Research Article
Print
Research Article
Description of a new species of Pseudobornella Baba, 1932 (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia, Dendronotidae) from the Yellow Sea
expand article infoShuqian Zhang§, Juhao Wang|
‡ Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China
§ Marine Biological Museum of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China
| Unaffiliated, Qingdao, China
Open Access

Abstract

The genus Pseudobornella Baba, 1932 (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia, Dendronotidae), which was previously thought to be monotypic and restricted to the Western Pacific, is here expanded with the description of a second species, Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov., discovered in the Yellow Sea, China. The new species is similar in general body shape to its sole congener, P. orientalis Baba, 1932, but these species can be distinguished based on both external morphology and internal anatomy. Phylogenetic analyses reconstructed by Bayesian inference and maximum-likelihood methods using concatenated mitochondrial (COI, 16S rRNA) and nuclear (H3) genes and species delimitation analyses support the monophyly of Pseudobornella as well as the separation of the two known species.

Key words:

Biodiversity, Chinese waters, Dendronotoidea, taxonomy

Introduction

Pseudobornella was originally proposed by Baba (1932) to include Pseudobornella orientalis Baba, 1932, a species of central Japan. The genus was originally placed in the family Bornellidae Bergh, 1874 (Baba 1932, 1933; Pola et al. 2009). Based on molecular evidence, Pola and Gosliner (2010) transferred P. orientalis to Dendronotus Alder & Hancock, 1845, a genus of the family Dendronotidae. This familial placement was accepted by subsequent studies, but Martynov et al. (2015) argued that P. orientalis could be distinguished from Dendronotus species by the presence of remarkably elongated papillae of the rhinophoral sheath and the absence of distinct tertiary branches of the dorsolateral appendages. Korshunova et al. (2020) presented a review of the Dendronotidae using morphological and molecular data and reinstated Pseudobornella as a valid genus. To date, P. orientalis remains the only recognized species within the genus and has a distribution spanning Japan (Baba 1932; Pola et al. 2009), China (Song et al. 2009), and the Far East of Russia (Korshunova et al. 2020).

In recent years, several nudibranch sea slugs were collected from the intertidal zone of Shandong Province, China. Through morphological study and genetic analyses, these specimens were identified as representing an undescribed species belonging to the genus Pseudobornella. In the present study, we describe the species and compare it with P. orientalis.

Materials and methods

Sampling and preservation

Ten specimens of the new species were collected from the intertidal zones of Rushan and Qingdao in Shandong Province, China. The live animals were photographed and preserved in 99% ethanol for molecular study and 4% formalin for morphological dissections. Type specimens were deposited at the Marine Biological Museum, Chinese Academy of Sciences (MBMCAS).

Light and scanning electron microscopy

External morphology and internal anatomy were examined, dissected, and photographed using a dissecting microscope (ZEISS Discovery V20). For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, jaws and radulae were dissected from the buccal bulb. They were then cleaned with 10% NaOH, rinsed in distilled water, air-dried, coated with gold, and examined under SEM at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.

Molecular analyses

Six individuals of the new species and two specimens of Pseudobornella orientalis were subjected to molecular analysis. Genomic DNA from each individual was extracted using the Column Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Beijing TIANGEN, China) following to the manufacturer’s instructions. Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were conducted in a total volume of 25 μl, including 2 μl DNA template, 0.5 μl of each 10 mM primers, 0.5 μl of 10 mM dNTPs, 2.5 μl of 10× buffer, and 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase. Thermal cycling was performed under the following conditions: 94 °C for 2 min (initial denaturation); followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s (denaturation), 42 °C for 45 s (annealing), and 72 °C for 60 s (extension); and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers LCO1490 (forward: 5′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGA TATTGG-3′) and HCO2198 (reverse: 5′-TTAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′) (Folmer et al. 1994), the 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) was amplified by the primers 16Sar (forward: 5’-CGCCTGTTTATCAAA AACAT-3’) and 16Sbr (reverse: 5’-CTCCGGTTTGAACTCAGATCA-3’) (Palumbi 1996), and the histone 3 gene (H3) was amplified by the primers HexAF (forward: 5’-ATGGCTCGTACCAAGCAGACGGC-3’) and HexAR (reverse: 5’-ATATCCTTGGGCATGATGGTGAC-3’) (Colgan et al. 1998). PCR products were verified on a GelGreen-stained 1.5% agarose gel and sequenced using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (v. 3.1 Applied Biosystems, USA) and an AB PRISM 3730 (Applied Biosystems, USA) automatic sequencer.

