Research Article |
Corresponding author: Zhong Peng ( pz0617@163.com ) Academic editor: Adam Brunke
© 2024 Yi Yang, Sophie Chen, Zhong Peng.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Yang Y, Chen S, Peng Z (2024) Six new species of micropterous Paederus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Paederinae) from China. ZooKeys 1221: 145-164. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1221.135891
|
Six new species of the genus Paederus Fabricius, 1775 from China are described: P. chentangus sp. nov. (Xizang: Chentang), P. mirus sp. nov. (Xizang: Xiayadong), P. songi sp. nov. (Chongqing: Polaoxiang), P. trispinosus sp. nov. (Hubei: Houhe), P. (Harpopaederus) yei sp. nov. (Hubei: Cuijia’ao), and P. zhaoi sp. nov. (Zhejiang: Majian). A key to the micropterous Paederus species of mainland China is given.
New species, rove beetles, taxonomic key
The genus Paederus Fabricius, 1775 was previously represented in mainland China by 55 known species and in Taiwan by 25 known species (
A study of the micropterous Paederus material of mainland China yielded six new species.
The genitalia and other dissected parts were mounted on plastic slides and attached to the same pin as the respective specimens. Photographs were taken with a Canon EOS 7D camera with a MP-E 65 mm macro lens or with a Canon G9 camera mounted on an Olympus CX 31 microscope.
The following abbreviations are used in the text, with all measurements in millimeters:
Body length (BL) from the anterior margin of the labrum to the abdominal apex; forebody length (FL) from the anterior margin of the labrum to the posterior margin of the elytra; head length (HL) from the anterior clypeal margin to the occipital constriction; maximum width of head (HW); length of antenna (AnL); length of pronotum (PL) along midline; maximum width of pronotum (PW); elytral length (EL) at the suture from the apex of the scutellum to the posterior margin of the elytra (at the sutural angles); maximum width of the elytra (EW); maximum width of abdomen (AW); length of aedeagus (AL) from the apex of the dorsal plate or the parameres (whichever forms the apex of the aedeagus) to the base of the aedeagal capsule.
All material treated in this paper is deposited in the Insect Collection of Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China (SNUC). The type labels are cited in the original spelling; different labels are separated by slashes.
Holotype. China – Xizang Prov. • ♂; glued on a card with two labels as follows: “China: Xizang Prov., Dingjie County, Chentang Town, Xiuxiongma Vill., alt. 27°54'11"N, 87°22'42"E, 2700–3000 m, 25.VI.2021, Peng, Yin & Zhang leg.” “Holotype: Paederuschentangus sp. n., Yang & Peng des. 2024” [red handwritten label]; SNUC. Paratypes. China – Xizang Prov. • 8 ♂♂, 12 ♀♀; Dingjie County, Chentang Town, Xiuxiongma Vill., alt. 27°54'11"N, 87°22'42"E, 2700–3000 m, 25.VI.2021, Peng, Yin & Zhang leg; SNUC • 4 ♂♂, 12 ♀♀; Dingjie County, Chentang Town, Ganma Zangbu, 27°51'38"N, 87°24'59"E, alt. 2300 m, 30.VII.2022, Peng, Song, Yin & Zhang leg; SNUC • 3 ♀♀; Dingjie County, Chentang Town, Ganma Zangbu, 27°51'50"N, 87°24'24"E, alt. 2400 m, 28.VI.2021, Z. Peng leg; SNUC.
Measurements (in mm) and ratios: BL: 9.39–11.22; FL: 4.43–5.00; HL: 1.25–1.37; HW: 1.47–1.57; AnL: 2.78–3.17; PL: 1.34–1.57; PW: 1.42–1.50; EL: 1.05–1.12; EW: 1.49–1.62; AW: 1.62–1.69; AL: 1.72–1.74; HL/HW: 0.84–0.87; HW/PW: 0.98–1.05; HL/PL: 0.87–0.93; PL/PW: 0.95–1.05; EL/PL: 0.71–0.78; diameter of eye: 0.37–0.42.
