Research Article |
Corresponding author: Shuo Liu ( liushuo@mail.kiz.ac.cn ) Corresponding author: Dingqi Rao ( raodq@mail.kiz.ac.cn ) Academic editor: Minh Duc Le
© 2025 Shuo Liu, Zhimin Li, Wenguang Duan, Mian Hou, Dingqi Rao.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Liu S, Li Z, Duan W, Hou M, Rao D (2025) A new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Squamata, Gekkonidae) from Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve, China. ZooKeys 1223: 69-86. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1223.137184
|
A new forest-dwelling species of the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group is described from southwestern Yunnan Province, China. Phylogenetically, it was recovered as the sister species of C. zhenkangensis, with a genetic distance of 9.2% in the ND2 gene. Morphologically, the new species can be separated from C. zhenkangensis by the discontinuity of enlarged femoral scales and enlarged precloacal scales, the absence of femoral pores, and the difference in dorsal color pattern. In addition, although the new species and C. zhenkangensis are distributed relatively close, their habitats are clearly different. Cyrtodactylus zhenkangensis inhabits karst limestone, while the new species inhabits forest. The new species is the 29th species of the C. chauquangensis group and the third forest-dwelling species of this group.
Bent-toed gecko, Cangyuan, Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group, mitochondrial DNA, systematics, taxonomy
The species diversity of the genus Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 had previously been severely underestimated, but currently the number of species in this genus has been rapidly increasing, and the number of species is now over 350 (
Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve is located in southwestern Yunnan Province, China. This nature reserve has a total area of 508.87 km2, with the lowest and highest elevations at 510 m and 2,977 m, respectively. There are numerous high mountains and valleys and many rivers and streams, as well as multiple vegetation types, such as rainforest and seasonal rainforest, in this nature reserve. Its main protected species are rare and endangered wild animals such as elephants, tigers, gibbons, and monkeys (
During our fieldwork in southwestern Yunnan, China, in 2024, two specimens of Cyrtodactylus were collected in Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve. Both morphological and phylogenetic analyses support the recognition of the two specimens as belonging to an unnamed species of the C. chauquangensis group. Therefore, we describe them as a new species below.
The field survey in Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve was conducted under the permit from Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve Management and Protection Bureau. Specimens were collected by hand at night and photographed alive prior to preservation. Liver tissues were dissected and preserved in analytical pure ethanol. The specimens were stored in 75% ethanol and deposited at Kunming Natural History Museum of Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (
Measurements were taken with digital calipers to the nearest 0.1 mm. Bilateral scale counts are given as left/right. The methodology of measurements and meristic counts is the same as those in
AG axilla to groin distance, measured from the posterior margin of the forelimb insertion to the anterior margin of the hindlimb insertion;
DTR dorsal tubercle rows, the number of dorsal, longitudinal rows of the tubercles at midbody between ventrolateral folds;
ED ear diameter, the greatest diameter of ear opening;
EE eye to ear distance, measured from the posterior edge of the orbit to the anterior edge of the ear opening;
EFS enlarged femoral scales, the number of the enlarged femoral scales beneath each thigh;
ForeaL forearm length, measured from the tip of the elbow to the wrist;
FP femoral pores;
GSDT granular scales surrounding dorsal midbody tubercles;
HH maximum head height;
HL head length, measured from the tip of the snout to the posterior margin of the retroarticular process of the lower jaw;
HW maximum head width;
I internasals, the number of the scales between the two supranasals;
IFL infralabials, counted from the first labial scale to the corner of the mouth;
IND internarial distance, the distance between nares;
IOD interorbital distance, measured across the narrowest point of the frontal bone;
LF4 subdigital lamellae under the fourth finger, counted from the base of the digit where it contacts the body of the hand to the base of the claw, including the claw sheath;
LT4 subdigital lamellae under the fourth toe, counted from the base of the digit where it contacts the body of the foot to the base of the claw, including the claw sheath;
ML mental length, the maximum length of the mental;
MW mental width, the maximum width of the mental;
OD greatest diameter of orbit;
PAT postcloacal tubercles, the number of the tubercles on each side of the postcloacal region;
PM postmentals, the number of the scales bordering the mental shield, excluding infralabials;
PP precloacal pores;
PVT paravertebral tubercles, counted in a single paravertebral row from the level of the forelimb insertions to the level of the hind limb insertion;
RH rostral height, the maximum height of the rostral;
RW rostral width, the maximum width of the rostral;
SE snout to eye distance, measured from the tip of the snout to the anterior edge of the orbit;
SL shank length, measured from the base of the heel to the knee;
SPL supralabials, counted from the first labial scale to the corner of the mouth;
SVL snout–vent length, measured from the tip of the snout to the anterior margin of the cloaca;
TaL tail length, measured from the posterior margin of the cloaca to the tip of the tail;
V ventral scale rows, the number of longitudinal rows of ventral scales at midbody between ventrolateral folds.
