Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new start? Revision of the genera Anauchen, Bensonella, Gyliotrachela and Hypselostoma (Gastropoda, Eupulmonata, Hypselostomatidae) of Southeast Asia with description of 46 new species
expand article infoVukašin Gojšina, András Hunyadi§, Chirasak Sutcharit|, Piyoros Tongkerd|, Kurt Auffenberg, Jozef Grego#, Jaap J. Vermeulen¤, Alexander Reischütz«, Barna Páll-Gergely»˄
‡ University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
§ Unaffiliated, Budapest, Hungary
| Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
¶ University of Florida, Gainesville, United States of America
# Unaffiliated, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
¤ JK Art and Science, Leiden, Netherlands
« Unaffiliated, Horn, Austria
» Széchenyi István University, Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary
˄ Plant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Martonvásár, Hungary
Open Access

Abstract

Hypselostomatidae is a large family of terrestrial pulmonate molluscs currently represented by 284 extant species, most confined to Southeast Asia. The current system of grouping species into genera is based on the morphology of the apertural barriers and the level of last whorl detachment. However, these characters overlap, challenging generic definitions. In this paper, these characters are evaluated and a novel classification proposed for hypselostomatid species belonging to the genera Anauchen (17 species), Bensonella (36 species), Boysidia (7 species, in part) and Hypselostoma (85 species). We assigned all species belonging to the genera Bensonella and Hypselostoma into two and four species groups respectively, which are characterised by combinations of morphological traits. Altogether 46 new species are described, seven species in Anauchen: A. crassus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., A. evanidus Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., A. grandiportus Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., A. obesus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., A. picasso Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., A. turritus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., A. jokaii Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.; 19 species in Bensonella: B. alycaeus Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. cardiostoma Gojšina, Vermeulen & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. cristatissima Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. dha Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. dracula Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. exploda Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. fracta Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. microdentata Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. mitochondria Gojšina, Vermeulen & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. mirabilis Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. montawa Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. multidentata Gojšina, A. Reischütz & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. nitens Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. obex Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. perfecta Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. sericata Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. serrata Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. spelaea Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., B. spinosa Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.; 20 species in Hypselostoma: H. aquila Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. bubalus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. circumcarinatum Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. coriaceum Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. aenigma Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. fortunatum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. fungus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. geckophilum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. iunior Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. ophis Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. platybasis Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. populare Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. sculpturatum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. similare Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. sorormajor Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. sororminor Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. torta Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. vesovici Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. vicinum Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., H. vujici Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov. One replacement name is proposed: H. tertiusfrater Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, nom. nov. pro Boysidia salpinx F. G. Thompson & Dance, 1983, non Hypselostoma salpinx (van Benthem Jutting, 1961) (originally described as Gyliotrachela). Gyliotrachela and Antroapiculus are both treated as junior synonyms of Hypselostoma. An additional 28 species and subspecies are reassigned to the synonymies of other taxa.

Key words:

Distribution, limestone habitats, Pupilloidea, taxonomy

Introduction

Hypselostomatidae is a large family of terrestrial pulmonate microsnails (shell size less than 5 mm) that occurs mostly in Southeast Asia (including the former Indochina, Indonesia, and the Philippines) and China (Schileyko 1998). The distribution of the family further extends westwards across India to Pakistan, with a much-reduced diversity (Pokryszko et al. 2009; Páll-Gergely and White 2023). Eastwards and southwards, the distribution of the family reaches Japan (two species) and Australia (one species) (Pilsbry 1908; Schileyko 1998; Páll-Gergely and White 2023). Representatives are usually restricted to limestone habitats and many species are narrow-range endemics. The family is currently represented by 284 species, which are divided into 15 genera (MolluscaBase eds. 2024). The most species-rich genus is Angustopila Jochum, Slapnik & Páll-Gergely, 2014 (Páll-Gergely et al. 2023) with 53 species. The typical shell shape of hypselostomatids is conical, conical-ovoid, or depressed conical, however, the last whorl is often detached from the penultimate (Hoekstra and Schilthuizen 2011; Chen et al. 2022), altering the shell shape drastically. Besides the shell shape, the species recognition is largely based on the number and arrangement of the apertural barriers.

Early study of hypselostomatids originated in the middle 19th and beginning of 20th century when the first genera and species were described (Pfeiffer 1849; Benson 1856; Benson 1860; Ancey 1881; Möllendorff 1890; Bavay and Dautzenberg 1909; Pilsbry 1917). The first genus described within the family was Boysia L. Pfeiffer, 1849 (type species Tomogeres boysii L. Pfeiffer, 1846). Tanystoma W. H. Benson, 1856 (type species Tanystoma tubiferum W. H. Benson, 1856) was next described, a junior homonym of Tanystoma Motschulsky, 1845 (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and Hypselostoma W. H. Benson, 1856 was given as a replacement name (Benson 1856a, b). The genus Systenostoma Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1909 (type species Helix (Systenostoma) pauperrima Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1909) (not Systenostoma Marsson, 1887, Bryozoa) was later described and replaced by the name Tonkinospira Jochum, Slapnik & Páll-Gergely, 2014 (Jochum et al. 2014). Gyliauchen Pilsbry, 1917 (type species Hypselostoma hungerfordianum Moellendorff, 1891) was erected in the new classification proposed by Pilsbry (1917), only to become a junior homonym of Gyliauchen Nicoll, 1915 (Platyhelminthes, Trematodes), and Gyliotrachela Tomlin, 1930 was proposed as a replacement name (Tomlin 1930). Van Benthem Jutting provided the first comprehensive data and described several species from Malaysia and the bordering regions between Vietnam and Cambodia (van Benthem Jutting 1950, 1961, 1962). A major acceleration in the description of hypselostomatid species occurred in the late 20th and early 21st century, when numerous papers were published describing mainly species from China and Thailand (e.g., Chen et al. 1995, 1999; Panha 1998a, b, c; Thompson and Upatham 1997; Panha and Burch 2002a, b, c, d, e; Luo et al. 2000; Burch et al. 2003; Panha et al. 2004; Guo et al. 2006).

Several genera were also misclassified within or outside this family, only to be subsequently reassigned, i.e., Campolaemus Pilsbry, 1892 and Clostophis W. H. Benson, 1860. Campolaemus was previously placed in the Hypselostomatidae by Schileyko (1998), only to be reassigned to the Streptaxidae by Páll-Gergely (2020) due to biogeography and greater morphological similarity to some African species. Clostophis was for some time considered a monotypic genus of diplommatinids (Benson 1860; Kobelt 1902; Egorov 2013). Panha and Burch (2002a) described the genus Montapiculus, to which M. proboscidea Panha & Burch, 2002 was assigned. Páll-Gergely et al. (2020) have shown that M. proboscidea is better assigned to Clostophis when Montapiculus was synonymised with Clostophis, which is included in the Hypselostomatidae. Nowadays, the number of hypselostomatid species is increasing even faster due to new discoveries throughout Southeast Asia (e.g., Páll-Gergely et al. 2015, 2019, 2022, 2023; Inkhavilay et al. 2016; Tanmuangpak and Dumrongrojwattana 2022; Chen 2023; Gojšina et al. 2023; Sutcharit et al. 2023; Tongkerd et al. 2024).

The work of Pilsbry (1917) introduced a classification which remained in use nowadays. His classification scheme of the “Hypselostoma-Boysidia“ group was based on two features: the appearance of the last whorl (detached or not detached from the penultimate whorl) and the appearance of the lamellae on the parietal wall (angular and parietal lamellae separated/concrescent or no angular lamella). This scheme was sufficient at the time, as only four genera (Boysidia, Gyliauchen (= Gyliotrachela), Hypselostoma, and Paraboysidia) were known and the distinctions were clear. Pilsbry noted that these characters can overlap and the classification may require alteration as new species and genera are described. As predicted, the characters overlapped a great deal, making it very difficult to develop a new classification scheme that would overcome the confusion. This also led to the description of species that were provisionally assigned to various genera because it was not clear which genus was appropriate (e.g., Páll-Gergely 2023a; Gojšina et al. 2023). Anauchen, whose type species is characterised by the last whorl attached to the penultimate and by the absence of an angular lamella, presently contains species with a detached last whorl (see Vermeulen et al. 2019) and even signs of a bifid angulo-parietal lamella (e.g., see Burch and Panha 2002 for A. utaithaniensis Panha, 2002). The type species of Anauchen (Boysidia gereti Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1904, now considered a synonym of Anauchen rochebruni (Mabille, 1887) (Páll-Gergely 2023a)), is relatively large (~ 3 mm) and thus strikingly different from some very small species tentatively placed in this genus (e.g., A. kozari Páll-Gergely, 2023 and A. palawanensis Gojšina, Schilthuizen & Páll-Gergely, 2023 which are both < 1.5 mm high).

The genital apparatus of hypselostomatids has only been described for a few species. First to deal with this subject was Berry (1963), who described the genital apparatus of H. depressispira van Benthem Jutting, 1949. After Berry’s work, the genital system was described for several other species such as H. cultura Tanmuangpak & Dumrongrojwattana, 2022, H. diarmaidi Panha & Burch, 2003, H. srakeoense Panha & Burch, 2004, and Boysidia salwiniana (Theobald, 1870) (Saenkamon et al. 2022; Tanmuangpak and Dumrongrojwattana 2022; Tongkerd et al. 2024). Recently, the genitalia and radula have been described for four Aulacospira species from Thailand: A. pluangtong Panha & Burch, 2004, A. tekavongae Dumrongrojwattana & Tanmuangpak, 2020, A. nutadhirai Dumrongrojwattana & Tanmuangpak, 2020 and A. vanwalleghemi Dumrongrojwattana & Tanmuangpak, 2020 (Dumrongrojwattana and Tanmuangpak 2020). Lastly, genitalia were described for Angustopila erawanica Páll-Gergely & Dumrongrojwattana, 2023, which is also the smallest hypselostomatid with known genital anatomy (Páll-Gergely et al. 2023).

Phylogenetic analyses on the Hypselostomatidae are scarce (Tongkerd et al. 2004; Hoekstra and Schilthuizen 2011). Unfortunately, there are no works that include many species from different genera, nor Gastrocopta Wollaston, 1878, which is why the relations of analysed species/genera in this group remain unclear.

The number of species of the group has increased dramatically since Pilsbry’s (1917) classification (38 species of Anauchen, Boysidia [including the subgenus Bensonella], Gyliauchen, Hypselostoma, Paraboysidia to 155 today), but the species remain classified according to the principles of Pilsbry (1917) even though it was well-known that his classification was faulty. For example, some representatives of the genera Gyliotrachela and Hypselostoma are very similar in basic shell morphology, the only character separating them being the appearance of the angulo-parietal lamellae, mentioned by Pilsbry as the key character to distinguish the two genera (i.e., Gyliotrachela depressispira/Hypselostoma tubiferum and Gyliotrachela luctans van Benthem Jutting, 1950/Hypselostoma piconis van Benthem Jutting, 1949).

Paraboysidia Pilsbry, 1917 was introduced as a genus that differs from Bensonella Pilsbry & Vanatta, 1900 in having non-hooked apertural barriers. However, this character has been proven incorrect, as the type species of Bensonella (Pupa plicidens W. H. Benson, 1849) has non-hooked barriers, so Paraboysidia is now treated as a junior synonym of Bensonella (see Páll-Gergely and White 2023).

In this work we have revised all species of the genera Anauchen, Bensonella, Gyliotrachela, and Hypselostoma from Southeast Asia except for the species inhabiting the Philippines which are not treated in this work and will be revised separately. Gyliotrachela and Antroapiculus are both considered junior synonyms of Hypselostoma. In total, 46 species are described as new to science and 28 new synonyms are proposed. We also provide a new classification method within the family by sorting them into several morphologically similar groups, utilising the overall shell shape, shell surface texture, and the arrangement of the apertural barriers. In previous studies (e.g., Páll-Gergely et al. 2016; Jirapatrasilp et al. 2024), it has been shown that several morphological characters of a hypselostomatid shell such as the surface sculpture, level of the last whorl detachment and ascension/ descension or number of apertural barriers can vary within a single species. Hence, the intraspecific variability and reliability of all shell characters are discussed here in detail.

Materials and methods

Type specimens of all species of interest were examined when the information provided in the original descriptions were not sufficient, or images/drawings were poor. New species have been compared to all similar congeners from Southeast Asia. Shells were photographed via a Nikon SMZ25 digital microscope with Nikon Nis-Elements software or directly observed without coating under a low vacuum using a Hitachi FlexSEM 1000 II scanning electron microscope in the Plant Protection Institute of the HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research (Martonvásár, Hungary). Shells were measured with a Nikon DS-L3 control unit. Shell width or height is greatly influenced if the last whorl is strongly detached. In these cases, shell width/height was measured twice: including the last whorl near the aperture (Fig. 1, SW1/SH1) and excluding it (Fig. 1, SW2/SH2). Distribution maps were made with Google Earth Pro. Literature citations were checked via MolluscaBase (MolluscaBase eds. 2024).

Figure 1. 

Basic measurements of a hypselostomatid shell.

Examined characters

Shell shape

Examined species could be separated into three main shell shapes: conical, conical-ovoid, and concave-conical. We have defined these main shell shapes as follows: i) Conical – an imaginary straight line contacts all whorls (Fig. 2A); ii) Conical-ovoid – an imaginary curved, convex line contacts all whorls (Fig. 2B); iii) Concave-conical – an imaginary curved, concave line contacts all whorls (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2. 

Shell shape variability of hypselostomatid genera (not to scale) A conical B conical-ovoid C concave-conical.

Surface sculpture of the teleoconch

Teleoconch surface sculpture varies a great deal among hypselostomatid species. We distinguished several different types: i) finely dimpled, pasty surface (reminiscent of floury dough) without spiral striation and with only radial growth lines (Fig. 3A); ii) strong, raised spiral striae which are sometimes crossed by radial growth lines or whitish radial streaks (Fig. 3B); iii) very fine, dense spiral striation occasionally crossed by some radial growth lines (Fig. 3C); iv) rough, reminiscent of the surface of sandpaper (Fig. 3D); v) weak spiral striae usually crossed by radial lines (Fig. 3E); vi) reticulated surface, consisting of rib-like radial growth lines crossed by equally strong spiral striae (Fig. 3F).

Figure 3. 

Shell surface variability of hypselostomatid genera A finely dimpled, pasty surface B strong, raised spiral striae occasionally crossed by radial growth lines C very fine, dense spiral striation occasionally crossed by radial growth lines D rough, wrinkled (sandpaper) surface E weak, non-raised spiral striae crossed by radial lines F reticulated, consisting of rib-like radial growth lines which are crossed by equally strong spiral striae.

Surface sculpture of the protoconch

Several types of protoconch surface sculpture exists: i) smooth (Fig. 4A); ii) pitted (dimpled, finely or roughly), pasty, showing no spiral pattern (Fig. 4B); iii) dimpled (finely or roughly), pasty, showing a spiral pattern, but no clear spiral striae (Fig. 4C); iv) spirally striated (Fig. 4D).

Figure 4. 

Protoconch surface sculpture variability of hypselostomatid genera A smooth B pitted, no spiralling pattern C pitted, spiral pattern D spirally striated.

Last whorl

We were able to distinguish the following traits of the last whorl: i) last whorl rounded (Fig. 5B); ii) last whorl keeled (a ridge occurs near the centre of the periphery); keel positioned at centre of the periphery, above or below it (Fig. 5C, D, E). Only one species, H. phupaman Panha & Burch, 2002 has two keels (one above and one below the periphery), so that the last whorl is double-keeled (Fig. 5F); iii) last whorl shouldered (at top of the last whorl or bottom of the last whorl) (Fig. 5A).

Figure 5. 

Appearance of the last whorl A shouldered B rounded C keeled at the centre of the periphery D keeled above the centre of the periphery E keeled below the centre of the periphery F double keeled.

Since the last whorl is often detached from the penultimate (especially in Hypselostoma), we distinguished four categories of detachment level in adult specimens: i) adnate (not detached) (Fig. 6A); ii) slightly detached (Fig. 6B); iii) moderately detached (Fig. 6C); iv) strongly detached (Fig. 6D).

Regarding the descending/ascending last whorl, we were able to distinguish three categories: i) slightly ascending/descending (0–30 degrees compared to the shell axis) (Fig. 6E, F); ii) moderately ascending/descending (31–59 degrees compared to the shell axis) (Fig. 6G, H); iii) strongly ascending/descending (60–90 degrees compared to the shell axis) (Fig. 6I, J).

Figure 6. 

A–D detachment of last whorl E–J direction of the last whorl A last whorl adnate to the penultimate B last whorl slightly detached C last whorl moderately detached D last whorl strongly detached E last whorl slightly ascending F last whorl slightly descending G last whorl moderately ascending H last whorl moderately descending I last whorl strongly ascending J last whorl strongly descending.

Apertural barriers on the parietal side

Apertural barriers (especially on the parietal side) are very important for distinguishing between species or species groups. These barriers can appear as follows: i) single, parietal lamella on the parietal side (Fig. 7A); ii) single, bifid angulo-parietal lamella (with more or less clearly discernible angular and parietal part of the fused lamellae) (Fig. 7B); iii) two separate lamellae on the parietal side (angular and parietal) (Fig. 7C); iv) three lamellae on the parietal side (angular, parietal and infraparietal) and an additional palatal tubercle situated at the edge of the palatal lip (Fig. 7D); v) aperture without barriers (Fig. 7E).

Figure 7. 

Appearance of the barriers on the parietal side A single, parietal lamella B single, bifid angulo-parietal lamella C angular and parietal lamellae separate D three lamellae on the parietal side (angular, parietal, infraparietal) E aperture without barriers. Abbreviations: a, angular lamella; ap, angulo parietal lamella; ifpr, infraparietal lamella; p, parietal lamella.

Barriers can also vary in shape and surface sculpture: i) hooked, pointing outside or inside the aperture (Fig. 8A); ii) blunt (Fig. 8B); iii) equipped with spines (spiniferous) (roughly or finely) (Fig. 8C); iv) granulated (roughly of finely) (Fig. 8D); v) smooth, without spines or granules (Fig. 8E).

Figure 8. 

Shape and surface sculpture of the apertural barriers A hooked barriers B blunt barriers C surface equipped with spines D surface granulated E surface smooth.

Nomenclature of the barriers on the palatal and columellar sides

We hypothesise the homology of palatal barriers in hypselostomatids (which can be especially challenging in Bensonella) based on their topology. The upper palatal plica is located behind the palatal tubercle or immediately above it at the beginning of the sinulus. The interpalatal plica is located slightly below the palatal tubercle. The lower palatal plica is located roughly halfway between the palatal tubercle and the basal plica. The suprapalatal plicae are always located deeper in the sinulus. The infrapalatal plica is located below the lower palatal and situated next to the basal. The columellar lamella is a strong barrier in the middle of the columellar side. Small barriers right above or below it are called supracolumellar and subcolumellar respectively. Basal plica is between the subcolumellar (sometimes columellar) and infrapalatal (sometimes lower palatal) (Fig. 9).

Figure 9. 

Apertural barriers on the palatal and columellar sides (example on Bensonella). Abbreviations: b, basal plica; c, columellar lamella; ifp, infrapalatal plica; ip, interpalatal plica; lp, lower palatal plica; pt, palatal tubercle; subc; subcolumellar lamella; sup, suprapalatal plica; supc, supracolumellar lamella; t, transversal plica; up, upper palatal plica.

Taxonomic treatment

Genus and species-group level

None of the hypselostomatid genera we have reviewed in this paper can be diagnosed on the basis of a single, unambiguous character. Therefore, the diagnoses of the genera must be based on the combination of morphological characters which, however, do not always allow a clear assignment of a species to a genus. These characters are all listed under the genus diagnosis section. In some cases (e.g., A. kozari, A. grandiportus sp. nov., H. aenigma sp. nov.), a species was provisionally placed in a genus due to the unique combination of morphological characters which may require a future introduction of a separate genus.

We were able to separate species groups within the genera Bensonella (two species groups) and Hypselostoma (four species groups). In Bensonella, the subdivision was based on a largely consistent shell shape and apertural barrier arrangement (three barriers on the parietal side and a palatal tubercle). In Hypselostoma, we relied on results of Tongkerd et al. (2004). These authors have shown that morphologically very different species can be very closely related, but that in this case, they share the same (or very similar) surface sculpture. Consequently, our subdivision of Hypselostoma was based on similarities in the shell surface sculpture.

Species level

During the examination of empty shells, we determined which characters were useful for species distinction. Species are regarded as distinct if the surface sculpture is strikingly different (e.g., granulated vs raised spirally striated). Variability in the strength (e.g., more or less thick spiral striae) of the shell surface sculpture (present in some widespread species such as H. khaowongense, H. crossei) was not considered for species separation unless it was coupled with other differences in shell morphology. On the other hand, species with different types of spiral striation (e.g., very dense vs coarse (see under Hypselostoma iunior sp. nov. for its comparison with H. panhai), raised vs non-raised) were considered distinct on the species level.

If otherwise similar species had concrescent or separate angular and parietal lamellae, we regarded them as distinct. However, the level of fusion (completely fused vs bifid) was not important for species distinction (i.e., there was an overlap within one population, see under A. utaithaniensis). The appearance of the minor barriers (between the main ones) was variable within populations and was not considered important if they did not differ clearly and consistently in number or arrangement between populations. The strength of apertural barriers was not considered informative for species distinction if it was not coupled with a different arrangement or morphology of barriers.

Whether barriers are blunt or hooked is important for species identification. If two species were virtually identical but one had blunt and other hooked barriers, they were always considered distinct (even though in these cases, we were usually able to find additional differences in shell morphology). The surface of the barriers (and even peristome) can be smooth, granulated or spiniferous which is also considered informative (e.g., see under B. spinosa sp. nov.).

The width of the umbilicus was considered important only if it was clearly and consistently different between the populations (i.e., there was no overlap between populations).

Appearance of the last whorl (rounded, keeled, shouldered) was considered important for the separation of species. However, this was never the only character on which we based our conclusions (i.e., usually coupled with other shell traits if the differences of the last whorl are not striking). This is especially true for e.g., H. khaowongense in which we have found that the level of the shoulderness of the last whorl can vary (i.e., shouldered part can be more or less sharp (distinct)) and sometimes it can even resemble a keel.

Abbreviations

AH aperture height

AW aperture width

SH shell height

SW shell width

Depository acronyms

ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences (Philadelphia, USA)

CUMZ Chulalongkorn University Museum of Zoology (Bangkok, Thailand)

HA Collection of András Hunyadi (Budapest, Hungary)

IZCAS National Zoological Museum of China, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Beijing, China)

IEBR Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources (Hanoi, Vietnam)

JG Collection of Jozef Grego (Banská Bystrica, Slovakia)

JJV Collection of Jaap J. Vermeulen (Leiden, The Netherlands)

MNHN Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France)

NHMUK The Natural History Museum (London, UK)

NHMW Naturhistorisches Museum Wien (Vienna, Austria)

NMNS National Museum of Natural Science (Taichung, Taiwan)

PGB Collection of Barna Páll-Gergely (Budapest, Hungary)

REI Collection of Alexander & Peter L. Reischütz (Horn, Austria)

RMNH National Museum of Natural History, formerly Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie (Leiden, The Netherlands)

SMF Senckenberg Froschunginstitut und Naturmuseum (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

SMNH Swedish Museum of Natural History [Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet] (Stockholm, Sweden)

UF Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida (Gainesville, USA)

UMZC University Museum of Zoology (Cambridge, United Kingdom)

VG Collection of Vukašin Gojšina (Belgrade, Serbia)

Results

By examining the entire literature and studying all species within the genera, we were able to draw several important conclusions:

  1. Currently, it seems that there are no clear genus-specific shell characters which allow unambiguous assignment of a species to a genus. However, there are some combinations of characters which allow at least provisional placement (these combinations are listed below every genus section in Results).
  2. Species pairs with similar shell appearance, but one with fused and one with separated angular and parietal lamellae, are not assigned to different genera (e.g., Hypselostoma tubiferum and Gyliotrachela depressispira; Hypselostoma piconis and Gyliotrachela luctans). Consequently, this trait used by Pilsbry (1917) should be treated with caution and cannot serve as a key trait to distinguish genera.
  3. Normally, there are four or five main apertural barriers, which are always present and are not significantly variable within a population. These barriers are the angular, parietal (sometimes as angulo-parietal or only parietal), upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar. In addition, there are also sometimes minor barriers that lie between the main ones. These barriers are highly variable in number and appearance (thickness, length, height) between genera or even within a genus (especially Hypselostoma) and have little taxonomic significance. Also, their nomenclature is far from clear. It is not obvious whether a small lamella usually present exactly between the columellar and the parietal lamella is actually the infraparietal or the supracolumellar lamella. If barriers are very numerous and variable (e.g., H. depressispira, H. crossei), it is impossible to confidently assign a name to each.
  4. The degree of separation of the last whorl from the penultimate whorl is very variable in some species (e.g., H. crossei, H. hungerfordianum, H. khaowongense) and is not a clear feature for differentiating genera or similar species.
  5. The homology of some barriers is important, but not unambiguous. For example, it is not clear whether a single lamella in Anauchen is homologous only to the parietal lamella or to both the parietal and angular lamellae. Since we have found some specimens of Anauchen with an additional small, pointed, angular part on the parietal lamella (instead of only one single lamella, see e.g., Fig. 35E, F), we consider the latter to be more likely. In addition, the genus Bensonella has a pronounced strong palatal tubercle on the palatal lip, which makes the genus relatively easy to recognise. There are also some similar thickenings in other genera (for Hypselostoma see Gojšina et al. (2023), for Anauchen see Páll-Gergely 2023a), which could be homologous with the mentioned tubercle. Finally, sometimes homology of the barriers is virtually unknown (see under Anauchen grandiportus sp. nov.).

Taxonomic part

Hypselostomatidae Zilch, 1959

Remarks.

Hypselostomatidae were originally introduced as a subfamily of Chondrinidae (Zilch 1959). In the same work, the subfamily Aulacospirinae Zilch, 1959 was erected, later synonymised by Schileyko (1998). Bouchet et al. (2017) treated Hypselostomatinae as a subfamily of Gastrocoptidae, while some authors used Hypselostomatidae (Páll-Gergely 2023a, b; Páll-Gergely and White 2023; Gojšina et al. 2022) Vertiginidae (Panha 1998a; Tanmuangpak and Dumrongrojwattana 2022) or Pupillidae (Burch and Panha 2002; Panha and Burch 2002a) to classify these representatives.

Anauchen Pilsbry, 1917

Anauchen Pilsbry, 1917: 188.

Diagnosis.

This genus is characterised by the combination of characters: i) a single lamella which is formed by a fusion of angular and parietal lamellae (it can appear bifid in some species, see below); ii) last whorl adnate to, or only very slightly detached from the penultimate; iii) shell surface pasty (dimpled) or finely spirally striated (never rough, sandpaper-like surface); iv) surface of apertural barriers smooth.

Remarks.

The following species possess some exceptions from the aforementioned combination of diagnostic characters for the genus: Anauchen kozari and Anauchen evanidus sp. nov. Both of them have rough (granulated) surfaces of the apertural barriers. Furthermore, A. kozari is much smaller (height 1.25 mm, width 1.3 mm) than all other congeners and has a palatal tubercle (typical for many Bensonella species). However, both species are retained in Anauchen for reasons listed under “Remarks” section for these species.

Anauchen angthongensis Panha, 2002

Figs 10A, 11, 37

Anauchen angthongense Panha in Burch & Panha, 2002: 245–246, fig. 4.

Anauchen angthongensePanha and Burch 2008: 48, fig. 44; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 7.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 1 paratype; from the type locality; S. Panha leg.; SMF 3311444.

Type locality.

“Angthong National Park, Suratthani Province Thailand, 9°38'6"N, 99°41′16"E, 60 meters elevation…”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to many congeners, mostly based on the appearance of the apertural barriers. For differences, see under the following species: A. crassus sp. nov., A. huaykhakang, A. informis, A. obesus sp. nov., A. utaithaniensis and A. banmiensis.

Figure 10. 

Synoptic view of the species belonging to the genus Anauchen A A. angthongensis B A. banmiensis C A. crassus sp. nov. D A. eotvosi E A. evanidus sp. nov. F A. grandiportus sp. nov. G A. huaykhakang H A. informis informis I A. informis parcedentata J A. jokaii sp. nov. K A. kozari L A. messageri M A. obesus sp. nov. N A. picasso sp. nov. O A. rochebruni P A. turritus sp. nov. Q A. utaithaniensis.

Figure 11. 

Anauchen angthongensis, paratype (SMF 331444) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

Basal plica can be present or absent.

Anauchen banmiensis Panha & J. B. Burch, 2004

Figs 10B, 12, 37

Anauchen banmiensis Panha & Burch in Panha et al. 2004: 59–60, fig. 2.

Hypselostoma banmiensisPanha and Burch 2008: 89–90, fig. 76; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 1 paratype; from the type locality; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver.44026.

Type locality.

“Chang Peuag Cave Mountain, Banmi District, Lopburi Province, 14°54'10"N, 100°30'8"E, 15 meters elevation” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from A. angthongensis by its shouldered whorls (not rounded as in the latter) and more enlarged last whorl. For differences from further similar species, see under A. crassus sp. nov., A. huaykhakang, A. informis, and A. utaithaniensis.

Figure 12. 

Anauchen banmiensis, paratype (CUMZ ver.44026) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

This species was also considered a member of Hypselostoma (Panha and Burch 2008) but given the fact that the shell shape and microsculpture resembles some Anauchen species (A. huaykhakang, A. utaithaniensis), we assign this species to the latter.

Anauchen crassus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 10C, 13, 14, 37

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 empty shell (SH: 4.83 mm, SW: 3.54 mm); Ranong Province, south of Kra Buri, Tham Phra Kayang, southeastern part of the rock; 10°19.480'N, 98°45.933'E; 10 m a.s.l.; 22 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; CUMZ 14427. Paratypes. Thailand • 6 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell (damaged, not paratype); same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Thailand, Ranong Province, south of Kra Buri, Tham Phra Kayang, southeastern part of the rock; 10°19.480'N, 98°45.933'E; 10 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Anauchen species with finely dimpled (pasty) shell surface sculpture (no spiral striae), aperture adnate to last whorl, five strong apertural barriers (parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, basal, columellar).

Figure 13. 

Anauchen crassus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14427) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical, consisting of 5.5–6 thick-walled, regularly increasing, rounded, convex whorls separated by a moderately deep suture. All shells from the type material are somewhat weathered but colouration is dark reddish brown to pinkish, opaque. Protoconch weathered so the surface sculpture is not clear, not spirally striated, consisting of ~ 1.5–1.75 whorls, glossy and slightly darker than the rest of the shell. Teleoconch pasty, very finely radially striated, with no sign of spiral striation. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate and slightly descending near the aperture (~ 10 ° compared to the shell axis) making the aperture profile prosocline to the shell axis. Peristome continuous, leaning on the penultimate whorl at the parietal side in form of a thick and distinct callus. It is slightly paler in colour than the rest of the shell, expanded (particularly on the parietal side where it forms a distinct callus) but not reflected. Aperture equipped with five strong, high, relatively short, and thick barriers (parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, basal, and columellar). Parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture, blade-like, slightly oblique, its outer part curved towards the palatal side and only almost reaching the expanding peristome. Upper palatal and lower palatal plicae are similar, the lower one being stronger, more slender, higher, and positioned slightly deeper in the aperture. Basal plica small and very short, knob-like. Columellar lamella thick and horizontal, situated in the middle of the columellar wall. None of these barriers reach the expanding peristome. Surface of all apertural barriers is smooth. Sinulus wide and parabolic (due to the position of angular lamella and upper palatal plica). Umbilicus open and deep but moderately wide, measuring ~ 1/6 of the shell width. Only the penultimate whorl is visible through the umbilicus. A very short and shallow groove is present on the last ~ ¼ of the body whorl, running from the peristome towards the umbilicus.

Figure 14. 

SEM imaging of Anauchen crassus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14427) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to Anauchen angthongensis Panha, 2002 from which it can be distinguished by the lack of spiral striation and much wider umbilicus. Additionally, A. crassus sp. nov. has a shallower suture resulting in less convex whorls than in A. angthongensis. Anauchen informis Vermeulen, Phung & Truong, 2007 is also spirally striated, has narrower umbilicus and its whorls are more convex and less regularly increasing. Anauchen banmiensis is spirally striated and has a shouldered last whorl. For differences from A. obesus sp. nov., see under that species. Boysidia phatangensis Dumrongrojwattana & Assawawattagee, 2018 is more slender and has more whorls which are more convex, with deeper sutures. It usually also has an additional lamella in the columellar-parietal boundary region, which was not (but may be) present in A. crassus sp. nov. Boysidia phatangensis has a bifid lamella (concrescent angular and parietal) on the parietal side while A. crassus sp. nov. has one blade-like lamella. Basal plica in B. phatangensis is seemingly more closely positioned to columellar lamella, while that of A. crassus sp. nov. is somewhere between the lower palatal and columellar or even closer to the lower palatal. Infraparietal lamella is absent in the new species, but present in B. phatangensis. Lastly, the umbilicus of B. phatangensis is slightly more excentrical and wider than in A. crassus sp. nov.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 4.83–5.39; SW = 3.54–4.04; AH = 2.15–2.24; 2.04–2.23.

Etymology.

The specific epithet refers to the thick (Lat. crassus) shell and apertural barriers of this species.

Distribution.

Only known from the type locality.

Anauchen eotvosi Páll-Gergely, 2023

Figs 10D, 15, 37

Anauchen eotvosi Páll-Gergely, 2023b: 452–454, fig. 1.

Anauchen eotvosiTongkerd et al. 2024: 165.

Type material examined.

Holotype. Thailand-Myanmar • Shan-Siam boundary; Woodthorpe coll.; NHMUK 1903.7.1.1227.1. Paratypes. Thailand-Myanmar •; 6, same data as for holotype; NHMUK 1903.7.1.1227.2–7.

Type locality.

“Shan [Shan States, Myanmar]-Siam [Thailand] Boundary”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from its congeners by the presence of weak barriers situated close to the peristome edge. All other congeners similar in shape (e.g., A. angthongensis, A. crassus sp. nov., A. informis), have barriers much stronger and higher. See also under H. iunior sp. nov.

Figure 15. 

Anauchen eotvosi, holotype (NHMUK 1903.7.1.1227.1) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views (from Páll-Gergely 2023b).

Distribution.

This species is known only from the imprecise type locality (Shan-Siam boundary).

Anauchen evanidus Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 10E, 16, 17, 37

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.57 mm, SW: 2.23 mm); Chanthaburi Province, 3.0 km W of Na Yai Am; 12.738°N, 101.881°E; 23 Apr. 1987; F.G. Thompson leg.; UF 530655. Paratypes. Thailand • 2 shells; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14431 • 33 shells; same data as for holotype; UF 591355.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 2 shells (1 damaged and 1 juvenile, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; UF 583732.

Type locality.

Thailand, Chanthaburi Province, 3.0 km W of Na Yai Am; 12.738°N, 101.881°E.

Diagnosis.

Anauchen with very slightly keeled last whorl (below the centre of the periphery) which is also detached from the penultimate. Teleoconch finely dimpled, pasty sculptured, with no spiral striae. Five or six apertural barriers present (parietal, infraparietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, basal and columellar), all strongly spiniferous.

Figure 16. 

Anauchen evanidus Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 530655) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical, brown, consisting of 4.5–5 convex whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch similar in colour as the rest of the shell, finely pitted, showing no spiralling pattern or spiral striae and consisting of 1.25–1.5 whorls. Teleoconch surface sculpture fine, pasty, without spiral striae and with several irregularly spaced whitish radial streaks which are most prominent on the last whorl. Last whorl convex but weakly keeled below the centre of the periphery, slightly detached from the penultimate near the aperture and very slightly ascending (below 5 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome dirty white, expanded but not reflected. Aperture rounded, equally as wide as high. It is equipped with five or six simple apertural barriers (parietal, infraparietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, basal and columellar). Parietal lamella high and moderately strong, not reaching the expanding peristome. Upper and lower palatal plicae equally strong but the lower palatal is usually slightly higher. Basal plica present as a very weak, dot-like swelling situated halfway between the lower palatal plica and columellar lamella. The latter is sometimes almost as wide as long, provoking a rounded shape. The columellar wall of the aperture is weakly swollen around the columellar lamella. Infraparietal lamella present as a small swelling or completely absent. None of the apertural barriers are reaching the peristome (although the parietal lamella is the closest) and all are roughly spiniferous as well as the apertural surface. Sinulus wide and not strongly isolated from the rest of the aperture due to the relatively weak upper palatal plica. Umbilicus very narrow, measuring ~ 1/10 of the shell width. The umbilical groove is present running alongside it. This groove is the broadest near the peristome and regularly tapering towards the umbilicus, ending as a narrow canal at the last ~ ¼ of the body whorl.

Figure 17. 

SEM imaging of Anauchen evanidus Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 530655) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is the most similar to A. picasso sp. nov. and for differences, see under that species. The new species also bears some resemblance to Aulacospira pluangtong Panha & Burch, 2004, but the latter has less rounded whorls, more elongated umbilicus, smooth apertural barriers (not spiniferous) and it lacks the basal plica.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SW = 2.10–2.58; SH = 2.39–2.82; AH = 1.10–1.22; AW = 1.09–1.28.

Etymology.

The Latin word evanidus means vanishing, which refers to the quarrying of the type locality of this species.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

Unlike congeners (except for A. kozari), this species has rough, spiniferous surface of the apertural barriers. It is retained in Anauchen because of the similar barrier arrangement to other species (e.g., A. angthongensis, A. crassus sp. nov., A. huaykhakang, A. obesus sp. nov.) and a single lamella on the parietal side.

Anauchen grandiportus Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 10F, 18, 37

Type material.

Holotype. Laos • 1 empty shell (SH: 1.71 mm, SW: 1.92 mm); Khammouane Province, NE foot of Mount Pha Soung, caverns among slope boulders; 17°33.108'N, 104°52.301'E; 08 Feb. 2017; J. Grego leg.; CUMZ 14428.

Type locality.

Laos, Khammouane Province, NE foot of Mount Pha Soung, caverns among slope boulders; 17°33.108'N, 104°52.301'E.

Diagnosis.

Shell conical-ovoid, teleoconch radially and not spirally striated. Last whorl not detached from the penultimate and slightly descending. Aperture large, with seven weak barriers sitting on the peristome edge. Umbilicus narrow.

Description.

Shell brown, conical-ovoid with deep suture and bulging whorls. Whorls 3.25, rounded, regularly increasing. Protoconch consists of slightly > 1 whorl, finely pitted, its terminal part with ~ 12 equidistant spiral striae. Teleoconch with inconspicuous, irregular growth lines and finely dimpled (pasty), spiral striation absent. Last whorl rounded, adnate to the penultimate and slightly descending near the aperture (~ 15 ° compared to the shell axis), aperture slightly prosocline to shell axis in lateral view. Aperture conspicuously large to the shell size, parietal part adnate onto penultimate whorl forming a weak callus. Peristome slightly expanded but not reflected. Altogether seven apertural barriers could be found, all being blunt, knob-like, situated on peristome edge, their homologies with traditionally recognised barriers somewhat questionable. Parietal lamella is the largest, but still weak. Suprapalatal and upper palatal plicae situated close to each other, after some distance the next plica is the lower palatal. Lower palatal, basal, subcolumellar, and columellar situated in approximately equal distance from one another, gap between columellar and parietal is approximately as large as between parietal and the suprapalatal. There is a very slight thickening next to lower palatal plica, although it is questionable whether it would develop into a barrier. Surfaces of all apertural barriers are very finely granulated. Sinulus wide but low, not strongly isolated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus narrow, elongate, only shows body whorl.

Figure 18. 

Anauchen grandiportus Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14428) A–D shell E enlarged protoconch view F, G enlarged view of the surface of the last whorl.

Differential diagnosis.

Anauchen grandiportus sp. nov. differs from all other species assigned to Anauchen on the basis of the seven small, marginal denticles and the greatly enlarged aperture.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 1). SH = 1.92; SW = 1.71, AH = 0.96, AW = 0.87.

Etymology.

The specific epithet refers to the relatively large aperture when compared to the shell size.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Anauchen huaykhakang Panha, 2002

Figs 10G, 19, 37

Anauchen huaykhakang Panha in Burch & Panha, 2002: 239–244, fig. 2.

Anauchen huaykhakangPanha and Burch 2008: 51–52, fig. 47; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 7.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 1 paratype; from the type locality; 1997; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 038.

Type locality.

“Subkao, Huaykhakang Wildlife Sanctuary, Lansak District, Utaithani Province, 15°35'7"N, 99°18'8"E, 310 meters elevation…” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from A. angthongensis by the shouldered last whorl and concave-conical shell (due to the strongly enlarged last whorl). Anauchen banmiensis is much more strongly spirally striated, it last whorl is more distinctly shouldered and has a wider umbilicus with a deep groove inside it (absent in A. huaykhakang). For differences from A. utaithaniensis, see under that species.

Figure 19. 

Anauchen huaykhakang, paratype (CUMZ ver. 038) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Anauchen informis informis Vermeulen, Phung & Truong, 2007

Figs 10H, 20, 37

Anauchen informis informis Vermeulen, Phung & Truong, 2007: 87–89, fig. 6.

Anauchen informis informisSchileyko 2011: 4.

Type material examined.

Vietnam • holotype; RMNH 108986.

Type locality.

Vietnam, Kien Giang Prov., Kien Luong, Hon Chong hill, doline along East flank.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is the most similar to A. angthongensis from which it differs by its more bulging whorls and more ovoid shell. A. banmiensis has a shouldered last whorl and stronger barriers.

Figure 20. 

Anauchen informis informis, holotype (RMNH.Moll.108986) A–F shell.

Distribution.

This subspecies is known only from the type locality.

Anauchen informis parcedentata Vermeulen, Phung & Truong, 2007

Figs 10I, 21, 37

Anauchen informis parcedentata Vermeulen, Phung & Truong, 2007: 89, fig. 7.

Anauchen informis parcedentataSchileyko 2011: 4.

Type material examined.

Vietnam • holotype; RMNH 108987.

Type locality.

“Vietnam, Kien Giang prov., Kien Luong, Ba Tai hill”.

Differential diagnosis.

Similar to the nominotypical subspecies but with 1–3 barriers in the aperture (parietal always present, both palatals occasionally) and usually more whorls.

Figure 21. 

Anauchen informis parcedentata, holotype (RMNH.Moll.108987) A–F shell.

Distribution.

This subspecies is known only from the type locality.

Anauchen jokaii Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 10J, 22, 23, 37

Type material.

Holotype. Vietnam • 1 shell (SH: 2.48 mm, SW: 2.31 mm); Nam Pia village, Hung Ba commune, Vi Xugen district, Ha Giang Province; 22°52.064'N, 105°4.814'E; 216 m a.s.l.; L.V. Hao, T. Ishibe, Y. Nakahara, K. Ohara, K. Okubo, J.U. Otani, V.P. Sang leg.; IEBR_LS_Anauchen.002H.

Type locality.

Vietnam, Nam Pia village, Hung Ba commune, Vi Xugen district, Ha Giang Province; 22°52.064'N, 105°4.814'E; 216 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Anauchen species with conical shell, last whorl keeled at its base and slightly ascending near the aperture. Spiral striation absent. Aperture armed with four strong barriers, umbilicus narrow.

Description.

Shell conical, consisting of 5.5 regularly increasing, convex whorls separated by a deep suture. Colour light brown. There is not a clear boundary between the protoconch and the teleoconch due to the similar surface sculpture. Teleoconch pasty, very finely but irregularly radially striated, with no signs of spiral striation. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate and its last quarter slightly ascending near the aperture (~ 10° compared to the shell axis), making the aperture profile opisthocline to the shell axis. Last whorl with a blunt keel at its base, making the shell strongly triangular. Peristome continuous and thick, not very strongly expanded on the parietal side and not fully leaning on the penultimate whorl. It is slightly lighter in colour than the rest of the shell, not reflected. Sinulus rounded and well separated from the rest of the aperture. Aperture equipped with four strong but short barriers (parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar). Parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture, blade-like. Upper palatal plica ~ 1/2 as strong as the parietal lamella and very slightly leaning towards the lower palatal plica. The latter is strong (only slightly weaker than the parietal) and moderately long. There is no basal plica. Columellar lamella thick and relatively low, situated in the middle of the columellar wall. All apertural barriers almost reach the expanding peristome. Surface of all apertural barriers is smooth. Umbilicus rounded, open but narrow, measuring ~ 1/11 of the shell width.

Figure 22. 

Anauchen jokaii Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (IEBR_LS_Anauchen.002H) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

See under A. messageri, A. rochebruni, A. pentadens and A. turritus sp. nov.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 1). SH = 2.48; SW = 2.31; AH = 1.12; AW = 1.04.

Etymology.

This species is named after and dedicated to Mór Jókai (1825–1904), Hungarian novelist, dramatist, to commemorate the bicentenary of his birth. Jókai was interested in malacology, he had a large collection of (mostly marine) shells, and even published a satirical novel entitled “Novel of snails” (A csigák regénye).

Figure 23. 

SEM imaging of Anauchen jokaii Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (IEBR_LS_Anauchen.002H) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

Only known from the type locality.

Anauchen kozari Páll-Gergely, 2023

Figs 10K, 24, 37

Anauchen kozari Páll-Gergely, 2023a: 64–66, figs 1D, F, 2, 3.

Type material examined.

Laos • holotype; Luang Prabang Province, Phou Xuang Mountain, ca 1.5 km NE of Ban Lak Sip, ca 5 km SE of Luang Prabang, under rocks and logs in old secondary forest under cliff; 19°851.6050'N, 10°2811.0810'E; 640 m a.s.l.; A. Abdou, I.V Muratov leg.; 24 Nov. 2006; MNHN-IM-2012-27269.

Type locality.

“Central Laos, Luang Prabang Province, Phou Xuang mountain, ca 1.5 km NE of Ban Lak Sip, ca 5 km SE of Luang Prabang, under rocks and logs in old secondary forest under cliff, 19°851.6050'N, 10°2811.0810'E, alt. 640 m”.

Differential diagnosis.

See under A. messageri.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

This species is not a typical representative of its genus since it has a palatal tubercle frequently found in Bensonella and a granulated, rough surface of the apertural barriers frequently found in Hypselostoma. It is also the smallest of all Anauchen species. It is however retained in Anauchen for the following reasons: i) the arrangement of apertural barriers is highly reminiscent to those of A. messageri (see Páll-Gergely 2023a); ii) there is a single lamella on the parietal side; iii) last whorl adnate to the penultimate.

Figure 24. 

Anauchen kozari Páll-Gergely, 2023, holotype (MNHN-IM-2012-27269) (from Páll-Gergely 2023a) A–D shell.

Anauchen messageri (Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1904)

Figs 1OL, 25, 37, 38

Boysidia messageri Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1904: 211, pl. 9, figs 1–4.

Anauchen messageri — Pilsbry 1917: 189, pl. 33, figs 4–7; Schileyko 2011: 5; Páll-Gergely 2023a: 67, fig. 1C.

Anauchen massageri [sic!] — Burch and Panha 2002: 242, 245, 247.

Anauchen whitteni Chen, 2023: 90–91, figs 1, 2. syn. nov.

Type material examined.

Vietnam • 1 syntype of A. messageri; from the type locality; C. Messager leg.; MNHN-IM-2000-35159.

Additional material examined.

Vietnam • 2 shells; Cao Bang Province, Đeo Ma Phuc - Quang Uyen, left side of the road, rock crevice; 22°43.981'N, 106°20.333'E; 610 m a.s.l.; 14 Nov. 2011; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Cao Bang Province, west of Quang Uyen, Phi Hao-Đau Tuyen; 22°42.188'N, 106°26.358'E; 500 m a.s.l.; 16. Nov 2011.; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 8 shells; Lang Son Province, Huu Lung district, Minh Tien, 1400 m northeast of Cau Cheo Minh Tien; 21°34.024'N, 106°17.790'E; 30 m a.s.l.; 20 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 13 shells; Lang Son Province, Huu Lung district, Huu Lien, 33.5 km from junction of roads 1B and 241 towards Ba Nang, left side of the road; 21°41.064'N, 106°22.871'E; 220 m a.s.l.;19 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi leg; coll. HA • 47 shells; Hoa Binh Province, Kim Boi district, Cao Duong, north of Đong Phu, 58 km from Nho Quan towards Hanoi on the Ho Chi Minh road; 20°42.591'N, 105°39.299'E; 10 m a.s.l.; 16 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Thanh Hoa Province, Xa Ban Cong, Xom Sat; 20°22.897'N, 105°12.712'E; 60 m a.s.l.; 18. May 2012¸ A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 15 shells; Thanh Hoa Province, 9.8 km from centre of Ngoc Lac towards Lang Chanh, Ngoc Khe, left side of the road, 115 km; 20°7.192'N, 105°18.277'E; 13 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA. China • 9 shells; Guangxi, Bose Shi, Leye Xian, Buliu He; 24°39.436'N, 106°43.245'E; 540 m a.s.l.; 08 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 74 shells; Guangxi, Hechi Shi, Huanjiang Maonanzu Zizhixian, south of Mulun Guojiaji Ziran Baohuqu, Dongning; 25°05.970'N, 107°57.639'E; 530 m a.s.l.; 17 Sept. 2013, A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 3 shells; Guangxi, Laibin Shi, Xingbin Qu, Qidong Xiang; 24°00.512'N, 109°04.288'E; 150 m a.s.l.; 20 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg. • 2 shells; coll. HA • 2 shells; Guangxi, Hechi Shi, Du an Yaozu Zizhixian, Gaoling Xiang, 2 km west of Dingfucun; 24°03.197'N, 108°01.290'E; 320 m a.s.l.; 08 Oct. 2009; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 171 shells; Guangxi, Hechi Shi, Bama Yaozu Zizhixian, southern edge of Jiaolecun; 24°07.045'N, 107°07.847'E; 590 m a.s.l.; 10 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 24 shells; Guangxi, Hechi Shi, Nandan Xian, Lihuyaozu Xiang, southeast of Encun, rocks above the road; 25°04.163'N, 107°36.176'E; 630 m a.s.l.; 11 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 10 shells; Guangxi, Guilin Shi, Guilin, Ludiyan Gongyuan, northeastern side of Moupanshan; 25°18.466'N, 110°15.862'E 145 m a.s.l.; 22 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 14 shells; Guangxi, Chongzuo Shi, Longzhou Xian, Wude Xiang, vicinity of the junction towards Banxintun; 22°35.239'N, 106°46.096'E; 350 m a.s.l.; 24 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 257 shells; Guangxi, Hechi Shi, Tiane Xian, Qimu Xiang, junction towards Lahaiyan, rock above the tomb; 24°51.130'N, 107°11.670'E; 600 m a.s.l.; 12 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi & M. Szekeres leg.; coll. HA • 5 shells; Guangxi, Guilin Shi, Yangshuo Xian, 5 km north of Xingpingzhen; 24°57.358'N, 110°31.857'E; 150 m a.s.l.; 15 Oct. 2009; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 13 shells; Yueliangshan, Gaotianzhen, Yangshuoxian, Guangxi Zhuangzu Zizhiqu; 24°43.45'N, 110°28.32'E; K. Ohara, K. Okubo, J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 17 shells; Daxiaojingfengjingqu, Moyangzhen, Luodianxian, Guizhousheng; 25°33.73'N, 106°51.4333'E; 450 m a.s.l.; T. Ishibe, K. Okubo, J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 4 shells; near Hudiequan bridge, Gaotianzhen, Yangshuoxian, Guangxi Zhuangzu Zizhiqu; 24°44.45'N, 110°29.62'E; K. Ohara, K. Okubo, J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB.

Type localities.

“Haut-Tonkin” (Vietnam) (A. messageri); “Collected from the rocks, Mt. Nanshe [南蛇山], Yizhou District [宜州区], Hechi City [河池市], Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. 24°30'22"N, 108°38'51"E, 270 m…” (A. whitteni).

Differential diagnosis.

Anauchen jokaii sp. nov. lacks the spiral striation and has its last whorl keeled at the base which separates it from A. messageri. Anauchen kozari is smaller, more depressed and has a palatal tubercle. See also under A. pentadens, A. rochebruni and A. turritus sp. nov.

Distribution.

This species has a wide distribution across Vietnam and China. Its northernmost known localities are situated in northern parts of Guangxi province (China) while the southernmost are from Thanh Hoa province (Vietnam).

Remarks.

We have observed high morphological variability within this species, particularly in the slenderness of the shell (Fig. 25). The basal plica is also occasionally present or sometimes absent. Anauchen whitteni Z.-Y. Chen, 2023 was described as a distinct species based on the absence of the basal plica. Since the basal plica was found here as a variable character and the species does not differ from A. messageri in any other characters, it is treated here as a junior synonym.

Figure 25. 

Anauchen messageri from different localities A China, Guangxi province, Hechi Shi (coll. HA) B China, Guangxi province, Bose Shi (coll. HA) C China, Guangxi province, Guilin Shi (coll. HA) D Vietnam, Tonkin, syntype (MNHN-IM-2000-35159 (from Páll-Gergely 2023a)).

Anauchen obesus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 10M, 26, 27, 37

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.94 mm, SW: 2.26 mm); Chiang Rai Province, Doi Tung, 50 metres before Wat Phra That Doi Tung, vicinity of the parking lot; 20°19.540'N, 99°49.987'E; 1350 m; 12 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; CUMZ 14429. Paratypes. Thailand • 15 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 10 shells; Chiang Rai Province, Doi Tung; 20°20′32″N, 99°50′21″E; 1320 m a.s.l.; 08. May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4417; UF 591335.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell (juvenile, not paratype); Chiang Rai Province, Doi Tung; 20°20′32″N, 99°50′21″E; 1320 m a.s.l.; 08. May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4417; UF 583720.

Type locality.

Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Doi Tung, 50 metres before Wat Phra That Doi Tung, vicinity of the parking lot; 20°19.540'N, 99°49.987'E; 1350 m.

Diagnosis.

Anauchen species with conical-ovoid, brown shell, pasty-like surface, last whorl adnate to the penultimate, five apertural barriers (parietal (angulo-parietal), upper palatal, lower palatal, weak basal, and columellar) and a narrow umbilicus.

Figure 26. 

Anauchen obesus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14429) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical-ovoid, brown, with 4.5–5 whorls separated by a deep suture. All whorls convex, bulging, rounded. Protoconch consists of ~ 1.5 whorls, finely pitted and with moderate spiral striae, the same colour as the rest of the shell. Teleoconch fine, pasty, with inconspicuous, irregular growth radial lines which are rarely more pronounced and in form of whitish streaks, most dense right behind the peristome. Spiral striation absent. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate and slightly descending (~ 25 ° compared to the shell axis) making the aperture profile prosocline to the shell axis. Peristome continuous, in form of a short and not much expanded callus leaning on the penultimate whorl at the parietal side. It is white, expanded but not reflected. Aperture equipped with five barriers (parietal (angulo-parietal), upper palatal, lower palatal, basal and columellar). Parietal (angulo-parietal) lamella almost fully reaching the expanded peristome edge. It is the largest in the aperture, sometimes single and sometimes with an additional smaller part, which is probably homologous with the angular lamella in other genera, pointed towards the palatal side. Upper palatal plica is weaker, lower, and less slender than the lower palatal. Lower palatal plica almost as strong as the angulo-parietal lamella. Basal plica in the form of inconspicuous knob, like a very slight swelling in the basal-columellar transition area. Columellar lamella almost reaching the expanded peristome, highest in its middle part and sloping towards the peristome edge where it becomes quite low. It is leaned towards the lower palatal plica. Surface of all apertural barriers is very finely granulated. Sinulus rounded, parabolic and well separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus narrow, ~ 1/8 of the shell width, previous whorls not clearly visible through it. Umbilical groove absent.