Habitus as in Figs
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Abdomen slightly broader than elytra; punctation dense; interstices with distinctly transverse microsculpture; posterior margin of tergite VII without palisade fringe.
Male. Anterior margin of labrum (Fig.
Female. Anterior margin of labrum (Fig.
The species was found in three localities in the Chentang area, to the south of Dingjie, southern Xizang. The specimens were sifted from moss, grass roots and loose gravel in shrub habitats at altitudes of 2300–3000 m (Figs
The species is named after its type locality (Chentang).
Based on the sexual characters and the external characters, closer affiliations with other Paederus species from Xizang are not evident. However, the highly similar male sexual characters, particularly the similarly derived morphology of the aedeagus, suggest that P. chentangus is very closely related to P. megascutum Willers, 1999 from Nepal. It differs from P. megascutum by the shape of the head (weakly transverse in P. megascutum), by the shorter elytra, and particularly by the stouter parameres and the curved ventral plate of the aedeagus in ventral view. For illustrations of P. megascutum, see
Holotype. China – Xizang Prov. • ♂; glued on a card with two labels as follows: “China: Xizang Prov., Yadong County, Xiayadong, 27°23'48"N, 88°50'02"E, alt. 3000 m, 01.VIII.2021, Peng, Yin & Zhang leg.” “HOLOTYPE: Paederus mirus sp. n., Yang & Peng des. 2024” [red handwritten label]; SNUC. Paratypes. China – Xizang Prov. • 3 ♀♀: Yadong County, Xiayadong, 27°23'48"N, 88°50'02"E, alt. 3000 m, 01.VIII.2021, Peng, Yin & Zhang leg; SNUC • 1 ♀: Yadong County, Xiayadong, 27°23'48"N, 88°50'02"E, alt. 2750 m, 10.VIII.2010, Wen-Xuan Bi leg; SNUC.
Measurements (in mm) and ratios: BL 9.10–9.45, FL 4.42–4.77, HL 1.26–1.32, HW 1.29–1.35, AnL: 3.24–3.78; PL: 1.50–1.57; PW: 1.26–1.29; EL: 1.01–1.09; EW: 1.24–1.27; AW: 1.51–1.59; AL: 0.95; HL/HW: 0.96–0.98; HW/PW: 1.02–1.05; HL/PL: 0.84–0.85; PL/PW: 1.19–1.21; EL/PL: 0.67–0.69; diameter of eye: 0.32–0.33.
Habitus as in Fig.
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Abdomen broader than elytra; punctation dense; interstices with shallow microsculpture; posterior margin of tergite VII without palisade fringe; posterior margin of tergite VIII (Fig.
Male. Sternites III–VI unmodified; sternite VII (Fig.
Female. Posterior margin of sternite VIII (Fig.
The species was discovered in two localities situated to southern Yadong, southern Xizang. Some specimens were sifted from moss and leaf litter in montane primary mixed and coniferous forests at an altitude of 3000 m (Fig.
The specific epithet mirus means “strange, wonderful”, referring to the shape of the aedeagus.
Paederus mirus is characterized particularly by the distinctive shape of the aedeagus and additionally by the shape and chaetotaxy of the male sternite VII, as well as by the slender habitus and antennae. Based on the sexual characters, closer affiliations with other Paederus species are not evident.
Holotype. China – Chongqing • ♂; glued on a card with two labels as follows: “China: Chongqing City, Shizhu County, Huangshui Town, Polaoxiang, Near Dafengbao, 30°13'04"N, 108°24'50"E, alt. 1550 m, 27.IX.2023, Xiao-Bin Song leg.” “HOLOTYPE: Paederus songi sp. n., Yang & Peng des. 2024” [red handwritten label]; SNUC. Paratypes. China – Chongqing • 1♀; Shizhu County, Huangshui Town, Polaoxiang, Near Dafengbao, 30°13'04"N, 108°24'50"E, alt. 1550 m, 27.IX.2023, Xiao-Bin Song leg; SNUC.