Morphological comparisons were based on the original descriptions of each species of the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group (
Total genomic DNA was extracted from liver tissue samples. A fragment of the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) gene was amplified and sequenced using the primers L4437b (5′-AAGCAGTTGGGCCCATACC-3′) and H5540 (5′- TTTAGGGCTTTGAAGGC -3′) (
Species | Locality | Catalog number | Accession number |
---|---|---|---|
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. | China, Yunnan, Lincang, Cangyuan |
|
PQ670135 |
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. | China, Yunnan, Lincang, Cangyuan |
|
PQ670136 |
Cyrtodactylus auribalteatus | Thailand, Phitsanulok, Noen Maprang | AUP-01745 | MZ439914 |
Cyrtodactylus bichnganae | Vietnam, Son La, Son La Urban | UNS 0473 | MF169953 |
Cyrtodactylus bobrovi | Vietnam, Hoa Binh, Lac Son | IEBR A.2015.29 | MT953471 |
Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis | Vietnam, Nghe An, Quy Hop | NA 2016.1 | MT953475 |
Cyrtodactylus cucphuongensis | Vietnam, Ninh Binh, Cuc Phuong NP | CP 17.02 | MT953477 |
Cyrtodactylus doisuthep | Thailand, Chiang Mai, Doi Suthep | AUP-00777 | MT497801 |
Cyrtodactylus dumnuii | Thailand, Chiang Mai, Chiang Dao | AUP-00769 | MT497802 |
Cyrtodactylus dumnuii | Thailand, Chiang Mai, Chiang Dao | AUP-00770 | MT497803 |
Cyrtodactylus dumnuii | Thailand, Chiang Mai, Chiang Dao | AUP 00768 | MW713972 |
Cyrtodactylus erythrops | Thailand, Mae Hong Son, Pang Mapha | AUP-00771 | MT497806 |
Cyrtodactylus gulinqingensis | China, Yunnan, Maguan, Gulinqing |
|
MZ782150 |
Cyrtodactylus houaphanensis | Laos, Luang Houaphan | IEBR A.2013.109 | MW792067 |
Cyrtodactylus huongsonensis | Vietnam, Ha Noi, My Duc, Huong Son | IEBR A.2011.3A | MT953481 |
Cyrtodactylus kunyai | Thailand, Loei, Nong Hin | AUP-01747 | MZ439916 |
Cyrtodactylus luci | Vietnam, Lao Cai, Bac Ha | IEBR R.5240 | PP253960 |
Cyrtodactylus menglianensis | China, Yunnan, Puer, Menglian |
|
OM296042 |
Cyrtodactylus menglianensis | China, Yunnan, Puer, Menglian |
|
OM296043 |
Cyrtodactylus menglianensis | China, Yunnan, Puer, Menglian |
|
OM296044 |
Cyrtodactylus ngoiensis | Laos, Luang Prabang, Ngoi | IEBR A.2013.110 | MW792066 |
Cyrtodactylus otai | Vietnam, Son La, Van Ho, Na Bai | TBU 2017.2 | MT953486 |
Cyrtodactylus phamiensis | Thailand, Chiang Rai, Mae Sai, Pha Mi | ZMKU R 01074 | PP430583 |
Cyrtodactylus phukhaensis | Thailand, Nan, Pua, Doi Phu Kha | AUP-01823 | MZ439912 |
Cyrtodactylus phukhaensis | Thailand, Nan, Pua, Doi Phu Kha | AUP-01824 | MZ439913 |
Cyrtodactylus puhuensis | Vietnam, Thanh Hoa | ND 01.15 | MT953489 |
Cyrtodactylus solaensis | Vietnam, Son La, Phu Yen | IEBR A.2017.1 | MT953492 |
Cyrtodactylus soni | Vietnam, Ninh Binh, Gia Vien | IEBR R.2016.4 | MT953491 |
Cyrtodactylus spelaeus | Laos, Vientiane, Kasi | HLM 0315 | MW713962 |
Cyrtodactylus taybacensis | Vietnam, Son La, Quyun Nhai, Ca Nang | IEBR 4379 | MT953495 |
Cyrtodactylus vilaphongi | Laos, Luang Prabang, Luang Prabang | IEBR A.2013.103 | MT953497 |