Figure 27. 

SEM imaging of Anauchen obesus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14429) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

Anauchen obesus sp. nov. is similar in shell shape to A. angthongensis, A. crassus sp. nov., A. eotvosi and A. informis. However, A. obesus sp. nov. can be separated by its smaller size and more globular shell.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 4). SH = 2.71–3; SW = 1.95–2.26; AH = 1.1–1.27; AW = 1.06–1.23.

Etymology.

This species is named for its globose shell.

Distribution.

This species is known only from Doi Tung mountain.

Anauchen picasso Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 10N, 28, 29, 37

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.95 mm, SW: 2.79 mm); Prachuap Khiri Khan Province, Khao Sam Roi Yot National Park, 3 km S of Park Entrance; 12.208°N, 99.993°E; 31 May 1987; F.G. Thompson leg.; UF 529706. Paratypes. Thailand • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14430; 8 shells; same data as for holotype; UF 591339.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell (juvenile/broken, not paratype); same data as for holotype; UF 583731.

Type locality.

Thailand, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province, Khao Sam Roi Yot National Park, 3 km S of Park Entrance; 12.208°N, 99.993°E.

Diagnosis.

Anauchen species with distinctly keeled last whorl (slightly below the centre of the periphery) which is also detached near the aperture and descending. Teleoconch spirally striated. Only four weak apertural barriers (parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar).

Figure 28. 

Anauchen picasso Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 529706) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical or very slightly conical-ovoid, brown, consisting of 4.5–5 whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch not much lighter than the rest of the shell, roughly pitted and terminally spirally striated, consisting of 1.25 whorls. Initial teleoconch whorls and the penultimate whorl slightly keeled. Fine spiral striation visible on the teleoconch as well, sometimes stronger near the protoconch (on initial teleoconch whorls), sometimes stronger on the last whorl. There are several irregularly spaced whitish radial streaks crossing the spiral striae. Last whorl enlarged and distinctly keeled slightly below the centre of the periphery. The keel is equally strong along its length but is getting lost right behind the peristome. Last whorl slightly detached from the penultimate near the aperture and slightly descending (~ 15 ° compared to the shell axis), thus making the aperture profile prosocline to the shell axis. Peristome is dirty white, very thick, expanded but not reflected. Aperture rounded, almost as high as wide. There are only four relatively weak apertural barriers (parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar). Of them, parietal lamella is the strongest and highest and reaching the expanding peristome. Both palatal plicae (upper and lower) are of similar appearance (but lower is usually slightly stronger than the upper), both weak (low and short) and tubercle-like. They are positioned close to each other, probably closer than in any other congener. Columellar lamella is weak and dot-like, usually not present as a distinct barrier but rather as a columellar thickening which is gradually lowering towards the expanding peristome. Surface of all apertural barriers is very finely granulated. Sinulus wide and not strongly isolated from the rest of the aperture due to the relatively weak upper palatal plica. Umbilicus very narrow, elongated and measuring 1/8–1/9 of the shell width. There is a strong umbilical groove running along the umbilicus. This groove is very wide near the peristome and then regularly tapering towards the umbilicus, finally terminating at the ~ ½ of the last whorl.

Figure 29. 

SEM imaging of Anauchen picasso Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 529706) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is different from other congeners by the strongly keeled last whorl below the centre of the periphery and the presence of four apertural barriers which are quite weak. It is most similar to A. evanidus sp. nov. but A. picasso sp. nov. has a more strongly keeled last whorl, weaker apertural barriers, and is spirally striated.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2.64–2.95; SW = 2.63–2.82; AH = 1.23–1.38; AW = 1.27–1.37.

Etymology.

This species looks like an Anauchen with rounded whorls painted in a Pablo Picasso style (i.e., resembling the art style known as Cubism). The specific epithet is to be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Anauchen pentadens (D.-N. Chen, M. Wu & G.-Q. Zhang, 1999)

Fig. 37

Boysidia (Boysidia) pentadens Chen, Wu & Zhang, 1999: 5 (Chinese description), 11 (English description), fig. 2. — Chen and Zhang 2002: 692.

Boysidia pentadensQian and Zhou 2014: 90–91; Chen et al. 2016: 50; Dumrongrojwattana and Assawawattagee 2018: 216.

Anauchen pentadensChen 2023: 89–90.

Material examined.

None.

Type locality.

“collected from Menglun Town (21°5'N, 100°6'E). Mengla County, Yunnan Province” (China).

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from A. messageri by its less triangular shell, narrower umbilicus, absence of spiral striation, and presence of strong radial ribs on the last whorl (especially near the aperture). Anauchen pentadens differs from A. jokaii sp. nov. by its wider umbilicus, strong ribs on the last whorl, especially near the aperture, and a basal plica. Its last whorl is also regularly rounded, so the is shell less triangular. See also under A. rochebruni.

Distribution.

This species is known only from Yunnan Province, China.

Remarks.

According to the figures presented in Qian and Zhou (2014) and Chen et al. (2016), Chen (2023) considered it a member of Anauchen rather than Boysidia which we follow herein.

Anauchen rochebruni (Mabille, 1887)

Figs 10O, 30, 31, 37, 38

Hypselostoma rochebruni Mabille, 1887a: 8.

Pupa angulina Gredler, 1885: 7. syn. nov.

Hypselostoma rochebruniMabille 1887b: 121–122.

Boysidia gereti Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1904: 212, pl. 9, figs 5–8.

Hypselostoma rochebrunei [sic] — Fischer and Dautzenberg 1904: 408.

Anauchen angulinus — Pilsbry 1917: 191, pl. 33, figs 5, 6.

Anauchen rochebruni — Pilsbry 1917: 190–191; Páll-Gergely 2023a: 63, 67, figs 1A, B.

Anauchen gereti — Pilsbry 1917: 189–190, pl. 33, figs 1–3; Schileyko 1998: 138, fig. 158; Schileyko 2011: 4.

Hypselostoma rochebruniSchileyko 2011: 3.

Boysidia geretiPáll-Gergely 2023a: 67, fig. 1A.

Type material examined.

Vietnam • 1 syntype of A. rochebruni; from the type locality; collector unknown; MNHN-IM-2000-35156 • 1 syntype of B. gereti; from the type locality; C. Messager leg.; MNHN-IM-2000-35161.

Additional material examined.

Vietnam • 59 shells; Lang Son Province, Binh Gia, eastern edge of the village, Di Chi Keo Leng, rock wall; 21°56.302'N, 106°23.819'E; 375 m a.s.l.; 17 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 55 shells; Lang Son Province, Bac Son district, Quinh Son, northern part of the village; 21°53.411'N, 106°20.944'E; 400 m a.s.l.; 18 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 31 shells; Lang Son Province, Bac Son district, Quinh Son, northeastern part of the village, rock wall; 21°54.616'N, 106°20.542'E; 420 m a.s.l.; 18 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 25 shells; Lang Son Province, Bac Son district, Long Dong, 3.8 km north from junction of roads 1B and 241; 21°56.728'N, 106°19.447'E; 390 m a.s.l.; 18 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 4 shells; Lang Son, vicinity of Chua Tam Than; 21°51.353'N, 106°44.809'E; 265 m a.s.l.; 21 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Ha Giang Province, Ha Giang 105.5 km - Đong Van, Xa Van Chai, left side of the road; 23°09.084'N, 105°10.774'E; 31. May 2012; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Cao Bang Province, Đong Khe 3 km- Đeo Lung Phay, right side of the road; 22°24.223'N, 106°25.937'E; 390 m a.s.l.; 15 Nov. 2011, A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Cao Ban Province, Tring Khanh district, Canh Tien commune, Pac Rao village; 22°48.9408'N, 106°30.549'E; 544 m a.s.l.; L.V. Hao, T. Ishibe, Y. Nakahara, K. Ohara, K. Okubo, J.U. Otani, V.P. Sang leg.; coll. PGB. • 5 shells; Bac Kan Province, Na Ri district, 2 km S of Ban Dem, W slopes of a deep sinkhole covered with forest, in small cavern, in dense rainforest; 06 Apr. 2012; J. Grego, J. Šteffek leg.; coll. JG. China • 2 shells; Hunan; ex. coll. Mollendorff; SMF 42108 • 2 shells; Guangxi, Laibin Shi, Wuxuan Xian, Wuxuan Tongling Zhen str., north of Yagangcun, rocks; 23°29.827'N, 109°38.534'E; 100 m a.s.l.; 21 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi & M. Szekeres leg. • 17 shells; Guangxi, Hechi Shi, Bama Yaozu Zizhixian, southern edge of Jiaolecun; 24°07.045'N, 107°07.847'E; 590 m a.s.l.; 10 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi & M. Szekeres leg. • 1 shell; Guangxi, Yulin Shi, Xingye Xian, 2 km southeast frim Chenghuang, Lufengshan Scenic Area; 22°36.814'N, 109°45.457'E; 05 Oct. 2009; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 147 shells; Guangxi, Chongzuo Shi, Longzhou Xian, north of Lenglei, Nonggang Nat. Res., northern edge; 22°29.161'N, 106°57.357'E; 220 m a.s.l.; 23 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi & M. Szekeres leg.; coll. HA • 2 shells; Hunan, coll. Moellendorff; SMF 42108; • 2 shells; Guangxi, Chongzuo Shi, 25 km southeast from the centre of Chongzuo, Chongzuo Shengtai Gongyuan, Langur Reserve; 22°16.293'N, 107°30.359'E; 220 m a.s.l.; 18 Oct. 2009; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 51 shells; Guangxi, Chongzuo Shi, Longzhou Xian, Wude Xiang, Banxintun; 22°35.239'N, 106°46.096'E; 350 m a.s.l.; 24 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 7 shells; Tao cun, Tong’anzhen, Pinglexian, Guangxi Zhuangzu Zizhiqu; 24°34.379'N, 110°56.022'E; 163 m a.s.l.; leg. K. Ohara, K. Okubo, J.U. Otani; coll. PGB.

Figure 30. 

Anauchen rochebruni from Hunan, China (SMF 42108) A–D shell.

Type localities.

“Tonkin” (Vietnam) (A. rochebruni); “Die nähere Heimat dieses Findelkindes von einer Windelschnecke ist nach obigem vorläufig nimmer wohl festzustellen; doch sicher im Innern des centralen China, in Hunan oder Hupé zu suchen.” [type locality questionable: Hunan or Hubei provinces, China] (A. angulinus).

Figure 31. 

Anauchen rochebruni from different localities A Vietnam, Cao Bang province (coll. HA) B China, Guangxi province (coll. HA) C Vietnam, Lang Son province (coll. HA) D Vietnam, Tonkin (syntype, MNHN-IM-2000-35156 (from Páll-Gergely 2023a)) E Vietnam, Tonkin, syntype of B. gereti (MNHN-IM-2000-35161 (from Páll-Gergely 2023a)).

Differential diagnosis.

The shell shape is most similar to A. messageri. However, it differs by the much weaker and fewer apertural barriers. Anauchen pentadens is less triangular, has a narrower umbilicus, lacks the spiral striation, has more apertural barriers which are also stronger and has strong ribs on the last whorl (especially near the aperture). Anauchen jokaii sp. nov. lacks the spiral striation and has its last whorl keeled at the base which separates it from A. rochebruni. The apertural barriers are also much weaker in A. rochebruni. See also under A. turritus sp. nov.

Distribution.

This species has a wide distribution extending from the Hunan province, China (type locality of A. angulinus) south to Lang Son province, Vietnam.

Remarks.

Anauchen angulinus is herein treated a synonym of this species because we observed no significant morphological differences between them.

There is intraspecific variation in the number of apertural barriers. There are usually three (parietal, palatal, columellar) but there can be as few as one (parietal). The last whorl can be more or less swollen, sometimes resulting in a strongly triangular shell shape.

Anauchen turritus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 10P, 32, 33, 34, 37

Type material.

Holotype. Vietnam • 1 shell (SH: 4.7 mm, SW: 3.2 mm); Thanh Hoa Province, 23.7 km south from centre of Ngoc Lac, Phuc Thinh, Lang Mieng, rock above the village; 19°55.869'N, 105°22.196'E; 65 m a.s.l.; 13 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; IEBR_LS_Anauchen.001H. Paratypes. Vietnam • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14432 • 79 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG • 29 shells; Thanh Hoa Province, Nhur Thanh District, Hai Van, Hang Lo Cao Khang Chien, near cave; 19°37.079'N, 105°34.629'E; 22 m a.s.l.; 14 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA.

Figure 32. 

Anauchen turritus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (IEBR_LS_Anauchen.001H) (slender form) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Additional material examined.

Vietnam • 13 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 7 shells (juveniles/ damaged, not paratypes); Thanh Hoa Province, Nhur Thanh District, Hai Van, Hang Lo Cao Khang Chien, near cave; 19°37.079'N, 105°34.629'E; 22 m a.s.l.; 14 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA.

Figure 33. 

SEM imaging of Anauchen turritus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (IEBR_LS_Anauchen.001H) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Type locality.

Vietnam, Thanh Hoa Province, 23.7 km south from centre of Ngoc Lac, Phuc Thinh, Lang Mieng, rock above the village; 19°55.869'N, 105°22.196'E; 65 m a.s.l.

Figure 34. 

Anauchen turritus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., paratype (coll. HA) (less slender form) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Diagnosis.

Shell conical, consisting of 7.5–8 whorls. Teleoconch densely spirally striated. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate. Aperture equipped with four main barriers (parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar), supra-angular and additional two smaller barriers (basal and infraparietal).

Description.

Shell conical to weakly concave-conical, light brown-yellowish in colour, opaque. It is consisting of 7–8 regularly increasing whorls separated by a moderately deep suture. All whorls rounded, weakly convex. Protoconch lighter than the rest of the shell, slightly translucent, consisting of ~ 1.25–1.5 weakly spirally striated whorls. Teleoconch finely and densely spirally striated, especially on the last ~ 3 whorls. Spiral striae strong, irregularly spaced, curved, > 40 on the last whorl in a standard view. The space between two spiral striae ranges from the width of one to the width of two or even three spiral striae. These striae are occasionally crossed by a few radial whitish streaks, randomly positioned, but mostly present on the last and the penultimate whorl. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate, slightly ascending (~ 5 ° compared to the shell axis) and making the apertural profile slightly opisthocline to the shell axis. Peristome thick, the same colour as the rest of the shell, expanded and not reflected, very finely pitted. It is especially strongly expanded at the parietal side where it leans against the penultimate whorl and forms a thick callus. Aperture equipped with four main barriers (parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, and columellar) and several smaller ones. Parietal lamella very strong and high, directed towards the lower palatal plica. Upper palatal plica very strong, developed equally as parietal lamella and slightly leaning towards the lower palatal plica. Parietal lamella and upper palatal plica are closely positioned, leaving a narrow spacing between them. Lower palatal plica is strong but weaker than the upper palatal, directed towards the embayment between columellar and parietal lamellae. Columellar lamella slightly oblique, directed towards the lower palatal plica and developed to the same extent. Between these main barriers, smaller number of minor ones are also observed. Supra-angular lamella present, small, and short, leaning towards the palatal wall. Interpalatal plica sometimes present, positioned rather obliquely. Subcolumellar lamella present as weak or absent. Basal plica present, short. A very slight thickening (swelling) like infraparietal lamella is present. This lamella is sometimes much stronger. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus large, distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture due to the strong angulo-parietal lamella and upper palatal plica. Umbilicus narrow, measuring ~ 1/8 of the shell width and with almost perpendicular walls, not showing previous whorls.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to various congeners such as A. rochebruni and A. messageri. However, it can be clearly separated from them by the separate lamellae on the parietal side (angular and parietal) and a generally more elongated shell with slightly more pronounced spiral threads. Anauchen turritus sp. nov. has spiral striation, more apertural barriers and a wider umbilicus than A. jokaii sp. nov. See also under H. annamiticum.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 4.05–4.7; SW = 2.72–3.43; AH = 1.54–1.88; AW = 0.7–0.87.

Etymology.

This species is named after the tower-shaped (turreted) shell.

Distribution.

This species is known from two localities in Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam.

Remarks.

We have observed significant intraspecific variability in this species. Shell can be high conical or conical (even weakly concave-conical). Some specimens (Fig. 32) have only six apertural barriers (supra-angular, parietal, columellar, basal, upper, and lower palatal) while others can have up to nine (including interpalatal, infraparietal and subcolumellar) (Fig. 34). Colouration is usually pale brown but colourless specimens also occur.

Anauchen utaithaniensis Panha, 2002

Figs 10Q, 35, 36, 37

Anauchen utaithaniensis Panha in Burch & Panha, 2002: 244–245, fig. 3.

Anauchen utaithaniensisTongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Panha and Burch 2008: 53–54, fig. 49; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 7.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 1997; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 041 • 2 paratypes; same data as for the holotype; SMF 331454.

Figure 35. 

Anauchen utaithaniensis, holotype (CUMZ ver. 041) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Type locality.

“Patavi Mountain, Utaithani Province, 15°28'20"N, 99°45'17"E, 70 meters elevation…” (Thailand).

Figure 36. 

Anauchen utaithaniensis, paratype (SMF 331454) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Diagnosis.

This species is most similar to A. huaykhakang and A. banmiensis but they are both spirally striated. Anauchen angthongensis is also spirally striated, has it last whorl regularly rounded and has a narrower umbilicus.

Figure 37. 

Distribution of species belonging to the genus Anauchen.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

This species shows intra-populational variation of the angulo-parietal lamella. The angulo-parietal lamella of the holotype is bifid, while that of the paratype is almost completely fused.

Bensonella Pilsbry & Vanatta, 1900

Bifidaria (Bensonella) Pilsbry & Vanatta, 1900: 591.

Boysidia (Bensonella) — Pilsbry 1917: 198.

Boysidia (Paraboysidia) Pilsbry, 1917: 174, 201.

Remarks.

We have divided the genus Bensonella in two species groups:

Group 1: Bensonella plicidens group which includes the majority of species. This group can be recognised by the combination of the following traits: i) a distinct palatal tubercle on the palatal lip (Fig. 9); ii) three barriers on the parietal side (angular, parietal, and infraparietal) (Fig. 9). Several species within the Bensonella plicidens group are not typical because they either lack a palatal tubercle or some of the three barriers on the parietal side (see remarks sections under those species).

Group 2: Bensonella wangviangensis species group includes only four species (B. wangviangensis, B. cardiostoma sp. nov., B. fracta sp. nov., and B. mitochondria sp. nov.). This group is recognised by the combination of the following traits: i) triangular-conical shell shape; ii) angular lamella as strong as the parietal or stronger, fully reaching the peristome; iii) palatal tubercle not typical but clearly represents a slightly discontinued part of the upper palatal plica (thus, it is of more lamella-like than tubercle-like). This part of the upper palatal plica is most probably homologous to the palatal tubercle found in other Bensonella species; iv) angular lamella and palatal tubercle are situated close together leaving a relatively narrow canal to the sinulus.

Figure 38. 

Distribution of A. messageri and A. rochebruni in China.

1. Bensonella plicidens group

Diagnosis. This species group is characterised by a distinct palatal tubercle on the peristome. as well as three barriers on the parietal side (angular, parietal, and infraparietal).

Remarks. The group includes 32 species distributed from eastern India all the way to northern Vietnam but also present in Japan, China, Taiwan, and south to Indonesia.

Bensonella alycaeus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39A, 40, 41, 100

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 1.6 mm, SW: 1.3 mm); Chiang Rai Province, Doi Thung; 20°20.533'N, 99°50.350'E; 1320 m a.s.l.; 08 May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg. UF 347144. Paratypes. Thailand • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14433 • 7 shells; same data as for holotype; UF 591340 • 1 shell; Chiang Rai Province, Doi Tung, 50 meters before Wat Phra That Doi Tung, vicinity of the parking lot; 20°19.563'N, 99°49.990'E; 1350 m a.s.l.; 12 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell (juvenile, not paratype); same data as for holotype; UF 583721.

Type locality.

Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Doi Thung; 20°20.533'N, 99°50.350'E; 1320 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with a triangular-conical shell and strongly radially ribbed last whorl, especially near the aperture. Palatal plicae very strong. Umbilicus very narrow and elongated, dot-like.

Description.

Shell triangular, conical-ovoid, brown, consisting of 4.5–5 convex, rounded whorls separated by a moderately deep suture. Protoconch spirally striated (~ 12–15 spiral striae). The protoconch is initially light in colour and then regularly darkening towards the teleoconch. Teleoconch surface very finely spirally striated, striae much weaker than on the protoconch. On the penultimate whorl, relatively coarse, weak, radial growth lines are visible. They become more densely arranged and more prominent on the last whorl and especially near the aperture where they are rib-like (important for species identification!). They are crossed by very delicate and widely spaced spiral striae. Last whorl rounded and adnate to the penultimate. It is slightly ascending near the aperture (~ 20 ° compared to the shell axis), making the aperture profile weakly opisthocline. Peristome lighter than the rest of the shell, not much expanded and not reflected. There is a slight thickening behind the peristome in form of a cervical crest. Aperture equipped with 10–12 barriers. Parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture, long and curved, sinuated in its middle part. Angular lamella long, thin, and continuous, reaching the peristome. There are four main palatal plicae (upper palatal, two interpalatals, and a lower palatal) and usually one smaller suprapalatal plica. Upper palatal plica strong, highest in its middle part and getting lower towards the peristome. Interpalatal plicae similar to each other and the upper palatal. Lower palatal plica is the strongest. There is a strong palatal tubercle sitting on the palatal lip of the peristome, sometimes of almost rectangular shape. Peristome is distinctly sinuated behind this tubercle. Below the palatal tubercle, there are usually one or two more tubercle-like swellings which are of unknown homology. Basal plica very weak and short. Columellar lamella almost horizontal and slightly weaker than upper and lower palatal plicae. Infraparietal lamella similar to the basal plica. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus small, narrow, and distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus very narrow, dot like and elongated.

Figure 39. 

Synoptic view of the species belonging to Bensonella plicidens group A B. alycaeus sp. nov. B B. boettgeri C B. cristatissima sp. nov. D B. dha sp. nov. E B. dracula sp. nov. F B. exploda sp. nov. G B. geminounca H B. hooki I B. karoensis J B. lakainguta K B. lophiodera L B. microdentata sp. nov. M B. mirabilis sp. nov. N B. montawa sp. nov. O B. multidentata sp. nov. P B. multihami Q B. nitens sp. nov. R B. nordsiecki S B. obex sp. nov. T B. pahpetensis U B. palatotridens V B. pangmapaensis W B. paviei X B. perfecta sp. nov. Y B. plicidens Z B. sericata sp. nov. AA B. serrata sp. nov. AB B. spelaea sp. nov. AC B. spinosa sp. nov. AD B. taiyaiorum AE B. tamphathai.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is different from other congeners by the strong, rib-like radial growth lines, especially on the last whorl near the aperture and very strong palatal plicae.

Figure 40. 

Bensonella alycaeus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 347144) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 1.55–1.78; SW = 1.3–1.57; AH = 0.65–0.80; AW = 0.65–0.70.

Etymology.

The specific epithet refers to the cyclophoroid subfamily Alycaeinae W. T. Blanford, 1864 due to the changing rib density on the last whorl. To be used as a noun in apposition.

Figure 41. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella alycaeus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 347144) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Bensonella boettgeri (Möllendorff, 1897)

Figs 39B, 42, 43, 60

Boysidia boettgeri Möllendorff, 1897: 70.

Boysidia (Paraboysidia) boettgeri — Pilsbry 1917: 208–209, pl. 34, figs 7, 8.

Paraboysidia boettgerivan Benthem Jutting 1950: 38; van Benthem Jutting 1952: 318; Zilch 1984: 164; Maassen 1999: 123.

Boysidia novemdentata Saurin, 1953: 115–116, fig. 1, pl. 4, fig. 4a–c. syn. nov.

Boysidia novemdentataInkhavilay et al. 2019: 59, fig. 26B.

Bensonella novemdentataInkhavilay and Sutcharit 2024: 444, fig. 4.

Type material examined.

Indonesia • lectotype of B. boettgeri; W Java; collector unknown; SMF 4616. Laos • 1 syntype of B. novemdentata; Pah Hia, Laos; collector unknown; MNHN-IM-2000-33881.

Additional material examined.

India • 6 shells; Nagaland, Naga hills; UF 00112290/5, UF 179749/1 • 3 shells; Eastern Naga Hills; W. Doherty leg.; NHMUK 1903.7.1.2853.

Type localities.

Java, Indonesia (B. boettgeri); “environs du village méo de Pah Hia, à 100 kilomètres au Sud de Xieng-Khouang, chef-lieu de la province du Tran Ninh, Laos” (probably refers to Ban Namthong, Longchaeng District, Xaisomboun Province, Laos, see Páll-Gergely et al. 2016) (B. novemdentata).

Differential diagnosis.

Even though there are no peculiarities regarding the apertural dentition of this species, it can be separated from all its congeners by the far most triangular, elongated shell and relatively shallow suture.

Figure 42. 

Bensonella boettgeri A–D lectotype (SMF 4616) E–H syntype of B. novemdentata (MNHN-IM-2000-33881).

Distribution.

This species is described from Java, Indonesia, but is also known from its synonym (B. novemdentata) in Laos. It has also been found in E India.

Figure 43. 

Bensonella boettgeri from Naga hills, India (NHMUK 1903.7.1.2853) A–D shell E–G enlarged apertural views.

Remarks.

Boysidia novemdentata was described from northeastern Laos, > 2800 km from the type locality of B. boettgeri. However, these two species are virtually identical in shell morphology. See the discussion section.

Bensonella cristatissima Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39C, 44, 45, 100

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 1.77 mm, SW: 1.51 mm); Shan State, Taunggyi, mountainside above Aye Say Tee, Dragon Cave; 20°47.489'N, 97°3.036'E; 1380 m a.s.l.; 08 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14434. Paratypes. Myanmar • 95 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG • 27 shells Shan State, west-southwest from Taunggyi, Montawa cave; 20°45.282'N, 97°1.057'E; 1260 m a.s.l.; 05 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 10 shells; Shan State, Hopong centre ca 22 km towards Namsang, Hkoche, near Htem Sann Cave; 20°49.084'N, 97°20.119'E; 1240 m a.s.l.; 06 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA.

Additional material examined.

Myanmar • 4 shells (3 juveniles and 1 broken, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Myanmar Shan State, Taunggyi, mountainside above Aye Say Tee, Dragon Cave; 20°47.489'N, 97°3.036'E; 1380 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

A small Bensonella species with fine, finely dimpled teleoconch sculpture, rounded last whorl adnate to the penultimate, and a strong, sharp cervical crest right behind the expanding peristome. Palatal plicae long and equally developed; umbilicus very narrow to almost closed.

Figure 44. 

Bensonella cristatissima Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14434) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell triangular, slightly conical-ovoid, brownish or yellowish, weakly glossy. It is consisting of 4.5–5 regularly increasing, convex, rounded whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch consisting of ~ 1.5 coarsely spirally striated whorls. There are ~ 13 spiral striae on the protoconch and they are more densely arranged at the bottom of the whorl. Teleoconch surface finely dimpled (pasty) and with not numerous, weak radial growth lines. Spiral striae present initially on the teleoconch but getting lost so that the surface remains finely pasty-like or a very weak spiralling pattern might be visible (only on SEM images). Last whorl rounded, adnate to the penultimate. Right behind the peristome, there is a strong, thick, sharp, white cervical crest which is wider than the peristome and even visible behind it in the apertural view. Peristome thick and expanded but not reflected. Aperture equipped with numerous barriers, four of which are particularly strong (angular, parietal, infraparietal, and columellar), and situated closer to the peristome edge. Parietal lamella is the strongest and highest in the aperture. Angular lamella much longer than the parietal, very slender but continuous. Its inner and outer parts are higher than its middle part. Columellar lamella similar in length to the parietal only slightly weaker. This lamella is almost horizontal but sometimes slightly curved towards the palatal plicae. Infraparietal lamella is roughly half as strong as the parietal. Palatal plicae equidistant, all of equal height and length, altogether four (one upper palatal, two interpalatals, and a lower palatal). They are all high at their inner parts and then regularly lowering and tapering towards their outer parts. Palatal tubercle moderately strong or absent. Basal plica present, the same length as the palatals or slightly shorter. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus small and narrow (resembling a comma sign), distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus very narrow (measuring ~ 1/10 of the shell width) or even dot-like, almost closed.

Figure 45. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella cristatissima Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14434) A protoconch surface B surface of the last whorl C apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

See under B. dha sp. nov.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 1.77–1.86; SW = 1.45–1.52; AH = 0.73–0.80; AW = 0.63–0.76.

Etymology.

This species is named for the strong cervical crest which is the strongest among all the congeners.

Distribution.

This species in known from three localities in Shan State, Myanmar.

Bensonella dha Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39D, 46, 47, 97

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 1.9 mm, SW: 1.3 mm); Shan State, 5.8 km from centre of Hopong towards Namsang, left side of road #4, Hopong Spring Cave; 20°49.028'N, 97°13.469'E; 1110 m a.s.l.; 06 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14435.

Paratypes. Myanmar • 34 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG.

Type locality.

Myanmar, Shan State, 5.8 km from centre of Hopong towards Namsang, left side of road #4, Hopong Spring Cave; 20°49.028'N, 97°13.469'E; 1110 m a.s.l.

Additional material examined.

Myanmar • 2 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 4 shells; Shan State, 22 km from centre of Hopong towards Namsang, Htem Sann Cave; 20°49.0836'N, 97°20.1192'E; 1240 m a.s.l.; 06 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 2 shells; Shan State, 13.5 km east-southeast from centre Kalaw, Myinmati Taung; 20°35.426'N, 96°36.794'E; 1350 m a.s.l.; 03 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J. U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 11 shells; Shan State, 7.4 km from centre of Hopong towards Namsang, 5 km north on road #4, Parpant cave; 20°50.963'N, 97°14.267'E; 1170 m a.s.l.; 06 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J. U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 4 shells; Shan State, Kalaw, Shwe Oo Min Paya; 20°37.2616'N, 96°33.4735'E; 1340 m a.s.l.; 02 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with conical shell which is not spirally striated. Apertural barriers numerous (angular, parietal, five palatals, one basal, one subcolumellar, one columellar, and one infraparietal) and with additional, strong palatal tubercle. Aperture well rounded.

Description.

Shell conical to conical-ovoid, light brownish and weakly glossy, consisting of 4.25–5.5 convex rounded whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch roughly pitted, sometimes with a spiralling pattern and consisting of ~ 1.5–1.75 whorls. Teleoconch with fine pasty structure, not spirally striated but with very fine radial growth lines. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate, aperture profile only slightly prosocline to the shell axis due to the slightly descending last whorl (~ 15 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome slightly lighter than the rest of the shell, expanded but not reflected. It is particularly expanded on the parietal side where it forms a weak callus which is leaned on the penultimate whorl. Aperture equipped with moderately strong, numerous barriers. Parietal lamella moderately strong and high. Angular lamella longer but overall weaker than the parietal. It is higher in its inner part and regularly tapering towards the peristome, which is not reached. There are two or three very weak barriers inside the sinulus. Palatal wall equipped with five long barriers (suprapalatal, upper palatal, interpalatal, lower palatal, and infrapalatal) and a single strong palatal tubercle sitting on the edge of the palatal lip. Suprapalatal plica weak, not much stronger than the sinulus plicae. Upper palatal plica only slightly stronger than the suprapalatal. Interpalatal moderate. Lower palatal is the strongest among all the palatal plicae. Infrapalatal weak and shorter than others. Basal plica developed to the same extent as the infrapalatal. Subcolumellar lamella weak and short (nearly the same as the basal and infrapalatal). Columellar lamella strong as the lower palatal, almost horizontal. Infraparietal lamella moderate, ~ ½ as strong as the columellar. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus small and not very distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus very narrow, dot-like.

Figure 46. 

Bensonella dha Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14435).A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from B. cristatissima sp. nov. by the thinner peristome, less elongated apertural barriers and by the absence of a strong and sharp cervical crest.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 13). SH = 1.56–2.02; SW = 1.14–1.53; AH = 0.64–0.78; AW = 0.64–0.73.

Etymology.

Named after the Burmese word for sword/knife (dha) referring to the blade-like anterior part of the palatal plicae. To be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is known from five localities in Shan State, Myanmar.

Remarks.

We have observed some intraspecific variability between the populations. The population from Shwe Oo Min Paya is the smallest and with the most ovoid shell. While the populations from Myinmati Taung and Parpant cave were the most triangular with slightly shallower sutures.

Figure 47. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella dha Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14435) A protoconch surface B surface of the last whorl C apertural view.

Bensonella dracula Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39E, 48, 49, 50, 51, 97

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 2 mm, SW: 1.6 mm); Shan State, 22 km from centre of Hopong towards Namsang, Hkoche, near Htem Sann Cave; 20°49.084'N, 97°20.119'E; 1240 m a.s.l.; 06 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14436. Paratypes. Myanmar • 16 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Myanmar, Shan State, 22 km from centre of Hopong towards Namsang, Hkoche, near Htem Sann Cave; 20°49.084'N, 97°20.119'E; 1240 m a.s.l.

Additional material examined.

Myanmar • 3 shells; Shan State, Pinlaung centre SSW 11 km – Laneli Bridge, Nam Pam, near “Upper Spider Cave”; 20°2.114'N, 96°45.728'E; 1420 m a.s.l.; 04 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Myanmar, Kayah State, Hpruso district, Maw Thi Do Village, entrance of Phruno river cave; 19°22.744'N, 97°2.570'E; 12 Feb. 2019; J. Grego leg.; coll. JG.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with triangular, conical-ovoid shell and rounded whorls devoid of spiral striation. There are two palatal tubercles in front of a strong and frontally concave transversal plica. A single, strong basal plica present.

Figure 48. 

Bensonella dracula Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14436) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell triangular, conical-ovoid, consisting of 5–5.5 rounded, convex whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch consisting of ~ 1.25–1.5 roughly pitted whorls. Teleoconch devoid of spiral striation but with some fine radial growth lines, otherwise smooth, pasty. Last whorl adnate to penultimate. Aperture profile slightly opisthocline to the shell axis due to the very slightly ascending last whorl (~ 5 ° compared to the shell axis). In this view, a weak cervical crest could be observed behind the peristome. Peristome thick, expanded (especially on the parietal side where it forms a thick callus) but not reflected. Sinulus small and distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Aperture equipped with nine barriers (angular, parietal, upper palatal, transversal, two palatal tubercles, basal, columellar, and infraparietal). Parietal lamella very strong and high, curved and blade-like. Angular lamella much weaker and lower but longer, reaching the expanding peristome. Upper palatal plica moderate, higher in its middle parts. Transversal plica strong and with its frontal surface concave. In front of the transversal plica, there are two strong palatal tubercles. The upper one (usually present in all Bensonella species) is narrower and more acute. The lower palatal tubercle is wider and blunter. Basal plica present, short and ~ ½ as strong as the columellar lamella. The latter is strong, wide, and almost horizontal. Infraparietal lamella as strong as the basal plica. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Umbilicus very narrow and slightly elongated, dot-like.

Figure 49. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella dracula Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14436) A protoconch surface B surface of the last whorl C apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

See under B. nordsiecki, B. obex sp. nov. and B. taiyaiorum.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 6). SH = 1.80–2.21; SW = 1.44–1.80; AH = 0.64–0.96; AW = 0.62–0.94.

Etymology.

Two strong palatal tubercles of this species resemble teeth of a vampire. The specific epithet refers to the iconic vampire, Count Dracula. To be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is known from the surroundings of Hopong and Pinlaung in Shan State, as well as Phruno river cave, Kayah State.

Remarks.

Specimens from Pinlaung (Shan) have a shorter transversal plica and have slightly more slender shells (Fig. 50). Specimen from the Phruno river cave in Kayah State has a more ovoid shell (Fig. 51).

Figure 50. 

Bensonella dracula Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov. from Pinlaung (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 51. 

Bensonella dracula Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely sp. nov. from Phruno river cave A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Bensonella exploda Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39F, 52, 53, 54, 100

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 1.8 mm, SW: 1.8 mm); Shan State, Pinlaung centre N 7.5 km, Tar Kge, near “Big Bang Cave”; 20°10.273'N, 96°47.442'E; 1540 m a.s.l.; 04 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14446. Paratypes. Myanmar • 32 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG.

Additional material examined.

Myanmar • 3 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 149 shells; Shan State, 5.7 km south-southwest from centre of Pinlaung, Wingabar Taung; 20°4.152'N, 96°46.232'E; 1510 m a.s.l.; 04 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Myanmar, Shan State, Pinlaung centre N 7.5 km, Tar Kge, near “Big Bang Cave”; 20°10.273'N, 96°47.442'E; 1540 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Colourless Bensonella species with triangular conical-ovoid and spirally striated whorls. Last whorl slightly ascending near the aperture. Aperture equipped with eight strong barriers (angular, parietal, infraparietal, columellar, lower palatal, interpalatal, upper palatal, and a palatal tubercle). Umbilicus narrow but clearly wider than in majority of congeners.

Figure 52. 

Bensonella exploda Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14446) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Description.

Shell strongly triangular, conical-ovoid, colourless, consisting of 5–5.5 regularly growing whorls separated by a moderately deep suture. All whorls rounded, convex. Protoconch-teleoconch boundary not clearly visible due to the similar surface sculpture and colouration. Protoconch with ten coarsely and equidistantly spaced spiral striae. Teleoconch also spirally striated but additionally with coarse radial growth lines which are roughly equidistant. Spacing between two spiral striae irregular, it ranges from the width of two to the width of four spiral striae. Last whorl flat at its base, adnate to the penultimate (but peristome not fully leaning on it), slightly ascending near the aperture (~ 5 ° compared to the shell axis) making the apertural profile weakly opisthocline to the shell axis. Peristome white, expanded but not reflected. Sinulus well-rounded and distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Aperture equipped with eight barriers (angular, parietal, infraparietal, columellar, lower palatal, interpalatal, upper palatal, and a palatal tubercle). All barriers relatively strong. Parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture and wavy. Angular lamella is longer than the parietal and reaching closer to the expanding peristome. It is sinuated in its middle part. Infraparietal lamella ~ 1.5 × weaker than the columellar, short. Columellar lamella strong as the lower palatal or slightly stronger. It is positioned obliquely to the shell axis, directed towards the parietal lamella. Basal plica absent. Palatal plicae all equally strong and relatively short, upper palatal is usually the shortest. Interpalatal situated halfway between the upper and lower palatal. Palatal tubercle prominent, sitting on the palatal lip and roughly in the level with upper palatal plica. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Umbilicus narrow (but clearly wider than in the majority of congeners), measuring ~ 1/8–1/9 of the shell width.

Figure 53. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella exploda Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14446) A protoconch surface B surface of the last whorl C apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from other congeners by the combination of the flat base of the last whorl, spirally striated whorls, and wider umbilicus.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 1.77–1.89; SW = 1.58–1.71; AH = 0.71–0.77; AW = 0.66–0.68.

Etymology.

This species is named exploda after its type locality, the “Big Bang Cave”.

Distribution.

This species is known only from two localities in Shan State, Pinlaung.

Remarks.

The specimens from Wingabar Taung (Fig. 54) share all the characters with the specimens from Big Bang Cave but have weaker apertural barriers.

Figure 54. 

Bensonella exploda Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov. from Wingabar Taung, Shan State (coll. HA) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Bensonella fengxianensis (D.-N. Chen, Y.-H. Liu & W.-X. Wu, 1995)

Figs 55, 56

Boysidia fengxianensis Chen, Liu & Wu, 1995: 275–276 (Chinese description), 276–277 (English description), fig. 2.

Bensonella fengxianensisSchileyko 1998: 140; Páll-Gergely and White 2023: 2016.

Boysidia (Boysidia) fengxianensisChen and Zhang 2002: 692.

Boysidia (Bensonella) fengxianensisZhang et al. 2014: 572.

Material examined.

China • 7 shells; Shaanxi province, Chang’an district, subtropical broadleaf forest, 1.2 km SE Xiaoqian Goukou village; 33°57.709'N, 108°45.868'E; 780 m a.s.l.; 08 July 2010; D.M. Palatov leg.; coll. JG • 4 shells; Hubei, Enshi Tujiazu Miaozu Zizhizhou, Enshi Shi, Taiyanghe Xian, Suobuya Shilin Jingqu, split rock; 30°34.663'N, 108°34.401'E; 975 m a.s.l.; 06 Nov. 2010; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Hubei, Enshi Tujiazu Miaozu Zizhizhou, Badong Xian, E Badong, Bashan Senlin Gongyuan (near Xinglingzhen); 31°01.472'N, 110°25.284'E; 225 m; 03 Nov. 2011; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Longfengyan, Hengjiangqiaoxiang, Jingzhoumiaozudongzuzizhixian, Hunansheng; 26°27.382'N, 109°34.650'E; 357 m a.s.l.; K. Ohara, K. Okubo, J. U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 5 shells; Sanjiaoyan. Zhilouzangzuxiang, Wenxian, Gansusheng Wenxian, Gansasheng; 32°53.180′N,, 104°24.672'E; 1646 m a.s.l.; Y. Nakahara, K. Okubo, J. U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 1 shell; along walking path below Cuying Lake (翠映湖), Qingchenghoushan (青城后山), Qingchengshanzhen (青城山镇), Dujiangyanshì (都江堰市), Chengdushì (成都市), Sìchuansheng (四川省); 30°56.2302'N, 103°28.7484'E; 1310 m a.s.l.; A. Hunyadi, T. Ishibe, K. Okubo, J. U. Otani, M. Szekeres leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

“Fengxian County (33°08'N, 106°05'E), Shaanxi Province” (China).

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

We could not locate the type specimens of this species. The original illustration of the holotype is inadequate. Based on the presence of the palatal tubercle, arrangement of apertural barriers, and shell shape, this species must belong to Bensonella (as already suggested by Páll-Gergely and White 2023). The specimens examined by us, collected in Shaanxi province (China) where the type locality of B. fengxianensis is located, may belong to this species, but this cannot be confirmed due to the absence of the type specimen. The same can be said for other samples in the nearby provinces (see Fig. 56).

Figure 55. 

Bensonella cf. fengxianensis from Shaanxi Province (coll. JG) A–D shell E–G enlarged views of the aperture.

Figure 56. 

Distribution map of Bensonella cf. fengxianensis.

Bensonella geminounca Jirapatrasilp & Tongkerd, 2024

Figs 39G, 57, 100

Bensonella geminounca Jirapatrasilp & Tongkerd in Jirapatrasilp et al. 2024: 90–91, fig. 2.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 27. May 1997, S. Panha, J. B. Burch, P. Dumrongrojwattana leg.; CUMZ 14366.

Type locality.

“Doi Chiang Dao, Chiang Dao Wildlife Sanctuary, Chiang Dao District, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand (19°22′046.3″N, 098°51′08.1″E, 2,015 m a.m.s.l.)”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species has a unique appearance of the infraparietal lamella which readily distinguishes it from all other congeners: it is consisting of two hooked parts pointing toward each other, outer (pointing inwards) and inner (pointing outwards).

Figure 57. 

Bensonella geminounca, holotype (CUMZ 14366) (from Jirapatrasilp et al. 2024) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural view G enlarged view of the protoconch.

Distribution.

This species is known from different altitudes at the type locality (altitude range: 1650–2015 m).

Bensonella hooki Páll-Gergely, 2023

Figs 39H, 58

Bensonella hooki Páll-Gergely in Páll-Gergely and White 2023: 2023–2025, figs 6, 9c, d.

Type material examined.

India • holotype; Godwin-Austen coll.; NHMUK 20191114.

Type locality.

“…Cherrapunji…” (India).

Differential diagnosis.

See under B. lakainguta, B. montawa sp. nov., B. multihami, B. plicidens and B. spinosa sp. nov.

Distribution.

SE and SW Himalaya region.

Remarks.

After long-lasting taxonomic confusion, it has been shown that this species (hooked apertural barriers) is distinct from B. plicidens (blunt barriers) even though both “forms” were found mixed together in the same specimen lot (for details see Páll-Gergely and White 2023).

Figure 58. 

Bensonella hooki, holotype (NHMUK 20191114) A–D shell E–I enlarged apertural views (from Páll-Gergely and White 2023).

Bensonella karoensis Maassen, 1999

Figs 39I, 59, 60

Bensonella karoensis Maassen, 1999: 123–126, figs 8, 9.

Type material examined.

Indonesia • holotype; Jul 1996; W. Maassen leg.; RMNH.Moll.84438.

Type locality.

“N. Sumatra, Karo Highlands, Kuta Buluh, 40 km N of Brastagi, near the entrance of the cave Liangdehar in leaf litter at the foot of limestone rocks”.

Differential diagnosis.

See under B. plicidens.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

This species is known only by a holotype (Maassen 1999).

Figure 59. 

Bensonella karoensis, holotype (RMNH.Moll.84438) A–F shell.

Figure 60. 

Distribution map of Bensonella boettgeri and B. karoensis.

Bensonella lakainguta C.-C. Hwang, 2014

Figs 39J, 61

Bensonella plicidens lakainguta Hwang, 2014: 18–19, figs 2–4.

Boysidia (Bensonella) qingliangfengensis Fang, Wang & Chen, 2015: 692, fig. 1.

Bensonella lakaingutaPáll-Gergely and White 2023: 2025–2026, figs 7, 8, 9e–h.

Bensonella qingliangfengensisPáll-Gergely and White 2023: 2020, fig. 7d–f.

Type material examined.

Taiwan • holotype; 27 Aug. 1998, C-C. Hwang leg.; NMNS-7244-00.

Additional material examined.

Japan • 4 shells; limestone outcrop along forest rd., upstream Ugui-gawa, Aiga, Tsuchiyama-cho, Koka, Shiga; 34°57.9108'N, 136°22.185'E; 461 m a.s.l.; Kawase, J. U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB.

Type locality.

“TAIWAN: Mt. Zhibenzhushan, Wutai, Pingdung, 22°43'32.6"N, 120°52'50.2"E, alt. 2100 m”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from B. hooki by its more triangular shell, more pointed apex, and parietal callus adnate to the penultimate whorl (not so in B. hooki, see Páll-Gergely and White 2023). For differences from B. montawa sp. nov., B. multihami, B. plicidens, and B. spinosa sp. nov. see under those species.

Figure 61. 

Bensonella lakainguta, holotype (NMNS-7244-00) A–D shell E–I enlarged apertural views (from Páll-Gergely and White 2023).

Distribution.

This species is well known from Japan as well as Taiwan and China (where it is known from a synonym, B. qingliangfengensis) (Fang et al. 2015; Páll-Gergely and White 2023).

Remarks.

This species was originally described as a subspecies of B. plicidens. Páll-Gergely and White (2023) have shown that it is distinct as it has hooked and not blunt apertural barriers, so. B. plicidens does not inhabit Japan and Taiwan where only B. lakainguta occurs.

Bensonella lophiodera Tongkerd & Panha, 2024

Figs 39K, 62, 63, 97

Bensonella lophiodera Tongkerd & Panha in Tongkerd et al. 2024: 176–178, figs 7C, 9, 13I.

Type material examined.

Myanmar • holotype; collector unknown; CUMZ 14378.

Additional material examined.

Myanmar • 158 shells; Shan State, NNE of Kalaw, Osei Mountain Pagoda NW 150 m; 20°39.320'N, 96°34.927'E; 1565 m a.s.l.; 03 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 181 shells; Shan State, Kalaw ESE 13.5 km, Myinmati Taung; 20°35.4264'N, 96°36.7938'E; 1350 m a.s.l.; 03 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg; coll. HA.

Type locality.

“Myinmati Cave, Kalaw Township, Taunggyi District, Shan State, Myanmar (20°35'24.6"N, 96°36'42.1"E; 1312 m a.s.l.)”.

Differential diagnosis.

The shell of this species is relatively large when compared to other geographically approximate congeners and the transversal palatal plica is rather weak and small. See under B. taiyaiorum.

Distribution.

This species is known from three localities in Kalaw.

Remarks.

This species lacks the palatal tubercle but is still clearly a member of Bensonella because of the triangular-conical shell shape and three barriers on the parietal side. In our specimens collected from Osei Mountain Pagoda (see above under “Material examined”), there is a transversal plica which is usually only partly merged, i.e., interpalatal and lower palatal plicae are clearly discernible (Fig. 63). Even though in the original description, this barrier is listed as a lower palatal, we believe that it is actually a transversal plica but just much weaker than in other congeners. Furthermore, Tongkerd et al. (2024: fig. 9C) shows a lower palatal plica that is wider than normal and positioned transversally indicating the fusion of the interpalatal and lower palatal plicae. Otherwise, our examined specimens fit perfectly in the description of B. lophiodera by all shell characters (size, colour, shape, surface sculpture, and apertural dentition).

Figure 62. 

Bensonella lophiodera, holotype (CUMZ 14378) (from Tongkerd et al. 2024) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 63. 

Bensonella lophiodera from Shan, Kalaw (Myanmar) (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Bensonella microdentata Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39L, 64, 65, 95

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2 mm; SW: 1.5 mm); Lampang Province limestone dome at pass 11 km SSW of Ban Pang La; 18°27.9667'N, 99°48.3833'E; 610 m a.s.l.; 14. May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; UF 346912. Paratypes. Thailand • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; CUMZ14437 • 6 shells; same data as for holotype; UF 591333.

Figure 64. 

Bensonella microdentata Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 346912) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 3 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as the holotype; UF 583726.

Type locality.

Thailand, Lampang Province limestone dome at pass 11 km SSW of Ban Pang La; 18°27.9667'N, 99°48.3833'E; 610 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with concave-conical, glossy shell that is spirally striated. Apertural barriers (usually eight or nine) and the surface around them prominently spiniferous.

Description.

Shell slightly concave-conical, glossy, light brownish, consisting of 5–5.5 convex and rounded whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch spirally striated, its boundary with the teleoconch not clear. There are ~ 12 widely spaced spiral striae on the protoconch and they are stronger at the base of the whorl. Teleoconch with relatively coarsely spaced, raised spiral striae (space between two striae equals the width of two or three striae) and with fine radial growth lines. On initial teleoconch whorls, radial lines are more densely arranged (similar to the spacing between the spiral striae) and are crossing the spiral striae forming a reticulated sculpture. Towards the last whorl, radial lines become coarser and the reticulated sculpture becomes weaker. Last whorl rounded, adnate to the penultimate, slightly descending near the aperture (~ 20 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome whitish, expanded but not reflected. Sinulus parabolic due to the position of the angular lamella and the palatal tubercle. Aperture equipped with numerous barriers which have the typical Bensonella arrangement. These are: angular, parietal, upper palatal, interpalatal, lower palatal, palatal tubercle, basal, columellar, and infraparietal. Parietal lamella strong and moderately high, angular separated into inner and outer parts of almost equal height and width and a strong sinuation between them. Upper and interpalatal plicae positioned close together and almost equally as strong. Lower palatal plica situated some distance from other palatals and stronger than both of them. Palatal tubercle strong and sitting on the edge of the palatal lip. Basal plica weak, low, and short. Columellar lamella nearly as strong as the lower palatal. Infraparietal lamella only very slightly stronger than the basal plica. Surface of all apertural barriers is roughly spiniferous. Umbilicus narrow but relatively deep, measuring ~ 1/6 of the shell width.

Figure 65. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella microdentata Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 346912) A protoconch surface B surface of the last whorl C apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is most similar to B. nitens (see under that species for differences). See also under B. paviei and B. tamphathai.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 4). SH = 1.73–2; SW = 1.47–1.61; AH = 0.73–0.83; AW = 0.63–0.75.

Etymology.

This species is named for its small apertural barriers.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Bensonella mirabilis Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39M, 66, 67, 95

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 2.05 mm, SW: 1.65 mm); Kayah State, Hpruso district, Maw Thi Do, road towards Han Li village, under bridge over Phruno river; 19°22.966'N, 97°2.153'E; 12 Feb. 2019; J. Grego leg.; CUMZ14438. Paratypes. Myanmar • 9 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. JG • 13 shells; Kayah state, Hpruso district, Maw Thi Do Village, entrance of Phruno river cave; 19°22.744'N, 97°2.570'E; 12 Feb. 2019; J. Grego leg.; coll. JG • 1 shell; same data as previous; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as previous; coll. VG • 2 shells; Kayah State, Hpruso distr., Hoyar village, Kwar Yin cave; 19°18.096'N, 96°56.396'E; 13 Feb. 2019; J. Grego leg.; coll. JG • 1 shell; Kayah state, Hpruso district, Maw Thi Do, road towards Han Li village, rocks above bridge over Phruno river; 19°23.011'N, 97°2.108'E; 12 Feb. 2019; J. Grego leg.; coll. JG.

Additional material examined.

Myanmar • 5 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. JG.

Type locality.

Myanmar, Kayah State, Hpruso district, Maw Thi Do, road towards Han Li village, under bridge over Phruno river; 19°22.966'N, 97°2.153'E.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with seven apertural barriers and a prominent hooked upper palatal plica which is pointing laterally (toward the palatal wall).

Description.

Shell triangular, slightly conical-ovoid, brownish, consisting of 5–5.5 whorls separated by a deep suture. All whorls rounded, convex, regularly increasing. Protoconch coarsely spirally striated, ~ 1.5 whorls. Spiral striae much more prominent terminally on the protoconch. Teleoconch with a fine pasty surface sculpture, without spiral striae but with fine radial growth lines. Last whorl rounded, adnate to the penultimate and straight near the aperture. Peristome brownish as the rest of the shell, expanded but not reflected. It is leaning on the penultimate whorl in form of a strong but not much expanded parietal callus. Palatal side of the peristome sinuated in its middle part, next to the palatal tubercle. Behind the expanding peristome, a weak cervical crest is present. Sinulus small and narrow, distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Aperture subrectangular, equipped with a smaller number of barriers (angular, parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, columellar, infraparietal and palatal tubercle) than usual in Bensonella. Parietal lamella long but not reaching the expanding peristome. Angular lamella consisting of two separated parts: inner, which is slightly curved and positioned deeper in the aperture and outer part which is reaching the peristome edge. There is a strong sinuation between the inner and outer parts of the angular lamella. Palatal wall equipped with upper and lower palatal plica. Upper palatal plica of very peculiar appearance: it is very high with a hook positioned laterally (not pointing outside but directly to the palatal wall). Lower palatal plica nearly as strong as the parietal lamella. In front of the upper palatal plica, on the peristome edge, a strong palatal tubercle is observed. Columellar lamella rather weak. Above the columellar lamella, one additional infraparietal is present and it is nearly equally strong as the columellar. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Umbilicus oblique (slightly elongated) and narrow, measuring ~ 1/6–1/7 of the shell width.

Figure 66. 

Bensonella mirabilis Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14438) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is easily distinguished from all other congeners by the presence of a laterally hooked upper palatal plica.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2.03–2.16; SW = 1.52–1.70; AH = 0.80–0.88; AW = 0.77–0.82

Etymology.

Named for the remarkable upper palatal plica (laterally hooked).

Figure 67. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella mirabilis Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14438) A protoconch surface B surface of the last whorl C apertural view.

Distribution.

Known from four sampling sites in Kayah state, Hpruso district.

Bensonella montawa Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39N, 68, 95

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 1.8 mm, SW: 1.5 mm); Shan State, west-southwest from Taunggyi, Montawa cave; 20°45.282'N, 97°1.057'E; 1260 m a.s.l.; 05 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14471. Paratypes. Myanmar • 30 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Myanmar, Shan State, west-southwest from Taunggyi, Montawa cave; 20°45.282'N, 97°1.057'E; 1260 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

A Bensonella species with conical, pale yellowish shell. Aperture equipped with numerous barriers, all of which are in form of sharp hooks pointing outside. Parietal lamella with a blunt but long projection in front of the hook, almost reaching the expanding peristome. Umbilicus narrow, dot-like.

