Research Article
Print
Research Article
A new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Squamata, Gekkonidae) from Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve, China
expand article infoShuo Liu, Zhimin Li§, Wenguang Duan§, Mian Hou|, Dingqi Rao
‡ Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China
§ Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve Management and Protection Bureau, Cangyuan, China
| Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China
Open Access

Abstract

A new forest-dwelling species of the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group is described from southwestern Yunnan Province, China. Phylogenetically, it was recovered as the sister species of C. zhenkangensis, with a genetic distance of 9.2% in the ND2 gene. Morphologically, the new species can be separated from C. zhenkangensis by the discontinuity of enlarged femoral scales and enlarged precloacal scales, the absence of femoral pores, and the difference in dorsal color pattern. In addition, although the new species and C. zhenkangensis are distributed relatively close, their habitats are clearly different. Cyrtodactylus zhenkangensis inhabits karst limestone, while the new species inhabits forest. The new species is the 29th species of the C. chauquangensis group and the third forest-dwelling species of this group.

Key words

Bent-toed gecko, Cangyuan, Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group, mitochondrial DNA, systematics, taxonomy

Introduction

The species diversity of the genus Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 had previously been severely underestimated, but currently the number of species in this genus has been rapidly increasing, and the number of species is now over 350 (Uetz et al. 2024). In China, only two species of this genus were recorded before 2010 (Zhao et al. 1999, 2000), namely C. khasiensis (Jerdon, 1870) from Yunnan Province and C. tibetanus (Boulenger, 1905) from Xizang Autonomous Region. Subsequently, C. zhaoermii Shi & Zhao, 2010 was described from Xizang, and C. wayakonei Nguyen, Kingsada, Rösler, Auer & Ziegler, 2010 was reported from Yunnan (Yuan and Rao 2011). Later, C. khasiensis was removed from the herpetofauna of China, and C. khasiensis cayuensis Li, 2007 was elevated to the level of species (Agarwal et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2020). Soon after, C. dianxiensis Liu & Rao, 2021, C. zhenkangensis Liu & Rao, 2021, C. gulinqingensis Liu, Li, Hou, Orlov & Ananjeva, 2021, C. hekouensis Zhang, Liu, Bernstein, Wang & Yuan, 2021, and C. menglianensis Liu & Rao, 2022 were described from Yunnan, and C. arunachalensis Mirza, Bhosale, Ansari, Phansalkar, Sawant, Gowete & Patel, 2021 and C. kamengensis Mirza, Bhosale, Thackeray, Phansalkar, Sawant, Gowande & Patel, 2022 were described from near the border between China and India. Recently, C. caixitaoi Liu, Rao, Hou, Wang & Ananjeva, 2023 was described from Yunnan, C. wayakonei was removed from the herpetofauna of China (Liu et al. 2023), C. hekouensis was treated as a junior synonym of C. gulinqingensis (Zhang et al. 2024), and C. laevis Ma, Wang & Jiang, 2024 was described from Xizang. So far, 11 species of this genus have been recorded in China, including six species from Xizang and five species from Yunnan (Ma et al. 2024).

Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve is located in southwestern Yunnan Province, China. This nature reserve has a total area of 508.87 km2, with the lowest and highest elevations at 510 m and 2,977 m, respectively. There are numerous high mountains and valleys and many rivers and streams, as well as multiple vegetation types, such as rainforest and seasonal rainforest, in this nature reserve. Its main protected species are rare and endangered wild animals such as elephants, tigers, gibbons, and monkeys (Yang and Du 2004; Tang et al. 2015).

During our fieldwork in southwestern Yunnan, China, in 2024, two specimens of Cyrtodactylus were collected in Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve. Both morphological and phylogenetic analyses support the recognition of the two specimens as belonging to an unnamed species of the C. chauquangensis group. Therefore, we describe them as a new species below.

Materials and methods

Sampling

The field survey in Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve was conducted under the permit from Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve Management and Protection Bureau. Specimens were collected by hand at night and photographed alive prior to preservation. Liver tissues were dissected and preserved in analytical pure ethanol. The specimens were stored in 75% ethanol and deposited at Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KIZ).

Morphological analyses

Measurements were taken with digital calipers to the nearest 0.1 mm. Bilateral scale counts are given as left/right. The methodology of measurements and meristic counts is the same as those in Liu et al. (2023):

AG axilla to groin distance, measured from the posterior margin of the forelimb insertion to the anterior margin of the hindlimb insertion;

DTR dorsal tubercle rows, the number of dorsal, longitudinal rows of the tubercles at midbody between ventrolateral folds;

ED ear diameter, the greatest diameter of ear opening;

EE eye to ear distance, measured from the posterior edge of the orbit to the anterior edge of the ear opening;

EFS enlarged femoral scales, the number of the enlarged femoral scales beneath each thigh;

ForeaL forearm length, measured from the tip of the elbow to the wrist;

FP femoral pores;

GSDT granular scales surrounding dorsal midbody tubercles;

HH maximum head height;

HL head length, measured from the tip of the snout to the posterior margin of the retroarticular process of the lower jaw;

HW maximum head width;

I internasals, the number of the scales between the two supranasals;

IFL infralabials, counted from the first labial scale to the corner of the mouth;

IND internarial distance, the distance between nares;