Measurements (in mm) and ratios: BL 8.11–9.55, FL 4.45–5.02, HL 1.49–1.52, HW 1.54–1.71, AnL: 2.94–3.31; PL: 1.54–1.72; PW: 1.59–1.68; EL: 0.95–1.02; EW: 1.55–1.60; AW: 1.73–1.79; AL: 2.25; HL/HW: 0.89–0.97; HW/PW: 0.97–1.02; HL/PL: 0.88–0.97; PL/PW: 0.97–1.02; EL/PL: 0.59–0.62; diameter of eye: 0.38–0.45.
Habitus as in Fig.
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Abdomen broader than elytra; punctation dense; interstices with distinctly transverse microsculpture; posterior margin of tergite VII without palisade fringe.
Male. Mandibles (Fig.
Female. Mandibles (Fig.
The type locality is in northeastern Shizhu, eastern Chongqing. The specimens were sifted from moist leaf litter and roots in a secondary deciduous forest with bamboo at an altitude of 1550 m (Song pers. comm.). The paratype is teneral.
The species is named after Xiao-Bin Song, who collected the type specimens. He is a renowned specialist on mainly Palaearctic Paussinae.
The external and particularly the male sexual characters leave no doubt that this species belongs to the P. biacutus group. Among the species of this group, it appears to be most closely allied to P. sinisterobliquus Li, Zhou & Solodovnikov, 2013, with which it shares the similar morphology of the aedeagus. It is distinguished from P. sinisterobliquus by slightly larger body size, by the stouter pronotum, by three distinctly sclerotized spines of the internal sac and the larger parameres of the aedeagus, as well as by the shape of the female sternite VIII.
Holotype. China – Hubei Prov. • ♂; glued on a card with two labels as follows: “China: Hubei Prov., Wufeng County, Houhe N.R., 30°11'53"N, 110°35'40"E, alt. 1480 m, 12.V.2020, Wen-Xuan Bi leg.” “HOLOTYPE: Paederus trispinosus sp. n., Yang & Peng des. 2024” [red handwritten label]; SNUC. Paratypes. China – Hubei Prov. •4 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Wufeng County, Houhe N.R., 30°11'53"N, 110°35'40"E, alt. 1480 m, 12.V.2020, Wen-Xuan Bi leg; SNUC • 1 ♂; Wufeng County, Houhe N.R., 30°05'10"N, 110°33'04"E, alt. 1150 m, 30.IV.2004, Li-Zhen Li leg; SNUC.
Measurements (in mm) and ratios: BL 9.11–9.67, FL 4.56–4.91, HL: 1.35–1.54; HW: 1.49–1.69; AnL: 3.08–3.22; PL: 1.49–1.67; PW: 1.50–1.67; EL: 1.00–1.10; EW: 1.47–1.54; AW: 1.67–1.74; AL: 2.14–2.17; HL/HW: 0.90–0.93; HW/PW: 0.99–1.02; HL/PL: 0.90–0.93; PL/PW: 0.97–1.01; EL/PL: 0.65–0.68; diameter of eye: 0.38–0.43.
Habitus as in Fig.
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Abdomen distinctly broader than elytra; punctation dense; interstices with distinctly transverse microsculpture; posterior margin of tergite VII without palisade fringe.
Male. Labrum (Fig.
Female. Labrum (Fig.
The species was found in two localities in the Houhe Natural Reserve, to western Wufeng, Hubei. Some specimens were sifted from leaf litter, grass roots and the soil along a forest path at an altitude of 1480 m (Fig.
The specific epithet of this new species consists of the Latin suffix tri- (which means “three”) and the Latin adjective spinosus (which means “spiny”). The name (a Latin adjective) refers to three distinctive sclerotized spines in the internal sac of the aedeagus.
The external and particularly the male sexual characters leave no doubt that this species belongs to the P. biacutus group. This new species is distinguished from other species of this group by the shape of female tergite VIII and the morphology of the aedeagus (the distinctly asymmetric dorsal plate and parameres, as well as two long sclerotized spines and one hooked sclerotized spine in the internal sac).