Figure 68. 

Bensonella montawa Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14471) A–D shell E enlarged protoconch view F, G enlarged views of the aperture H enlarged view of the last whorl surface.

Description.

Shell pale yellowish, triangular, conical ovoid, whorls 4–4.5, convex, rounded, rather regularly increasing. Protoconch consisting of ~ 1.25 whorls, showing spiralling pattern but with no clear spiral striae. Teleoconch with pasty surface, not spirally striated but with coarsely spaced, irregular radial growth lines. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate and slightly ascending near the aperture (~ 15–20 ° compared to the shell axis) making the aperture profile opisthocline to the shell axis. Peristome strongly expanded, not reflected. Aperture equipped with numerous barriers, all of which are in form of sharp hooks pointing outside the aperture. All barriers have low, slender projections situated in front of the hooks. A blunt, knob-like palatal tubercle sits anterior to the upper palatal plica on the peristome edge. Parietal lamella in form of a strong hook. A blunt, outer part of the parietal lamella is in form of a low, narrow, and blunt projection (situated in front of the hooked part) almost reaching the peristome edge. Angular lamella strong, consisting of inner and outer part separated by a strong sinuation. Inner part smaller, hooked, pointing towards the outer part which is larger but blunt. There are four weak barriers inside the sinulus. Upper palatal plica ~ 2 × weaker than the parietal and situated slightly above the palatal tubercle. First interpalatal plica as strong as the upper palatal, situated slightly below the palatal tubercle. Second interpalatal plica slightly weaker than the first. Lower palatal plica as strong as the first interpalatal and upper palatal. Infrapalatal plica small, as strong as the basal and subcolumellar. These three plicae are roughly equidistant. Above the subcolumellar, there is a clearly stronger columellar (similar in strength to the lower palatal plica) and one slightly stronger supracolumellar. Infraparietal lamella ~ 1/3 weaker than the parietal, with a similar (but shorter) projection in front of the hooked part. There are also some barrier-like swellings, although they never develop into a proper barrier. They can be e.g., between the upper palatal and first interpalatal plica, between the columellar and supracolumellar lamellae, between the supracolumellar and infraparietal lamellae, between the infraparietal and parietal lamellae. Surface of all apertural barriers is smooth. Sinulus parabolic, well separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus very narrow, dot-like.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is very similar to B. hooki and B. lakainguta. Bensonella hooki is however more ovoid, reddish-brown, and does not have a slender projection in front of the parietal lamella. The latter also distinguishes the new species from B. lakainguta, which is also more triangular (i.e., pointed). See also under B. multihami.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 3). SH = 1.8; SW = 1.4–1.6; AH = 0.69–0.77; AW = 0.74–0.79.

Etymology.

This species is named after its type locality, the Montawa Cave. The specific epithet is to be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is only known from the type locality.

Bensonella multidentata Gojšina, A. Reischütz & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39O, 69, 70, 71, 72, 100

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.40 mm, SW: 1.95 mm); Chiang Rai Province, Wat Phra That Tham Doi Khong Khao Meditation Centre, cave clay at the entrance of the cave, ca 6 km W of Chiang Rai; 19°54.771'N, 99°46.607'E; ca 420 m a.s. l.; Sept. 2017; A. Reischütz leg.; NHMW-MO-113729. Paratypes. Thailand • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14439 • 29 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. REI • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG • 41 shells; Chiang Rai Province, 5 km west from centre of Chiang Rai, vicinity of Wat Phra That Tham Doi Kong Khao; 19°54.820'N, 99°46.642'E; 420 m a.s.l.; 11 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 3 shells (damaged/ juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. REI • 2 shells; Chiang Rai Province, south-southwest from Mae Sai, vicinity of Wat Tham Pla; 20°19.723'N, 99°51.817'E; 400 m a.s.l.; 12 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 22 shells; Chiang Rai Province, limestone Mtn. 6 km by road W of Ban Mae Suai; 19°38′55″N, 99°26′41″E; 650 m a.s.l.; 07. May 1988; F. G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4415; UF 347105.

Figure 69. 

Bensonella multidentata Gojšina, A. Reischütz & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (NHMW-MO-113729) A–D shell E enlarged protoconch view F, G enlarged views of the surface of the last whorl.

Type locality.

Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, Wat Phra That Tham Doi Khong Khao Meditation Centre, cave clay at the entrance of the cave, ca 6 km NW of Chiang Rai, 19°54.771'N, 99°46.607'E, ca 420 m a.s.l.

Figure 70. 

Bensonella multidentata Gojšina, A. Reischütz & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., enlarged apertural views A, B holotype (NHMW-MO-113729) C paratype (coll. REI).

Diagnosis.

A Bensonella species with high triangular, concave-conical, densely spirally striated shell. Last whorl wide, rounded. Multiple (at least 10) well-developed apertural barriers.

Figure 71. 

Bensonella multidentata Gojšina, A. Reischütz & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., paratype (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell light brown, triangular, concave-conical, whorls 5–5.25, convex, rounded, rather regularly increasing. Protoconch consisting of ~ 1.25 whorls, its sculpture consists of ~ 10 equidistant spiral striae. Teleoconch finely, very densely spirally striated, and ornamented with a few, inconspicuous radial growth lines. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate and slightly to moderately descending near the aperture (~ range: 15–32 ° compared to the shell axis) making the aperture profile prosocline to the shell axis. Aperture subcircular, parietal part strongly extended towards penultimate whorl. Peristome strongly expanded, not reflected. Aperture with numerous and strong barriers. A blunt, knob-like palatal tubercle sits anterior to the upper palatal plica on the peristome edge. Sometimes, this tubercle is very weak or completely absent. All other barriers sit deeper, not reaching the peristome edge. Parietal lamella is the highest among all apertural barriers, long, almost straight, only slightly curved downwards. Angular lamella much lower and more slender than the parietal one. Upper palatal plica short and located slightly above the palatal tubercle. First interpalatal and lower palatal plicae equally strong. There is a smaller and shorter second interpalatal plica between them. Basal part of peristome with two or three low plicae (rarely one), they are situated next to each other, the one situated closer to the columellar lamella may be homologous with the subcolumellar lamella, and the other may be basal plicae. Columellar lamella is weaker than parietal and stronger than the palatal plicae, straight, pointing obliquely upwards. Supracolumellar and infraparietal denticles small, knob-like. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus parabolic, wide, and not strongly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus wide, covers 1/3–1/4 of shell width.

Figure 72. 

Bensonella cf. multidentata Gojšina, A. Reischütz & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., specimen found near Ban Mae Suai (UF 347105) A–D shell E enlarged view of the protoconch F enlarged view of the aperture G view of the last whorl surface sculpture.

Differential diagnosis.

See under B. nitens sp. nov., B. paviei, B. sericata sp. nov. and B. tamphathai.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2.40–2.51; SW = 1.81–1.97; AH = 0.82–0.94; AW = 0.85–0.95.

Etymology.

Named for the numerous barriers in the aperture.

Distribution.

This species is known from four localities in Chiang Rai province, Thailand.

Remarks.

The population found near Ban Mae Suai is characterised by shells that lack the palatal tubercle (or have a very slight swelling indicating its presence) and smaller number of apertural barriers (only one basal and one interpalatal). However, we do not intend to regard this population as distinct due to the lack of extensive material and the fact that main shell characters are shared with B. multidentata sp. nov. (shell shape, surface sculpture, umbilicus width and appearance of other barriers).

Bensonella multihami Jirapatrasilp & Tongkerd, 2024

Figs 39P, 73, 88, 100

Bensonella multihami Jirapatrasilp & Tongkerd in Jirapatrasilp et al. 2024: 95–96, fig. 5.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 27. May 1997, S. Panha, J. B. Burch, P. Dumrongrojwattana leg.; CUMZ 14366.

Type locality.

“Doi Chiang Dao, Chiang Dao Wildlife Sanctuary, Chiang Dao District, Chiang Mai province, Thailand (19°22′046.3″N, 098°51′08.1″E, 2,015 m. a. m.s.l.)”

Differential diagnosis.

This species is strikingly similar to B. hooki, B. lakainguta, and B. montawa sp. nov. from which it differs in its blunt parietal lamella (hooked in former three)

Distribution.

This species is, apart from its type locality, known from one additional site: Doi Ang Khang (1400 m).

Figure 73. 

Bensonella multihami, holotype (CUMZ 14366) (from Tongkerd et al. 2024) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view F enlarged view of the protoconch.

Bensonella nitens Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39Q, 74, 75, 100

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 1.91 mm; SW: 1.77 mm); Phrae Province, 11 km W of Phrae, on Road 1023 limestone knoll, leaf litter; 18°10′41″N, 100°4′14″E; 290 m a.s.l.; 16. May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4447, UF 346975. Paratypes. Thailand • 2 shells; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14440 • 45 shells; same data as for holotype; UF 591334.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 4 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; UF 583730.

Type locality.

Thailand, Phrae Province, 11 km W of Phrae, on Road 1023 limestone knoll, leaf litter; 18°10′41″N, 100°4′14″E; 290 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Shell concave-conical, glossy, last whorl strongly enlarged. Teleoconch spirally striated. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate. Aperture equipped with numerous barriers, angular and columellar lamellae reaching the peristome. Umbilicus moderately wide.

Figure 74. 

Bensonella nitens Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 346975) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell concave-conical, brownish, consisting of 5–5.5 convex, rounded whorls separated by a deep suture. Last whorl much wider than all preceding ones, resulting in a concave-conical shell shape. Protoconch finely spirally striated initially, more prominently terminally. Its boundary with the teleoconch is not clearly visible due to the similar surface sculpture. Fine spiral striae present across the whole shell surface but quite difficult to observe on initial teleoconch whorls without SEM imaging. They are most clearly visible on the last whorl but still very fine. Spacing between the two spiral striae approximately measures the width of one or two striae. Radial growth lines extremely fine, irregularly spaced and not numerous, most clearly visible on the last and the penultimate whorls. Last whorl rounded, slightly descending (~ 10 ° compared to the shell axis), and adnate to the penultimate near the aperture. Peristome brownish, expanded but not reflected. On the parietal side of the aperture, the peristome leans on the penultimate whorl forming a thin parietal callus. Aperture equipped with numerous barriers (angular, parietal, upper palatal, two interpalatals, lower palatal, palatal tubercle, basal, columellar, and infraparietal). Parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture, blade like and relatively high. Angular lamella discontinuous, consisting of weaker outer part (which is reaching the expanding peristome) and stronger (higher) inner part. Palatal plicae almost all equidistant. Upper palatal and first interpalatal equally strong, higher in their inner than in outer parts (but upper palatal can be weaker than the interpalatal). There is a strong, white palatal tubercle sitting on the palatal lip of the aperture, in front and between the upper palatal and interpalatal plica. Lower interpalatal plica is the weakest among them all. Lower palatal plica is the strongest among all the palatals. Sometimes, a very weak infrapalatal plica is also present and situated between the lower palatal and basal. All palatal plicae continue as slender projections towards the peristome. Basal plica small and usually the weakest in the aperture. Columellar lamella strong and oblique, leaned towards the parietal lamella. Infraparietal lamella slightly stronger than the basal plica. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus parabolic due to the position of the angular lamella and the palatal tubercle. Umbilicus moderately wide, measuring ~ 1/5 of the shell width.

Figure 75. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella nitens Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 346975) A protoconch surface B surface of the last whorl C apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to Bensonella microdentata sp. nov., but the barriers are more numerous and not spiniferous, the umbilicus is wider and the last whorl is more enlarged. Bensonella nitens sp. nov. is smaller, glossier and has a weaker surface sculpture than B. multidentata sp. nov. The apertural barrier arrangement is strikingly similar in these two species but B. multidentata sp. nov. has stronger barriers and palatal plicae without slender projections towards the peristome. These projections are always present in B. nitens sp. nov. See also under B. sericata sp. nov. and B. tamphathai.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 1.91–2.00; SW = 1.57–1.87; AH = 0.86–0.96; AW = 0.86–0.94.

Etymology.

The specific epithet refers to the shiny shell surface.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Bensonella nordsiecki Jirapatrasilp & Tongkerd, 2024

Figs 39R, 76, 100

Bensonella nordsiecki Jirapatrasilp & Tongkerd in Jirapatrasilp et al. 2024: 91–93, fig. 3.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 27. May 1997, S. Panha, J. B. Burch, P. Dumrongrojwattana leg.; CUMZ 14372.

Type locality.

“Doi Chiang Dao, Chiang Dao Wildlife Sanctuary, Chiang Dao District, Chiang Mai province, Thailand (19°22′046.3″N, 098°51′08.1″E, 2,015 m. a.m.s.l.)”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is much more ovoid (less slender and triangular) than Bensonella dracula sp. nov. which also has a strong second palatal tubercle (very weak or absent in B. nordsiecki). The umbilicus is wider in B. dracula sp. nov. See also under B. obex sp. nov.

Figure 76. 

Bensonella nordsiecki, holotype (CUMZ 14372) (from Tongkerd et al. 2024) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view F enlarged view of the protoconch.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality, with an altitude range from 605 m to 2015 m.

Bensonella obex Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39S, 77, 78, 97

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 1.8 mm, SW: 1.5 mm); Shan State, 5.7 km south-southwest from Pinlaung, Wingabar Taung; 20°4.152'N, 96°46.232'E; 1510 m a.s.l.; 04 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14441. Paratypes. Myanmar • 32 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Additional material examined.

Myanmar • 12 shells; Shan State, Pinlaung centre N 7.5 km, Tar Kge, near ”Big Bang Cave”; 20°10.273'N, 96°47.442'E; 1540 m a.s.l.; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 4 shells; Shan State, Pinlaung centre SSW 11 km – Laneli Bridge, Nam Pam, near “Upper Spider Cave”; 20°2.114'N, 96°45.728'E; 1420 m a.s.l.; 04 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Myanmar, Shan State, 5.7 km south-southwest from Pinlaung, Wingabar Taung; 20°4.152'N, 96°46.232'E; 1510 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with a pitted protoconch and conical-ovoid shell. Last whorl slightly ascending near the aperture. Peristome usually wrinkled due to several tubercles. Transversal plica strong and very weakly concave.

Figure 77. 

Bensonella obex Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14441) A–D shell E–F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical-ovoid, consisting of 4.5–5 rounded, convex, regularly increasing whorls separated by a deep suture. Shell colour slightly weathered in the holotype but probably light brownish. Protoconch consisting of 1.75 whorls, finely pitted or sometimes spirally striated, especially terminally. Teleoconch finely pitted, with a pasty sculpture and without visible spiral striae but with coarsely and irregularly spaced radial growth lines. Last whorl enlarged, adnate to the penultimate and slightly ascending near the aperture (~ 20–25 ° compared to the shell axis). Aperture profile opisthocline to the shell axis. Peristome white and expanded (at columellar but especially at the parietal side where it forms a distinct callus) but not reflected. Aperture equipped with numerous barriers. Parietal lamella strong and high, almost reaching the expanding peristome. It sometimes has a heart-like appearance due to the distinct sinuation in the middle. Angular lamella weakly wavy, slightly weaker than the parietal but longer, reaching the expanding peristome. It also has a sinuation as in the parietal lamella but weaker. Upper palatal plica very short and moderately strong. Transversal plica strong, slightly concave on the front surface. A strong palatal tubercle is sitting in front and between the upper palatal and transversal plica. Below this tubercle, there are several more tubercle-like swellings which give the peristome a wrinkled appearance. Infrapalatal plica elongated and low. Basal plicae number ranging from one to four, similarly shaped as the infrapalatal plica. Subcolumellar lamella (if present) shares the same appearance as the former two. Columellar lamella moderate, ~ ½ as strong as the parietal. Supracolumellar lamella present but can be strong or quite weak. Infraparietal lamella slightly weaker than the columellar or even half as strong. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus relatively narrow, small, and distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus very narrow, measuring ~ 1/10 of the shell width, slightly elongated.

Figure 78. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella obex Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14441) A protoconch surface B surface of the last whorl C apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

Bensonella nordsiecki has a smooth protoconch and more ovoid shell. The transversal plica in B. nordsiecki is without a concave frontal surface. Bensonella dracula sp. nov. is less ovoid, does not have a wrinkled peristome (but two palatal tubercles) and has a wider umbilicus.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 10). SH = 1.42–1.8; SW = 1.36–1.5; AH = 0.61–0.81; AW = 0.63–0.70.

Etymology.

The specific epithet comes from a Latin word for a barricade (obex), which refers to the transversal palatal plica in the form of a barrier/obstacle. To be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is known from three localities around Pinlaung, Shan State.

Bensonella pahpetensis (Saurin, 1953), comb. nov.

Figs 39T, 79, 100

Boysidia pahpetensis Saurin, 1953: 116, fig. 2, pl. 4, fig. 5a–c.

Boysidia pahpetensisInkhavilay et al. 2019: 59, fig. 26C; Inkhavilay and Sutcharit 2024: 442, fig. 2A.

Type material examined.

Laos • 1 syntype; Pah Hia, Laos; collector unknown; MNHN-IM-2000-33880.

Type locality.

“environs du village méo de Pah Hia, à 100 kilomètres au Sud de Xieng-Khouang, chef-lieu de la province du Tran Ninh, Laos” (probably refers to Ban Namthong, Longchaeng District, Xaisomboun Province, Laos, see Páll-Gergely et al. 2016).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is unique due to the presence of one concrescent barrier on the parietal side in combination with the palatal tubercle typical for the genus Bensonella.

Distribution.

This species in known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

Bensonella pahpetensis is not a typical representative of its genus due to the concrescent angular and parietal lamellae. However, we have placed it in this genus because of the presence of the palatal tubercle as well as the triangular-conical shell shape.

Figure 79. 

Bensonella pahpetensis, syntype (MNHN-IM-2000-33880 (from Inkhavilay and Sutcharit 2024)) A–C shell.

Bensonella palatotridens Jirapatrasilp & Tongkerd, 2024

Figs 39U, 80, 100

Bensonella palatotridens Jirapatrasilp & Tongkerd in Jirapatrasilp et al. 2024: 93, fig. 4.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 27. May 1997, S. Panha, J. B. Burch, P. Dumrongrojwattana leg.; CUMZ 14370.

Type locality.

“Doi Chiang Dao, Chiang Dao Wildlife Sanctuary, Chiang Dao District, Chiang Mai province, Thailand (19°22′046.3″N, 098°51′08.1″E, 2,015 m. a.m.s.l.)”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is characterised by three plicae on the palatal side of the aperture. See under B. paviei and B. tamphathai.

Figure 80. 

Bensonella palatotridens, holotype (CUMZ 14370) (from Jirapatrasilp et al. 2024) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view F enlarged view of the protoconch.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Bensonella pangmapaensis (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2002)

Figs 39V, 81, 100

Paraboysidia pangmapaensis Panha & Burch, 2002c: 87, fig. 5.

Paraboysidia pangmapaensisPanha and Burch 2008: 114, fig. 97; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324.

Material examined.

Thailand • 6 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, Mae Hong Son, Road 1095; 19°25'N, 97°58'E; 390 m a.s.l.; 22 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0596; UF 345697 • 5 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, Mae Hong Son, Road 1095; 19°25'N, 97°58'E; 390 m a.s.l.; 22 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0595B; UF 345721 • 7 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, 21 km N Mae Hong Son, Fish Cave; 19°26'N, 97°58'E; 380 m a.s.l.; 22 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0593; UF 345671 • 20 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, 35.5 km NNE of Mae Hong Son on road to Ban Huai Phung off Road 1095; 19°29'N, 97°58'E; 450 m a.s.l.; 21 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0591; UF 345665 • 34 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, 35.1 km S Mae Hong Son, 1.7 km E of Route 108; 19°5'N, 97°58'E; 850 m a.s.l.; 23 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0579; UF 345727.

Type locality.

“Lod cave, Pang Ma Pa District, Mae Hong Son Province, 19°29'36"N, 98°17'18"E and 19°34′03″N, 98°16′41″E, 800 meters elevation…” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is clearly distinguishable by its rough sculpture showing the spiralling pattern in combination with hooked basal and palatal plicae, as well as the inner part of the angular lamella.

Figure 81. 

Bensonella pangmapaensis from Mae Hong Son province (UF 345697) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from several sampling sites, all located in Mae Hong Son province where the type locality is also situated.

Bensonella paviei (Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1912)

Figs 39W, 82, 83, 100

Boysidia paviei Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1912: 20, pl. 3, figs 4–6.

Boysidia (Paraboysidia) paviei — Pilsbry 1917: 203–204, pl. 35, figs 7–8; Schileyko 1998: 138, fig. 156; Chen et al. 1999: 1; Schileyko 2011: 2.

Paraboysidia pavieivan Benthem Jutting 1950: 39.

Paraboysidia nabhitabhatai Panha & Burch, 2002c: 81–84, fig. 3. syn. nov.

Paraboysidia nabhitabhataiPanha and Burch 2008: 113–114, fig. 96.

Paraboysidia anguloobtusus Inkhavilay & Panha in Inkhavilay et al. 2016: 215–217, figs 1, 2D–F, 4B. syn. nov.

Paraboysidia anguloobtusaInkhavilay et al. 2019: 61, fig. 26F.

Bensonella pavieiPáll-Gergely and White 2023: 2015, fig. 3f–k.

Bensonella anguloobtusaTongkerd et al. 2024: 171–174, figs 6B, 7A, 13G.

Bensonella nabhitabhataiDumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324.

Type material examined.

Vietnam • 1 syntype; Pac-Kha: Long-ping; C. Messager leg.; MNHN-IM-2000-35158. Thailand • holotype of P. nabhitabhatai; 1998; S. Panha, P. Dumrongrojwattana, C. Sutcharit, S. Tumpeesuwan leg.; CUMZ ver. 064.

Additional material examined.

Vietnam • 4 shells; Son La Province, 27 km east-southeast from centre of Phu Yen, Muong Do, Ban Han Mot, southern part of the village; 21°11.731'N, 104°47.129'E; 800 m a.s.l.; 06 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 23 shells; Son La Province, Moc Chau district, Van Ho, northeastern edge of Pa Cop towards Bo Nhang; 20°46.001'N, 104°45.203'E; 980 m a.s.l.; 10 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 31 shells; Son La Province, Yen Chau district, Xa Chieng On, Ban Tram Hoc, Hang Nha Nhung, vicinity of the cave; 20°59.483'N, 104°11.270'E; 970 m a.s.l.; 09 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 110 shells; Son La Province, Quynh Nhai district, 20 km east from cross towards Thuan Chau, Chieng Khoang, cave above the village; 21°33.441'N, 103°40.909'E; 315 m a.s.l.; 07 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 10 shells; Son La Province, Moc Chau district, Long Luong, Ban Tan Lap, northern edge of the village; 20°46.835'N, 104°50.752'E; 1165 m a.s.l.; 05 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 4 shells; Sơn La Province, Thuận Châu district, 900 m from centre of Co Mạ, rock wall above the road; 21°21.186'N, 103°31.676'E; 1300 m a.s.l.; 08 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi leg.; Laos • 37 shells; Udomxai Province, 6.5 km southeast from centre of Na Mor towards Udomxai, Ban Nathong, Tham Nathong, above cave spring; 20°52.369'N, 101°46.981'E; 635 m a.s.l.; 07 Oct. 2019; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Luang Prabang Province, 28.5 km south from Pak Mong towards Luang Prabang, northern bank of Nam Nga, Tham Nam Nga; 20°22.220'N, 102°20.078'E; 350 m a.s.l.; 09 Oct. 2019; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 45 shells; Luang Prabang Province, 10.3 km from centre of Luang Prabang towards Xiang Ngeum, east, 1800 m on a path, Phou Xuang, eastern mountain slope; 19°51.526'N, 102°11.100'E; 730 m a.s.l.; 10 Oct. 2019; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 26 shells; Luang Prabang Province, 12 km from centre of Nong Khiaw towards Pak Xeng, northeast from Ban Huai Lek, left side of the road; 20°32.585'N, 102°41.161'E; 350 m a.s.l.; 05 Oct. 2019; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 103 shells; Luang Prabang Province, 2.8 km northeast from Phou Khoun, rock wall above the cave; 19°26.787'N, 102°26.338'E; 1200 m a.s.l.; 11 Oct. 2019; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 113 shells; Udomxai Province, 10 km southeast from centre of Na Mor, 3.8 km east-northeast from Na Xay, northern rock wall; 20°53.371'N, 101°48.963'E; 660 m a.s.l.; 07 Oct. 2019; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 5 shells; Xieng Khouang Province, ca 15 km SW of Ban Ko Kieng, ca 19 km SW of Vieng Thong, on the left side of Nam Khan, under rocks and logs in old forest; 19°56.264'N, 103°15.763'E; 570 m a.s.l.; 27 Oct. 2006; A. Abdou, I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-27287 • 3 shells; Luang Prabang Province, ca 6 km E of Muang Xiang Ngeun, under rocks in old secondary forest under cliff; 19°44.690'N, 102°15.193'E; 390 m a.s.l.; 21 Nov. 2006; A. Abdou, I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-27288 • 2 shells; Luang Prabang Province, Phou Xuang mountain, ca 1.5 km NE of Ban Lak Sip, ca 5 km SE of Luang Prabang, under rocks and logs in old secondary forest under cliff; 19°51.605'N, 102°11.081'E; 640 m a.s.l.; 24 Nov. 2006; A. Abdou, I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-27270 • 1 shell; Luang Prabang Province, ca 18 km SE of Muang Xiang Ngeun, on the left side of Nam Khan, under rocks and logs in old forest; 19°40.931'N, 102°19.743'E; 455 m a.s.l.; 30 Oct. 2006; A. Abdou, I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-27285 • 9 shells; Xieng Khouang Province, ca 30 km WNW of Phonsavan, ca 47 km ENE of Phou Khoun, limestone, black soil in limestone pockets, clay, under rocks in old secondary forest at base of cliff near cave; 19°32.019'N, 102°51.901'E; 1131 m a.s.l.; 15 Nov. 2006; A. Abdou, I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-27272 • 6 shells; Luang Prabang Province, just NE of Phou Khoun, under rocks in old secondary forest above large cave; 19°26.784'N, 102°26.290'E;1177 m a.s.l.; 15 Nov. 2006; A. Abdou, I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-27289 • 12 shells; Xieng Khouang Province, Plane of Jars, Site 1, ca 6 km S of Phonsavan, limestone, clay, under rocks near small trees under cliff surrounded by grassland; 19°25.819'N, 103°09.216'E; 1097 m a.s.l.; 14 Nov. 2006; I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-27286 • 12 shells; Luang Prabang Province, ca 17 km SE of Muang Xiang Ngeun, along small stream on the left side (ca 2 km S) of Nam Khan, on and under rocks and logs in old forest with banana; 19°40.188'N, 102°18.538'E; 525 m a.s.l.; 31 Oct. 2006; A. Abdou, I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-27273 • 22 shells; Luang Prabang Province, ca 6 km N of Phou Khoun, under rocks in dry secondary forest under and above cliff; 19°29.653'N, 102°24.470'E; 1244 m a.s.l.; 16 Nov. 2006; A. Abdou, I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-27271 • 28 shells; Xieng Khouang Province, ca 18 km SW of Ban Ko Kieng, ca 22 km SW of Vieng Thong, on the right side of Nam Khan, under rocks and logs at base of cliff in secondary forest; 19°54.842'N, 103°14.392'E; 560 m a.s.l.; 28 Oct. 2006; A. Abdou, I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-27284. Myanmar • 1 shell; Mandalay, Anesakhan, Dat Taw Gyaint Waterfall; 21°58.760'N, 96°23.116'E; 610 m a.s.l.; 18 Oct. 2018; Hunyadi leg; coll. HA. Thailand • 51 shells; Chiang Mai Province, northeastern side of Doi Chiang Dao, 2 km northwest from Wat Tham Chiang Dao; 19°24.016'N, 98°54.680'E; 835 m a.s.l.; 07 Feb. 2015, A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 3 shells; Mae Hong Song Province, 10.2 km WNW of Soppong, road 1095; 19°33'N, 98°3'E; 820 m a.s.l.; 23 Mar. 1998; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0586; UF 345620.

Figure 82. 

Bensonella paviei from different localities A Thailand, Chiang Mai province (coll. HA) B Laos, Udomxai province (coll. HA) C Laos, Luang Prabang province (coll. HA) D–F Vietnam, Son La province (coll. HA).

Type localities.

“Pac-Kha”, Vietnam (B. paviei); “Limestone wall outside of Kao Rao. Cave, Vieng Phouka District, Luang Namtha Province, Laos (20°43'30.1"N, 101°9'4.3"E), 732 m amsl” (Paraboysidia anguloobtusus); “Phadevada, Phukhieo Wildlife Sanctuary, Chaiyapumi Province, 16°3'20"N, 101°34'14"E, 110 meters elevation…” (P. nabhitabhatai).

Figure 83. 

Bensonella paviei A–F holotype of P. nabhitabhatai (CUMZ ver. 064) G–J syntype of B. paviei (MNHN-IM-2000-35158 (from Páll-Gergely and White 2023)) A–D, G–J shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is smaller, with less numerous apertural barriers and a narrower umbilicus than Bensonella multidentata sp. nov. B. palatotridens is not spirally striated. This species differs from B. microdentata sp. nov. in the less glossy shell surface, stronger apertural barriers and non-spiniferous aperture surface (including the barriers). See also under B. tamphathai. This species is also similar to B. nitens but can be separated by the much less glossy shell surface and stronger and fewer apertural barriers.

Distribution.

This species is known from several localities in Laos (Xieng Khouang, Udomxai and Luang Prabang provinces), Vietnam (Son La province), Myanmar (Shan State, see Tongkerd et al. 2024, Mandalay) as well as Thailand (Chiang Mai, Mae Hong Son and Chaiyapumi provinces).

Remarks.

Paraboysidia anguloobtusa described from a Kao Rao Cave, Vieng Phouka District, Luang Namtha Province, Laos (20°43'30.1"N, 101°9'4.3"E) and Paraboysidia nabhitabhatai described from Phadevada, Phukhieo Wildlife Sanctuary, Chaiyapumi Province, Thailand (16°3'20"N, 101°34'14"E) are both herein considered junior synonyms of B. paviei since no morphological differences were observed. Inkhavilay et al. (2016) stated that P. anguloobtusa has a different shell shape than B. paviei and that it has a blunt angular lamella. However, the shell shape of both species is the same (conical to slightly concave-conical) and both species have a blunt angular lamella. Other differences mentioned for apertural barriers (infraparietal situated closer to the parietal and angular lamellae, suprapalatal absent, lamellae more twisted) are considered minor intraspecific variation. The umbilicus in B. paviei is not widely opened as stated by Inkhavilay et al. (2016) but rather narrow and of the same appearance as that in Paraboysidia anguloobtusa. Sometimes, the last whorl of B. paviei is more or less enlarged, but the apertural barrier arrangement is largely consistent. Spiral striation can vary in strength but is always present.

Bensonella perfecta Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39X, 84, 85, 95

Type material.

Holotype. Laos • 1 shell (SH: 2.9 mm; SW: 2.1 mm); Central Laos, Xieng Khouang Province, ca 30 km WNW of Phonsavan, ca 47 km ENE of Phou Khoun, limestone, black soil in limestone pockets, clay, under rocks in old secondary forest at base of cliff; 19°32.019'N, 102°51.901'E; 1131 m a.s.l.; 15 Nov. 2006; A. Abdou, I.V. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2000-39829.

Paratypes. Laos • 2 shells; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14442; 174 shells; same data as for holotype; MNHN-IM-2000-39830.

Additional material examined.

Laos • 94 shells (damaged and juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; MNHN-IM-2012-25390.

Type locality.

Central Laos, Xieng Khouang Province, ca 30 km WNW of Phonsavan, ca 47 km ENE of Phou Khoun, limestone, black soil in limestone pockets, clay, under rocks in old secondary forest at base of cliff; 19°32.019'N, 102°51.901'E; 1131 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with a conical, brownish shell that is not spirally striated. Apertural barriers numerous: five plicae (4 palatals and one basal), all weak and low. Palatal tubercle strong.

Figure 84. 

Bensonella perfecta Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (MNHN-IM-2000-39829) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical, pale brown, consisting of 5–5.5 regularly increasing, rounded whorls. Protoconch consisting of 1.75 whorls, same colour as the rest of the shell, finely pitted and spirally striated. Teleoconch with fine pasty like surface sculpture and coarse radial growth lines which are irregularly spaced. Rarely, these radial lines appear as stronger, whitish streaks. A spiralling pattern is very slightly visible on the last whorl (only under SEM) although there are no spiral striae. Last whorl rounded, adnate to the penultimate and slightly descending near the aperture (~ 5–10 ° compared to the shell axis). Apertural profile slightly prosocline to the shell axis. Peristome of same colour as the rest of the shell, expanded but not reflected. There is a weak cervical crest just behind the peristome. Aperture equipped with numerous barriers. Parietal lamella strong and blade-like, not reaching the peristome. Angular lamella closer to the peristome but appears discontinuous as its outer and inner parts are separated by a distinct sinuation. These two parts are roughly equally strong. There are one or two barriers inside the sinulus. Four palatal plicae (upper palatal, interpalatal, lower palatal and infrapalatal). Upper, inter and lower palatal are moderately long and high, equally developed and equally distanced. Sometimes, upper palatal is weak and lower palatal is stronger than others. Infrapalatal plica is much weaker (lower and shorter). Palatal tubercle is strong, sitting on the palatal lip of the peristome just below the line of upper palatal plica. Basal plica situated close to the infrapalatal and equally developed or sometimes weaker. Columellar lamella stronger than in most of the congeners (quite broad and high), almost horizontal, sometimes appears slightly wavy. Infraparietal lamella moderate, weaker than other lamellae but stronger than all the plicae. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Additionally, plicae in the palatal and basal areas as well as the infraparietal and angular lamellae are equipped with isolated but strong spines which are positioned medially. Sinulus small and distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus narrow, slightly elongated, measuring ~ 1/5–1/6 of the shell width.

Figure 85. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella perfecta Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (MNHN-IM-2000-39829) A protoconch surface B surface of the last whorl C apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. frequens.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2.91–3.09; SW = 2.08–2.23; AH = 1.15–1.30; AW = 1.2–1.37.

Etymology.

This species is named for the exceptionally fine surface sculpture.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Bensonella plicidens (Benson, 1849)

Figs 39Y, 86

Pupa plicidens Benson, 1849: 126.

Pupa plicidens — Küster 1852: 136, pl. 17, figs 23, 24.

Boysidia plicidensPfeiffer 1853: 553; Hanley and Theobald 1874: pl. 100, fig. 8; Sowerby 1876: pl. 16, fig. 151; Ancey 1881: 373; Gude 1914: 294.

Vertigo (Odontocyclas) plicidens — Adams and Adams 1858: 173.

Pupa (Scopelophila) plicidens — Albers and Martens 1860: 296.

Pupa (Odontocyclas) plicidens — Pfeiffer 1879: 350.

Bifidaria (Bensonella) plicidensPilsbry and Vanatta 1900: 591.

Bifidaria (Bensonella) landurensis [sic] Pilsbry, 1915: 73.

Boysidia landurensis — Pilsbry 1917: 204, pl. 35, fig. 9.

Paraboysidia landourensisvan Benthem Jutting 1950: 39.

Boysidia (Bensonella) plicidensChen and Zhang 2002: 693; Zhang et al. 2014: 572.

Bensonella plicidensHwang 2014: 17–20 (partim: fig. 5 shows B. plicidens); Páll-Gergely and White 2023: 2018–2023, figs 3a–e, 4, 5, 9a, b.

Bensonella landourensis and plicidensBudha and Backeljau 2017. (partim: figs 2B, 3, 5A, F show B. plicidens).

Type material examined.

India • lectotype; R. McAndrew coll. (ex. W.H. Benson coll.); UMZC I.103325.

Type locality.

“ad Landour et Moussoorie, montibus Himalayanis”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to B. lakainguta, B. multihami, and B. hooki, but differs from all by the presence of spiral striation on the shell and absence of hooked apertural barriers. Bensonella karoensis is also not spirally striated, is more ovoid with a blunter apex and shallower suture. See also under B. spinosa sp. nov.

Figure 86. 

Bensonella plicidens, lectotype (UMZC I.103325) A–E shell (from Páll-Gergely and White 2023).

Distribution.

SW and SE Himalaya.

Bensonella sericata Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39Z, 87, 88, 100

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.38 mm, SW: 1.69 mm); Chiang Rai Province, limestone knoll, Ban Mae Song Nai, 4.0 km N, 6.0 km NW Mae Chan, limestone domes, shaded ledges; 20°11′37″N, 99°33′6″E; 520 m a.s.l.; 10. May 1988; F. G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4425; UF 380270. Paratypes. Thailand • 4 shells; same data as for holotype; UF 591360.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 5 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; UF 591368.

Type locality.

Thailand, Chiang Rai Province, limestone knoll, Ban Mae Song Nai, 4.0 km N, 6.0 km NW Mae Chan, limestone domes, shaded ledges; 20°11′37″N, 99°33′6″E; 520 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

A Bensonella species with conical to conical-ovoid shell, very dense spiral striation, and a small number of apertural barriers, only four of which are strong (parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar).

Description.

Shell brown, conical to conical-ovoid, whorls 4.5–5, convex, regularly increasing. Protoconch consisting of ~ 1.5 whorls, its sculpture consists of ~ 10 roughly equidistant spiral striae. Teleoconch finely, very densely spirally striated, and ornamented with a few, inconspicuous radial growth lines. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate and slightly descending near the aperture (~ 15 ° compared to the shell axis) making the aperture profile prosocline to the shell axis. Peristome slightly expanded, not reflected. A blunt, weak, knob-like palatal tubercle sits anterior and slightly below the upper palatal plica on the peristome edge. Parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture and slightly leaned towards the palatal wall. Angular lamella weak, its outer part reduced, inner part sits deep in the aperture. Upper palatal plica in form of a very weak swelling, situated slightly above the palatal tubercle. Interpalatal plica strong, located slightly below the palatal tubercle. Lower palatal plica nearly as strong as the parietal, stronger than the interpalatal. There can be two additional swellings: one between the upper and interpalatal and one between the interpalatal and lower palatal. Basal plica absent. Columellar lamella strong and slightly oblique. Infraparietal lamella in form of indistinct swelling located close to the parietal lamella. Surface of all apertural barriers is smooth. Sinulus wide and relatively well separated from the rest of the aperture due to the strong parietal lamella. Umbilicus moderately wide, measuring 1/5 of shell width.

Figure 87. 

Bensonella sericata Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 380270) A–D shell.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from B. multidentata sp. nov. by the less numerous apertural barriers (including the lack of the basal plica) and not concave-conical shell. The shell in B. multidentata sp. nov. is also more pointed. Bensonella nitens sp. nov. is glossier due to the very coarse spiral striae (very dense in B. sericata sp. nov.), concave conical and has slender and sharp projections proximally and distally from the palatal plicae. See also under B. tamphathai.

Figure 88. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella sericata Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 380270) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 4). SH = 2.26–2.39; SW = 1.69–1.73; AH = 0.94–1.01; AW = 0.87–0.94.

Etymology.

The specific epithet refers to the silky surface of the shell (as if “covered in silk”).

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

Coordinates of the sample point in Myanmar just next to the Thai border.

Bensonella serrata Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39AA, 89, 90, 95

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 2.71 mm, SW: 1.92 mm); Shan State, 16 km from centre of Taunggyi towards Hopong, 1.5 km along road #4, Shwe Pyi Aunchonda monastery; 20°47.263'N, 97°8.239'E; 1110 m a.s.l.; 08 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J. U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14443. Paratypes. Myanmar • 15 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 13 shells; Shan State, Hopong, Sam Phu, Cave Ae-5 at ridge above village Ho Hwe; 20°41.103'N, 97°16.198'E; 02 Feb. 2019; J. Grego leg., coll. JG.

Additional material examined.

Myanmar • 3 shells (damaged, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 5 shells (damaged/ juveniles, not paratypes); Shan State, Hopong, Sam Phu, Cave Ae-5 at ridge above village Ho Hwe; 20°41.103'N, 97°16.198'E; 02 Feb. 2019; J. Grego leg., coll. JG.

Type locality.

Myanmar, Shan State, 16 km from centre of Taunggyi towards Hopong, 1.5 km along road #4, Shwe Pyi Aunchonda monastery; 20°47.263'N, 97°8.239'E; 1110 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with pasty shell surface, last whorl adnate to the penultimate and palatal plicae with serrated, elevated inner and very low outer parts.

Figure 89. 

Bensonella serrata Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14443) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell triangular, slightly conical-ovoid, brown, not very glossy, consisting of 5–5.5 regularly increasing whorls separated by a deep suture. All whorls convex, rounded. Protoconch consisting of 1.5 whorls, finely pitted, showing spiralling pattern even though without clear spiral striae. The boundary between the protoconch and the teleoconch is visible due to the presence of radial growth lines on the teleoconch. Teleoconch surface finely dimpled, pasty and with less numerous, weak radial growth lines, spiral striae absent. Last whorl also rounded, adnate to the penultimate near the aperture. Last whorl slightly descending immediately behind the aperture (~ 10 ° compared to the shell axis) making the apertural profile slightly prosocline to the shell axis. Peristome weakly expanded but not reflected, its edges are thickened. Aperture equipped with numerous barriers, two of them relatively strong (parietal, columellar), others weak. Parietal lamella is the strongest and highest in the aperture. Angular lamella is the longest in the aperture, much longer than the parietal, very slender and low but continuous. Its inner and outer parts are higher than its middle part. Columellar lamella similar in length to the parietal but much weaker. There is one weak infraparietal lamella. On the palatal side, there are four main palatal plicae which are all almost equally strong and long (upper palatal, two interpalatals, and a lower palatal). They are all elevated at their inner ends and sloping towards the outer end, ending very low. These low parts are equipped with numerous small spines (serrated), thus resembling a saw. Palatal tubercle, sitting on the palatal lip, is weak but clearly present. There are several suprapalatal plicae (with similar morphology as in the main palatals) all weak and located inside the sinulus (the length and number (usually two to four) of these plicae is variable and not useful in species identification). There are usually two basal plicae (although one of them could be homologous with the infrapalatal plica), which are long but can occasionally be shorter. Surface of all barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus not strongly isolated from the rest of the aperture due to the low angular lamella and weak palatal tubercle. Umbilicus is narrow, measuring 1/8 of the shell width.

Figure 90. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella serrata Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14443) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view D enlarged view of the palatal plicae.

Differential diagnosis.

This species can be separated from its congeners by the presence of equally strong palatal plicae with elevated inner and very low outer portions equipped with numerous spines.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2.52–2.86; SW = 1.80–2.06; AH = 0.94–1.03; AW = 0.83–0.94.

Etymology.

This species is named for the serrated (saw-like) palatal plicae.

Distribution.

This species is known from two localities situated ca 18 km apart (straight-line distance).

Bensonella spelaea Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39AB, 91, 92, 95

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 3.3 mm, SW: 2.4 mm); Kayah State, Hpruso district, Maw Thi Do Village, entrance of Phruno river cave; 19°22.744'N, 97°2.570'E; 12 Feb. 2019; J. Grego leg.; CUMZ 14444. Paratypes. Myanmar • 7 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. JG • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Myanmar, Kayah State, Hpruso district, Maw Thi Do Village, entrance of Phruno river cave; 19°22.744'N, 97°2.570'E.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with 7–9 apertural barriers, most peculiar of these is the transversal plica (strong, high but with a concave frontal surface resembling a cave entrance).

Description.

Shell triangular, conical-ovoid, brownish, consisting of 5–5.5 convex, regularly increasing, rounded whorls separated by a deep suture. Boundary between the protoconch and the teleoconch is only clearly visible after SEM imaging because of the delicate sculpture and somehow weathered type series. Protoconch is spirally striated, probably ~ 1.75 whorls). Teleoconch of fine, pasty sculpture with dense but fine radial growth lines and without signs of spiral striation. Last whorl rounded, adnate to the penultimate. Aperture profile sinuated in its upper portion (concave) but convex in its middle and lower sections. Peristome expanded, especially at the parietal side where it leans on the penultimate whorl in form of a strong callus but not reflected. There is a moderate cervical crest located a short distance behind the peristome. Aperture equipped with relatively small number of barriers, seven to nine. Angular, parietal, upper palatal, transversal, palatal tubercle, columellar and infraparietal are always present, while basal and supracolumellar only sometimes. Parietal lamella heart-shaped in profile due to the sinuation located in its middle part (this makes the middle part of the lamella lower than outer and inner parts). Angular lamella also appears curvy, and it is curved to the palatal side. Upper palatal plica relatively weak and low. Transversal plica large (the largest in the aperture), high but with a strongly concave frontal surface (this gives the appearance of the transversal plica as an entrance to a cave). Basal very short and low when present. Columellar lamella very strong and thick (roughly the same as the parietal lamella). Supracolumellar lamella weak, dot like (sometimes absent). Infraparietal lamella present but much weaker than both the parietal and the columellar. Surface of all apertural barriers is granulated to almost spiniferous. Sinulus small and distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture due to the strong and closely positioned angular lamella and palatal tubercle. Umbilicus initially narrow and the widening at the last whorl, elongated, measuring ~ 1/6–1/7 of the shell width.

Figure 91. 

Bensonella spelaea Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14444) A–D shell E–H enlarged apertural views.

Figure 92. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella spelaea Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14444) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C–D enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is the largest one with a transversal plica. This plica shows the peculiar appearance with the strongly concave frontal surface resembling a cave entrance.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2.48–3.38; SW = 1.98–2.4; AH = 1.08–1.30; AW = 0.95–1.12.

Etymology.

Named after the cave-like transversal plica.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Bensonella spinosa Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 39AC, 93–95

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 2 mm, SW: 1.5 mm); Shan State, 5.7 km south-southwest from centre of Pinlaung, Wingabar Taung; 20°4.152'N, 96°46.232'E; 1510 m a.s.l.; 04 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J. U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14445. Paratypes. Myanmar • 14 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Myanmar, Shan State, 5.7 km south-southwest from centre of Pinlaung, Wingabar Taung; 20°4.152'N, 96°46.232'E; 1510 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella with triangular-conical, reddish-brown shell. Teleoconch fine, pasty, not spirally striated. All barriers and aperture surface around them very roughly spiniferous.

Figure 93. 

Bensonella spinosa Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14445) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell triangular, slightly conical-ovoid, reddish brown, consisting of 5–5.5 convex, rounded whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch of ~ 1.5 whorls, finely pitted, showing very weak spiralling pattern, lighter than the rest of the shell but with no clearly visible boundary with the teleoconch. Teleoconch finely dimpled (pasty) and finely radially striated but without spiral striae. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate and very slightly ascending near the aperture (~ 5–10 ° compared to the shell axis), making the aperture profile weakly opisthocline to the shell axis. Peristome of the same colour as the rest of the shell, expanded and not reflected. Aperture equipped with numerous barriers. Parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture, high but not curved, directed towards the palatal wall. Angular lamella slightly lower than the parietal but otherwise very similar, continuous. There are three main palatal plicae (upper palatal, interpalatal and lower palatal) and one additional small interpalatal plica situated below the stronger interpalatal and a lower palatal. Upper palatal as strong as the main interpalatal. Lower palatal plica is the strongest. Infrapalatal plica weak. Basal plica 2 × stronger than the infrapalatal. All palatal plicae are higher at their inner parts and sloping towards their outer parts. There is a strong palatal tubercle sitting on the palatal lip of the peristome, in front of the upper palatal plica. Peristome is distinctly sinuated behind this tubercle. Columellar lamella ~ 2 × stronger than the basal and positioned obliquely, directed towards the parietal lamella. Subcolumellar similar to the infrapalatal. Supracolumellar lamella similar to the subcolumellar. Infraparietal lamella strong as the columellar. All apertural barriers are very strongly spiniferous as well as the surface of the aperture around them. Sinulus small and well separated from the rest of the aperture due to the strong angular lamella. Umbilicus very narrow, dot like.

Figure 94. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella spinosa Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14445) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Figure 95. 

Distribution map of some species belonging to the B. plicidens group.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is most similar to B. plicidens from which it differs by the absence of spiral striation as well as spiniferous barriers and aperture surface (both smooth in B. plicidens). Bensonella lakainguta, B. multihami and B. hooki all have more numerous and hooked apertural barriers and they are not spiniferous.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 1.81–2.14; SW = 1.37–1.5; AH = 0.66–0.79; AW = 0.63–0.75.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is due to the numerous spines in the aperture.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Bensonella taiyaiorum Tongkerd & Panha, 2024

Figs 39AD, 96, 97

Bensonella taiyaiorum Tongkerd & Panha in Tongkerd et al. 2024: 174–176, figs 7B, 8, 13H.

Type material examined.

Myanmar • holotype; collector unknown; CUMZ 14380.

Type locality.

“Dragon Rock, Pindaya Township, Taunggyi District, Shan State, Myanmar (20°55'31.5"N, 96°39'01.2"E; 1300 m a.s.l.)”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from B. lophiodera by the stronger apertural barriers, narrower umbilicus, and the lack of a sharp cervical crest. Bensonella dracula sp. nov. is smaller, has a second palatal tubercle and lacks the suprapalatal plica.

Figure 96. 

Bensonella taiyaiorum, holotype (CUMZ 14380) (from Tongkerd et al. 2024) A–B shell C enlarged apertural view D enlarged view of the protoconch.

Figure 97. 

Distribution map of some Bensonella species from Myanmar.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Bensonella tamphathai (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2000)

Figs 39AE, 98–100

Paraboysidia tamphathai Panha & Burch, 2000: 107, fig. 2.

Paraboysidia tamphathaiPanha and Burch 2008: 115, fig. 98.

Bensonella tamphathaiDumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324.

Material examined.

Thailand • 4 shells; Lampang Province, limestone ridge, Ban Pang La; 18°35′7″N, 99°50′32″E; 400 m a.s.l.; 14. May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4438; UF 346895 • 11 shells; Lampang Province, limestone knoll 1 km NE of Ban Pang La; 18°33′15″N, 99°52′11″E; 400 m a.s.l.; 14. May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4436; UF 346878 • 14 shells; same data as previous; locality code FGT-4435; UF 380388 • 3 shells; Lampang Province, limestone mtn. 3 km SE of Ban Mae Moa ledge on NW slope of mtn., leaf litter; 18°14′3″N, 99°42′49″E; 500 m a.s.l.; 15. May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4443; UF 346921 • 2 shells; Lampang Province, 6 km SW Mae Pak, limestone hill, 17°57′53″N, 98°51′7″E (provided coordinates point in Lamphun province); 600 m a.s.l.; 13 June 1987; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4328; UF 346579.

Type locality.

“Tam Pha Thai National Park, Lampang Province,18°36'20"N, 99°53'49"E, 490 meters elevation” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

The most similar species is B. paviei which is however smaller and has less pronounced spiral sculpture. Apertural barriers are also more numerous than in B. paviei. Bensonella palatotridens is not spirally striated. Bensonella tamphathai has a blunter conical shell (i.e., more barrel-shaped), narrower umbilicus and fewer basal plicae than B. multidentata sp. nov. Bensonella multidentata sp. nov. is also much more densely spirally striated which makes it shell surface less shiny than in B. tamphathai. Bensonella nitens sp. nov. has a wider umbilicus, is more concave-conical and has a thin, sharp, and long projections of palatal plicae (proximally and distally). Also, the last whorl is B. nitens sp. nov. is much narrower than in B. tamphathai (i.e., it contributes less to the total shell height than in B. tamphathai). Bensonella sericata sp. nov. is much more densely spirally striated, lacks the basal plica and has weaker upper palatal plica. Bensonella microdentata sp. nov. has weaker apertural barriers which are roughly spiniferous.

Figure 98. 

Bensonella tamphathai from Lampang province near Ban Pang La (UF 346895), Thailand A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 99. 

Bensonella cf. tamphathai from Lampang province near Ban Mae Moa (UF 346921), Thailand A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 100. 

Distribution map of some species belonging to B. plicidens group.

Distribution.

This species is known from Lampang Province, Thailand.

Bensonella wangviangensis group

Diagnosis.

This species group is characterised by angular lamella as strong as the parietal or even stronger, fully reaching the peristome edge, palatal tubercle not in its typical form but clearly represents a slightly discontinued part of the upper palatal plica (thus, it is of more lamella-like than tubercle-like appearance) and closely situated angular lamella and palatal tubercle which clearly separated the sinulus from the rest of the aperture.

Remarks.

Four species are assigned to this group and they inhabit northern Thailand (Loei Province) as well as adjacent territories in Laos (Vientiane and Khammouane provinces). Due to the same distribution and very similar overall shell morphology, these species are probably closely related.

Bensonella cardiostoma Gojšina, Vermeulen & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 101A, 102, 107

Type material.

Holotype. Laos • 1 shell (SH: 1.12 mm; SW: 1.17 mm); Vientiane Province, Vang Vieng District, Nakay Village, steep forested limestone hill; 19°08.731'N, 102°22.481'E; 323 m a.s.l.; 24 Oct. 2006; A. Schuiteman leg.; locality code JJV 15174; CUMZ 14447.

Type locality.

Laos, Vientiane Province, Vang Vieng District, Nakay Village, steep forested limestone hill, 19°08.731'N, 102°22.481'E, 323 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with obscure, weak spiral striae, asymmetric heart-shaped aperture, an angular lamella, and a palatal tubercle on the peristome and six barriers (upper palatal, lower palatal, basal, columellar, infraparietal, parietal) situated deeper inside the aperture.

Figure 101. 

Synoptic view of species belonging to the Bensonella wangviangensis group A B. cardiostoma sp. nov. B B. fracta sp. nov. C B. mitochondria sp. nov. D B. wangviangensis.

Description.

Shell colourless (white), conical-ovoid with strongly widened last whorl. Whorls 3.5, nearly rounded, slightly shouldered. Protoconch consisting of 1.25 whorls, pitted, showing spiralling pattern, although no clear spiral striae are visible. Teleoconch sculpture roughly pitted. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate, very slightly ascending (~ 10 ° compared to the shell axis), thus making the apertural profile opisthocline to the shell axis. Aperture asymmetric heart-shaped, the parietal part being the shield-like extended peristome. Angular lamella and palatal tubercle situated on the peristome, both are pointed, directed towards each other. Other barriers, altogether 6, are lamella-like, elongated, low. Upper palatal plica sits behind palatal tubercle, lower palatal situated between the basal and upper palatal plica. Columella lamella situated halfway between basal and infraparietal lamella, infraparietal and parietal situated close to each other. Peristome strongly expanded, not reflected. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus relatively narrow and clearly separated from the rest of the aperture due to the strong and closely positioned angular lamella and palatal tubercle. Umbilicus very narrow, shows only last whorl. Last quarter whorl sigmoid.

Figure 102. 

Bensonella cardiostoma Gojšina, Vermeulen & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14447) A–D shell E enlarged view of the protoconch F, G enlarged apertural views H, I enlarged views of the surface of the last whorl.

Differential diagnosis.

See under B. mitochondria sp. nov. and B. wangviangensis.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 1). SH = 1.12; SW = 1.17; AH = 0.56; AW = 0.58.

Etymology.

Named after the heart-shaped aperture.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Bensonella fracta Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 101B, 103, 104, 107

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.08 mm; SW: 2.09 mm); Loei Province, Nong Hin district, 20.3 km southwest from centre of Nong Hin towards Pha Wai, left side of road no. 3029; 17°2.471'N, 101°43.655'E; 705 m a.s.l.; 28 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14448.

