Research Article
Research Article
Morphology of the limbs in the semi-fossorial desert rodent species of Tympanoctomys (Octodontidae, Rodentia)
expand article infoJulieta Perez, Ruben Marcos Barquez, M. Monica Diaz§
‡ PIDBA- UNT, CONICET, Tucuman, Argentina
Open Access


Here, a detailed description of the forelimbs and hindlimbs of all living species of the genus Tympanoctomys are presented. These rodents, highly adapted to desert environments, are semi-fossorial with capacity to move on the surface as well as to build burrows. The shape, structure, and size of the limbs are described. Contrary to what was expected for scratch digging semi-fossorial species, Tympanoctomys have slender humerus, radius and ulna; with narrow epicondyles of the humerus and short olecranon of the ulna with poorly developed processes. Following our descriptions, no intrageneric morphological variation regarding to the configuration of the limbs was detected, probably due to phylogenetic proximity, and not related to specific variations in response to different use of substrates or habits. The obtained results constitute a source of previously unpublished information as well as an important base for future analysis in different studies, such as morphometric, morpho-functional, or phylogenetic researches.


Argentina, Chalchalero Vizcacha Rat, description, morphology


Tympanoctomys is member of a clade of the family Octodontidae, restricted to Argentina (Reig 1989; Ojeda et al. 2013; Díaz et al. 2015). Octodontid rodents are highly diverse in eco-morphological aspects, including six genera with terrestrial, semi-fossorial, fossorial and subterranean forms (Ojeda et al. 2013; Verzi et al. 2015). Due to their broad ecological and geographical diversity at both sides of the Andean mountain range, these rodents represent a very interesting group in biogeographical and evolutionary aspects (Lessa et al. 2008; Ojeda 2010; Ojeda et al. 2013).

It was estimated that Tympanoctomys diverged about six million years ago (Gallardo and Kirsch 2001) in coincidence with the origin of deserts at Late Miocene (Gallardo et al. 2006); but other authors mentioned different times of divergence from 2.5 to 6.5 million years (see Upham and Patterson 2012; Gallardo et al. 2013; Upham and Patterson 2015; Verzi et al. 2016; Suárez-Villota et al. 2016; Álvarez et al. 2017). This genus is one of the few mammals (all rodents) most highly adapted to desert environments (Mares 1975, 1993; Bozinovic and Contreras 1990; Ojeda et al. 1996; Mares et al. 2000; Honeycutt et al. 2003). Tympanoctomys is a polytypic genus containing four living species: T. aureus, T. barrerae, T. kirchnerorum, and T. loschalchalerosorum, of which two species were originally described as separate genera (Pipanacoctomys aureus and Salinoctomys loschalchalerosorum) and T. kirchnerorum was recently described from the central Patagonia of Argentina (see Díaz et al. 2000; Barquez et al. 2002; Díaz and Verzi 2006; Gallardo et al. 2004, 2013, 2009; Teta et al. 2014; Díaz et al. 2015). Recently Suárez-Villota et al. (2016) tested the monophyly of these species through a molecular phylogenetic, and the analysis supported the notion that Salinoctomys and Pipanacoctomys are not distinct from Tympanoctomys. These results are in accordance with previous morphological and molecular researches where Pipanacoctomys is placed external to Tympanoctomys-Salinoctomys (Barquez et al. 2002; Upham and Patterson 2015, 2016).

Tympanoctomys is a small- sized octodontid, with body mass ranging from 67–104 g, head and body length from 130–170 mm (Mares et al. 2000; Teta et al. 2014); T. aureus is the largest species in the genus, with head and body length mean of 170 mm, T. barrerae is a middle size, with head and body length mean of 145 mm, only slightly larger than T. loschalchalerosorum (144–156 mm), and finally, T. kirchnerorum is the smallest, with head and body length mean of 129.4 mm (Verzi et al. 2015). They are endemic to arid regions of central and western Argentina, within the Monte, Chaco, and Patagonian Desert biomes, inhabiting salt basins, sand dunes, and open scrubland in Catamarca, Chubut, La Rioja, Mendoza, San Juan, La Pampa, and Neuquén provinces (see Verzi et al. 2015). Ecological aspects of the species are poorly known, T. barrerae being the best studied. The colonization success and expanded range of T. barrerae has been suggested to be the result of a set of behavioral, ecomorphological, and physiological features that allows better utilization of salt basin, open xeric habitats, and hypersaline food resources (Mares et al. 1997; Ojeda et al. 1999; Gallardo et al. 2007; Ojeda et al. 2013).

