Research Article |
Corresponding author: Andrzej Zawal ( zawal@univ.szczecin.pl ) Academic editor: Vladimir Pesic
© 2018 Medeni Aykut, Andrzej Zawal, Yunus Esen, Orhan Erman.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Aykut M, Zawal A, Esen Y, Erman O (2018) First record of larvae of the water mite Hydrachna processifera Piersig, 1895 from Turkey (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Hydrachnidae). ZooKeys 738: 89-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.738.21021
|
Larvae of water mite Hydrachna processifera Piersig, 1895 (Acari, Hydrachnidiae) were reported on diving beetles Dytiscus marginalis Linnaeus, 1758 (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) from Turkey. The redescription of the larva was made. Earlier, the larva H. processifera was described as H. inermis, but it was subsequently synonymized with H. processifera. The larva of H. processifera is a new record for the Turkish fauna. All larvae of H. processifera were found on the mesosternum of the one specimens (prevalence = 16.7%).
Dytiscus marginalis , Hydrachna inermis , parasitism, water beetles, water mites
Mite taxonomy issues continue to pose some difficulties, which causes many synonymic names of particular species. The situation is much more difficult because of the presence of pre-adult stages such as larvae and deutonymphs. For instance, Hydrachna inermis Piersig, 1895 has been synonymized with H. processifera Piersig, 1895 by
Larvae of water mites of the genera Hydrachna, Eylais, Limnochares, and Acherontacarus are ectoparasites on aquatic Hemiptera and aquatic Coleoptera (
Parasitizing larvae of H. processifera (as H. inermis) were reported on Dytiscidae and Hydrophilidae in previous studies (
Parasitized specimens of Dytiscus marginalis were collected from a small pond supplied by a small water source in the plateau near Çayıryolu village of Varto district (39°09'23"N, 41°34'56"E; 20.08.2014) in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey (Fig.
The following abbreviations are used: Cx – coxa; L – length; W – width.
In total, six specimens of D. marginalis including four females and two males were collected. Of these, only one female specimen was infected (prevalence = 16.7%). Except D. marginalis, a total of 37 specimens belongs to four genera and seven species (Agabus biguttatus, A. bipustulatus, A. conspersus, Colymbetes fuscus, Hydroporus pubescens, H. tesellatus, Platambus maculatus). None of them was positive with regards to water mites.
On D. marginalis, eleven larvae of H. processifera were observed (Fig.
Hydrachna inermis was described from a site in Germany (Piersig 1895, 1897, 1899). Later it was recorded in various parts of Europe but without clearly defined diagnostic features; it was synonymized with H. processifera by
The small size all of water mite larvae of H. processifera confirms that the reproductive time is during summer.
The water mite larvae collected from Muş Province were identified as H. processifera on the basis of shape of idiosoma and gnatosoma, and the shape of coxae and its setation. All tibiotarsal claws were large and of equal size. Unlike other larvae of water mites attached under elytra, larvae of water mites H. processifera are attached to outer surface of beetle bodies (Fig.
The redescribed of H. processifera is identical to