Paratypes. Thailand • 5 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Thailand, Loei Province, Nong Hin district, 20.3 km southwest from centre of Nong Hin, Pha Wai; left side of road no. 3029; 17°2.471'N, 101°43.655'E; 705 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Bensonella species with spirally striated teleoconch and strongly convex whorls separated by a deep suture. Last whorl narrow, slightly detached, rounded. Apertural barriers usually 7. Upper palatal plica bipartite, consisting of anterior and posterior bulge.

Figure 103. 

Bensonella fracta Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14448) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical, light yellowish-brownish, opaque. It is consisting of ~ 5 regularly increasing, strongly convex whorls separated by a deeply impressed suture. Protoconch finely pitted, showing a spiralling pattern (which is stronger terminally) and consisting of ~ 1.5 whorls, coloured as the rest of the shell. Teleoconch with sculpture consisting of fine, raised, and innumerable spiral striae which are occasionally crossed by much weaker radial growth lines (rarely present as strong white streaks). The sculpture of the teleoconch gets more prominent as the whorls are increasing, thus being most noticeable on the last two whorls. Last whorl relatively narrow (low), slightly detached from the penultimate, and slightly ascending near the aperture (~ 5–10 ° compared to the shell axis). It is completely rounded and strongly convex. Peristome the same colour as the rest of the shell, strongly expanded with finely pitted surface, not reflected. Aperture equipped with five main barriers (angular, parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, and columellar). Angular lamella short and thick, directed towards the lower palatal plica. Parietal lamella longer than the angular, leaned towards the upper palatal plica. Upper palatal plica usually bipartite, consisting of anterior and posterior bulge. Anterior bulge is closer to the peristome, smaller and lower. Posterior bulge is longer, higher, and stronger, positioned behind the anterior (deeper in the aperture). Origin of the anterior bulge is not known but it may be homologous with the palatal tubercle usually found in many typical Bensonella species. Columellar lamella developed to the similar extent as the palatal plicae. In front of the columellar lamella, there is sometimes a small swelling on the peristome. Apart from these main barriers, there is usually an additional smaller basal plica and one even smaller knob-like lamella in the columello-parietal embayment. Only the angular lamella and anterior bulge of the upper palatal plica are reaching t peristome. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus small, well separated from the rest of the shell due to the closely situated angular lamella and upper palatal plica. Umbilicus moderately wide (1/5–1/6 of the shell width), showing only the penultimate whorl. Umbilical groove absent.

Figure 104. 

SEM imaging of Bensonella fracta Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14448) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

Bensonella fracta sp. nov. is much larger than all other representatives of Bensonella wangviangensis group. See also under B. wangviangensis.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 4). SW1 = 2.09–2.18; SW2 = 1.31–1.48; SH = 1.9–2.08; AH = 0.81–1.1; AW = 0.89–1.23.

Etymology.

The first examined specimen of this species had a crack on the apical whorls, which gave the specific epithet fracta.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

This species is not a typical representative of this group since the angular lamella is quite small and not almost enclosing the sinulus. However, it is placed here because of the high morphological similarity with mostly B. wangviangensis. A tubercle-like swelling in the columellar-parietal embayment was found to be missing in one specimen. Otherwise, this species does not seem to be much variable regarding apertural barriers.

Bensonella mitochondria Gojšina, Vermeulen & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 103C, 105, 107

Type material.

Holotype. Laos • 1 shell (SH: 1.21 mm; SW: 1.27 mm); Khammouane Province, Thakhek Distr., Ban Nakok, base of forested limestone hill; 17°25.993'N, 105°07.880'E; 222 m a.s.l.; 14 Nov. 2006; A. Schuiteman leg.; locality code JJV 15157; CUMZ 14449. Paratypes. Laos • 9 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. JJV.

Additional material examined.

Laos • 2 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. JJV.

Type locality.

Laos, Khammouane Province, Thakhek Distr., Ban Nakok, base of forested limestone hill; 17°25.993'N, 105°07.880'E; 222 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

A colourless Bensonella species with shouldered last whorl and spirally striated teleoconch and nearly heart-shaped aperture. Apertural barriers numerous and almost all equally strong, umbilicus moderately wide.

Description.

Shell conical-ovoid, colourless. Whorls 3.5, initial whorls rounded, last two strongly shouldered, separated by a deep suture. Protoconch consisting of ~ 1 whorl, very finely pitted, with signs of indistinct and widely spaced spiralling pattern. Teleoconch with coarse spiral striae which are crossed by stronger, coarse, not numerous, and almost regularly spaced radial growth lines. Approximately 25 widely spaced spiral striae present on the last whorl in standard apertural view. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate, slightly ascending near the aperture (~ 10–15 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome continuous, strong, and expanded, especially at the parietal side where it leans on the penultimate whorl. Aperture nearly heart-shaped, equipped with a strong angular lamella, which is curved and almost merges with the prominent palatal tubercle, thus nearly enclosing the small sinulus (which makes it strongly separated from the rest of the aperture). Angular lamella reaches the peristome. There are eight to nine other barriers situated deep in the aperture and not reaching the peristome. Additional two lamellae at the parietal side (equally strong parietal and infraparietal), one columellar lamella, one subcolumellar, one basal plica, two palatal plicae (sometimes with additional, weak infrapalatal plica) and a palatal tubercle. Upper and lower palatal plicae strong, the former is situated slightly above the palatal tubercle. Palatal tubercle quite strong and elevated. Basal plica weaker than the palatals but stronger than the subcolumellar lamella. Columellar lamella slightly stronger than them but weaker than upper and lower palatal plica. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Umbilicus moderately wide, measuring ~ 1/5 of the shell width and showing only the penultimate whorl.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from B. cardiostoma sp. nov. most clearly by the spirally striated shell and a wider umbilicus.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 1.21–1.33; SW = 1.21–1.37; AH = 0.57–0.62; AW = 0.58–0.67.

Etymology.

The appearance of the apertural barriers when the last whorl is broken behind them resembles the morphology of a mitochondria (Fig. 105F), hence the specific epithet which is to be used as a noun in apposition.

Figure 105. 

Bensonella mitochondria Gojšina, Vermeulen & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov. A–D shell, holotype (CUMZ 14449) E enlarged protoconch view, holotype (CUMZ 14449) F enlarged apertural view (from the back, last whorl broken), paratype (coll. JJV) G, H enlarged views of the surface of the last whorl, holotype (CUMZ 14449).

Distribution.

This species in known only from the type locality.

Bensonella wangviangensis (Panha & Tongkerd, 2003)

Figs 103D, 106, 107

Paraboysidia wangviangensis Panha & Tongkerd in Panha et al. 2003: 123–128, figs 2–3.

Paraboysidia wangviangensisInkhavilay et al. 2019: 62.

Type material examined.

Laos • 1 paratype; from the type locality; 1998; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 089.

Type locality.

“Tam Chang Cave, Wangviang, Laos, 18°54′47″N, 102°26′33″E, 140 meters elevation…” (Laos).

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from B. cardiostoma sp. nov. and B. mitochondria sp. nov. by the more elongated shell, larger size as well as depressed and more elongated aperture. Additionally, B. cardiostoma sp. nov. is not spirally striated. Apart from the clearly smaller size, this species can further be separated from B. fracta sp. nov. by the shouldered last whorl, which is rounded in B. fracta sp. nov.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

We examined the types of this species and could add several notes to the original description. This species is originally described as having six apertural barriers (angular, parietal, infraparietal, two upper palatals and a lower palatal). From the Fig. 106, it can be clearly seen that there are eight barriers, the ones already described and additionally one interpalatal and a columellar lamella. The “second upper palatal plica” from the original description is in the position of usually mentioned palatal tubercle (typical for Bensonella), although it does not look like a tubercle but more like a proper lamella. Nevertheless, we treat them homologous.

Figure 106. 

Bensonella wangviangensis, paratype (CUMZ ver. 089) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 107. 

Distribution map of species belonging to the Bensonella wangviangensis group.

Bensonella sp. 1

Material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell; Phangnga Province, 32 km NE Khok Kloi, Wat Tham Suwan Khuha; 8°27'N, 98°27'E; 27 Mar. 1988; 20 m a.s.l.; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0601; UF 345752.

Remarks.

Only a single, weathered shell was in this sample which made the precise idenitifcation impossible. Based on the morphology of apertural barriers, they were possibly hooked.

Bensonella sp. 2

Material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell; Chiang Rai prov., Tham Tumluang cave, 7 km S, 2 k W of Mae Sai. Around caves, leaf litter; 20°22.1667'N, 99°51.4667'E; 08. May 1988; F. G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4419; UF 380223.

Remarks.

A single, damaged specimen was in this sample which made its identification impossible.

Bensonella sp. 3

Fig. 108

Material examined.

Laos • Luang Namtha Province, Luang Namtha ca 43.8 km southwest – Vieng Phou Kha, Phou Lan, right side of the road 100 m; 20°44.5278'N, 101°11.1011'E; 770 m a.s.l.; 08 Oct. 2019; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo, J. U. Otani leg., coll. HA.

Remarks.

Only a single, rather weathered, and partly damaged specimen of Bensonella which is the most similar to B. lakainguta and related species (B. hooki, B. montawa sp. nov., B. multihami) could be examined from Laos. Most of the aperture is obstructed by the dirt that could not be cleaned which is why majority of the barriers were invisible. The identity of this species remains unresolved until more specimens are collected.

Figure 108. 

Bensonella sp. 3 from Luang Namtha Province, Laos A–D shell E enlarged view of the protoconch F enlarged view of the aperture G view of the last whorl surface sculpture.

Boysidia Ancey, 1881

Pupa (Boysidia) Ancey, 1881: 373.

Diagnosis.

The genus Boysidia remains unrevised. This is urgently needed because many species are misunderstood due to poor original descriptions/drawings or the uncertain status of type specimens. The genus currently includes the following species: Boysidia chiangmaiensis Panha & J. B. Burch, 2002, B. conspicua (Möllendorff, 1885), B. dilamellaris D.-N. Chen, Y.-H. Liu & W.-X. Wu, 1995, B. dorsata (Ancey, 1881), B. gracilis F. Haas, 1937, B. guiyangensis T.-C. Luo, D.-N. Chen, G.-Q. Zhang, La. Zhang, Li Zhang & T.-W. Li, 1998, B. hangchowensis (Pilsbry & Y. Hirase, 1908), B. houaphanica Inkhavilay & Sutcharit, 2024, B. huangguoshuensis T.-C. Luo, D.-N. Chen & G.-Q. Zhang, 2000, B. hunana (Gredler, 1881), B. jinpingensis M. Tian, B. Fao & Y.-X. Chen, 2015, B. nanjiangensis Z.-L. Zhang, W.-H. Zhang & T.-C. Luo, 2011, B. orientalis B. Rensch, 1935, B. phatangensis Dumrongrojwattana & Assawawattagee, 2018, B. ringens van Benthem Jutting, 1950; B. robusta Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1912, B. shilinensis D.-N. Chen, M. Wu & G.-Q. Zhang, 1999, B. strophostoma (Möllendorff, 1885), B. taibaiensis D.-N. Chen, M. Wu & G.-Q. Zhang, 1999, B. tamtouriana Pokryszko & Auffenberg, 2009, B. tholos Panha & J. B. Burch, 2002, B. tongguanensis D.-N. Chen & W.-H. Zhang, 2002, B. xianfengensis W.-H. Zhang, D.-N. Chen & W.-C. Zhou, 2014, B. xiaoguanensis W.-H. Zhang, D.-N. Chen & W.-C. Zhou, 2014, B. xishanensis D.-N. Chen, M. Wu & G.-Q. Zhang, 1999, B. xiuwenensis W.-H. Zhang, T.-C. Luo & W.-C. Zhou, 2010.

The species listed below are excluded from the genus Bensonella and transferred to Boysidia due to the following traits (not shared among all these species): i) apertural dentition more similar to Boysidia (columellar lamella very strong and long, absence of three barriers on the parietal side); ii) surface sculpture similar to Boysidia (radial growth lines, no spiral striae); iii) larger shell sizes (frequently over 4 mm), which is more common in Boysidia representatives.

Boysidia gittenbergeri (Maassen, 2008), comb. nov.

Paraboysidia gittenbergeri Maassen, 2008: 237–239, figs 5, 6.

Paraboysidia gittenbergeriInkhavilay et al. 2016: 215–216, figs 1, 2A–C, 4A, tables 1, 2; Inkhavilay et al. 2019: 61, fig. 27A.

Material examined.

None.

Type locality.

“NW Laos, province Luang Namtha, district Vieng Phouka, Oung (= Khama word for cave) Pra Ngiene, 500 m SE of Ban (= village) Phou Lek, at the entrance of the cave”.

Remarks.

We have excluded this species from Bensonella and classified it in the genus Boysidia due to the combination of the following traits: i) large shell size (nearly 6 mm); ii) absence of the palatal tubercle typical for Bensonella; iii) shell shape more similar to some Boysidia species (e.g., B. chiangmaiensis, B. tholos, B. lamothei).

Boysidia hupeana (Gredler, 1901)

Figs 109

Hypselostoma hupeanum Gredler, 1901: 151.

Boysidia (Paraboysidia) hupeana — Pilsbry 1917: 206; Haas 1937: 8–9.

Paraboysidia hupeanavan Benthem Jutting 1950: 38; Zilch 1984: 165.

Paraboysidia kitteli Maassen, 1999: 123, figs 5–7. syn. nov.

Boysidia (Paraboysidia) hubeina [sic] — Chen and Zhang 2002: 692.

Boysidia (Boysidia) gongyaoshanensis Yang, Zhang & Chen, 2012: 550 (English description), 550–551 (Chinese description), figs 1–3. syn. nov.

Type material examined.

Indonesia • 1 paratypes of P. kitteli; from the type locality; 17 Aug. 1993; ex. coll. Hemmen, Wiesbaden; coll. PGB • 1 paratype of P. kitteli; from the type locality; 16 June 1990; ex. coll. Hemmen, Wiesbaden; coll. PGB • 4 paratypes of P. kitteli; from the type locality; Aug. 1993; ex. coll. W.J.M. Maassen; coll. PGB.

Additional material examined.

China • 1 shell; Badung, Hubei, coll. Moellendorff; SMF 10775.

Type localities.

“Südwest Hupé”, China (B. hupeana); “Gongyao Hill, Xingyi County (25°N, 104°08'E), Guizhou province, China” (B. gongyaoshanensis); “N. Sumatra, Karo Highlands, Kuta Buluh, 40 km N of Brastagi, near the entrance of the cave Liangdehar in leaf litter at the foot of limestone rocks” (B. kitteli).

Remarks.

Boysidia (Boysidia) gongyaoshanensis, described from Gongyao Hill, Xingyi County (25°N, 104°08'E), Guizhou province, China, is herein treated a junior synonym of B. hupeana since no morphological differences were noticed. Also, no differences in shell morphology were noticed between B. kitteli and B. hupeana even though they are described from localities which are ca 3200 km from each other. Even though the distance is enormous, they are treated conspecific due to the lack of conchological differences. Both new synonyms were not compared to B. hupeana in their respective original descriptions (Maassen 1999; Yang et al. 2012).

Figure 109. 

Boysidia hupeana A–E paratype of B. kitteli (coll. PGB) F–I specimen from Badung, Hubei (SMF 10775) A, F–I shell B–E enlarged apertural views.

Boysidia lamothei Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1912

Boysidia lamothei Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1912: 21, pl. 3, figs 7–9.

Boysidia (Paraboysidia) lamothei — Pilsbry 1917: 202–203, pl. 35, figs 3–6; Schileyko 2011: 2.

Paraboysidia lamotheivan Benthem Jutting 1950: 39.

Type material examined.

Vietnam • syntype; MNHN-IM-2000-35160.

Type locality.

“Ban-Lao”, Vietnam.

Remarks.

This species is treated as a member of Boysidia due to the shell shape being more similar to some other congeners such as B. robusta and B. jinpingensis and a strong and oblique columellar lamella which extends to the expanding peristome.

Boysidia paralella (Inkhavilay & Panha, 2016), comb. nov.

Paraboysidia paralella Inkhavilay & Panha in Inkhavilay et al. 2016: 220, figs 1, 3A–C, 4C.

Paraboysidia paralellaInkhavilay et al. 2019: 62, fig. 27B.

Material examined.

Laos • holotype; CUMZ 7059.

Type locality.

“Limestone wall near the entrance of Kao Rao Cave, Vieng Phouka District, Luang Namtha Province, Laos (20°43'30.1"N, 101°9'4.3"E), 732 m amsl”.

Remarks.

This species is assigned to Boysidia because of similar shell shape, surface sculpture and apertural barrier arrangement (especially strong columellar lamella) to some Boysidia species such as B. gittenbergeri, and B. hupeana.

Boysidia salwiniana (Theobald, 1870)

Pupa salwiniana Theobald, 1870: 400.

Pupa salwiniana — Hanley and Theobald 1874: pl. 100, fig. 9; Sowerby 1876: pl. 16, fig. 150; Nevill 1878: 23.

Pupa salwineana [sic] — Godwin-Austen 1888: 244.

Boysidia (Paraboysidia) salwiniana — Pilsbry 1917: 206–208, pl. 33, fig. 11.

Paraboysidia salwinianavan Benthem Jutting 1950: 40.

Bensonella salwinianaTongkerd et al. 2024: 167–171, figs 4, 5, 6A, 13F.

Material examined.

Myanmar • 1 shell; Burma NHMUK 1912.4.16.66.

Type locality.

“Shan States”, Myanmar.

Remarks.

Tongkerd et al. (2024) provided the first description of the genitalia and radula of this species. They have also pointed out that the type specimens could not be located.

Boysidia shuitianbaensis T.-C. Luo, D.-N. Chen, G.-Q. Zhang, La. Zhang, Li Zhang & T.-W. Li, 1998

Boysidia (Bensonella) shuitianbaensis Luo et al., 1998: 2 (Chinese description), 3–4 (English description), fig. 2.

Material examined.

None.

Type locality.

“Collected from Shuitianba town (26°7'N, 106°8'E), Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China”.

Remarks.

According to the original description, this species should be assigned to Boysidia due to the presence of only four barriers and a merged angulo-parietal lamella.

Additional Boysidia material examined

Boysidia ringens van Benthem Jutting, 1950

Fig. 110

Boysidia ringens van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 11–12, fig. 3.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 23 paratypes; from the type locality; M. W. F. Tweedie leg.; RMNH Moll.137127.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia • 7 shells; Kedah, Gunung Keriang (N of Alor Setar), Oct. 1998, Hemmen, leg. Wiesbaden ex. coll.; coll. PGB • 1 shell; Kedah, Gunung Keriang, 7.5 km NW of Alor Setar; ex. coll. Maassen; coll. PGB.

Figure 110. 

Boysidia ringens, paratype (RMNH Moll.137127) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Type locality.

“Mount Keriang, Kedah”, Malaysia.

Cross-diagnosis.

This species is not similar to any other congener.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma Benson, 1856

Hypselostoma Benson, 1856b: 342 (replacement name forTanystoma Benson, 1856, non Motschulsky 1845, Carabidae, Coleoptera).

Gyliotrachela Tomlin, 1930: 24. (replacement name forGyliauchen Pilsbry 1917 non Nicoll 1915, Platyhelminthes, Trematoda) syn. nov.

Antroapiculus Panha & Burch, 2002a: 144–148. syn. nov.

Diagnosis.

This genus is subdivided into four species groups: i) H. bensonianum group ii) H. hungerfordianum group; iii) H. terae group and iv) H. tubiferum group. This subdivision is based on the shell surface sculpture (coupled with apertural barrier morphology and geographic distribution in H. terae group) which is raised spirally striated in H. bensonianum group, granulated (sandpaper-like) in H. hungerfordianum group and fine, pasty in H. terae and H. tubiferum group. Most representatives share the depressed-conical or conical shell shape with last whorl adnate to or detached from the penultimate.

Remarks.

Hypselostoma aenigma sp. nov. is provisionally placed in this genus due to the specific apertural barrier arrangement. Hypselostoma torta sp. nov. is also not a typical representative since it has non-raised spiral striae which are probably not homologous to the raised ones as usual for the genus.

Genera Gyliotrachela and Antroapiculus are both treated as junior synonyms of Hypselostoma due to the following facts: i) Antroapiculus is described based on a unique shell (flat with strongly downwards descending aperture) and a single lamella on the parietal side (parietal lamella). This however does not seem to warrant separation of a new genus since the flat shell (H. tridentatum, H. khaowongkot, H. utongense) and strongly descending aperture (H. srakeoense, H. chaunosalpinx, H. fungus sp. nov., H. transitans, H. torticollis) are shared with other congeners. Furthermore, apertural barrier arrangement is also similar to H. torticollis, H. fungus sp. nov., H. depressum which indicates that the combination of characters in H. pendulum could just be an autapomorphic state which could be changed rapidly during the evolution; ii) Gyliotrachela is treated distinct from Hypselostoma solely based on the separated parietal and angular lamella on the parietal side (Pilsbry 1917). Since we have found several examples of species with almost exactly the same shell morphology, but with different apertural barrier arrangements (Fig. 262), we find it less likely that they belong to different genera and find this criterium insufficient.

1. Hypselostoma bensonianum group

Diagnosis. Hypselostoma bensonianum group is characterised by raised and usually widely spaced spiral striation (in form of threads).

Remarks. A total of 46 species belong to this group. This group has a wide distribution across Southeast Asia as well as in Australia where only one species can be found. In Southeast Asia, this group spans from central and eastern Myanmar to Taiwan as well as southwards all the way to Indonesia. Northernmost localities on mainland Southeast Asia are known from Luang Prabang Province in Laos.

Hypselostoma adela (F.G. Thompson & Upatham, 1997), comb. nov.

Figs 111A, 112, 113, 154

Gyliotrachela adela Thompson & Upatham, 1997: 234–235, figs 44–47.

Gyliotrachela adelaTongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Panha and Burch 2008: 65–66, fig. 57; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 03 June 1987; F. G. Thompson leg.; UF 00113508; 4 paratypes; from the type locality; 03 June 1987; F. G. Thompson leg.; UF 00113509.

Additional material examined.

Thailand-South • 16 shells; Suratthani Province, 28.4 km E Surat Thani, 19 km S Hwy. 401, dry, scrubby evergreen forest, leaf litter, rocks, boulders; 9.15°N, 99.6°E; 40 m a.s.l.; 19 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0675; UF 591322 • 15 shells; Suratthani Province, limestone outcrop along Hwy. 401, 2.7 km W junc Hwys. 4142 & 401; 9°10'N, 99°40'E; 90 m a.s.l.; 19 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0673; UF 591323 • 2 shells; Suratthani Province, 15.3 km NE Ban Na San off road to Tha Rom Yen National Park; 8°53'N, 99°26'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 20 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0678; UF 345389 • 5 shells; Suratthani Province, 13.8 km SE Don Sak, 5 km SW Hwy. 4142; 9°18'N, 99°43'E; 50 m a.s.l.; 14 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0670; UF 345284 • 1 shell; Suratthani Province, 1 km NE of Na San, 100 m limestone mountain; 8.812°N, 99.382°E; 20 June 1987; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4309; UF 529617 • 35 shells; Suratthani Province, Hwy. 401, 2.7 km W junction Hwy. 4142 and 401, evergreen forest on rocky hillside, below cliff, base of cliff; 9°10'N, 99°40'E; 90 m a.s.l.; 19 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0674; UF 345331 • 3 shells; Suratthani Province, 4.5 km S Don Sak, E side of Hwy. 4142, evergreen forest, limestone outcrop, base of cliff; 9°18'N, 99°42'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 18 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0672; UF 345302 • 5 shells; Suratthani Province, 15.3 km NE Ban Na San off road to Thi Rom Yen National Park; 8°53'N, 99°26'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 20 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0678; UF 591320 • 12 shells; Suratthani Province, 13.8 km SE Don Sak, 5 km SW Hwy. 4142; 9°18'N, 99°43'E; 50 m a.s.l.; 17 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0669; UF 345277 • 9 shells; Suratthani Province, 15.3 km NE Ban Na San off road to Tha Rom Yen National Park; 8°53'N, 99°26'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 20 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0679; UF 345397 • 16 shells; Suratthani Province, 28.4 km E Surat Thani, 1.9 km S Hwy. 401, dry, scrubby evergreen forest, leaf litter, rocks, boulders; 9.15°N, 99.6°E; 40 m a.s.l.; 19 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0675; UF 436269 • 2 shells; Suratthani Province, limestone hill (with monastery) left side off rd. #4009 (~ 11 km N of Waing Sa); 08°41.590'N, 099°22.689'E; ex. coll. Hemmen, Wiesbaden; coll. PGB • 8 shells; Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, 15.6 km SE Don Sak, 1 km SW Hwy. 4142; 9°17'N, 99°46'E; 50 m a.s.l.; 15 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0667; UF 345253 • 16 shells; Nakhon Sri Thammarat Province, 15.6 km SE Don Sak, 1 km SW Hwy. 4142; 9°17'N, 99°46'E; 50 m a.s.l.; 17 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0668; UF 345258 • 2 shells; Nakhon Sri Thammarat Province, limestone hill right off road #4142 ca km 38.2 (road Khanom-Don Sak); Mar. 2000; ex. coll. Hemmen, Wiesbaden; coll. PGB • 4 shells; Krabi Province, Phi Phi islands, Phi Phi Don island, climbing rock above the western end of the beach in Ton Sai Bay, at the base of limestone rocks in the forest; 7°44.063'N, 98°45.947'E; 50 m a.s.l.; Mar. 2010; A. Reischütz leg; coll. REI • 1 shell; Phattalung Province, Khao Ok Thalu, rock wall; 07°37.506'N, 100°05.330'E; 19 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Phatthalung Province, Khao Pu-Khao Ya Nat. Parl, Si Banphot district, ca 6 km NNW of Taphaen, 7°40.738'N, 99°50.822'E; 24 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Songkhla Province, 31.3 km NW Hat Yai, 1.2 km W of Hwy. 43; 7°10'N, 100°16'E; 80 m a.s.l.; 08 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0636B; UF 344945. Malaysia • 3 shells; Pahang, Bandar Pusat Jengka, west 15 km, Hutan Lipur Gunung Senyum; 03°41.862'N, 102°25.980'E; 85 m a.s.l.; 23 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

“Thailand, Surat Thani Province, box canyon in limestone range 6 km south of Na San; 100 m altitude (08°39.6'N, 99°23.9'E)”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is not similar to any other congener and is unique due to the combination of the following characters: small size, yellowish shell, spirally striated teleoconch with descending detached last whorl and aperture equipped with several equally developed barriers (without smaller ones). See under H. cucumense.

Figure 111. 

Synoptic view of species belonging to the Hypselostoma bensonianum group A H. adela B H. aenigma sp. nov. C H. annamiticum D H. aquila sp. nov. E H. australe F H. benetuitum G H. bensonianum H H. cambodjense I H. chaunosalpinx J H. chedi K H. circumcarinatum sp. nov. L H. cucumense M H. cf. cultura N H. depressum O H. diarmaidi P H. dilatatum Q H. discobasis R H. edentatum S H. erawan T H. everetti U H. fruhstorferi V H. fungus sp. nov. W H. geckophilum sp. nov. X H. holimanae Y H. insularum Z H. iunior sp. nov. AA H. khaochakan AB H. khaochongpran AC H. khaowongense AD H. kohrin AE H. platybasis sp. nov. AF H. populare sp. nov. AG H. rupestre AH H. salpinx AI H. saxicola AJ H. sculpturatum sp. nov. AK H. smokon AL H. sorormajor sp. nov. AM H. sororminor sp. nov. AN H. taehwani AO H. torta sp. nov. AP H. torticollis AQ H. tridentatum AR H. utongense.

Distribution.

This species in known from several localities in Thailand and one in Peninsular Malaysia. Our record from Malaysia is the first record of this species in the country.

Figure 112. 

Hypselostoma adela, holotype (UF 00113508) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view. The specimen is coated for the purpose of SEM imaging, which is why the original colouration is not retained.

Remarks.

Apertural barriers were constant in number in all the specimens examined. We have examined the material from northern Thailand hosted in UF with the following data: 1 shell; Mae Hong Song Province, Tham Lod Cave, 1.5 km SE Ban Tham Lod Village, 6 km N Sappong on Road 1095; 19°34'N, 98°9'E; 720 m a.s.l.; 19 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0576; UF 591321; 7 shells; Mae Hong Song Province, Tham Lod Cave, 1.5 km SE Ban Tham Lod Village, 6 km N Sappong on Road 1095; 19°34'N, 98°9'E; 720 m a.s.l.; 19 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0674; UF 345523. Since these localities are quite far from the actual distribution area of this species, we believe that these samples were mislabelled and that this species actually does not occur in Mae Hong Son Province.

Figure 113. 

Hypselostoma adela, paratype (UF 00113509) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Hypselostoma aenigma Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111B, 114, 115, 158

Type material.

Holotype. Myanmar • 1 shell (SH: 2.1 mm; SW: 1.7 mm); Kayin State, Kamarmaung, Phon Tho Village, Pan Do Mi Mountain spring cave at W foot of the mountain; 17°19.3575'N, 97°43.4842'E 19. May 2019; J. Grego leg; CUMZ 14452.

Type locality.

Myanmar, Kayin State, Kamarmaung, Phon Tho Village, Pan Do Mi Mountain spring cave at W foot of the mountain; 17°19.3575'N, 97°43.4842'E.

Diagnosis.

Hypselostoma species with conical-ovoid shell, spirally striated whorls, and the last whorl with a keel below the centre of the periphery. Apertural barriers three but the parietal lamella is the only tooth-like barrier. Palatal plica and columellar lamella are present as swellings on the peristome.

Description.

Shell conical-ovoid, pale yellowish, consisting of nearly 4.5 whorls separated by a deep suture. All whorls, except the last one, regularly rounded and convex. Last whorl with a blunt keel below the centre of the periphery and weakly concave to almost flat whorl outline both above and below the keel. Protoconch of same colour as the rest of the shell, finely pitted showing spiralling pattern which continues as more distinct spiral striae terminally. It consists of ~ 1.75 whorls. Teleoconch coarsely sculptured with irregularly spaced radial growth lines but also with dense spiral striae. Spacing between the two spiral striae equals the width of two or three striae. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate and very slightly ascending (~ 7 ° compared to the shell axis), making the apertural profile weakly opisthocline to the shell axis. Peristome white, thick, and expanded (especially on the parietal side) but not reflected. Apertural barriers largely reduced and of very unusual appearance for any hypselostomatid. Parietal lamella is the only „tooth-like“ barrier in the aperture but it is very low and short. Palatal plica and columellar lamella not present in their typical forms but rather as very weak and indistinct swellings on the peristome, visible only in the frontal view. These swellings are probably homologous to the two mentioned barriers. There are no other barriers in the aperture. Surface of all apertural barriers is very finely granulated (almost smooth). Sinulus wide due to the weak parietal lamella and palatal plica. Umbilicus extremely narrow, dot like and slightly elongated. Umbilical groove absent.

Figure 114. 

Hypselostoma aenigma Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14452) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is not similar to any other congener or species within other genera due to the unique appearance of apertural barriers.

Figure 115. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma aenigma Gojšina, Grego & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14452) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 1): SH = 2.1; SW = 1.7; AH = 0.97; AW = 0.93.

Etymology.

The specific epithet aenigma comes from a Latin word for a riddle (which refers to the unique appearance of the shell and unclear relationship with other congeners) and is to be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is known only from its type locality.

Hypselostoma annamiticum Möllendorff, 1900

Figs 111C, 116, 154

Hypselostoma annamiticum Möllendorff, 1900: 133.

Hypselostoma annamiticumMöllendorff 1901a: 50; Fischer and Dautzenberg 1904: 408; Pilsbry 1917: 180–181; Zilch 1984: 161; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 41.

Hypselostoma annamiticum altius Pilsbry, 1917: 181, pl. 31, figs 11–13. syn. nov.

Hypselostoma annamiticum altiusvan Benthem Jutting 1950: 41; Schileyko 2011: 3.

Hypselostoma annamiticum annamiticumSchileyko 2011: 3.

Type material examined.

Vietnam • holotype of H. annamiticum annamiticum; “Phuc-Son, Touranne, Annam”; ex. coll. Möllendorff; SMF 4871 • 11 paratypes of H. annamiticum annamiticum; same data as for the holotype; ex. coll. Möllendorff; SMF 4872 • 1 paralectotype of H. annamiticum altius; from the type locality; ANSP 45167.

Type localities.

“Phuc-son”, Vietnam (H. annamiticum annamiticum), “Annam (Fruhstorfer)”, Vietnam (H. annamiticum altius).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is superficially similar and geographically approximate to A. turritus sp. nov., but the suture of this species is shallower, the shell is more slender, the umbilicus is wider and the apertural dentition is also different (no concrescent barriers on the parietal side in the new species vs angulo-parietal lamella in H. annamiticum).

Distribution.

This species is known only from Annam, Vietnam.

Remarks.

Holotype of H. annamiticum annamiticum has a vestigial lamella between the columellar lamella and angulo-parietal lamella. Some paratypes do not have this lamella or it is further less developed, sometimes also located much deeper inside the aperture. In some specimens, upper palatal plica has an additional palatal tubercle which is sometimes connected with the former. Hypselostoma annamiticum altius is synonymised with the nominotypical subspecies since we could observe no morphological differences. The fact that it is higher than the nominotypical subspecies (Pilsbry 1917) does not seem to justify its distinctness.

Figure 116. 

Hypselostoma annamiticum A–E holotype of H. annamiticum annamiticum (SMF 4871) F–H paralectotype of H. annamiticum altius (ANSP 45167) A–D, F–H shell E enlarged apertural view.

Hypselostoma aquila Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111D, 117, 118, 177

Type material.

Holotype. Cambodia • 1 shell (SH: 1.98 mm; SW1: 2.39 mm); Steung Treng Province, 55.7 km northwest + 2 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, Chap Phleung Mt. (Neak Khiev Mt.); 13°47.821'N, 105°36.205'E; 135 m a.s.l.; 26 Oct. 2023, A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14461. Paratypes. Cambodia • 107 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG • 229 shells; Steung Treng Province, Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, 36.3 km NWN + 5 km N, Phnom Chhnok; 13°46.573'N, 105°44.878'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 25 Oct. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA.

Additional material examined.

Cambodia • 4 shells (juveniles/ damaged, not paratypes); Steung Treng Province, Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, 36.3 km NWN + 5 km N, Phnom Chhnok; 13°46.573'N, 105°44.878'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 25 Oct. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Cambodia, Steung Treng Province, 55.7 km northwest + 2 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, Chap Phleung Mt. (Neak Khiev Mt.); 13°47.821'N, 105°36.205'E; 135 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

A Hypselostoma species with a slender, concave-conical shell, bluntly and strongly keeled last whorl (and a deep groove above it), raised spiral striation, hooked apertural barriers (upper palatal, and lower palatal) and a wide umbilicus which is initially narrow.

Figure 117. 

Hypselostoma aquila Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14461) A–D shell

Description.

Shell concave-conical, light-brown, consisting of 4.5–5 whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch nearly white, consisting of ~ 1.25 coarsely spirally striated whorls. There are ~ 12 weak spiral striae on the protoconch. Protoconch and initial teleoconch whorls rounded, penultimate weakly convex. Last whorl with strong but blunt keel positioned at the centre of the periphery. Above the keel there is a deep groove on the last 0.75–1 whorl. All whorls densely sculptured with strong, thick spiral striae crossed by less dense radial growth lines and occasionally by a few thin, whitish radial streaks. Spacing between the spiral striae irregular and ranges from the width of two to the width of three spiral striae. Last whorl moderately detached from the penultimate and weakly ascending (≤ 10 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome expanded, not reflected, its surface finely pitted. Aperture equipped with four strong, main barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar) and several smaller ones. Angulo-parietal lamella strong and leaned towards the palatal side, almost reaching the expanding peristome. It is consisting of main, parietal part, and a smaller, pointed angular part which are separated by a weak sinuation. Upper and lower palatal plicae roughly the same size, both divided and the inner parts are hooked (with the tip of hooks pointing outside), slender and high, while the outer parts are low and slender. A weak swelling is also observed at the palatal side (in front of the upper palatal plicae) which is probably homologous to the palatal tubercle in the majority of Bensonella species. Columellar lamella almost horizontal, approximately as high as the palatal plicae. There are four smaller barriers, two interpalatal plicae, one basal plica and one infraparietal lamella. Surface of all apertural barriers is smooth or with very weak granules. Sinulus rounded, distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus initially narrow and then abruptly widening, measuring between 1/3 and 1/4 of the shell width. There is a periumbilical keel situated on the last ~ 0.75 whorl near the centre of the last whorl, but rather slightly towards the umbilicus. Along this keel there are shallow grooves on both sides.

Figure 118. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma aquila Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14461) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. benetuitum, H. sorormajor sp. nov., and H. sororminor sp. nov.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 1.91–2.04; SW1 = 2.16–2.39; SW2 = 1.35–1.42; AH = 0.80–0.86; AW = 0.69–0.82.

Etymology.

This species is named for the apertural barriers resembling claws of an eagle (aquila = eagle in Latin). To be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is known from two localities in Steung Treng province.

Remarks.

The largest, and still unexplored limestone hill in Steung Treng Province (13°47.941'N, 105°43.7671'E) was inaccessible during the collecting efforts in 2023 due to the works of a cement factory. Due to the proximity of this hill to the type locality of H. aquila sp. nov., it is possible that this species can be found here as well and be threatened by quarrying.

Hypselostoma australe australe Odhner, 1917

Figs 111E, 119

Hypselostoma australis Odhner, 1917: 98, pl. 3, figs 107–109.

Gyliotrachela australisIredale 1937: 305; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 44; Pokryszko 1996: 1117, figs 31, 33, 34.

Gyliotrachela ningbingia Solem, 1981: 91, figs 3, 4, 10, 14–16, 18, 19.

Gyliotrachela catherina Solem, 1981: 91–92, figs 5, 6, 11, 17; Pokryszko 1996: 1117.

Gyliotrachela ninbingia [sic] — Pokryszko 1996: 1117.

Type material examined.

Australia • syntype of H. australis australis; SMNH 1667.

Type locality.

“caves at Chillagoe” (North Queensland, Australia).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar in shape to several Southeast Asian representatives, but it can be separated clearly by its different shell surface sculpture which consists of equally strong, rib-like radial growth lines and spiral striae. See also under H. australe napierana.

Distribution.

This species in known from several localities in N Australia as well as under several synonyms (Iredale 1937; Solem 1981).

Remarks.

Pokryszko (1996) synonymised G. catherina and G. ningbingia with H. australe, mentioning that the former two show only biometrical differences from H. australe which does not justify their distinctness.

Figure 119. 

Hypselostoma australe australe, syntype (SMNH 1667) A–D shell.

Hypselostoma australe napieranum (Solem, 1981), comb. nov.

Gyliotrachela napierana Solem, 1981: 90–91, figs 1, 2, 9, 13.

Gyliotrachela australis napieranaPokryszko 1996: 1117–1118, fig. 32.

Material examined.

None.

Type locality.

“Station WA-325, 0.6 km south-west of road along north side of Napier Range, 5.9 km north-west of Yammera Gap, Western Australia”.

Differential diagnosis.

This subspecies is different from the nominotypical by the more numerous and stronger apertural barriers.

Distribution.

This subspecies is known from several localities in Napier Range, western Australia.

Hypselostoma benetuitum Vermeulen, Luu, Theary & Anker, 2019

Figs 111F, 120, 182

Hypselostoma benetuitum Vermeulen et al., 2019: 38–39, figs 64–68.

Hypselostoma benetuitumSutcharit et al. 2020: 18, fig. 7E, F; Sutcharit et al. 2023: 1290.

Type material examined.

Cambodia • holotype; J. Vermeulen leg.; NHMUK 20180575.

Type locality.

“Phnom Kampong Trach”, Cambodia.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar in shell shape to other Cambodian representatives (H. discobasis, H. sorormajor sp. nov., H. sororminor sp. nov., H. aquila sp. nov.) but differs from all of them by the presence of a keel with a concave surface below it but flat above it (vice versa in other species). Furthermore, this species has hooked apertural barriers in contrast to H. discobasis and H. sororminor sp. nov. See also under H. cambodjense.

Figure 120. 

Hypselostoma benetuitum, holotype (NHMUK 20180575) A–E shell.

Distribution.

This species is known from Kampot province, Cambodia.

Hypselostoma bensonianum W.T. Blanford, 1863

Figs 111G, 121, 158

Hypselostoma bensonianum Blanford, 1863: 326–327.

Hypselostoma bensonianum — Hanley and Theobald 1870: 4, pl. 8 fig. 2; Pfeiffer 1875: 488; Möllendorff 1891: 338; Gude 1914: 299.

Pupa (Hypselostoma) bensoniNevill 1878: 193.

Gyliauchen bensonianus — Pilsbry 1917: 211; pl. 37 figs 11, 12.

Gyliotrachela bensonianavan Benthem Jutting 1950: 44.

Gyliotrachela bensonianumGojšina et al. 2022: 136–137, figs 4–5; Tongkerd et al. 2024: 179, fig. 13L.

Type material examined.

Myanmar • 5 syntypes; NHMUK 20191141.

Type locality.

“Mya Leit Doung, Ava” (nowadays Melai Taung 21.8°N, 96.2°E).

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from all other congeners by its keeled last whorl and spirally striated teleoconch in combination with a small number of relatively strong apertural barriers (usually up to seven). See also under H. aunglini.

Figure 121. 

Hypselostoma bensonianum, syntype (NHMUK 20191141) (from Gojšina et al. 2022) A–D shell.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma cambodjense van Benthem Jutting, 1962

Figs 111H, 122, 182

Hypselostoma cambodjense van Benthem Jutting, 1962: 3–5, fig. 1.

Hypselostoma cambodjenseVermeulen et al. 2019: 39; Sutcharit et al. 2020: 18, figs 3H, 8A–C; Sutcharit et al. 2023: 1290.

Type material examined.

Cambodia • 4 paratypes; from the type locality; 1960; E. Saurin leg.; RMNH.Moll.137169.

Type locality.

“Phnom Can Long, à 6 km au Sud de Tuk Méas, Cambodge”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from H. benetuitum by the absence of hooked apertural barriers. Also, the keel is slightly sharper in H. benetuitum with a more concave surface below it.

Distribution.

This species in known from Kampot province (Cambodia) and Kien Giang province (Vietnam) (Vermeulen et al. 2019).

Figure 122. 

Hypselostoma cambodjense, paratype (RMNH Moll.137169) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Remarks.

Of four paratypes examined, one of them had the last whorl fully adnate to the penultimate.

Hypselostoma chaunosalpinx (Vermeulen, Luu, Theary & Anker, 2019), comb. nov.

Figs 111I, 123, 182

Anauchen chaunosalpinx Vermeulen et al., 2019: 35, figs 57–59.

Anauchen chaunosalpinxSutcharit et al. 2023: 1290.

Type material examined.

Cambodia • holotype; NHMUK 20180573.

Type locality.

“Cambodia: Kampot Province, Kampong Trach area: Phnom Kampong Trach”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is not similar to any other congener due to the combination of conical shell with wide last whorl which is strongly descending and has several hooked apertural barriers. See under H. depressum.

Figure 123. 

Hypselostoma chaunosalpinx, holotype (NHMUK 20180573) A–E shell.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma chedi Panha, 1998

Figs 111J, 124, 154

Hypselostoma chedi Panha, 1998b: 61–63, fig. 2.

Anauchen chediBurch and Panha 2002: 246, fig. 4; Tongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Panha and Burch 2008: 50–51, fig. 46; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 7.

Hypselostoma chediHemmen and Hemmen 2001: 41.

Type material examined.

Thailand • paratype; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 004; 2 paratypes; from the type locality; SMF 331470.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 36 shells; Nakhon Sawan Province, 19.5 km NE intersection Hwys 11 and 32; 15°14'N, 100°16'E; 50 m a.s.l.; 02. May 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0696; UF 346127/2, UF 346138/34.

Figure 124. 

Hypselostoma chedi, paratype (CUMZ ver. 004) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Type locality.

“Thailand, Tebpratan Nature Reserve area, Kampangpet Province, 15°54′52″N, 99°52′63″E, 140 meters elevation”.

Differential diagnosis.

see under H. smokon and H. khaochakan.

Distribution.

This species is known from Nakhon Sawan and Kampangpet provinces.

Remarks.

Coordinates provided in the original description are not correct.

Hypselostoma circumcarinatum Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111K, 125, 126, 154

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.3 mm; SW: 2.2 mm); Kanchanaburi Province, 4.3 km SW Kanchanaburi, Taoist Buddhist temple; 13°59'N, 99°31'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 13. May 1988, K. Auffenberg leg.; UF 345933. Paratypes. Thailand • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14456 • 3 shells (2 whole and 1 with complete aperture); same data as for holotype; UF 591336.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 4 shells (damaged, without last whorl, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; UF 583722.

Type locality.

Kanchanaburi Province, 4.3 km SW Kanchanaburi, Taoist Buddhist temple; 13°59'N, 99°31'E; 40 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Hypselostoma species with very deep sutures and spirally striated whorls. Penultimate and the last whorl are keeled. Last whorl not detached from the penultimate. Aperture equipped with six barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, basal, columellar and a small infraparietal). Umbilicus initially narrow, abruptly widening at the last whorl.

Figure 125. 

Hypselostoma circumcarinatum Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 345933) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical-ovoid, consisting of 4–4.5 whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch pitted, showing some spiralling pattern, the same colour as the rest of the shell, consisting of ~ 1.5 whorls. Teleoconch surface sculptured with coarsely spaced radial lines crossed by much stronger and dense spiral striae. Spacing between two spiral striae approximates the width of one or two striae. First teleoconch whorl rounded. All other teleoconch whorls strongly keeled, last one the most prominent. Surface above the keel on the penultimate whorl is almost flat, (like a platform) but is much more steep (sloping) on the last whorl. Last whorl adnate to the penultimate and slightly ascending near the aperture (~ 5–10 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome not very strong but expanded, not reflected. It is forming a weak callus on the parietal side. Aperture equipped with five main barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, basal and columellar) and one small infraparietal lamella which is knob-like (although it can be absent as well). Angulo-parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture, consisting of larger parietal part and indistinct angular part so that it appears slightly bilobed. Upper palatal plica short, weaker than the lower palatal and slightly bent towards it. Lower palatal plica roughly as strong as the columellar, situated halfway between upper palatal and basal plica. Basal plica small, slightly weaker than the upper palatal. Columellar lamella strong, directed towards the upper palatal plica and almost reaching the expanding peristome. Peristome is weakly swollen in front of the columellar lamella. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated to almost smooth. Sinulus wide and not distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus initially very narrow and then abruptly widening at the last whorl, measuring ~ 1/5–1/6 of the shell width. A weak groove is visible running alongside the umbilicus but it is getting lost near the middle part of the last whorl.

Figure 126. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma circumcarinatum Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 345933) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. sculpturatum and H. khmerianum.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 4). SH = 1.93–2.46; SW = 2.09–2.24; AH = 1.02–1.16; AW = 1.05–1.18.

Etymology.

The two largest whorls (last and the penultimate) are keeled which gives the initial impression that the whole shell is keeled, hence the specific epithet.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

Some specimens had a more depressed shell which was even slightly wider than high.

Hypselostoma cultura (Tanmuangpak & Dumrongrojwattana, 2022), comb. nov.

Figs 111M, 127, 154

Gyliotrachela cultura Tanmuangpak & Dumrongrojwattana, 2022: 408–415, fig. 2.

Material examined.

Thailand • 52 shells; Chonburi Province, Ko Sichang, Tha Thewawong, vicinity of Mondop Roi Phraphutthabat; 13°10.256'N, 100°48.305'E; 140 m a.s.l.; 11 Mar. 2023; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 3 shells; Chonburi Province, Si Racha, Ko Si Chang; 25 Oct. 2019; J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 2 shells; Lampang Province, Maemoh district, Wat Tam Innaeramitr; 10 Aug. 2014; J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB.

Type locality.

“Agricultural areas in Mueang Loei District, Loei Province, Thailand (17°34′43.020″N, 101°51′04.020″E)”.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. khaowongense.

Distribution.

This species is, apart from the type locality in Loei province, known from two more localities: one in Lampang and one in Chonburi province.

Remarks.

This species might be conspecific with H. khaowongense. The differences mentioned by Tanmuangpak and Dumrongrojwattana (2022) between this species and H. khaowongense (therein under Gyliotrachela saraburiensis) are only regarding the number of apertural barriers, which are very variable in H. khaowongense. We have noticed additionally that the shells of H. cultura are strongly shouldered when observed laterally (e.g., as in Tanmuangpak and Dumrongrojwattana 2022: Fig. 2E, K) which is not typical for H. khaowongense. Due to the absence of relevant comparative material, we do not formally synonymise the two species. Specimens examined by us from Chonburi (Fig. 127) and Lampang provinces show very similar shell morphology as figured in Tanmuangpak and Dumrongrojwattana (2022), just with a wider umbilicus. We do not intend to describe this species as separate from H. cultura until more comparative material becomes available.

Figure 127. 

Hypselostoma cf. cultura from Ko Sichang Island, Chonburi province (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Hypselostoma cucumense Panha, 1998

Figs 111L, 128, 154

Hypselostoma cucumensis Panha, 1998b: 65–66, figs 1b, 3.

Hypselostoma cucumensisHemmen and Hemmen 2001: 41; Panha and Burch 2008: 90, fig. 77; Tongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Material examined.

Thailand • 35 shells; Phetchaburi Province, Khao Yoi, northeastern side of the mountain; 13°14.316'N, 99°49.493'E; 30 m a.s.l.; 24 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

“Limestone hills at Kangkrajan National Park, Petchaburi Province, 13°14′9″N, 99°49′43″E, 80 meters elevation” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

This species resembles H. adela in shell size, surface sculpture and colouration. However, in H. adela, the angular and parietal lamellae are separated, the barriers are generally stronger and the last whorl is always at least slightly descending (slightly ascending in H. cucumense). See also under H. populare sp. nov. and H. khaochongpran.

Figure 128. 

Hypselostoma cucumense from Phetchaburi province (near the type locality, coll. HA) A–D shell E–F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from the type locality and its immediate surroundings.

Hypselostoma depressum (Vermeulen, Luu, Theary & Anker, 2019), comb. nov.

Figs 111N, 129, 182

Anauchen depressus Vermeulen et al., 2019: 35–37, figs 60–63.

Anauchen depressusSutcharit et al. 2023: 1290.

Type material examined.

Cambodia • holotype; NHMUK 20180574.

Type locality.

“Cambodia: Kampot Province, Kampot area: Phnom La’Ang, cave with shrine at its entrance, first chamber with collapsed roof…southeast end…”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from H. chaunosalpinx by the keeled last whorl and less numerous apertural barriers, none of which are hooked. The umbilicus is also wider in H. chaunosalpinx. See also under H. taehwani.

Figure 129. 

Hypselostoma depressum, holotype (NHMUK 20180574) A–E shell.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

The type locality of this species was inaccessible during collecting efforts in 2023 due to the restricted access and the presence of concrete walls around the locality. This indicates that the species could be seriously threatened by quarrying.

Hypselostoma diarmaidi (Panha & J.B. Burch, 2003), comb. nov.

Figs 111O, 130, 131, 154

Gyliotrachela diarmaidi Panha & Burch in Burch et al. 2003: 157–162, figs 10, 11.

Gyliotrachela diarmaidiTongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Panha and Burch 2008: 67–69, fig. 59; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 8.

Material examined.

Thailand • 2 shells; Rayong Province, Wang Chan; 10 Aug. 2013 • 9 shells; Songkhla Province, 31.3 km NW Hat Yai 1.2 km W of Hwy. 43. Limestone outcrop, evergreen forest, leaf litter, roots and sticks, small solution pits; 7.1667°N, 100.2667°E; 80 m a.s.l.; 08 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; UF 344927 • 1 shell; same data as previous; locality code KA-0636B; UF 344944.

Type locality.

“Pluangthong Mountain, west of Pluangthong Temple, Botong District, Chonburi Province, 13°11'5"N, 101°34'59"E, 110 meters elevation, Thailand”.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. kohrin and H. surakiti.

Distribution.

Apart from the type locality, this species is known from one other sampling site near the type locality as well as from the Rayong, Sa Kaeo, Prachinburi, and Songkhla provinces (Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024).

Figure 130. 

Hypselostoma diarmaidi from near the type locality (coll. PGB) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 131. 

Hypselostoma diarmaidi from Songkhla province (UF 344927) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Hypselostoma dilatatum van Benthem Jutting, 1962

Figs 111P, 132, 182

Hypselostoma dilatatum van Benthem Jutting, 1962: 5–6, fig. 2.

Hypselostoma dilatatumSchileyko 2011: 3; Vermeulen et al. 2019: 39.

Type material examined.

Vietnam • 2 paratypes; Nui Xo Ngach, 16 km SE of Haiten; 1960; E. Saurin leg.; RMNH.Moll.137167.

Additional material examined.

Vietnam • 4 shells; Kien Giang Province, Kien Luong district, Binh An commune, Ba Nui village, cave Mo So, limestone rocks; 10°13.659'N, 104°36.975'E; 18 Sept. 2018; I. Dedov, N. Simov, R. Bekchiev, P. Beron leg., coll. PGB.

Type locality.

“Xa Ngach, à 16 km. au S.-E. de Hatien, Sud Vietnam”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to H. cambodjense from which it differs by its hooked apertural barriers and a narrower umbilicus. See also under H. rupestre.

Figure 132. 

Hypselostoma dilatatum, paratype (RMNH Moll.137167) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from the Vietnam part of the Mekong Delta limestone.

Remarks.

One paratype is figured, the second paratype was corroded and with broken hooked barriers in the aperture. It was also slightly larger than the figured specimen.

Hypselostoma discobasis Vermeulen, Luu, Theary & Anker, 2019

Figs 111Q, 133, 182

Hypselostoma discobasis Vermeulen et al., 2019: 39–40, figs 66–68.

Hypselostoma discobasisSutcharit et al. 2023: 1290.

Type material examined.

Cambodia • holotype; NHMUK 20180576.

Type locality.

“Cambodia: Kampot Province, Kampot area: Phnom La’Ang, southeast-end”.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. sorormajor sp. nov. and H. sororminor sp. nov.

Distribution.

This species in known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

The type locality of this species was inaccessible during collecting efforts in 2023 due to the restricted access and the presence of concrete walls around the locality. This indicates that the species could be seriously threatened by quarrying.

Figure 133. 

Hypselostoma discobasis, holotype (NHMUK 20180576) A–E shell.

Hypselostoma edentatum (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2002)

Figs 111R, 134, 154

Systenostoma edentatum Panha & Burch, 2002d: 121–124, fig. 4.

Systenostoma edentataPanha and Burch 2008: 119–120, fig. 102.

Hypselostoma edentataJochum et al. 2014: 31; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 1997; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver.022.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 12 shells; Chiang Rai Province, limestone knoll, 4 km NE of Ban Pa Ngae limestone knoll, base of limestone ledge; 19°34.3167'N, 99°59.2333'E; 410 m a.s.l.; F. G. Thompson leg.; 12. May 1988; locality code FGT-4429; UF 380304.

Type locality.

“Tamphatai National Park…, Phrae Province, 18°36”20'N, 99°53”49'E, 650 meters elevation…, Thailand…”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from all of its congeners by the absence of apertural barriers, which makes it superficially more similar to some Tonkinospira species. From all similar toothless Aulacospira species from Thailand, this species differs by the presence of raised spiral striation. See also under H. panhai.

Figure 134. 

Hypselostoma edentatum, holotype (CUMZ ver.022) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species in known from Lampang and Chiang Rai provinces in Thailand.

Remarks.

The type locality of this species is not in Phrae but in Lampang province. Specimens from Chiang Rai province shared the same shell morphology but were slightly more depressed than the holotype.