Holotype. China – Hubei Prov. • ♂; glued on a card with two labels as follows: “China: Hubei Prov., Baokang County, Cuijia’ao, 31.72°N, 111.13°E, alt. 1550 m, 31.VII.2021, Mao Ye leg.” “HOLOTYPE: Paederus (Harpopaederus) Paederusyei sp. n., Yang & Peng des. 2024” [red handwritten label]; SNUC. Paratypes. China – Hubei Prov. • 6 ♂♂, 5 ♀♀; Baokang County, Cuijia’ao, 31.72°N, 111.13°E, alt. 1550 m, 31.VII.2021, Mao Ye leg; SNUC • 3 ♂♂: Baokang County, Longping, alt. 1100 m, 15.VII.2017, Lu Qiu leg; SNUC.
Measurements (in mm) and ratios: BL 9.43–10.02, FL 4.46–5.01, HL 1.20–1.25, HW 1.44–1.54, AnL: 2.67–2.79; PL: 1.49–1.67; PW: 1.49–1.69; EL: 1.14–1.20; EW: 1.64–1.74; AW: 1.62–1.74; AL: 1.94–1.99; HL/HW: 0.81–0.83; HW/PW: 0.91–0.97; HL/PL: 0.75–0.81; PL/PW: 0.98–1.01; EL/PL: 0.72–0.76; diameter of eye: 0.30–0.38.
Habitus as in Fig.
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Abdomen as broad as elytra or somewhat broader than elytra; punctation dense; interstices with shallow microsculpture; posterior margin of tergite VII without palisade fringe.
Male. Posterior margin of tergite VIII (Fig.
Female. Tergite VIII (Fig.
The species was discovered in two localities situated to southwestern Baokang, western Hubei. Some specimens were sifted from leaf litter in a mixed deciduous forest with shrubs at an altitude of 1550 m (Ye pers. comm.).
The species is named for Mao Ye, who collected some of the type specimens.
The geographically closest Harpopaederus species are P. apfelsinicus Willers, 2001, P. cultellatus Assing, 2015, and P. multidenticulatus Li, Solodovnikov & Zhou, 2014. Paederus yei is distinguished from them by the stouter pronotum, particularly by the smaller aedeagus of different morphology (dorsal plate with hooked apex; shape of the internal structure), and by the oblong female tergite VIII. For illustrations of P. apfelsinicus see
Holotype. China – Zhejiang Prov. • ♂; glued on a card with two labels as follows: “China: Zhejiang Prov., Zhuji City, Majian Town, Near Longmen, 29.76°N, 119.89°E, 700–1000 m, 27.IX.2023, Tie-Xiong Zhao leg.” “HOLOTYPE: Paederus zhaoi sp. n., Yang & Peng des. 2024” [red handwritten label]; SNUC. Paratypes. Zhejiang Prov. • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Zhuji City, Majian Town, Near Longmen, 29.76°N, 119.89°E, 700–1000 m, 27.IX.2023, Tie-Xiong Zhao leg; SNUC.
Measurements (in mm) and ratios: BL 9.99–10.42, FL 4.65–4.78, HL 1.41–1.57, HW 1.56–1.82, AnL: 3.00–3.33; PL: 1.54–1.64; PW: 1.67–1.82; EL: 1.02–1.10; EW: 1.57–1.64; AW: 1.64–1.79; AL: 2.24–2.29; HL/HW: 0.85–0.92; HW/PW: 0.88–1.00; HL/PL: 0.88–0.91; PL/PW: 0.95–1.00; EL/PL: 0.66–0.68; diameter of eye: 0.33–0.37.
Habitus as in Figs
Head (Fig.
Pronotum (Fig.
Elytra (Fig.
Abdomen broader than elytra; punctation dense; interstices with distinctly transverse microsculpture; posterior margin of tergite VII without palisade fringe.
Male. Mandibles (Fig.