Phylogenetic analyses

Three partial gene sequences (COI, 16S, and H3) were obtained from each specimen and deposited in the GenBank. Additionally, sequences of other dendronotid species were retrieved from GenBank and used for phylogenetic analyses (Table 1). Two tritoniid species, Marionia blainvillea (Risso, 1818) and Marioniopsis arborescens (Bergh, 1890), were used to root the phylogenetic tree.

Table 1.

List of representatives of the family Dendronotidae and outgroup species used for phylogenetic analysis.

Species name Voucher Locality COI 16S H3 Reference
Dendronotus albus ZMMU:Op-566 USA: Washington KX788135 KX788123 Korshunova et al. 2016
Dendronotus arcticus ZMMU:Op-561 Russia: Laptev Sea KX788140 KX788129 Korshunova et al. 2016
Dendronotus claguei LACM 3554 Mexico MH756144 Valdés et al. 2018
Dendronotus dalli ZMMU:Op-330 Russia: Kamchatka KM396999 KM397081 KM397102 Ekimova et al. 2015
Dendronotus frondosus ZMMU:Op-380 Norway KM396976 KM397056 KM397111 Ekimova et al. 2015
Dendronotus elegans ZMMU:Op-269 Russia: White sea KM396996 KM397078 KM397087 Ekimova et al. 2015
Dendronotus europaeus ZMMU:Op-554 Norway KY391823 KY391842 Korshunova et al. 2017
Dendronotus iris CASIZ:174471 USA: Washington KX058083 HM162631 HM162537 Ekimova et al. 2016a
Dendronotus jamsteci JAMSTEC No. 1160047463 Japan MN808558 MN811023 Martynov et al. 2020
Dendronotus kalikal ZMMU:Op-283 Russia: Kamchatka KC660024 KC611284 KC660044 Ekimova et al. 2015
Dendronotus kamchaticus ZMMU:Op-245 Russia: Kamchatka KC660032 KC611288 KC660048 Ekimova et al. 2015
Dendronotus lacteus ZMMU:Op-584 Norway KY391830 KY391849 Korshunova et al. 2017
Dendronotus nordenskioeldi ZMMU:Op-665 Russia: Laptev sea MT654636 MT655309 Korshunova et al. 2020
Dendronotus patricki SIO-BIC M12133 USA: California HQ225828 HQ225829 Stout et al. 2011
Dendronotus primorjensis W196 KT031812 KT031825 MN138263 Ekimova et al. 2016b
Dendronotus robilliardi IE251 Russia: Kamchatka KX058077 KX058117 KX058105 Ekimova et al. 2016a
Dendronotus robustus ZMMU:Op-343 Russia: Barents Sea KM397002 KM397084 KM397106 Ekimova et al. 2015
Dendronotus rufus LACM:174861 USA: Alaska KX058084 GU339191 HQ267091 Ekimova et al. 2016a
Dendronotus subramosus ZMMU:Op-699 USA: Washington MN808564 MN811029 Martynov et al. 2020
Dendronotus velifer ZMMU:Op-348 Russia: Kara Sea MF685027 KY996407 Lundin et al. 2017
Dendronotus venustus ZMMU:Op-660 USA: Washington MK302460 MK302455 Korshunova et al. 2019
Dendronotus yrjargul WS9116 Russia: Kara Sea MN138317 MN138082 MN138232 Ekimova et al. 2019
Dendronotus zakuro KSNHM: OP0485 Japan MN808562 MN811027 MN138228 Martynov et al. 2020
Pseudobornella orientalis ZMMU: Op-664 Russia: Sea of Japan MT654637 MT655310 Korshunova et al. 2020
Pseudobornella orientalis CASIZ:174989 China: Daisong Bay HM162628 HM162534 Pola and Gosliner 2010
Pseudobornella orientalis Op-24021903 China: Hailing Island PV454581 PV457542 PV474719 This study
Pseudobornella orientalis Op-24021904 China: Hailing Island PV454582 PV457543 PV474720 This study
Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov. isolate 01 China: Qingdao OQ573562 Wei 2023
Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov. MBM288160 China: Qingdao PV454583 PV457544 PV474721 This study
Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov. MBM288155 China: Qingdao PV454584 PV457545 PV474722 This study
Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov. MBM288156 China: Qingdao PV454585 PV457546 PV474723 This study
Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov. MBM288157 China: Qingdao PV454586 PV457547 PV474724 This study
Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov. MBM288158 China: Qingdao PV454587 PV457548 PV474725 This study
Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov. MBM288159 China: Qingdao PV454588 PV457549 PV474726 This study
Cabangus regius CASIZ:179492 Philippines HM162708 HM162629 HM162535 Pola and Gosliner 2010
Cabangus regius CASIZ:179493 Philippines JN869451 JN869407 JN869430 Pola et al. 2012
Marionia arborescens CASIZ:177578 Philippines HM162722 HM162646 HM162554 Pola and Gosliner 2010
Marionia blainvillea CASIZ:176812 Portugal HM162721 HM162645 HM162553 Pola and Gosliner 2010