Members of the genus Tympanoctomys have the capability to move on the surface as well as to build complex burrows (Ojeda et al. 2013; Teta et al. 2014; Díaz et al. 2015), a feature that distinguishes the semi-fossorial forms (Eisenberg 1981). According to Lessa et al. (2008), this digging ability is not reflected in substantial changes in the locomotor system of subterranean octodontids, strongly suggesting that during the early evolution of these rodents, behavioral events have preceded and probably promoted subsequent morphological changes. In addition, among fossorial rodents two burrow strategies have been developed: with the incisors (chisel-tooth digging) or with the forelimbs (scratch-digging), while they can use both types or only one of them. The cranio-dental morphology of Tympanoctomys is not similar to that of those corresponding to chisel-tooth digging as the case of Spalacopus, subterranean octodontid (Vassallo and Verzi 2001; Bacigalupe et al. 2002; Verzi 2002; Olivares et al. 2004; Lessa et al. 2008; Becerra et al. 2012). Based on this idea, some authors have analyzed skeletal features in few related genera and members of the family, but including only one species of Tympanoctomys (T. barrerae), proposing novel functional inferences (Morgan and Verzi 2006; Lessa et al. 2008; Morgan 2009; Morgan and Verzi 2011; Morgan and Álvarez 2013).

However, studies of postcranial anatomy of this genus are insufficient. The objective of our research was to describe in detail the morphology of the forelimbs and hindlimbs of all species of the genus Tympanoctomys, mainly analyzing shape and size of some elements. Expecting to generate new data set that allow infer correlation between postcranial morphology and digging strategy.

Materials and methods

Sixty specimens of all the living species of the genus Tympanoctomys were examined: Tympanoctomys aureus (22), Tympanoctomys barrerae (35), Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum (2), and Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum (1). All with complete postcranial skeletons deposited in three argentine collections, CML (Colección Mamíferos Lillo; Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán), CNP (Colección de Mamíferos “Elio Massoia”, Centro Nacional Patagónico, Puerto Madryn, Chubut), and CMI (Colección de Mamíferos IADIZA, Mendoza). Also, four individuals of Ctenomys opimus were measured for comparisons with the species of Tympanoctomys. The specific localities and collection numbers of specimens are given in Appendix I.

The morphology of elements of the stylopodium and zeugopodium, excluding the autopodial elements, of the limbs was described considering form, size, and orientation. For a more comprehensive description, it was divided into A) forelimb: humerus, radius, and ulna; and B) hindlimb: femur, tibia, and fibula. The nomenclature for the anatomical description follows that of previous studies on different groups of mammals (Evans 1993; Argot 2001, 2002, 2003; Sargis 2001, 2002a, b; Horovitz and Sánchez-Villagra, 2003; Bezuidenhout and Evans 2005; Selthofer et al. 2006; Flores and Díaz 2009; Morgan and Verzi 2011). The anterior and posterior autopodium are not included because they are not complete or conserved in most analyzed specimens.

Based on the previous researches by Biknevicius (1993), Elissamburu and Vizcaíno (2004), Morgan and Verzi (2006), and Hopkins and Samuels (2009), eight measurements of the humerus, ulna, and femur (Fig. 1) corresponding to diameters and functional lengths (length among articular surfaces) of the bones and muscular insertion sites, were taken with digital calipers to the nearest 0.01 mm. Five indexes with functional significance, calculated from linear measurements were selected, based on a qualitative assessment and previous proposals (Bicknevicius et al. 1993; Fernández et al. 2000; Elissamburu and Vizcaíno 2004; Morgan and Verzi 2006). These indexes are: 1) Shoulder moment index (SMI): dlh/hl × 100, where dlh is the deltoid length of the humerus and hl is the functional length of the humerus; this index is an indication of the mechanical advantage of the deltoid and major pectoral muscles acting across the shoulder joint; 2) Epicondyle index (EI): deh/hl × 100, where deh is the epicondylar width of the humerus; this index is considered a good indicator of fossoriality; 3) Humeral robustness index (HWL): apdh/hl × 100, where apdh is the anteroposterior diameter of the humerus; it is a good indicator of general resistance of the bone; 4) Index of fossorial ability (IFA): ol/(ful-ol) × 100, ol is the length of the olecranon process and ful is the functional ulna length; this index gives a measure of the mechanical advantage of the triceps and dorsoepitrochlearis muscles in elbow extension, it is also a good indicator of fossoriality; 5) Femur robustness index (FRI): tdf/fl × 100, where tdf is the transverse diameter of the femur; this index gives an idea of capacity for supporting body mass and to withstand the vertical forces associated with speed increase.

Figure 1.

Measurements of the long bones. apdh, anteroposterior diameter of the humerus; deh, diameter of the epicondyles; dlh, deltoid length of the humerus; fl, functional femur length; hl, functional humerus length; ful, functional ulna length; ol, length of the olecranon process; tdf, transverse diameter of the femur.



Humerus. The diaphysis is robust with a cross-section angled in T. loschalchalerosorum and more cylindrical in the other species (Fig. 2). In all species of Tympanoctomys, the head is oval, elongated in the sagittal plane, and becomes narrower distally with a posterior extension forming a “peak” (Fig. 2). In T. loschalchalerosorum and T. barrerae, the greater and lesser tubercles are separated by a deep and narrow bicipital groove, which is shallower and broader in T. aureus and T. kirchnerorum. The greater tubercle is oval, has an irregular surface, posteriorly extended, and can be observed in caudal view, with a marked humeral lateral tuberosity. The lesser tubercle is oval and more extended toward the proximo-medial portion in T. loschalchalerosorum; furthermore, it is more developed in T. kirchnerorum than in the other species, and medially projected. In all analyzed species, the tubercles do not surpass the height of the humeral head (Fig. 2). In T. loschalchalerosorum and T. barrerae, a small foramen is located between the two tubercles.