Hypselostoma erawan Panha & J. B. Burch, 2003

Figs 111S, 135, 154

Hypselostoma erawan Panha & Burch in Burch et al. 2003: 169–174, figs 14, 15.

Hypselostoma erawanTongkerd et al. 2004: 145, fig. 4A–C; Panha and Burch 2008: 91–92, fig. 78; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 3 paratypes; from the type locality; SMF 331455.

Type locality.

“A limestone mountain in the southern part of Erawan National Park, Triyoke District, Karnchanaburi Province, 14°12'15"N, 99°7'58"E, 70 meters elevation, Thailand”.

Figure 135. 

Hypselostoma erawan, paratype (SMF 331455) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. populare sp. nov.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma everetti E. A. Smith, 1896

Figs 111T, 136, 137, 140

Hypselostoma everetti Smith, 1896: 148, Plate 10, fig. 9–9b.

Hypselostoma dohertyi Fulton, 1899: 215, pl. 11, fig. 17. syn. nov.

Gyliauchen everetti — Pilsbry 1917: 218–219, pl. 37, figs 4, 6, 10.

Gyliauchen dohertyi — Pilsbry 1917: 219–220, pl. 37, figs 7–9.

Gyliotrachela everettivan Benthem Jutting 1950: 45; Vermeulen and Whitten 1998: 80–81, fig. 64.

Gyliotrachela dohertyivan Benthem Jutting 1950: 45; Zilch 1984: 165.

Type material examined.

Indonesia • syntype of H. everetti; NHMUK 1896.5.17.1–6; syntype of H. dohertyi; SMF 4586/1.

Additional material examined.

Indonesia • 2 shells; Kalao island, Celebes; SMF 227446 • 2 shells; Kalao island, T. H. Aldrich coll.; UF 00112280. • 1 shell; Timor island, 1 km W. Baucau; 18. Aug. 1971; F. G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-1729; UF 210107.

Type localities.

“Kalao island”, Indonesia (H. everetti); “Tenimber I”, (= Tanimbar islands, Indonesia) (H. dohertyi).

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from other congeners by the presence of strong keel (almost like a shoulder) positioned slightly above the centre of the periphery and a very wide umbilicus.

Figure 136. 

Hypselostoma everetti, syntype (NHMUK 1896.5.17.1–6) A–E shell.

Distribution.

This species is known from Timor island, Kalao island, Sulawesi, Java, Bali, Lesser Sunda islands and Tanimbar islands (latter is the type locality of H. dohertyi).

Figure 137. 

Hypselostoma everetti, syntype of H. dohertyi (SMF 4586) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Remarks.

During examination of the type material, we found no clear differences between H. everetti and H. dohertyi. The differences mentioned by Fulton (1899) in the original description include the narrower shell, less detached aperture, “not perspectively umbilicated” shell and that the shell is “more closely coiled below”. The umbilicus appears very slightly narrower in H. dohertyi but this falls within the intraspecific variability. Other characters mentioned are also very similar between the two species and also fall within the intraspecific variability, which is especially true for the level of the detachment of the last whorl.

Hypselostoma fruhstorferi Möllendorff, 1897

Figs 111U, 138, 139, 140

Hypselostoma fruhstorferi Möllendorff, 1897: 70–71.

Gyliauchen fruhstorferi — Pilsbry 1917: 217, pl. 37, figs 1–3; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 46.

Gyliotrachela concreta van Benthem Jutting, 1949a: 64–65, fig. 1. syn. nov.

Gyliotrachela concretavan Benthem Jutting 1950: 44.

Gyliotrachela fruhstorferivan Benthem Jutting 1952: 318; Zilch 1984: 165.

Type material examined.

Indonesia • lectotype of H. fruhstorferi; SMF 4580 • 5 paralectotypes of H. fruhstorferi; SMF 4581 • 16 paratypes of G. concreta; from the type locality; Sept. 1948; G. A. Tammes-Bolt leg.; RMNH.Moll.137155.

Additional material examined.

Indonesia • 5 shells; Sulawesi, South-Sulawesi, Lemo SE of Rantepao; 700 m a.s.l.; May 1995; W. J. M. Maassen leg.; coll. PGB • 2 shells; Lesser Sunda islands, Rintja island, ca 1 mile S Rintja village, mouth of cave; Apr. 1994; W. Auffenberg leg.; UF 220736.

Figure 138. 

Hypselostoma fruhstorferi, paratype of G. concreta (RMNH Moll.137155) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Type localities.

“Java” (Djampang, Java, Indonesia) (H. fruhstorferi); “Sulawesi, Main road from Makalé to Kalossi, South Celebes, 700–800 m alt.” (G. concreta).

Figure 139. 

Hypselostoma fruhstorferi, lectotype (SMF 4580) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is probably most similar to the geographically distant H. khaowongense and for differences, see under that species.

Distribution.

This species in known from Lesser Sunda islands, Java and Sulawesi islands, Indonesia.

Remarks.

Slightly variable smaller barriers. Some specimens of G. concreta had two and some three barriers between the lower palatal and columellar one. Interpalatal plica can be well developed or weaker.

We observed no differences between the type specimens of G. concreta and H. fruhstorferi. Van Benthem Jutting (1949a) compared the newly described G. concreta with H. fruhstorferi but her decision was based on variable characters such as the level of detachment of the last whorl, broadness of the last whorl (which is, by us, not observed as different between the types) and level of keel development (namely slightly weaker in G. concreta, but this difference is very slight). We treat all these differences as intraspecific variability.

Figure 140. 

Distribution map of H. everetti and H. fruhstorferi.

Hypselostoma fungus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111V, 141, 142, 177

Material examined.

Holotype. Cambodia • 1 shell (SH2: 2.94 mm; SW: 3.09 mm); Steung Treng Province, 36.3 km northwest and 5 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, Phnom Chhnok; 13°46.573'N, 105°44.878'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 25 Oct. 2023, A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14453.

Paratypes. Cambodia • 219 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG.

Additional material examined.

Cambodia • 3 shells (broken, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Steung Treng Province, 36.3 km northwest and 5 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, Phnom Chhnok; 13°46.573'N, 105°44.878'E; 120 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Hypselostoma species with a large last whorl (previous whorls sunken into it) and spirally striated teleoconch. Last whorl strongly detached from the penultimate and descending at almost 80 ° compared to the shell axis. Aperture equipped with four main barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar) and some smaller ones. Basal furrow present. Umbilicus extremely wide, almost as wide as the whole shell.

Figure 141. 

Hypselostoma fungus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14453) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell depressed-conical, brown, and not glossy, consisting of 3.5–4 whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch rounded, roughly pitted and consisting of one whorl. Initial teleoconch whorls bluntly keeled and sunken into the last whorl (but sometimes they appear more elevated). Last whorl contributing to almost 100% of the shell height. It is extending obliquely around the previous whorls and is strongly shouldered both on its upper and lower sides, which gives the shell a unique appearance. Surface of the teleoconch is irregularly, very finely and densely spirally striated. Whitish radial streaks are numerous and present on all teleoconch whorls but unevenly spaced (rather randomly positioned). Last whorl is strongly detached from the penultimate and strongly descending (~ 80 ° compared to the shell axis). This makes the aperture profile almost perpendicular to the shell axis. The so called “trumpet” is quite broad (similar to e.g., H. chaunosalpinx). Peristome is dirty white (or light brown), thick and strongly expanded, not reflected. Aperture is equipped with four main barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar) and additional smaller ones. The parietal part of the angulo-parietal lamella is strong and very high (blade-like), but the angular is very short and pointed towards the palatal side. Upper palatal plica is directed towards the lower palatal plica but is weaker. Lower palatal plica is long and low in its inner part and much higher in its outer part (closer to the peristome). This plica is similar to the columellar lamella but more slender. Basal (?) plica is situated closer to the lower palatal. It is not clear whether this plica actually represents the infrapalatal or the basal. In the region where usually the basal plica is present, there is a deep basal furrow which is also rarely encountered in this group (similar structure is also present in H. torta sp. nov.). This furrow is stretching all the way to the expanding peristome. Columellar lamella almost horizontal, thick, and long. A distinct infraparietal lamella is present (sometimes absent) between the columellar and parietal lamellae. Of all these barriers, only the angulo-parietal and columellar lamellae are reaching the expanding peristome. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus narrow, well separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus extremely wide (almost as wide as the whole shell). The lower edge of the last whorl (towards the umbilicus) is very strongly ridged (almost forming a cliff-like structure), leaving the walls of the umbilicus very steep (like a playground slide). The walls of the umbilicus are especially densely sculptured with white radial streaks.

Figure 142. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma fungus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14453) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. srakeoense, H. pendulum, H. torticollis, and H. transitans.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH1 = 2.83–2.97; SH2 = 1.62–1.85; SW = 3.09–3.85; AH = 1.82–2; AW = 1.77–2.05.

Etymology.

This species’ shape resembles a mushroom, which gave its specific epithet (Lat. fungus). The detached last whorl resembles a stalk while the rest of the shell resembles a cap. To be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is known only from its type locality.

Remarks.

The largest, and still unexplored limestone hill in Steung Treng Province (13°47.941'N, 105°43.7671'E) was inaccessible during the collecting efforts in 2023 due to the works of a cement factory. Due to the proximity of this hill to the type locality of H. fungus sp. nov., it is possible that this species can be found here as well and be threatened by quarrying.

Hypselostoma geckophilum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111W, 143, 144, 154

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.92 mm; SW1: 2.74 mm); Chanthaburi Province, Kaeng Hang Maeo district, Tham Khao Wongkot; 12°53.236'N, 101°49.065'E; 60 m a.s.l.; 08 Mar. 2023; A. Hunyadi leg.; CUMZ 14451. Paratypes. Thailand • 105 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 14 shells (juveniles/ damaged, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Thailand, Chanthaburi Province, Kaeng Hang Maeo district, Tham Khao Wongkot; 12°53.236'N, 101°49.065'E; 60 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Shell concave-conical, last whorl shouldered, previous whorls weakly convex. Teleoconch with raised spiral striae and strong whitish streaks. Last whorl detached from the penultimate, slightly turned downwards. Aperture equipped with five barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, basal, and columellar). Umbilicus initially narrow but suddenly expanding at the last whorl.

Figure 143. 

Hypselostoma geckophilum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14451) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell concave-conical (due to the strongly expanded last whorl), light brown, weakly glossy, opaque. It is consisting of 4.5–5 step-like, regularly increasing whorls separated by a very deep suture. All whorls except for the last one are rounded, convex. Protoconch slightly lighter than the rest of the shell, spirally striated (~ 25 densely arranged spiral striae) and consisting of ~ 1.25 whorls. Boundary between protoconch and teleoconch not particularly clear but visible as stronger spiral striation and darker surface. Teleoconch densely and strongly spirally striated, especially on the last whorl. Spiral striae slightly almost regularly spaced, leaving the space between the two striae up to the width of three or rarely two striae. Spiral striae get more densely arranged at the lower part of the last whorl than those at the centre of the periphery. There are ~ 33 spiral striae on the last whorl in standard view. Strong and wide radial white streaks cross the spiral striae. These streaks vary in number and are mostly present on the last three whorls. Last whorl shouldered, slightly detached from the penultimate and slightly descending near the aperture (~ 5–10 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome of the same colour as the rest of the shell, or very slightly lighter. It is expanded and not reflected. Aperture equipped with four main barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar). Angular part of the angulo-parietal lamella reaching the peristome, very small and pointed, leaned towards the upper palatal plica. Parietal part of the angulo-parietal lamella is much stronger and high, blade shaped. Upper palatal plica moderately developed, slightly curved towards the lower palatal and similarly strong. Lower palatal plica high and narrow, making it particularly slender. Columellar lamella strong as the palatal plicae, almost horizontal and very slightly leaned towards the lower palatal plica. Between these main barriers, only a small and weak basal one is additionally observed. Surface of all apertural barriers is smooth. Sinulus wide, not strongly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus initially very narrow, suddenly expanded at the last whorl, measuring between 1/3 and ¼ of the shell width. A deep groove is running from the columellar side of the peristome towards the inner walls of the umbilicus.

Figure 144. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma geckophilum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14451) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. platybasis sp. nov.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SW1 = 2.48–2.74; SW2 = 1.68–1.75; SH = 2.62–2.92; AH = 1.09–1.21; AW = 1.12–1.25.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is due to the fact that there were many geckos at its habitat.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

The concrescent angulo-parietal lamella can have the appearance of the typical form (with strong parietal and weaker, pointed angular part) or can have the appearance of only a single, parietal lamella with a very slightly visible swelling which represents the angular part. Infrapalatal lamella can be well visible or very weakly developed.

Hypselostoma holimanae F.G. Thompson & H.G. Lee, 1988

Figs 111X, 145, 154

Hypselostoma holimanae Thompson & Lee, 1988: 78, figs 1–6.

Hypselostoma holimanaeThompson and Upatham 1997: 223; Hemmen and Hemmen 2001: 41; Tongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Panha and Burch 2008: 92–93, fig. 79; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; UF 00113427 • 14 paratypes; from the type locality; UF 00113483/1; UF 00113428/13.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 10 shells; Kanchanaburi province, 15 km W Kanchanaburi; 14.154°N, 99.291°E; 15 Mar. 1987; S. Holiman leg.; UF 540579.

Type locality.

“Thailand, Kanchanaburi province, small limestone range on the west border of Kanchanaburi Agricultural College, about 15 km west of Kanchanaburi”.

Figure 145. 

Hypselostoma holimanae, holotype (UF 00113427) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. khaowongense.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma insularum Pilsbry, 1908

Figs 111Y, 146, 147

Hypselostoma insularum Pilsbry, 1908: 41, fig. 2.

Hypselostoma insularum — Pilsbry 1917: 182–183, pl. 32, figs 1–4, 6; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 41.

Hypselostoma kentingensis Hwang, 2014: 30–32, fig. 2. syn. nov.

Type material examined.

Japan • lectotype of H. insularum; ANSP 95252.

Type localities.

“Yonakunijima, Ryuyku”, Japan (H. insularum); “TAIWAN: Kenting Tropical Botanical Garden, Kenting, Hengchun, Pingdung, 21°58'04.5"N 120°48'55.3"E, alt. 295 m” (H. kentingensis).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is unique by its shell shape which resembles a pyramid (due to the sharp keel located at the base of the last whorl and moderately deep suture). All apertural barriers are strong but this is especially true for the angulo-parietal lamella.

Figure 146. 

Hypselostoma insularum, lectotype (ANSP 95252) A–D shell.

Distribution.

This species is known from the type locality and Kenting Tropical Botanical Garden, Kenting, Hengchun, Pingdung, Taiwan (21°58'04.5"N, 120°48'55.3"E). The latter is the type locality of H. kentingensis.

Figure 147. 

Distribution map of H. insularum.

Remarks.

Hypselostoma kentingensis is considered a junior synonym of this species since no major differences were observed between the two. All differences mentioned by Hwang (2014) in the original description are considered intraspecific variability. The statement in Hwang (2014) that H. kentingensis is smaller is not correct given the fact that the dimensions of the two species largely overlap (see Pilsbry 1917).

Hypselostoma iunior Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111Z, 148, 149, 154

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.44 mm, SW: 1.70 mm); Nan Province, Pha Tup cave, Ban Pha Tup, 12 km N of Nan; 18°51′0″N, 100°44′9″E; 260 m a.s.l.; 29 Apr. 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; UF 347376. Paratypes. Thailand • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14454 • 3 shells; same data as for holotype; UF 591327 • 3 shells; Nan Province, Ban Pha Sing, 16 km N of Nan; 18°52′26″N, 100°45′0″E; 270 m a.s.l.; 28 Apr. 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4349, UF 347358.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 7 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; UF 583729.

Type locality.

Thailand, Nan Province, Pha Tup cave, Ban Pha Tun, 12 km N of Nan; 18°51′0″N, 100°44′9″E; 260 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Hypselostoma with very dense spiral striation on the teleoconch. Apertural barriers very weak and four (parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar). Umbilicus narrow, widening at the last whorl.

Figure 148. 

Hypselostoma iunior Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 347376) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical, light yellow to brown, consisting of 5–5.5 convex, rounded whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch slightly lighter than the rest of the shell, consisting of ~ 1.5 whorls, densely spirally striated (striae clearer terminally). Teleoconch very finely, densely spirally striated crossed by stronger and much coarser, irregularly spaced radial growth lines. Last whorl rounded to slightly shouldered, adnate to the penultimate and slightly to moderately descending (~ 25–35 ° compared to the shell axis) making the aperture profile prosocline to the shell axis. Peristome white but not much expanded, not reflected. It is only particularly expanded on the columellar side where it forms a strong margin which is, however, not covering the umbilicus. The peristome is discontinuous on the parietal side where it is completely merged with the penultimate whorl. Aperture almost as wide as high. Apertural barriers few and much weaker than in the majority of congeners. There are four barriers: parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar. Parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture but still somehow weak, moderately high and curved towards the palatal side. Two palatal plicae (upper and lower palatal) are very weak, like small thickenings. Columellar lamella also weak and shares the same appearance as the palatal plicae but situated slightly closer to the peristome edge. None of the apertural barriers are reaching the thin peristome. Surface of all apertural barriers is almost smooth but very finely granulated. Sinulus wide and not strongly isolated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus moderately wide, measuring 1/5 of the shell width, initially narrow and suddenly widening at the last whorl (which gives it a slightly elongated appearance).

Figure 149. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma iunior Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 347376) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to A. eotvosi with which is also geographically adjacent. It differs by the much larger sizes in A. eotvosi, narrower umbilicus and the lack of spiral striation. The shell of A. eotvosi is also more pointed, especially near the apex. See also under H. panhai.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 6). SH = 2.27–2.48; SW = 1.67–1.72; AH = 0.81–0.92; AW = 0.84–0.96.

Etymology.

This species is named iunior for the very weak teeth and weakly expanded peristome which is common in subadult hypselostomatid specimens.

Distribution.

This species is known only from its type locality.

Remarks.

Since the most similar species (H. panhai) belongs to the genus Hypselostoma (as shown in a phylogenetic study by Tongkerd et al. 2004), this species is also included in this genus even though it fits in the diagnosis of Anauchen.

Hypselostoma khaochakan (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2003), comb. nov.

Figs 111AA, 150–152, 154

Gyliotrachela khaochakan Panha & Burch in Burch et al. 2003: 138–143, figs 4–5.

Gyliotrachela srirachaensis Panha & Burch in Panha et al. 2004: 69–70, fig. 8. syn. nov.

Gyliotrachela khaochakanTongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Panha and Burch 2008: 69–70, fig. 60; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 8.

Gyliotrachela srirachaensisPanha and Burch 2008: 81, fig. 70; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 2 paratypes of H. khaochakan; from the type locality; SMF 331445 • 1 paratype of H. khaochakan; from the type locality; CUMZ 44041 • 1 paratype of G. srirachaensis; from the type locality; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 44008.

Additional material examined.

4 shells; Sa Kaeo Province, Khao Chakan district, vicinity of Wat Tham Khao Chakan; 13°39.668'N 102°05.195'E; 80 m a.s.l.; 05 Mar. 2023, A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA.

Type localities.

“Chakan Mountain, east of Khaochakan Temple, Khaochakan District, Srakeaw Province, 13°39'17"N, 102°5'12"E, 70 meters elevation, Thailand” (H. khaochakan); “Sichang Island, Sriracha, Chonburi Province, 13°20'05"N, 100°55'24"E, 70 meters elevation” (H. srirachaensis).

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from H. chedi by the separated angular and parietal lamellae. See also under H. smokon.

Distribution.

This species is, apart from the type locality, known also from Sichang Island (type locality of H. srirachaensis).

Figure 150. 

Hypselostoma khaochakan, paratype (SMF 331445) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Remarks.

Gyliotrachela srirachaensis is a junior synonym of H. khaochakan since we could not find any morphological differences. The two species were not compared in the original description of G. srirachaensis.

Figure 151. 

Hypselostoma khaochakan, paratype (CUMZ 44041) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 152. 

Hypselostoma khaochakan, paratype of G. srirachaensis (CUMZ ver. 44008) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Hypselostoma khaochongpran (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2002)

Figs 111AB, 153, 154

Anauchen khaochongpran Panha & Burch, 2002e: 22, fig. 3.

Hypselostoma khaochongpranPanha and Burch 2008: 94, fig. 80; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 1999; S. Panha leg; CUMZ 4022.

Type locality.

“Khaochongpran, Ratchaburi province, 13°35′38″N, 99°40′0″E, 60 meters elevation” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is strikingly similar to H. cucumense but differs by the much weaker apertural barriers and less distinctly ascending last whorl.

Figure 153. 

Hypselostoma khaochongpran, holotype (CUMZ 4022) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Figure 154. 

Distribution map of some species belonging to the H. bensonianum group.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma khaowongense Panha, 1998

Figs 111AC, 155–158, 185

Hypselostoma khaowongensis Panha, 1998b: 66, fig. 4.

Hypselostoma khaowongensisHemmen and Hemmen 2001: 41.

Gyliotrachela saraburiensis Panha & Burch in Burch et al. 2003: 143–151, figs 6–7. syn. nov.

Gyliotrachela muangon Panha & Burch in Panha et al. 2004: 67–68, fig. 7. syn. nov.

Gyliotrachela khaowongensisPanha and Burch 2008: 71–72, fig. 62; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 8.

Gyliotrachela saraburiensisTongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Panha and Burch 2008: 78–80, fig. 68; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Gyliotrachela muangonPanha and Burch 2008: 76–77, fig. 66; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8; Gojšina et al. 2022: 137, fig. 6; Tongkerd et al. 2024: 182–184, figs 11, 13O.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 001 • paratype of G. saraburiensis; from the type locality; CUMZ 44047 • 2 paratypes of H. khaowongense; from the type locality; SMF 331439 • 3 paratypes of G. saraburiensis; from the type locality; SMF 331446 • 2 paratypes of G. muangon; from the type locality; S. Panha leg.; SMF 331459.

Additional material examined.

Thailand-North • 24 shells; Chiang Rai Province, Chiang Rai ca 5 km west from centre of Wat Phra That Tham Doi Kong Khao; 9°54.820'N, 99°46.642'E; 11 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 33 shells; Chiang Rai Province, ca 5 km WNW of Chiang Rai, Tham Phra cave by Mae Nam Kok river, limestone rocks near the cave entrance; 19°55.047'N, 99°47.342'E; 420 m a.s.l; Sep. 2007; A. Reischütz leg.; coll. REI • 12 shells; Chiang Mai Province, 5 km northwest from Chiang Dao, vicinity of Wat Tham Chiang Dao; 19°23.628'N, 98°55.711'E; 450 m a.s.l.; 07 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 13 shells; Chiang Mai Province, Doi Pha Sao Mountain, 3 km W of Ban Prang Mao; 19°25.98'N, 99°3.48'E; 500 m a.s.l.; 19 Jun. 1987; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4338; UF 528706 • 21 shells; Chiang Mai Province, NW side of Doi Pha Sam Sao ravine with Dipterocarp forest, leaf litter; 19°24.45'N, 99°2.9333'E; 800 m a.s.l.; 20 May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4453; UF 347006 • 59 shells; Chiang Mai Province, NW side of Doi Pha Sam Sao ravine with Dipterocarp forest, leaf litter; 19°24.45'N, 99°2.9333'E; 800 m a.s.l.; 20. May 1988; F. G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4452; UF 346992 • 150 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, 13.9 km NW Pai, along road 1095; 19°23'N, 98°23'E; 780 m a.s.l.; 18 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0571; UF 345938 • 3 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, Ban Tham Lod Village, 7 km N Soppong on Road 1095; 19°34'N, 98°9'E; 790 m a.s.l.; 18 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0574; UF 591328 • 20 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, 21 km N Mae Hong Son, Fish Cave; 19°26'N, 97°58'E; 380 m a.s.l.; 22 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0593; UF 345672 • 40 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, 40 km N of Mae Hong Son; 19°27'N, 97°59'E; 550 m a.s.l.; 22 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0588; UF 345643 • 1 shell; Mae Hong Son Province, 21 km N Mae Hong Son, Fish Cave; 19°26'N, 97°58'E; 380 m a.s.l.; 22 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0595A; UF 345702 • 7 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, Mae Hong Son, Road 1095; 19°25'N, 97°58'E; 390 m a.s.l.; 22 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0595B; UF 591329 • 3 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, Mae Hong Son, Road 1095; 19°25'N, 97°58'E; 390 m a.s.l.; 22 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0595; UF 345699 • 1 shell; Lampang Province, 6 km SW Mae Pak, limestone hill; 17°57.8833'N, 98°51.1167'E; 600 m a.s.l.; 13 June 1987; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4328; UF 591330 • 11 shells; Lampang Province, limestone dome at pass 11 km SSW of Ban Pang La; 18°27.9667'N, 99°48.3833'E; 610 m a.s.l.; 14 May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4441; UF 591331 • 2 ethanol preserved shells; same locality data as previous; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4440; UF 346908 • 43 shells; Phrae Province, limestone knoll 4 km N of Ban Nam Rin, deep rocks and leaves; 18°10.1333'N, 99°56.6833'E; 200 m a.s.l.; 16. May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4444; UF 346931 • 1 shell; Phrae Province, Than Pha Nan Cave, 6 km NE of Rang Kwang; 18°23.1'N, 100°20.7667'E; 300 m a.s.l.; 30 Apr. 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4400; UF 347403 • 2 shells; Phrae Province., 4 km N of Ban Nam Rin valley with limestone ridges, leaf litter at base of boulders; 18°10.1333'N, 99°56.6833'E; 200 m a.s.l.; 16. May 1988; F. G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4445; UF 346935 • 5 ethanol preserved shells; Phrae Province, 11 km W of Phrae, on Road 1023 teak plantation and cut forest; 18°10.6833'N, 100°4.2333'E; 290 m a.s.l.; 16. May 1988; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4446; UF 346967 • 19 shells; same locality data as previous; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4447; UF 591332. Thailand-Northeast • 28 shells; Petchabun Province, 24.4 km S. Petchabun on Hwy. 2275, evergreen forest in back of outcrop, leaf litter next to rocks; 16°16'N, 101°10'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 02. May 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0693; UF 346096 • 1 shell; Nakhon Ratchasima Province, 3.4 km W of Ban Mu Si; 14.534°N, 101.380°E; 380 m a.s.l.; 05. May 1987; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4241; UF 534868 • 9 shells; Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Pak Chong district, mountain above Wat Thep Phithak Punnaram; 14°36.865'N, 101°15.926'E; 500 m a.s.l.; 04 Mar. 2023; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA. Thailand-West • 16 shells; Kanchanaburi Province, Erawan Nat. Park, Erawan Falls Trail; 14°22.310'N, 99°08.699'E; 85 m a.s.l.; 17 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 10 shells; Petchabun Province, 24.4 km S. Petchabun on Hwy. 2275, evergreen forest in back of outcrop, leaf litter next to rocks; 16°16'N, 101°10'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 02. May 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0694; UF 346100. Thailand-Central • 10 shells; Phitsanulok Province, Noen Maprang district, Chomphu, Tham Phra Wang Daeng; 16°40.651'N, 100°41.287'E; 02 Mar. 2023; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 37 shells; Nakhon Sawan Province, 19.5 km NE intersection of Hwys 11 and 32, limestone outcrop, base of cliff under Georissa zone; 15°14'N, 100°16'E (provided coordinates point in Chai Nat Province); 50 m a.s.l.; 02. May 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0697; UF 346135 • 1 shell; Nakhon Sawan Province, 19.5 km NE intersection of Hwys 11 and 32; 16°14'N, 100°16'E; 50 m a.s.l.; 02. May 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0697; UF 346126 • 1 shell; Lopburi Province, Tha Wung district, Khao Samo Khon, Wat Tham Chang Pueak; 14°54.139'N, 100°30.151'E; 30 m a.s.l.; 03 Mar. 2023; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 2 shells; Saraburi Province, behind Phra Phutthabat, limestone hill with scrubby evergreen forest, leaf litter among rocks; 14.733°N, 100.800°E; 50 m a.s.l.; 03. May 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0699; UF 508979. Laos • 27 shells; Luang Prabang Province, old forest on Phousi Mountain in Luang Prabang, clay, black soil, on and under rocks; 19°53.411'N, 102°08.216'E; 374 m a.s.l.; 13 Nov. 2004; A. Abdou & I. Muratov leg.; MNHN-IM-2012-25387 • 6 shells; Luang Prabang Province, 3.1 km from centre of Nong Khiaw towards Pak Xeng, Tham Pha Toke, vicinity of the cave; 20°33.215'N, 102°37.722'E; 345 m a.s.l.; 05 Oct. 2019; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 24 shells; Luang Prabang Province, 12 km from centre of Nong Khiaw towards Pak Xeng, northeast from Ban Huai Lek, left side of the road; 20°32.585'N, 102°41.161'E; 345 m a.s.l.; 05 Oct. 2019; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA. Myanmar • 3 shells; Shan State, c. 3.6 km NNE of Hsihseng centre, limestone hill; 20°11′15″N, 97°16′07″E; 1040 m a.s.l.; 07 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 7 shells; Shan State, 9.5 km from centre of Hsihseng; 20°14.066'N, 97°15.514'E; 1140 m a.s.l.; 07 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 21 shells; Shan State, 3.6 km north-northeast from centre of Hsihseng; 20°11.248'N, 97°16.114'E; 1040 m a.s.l.; 07 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 63 shells; Shan State, ca 16 km from centre of Taunggyi centre towards Hopong, 1.5 km north on rd. #4, „Shwe Pyi Aunchonda” monastery; 20°47.263'N, 97°8.239'E;1110 m a.s.l.; 08 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 57 shells; Shan State, ca 6 km east from centre of Hsihseng; 20°8.002'N, 97°18.024'E; 500 m a.s.l.; 07 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA.

Type localities.

“A limestone hill near Takli District, Nakornsawan Province, 15°16′52″N, 100°22′38″E, 114 meters elevation”, Thailand (H. khaowongense); “East of Tepitak Tamaram Temple, Tepitak Mountain, Muang Saraburi District, Saraburi Province, 14°36'57"N, 101°15'50"E, 510 meters elevation. Thailand” (G. saraburiensis); “Muangon Cave, San Kam Pang District, Chiangmai Province, 18°47'11"N, 99°14'16"E, 280 meters elevation” (G. muangon).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to H. holimanae but is clearly different by the separated angular and parietal lamellae (fused in H. holimanae) as well as the presence of numerous and variable apertural barriers (only four in H. holimanae). Hypselostoma fruhstorferi has a narrower umbilicus and fewer apertural barriers. This species is also similar to H. cultura from which it can be separated by the less prominently shouldered last whorl and a narrower umbilicus.

Figure 155. 

Hypselostoma khaowongense, holotype (CUMZ ver. 001) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 156. 

Hypselostoma khaowongense, paratype of G. saraburiensis (CUMZ 44047) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

Clearly a widespread species: its distribution stretches from Chiang Rai province in N Thailand to the southernmost known localities in Ratchaburi and Chonburi provinces. Westwards, this species stretches to Taunggyi in Myanmar and the easternmost locality is known from Luang Prabang province in Laos.

Remarks.

Examined specimens had the usual main barriers and a larger number of smaller barriers between them of very variable number (usually 2–5 between each of the main barriers). Umbilicus was always wide but sometimes more or less so (specimens from Chiang Mai (Thailand) had the narrowest umbilicus). Last whorl is always at least very slightly keeled, in some specimens more prominent. Spiral striation is present, in some populations hardly observable and in some very rough. During comparison of the type material of G. saraburiensis and G. muangon, we have not observed any difference between these species and H. khaowongense. The former two are not compared with the latter in the respective original descriptions. Because of no difference observed, we treat both G. saraburiensis and G. muangon as junior synonyms of H. khaowongense.

Figure 157. 

Hypselostoma khaowongense, paratype of G. muangon (SMF 331459) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 158. 

Distribution map of Hypselostoma bensonianum group in Myanmar.

Hypselostoma khaowongkot (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2004), comb. nov.

Fig. 185

Gyliotrachela khaowongkot Panha & Burch in Panha et al. 2004: 65–67, fig. 6.

Gyliotrachela khaowongkotPanha and Burch 2008: 72–73, fig. 63; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 8.

Material examined.

Thailand • holotype; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 44031.

Type locality.

“Khaowongkot, Ban Mee District, Lopburi Province, 15°1'13"N, 100°32'44"E, 60 meters elevation”.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. tridentatum and H. utongense.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma kohrin (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2003), comb. nov.

Figs 111AD, 159, 185

Gyliotrachela kohrin Panha & Burch in Burch et al. 2003: 151–157, figs 8–9.

Gyliotrachela kohrinTongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Panha and Burch 2008: 74–75, fig. 64; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 8.

Material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell; Chonburi Province, Koh Rin, 25 km from eastern coast of Thailand; 26 Oct. 2013; J. U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 2 shells; Chonburi Province, Pattaya, Koh Rin, 28 June 2014; J. U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB.

Type locality.

“On a limestone hill on Kohrin (Rin Island), which is a small island located in the upper Gulf of Thailand, south of Pattya Beach, eastern coast of Thailand, about 25 kilometers from the coast, Satthip District, Chonberi Province, 12°48'5"N, 100°42'4"E, 30 meters elevation, Thailand”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to H. diarmaidi from which it can be separated by the last whorl distally shortly detached as well as the weaker keel and not so concave surface above it. See also under H. surakiti.

Figure 159. 

Hypselostoma kohrin, specimen from the type locality (coll. PGB) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma panhai J. B. Burch & Tongkerd, 2003

Fig. 185

Hypselostoma panhai Burch & Tongkerd in Burch et al. 2003: 178–183, fig. 18.

Hypselostoma panhaiTongkerd et al. 2004: 145, fig. 4D–H; Panha and Burch 2008: 95–97, fig. 82; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; CUMZ 44055.

Type locality.

“Chongkhaokad, west of the World War II museum, near the famous bridge of the now abandoned railroad of World War II, Triyoke District, Kanchanaburi Province, 14°24'8"N, 98°53'23"E, 140 meters elevation, Thailand”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to H. edentatum but the latter lacks apertural barriers. However, this species is most similar to H. iunior sp. nov. from which it can be separated by the less conical shell, deeper sutures, more convex whorls, clearly weaker parietal callus, slightly wider umbilicus, and much coarser spiral striation (dense in H. iunior sp. nov.).

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma platybasis Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111AE, 160, 161, 177

Type material.

Holotype. Cambodia • 1 shell (SH: 2.60 mm; SW: 2.56 mm); Steung Treng Province, 55.7 km northwest + 2 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, Chap Phleung Mt. (Neak Khiev Mt.); 13°47.821'N, 105°36.205'E; 135 m a.s.l.; 26 Oct. 2023, A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14457. Paratypes. Cambodia • 160 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG.

Additional material examined.

Cambodia • 10 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Steung Treng Province, 55.7 km northwest + 2 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, Chap Phleung Mt. (Neak Khiev Mt.); 13°47.821'N, 105°36.205'E; 135 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Hypselostoma species with bluntly keeled penultimate (at the centre of the periphery) and shouldered last whorl. Teleoconch densely spirally striated. Last whorl very slightly detached from the penultimate and with a sharp shoulder. Apertural barriers few (angulo-parietal (parietal), upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar) and relatively weak. Umbilicus initially narrow and then abruptly widening at the last whorl.

Figure 160. 

Hypselostoma platybasis Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14457) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical or slightly concave-conical, dark brown, consisting of 4–4.5 whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch rounded, slightly glossy, roughly pitted, consisting of ~ 1.5 whorls. Initial teleoconch whorls rounded, penultimate whorl bluntly keeled. Teleoconch sculptured with strong, raised spiral striae which are crossed by weaker radial growth lines usually in form of whitish radial streaks. There are ~ 30 spiral striae on the last whorl in standard view. The spacing between two striae ranges to ~ 2–3 × the width of one stria. Basis of the last whorl flat. Last whorl with a sharp shoulder (almost like a keel), adnate or very slightly detached from the penultimate, very slightly descending near the aperture (less than 5 ° compared to the shell axis), almost straight. Peristome brown, not very strong but still expanded and not reflected. Aperture equipped with four main barriers (parietal (angulo-parietal), upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar), none of which reach the expanding peristome. Angulo-parietal lamella is the strongest, longest and the highest in the aperture. There is usually no sign of the angular part. Upper and lower palatal plicae both low and relatively weak, almost equally strong. Basal plica clearly present and moderately strong or absent (with only a slight swelling in its place). Columellar lamella developed to a similar extent as both palatal plicae. There is one additional swelling in the columello-parietal embayment which corresponds to the infraparietal lamella. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus wide and not distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus initially narrow, but abruptly widening at the last whorl, becoming very wide, and measuring slightly > ½ of the shell width. There is a deep groove running from the peristome edge towards the umbilicus along the inner side of the last whorl. This groove is terminating at the transition from the last whorl to penultimate.

Figure 161. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma platybasis Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14457) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is the most similar to H. geckophilum sp. nov. from which it differs in the more rectangular shape of the last whorl and a stronger shoulder. Umbilicus is also much narrower in H. geckophilum sp. nov. and the barriers are more slender.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2.36–2.75; SW = 2.56–2.85; AH = 1.20–1.32; AW = 1.25–1.47.

Etymology.

This species is named for the flat base of the shell.

Distribution.

This species is only known from the type locality.

Remarks.

The largest, and still unexplored limestone hill in Steung Treng Province (13°47.941'N, 105°43.7671'E) was inaccessible during the collecting efforts in 2023 due to the works of a cement factory. Due to the proximity of this hill to the type locality of H. platybasis sp. nov., it is possible that this species can be found here as well and be threatened by quarrying.

Hypselostoma populare Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111AF, 162, 163, 185

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 1.4 mm; SW: 2.2 mm); Krabi Province, 9.2 km northwest from Krabi towards Phang Nga, right side of the road; 08°07.305'N, 98°52.231'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 21 Feb. 2015, A. Hunyadi leg.; CUMZ 14455. Paratypes. Thailand • 5 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; Chumphon Province, Pathio, 500 m from the junction Ban Tham Tong - Thung Yang Beach, large rock; 10°54.328'N, 99°29.903'E; 20 m a.s.l.; 23 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 10 shells; Ranong Province, south of Kra Buri, Tham Phra Kayang, southeastern part of the rock, 10°19.480'N, 98°45.933'E; 22 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 17 shells; Chumphon Province, 2.5 km northeast from Pathio, Tham Khao Phlu, 10°43.851'N, 99°19.242'E; 30 m a.s.l.; 23 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 2 shells; Krabi Province, Railay (= Rai Leh) Beach West, Railay Highlands, at the base of limestone rocks; 8°0.865'N, 98°50.219'E; 30 m a.s.l.; Sep. 2007; A. Reischütz leg.; coll. REI • 3 shells; Krabi Province, N of Krabi, Tiger Cave Temple (=Wat Tham Suea), along the ~ 200 steps to the cave, at the base of limestone rocks; 8°7.603'N, 98°55.466'E; 90 m a.s.l.; Sep. 2007; A. Reischütz leg.; coll. REI.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 8 shells (damaged/ juveniles, not paratypes); Chumphon Province, 2.5 km northeast from Pathio, Tham Khao Phlu, 10°43.851'N, 99°19.242'E; 30 m a.s.l.; 23 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 5 shells (damaged/ juveniles, not paratypes); Ranong Province, south of Kra Buri, Tham Phra Kayang, southeastern part of the rock, 10°19.480'N, 98°45.933'E; 22 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Krabi Province, 9.2 km northwest from Krabi towards Phang Nga, right side of the road; 08°07.305'N, 98°52.231'E; 40 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Shell depressed, concave-conical, last whorl strongly detached from the penultimate and ascending at nearly 60–70° angle. Teleoconch strongly spirally striated. Aperture equipped with four blunt barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, and columellar). Umbilicus very wide.

Figure 162. 

Hypselostoma populare Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ14455) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell depressed, concave-conical (due to the strongly enlarged last whorl), consisting of 3.75–4.25 whorls separated by a very deep suture. Colouration yellowish or very pale brownish, opaque. Protoconch initially almost smooth and then finely pitted, showing spiralling pattern and consisting of 1.25–1.5 whorls. Boundary between the protoconch and teleoconch clearly visible due to the change of microsculpture. Teleoconch strongly and regularly spirally striated, spiral striae thread-like raised. Space between two spiral striae measuring approximately the width of two to four spiral striae. There are ~ 30 spiral striae on the last whorl in standard view. Weaker, irregularly spaced radial growth lines are also visible crossing the spiral striae. Some irregularly spaced radial white streaks are occasionally present. Last whorl shouldered, strongly detached from the penultimate and ascending strongly near the aperture (~ 60–70° compared to the shell axis). Peristome lighter than the rest of the shell, fragile, expanded and not reflected. Aperture equipped with four moderately strong barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, and columellar). Angulo-parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture, consisting of two parts corresponding to angular and parietal lamellae in the former Gyliotrachela. The angular part of the angulo-parietal lamella is very small and pointy, leaning towards the palatal wall. The parietal part of the angulo-parietal lamella is much stronger and positioned deeper in the aperture, leaned towards the columellar lamella. Both palatal plicae and a columellar lamella are developed to similar level, relatively short and blunt. Upper palatal plica nearly fully rectangular in shape, lower palatal plica and columellar lamella more rounded and positioned even deeper in the aperture than the upper palatal plica. The apertural barriers are not very variable. None of these barriers reach the peristome. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus rounded and well separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus open, very wide, measuring ~ 1/3 of the shell width and showing all previous whorls.

Figure 163. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma populare Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14455) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is nearly identical in external appearance to Hypselostoma erawan. However, H. erawan clearly differs in the appearance of the apertural barriers. Hypselostoma erawan has more barriers than the new species and palatal plicae are hooked (neither of the barriers in H. populare sp. nov. are hooked). Acinolaemus colpodon F. G. Thompson & Upatham, 1997 is smaller and also has hooked barriers. Hypselostoma cucumense has the same appearance of the apertural barriers but the last whorl in H. populare sp. nov. is without a keel. The umbilicus is also initially narrow in H. cucumense and then widening at the last whorl, but it is wide even in its initial parts in H. populare sp. nov.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 1.33–1.41; SW = 2.13–2.22; AH = 0.79–0.86; AW = 0.7–0.87.

Etymology.

Named after the fact that many sampling sites of this species are popular touristic destinations.

Distribution.

This species is known from Krabi, Chumphon and Ranong provinces in Thailand.

Remarks.

This species is not very variable in terms of shell size and apertural dentition but in some specimens the spire is more depressed conical than in others.

Hypselostoma rupestre van Benthem Jutting, 1962

Figs 111AG, 164, 182

Hypselostoma rupestre van Benthem Jutting, 1962: 6–8, fig. 3.

Hypselostoma rupestreSchileyko 2011: 3–4; Vermeulen et al. 2019: 40.

Material examined.

Cambodia • 32 shells; Kampot Province, Kampong Trach district, Phnom Teuk Thom (northwest from Wat Aranhatry); 10°26.335'N, 104°28.822'E; 400 m a.s.l.; 21 Oct. 2023; A. Hunyadi, T. Ishibe, K. Okubo, J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

“Nui Hon Chong (Cap de la Table), à 32 km au S.-E. de Hatien, Sud Vietnam”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from H. cambodjense by its rounded whorls. It is thus superficially more similar to H. dilatatum but the latter has several hooked apertural barriers (they are all blunt in H. rupestre).

Figure 164. 

Hypselostoma rupestre from Cambodia (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species in known from several localities in Kien Giang province (Vietnam). We have also found this species in Kampot province, Cambodia (see under Material examined).

Hypselostoma salpinx (van Benthem Jutting, 1961), comb. nov.

Figs 111AH, 165, 166, 185

Gyliotrachela salpinx van Benthem Jutting, 1961: 38–39, pl. 10, fig. 4.

Gyliotrachela salpinxMaassen 2001: 76.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 60 paratypes; from the type locality; Aug. 1950; Raffles Museum ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.137154.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia • 6 shells; Pahang, 10 km northeast from Raub, 1.5 km northwest from Sungai Ruan, vicinity of Bukit Serdam limestone rock; 03°49.817'N, 101°55.387'E; 170 m a.s.l.; 20 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 6 shells; Pahang, Tok Machang (end of Raub), road Raub-Sungai Ruan; Oct. 1998; ex. coll. Hemmen, Wiesbaden; coll. PGB. Thailand • 4 damaged shells; Thailand, Suratthani Province, Angthong islands, Mae Koh island, footpath to the Lagoon, at the base of limestone rocks; 9°39.460'N, 99°39.976'E; 20 m a.s.l.; Sep. 2007; A. Reischütz leg.; coll. REI (cf. salpinx) • 1 shell; Phattalung Province, 6.4 km E of Hwy. 4081, 1 km SW of Khao Chai Son; 7°27'N, 100°11'E; 11 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0648; UF 591343 • 1 shell; same locality data as previous; 11 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0648; UF 591342; 3 shells; Phattalung Province, 6 km NW of Phattalung, 1 km NE of Hwy. 4048; 7°40'N, 100°3'E; 60 m a.s.l.; 13 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0653; UF 591345 • 5 shells; Phattalung Province, 6.4 km E of Hwy. 4 on Hwy. 4081, 1 km SW of Khao Chai Son, large limestone outcrop with solution pits; 7.450°N, 100.183°E; 50 m a.s.l.; 11 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0649; UF 591344 • 1 shell; Phattalung Province, Khao Pu Khao Ya National Park, Matcha cave vicinity; 7°39.980'N, 99°52.343'E; 125 m a.s.l.; 25 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 35 shells; Songkhla Province, 31.3 km NW of Hat Yai, 1.2 km W of Hwy. 43; 7°10'N, 100°16'E; 80 m a.s.l.; 08 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0635; UF 344926 • 5 shells; same locality data as previous; 08 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0636; UF 591341.

Type locality.

“Bukit Serdam, near Raub, Pahang” (Malaysia).

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. saxicola and H. coriaceum sp. nov.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the limited area (Raub) in Malaysia and Suratthani, Phattalung and Songkhla provinces in Thailand.

Figure 165. 

Hypselostoma salpinx, paratype (RMNH Moll.137154) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Figure 166. 

Hypselostoma salpinx from Phattalung Province, Thailand (UF 591342) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Hypselostoma saxicola (van Benthem Jutting, 1960), comb. nov.

Figs 111AI, 167, 185

Gyliotrachela saxicola van Benthem Jutting, 1960: 14–16, fig. 1.

Gyliotrachela saxicolaMaassen 2001: 76.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 22 paratypes; Perlis, N of Kangar, limestone hill near Kampong Tebing Tinggi, on the face of the rock; 19 Dec. 1958; W. S. S. van der Feen-van Benthem Jutting leg.; RMNH.Moll.137139.

Type locality.

“Limestone hill near Kampong Tebing Tinggi, N. of Kangar, Perlis”, Malaysia.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is most similar to H. salpinx from which it can be separated by smaller number of overall stronger barriers and wider umbilicus (which is initially narrower in H. salpinx). See also under H. coriaceum sp. nov.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

In paratypes examined, besides the five barriers that are always present, there were additional 1–3 smaller. These are interpalatal, infrapalatal and infraparietal and they were present in some and absent in other specimens. As a consequence, the number of barriers varied from 6–8 (as there was always at least one of the smaller). This was also noted by van Benthem Jutting (1960) in the original description. She also noted that the last whorl can be more or less detached or completely adnate, but this variation is not useful for separation of the species.

Figure 167. 

Hypselostoma saxicola, paratype (RMNH Moll.137139) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Hypselostoma sculpturatum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111AJ, 168, 169, 177

Type material.

Holotype. Cambodia • 1 shell (SH: 2.70 mm; SW1: 3.80 mm); Steung Treng Province, 36.3 km northwest + 5 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, Phnom Chhnok; 13°46.573'N, 105°44.878'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 25 Oct. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14458.

Paratypes. Cambodia • 51 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG.

Additional material examined.

Cambodia • 4 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Cambodia, Steung Treng Province, 36.3 km northwest + 5 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, Phnom Chhnok; 13°46.573'N, 105°44.878'E; 120 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Hypselostoma species with all teleoconch whorls keeled, detached last whorl and strongly spirally striated shell surface. There are five strong barriers in the aperture (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, basal and columellar). Umbilicus initially narrow, suddenly widening at the last whorl.

Description.

Shell conical-ovoid, brownish, not glossy. It is consisting of 4–4.5 whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch rounded, of ~ 1.75 finely pitted whorls of the same colour as the rest of the shell. Teleoconch sculptured with strong, raised spiral striae. Spacing between two striae equals the width of one stria or is twice as wide as a stria. Spiral striae are more densely arranged on the initial teleoconch whorls, and more coarsely on the last whorl. The number of striae on the last whorl is ~ 25 in standard view. There are several white, unevenly positioned, radial streaks crossing the spiral striae. All teleoconch whorls are keeled, and the strength of the keel is increasing towards the last whorl which is especially strongly keeled. Surfaces of the whorls above and below the centrally positioned keel are flat, to very slightly concave (above the keel on the last whorl). Last whorl moderately detached from the penultimate, distanced from the shell axis. From the lateral view (Fig. 168B), it can be seen that the last whorl is initially slightly ascending and then straightening right near the aperture so that the aperture profile is almost parallel to the shell axis (leaving the aperture only slightly ascending at ~ 5–10 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome light brownish, expanded and not reflected. Aperture equipped with five barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, basal, and columellar). Angulo-parietal strong and high, lamella usually appears as a single barrier (parietal) but has a very short swollen part in front of it which most probably represents the remains of the angular part. Upper palatal plica moderately high, slightly curved towards the lower palatal plica (somehow similar to the upper palatal plica in H. serpa). Lower palatal plica slightly higher, longer, and more slender than the upper palatal but similar in width. It is pointing towards the embayment between the columellar and parietal lamellae. Basal plica more closely positioned to the lower palatal (not in its usual position between the lower palatal and columellar), ~ 2 × lower than the latter and short. Columellar lamella thick and broad, more closely resembling a very large swelling than a distinct barrier. There is also a small swelling between the columellar and parietal lamellae. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus narrow, distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus initially very narrow and suddenly widening at the last whorl. It is measuring between ½ and ¹⁄3 of the shell width. There is a deep groove running from the peristome edge towards the umbilicus along the inner side of the last whorl. This groove is terminating at the transition from the last whorl to penultimate.

Figure 168. 

Hypselostoma sculpturatum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ14458) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 169. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma sculpturatum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14458) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species superficially resembles H. circumcarinatum sp. nov. but the latter has its last whorl adnate from the penultimate, weaker barriers, narrower umbilicus, and less prominent shell sculpture. The new species is distinguished from H. khmerianum by the concrescent angular and parietal lamella as well as by the presence of spiral striation.

See under H. taehwani.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2.35–2.70; SW1 = 3.52–3.80; SW2 = 2.08–2.18; AH = 1.32–1.62; AW = 1.40–1.79.

Etymology.

This species is named for the strong surface sculpture of its shell.

Distribution.

This species is only known from the type locality.

Remarks.

The largest, and still unexplored limestone hill in Steung Treng Province (13°47.941'N, 105°43.7671'E) was inaccessible during the collecting efforts in 2023 due to the works of a cement factory. Due to the proximity of this hill to the type locality of H. sculpturatum sp. nov., it is possible that this species can be found here as well and be threatened by quarrying.

Hypselostoma smokon (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2004)

Figs 111AK, 170, 185

Anauchen smokon Panha & Burch in Panha et al. 2004: 60, fig. 3.

Hypselostoma smokonPanha and Burch 2008: 99–100, fig. 85; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 2 paratypes; from the type locality; S. Panha leg.; SMF 331457.

Type locality.

“Smokon Mountain, Banmi District, Lopburi Province, 14°54'54"N, 100°29'45"E, 30 meters elevation”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar in shell shape to H. chedi and H. khaochakan. From them, H. smokon clearly differs by the concrescent angular and parietal lamellae. It is most similar to H. chedi which has its last whorl bluntly keeled (shouldered in H. smokon) and narrower umbilicus.

Figure 170. 

Hypselostoma smokon, paratype (SMF 331457) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

In the original description, the species was placed in the genus Anauchen because of the absent angular lamella. However, it is present as an angular part of the joined angulo-parietal lamella which justifies its placement in the genus Hypselostoma.

Hypselostoma sorormajor Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111AL, 171–174, 177

Type material.

Holotype. Cambodia • 1 shell (SH: 2.70 mm; SW1: 3.91 mm); Steung Treng Province, 55.7 km northwest + 2 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, Chap Phleung Mt. (Neak Khiev Mt.); 13°47.821'N, 105°36.205'E; 135 m a.s.l.; 26 Oct. 2023, A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14459. Paratypes. Cambodia • 28 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Additional material examined.

Cambodia • 3 shells (2 damaged and 1 juvenile, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 41 shells; Steung Treng Province, 40 km northwest + 2 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, limestone mountain at the left side of the joining road; 13°45.568'N, 105°43.644'E; 135 m a.s.l.; 26 Oct. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 78 shells; Steung Treng Province, Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, 45 km NWN + 400 m N, limestone hill, right side of the road #64; 13°45.866'N, 105°41.154'E; 180 m a.s.l.; 26 Oct. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as previous; coll. VG • 26 shells; Steung Treng Province, 36.3 km northwest + 3.1 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, limestone mountain on the left side of the joining road; 13°45.585'N, 105°44.930'E; 130 m a.s.l.; 25 Oct. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J. U. Otani leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Cambodia, Steung Treng Province, 55.7 km northwest + 2 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, Chap Phleung Mt. (Neak Khiev Mt.); 13°47.821'N, 105°36.205'E; 135 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

A Hypselostoma species with depressed, concave-conical shell, bluntly and strongly keeled last whorl, raised spiral striation, hooked apertural barriers (upper palatal, interpalatal, lower palatal and basal) and very wide umbilicus. Angular and parietal lamellae fused. Shell width reaches 4 mm.

Figure 171. 

Hypselostoma sorormajor Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ14459) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell depressed, concave-conical, brown to yellowish-brown, consisting of 4.75–5.5 whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch slightly lighter than the rest of the shell, finely pitted, showing spiralling pattern initially and clearer spiral striae terminally. It is consisting of ~ 1.25–1.5 whorls. Protoconch and initial teleoconch whorls rounded, penultimate weakly convex. Last whorl with strong but blunt keel positioned at the centre of the periphery. Above the keel there is a deep or rarely shallow groove. All whorls densely sculptured with strong, raised spiral striae crossed by less dense radial growth lines and occasionally by a few thick, whitish radial streaks. Spacing between the spiral striae irregular, but usually around the width of two to four spiral striae. Last whorl moderately detached from the penultimate and moderately ascending (~ 35 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome expanded, not reflected, its surface finely pitted. Aperture equipped with four main barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, and columellar) and several smaller ones. Angulo-parietal lamella strong, its angular part is leaned towards the palatal side while the parietal part is leaned towards the columellar side. Angular part is pointed and smaller than the parietal. It is the only barrier reaching the expanding peristome. Sometimes, there is a deep constriction between the angular and parietal part so that these lamellae appear almost separated (as in former Gyliotrachela). Upper and lower palatal plicae are hooked, pointing outside and roughly the same size. Columellar lamella thick and almost horizontal. Of smaller barriers, there is usually one hooked interpalatal, one infrapalatal, one basal plica (hooked or blunt) and one blunt lamella in the columello-parietal transition embayment. Of them, the strongest one is the basal, which is almost as strong as the palatals. A distinct swelling is also observed at the palatal side (in front of the upper palatal and interpalatal plicae) which is probably homologous to the palatal tubercle in the majority of Bensonella species. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus rounded, distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus very wide, measuring ~ ½ of the shell width. There is a periumbilical keel situated on the last ~ 0.75 whorl right above the umbilicus. Along this keel there is a deep groove on the umbilical side.