Cyrtodactylus wayakonei | Laos, Luang Nam Tha, Vieng Phoukha | ZFMK 91016 | MT953498 |
Cyrtodactylus zhenkangensis | China, Yunnan, Lincang, Zhenkang |
|
MW792062 |
Cyrtodactylus zhenkangensis | China, Yunnan, Lincang, Zhenkang |
|
PQ670137 |
Cyrtodactylus dammathetensis | Myanmar, Mon State, Mawlamyine | LSUHC:12863 | MF872277 |
Cyrtodactylus sinyineensis | Myanmar, Kayin State, Hpa-an | LSUHC:12836 | MF872355 |
Sequences were aligned using MAFFT 7.471 (
The phylogenetic topologies of Bayesian-inference and maximum-likelihood analysis were identical. The sequences of the newly collected specimens were nested within the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group and formed a strongly supported lineage sister to C. zhenkangensis (Fig.
Uncorrected pairwise genetic distances (%) among species of the Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis group based on the ND2 sequences.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 Cyrtodactylus auribalteatus | 14.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Cyrtodactylus bichnganae | 18.3 | 18.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 Cyrtodactylus bobrovi | 16.3 | 15.0 | 19.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Cyrtodactylus chauquangensis | 15.7 | 14.4 | 18.1 | 8.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
6 Cyrtodactylus cucphuongensis | 16.8 | 15.7 | 19.9 | 7.9 | 8.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
7 Cyrtodactylus doisuthep | 16.8 | 14.1 | 16.4 | 15.4 | 14.2 | 15.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
8 Cyrtodactylus dumnuii | 13.6 | 13.3 | 16.9 | 13.7 | 12.2 | 14.2 | 14.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
9 Cyrtodactylus erythrops | 15.9 | 14.7 | 16.7 | 14.8 | 13.7 | 15.1 | 10.9 | 13.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
10 Cyrtodactylus gulinqingensis | 15.7 | 14.5 | 18.1 | 13.7 | 14.0 | 14.0 | 13.6 | 12.9 | 14.1 | |||||||||||||||||
11 Cyrtodactylus houaphanensis | 16.3 | 15.6 | 19.4 | 6.5 | 9.0 | 7.5 | 15.1 | 14.2 | 15.1 | 14.0 | ||||||||||||||||
12 Cyrtodactylus huongsonensis | 15.3 | 14.5 | 17.7 | 14.3 | 12.2 | 14.3 | 14.6 | 14.0 | 14.4 | 12.4 | 14.8 | |||||||||||||||
13 Cyrtodactylus kunyai | 16.5 | 12.5 | 17.8 | 15.5 | 14.4 | 17.1 | 14.9 | 13.8 | 15.7 | 14.4 | 16.3 | 14.7 | ||||||||||||||
14 Cyrtodactylus luci | 16.5 | 13.9 | 18.1 | 14.2 | 14.2 | 14.6 | 13.9 | 13.3 | 15.1 | 9.1 | 14.4 | 12.4 | 14.2 | |||||||||||||
15 Cyrtodactylus menglianensis | 11.5 | 12.6 | 18.4 | 14.9 | 12.7 | 15.0 | 15.1 | 11.4 | 14.4 | 14.3 | 14.7 | 14.4 | 15.0 | 14.0 | ||||||||||||
16 Cyrtodactylus ngoiensis | 15.4 | 13.8 | 18.2 | 11.2 | 10.3 | 10.8 | 14.8 | 12.0 | 14.5 | 13.1 | 11.4 | 13.1 | 13.8 | 13.4 | 13.1 | |||||||||||
17 Cyrtodactylus otai | 15.9 | 14.1 | 19.1 | 3.6 | 9.1 | 8.4 | 16.2 | 15.6 | 16.4 | 15.6 | 6.8 | 14.7 | 15.5 | 14.8 | 15.2 | 12.2 | ||||||||||
18 Cyrtodactylus phamiensis | 17.0 | 16.0 | 16.4 | 16.0 | 14.8 | 16.4 | 14.1 | 14.9 | 15.1 | 15.6 | 16.0 | 14.4 | 16.2 | 17.0 | 16.0 | 15.5 | 16.9 | |||||||||