IOD interorbital distance, measured across the narrowest point of the frontal bone;

LF4 subdigital lamellae under the fourth finger, counted from the base of the digit where it contacts the body of the hand to the base of the claw, including the claw sheath;

LT4 subdigital lamellae under the fourth toe, counted from the base of the digit where it contacts the body of the foot to the base of the claw, including the claw sheath;

ML mental length, the maximum length of the mental;

MW mental width, the maximum width of the mental;

OD greatest diameter of orbit;

PAT postcloacal tubercles, the number of the tubercles on each side of the postcloacal region;

PM postmentals, the number of the scales bordering the mental shield, excluding infralabials;

PP precloacal pores;

PVT paravertebral tubercles, counted in a single paravertebral row from the level of the forelimb insertions to the level of the hind limb insertion;

RH rostral height, the maximum height of the rostral;

RW rostral width, the maximum width of the rostral;

SE snout to eye distance, measured from the tip of the snout to the anterior edge of the orbit;

SL shank length, measured from the base of the heel to the knee;

SPL supralabials, counted from the first labial scale to the corner of the mouth;

SVL snout–vent length, measured from the tip of the snout to the anterior margin of the cloaca;

TaL tail length, measured from the posterior margin of the cloaca to the tip of the tail;

V ventral scale rows, the number of longitudinal rows of ventral scales at midbody between ventrolateral folds.

Morphological comparisons were based on the original descriptions of each species of the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group (Hoang et al. 2007; Bauer et al. 2009, 2010; Ngo and Grismer 2010; Nguyen et al. 2010, 2014, 2015, 2017; Sumontha et al. 2010; Luu et al. 2011; Ngo 2011; Ngo and Chan 2011; Kunya et al. 2014; Nazarov et al. 2014; Pauwels et al. 2014; Schneider et al. 2014, 2020; Le et al. 2016; Pham et al. 2019; Liu and Rao 2021, 2022; Liu et al. 2021, 2023; Chomdej et al. 2022; Grismer et al. 2024; Tran et al. 2024).

Molecular analyses

Total genomic DNA was extracted from liver tissue samples. A fragment of the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) gene was amplified and sequenced using the primers L4437b (5′-AAGCAGTTGGGCCCATACC-3′) and H5540 (5′- TTTAGGGCTTTGAAGGC -3′) (Macey et al. 2000) for the two newly collected specimens. Sequences were assembled and edited using SeqMan in Lasergene 7.1 (Burland 2000) and MEGA 11 (Tamura et al. 2021). New sequences have been deposited on GenBank and available sequences of the C. chauquangensis group were obtained from GenBank (Table 1). Cyrtodactylus dammathetensis Grismer, Wood, Thura, Zin, Quah, Murdoch, Grismer, Lin, Kyaw & Lwin, 2017 and C. sinyineensis Grismer, Wood, Thura, Zin, Quah, Murdoch, Grismer, Lin, Kyaw & Lwin, 2017 were used as outgroups following Grismer et al. (2024).

Table 1.

Sequences (ND2) used in the phylogenetic analysis of this study.

Species Locality Catalog number Accession number
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. China, Yunnan, Lincang, Cangyuan KIZ 2024083 PQ670135
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. China, Yunnan, Lincang, Cangyuan KIZ 2024084 PQ670136
Cyrtodactylus auribalteatus Thailand, Phitsanulok, Noen Maprang AUP-01745 MZ439914
Cyrtodactylus bichnganae Vietnam, Son La, Son La Urban UNS 0473 MF169953
Cyrtodactylus bobrovi Vietnam, Hoa Binh, Lac Son IEBR A.2015.29 MT953471
Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis Vietnam, Nghe An, Quy Hop NA 2016.1 MT953475
Cyrtodactylus cucphuongensis Vietnam, Ninh Binh, Cuc Phuong NP CP 17.02 MT953477
Cyrtodactylus doisuthep Thailand, Chiang Mai, Doi Suthep AUP-00777 MT497801
Cyrtodactylus dumnuii Thailand, Chiang Mai, Chiang Dao AUP-00769 MT497802
Cyrtodactylus dumnuii Thailand, Chiang Mai, Chiang Dao AUP-00770 MT497803
Cyrtodactylus dumnuii Thailand, Chiang Mai, Chiang Dao AUP 00768 MW713972
Cyrtodactylus erythrops Thailand, Mae Hong Son, Pang Mapha AUP-00771 MT497806
Cyrtodactylus gulinqingensis China, Yunnan, Maguan, Gulinqing KIZ 061813 MZ782150
Cyrtodactylus houaphanensis Laos, Luang Houaphan IEBR A.2013.109 MW792067
Cyrtodactylus huongsonensis Vietnam, Ha Noi, My Duc, Huong Son IEBR A.2011.3A MT953481
Cyrtodactylus kunyai Thailand, Loei, Nong Hin AUP-01747 MZ439916
Cyrtodactylus luci Vietnam, Lao Cai, Bac Ha IEBR R.5240 PP253960
Cyrtodactylus menglianensis China, Yunnan, Puer, Menglian KIZ 20210713 OM296042
Cyrtodactylus menglianensis China, Yunnan, Puer, Menglian KIZ 20210714 OM296043
Cyrtodactylus menglianensis China, Yunnan, Puer, Menglian KIZ 20210716 OM296044
Cyrtodactylus ngoiensis Laos, Luang Prabang, Ngoi IEBR A.2013.110 MW792066
Cyrtodactylus otai Vietnam, Son La, Van Ho, Na Bai TBU 2017.2 MT953486
Cyrtodactylus phamiensis Thailand, Chiang Rai, Mae Sai, Pha Mi ZMKU R 01074 PP430583
Cyrtodactylus phukhaensis Thailand, Nan, Pua, Doi Phu Kha AUP-01823 MZ439912
Cyrtodactylus phukhaensis Thailand, Nan, Pua, Doi Phu Kha AUP-01824 MZ439913
Cyrtodactylus puhuensis Vietnam, Thanh Hoa ND 01.15 MT953489
Cyrtodactylus solaensis Vietnam, Son La, Phu Yen IEBR A.2017.1 MT953492
Cyrtodactylus soni Vietnam, Ninh Binh, Gia Vien IEBR R.2016.4 MT953491
Cyrtodactylus spelaeus Laos, Vientiane, Kasi HLM 0315 MW713962
Cyrtodactylus taybacensis Vietnam, Son La, Quyun Nhai, Ca Nang IEBR 4379 MT953495
Cyrtodactylus vilaphongi Laos, Luang Prabang, Luang Prabang IEBR A.2013.103 MT953497
Cyrtodactylus wayakonei Laos, Luang Nam Tha, Vieng Phoukha ZFMK 91016 MT953498
Cyrtodactylus zhenkangensis China, Yunnan, Lincang, Zhenkang KIZ L2020047 MW792062
Cyrtodactylus zhenkangensis China, Yunnan, Lincang, Zhenkang KIZ L2020048 PQ670137
Cyrtodactylus dammathetensis Myanmar, Mon State, Mawlamyine LSUHC:12863 MF872277
Cyrtodactylus sinyineensis Myanmar, Kayin State, Hpa-an LSUHC:12836 MF872355

