Research Article
Print
Research Article
Three new species of Eucorydia Hebard, 1929 (Blattodea, Corydioidea, Corydiidae) from China, with notes on female genitalia
expand article infoTing-Ting Cai‡§, Wei Han‡§, Zong-Qing Wang‡§, Yan-Li Che‡§
‡ College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Beibei, China
§ Key Laboratory of Agricultural Biosafety and Green Production of Upper Yangtze River (Ministry of Education), Southwest University, Chongqing, China
Open Access

Abstract

Three new species of Eucorydia from China are described using an integrative taxonomic approach combining morphology and COI sequences, with ASAP and GMYC methods: Eucorydia parva Cai & Che, sp. nov., Eucorydia qinlingensis Cai & Che, sp. nov., and Eucorydia absens Cai & Che, sp. nov. The female genitalia are illustrated and comparatively analyzed, demonstrating their taxonomic significance. Although genetic divergence between the zonata population of E. dasytoides and E. qinlingensis is low, phylogenetic analysis supports the distinctiveness of the three new species. A key to the Chinese species of Eucorydia is also provided.

Key words:

ASAP, cockroach, DNA barcoding, GMYC

Introduction

Eucorydia Hebard, 1929 exhibits striking metallic coloration and bright markings, making it one of the most morphologically and aesthetically distinct lineages within Corydioidea. The genus is widely distributed across East Asia, Southeast Asia, and South Asia, with 22 known species worldwide, ten of which occur in China (Asahina 1971; Woo et al. 1986; Qiu et al. 2017; Yanagisawa et al. 2021a).

Early taxonomic studies relied primarily on external morphological characters, such as body color, tegminal and abdominal markings (Princis 1963; Asahina 1971; Woo et al. 1986; Woo and Feng 1988). Subsequent revisions incorporated male genitalia, greatly improving species delimitation (Qiu et al. 2017, 2019). More recently, molecular approaches, including genetic distance analyses and phylogenetic inference, have further enhanced taxonomic resolution within the genus (Yanagisawa et al. 2021a, 2021b, 2021c). Despite these advances, studies of Eucorydia remain strongly biased toward males. Females have received little attention, with most studies limited to simple descriptions and comparisons of external morphology (Qiu et al. 2017). However, previous research has shown that the sclerotized structures of female genitalia in Blattodea are stable and species-specific, serving as important diagnostic characters (McKittrick 1964; Zhu et al. 2022; Valero-Pérez 2023; Han et al. 2024). Such characters have not yet been systematically investigated in Eucorydia. Furthermore, molecular data for Chinese species remain limited, despite China harboring nearly half of the known diversity of the genus.

Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), especially the standard 658-bp barcode fragment, is widely recognized as a rapid and reliable molecular marker for species identification (Hebert et al. 2003; Liao et al. 2019). It has been successfully applied to insect species delimitation using the Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) and Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC) methods (Bai et al. 2018; Puillandre et al. 2021; Neo et al. 2025).

In this study, we re-evaluate the species diversity of Eucorydia in China using an integrative approach combining morphology and molecular data. Based on detailed morphological comparisons and phylogenetic analysis of COI sequences, together with ASAP and GMYC, we describe three new species within this genus. Furthermore, we provide the first comparative analysis of female genitalia in this genus and evaluate their taxonomic significance.

Materials and methods

Material

All specimens examined in this study, including the type specimens, are deposited in the College of Plant Protection, Southwest University, Chongqing, China (SWU). A total of 13 female specimens were examined, including E. westwoodi (2), E. dasytoides (7), E. linglong (1), E. guilinensis (1), and E. qinlingensis (2).

For genitalia dissection, the terminal 3–4 abdominal segments were excised, soaked in 10% NaOH, and heated for 10–20 min to digest soft tissues. DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing followed Han et al. (2022). Observations were conducted in glycerol using a SZ780 stereomicroscope. Images were captured using a Leica M205A stereomicroscope and processed with Adobe Photoshop 2024.

Terminology for external morphology follows Roth (2003); male genitalia follows Klass (1997) and Qiu et al. (2017); female genitalia follows McKittrick (1964). The term of meristal annulus follows Fujita and Machida (2014).

Abbreviations in this paper are as follows

L1, L2, L3, L4M, L4N sclerites of the left complex

Sc subcosta

TX supra-anal plate

SVII subgenital plate

pp. paraprocts

v.I first valve

v.II second valve

v.III third valve

cp. crosspiece

T tergite

R1M, R2, R3, L7 sclerites of the right phallomere and appendage sclerite

RA radius anterior

p.l. posterior lobes of valvifer II

ltst. IX laterosternite IX

vlf.I first valvifer

pt. paratergites

sp.pl. spermathecal plate

bsv. basivalvula

vst.s vestibular sclerite

S sternite

Sequence processing and phylogenetic analyses

A total of 23 COI sequences (Table 1) were included, of which 13 were newly generated and 10 were obtained from GenBank. Ergaula nepalensis Saussure, 1893 and Diploptera punctata (Eschscholtz, 1822) were used as outgroup. All 13 newly generated sequences were submitted to GenBank with accession numbers of PZ945043–PZ945055. The COI fragments were aligned using the MUSCLE algorithm in MEGA 11 (Tamura et al. 2021). Interspecific and intraspecific genetic distances were calculated using the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model (Kimura 1980).

Table 1.

Samples used in the phylogenetic analysis.