Figure 172. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma sorormajor Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14459). A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from H. discobasis in the less slender shell and hooked apertural barriers. Hypselostoma aquila sp. nov. is much smaller, more slender and has a narrower umbilicus. For differences from H. sororminor sp. nov. see under that species.

Figure 173. 

Hypselostoma sorormajor Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., specimen with almost separated angular and parietal lamellae (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 15). SH = 1.62–2.78; SW1 = 2.44–4.01; SW2 = 1.57–2.56; AH = 0.85–1.71; AW = 0.81–1.46.

Figure 174. 

Hypselostoma sorormajor Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., smaller specimen (SW ~ 2.5 mm) (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Etymology.

The name of this species is derived from two Latin words, soror meaning sister and major meaning greater, larger, or elder, which serves as a comparison with similar but smaller H. sororminor sp. nov.

Distribution.

This species is known from four closely situated localities in Steung Treng Province.

Remarks.

This is a very variable species in terms of shell size. These different “forms” were not regarded as distinct species since there were no other significant morphological differences noticed. The angulo-parietal lamellae were sometimes clearly fused, while sometimes almost completely separated. The largest, and still unexplored limestone hill in Steung Treng Province (13°47.941'N, 105°43.7671'E) was inaccessible during the collecting efforts in 2023 due to the works of a cement factory. Due to the proximity of this hill to the type locality of H. sorormajor sp. nov., it is possible that this species can be found here as well and be threatened by quarrying.

Hypselostoma sororminor Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111AM, 174–177

Type material.

Holotype. Cambodia • 1 shell (SH: 2.44 mm; SW1: 3.57 mm); Steung Treng Province, 36.6 km northwest + 3.1 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, limestone mountain on the left side of the joining road; 13°45.585'N, 105°44.930'E; 130 m a.s.l.; 25 Oct. 2023, A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14460. Paratypes. Cambodia • 32 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG.

Additional material examined.

Cambodia • 2 shells (juveniles/ damaged, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Cambodia, Steung Treng Province, 36.6 km northwest + 3.1 km north from Stung Treng Mekong Bridge, limestone mountain on the left side of the joining road; 13°45.585'N, 105°44.930'E; 130 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

A Hypselostoma species with depressed, concave-conical shell, bluntly and strongly keeled last whorl, raised spiral striation, blunt apertural barriers (altogether 6 or 7) and very wide umbilicus. Angular and parietal lamellae fused.

Description.

Shell depressed, concave-conical, brown, consisting of 5–5.5 whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch lighter than the rest of the shell, coarsely spirally striated (~ 12 striae) and consisting of 1.25–1.5 whorls. Protoconch and initial teleoconch whorls rounded, penultimate weakly convex. Last whorl with strong but blunt keel positioned at the centre of the periphery. Above the keel there is a deep groove. All whorls densely sculptured with strong, raised spiral striae crossed by less dense radial growth lines and occasionally by a few thin, whitish radial streaks. Spacing between the spiral striae irregular, but usually around the width of two, three, or four spiral striae. Last whorl slightly to moderately detached from the penultimate and slightly to moderately ascending near the aperture (~ 25–35 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome expanded, not reflected, its surface finely pitted. Aperture equipped with four strong, main barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, and columellar) and several smaller ones. Angulo-parietal lamella strong, its angular part is leaned towards the palatal side while its parietal part is leaned towards the columellar side. Angular part is pointed and smaller than the parietal. It is the only barrier reaching the expanding peristome. Upper and lower palatal plicae approximately the same size, the lower palatal being longer and more slender. Upper palatal plica slightly bent towards the lower palatal. Columellar lamella very thick and almost horizontal. Of smaller barriers, a small and weak interpalatal plica is present, stronger (but still weak) basal and a moderate knob-like plica in the columello-parietal transition embayment. A weak swelling is also observed at the palatal side (in front of the upper palatal plicae) which is probably homologous to the palatal tubercle in the majority of Bensonella species. Surface of all apertural barriers is densely granulated. Sinulus rounded, distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus very wide, measuring between 1/3 and ½ of the shell width. There is a periumbilical keel situated on the last ~ 0.75 whorl right above the umbilicus. Along this keel there is a deep groove on the umbilical side.

Figure 175. 

Hypselostoma sororminor Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14460) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from H. discobasis in the less slender shell and less numerous apertural barriers which are also thicker. It differs from H. sorormajor sp. nov. in its smaller dimensions and apertural barrier arrangement: it has less numerous barriers, none of which are hooked (in contrast to H. sorormajor sp. nov.). Hypselostoma aquila sp. nov. is smaller, more slender, has a narrower umbilicus and hooked barriers.

Figure 176. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma sororminor Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14460) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2.37–2.57; SW1 = 3.20–3.61; SW2 = 2.05–2.40; AH = 1.25–1.42; AW = 1.22–1.26.

Etymology.

The name of this species is derived from two Latin words, soror meaning sister and minor meaning smaller which serves as a comparison with similar but usually larger H. sorormajor sp. nov.

Figure 177. 

Distribution map of some species belonging to Hypselostoma bensonianum group in Cambodia.

Distribution.

This species is only known from the type locality.

Remarks.

The largest, and still unexplored limestone hill in Steung Treng Province (13°47.941'N, 105°43.7671'E) was inaccessible during the collecting efforts in 2023 due to the works of a cement factory. Due to the proximity of this hill to the type locality of H. sororminor sp. nov., it is possible that this species can be found here as well and be threatened by quarrying.

Hypselostoma taehwani Panha & J. B. Burch, 2003

Figs 111AN, 178, 185

Hypselostoma taehwani Panha & Burch in Burch et al. 2003: 174–178, figs 16, 17.

Hypselostoma taehwaniPanha and Burch 2008: 101–102, fig. 86.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 1 paratype; from the type locality; CUMZ 44053.

Type locality.

“Central area of Tamrong Temple, Muang Petchburi District, near the main Petchkasem artery of the Asian Hwy. to southern Thailand, Petchaburi Province, 13°01'32"N, 99°55'11"E, 10 meters elevation, Thailand”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is strikingly similar to H. sculpturatum sp. nov. They can be separated by the following characters: i) initial teleoconch whorls and the penultimate whorl are more angled in H. sculpturatum sp. nov.; ii) umbilicus is wider and has a wider, deeper, and longer umbilical groove; iii) basal plica is in H. taehwani situated closer to the columellar lamella but always closer to the lower palatal plica in H. sculpturatum sp. nov. Furthermore, the protoconch is spirally striated in H. taehwani but pitted in H. sculpturatum sp. nov. Hypselostoma depressum has a wider umbilicus, much less detached last whorl near the aperture as well as the narrower spire. See also under H. burchi.

Figure 178. 

Hypselostoma taehwani, paratype (CUMZ 44053) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma torta Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 111AO, 179, 180, 185

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 3.8 mm, SW: 3.5 mm); Nakhon Sawan Province 19.5 m NE intersection Hwys 11 and 32; 15°14'N, 100°16'E; 50 m a.s.l.; 02. May 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0696; UF 591362. Paratypes. Thailand • 2 shells; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14462 • 20 shells; same data as for holotype; UF 346125 • 18 shells; same data as for holotype; locality code KA-0697; UF 346133 • 4 ethanol-preserved shells; same data as for holotype; locality code KA-0696; UF 591361.

Figure 179. 

Hypselostoma torta Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 591362) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 5 shells (juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; locality code KA-0697; UF 583727.

Type locality.

Thailand, Nakhon Sawan Province 19.5 m NE intersection Hwys 11 and 32; 15°14'N, 100°16'E; 50 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

A Hypselostoma with all teleoconch whorls shouldered and very weakly spirally striated. Spiral striae not raised. Last whorl detached from the penultimate and slightly descending. Four weak barriers in the aperture. Columellar lamella is like a strong swelling, forming a basal furrow.

Figure 180. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma torta Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 591362) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Description.

Shell concave-conical (due to the strongly enlarged last whorl), brownish, consisting of 5–5.5 whorls separated by a very deep suture. Protoconch finely pitted, not showing spiralling pattern, rounded, same colour as the initial teleoconch whorls but slightly lighter than the last whorl. First two teleoconch whorls weakly shouldered, penultimate strongly and the last whorl is very strongly shouldered. The outline of the last and the penultimate whorl above the shoulder is concave (forming a flat platform). This surface is on initial teleoconch whorls more sloping. Whole teleoconch surface is weakly spirally striated (these spiral striae are not thread-like raised as in many congeners, but very blunt and indistinct) and occasionally crossed by radial growth lines and several thicker, whitish radial streaks which are rather unevenly positioned. These whitish streaks seem to be the densest on the penultimate whorl. Last whorl convex at its base, towards the umbilicus. It is slightly to moderately detached from the penultimate whorl and slightly descending near the aperture (~ 15–25 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome very strong, dirty white, expanded but not reflected. Aperture equipped with three or four barriers (parietal (angulo-parietal?), upper palatal, lower palatal (sometimes absent), and columellar). There are no smaller barriers between the main ones. Parietal lamella is strong, high, and triangular when observed in perpendicular view. There is a very small tubercle-like swelling in front of the parietal lamella which may be homologous with the angular part of the usually present angulo-parietal (or just angular) in other congeners. Upper palatal plica moderately strong, almost twice as weak as the parietal lamella. Lower palatal plica very weak and low, dot-like, sometimes absent. Columellar lamella not present in its usual form (its borders are not clearly delimited) but as a rather strong, swelled part of the aperture which forms a prominent basal furrow below it (similar to the one present in H. fungus sp. nov.). The shape of the columellar side of the aperture is also reminiscent of the playground slide. Surface of all apertural barriers is smooth. Sinulus wide, distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus wide, measuring ~ 1/3 of the shell width, expanding at the last whorl. Inside the umbilicus, there is a strong groove present, stretching across the whole last whorl.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is not similar to any of its congeners. It most closely resembles some Aulacospira species (e.g., A. pluangtong, A. smaesarnensis). However, it has a much wider umbilicus than both species as well as spiral striation and way more strongly shouldered whorls.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 3.45–3.8; SW = 2.83–3.62; AH = 1.62–1.82; AW = 1.38–1.84.

Etymology.

Since all whorls of this species are shouldered, the shell has an appearance of the wedding cake. The specific epithet torta comes from a Serbian word torta meaning a cake. To be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

The shell of this species can sometimes be more depressed so that it is almost as wide as high. This species may belong to a separate genus or it may be closely related to some Aulacospira species (A. pluangtong, A. smaesarnensis). However, due to the different shell shape (concave-conical), height (> 3.4 mm) and surface sculpture (delicate, non-raised spiral striae) from typical Aulacospira species (inhabiting the Philippines), we provisionally place this species in the genus Hypselostoma.

Hypselostoma torticollis (van Benthem Jutting, 1962), comb. nov.

Figs 111AP, 181, 182

Gyliotrachela torticollis van Benthem Jutting, 1962: 8–10, fig. 4.

Gyliotrachela torticollisSutcharit et al. 2023: 1293–1295, fig. 3.

Type material examined.

Cambodia • 3 paratypes; Battambang, Phuom Truong Mean; 1960; E. Saurin leg.; RMNH.Moll.137136.

Type locality.

“Phum Troung Mean, à 15 km au S.-O. de Battambang, Cambodge” (Cambodia).

Differential diagnosis.

Hypselostoma fungus sp. nov. has merged angular and parietal lamellae, wider umbilicus, last whorl without a keel and a flatter shell. See also under H. transitans, H. pendulum, H. srakeoense.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the Battambang province, Cambodia.

Figure 181. 

Hypselostoma torticollis, paratype (RMNH Moll.137136) (A, B and E are used from Sutcharit et al. 2023) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Remarks.

Of three examined paratypes, one did not have the aperture as downturned as the others.

Figure 182. 

Distribution map of some species belonging to Hypselostoma bensonianum group in Cambodia.

Hypselostoma tridentatum (Panha & J.B. Burch, 2004), comb. nov.

Figs 111AQ, 183, 185

Gyliotrachela tridentatus Panha & Burch in Panha et al. 2004: 70–71, fig. 9.

Gyliotrachela tridentataPanha and Burch 2008: 86–87, fig. 75.

Gyliotrachela tridentatusDumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Material examined.

Thailand • 2 shells; Srakeo Province, Plubpluengtong, Phloeng Thong Cave, Khao Phiap; 24 Dec. 2012; K. Okubo leg.; coll. PGB. Cambodia • Battambang Province, Phnum Proek District, Phnom Prampi Cave; 13°18.834'N, 102°36.490'E; 90 m a.s.l.; 10 Oct. 2023; A. Hunyadi, J.U. Otani leg., coll. HA.

Type locality.

“Plubpluengtong limestone hills, Srakeo Province, 13°27'07"N, 102°12'49"E, 80 meters elevation” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

This species has fewer barriers in the aperture than H. khaowongkot which is the most similar species. It also does not have columellar lamella (present in H. khaowongkot) and lacks the strongly spiniferous surface of apertural barriers (also present in H. khaowongkot). See also under H. utongense.

Figure 183. 

Hypselostoma tridentatum, specimen from the type locality (coll. PGB) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is, apart from the type locality, also known from Phnom Prampi Cave in Battambang Province which is a first record from Cambodia.

Hypselostoma utongense Panha & J. B. Burch, 2004

Figs 111AR, 184, 185

Hypselostoma utongensis Panha & Burch in Panha et al. 2004: 72–73, fig. 10.

Hypselostoma utongensisPanha and Burch 2008: 103, fig. 87; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Material examined.

Thailand • 16 shells; Kanchanaburi Province, Erawan National Park, Erawan Falls Trail; 14°22.310'N, 99°08.699'E; 17 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

“Tam Sua Hill, Utong District, Supanburi Province, 14°34'27"N, 99°46'26"E, 80 meters elevation”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to two Hypselostoma which share the completely (or almost completely) flat shell with strongly upturning last whorl (H. khaowongkot and H. tridentatum). From them, it most obviously differs by its hooked upper and lower palatal plicae which are blunt in the former.

Figure 184. 

Hypselostoma utongense from Erawan National Park, Kanchanaburi province (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from two provinces in Thailand, Supanburi (type locality) and Kanchanaburi (this study).

Remarks.

In some specimens, previous whorls are partly sunken into the last while in others completely.

2. Hypselostoma hungerfordianum group

Diagnosis. Hypselostoma hungerfordianum group is characterised by a peculiar shell surface sculpture, as if “scaly, granulated”. This surface sculpture is unique and we assume that all the species which share this trait are possibly more closely related.

Remarks. This group has representatives across Southeast Asia and includes 19 species. The distribution spans from Kayin State in Myanmar and eastwards to western Cambodia (Battambang Province). Southernmost localities are known in Peninsular Malaysia while northernmost come from Loei Province in Thailand.

Figure 185. 

Distribution map of some species belonging to Hypselostoma bensonianum group.

Hypselostoma aunglini (Tongkerd & Panha, 2024), comb. nov.

Figs 186A, 187, 223

Gyliotrachela aunglini Tongkerd & Panha in Tongkerd et al. 2024: 184–187, figs 12, 13P.

Type material examined.

Myanmar • holotype; collector unknown; CUMZ 14383.

Type locality.

“Kaw Gon Cave, Hpa-An, Kayin State, Myanmar (…; 16°49'22.2"N, 97°35'08.9"E)”.

Differential diagnosis.

The most similar congener from Myanmar is H. bensonianum which is however spirally striated (granulated in H. aunglini) and has its last whorl keeled (shouldered in H. aunglini).

Figure 186. 

Synoptic view of species belonging to Hypselostoma hungerfordianum group A H. aunglini B H. bubalus sp. nov. C H. chatnareeae D H. coriaceum sp. nov. E H. fortunatum sp. nov. F H. hungerfordianum G H. khmerianum H H. loei I H. luctans J H. ophis sp. nov. K H. piconis L H. sichang M H. srakeoense N H. surakiti O H. transitans P H. venustum Q H. vesovici sp. nov. R H. vicinum sp. nov. S H. vujici sp. nov.

Figure 187. 

Hypselostoma aunglini, holotype (CUMZ 14383) (from Tongkerd et al. 2024) A–C shell D enlarged apertural view E enlarged view of the protoconch.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma bubalus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 186B, 188, 189, 223

Type material.

Holotype. Malaysia • 1 shell (SH: 2 mm; SW: 3.7 mm); Kedah, 1.5 km east from Kodiang, Gua Kerbau; 06°23.431'N, 100°18.904'E, 14 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; CUMZ 14466.

Paratypes. Malaysia • 216 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia • 25 shells (damaged, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Malaysia, Kedah, 1.5 km east from Kodiang, Gua Kerbau; 06°23.431'N, 100°18.904'E.

Diagnosis.

Shell depressed, concave-conical. Teleoconch finely radially and spirally striated (localised, just below and above the keel on the last whorl). Last whorl detached from the penultimate and strongly ascending. Aperture wide, equipped with five main barriers (angular, parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar) and two smaller barriers (basal and infraparietal). Umbilicus wide, measuring 50% of the shell width.

Figure 188. 

Hypselostoma bubalus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14466) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell depressed, concave-conical, chestnut brown, very weakly glossy and not translucent. Whorls 3.5–4, initially weakly convex, separated by a deep suture, regularly increasing until the last whorl which is strongly enlarged and flat. Protoconch lighter than the rest of the shell, finely pitted without spiralling pattern, consisting of ~ 1.25 whorls. Teleoconch very finely granulated (sandpaper-like surface) and radially striated with additional whitish radial streaks which are weak, widely, and irregularly spaced. Spiral striae present but localised, clearly visible only on the last whorl above and below the keel, elsewhere absent. Sometimes, spiral striae are very difficult to observe on the whole shell. Last whorl strongly enlarged in comparison to previous ones, bluntly keeled very slightly above the centre of the periphery (or sometimes at the centre of the periphery) and almost flat above and weakly convex below the keel. Keel is strongest near the aperture. Last whorl moderately to strongly ascending near the aperture (~ 50–65 ° compared to the shell axis) and moderately detached from the penultimate whorl. Peristome very pale brownish, strongly expanded but not reflected. Aperture equipped with five main barriers (angular, parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, and columellar). Angular lamella short and small, directed towards the upper palatal plica. Parietal lamella strong and high, not much longer than the angular and only reaching its profile. Upper palatal plica slightly weaker than the parietal lamella and bent towards the lower palatal plica. Lower palatal plica straight, equally strong as the upper palatal but not bent. Columellar lamella is the broadest in the aperture but relatively short. Between these main barriers, additional small basal and infraparietal plicae visible. Surface of all apertural barriers is very finely spiniferous medially and very finely granulated laterally. Sinulus small and distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus very wide, measuring half of the shell width and showing all previous whorls. A deep and wide groove is running from the columellar side of the peristome alongside the umbilicus.

Figure 189. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma bubalus Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14466) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. luctans.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2–2.23; SW1 = 3.40–4.13; SW2 = 1.95–2.41; AH = 1.44–1.78; AW = 1.33–1.61.

Etymology.

The type locality of this species, Gua Kerbau, means “Buffalo cave” in Malay. The specific epithet bubalus is also a scientific name for a buffalo, which is to be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

Although this species shows some spiral striation, it is placed into H. hungerfordianum group because of the predominant sandpaper-like surface on the teleoconch.

Hypselostoma chatnareeae (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2003), comb. nov.

Figs 186C, 190, 223

Anauchen chatnaeerae Panha & Burch in Burch et al. 2003: 132–138, figs 2, 3.

Anauchen chatnaeeraeTongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Panha and Burch 2008: 49–50, fig. 45; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 7.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 3 paratypes; from the type locality; SMF 331447.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell; Tam Sua Hill, Utong, Suphanburi; 21 Dec. 2002; K. Okubo leg.; coll. PGB.

Type locality.

“Tam Sua, on the limestone hill on the west side of Tam Sua Temple, Utong District, Suphanburi Province, 14°17'31"N, 100°7'31"E, 20 meters elevation, Thailand”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is not similar to any of its congeners. The shell shape (conical) and apertural dentition (one barrier on the parietal side) strongly resembles some Anauchen species (e.g., A. angthongensis) but the surface is granulated as in H. hungerfordianum and all whorls are keeled. See also under H. khmerianum.

Figure 190. 

Hypselostoma chatnareeae, paratype (SMF 331447) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

Apart from the type locality, this species is also known from one more nearby locality.

Remarks.

Even though this species has high morphological similarities to some Anauchen species (e.g., A. angthongensis), the shell surface sculpture is characteristically granulated (as in H. hungerfordianum) which is the reason it is transferred to this genus.

Hypselostoma coriaceum Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 186D, 191, 192, 223

Type material.

Holotype. Malaysia • 1 shell (SH: 2.11 mm; SW1: 3.35 mm); Langkawi Island, Tanjung Rhu; 23 Aug. 1998; Hemmen, Wiesbaden ex. coll.; CUMZ 14464. Paratypes. Malaysia • 30 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. PGB • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 4 shells; Kedah, limestone outcrop near Tanjung Rhu, Langkawi Island; 6°26′51.48″N, 99°48′38.89″E; 16. May 2009; M. E. Marzuki leg.; coll. PGB.

Type locality.

Malaysia, Langkawi Island, Tanjung Rhu.

Diagnosis.

Shell depressed-conical, yellowish, and glossy. Last whorl bluntly keeled. Aperture detached from the penultimate whorl and slightly ascending upwards. Teleoconch finely granulated and radially striated. Spiral striation absent. Aperture equipped with five main strong barriers (parietal, upper and lower palatal, basal, and columellar) and additional smaller one of variable number.

Figure 191. 

Hypselostoma coriaceum Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14464) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Description.

The yellowish, glossy, and weakly translucent, depressed-conical shell is consisting of 4–4.5 whorls separated by a deep suture. The finely pitted protoconch is showing a weak spiralling pattern, consisting of ~ 1.5 whorls without a clear boundary with teleoconch. Teleoconch finely granulated, sandpaper-like (surface microsculpture similar to H. hungerfordianum) and inconspicuously regularly radially striated. Last whorl bluntly keeled, slightly detached from the penultimate and slightly to moderately ascending upwards (~ 25–35 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome expanded and not reflected, with sharp edges. Aperture equipped with five main barriers (parietal, angular, upper palatal, lower palatal, and columellar) and variable number of smaller ones. Angular lamella is the weakest among the main five, the rest of the main barriers are developed roughly to the same level. They are all high and straight. Parietal and angular lamellae are directed towards the palatal wall. In front of the upper palatal plica, a small swelling is present which is probably homologous with the palatal tubercle present in other genera (e.g., Bensonella, see Páll-Gergely and White 2023). Between the angular lamella and upper palatal plica, one or two additional plicae are present. There are also usually two interpalatal plicae, two between lower palatal and columellar (including basal plica) and two between the columellar and parietal lamellae. None of these smaller barriers reach the profiles of the main ones, and none of the apertural barriers reach the peristome. Surface of all apertural barriers is very finely spiniferous medially and very finely granulated laterally. Sinulus parabolic and not very strongly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus open, initially narrow, and then abruptly widening at the last whorl, measuring ~ ¼ of the shell width and showing the penultimate whorl. A strong groove can be observed running from the peristome towards the inner side of the umbilicus.

Figure 192. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma coriaceum Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14464) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is larger than both H. salpinx and H. saxicola and it additionally differs from them by the absence of spiral striation and a narrower umbilicus.

Measurements

. SH = 2.05–2.32; SW1 = 3.12–3.37; SW2 = 1.85–2.09; AH = 1.33–1.58; AW = 1.28–1.40.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is due to its “leathery” surface sculpture.

Distribution.

Known only from Tanjung Rhu, Langkawi Island, Malaysia.

Hypselostoma fortunatum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 186E, 193, 194, 195, 223

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 1.57 mm; SW1: 2.83 mm); Phattalung Province, Khao Ok Thalu, rock wall; 07°37.506'N 100°05.330'E; 19 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; CUMZ 14465. Paratypes. Thailand • 20 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 6 shells (juveniles/damaged, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; coll. HA • 11 shells; Songkhla Province, 31.3 km NW Hat Yai, 1.2 km W of Hwy. 43; 7°10'N, 100°16'E; 80 m a.s.l.; 08 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0636A; UF 344932 • 1 shell; same locality data as previous; 08 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0635; UF 591324.

Type locality.

Thailand, Phattalung Province, Khao Ok Thalu, rock wall; 07°37.506'N, 100°05.330'E.

Diagnosis.

Hypselostoma with depressed-conical shell, teleoconch with finely sandpaper-like surface and radially but not spirally striated. Aperture equipped with only four relatively weak barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar).

Figure 193. 

Hypselostoma fortunatum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14465) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell depressed-conical, chestnut brown, glossy, not translucent. It is consisting of 3.5–4 regularly increasing, convex whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch of the same colour as the teleoconch, finely pitted, not showing spiralling pattern and consisting of ~ 1.25 whorls. Teleoconch sculpture finely granulated (sandpaper-like) with additional radial growth lines which are more or less regularly spaced. Last whorl bluntly keeled at the centre of the periphery, slightly to moderately detached from the penultimate whorl and strongly ascending near the aperture (usually ranging from 65 to almost 90 ° compared to the shell axis). The keel is the most prominent on the last whorl behind the peristome. Peristome brown, weakly expanded, not reflected. Aperture equipped with four main barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar), all of which are relatively weak. Angulo-parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture, consisting of a high parietal part and weak, tubercle-like angular part which is sometimes weakly sinuated in the middle. The angular part is sometimes also more distinctly separated from the parietal. Upper palatal plica relatively weak and straight. Lower palatal plica only slightly stronger (broader and higher) than the upper palatal. Columellar lamella horizontal, developed to the same extent as the lower palatal plica. Weak basal plica and infraparietal lamella sometimes present. All barriers weaker than in the majority of the congeners, all finely spiniferous medially but indistinctly granulated to almost smoot laterally. Sinulus wide and not strongly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus moderately wide to wide, measuring ~ 1/3–1/5 of the shell width and clearly showing the penultimate whorl. A relatively shallow groove runs towards the inner side of the umbilicus, terminating at the penultimate whorl.

Figure 194. 

Hypselostoma fortunatum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., a strongly depressed form (UF 344932) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. pattalungense and H. depressispira.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 1.46–1.58; SW1 = 2.67–2.90; SW2 = 1.74–1.92; AH = 1.06–1.26; AW = 1.05–1.23.

Etymology.

The shape of the aperture, between the barriers, resembles a four-leaf clover which is a common symbol of luck, hence the specific epithet which is derived from the Latin word for lucky (fortunatus).

Figure 195. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma fortunatum Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14465) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species is known from Phattalung and Songkhla provinces (S Thailand).

Remarks.

This species is present in one more distinct form superficially resembling H. depressispira. Namely, in this form the spire is much more depressed and the umbilicus is noticeably wider. We decided not to treat this form a separate species since other characters (apertural dentition, general shell shape, and its surface sculpture) are fully shared with the “typical form” of H. fortunatum sp. nov.

Hypselostoma hungerfordianum Möllendorff, 1891

Figs 186F, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201

Hypselostoma hungerfordianum Möllendorff, 1891: 337, pl. 30, figs 7, 7a.

Hypselostoma striolatum Möllendorff, 1894: 152. syn. nov.

Hypselostoma hungerfordianumSykes 1902: 61.

Hypselostoma striolatumFischer and Dautzenberg 1904: 408.

Gyliauchen hungerfordianus — Pilsbry 1917: 212, pl. 36, figs 1–4.

Gyliauchen striolatus — Pilsbry 1917: 215.

Gliotrachela hungerfordiana [sic] — Laidlaw 1933: 214.

Gliotrachela striolatus [sic] — Laidlaw 1933: 214.

Gyliotrachela hungerfordianavan Benthem Jutting 1949b: 60; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 46; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 26; Zilch 1959: 164, fig. 563; van Benthem Jutting 1960: 14; Zilch 1984: 166; Davison 1995: 239; Schileyko 1998: 142, fig. 162; Maassen 1999: 122–123; Schilthuizen 1999: 283; Maassen 2001: 75–76; Foon et al. 2017: 79, fig. 30B; Hoekstra and Schilthuizen 2011: 267–272, fig. 2; Foon and Marzuki 2023: 142, fig. 1AP; Tongkerd et al. 2024: 180–182, figs 10, 13M.

Gyliotrachela striolatavan Benthem Jutting 1950: 46; Zilch 1984: 166; Thompson and Upatham 1997: 233; Hemmen and Hemmen 2001: 41.

Gyliotrachela khaochongensis Panha in Panha 1998a: 53–56, fig. 2.

Gyliotrachela khaochongensisHemmen and Hemmen 2001: 41; Panha and Burch 2008: 70–71, fig. 61. Tongkerd et al. 2024: 180, fig. 10B.

Hypselostoma satulensis Panha & Burch in Panha et al. 2004: 75–76, fig. 12. syn. nov.

Hypselostoma satulensisPanha and Burch 2008: 98–99, fig. 84; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Gyliotrachela striolatus [sic] — Panha and Burch 2008: 81–82, fig. 71.

Gyliotrachela phoca Tongkerd & Panha, 2013 in Tongkerd et al. 2013: 71–75, figs 5–7.

Gyliotrachela phocaTongkerd et al. 2024: 180. Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • lectotype of H. hungerfordianum; SMF 4587. Thailand • holotype of H. striolatum; SMF 4591 • holotype of H. satulensis; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 44028; paratype of G. khaochongensis; from the type locality; CUMZ ver. 010.

Additional material examined.

Thailand-South • 6 shells; Suratthani Province, 6 km S of Na San, limestone mountain; 8.660°N, 99.398°E; 03 June 1987; F. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4311; UF 530647 • 2 shells; Suratthani Province, Hwy. 401, 2.7 km W junction Hwy. 4142 and 401, evergreen forest on rocky hillside; 9°10'N, 99°40'E; 90 m a.s.l.; 19 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0674; UF 591325 • 34 shells; Suratthani Province, 15.3 km NE Ban Na San off road to Tha Rom Yen National Park; 8°53'N, 99°26'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 20 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0678; UF 345386 • 12 shells; Suratthani Province, 1 km NE of Na San, 100 m limestone mountain; 8.812°N, 99.382°E; 02 June 1987; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4309; UF 547905 • 3 shells; Suratthani Province, Angthong islands, Wia Talap island, steep path to Buaboke cave, at the base of limestone rocks; 8°7.603'N, 98°55.466'E; 50 m a.s.l.; Sep. 2007; A. Reischütz leg.; coll. REI • 1 shell; Suratthani Province, 15.3 km NE Ban Na San off road to Tha Rom Yen National Park; 8°53'N, 99°26'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 20 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0678; UF 591326 • 3 shells; Phangnga Province, 32 km NE Khok Kloi, Wat Tham Suwan Khuha; 08°27'N, 98°27'E; 20 m a.s.l.; 27 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0601; UF 345751 • 1 shell; Phangnga Province, limestone knoll, 5.7 km SW intersection Hwys 4 & 4152; 8°27'N, 98°29'E; 20 m a.s.l.; 28 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0602; UF 345771 • 1 shell; Krabi Province, 5.6 km SW of Ao Luek Tai, on uneven surface of large boulder at the base of limestone cliff; 8°20.772'N, 98°40.968'E; 20–25 m a.s.l.; 16 Mar. 2020; ex. coll. S. Aiken; coll. HA • 8 shells; Krabi Province, 9.2 km northwest from Phang Nga; 08°07.305'N, 98°52.231'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 21 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 3 shells; Krabi Province, Viewpoint Hill, Railay (=Rai Leh) Beach West, at the base of limestone rocks; 8°0.511'N, 98°50.248'E; 40 m a.s.l.; Sep. 2007; A. Reischütz leg.; coll. REI • 4 shells; Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Lan Saka, N side of Hwy. 4015; 08°25'N, 99°45'E; 16 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0665; UF 345226 • 8 shells; Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, circa 38 km WNW of Tha Sala, outcrop 1.5 km W of junction Hwys 4186 and 4188; 8°43'N, 99°47'E; 80 m a.s.l.; 16 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0661; UF 345194 • 16 shells; Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Wat Tham Thong Panara, vicinity of the rock temple; 08°25.278'N, 99°22.762'E; 19 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 23 shells; Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, circa 38 km WNW of Tha Sala, outcrop 1.5 km W of junction Hwys 4186 and 4188; 08°43'N, 99°47'E; 80 m a.s.l.; 16 Apr. 1998; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0661; UF 345193 • 20 shells; Phattalung Province, 6 km NW of Phattalung, 1 km NE of Hwy. 4048; 7°40'N, 100°3'E; 60 m a.s.l.; 13 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0653; UF 345102 • 54 shells; Phatthalung Province, Khao Pu-Khao Ya Nat. Park, Si Banphot district, Ruesi Cave; 7°41.797'N, 99°50.162'E; 25 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 25 shells; Phattalung Province, 6.4 km E of Hwy. 4 on Hwy. 4081, 1 km SW of Khao Chai Son; 7°27'N, 100°11'E; 50 m a.s.l.; 11 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0648; UF 345063 • 14 shells; Phattalung Province, 6.4 km E of Hwy. 4 on Hwy. 4081, 1 km SW of Khao Chai Son; 7°27'N, 100°11E; 11 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0648; UF 345064 • 7 shells; Phattalung Province, 16.2 km S of junction of Hwy.s 4 and 4122; 7°25'N, 99°59'E; 150 m a.s.l.; 09 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0637; UF 344971 • 4 shells; Phattalung Province, 6 km NW of Phattalung, 1 km NE of Hwy. 404; 7°40.02'N, 100°3'E; 60 m a.s.l.; 13 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0653; UF 436278 • 18 shells; Phattalung Province, 15.1 km W Hwy. 41 on Hwy. 4164, Khaopu and Khaoya National Park; 7°47'N, 99°56'E; 160 m a.s.l.; 14 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0657; UF 345154 • 6 shells; Phattalung Province, 6.4 km E Hwy. 4 on Hwy. 4081, 1 km SW Khao Chai Son; 7°27'N, 100°10.98'E; 11 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0649; UF 345073 • 17 shells; Phattalung Province, 16.2 km S of junction of Hwys 4 and 4122; 7°25'N, 99°59'E; 150 m a.s.l.; 09 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0637; UF 344970 • 3 shells; Phattalung Province, Khao Pu Khao Ya National Park, vicinity of Matcha cave; 7°39.980'N, 99°52.343'E; 125 m a.s.l.; 25 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 23 shells; Phattalung Province, Khao Pu Khao Ya National Park, Si Banphot district, ca 6 km north-northwest from Taphaen; 7°40.738'N, 99°50.822'E; 85 m a.s.l.; 24 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Yala Province, 6.3 km W of Yala, Ban Na Tham, Wat Khuha Phi Muk; 6°33'N, 101°15'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 01 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0612; UF 344665 • 3 shells; Yala Province, 6.3 km W of Yala, Ban Na Tham, Wat Khuha Phi Muk; 6°33'N, 101°15'E; 40 m a.s.l.; 01 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0612; UF 344664 • 25 shells; Yala Province, Mueang Yala district, Na Tham, Silp Cave (~ 9 km from centre of Yala); 6°31.316'N. 101°13.982'E; 21 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA. Malaysia • 2 shells; Selangor, Templer Park, Bukit Takun; NNW of Kuala Lumpur; Nov. 1998; ex. coll. Hemmen; coll. PGB • 46 shells; Kedah, Baling, eastern side of Bukit Baling; 55 m a.s.l.; 05°40.575'N, 100°54.803'E; 11 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 9 shells; Kelantan, Gua Musang, environment of the cave entrance; 04°52.974'N, 101°58.116'E; 135 m a.s.l.; 17 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 7 shells; Perlis, Kaki Bukit, vicinity of Gua Kelam; 06°38.674'N, 100°12.170'E; 45–55 m a.s.l.; 13 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 11 shells; Pahang, 15 km west from Bandar Pusat Jengka, Hutan Lipur Gunung Senyum; 03°41.862'N, 102°25.980'E; 85 m a.s.l.; 23 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 3 shells; Perak, 800 m north from Padang Rengas on the road no. A107, eastern side of Gunung Pondok; 04°47.195'N, 100°50.493'E; 90 m a.s.l.; 08 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 12 shells; Kelantan, Gua Musang, 6 km Pulai, Gua Madu, vicinity of the cave; 04°50.213'N, 101°56.982'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 17 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 3 shells; Selangor, Kuala Lumpur E - Kanching, Templer Park, Perangsang Templer Golf Club, rock; 03°17.878'N, 101°38.438'E; 100 m a.s.l.; 25 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 22 shells; Perak, Lenggong, Taman Awam Gua Tok Giring; 05°07.128'N, 100°.351'E; 90 m a.s.l.; 06 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 131 shells; Perak, northeast from Chemor, 2 km east from Kampung Kanthan, western side of the mountain; 04°44.799'N, 101°07.794'E; 105 m a.s.l.; 08 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 304 shells; Pahang, Bukit Cinta Manis, south-southeastern side, 800 m from Lebuhraya Karak towards Kampung Cinta Manis; 03°26.714'N, 102°00.814'E; 130 m a.s.l.; 22 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 18 shells; Perlis, Kangar, Bukit Kaya/Bukit Lagi, northeastern edge of the mountain; 06°26.076'N, 100°11.469'E; 5 m a.s.l.; 12 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 67 shells; Pahang, Gua Bama, Kuala Lipis 9 km, Padang Tungku; 04°11.652'N, 101°57.936'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 19 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 180 shells; Pahang, 20 km southeast from Jerantut, Gua Kota Gelanggi, below Gua Balai; 03°54.000'N, 102°28.412'E; 115 m a.s.l.; 21 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 4 shells; Kelantan Province, Gua Musang, behind railway station; 04°53.033'N, 101°58.178'E; J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 6 shells; Pahang Province, Lipis, Kenong Rimba park; 04°12.952'N, 102°11.263'E; 83 m a.s.l.; J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 2 shells; Pahang Province, Jerantut, Taman Negara, Kuala Tahan, Gua Luas; 04°30.640'N, 102°26.548'E; 75 m a.s.l.; J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 1 shell; Pahang Province, Jerantut, Kg. Baheru, Gua Kota Gelanggi, Gua Terang Bulan; J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 8 shells; Kedah, 1.5 km east from Kodiang, Gua Kerbau; 06°23.431'N, 100°18.904'E, 14 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 5 shells; Kelantan Province, Gua Musang, 264 km from KL, Route 8; 191 m a.s.l.; 04°46.685'N, 102°00.095'E; J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 5 shells; Selangor, Templer Park, Bukit Takun; NNW of Kuala Lumpur; Nov. 1999; J. Hemmen leg.; coll. PGB • 5 shells; Kelantan Province, Gua Madu, south of Gua Musang; 04°52.405'N, 101°57.925'E; 02 Nov. 2000; J. Hemmen leg.; coll. PGB • 8 shells; Pahang, Kota Gelanggi, Jengka-Jerantut road, on limestone surfaces covered with mosses; 03°53.4758'N, 102°28.388'E; 29. May 2011; M. E. Marzuki leg.; coll. PGB.

Type localities.

“Perak” (Bukit Pondong, Malaysia) (H. hungerfordianum); “Kuankalong Limestone Hill, Satul Province, 6°52'59"N, 100°07'38"E, 110 meters elevation”, Thailand (H. satulensis); “Samui islands, Gulf of Siam”, Thailand (H. striolatum).

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. sichang and H. loei.

Distribution.

This species is widely spread in Malaysia and adjacent regions of Thailand. Also known from Myanmar where the northernmost locality of the species is known (Tongkerd et al. 2024). The southernmost localities are positioned in and near the city of Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia).

Figure 196. 

Hypselostoma hungerfordianum, lectotype (SMF 4587) A–D shell.

Remarks.

This species can have a more or less elongated spire. The umbilicus is usually consistent in its width but we have observed slight variations. The apertural dentition is variable in terms of the number of smaller barriers between the five main ones (angular, parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar). Gyliotrachela striolata was known only from a single damaged type, which retained its last whorl only. Even in damaged condition, it was clear that there are no differences between G. striolata and H. hungerfordianum which is why they are treated conspecific. Hypselostoma satulensis was described from Satun province in S Thailand and shows no morphological differences from H. hungerfordianum. Its type locality is practically located in the middle of the distribution area of H. hungerfordianum. We have examined the material from northern Thailand hosted in UF with the following data: 2 shells; Mae Hong Son Province, Tham Lod Cave, 1.5 km SE Ban Tham Lod Village; 19°34'N, 98°9'E; 720 m a.s.l.; 19 Mar. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0576; UF 345527. Since this locality is quite far from the actual distribution area of this species, we believe that this sample was mislabelled and that this species actually does not occur in Mae Hong Son Province.

Figure 197. 

Hypselostoma hungerfordianum, holotype of H. striolatum (SMF 4591) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 198. 

Hypselostoma hungerfordianum, holotype of H. satulensis (CUMZ ver. 44028) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 199. 

Hypselostoma hungerfordianum, paratype of G. khaochongensis (CUMZ ver. 010) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 200. 

Hypselostoma hungerfordianum from different localities A Malaysia, Kelantan province (coll. HA) B Malaysia, Pahang province (coll. HA) C Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur (coll. HA) D Thailand, Krabi province (coll. HA) E Thailand, Nakhon Si Thammarat provinve (coll. HA) F Malaysia, Perlis province (coll. HA).

Figure 201. 

Distribution map of Hypselostoma hungerfordianum.

Hypselostoma khmerianum (Sutcharit & Panha, 2023), comb. nov.

Figs 186G, 202, 223

Gyliotrachela khmeriana Sutcharit & Panha in Sutcharit et al. 2023: 1295–1299, fig. 4.

Type material examined.

Cambodia • holotype; CUMZ 14206.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 15 shells (4 adult, 1 of them broken); Sa Kaeo Province, Khlong Hat district, Tham Phet Pho Thong; 13°24.946'N, 102°19.691'E; 03 June 2023; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

“The limestone hills at Phnom Sampeov Mountain, Banan District, Battambang Province, Cambodia (13.026000°N, 103.101011°E)”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is not similar to any hitherto described congener due to the combination of conical shell, absence of spiral striation, all whorls keeled, strong but not numerous apertural barriers, and separated angular and parietal lamellae. The shell shape somehow resembles H. sculpturatum but it differs from it by its adnate last whorl, separated angular and parietal lamellae and not spirally striated teleoconch. Hypselostoma circumcarinatum sp. nov. has its whorls keeled, a merged angulo-parietal lamella and spirally striated whorls. It is different from H. chatnareeae by the separated angular and parietal lamellae, weaker keel, and the absence of a deep groove above the keel.

Figure 202. 

Hypselostoma khmerianum from Sa Kaeo Province, Thailand (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from the type locality in Cambodia and is now reported for the first time in Thailand (Sa Kaeo province).

Hypselostoma loei Panha & Prateespasen, 2005

Figs 186H, 203, 223

Hypselostoma loei Panha & Prateespasen, 2005: 99, fig. 2.

Hypselostoma loeiPanha and Burch 2008: 94–95, fig. 81; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 1 paratype; from the type locality; CUMZ ver. 025.

Additional material examined.

Thailand-Central • 3 shells; Phitsanulok Province, Noen Maprang district, Chomphu, Tham Phra Wang Daeng; 16°40.651'N, 100°41.287'E; 150 m a.s.l.; 02 Mar. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HAThailand- Northeast • 54 shells; Loei Province, Nong Hin district, 20.3 km southwest from the centre of Nong Hin towards Pha Wai, left side of the road no. 3029; 17°2.471'N, 101°43.655'E; 705 m a.s.l.; 28 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 46 shells; Loei Province, Mueang Loei district, rock wall above Wat Tham Piya Thammarangsi; 17°27.896'N, 101°51.578'E; 27 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 9 shells; Loei Province, 9.2 km NW Loei Buddhist temple, up and N of main cave entrance, among leaves; 17°35'N, 101°44'E; 28 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0685, UF 345859 • 1 shell; Loei Province, 1 km E Ban Huai Muang; 17.474°N, 101.889°E; 375 m a.s.l.; 21. May 1987; F.G. Thompson leg.; locality code FGT-4274, UF 527260 • 11 shells; Nong Bua Lamphu Province, Na Klang district, Wat Phuttha Banphot - Tham Pha Choo; 17°18.931'N, 102°7.042'E; 27 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 13 shells; Khon Kaen Province, Phu Pha Man district, rocks above Wat Phu Hua Chang; 16°39.170'N, 101°48.094'E; 345 m a.s.l.; 01 Mar. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA • 10 shells; Khon Kaen Province, Chum Phae district, Na Nong Tum, Kled Kaew cave; 16°49.021'N, 101°57.382'E; 580 m a.s.l.; 01 Mar. 2023; A. Hunyadi & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. HA

Type locality.

“Limestone hills in Loei Province, 16°45'47"N. 101°59'8"E, 110 meters elevation…Thailand…”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to H. hungerfordianum but the latter has separate angular and parietal lamellae and more numerous barriers.

Distribution.

Known from Loei, Phitsanulok, Khon Kaen and Nong Bua Lamphu provinces in Thailand.

Figure 203. 

Hypselostoma loei, paratype (CUMZ ver. 025) A–D shell

Remarks.

The striking similarity of this species with H. hungerfordianum suggests that Gyliotrachela is a junior synonym of Hypselostoma.

Hypselostoma luctans (van Benthem Jutting, 1950), comb. nov.

Figs 186I, 204, 205, 223

Gyliotrachela luctans van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 33–34, fig. 19.

Gyliotrachela luctansvan Benthem Jutting 1950: 46; Zilch 1984: 166; Maassen 2001: 76; Foon et al. 2017: 79, fig. 30C.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 23 paratypes; from the type locality; 1938; Raffles Museum Singapore ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.137158.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 7 shells; Yala Province, 9.5 km from the junction to Bannang Sata, 1700 m north from the road no 4077, left side of the side road; 6°19.803'N, 101°13.135'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 22 Feb. 2023; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

“Gunong Pondok, Padang Rengas, Perak”, Malaysia.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to H. bubalus sp. nov. with which it is also geographically approximate. It differs from it by a clearly narrower umbilicus. Hypselostoma bubalus sp. nov. is also spirally striated on some isolated parts of the shell (above or below the keel), but H. luctans is not. See also under H. piconis.

Figure 204. 

Hypselostoma luctans, paratype (RMNH.Moll.137158) A–D shell E–G enlarged apertural views.

Figure 205. 

Hypselostoma luctans from Yala province, Thailand (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from Peninsular Malaysia and Yala Province in Thailand.

Remarks.

There can be two interpalatal plicae, and in some cases, none are visible. Umbilicus can sometimes be slightly wider, with a stronger groove inside (than the figured specimen).

Hypselostoma ophis Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 186J, 206, 207, 223

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.1 mm; SW: 2.6 mm); Phattalung Province, Phattalung, Khao Ok Thalu, rock wall; 07°37.506'N, 100°05.330'E; 19 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; CUMZ 14467. Paratypes. Thailand • 5 shells (3 whole and 2 last whorls with retained apertures); same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell (fragment, not paratype); same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Thailand, Phattalung Province, Phattalung, Khao Ok Thalu, rock wall; 07°37.506'N, 100°05.330'E.

Diagnosis.

A Hypselostoma species with sandpaper-like shell surface and a bluntly keeled last whorl which is detached from the penultimate and slightly ascending upwards. Five main barriers in the aperture (parietal, angular, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar). Parietal lamella very long and wavy. Umbilicus moderately wide.

Figure 206. 

Hypselostoma ophis Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14467) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell shape concave-conical (due to the strongly enlarged last whorl), consisting of 4.5–5 convex whorls separated by a deep suture. Colouration dark brown, weakly glossy and opaque. Protoconch finely pitted, showing very weak spiralling pattern, consisting of ~ 1.25–1.5 whorls, coloured the same as the teleoconch. Teleoconch very finely granulated (sandpaper-like) with additional radial growth lines. Also, some irregularly spaced radial white streaks are occasionally visible. Last whorl bluntly keeled, moderately detached from the penultimate and slightly ascending upwards (~ 20 ° compared to the shell axis). In lateral view, two strong grooves are visible near the aperture, one above and one below the central keel. Peristome expanded and not reflected, slightly lighter than the rest of the shell. Aperture equipped with five strong and thick barriers (parietal, angular, upper palatal, lower palatal, and columellar) and several smaller ones. Parietal lamella very strong, wavy, and very long. Angular lamella short and sometimes separated in inner and outer part. Inner part is weaker. Both palatal plicae very strong, nearly as strong as the parietal lamella or even stronger but clearly shorter. In front of the upper palatal plica, a small swelling is present which is probably homologous with the palatal tubercle present in other genera (e.g., Bensonella, see Páll-Gergely and White 2023) Columellar lamella nearly horizontal, stronger only than the angular among the main barriers. Additionally, smaller barriers are present between the main ones. There is usually one in the interpalatal region, one basal and one between the columellar and parietal. None of these barriers reach the peristome. Surface of all barriers is very finely spiniferous medially and very finely granulated laterally. Sinulus rounded and visibly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus open and moderately wide, measuring 1/3 of the shell width and showing the penultimate whorl. A strong groove running from the peristome towards the umbilicus is visible. This groove is getting lost near the penultimate whorl.

Figure 207. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma ophis Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14467) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C, D enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. venustum.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 4). SH = 1.76–2.1; SW1 = 2.38–2.6; SW2 = 1.48–1.54; AH = 0.88–0.95; AW = 0.85–0.89.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is derived from the Greek work ophis (snake) which is in special reference to the curved and long parietal lamella (which is also one of the longest in all hitherto described Hypselostoma species). To be used as a noun in apposition.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma piconis van Benthem Jutting, 1949

Figs 186K, 208, 223

Hypselostoma piconis van Benthem Jutting, 1949b: 59, pl. 2., figs a–d.

Hypselostoma piconisvan Benthem Jutting 1950: 24, 42, fig. 13; Maassen 2001: 77.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 1 paratype; from the type locality; Raffles Museum, Singapore ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.140161.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia • 9 shells; Perak, 8–10 km northeast from Sungai Siput, east from Batu Lima, cave temple; 04°51.985'N, 101°07.333'E; 70 m a.s.l.; 07 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

“Sungei Siput, Perak”, Malaysia.

Differential diagnosis.

Hypselostoma piconis is strikingly similar to H. luctans from which it can be separated by the appearance of the apertural barriers, most importantly the concrescent angular and parietal lamellae, which are separate in H. luctans.

Figure 208. 

Hypselostoma piconis, paratype (RMNH.Moll.140161) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality and its surroundings.

Remarks.

The fact that the major difference between H. piconis and H. luctans is the appearance of the barriers on the parietal side further supports the indistinctness of Gyliotrachela and its synonymy with Hypselostoma.

Hypselostoma sichang (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2002), comb. nov.

Figs 186L, 209, 210, 223

Anauchen sichang Panha & Burch, 2002e: 21, fig. 2.

Gyliotrachela sichangPanha and Burch 2008: 80, fig. 69; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 2001; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ 44001 • 2 paratypes; from the type locality; 2001; S. Panha leg.; SMF 331463.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 10 shells; Sa Kaeo Province, Wang Sombun district, vicinity of Tham Khoa Phlapphueng Thong; 13°26.873'N, 102°13.071'E; 06 Mar. 2023; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Type locality.

“Sichang island, Si Racha, Chon Buri Province, 13°20′05″N, 100°55′24″E, 70 meters elevation” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to H. hungerfordianum from which it can be separated by the much stronger and lower peripheral keel, very rough, sandpaper-like shell surface sculpture as well as the narrower umbilicus. See also under H. vesovici sp. nov.

Figure 209. 

Hypselostoma sichang, holotype (CUMZ 44001) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is, apart from the type locality, known from one more sampling site in Sa Kaeo Province.

Figure 210. 

Hypselostoma sichang from Sa Kaeo province (coll. HA) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Hypselostoma srakeoense (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2004)

Figs 186M, 211, 223

Anauchen srakeoensis Panha & Burch in Panha et al. 2004: 62–63, fig. 4.

Anauchen srakeoensisPanha and Burch 2008: 52–53, fig. 48; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 7.

Hypselostoma srakeoensisSutcharit et al. 2023: 1291–1293, fig. 2.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 1 paratype; from the type locality; S. Panha leg.; SMF 331473.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell; Srakeo Province, Khaochakan District, Wat Khao Chakan; 22 June 2014; P. Dumrongrojwattana leg.; ex. coll. Maassen; coll. PGB.

Type locality.

“Plubpluengtong limestone hills, Srakeo Province, 13°48'02"N, 102°12'49"E, 110 meters elevation” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is superficially similar to several congeners with strongly enlarged last whorl which is also sharply descending. The two most similar species are H. torticollis and H. fungus sp. nov. However, H. torticollis has separated lamellae on the parietal side and it is also less depressed with clearly narrower umbilicus. Hypselostoma fungus sp. nov. has more rounded last whorl, wider umbilicus, more apertural barriers and is spirally striated. See also under H. pendulum.

Figure 211. 

Hypselostoma srakeoense, paratype (SMF 331473). A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from four sampling sites, two in Sa Kaeo province (Thailand) and two in Banteay Meanchey province (Cambodia) (Sutcharit et al. 2023).

Hypselostoma surakiti (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2003)

Figs 186N, 212, 223

Gyliotrachela surakiti Panha & Burch in Burch et al. 2003: 162–169, figs 12, 13.

Gyliotrachela surakitiTongkerd et al. 2004: 143, fig. 2; Panha and Burch 2008: 82–84, fig. 72; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 2 paratypes; from the type locality; SMF 331450 • 1 paratype; from the type locality; CUMZ ver078.

Type locality.

“South of Puttabanpot Temple, Pajoh Village, Nawang District, Nongbualumpoo Province, 17°19'1"N, 102°7'3"E, 320 meters elevation, Thailand”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is by the level of its last whorl ascension similar to H. kohrin and H. diarmaidi. It can be separated from H. kohrin and H. diarmaidi by the absence of typical spiral striation on the shell which is present in the latter two.

Figure 212. 

Hypselostoma surakiti, paratype (CUMZ ver. 078) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

In H. surakiti, we could observe some irregular and weak spiral striae on the last whorl although they are not in form of typical raised spiral striae.

Hypselostoma transitans Möllendorff, 1894

Figs 186O, 213, 214, 223

Hypselostoma transitans Möllendorff, 1894: 16, figs 12, 13.

Hypselostoma translucidum [sic] — Fischer and Dautzenberg 1904: 408.

Gyliauchen transitans — Pilsbry 1917: 214–215, pl. 36, figs 5–8.

Gliotrachela transitans [sic] — Laidlaw 1933: 214.

Gyliotrachela transitans transitansvan Benthem Jutting 1950: 47; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 28; Thompson and Upatham 1997: 233.

Gyliotrachela transitansZilch 1984: 166; Hemmen and Hemmen 2001: 41; Panha and Burch 2008: 85, fig. 74; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Hypselostoma transitansFischer and Dautzenberg 1904: 408.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 1 lectotype; SMF 4589 • 8 paralectotypes; from the type locality; SMF 4590.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 2 shells; Chumphon Province, 2.5 km northeast from Pathio, Tham Khao Phlu; 10°43.851'N, 99°19.242'E; 23 Feb. 2015; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 22 fragments and 1 complete shell; Suratthani Province, Angthong islands, Wia Talap island, steep path to Buaboke cave, at the base of limestone rocks; 8°7.603'N, 98°55.466'E; 50 m a.s.l.; Sep. 2007; A. Reischütz leg.; coll. REI.

Type locality.

“Samui islands, Gulf of Siam”, Thailand.

Differential diagnosis.

