Research Article |
Corresponding author: Hong-Liang Shi ( shihl@bjfu.edu.cn ) Academic editor: Borislav Guéorguiev
© 2025 Jia-Heng Chen, Hong-Liang Shi, Hong-Bin Liang.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Chen J-H, Shi H-L, Liang H-B (2025) Revision of the Chinese endemic genus Megadrypta Sciaky & Anichtchenko, 2020 (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Dryptini), with description of a new species. ZooKeys 1226: 183-193. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1226.142678
|
The species of the genus Megadrypta Sciaky & Anichtchenko, 2020 are reviewed. A new species M. maozhoui sp. nov. is described from Sichuan and Yunnan provinces, China (type locality: Tiantaishan, Qionglai City, Sichuan). New provincial records of M. mirabilis Sciaky & Anichtchenko, 2020 are reported as well. A key of the genus Megadrypta is provided.
China, Dryptinae, ground beetles, new records, new species, taxonomy
The Chinese endemic genus Megadrypta Sciaky & Anichtchenko, 2020 belonging to the tribe Dryptini was established by
It comes as a complete surprise to us that there might be additional undiscovered Megadrypta species when our dear friends presented us with a large, flightless dryptine specimen collected from Sichuan Province in the summer of 2024. After carefully examining more adult specimens from Sichuan and comparing them with M. mirabilis, we can confirm that these specimens represent a new species. Furthermore, examination of specimens from Guizhou and Hunan provinces revealed new provincial distribution records for M. mirabilis.
The purposes of this paper are to revise the genus Megadrypta, to describe M. maozhoui sp. nov., to report new provincial records for M. mirabilis, and to present a key to identification of the species of the genus.
Specimens examined in this study were borrowed from or examined in the following institutions and private collections:
CCJH personal collection of Jia-Heng Chen, Guangdong, China
CHYZ personal collection of Yu-Zhou Huang, Hunan, China
CYXH personal collection of Xiao-Han Ye, Zhejiang, China
Labels of type material are cited verbatim. Detail information of each label is enclosed within quotation marks (“ ”). Individual labels are separated by double slashes (//). Our added notes are within brackets ([]). Each specimen of the newly described species is provided with one printed label “HOLOTYPE [or] PARATYPE taxon name, det. [author(s)], 2024”. Both holotype and paratype labels are in red.
Most morphological terms in the present paper follow their general applications (
Measurements and abbreviations are as follows : the length of the pronotum (PL) was measured along the median line ; the width of the pronotum (PW) was measured at the maximum width of the pronotum ; the length of the elytra (EL) was measured from the basal border to the sutural apex ; the width of the elytra (EW) was measured at the maximum width of the two closed elytra ; the length of the body (BL) was the linear distance from the apex of the labrum to the elytral sutural end ; the length of the apical lamella of the aedeagus (ALL) was measured from apical margin of apical orifice to the tip of apical lamella ; the width of apical lamella of the aedeagus (ALW) was measured along the base of the apical lamella.
The habitus photographs were taken using a Nikon D7100 camera with a Laowa CF 60 mm f/2.8 2× Super Macro lens. Images of external characters and male genitalia characters were taken with a Nikon SMZ-18 stereoscopic dissecting microscope fitted with a Nikon D7500 camera. For each final image, several photographs were taken at different focal planes and combined with Zerene Stacker to get one synthesized photograph. The distribution map was made with QGIS v. 3.28. All images were finally modified and arranged into plates by Adobe Photoshop CC 2019.
Megadrypta Sciaky & Anichtchenko, 2020: 525.
Megadrypta mirabilis Sciaky & Anichtchenko, 2020, by original designation.