Species Abbreviation Locality GenBank number
E. parva sp. nov. Eucoparva1(♂) Guizhou Prov., Dushan County, Mawei Town PZ945055
E. qinlingensis sp. nov. EucoQL(♂) Shaanxi Prov., Mt. Qinling PZ945043
E. absens sp. nov. EucoSNJ01(♂) Hubei Prov., Shennongjia Forestry District, Zhuheyuan PZ945047
E. westwoodi EucoWest1(♀) Yunnan Prov., Dehong Prefecture, Yingjiang County PZ945050
EucoWest2(♂) PZ945051
E. linglong EucoLing1(♂) Hainan Prov., Mt. Jianfengling PZ945048
EucoLing2(♂) PZ945049
E. dasytoides EucoDasyHN1(♂) Hunan Prov., Changde City, Mt. Guniu PZ945045
EucoDasyHN2(♂) PZ945046
EucoDasyGZ(♂) Guizhou Prov. PZ945044
TWN01 / LC480880
TWN02 / LC480881
E. yasumatsui EucuYasu1(♂) Japan PZ945053
EucoYasu2(♂) PZ945054
EucoYasu3 / LC480869
E. tokarensis EucoToka1 / LC480874
EucoToka2 / LC480875
E. miyakoensis EucoMiya1 / LC565397
EucoMiya2 / LC565398
E. donanensis EucoDona1 / LC480877
EucoDona2 / LC480878
Outgroup
Ergaula nepalensis ErgaNepa / NC_082502
Diploptera punctata DiplPunc / MF49156

For phylogenetic analysis, the optimal partition scheme and substitution model were determined using PartitionFinder v. 2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2017) with default parameters. The maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was reconstructed with ten independent likelihood searches performed in IQ-TREE v. 2.2.0 (Nguyen et al. 2015) to identify the best-supported topology. The result with the highest likelihood value was selected for presentation. Node and branch support was evaluated with 10,000 ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot) replicates. In addition, the ‘-bnni’ option was used to mitigate severe model violations, and finally visualization was performed using FigTree v. 1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). Molecular species delimitation was performed using the ASAP method (Puillandre et al. 2021), based on pairwise K2P genetic distances with default parameters and a recursive split threshold of 0.01. The optimal species partition was determined by the minimum ASAP score, which integrates the probability of panmixia and the relative barcode gap width.

The GMYC method requires a fully resolved, strictly ultrametric bifurcating tree as input. To meet this requirement, a Bayesian inference tree was reconstructed in BEAST 1.8.2 using the best-fit nucleotide substitution model selected by PartitionFinder2. An uncorrelated lognormal relaxed-clock model was applied to accommodate rate variation among branches. The mean clock rate was estimated under a uniform prior distribution with a lower boundary of 0, an upper boundary of 1, and an initial value of 0.0001. A UPGMA tree was used as the starting tree, and a birth-death model was specified as the tree prior. Two independent Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analyses were executed for 5 million generations each, with sampling every 500 generations. The resulting trees were then summarized using TreeAnnotator in the BEAST package to generate a maximum clade credibility tree, with the first 10% of sampled trees from each run discarded as burn-in. Convergence was assessed with effective sample size (ESS) values ≥ 200 in Tracer v. 1.6.0 (Drummond and Rambaut 2007).

The final ultrametric gene tree was submitted to the GMYC online server (https://species.h-its.org/gmyc/) for species delimitation using the single-threshold algorithm. The backend of this web server implements the original R version of the GMYC model (Fujisawa and Barraclough 2013). The delimitation results were evaluated using a likelihood-ratio test, which statistically compares the multiple-species clustering model with a single-species null model.

Results

Molecular analysis based on COI

Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis of 23 COI sequences (Fig. 1) recovered all conspecific clades (including both males and females) as well supported monophyletic groups, except for E. dasytoides. The zonata population of E. dasytoides clustered with E. qinlingensis sp. nov. rather than with the type population.

Figure 1. 

Phylogenetic relationships inferred from COI sequences using Maximum Likelihood. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap support values. Red bar: results of morphological delimitation; E. dasytoides in black frame. Blue bar: results of MOTUs in ASAP. Green bar: results of MOTUs in GMYC.

The ASAP analysis identified ten molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) (Fig. 1, blue), largely congruent with morphological identification results. However, incongruence between molecular and morphological delimitation was observed in E. dasytoides: the zonata and the type populations were recovered as two independent MOTUs, whereas the zonata lineage and E. qinlingensis sp. nov. were delimited as a single MOTU.

The GMYC analysis identified 11 MOTUs (Fig. 1, green), in contrast to the ASAP results, the zonata population and E. qinlingensis sp. nov. were resolved as two separate MOTUs.

Interspecific genetic distances ranged from 3.39% (between the zonata population of E. dasytoides and E. qinlingensis sp. nov.) to 22.21% (between E. linglong and E. yasumatsui). The maximum intraspecific COI genetic divergence of E. dasytoides reached 8.67%, occurring between the geographical sample from Guizhou Prov. and Taiwan Prov., respectively (Suppl. material 1).