Figure 2.

Left humerus, proximal, anterior, posterior, and distal views. A Tympanoctomys aureus B Tympanoctomys barrerae C Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum D Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum. bg, bicipital groove; dc, deltoid crest; gt, greater tuberosity; hh, humeral head; le, lateral epicondyle; lec, lateral epicondylar crest; lt, lesser tuberosity; me, medial epicondyle; sf, supratrochlear foramen. Scale bars 5 mm for all views except distal view where the scale bars are 1 mm.

The deltoid crest is located, in all species, in the proximal half portion of the diaphysis, it is well developed and greatly expanded laterally in T. loschalchalerosorum and T. barrerae, and ends as a pointed tip; whereas in T. aureus the distal tip is rounded and slightly extends laterally, it is more cranially oriented, similar to T. kirchnerorum. In the distal epiphysis, the capitulum is flattened, expanded, and separated from the trochlea by a well-marked groove. The trochlea is broader than the capitulum, is pulley-shaped, and its orientation with respect to the longitudinal axis of the humerus is straight in T. barrerae and oblique in the other species. The lateral epicondylar crest is well developed in T. loschalchalerosorum (Fig. 2C) in comparison to the other species, whereas the medial epicondyle is equal in size in all species. The supratrochlear foramen is observed in all specimens of all species analyzed (the greatest development was observed in T. aureus), except in specimens of T. barrerae in which it can be present or absent; when the foramen was completely ossified it was considered as absent. In T. loschalchalerosorum and T. kirchnerorum, the radial and olecranon fossa are shallow, whereas in T. aureus the radial fossa, and in T. barrerae the olecranon fossa, are the deepest. In all species analyzed, the entepicondylar foramen is absent and a notch on the articular surface with the radius is observed.

Radius and ulna. In T. loschalchalerosorum, T. barrerae, and T. kirchnerorum the diaphysis of the radius is somewhat cylindrical, with a flat side on the contact surface with the ulna, whereas in T. aureus it is more compressed (Figs 3, 4). In the proximal epiphysis, the central fossa of the radius is oval and concave in all species. The anterior edge of the proximal epiphysis (opposed surface to the articulation with the ulna) has a notch (Fig. 3) clearly evident in T. loschalchalerosorum and T. kirchnerorum, less evident in T. aureus, and almost imperceptible in T. barrerae. The articular fovea is well-marked and oval in all species, with a less concave surface in T. aureus and T. barrerae. The neck is well marked, more evident in T. kirchnerorum. The radial tuberosity is well developed in all species except in T. barrerae. The proximal portion of the diaphysis is slightly curved cranially, and the posterior proximal border is straight.

Figure 3.

Cranial and proximal views of the proximal portion of the right radio. A Tympanoctomys aureus B Tympanoctomys barrerae C Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum D Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum. cf, central fossa; h, head; n, notch. Scale bars 1mm.

In the ulna (Fig. 4), the olecranon is short, more robust in T. loschalchalerosorum (Fig. 4D) and thinner in T. kirchnerorum (Fig. 4C) than in the other species. The anconeal process is poorly developed and defined by two small crests: the ulnar lateral proximal trochlear crest (ulptc) and the ulnar medial proximal trochlear crest (umptc). The umptc varies among specimens of T. aureus; in the holotype (CML 6137) is similar to the other three species where the angle is not greater than 30°, while in the paratype (CML 4137) and other examined specimens from the CMI, this crest is markedly oblique at an angle of 45° with respect the body axis of the ulna. The trochlear notch is relatively open. The lateral coronoid process is well developed in T. barrerae and the holotype of T. aureus, less developed in T. loschalchalerosorum and T. kirchnerorum, and tiny in the paratypes and other specimens examined of T. aureus. The medial coronoid process protrudes anteriorly and is less developed in some specimens of T. aureus. The radial notch is wide and concave in all species; in T. loschalchalerosorum and T. barrerae is rounded and oblique, in T. aureus it is less oblique and in T. kirchnerorum it is almost horizontal (Fig. 4). The lateral fossa is deep in all species.

Figure 4.

Right ulna, proximal portion in cranial and distal views of radio and ulna. A Tympanoctomys aureus B Tympanoctomys barrerae C Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum D Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum. lcp, lateral coronoid process; mcp, medial coronoid process; ol, olecranon; r, radio distal surface; rn, radial notch; ul, ulnar distal surface; ulptc, ulnar lateral proximal trochlear crest; umptc, ulnar medial proximal trochlear crest. Scale bars 1 mm.