Sequences were aligned using MAFFT 7.471 (Katoh and Standley 2013) with default parameters. The best-fit substitution models (GTR+F+I+G4 for the first and second codon positions and the tRNAs, and GTR+F+G4 for the third codon position) were chosen using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) in ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). The technical computation methods for genetic divergences calculation and Bayesian-inference and maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analyses were the same as those used by Liu and Rao (2022).

Results

The phylogenetic topologies of Bayesian-inference and maximum-likelihood analysis were identical. The sequences of the newly collected specimens were nested within the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group and formed a strongly supported lineage sister to C. zhenkangensis (Fig. 1). The genetic distance between the sequences of the newly collected specimens and the sequences of C. zhenkangensis was 9.2%, and the genetic distances between the sequences of the newly collected specimens and the sequences of other named species of this group ranged from 11.4% to 18.3% (Table 2).

Figure 1. 

Bayesian phylogram of the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group based on the ND2 sequences. Numbers before slashes indicate Bayesian posterior probabilities and numbers after slashes indicate maximum-likelihood ultrafast bootstrap. The symbol “–” represents the value below 0.90/90.

Table 2.

Uncorrected pairwise genetic distances (%) among species of the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group based on the ND2 sequences.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1 Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov.
2 Cyrtodactylus auribalteatus 14.6
3 Cyrtodactylus bichnganae 18.3 18.0
4 Cyrtodactylus bobrovi 16.3 15.0 19.7
5 Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis 15.7 14.4 18.1 8.6
6 Cyrtodactylus cucphuongensis 16.8 15.7 19.9 7.9 8.5
7 Cyrtodactylus doisuthep 16.8 14.1 16.4 15.4 14.2 15.2
8 Cyrtodactylus dumnuii 13.6 13.3 16.9 13.7 12.2 14.2 14.0
9 Cyrtodactylus erythrops 15.9 14.7 16.7 14.8 13.7 15.1 10.9 13.7
10 Cyrtodactylus gulinqingensis 15.7 14.5 18.1 13.7 14.0 14.0 13.6 12.9 14.1
11 Cyrtodactylus houaphanensis 16.3 15.6 19.4 6.5 9.0 7.5 15.1 14.2 15.1 14.0
12 Cyrtodactylus huongsonensis 15.3 14.5 17.7 14.3 12.2 14.3 14.6 14.0 14.4 12.4 14.8
13 Cyrtodactylus kunyai 16.5 12.5 17.8 15.5 14.4 17.1 14.9 13.8 15.7 14.4 16.3 14.7
14 Cyrtodactylus luci 16.5 13.9 18.1 14.2 14.2 14.6 13.9 13.3 15.1 9.1 14.4 12.4 14.2
15 Cyrtodactylus menglianensis 11.5 12.6 18.4 14.9 12.7 15.0 15.1 11.4 14.4 14.3 14.7 14.4 15.0 14.0
16 Cyrtodactylus ngoiensis 15.4 13.8 18.2 11.2 10.3 10.8 14.8 12.0 14.5 13.1 11.4 13.1 13.8 13.4 13.1
17 Cyrtodactylus otai 15.9 14.1 19.1 3.6 9.1 8.4 16.2 15.6 16.4 15.6 6.8 14.7 15.5 14.8 15.2 12.2
18 Cyrtodactylus phamiensis 17.0 16.0 16.4 16.0 14.8 16.4 14.1 14.9 15.1 15.6 16.0 14.4 16.2 17.0 16.0 15.5 16.9
19 Cyrtodactylus phukhaensis 11.4 12.6 17.5 14.6 12.1 14.4 14.9 11.9 14.1 14.0 14.5 13.8 14.1 14.4 7.0 11.2 15.4 15.1
20 Cyrtodactylus puhuensis 15.4 14.3 18.9 5.7 8.0 7.1 14.4 12.8 14.3 13.5 2.8 13.9 14.9 14.2 14.1 10.5 6.2 15.4 13.7
21 Cyrtodactylus solaensis 16.9 16.5 19.4 17.5 16.9 18.2 16.4 16.7 17.3 14.8 18.0 15.0 16.2 15.9 17.3 16.2 17.7 18.3 16.2 18.0
22 Cyrtodactylus soni 15.5 14.0 18.2 14.6 13.3 14.7 13.9 13.4 14.1 13.4 15.4 7.3 14.1 12.7 14.0 14.3 14.7 14.5 14.0 14.4 15.3