Key to Eucorydia species within China (based males)

1 Antennae without meristal annuli (Fig. 5E) E. absens sp. nov.
– Antennae with meristal annuli 2
2 Tegmina with three heart-shaped spots E. westwoodi (Gerstaecker, 1861)
– Not as above 3
3 Apical part of tegmina with a small yellow spot on each side and a band of white pubescence between them E. linglong Qiu, Che & Wang, 2017
– Not as above 4
4 Apical half of tegmina uniformly yellow 5
– Apical half of tegmina not entirely yellow 7
5 Anal region of each tegmen with a metallic bluish-green spherical area, the two areas disconnected E. xizangensis Woo & Feng, 1988
– Not as above 6
6 Boundary between metallic and yellow areas on tegmina nearly straight E. hilaris (Kirby, 1903)
– Boundary between metallic and yellow areas on tegmina W-shaped E. splendida Qiu, Che & Wang, 2017
7 Base of tegmina with white or gray pubescence 8
– Base of tegmina without pale pubescence 11
8 Pronotum with short yellowish white pubescence, posterior margin of supra-anal widely concave E. guilinensis Qiu, Che & Wang, 2017
– Not as above 9
9 Body length (excluding tegmina) ≤ 14 mm (Fig. 2A, B) E. parva sp. nov.
– Body length (excluding tegmina) > 14 mm 10
10 Last two sternites black, remaining sternites orange E. pilosa Qiu, Che & Wang, 2017
– Last two sternites black; remaining sternites medially black and laterally orange E. tangi Qiu, Che & Wang, 2017
11 Tegmina slightly exceeding abdomen (< 4 mm); R2 elongate E. yunnanensis Woo, Guo & Feng, 1986
– Tegmina far exceeding abdomen (> 6 mm); R2 rounded 12
12 Posterior margin of supra-anal plate nearly straight E. dasytoides (Walker, 1868)
– Posterior margin of supra-anal plate deeply concave (Fig. 3F) E. qinlingensis sp. nov.

Taxonomy

Eucorydia Hebard, 1929

Eucorydia Hebard, 1929: 96; Princis 1963: 81; Asahina 1971: 256.

Type species.

Eucorydia westwoodi (Gerstaecker, 1861).

Eucorydia parva Cai & Che, sp. nov.

Fig. 2

Type material.

Holotype: China • male; Guizhou Prov., Dushan County, Mawei Town; 9 June 2019; Lu Qiu leg; SWU-BB-CC-025001.

Diagnosis.

The new species resembles the Hainan population of E. dasytoides but is distinctly smaller (overall length 14.00 mm vs 18.60–22.30 mm in E. dasytoides; Qiu et al. 2017). The orange-yellow transverse band on the tegmina is markedly narrower in the new species. Additionally, the last four abdominal segments are entirely black in E. parva sp. nov., whereas in the Hainan population of E. dasytoides only the last three segments are black (Qiu et al. 2017: fig. 4G), with the lateral margins of segments 4 and 5 black (Qiu et al. 2017: fig. 2A, B).

Figure 2. 

Eucorydia parva Cai & Che, sp. nov. A. Male holotype, dorsal view, red arrow points to the area with white setae; B. Male holotype, ventral view; C. Head, ventral view; D. Pronotum, dorsal view; E. Front femur F. T8, dorsal view; G. Supra-anal plate, ventral view; H. Subgenital plate, dorsal view; I. Genitalia, dorsal view.

Description.

Holotype (male). Measurements (mm). Overall length: 14.00; body length: 11.00; body width (excluding tegmina): 6.37; tegmen length × width: 12.30 × 5.00; pronotum length × width: 2.10 × 4.10.

Coloration. Pronotum metallic greenish blue, with black setae. Tegmina with basal half metallic greenish blue, a transverse orange-yellow median band, and apical half nearly black; basal pubescence white, hind wings brown. Head metallic dark blue. Eyes black, ocelli, antennal sockets, and ante-clypeus white. Antennae (except the white apical portion), labial palpi, and maxillary palpi dark brown. Legs dark brownish black, covered with brown pubescence. Leg spines dark brown with reddish brown tips. Last four abdominal sternites blackish brown, remaining sternites yellow.

Head. Slightly rounded, subtriangular. Eyes widely separated, ocelli small and rounded. Interocular space wider than the distance between antennal sockets, and the latter wider than the distance between ocelli. Two shallow depressions present between the antennal sockets. Labrum with a round median impression (Fig. 2C). Pronotum. Transverse, densely nodulose and setose, widest near the posterior margin, median area with dark stripes (Fig. 2D). Tegmina and hind wings. Basal region of tegmina with a patch of white pubescence (Fig. 2A). Sc swellings present. Legs. Slender. Front femur Type C1 (Fig. 2E). Tibiae with multiple big spines, including its apical part. Pulvilli and arolia present. Tarsal claws symmetrical, unspecialized. Abdomen. T8 specialized and asymmetrical; posterolateral corners produced and spinose (Fig. 2F). Supra-anal plate transverse, with posterior margin rounded and broadly concave, posterolateral corners rounded. Paraprocts basally bifurcate, extending outward, irregularly narrow, lamellate. Cerci long and slender (Fig. 2G). Subgenital plate asymmetrical; posterior margin nearly straight; left margin concave upward, bearing a left stylus distinctly smaller than the right; right stylus angled at proximal third (Fig. 2H). Genitalia. Strongly sclerotized. L2 irregularly plate-like; left portion extended into a slender, curved, arm-like process, right portion with a rounded, blunt protrusion. L3 (genital hook) curved, with apex sharp. Basal portion of L7 extended and convex, apical part distinctly narrowed. R2 slightly rounded (Fig. 2I).

Female. Unknown.

Nymph. Unknown.

Ootheca. Unknown.

Natural history.

The male holotype was found freshly dead on a roadside at the edge of a town surrounded by karst landscapes.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is derived from the Latin adjective parvus, meaning “small”, and refers to the relatively small body size of this species compared with its congeners. The name is feminine in gender.

Remarks.

Interspecific genetic distances between the new species and its sequenced congeners range from 10.85–19.77%. The shapes of L7 and R2 are similar to those of E. dasytoides (Qiu et al. 2017), but the new species can be easily distinguished by the presence of white pubescence at the base of the tegmina and its significantly smaller body size.