The distal epiphysis of the radius and ulna are here described for only two species (T. aureus and T. barrerae), because in other species these structures were broken and missing in the specimens examined. The medial styloid process of the radius is poorly developed in both species; the carpal surface is more concave and triangular in T. barrerae, whereas it is crescent-shaped in T. aureus. The medial styloid process of the ulna is well developed in both species, being proportionally longer in T. barrerae, and rounder in T. aureus (Fig. 4)

Femur. The femur is robust with a straight and cylindrical diaphysis. In the proximal epiphysis, the femoral head is spherical and dorso-medially oriented with a short neck (Fig. 5). The greater and lesser trochanters are well developed; the greater trochanter slightly extends dorsally above the head. The lesser trochanter is postero-medially oriented. The third trochanter is poorly developed in T. loschalchalerosorum, T. barrerae, and T. kirchnerorum, and more developed in T. aureus. In T. loschalchalerosorum the third trochanter lies in the middle of the diaphysis, whereas in T. barrerae, T. aureus, and T. kirchnerorum it is more proximally located. The trochanteric fossa is well developed in all species, but is deeper in T. aureus.

Figure 5.

Right femur, anterior, posterior, and distal views. A Tympanoctomys aureus B Tympanoctomys barrerae C Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum D Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum. fh, femoral head; gt, greater trochanter; if, intercondylar fossa; lc, lateral condyle; lt, lesser trochanter; mc, medial condyle; pg, patellar groove; tt, third trochanter. Scale bars 5 mm for all views except distal view where the scale bars are 1 mm.

In the distal epiphysis, the lateral condyle is slightly wider than the medial condyle, which is more distally projected. The intercondylar fossa is narrow and deep, being shallower in T. aureus and T. barrerae than the other two species. The patellar groove is narrow and bordered by two parallel ridges.

Tibia and fibula. In the analyzed specimens of T. loschalchalerosorum and T. kirchnerorum, the tibias were broken and distal epiphyses were missing, so that many of the characters could not be described (Figs 6, 7). In T. aureus and T. barrerae, the tibia is approximately 25% longer than the femur. The lateral and medial condyles are oval; in T. loschalchalerosorum, they are sub-equal in size (Fig. 7D), whereas in the other species the lateral condyle is slightly larger than the medial condyle. In T. loschalchalerosorum, the two condyles are slightly concave, and tend to be flattened; in T. barrerae and T. kirchnerorum the lateral condyle is slightly more concave than the medial, and in T. aureus the medial condyle is flatter than the lateral (Fig. 7). The lateral condyle is somewhat higher than the medial and has a caudal projection. In T. loschalchalerosorum and T. barrerae, the intercondylar area is narrow and concave with an evident groove; this intercondylar area is caudally wider in T. aureus, and wider and deeper in T. kirchnerorum. The popliteal notch is narrow with a well-marked fossa in T. loschalchalerosorum and T. barrerae, broad and shallower in T. aureus, and narrow and deeper in T. kirchnerorum. The tibial tuberosity is developed and anteriorly projected below the condyles. In T. loschalchalerosorum, the tibial crest is more strongly developed and antero-medially extended, than in the other species, and in T. barrerae the crest is located slightly closer to the proximal tip. A caudal crest, observed between the condyles and the popliteal notch, is well developed in T. loschalchalerosorum, less developed in T. barrerae and T. kirchnerorum, and absent in T. aureus.

Figure 6.

Caudal and distal views of the right tibia and fibula. A Tympanoctomys aureus B Tympanoctomys barrerae C Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum D Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum. Fi, fibula; lc, lateral condyle; mc, medial condyle; mm, medial malleolus; n, notch; pp, posterior process; Ti, tibia. Scale bars 5 mm for all views except distal view where the scale bars are 1 mm.

Figure 7.

Proximal view of the tibia. A Tympanoctomys aureus B Tympanoctomys barrerae C Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum D Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum. a, intercondylar area; lc, lateral condyle; mc, medial condyle; tt, tibial tuberosity. Scale bars 5mm.

In T. aureus, the two foveae on the distal epiphysis are oval, and the medial fovea is narrower and more concave than the lateral one (Fig. 6A). In T. barrerae (Fig. 6B), these foveae are more rounded and the medial is also deeper than the lateral, but not as much as in T. aureus. The ridge that divides the two foveae is well developed in T. aureus and less developed in T. barrerae. The medial malleolus is sub-quadrangular, short, and transversally wide in T. barrerae and slightly longer and sub-triangular in T. aureus. Distal edge of medial malleolus is more pointed in T. barrerae than T. aureus. In both species, the posterior process and the groove for tendon of flexor digitorum tibialis are evident; the posterior edge of the process is concave, but in T. barrerae a marked notch is observed (Fig. 6A, B).

The fibula (Fig. 6) shows the distal portion cylindrical and the proximal portion compressed. The head is fan-shaped. In the proximal union with the tibia, a well-developed foramen is observed. The lateral fibular malleolus is more rounded in T. barrerae than in the other species, whereas it is slightly elongated with an irregular surface in T. aureus.

Indexes. For each species, the results are indicated in Table 1. In the humerus, the averages for the genus are: SMI=42.65, EI=21.6, and HWL=8.76. Tympanoctomys aureus shows the highest values of SMI, HWL, and EI. Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum has the lowest SMI while T. loschalchalerosorum has the lowest HWL. For the ulna, IFA average is 11.56, values are the highest in T. aureus, followed by T. barrerae, T. kirchnerorum and T. loschalchalerosorum with the lowest. Finally, in the femur, for FRI the average is 10.03, with the lowest value in T. kirchnerorum and the highest in T. loschalchalerosorum. Additionally, these indexes were also calculated for C. opimus for comparisons with the semifossorial Tympanoctomys, and although it has the highest values in most of the indexes, it is worth noting the value of the epicondylar development (EI) of the humerus as well as the fossorial ability (IFA). This analysis is preliminary and aims to help in the description and comparison among species.