Large dryptine ground beetles with BL 13.0–17.0 mm. Dorsal surface dark with more or less bluish metallic luster; mouth parts, antennae, and legs reddish or dark brown. All terminal palpomeres securiform in males, slenderer and weakly expanded at apex in females; labrum trilobate, with medial lobe forwardly projecting; antennae long, aligned backward reaching middle of elytra; antennomere 1 nearly as long as sum of antennomeres 2–7 combined; temporae well developed. Pronotum cylindrical; anterior angles obtuse; lateral margins of pronotum distinctly doubly concave, before middle and after middle; lateral margins of pronotum completely beaded; posterior angles nearly rectangular, apex rounded. Elytra wide; shoulders extremely narrow; with 6–8 parascutellar pores; striae deeply punctate; intervals slightly convex and pubescent; posterior margins of elytra truncated, slightly sinuate near outer-apical angles. Hind wings reduced. Legs slender, tarsal claws toothless. Male genitalia stout; apical lamella short and wide, apex rounded and thickened; endophallus with more or less distinct central sclerite. Gonocoxite 2 of ovipositor falciform and smooth, without ensiform setae.
(Fig.
1 | Body very large (BL 13–17 mm); pronotal lateral bead complete; elytron with 6–8 parascutellar pores; elytra strongly narrowed toward shoulders; hind wings strongly reduced; gonocoxite 2 of ovipositor without setae | 2 (Megadrypta) |
– | Body smaller in size (BL < 14 mm); pronotal lateral bead complete or not; elytron with 1–4 parascutellar pores; elytra less pronouncedly narrowed toward shoulders; hind wings well developed; gonocoxite 2 of ovipositor setose (except for the genus Nesiodrypta Jeannel, 1949 without setae) | other Dryptini genera |
2 | Dorsal surface black, with bluish luster very faint and hardly visible; femora dark brown to piceous, tibiae and tarsi sometimes lighter (Fig. |
M . mirabilis Sciaky & Anichtchenko |
– | Dorsal surface dark with distinct bluish metallic luster; legs entirely reddish brown (Fig. |
M . maozhoui sp. nov. |
Holotype: China • male, labeled “Sichuan, Qionglai, Mt. Tiantaishan, Sandaowan, 1246 m, 2024.V.1-5, N30.2674 E103.1199, Maozhou XU & Tianxuan GU leg.”; “HOLOTYPE Megadrypta maozhoui sp. nov., det. Chen & Shi. 2024” [red label];
Dorsal surface dark with distinct bluish metallic luster, mouth parts, antennae and all parts of legs reddish brown. Mentum with anterior margin concave and shallowly emarginate at middle. Pronotum with lateral margins gradually sinuate twice, behind anterior angles and before posterior angles. Elytra with 7–8 parascutellar pores, significantly narrowed base and discontinuous striae, interrupted by coarse foveae (of similar size as interval width) (Fig.
Megadrypta maozhoui sp. nov. can be easily distinguished from the type species of the genus by the combination of following characters: (1) dorsum with distinct bluish metallic luster (versus dark without or with very faint metallic luster in M. mirabilis); (2) legs entirely reddish brown, always much paler than that of the latter species; (3) mentum with anterior margin concaved and shallowly emarginate at middle (versus straight and without emargination in M. mirabilis); (4) pronotum narrower PL/PW 1.76–1.88 (versus PL/PW 1.62–1.68 in M. mirabilis); (5) elytra more elongated, EL/EW 1.56–1.68 (versus EL/EW 1.44–1.50 in M. mirabilis); (6) elytral striae discontinuous, interrupted by coarse foveae (versus striae entire with normal punctures in M. mirabilis); (7) median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view gradually attenuate to apex, ventral margin nearly straight before apex (versus median lobe evenly thickened before apical third and then abruptly narrowed, ventral margin distinctly curved before apex in M. mirabilis); (8) apical lamella of aedeagus with apex obtuse and rounded in dorsal view (versus a little narrower in the latter species); (9) central sclerite of endophallus more distinctly sclerotized with clear border in ventral view (versus less sclerotized with ambiguous border in the latter species).