Eucorydia qinlingensis Cai & Che, sp. nov.

Figs 3, 4

Type material.

Holotype: China • male; Shaanxi Prov., Mt. Qinling; July 2022; collector unknown; SWU-BB-CC-026001. Paratype: China • 2 male & 2 females; same collection data as holotype; SWU-BB-CC-026002 to SWU-BB-CC-026005.

Diagnosis.

The new species is externally similar to the purpuralis population of E. dasytoides (Zhejiang Prov., Mt. Tianmushan; Qiu et al. 2017: fig. 5F, G), but can be readily distinguished by the shape of the male supra-anal plate: the posterior margin is shallowly emarginated in E. dasytoides, whereas deeply concave in the new species (Fig. 3H).

Figure 3. 

Eucorydia qinlingensis Cai & Che, sp. nov. A. Male holotype, dorsal view; B. Male holotype, ventral view; C. Head, ventral view; D. Pronotum, dorsal view; E. Front femur; F. Hind tarsi G. T8, dorsal view; H. Supra-anal plate, ventral view; I. Subgenital plate, dorsal view; J. Genitalia, dorsal view.

Description.

Holotype (male). Measurements (mm). Overall length: 19.24; body length: 16.04; body width (excluding tegmina): 8.20; tegmen length × width: 13.74 × 5.53; pronotum length × width: 7.97 × 4.62.

Coloration. Pronotum metallic bluish-green, covered with black setae. Tegmina with three orange-yellow spots, the basal part metallic bluish-green, and the apical part dark brown. Hind wings uniformly brown. Head metallic dark blue. Eyes black, ocelli and antennal sockets white. Hind-clypeus black, Ante-clypeus white. Middle part of labrum white, dark brown on the remaining parts. Antennae (excluding the whitish apical segments), labial palpi and maxillary palpi black. Legs black, covered with black pubescence, spines on legs dark blackish-brown with reddish-brown apices. Pulvilli white, arolia nearly black. Sternites black, with orange-yellow lateral stripes on sternites III–V.

Head. Drop-shaped, slightly extending beyond the pronotum, frons flat. Interocular space relatively wide, distance between ocelli nearly equal to that between antennal sockets, both smaller than interocular space. Ocelli small. Middle of labrum prominently raised into a mound-like shape, with a distinct small tongue-shaped protrusion at the center of the lower margin (Fig. 3C). Pronotum. Triangular, covered with short pubescence (Fig. 3D). Tegmina and hind wings. Tegmina with Sc swellings present, with orange markings on the lateral margin and two obscure orange markings medially, hind wings without markings. Legs. Slender. Front femur Type C1. Tibiae with multiple large spines, pulvilli and arolia present. Tarsal claws unspecialized (Fig. 3E, F). Abdomen. Covered with short brown setae (Fig. 3B). T8 specialized and slightly asymmetrical; posterolateral corners spinose and produced, with the right projection longer than the left (Fig. 3G). Supra-anal plate transverse, posterior margin broadly arcuate with a deep median concavity, lateral corners rounded and protruding. Paraprocts basally bifurcate, extending outward, irregularly narrow, lamellate. Cerci slender (Fig. 3H). Subgenital plate covered with short black setae, anterior margin asymmetrical, posterior margin produced, right stylus angled at proximal third and slightly larger than left (Fig. 3I). Genitalia. Highly sclerotized. L2 irregularly plate-like; left portion extending into a slender, curved arm-like process, right portion with an acute protrusion. L3 arcuate with acute apex. L7 subrounded in basal half, evenly elongated in distal half, with a bud-like apex. R2 slightly elongated, basal right with a corniform protrusion (Fig. 3J).

Male (paratypes). Generally matching holotype. Overall length: 19.24; body length: 16.04; body width (excluding tegmina): 8.63; tegmen length × width: 15.33 × 6.13; pronotum length × width: 7.97 × 4.62.

Female (paratypes). Measurements (mm). Overall length: 13.38–13.45; body length: 13.02–13.25; body width (excluding tegmina): 8.32–8.46; tegmen length × width: 10.15–10.16 × 4.71–5.15; pronotum length × width: 6.69–6.94 × 3.40–4.36.

Coloration. Similar to male holotype, except orange-yellow tegminal markings indistinct medially and head almost entirely black.

Head. Vertex with pubescence, maxillary and labial palpi pubescent. Frons convex, labrum nearly trapeziform (Fig. 4C). Pronotum. Subelliptical and pubescent, widest near the posterior margin (Fig. 4D). Tegmina and hind wings. The posterior margin of tegmina nearly level with the end of abdomen (Fig. 4A). Legs. Slender, pulvilli and arolia present (Fig. 4B). Abdomen. S3-S5 with yellow lateral maculae; tergites unspecialized. Supra-anal plate dark blackish-brown, posterior margin slightly concave medially, surface setose (Fig. 4E). Subgenital plate without valvar; apical margin arcuately produced, surface setose (Fig. 4F). Genitalia. Paraprocts with long marginal setae; middle of the inner margin extending inward to form a leaf-like protrusion; cerci short, segmented, densely setose. Paratergites narrow and band-shaped. Crosspiece relatively large. Posterior lobes of valvifer II distinct, apex irregular. Ovipositors large and slender, surface smooth. Spermathecal plate highly sclerotized, medially constricted, trapezoidal. Basivalvula broad, with two spherical protrusions medially. Vestibular sclerite highly sclerotized, hillock-shaped (Fig. 4E). Spermathecal duct short, spermatheca tubular with expanded and spiraled apex (Fig. 4G).