Mean, standard deviation, and number of specimens in brackets are indicated for each index and species.

T. aureus T. barrerae T. kirchnerorum T. loschalchalerosorum Ct. opimus
SMI 44.43
HWL 9.46
EI 22.54
IFA 15.71
FRI 9.66


Generally, most studies have been limited to one species of Tympanoctomys (T. barrerae) therefore there is almost no information about morphological change within species. This study provides a detailed description of the postcranial elements of the limbs of all species of the genus Tympanoctomys including the holotype of T. loschalchalerosorum, one of the only two known specimens of this species in the world, and the recently described T. kirchnerorum. As taxonomists know, using descriptions based on a single specimen is not the best protocol; nevertheless, it is useful in phylogenetic reconstructions. Because this unique material is not available in systematic collections and the animals are very rare in natural environments, the descriptions presented here represent the first qualitative approach for the species of the genus Tympanoctomys and for the genus as such. The information here would be useful for future comparisons with the rest of the octodontids.

The morphological differences among the species of the genus are still under revision. Therefore, here is the importance of including new evidence, such as postcranial characters in phylogenetic analysis. Mares et al. (2000), based on external and cranial morphology, suggested a greater affinity between T. loschalchalerosorum and T. aureus. However, when a fourth species (T. kirchnerorum) was included in the analysis, that was not previously considered, it might be expected that the relationship among species would be affected. These results show that T. loschalchalerosorum shares more attributes (e.g. bicipital groove of the humerus, intercondylar area, and popliteal notch of the tibia) with T. barrerae than with the other species. Furthermore, considering the remainder of the postcranial elements, T. aureus shows more affinity with T. kirchnerorum than with the other species (data unpublished and under analysis data from Pérez 2013).

On the other hand, the postcranial elements of the forelimbs and hind limbs of the four species of the genus show an anatomical plan related to the mode of terrestrial life, consistent with what was observed in other rodents and marsupials, for example the posterior extension of the humeral head forming a “peak”, the tubercles not surpassing the head, the separation between the trochlea and the capitulum, the flat or just concave articular surface of the radial notch in the ulna, the diaphysis of the radio curved, the extension of the greater trochanter above the femoral head, the posterior or posteromedial position of the third trochanter, and the asymmetry between the lateral and medial condyles, with the lateral wider (Hatt 1932; Sargis 2002a, b; Argot 2003; Candela and Picasso 2008; Flores and Díaz 2009; Olivares 2009; Carrizo and Díaz 2011). However, because the genus Tympanoctomys is semi-fossorial and scratch digging, characteristics in their long bones were expected which reflected their digging habit (Elissamburu and Vizcaíno 2004; Morgan and Verzi 2006; Samuels and Van Valkenburgh 2008, 2009; Salton and Sargis 2008; Hopkins and Davis 2009). Previous studies (e.g. Morgan and Verzi 2006; Lessa et al. 2008) indicate that Tympanoctomys as well as Octodon and Aconaemys are capable of building complex burrows, consisting in oblique tunnels that connect the surface with their nests, including several bifurcations and openings, but in T. aureus the tunnels are nearly parallel to the ground surface (M.M. Díaz and R.M. Barquez personal observations). Contrary to what were expected in semi-fossorial species, these rodents have slender humerus, radius and ulna; narrow epicondyles of the humerus and short olecranon of the ulna with poorly developed processes.

Almost all indexes analyzed in Tympanoctomys have values below those calculated in Ctenomys, except for the robustness of the femur where T. loschalchalerosorum shows a higher value. Moreover, the results for SMI, HWL, EI and IFA in T. aureus has higher values among Tympanoctomys. These scores and a lowest value for the robustness of the femur can be related with allometric changes in T. aureus, the largest species of the genus. Elissamburu and Vizcaíno, (2004) and Elissamburu and De Santis (2011) analyzed the morphometric variation in other caviomorph rodents to evaluate the fossorial forms in a functional context. Comparing our results, the loadings of the indexes in Tympanoctomys are more related to cursorial forms or occasional diggers, like Dolichotis or Microcavia. Although our analysis is preliminary and serves to quantify what is qualitatively described; in the future deeper studies will be performed including all octodontid taxa.

Lessa et al. (2008), who analyzed and compared certain muscle-skeletal characteristics of Octodontidae, concluded that neither Octomys nor Tympanoctomys (including only T. barrerae) shows great skeletal adaptations related with digging capacity. The octodontid and ctenomyid rodents, two closely related families, are included within the five extant families of rodents (Geomyidae, Ctenomyidae, Octodontidae, Bathyergidae, and Muridae, including Spalacinae and Rhizomyinae) in which the fossorial and subterranean habits have evolved independently, as a further specialization in close association with the emergence of open environments during mid to late Cenozoic (Lessa et al. 2008). This is especially interesting and encourages the development of studies to learn more the about behavioral and structural adaptations in these families of rodents. Some authors (Elissamburu and Vizcaíno 2004; Morgan and Verzi 2006; Elissamburu and De Santis 2011; Morgan and Álvarez 2013) have studied the adaptations of the forelimbs and hindlimbs, especially the digging capacity of Ctenomys, and concluded that the greater development of the medial epicondyle could be an early specialization and one of the main characters by which to recognize the digging fossorial forms. In Tympanoctomys, this feature is not observed; it can be related to the fact that this genus occurs in sandy soils then strong modifications of the limbs are not necessary.