Sequences were aligned with MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013) using ‘G-INS-i (accurate)’ strategy and normal alignment mode. Separate analyses were conducted for COI (634 bp), 16S (401 bp), H3 (302 bp), and concatenated data (1328 bp). Ambiguously aligned fragments of 16S alignment were removed using Gblocks (Talavera and Castresana 2007). Maximum-likelihood phylogenies (ML) were inferred using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015) under Edge-unlinked partition model for 10,000 ultrafast bootstraps (Minh et al. 2013), as well as the Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood ratio test (Guindon et al. 2010). Bayesian-inference (BI) phylogenies were inferred using MrBayes v. 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) under partition model (2 parallel runs, 5 million generations), in which the initial 25% of sampled data were discarded as burn-in. The best-fit models of evolution (GTR+F+I+G4 for COI and 16S, GTR+F+I for H3) were determined by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) using AIC criterion. Results were visualized using FigTree v. 1.4.3. The p-distances within and among each species grouping were estimated with MEGA 6 (Tamura et al. 2013) based on the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model (Kimura 1980).

Species delimitation

The Automatic Barcode gap Discovery (ABGD) (Puillandre et al. 2012) and the Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) (Puillandre et al. 2021) methods were used to assess the number of Pseudobornella species. The alignment from the fast-evolving COI gene was uploaded to the online servers of ABGD (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/abgd/abgdweb.html) and ASAP (https://bioinfo.mnhn.fr/abi/public/asap), respectively. The analyses were performed with the model of Jukes-Cantor (JC69) with default settings.

Systematics

Order Nudibranchia Cuvier, 1817

Superfamily Dendronotoidea Allman, 1845

Family Dendronotidae Allman, 1845

Pseudobornella Baba, 1932

Type species.

Pseudobornella orientalis Baba, 1932, by original designation.

Type locality.

Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan.

Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov.

Figs 1, 2, 3

Type material.