Figure 4. 

Eucorydia qinlingensis Cai & Che, sp. nov. A. Female paratype, dorsal view; B. Female paratype, ventral view; C. Head, ventral view; D. Pronotum, dorsal view; E. Genitalia and supra-anal plate; F. Subgenital plate; G. Spermatheca.

Nymph. Unknown.

Ootheca. Unknown.

Etymology.

The specific epithet qinlingensis refers to the Mt. Qinling, the type locality of this species. The name is feminine in gender.

Remarks.

This species differs morphologically from the zonata population of E. dasytoides by the following characters: 1) the orange band on the tegmina is markedly wider in the latter (Qiu et al. 2017: fig. 4A–D); 2) the posterior margin of the male supra-anal plate is relatively flat in the latter (Qiu et al. 2017: fig. 6B), whereas it is distinctly concave in the new species; and 3) the two taxa are geographically isolated, with a straight-line distance approximately 1700 km between the Mt. Qinling and Mt. Lalashan (Taiwan Prov.). Despite the relatively low genetic distance (3.39%), the combined evidence from morphological differences, genitalic characters and geographic isolation support their recognition as distinct species.

Eucorydia absens Cai & Che, sp. nov.

Fig. 5

Type material.

Holotype: China • male; Hubei Prov., Shennongjia Forestry District, Zhuheyuan; June 2023; Chun-Hong Wang leg; SWU-BB-CC-027001.

Diagnosis.

This species can be readily distinguished from other congeners by its entirely black antennae lacking meristal annuli (Fig. 5F). It otherwise resembles the zonata population of E. dasytoides, but differs in the following characters: tegminal markings: the orange-yellow markings possess a median fissure, and the curvature of L3 is distinctly stronger than in E. dasytoides.

Figure 5. 

Eucorydia absens Cai & Che, sp. nov. A. Male holotype, dorsal view; B. Male holotype, ventral view; C. Head, ventral view; D. Pronotum, dorsal view; E. Front femur; F. Antenna, showing absence of meristal annuli; G. Supra-anal plate, ventral view H. T8, dorsal view; I. Subgenital plate, dorsal view; J. Genitalia, dorsal view.

Description.

Holotype (male). Measurements (mm). Overall length: 22.32; body length: 18.01; body width (excluding tegmina): 8.62; tegmen length × width: 16.32 × 6.88; pronotum length × width: 7.96 × 3.96.

Coloration. Head, eyes and antennae black, ocelli white. Ante-clypeus with a white band-shaped marking; labrum blackish-brown, with only the apex of the median protrusion white. Pronotum metallic bluish-green. Tegminal overall metallic bluish-green, middle part with a yellow band. Legs dark brownish-black, covered with brown pubescence, spines dark brown with reddish-brown apices. Eversible glands, pulvilli, and arolia white. The last four sternites black, remaining sternites orange-yellow and median with symmetrical black marking.

Body. Slightly broad (Fig. 5A-B). Head. Inverted triangular, almost entirely covered by pronotum. Frons flat, with two small medial depressions. Interocular space relatively wide, distance between ocelli slightly smaller than that between antennal sockets, both narrower than interocular space. Ocelli small, rounded (Fig. 5C). Pronotum. Transverse, widest near the posterior margin, densely covered with short setae, with indistinct dark longitudinal stripes medially (Fig. 5D). Tegmina and hind wings. Tegmina with Sc swellings present. Hind wings hyaline, apex brown, anterior margin of the RA area with an elongate yellow spot, venation brown (Fig. 5A). Legs. Slender. Front femur Type C1 (Fig. 5E). Tibiae with multiple large spines, pulvilli and arolia present. Tarsal claws symmetrical, unspecialized (Fig. 5B). Abdomen. Setose, eversible glands distinct. Posterior margin of the supra-anal plate constricted medially, forming a clear notch, lateral posterior angles rounded. Paraprocts basally bifurcate, extending outward, irregularly narrow, and lamellate; median sclerites lost during dissection (Fig. 5G). T8 specialized and asymmetrical, posterolateral angles spinose-produced and pubescent (Fig. 5H). Subgenital plate asymmetrical and densely setose; styli subequal in length, each angulate to varying degrees at proximal third (Fig. 5I). Genitalia. Highly sclerotized. L2 plate-like, left portion extending into a slender, curved arm-like process, right portion with a corniform protrusion. L3 strongly curved, semicircular, with a small hook at the apex. L7 with base rounded, medially elongated, apex bud-shaped. R2 nearly elongate-elliptical (Fig. 5J).

Female. Unknown.

Nymph. Unknown.

Ootheca. Unknown.

Etymology.

The specific epithet absens is a Latin adjective, meaning absent, and refers to the absence of meristal annuli. The name is feminine in gender.

Remarks.

The species resembles the zonata population of E. dasytoides, but differs in the medially interrupted tegminal markings, a more strongly curved L3, and genetic distances of 9.35–18.93% from its congeners. These combined morphological and molecular differences support its recognition as a distinct species.

Eucorydia westwoodi (Gerstaecker, 1861)

Fig. 6

Corydia westwoodi Gerstaecker, 1861: 114.

Eucorydia westwoodi: Hebard 1929: 96; Qiu et al. 2017: 48; Qiu et al. 2019: 6.

New material examined.

China • 1 female; Yunnan Prov., Dehong Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, Yingjiang County, Shangbangwa Village; 2021; Jia-Zhi Zhang leg; SWU-BB-CC-021028 • 1 female; Yunnan Prov., purchased from the cockroach pet market; SWU-BB-CC-021023.