Hypselostoma torticollis is similar due to the down-turning aperture and same arrangement of the apertural barriers but this species has a much wider umbilicus, more enlarged last whorl and is spirally striated. Hypselostoma fungus sp. nov. is spirally striated, has merged angular and parietal lamellae, more down-turning last whorl and a much wider umbilicus. See also under H. venustum.

Figure 213. 

Hypselostoma transitans, lectotype (SMF 4590) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species in known from Chumphon and Suratthani provinces in Thailand.

Remarks.

In some paralectotypes, a lamella between the columellar and parietal was positioned much deeper in the aperture. We have examined a distinct form of this species from Tham Khao Phlu (Chumphon province). This form had a wider umbilicus and a sharper keel as well as more enlarged last whorl in comparison to previous ones. However, we decided not to treat it as distinct species due to the fact that we have also found a transitional form between the typical H. transitans (close to its type locality) and the one from Tham Khao Phlu.

Figure 214. 

Hypselostoma transitans, specimen from Tham Khao Phlu (coll. HA) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Hypselostoma venustum (van Benthem Jutting, 1950)

Figs 186P, 215, 216, 223

Gyliotrachela transitans venusta van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 28–29, 47, fig. 16.

Gyliotrachela transitans venusta — Maassen, 2001: 76.

Gyliotrachela transitans helioscopia van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 29–31, fig. 17. syn. nov.

Gyliotrachela transitans heliscopia [sic] — Maassen, 2001: 76.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • holotype of G. transitans venusta; Raffles Museum, Singapore ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.137140 • 8 paratypes of G. transitans helioscopia; from the type locality; Raffles Museum, Singapore ex. coll.; 1947; RMNH.Moll.137144.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia • 3 shells; Pahang, 20 km southeast from Jerantut, Gua Kota Gelanggi, under Gua Balai; 03°54.000'N, 102°28.412'E; 115 m a.s.l.; 21 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Type localities.

“Gunong Pondok, Padang Rengas, Perak”, Malaysia (H. venustum); “Kota Tongkat, Pahang”, Malaysia (G. transitans helioscopia).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar to H. ophis sp. nov., from which it can be separated by narrower umbilicus and shorter and wavy parietal lamella. Hypselostoma transitans has more rough shell sculpture as well as the descending last whorl and a wider umbilicus. See also under H. vesovici sp. nov.

Figure 215. 

Hypselostoma venustum, holotype (RMNH.Moll.137140) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known only from three localities in Peninsular Malaysia (Gunong Pondok, Kota Tongkat and Gua Kota Gelanggi).

Remarks.

Van Benthem Jutting (1950) recognised two additional subspecies of G. transitans, namely G. transitans helioscopia and G. transitans venusta. However, these two taxa should not be considered as subspecies since they differ from the nominotypical subspecies in several very important characters: last whorl is in nominotypical subspecies strongly descending near the aperture while in G. transitans venusta it is slightly ascending; whorls are more depressed in nominotypical subspecies; shell surface is also different, being more sandpaper-like in nominotypical subspecies and almost smooth to very finely sculptured in other two subspecies. Finally, umbilicus is wider in G. transitans. Because of all aforementioned clear differences, we conclude that H. venusta is a good species separated from H. transitans. Gyliotrachela transitans helioscopia is its junior synonym due to the virtually identical shell morphology. Van Benthem Jutting (1950) noted that in G. transitans venusta, the shell is less elevated, peripheral keel sharper and longitudinal grooves deeper than in G. transitans helioscopia. These differences are only minor and fall within the intraspecific variability, thus there are no clear characters which allow the separation of these two taxa.

Figure 216. 

Hypselostoma venustum, paratype of G. transitans helioscopia (RMNH.Moll.137144) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Hypselostoma vesovici Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 186Q, 217, 218, 223

Type material.

Holotype. Malaysia • 1 shell (SH: 2.18 mm; SW1: 3.12 mm); Gua Telinga, Kuala Tahan, Taman Negara, Jerantut, Pahang; 4°22.326'N, 102°23.747'E; 69 m a.s.l.; T. Ishibe, K. Ohara, K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; CUMZ 14463. Paratypes. Malaysia • 10 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. PGB • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. VG • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Malaysia, Gua Telinga, Kuala Tahan, Taman Negara, Jerantut, Pahang; 4°22.326'N, 102°23.747'E; 69 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Shell concave-conical, with roughly granulated (sandpaper-like) surface sculpture. Last two whorls keeled below the periphery, keel especially strong on the last whorl. Last whorl detached from the penultimate, directed upwards. Aperture equipped with five main barriers and usually five smaller ones. All barriers are very broad and thick, very strongly spiniferous. Umbilicus very narrow, dot-like.

Figure 217. 

Hypselostoma vesovici Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14463) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell concave-conical (due to the strongly enlarged last whorl), pinkish-brown in colour, corneous. It is consisting of 4.5–5 regularly increasing whorls separated by a deeply impressed suture. Protoconch finely pitted, not showing spiralling pattern, consisting of 1.25–1.5 whorls and slightly darker than the rest of the shell. Protoconch- teleoconch boundary clearly visible due to the change in shell surface sculpture. Teleoconch roughly granulated, sandpaper-like. On the last whorl near the keel, granules can in some specimens be arranged in a way to provoke a spiralling pattern although no regular spiral striae are developed. Radial lines are strong, widely and irregularly spaced, ~ 17 radial lines on the last whorl in standard view. They are more densely arranged on the initial teleoconch whorls. Protoconch and initial teleoconch whorls rounded and convex, last two whorls are keeled below the centre of the periphery. Last whorl especially strongly keeled, with a deep groove above the keel. It is also moderately detached from the penultimate near the aperture, and slightly ascending (~ 15–25 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome whitish, strongly expanded but not reflected. Aperture large, equipped with five main barriers (parietal, angular, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar). Angular lamella is the weakest and the shortest among the main five. All other main barriers are relatively thick and broad, almost equally developed. Parietal lamella is the longest in the aperture and surpassing the profile of the angular. Between the main barriers, several smaller ones could be observed. There are usually two interpalatal plicae, two between the lower palatal and the columellar and one knob-like infraparietal lamella. All barriers, as well as the aperture surface, are very strongly spiniferous. These spines are widely spaced (especially on the barriers) and much stronger than in other congeners. Sinulus not very distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus is very narrow, dot-like, not showing previous whorls and measuring slightly > 1/10 of the shell width. A very shallow groove is visible running alongside the umbilicus.

Figure 218. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma vesovici Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14463) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is by the general shell shape similar to H. venustum from which it clearly differs by a sharply keeled last whorl below the periphery (provoking a discoid basis of the shell and a concave surface above the keel), thicker apertural barriers with very strongly spiniferous surfaces and a slightly narrower umbilicus with a much shallower groove inside it. Furthermore, the penultimate whorl in H. venustum is rounded, not keeled as in H. vesovici sp. nov. and the aperture in H. vesovici sp. nov. is much larger when compared to the rest of the shell than in H. venustum. However, the species which has the same appearance of the last whorl, and thus most similar are H. sichang and H. discobasis. In contrast to the new species, these two representatives share the different shell surface (very roughly sandpaper-like in H. sichang and coarsely spirally striated in H. discobasis) and different arrangement of the apertural barriers (less strong and spiniferous, angular and parietal lamellae merged in H. discobasis), as well as much wider umbilicus especially in H. discobasis. Hypselostoma vesovici sp. nov. also has clearly much larger aperture when compared to the rest of the shell than in H. sichang.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 2.10–2.35; SW1 = 2.53–3.12; SW2 = 1.49–1.77; AH = 1.10–1.23; AW = 1.05–1.25.

Etymology.

Named after Dr. Nikola Vesović, a prominent Serbian entomologist and a friend of the first author.

Distribution.

Known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma vicinum Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 186R, 219, 220, 223

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 1.9 mm, 2.6 mm); Suratthani Province, limestone outcrop along Hwy. 401, 2.7 km W junc Hwys. 4142 & 401, evergreen forest on rocky hillside, below cliff, base of cliff; 9°10'N, 99°40'E; 90 m a.s.l.; 18 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; UF 345327.

Paratypes. Thailand • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14468 • 51 shells; same data as for holotype; UF 591363 • 45 shells; same data as for holotype; locality code KA-0674, UF 345336 • 16 ethanol-preserved specimens; same data as for holotype; locality code KA-0673, UF 345328.

Figure 219. 

Hypselostoma vicinum Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 345327) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 12 shells (apical whorls/ juveniles, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; UF 583724 • 3 shells (juveniles/damaged, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; locality code KA-0674; UF 583725.

Figure 220. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma vicinum Gojšina, Auffenberg & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 345327) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Type locality.

Thailand, Suratthani Province, limestone outcrop along Hwy. 401, 2.7 km W junc Hwys. 4142 & 401, evergreen forest on rocky hillside, below cliff, base of cliff; 9°10'N, 99°40'E; 90 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

A Hypselostoma species with roughly granulated (not spirally striated) teleoconch, and keeled, detached, and ascending last whorl. Apertural barriers few (five main ones and usually three smaller ones).

Description.

Shell depressed, concave-conical (due to the strongly enlarged last whorl), chestnut brown and weakly glossy, consisting of 3.75–4.25 convex whorls separated by a deep suture. Protoconch is of the same colouration as the teleoconch, finely pitted and showing no spiralling pattern. Boundary between the protoconch and the teleoconch not clear under microscope because of the very similar surface sculpture of the two regions, but the former is ~ 1.5 whorls. Teleoconch roughly granulated (sandpaper-like), weakly sculptured with radial growth lines but devoid of spiral striation (these radial lines are much harder to observe than the prominent granulation). Occasionally, thicker whitish radial streaks are unevenly placed across the surface of the shell. Last whorl with a very blunt keel (which is getting stronger near the aperture) positioned at the centre of the periphery. Shell surface is immediately below and above the keel concave, and then again convex towards the suture and the umbilicus. Last whorl is also very slightly detached from the penultimate and moderately ascending upwards (~ 40–50 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome dirty white, expanded but not reflected, its surface very finely pitted. There are altogether five main apertural barriers (angular, parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar) and several smaller ones of variable number. Parietal lamella is the strongest and highest in the aperture, straight but directed towards the palatal side. Angular lamella ~ 2 × lower and shorter than the parietal, but extends closer to the expanding peristome, almost reaching it. Upper and lower palatal plicae almost the same in height and length, the former may be slightly weaker than the latter. Columellar lamella horizontal, almost identical to the lower palatal plica. Among the smaller barriers, there is usually one interpalatal plica which is very small, dot-like. Slightly larger basal plica is present nearly halfway between the lower palatal and columellar. One dot-like swelling is present in the columello-parietal transition embayment. Surface of all apertural barriers is very finely spiniferous medially and very finely granulated laterally. Sinulus wide, not distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus wide, measuring slightly > 1/4 of the shell width. A shallow groove runs alongside the umbilicus but is visible only around the last quarter of the last whorl.

Differential diagnosis.

Less depressed forms of H. fortunatum sp. nov. can resemble this species but the barriers in the former are much weaker and angular and parietal lamellae are concrescent. See also under H. troglodytes.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 5). SH = 1.73–2.06; SW1 = 2.49–2.85; SW2 = 1.63–1.79; AH = 0.93–1.19; AW = 0.94–1.10.

Etymology.

The specific epithet vicinum comes from the Latin word for neighbour. This name is provided because the most similar species to the new one, H. troglodytes, lives in the neighbouring Peninsular Malaysia.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma vujici Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 186S, 221, 222, 223

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 2.47 mm; SW: 1.93 mm); Nakhon Sawan Province, 4.0 km NW of Ban Non San; 15°942'N, 99°873'E; 100 m a.s.l.; 12 June 1987; F.G. Thompson leg.; UF 528941. Paratypes. Thailand • 1 shell; same data as for holotype; CUMZ 14469 • 2 shells; same data as for holotype; UF 591364 • 8 shells (2 whole, others badly damaged, paratypes); same locality data as for holotype; locality code FGT-4325, UF 530691.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 3 shells (2 juveniles, 1 last whorl with damaged aperture, not paratypes); same data as for holotype; UF 583723.

Type locality.

Thailand, Nakhon Sawan Province, 4.0 km NW of Ban Non San; 15°942'N, 99°873'E; 100 m a.s.l. (provided coordinates are wrong, they cannot be understood by Google Earth).

Figure 221. 

Hypselostoma vujici Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 528941) A–D shell E–G enlarged apertural views.

Diagnosis.

A Hypselostoma species with 5.75–6 roughly granulated whorls and a very deep suture. Last whorl somehow canted and adnate to the penultimate near the aperture. Palatal plicae and basal plica hooked. Other barriers (angulo-parietal, columellar and infraparietal) blunt. Umbilicus narrow.

Figure 222. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma vujici Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (UF 528941) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Description.

Shell high, concave-conical, shiny brown or even colourless, consisting of 5–5.5 whorls separated by a very deep suture. Protoconch almost smooth, with very weak spiralling pattern, consisting of ~ 1.5 whorls but its boundary with the teleoconch is not clearly visible due to the similar surface sculpture. Teleoconch with weak and coarse radial growth lines, which are on the last two whorls visible as white streaks, and rough granulation (sandpaper-like) but no spiral striation. Initial teleoconch whorls rounded, penultimate only very slightly less rounded. Last whorl adnate to slightly detached from the penultimate, with a very weak keel situated near the centre of the periphery. It is slightly descending near the aperture (~ 5–10 ° compared to the shell axis). Peristome dirty white, expanded but not reflected. Aperture rounded (almost as wide as high), equipped with six main barriers (angulo-parietal, upper palatal, interpalatal, lower palatal, basal and columellar) and one weak infraparietal swelling-like lamella. Angulo-parietal lamella is the strongest in the aperture, with clearly distinguishable angular and parietal part and a prominent sinuation between them. Parietal part stronger and higher than the angular, both curved towards the palatal wall. All palatal plicae hooked, pointing outside. Upper palatal and interpalatal plica positioned close together, almost equally as strong. Lower palatal plica stronger than others and situated some distance from the interpalatal. Basal plica also hooked but less clearly than the palatals, strong as the interpalatal and upper palatal but situated closer to the columellar lamella than to the lower palatal plica. Columellar lamella not hooked, long and almost horizontal. A small swelling-like infraparietal lamella is present. Angulo-parietal lamella is reaching the expanding peristome, columellar lamella almost reaching it. Surface of all apertural barriers is finely granulated. Sinulus wide, not distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus always open but of variable width, measuring ~ 1/6 or ≤ 1/3 of the shell width. Umbilical groove is strong in specimens with wider and weak in specimens with narrower umbilicus.

Figure 223. 

Distribution map of species belonging to Hypselostoma hungerfordianum group.

Differential diagnosis.

This species can be separated from all other congeners by the combination of a slender shell with a larger number of whorls (usually ~ 6), roughly granulated teleoconch and hooked basal and three palatal plicae in the aperture.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 4). SH = 2.36–2.62; SW = 1.78–1.93; AH = 0.92–0.96; AW = 0.85–0.93.

Etymology.

Named after Mihailo Vujić, a prominent Serbian entomologist and a friend of the first author.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

We have noticed significant intraspecific variability in this species: there were some specimens with elongated-conical, brown shell and some with more depressed spire or much lighter (sometimes even colourless) shell. Umbilicus varied from 1/6 to 1/3 of the shell width with weak or sometimes deep and strong groove inside it.

3. Hypselostoma terae group

Diagnosis. This species group is characterised by the fine, pasty surface sculpture (like floury dough). Apertural barriers are never spiniferous, never hooked and not numerous: apart from the main five barriers (angular, parietal, two palatals, and a columellar), there are usually up to two more small barriers.

Remarks. This group includes 11 species. All of them inhabit Borneo, Peninsular Malaysia, and adjacent regions of Thailand. The morphology of the species within this group agrees well with the distribution pattern.

Hypselostoma elephas van Benthem Jutting, 1950

Figs 224A, 225, 241

Hypselostoma elephas van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 23–24, fig. 12.

Hypselostoma elephasvan Benthem Jutting 1950: 41; Maassen 2001: 77.

Boysidia (Dasypupa) elephasThompson and Dance 1983: 109.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • holotype; RMNH.Moll.137159.

Type locality.

“Bukit Tenggek, Pahang”, Malaysia.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. terae.

Distribution.

This species in known from Bukit Tenggek and Gunung Sagu (IUCN, 2015).

Figure 224. 

Synoptic view of species belonging to the Hypselostoma terae group A H. elephas B H. emergens C H. frequens D H. kelantanense E H. modestum F H. paini G H. procerum H H. serpa I H. terae J H. tertiusfrater nom. nov. K H. troglodytes.

Remarks.

This species is critically endangered due to the heavy quarrying of localities where it occurs (Clements 2009; IUCN 2015).

Figure 225. 

Hypselostoma elephas, holotype (RMNH.Moll.137159) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Hypselostoma emergens (van Benthem Jutting, 1950), comb. nov.

Figs 224B, 226, 241

Gyliotrachela emergens van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 34–35, fig. 20.

Gyliotrachela emergensvan Benthem Jutting 1950: 45; Zilch 1984: 165; Maassen 2001: 75.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 54 paratypes; from the type locality; 1939; Raffles Museum, Singapore ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.137150.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia • 2 shells; Perlis, ca 2 km S of Bukit Keteri (NE of Kangar); 22 Mar. 1998; Hemmen leg.; coll. PGB.

Type locality.

“Bukit Chuping, Perlis”, Malaysia.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. modestum.

Distribution.

This species is known from Bukit Chuping (type locality) and Bukit Keteri (this study), both located in Perlis, N Peninsular Malaysia.

Figure 226. 

Hypselostoma emergens, paratype (RMNH.Moll. 137150) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Remarks.

Some of the paratypes have more or less protruding and detached last whorl. Also, variability is observed in the keel near the aperture, it can be more or less sharp/pronounced.

Hypselostoma frequens (van Benthem Jutting, 1950), comb. nov.

Figs 224C, 227, 241

Paraboysidia frequens van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 17, fig. 7.

Paraboysidia frequensvan Benthem Jutting 1950: 38; van Benthem Jutting 1960: 14; van Benthem Jutting 1961: 35; Berry 1963: pl. 5, fig. 40; Zilch 1984:165; Maassen 2001: 73–74; Foon and Marzuki 2023: 142, fig. 1AQ.

Paraboysidia oreia van Benthem Jutting, 1961: 37, pl. 9, fig. 3. syn. nov.

Gyliotrachela frequensSchilthuizen et al. 1999: 284, fig. 2.

Paraboysidia oreiaMaassen 2001: 75; Foon et al. 2017: 79–80, fig. 30D.

Type localities.

“Kota Tongkat, Pahang”, Malaysia (H. frequens); “Gunong Batu Kurau, Perak”, Malaysia (P. oreia).

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 48 paratypes of Paraboysidia frequens; from the type locality; 1947; Raffles Museum, Singapore ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.137114 • 23 paratypes of Paraboysidia oreia; from the type locality; RMNH.Moll.137132.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia •1 shell; Perak, Ipoh, Perak Tong Temple; Oct. 1998; Hemmen leg.; coll. PGB • 5 shells; Selangor, Batu Caves (N of Kuala Lumpur); Nov. 1998; Hemmen leg.; coll. PGB • 1 shell; Selangor, Templer Park, Bukit Takun (NNW of Kuala Lumpur); Nov. 1998; Hemmen leg.; coll. PGB • 4 shells; Kedah, Gunung Keriang (N of Alor Setar); Sept. 1999; Hemmen leg.; coll. PGB.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. kelantanense, H. modestum, H. muaklekense and H. serpa. This species also similar to the distant Bensonella perfecta sp. nov. from which it differs by less numerous barriers on the palatal side, the absence of the palatal tubercle on the peristome edge, non-spiniferous apertural barrier surface, less conical shell, and very slightly narrower umbilicus.

Figure 227. 

Hypselostoma frequens. A–F paratype of H. frequens (RMNH.Moll.137114) G–K paratype of P. oreia (RMNH.Moll.137132) A–D, G–J shell E, F, K enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from Pahang, Kedah, Perak, and Selangor provinces of Peninsular Malaysia. Possibly more widely spread.

Remarks.

In the original description of Paraboysidia oreia, van Benthem-Jutting (1961) mentioned that it differs from H. frequens by the less numerous barriers, less inflated and more rounded last whorl. During our examination of the type material, we found no differences between the two species: the last whorl was not more inflated nor more rounded. The apertural barriers were sometimes more numerous in H. frequens but this is only true for smaller and more variable barriers which are of none or very limited taxonomic importance. Therefore, we treat P. oreia as a junior synonym of H. frequens.

Hypselostoma kelantanense (Sykes, 1902), comb. nov.

Figs 224D, 228, 229, 230, 241

Boysidia kelantanense Sykes, 1902: 61, pl. 3, fig. 7.

Boysidia kelantanensisMöllendorff 1902: 139; Pilsbry 1917: 208, pl. 35, figs 10–12.

Paraboysidia kelantanensisLaidlaw 1933: 213–214.

Paraboysidia kelantanensis kelantanensisvan Benthem Jutting 1950: 12–13, 39, fig. 4; Maassen 2001: 74.

Paraboysidia kelantanensis rafflesi van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 13–14, 39, fig. 5. syn. nov.

Paraboysidia kelantanensis tenuidentata van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 15–17, 39, fig. 6. syn. nov.

Paraboysidia kelantanensis rafflesiMaassen 2001: 74.

Paraboysidia kelantanensis tenuidentataMaassen 2001: 74.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 1 syntype of Paraboysidia kelantanensis kelantanensis; NHMUK 1930.9.12.13–15 • syntypes of Paraboysidia kelantanensis kelantanensis; Kelantan; UF 00113222 • 4 paratypes of Paraboysidia kelantanensis rafflesi; from the type locality; 1947; Raffles Museum, Singapore ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.137125 • 1 paratype of Paraboysidia kelantanensis tenuidentata; from the type locality; Mar. 1939; Raffles Museum, Singapore ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.137127. Syntypes of Paraboysidia kelantanensis kelantanensis; ANSP 98191.

Type localities.

“Kelantan”, Malaysia (H. kelantanensis kelantanensis); “Kota Tongkat, Pahang”, Malaysia (H. kelantanensis rafflesi); “Kramat Pulai, Perak”, Malaysia (H. kelantanensis tenuidentata).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is in terms of apertural dentition and surface sculpture similar to H. frequens. However, it has a more rounded shell with more bulging whorls and narrower umbilicus than previous species. See also under H. serpa.

Figure 228. 

Hypselostoma kelantanense, syntypes A–E NHMUK 1930.9.12.13–15 F–H ANSP 98191.

Distribution.

This species is known from Kelantan, Pahang, and Perak provinces in Peninsular Malaysia.

Figure 229. 

Hypselostoma kelantanense, paratype of P. kelantanensis rafflesi (RMNH.Moll.137125) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Remarks.

We observed no crucial differences between the two subspecies described by van Benthem Jutting (1950) and the nominotypical subspecies. Furthermore, one paratype of P. kelantanensis rafflesi had the identical shell morphology as that of P. kelantanensis tenuidentata which indicates that the differences mentioned by van Benthem Jutting (1950) (strength of the apertural barriers and overall shell shape) can be considered as a part of intraspecific variability. Some of the examined type specimens are more slender than others. Additionally, some of them had a small lamella between parietal and columellar, while some of them did not.

Figure 230. 

Hypselostoma kelantanense, paratype of P. kelantanensis tenuidentata (RMNH.Moll.137127) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Hypselostoma modestum (van Benthem Jutting, 1950), comb. nov.

Figs 224E, 231, 241

Gyliotrachela modesta van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 31–32, fig. 18.

Gyliotrachela modestavan Benthem Jutting 1950: 46; Davison and Kiew 1990: 25; Maassen 2001: 76.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 2 paratypes; from the type locality; 1939; Raffles Museum, Singapore ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.137148.

Type locality.

“Gua Musang, Kelantan”, Malaysia.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is very similar to H. emergens from which it differs in its narrower last whorl (but also the entire shell) which is also more detached and protruding. The keel on the last whorl is also stronger in H. emergens (best seen in the lateral view). Hypselostoma frequens has a narrower umbilicus and more enlarged last whorl when compared to the previous ones, which makes the shell less slender. See also under H. muaklekense and H. burchi.

Figure 231. 

Hypselostoma modestum, paratype (RMNH.Moll.137148) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma paini (F.G. Thompson & Dance, 1983), comb. nov.

Figs 224F, 232, 239

Boysidia (Dasypupa) paini Thompson & Dance, 1983: 107–108, figs 9, 10.

Boysidia painiDumrongrojwattana and Assawawattagee 2018: 216.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • holotype; UF 35949 • 6 paratypes; from the type locality; UF 35951.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia • 4 shells; Borneo, Sarawak, Fifth division, SW flank Gunong Budah, Medalam Valley, trib. Of Limbang R.; UF 35950.

Type locality.

“Foot of cliff about 400 yards north of the main to Deer Cave, Melinau Paku Valley, Fourth Div., Sarawak, Borneo, 04°5'N, 114°53'E”.

Figure 232. 

Hypselostoma paini, holotype (UF 35949) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

See under H. procerum and H. tertiusfrater nom. nov.

Distribution.

This species is known only from Sarawak, Borneo.

Hypselostoma procerum (F. G. Thompson & Dance, 1983), comb. nov.

Figs 224G, 233, 239

Boysidia (Dasypupa) procera Thompson & Dance, 1983: 108–109, figs 11, 12.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • holotype; UF 38022 • 3 paratypes; from the type locality; UF 38023.

Type locality.

“Southwest flank of Gunong Budah, Medalam Valley, a tributary of the Limbang river, Fifth Division, Sarawak, Borneo 04°08'N, 115°5'E”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is most similar to H. paini which is also described from Borneo. However, this species is more elongated and has a wider umbilicus. See also under H. tertiusfrater nom. nov.

Figure 233. 

Hypselostoma procerum, holotype (UF 38022) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma serpa (van Benthem Jutting, 1950), comb. nov.

Figs 224H, 234, 241

Paraboysidia serpa van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 18–19, 40, fig. 8.

Paraboysidia serpaMaassen 2001: 75.

Paraboysidia tarutao Panha & Burch, 2002c: 85–87, fig. 4. syn. nov.

Gyliotrachela tarutoa [sic] — Panha and Burch 2008: 84, fig. 73.

Gyliotrachela tarutaoDumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 18 paratypes of H. serpa; from the type locality; Dec. 1938; Raffles Museum, Singapore ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.140164. Thailand • 1 paratype of G. tarutao; from the type locality; 1998; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 062.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 22 shells; Krabi Province, Railay (= Rai Leh) Beach West, Railay Highlands, at the base of limestone rocks; 8°0.865'N, 98°50.219'E; 30 m a.s.l.; Sep. 2007; A. Reischütz leg.; coll. REI • 1 shell; Krabi Province, Phi Phi islands, Phi Phi Don island, climbing rock above the western end of the beach in Ton Sai Bay, at the base of limestone rocks in the forest; 7°44.063'N, 98°45.947'E; 50 m a.s.l.; Mar. 2010; A. Reischütz leg; coll. REI.

Type localities.

“Baling, Kedah”, Malaysia (H. serpa); “Tarutoa National Park, Satul Province, Thailand, 6°41'58'N, 99°38'48'E, 70 meters elevation” (P. tarutao).

Differential diagnosis.

Hypselostoma serpa is most similar to H. frequens, from which it can be separated by the keeled last whorl (rounded in H. frequens), the bent upper palatal plica and the wider umbilicus. Hypselostoma kelantanense has a more ovoid shell shape, more rounded and bulging whorls as well as narrower umbilicus.

Figure 234. 

Hypselostoma serpa, paratype (RMNH.Moll.140164) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from Kedah, Malaysia (the type locality) as well as from Krabi Province and Ko Tarutao Island, Satun province, Thailand (the type locality of G. tarutao).

Remarks.

In the paratypes, interpalatal plica is simple or bulge like, infraparietal lamella can be present or absent. All examined paratypes have upper palatal plica curved towards the lower one which could be characteristic for this species. Paraboysidia tarutao is treated as a junior synonym of this species since no morphological differences were noticed. In the original description (Panha and Burch 2002c), P. tarutao was not compared to H. serpa which gives the impression that the latter was overlooked.

Hypselostoma terae Tomlin, 1939

Figs 224I, 235, 236, 237, 241

Hypselostoma terae Tomlin, 1939: 146, pl. 12, fig. 2.

Hypselostoma teraevan Benthem Jutting 1949b: 59; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 43; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 21–22, fig. 10; Berry 1963: pl.5, fig. 42.

Hypselostoma megaphonum van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 21–23, fig. 11. syn. nov.

Hypselostoma megaphonumvan Benthem Jutting 1950: 42; Maassen 2001: 77.

Hypselostoma perigyra van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 25–26, fig. 14. syn. nov.

Hypselostoma perigyravan Benthem Jutting 1950: 42; Maassen 2001: 77.

Boysidia (Dasypupa) teraeThompson and Dance 1983: 109.

Boysidia (Dasypupa) megaphonaThompson and Dance 1983: 109.

Boysidia (Dasypupa) perigyraThompson and Dance 1983: 109.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 53 paratypes of H. terae; from the type locality; RMNH Moll.137160 • 23 paratypes of H. perigyra; from the type locality; RMNH Moll.137163 • 23 paratypes of H. megaphonum; from the type locality; RMNH Moll.137161.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia • 2 shells; Pahang, Bukit Cinta Manis, SSE side, Lebuhraya Karak 800 m - Kampung Cinta Manis; 03°26.714'N, 102°00.814'E; 130 m a.s.l.; 22 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 2 shells; Pahang, 25 km northwest from Kuantan, east from Kampung Panching, Gua Charas, rock temple; 03°54.692'N, 103°08.839'E; 140 m a.s.l.; 24 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Selangor, Kual Lumpur E- Kanching, Templer Park, Perangsang Templer Golf Club, limestone rock; 03°17.878'N, 101°38.438'E; 100 m a.s.l.; 25 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 25 shells; Pahang, 15 km west from Bandar Pusat Jengka, Hutan Lipur Gunung Senyum; 03°41.862'N, 102°25.980'E; 85 m a.s.l.; 23 Jan. 2023; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA.

Figure 235. 

Hypselostoma terae, paratype (RMNH Moll.137160) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Type localities.

“Bukit Chintamani, Pahang” (Bukit Cinta Manis), Malaysia (H. terae); “Bukit Charas, near Kuantan, Pahang”, Malaysia (H. megaphonum); “Bukit Takun, Kanching, Selangor”, Malaysia (H. perigyra).

Figure 236. 

Hypselostoma perigyra, paratype (RMNH Moll.137163) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from H. elephas by its less detached and protruding last whorl as well as the much more conical shell.

Figure 237. 

Hypselostoma megaphonum, paratype (RMNH Moll.137161) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from Pahang and Selangor provinces in Peninsular Malaysia.

Remarks.

Hypselostoma megaphonum and H. perigyra are synonymised with this species based on the following: i) all three species share the same arrangement and morphology of apertural barriers; ii) umbilici of all three species are equally narrow (with very slight variability which can be considered intraspecific); iii) all three species have the same narrow and sharp peripheral keel and iv) all three species are of similar size and distributed geographically close. All differences mentioned by van Benthem Jutting (1950) in the original description (last whorl inflation level, umbilicus width and apertural barrier strength) are recognised as intraspecific variability. Hypselostoma megaphonum can be interpreted as an intermediary form between H. terae and H. perigyra based on the following characters: i) last whorl more inflated than in H. terae but less than in H. perigyra; ii) apertural barriers stronger than in H. terae but weaker than in H. perigyra; iii) umbilicus wider than in H. terae but narrower than in H. perigyra.

Hypselostoma tertiusfrater Gojšina & Páll-Gergely, nom. nov.

Figs 224J, 238, 239

Boysidia (Dasypupa) salpinx Thompson & Dance, 1983: 106–107, figs 2–8.

Boysidia salpinxDumrongrojwattana and Assawawattagee 2018: 216; Marzuki et al. 2021: 103–104, figs 45E, 50B; Inkhavilay and Sutcharit 2024: 441, fig. 1D.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • holotype; UF 35944 • 33 paratypes; from the type locality; UF 36281/2, used for SEM by F.G. Thompson, destroyed; UF 35946/31.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia • 3 shells; Borneo, Sarawak, 4th Div., Niah Caves Nat. Park, near Painted Cave; Aug. 2002; coll. PGB • 24 shells; Borneo, Sarawak, SE portion, Bau area, Gunong Kapor, entrance to main cave; UF 35945 • 397 shells; Borneo, Sabah, ca 20 km upstream from Simatuoh, E side of Sapulut R., Batu Punggul; 16. May 1988; D. K. Dorman leg; locality code DKD-91, UF 196670 • 190 shells; Borneo, Sarawak, Fourth division, Niah Caves National park, summit of Gunong Subis, SE Batu Niah; 03°48'N, 113°46′E; 29 Apr. 1988; D. K. Dorman leg.; locality code DKD-77, UF 196488 • 15 shells; same data as previous; UF 196487 • 1 shell; Borneo, Sabah, ca 20 km upstream from Simatuoh, E side of Sapulut R., Batu Punggul; 04°38.8'N, 116°36.7'E; 16. May 1988; D. K. Dorman leg.; locality code DKD-90, UF 196667 • 91 shells; same data as previous; locality code DKD-091; UF 196669 • 26 shells; Borneo, Sarawak, SW portion, S of Serian, E side Gunong Selabor, main entrance Lobang Batu cave; UF 35948 • 25 shells; Borneo, Sarawak, SW portion S side Gunong Selabor, S of Serian; UF 35947 • 3 shells; Sabah, ca. 25 km W Kunak, Baturong Caves; 04°37'N, 118°09'E; 12. Jun.1988; David K. Dorman leg.; locality code DKD-102; UF 196829.

Type locality.

“Gunong Subis, limestone massif about 40 mi SW of Mira, Niah area, Fourth Div., Sarawak, Borneo, 03°51'N, 113°45'E”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is clearly different from the two congeners from Borneo (H. paini and H. procerum) by its depressed-conical shell (vs conical) and a wider umbilicus.

Figure 238. 

Hypselostoma tertiusfrater Gojšina & Páll-Gergely nom. nov., holotype (UF 35944) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view. A and E are used from Inkhavilay and Sutcharit 2024.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is made of tertius meaning third and frater meaning brother, given the fact that this is one of three Hypselostoma species described from Borneo.

Figure 239. 

Distribution of species belonging to Hypselostoma terae group in Borneo.

Distribution.

This species in known from Sarawak and Sabah, Borneo.

Remarks.

Boysidia salpinx F.G. Thompson & Dance, 1983 is moved to the genus Hypselostoma herein, and thus, becomes a secondary homonym of Hypselostoma salpinx (van Benthem Jutting, 1961). Therefore, Hypselostoma tertiusfrater nom. nov. is proposed as a replacement name.

Hypselostoma troglodytes (van Benthem Jutting, 1950), comb. nov.

Figs 224K, 240, 241

Gyliotrachela troglodytes van Benthem Jutting, 1950: 35–36, 47, fig. 21.

Gyliotrachela troglodytesMaassen 2001: 77.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 3 paratypes; from the type locality; Sept. 1941; Raffles Museum, Singapore ex. coll.; RMNH.Moll.137138.

Type locality.

“Gua Bama, Padang Tengku, Pahang”, Malaysia.

Differential diagnosis.

This species can be separated from H. vicinum sp. nov. by the notably narrower umbilicus, weaker peripheral keel, and the absence of the basal and one interpalatal plica. Furthermore, the shell surface sculpture seems to be less rough than in H. vicinum sp. nov.

Figure 240. 

Hypselostoma troglodytes, paratype (RMNH.Moll.137138) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

In the original description, an infraparietal lamella is mentioned. We observed it in paratypes but it should be noted that it is dot-like and very small.

Figure 241. 

Distribution map of species belonging to Hypselostoma terae group.

4. Hypselostoma tubiferum group

Diagnosis. Hypselostoma tubiferum group is devoid of any peculiar shell surface sculpture. It is smooth or finely pitted with some radial growth lines.

Remarks. This group includes nine species. Their distribution spans from Guangxi, Guizhou, and Yunnan provinces in China southwards to Peninsular Malaysia. Westernmost localities are known from central Myanmar.

Hypselostoma burchi (Panha, 1998), comb. nov.

Figs 242A, 243, 259

Gyliotrachela burchi Panha, 1998c: 123–124, fig. 2.

Gyliotrachela burchiHemmen and Hemmen 2001: 41, fig. 9; Panha and Burch 2008: 66–67, fig. 58; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 1996; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 015.

Type locality.

“Pattalung province, 7°40′17″N, 100°1′11″E, 70 meters elevation”. (Thailand)

Differential diagnosis.

This species is similar in shell shape to H. taehwani but the latter is spirally striated and has concrescent angular and parietal lamellae. Also, H. taehwani has a stronger keel than H. burchi and deeper grooves both above and below the keel. It also resembles H. modestum but the last whorl in H. burchi is keeled and more strongly detached and descending. The umbilicus is also wider in H. burchi.

Figure 242. 

Synoptic view of species belonging to Hypselostoma tubiferum group A H. burchi B H. crossei C H. depressispira D H. muaklekense E H. pattalungense F H. pendulum G H. phupaman H H. similare I H. tubiferum.

Figure 243. 

Hypselostoma burchi, holotype (CUMZ ver. 015) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma crossei Morlet, 1886

Figs 242B, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251

Hypselostoma crossei Morlet, 1886: 2–3.

Hypselostoma crosseiMöllendorff 1891: 338.

Hypselostoma crossei brevituba Möllendorff, 1901b: 76. syn. nov.

Hypselostoma crossei endodonta Möllendorff, 1901b: 76. syn. nov.

Hypselostoma brevitubaFischer and Dautzenberg 1904: 408.

Hypselostoma crossei endodontaFischer and Dautzenberg 1904: 408.

Gyliotrachela crossei — Pilsbry 1917: 215–216; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 44; Inkhavilay et al. 2019: 147, fig. 17I; Thompson and Upatham 1997: 233.

Gyliotrachela crossei brevituba — Pilsbry 1917: 217, pl. 36, figs 9–13; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 45; Zilch 1984: 165; Schileyko 2011: 3.

Boysidia (Bensonella) xingyinensis Guo, Zhou & Luo, 2006: 541–542 (Chinese description), 542–543 (English description), figs 1–4. syn. nov.

Gyliotrachela crossei endodonta — Pilsbry 1917: 217; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 45; Zilch 1984: 165; Schileyko 2011: 3.

Boysidia (Bensonella) tianxingqiaoensis Luo, Chen & Zhang, 2000: 147 (Chinese description), 150 (English description), figs 1–4. syn. nov.

Boysidia (Bensonella) tianxingqiaoensisChen and Zhang 2002: 693.

Gyliotrachela crossei crosseiSchileyko 2011: 3.

Gyliotrachela plesiolopa Inkhavilay & Panha in Inkhavilay et al. 2016: 222, figs 1, 3D–F, 4D. syn. nov.

Gyliotrachela plesiolopaInkhavilay et al. 2019: 60, fig. 26D.

Boysidia tianxingqiaoensisDumrongrojwattana and Assawawattagee 2018: 216.

Boysidia xingyinensis — Dumrongrojwattana and Assawawttagee 2018: 216.

Gyliotrachela tianxingqiaoensisGojšina et al. 2022: 132, figs 2–5; Tongkerd et al. 2024: 182, fig. 13N.

Type material examined.

Vietnam • syntype of H. crossei crossei; coll. Morlet; MNHN-IM-2000-35155 • lectotype of G. crossei brevituba; ex. coll. Fruhstorfer; coll. Möllendorff; SMF 4582 • lectotype of G. crossei endodonta; ex. coll. Fruhstorfer; coll. Möllendorff; SMF 4584. China • holotype of B. tianxingqiaoensis; 13 Aug. 1997; D.-N. Chen leg.; IZCAS 025075 • holotype of B. xingyinensis; 02 Oct. 2004; Guo Y.-H, Zhou W.-C., Luo T.-C. leg.; IZCAS 069205. Laos • 2 paratypes of G. plesiolopa; from the type locality; ex. coll. S. Panha; SMF 357824.

Additional material examined.

Vietnam • 1 shell; Cao Bang Province, wet limestone wall; Jul. 2006.; M. Calo leg.; coll. PGB • 1 shell; Ninh Binh Province, Ninh Binh, Hoa Lu Temple; 20°15.738'N, 105°57.886'E; 8 m a.s.l.; 01 Oct. 2009; Hemmen leg; coll. PGB • 1 shell; Hoa Binh Province, ca 15 km rd. Tang Dao to Co Luong (rd #15 left side); 20°35.951'N, 105°01.905'E; 16 Oct. 2011.; Hemmen leg; coll. PGB • 5 shells; Quang Ninh Province, Ha Long Bay area, Tien Ong Cave on Hang Trai Island; 20°48.96'N, 107°07.33'E; 6 Sept. 2003.; Hemmen leg; coll. PGB • 1 shell; Quang Ninh Province, near Dau Go Isl., Halong Bay; 20°53.853'N, 107°00.825'E; 2 m a.s.l.; 18 Nov. 2005; J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 23 shells; Ninh Binh Province, Nho Quan District, Cuc Phuong N. P., near kiosk at entrance to Cave of the prehistoric man (Dong Nguoi Xua); 20°17.613'N, 105°40.063'E; 247 m a.s.l.; 12 Apr. 2007; K. Okubo & J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 2 shells; Quang Ninh Province, Halong Bay area, Hang Trai Id., Tieng Ong cave; 20°48.96'N, 107°07.33'E; Hemmen leg; coll. PGB • 15 shells; Hai Phong city, Cat Ba island, Gia Luan Commune; 20°51.402'N, 106°58.961'E; 4 m a.s.l.; 18 Nov. 2005; J.U. Otani leg.; Coll, PGB • 3 shells; Cao Bang Province, Pac Rao, 300 m from junction to Xa Canh Tien towards Trung Khanh, right side of the road; 22°49.385'N, 106°30.742'E; 530 m a.s.l.; 28 May 2012; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 2 shells; Lang Son Province, Lang Son, NNE side of Nui Vong Phu; 21°51.183'N, 106°44.950'E; 11 Nov. 2011; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Lang Son Province, north of Chi Lang, pass along the path (north of Đong Banh); 21°34.945'N, 106°30.567'E; 75 m a.s.l.; 13 Nov. 2011; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 5 shells; Lang Son, vicinity of Chua Tam Thanh; 21°51.353'N, 106°44.809'E; 265 m a.s.l.; 21 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 1 shell; Thai Nguyen Province, Cho Chu, rock wall at the northeastern part of the village; 21°54.613'N, 105°39.195'E; 90 m a.s.l.; 21 Nov. 2011; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 34 shells: Lang Son Province, Lang Son, Thanh Nha Mac, southern group of rocks; 21°51.358'N, 106°45.035'E; 295 m a.s.l.; 26 May 2012; leg. A. Hunyadi; coll. HA • 7 shells; Lang Son Province, Huu Lung district, Minh Tien, Cau Cheo Minh Tien, southern side of the bridge; 21°33.605'N, 106°17.427'E; 20 m a.s.l.; 20 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 7 shells; Thanh Hoa Province, north of Thanh Hoa, Ham Rong Eny, Đong Tien Son; 19°51.108'N, 105°46.783'E; 35 m a.s.l.; 24 Nov. 2011; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 60 shells; Hoa Binh Province, Tan Lac district, Quy Hau, 1300 m west on road no. 6, rock wall; 20.63222°N, 105.26955°E; 150 m a.s.l.; 11 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 54 shells; Son La Province, 32.2 km northwest from centre of Son La towards Tuan Giao, Phong Lang, Tong Lanh, northeastern part of the village; 21°26.283'N, 103°43.965'E; 550 m a.s.l.; 07 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 180 shells; Son La Province, Quynh Nhai district, 20 km north from junction of Thuan Chau, Chieng Khoang, cave above the village; 21°33.441'N, 103°40.909'E; 315 m a.s.l.; 07 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 155 shells; Thanh Hoa Province, Quan Hoa district, Khu di tich Hang Ma, Song Luong gorge; 20°23.888'N, 105°4.016'E; 100 m a.s.l.; 12 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 386 shells; Thanh Hoa Province, 3.6 km northwest from centre of Ngoc Lac, Lang Sat, 600 m north on the road no 15, under rock wall; 20°5.897'N, 105°21.578'E; 55 m a.s.l.; 13 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA • 51 shells; Hoa Binh Province, Mai Chau, 550 m west of Cho Mai Chau, stream bank; 20.66029°N, 105.07804°E; 265 m a.s.l.; 11 Feb. 2020; A. Hunyadi, H.V. Luong, J.U. Otani & S.V. Pham leg.; coll. HA. China • 1 shell; Guangxi, Guigang Shi, Guzhang Xiang, Chuanshancun, road leading to north, limestone rock wall on the east; 23°20.865'N, 109°19.169'E; 150 m a.s.l.; 10 Sept. 2009; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 17 shells; Guangxi, Chongzuo Shi, Longzhou Xian, Wude Xiang, Banxintun, vicinity of the junction; 22°35.239'N, 106°46.096'E; 350 m a.s.l.; 24 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi & M. Szekeres leg.; coll. HA • 2 shells; Yunnan, Yuxi shi, Chengjiang Xian, Luchong Ziran Fengjingqu, under Liushanting; 24°33.842'N, 102°50.614'E; 1778 m a.s.l.; 18 Mar. 2011; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 2 shells; Guangxi, Guigang Shi, Guzhang Xiang, rocks above Chuanshancun; 23°21.056'N, 109°19.247'E; 200 m a.s.l.; 10 Sept. 2009; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 9 shells; Guangxi, Laibin Shi, Wuxuan Xian, Wuxuan Tongling Zhen road, north of Yagangcun, rock wall; 23°29.827'N, 109°38.534'E; 21 Sept. 2013; A. Hunyadi & M. Szekeres leg.; coll. HA • 3 shells; Guangxi, Hechi Shi, Du an Yaozu Zizhixian, Gaoling Xiang, 2 km west from Dingfucun; 24°03.197'N, 108°01.290'E; 320 m a.s.l.; 10 Aug. 2009; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 17 shells; Yunnan, Wenshan Zhuangzu Miaozu Zizhizhou, Guangnan Xian, Babao Zhen, southeastern edge of Babao; 23°44.682'N, 105°24.875'E; 1130 m; 24 Mar. 2011; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 33 shells; Guangxi, Laibin Shi, Wuxuan Xian, Wuxuan Tongling Zhen road, west from Yagangcun, rocks; 23°29.151'N, 109°38.375'E; 80 m a.s.l.; 21 Sep 2013; A. Hunyadi & M. Szekeres leg.; coll. HA • 11 shells; Guangxi, Bose Shi, Leye Xian, southern edge of Molicun, left bank of Buliu He; 24°39.436'N, 106°43.245'E; 540 m a.s.l.; 08 Sep. 2013; A. Hunyadi & M. Szekeres leg.; coll. HA • 17 shells; Guangxi, Bose Shi, Lingyun Xian, Xiajia Xiang, southeastern edge of Xiajia, rock wall above the graves; 24°17.508'N, 106°38.376'E; 440 m a.s.l.; 22 Oct. 2009; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 5 shells; village across from Yangchangshilin, Moyangzhen, Luodianxian, Guizhousheng; 25°32′39″N, 106°49′39.14″E; 908 m a.s.l.; T. Ishibe, K. Okubo, J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 4 shells; same data as previous; coll. PGB • 9 shells; Daxiaojingfengjingqu, Moyangzhen, Lodianxian, Guizhousheng; 25°33′39″N, 106°51′39″E; 450 m a.s.l.; T. Ishibe, K. Okubo, J. U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 8 shells; same data as previous; T. Ishibe, K. Okubo, J. U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB • 1 shell; Xianshanyuan, Shuangqiao-zhen, Wuming-xian, Guangxi Zhuanzu Zizhiou; 23°02.08015'N, 108°17.68551'E; 177 m a.s.l.; Ohai leg.; coll. PGB.

Type localities.

“Tonkin” (Montagne de ľÉléphant, Tonkin, Vietnam) (H. crossei crossei); “Lang-son” (Tonkin, N Vietnam) (H. crossei brevituba); “Lang-son” (Tonkin, N Vietnam) (H. crossei endodonta); “collected from Tianxingqiao Town, Zhenning Bouyeizu Miaozu Zizhixian, Guizhou Province (26°N, 105°07'E), Guizhou Province”, China (G. tianxingqiaoensis); “collected from Nahui Town, Xingyi County (25°1'N, 104°8'E), Guizhou Province, China” (G. xingyinensis); “Limestone outcrop in Nawit Village, Viengxay District, Houaphane Province, Laos (20°22'37.3"N, 104°16'43.2"E), 695 m amsl” (G. plesiolopa).

Figure 244. 

Hypselostoma crossei, syntype of H. crossei crossei (MHNH-IM-2000-35155)

Figure 245. 

Hypselostoma crossei, lectotype of H. crossei brevituba (SMF 4582) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 246. 

Hypselostoma crossei, lectotype of H. crossei endodonta (SMF 4584) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Figure 247. 

Hypselostoma crossei, paratype of G. plesiolopa (SMF 357824) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Differential diagnosis.

This species differs from all its congeners by the combination of the dark brown shell, which is moderately umbilicate, numerous and variable apertural barriers, almost smooth shell surface (pasty), as well as the absence of the spiral striation.

Figure 248. 

Hypselostoma crossei A–D holotype of B. tianxingqiaoensis (IZCAS 025075 (from Gojšina et al. 2022)) E–H holotype of B. xingyinensis (IZCAS 069205) (photo. Z.-Y. Chen).

Distribution.

This species is known from a wide area covering China, N Vietnam, Myanmar, and Laos (from where it is known as G. plesiolopa).

Remarks.

The examination of type specimens of H. crossei brevituba and H. crossei endodonta and numerous additional samples of H. crossei, led us to the conclusion that this species is very variable regarding the appearance of the last whorl and also regarding barrier numbers, as was also observed by Pilsbry (1917). These were the characters used to describe the subspecies and there are no reasons to support their distinctness. Gyliotrachela plesiolopa, G. xingyinensis and G. tianxingqiaoensis are junior synonyms of this species since no major morphological differences were observed. The latter two are originally described in exactly the same way, using exactly the same sentences, and are not compared mutually (or to H. crossei) but to other very distant species (Luo et al. 2000; Guo et al. 2006). Inkhavilay et al. (2016) pointed out that G. plesiolopa has fewer whorls (four) than H. crossei (five). However, this is not true due to the fact that we examined the types of the nominotypical subspecies of H. crossei and the other two described subspecies all of which showed between 3.5–4 whorls. According to them, H. crossei is also larger, but there is a clear continuum in size variation up to 1 mm. Therefore, we do not consider this character as relevant.

Figure 249. 

Hypselostoma crossei from different localities A China, Guangxi province (coll. HA) B China, Guizhou province (coll. PGB) C China, Yunnan province (coll. HA) D Vietnam, Cao Bang province (coll. HA) E Vietnam, Hoa Binh province (coll. HA) F Vietnam, Lang Son province (coll. HA).

Figure 250. 

Hypselostoma crossei from different localities A Vietnam, Quang Ninh province (coll. PGB) B Vietnam, Ninh Binh province (coll. PGB) C Vietnam, Son La province (coll. HA) D Vietnam, Thai Nguyen province (coll. HA) E Vietnam, Thanh Hoa province (coll. HA).

Figure 251. 

Distribution map of H. crossei.

Hypselostoma depressispira (van Benthem Jutting, 1949), comb. nov.

Figs 242C, 252, 259

Gyliotrachela depressispira van Benthem Jutting, 1949b: 60, pl. 3.

Gyliotrachela depressispiravan Benthem Jutting 1950: 27, 45, fig. 15; Berry 1963: 361; Maassen 2001: 75.

Type material examined.

Malaysia • 12 paratypes; Pahang, Bukit Chintamani; ex. coll. Raffles Museum, Singapore; RMNH.Moll.137152.

Additional material examined.

Malaysia • 2 shells; Pahang, 25 km northwest from Kuantan, north of Kampung Panching, Gua Charas, rock temple; 03°54.692'N, 103°08.839'E; 140 m a.s.l.; 24 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 28 shells; Kelantan, Gua Musang, vicinity of cave entrance; 04°52.974'N, 101°58.116'E; 135 m a.s.l.; 17 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 37 shells; Kelantan, Gua Musang, 6 km towards Pulai, Gua Madu, vicinity of cave, 04°50.213'N, 101°56.982'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 17 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 25 shells; Pahang, Gua Bama, Kuala Lipis 9 km, Padang Tungku; 04°11.652'N, 101°57.936'E; 120 m a.s.l.; 19 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 201 shells; Pahang, Bukit Cinta Manis, south-southeastern side, Lebuhraya Karak 800 m towards Kampung Cinta Manis; 03°26.714'N, 102°00.814'E; 22 Jan. 2013; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 3 shells; Pahang, Kota Gelanggi, Jengka-Jerantut road, on limestone surfaces covered with mosses; 03°53′28.55″N, 102°28′23.28″E; 29. May 2011; M. E. Marzuki leg.; coll. PGB • 4 shells; Pahang, Gua Bama at Kp. Relong (~ 14 km N of Kuala Lipis); Oct. 1998; Hemmen leg; coll. PGB • 6 shells; Pahang, Gua Bama (~ 12/13 km N of Kuala Lipis); 04°11.643'N, 101°57.925'E; Nov. 2000; Hemmen leg; coll. PGB.

Type locality.

“Bukit Chintamani, Pahang”, Malaysia.

Differential diagnosis.

This species bears some resemblance to the more depressed form of H. fortunatum sp. nov. However, H. depressispira has much more apertural barriers as well as separated angular and parietal lamellae. The last whorl is also more prominently keeled in H. depressispira and the umbilicus is slightly wider. See also under H. tubiferum.

Figure 252. 

Hypselostoma depressispira, paratype (RMNH.Moll.137152) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from Peninsular Malaysia.

Remarks.

While examining the types, variability was observed in the smaller barriers. In some specimens, there were two and in others three interpalatal plicae. The number of lamellae between the columellar and parietal ranged between three and four. Number of barriers between lower palatal plica and columellar lamella ranged from two to three. Some specimens from Gua Musang (Kelantan) had only one barrier between the lower palatal and columellar and only one dot-like barrier between the columellar and parietal. Otherwise, the apertural barrier variability of other samples examined by us matches that of the type series.

Hypselostoma muaklekense (Panha & J.B. Burch, 2002), comb. nov.

Figs 242D, 253, 259

Paraboysidia muaklekensis Panha & Burch, 2002c: 79–81, fig. 2.

Gyliotrachela muaklekensisPanha and Burch 2008: 75–76, fig. 65; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • holotype; 1997; S. Panha leg.; CUMZ ver. 020.

Type locality.

“Tepitak mountain, Muaklek District, Saraburi Province, 14°36'57"N, 101'15'50"E, 700 meters elevation” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is most similar to H. modestum from which it can be separated by the wider umbilicus, three strong apertural barriers on the palatal side (two in H. modestum) and smaller dimensions (SH = 2.9–3.1 and SW = 2.3–2.7 in H. modestum while SH = 1.8–2.0 and SW = 1.4–1.5 in H. muaklekense). Hypselostoma frequens also has only two strong barriers on the palatal side, is less slender and larger (SH = 2.8–3.5, SW = 2.4–2.6).

Figure 253. 

Hypselostoma muaklekense, holotype (CUMZ ver. 020) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma pattalungense Panha & J. B. Burch, 2004

Figs 242E, 254, 259

Hypselostoma pattalungensis Panha & Burch in Panha et al. 2004: 73–75, fig. 11.