Holotype (Fig. 1A, B): China • 1 specimen, length alive 40 mm; dissected; Shandong Province, Qingdao, Golden Beach Park, intertidal zone; 35°57'03"N, 120°14'26"W; 18 Jan. 2025; Shu-Qian Zhang leg.; MBM288155. Paratypes 1–4: China • 4 specimens, lengths 35–40 mm; complete; complete; Shandong Province, Qingdao, Golden Beach Park, intertidal zone; 35°57'03"N, 120°14'26"W; 20 Jan. 2025; Shu-Qian Zhang leg.; MBM288156–MBM288159. Paratype 5 (Fig. 1C): China • 1 specimen, preserved length 10 mm; dissected; Shandong Province, Qingdao, Taiping Bay, intertidal zone; 11 Apr. 2024; Ju-Hao Wang leg.; MBM288160. Paratype 6 (Fig. 1D): China • 1 specimen, preserved lengths 20 mm; dissected; Shandong Province, Rushan, intertidal zone; 19 Apr. 2019; Ju-Hao Wang leg.; MBM288161. Paratypes 7–10: China • 4 specimens, preserved lengths 20 mm; complete; same collection data as paratypes 6; MBM288162–MBM288165.

Figure 1. 

Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov. A, B holotype, MBM288155, length 40 mm C paratype 5, MBM288160, preserved length 1.0 cm D paratype 6, MBM288161, preserved length 20 mm.

Diagnosis.

A large Pseudobornella reaching 40 mm in body length. Background color generally translucent yellow to dark brown, with numerous scattered orange to brown spots and white blotches. Radula formula 11 × 3.0.3.

Description.

External morphology (Fig. 1). Living animals up to 40 mm in length. Foot wide and tapering relatively abruptly towards the tail. Background color generally translucent yellow to dark brown, with numerous scattered orange to brown spots and white blotches. In some individuals, the white blotches forming two longitudinal streaks running along both sides of the dorsum. Anterior margin of head rounded. Each side of the mouth equipped with four or five smooth, tapering oral tentacles of varying size. Rhinophore sheath very elongate. Upper edge of each rhinophore sheath bearing four lateral digitiform branched papillae and one posterior papilla that is remarkably longer. Rhinophores with ~12 lamellae. Dorsal margin with four pairs of dorsolateral papillae, decreasing in size towards the posterior end of the foot. Each papilla with numerous unbranched gills attached to its inner side. Anus small, located on the right side of the dorsum between the first and second pair of dorsolateral appendages. Genital opening located on the right side, midway between the rhinophore sheath and the first dorsolateral appendage. Foot pale pink, scattered with numerous very small, indistinct darker spots, separated from the head by a long, transversal groove.

Internal anatomy. Jaws (Fig. 2A, B) elongate, inner margin (masticatory margin) terminating distally in a small, pointed process. Masticatory margin equipped with rows of short, cone-shaped rodlets. Radular (Fig. 2C–F) formula 11 × 3.0.3. Rachidian teeth stout, with a strong and bluntly pointed cusp and ~9–12 denticles on both sides of the cusp. Innermost lateral teeth with a very strong elongate and sharp cusp and serrated sides. Outer lateral teeth simple and hamate, and outermost one smallest.

Figure 2. 

Jaws, radulae of Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov. A jaw, MBM288155 B jaw masticatory border, MBM288155 C, D radula, MBM288155 E, F radula, MBM288161. Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 50 μm (B, C); 20 μm (D, F); 100 μm (E).

Reproductive system (Fig. 3) located in the front right corner of the body. Ampulla very large, sausage-shaped, one end connecting with ovotestis via a thin hermaphroditic duct, the other end divided into two different, thin ducts: the short oviduct entering the female gland mass and the second duct branching into a wide, short prostate which extends into a long, folded vas deferens, narrowly opening to a wide and stout penial sac. Two ducts departing from the genital aperture: vagina relatively long and simply folded, connecting with a small, rounded receptaculum seminis; second duct wider and shorter, connecting with a very large pyriform bursa copulatrix.

Figure 3. 

Reproductive system of Pseudobornella qingdaoensis sp. nov., with ovotestis and female gland mass removed, MBM288155. Abbreviations: am–ampulla; bc–bursa copulatrix; ga–genital aperture; hd–hermaphrodite duct; ov–oviduct, pr–prostate, ps–penial sac; rs–receptaculum seminalis; va–vagina; vd–vas deferens. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Etymology.

The new species is named after its type locality, Qingdao.

Distribution and habitat.

Known from Yellow Sea, China, and possibly also distributed in Japan (Kinoshita 2002; Nobuhiko 2017). It was found in the rocky intertidal zone, feeding on a hydroid (Kinoshita 2002).