19 Cyrtodactylus phukhaensis | 11.4 | 12.6 | 17.5 | 14.6 | 12.1 | 14.4 | 14.9 | 11.9 | 14.1 | 14.0 | 14.5 | 13.8 | 14.1 | 14.4 | 7.0 | 11.2 | 15.4 | 15.1 | ||||||||
20 Cyrtodactylus puhuensis | 15.4 | 14.3 | 18.9 | 5.7 | 8.0 | 7.1 | 14.4 | 12.8 | 14.3 | 13.5 | 2.8 | 13.9 | 14.9 | 14.2 | 14.1 | 10.5 | 6.2 | 15.4 | 13.7 | |||||||
21 Cyrtodactylus solaensis | 16.9 | 16.5 | 19.4 | 17.5 | 16.9 | 18.2 | 16.4 | 16.7 | 17.3 | 14.8 | 18.0 | 15.0 | 16.2 | 15.9 | 17.3 | 16.2 | 17.7 | 18.3 | 16.2 | 18.0 | ||||||
22 Cyrtodactylus soni | 15.5 | 14.0 | 18.2 | 14.6 | 13.3 | 14.7 | 13.9 | 13.4 | 14.1 | 13.4 | 15.4 | 7.3 | 14.1 | 12.7 | 14.0 | 14.3 | 14.7 | 14.5 | 14.0 | 14.4 | 15.3 | |||||
23 Cyrtodactylus spelaeus | 16.0 | 15.5 | 18.3 | 10.1 | 9.3 | 10.5 | 15.1 | 13.5 | 15.2 | 13.8 | 10.5 | 14.3 | 15.0 | 14.5 | 14.6 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 16.1 | 13.9 | 9.1 | 17.7 | 14.6 | ||||
24 Cyrtodactylus taybacensis | 17.9 | 17.4 | 9.3 | 16.6 | 15.6 | 16.8 | 15.4 | 14.8 | 16.4 | 16.0 | 17.0 | 15.8 | 17.2 | 15.6 | 16.6 | 16.4 | 18.3 | 16.8 | 16.8 | 16.3 | 18.9 | 15.6 | 16.1 | |||
25 Cyrtodactylus vilaphongi | 16.0 | 13.8 | 17.8 | 8.1 | 7.3 | 8.2 | 14.1 | 13.2 | 14.2 | 13.4 | 8.2 | 14.2 | 14.5 | 14.4 | 14.0 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 15.0 | 13.8 | 7.0 | 16.9 | 13.7 | 9.6 | 16.3 | ||
26 Cyrtodactylus wayakonei | 12.1 | 13.5 | 18.0 | 15.5 | 13.1 | 15.5 | 16.2 | 12.5 | 15.6 | 15.3 | 14.7 | 15.1 | 14.2 | 15.9 | 7.2 | 12.2 | 15.4 | 15.5 | 5.0 | 14.2 | 16.5 | 14.0 | 15.2 | 17.5 | 13.7 | |
27 Cyrtodactylus zhenkangensis | 9.2 | 12.8 | 18.3 | 14.3 | 13.2 | 13.8 | 14.9 | 11.8 | 14.3 | 12.9 | 14.0 | 13.2 | 15.1 | 12.9 | 10.7 | 13.3 | 15.5 | 15.7 | 10.2 | 13.3 | 17.3 | 13.9 | 14.1 | 15.3 | 13.7 | 11.9 |
Holotype. China • ♂; Yunnan, Cangyuan; 23°13'19"N, 99°1'2"E; 950 m; 17 Aug. 2024; Shuo Liu leg.;
Body size relatively large (SVL 89.5–97.0 mm); tail long (TaL/SVL 1.07–1.14); head relatively long (HL/SVL 0.27–0.28), moderately widened (HW/HL 0.67–0.68); snout long (SE/HL 0.40); body slender (AG/SVL 0.43–0.44); 16–18 longitudinal rows of dorsal tubercles at midbody, 25–27 paravertebral tubercles; ventrolateral fold distinct, interspersed with tubercles; 29–31 longitudinal ventral scale rows at midbody; eight precloacal pores separated by one poreless scale in male; precloacal pores absent, three indistinct shallow pits on enlarged precloacal scales in female; 7–8 slightly enlarged femoral scales beneath each thigh in male, four slightly enlarged femoral scales beneath each thigh in female; enlarged femoral scales separated from enlarged precloacal scales by some smaller scales; femoral pores absent in both sexes; 3–4 shallow pits on enlarged femoral scales on each side in male, absent in female; 1–2 postcloacal tubercles on each side; 19–22 lamellae under finger IV, 24–25 lamellae under toe IV; two rows of subcaudals enlarged; dorsal ground color brownish-black; distinct reticulated pattern composed of thin, light-yellow stripes on dorsal head; six irregular, narrow, light-yellow, transverse bands on dorsum; 6–7 light bands on dorsal tail.