23 Cyrtodactylus spelaeus 16.0 15.5 18.3 10.1 9.3 10.5 15.1 13.5 15.2 13.8 10.5 14.3 15.0 14.5 14.6 11.1 11.3 16.1 13.9 9.1 17.7 14.6
24 Cyrtodactylus taybacensis 17.9 17.4 9.3 16.6 15.6 16.8 15.4 14.8 16.4 16.0 17.0 15.8 17.2 15.6 16.6 16.4 18.3 16.8 16.8 16.3 18.9 15.6 16.1
25 Cyrtodactylus vilaphongi 16.0 13.8 17.8 8.1 7.3 8.2 14.1 13.2 14.2 13.4 8.2 14.2 14.5 14.4 14.0 9.4 9.1 15.0 13.8 7.0 16.9 13.7 9.6 16.3
26 Cyrtodactylus wayakonei 12.1 13.5 18.0 15.5 13.1 15.5 16.2 12.5 15.6 15.3 14.7 15.1 14.2 15.9 7.2 12.2 15.4 15.5 5.0 14.2 16.5 14.0 15.2 17.5 13.7
27 Cyrtodactylus zhenkangensis 9.2 12.8 18.3 14.3 13.2 13.8 14.9 11.8 14.3 12.9 14.0 13.2 15.1 12.9 10.7 13.3 15.5 15.7 10.2 13.3 17.3 13.9 14.1 15.3 13.7 11.9

Taxonomy

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov.

Figs 2, 3, 4, 5, 7

Type material

Holotype. China • ♂; Yunnan, Cangyuan; 23°13'19"N, 99°1'2"E; 950 m; 17 Aug. 2024; Shuo Liu leg.; KIZ 2024083. Paratype. China • ♀; same locality; 24 Aug. 2024; Shuo Liu leg.; KIZ 2024084.

Diagnosis

Body size relatively large (SVL 89.5–97.0 mm); tail long (TaL/SVL 1.07–1.14); head relatively long (HL/SVL 0.27–0.28), moderately widened (HW/HL 0.67–0.68); snout long (SE/HL 0.40); body slender (AG/SVL 0.43–0.44); 16–18 longitudinal rows of dorsal tubercles at midbody, 25–27 paravertebral tubercles; ventrolateral fold distinct, interspersed with tubercles; 29–31 longitudinal ventral scale rows at midbody; eight precloacal pores separated by one poreless scale in male; precloacal pores absent, three indistinct shallow pits on enlarged precloacal scales in female; 7–8 slightly enlarged femoral scales beneath each thigh in male, four slightly enlarged femoral scales beneath each thigh in female; enlarged femoral scales separated from enlarged precloacal scales by some smaller scales; femoral pores absent in both sexes; 3–4 shallow pits on enlarged femoral scales on each side in male, absent in female; 1–2 postcloacal tubercles on each side; 19–22 lamellae under finger IV, 24–25 lamellae under toe IV; two rows of subcaudals enlarged; dorsal ground color brownish-black; distinct reticulated pattern composed of thin, light-yellow stripes on dorsal head; six irregular, narrow, light-yellow, transverse bands on dorsum; 6–7 light bands on dorsal tail.

Figure 2. 

Type specimens of Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. in preservative A dorsal view B ventral view.

Description of holotype

Adult male, SVL 89.5 mm; head clearly distinguished from neck, relatively long (HL/SVL 0.28), moderately widened (HW/HL 0.67), depressed (HH/HL 0.44); nare oval, surrounded by supranasal dorsally, rostral anteriorly, first supralabial ventrally, and two postnasals posteriorly; snout long (SE/HL 0.40), round anteriorly, longer than diameter of orbit (SE/OD 1.29); snout scales much larger than those in frontal and parietal regions; eye large (OD/HL 0.31), pupils vertical; upper eyelid fringe with spinous scales; ear opening oval, much small in size (ED/HL 0.05); rostral large (RW/HL 0.17), wider than high (RW/RH 1.54), medially divided dorsally by a suture, reaching to approximately half down rostral, in contact with first supralabial laterally on each side and two supranasals and one internasal dorsally; mental triangular, wider than high (MW/ML 1.31), slightly narrower than rostral (MW/RW 0.88); two postmentals, enlarged, in contact posteriorly, bordered by mental anteromedially, first infralabial anterolaterally and one enlarged chin scale posterolaterally on each side, and small chin scales posteriorly; 8/8 supralabials; 8/8 infralabials.