Molecular support

The phylogenetic trees inferred using BI and ML criteria were generally congruent (Fig. 4). The genus Pseudobornella was recovered as monophyletic with high support (PP = 1, BS = 99). Within the genus, P. qingdaoensis sp. nov. formed an independent clade (PP = 1, BS = 100) from P. orientalis. This result supports the systematic placement of the new species in the genus Pseudobornella and its separation from P. orientalis.

Figure 4. 

Phylogenetic tree inferred by Bayesian analysis (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) based on concatenated dataset of COI, 16S and H3 genes. Numbers adjacent to nodes refer to BI posterior probability (PP > 0.5) and ML bootstrap scores. Numbers in the vertical black bars indicate the results of ABGD and ASAP species delimitations.

The ABGD analysis resulted in the delimitation of two species. The prior maximal distance (p-distance) ranged between 0.0017 and 0.1. However, the ASAP analysis recovered three partitions with the lowest score (generally considered to be the most supported partition scheme) (Fig. 4; Suppl. material 1). The partition with the second highest score was chosen here as it avoided the splitting of two populations of P. orientalis with a pairwise genetic distance of only 0.6%. In both cases, P. qingdaoensis sp. nov. was separated from P. orientalis.

Based on the available molecular data, the analysis of a 634-bp fragment of the COI gene yielded a pairwise distance of 11.7–12.5% between P. qingdaoensis sp. nov. and P. orientalis, a divergence much higher than the known intraspecific variation (0–0.6%) (Suppl. material 2), further supporting the separation of P. qingdaoensis sp. nov. from P. orientalis.

Discussion

In this study, we incorporated the recently obtained molecular data for Pseudobornella orientalis and the new species described here into the phylogenetic analyses. The results show that the family Dendronotidae was divided into three distinct clades with high support, corresponding to the three genera currently recognized: Dendronotus Alder & Hancock, 1845; Pseudobornella Baba, 1932; and Cabangus Korshunova, Bakken, Grøtan, K.B. Johnson, Lundin & Martynov, 2020. This topology is consistent with that of a previous study by Korshunova et al. (2020). Our results once again confirmed the validity of Pseudobornella. During the molecular analysis, we found a COI sequence of P. orientalis (accession number: OQ573562) derived from a specimen collected in Qingdao. However, this is a misidentification, as the external morphology of this specimen is clearly different from P. orientalis but consistent with P. qingdaoensis sp. nov. (photograph, Wei pers. comm., 7 Jun. 2024). The COI sequence of this specimen is almost identical to that of the new species, with only 0.2–0.5% divergence, further proving that they belong to the same species.

Despite the close resemblance between P. orientalis and P. qingdaoensis sp. nov., a comparison of their external morphology and internal anatomy allows for a clear differentiation between the two species. In terms of external coloration, the new species has prominent white spots scattered over the body surface and lacks the yellow diagonal stripes on the dorsal body surface that are characteristic of P. orientalis. In its internal anatomy, P. qingdaoensis sp. nov. differs from P. orientalis in having a distinct radula with three instead of two lateral teeth. Additionally, the vas deferens of P. qingdaoensis sp. nov. is significantly longer than that of P. orientalis. In Japan, some recorded individuals identified as P. orientalis are very similar to P. qingdaoensis sp. nov. in color pattern and number of oral tentacles (Kinoshita 2002; Nobuhiko 2017) and thus may be conspecific with the new species. If this is the case, the distribution of P. qingdaoensis sp. nov. would extend to Japan.