Although these results are preliminary, data obtained in this study are consistent with observations made by other authors for other members of the family Octodontidae, and provide information for species that are poorly known or recently described. The family Octodontidae is highly specialized and adapted to living in desert habitats with a wide range of habits in just a few genera, so it is expected that the limbs have modified structures for that purpose. According to our descriptions, there are not too many intrageneric morphological variations regarding to the configuration of the limbs, probably due to phylogenetic proximity, and not related to specific variations in response to different use of substrates or habits. With regard to ecological aspects, just one species (T. barrerae) is well known about their burrow system, which is considered as an intermediate level of complexity compared with Ctenomys (see Lessa et al. 2008), and something similar was observed by two of the authors (RMB and MMD) in T. aureus; nothing is known for the other two species.

Some authors (Upham and Patterson 2012, 2015; Suárez-Villota et al. 2016), through molecular studies, suggested to maintain the four species under the same genus. But Suárez-Villota et al. (2016), in their analysis, do not recognize T. loschalchalerosorum as a valid taxon but included within the diversity of T. barrerae. As mentioned above, T. loschalchalerosorum and T. barrerae share several characteristics, but also similarities are observed between T. aureus and T. kirchnerorum (e.g, shape and orientation of the deltoid crest in the humerus) and T. aureus and T. barrerae (e.g. depth of intercondylar fossa of the femur). We are currently studying the rest of the postcranial morphology in Tympanoctomys like in the other members of the family Octodontidae, in order to understand their evolution in relation to the huge eco-morphological diversity and their origin and time of diversification. Following these proposal, it would be interesting to include information of postcranial morphology as new evidence in comprehensive phylogenetic analysis with all the octodontid members.


We thank M. Fernanda López Berrizbeitia for her assistance with the change by Colección Mamíferos Lillo–Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Ulyses Pardiñas (Centro Nacional Patagónico, Puerto Madryn, Chubut) and Benjamín Bender (IADIZA, Mendoza) for allowing access to the collections. Thanks also to Dr. Emily Oaks who improved the English of the manuscript. This study was founded through a scholarship from CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas).