Female. Left mandible (Fig.
The type locality is situated to the west of Zhuji, central Zhejiang. The specimens were collected by hand on grasses and by sweep-netting of shrubs and shaking of branches both in shrub habitats with oak and bamboo at altitudes of 700–1000 m (Fig.
The species is named after Tie-Xiong Zhao, who collected the type specimens.
The external and particularly the male sexual characters leave no doubt that this species belongs to the P. biacutus group. Among the species of this group, it appears to be most closely allied to P. jianyueae Peng & Li, 2014, with which it shares the similar morphology of the aedeagus. It is distinguished from P. jianyueae by the longer antennae, particularly the morphology of the aedeagus (distinctly asymmetric parameres; shape of the internal structure), and by the shape of the female tergite VIII and sternite VIII. For illustrations of P. jianyueae see
According to recent contributions (
1 | Male mandibles with dorsal tooth | 2 |
– | Male mandibles without dorsal tooth | 9 |
2 | Internal sac of aedeagus with two spines | 3 |
– | Internal sac of aedeagus with one spine | 4 |
3 | HL/PL more than 1.00. Male right mandible with small dorsal tooth; internal sac of aedeagus with one long curved spine and one short spine. Posterior margin of female tergite VIII truncate | P. (Gnathopaederus) szechuanus (Chapin, 1927) |
– | HL/PL no more than 0.95. Male right mandible with large dorsal tooth; internal sac of aedeagus with two short spines. Posterior margin of female tergite VIII convex | P. (Gnathopaederus) bursavacua Willers, 2001 |
4 | Smaller species, length of body: 7.2 mm. Length of antenna no more than 3.0 mm | P. (Gnathopaederus) jilongensis Li & Zhou, 2009 |
– | Larger species, length of body more than 8.0 mm. Length of antenna more than 3.3 mm | 5 |
5 | Male sternite V–VI with shallow median impression posteriorly, this impression with weakly modified setae | P. (Gnathopaederus) zhangmuensis Cheng & Peng, 2019 |
– | Male sternite V–VI without median impression and modified setae posteriorly | 6 |
6 | Dorsal plate of aedeagus straight in lateral view and internal sac with one short spine | P. (Gnathopaederus) cheni Peng & Li, 2015 |
– | Dorsal plate of aedeagus weakly curved in lateral view and internal sac with one long spine | 7 |
7 | Male left mandible with large dorsal tooth; internal spine of aedeagus apically extending nearly to apex of dorsal plate | P. (Gnathopaederus) furcillatus Assing, 2017 |
– | Male left mandible with small dorsal tooth; internal spine of aedeagus far from reaching apex of dorsal plate | 8 |
8 | Smaller species, length of body: 8.3–10.5 mm. Male right mandible with small dorsal tooth; smaller aedeagus with slenderer parameres | P. (Gnathopaederus) yunnanensis Willers, 2001 |
– | Larger species, length of body 11.6–12.4 mm. Male right mandible with large dorsal tooth; larger aedeagus with stouter parameres | P. (Gnathopaederus) xuei Peng & Li, 2015 |
9 | Coloration of abdomen black | 10 |
– | Abdomen bicoloured (usually segments III–VI reddish and segments VII–X black) | 21 |
10 | Coloration of head brown. Male sternite VI with distinct median impression posteriorly | P. lateralis Li, Solodovnikov & Zhou, 2014 |
– | Coloration of head black. Male sternite VI without median impression posteriorly | 11 |
11 | Male sternite VII with deep median impression posteriorly. Parameres of aedeagus very short | P. mirus Yang & Peng, sp. nov. |
– | Male sternite VII without impression posteriorly. Parameres long and conspicuous | 12 |
12 | Small species, length of body no more than 8.5 mm | P. sinisterobliquus Li, Zhou & Solodovnikov, 2013 |
– | Large species, length of body larger than 9.0 mm | 13 |