Figure 6. 

Female genitalia of four Eucorydia species (supra-anal plate and subgenital plate included). A. Eucorydia westwoodi (Gerstaecker, 1861); B. Eucorydia dasytoides (Walker, 1868); C. Eucorydia linglong Qiu, Che & Wang, 2017; D. Eucorydia guilingensis Qiu, Che & Wang, 2017. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Female genitalia.

Supra-anal plate dark yellowish brown, posterior margin evenly rounded, surface setose. Paraprocts with long setae along the outer margin, inner margin medially curved, with two median sclerites present; cerci segmented, densely setose. Paratergites narrow and strap-shaped, with a bifurcated apex. Crosspiece relatively small, connected to the dorsal plate. Posterior lobes of valvifer II distinct, with a robust apex. First valvule large and slender, surface smooth, fused with the spermathecal plate. Spermathecal plate strongly sclerotized, medially constricted, curved downward, and apically bearing two small angular processes. Lateral lobe of basivalvula broad, roughly triangular, with differently curved inner and outer margins. Spermathecal duct short. Spermatheca tubular, apex swollen. Vestibular sclerite strongly sclerotized, with two median projections and a distinct depression. Subgenital plate without valvar; distal margin rounded and produced, and surface setose.

Eucorydia dasytoides (Walker, 1868)

Fig. 6

Euthyrrhapha dasytoides Walker, 1868: 191.

Eucorydia dasytoides: Hebard 1929: 98; Qiu et al. 2017: 24.

Corydia tonkinensis Kirby, 1903: 405. Synonymized by Kirby (1904).

Eucorydia tonkinensis: Hebard 1929: 97.

Corydia purpuralis Kirby, 1903: 405. Synonymized by Qiu et al. (2017).

Eucorydia purpuralis: Hebard 1929: 98.

Corydia zonata Shiraki, 1907: 110. Synonymized by Princis (1963).

Eucorydia paucipilosa Woo et al., 1986: 156. Synonymized by Qiu et al. (2017).

New material examined.

China • 1 female; Hunan Prov., Yongzhou City, Ningyuan County, Mt. Jiuyi Sanfenshi Scenic Spot; 5 June 2021; Jing Zhu leg; SWU-BB-CC-022066 • 1 female; Hunan Prov., Huaihua City, Yuanling County, collector unknown; SWU-BB-CC-022067.

Material examined for female genitalia.

China • 1 female, Hunan Prov., Huaihua City, Yuanling County, data unknown; SWU-BB-CC-022007 • 1 female, Hunan Prov., Yueyang City, 6 Jun, Liu & Wang (only surnames) leg; SWU-BB-CC-022008 • 1 female, Guizhou Prov., Tongren City, Jiangkou County, Mt. Fanjingshan, 12 July 1988, Shu-Yong Wang leg; SWU-BB-CC-022009 • 1 female, Guizhou Prov., Zhenyuan County, Tiexi, 25 May 2016, Yong-Shan Guo & Shu-Lin Yang leg; SWU-BB-CC-022010 • 1 female, Guizhou Prov., Yanhe County, Daheba, 450–700 m, 5–12 Jun 2007, Qiong-Zhang Song leg; SWU-BB-CC-022016.

Female genitalia.

Supra-anal plate yellowish brown, surface setose, posterior margin rounded. Paraprocts medially depressed. Two median sclerites present. Paratergites band-shaped. Laterosternite IX lamellar, attached to the crosspiece and paratergites. Posterior lobes of valvifer II distinct, apical portion slightly curved. First valve elongate, basal portion of third valve broad. First valvifer lamellate, with an oblique fold. Spermathecal plate with basal half subtrapezoidal and apical half subrectangular. Basivalvula narrow, symmetrical; lobes bulbous and expanded proximally. Spermathecal duct short. Spermatheca elongate, tubular, with both ends expanded (Liu et al. 2023: fig. S26H). Vestibular sclerite with margins poorly defined, median region bearing a large protrusion. Subgenital plate without valvar; posterior margin produced, and surface densely setose.

Eucorydia linglong Qiu, Che & Wang, 2017

Fig. 6

Eucorydia linglong Qiu et al., 2017: 31.

Type locality.

Hainan Prov., Ledong County, top of Mt. Jianfengling.

Material examined for female genitalia.

China • 1 female (Paratype); Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Chongzuo City, Daxin County, Shuolong Town; 20 May 2016; Yi-Zhou Liu leg; SWU-BB-CC-023002.

Female genitalia.

Supra-anal plate dark yellowish brown, covered with long setae, posterior margin roundly produced. Paraprocts medially depressed, with a slender, curved hook-like process. Two median sclerites present. Paratergites narrow and band-shaped, laterosternite IX attached to crosspiece and paratergites. Posterior lobes of valvifer II robust, apical portion slightly expanded with well-defined margins. Valves short, basal part of third valvule broad. First valvifer lamellate, attached to the spermathecal plate. Spermathecal plate with basal half sub-trapezoidal and the apical half sub-rectangular. Basivalvula narrow, with lobes unequal in size (left lobe narrower, right lobe slightly wider). Spermathecal duct short. Spermatheca elongate, tubular, with both ends expanded (Liu et al. 2023: fig. 4(9)). Vestibular sclerite with well-defined, undulate anterior and posterior margins, median region with two protrusions. Subgenital plate without valvar; posterior margin produced, and surface densely setose.

Eucorydia guilingensis Qiu, Che & Wang, 2017

Fig. 6

Eucorydia guilingensis Qiu et al., 2017: 40.