  • Álvarez A, Moyers Arévalo RL, Verzi DH (2017) Diversification patterns and size evolution in caviomorph rodents. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 121(4) 907–922.
  • Argot C (2001) Functional-Adaptive anatomy of the forelimb in the Didelphidae, and the paleobiology of the Paleocene Marsupials Mayulestes ferox and Pucadelphys andinus. Journal of Morphology 247: 51–79.
  • Argot C (2002) Functional-Adaptive analysis of the hindlimb anatomy of extant Marsupials and Paleobiology of the Paleocene Marsupials Mayulestes ferox and Pucadelphys andinus. Journal of Morphology 253: 76–108.
  • Argot C (2003) Functional-adaptative anatomy of the axial skeleton of some extant marsupials and the paleobiology of the Paleocene marsupials Mayulestes ferox and Pucadelphys andinus. Journal of Morphology 255: 279–300.
  • Barquez R, Flores DA, Díaz MM, Giannini NP, Verzi DH (2002) Análisis filogenético preliminar de los octodóntinos vivientes basado en caracteres morfológicos. Abstract, XVII Jornadas Argentinas de Mastozoología. Mar del Plata, Argentina.
  • Becerra F, Vassallo AI, Echeverría A, Casinos A (2012) Scaling and adaptations of incisors and cheek ceeth in caviomorph rodents (Rodentia, Hystricognathi). Journal of morphology 73: 1150–1162.
  • Bezuidenhout AJ, Evans HE (2005) Anatomy of woodchuck (Marmota monax). Special publicación Nº13. American Society of Mammalogists.
  • Bozinovic F, Contreras LC (1990) Basal rate of metabolism and temperature regulation of two desert herbivorous rodents: Octomys mimax and Tympanoctomys barrerae. Oecologia 84: 567–570.
  • Candela A, Picasso MBJ (2008) Functional anatomy of the limbs of Erethizontidae (Rodentia, Caviomorpha): Indicators of locomotor behavior in Miocene porcupines. Journal of morphology 269: 552–593.
  • Díaz MM, Verzi DH (2006) Familia Octodontidae. In: Barquez RM, Díaz MM, Ojeda RA (Eds) Mamíferos de Argentina Sistemática y Distribución. Mendoza: SAREM (Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos), 231–236.
  • Díaz MM, Barquez RM, Verzi DH (2015) Genus Tympanoctomys. In: Patton JL, Pardiñas UFJ, D'Elía G (Eds) Mammals of South America, Volume 2, Rodents. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, lL., 1043–1048.
  • Eisenberg JF (1981) The mammalian radiations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Elissamburu A, De Santis L (2011) Forelimb proportions and fossorial adaptations in the scratch-digging rodent Ctenomys (Caviomorpha). Journal of Mammalogy 92(3): 683–689.
  • Evans HE (1993) Miller’s Anatomy of the dog, 3rd edition. W.B. Saunders Company.
  • Flores DA, Díaz MM (2009) Postcranial skeleton of Glironia venusta (Didelphimorpha, Didelphidae, Caluromyinae): Description and functional morphology. Zoosystematics and Evolution 85(2): 311–339.
  • Gallardo MH, Bickham JW, Honeycutt RL, Ojeda RA, Köhler N (1999) Discovery of tetraploidy in a mammal. Nature 401: 341.
  • Gallardo MH, Kausel G, Jiménez A, Bacquet C, González C, Figueroa J, Köhler N, Ojeda RA (2004) Whole genome duplications in South American desert rodents (Octodontidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 443–451.
  • Gallardo MH, Suárez-Villota YE, Nuñez JJ, Vargas RA, Haro R, Köhler N (2013) Phylogenetic analysis and phylogeography of the tetraploid rodent Tympanoctomys barrerae (Octodontidae): insights on its origin and the impact of Quaternary climate changes on population dynamics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 108: 453–469.
  • Gallardo MH, Udrizar Sauthier DE, Ojeda AA, Pardiñas UFJ (2009) Discovery of desert-adapt in Central Patagonia, Argentina. Mammalia 73: 158–161.
  • Hatt RT (1932) The vertebral columns of ricochetal rodents. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 63: 599–738.
  • Honeycutt RL, Rowe DL, Gallardo MH (2003) Molecular systematics of the South American caviomorph rodents: relationships among species and genera in the family Octodontidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26: 476–489.
  • Lessa EP, Vasallo AI, Verzi DH, Mora MS (2008) Evolution of morphological adaptations for digging in living and extinct ctenomyid and octodontid rodents. The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95: 267–283.
  • Mares MA (1975) South American mammal zoogeography: evidence from convergent evolution in desert rodents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 72: 1702–1706.
  • Mares MA, Braun JK, Barquez RM, Díaz MM (2000) Two new genera and species of halophytic desert mammals from isolated Salt Flats in Argentina. Occasional Papers, Museum Texas Tech University 203: 1–27.
  • Morgan CC (2009) Geometric morphometrics of the scapula of South American caviomorph rodents (Rodentia: Hystricognathi): Form, function and phylogeny. Mammalian Biology 74: 497–506.
  • Morgan CC, Álvarez A (2013) The humerus of South American caviomorph rodents: shape, function and size in a phylogenetic context. Journal of Zoology 290(2): 107–116.
  • Morgan CC, Verzi DH (2006) Morphological diversity of the humerus of the South American subterranean rodent Ctenomys (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae). Journal of Mammalogy 87: 1252–1260.
  • Ojeda AA (2010) Phylogeography and genetic variation in the South American rodent, Tympanoctomys barrerae (Rodentia: Octodontidae). Journal of Mammalogy 91: 302–313.
  • Ojeda RA, Gonnet JM, Borghi CE, Giannoni SM, Campos CM, Diaz GB (1996) Ecological observations of the red vizcacha rat, Tympanoctomys barrerae in desert habitats of Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical 3: 183–191.
  • Ojeda AA, Novillo A, Ojeda RA, Roig-Juñent S (2013) Geographical distribution and ecological diversification of South American octodontid rodents. Journal of Zoology 289: 285–293.
  • Olivares AI (2009) Anatomía, sistemática y evolución de los roedores caviomorfos sudamericanos del grupo Eumysops ameghino (Rodentia, Echimyidae). PhD thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo Universidad Nacional de la Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires.
  • Olivares AI, Verzi DH, Vassallo AI (2004) Masticatory morphological diversity and chewing modes in South American caviomorph rodents (family Octodontidae). Journal of Zoology 263: 167–177.
  • Pérez MJ (2013) Descripción del postcráneo de Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum y una comparación intragenérica (Rodentia: Octodontidae). Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina.
  • Reig O (1989) Karyotypic repatterning as one triggering factor in cases of explosive speciation. In: Fontdevila A (Ed.) Evolutionary biology of transient unstable populations. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 246–289.
  • Salton JA, Sargis EJ (2008) Evolutionary Morphology of the Tenrecoidea (Mammalia) Forelimb Skeleton. In: Sargis EJ, Dagosto M (Eds) Mammalian Evolutionary Morphology. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Netherlands, 51–71.
  • Samuels J, Van Valkenburgh B (2008) Skeletal Indicators of Locomotor Adaptations in Living and Extinct Rodents. Journal of Morphology 269: 1387–1411.
  • Sargis EJ (2001) The grasping behaviour, locomotion and substrate use of the tree shrews Tupaia minor and T. tana (Mammalia, Scandentia). Journal of Zoology, London 253: 485–490.
  • Sargis EJ (2002a) Functional morphology of the forelimb of tupaiids (Mammalia, Scandentia) and its phylogenetic implications. Journal of Morphology 253: 10–42.
  • Sargis EJ (2002b) Functional morphology of the hindlimb of tupaiids (Mammalia, Scandentia) and its phylogenetic implications. Journal of Morphology 254: 149–185.
  • Suárez-Villota EI, González-Wevar CA, Gallardo MH, Vásquez RA, Poulin E (2016) Filling phylogenetic gaps and the biogeographic relationships of the Octodontidae (Mammalia: Hystricognathi). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 105: 96–101.
  • Selthofer R, Nikolié V, Mrčela T, Radié R, Lekšan I, Rudež I, Selthofer K (2006) Morphometric Analysis of the Sternum. Collegium Antropologicum 30(1): 43–47.
  • Teta P, Pardiñas UFJ, Udrizar Sauthier DE, Gallardo MH (2014) A new species of the tetraploid vizcacha rat Tympanoctomys (Caviomorpha, Octodontidae) from Central Patagonia, Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 95: 60–71.
  • Upham NS, Patterson BD (2012) Diversification and biogeography of the Neotropical caviomorph lineage Octodontoidea (Rodentia: Hystricognathi). Molecular and Phylogenetics Evolution 63: 417–429.
  • Upham NS, Patterson BD (2015) Evolution of caviomorph rodents: a complete phylogeny and timetree. In: Vassallo AI, Antenucci D (Eds) Biology of caviomorph rodents: diversity and evolution. SAREM, series A, Buenos Aires, 63–120.
  • Vassallo AI, Verzi DH (2001) Patrones craneanos y modalidades de masticación en roedores caviomorfos. Boletín de la Sociedad de Biología de Concepción 72: 139–145.
  • Verzi DH (2002) Patrones de evolución morfológica en Ctenomyinae (Rodentia, Octodontidae). Mastozoología neotropical 9(2): 309–328.
  • Verzi DH, Díaz MM, Barquez RM (2015) Family Octodontidae. In: Patton JL, Pardiñas UFJ, D'Elía G (Eds) Mammals of South America. Volume 2, Rodents.University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1023–1024.
  • Verzi DH, Olivares AI, Morgan CC, Álvarez A (2016) Contrasting phylogenetic and diversity patterns in octodontoid rodents and a new definition of the family Abrocomidae. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 23: 93–115.