Figure 3. 

Close-up views of the femoral and precloacal regions of Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. in preservative A male holotype (KIZ 2024083) B female paratype (KIZ 2024084).

Body slender (AG/SVL 0.42), ventrolateral fold distinct, interspersed with tubercles; dorsal scales granular; dorsal tubercles heterogeneous, conical, in approximately 18 longitudinal rows at midbody, largest ones approximately five times size of adjoining scales and surrounded by 10 granular scales, approximately 25 paravertebral tubercles; gular region with homogenous small smooth scales; ventral scales smooth, homogenous, larger than those of dorsum and in gular region, subimbricate, in approximately 29 longitudinal rows at midbody; precloacal groove absent; precloacal scales significantly enlarged; eight precloacal pores separated by one poreless scale in middle, round or oval; 8/7 slightly enlarged femoral scales, separated from enlarged precloacal scales by some smaller scales; femoral pore absent, four indistinct shallow pits on enlarged femoral scales on left side, three distinct shallow pits on enlarged femoral scales on right side.

Figure 4. 

Holotype (KIZ 2024083) of Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. in life A dorsal view B lateral view C ventral view.

Limbs relatively long (ForeaL/SVL 0.16, SL/SVL 0.19), fore limbs slender, hind limbs robust; tubercles on dorsal surface of limbs heterogeneous, conical, ones on fore limbs smaller than most dorsal tubercles, ones on hind limbs approximately as large as most dorsal tubercles; interdigital webbing absent; lamellae under finger IV 21/22, under toe IV 24/24; relative length of fingers I<II≈V<III≈IV, relative length of toes I<II<III<V<IV.

Figure 5. 

Paratype (KIZ 2024084) of Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. in life A dorsal view B lateral view C ventral view.

Tail original, long (TaL/SVL 1.14); 2/2 postcloacal tubercles; dorsal tail base with tubercles; subcaudals smooth, two irregular rows enlarged.

Color of holotype in life

Dorsal ground color brownish-black; dorsal surface of head with distinct reticulated pattern composed of thin, light-yellow stripes; nape with irregular thin, light-yellow stripes; dorsum with six irregular, narrow, light-yellow, transverse bands and one longitudinal, continuous, thin, vertebral stripe; flanks scattered with some small light-yellow spots; dorsal surfaces of limbs with indistinct light-yellow bands; dorsal surface of tail black with seven light bands, first two yellowish-gray, last five grayish-white; ventral surface of head pinkish-white, ventral surfaces of body and limbs grayish-white, some light-yellow spots on ventral surfaces of limbs and on ventrolateral surfaces of head and body; ventral surface of tail base gray with some light-yellow spots, other region of ventral tail black; iris bronze.

Variations

Morphometric and meristic data for the type specimens are presented in Table 3. The female paratype (KIZ 2024084) resembles the holotype except that it has no precloacal pores but three indistinct shallow pits on the enlarged precloacal scales, fewer enlarged femoral scales, and no pits on the enlarged femoral scales. Color pattern of the female paratype (KIZ 2024084) also resembles the holotype except that it has no longitudinal vertebral stripe on dorsum and six light bands on the dorsal surface of the tail.

Table 3.

Measurements (in mm) and meristic data for the type specimens of the new species. Abbreviations defined in Materials and methods.

KIZ 2024083 KIZ 2024084 KIZ 2024083 KIZ 2024084
Holotype Paratype Holotype Paratype
Male Female Male Female
SVL 89.5 97.0 MW 3.8 3.4
TaL 102.2 103.8 ML 2.9 2.9
HH 11.1 11.3 SPL 8/8 9/8
HL 25.2 26.6 IFL 8/8 9/8
HW 17.0 18.2 I 1 1
OD 7.8 8.2 PM 2 2
SE 10.1 10.6 GSDT 10 9
EE 5.2 5.7 DTR 18 16
IND 3.3 3.5 PVT 25 27
IOD 3.2 3.6 V 29 31
ED 1.3 1.5 EFS 8/7 4/4
AG 37.5 42.6 PP 8 0 (3 pitted)
ForeaL 14.3 14.6 FP 0 (4/3 pitted) 0
SL 17.4 17.9 PAT 2/2 1/1
RW 4.3 4.3 LF4 21/22 19/20
RH 2.8 2.6 LT4 24/24 25/24

Distribution

This species is currently known only from Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve in Cangyuan County, Yunnan Province, China (Fig. 6).

Figure 6. 

Map showing the distribution of species of the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group in China. Star, Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov.; dot, C. zhenkangensis; triangle, C. menglianensis; square, Cyrtodactylus caixitaoi; pentagon, C. gulinqingensis.

