelytron development: strong brachypterism in both sexes (0); macropterous in both sexes (1).

7. Hemelytron in brachypterous specimen, relative length with respect to abdomen: short, not reaching genital capsule (0); long, reaching genital capsule (1).

8. Hemelytron in brachypterous specimen, shape of apex: acute (0); rounded (1).

9. Hemelytron, density of setae on apex (or cuneus): sparse (0); abundant (1).

10. Genital capsule, relative size to abdomen length: about half abdomen (0); about 2/3 abdomen (1); about 1/3 abdomen (2).

11. Genital capsule, structure of cephalic lateral margin in lateral view: strongly curved (0); straight (1); slightly curved (2).

12. Genital capsule, extent of ventral posterior margin relative to insertion of parameres: not projected (0); greatly projected (1).

13. Right paramere, structure of distal half: clubbed (0); nearly cylindrical (1).

14. Right paramere, structure apex: without a differentiated ventral portion (0); with a differentiated ventral portion (1).

15. Right paramere, structure of ventral portion: strongly curved dorsally (1); straight, directed caudad (1); straight, directed ventrad (2).

16. Right paramere, relative length of ventral portion: as long as apical margin (0); about half as long as apical margin (1).

17. Right paramere, structure of apical ventral portion: with a preapical spine (0); strongly bifurcated (1); as an acute process (2).

18. Right paramere, ornamentation of apical margin: gently serrate (0); strongly serrate (1); smooth, not serrate (2).

19. Right paramere, orientation of apical margin: vertical (0); reclined (1).

20. Right paramere, structure of apical margin: entire, uninterrupted (0); interrupted (1).

21. Right paramere, structure of process on apical margin interrupting margin: medium-sized spine near dorsal portion (0); large, median truncate process (1).

22. Right paramere, base of process on apical margin: constricted (0); not constricted (1).

23. Left paramere, structure of area caudad to dorsal sensory area: flat (0); with a dorsal process (1).

24. Left paramere, relative size of base of dorsal process caudad to dorsal sensory area: narrow (0); broad (1).

25. Left paramere, structure of apex: deeply cleft (0); not cleft (1).

26. Left paramere, structure on ventral surface: flat, not produced (0); with a ventral process (1).

27. Left paramere, size of apical process on ventral surface: large (0); small (1).

28. Left paramere, structure of apical process on ventral surface: acute (0); rounded (1).

29. Left paramere, structure of preapical ventral area: protruding (0); nearly flat (1).

30. Left paramere, cuticle on preapical ventral area: with medium-sized trichia (0); with very small trichia (1); flat, without trichia (2).

31. Phallotheca, structure of basal lateral area with flaplike protuberances: flat (0); with paired protuberances (1).

32. Phallotheca, structure of preapical margin: acute (0); broadly rounded (1).

33. Endosoma, number of spicules: one (0); two (1); three (2).

34. Endosomal spicule DES2, shape of spicule in lateral view: C-shaped (0); straight (1).

35. Endosomal spicule DES2, structure of the base: wide (0); narrow (1).

36. Endosomal spicule DES2, relative position in repose with respect to cephalad portion of aedeagus: close to cephalad portion (0); barely reaching caudal portion of articulatory apparatus (1).

37. Endosomal spicule DES2, C-shaped, dorsal portion, length with respect to ventral portion: three fourths of the length (0); half the length (1).

38. Endosomal spicule DES2, C-shaped, ventral portion, structure of apex: acute (0); expanded (1).

39. Endosomal spicule DES2, C-shaped, ventral portion, structure of apex: straight (0); curved dorsally (1); curved cephalad (2).

40. Endosomal spicule DES2, relative length with respect to apex of phallotheca: not reaching apex (0); reaching or surpassing apex (1).

41. First gonapophysis, symmetry of anterior medial margin: nearly symmetrical (0); strongly asymmetrical (1).

42. Dorsal labiate plate, structure of area of insertion of accessory gland: produced ventrally as a conical depression (0); flat (1).

43. Sclerotized rings of dorsal labiate plate, lateral structure: with lateral infoldings (0); without lateral infoldings (1).

44. Sclerotized rings of dorsal labiate plate, lateral infoldings structure of caudal margin: with acute process (0); rounded (1).

Table A1.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Matrix of morphological characters and their states used in the phylogenetic analysis of Carvalhomiris species ("–": inapplicable; "?": unknown).

Taxon	Characters
	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20	21	22
Orthotylus sp.	1	1	0	2	3	–	1	–	–	0	1	2	1	1	0	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Itacoris sp.	0	0	0	0	2	1	1	–	–	0	2	1	1	0	1	1	1	0	2	1	0	–	–
Parachius sp.	0	1	0	2	3	1	1	–	–	1	2	1	0	0	1	2	1	2	2	0	0	–	–
C. bifurcatus	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	1	0	–	–
C. brachypterus	0	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	0	1	0	1	0	–
C. truncatus	0	1	0	1	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	1	1	1
C. henryi sp. n.	0	1	0	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	2	0	0	1	1	1	0	1	0	1	1	0
	23	24	25	26	27	28	29	30	31	32	33	34	35	36	37	38	39	40	41	42	43	44
Orthotylus sp.	0	–	0	0	–	–	1	2	2	1	2	1	1	1	–	–	–	1	0	1	0	1
Itacoris sp.	0	–	1	0	–	–	1	2	0	1	1	1	1	1	–	–	–	1	?	?	?	?
Parachius sp.	0	–	1	1	1	1	1	2	0	1	0	1	1	1	–	–	–	1	0	1	0	1
C. bifurcatus	0	–	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
C. brachypterus	1	0	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	0	0	–
C. truncatus	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	1	1	1	0	0	–
C. henryi sp. n.	1	1	1	1	1	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	2	1	1	0	0	–

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1

Carvalhomiris matrix (phylogenetic)

Dimitri Forero, Juanita Rodríguez, Valentina Ocampo

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Download file (4.86 kb)