Pseudobornella orientalis was first described in 1932 from Japan. Since then, no additional species have been described within the genus. A review of the literature and online photographic records suggests that the biodiversity of this group may be largely underestimated. As previously noted by Pola et al. (2009), some specimens identified as P. orientalis on the Sea Slug Forum (Rudman 2002) exhibit some differences, such as longer lateral papillae on the rhinophore sheath, indicating that these specimens may represent different species. Some naturalists have documented P. orientalis in the Northeastern Pacific (e.g. Johnson 2016; Pomeroy 2016; Young 2016; Agarwal 2017), but those specimens differ in the number of oral tentacles (five pairs) compared to those from the Western Pacific specimens (three pairs). The specimens are also similar to the new species by having five oral tentacles, but they differ in having a reticulated pattern of yellow stripes on the body surface and potentially represent another distinct species. Huang and Huang (2021) reported an undescribed species of Pseudobornella from Kinmen, China, but this species is easily distinguishable by its translucent whitish body with scattered purple-brown spots and oral tentacles with alternating purple-brown and white bands. Further integrative taxonomic work is needed to accurately determine the biodiversity of this group.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Yuanyuan Sun for her enthusiastic assistance in SEM photography. Jingcheng Wei provided us with an unpublished specimen photograph for comparison. The present contribution benefited from meticulous editorial work and comments by Nathalie Yonow and review by Ángel Valdés.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42090044), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2021MD072), and the Biological Resources Programme of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS-TAX-24-031).

Author contributions

SZ conceived and designed the project. SZ and JW collected and performed morphological examinations of the specimens. SZ conducted DNA sequencing, analyzed the molecular data, and drafted the manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Shuqian Zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1521-5317