Adult male, SVL 89.5 mm; head clearly distinguished from neck, relatively long (HL/SVL 0.28), moderately widened (HW/HL 0.67), depressed (HH/HL 0.44); nare oval, surrounded by supranasal dorsally, rostral anteriorly, first supralabial ventrally, and two postnasals posteriorly; snout long (SE/HL 0.40), round anteriorly, longer than diameter of orbit (SE/OD 1.29); snout scales much larger than those in frontal and parietal regions; eye large (OD/HL 0.31), pupils vertical; upper eyelid fringe with spinous scales; ear opening oval, much small in size (ED/HL 0.05); rostral large (RW/HL 0.17), wider than high (RW/RH 1.54), medially divided dorsally by a suture, reaching to approximately half down rostral, in contact with first supralabial laterally on each side and two supranasals and one internasal dorsally; mental triangular, wider than high (MW/ML 1.31), slightly narrower than rostral (MW/RW 0.88); two postmentals, enlarged, in contact posteriorly, bordered by mental anteromedially, first infralabial anterolaterally and one enlarged chin scale posterolaterally on each side, and small chin scales posteriorly; 8/8 supralabials; 8/8 infralabials.
Body slender (AG/SVL 0.42), ventrolateral fold distinct, interspersed with tubercles; dorsal scales granular; dorsal tubercles heterogeneous, conical, in approximately 18 longitudinal rows at midbody, largest ones approximately five times size of adjoining scales and surrounded by 10 granular scales, approximately 25 paravertebral tubercles; gular region with homogenous small smooth scales; ventral scales smooth, homogenous, larger than those of dorsum and in gular region, subimbricate, in approximately 29 longitudinal rows at midbody; precloacal groove absent; precloacal scales significantly enlarged; eight precloacal pores separated by one poreless scale in middle, round or oval; 8/7 slightly enlarged femoral scales, separated from enlarged precloacal scales by some smaller scales; femoral pore absent, four indistinct shallow pits on enlarged femoral scales on left side, three distinct shallow pits on enlarged femoral scales on right side.
Limbs relatively long (ForeaL/SVL 0.16, SL/SVL 0.19), fore limbs slender, hind limbs robust; tubercles on dorsal surface of limbs heterogeneous, conical, ones on fore limbs smaller than most dorsal tubercles, ones on hind limbs approximately as large as most dorsal tubercles; interdigital webbing absent; lamellae under finger IV 21/22, under toe IV 24/24; relative length of fingers I<II≈V<III≈IV, relative length of toes I<II<III<V<IV.
Tail original, long (TaL/SVL 1.14); 2/2 postcloacal tubercles; dorsal tail base with tubercles; subcaudals smooth, two irregular rows enlarged.
Dorsal ground color brownish-black; dorsal surface of head with distinct reticulated pattern composed of thin, light-yellow stripes; nape with irregular thin, light-yellow stripes; dorsum with six irregular, narrow, light-yellow, transverse bands and one longitudinal, continuous, thin, vertebral stripe; flanks scattered with some small light-yellow spots; dorsal surfaces of limbs with indistinct light-yellow bands; dorsal surface of tail black with seven light bands, first two yellowish-gray, last five grayish-white; ventral surface of head pinkish-white, ventral surfaces of body and limbs grayish-white, some light-yellow spots on ventral surfaces of limbs and on ventrolateral surfaces of head and body; ventral surface of tail base gray with some light-yellow spots, other region of ventral tail black; iris bronze.