Natural history

There is no karst landform in the area where the type specimens were collected. This species was found on rocks or tree trunks in the virgin evergreen broadleaved forest at night. Individuals were slow and easy to catch. In addition, this species was found on the wall of an abandoned house near the collection site of the type specimens by locals (Fig. 7). The only female specimen did not carry eggs and no juveniles were found, so the reproductive season of this species is unknown. Other reptiles found at the type locality of the new species include Acanthosaura rubrilabris Liu, Rao, Hou, Orlov, Ananjeva & Zhang, 2022, Boiga multomaculata (Boie, 1827), Calotes emma Gray, 1845, Hemidactylus garnotii Duméril & Bibron, 1836, Lycodon fasciatus (Anderson, 1879), and Ptyas korros (Schlegel, 1837).

Figure 7. 

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. from near the type locality.

Etymology

The specific epithet nangunhe is a noun in apposition, and therefore invariable; it refers to Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve, where the new species was found.

Comparisons

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. can be distinguished from all other members of the C. chauquangensis species group by a unique combination of morphological characters. Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. auribalteatus Sumontha, Panitvong & Deein, 2010, C. bichnganae Ngo & Grismer, 2010, C. doisuthep Kunya, Panmongkol, Pauwels, Sumontha, Meewasana, Bunkhwamdi & Dangsri, 2014, C. dumnuii Bauer, Kunya, Sumontha, Niyomwan, Pauwels, Chanhome & Kunya, 2010, C. erythrops Bauer, Kunya, Sumontha, Niyomwan, Panitvong, Pauwels, Chanhome & Kunya, 2009, C. gulinqingensis, C. huongsonensis Luu, Nguyen, Do & Ziegler, 2011, C. kunyai Pauwels, Sumontha, Keeratikiat & Phanamphon, 2014, C. luci Tran, Do, Pham, Phan, Ngo, Le, Ziegler & Nguyen, 2024, C. ngoiensis Schneider, Luu, Sitthivong, Teynié, Le, Nguyen & Ziegler, 2020, C. phamiensis Grismer, Aowphol, Grismer, Aksornneam, Quah, Murdoch, Gregory, Nguyen, Kaatz, Bringsøe & Rujirawan, 2024, C. phukhaensis Chomdej, Pradit, Pawangkhanant, Naiduangchan & Suwannapoom, 2022, C. soni Le, Nguyen, Le & Ziegler, 2016, and C. sonlaensis Nguyen, Pham, Ziegler, Ngo & Le, 2017 by the absence of femoral pores (vs femoral pores present).

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. bobrovi Nguyen, Le, Pham, Ngo, Hoang, Pham & Ziegler, 2015, C. chauquangensis Hoang, Orlov, Ananjeva, Johns, Hoang & Dau, 2007, C. houaphanensis Schneider, Luu, Sitthivong, Teynié, Le, Nguyen & Ziegler, 2020, C. menglianensis, C. otai Nguyen, Le, Van Pham, Ngo, Hoang, The Pham & Ziegler, 2015, C. spelaeus Nazarov, Poyarkov, Orlov, Nguyen, Milto, Martynov, Konstantinov & Chulisov, 2014, and C. wayakonei by having enlarged femoral scales (vs femoral scales not enlarged).

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. caixitaoi by having different dorsal coloration (brownish-black ground color with thin stripes on head and narrow bands on dorsum vs orange brown or pinkish-brown ground color with thick stripes on head and wide bands on dorsum), more longitudinal rows of dorsal tubercles at midbody (16–18 vs 14–15), and more paravertebral tubercles (25–27 vs 20–21).

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. cucphuongensis Ngo & Chan, 2011 by the different conditions of precloacal pores in males (present vs absent).

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. martini Ngo, 2011 by having more precloacal pores in males (eight vs four), fewer longitudinal ventral scale rows (29–31 vs 39–43), and enlarged femoral scales separated from enlarged precloacal scales by smaller scales (vs enlarged femoral scales continuous with enlarged precloacal scales).

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. puhuensis Nguyen, Yang, Le, Nguyen, Orlov, Hoang, Nguyen, Jin, Rao, Hoang, Che, Murphy & Zhang, 2014 by having more precloacal pores in males (eight vs five), enlarged femoral scales separated from enlarged precloacal scales by smaller scales (vs enlarged femoral scales continuous with enlarged precloacal scales), and two rows of subcaudals enlarged under original tail (vs one row).

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. taybacensis Pham, Le, Ngo, Ziegler, Nguyen, 2019 by having fewer precloacal pores in males (eight vs 11–13), ventrolateral fold with interspersed tubercles (vs without), and two rows of subcaudals enlarged under original tail (vs one row).

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. vilaphongi Schneider, Nguyen, Duc Le, Nophaseud, Bonkowski & Ziegler, 2014 by being larger (SVL 89.5–97.0 mm vs 60.9–86.1 mm), dorsal head with a distinct reticulated pattern (vs indistinct), and having enlarged subcaudals (vs not enlarged).

Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from its sister species C. zhenkangensis by enlarged femoral scales separated from enlarged precloacal scales by smaller scales (vs enlarged femoral scales continuous with enlarged precloacal scales), femoral pores absent (vs femoral pores present), having fewer pitted precloacal scales in females (three vs 7–9), fewer longitudinal rows of dorsal tubercles at midbody (16–18 vs 20–24), more lamellae under toe IV (24–25 vs 21–23), thin stripes on head and narrow bands on dorsum (vs thick stripes on head and wide bands on dorsum), fewer light bands on tail (6–7 vs 8–10), and most light bands on tail not connected on ventral surface of tail (vs connected on ventral surface of tail).