Type locality.

Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin City, Yanshan, 200 m.

New material examined.

China • 1 female, 3 nymphs & 8 oothecae; Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin City, around Ludiyan; 21 Aug. 2020; Lu Qiu leg; SWU-BB-CC-024002 to SWU-BB-CC-024005.

Remarks.

The female genitalia of this species are very similar to that of E. linglong, but the apices of the posterior lobes of valvifer II are less robust. Therefore, they are not redescribed here.

Notes on female genitalia of Eucorydia

We provide the first detailed comparative analysis of female genitalia in Eucorydia. Comparative analysis reveals consistently high sclerotization in four key structures across all examined species: spermathecal plate, basivalvula, vestibular sclerite, and laterosternite IX, which also exhibits species-specific variation, supporting their taxonomic value. The sclerotized portions of the basivalvular lobe are relatively narrow and are connected to the spermathecal plate by a membranous structure (Figs 4E, 6). The crosspiece typically articulates with the first valvifer and laterosternite IX, extending toward the posterior lobe of valvifer II (Figs 4E, 6), which exhibits interspecific variation in both shape and size. Interspecific differences are also evident in other characters: the first valvifer is folded in E. dasytoides but smooth in the other three species (Fig. 6A); the spermathecal plate bears two small apical horns in E. westwoodi but is nearly trapezoidal in the remaining species (Fig. 6B); and the basal end of the basivalvular lobe is acute in most species, but distinctly bulbous in E. dasytoides (Fig. 6A).

Discussion

In this study, the minimum interspecific COI genetic distance was found to be 3.39%, observed between the zonata population of E. dasytoides and E. qinlingensis sp. nov. This value falls well below the maximum intraspecific variation of 8.67%, which was detected between the geographically separated samples from Guizhou and Taiwan Provinces, thereby resulting in an overlap in the DNA barcoding gap. Consequently, the distance-based ASAP analysis fails to delimit the two lineages as separate MOTUs. Nevertheless, morphological evidence, particularly the shape of the posterior margin of the male supra-anal plate, combined with results from the tree-based GMYC analysis, supports their recognition as distinct species.

Compared with related corydiid cockroaches, the minimum interspecific distance detected in Eucorydia is relatively low. For example, the reported minimum interspecific COI distances are 9.8% in Eupolyphaga and 5.80% in Pseudoeupolyphaga (Han et al. 2022; Ren et al. 2025). However, an overlap between intra- and interspecific genetic distances has also been reported in these genera, with maximum intraspecific distances reaching 9.54% in Eupolyphaga and 6.90% in Pseudoeupolyphaga (Han et al. 2022; Ren et al. 2025). These comparisons suggest that the absence of a clear DNA barcoding gap may not be unique to Eucorydia, but may occur more broadly among related corydiid taxa.

These results highlight the limitations of relying exclusively on COI sequences for species delimitation in Eucorydia and related genera, as single mitochondrial markers may be affected by incomplete lineage sorting, introgression, and recent divergence (Funk and Omland 2003; Dupuis et al. 2012). Although external morphology and color pattern are useful for preliminary identification, they may be insufficient when closely related species show limited mitochondrial divergence or when geographically structured populations exhibit high intraspecific variation (Will et al. 2005). Therefore, future studies should integrate broader geographic sampling, quantitative morphometric analyses, multi-locus nuclear markers, and genomic-scale data to clarify species boundaries and evaluate cryptic diversity in corydiid cockroaches.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all individuals who contributed to the collection of the material. We are particularly grateful to Lu Qiu and Chun-Hong Wang for providing alcohol-preserved specimens, and to the reviewers and editors for their valuable comments.