Morphometric and meristic data for the type specimens are presented in Table
Measurements (in mm) and meristic data for the type specimens of the new species. Abbreviations defined in Materials and methods.
|
|
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Holotype | Paratype | Holotype | Paratype | ||
Male | Female | Male | Female | ||
SVL | 89.5 | 97.0 | MW | 3.8 | 3.4 |
TaL | 102.2 | 103.8 | ML | 2.9 | 2.9 |
HH | 11.1 | 11.3 | SPL | 8/8 | 9/8 |
HL | 25.2 | 26.6 | IFL | 8/8 | 9/8 |
HW | 17.0 | 18.2 | I | 1 | 1 |
OD | 7.8 | 8.2 | PM | 2 | 2 |
SE | 10.1 | 10.6 | GSDT | 10 | 9 |
EE | 5.2 | 5.7 | DTR | 18 | 16 |
IND | 3.3 | 3.5 | PVT | 25 | 27 |
IOD | 3.2 | 3.6 | V | 29 | 31 |
ED | 1.3 | 1.5 | EFS | 8/7 | 4/4 |
AG | 37.5 | 42.6 | PP | 8 | 0 (3 pitted) |
ForeaL | 14.3 | 14.6 | FP | 0 (4/3 pitted) | 0 |
SL | 17.4 | 17.9 | PAT | 2/2 | 1/1 |
RW | 4.3 | 4.3 | LF4 | 21/22 | 19/20 |
RH | 2.8 | 2.6 | LT4 | 24/24 | 25/24 |
This species is currently known only from Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve in Cangyuan County, Yunnan Province, China (Fig.
There is no karst landform in the area where the type specimens were collected. This species was found on rocks or tree trunks in the virgin evergreen broadleaved forest at night. Individuals were slow and easy to catch. In addition, this species was found on the wall of an abandoned house near the collection site of the type specimens by locals (Fig.
The specific epithet nangunhe is a noun in apposition, and therefore invariable; it refers to Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve, where the new species was found.
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. can be distinguished from all other members of the C. chauquangensis species group by a unique combination of morphological characters. Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. auribalteatus Sumontha, Panitvong & Deein, 2010, C. bichnganae Ngo & Grismer, 2010, C. doisuthep Kunya, Panmongkol, Pauwels, Sumontha, Meewasana, Bunkhwamdi & Dangsri, 2014, C. dumnuii Bauer, Kunya, Sumontha, Niyomwan, Pauwels, Chanhome & Kunya, 2010, C. erythrops Bauer, Kunya, Sumontha, Niyomwan, Panitvong, Pauwels, Chanhome & Kunya, 2009, C. gulinqingensis, C. huongsonensis Luu, Nguyen, Do & Ziegler, 2011, C. kunyai Pauwels, Sumontha, Keeratikiat & Phanamphon, 2014, C. luci Tran, Do, Pham, Phan, Ngo, Le, Ziegler & Nguyen, 2024, C. ngoiensis Schneider, Luu, Sitthivong, Teynié, Le, Nguyen & Ziegler, 2020, C. phamiensis Grismer, Aowphol, Grismer, Aksornneam, Quah, Murdoch, Gregory, Nguyen, Kaatz, Bringsøe & Rujirawan, 2024, C. phukhaensis Chomdej, Pradit, Pawangkhanant, Naiduangchan & Suwannapoom, 2022, C. soni Le, Nguyen, Le & Ziegler, 2016, and C. sonlaensis Nguyen, Pham, Ziegler, Ngo & Le, 2017 by the absence of femoral pores (vs femoral pores present).
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. bobrovi Nguyen, Le, Pham, Ngo, Hoang, Pham & Ziegler, 2015, C. chauquangensis Hoang, Orlov, Ananjeva, Johns, Hoang & Dau, 2007, C. houaphanensis Schneider, Luu, Sitthivong, Teynié, Le, Nguyen & Ziegler, 2020, C. menglianensis, C. otai Nguyen, Le, Van Pham, Ngo, Hoang, The Pham & Ziegler, 2015, C. spelaeus Nazarov, Poyarkov, Orlov, Nguyen, Milto, Martynov, Konstantinov & Chulisov, 2014, and C. wayakonei by having enlarged femoral scales (vs femoral scales not enlarged).