13 | Maximum width of pronotum no more than 1.50 mm. Parameres of aedeagus apically distinctly curved in lateral view | P. chentangus Yang & Peng, sp. nov. |
– | Maximum width of pronotum more than 1.54 mm. Parameres of aedeagus apically weakly curved or straight in lateral view | 14 |
14 | Internal sac of aedeagus with two spines | 15 |
– | Internal sac of aedeagus with three spines | 17 |
15 | Maximum width of abdomen more than 2.1 mm. Parameres of aedeagus slender. Female sternite IX longer | P. parvidenticulatus Li, Zhou & Solodovnikov, 2013 |
– | Maximum width of abdomen no more than 2.0 mm. Parameres of aedeagus stout. Female sternite IX shorter | 16 |
16 | HL/HW more than 0.95. Aedeagus with apically hooked dorsal plate in dorsal view and two long sclerotized spines in internal sac. Female sternite VIII with elliptic depression posteriorly | P. volutobliquus Li, Zhou & Solodovnikov, 2013 |
– | HL/HW no more than 0.90. Aedeagus with apically acute dorsal plate in dorsal view and two short sclerotized spines in internal sac. Female sternite VIII without depression | P. nanlingensis Peng & Li, 2016 |
17 | Legs with infuscate apical portion of femora. Aedeagus with apically hooked dorsal plate in dorsal view | P. biacutus Li, Zhou & Solodovnikov, 2013 |
– | Legs with brown femora. Aedeagus with apically acute dorsal plate in dorsal view | 18 |
18 | Parameres of aedeagus symmetric and slender in ventral view | P. jianyueae Peng & Li, 2014 |
– | Parameres of aedeagus asymmetric and stouter in ventral view | 19 |
19 | Internal sac of aedeagus with one additional dark membranous structure. Female right mandible with single-pointed middle tooth | P. zhaoi Yang & Peng, sp. nov. |
– | Internal sac of aedeagus without dark membranous structure. Female right mandible with small bifid molar tooth apically | 20 |
20 | Ventral plate of aedeagus short and broad. Posterior margin of female sternite VIII strongly convex | P. songi Yang & Peng, sp. nov. |
– | Ventral plate of aedeagus long and slender. Posterior margin of female sternite VIII distinctly trifurcate | P. trispinosus Yang & Peng, sp. nov. |
21 | Aedeagus stout, with short and stout dorsal plate in dorsal view | 22 |
– | Aedeagus slender, with long and slender dorsal plate in dorsal view | 24 |
22 | Legs reddish with infuscate apical portion of femora. Aedeagus with apically acute dorsal plate in dorsal view | P. tibetanus Cameron, 1928 |
– | Legs yellowish brown. Aedeagus with apically convex dorsal plate in dorsal view | 23 |
23 | Male labrum with sinuate anterior margin. Aedeagus with short parameres. Female sternite VIII with truncate median process posteriorly | P. describendus Willers, 2001 |
– | Male labrum with deeply excavate anterior margin. Aedeagus with long parameres. Posterior margin of female sternite VIII convex | P. daicongchaoi Peng & Li, 2016 |
24 | Dorsal plate of aedeagus not reaching apices of parameres | 25 |
– | Dorsal plate of aedeagus extending beyond apices of parameres | 29 |
25 | Segments III–VI of abdomen reddish and with black patch in middle; elytra with pronounced impression | P. (Harpopaederus) gottschei Kolbe, 1886 |
– | Segments III-VI of abdomen pale-reddish and without black patch in middle; elytra without impression | 26 |
26 | Dorsal plate of aedeagus without denticles | P. (Harpopaederus) antennocinctus Willers, 2001 |
– | Dorsal plate of aedeagus with conspicuous denticles | 27 |
27 | Internal sac of aedeagus with one long and apically acute moderately sclerotized structure | P. (Harpopaederus) willersi Assing, 2020 |
– | Internal sac of aedeagus with one basal clip-shaped structure and one asymmetric apical structure | 28 |
28 | Length of aedeagus: 2.4 mm. Female tergite VIII apically narrower | P. (Harpopaederus) deplectens Assing, 2015 |
– | Length of aedeagus: 2.7 mm. Female tergite VIII apically broader | P. (Harpopaederus) chinensis Bernhauer, 1931 |