References

  • Asahina S (1971) Notes on the cockroaches of the genus Eucorydia from the Ryukyus, Taiwan, Thailand and Nepal. Kontyû 39: 256–262.
  • Bai QK, Wang LL, Wang ZQ, Lo N, Che YL (2018) Exploring the diversity of Asian Cryptocercus (Blattodea: Cryptocercidae): species delimitation based on chromosome numbers, morphology and molecular analysis. Invertebrate Systematics 32: 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS17003
  • Fujisawa T, Barraclough TG (2013) Delimiting species using single-locus data and the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent approach: A revised method and evaluation on simulated data sets. Systematic Biology 62: 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syt033
  • Fujita M, Machida R (2014) Reproductive biology and postembryonic development of a polyphagid cockroach Eucorydia yasumatsui Asahina (Blattodea: Polyphagidae). Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 72: 193–211. https://doi.org/10.3897/asp.72.e31895
  • Gerstaecker A (1861) Ueber das vorkommen von ausstülpbaren Hautanhängen am Hinterleibe an schaben. Archiv fur naturgeschichte 27: 107–115.
  • Han W, Qiu L, Zhu J, Wang ZQ, Che YL (2022) Exploring the diversity of Eupolyphaga Chopard, 1929 (Blattodea, Corydioidea): species delimitation based on morphology and molecular analysis. ZooKeys 1120: 67–94. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1120.87483
  • Han W, Che YL, Zhang PJ, Wang ZQ (2024) New species of Eupolyphaga Chopard, 1929 and Pseudoeupolyphaga Qiu & Che, 2024 (Blattodea, Corydioidea, Corydiinae), with notes on their female genitalia. ZooKeys 1211: 151–191. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1211.128805
  • Hebard M (1929) Studies in Malayan Blattidae (Orthoptera). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 81: 1–109.
  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, Dewaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270: 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
  • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  • Kirby WF (1903) Notes on Blattidae & C., with descriptions of new genera and species in the collection of the British Museum, South Kensington. No. 1. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History 7: 404–415.
  • Kirby WF (1904) A synonymic Catalogue of Orthoptera. Vol. I. Orthoptera Euplexoptera, Cursoria, et Gressoria. (Forficulidæ, Hemimeridæ, Blattidæ, Mantidæ, Phasmidæ.). British Museum, London, 501 pp. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930308678790
  • Klass KD (1997) The external male genitalia and the phylogeny of Blattaria and Mantodea. Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, 341 pp.
  • Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B (2017) PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34: 772–773. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
  • Liu JL, Zhang JW, Han W, Wang YS, He SL, Wang ZQ (2023) Advances in the understanding of Blattodea evolution: Insights from phylotranscriptomics and spermathecae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 182: 107753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107753
  • McKittrick FA (1964) Evolutionary studies of cockroaches. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Memoir 389: 197.
  • Neo I, Loh RK, Cho TJY, Puniamoorthy N, Yeo DCJ, Tan MK (2025) First DNA barcodes and morphometric analysis of Singaporean Tetrigidae (Orthoptera, Caelifera) support color variations as intraspecific polymorphism through integrative taxonomy. ZooKeys 1257: 305–326. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1257.163020
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Princis K (1963) Blattariae: Subordo Polyphagoidea: Fam.: Homoeogamiidae, Euthyrrhaphidae, Latindiidae, Anacompsidae, Atticolidae, Attaphilidae; Subordo Blaberoidea: Fam. Blaberidae. In: Beier M (Ed.) Orthopterorum Catalogus. pars 4. Uitgeverij Dr. W. Junk, ’s-Gravenhage, 77–172.
  • Qiu L, Che YL, Wang ZQ (2017) Revision of Eucorydia Hebard, 1929 from China, with notes on the genus and species worldwide (Blattodea, Corydioidea, Corydiidae). ZooKeys 709: 17–56. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.709.14755
  • Qiu L, Yang ZB, Wang ZQ, Che YL (2019) Notes on some corydiid species from China, with the description of a new genus (Blattodea: Corydioidea: Corydiidae). Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.) 55: 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2019.1603081
  • Ren YM, Han W, Che YL, Wang JR (2025) Four new species of the genus Pseudoeupolyphaga Qiu & Che, 2024 (Blattodea, Corydioidea, Corydiinae) from Yunnan, China. ZooKeys 1261: 337–358. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1261.168015
  • Shiraki T (1907) Neue Blattiden und forficuliden Japans. Transactions of the Sapporo Natural History Society 2: 103–111.
  • Valero-Pérez N (2023) Descripción de estructuras genitales en hembras de tres especies de Colapteroblatta Hebard, 1919 (Epilamprinae: Colapteroblattini). In: Estrada-Álvarez R, Núñez-Bazán N, Valero-Pérez N, Domínguez MRF, de Luna M (Eds) Memorias del Primer Coloquio de Cucarachas Silvestres (Blattodea: Blattaria) de Latinoamérica (CCSL). México, 81–88.
  • Walker F (1868) Catalogue of the Specimens of Blattariæ in the Collection of the British Museum. British Museum, London, 239 pp.
  • Woo FZ, Feng PZ (1988) Blattoptera: Corydiidae, Blattidae, Epilampridae, Phyllodromiidae, Blaberidae. In: Huang F-S, et al. (Eds) Insects of Mt. Namjagbarwa Region of Xizang. Science Press, Beijing, 621 pp.
  • Woo FZ, Guo YY, Feng PZ (1986) Notes on the genus Eucorydia of China (I). Entomotaxonomia 8: 153–157.
  • Yanagisawa S, Hiruta SF, Sakamaki Y, Liao JR, Shimano S (2021a) Two new species of the genus Eucorydia (Blattodea: Corydiidae) from the Nansei Islands in southwest Japan. Zoological Science 38: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2108/zs200048
  • Yanagisawa S, Sakamaki Y, Jantarit S, Shimano S (2021b) A new species of the genus Eucorydia (Blattodea: Corydiidae) from Chiang Mai in northern Thailand. Species Diversity 26: 191–195. https://doi.org/10.12782/specdiv.26.191
  • Yanagisawa S, Hiruta SF, Sakamaki Y, Shimano S (2021c) A new species of the genus Eucorydia (Blattodea: Corydiidae) from the Miyako-jima Island in southwest Japan. Species Diversity 26: 145–151. https://doi.org/10.12782/specdiv.26.145
  • Zhu J, Zhang JW, Luo XX, Wang ZQ, Che YL (2022) Three cryptic Anaplecta (Blattodea, Blattoidea, Anaplectidae) species revealed by female genitalia, plus seven new species from China. ZooKeys 1080: 53–97. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1080.74286

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) use

The authors accept full responsibility for the content of the manuscript, including the disclosure of any use of AI.

No AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 32470462).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: YLC, ZQW. Formal analysis: YLC, ZQW. Funding acquisition: YLC, ZQW. Methodology: ZQW. Software: WH. Supervision: YLC. Visualization: TTC. Writing - original draft: TTC, WH. Writing - review and editing: TTC, YLC.

Author ORCIDs

T.-T. Cai https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7796-2514

W. Han https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7243-1657

Z.-Q. Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9413-1105

Y.-L. Che https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3214-9494

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Supplementary information

Ting-Ting Cai, Wei Han, Zong-Qing Wang, Yan-Li Che

Data type: xls

Explanation note: Genetic divergence of distances calculated by K2P model method using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene sequences in MEGA.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (36.00 kb)
login to comment