Discussion

Grismer et al. (2021) partitioned the species of Cyrtodactylus into 10 ecotypes according to their habitat preferences. The C. chauquangensis group is a karst ecotype group, and most species of this group are karst dwellers except for C. doisuthep and C. phukhaensis, which inhabit the forests in northern Thailand (Kunya et al. 2014; Chomdej et al. 2022; Tran et al. 2024). Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. represents the third forest-dwelling species of this group. Although Cangyuan County is rich in karst landforms, we have not found any individual of Cyrtodactylus in the karst habitats in this county. On the contrary, there is no karst landform in the area where C. nangunhe sp. nov. was discovered. The reason is unknown why this species does not live in karst areas but instead in the forest without karst habitat.

The straight-line distance between the type localities of C. nangunhe sp. nov. and its sister species C. zhenkangensis is only approximately 65 km. However, these two species inhabit very different habitats: C. zhenkangensis in an area of limestone and C. nangunhe sp. nov. in forest. Limestone is usually grayish-white and has many cracks and holes. Individuals of C. zhenkangensis have a light general color and relatively distinct stripes on the dorsal surface, which may be to better hide themselves in limestone environments. On the other hand, the rocks or tree trunks in forests are often of a single color, and living in forests often requires passing on the ground. Individuals of C. nangunhe sp. nov. have a dark general color and relatively indistinct stripes on the dorsal surface, which may make them less visible to predators in the forest. Perhaps it is the differentiation of habitats that has led to the genetic divergence between C. zhenkangensis and C. nangunhe sp. nov. Although most species of this genus tend to inhabit karst habitats, some of them can adapt to other habitats such as forests. The discovery of the new species reminds us that the diversity of forest-dwelling species of this genus is still greatly underestimated.

Acknowledgements

We thank the forest rangers of Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve for their help in the field. We also thank the editors and reviewers for their working on the manuscript.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation Project: Investigation and Classificatory and Phylogenetic Studies on the Lizards of Gekkonidae of China (grant no. NSFC-31970404), Science-Technology Basic Condition Platform from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (grant no. 2005DKA21402), and the Position of Bioclassonomist of Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. CAS-TAX-24).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: DR, ZL, WD. Formal analysis: SL, DR. Investigation: SL, ZL, WD. Writing - original draft: SL. Writing - review and editing: SL, MH, DR.