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

References

  • Agarwal M (2017) First record of Dendronotus orientalis (Baba, 1932) (Nudibranchia: Dendronotidae) in the temperate Eastern Pacific. BioInvasions Records 6(2): 135–138. https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2017.6.2.08
  • Baba K (1932) Pseudobornella orientalis, nov. gen. et sp. from Japan. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 13(4): 369–376.
  • Baba K (1933) Supplementary note on the nudibranchia collected in the vicinity of the Amakusa Marine Biological Laboratry. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 14: 273–283.
  • Colgan DJ, McLauchlan A, Wilson GDF, Livingston SP, Edgecombe GD, Macaranas J, Cassis G, Gray MR (1998) Histone H3 and U2 snRNA DNA sequences and arthropod molecular evolution. Australian Journal of Zoology 46(5): 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO98048
  • Ekimova I, Korshunova T, Schepetov D, Neretina T, Sanamyan N, Martynov A (2015) Integrative systematics of northern and arctic nudibranchs of the genus Dendronotus (Mollusca, Gastropoda), with descriptions of three new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 173(4): 841–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12214
  • Ekimova I, Valdés Á, Schepetov D, Chichvarkhin A (2016a) Was Gordon Robilliard right? Integrative systematics suggest that Dendronotus diversicolor (multicolor frond-aeolis) is a valid species. Canadian Journal of Zoology 94(11): 793–799. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2016-0096
  • Ekimova I, Schepetov D, Chichvarkhina O, Chichvarkhin AY (2016b) Nudibranch molluscs of the genus Dendronotus Alder et Hancock, 1845 (Heterobranchia: Dendronotina) from northwestern Sea of Japan with description of a new species. Zoologia Bespozvonocnyh 13(1): 15–42. https://doi.org/10.15298/invertzool.13.1.02
  • Ekimova I, Valdés Á, Chichvarkhin A, Antokhina T, Lindsay T, Schepetov D (2019) Diet-driven ecological radiation and allopatric speciation result in high species diversity in a temperate-cold water marine genus Dendronotus (Gastropoda: Nudibranchia). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 141: 106609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106609
  • Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3(5): 294–299.
  • Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59(3): 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq010
  • Huang CC, Huang ST (2021) Sea Slugs of Kinmen. Kinmen National Park, Taipei, 239 pp.
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4): 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kimura M (1980) a simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16(2): 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  • Kinoshita H (2002) Pseudobornella orientalis from Izu Peninsula, Japan. [Message in] Sea Slug Forum. Australian Museum, Sydney. http://www.seaslugforum.net/find/6851 [Accessed 25 April 2025]
  • Korshunova T, Sanamyan N, Zimina O, Fletcher K, Martynov A (2016) Two new species and a remarkable record of the genus Dendronotus from the North Pacific and Arctic oceans (Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 630: 19–42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.630.10397
  • Korshunova T, Martynov A, Bakken T, Picton B (2017) External diversity is restrained by internal conservatism: New nudibranch mollusc contributes to the cryptic species problem. Zoologica Scripta 46(6): 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12253
  • Korshunova T, Nakano R, Fletcher K, Sanamyan N, Martynov A (2019) First molecular confirmation of the presence of Dendronotus primorjensis Martynov, Sanamyan & Korshunova, 2015 in Japan and new distributional records of Dendronotus species in the North Pacific (Nudibranchia: Dendronotidae). Venus (Tokyo) 77(1–4): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18941/venus.77.1-4_1
  • Korshunova T, Bakken T, Grøtan VV, Johnson KB, Lundin K, Martynov A (2020) A synoptic review of the family Dendronotidae (Mollusca: Nudibranchia): a multilevel organismal diversity approach. Contributions to Zoology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 90(1): 93–153. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-BJA10014
  • Lundin K, Korshunova T, Malmberg K, Martynov A (2017) Intersection of historical museum collections and modern systematics: A relict population of the Arctic nudibranch Dendronotus velifer G.O. Sars, 1878 in a Swedish fjord. Contributions to Zoology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 86(4): 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-08604004
  • Martynov A, Sanamyan N, Korshunova T (2015) New data on the opisthobranch molluscs (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) of waters of Commander Islands and Far-Eastern seas of Russia. In: Conservation of biodiversity of Kamchatka and coastal waters. Proceedings of the XV International Scientific Conference Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky. Kamchat Press, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, 55–69.
  • Martynov A, Fujiwara Y, Tsuchida S, Nakano R, Sanamyan N, Sanamyan K, Fletcher K, Korshunova T (2020) Three new species of the genus Dendronotus from Japan and Russia (Mollusca, Nudibranchia). Zootaxa 4747(3): 495–513. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4747.3.4
  • Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, Von Haeseler A (2013) Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(5): 1188–1195. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst024
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Palumbi SR (1996) Nucleic acids II: the polymerase chain reaction. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK (Eds) Molecular Systematics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 205–247.
  • Pola M, Gosliner TM (2010) The first molecular phylogeny of cladobranchian opisthobranchs (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Nudibranchia). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56(3): 931–941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.05.003
  • Pola M, Rudman WB, Gosliner TM (2009) Systematics and preliminary phylogeny of Bornellidae (Mollusca: Nudibranchia: Dendronotina) based on morphological characters with description of four new species. Zootaxa 1975(1): 1–57. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1975.1.1
  • Pola M, Camacho-García YE, Gosliner TE (2012) Molecular data illuminate cryptic nudibranch species: the evolution of the Scyllaeidae (Nudibranchia: Dendronotina) with a revision of Notobryon. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 165(2): 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00816.x
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Song XK, Qin J, Ke CH, Li FX (2009) New records of two Nudibranchia species in coastal waters of China. Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Straits 28(1): 1–6. [In Chinese with English abstract]
  • Stout CC, Wilson NG, Valdés Á (2011) A new species of deep-sea Dendronotus Alder & Hancock (Mollusca: Nudibranchia) from California, with an expanded phylogeny of the genus. Invertebrate Systematics 25(1): 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS10027
  • Talavera G, Castresana J (2007) Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Systematic Biology 56(4): 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701472164
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(12): 2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  • Valdés Á, Lundsten L, Wilson NG (2018) Five new deep-sea species of nudibranchs (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Cladobranchia) from the Northeast Pacific. Zootaxa 4526(4): 401–433. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4526.4.1
  • Wei JC (2023) Research on the species diversity and molecular systematics of Nudibranchia along the coast of China. Masters Dissertation, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China. [In Chinese]

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

ABGD analyses and ASAP analyses

Shuqian Zhang, Juhao Wang

Data type: doc

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (453.50 kb)
Supplementary material 2 

Estimates of evolutionary divergence between sequences

Shuqian Zhang, Juhao Wang

Data type: xls

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (25.00 kb)
login to comment