Hypselostoma pattalungensisPanha and Burch 2008: 97–98, fig. 83; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type locality.

“Ko Si Ko Ha (Ko Na Thewada), Limestone Hill, Pattalung Province” (Thailand).

Type material examined.

Thailand • 3 paratypes; from the type locality; S. Panha leg.; SMF 331456.

Additional material examined.

Thailand • 3 shells; Phattalung Province, 6.4 km E of Hwy. 4081, 1 km SW of Khao Chai Son; 7°27'N, 100°11'E; 50 m a.s.l.; 11 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0648; UF 345066 • 1 shell; same locality data as previous; UF 591338 • 13 shells; Songkhla Province, 31.3 km NW Hat Yai, 1.2 km W of Hwy. 43; 7°10'N, 100°16'E; 80 m a.s.l.; 08 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0636; UF 344933 • 1 shell; same locality data as previous; 08 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0635; UF 591337.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is most similar to H. fortunatum sp. nov., from which it differs by stronger and more numerous apertural barriers, separated angular and parietal lamellae as well as the higher spire.

Figure 254. 

Hypselostoma pattalungense, paratype (SMF 331456) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known from Phattalung and Songkhla provinces, Thailand.

Remarks.

Intraspecific variability is noticed on the appearance of the subcolumellar lamella, it can be present or completely absent.

Hypselostoma pendulum (Panha & J. B Burch, 2002), comb. nov.

Figs 242F, 255, 259

Antroapiculus pendulus Panha & Burch, 2002a: 144–148, figs 2, 3.

Anthroapiculus pendulus [sic] — Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 323, fig. 7.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 1 paratype; from the type locality; May 1998.; S. Panha, J. B. Burch, P. Dumrongrojwattana, C. Sutcharit, S. Tumpeesuwan, P. Tongkerd, W. Wanarat, S. Klomtong leg.; CUMZ ver. 077.

Type locality.

“Chonglom Mountain, Bhumiphol Dam reservoir, Samngao District, Tak province 17°14′51″N, 98°56′21″E” (Thailand).

Differential diagnosis.

This species is not similar to any other congener due to the completely flat but high and broad last whorl which is also strongly descending near the aperture (almost 90° angle). The parietal side of the aperture is with only a single, parietal lamella while the angular is absent. Hypselostoma srakeoense, H. torticollis, and H. fungus sp. nov. are superficially similar but none of them are flat and the latter two are also spirally striated. Hypselostoma torticollis additionally has separated parietal and angular lamellae on the parietal side.

Figure 255. 

Hypselostoma pendulum, paratype (CUMZ ver. 077) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma phupaman (Panha & J. B. Burch, 2002), comb. nov.

Figs 242G, 256, 259

Paraboysidia phupaman Panha & Burch, 2002c: 90, fig. 6.

Gyliotrachela phupamanPanha and Burch 2008: 77–78, fig. 67; Dumrongrojwattana and Wongkamhaeng 2024: 324, fig. 8.

Type material examined.

Thailand • 1 paratype; from the type locality; 1998; S. Panha, P. Dumrongrojwattana, C. Sutcharit, S. Tumpeesuwan leg.; CUMZ ver. 086.

Type locality.

“Phupaman mountains, Petchaboon Province, Thailand, 16°39′52″N, 101°54′17″E, 60 meters elevation”.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is not similar to any of its congeners due to the unique, double-keeled last whorl.

Figure 256. 

Hypselostoma phupaman, paratype (CUMZ ver. 086) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Hypselostoma similare Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov.

Figs 242H, 257, 258, 259

Type material.

Holotype. Thailand • 1 shell (SH: 1.83 mm; SW1: 2.51 mm); Rayong Province, Khao Chamao district, Wat Tham Khao Prathun, gorge above the temple; 13°07.439'N, 101°35.850'E; 115 m a.s.l.; 09 Mar. 2023, A. Hunyadi leg.; CUMZ 14470. Paratypes. Thailand • 2 shells; same data as for holotype; coll. HA.

Type locality.

Thailand, Rayong Province, Khao Chamao district, Wat Tham Khao Prathun, gorge above the temple; 13°07.439'N, 101°35.850'E; 115 m a.s.l.

Diagnosis.

Shell triangular conical. Teleoconch almost smooth, finely radially but not spirally striated. Last whorl detached from the penultimate and ascending, keeled below the centre of the periphery. Aperture equipped with weak barriers, five main (angular, parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal and columellar) and several smaller ones. Umbilicus narrow, measuring 1/7–1/8 of the shell width.

Figure 257. 

Hypselostoma similare Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14470) A–D shell E, F enlarged apertural views.

Description.

Shell conical, light brownish, opaque, consisting of 3.75–4.25 weakly convex and regularly increasing whorls separated by a relatively shallow suture. Protoconch finely pitted, without spiral striae, consisting of ~ 1.5 whorls, same colour as the rest of the shell. Teleoconch sculpture delicate, very finely dimpled (pasty) and crossed by relatively weak radial growth lines. Spiral striae absent. Occasionally, a few stronger whitish radial streaks can be observed at the last whorl near the aperture. Last whorl weakly detached from the penultimate and slightly ascending near the aperture (~ 15–20 ° compared to the shell axis). It is bluntly but prominently keeled below the periphery, making the last whorl oblique to the shell axis and not convex but with a sloping, flat outline. There is a slight furrow above the keel. Peristome thick, whitish, expanded and not reflected. All apertural barriers are weak. Aperture equipped with five main barriers (angular, parietal, upper palatal, lower palatal, and columellar) and several smaller ones of variable number and appearance. There are usually no plicae in the sinulus, usually one plica in the interpalatal region, two or three plicae in the region of the basal plica and usually one or two lamellae in the columello-parietal region. Angular lamella tubercle-like, almost reaching the peristome. Behind it, more deeply situated, there is one additional part which also belongs to the angular lamella. Parietal lamella stronger and higher when compared to the others (except lower palatal plica), not reaching the profile of the angular tubercle. Lower palatal plica developed to the same extent as the parietal lamella and slightly higher and stronger than the upper palatal plica. Columellar lamella horizontal, developed equally as the upper palatal plica. Anterior to the upper palatal plica, there is one more tubercle-like part, possibly homologous with the palatal tubercle found in the genus Bensonella (see Páll-Gergely and White 2023) or it even might represent a part of the upper palatal plica. Weaker barriers are all positioned deeper in the aperture and never reaching the profiles of the main ones. A tubercle-like swelling is present in the columellar-parietal transition embayment. All barriers are strongly and coarsely spiniferous. Sinulus small, rounded and distinctly separated from the rest of the aperture. Umbilicus narrow, with almost perpendicular walls, showing only a part of the penultimate whorl and measuring ~ 1/7–1/8 of the shell width.

Figure 258. 

SEM imaging of Hypselostoma similare Gojšina, Hunyadi & Páll-Gergely, sp. nov., holotype (CUMZ 14470) A protoconch surface B teleoconch surface C enlarged apertural view.

Differential diagnosis.

By its last whorl keeled at its base, this species in superficially most similar to H. insularum and Hypselostoma species inhabiting the Philippines. However, this species most clearly differs from these representatives by the presence of two lamellae on the parietal side (angular and parietal) and more numerous barriers in the aperture including smaller ones. Hypselostoma insularum further has strong spiral striae which are absent in the new species.

Figure 259. 

Distribution map of species belonging to Hypselostoma tubiferum group.

Etymology.

Named after the fact that this species is in shell shape very similar to some Hypselostoma species inhabiting the Philippines.

Measurements

(in mm, n = 3). SH = 1.82–1.91; SW1 = 2.34–2.51; SW2 = 1.45–1.51; AH = 0.98–1.01; AW = 0.9–0.98.

Distribution.

This species is known only from the type locality.

Remarks.

All barriers in the aperture very weak, smaller ones are hardly observable, only in form of very weak lines. Single interpalatal plica present or absent. Sinulus plicae present or absent.

Hypselostoma tubiferum (Benson, 1856)

Figs 242I, 260, 261

Tanystoma tubiferum Benson, 1856a: 130.

Hypselostoma tubiferumPfeiffer 1859: 325; Blanford 1863: 326; Hanley and Theobald 1870: 4, pl. 8 fig. 3; Stoliczka 1871: 173, pl. 7 fig. 1; Pfeiffer 1876 in 1875–1876: 488; Möllendorff 1891: 338; Gude 1914: 298; Pilsbry 1917: 178–179, pl. 31 figs 1–5; van Benthem Jutting 1950: 43; Zilch 1984: 163; Gojšina et al. 2022: 137, fig. 7; Tongkerd et al. 2024: 188, fig. 13Q.

Pupa (Hypselostoma) tubifera — Nevill 1878: 193.

Material examined.

Myanmar • 6 shells; Tondung/Thyet Mio; W. Theobald leg.; NHMUK 1888.12. 4.17–22 • 35 shells; Mandalay, Patheingyi, near Shin Bodh Mell Waterfall; 21°59.281'N, 96°12.909'E; 225 m a.s.l.; 16 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 31 shells; Mandalay, Kyaukse, Kho Nan Shin Cave Pagoda; 21°44.153'N, 96°20.229'E; 110 m a.s.l.; 17 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 45 shells; Mandalay, Dee Dote, Waterfall; 21°42.564'N, 96°21.282'E; 185 m a.s.l.; 17 Oct. 2018; A. Hunyadi leg.; coll. HA • 3 shells; "India" (probably referring to former British India); F. F. Linter coll.; UF 00112342 • 1 shell; India (probably referring to former British India), Tankarin; 01. Jun. 1998– 30. Jun. 1998; UF 540729.

Figure 260. 

Hypselostoma tubiferum (NHMUK 1888.12.4.17–22) A–D shell E enlarged apertural view F enlarged view of the protoconch G, H enlarged view of the surface of the last whorl (from Gojšina et al. 2022).

Type locality.

“Thyet-Mio prope ripas fluminis Irawadi Burmanici, saxis calcareis adhaerens” (nowadays Thayet), Myanmar.

Differential diagnosis.

This species is superficially similar to H. depressispira from which it can be separated by the concrescent angulo-parietal lamella (separated in H. depressispira) and fewer barriers in the aperture which are developed to roughly the same extent.

Figure 261. 

Distribution map of Hypselostoma tubiferum.

Distribution.

This species is, apart from the type locality, known from several localities in Mandalay, Myanmar.

Remarks.

Colouration of the animal body was observed and described by Stoliczka (1871). It was described as pale grey with blackish tentacles. Foot is short and ovate-elongated. The striking similarity of this species with H. depressispira suggests that Gyliotrachela is a junior synonym of Hypselostoma.

Hypselostoma sp. 1

Material examined.

Thailand • 2 shells; Trang Province, Kantang district, Yong Ling beach; 4 July 2014; J.U. Otani leg.; coll. PGB. Malaysia • 344 shells; Kelantan Province, 19 km south of Gua Musang; Oct. 1999; Hemmen leg.; coll. PGB.

Remarks.

Two samples from Thailand and Malaysia represent two different species, both of them probably most similar to H. burchi. Two specimens from Thailand are slightly more slender, lack interpalatal plica and have slightly narrower umbilicus. Specimens from Malaysia have slightly more detached and descending last whorl and they lack the interpalatal plica as well. Due to the absence of proper comparison material of H. burchi, we do not describe these taxa in this work.

Figure 262. 

Comparison of superficially very similar species which were formerly placed in different genera A, G H. depressispira (formerly in Gyliotrachela) B, H H. tubiferum C, J H. luctans (formerly in Gyliotrachela) D, K H. piconis E, L H. taehwani F, I H. burchi (formerly in Gyliotrachela).

Hypselostoma sp. 2

Material examined.

Thailand • 1 shell; Suratthani Province, 4.5 km S Don Sak, E side of Hwy. 4142, evergreen forest, limestone outcrop, base of cliff; 9°18'N, 99°42'E; 18 Apr. 1988; K. Auffenberg leg.; locality code KA-0674; UF 345307.

Remarks.

A single fragment, identification impossible.

Discussion

Comments on some characters used for the distinction of hypselostomatid genera

As aforementioned, characters used for traditional distinction of genera are: i) the level of last whorl detachment (detached or adnate) and ii) the appearance of the lamellae on the parietal side (parietal and angular lamellae merged or separated, angular lamella absent). We note that the shell size can also be important for generic placement.

Appearance of the last whorl

According to Pilsbry (1917), the free last whorl is present in Hypselostoma and Gyliotrachela, a character used for their distinction from Boysidia, Paraboysidia, and Anauchen. Subsequent descriptions of species with a detached last whorl in e.g., Anauchen, has proven that the appearance of the last whorl is no longer considered significant in the separation of these genera (Vermeulen et al. 2019). We have noticed that this trait can be variable to some extent within the same population (or different populations) of one species. Examples of this can be found in some widespread and variable species such as H. crossei, which led to descriptions of several subspecific taxa (e.g., H. crossei brevituba which is characterised by a short, almost adnate, trumpet, see Möllendorff 1901b). These subspecies are all herein treated as junior synonyms of the nominotypical subspecies because they completely fall within the intraspecific variability and a clear continuum of character states has been observed.

Another example of a different last whorl appearance within the same population, is found in the type series of H. cambodjense. In these samples, we found a specimen with a completely adnate last whorl which is also straight (in contrast to other specimens in which the last whorl is detached and slightly turned upwards).

Because of this, last whorl detachment is not a reliable character for generic distinction, and is subjected to a certain amount of intraspecific variability. This variability is not large since we have not found a population of the same species with different last whorl appearance (such as ascending and descending within one species). It is clear that the level of detachment of the last whorl is a reliable character for species-level identification if there are no overlapping examples between populations of two species.

Appearance of the apertural barriers

Since the last whorl is now considered insignificant on the generic level, the only character used for genus distinction is the appearance of the apertural barriers. According to Pilsbry (1917), Gyliotrachela and Paraboysidia had separate angular and parietal lamellae, Boysidia and Hypselostoma had a bifid angulo-parietal lamella and Anauchen had a parietal lamella only. We have found several populations of hypselostomatids with a typical Anauchen shape (e.g., A. angthongensis, A. obesus sp. nov.) but with a bifid angulo-parietal lamella, which is sometimes also represented as a single (parietal) lamella. Furthermore, examining the literature and type material, we have found some species which are very similar in shell shape, but have a single parietal lamella (A. huaykhakang) or bifid angulo-parietal lamella (A. utaithaniensis).

As for the genus Gyliotrachela, the only feature that distinguishes it from Hypselostoma is separate angular and parietal lamellae. However, it has been found that there are several cases where two species belonging to these two genera also have a superficially identical shell morphology (Fig. 262). Examples of such species are Hypselostoma tubiferum and Hypselostoma depressispira as well as H. piconis and H. luctans. Even in some cases where the shell of H. utongense is completely flat, it looks superficially very similar to H. tridentatum or H. khaowongkot. Furthermore, H. chedi and H. smokon are superficially very similar to H. khaochakan and geographically they are also quite approximate, so it is very unlikely that they belong to two different genera. This also applies to H. taehwani and H. burchi. We have not yet come across a population of Gyliotrachela/Hypselostoma with specimens with both concrescent and separate lamellae on the parietal side, but in “Anauchen” this was the case. It seems that the appearance of the lamellae on the parietal side alone does not justify the separation of the two genera, which is why Gyliotrachela is treated here as a junior synonym of Hypselostoma.

Apertural barriers, however, are not of zero importance on the generic level. Typical Bensonella species (grouped around the type species, B. plicidens) largely share a consistent barrier arrangement (with some exceptions, e.g., B. pahpetensis). This is manifested in the form of three lamellae on the parietal side (infraparietal, parietal, and angular) and an additional strong palatal tubercle sitting on the palatal lip. This means that the apertural barriers, at the generic level, should be used in combination with other characters (shell size, shape, and surface sculpture) for a proper assignment to the genus.

Shell size

Size of the shell can also be important on the genus-level, but even here, the situation is far from clear. Genera not treated herein (such as Acinolaemus, Angustopila, Clostophis, Tonkinospira) are by far much smaller in size (including the world’s smallest land snail species, see Páll-Gergely et al. 2022). In Anauchen, some species are provisionally placed based on a single parietal lamella and adnate last whorl, even though they are by far much smaller than the type species of the genus (Gojšina et al. 2023; Páll-Gergely 2023a). These species almost certainly do not belong to Anauchen and could even be considered genera of their own. However, given the confusion at the genus level, erecting new genera for these species would be premature and this would not be based on stable morphological characters. This means that the shell size could be more important in the future as we gather more morphological and phylogenetic evidence.

Homology of apertural barriers and their “hooked“ appearance

After examining numerous specimens, we were able to draw several important conclusions regarding the homology of apertural barriers. There is a continuum of the appearance of the barriers on the parietal side among different genera. In the former Gyliotrachela, angular and parietal lamellae are separate, but this is different from species to species. For instance, in H. khmerianum (originally described under Gyliotrachela) the angular and parietal lamellae are quite distant from each other but less so in some other species (including the type species, H. hungerfordianum). Hypselostoma khaowongkot has its angular and parietal lamella very closely positioned but still separate (even though it was originally described under Hypselostoma). In Hypselostoma, the angular portion of the concrescent angulo-parietal lamella can be more or less pronounced (pointed) or be almost absent. Finally, in many Anauchen species, there is only one clearly visible lamella (parietal). This makes it clear that there is a continuum of parietal barrier appearance between these three genera. The angular lamella of former Gyliotrachela is clearly homologous to the angular part of the angulo-parietal lamella in Hypselostoma, while the parietal lamella is homologous to the larger (parietal) portion of the angulo-parietal lamella. The single ”parietal” lamella in Anauchen is probably only a completely fused angulo-parietal and is thus homologous to both these lamellae. This means that the angular lamella is not absent in Anauchen, as traditionally interpreted, but is completely fused so that the boundary is not discernible.

Regarding the palatal plicae, the palatal tubercle in Bensonella is most probably homologous to the small swelling which can occasionally be seen in several Hypselostoma and Anauchen species (Gojšina et al. 2023). Very rarely, there is a unique barrier on the palatal side which is positioned perpendicularly to the shell axis (e.g., in B. nordsiecki, B. obex sp. nov., B. dracula sp. nov.). We propose that this barrier should be called “transversal palatal plica“. It seems that the homology of the transversal palatal plica is clear. This plica originated by fusion of the interpalatal and lower palatal plica, while the outer portions remained unfused in some cases. This is strongly supported by the fact that in e.g., B. taiyaiorum, two line-like extensions can be seen extending from the transversal palatal plica toward the peristome edge. The one closer to the separated upper palatal plica is actually an interpalatal, while the one below it is the lower palatal. In some species/specimens, it seemed that the fusion only partly occurred so that two distinct parts are clearly visible (in B. lophiodera). This transversal plica surely provides more efficient defence against predators since it resembles the appearance of the “barricade”. In Bensonella, frequently there are multiple palatal or basal plicae of the same appearance (height, width, length) which makes the naming and the homology of them more complicated. It is not always clear whether several barriers in the basal region represent multiple basal plicae or some are infrapalatal or subcolumellar. We tried to standardize the nomenclature of these barriers as follows: the upper palatal plica is located behind the palatal tubercle or slightly above it at the beginning of the sinulus; the interpalatal plica is located behind and slightly below the palatal tubercle, while lower palatal plica is located halfway between the palatal tubercle and basal plica. However, when several equally strong palatal plicae exist, it might not be possible to unambiguously separate interpalatals from the lower palatal or even infrapalatal. In these cases, homology is unclear (Fig. 9).

Hooked apertural barriers are not uncommon in hypselostomatids (altogether 17 species of described within the genera in scope have at least one barrier hooked). We have noticed that the barriers on the parietal and columellar sides are relatively rarely hooked (e.g., in B. hooki and B. lakainguta), while palatal plicae are always hooked (in species with hooked barriers). It is known that these hooks (together with the protruding, detached last whorl) contribute to the defence of the specimen against different predators. If hooks and the protruding last whorl were not removed, the survival rate was very high (94%). Removal of these hooks led to higher vulnerability and higher death rate (survival rate was 20% lower than with hooks, see Cameron 2016). If the protruded last whorl is removed together with the hooks, death rate was very high (survival rate was 43% lower than in the control group) (Cameron 2016 and references therein). Within a single population of species with normally hooked barriers, hooks may sometimes be missing. This is found in H. sorormajor sp. nov. where a basal plica can be blunt or distinctly hooked. In general, species with hooked barriers were always regarded as distinct from the one without hooks.

Further notes

We have found some species that are geographically very distant from each other but morphologically almost identical, such as Bensonella kitteli and B. hupeana, which have been described from type localities more than 3000 km apart. A similar example is found in B. boettgeri which was described from Java (Indonesia). This species shares the identical shell traits as B. novemdentata from Laos even though their type localities are located ~ 2900 km away from each other. One more identical specimen from India is herein examined by us and treated conspecific with B. boettgeri. We do not know whether this is a result of insufficient exploration, parallel evolution, or a long-distance dispersal but these species are herein all treated conspecific since not a single difference in shell morphology could be observed. A similar case is present and explained in Páll-Gergely et al. (2015) for Angustopila.

There are also several species with continuous, broad distributions. Hypselostoma khaowongense is reported from many localities in Thailand and also Myanmar and Laos. Hypselostoma hungerfordianum is apparently widespread in southern Thailand and Malaysia. Hypselostoma crossei is distributed in a belt extending from Myanmar through northern Laos and Vietnam (possibly also in Thailand). It also occurs in China, where it is known under two synonyms (H. tianxingqiaoensis and H. xingyinensis). This makes it clear that not all species are stenoendemic and that special attention should be paid to the widespread species. It should also be noted that these widespread species show considerable intraspecific variation. Hypselostoma crossei is so variable with respect to the arrangement of the apertural barriers that they no longer have taxonomic significance. This species is also variable in the level of the last whorl protrusion and even shell surface to some extent. In the same population of H. crossei, we have found specimens with no spiral striation as well as specimens with very faint spiral striation. Another widespread species, H. hungerfordianum, is also quite variable in some conchological characters such as the level of the last whorl detachment, the number of smaller apertural barriers, and sometimes also the width of the umbilicus.

Hypselostoma khaowongense is a widely spread species which shows variability similar to the one found in H. crossei. In H. khaowongense, there is a highly variable number of smaller barriers between the larger ones, the last whorl can be rounded or slightly keeled, the umbilicus can vary in width (although always wide) and even spiral surface sculpture can be more or less pronounced.

We can also separate a group of species which share the same, unique shell microsculpture in the form of very fine granules (herein classified under H. hungerfordianum group). It is very unlikely that this type of unique microsculpture has independently evolved several times in this group, so we can consider that all these species are probably more closely related.

Some species clearly show enormous variability in the number and arrangement of apertural barriers, while others are less or far less variable. A smaller number of species possess hooked (claw-like) barriers, which has already been described as a sign of rapid adaptive evolution (Wada and Chiba 2013) that is not due to close phylogenetic relationships.

Antroapiculus was described as a monotypic genus due to the unique combination of shell features, such as the very high but flat last whorl, the strongly sloping last whorl and the parietal side equipped with a single lamella. There are also species such as Hypselostoma srakeoense (described as Anauchen srakeoensis) and H. torticollis (described as Gyliotrachela torticollis) and H. fungus sp. nov. that have the same degree of downward rotation of the aperture, and H. srakeoense even has a single lamella on the parietal side, just like Antroapiculus. Antroapiculus pendulus also has a very high last whorl and a wide trumpet, which gives it a unique appearance. This feature is also shared with H. chaunosalpinx, described from Cambodia, further supporting the sharing of features (overlap), and justifying the synonymy with Hypselostoma.

Based on molecular data, Tongkerd et al. (2004) have shown that species with strikingly different shells, but with the same surface sculpture, can be closely related (as in the case of Hypselostoma erawan and H. panhai). This can be used as a basis for further taxonomic studies which are needed urgently to solve the current confusion at the genus level. It was impossible to propose a new and appropriate system of placing species into genera since hypselostomatids are a very diverse group with numerous transitional forms in terms of shell size, shape, and appearance of the apertural barriers. We believe that a thorough phylogenetic work, in combination with morphological and anatomical characters, can solve this more than a century-long mystery.

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Ivaylo Dedov (for providing a sample of Hypselostoma dilatatum), Sigrid Hof (for granting access to the SMF collection), Alexander Fedosov and Mattias Forshage (for their help in finding and photographing a type specimen of H. australe from SMNH), Ellen Strong (for helping us find the type of H. annamiticum altius), Zhe-Yu Chen (for sending the data and photos of H. xingyinensis), Bram van der Bijl (for loaning the RMNH types and arranging the photographing of other types), John Slapcinsky (for loaning the UF material), Jonathan Ablett (for sending images from the NHM), Philippe Bouchet and Virginie Héros (for sending specimens from Paris and help with some Latin names), Uiriamu Otani and Christa Hemmen (for providing specimens for this study), Dragan Antić (for help with some Latin names). The authors are also grateful to two reviewers, Naoto Sawada and Ruud Bank, for comments which greatly improved this manuscript. Edward Cavin and the late Harry G. Lee, both of Jacksonville, Florida assisted KA in the Kanchanaburi area, Thailand.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Serbian Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation (Contract No. 451-03-136/2025-03/ 200178). The collecting efforts of KA in Thailand were supported by the Thomas Ladue McGinty Fund, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida. This research has received funding support from the NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation, Thailand [grant number B42G670038] for CS and PT. This study was supported by the SYNTHESYS Project (GB-TAF-2523), the Hungarian Research Fund (OTKA FK 135262), and the Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences for B. Páll-Gergely.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: VG, BPG. Data curation: BPG. Methodology: KA, JJJV, JG, AH, AR. Resources: BPG. Supervision: CS, BPG, PT. Validation: BPG. Writing - original draft: VG. Writing - review and editing: VG, PT, BPG, AH, JJJV, JG, AR, KA, CS.

Author ORCIDs

Vukašin Gojšina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0413-9304

András Hunyadi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3488-2817

Chirasak Sutcharit https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7670-9540

Piyoros Tongkerd https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9221-9293

Kurt Auffenberg https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9660-6776

Jozef Grego https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-0415

Jaap J. Vermeulen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8505-0319

Alexander Reischütz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-7004

Barna Páll-Gergely https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6167-7221

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  • Adams H, Adams A (1854–1858) The genera of recent Mollusca; arranged according to their organization. John Van Voorst, London. Vol. 2: 1–92 [pls 61–72 (1854); 93–284, pls 73–96 (1855); 285–412, pls 97–112 (1856); 413–540, pls 113–128 (1857); 541–660, i–xl, pls 129–138 (1858)].
  • Albers JC, von Martens E (1860) Die Heliceen nach natürlicher Verwandtschaft systematisch geordnet. Manuskript besorgt von Eduard von Martens. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leizig [i–xviii] 1–359. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.11218
  • Ancey CF (1881) Description de mollusques terrestres nouveaux. Le Naturaliste 3(47): 373–374.
  • Bavay A, Dautzenberg P (1904) [“1903”] Description de coquilles nouvelles de l’Indo-Chine. (3e suite). Journal de Conchyliologie 51(3): 201–236 [pls 7–11].
  • Bavay A, Dautzenberg P (1909) [“1908”] Molluscorum terrestrium Tonkinorum diagnoses. Journal de Conchyliologie 56(4): 229–251.
  • Bavay A, Dautzenberg P (1912) Description de coquilles nouvelles de l’Indo-Chine (7e suite). Journal de Conchyliologie 60(1): 1–54 [pls 1–6].
  • Benson WH (1856a) Description of Tanystoma tubiferum, a Burmese form related to the genus Anostoma of Lamarck. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 2, 17(98): 129–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222935608697483
  • Blanford WT (1863) Contributions to Indian malacology. No. IV. Descriptions of new land shells from Ava, and other parts of Burma. The Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 32(4): 319–327
  • Bouchet P, Rocroi JP, Hausdorf B, Kaim A, Kano Y, Nützel A, Parkhaev P, Schrödl M, Strong EE (2017) Revised classification, nomenclator and typification of gastropod and monoplacophoran families. Malacologia 61(1–2): 1–526. https://doi.org/10.4002/040.061.0201
  • Budha PB, Backeljau T (2017) First report of Paraboysidia landourensis (Pilsbry, 1915) from Nepal, with description of a putative new species and a note on Bensonella plicidens (Benson, 1849) (Stylommatophora: family unclear). In: Budha PB (Ed.) Taxonomy of terrestrial molluscs of Nepal. PhD dissertation, Evolutionary Ecology Group, University of Antwerp, 189–201.
  • Burch JB, Panha S (2002) [“2000”] The pupillid genus Anauchen in Thailand (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora). Walkerana 11(26): 239–248.
  • Burch JB, Panha S, Tongkerd P (2003) [“2002”] New taxa of Pupillidae (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora) from Thailand. Walkerana 13 (29/30): 129–187.
  • Cameron R (2016) Slugs and snails. William Collins, London [i–xvii], 1–508.
  • Chen Z-Y (2023) A new species of Anauchen Pilsbry, 1917 from Guangxi, China (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Hypselostomatidae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 130(1): 89–92. https://doi.org/10.35929/RSZ.0090
  • Chen D-N, Zhang W-H (2002) Zoogeographical analysis of the Boysidia (Ancey, 1881) in China, description of a new species (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Pupillidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 27(4): 690–698.
  • Chen D-N, Liu Y-H, Wu W-X (1995) Two new species of land snails from Shaanxi Province, China (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Pupillidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 20(3): 274–277.
  • Chen D-N, Wu M, Zhang G-Q (1999) Studies on the genus Boysidia Ancey from China with descriptions of six new species (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Pupillidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 24(2): 124–135.
  • Chen Y-X, Tian M, Fan B (2016) Terrestrial molluscs in Yunnan. Science Press, Beijing [i–ix], 1–259. [in Chinese]
  • Chen Z-Y, Huang B, Páll-Gergely B (2022) Exceptional among the exceptional: a new species of Stenogyropsis Möllendorff, 1899 (Eupulmonata: Camaenidae), with a review of the free last whorl in terrestrial gastropods. Journal of Molluscan Studies 88: eyac015. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyac015
  • Clements R (2009) Hypselostoma elephas. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2009: e.T168177A6462664. [accessed on 30 October 2024]
  • Davison GWH (1995) The terrestrial Molluscan fauna of Temengor Forest Reserve, Hulu Perak, Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal 48(3–4): 233–248.
  • Davison GWH, Kiew R (1990) Survey of flora and fauna of limestone hills in Kelantan with recommendations for conservation. Report WWF Malaysia, WWF 3829 & MYS 161/89: 1–99.
  • Dumrongrojwattana P, Assawawattagee S (2018) A new species of the genus Boysidia (Pulmonata: Pupillidae) from Northern Thailand. Sains Malaysiana 47(2): 215–219. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2018-4702-01
  • Dumrongrojwattana P, Tanmuangpak K (2020) The terrestrial microsnail genus Aulacospira Möllendorff, 1890 (Eupulmonata, Stylommatophora, Hypselostomatidae) in Thailand with key to Thai species. ZooKeys 980: 23–42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.980.54100
  • Dumrongrojwattana P, Wongkamhaeng K (2024) Two decades of microsnails (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia: Pulmonata) study in Thailand and ongoing research. In: Claude J, Kitana N (Eds) On the Edge of the Sixth Mass Extinction in Biodiversity Hotspots: Facts, needs, solutions and opportunities in Thailand and adjacent countries, Center of Learning Network for the Region (CLNR), Chulalongkorn University, 313–336.
  • Egorov RV (2013) Treasure of Russian shells. Supplement 3. Part 3: A review of the genera of the terrestrial pectinibranch molluscs (synopsis mainly based on published data). Littoriniformes: Liareidae, Pupinidae, Diplommatinidae, Alycaeidae, Cochlostomatidae. Roman Egorov, Moscow, 1–61.
  • Fang F, Wang J, Chen Y (2015) Studies on the genus Boysidia Ancey from China, with description of one new species (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Pupillidae). Sichuan Journal of Zoology 34(5): 688–694.
  • Fischer H, Dautzenberg P (1904) Catalogue des mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles de ľIndo-Chine orientale cités jusqu’ à ce jour. In: Leroux E (Ed.) Mission Pavie Indo-Chine 1879–1895, Études diverses III Recherches sur l’histoire naturelle de l’Indo-Chine orientale. Leroux, E., Paris, 390–450. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.5099
  • Foon JK, Marzuki M, Bin E (2023) A checklist of land snails (Mollusca, Gastropoda) of Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia. Malayan Nature Journal 75(1): 133–148.
  • Foon JK, Clements GR, Liew TS (2017) Diversity and biogeography of land snails (Mollusca, Gastropoda) in the limestone hills of Perak, Peninsular Malaysia. ZooKeys 682: 1–94. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.682.12999
  • Fulton HC (1899) A list of the species of land Mollusca collected by Mr. W. Doherty in the Malay Archipelago; with descriptions of some supposed new species and varieties. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 3: 212–219 [pl. 11].
  • Gojšina V, Schilthuizen M, Páll-Gergely B (2023) Three new hypselostomatid species (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Pupilloidea) from El Nido, the Philippines. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 152(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1127/arch.moll/152/001-009
  • Gredler VM (1885) Zur Conchylien-Fauna von China. VIII. Stück. Bozen, 1–19.
  • Gredler VM (1901) Drei neue Land-Conchylien aus China. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 33(9–10): 150–153.
  • Gude GK (1914) The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Mollusca-II. Trochomorphidae-Janellidae. Taylor & Francis, London [i–xii], 1–520. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.12891
  • Guo Y-H, Zhou W-C, Luo T-C (2006) One new species of the genus Boysidia (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Pupillidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 31(3): 541–543.
  • Haas F (1937) Neue und kritische Pupilliden. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 69 (1/2): 2–17.
  • Hanley SC, Theobald W (1870–1876) Conchologia Indica, being illustrations of the land and freshwater shells of British India. L. Reeve & Co, London, Part 1: 1–10, pls 1–20 (1870); part 2: 11–18, pls 21–40 (1870); part 3: 19–28, pls 41–60 (1872); part 4: 29–34, pls 61–80 (1873); part 5: 35–40, pls 81–100 (1874); part 6: 41–48, pls 101–120 (1874); part 7: 49–56, pls 121–140 (1875); part 8: 57–65, i–xviii, pls 141–160 (1876).
  • Hemmen J, Hemmen C (2001) Aktualisierte Liste der terrestrischen Gastropoden Thailands. Schriften zur Malakozoologie 18: 35–70.
  • Hoekstra P, Schilthuizen M (2011) Phylogenetic relationships between isolated populations of the limestone dwelling microsnail Gyliotrachela hungerfordiana (Gastropoda: Vertiginidae). Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 49(4): 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0469.2011.00623.x
  • Hwang C-C (2014) A new subspecies of land snail Bensonella plicidens lakainguta (Gastropoda, Vertiginidae) from southern Taiwan. Bulletin of Malacology 37: 15–26.
  • Inkhavilay K, Sutcharit C (2024) A new pulmonate microsnail species in the genus Boysidia, with remarks on Bensonella and Krobylos species (Pupilloidea: Hypselostomatidae) from northern Laos. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 72: 438–449.
  • Inkhavilay K, Sutcharit C, Tongkerd P, Panha S (2016) New species of micro snails from Laos (Pulmonata: Vertiginidae and Diapheridae). Journal of Conchology 42(4): 213–232.
  • Inkhavilay K, Sutcharit C, Bantaowong U, Chanabun R, Siriwut W, Srisonchai R, Pholyotha A, Jirapatrasilp P, Panha S (2019) Annotated checklist of the terrestrial molluscs from Laos (Mollusca, Gastropoda). ZooKeys 834: 1–166. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.834.28800
  • Iredale T (1937) A basic list of the land Mollusca of Australia. The Australian Zoologist 8(4): 287–333.
  • IUCN (2015) Annual Report of the Species Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Cambridge, 1–351.
  • Jirapatrasilp P, Panha S, Sutcharit C, Tongkerd P (2024) Four new species of micro land snail in the genus Bensonella Pilsbry & Vanatta, 1900 (Stylommatophora: Hypselostomatidae) from Thailand. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 153(1): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1127/arch.moll/153/087-098
  • Jochum A, Slapnik R, Kampschulte M, Martels G, Heneka M, Páll-Gergely B (2014) A review of the microgastropod genus Systenostoma Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1908 and a new subterranean species from China (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Hypselostomatidae). ZooKeys 410: 23–40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.410.7488
  • Kobelt W (1902) Das Tierreich. Eine Zusammenstellung und Kennzeichnung der rezenten Tierformen. Lieferung 16. Mollusca: Cyclophoridae. R. Friedländer und Sohn, Berlin [i–xxxix], 1–662.
  • Küster HC (1841–1855) Die Gattungen Pupa, Megaspira, Balea und Tornatellina. In Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen. In: Systematisches Conchylien-Cabinet von Martini und Chemnitz. Ersten Bandes, fünfzehnte Abtheilung. Bauer & Raspe, Nürnberg, 1–20, pls 1–2 (1841); 21–68, pls 3, 8–10 (1843); 69–76, pls 11–12 (1844); 77–88, pl. 13 (1845); 89–96, pls 4–5, 14 (1847); 97–128, pls 6, 15–16 (1850); 129–152, pls 7, 17–21 (1852); 153–194 (1855).
  • Laidlaw FF (1933) A list of the land and fresh-water Mollusca of the Malay Peninsula. Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 11(2,117): 211–234.
  • Luo T-C, Chen D-N, Zhang G-Q, Zhang L, Zhang L, Li T-W (1998) Two new species of the terrestrial mollusks from China. Journal of the Guizhou Normal University (Natural Science) 16(2): 1–4.
  • Luo T-C, Chen D-N, Zhang G-Q (2000) Two new species of Pupillidae from China (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Pupillidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 25(2): 147–151.
  • Maassen WJM (1999) Some new records of Streptaxidae and Hypselostomatidae from Sumatra, Indonesia, with descriptions of three new species. Basteria 63(4–6): 121–126.
  • Maassen WJM (2001) A preliminary checklist of the non-marine molluscs of west-Malaysia. “A handlist”. De Kreukel, extra edition: 1–155 [pls 1–3].
  • Maassen WJM (2008) Remarks on a small collection of terrestrial molluscs from north-west Laos, with descriptions of three new species (Mollusca: Pulmonata: Streptaxidae, Vertiginidae). Basteria 72(4–6): 233–240.
  • Mabille J (1887a) Molluscorum Tonkinorum diagnoses. A. Masson, Meulan 1–18.
  • Mabille J (1887b) Sur quelques mollusques du Tonkin. Bulletins de la Société malacologique de France 4: 73–164 [pls 1–4].
  • Marzuki ME, Liew TS, Mohd-Azlan J (2021) Land snails and slugs of Bau limestone hills, Sarawak (Malaysia, Borneo), with the descriptions of 13 new species. ZooKeys 1035: 1–113. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1035.60843
  • Möllendorff OF von (1890) Die Landschnecken-Fauna der Insel Cebu. Bericht über die Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gesellschaft, 1889/1890: 189–292 [pls 6–9]. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.13047
  • Möllendorff OF von (1894) On a collection of land-shells from the Samui Islands, Gulf of Siam. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 62(1): 146–156 [pl. 16].
  • Möllendorff OF von (1897) Neue Landschnecken von Java. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 29(5–6, 7–8): 57–72, 89–97.
  • Möllendorff OF von (1900) Zur Binnenmollusken-Fauna Annams III. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 32(7–8): 117–121, 32(9–10): 129–139.
  • Möllendorff OF von (1901a) Zur Binnenmollusken-Fauna von Annam, IV. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 33(3–4): 45–50.
  • Möllendorff OF von (1901b) Diagnosen neuer von H. Fruhstorfer in Tongking gesammelter Landschnecken. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 33(5–6, 7–8): 65–81, 110–119.
  • Möllendorff OF von (1902) Binnenmollusken aus Hinterindien. 1. Landschnecken von Kelantan, Ostküste der Halbinsel Malacca. Nachrichtsblatt der Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschaft 34(7–8): 135–149.
  • Motschoulsky V de (1845) Observations sur le Musée entolomogique de l`Université Impériale de Moscou. Bulletin de la Sociéte Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 18(4): 332–388 [pls 5–7].
  • Nevill G (1878) Hand List of Mollusca in the Indian Museum, Calcutta: Gastropoda. Pulmonata and Prosobranchia-Neurobranchia. Calcutta (Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing), [i–xv] 1–338. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.6561
  • Odhner NH (1917) Results of Dr. E. Mjöbergs Swedish scientific expeditions to Australia 1910–1913. Mollusca. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 52(16): 1–115 [pls 1–3]. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.12985
  • Páll-Gergely B (2023a) Anauchen (?) kozari n. sp., a new Hypselostomatid species from Laos (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Pupilloidea). Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 58(1): 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1556/038.2023.00171
  • Páll-Gergely B (2023b) Anauchen eotvosi n. sp. from the “Shan-Siam Boundary” (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Hypselostomatidae). Journal of Conchology 44(5): 451–455.
  • Páll-Gergely B, White TS (2023) Solving the mystery of the misunderstood Bensonella plicidens (Benson, 1849) (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Hypselostomatidae). Journal of Natural History 56(45–48): 2011–2029. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2022.2152750
  • Páll-Gergely B, Hunyadi A, Jochum A, Asami T (2015) Seven new hypselostomatid species from China, including some of the world’s smallest land snails (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Orthurethra). ZooKeys 523: 31–62. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.523.6114
  • Páll-Gergely B, Muratov I V, Asami T (2016) The family Plectopylidae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata) in Laos with the description of two new genera and a new species. ZooKeys 592: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.592.8118
  • Páll-Gergely B, Schilthuizen M, Örstan A, Auffenberg K (2019) A review of Aulacospira Möllendorff, 1890 and Pseudostreptaxis Möllendorff, 1890 in the Philippines (Gastropoda, Pupilloidea, Hypselostomatidae). ZooKeys 842: 67–83. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.842.33052
  • Páll-Gergely B, Hunyadi A, Grego J, Reischütz A, Buczkó K, Vermeulen JJ (2020) Clostophis Benson, 1860, is not a monotypic diplommatinid but a speciose hypselostomatid (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata), with descriptions of six new species. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 68: 350–368.
  • Páll-Gergely B, Jochum A, Vermeulen JJ, Anker K, Hunyadi A, Örstan A, Ábel S, Dányi L, Schilthuizen M (2022) The world’s tiniest land snails from Laos and Vietnam (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Hypselostomatidae). Contributions to Zoology 91(1): 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-bja10025
  • Páll-Gergely B, Hunyadi A, Vermeulen JJ, Grego J, Sutcharit C, Reischütz A, Dumrongrojwattana P, Botta-Dukát Z, Örstan A, Fekete J, Jochum A (2023) Five times over: 42 new Angustopila species highlight Southeast Asia’s rich biodiversity (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora, Hypselostomatidae). ZooKeys 1147: 1–177. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1147.93824
  • Panha S (1998a) [“1997”] Three new species of microsnails from southern Thailand (Pulmonata: Vertiginidae; Prosobranchia: Diplommatinidae). Malacological Review 30(1): 53–59.
  • Panha S (1998b) [“1997”] Three new species of Hypselostoma from Thailand (Pulmonata: Vertiginidae). Malacological Review 30(1): 61–69.
  • Panha S (1998c) [“1997”] A new species of Gyliotrachela from Thailand (Pulmonata: Vertiginidae). Malacological Review 30(1): 123–126.
  • Panha S, Burch JB (2002a) [“1998–1999”] Two new genera of pupillid land snails from Thailand (Pulmonata: Pupillidae: Gastrocoptinae). Malacological Review 31/32: 143–153.
  • Panha S, Burch JB (2002b) [“1998–1999”] First records and new species of Boysidia and Sinoennea from Thailand. Malacological Review 31/32: 117–122.
  • Panha S, Burch JB (2002c) [“2001”] The Pupillid genus Paraboysidia in Thailand (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora). Walkerana 12(28): 77–94.
  • Panha S, Burch JB (2002d) [“1999”] New taxa of Pupillidae (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora) from Thailand. Walkerana 10(24): 113–134.
  • Panha S, Burch JB (2002e) New pupilloid land snails from Thailand (Pulmonata: Pupillidae). Natural History Journal of Chulalongkorn University 2(1): 21–24.
  • Panha S, Burch JB (2008) [“2004–2005”] An introduction to the microsnails of Thailand. Malacological Review 37/38(1): 1–155.
  • Panha S, Prateespasen R (2005) [“2000–2001”] A new gastrocoptine land snail from Thailand (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Pupillidae) Malacological Review 33/34: 99–103.
  • Panha S, Tongkerd P, Sucharit C, Tumpeesuwan S, Vongsombath C (2003) [“2002”] A new species of Paraboysidia (Pupillidae: Gastrocoptinae) from Laos. Walkerana 13(29/30): 123–128.
  • Panha S, Tongkerd P, Sutcharit C, Burch JB (2004) New pupillid species from Thailand (Pulmonata: Pupillidae). Natural History Journal of Chulalongkorn University 4(2): 57–82.
  • Pfeiffer L (1849–1850) Neue Molluskengattungen. Zeitschrift für Malakozoologie 6(7, 8): 9–112 [(1849), 113–116 (1850)].
  • Pfeiffer L (1853) Monographia heliceorum viventium. Sistens descriptiones systematicas et criticas omnium huius familiae generum et specierum hodie cognitarum. Volumen tertium. F.A. Brockhaus, Lipsae [i–viii], 1–711.
  • Pfeiffer L (1859) Monographia Heliceorum viventium. Sistens descriptiones systematicas et criticas omnium huius familiae generum et specierum hodie cognitarum. Volumen quatrum. F.A. Brockhaus, Lipisae 1: 1–352 [January or February] [(2): 353–920, i–ix] [< November].
  • Pfeiffer L (1875–1876) Monographia Heliceorum viventium. Sistens descriptiones systematicas et criticas omnium huius familiae generum et specierum hodie cognitarum. Volumen septimum. F.A. Brockhaus, Lipsae, 1: 1–160 [(1875); (2): 161–320 (1875); (3): 321–480 (1875); (4): 481–674, i–x (1876)].
  • Pfeiffer L (1878–1881) Nomenclator heliceorum viventium. [Posthumous work edited by S. Clessin]. Cassel: Fischer. [See Bank et al. 2020, Archiv für Molluskenkunde 149(1): 80 for section dates. pp. 1–64, 1878; 65–192, 1879; 193–384, 1879–80; 385–617, 1881].
  • Pilsbry HA (1908) Two genera of land snails new to Japan and Korea. Conchological Magazine 2(8): 39–42.
  • Pilsbry HA (1915) A new Indian species of Pupillidae. The Nautilus 29(7): 73–74.
  • Pilsbry HA (1916–1918) Manual of Conchology. Second Series: Pulmonata. Vol. 24 Pupillidae (Gastrocoptinae). [(2) 24 (93): 1–112, plates 1–13 (1916); (2) 24 (94): 113–176, plates 14–29 (1917); (2) 24 (95): 177–256, plates 30–38 (1917); (2) 24 (96): 257–380, i–xii, plates 39–49 (1918).] Conchological Department, Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
  • Pilsbry HA, Vanatta EG (1900) A partial revision of the Pupae of the United States. Proceedings Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia 52: 582–611 [pls 22–23].
  • Pokryszko B (1996) The Gastrocoptinae of Australia (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Pupilloidae): Systematics, distribution and origin. Invertebrate Systematics 10(5): 1085–1090. https://doi.org/10.1071/IT9961085
  • Pokryszko BM, Auffenberg K, Hlaváč JČ, Naggs F (2009) Pupilloidea of Pakistan (Gastropoda: Pulmonata): Truncatellininae, Vertigininae, Gastrocoptinae, Pupillinae (in part). Annales Zoologici 59(4): 423–458. https://doi.org/10.3161/000345409X484847
  • Qian ZX, Zhou WC [Eds] (2014) Illustrated handbook of common terrestrial mollusks in China. Zhejiang People’s Fine Arts Publishing House, Hangzhou, 1–228. [in Chinese]
  • Saenkamon O, Wiboonpuech N, Techama S, Tanmuengpak K, Dumrongrojwattana P (2022) Preliminary comparative study of shell, radula and genital system of terrestrial microsnails genus Gyliotrachela Tomlin, 1930 and Anauchen Pilsbry, 1917 from Eastern Thailand. Burapha Science Journal 27(2): 1055–1065.
  • Saurin E (1953) Coquilles nouvelles de l’Indochine. Journal de Conchyliologie 93(4): 113–120 [pl. 4].
  • Schileyko AA (1998) Treatise on recent terrestrial pulmonate molluscs. Part 2. Gastrocoptidae, Hypselostomatidae, Vertiginidae, Truncatellinidae, Pachnodidae, Enidae, Sagdidae. Ruthenica, Supplement 2: 129–262.
  • Schileyko AA (2011) Check-list of land pulmonate molluscs of Vietnam (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora). Ruthenica 21(1): 1–68.
  • Schilthuizen M, Vermeulen JJ, Davison GWH, Gittenberger E (1999) Population structure in a snail species from isolated Malaysian limestone hills, inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences. Malacologia 41(1): 283–296.
  • Smith EA (1896) On a collection of land-shells from the Islands of Selayar, Jampea, and Kalao. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 6, 18(104): 144–152 [pl. 10]. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222939608680425
  • Solem A (1981) Small land snails from Northern Australia, I: Species of Gyliotrachela Tomlin, 1930 (Mollusca: Pulmonata, Vertiginidae). Journal of the Malacological Society of Australia 5(1–2): 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00852988.1981.10673940
  • Sowerby GB II (1876) Monograph of the genus Pupinidae. In: Reeve L (Ed.) Conchologia Iconica, or illustrations of the shells of molluscous animals. Vol. 20. London: L. Reeve, London [plates 1–10 + unpaginated text].
  • Stoliczka F (1871) Notes on terrestrial Mollusca from the neighbourhood of Moulmein (Tenasserim provinces), with descriptions of new species. The Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Part II, 40(2): 143–177.
  • Sutcharit C, Thach P, Chhuoy S, Ngor PB, Jeratthitikul E, Siriwut W, Srisonchai R, Ng TH, Pholyotha A, Jirapatrasilp P, Panha S (2020) Annotated checklist of the land snail fauna from southern Cambodia (Mollusca, Gastropoda). ZooKeys 948: 1–46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.948.51671
  • Sutcharit C, Ngor PB, Páll-Gergely B, Jeratthitikul E, Siriwut W, Srisonchai R, Hui Ng T, Jirapatrasilp P, Panha S (2023) Notes on the hypselostomatid snails (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) from limestone hills in Western Cambodia with a new record and a new species. Journal of Natural History 57(25–28): 1287–1303. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2023.2223386
  • Sykes ER (1902) On a collection of land and fresh water shells from Kelantan, Malay Peninsula. The Journal of Malacology 9(2): 60–63.
  • Tanmuangpak K, Dumrongrojwattana P (2022) Gyliotrachela cultura, a new species of terrestrial microsnail (Gastropoda: Eupulmonata: Vertiginidae) from Thailand. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 70: 407–416.
  • Thompson FG, Dance SP (1983) Non-marine mollusks of Borneo. II Pulmonata: Pupillidae, Clausiliidae. III Prosobranchia: Hydrocenidae, Helicinidae. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum Biological Science 29(3): 101–152. https://doi.org/10.58782/flmnh.gwgk9850
  • Theobald W (1870) Descriptions of some new land shells from the Shan States and Pegu. The Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal Part II 39(4): 395–402.
  • Thompson FG, Upatham S (1997) Vertiginid land snails from Thailand (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Pupilloidea). Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History 39(7): 221–245. https://doi.org/10.58782/flmnh.lecm3617
  • Tongkerd P, Lee T, Panha S, Burch JB, O’Foighil D (2004) Molecular phylogeny of certain Thai gastrocoptine micro land snails (Stylommatophora: Pupillidae) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Journal of Molluscan Studies 70(2): 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/70.2.139
  • Tongkerd P, Sutcharit C, Panha S (2013) Two new species of micro land snails from two islands in the Andaman Sea (Prosobranchia: Diplommatinidae; Pulmonata: Pupillidae). Tropical Natural History 13(2): 65–76.
  • Tongkerd P, Lwin N, Páll-Gergely B, Chanabun R, Pholyotha A, Prasankok P, Seesamut T, Siriwut W, Srisonchai R, Sutcharit C, Panha S (2024) Contributions of a small collection of terrestrial microsnails (Pupilloidea, Hypselostomatidae) from Myanmar with description of three new species. ZooKeys 1195: 157–197. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1195.112112
  • Van Benthem Jutting WSS (1949a) On a new species of Gyliotrachela from Celebes. Basteria 13(4): 64–65.
  • Van Benthem Jutting Jutting WSS (1949b) On a collection of non-marine Mollusca from Malaya in the Raffles Museum, Singapore, with an appendix on cave shells. Bulletin of the Raffles Museum 19: 50–77.
  • Van Benthem Jutting WSS (1950) The Malayan species of Boysidia, Paraboysidia, Hypselostoma and Gyliotrachela (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Vertiginidae) with a catalogue of all the species hitherto described. Bulletin of the Raffles Museum 21: 5–47.
  • Van Benthem Jutting WSS (1952) Systematic studies on the non-marine Mollusca of the Indo-Australian Archipelago. III. Critical revision of the Javanese pulmonate land-snails of the families Ellobiidae to Limacidae, with an appendix on Helicarionidae. Treubia 21(2): 291–435.
  • Van Benthem Jutting WSS (1960) Some notes on land and freshwater Mollusca of Malaya. Basteria 24(1–2): 10–20.
  • Van Benthem Jutting WSS (1961) Additional new species and new localities of the family Vertiginidae and the genera Oophana and Opisthostoma from Malaya. Bulletin of the Raffles Museum 26: 34–48 [pls 8–14].
  • Van Benthem Jutting WSS (1962) Coquilles terrestres nouvelles de quelques collines calcaires du Cambodge et du Sud Vietnam. Journal de Conchyliologie 102(1): 3–15.
  • Vermeulen JJ, Whitten T (1998) Fauna Malesiana. Guide to the land snails of Bali. W. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden [i–ix], 1–164.
  • Vermeulen JJ, Le Cang P, Quam Tarn T (2007) New species of terrestrial molluscs (Caenogastropoda, Pupinidae & Pulmonata, Vertiginidae) of the Hon Chong–Ha Tien limestone hills, Southern Vietnam. Basteria 71(1/3): 81–92.
  • Vermeulen JJ, Luu H T, Theary K, Anker K (2019) New species of land snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Caenogastropoda and Pulmonata) of the Mekong Delta limestone hills (Cambodia, Vietnam). Folia Malacologica 27(1): 7–41. https://doi.org/10.12657/folmal.027.001
  • Yang H-F, Zhang W-H, Chen D-N (2012) A new species of the genus Boysidia (Ancey, 1881) from China (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Pupillidae). Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 37(3): 550–551.
  • Zhang W-H, Chen D-N, Zhou W-C (2014) Two new species of the genus Boysidia from China, with a preliminary discussion of its geography (Pulmonata: Stylommatophora: Pupillidae). Zoological Systematics 39(4): 570–575. https://doi.org/0.11865/zs.20140410
  • Zilch A (1959–1960) Gastropoda. Teil 2. Euthyneura. In: Schindewolf OH (Ed.) Handbuch der Paläozoologie, 6 (2, 1): 1–200 [(1959); (2, 2): 201–400 (1959); (2, 3): 401–600 (1960); (2, 4): 601–834, I–XII (1960).] Borntraeger, Berlin.
  • Zilch A (1984) Die Typen und Typoide des Natur-Museums Senckenberg. Mollusca: Pupillacea: Chondrinidae: Gastrocoptinae, Hypselostomatidae, Aulacospirinae. Archiv für Molluskenkunde 115(1–3): 151–177.
login to comment