29 | Dorsal plate of aedeagus without denticles | 30 |
– | Dorsal plate of aedeagus with denticles | 31 |
30 | Length of aedeagus: 1.4 mm; internal sac without sclerotized basal structures | P. (Harpopaederus) xui Peng & Li, 2015 |
– | Length of aedeagus: 2.0 mm; internal sac with one clip-shaped, weakly sclerotized basal structure | P. (Harpopaederus) edentulus Assing, 2015 |
31 | Legs with blackish metatibiae | 32 |
– | Coloration of metatibiae much paler (usually yellowish) | 33 |
32 | Length of aedeagus: 2.4–2.7 mm, with apically stouter dorsal plate. Female sternite VIII with short median process posteriorly | P. (Harpopaederus) apfelsinicus Willers, 2001 |
– | Length of aedeagus: 2.9 mm, with apically more slender dorsal plate. Female sternite VIII with long median process posteriorly | P. (Harpopaederus) lineodenticulatus Li & Zhou, 2007 |
33 | Forebody longer than 5.8 mm. Aedeagus conspicuously long (2.7 mm) | P. (Harpopaederus) minicus Assing, 2015 |
– | Forebody no more than 5.5 mm. Aedeagus shorter | 34 |
34 | Internal sac of aedeagus with one long, apically acute and sclerotized apical structure | 35 |
– | Internal sac of aedeagus without distinctly sclerotized apical structure | 38 |
35 | Aedeagus 2.4 mm long, with longer apical portion of the dorsal plate | P. (Harpopaederus) cultellatus Assing, 2015 |
– | Aedeagus 1.9–2.1 mm long, with shorter apical portion of the dorsal plate | 36 |
36 | Dorsal plate of aedeagus with hooked apex. Posterior margin of female sternite VIII trifurcate | P. (Harpopaederus) yei Yang & Peng, sp. nov. |
– | Dorsal plate of aedeagus with acute apex. Female sternite VIII posteriorly with median process of triangular shape | 37 |
37 | Tibiae usually yellowish; mandibles and shape of head without sexual dimorphisms. Aedeagus with moderately sclerotized apical internal structure | P. (Harpopaederus) agnatus Eppelsheim, 1889 |
– | Tibiae distinctly infuscate basally; mandibles and shape of head with pronounced sexual dimorphisms. Aedeagus with strongly sclerotized apical internal structure | P. (Harpopaederus) konfuzius Willers, 2001 |
38 | Femora brown. Dorsal plate of aedeagus with 20 small denticles; parameres apically weakly curved in lateral view | P. (Harpopaederus) multidenticulatus Li, Zhou & Solodovnikov, 2014 |
– | Femora bicoloured. Dorsal plate of aedeagus with several large denticles; parameres apically hooked in lateral view | 39 |
39 | Head transverse (HL/HW: 0.90). Dorsal plate of aedeagus with short apical portion. Female sternite VIII with strongly convex posterior margin | P. (Harpopaederus) brevior Li, Zhou & Solodovnikov, 2014 |
– | Head weakly transverse (HL/HW: 0.99). Dorsal plate of aedeagus with long apical portion. Female sternite VIII with long median process posteriorly | P. (Harpopaederus) gracilacutus Li & Zhou, 2007 |
All the collectors mentioned in the text are acknowledged for their fieldwork. Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for comments on a previous version of the manuscript.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
No ethical statement was reported.
The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31872965), GDAS Special Project of Science and Technology Development (No. 2020GDASYL–20200102021, 2020GDASYL–20200301003) and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China (19QA1406600) awarded to Zi-Wei Yin.
Conceptualization: SC. Writing – original draft: ZP. Writing – review and editing: YY.
Yi Yang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1132-9103
Sophie Chen https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3396-9810
Zhong Peng https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5959-1536
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.