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. caixitaoi by having different dorsal coloration (brownish-black ground color with thin stripes on head and narrow bands on dorsum vs orange brown or pinkish-brown ground color with thick stripes on head and wide bands on dorsum), more longitudinal rows of dorsal tubercles at midbody (16–18 vs 14–15), and more paravertebral tubercles (25–27 vs 20–21).
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. cucphuongensis Ngo & Chan, 2011 by the different conditions of precloacal pores in males (present vs absent).
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. martini Ngo, 2011 by having more precloacal pores in males (eight vs four), fewer longitudinal ventral scale rows (29–31 vs 39–43), and enlarged femoral scales separated from enlarged precloacal scales by smaller scales (vs enlarged femoral scales continuous with enlarged precloacal scales).
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. puhuensis Nguyen, Yang, Le, Nguyen, Orlov, Hoang, Nguyen, Jin, Rao, Hoang, Che, Murphy & Zhang, 2014 by having more precloacal pores in males (eight vs five), enlarged femoral scales separated from enlarged precloacal scales by smaller scales (vs enlarged femoral scales continuous with enlarged precloacal scales), and two rows of subcaudals enlarged under original tail (vs one row).
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. taybacensis Pham, Le, Ngo, Ziegler, Nguyen, 2019 by having fewer precloacal pores in males (eight vs 11–13), ventrolateral fold with interspersed tubercles (vs without), and two rows of subcaudals enlarged under original tail (vs one row).
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from C. vilaphongi Schneider, Nguyen, Duc Le, Nophaseud, Bonkowski & Ziegler, 2014 by being larger (SVL 89.5–97.0 mm vs 60.9–86.1 mm), dorsal head with a distinct reticulated pattern (vs indistinct), and having enlarged subcaudals (vs not enlarged).
Cyrtodactylus nangunhe sp. nov. differs from its sister species C. zhenkangensis by enlarged femoral scales separated from enlarged precloacal scales by smaller scales (vs enlarged femoral scales continuous with enlarged precloacal scales), femoral pores absent (vs femoral pores present), having fewer pitted precloacal scales in females (three vs 7–9), fewer longitudinal rows of dorsal tubercles at midbody (16–18 vs 20–24), more lamellae under toe IV (24–25 vs 21–23), thin stripes on head and narrow bands on dorsum (vs thick stripes on head and wide bands on dorsum), fewer light bands on tail (6–7 vs 8–10), and most light bands on tail not connected on ventral surface of tail (vs connected on ventral surface of tail).
The straight-line distance between the type localities of C. nangunhe sp. nov. and its sister species C. zhenkangensis is only approximately 65 km. However, these two species inhabit very different habitats: C. zhenkangensis in an area of limestone and C. nangunhe sp. nov. in forest. Limestone is usually grayish-white and has many cracks and holes. Individuals of C. zhenkangensis have a light general color and relatively distinct stripes on the dorsal surface, which may be to better hide themselves in limestone environments. On the other hand, the rocks or tree trunks in forests are often of a single color, and living in forests often requires passing on the ground. Individuals of C. nangunhe sp. nov. have a dark general color and relatively indistinct stripes on the dorsal surface, which may make them less visible to predators in the forest. Perhaps it is the differentiation of habitats that has led to the genetic divergence between C. zhenkangensis and C. nangunhe sp. nov. Although most species of this genus tend to inhabit karst habitats, some of them can adapt to other habitats such as forests. The discovery of the new species reminds us that the diversity of forest-dwelling species of this genus is still greatly underestimated.
We thank the forest rangers of Yunnan Nangunhe National Nature Reserve for their help in the field. We also thank the editors and reviewers for their working on the manuscript.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation Project: Investigation and Classificatory and Phylogenetic Studies on the Lizards of Gekkonidae of China (grant no. NSFC-31970404), Science-Technology Basic Condition Platform from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (grant no. 2005DKA21402), and the Position of Bioclassonomist of Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. CAS-TAX-24).
Conceptualization: DR, ZL, WD. Formal analysis: SL, DR. Investigation: SL, ZL, WD. Writing - original draft: SL. Writing - review and editing: SL, MH, DR.
Shuo Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7825-3006
Mian Hou https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3322-6570
Dingqi Rao https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2680-1503
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.