List of specimens analyzed detailing the number of individuals by species in brackets, collection localities, type specimens, and collection numbers are indicated. See materials and methods by collections acronyms.

Ctenomys opimus (4): Jujuy Province, Susques Department: Borde de Ecalón, 31 km al SO de Susques, por ruta 52 y 1 km SE de ruta, 1 (CML 9353). Salta Province, Los Andes Department: Vega Cortadera 1 km W de ruta 53, 3910 m, 2 (CML 7243, 7244); 36 km N San Antonio de Los Cobres, 11,600 ft., 1 (CML 8438).

Tympanoctomys aureus (22): Catamarca Province, Pomán Department: Salar de Pipanaco, 10 km de Pío Brizuela (Est. Río Blanco), km 96 sobre R46, 35 km S de Andalgalá, 3 (CMI 6565, 6818, 6888); en los bordes del Salar Pipanaco, 3 (CMI 6562, 6563, 6564); 5 km del puesto de Pío Brizuela, entrada km 96 sobre R46, 2 (CMI 7188, 7189); a 13 km de la entrada Establecimiento Río Blanco, 4 (CMI 6558, 6559, 6560, 6561); Establecimiento Río Blanco, 28 km S, 9.3 km W Andalgalá, 4 (CML 6137, holotype; 4136, 4137, paratypes; 10110); Pipanaco, Salar Pipanaco, 6 (CMI 6846, 6848, 6849, 6850, 6851, 6856).

Tympanoctomys barrerae (35): La Pampa Province, Limay Mahuida Department: Gran salitral, 6 (CMI 6877, 6878, 6879, 6880, 6882, 6883). Mendoza Province, La Paz Department: 27 km N Desaguadero, 556 m app, 2(CMI 4485, CML 3438), Desaguadero, El Tapón 37 km, 1 (CMI 3314); Lavalle Department: 34 km al N de Desagüadero camino a Arroyito, 1 (CML 10111); Malargüe Department, 6(CMI 7263, 7264, 7266, 7267, 7268, 7269), a 8.5 km camino a Llancanelo, 1(CMI 7098), Camino Llancanelo 7(CMI 7270, 7271, 7272, 7273, 7274, 7275, 7276), Laguna Llancanelo, 2(CMI 7248, 7250); San Rafael Department: 10 km S El Nihuil 2 (CMI 3845, 3846), El Nihuil, 2 (CMI 6290, 6291). San Juan Province, Valle Fértil Department: Parque Provincial Ischigualasto, 4 (CMI 6842, 6843, 6853, 6889). San Luis Province, 1 (CMI 3821).

Tympanoctomys loschalchalerosorum (1): La Rioja Province, Chamical Department: 26 km SW Quimilo, 1 (CML 3695, holotype).

Tympanoctomys kirchnerorum (2): Chubut Province, Sarmiento Department: Ea. La Porfía, 2 (CNP 2503, 2505).