Author ORCIDs

Shuo Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-3006

Mian Hou https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3322-6570

Dingqi Rao https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2680-1503

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

Reference

  • Agarwal I, Mahony S, Giri VB, Chaitanya R, Bauer AM (2018) Two new species of bent toed geckos, Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Northeast India with comments on name-bearing types from the region. Zootaxa 4420: 334–356. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4420.3.2
  • Bauer AM, Kunya K, Sumontha M, Niyomwan P, Panitvong N, Pauwels OSG, Chanhome L, Kunya T (2009) Cyrtodactylus erythrops (Squamata: Gekkonidae), a new cave-dwelling gecko from Mae Hong Son Province, Thailand. Zootaxa 2142: 51–62. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2124.1.4
  • Bauer AM, Kunya K, Sumontha M, Niyomwan P, Panitvong N, Pauwels OSG, Chanhome L, Kunya T (2010) Cyrtodactylus dumnuii (Squamata: Gekkonidae), a new cave-dwelling gecko from Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Zootaxa 2570: 41–50. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2570.1.2
  • Chomdej S, Pradit W, Pawangkhanant P, Kuensaen C, Phupanbai A, Naiduangchan M, Piboon P, Nganvongpanit K, Yuan ZY, Zhang YP, Che J, Sucharitakul P, Suwannapoom C (2022) A new Cyrtodactylus species (Reptila: Gekkonidae) from Nan Province, northern Thailand. Asian Herpetological Research 13: 96–108. https://doi.org/10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.210055
  • Grismer LL, Wood PLJr, Poyarkov NA, Le MD, Karunarathna S, Chomdej S, Suwannapoom C, Qi S, Liu S, Che J, Quah ESH, Kraus F, Oliver PM, Riyanto A, Pauwels OSG, Grismer JL (2021) Karstic landscapes are foci of species diversity in the world’s third-largest vertebrate genus Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Reptilia: Squamata; Gekkonidae). Diversity 13: 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13050183
  • Grismer LL, Aowphol A, Grismer JL, Aksornneam A, Quah ESH, Murdoch ML, Gregory JJ, Nguyen E, Kaatz A, Bringsøe H, Rujirawan A (2024) A new species of the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group (Squamata, Gekkonidae) from the borderlands of extreme northern Thailand. ZooKeys 1203: 211–238. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1203.122758
  • Hoang XQ, Orlov NL, Ananjeva NB, Johns AG, Hoang NT, Dau QV (2007) Description of a new species of the genus Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Squamata: Sauria: Gekkonidae) from the Karst of north central Vietnam. Russian Journal of Herpetology 14: 98–106. https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2007-14-2-98-106
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14: 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010
  • Kunya K, Panmongkol A, Pauwels OGS, Sumontha M, Meewasana J, Bunkhwamdi W, Dangsri S (2014) A new forest-dwelling bent-toed gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Cyrtodactylus) from Doi Suthep, Chiang Mai Province, northern Thailand. Zootaxa 3811: 251–261. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3811.2.6
  • Liu S, Rao DQ, Hou M, Wang QY, Ananjeva NB (2023) A new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Squamata, Gekkonidae), previously confused with C. wayakonei Nguyen, Kingsada, Rösler, Auer et Ziegler, 2010. Russian Journal of Herpetology 30: 529–538. https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2023-30-6-529-538
  • Luu VQ, Nguyen TQ, Do HQ, Ziegler T (2011) A new Cyrtodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Huong Son limestone forest, Hanoi, northern Vietnam. Zootaxa 3129: 39–50. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3129.1.3
  • Ma S, Shi SC, Qian TY, Sui LL, Wang B, Jiang JP (2024) A new species of Cyrtodactylus tibetanus group (Reptilia: Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Xizang Autonomous Region, China. Animals 14: 2384. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162384
  • Macey JR, Larson A, Ananjeva NB, Wang Y, Pethiyagoda R, Rastegar-Pouyani N, Papenfuss TJ (2000) Evaluating trans-Tethys migration: an example using acrodont lizard phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 49: 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/49.2.233
  • Nazarov RA, Poyarkov NA, Orlov NL, Nguyen SN, Milto KD, Martynov AA, Konstantinov EL, Chulisov AS (2014) A review of genus Cyrtodactylus (Reptilia: Sauria: Gekkonidae) in fauna of Laos with description of four new species. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute RAS 318: 391–423. https://doi.org/10.31610/trudyzin/2014.318.4.391
  • Ngo VT (2011) Cyrtodactylus martini, another new karst-dwelling Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northwestern Vietnam. Zootaxa 2834: 33–46. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2834.1.3
  • Ngo VT, Grismer LL (2010) A new karst dwelling Cyrtodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Son La Province, northwestern Vietnam. Hamadryad 35: 84–95.
  • Nguyen SN, Yang JX, Le TNT, Nguyen LT, Orlov NL, Hoang CV, Nguyen TQ, Jin JQ, Rao DQ, Hoang TN, Che J, Murphy RW, Zhang YP (2014) DNA barcoding of Vietnamese bent-toed geckos (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Cyrtodactylus) and the description of a new species. Zootaxa 3784: 48–66. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3784.1.2.
  • Nguyen TQ, Le MD, Pham AV, Ngo HN, Hoang CV, Pham CT, Ziegler T (2015) Two new species of Cyrtodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the karst forest of Hoa Binh Province, Vietnam. Zootaxa 3985: 375–390. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3985.3.3
  • Nguyen TQ, Pham AV, Ziegler T, Ngo HT, Le MD (2017) A new species of Cyrtodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) and the first record of C. otai from Son La Province, Vietnam. Zootaxa 4341: 25–40. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4341.1.2
  • Pauwels OSG, Sumontha M, Keeratikiat K, Phanamphon E (2014) Cyrtodactylus kunyai (Squamata: Gekkonidae), a new cave-dwelling bent-toed gecko from Loei Province, northeastern Thailand. Zootaxa 3821: 253–264. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3821.2.5
  • Schneider N, Nguyen TQ, Le MD, Nophaseud L, Bonkowski M, Ziegler T (2014) A new species of Cyrtodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the karst forest of northern Laos. Zootaxa 3835: 80–96. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3835.1.4
  • Schneider N, Luu VQ, Sitthivong S, Teynié A, Le MD, Nguyen TQ, Ziegler T (2020) Two new species of Cyrtodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northern Laos, including new finding and expanded diagnosis of C. bansocensis. Zootaxa 4822: 503–530. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4822.4.3
  • Sumontha M, Panitvong N, Deein G (2010) Cyrtodactylus auribalteatus (Squamata: Gekkonidae), a new cave-dwelling gecko from Phitsanulok Province, Thailand. Zootaxa 2370: 53–64. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2370.1.3
  • Tang FL, Du F, Sun GZ (2015) National Nature Reserve of Nangunhe, Yunnan Province – Comprehensive Scientific Investigation Research. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, 1009 pp.
  • Tran TT, Do QH, Pham CT, Phan TQ, Ngo HT, Le MD, Ziegler T, Nguyen TQ (2024) A new species of the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis species group (Squamata, Gekkonidae) from Lao Cai Province, Vietnam. ZooKeys 1192: 83–102. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1192.117135
  • Wang K, Ren JL, Chen HM, Lyu ZT, Guo XG, Jiang K, Chen JM, Li JT, Guo P, Wang YY, Che J (2020) The updated checklists of amphibians and reptiles of China. Biodiversity Science 28: 189–218. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2019238
  • Yang YM, Du F (2004) Nangun River National Nature Reserve Of China. Yunnan Science and Technology Press, Kunming, 386 pp.
  • Zhao EM, Jiang YM, Huang QY, Zhao H, Zhao KT, Zhou KY, Liu YZ, Liu MY, Li DJ, Zhang YX (1999) Fauna Sinica (Reptilia 2): Squamata (Lacertilia). Science Press, Beijing, 394 pp.
  • Zhao EM, Zhang XW, Zhao H, Adler K (2000) Revised checklist of Chinese amphibia & reptilia. Sichuan Journal of Zoology 19: 196–207.
login to comment