BL 13.6–15.5 mm (13.8 mm in holotype); dorsal and ventral surface with distinct bluish metallic luster; palpi, antennae and all parts of legs reddish brown, mandibles dark brown. Head (Fig.
Collecton site and habitus of M. maozhoui sp. nov. A Collection site on Mount Tiantaishan, Sichuan (B and C photographed in area of the red circle, D photographed in area of yellow circle) B–D habitus (photographed by Mao-Zhou Xu) E habitus, from Mount Zhougongshan (photographed by Yong Wang).
This species is named after Mr Mao-Zhou Xu, who collected and donated most of the type specimens.
This species is known from three localities in two provinces of southwestern China: Mount Tiantaishan and Mount Zhougongshan of central Sichuan, and Luowang Township of northeastern Yunnan.
(Fig.
Megadrypta mirabilis Sciaky & Anichtchenko, 2020: 526.
Holotype
: China • male, labeled “CHINA. Guangdong, Ruyuan, Nanling Nature Reserve, 24.92579, 113.01638”; “1021 m, 2007.6.18–21 Huang Hao”;
China • 1 female, labeled “CHINA: Hunan, Mt. Mangshan, Jiangjunzhai [in Chinese], 2020.VII-28, 1200 m, Leg. Yuzhou Huang”; CHYZ • 1 female, labeled “CHINA: Guangxi, Laibin, Jinxiu County, Changtong Township, Guitian Village, 2024.VI-1, leg. Chunfu FENG”; CCJH • 1 female, labeled “Guangdong, Nanling, 2017-8” [in Chinese]; CCJH • 1 male, labeled “CHINA: Guizhou, Leishan County, Mt. Leigongshan, Xiannütang, 1555 m” [in Chinese]; “2024.V.31, 26.37303146N 108.19808469E, Leg. Ye”; CYXH.
Dorsal surface nearly black, with very weak bluish luster; femora dark brown to piceous; mouth parts, tibiae, and tarsi sometimes lighter. Mentum with anterior margin straight at middle. Elytra narrowed toward shoulders; elytral striae incised with large punctures (much smaller than interval width). Median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view equally broadened before apical third and then abruptly narrowed; ventral margin strongly curved before apex.
BL 13.9–16.1 mm (15.0 mm in the holotype); dorsal and ventral surface nearly black, with very weak bluish luster; mouth parts brown; femora dark brown to piceous; tibiae and tarsi sometimes lighter (Fig.
This species is widely distributed in the Nanling Area of southern China (Fig.
We express our sincere gratitude to all those who contributed to the collection of the materials examined in this study. Special thanks are extended to Mr Mao-Zhou Xu (Sichuan, China), Mr Tian-Xuan Gu (Chongqing, China), Dr Ping-Zhou Zhu (China Agricultural University, Beijing, China), Mr Yu-Zhou Huang (Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China), Mr Xiao-Han Ye, and Ms Yu-Li Zhang (Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China) for generously donating valuable specimens. We also thank Mr Wen-Qi Yin (Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China), Mr Hao-Yuan Li (Capital Normal University, Beijing, China), and Mr Yi-Hang Li (Beijing, China) for their insightful discussions during the development of this article. Dr Riccardo Sciaky (Milano, Italy) and Dr Borislav Gueorguiev (Sofia, Bulgaria) provided constructive suggestions to improve the quality of the manuscript. Lastly, we thank Mr Michael Zelun Lee (University of California, Riverside, USA) for kindly revising the English of this work.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
This research was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2023YFC2605201), Expert Workstation in Zhaotong, Yunnan (Nos. 2019ZTYX03, 2021ZTYX05) and National Science Foundation of China (No. 32261143728).
Conceptualization: JHC. Resources: HBL. Visualization: JHC. Writing - original draft: JHC. Writing - review and editing: HLS.
Jia-Heng Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2449-8838
Hong-Liang Shi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9989-5830
Hong-Bin Liang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9668-1167
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.